Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Bremerton Ferry Terminal Dolphin Relocation Project in Washington State, 32881-32888 [2019-14683]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 132 / Wednesday, July 10, 2019 / Notices
Marine Fisheries Service. Physical
comments should be sent to 1315 EastWest Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910
and electronic comments should be sent
to ITP.Fowler@noaa.gov.
Instructions: NMFS is not responsible
Dated: July 5, 2019.
for comments sent by any other method,
Nkolika Ndubisi,
to any other address or individual, or
Management and Program Analyst, National
received after the end of the comment
Ocean Service, National Oceanic and
period. Comments received
Atmospheric Administration.
electronically, including all
[FR Doc. 2019–14713 Filed 7–9–19; 8:45 am]
attachments, must not exceed a 25BILLING CODE 3510–08–P
megabyte file size. Attachments to
electronic comments will be accepted in
Microsoft Word or Excel or Adobe PDF
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
file formats only. All comments
received are a part of the public record
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
and will generally be posted online at
Administration
https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/permit/
RIN 0648–XR014
incidental-take-authorizations-underTakes of Marine Mammals Incidental to marine-mammal-protection-act without
change. All personal identifying
Specified Activities; Taking Marine
information (e.g., name, address)
Mammals Incidental to Bremerton
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
Ferry Terminal Dolphin Relocation
may be publicly accessible. Do not
Project in Washington State
submit confidential business
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
information or otherwise sensitive or
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
protected information.
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Commerce.
Amy Fowler, Office of Protected
ACTION: Notice; incidental harassment
Resources, NMFS, (301) 427–8401.
authorization; request for comments on
Electronic copies of the original
proposed renewal.
application, Renewal request, and
supporting documents (including NMFS
SUMMARY: NMFS received a request from Federal Register notices of the original
the Washington State Department of
proposed and final authorizations, and
Transportation (WSDOT) for the
the previous IHA), as well as a list of the
Renewal of their currently active
references cited in this document, may
incidental harassment authorization
be obtained online at: https://
(IHA) to take marine mammals
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/permit/
incidental to the dolphin (a man-made
incidental-take-authorizations-understructure that protects other structures
marine-mammal-protection-act. In case
from being struck by boats) relocation
of problems accessing these documents,
project at the Bremerton Ferry Terminal please call the contact listed above.
in Washington State. These activities
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
consist of activities that are covered by
the current authorization but will not be Background
completed prior to its expiration.
The MMPA prohibits the ‘‘take’’ of
Pursuant to the Marine Mammal
marine mammals, with certain
Protection Act (MMPA), prior to issuing exceptions. Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and
the currently active IHA, NMFS
(D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et
requested comments on both the
seq.) direct the Secretary of Commerce
proposed IHA and the potential for
(as delegated to NMFS) to allow, upon
renewing the initial authorization if
request, the incidental, but not
certain requirements were satisfied. The intentional, taking of small numbers of
Renewal requirements have been
marine mammals by U.S. citizens who
satisfied, and NMFS is now providing
engage in a specified activity (other than
an additional 15-day comment period to commercial fishing) within a specified
allow for any additional comments on
geographical region if certain findings
the requested Renewal not previously
are made and either regulations are
provided during the initial 30-day
issued or, if the taking is limited to
comment period.
harassment, a notice of a proposed
DATES: Comments and information must incidental take authorization is
be received no later than July 25, 2019.
provided to the public for review.
Authorization for incidental takings
ADDRESSES: Comments should be
shall be granted if NMFS finds that the
addressed to Jolie Harrison, Chief,
taking will have a negligible impact on
Permits and Conservation Division,
the species or stock(s) and will not have
Office of Protected Resources, National
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
provide aquatic/upland management;
and (4) research and monitor the area.
The proposed boundary expansion is
therefore preferred over the no action
alternative.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:32 Jul 09, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32881
an unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for
taking for subsistence uses (where
relevant). Further, NMFS must prescribe
the permissible methods of taking and
other ‘‘means of effecting the least
practicable adverse impact’’ on the
affected species or stocks and their
habitat, paying particular attention to
rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of
similar significance, and on the
availability of such species or stocks for
taking for certain subsistence uses
(referred to here as ‘‘mitigation
measures’’). Monitoring and reporting of
such takings are also required. The
meaning of key terms such as ‘‘take,’’
‘‘harassment,’’ and ‘‘negligible impact’’
can be found in section 3 of the MMPA
(16 U.S.C. 1362) and the agency’s
regulations at 50 CFR 216.103.
