Proposed Data Collection Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations, 32919-32922 [2019-14684]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
32919
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 132 / Wednesday, July 10, 2019 / Notices
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Form name
Potential participant ........................................
Potential participant ........................................
Potential participant ........................................
Potential participant ........................................
Enrolled participant .........................................
Enrolled participant .........................................
Enrolled participant .........................................
Enrolled participant .........................................
Enrolled participant .........................................
Guest ...............................................................
Guest ...............................................................
Eligibility Consent ...........................................
Eligibility Screener ..........................................
Study Consent ................................................
Registration contact information ....................
Baseline Survey .............................................
Initial HIV Test Result Survey ........................
Follow-up Survey ...........................................
Final HIV Test Result Survey ........................
Product ordering .............................................
Guest Consent ...............................................
Guest HIV Test Result Survey .......................
Jeffrey M. Zirger,
Lead, Information Collection Review Office,
Office of Scientific Integrity, Office of Science,
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
treatment of fetal alcohol spectrum
disorders (FASDs).
DATES: CDC must receive written
comments on or before September 9,
2019.
[FR Doc. 2019–14681 Filed 7–9–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[60Day–19–1129; Docket No. CDC–2019–
0058]
Proposed Data Collection Submitted
for Public Comment and
Recommendations
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notice with comment period.
AGENCY:
The Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC), as part of
its continuing effort to reduce public
burden and maximize the utility of
government information, invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies the opportunity to comment on
a proposed and/or continuing
information collection, as required by
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
This notice invites comment on a
proposed information collection titled,
Improving Fetal Alcohol Spectrum
Disorders (FASD) Prevention and
Practice through Practice and
Implementation Centers and National
Partnerships (PICs). The purpose of
FASD PICs is to collect training
evaluation data from healthcare
practitioners and staff in health systems
where FASD-related practice and
systems changes are implemented, and
from grantees of Practice and
Implementation Centers and national
partner organizations related to
prevention, identification, and
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:32 Jul 09, 2019
You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. CDC–2019–
0058 by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
Regulations.gov. Follow the instructions
for submitting comments.
• Mail: Jeffrey M. Zirger, Information
Collection Review Office, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, 1600
Clifton Road NE, MS–D74, Atlanta,
Georgia 30329.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
Docket Number. CDC will post, without
change, all relevant comments to
Regulations.gov.
Please note: Submit all comments
through the Federal eRulemaking portal
(regulations.gov) or by U.S. mail to the
address listed above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request more information on the
proposed project or to obtain a copy of
the information collection plan and
instruments, contact Jeffrey M. Zirger,
Information Collection Review Office,
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, MS–
D74, Atlanta, Georgia 30329; phone:
404–639–7570; Email: omb@cdc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA)
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), Federal agencies
must obtain approval from the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for each
collection of information they conduct
or sponsor. In addition, the PRA also
requires Federal agencies to provide a
60-day notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of
information, including each new
proposed collection, each proposed
extension of existing collection of
information, and each reinstatement of
ADDRESSES:
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
Number of
respondents
Type of respondent
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Number of
responses per
respondent
per year
3,333
3,333
1,333
1,267
1,200
1,000
1,000
1,000
400
667
667
Average
burden per
response
(in hrs)
3
20
2
7
107
43
187
18
12
1
24
2/60
2/60
4/60
2/60
20/60
5/60
30/60
5/60
3/60
2/60
5/60
previously approved information
collection before submitting the
collection to the OMB for approval. To
comply with this requirement, we are
publishing this notice of a proposed
data collection as described below.
The OMB is particularly interested in
comments that will help:
1. Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
2. Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
3. Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
4. Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submissions
of responses.
5. Assess information collection costs
Proposed Project
Improving Fetal Alcohol Spectrum
Disorders (FASD) Prevention and
Practice through Practice and
Implementation Centers and National
Partnerships’’ project (OMB Control No.
0920–1129, Exp. 8/31/2019))—Revision
— National Center for Birth Defects and
Developmental Disability (NCBDDD),
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
Prenatal exposure to alcohol is a
leading preventable cause of birth
defects and developmental disabilities.
