Air Quality Implementation Plan; California; Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District; Stationary Source Permits, 33030-33032 [2019-14629]

Download as PDF 33030 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 133 / Thursday, July 11, 2019 / Proposed Rules .02(2)(jjj)—NOX Emissions from Electric Utility Steam Generating Units, 391–3– 1–.02(2)(lll)—NOX Emissions From Fuel-Burning Equipment, and Regulation 391–3–1–.02(2)(rrr)—NOX from Small Fuel-Burning Equipment. Georgia also identified Regulation 391– 3–20—Vehicle Emissions Inspection and Maintenance (I/M) Program which regulates vehicle emissions in the state.13 Georgia further identified the following SIP-approved regulations that provide for the implementation of VOC emissions controls by fulfilling RACT requirements for specific source categories: Regulation 391–3–1–.02(2)(t) through (ff), (hh) through (nn), (pp) through (ss), (vv), (ccc) through (eee), (hhh), (kkk), (vvv), and (yyy) through (aaaa). GA EPD further identified Regulation 391–3–1–.02(2)(tt)—VOC Emissions from Major Sources, which outlines the case-by-case RACT regulations in the State. EPA proposes to approve Georgia’s August 15, 2018, SIP submission on grounds that it addresses the State’s 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) good neighbor obligation for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS because EPA has found that the State will not contribute significantly to nonattainment in, or interfere with maintenance by, any other state. khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2 III. Proposed Action EPA is proposing to determine that Georgia will not contribute significantly to nonattainment or interfere with maintenance of the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS in any other state. Therefore, EPA is proposing to approve Georgia’s August 15, 2018, SIP submission as meeting the CAA requirements of prongs 1 and 2 under section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. EPA requests comment on this proposed approval of Georgia’s SIP. IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this proposed action merely proposes to approve state 13 Although not relied upon for purposes of approval, GA EPD also identified state-only provisions of the Georgia Rules for Air Quality Control 391–3–1–.02(2)(sss)—Multipollutant Control for Electric Utility Steam Generating Units as a regulations that the State is implementing which provides for the control of NOX emissions. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:00 Jul 10, 2019 Jkt 247001 law as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action: • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); • Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under Executive Order 12866; • Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); • Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); • Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); • Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); • Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and • Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: June 26, 2019. Mary S. Walker, Regional Administrator, Region 4. [FR Doc. 2019–14729 Filed 7–10–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R09–OAR–2019–0165; FRL–9996–17– Region 9] Air Quality Implementation Plan; California; Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District; Stationary Source Permits Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing action on a revision to the Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District (YSAQMD or ‘‘the District’’) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). We are proposing to approve a rule governing issuance of permits for stationary sources, including review and permitting of major sources and major modifications under part D of title I of the Clean Air Act (CAA or ‘‘the Act’’). Specifically, the revision pertains to YSAQMD Rule 3.25, ‘‘Federal New Source Review for New and Modified Major PM2.5 Sources.’’ We are taking comments on this proposal and a final action will follow. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before August 12, 2019. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09– OAR–2019–0165 at https:// www.regulations.gov, or via email to R9AirPermits@epa.gov. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be removed or edited from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM 11JYP1 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 133 / Thursday, July 11, 2019 / Proposed Rules official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maggie Waldon, EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105. By phone: (415) 972–3987 or by email at waldon.margaret@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, the terms ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. Table of Contents I. The State’s Submittal A. What rule did the State submit? B. What is the purpose of the submitted rule? II. The EPA’s Evaluation A. What is the background for today’s proposal? B. How is the EPA evaluating the rule? C. Does the rule meet the