NMFS’ regulations implementing the
MMPA at 50 CFR 216.107(e) indicate
that IHAs may be renewed for
additional periods of time not to exceed
one year for each reauthorization. In the
notice of proposed IHA for the initial
authorization, NMFS described the
circumstances under which we would
consider issuing a Renewal for this
activity, and requested public comment
on a potential Renewal under those
circumstances. Specifically, on a caseby-case basis, NMFS may issue a oneyear IHA Renewal when (1) another year
of identical or nearly identical activities
as described in the Specified Activities
section is planned or (2) the activities
would not be completed by the time the
IHA expires and a second IHA would
allow for completion of the activities
beyond that described in the Dates and
Duration section of the initial IHA. All
of the following conditions must be met
in order to issue a Renewal:
• A request for Renewal is received
no later than 60 days prior to expiration
of the current IHA;
• The request for Renewal must
include the following:
(1) An explanation that the activities
to be conducted beyond the initial dates
either are identical to the previously
analyzed activities or include changes
so minor (e.g., reduction in pile size)
that the changes do not affect the
previous analyses, take estimates, or
mitigation and monitoring
requirements; and
(2) A preliminary monitoring report
showing the results of the required
monitoring to date and an explanation
showing that the monitoring results do
not indicate impacts of a scale or nature
not previously analyzed or authorized.
• Upon review of the request for
Renewal, the status of the affected
species or stocks, and any other
pertinent information, NMFS
E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM
10JYN1
32882
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 132 / Wednesday, July 10, 2019 / Notices
determines that there are no more than
minor changes in the activities, the
mitigation and monitoring measures
remain the same and appropriate, and
the initial findings remain valid.
An additional public comment period
of 15 days (for a total of 45 days), with
direct notice by email, phone, or postal
service to commenters on the initial
IHA, is provided to allow for any
additional comments on the proposed
Renewal. A description of the Renewal
process may be found on our website at:
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/
marine-mammal-protection/incidentalharassment-authorization-renewals.
Any comments received on the potential
Renewal, along with relevant comments
on the initial IHA, have been considered
in the development of this proposed
IHA Renewal, and a summary of agency
responses to applicable comments is
included in this notice. NMFS will
consider any additional public
comments prior to making any final
decision on the issuance of the
requested Renewal, and agency
responses will be summarized in the
final notice of our decision.
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
National Environmental Policy Act
Issuance of an MMPA 101(a)(5)(D)
authorization requires compliance with
the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA).
NMFS preliminary determined the
issuance of the proposed Renewal is
consistent with categories of activities
identified in CE B4 (issuance of
incidental harassment authorizations
under section 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the
MMPA for which no serious injury or
mortality is anticipated) of NOAA’s
Companion Manual for NAO 216–6A,
and we have not identified any
extraordinary circumstances listed in
Chapter 4 of the Companion Manual for
NAO 216–6A that would preclude this
categorical exclusion under NEPA.
We will review all comments
submitted in response to this notice
prior to making a final decision as to
whether application of this CE is
appropriate in this circumstance.
History of Request
On August 24, 2018, NMFS issued an
IHA to WSDOT to take marine mammals
incidental to Bremerton and Edmonds
Ferry Terminal Dolphin Relocation
Project in Washington State (83 FR
45897; September 11, 2018), effective
from October 1, 2018 through
September 31, 2019. On May 8, 2019,
NMFS received a request for the
Renewal of that initial IHA. As
described in the request for Renewal,
the activities for which incidental take
is requested consist of activities that are
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:32 Jul 09, 2019
Jkt 247001
covered by the initial authorization but
will not be completed prior to its
expiration. As required, the applicant
also provided a preliminary monitoring
report (available at https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/permit/
incidental-take-authorizations-undermarine-mammal-protection-act), which
confirms that the applicant has
implemented the required mitigation
and monitoring, and which also shows
that no impacts of a scale or nature not
previously analyzed or authorized have
occurred as a result of the activities
conducted.