The term ‘fetal alcohol spectrum
E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM
10JYN1
32920
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 132 / Wednesday, July 10, 2019 / Notices
disorders’ describes the full continuum
of effects that can occur in an individual
exposed to alcohol in utero. These
effects include physical, mental,
behavioral, and learning disabilities. All
of these have lifelong implications.
Since 2002, CDC funded FASD
Regional Training Centers (RTCs) to
provide education and training to
healthcare professionals and students
about FASD prevention, identification,
and treatment. In July 2013, CDC
convened an expert review panel to
evaluate the effectiveness of the RTC
program overall and to make
recommendations about the program.
The panel highlighted several
accomplishments of the RTCs and
proposed several changes for future
programming: (1) The panel identified a
need for more comprehensive coverage
nationally with discipline-specific
trainings, increased use of technology,
greater collaboration with medical
societies, and stronger linkages with
national partner organizations to
increase the reach of training
opportunities, and (2) The panel
suggested that the training centers focus
on demonstrable practice change and
sustainability and place a stronger
emphasis on primary prevention of
FASDs. In addition, it was
recommended that future initiatives
have stronger evaluation components.
Based on the recommendations of the
expert review panel, CDC is placing
whether project trainings impacted their
knowledge and practice behavior
regarding FASD identification,
prevention, and treatment. The
information will be used to improve
future trainings and assess whether
knowledge and practice changes
occurred. Some participants will also
complete qualitative key informant
interviews to gain additional
information on practice change. Health
system employees will be interviewed
or complete surveys as part of projects
to assess healthcare systems change,
including high impact evaluation
studies and DSW systems change
projects. The high impact evaluation
studies will be primarily qualitative
assessments of two to three specific
grantee efforts that seem likely to result
in achievement of program objectives.
The DSW systems change projects will
employ online surveys to assess systems
change in selected health systems across
the U.S.
Grantees will complete program
evaluation forms to track perceptions of
DSW collaboration and perceptions of
key successes and challenges
encountered by the DSW. It is estimated
that 29,573 respondents will participate
in the evaluation each year, for a total
estimated burden of 3790 hours
annually. There are no costs to
respondents other than their time.
increased focus on prevention,
demonstrating practice change,
achieving national coverage, and
strengthening partnerships between
FASD Practice and Implementation
Centers, or PICs (the newly redesigned
RTCs), and medical societies and
national partner organizations. The
National Organization on Fetal Alcohol
Syndrome (NOFAS) also participates in
this project as a resource to the PICS
and national partners. The PICs and
national partners are asked to closely
collaborate in discipline-specific
workgroups (DSWs) and identify
strategies that will increase the reach of
the program on a national level. While
a major focus of the grantees’ work will
be national, regional approaches will be
used to develop new content and test
feasibility and acceptability of materials,
especially among healthcare providers
and medical societies. In addition, CDC
is placing a stronger emphasis on
evaluation, with both individual DSW/
NOFAS evaluations and a cross-site
evaluation.
CDC requests OMB approval to collect
program evaluation information from (1)
healthcare practitioners from disciplines
targeted by each DSW, including
training participants, (2) health system
staff, and (3) cooperative agreement
grantees over a three-year period.
Healthcare practitioners will complete
surveys to provide information on
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Form name
Project Grantee Staff ........................
Project Grantee Staff ........................
DSW Report .....................................
High Impact Study: Discipline Specific Workgroup Discussion Guide
for Project Staff.
High Impact Study: Key Informant
Interview—Health Care System
Staff.
FASD Core Training Survey—PreTest.
FASD Core Training Survey—PostTest.
FASD Core Training Survey—6
Month Follow-Up.
Pre-Training Survey for Nursing ......
Post-Training Survey for Nursing .....
Six Month Follow-Up Training Survey for Nursing.
Nursing DSW Polling Questions ......
Key Informant Interviews with
Champions.
Brief Questionnaire for Nursing Organization Memberships.
Friends & Members of the Network
Survey.
Healthcare Organization Utilization
Survey.
Health Care System Staff .................
FASD Core Training Participants .....
FASD Core Training Participants .....
FASD Core Training Participants .....
Nurses ...............................................
Nurses ...............................................
Nurses ...............................................