evaluation criteria? III. Proposed Action and Public Comment 33031 IV. Incorporation by Reference V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. The State’s Submittal A. What rule did the State submit? Table 1 lists the rule addressed by this proposal with the date it was adopted by YSAQMD and submitted by the California Air Resources Board (CARB), the governor’s designee for California SIP submittals. Rule 3.25 contains the District’s Nonattainment New Source Review (NNSR) permit requirements applicable to new and modified major sources emitting fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and PM2.5 precursors. TABLE 1 SUBMITTED RULE Rule # Rule title Adopted Submitted 3.25 ................... Federal New Source Review for New and Modified Major PM2.5 Sources ............................. 05/15/19 06/04/19 On June 10, 2019, the EPA notified CARB that its June 4, 2019 submittal of Rule 3.25 met the completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51, appendix V, which must be met before formal EPA review. The submittal includes evidence of public notice and adoption of the regulation. B. What is the purpose of the submitted rule? For areas designated as nonattainment for one or more National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), the SIP must include preconstruction permit requirements for new or modified major stationary sources of such nonattainment pollutant(s), commonly referred to as Nonattainment New Source Review (NNSR). YSAQMD Rule 3.25 addresses statutory and regulatory requirements for NNSR permits for major sources of PM2.5 and PM2.5 precursors. II. The EPA’s Evaluation khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2 A. What is the background for today’s proposal? On November 13, 2009, the EPA designated the Sacramento Valley Air Basin, including the eastern portions of Yolo and Solano counties, as nonattainment for the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS (the Sacramento PM2.5 nonattainment area).1 Because the Sacramento PM2.5 nonattainment area includes areas under YSAQMD’s jurisdiction, the District was required to submit, by December 31, 2014, a SIP revision to address NNSR requirements 17 FR 65346, October 26, 2012. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:00 Jul 10, 2019 Jkt 247001 for major sources of PM2.5 and PM2.5 precursors. On June 8, 2016, the EPA published in the Federal Register a finding of failure to submit the required SIP revision.2 On August 16, 2017, YSAQMD submitted Rule 3.25 ‘‘New Source Review for New and Modified Major PM2.5 Sources,’’ as adopted on July 12, 2017, and on May 16, 2018, the EPA notified the state that its August 16, 2017 submittal of Rule 3.25 addressed the EPA’s finding of failure to submit.3 As noted in Table 1, today’s action involves a newly revised version of Rule 3.25, adopted on May 15, 2019 and submitted on June 5, 2019. B. How is the EPA evaluating the rule? The EPA reviewed YSAQMD Rule 3.25 for compliance with CAA requirements for: (1) SIPs in general as set forth in CAA section 110(a)(2); (2) SIP revisions as set forth in CAA section 110(l); 4 (3) stationary source preconstruction permitting programs in CAA Part D, including section 172 and 173(a) through (c) of subpart 1, and subpart 4; and (4) requirements related to the review and modification of major sources in 40 CFR 51.160—51.165 including requirements set forth in the EPA’s rule ‘‘Fine Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality FR 36803, June 8, 2016. from Elizabeth J. Adams, U.S. EPA Region 9, to Richard Corey, CARB, dated May 16, 2018. 4 CAA section 110(l) requires SIP revisions to be subject to reasonable notice and public hearing prior to adoption and submittal by States to EPA and prohibits EPA from approving any SIP revision that would interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further progress, or any other applicable requirement of the CAA. PO 00000 2 81 3 Letter Frm 00021 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Standards: State Implementation Plan Requirements’’ (‘‘2016 Implementation Rule’’).5 The 2016 Implementation Rule requires areas classified as nonattainment for any PM2.5 NAAQS to comply with CAA section 189(e) requirements for control of major stationary sources of PM10 and PM2.5 precursors.6 To implement requirements applicable to major sources of PM2.5, the 2016 Implementation Rule also amended 40 CFR 51.165 definitions of the terms (1) Regulated NSR Pollutant; (2) Major Stationary Source; and (3) Significant. Rule 3.25 must be consistent with these recent regulatory requirements. C. Does the rule meet the evaluation criteria? With respect to procedural requirements, CAA sections 110(a)(2) and 110(l) require that revisions to a SIP be adopted by the State after reasonable notice and public hearing. Based on our review of the public process documentation included in the August 16, 2017 submittal, we find that YSAQMD has provided sufficient evidence of public notice, opportunity for comment and a public hearing prior to adoption and submittal of these rules to the EPA. With respect to substantive requirements found in CAA sections 172, 173 and 189(e) and 40 CFR 51.160– 51.165, we have evaluated YSAQMD Rule 3.25 in accordance with the CAA and regulatory requirements that apply 5 81 FR 58010, (August 24, 2016). CFR 51.165(a)(13); 81 FR 58106–58116 (August 24, 2016). 