Description of the Specified Activities
and Anticipated Impacts
WSDOT proposes to relocate one
dolphin to improve safety at the
Bremerton Ferry Terminal. The Olympic
Class ferries have an atypical shape,
which at some terminals causes the
vessels to make contact with the inner
dolphin prior to the stern of the vessel
reaching the intermediate or outer
dolphin. This tends to cause rotation of
the vessel away from the wingwalls,
which presents a safety issue.
Relocating the dolphin will reduce the
risk of landing issues for Olympic Class
ferries at the Bremerton ferry terminal.
Due to NMFS and the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS) in-water
work timing restrictions to protect ESAlisted salmonids, planned WSDOT inwater construction at the Bremerton
ferry terminal is limited to August 1,
2019 through February 15, 2020. All
work proposed by WSDOT would be
conducted within this window.
The specified activities described for
this Renewal are an identical subset of
the activities covered by the initial IHA.
NMFS previously published notices of
proposed IHA (83 FR 16330; April 16,
2018) and issued IHA (83 FR 45897;
September 11, 2018). These documents,
as well as WSDOT’s initial IHA
application and the preliminary
monitoring report for the previously
issued IHA, are available at: https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/action/
incidental-take-authorizationwashington-state-departmenttransportation-ferry-terminal.
Similarly, the anticipated impacts are
identical to those described in the initial
IHA. Specifically, we anticipate the take
of individuals of eleven marine mammal
stocks (including four pinniped and
seven cetacean stocks), by Level B
harassment only, incidental to noise
resulting from pile driving associated
with the proposed activities. WSDOT
was not able to complete the pile
driving activities analyzed in the initial
IHA by the date that IHA is set to expire
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and anticipates the need for additional
pile driving to complete the project.
The following documents are
referenced in this notice and include
important supporting information, and
may be found at the indicated location:
• Initial Proposed IHA: Takes of
Marine Mammals Incidental to
Specified Activities; Taking Marine
Mammals Incidental to Bremerton and
Edmonds Ferry Terminals Dolphin
Relocation Project in Washington State
(83 FR 16330; April 16, 2018). Available
at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/
action/incidental-take-authorizationwashington-state-departmenttransportation-ferry-terminal;
• Initial Final IHA: Takes of Marine
Mammals Incidental to Specified
Activities; Taking Marine Mammals
Incidental to Bremerton and Edmonds
Ferry Terminals Dolphin Relocation
Project in Washington State (83 FR
45897; September 11, 2018). Available
at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/
action/incidental-take-authorizationwashington-state-departmenttransportation-ferry-terminal; and
• Preliminary Monitoring Report from
Initial IHA. Available at: https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/action/
incidental-take-authorizationwashington-state-departmenttransportation-ferry-terminal.
Detailed Description of the Activity
As described above, WSDOT was not
able to complete the activities analyzed
in the initial IHA by the date that IHA
is set to expire (September 30, 2019). As
such, the activities WSDOT proposes to
conduct between August 1, 2019 and
February 15, 2020 would be a
continuation of the activities as
described in the initial 2018 IHA and
would be identical to the activities
analyzed in the initial IHA (e.g., same
location, equipment, methods,
seasonality). The initial IHA analyzed
the potential impacts to marine
mammals from the relocation of one
dolphin each at the Edmonds and
Bremerton ferry terminals to
accommodate the Olympic Class ferries.
WSDOT completed all planned
activities at the Edmonds ferry terminal
in the 2018–2019 in-water work period
but no work was conducted at the
Bremerton ferry terminal. The numbers
of each pile size that were planned to be
driven during the 2018–2019 work
window is shown in Table 1 of the
initial proposed IHA (83 FR 16330;
April 16, 2018). WETA planned to
install and remove a total of 30 piles in
the 2018–2019 work window (11 at the
Edmonds ferry terminal and 19 at the
Bremerton ferry terminal). However, as
described above, WSDOT was only able
E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM
10JYN1
32883
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 132 / Wednesday, July 10, 2019 / Notices
to complete pile driving at the Edmonds
ferry terminal. Four 36-inch steel pipe
piles were removed with a vibratory
hammer and seven steel pipe piles
(three 30-inch and four 36-inch) were
installed with a vibratory hammer at the
Edmonds ferry terminal. Construction
occurred on six days between January
29 and February 7, 2019. WSDOT
therefore proposes to complete pile
driving activities at the Bremerton ferry
terminal in the 2019–2020 work
window.