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
Number of
respondents
Type of respondents
Nurses ...............................................
Nurses ...............................................
Nurses ...............................................
Nurses ...............................................
Healthcare Organization Representatives.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:32 Jul 09, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Number
responses per
respondent
Average
burden per
response
(in hours)
Total burden
hours
90
10
2
2
10/60
60/60
30
20
10
2
60/60
20
4013
1
9/60
602
4013
1
5/60
335
4013
1
6/60
402
667
550
440
1
1
1
9/60
9/60
9/60
101
83
66
417
14
1
2
5/60
45/60
35
21
2,934
1
10/60
489
34
2
10/60
12
234
1
30/60
117
E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM
10JYN1
32921
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 132 / Wednesday, July 10, 2019 / Notices
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS—Continued
Number
responses per
respondent
Average
burden per
response
(in hours)
Total burden
hours
Form name
Obstetrician-Gynecologists and students in allied health professions.
Obstetrician-Gynecologists ...............
OBGYN SBI Knowledge & Agency ..
600
1
2/60
20
OBGYN BI–MI Proficiency Rating
Scale—Provider Skills Training
Baseline.
OBGYN BI–MI Proficiency Rating
Scale—Standardized
Patient
Version.
OBGYN BI–MI Proficiency Rating
Scale—Provider Follow Up (3m &
6m).
OBGYN Telecom Training Satisfaction Survey.
OBGYN Avatar Training Satisfaction
Survey.
OBGYN FASD–SBI Training Event
Evaluation.
OBGYN Qualitative Key Informant
Interview—Pre-Training.
600
1
3/60
30
600
1
3/60
30
600
2
3/60
60
480
1
5/60
40
120
1
5/60
10
124
1
2/60
5
34
1
25/60
15
OBGYN Qualitative Key Informant
Interview—Post-Training.
34
1
25/60
15
Medical Assistant—Pre-Test Survey
334
1
10/60
56
Medical Assistant—Pre-Test Survey
(Academic).
Medical Assistant—Post-Test Survey.
Medical Assistant—Post-Test Survey (Academic).
Medical Assistant Follow Up Survey
67
1
10/60
12
334
1
10/60
56
67
1
10/60
12
200
1
10/60
34
17
1
10/60
3
250
1
15/60
63
534
2
10/60
178
120
1
7/60
14
120
120
1
1
7/60
2/60
14
4
120
1
5/60
10
50
10
1
1
15/60
30/60
13
5
10
1
20/60
4
10
1
4/60
1
62
1
8/60
9
1167
1
8/60
156
1167
1
5/60
98
1167
1
8/60
156
601
601
1
1
2/60
2/60
20
20
551
551
1
1
3/60
3/60
28
28
Students in allied health professions
Obstetrician-Gynecologists ...............
Obstetrician-Gynecologists and students in allied health professions.
Obstetrician-Gynecologists and students in allied health professions.
Obstetrician-Gynecologists ...............
Residency Directors, Training Coordinators, Clinical Directors, Obstetrician-Gynecologists.
Residency Directors, Training Coordinators, Clinical Directors, Obstetrician-Gynecologists.
Certified Medical Assistants and students.
Students in allied health professions
Certified Medical Assistants and students.
Students in allied health professions
Certified Medical Assistants and students.
Students in allied health professions
Certified Medical Assistants and students.
Pediatricians ......................................
Pediatricians ......................................
Pediatricians ......................................
Pediatricians ......................................
Pediatricians ......................................
Pediatricians ......................................
Pediatricians ......................................
Pediatricians ......................................
Pediatricians ......................................
Family Medicine Physicians ..............
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
Number of
respondents
Type of respondents
Family medicine physicians, social
workers, social work students.
Family medicine physicians, social
workers, social work students.
Family medicine physicians, social
workers, social work students.
NOFAS webinar attendees ...............
NOFAS webinar attendees ...............
NOFAS training participants .............
NOFAS training participants .............
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:32 Jul 09, 2019
Medical Assistant Follow Up Survey
(Academic).
Medical Assistants Change in Practice Survey.
Survey of Pediatricians—Baseline
and Follow Up.
AAP Post-Training Evaluation Survey.