6 40 E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM 11JYP1 33032 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 133 / Thursday, July 11, 2019 / Proposed Rules to NNSR permit programs under part D of title I of the Act. We find that Rule 3.25 satisfies the requirements for a PM2.5 NNSR permit program. Our Technical Support Document, which can be found in the docket for this rule, contains a more detailed discussion of our evaluation of Rule 3.25. III. Proposed Action and Public Comment As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is proposing to approve the submitted rule because it fulfills all relevant requirements. We have concluded that our approval of the submitted rule would comply with CAA sections 110(a)(2), 172, 173 and 189(e), and 40 CFR 51.160–51.165. In support of this proposed action, we have concluded that our action would comply with section 110(l) of the Act because approval of Rule 3.25 will not interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further progress, or any other CAA applicable requirement. If we finalize this action as proposed, our action will be codified through revisions to 40 CFR 52.220 (Identification of Planin part). We will accept comments from the public on this proposal until August 12, 2019. IV. Incorporation by Reference In this rule, the EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference the YSAQMD rule listed in Table 1 of this preamble. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, this document available electronically through https:// www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at the EPA Region IX Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information). khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2 V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this proposed action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:18 Jul 10, 2019 Jkt 247001 beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action: • Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); • Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under Executive Order 12866; • Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); • Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); • Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); • Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); • Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and • Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority to address disproportionate human health or environmental effects with practical, appropriate, and legally permissible methods under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: June 25, 2019. Deborah Jordan, Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. [FR Doc. 2019–14629 Filed 7–10–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R03–OAR–2019–0184; FRL–9996–27– Region 3] Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; District of Columbia; Reasonably Available Control Technology State Implementation Plan for Volatile Organic Compounds Under the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a state implementation plan (SIP) revision submitted by the District of Columbia (the District). The District’s SIP revision satisfies the volatile organic compound (VOC) reasonably available control technology (RACT) requirements under the 2008 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). The District will address RACT for nitrogen oxides (NOX) in a separate SIP submission. The District’s RACT submittal for the 2008 ozone NAAQS includes certification that for certain major sources, previously adopted VOC RACT controls in the District’s SIP that were approved by EPA under the 1979 1-hour and 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS are based on the currently available technically and economically feasible controls, and continue to represent RACT for implementation of the 2008 8hour ozone NAAQS; a listing of the Control Techniques Guidelines (CTGs) already adopted into the District’s SIP, and a listing of those categories of sources subject to CTGs which do not exist in the District and the location of prior negative declarations previously submitted and approved by EPA. The District’s SIP submittal also includes an update to the 2002 Mobile Equipment Repair and Refinishing (MERR) rule to incorporate the Ozone Transport Commission’s (OTC) 2009 Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment NonAssembly Line Coating Operations regulations (MVMERR) rule adopted by the District in 2016. EPA is addressing SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM 11JYP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 133 (Thursday, July 11, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 33030-33032]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-14629]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2019-0165; FRL-9996-17-Region 9]