The proposed activities at the
Bremerton ferry terminal include
vibratory installation and removal of
steel pipe piles. A total of 19 steel pipe
piles will be installed and removed at
the Bremerton ferry terminal. One
temporary 36-inch indicator pile will be
installed with a vibratory hammer. The
temporary indicator pile will be used as
a visual landing aid for vessel captains
during construction. Once the indicator
pile is in place, the 6 36-inch piles that
comprise the left outer dolphin will be
removed with a vibratory hammer
and/or by direct pull and clamshell
removal. Using a vibratory hammer,
three 30-inch reaction piles will be
installed as a back group of piles to
provide stability to the dolphin. A
concrete diaphragm atop the back piles
will be installed, followed by four
additional 30-inch reaction piles
installed with a vibratory hammer.
Three 36-inch steel pipe fender piles
will be installed with a vibratory
hammer. Fenders and rub panels will be
installed to absorb energy from the
vessel as it makes contact with the
dolphin. Finally, using a vibratory
hammer, the 36-inch temporary
indicator pile will be removed and
reinstalled as the last fender pile.
Vibratory removal of both 30- and 36inch piles is expected to take up to 15
minutes per pile. Vibratory installation
of 30- and 36-inch piles is expected to
take up to 20 minutes per pile.
Underwater sound resulting from pile
driving could result in the harassment
of marine mammals. The proposed
Renewal would be effective from August
1, 2019 through July 31, 2020.
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
Description of Marine Mammals
A description of the marine mammals
in the area of the activities for which
authorization of take is proposed here,
including information on abundance,
status, distribution, and hearing, may be
found in the Notices of the proposed
IHA for the initial authorization (83 FR
16330; April 16, 2018). The marine
mammal species for which take was
authorized in the initial IHA, and for
which take is proposed in this requested
Renewal are: Pacific harbor seal (Phoca
vitulina richardii), Northern elephant
seal (Mirounga angustirostris),
California sea lion (Zalophus
californianus), eastern Distinct
Population Segment (eDPS) Steller sea
lion (Eumetopias jubatus), transient
killer whales (Orcinus orca), gray whale
(Eschrichtius robustus), humpback
whale (Megaptera novaeangliae), minke
whale (Balaenoptera acutorostrata),
harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena),
Dall’s porpoise (Phocoenoides dalli),
and common dolphin (Delphinus
delphis).
NMFS has reviewed the monitoring
data from the initial IHA, recent draft
Stock Assessment Reports, information
on relevant Unusual Mortality Events,
and other scientific literature. The 2018
Stock Assessment Report notes that the
estimated abundance of California sea
lions has decreased slightly and the
estimated abundances of Eastern North
Pacific gray whales and California/
Oregon/Washington humpback whales
increased slightly. Additionally, since
January 1, 2019, elevated gray whale
strandings have occurred along the west
coast of North America from Mexico
through Alaska. NMFS declared an
Unusual Mortality Event on May 31,
2019. As of June 27, 2019, a total of 85
gray whales have stranded along the
U.S. coast, with a combined additional
86 whales stranded in Mexico and
Canada. Full or partial necropsy
examinations have been conducted on a
subset of the stranded gray whales.
Preliminary findings in several of the
whales have shown evidence of
emaciation. However, neither this nor
any other new information affects which
species or stocks have the potential to
be affected or the pertinent information
in the Description of the Marine
Mammals in the Area of Specified
Activities contained in the supporting
documents for the initial IHA.
Potential Effects on Marine Mammals
and Their Habitat
A description of the potential effects
of the specified activity on marine
mammals and their habitat for the
activities for which take is proposed
here may be found in the Notices of the
proposed IHA for the initial
authorization (83 FR 16330; April 16,
2018). NMFS has reviewed the
monitoring data from the initial IHA,
recent draft Stock Assessment Reports,
information on relevant Unusual
Mortality Events, and other scientific
literature, and determined that neither
this nor any other new information
affects our initial analysis of impacts on
marine mammals and their habitat.
Estimated Take
A detailed description of the methods
and inputs used to estimate take for the
specified activity are found in the
Notice of proposed IHA (83 FR 16330;
April 16, 2018) and issued IHA (83 FR
45897; September 11, 2018) for the
initial authorization. The pile driving
equipment that may result in take, as
well as the source levels, marine
mammal stocks taken, and the methods
of take estimation remain unchanged
from the previously issued IHA.