AAP Pre-Training Evaluation Survey
AAP Three Month Follow Up Evaluation Survey.
AAP Six Month Follow Up Evaluation Survey.
FASD Toolkit User Survey ...............
FASD Toolkit Evaluation Focus
Group/Guided Interview.
Pediatric FASD Regional Education
and Awareness Liaisons Work
Plan.
Pediatric FASD Regional Liaison/
Champion Training Session Evaluation.
Family Medicine Evaluation Questions Addendum for Practice or Individual Provider.
Social Work and Family Physicians
Pre-training Survey.
Social Work and Family Physicians
Post-training Survey.
Social Work and Family Physicians
6-Month Follow Up Survey.
NOFAS Webinar Survey ..................
NOFAS Three Month Follow-Up
Webinar Questionnaire.
NOFAS Pre-Test Survey ..................
NOFAS Post-Test Survey ................
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM
10JYN1
32922
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 132 / Wednesday, July 10, 2019 / Notices
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS—Continued
Form name
Systems change project participants
Clinical Process Improvement Survey.
TCU Organizational Readiness Survey.
Organizational
Readiness
to
Change Assessment.
Systems change project participants
Systems change project participants
TOTAL .......................................
...........................................................
Jeffrey M. Zirger,
Lead, Information Collection Review Office,
Office of Scientific Integrity, Office of Science,
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2019–14684 Filed 7–9–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[30Day–19–19ABV]
Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork
Reduction Act Review
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
Number of
respondents
Type of respondents
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
has submitted the information
collection request titled ‘‘Information
Collection on Soil-transmitted Helminth
Infections in Alabama and Mississippi’’
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval. CDC
previously published a ‘‘Proposed Data
Collection Submitted for Public
Comment and Recommendations’’
notice on April 2, 2019 to obtain
comments from the public and affected
agencies. CDC did not receive any
comments related to the previous
notice. This notice serves to allow an
additional 30 days for public and
affected agency comments.
CDC will accept all comments for this
proposed information collection project.
The Office of Management and Budget
is particularly interested in comments
that:
(a) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
(b) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agencies estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:32 Jul 09, 2019
Jkt 247001
10/60
82
246
2
10/60
82
220
2
10/60
74
29,573
........................
........................
3,790
Background and Brief Description
Soil-transmitted helminths (STH) are
intestinal worms transmitted through
contaminated soil. They include
roundworms (Ascaris lumbricoides),
whipworms (Trichuris trichiura),
hookworms (Ancylostoma duodenale
and Necator americanus) and the worm
Strongyloides stercoralis. These
infections were widespread across the
American South through the early 20th
century, yet despite the historically high
burden of STH infections in these
endemic areas of the United States, few
resources have been devoted to
surveillance, prevention, and treatment
of STH infections in recent years and
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Total burden
hours
2
Proposed Project
Information Collection on Soiltransmitted Helminth Infections in
Alabama and Mississippi—New—
Center for Global Health (CGH), Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC).
Frm 00064
Average
burden per
response
(in hours)
246
(c) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected;
(d) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including, through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses; and
(e) Assess information collection
costs.
To request additional information on
the proposed project or to obtain a copy
of the information collection plan and
instruments, call (404) 639–7570 or
send an email to omb@cdc.gov. Direct
written comments and/or suggestions
regarding the items contained in this
notice to the Attention: CDC Desk
Officer, Office of Management and
Budget, 725 17th Street NW,
Washington, DC 20503 or by fax to (202)
395–5806. Provide written comments
within 30 days of notice publication.
PO 00000
Number
responses per
respondent
they are missed by routine information
collection systems. As a result, the
current prevalence of STH infections in
previously endemic areas is unknown,
but socioeconomic and environmental
conditions favorable to ongoing
transmission persist in areas of the
south, including Alabama and
Mississippi. Collecting this data, along
with biological specimens to document
infection, is critical to determine the
prevalence of STH infections, their
distribution, and risk factors associated
with infection. This data will be used to
inform the development and
implementation of effective and
sustainable prevention and control
measures in affected areas.