Air Quality Implementation Plan; California; Yolo-Solano Air 
Quality Management District; Stationary Source Permits

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing action 
on a revision to the Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District 
(YSAQMD or ``the District'') portion of the California State 
Implementation Plan (SIP). We are proposing to approve a rule governing 
issuance of permits for stationary sources, including review and 
permitting of major sources and major modifications under part D of 
title I of the Clean Air Act (CAA or ``the Act''). Specifically, the 
revision pertains to YSAQMD Rule 3.25, ``Federal New Source Review for 
New and Modified Major PM2.5 Sources.'' We are taking 
comments on this proposal and a final action will follow.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before August 12, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R09-
OAR-2019-0165 at https://www.regulations.gov, or via email to 
[email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow 
the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, 
comments cannot be removed or edited from Regulations.gov. For either 
manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its 
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you 
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other 
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia 
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written 
comment. The written comment is considered the

[[Page 33031]]

official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish 
to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment 
contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, 
cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission 
methods, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public comment policy, 
information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance 
on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maggie Waldon, EPA Region IX, 75 
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105. By phone: (415) 972-3987 or by 
email at [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, the terms ``we,'' 
``us,'' and ``our'' refer to the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. The State's Submittal
    A. What rule did the State submit?
    B. What is the purpose of the submitted rule?
II. The EPA's Evaluation
    A. What is the background for today's proposal?
    B. How is the EPA evaluating the rule?
    C. Does the rule meet the evaluation criteria?
III. Proposed Action and Public Comment
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. The State's Submittal

A. What rule did the State submit?

    Table 1 lists the rule addressed by this proposal with the date it 
was adopted by YSAQMD and submitted by the California Air Resources 
Board (CARB), the governor's designee for California SIP submittals. 
Rule 3.25 contains the District's Nonattainment New Source Review 
(NNSR) permit requirements applicable to new and modified major sources 
emitting fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and 
PM2.5 precursors.

                         Table 1 Submitted Rule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Rule #            Rule title        Adopted         Submitted
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3.25.................  Federal New            05/15/19         06/04/19
                        Source Review
                        for New and
                        Modified Major
                        PM2.5 Sources.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On June 10, 2019, the EPA notified CARB that its June 4, 2019 
submittal of Rule 3.25 met the completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51, 
appendix V, which must be met before formal EPA review. The submittal 
includes evidence of public notice and adoption of the regulation.

B. What is the purpose of the submitted rule?

    For areas designated as nonattainment for one or more National 
Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), the SIP must include 
preconstruction permit requirements for new or modified major 
stationary sources of such nonattainment pollutant(s), commonly 
referred to as Nonattainment New Source Review (NNSR). YSAQMD Rule 3.25 
addresses statutory and regulatory requirements for NNSR permits for 
major sources of PM2.5 and PM2.5 precursors.

II. The EPA's Evaluation

A. What is the background for today's proposal?

    On November 13, 2009, the EPA designated the Sacramento Valley Air 
Basin, including the eastern portions of Yolo and Solano counties, as 
nonattainment for the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS (the Sacramento 
PM2.5 nonattainment area).\1\ Because the Sacramento 
PM2.5 nonattainment area includes areas under YSAQMD's 
jurisdiction, the District was required to submit, by December 31, 
2014, a SIP revision to address NNSR requirements for major sources of 
PM2.5 and PM2.5 precursors. On June 8, 2016, the 
EPA published in the Federal Register a finding of failure to submit 
the required SIP revision.\2\ On August 16, 2017, YSAQMD submitted Rule 
3.25 ``New Source Review for New and Modified Major PM2.5 
Sources,'' as adopted on July 12, 2017, and on May 16, 2018, the EPA 
notified the state that its August 16, 2017 submittal of Rule 3.25 
addressed the EPA's finding of failure to submit.\3\ As noted in Table 
1, today's action involves a newly revised version of Rule 3.25, 
adopted on May 15, 2019 and submitted on June 5, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 7 FR 65346, October 26, 2012.
    \2\ 81 FR 36803, June 8, 2016.
    \3\ Letter from Elizabeth J. Adams, U.S. EPA Region 9, to 
Richard Corey, CARB, dated May 16, 2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. How is the EPA evaluating the rule?

    The EPA reviewed YSAQMD Rule 3.25 for compliance with CAA 
requirements for: (1) SIPs in general as set forth in CAA section 
110(a)(2); (2) SIP revisions as set forth in CAA section 110(l); \4\ 
(3) stationary source preconstruction permitting programs in CAA Part 
D, including section 172 and 173(a) through (c) of subpart 1, and 
subpart 4; and (4) requirements related to the review and modification 
of major sources in 40 CFR 51.160--51.165 including requirements set 
forth in the EPA's rule ``Fine Particulate Matter National Ambient Air 
Quality Standards: State Implementation Plan Requirements'' (``2016 
Implementation Rule'').\5\ The 2016 Implementation Rule requires areas 
classified as nonattainment for any PM2.5 NAAQS to comply 
with CAA section 189(e) requirements for control of major stationary 
sources of PM10 and PM2.5 precursors.\6\ To 
implement requirements applicable to major sources of PM2.5, 
the 2016 Implementation Rule also amended 40 CFR 51.165 definitions of 
the terms (1) Regulated NSR Pollutant; (2) Major Stationary Source; and 
(3) Significant. Rule 3.25 must be consistent with these recent 
regulatory requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ CAA section 110(l) requires SIP revisions to be subject to 
reasonable notice and public hearing prior to adoption and submittal 
by States to EPA and prohibits EPA from approving any SIP revision 
that would interfere with any applicable requirement concerning 
attainment and reasonable further progress, or any other applicable 
requirement of the CAA.
    \5\ 81 FR 58010, (August 24, 2016).
    \6\ 40 CFR 51.165(a)(13); 81 FR 58106-58116 (August 24, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Does the rule meet the evaluation criteria?

    With respect to procedural requirements, CAA sections 110(a)(2) and 
110(l) require that revisions to a SIP be adopted by the State after 
reasonable notice and public hearing. Based on our review of the public 
process documentation included in the August 16, 2017 submittal, we 
find that YSAQMD has provided sufficient evidence of public notice, 
opportunity for comment and a public hearing prior to adoption and 
submittal of these rules to the EPA.
    With respect to substantive requirements found in CAA sections 172, 
173 and 189(e) and 40 CFR 51.160-51.165, we have evaluated YSAQMD Rule 
3.25 in accordance with the CAA and regulatory requirements that apply

[[Page 33032]]

to NNSR permit programs under part D of title I of the Act. We find 
that Rule 3.25 satisfies the requirements for a PM2.5 NNSR 
permit program.
    Our Technical Support Document, which can be found in the docket 
for this rule, contains a more detailed discussion of our evaluation of 
Rule 3.25.

III. Proposed Action and Public Comment

    As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is proposing 
to approve the submitted rule because it fulfills all relevant 
requirements. We have concluded that our approval of the submitted rule 
would comply with CAA sections 110(a)(2), 172, 173 and 189(e), and 40 
CFR 51.160-51.165.
    In support of this proposed action, we have concluded that our 
action would comply with section 110(l) of the Act because approval of 
Rule 3.25 will not interfere with any applicable requirement concerning 
attainment and reasonable further progress, or any other CAA applicable 
requirement. If we finalize this action as proposed, our action will be 
codified through revisions to 40 CFR 52.220 (Identification of Plan-in 
part).
    We will accept comments from the public on this proposal until 
August 12, 2019.

IV. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, the EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule 
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance 
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by 
reference the YSAQMD rule listed in Table 1 of this preamble. The EPA 
has made, and will continue to make, this document available 
electronically through https://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at 
the EPA Region IX Office (please contact the person identified in the 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more 
information).

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a 
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and 
applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state 
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. 
Accordingly, this proposed action merely proposes to approve state law 
as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional 
requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this 
proposed action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to 
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 
2011);
     Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under 
Executive Order 12866;
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority 
to address disproportionate human health or environmental effects with 
practical, appropriate, and legally permissible methods under Executive 
Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian 
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe 
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not 
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal 
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 
2000).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Particulate matter, Reporting 
and recordkeeping requirements.

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: June 25, 2019.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2019-14629 Filed 7-10-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.