The core data elements were
developed with input from community
advocates, and local, state, and federal
public health and environmental health
partners in both Alabama and
Mississippi. The questionnaires have
been designed for self-completion by
respondents. The data that are collected
will be pooled and analyzed by
university partners and CDC, to generate
hypotheses about potential risk factors
for infection.
CDC requests OMB approval to collect
critical information, not available
otherwise, on the prevalence and
distribution of disease and on risk
factors, knowledge, attitudes and/or
practices related to STH infections
among residents in at-risk areas in
Alabama and Mississippi. This
information is critical for planning and
implementation of disease prevention
and control strategies targeting STH
infections in the southeastern United
States.
This data collection is not expected to
entail substantial burden for
respondents. The estimated total
annualized burden associated with this
data collection is 220 hours
(approximately 958 individuals
interviewed × 10 minutes/response).
There will be no costs to respondents
other than their time.
E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM
10JYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 132 (Wednesday, July 10, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32919-32922]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-14684]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
[60Day-19-1129; Docket No. CDC-2019-0058]
Proposed Data Collection Submitted for Public Comment and
Recommendations
AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notice with comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), as part
of its continuing effort to reduce public burden and maximize the
utility of government information, invites the general public and other
Federal agencies the opportunity to comment on a proposed and/or
continuing information collection, as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. This notice invites comment on a proposed
information collection titled, Improving Fetal Alcohol Spectrum
Disorders (FASD) Prevention and Practice through Practice and
Implementation Centers and National Partnerships (PICs). The purpose of
FASD PICs is to collect training evaluation data from healthcare
practitioners and staff in health systems where FASD-related practice
and systems changes are implemented, and from grantees of Practice and
Implementation Centers and national partner organizations related to
prevention, identification, and treatment of fetal alcohol spectrum
disorders (FASDs).
DATES: CDC must receive written comments on or before September 9,
2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. CDC-2019-
0058 by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Jeffrey M. Zirger, Information Collection Review
Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road
NE, MS-D74, Atlanta, Georgia 30329.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and Docket Number. CDC will post, without change, all relevant comments
to Regulations.gov.
Please note: Submit all comments through the Federal eRulemaking
portal (regulations.gov) or by U.S. mail to the address listed above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request more information on the
proposed project or to obtain a copy of the information collection plan
and instruments, contact Jeffrey M. Zirger, Information Collection
Review Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton
Road NE, MS-D74, Atlanta, Georgia 30329; phone: 404-639-7570; Email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), Federal agencies must obtain approval from
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for each collection of
information they conduct or sponsor. In addition, the PRA also requires
Federal agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of information, including each new
proposed collection, each proposed extension of existing collection of
information, and each reinstatement of previously approved information
collection before submitting the collection to the OMB for approval. To
comply with this requirement, we are publishing this notice of a
proposed data collection as described below.
The OMB is particularly interested in comments that will help:
1. Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
2. Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of
the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
3. Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
4. Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submissions of responses.
5. Assess information collection costs
Proposed Project
Improving Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders (FASD) Prevention and
Practice through Practice and Implementation Centers and National
Partnerships'' project (OMB Control No. 0920-1129, Exp. 8/31/2019))--
Revision -- National Center for Birth Defects and Developmental
Disability (NCBDDD), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
Prenatal exposure to alcohol is a leading preventable cause of
birth defects and developmental disabilities. The term `fetal alcohol
spectrum
[[Page 32920]]
disorders' describes the full continuum of effects that can occur in an
individual exposed to alcohol in utero. These effects include physical,
mental, behavioral, and learning disabilities. All of these have
lifelong implications.
Since 2002, CDC funded FASD Regional Training Centers (RTCs) to
provide education and training to healthcare professionals and students
about FASD prevention, identification, and treatment. In July 2013, CDC
convened an expert review panel to evaluate the effectiveness of the
RTC program overall and to make recommendations about the program.
The panel highlighted several accomplishments of the RTCs and
proposed several changes for future programming: (1) The panel
identified a need for more comprehensive coverage nationally with
discipline-specific trainings, increased use of technology, greater
collaboration with medical societies, and stronger linkages with
national partner organizations to increase the reach of training
opportunities, and (2) The panel suggested that the training centers
focus on demonstrable practice change and sustainability and place a
stronger emphasis on primary prevention of FASDs. In addition, it was
recommended that future initiatives have stronger evaluation
components.
Based on the recommendations of the expert review panel, CDC is
placing increased focus on prevention, demonstrating practice change,
achieving national coverage, and strengthening partnerships between
FASD Practice and Implementation Centers, or PICs (the newly redesigned
RTCs), and medical societies and national partner organizations. The
National Organization on Fetal Alcohol Syndrome (NOFAS) also
participates in this project as a resource to the PICS and national
partners. The PICs and national partners are asked to closely
collaborate in discipline-specific workgroups (DSWs) and identify
strategies that will increase the reach of the program on a national
level. While a major focus of the grantees' work will be national,
regional approaches will be used to develop new content and test
feasibility and acceptability of materials, especially among healthcare
providers and medical societies. In addition, CDC is placing a stronger
emphasis on evaluation, with both individual DSW/NOFAS evaluations and
a cross-site evaluation.
CDC requests OMB approval to collect program evaluation information
from (1) healthcare practitioners from disciplines targeted by each
DSW, including training participants, (2) health system staff, and (3)
cooperative agreement grantees over a three-year period.
Healthcare practitioners will complete surveys to provide
information on whether project trainings impacted their knowledge and
practice behavior regarding FASD identification, prevention, and
treatment. The information will be used to improve future trainings and
assess whether knowledge and practice changes occurred. Some
participants will also complete qualitative key informant interviews to
gain additional information on practice change. Health system employees
will be interviewed or complete surveys as part of projects to assess
healthcare systems change, including high impact evaluation studies and
DSW systems change projects. The high impact evaluation studies will be
primarily qualitative assessments of two to three specific grantee
efforts that seem likely to result in achievement of program
objectives. The DSW systems change projects will employ online surveys
to assess systems change in selected health systems across the U.S.
Grantees will complete program evaluation forms to track
perceptions of DSW collaboration and perceptions of key successes and
challenges encountered by the DSW. It is estimated that 29,573
respondents will participate in the evaluation each year, for a total
estimated burden of 3790 hours annually. There are no costs to
respondents other than their time.
Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average
Number of Number burden per Total burden
Type of respondents Form name respondents responses per response (in hours
respondent hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project Grantee Staff......... DSW Report...... 90 2 10/60 30
Project Grantee Staff......... High Impact 10 2 60/60 20
Study:
Discipline
Specific
Workgroup
Discussion
Guide for
Project Staff.
Health Care System Staff...... High Impact 10 2 60/60 20
Study: Key
Informant
Interview--Heal
th Care System
Staff.
FASD Core Training FASD Core 4013 1 9/60 602
Participants. Training
Survey--Pre-
Test.
FASD Core Training FASD Core 4013 1 5/60 335
Participants. Training
Survey--Post-
Test.
FASD Core Training FASD Core 4013 1 6/60 402
Participants. Training
Survey--6 Month
Follow-Up.
Nurses........................ Pre-Training 667 1 9/60 101
Survey for
Nursing.
Nurses........................ Post-Training 550 1 9/60 83
Survey for
Nursing.
Nurses........................ Six Month Follow- 440 1 9/60 66
Up Training
Survey for
Nursing.
Nurses........................ Nursing DSW 417 1 5/60 35
Polling
Questions.
Nurses........................ Key Informant 14 2 45/60 21
Interviews with
Champions.
Nurses........................ Brief 2,934 1 10/60 489
Questionnaire
for Nursing
Organization
Memberships.
Nurses........................ Friends & 34 2 10/60 12
Members of the
Network Survey.
Healthcare Organization Healthcare 234 1 30/60 117
Representatives. Organization
Utilization
Survey.
[[Page 32921]]
Obstetrician-Gynecologists and OBGYN SBI 600 1 2/60 20
students in allied health Knowledge &
professions. Agency.
Obstetrician-Gynecologists.... OBGYN BI-MI 600 1 3/60 30
Proficiency
Rating Scale--
Provider Skills
Training
Baseline.
Students in allied health OBGYN BI-MI 600 1 3/60 30
professions. Proficiency
Rating Scale--
Standardized
Patient Version.
Obstetrician-Gynecologists.... OBGYN BI-MI 600 2 3/60 60
Proficiency
Rating Scale--
Provider Follow
Up (3m & 6m).
Obstetrician-Gynecologists and OBGYN Telecom 480 1 5/60 40
students in allied health Training
professions. Satisfaction
Survey.
Obstetrician-Gynecologists and OBGYN Avatar 120 1 5/60 10
students in allied health Training
professions. Satisfaction
Survey.
Obstetrician-Gynecologists.... OBGYN FASD-SBI 124 1 2/60 5
Training Event
Evaluation.
Residency Directors, Training OBGYN 34 1 25/60 15
Coordinators, Clinical Qualitative Key
Directors, Obstetrician- Informant
Gynecologists. Interview--Pre-
Training.
Residency Directors, Training OBGYN 34 1 25/60 15
Coordinators, Clinical Qualitative Key
Directors, Obstetrician- Informant
Gynecologists. Interview--Post-
Training.
Certified Medical Assistants Medical 334 1 10/60 56
and students. Assistant--Pre-
Test Survey.
Students in allied health Medical 67 1 10/60 12
professions. Assistant--Pre-
Test Survey
(Academic).
Certified Medical Assistants Medical 334 1 10/60 56
and students. Assistant--Post-
Test Survey.
Students in allied health Medical 67 1 10/60 12
professions. Assistant--Post-
Test Survey
(Academic).
Certified Medical Assistants Medical 200 1 10/60 34
and students. Assistant
Follow Up
Survey.
Students in allied health Medical 17 1 10/60 3
professions. Assistant
Follow Up
Survey
(Academic).
Certified Medical Assistants Medical 250 1 15/60 63
and students. Assistants
Change in
Practice Survey.
Pediatricians................. Survey of 534 2 10/60 178
Pediatricians--
Baseline and
Follow Up.
Pediatricians................. AAP Post- 120 1 7/60 14
Training
Evaluation
Survey.
Pediatricians................. AAP Pre-Training 120 1 7/60 14
Evaluation
Survey.
Pediatricians................. AAP Three Month 120 1 2/60 4
Follow Up
Evaluation
Survey.
Pediatricians................. AAP Six Month 120 1 5/60 10
Follow Up
Evaluation
Survey.
Pediatricians................. FASD Toolkit 50 1 15/60 13
User Survey.
Pediatricians................. FASD Toolkit 10 1 30/60 5
Evaluation
Focus Group/
Guided
Interview.
Pediatricians................. Pediatric FASD 10 1 20/60 4
Regional
Education and
Awareness
Liaisons Work
Plan.
Pediatricians................. Pediatric FASD 10 1 4/60 1
Regional
Liaison/
Champion
Training
Session
Evaluation.
Family Medicine Physicians.... Family Medicine 62 1 8/60 9
Evaluation
Questions
Addendum for
Practice or
Individual
Provider.
Family medicine physicians, Social Work and 1167 1 8/60 156
social workers, social work Family
students. Physicians Pre-
training Survey.
Family medicine physicians, Social Work and 1167 1 5/60 98
social workers, social work Family
students. Physicians Post-
training Survey.
Family medicine physicians, Social Work and 1167 1 8/60 156
social workers, social work Family
students. Physicians 6-
Month Follow Up
Survey.
NOFAS webinar attendees....... NOFAS Webinar 601 1 2/60 20
Survey.
NOFAS webinar attendees....... NOFAS Three 601 1 2/60 20
Month Follow-Up
Webinar
Questionnaire.
NOFAS training participants... NOFAS Pre-Test 551 1 3/60 28
Survey.
NOFAS training participants... NOFAS Post-Test 551 1 3/60 28
Survey.
[[Page 32922]]
Systems change project Clinical Process 246 2 10/60 82
participants. Improvement
Survey.
Systems change project TCU 246 2 10/60 82
participants. Organizational
Readiness
Survey.
Systems change project Organizational 220 2 10/60 74
participants. Readiness to
Change
Assessment.
---------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL..................... ................ 29,573 .............. .............. 3,790
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeffrey M. Zirger,
Lead, Information Collection Review Office, Office of Scientific
Integrity, Office of Science, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2019-14684 Filed 7-9-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