Changes in the density of seven stocks
are indicated below, though they result
in only minor changes in the take
estimates that do not affect our findings,
as described.
Authorized takes would be by Level B
harassment only, in the form of
disruption of behavioral patterns for
individual marine mammals resulting
from exposure to acoustic sources (i.e.,
vibratory pile driving). Based on the
nature of the activity and the
anticipated effectiveness of the
mitigation measures (i.e., shutdowns)
discussed in detail below in Proposed
Mitigation section, Level A harassment
is neither anticipated nor proposed to be
authorized.
As described above, WSDOT
completed all pile driving activities at
the Edmonds ferry terminal in the 2018–
2019 in-water work period and proposes
to install and remove a total of 19 piles
at the Bremerton ferry terminal in the
2019–2020 work period to complete the
project. All piles to be installed and
removed at the Bremerton ferry terminal
would be 30- and 36-inch steel pipe
piles. The number of piles for each
respective size and element are shown
in Table 1.
TABLE 1—NUMBER AND SIZES OF PILES PROPOSED FOR INSTALLATION AND REMOVAL, AND ESTIMATED DURATION OF
PILE DRIVING
Size
(inch)
Pile element
Method
Indicator pile ........................
Vibratory install ...................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:32 Jul 09, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Number of
piles
36
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Duration/pile
(min)
1
E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM
20
10JYN1
Number of
piles per day
1
Duration
(days)
1
32884
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 132 / Wednesday, July 10, 2019 / Notices
TABLE 1—NUMBER AND SIZES OF PILES PROPOSED FOR INSTALLATION AND REMOVAL, AND ESTIMATED DURATION OF
PILE DRIVING—Continued
Pile element
Indicator pile ........................
Existing dolphin ...................
Relocate dolphin install .......
Relocated dolphin install .....
Total .............................
Size
(inch)
Method
Vibratory
Vibratory
Vibratory
Vibratory
Number of
piles
Duration/pile
(min)
Number of
piles per day
Duration
(days)
removal ...............
removal ...............
install ...................
install ...................
36
36
36
30
1
6
4
7
15
15
20
20
1
3
3
3
1
2
2
3
.............................................
........................
19
345
........................
9
Distances to the isopleths
corresponding to the Level B
harassment threshold for each pile size
are shown in Table 2. Distances to the
isopleths corresponding to the Level A
harassment thresholds for the various
marine mammal functional hearing
groups, by pile size and duration of pile
driving, are shown in Table 3.
Descriptions of the modeling methods
used to determine the distances shown
in Tables 2 and 3 are described in detail
in the Notice of proposed IHA (83 FR
16330; April 16, 2018) for the initial
IHA. These methods have not changed
from the initial IHA, and all values
shown in Tables 2 and 3 have not
changed from the initial IHA.
TABLE 2—DISTANCES TO ISOPLETHS
CORRESPONDING TO THE LEVEL B
HARASSMENT THRESHOLD
Distance
to Level B
harassment
threshold
(m)
Pile driving activity
36-inch steel pile (installation
and removal) .........................
30-inch steel pile (installation) ..
63,100
39,800
TABLE 3—DISTANCES TO ISOPLETHS CORRESPONDING TO LEVEL A HARASSMENT THRESHOLDS
Distance to Level A harassment threshold
(m)
Pile driving activity
LF Cetacean
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
36-inch
36-inch
36-inch
36-inch
30-inch
indicator pile install (1 pile/day) ..............................
indicator pile removal (1 pile/day) ...........................
steel pile (existing dolphin) removal (3 piles/day) ..
steel pile (relocated dolphin) install (3 piles/day) ...
steel pile (relocated dolphin) install (3 piles/day) ...
As the number of pile driving days
that would occur in this year of activity
is less than the number of pile driving
days analyzed in the initial IHA, the
number of takes estimated to occur in
the 2019–2020 work season, and
requested for this Renewal, has changed
from the number of takes authorized in
the initial IHA. Take numbers
authorized in the initial IHA are shown
in Table 7 in the Notice of issued IHA
(83 FR 45897; September 11, 2018),
available at: https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/action/
incidental-take-authorizationwashington-state-departmenttransportation-ferry-terminal.
The number of takes requested for this
Renewal, for each marine mammal
stock, are shown in Table 4. Auditory
injury (i.e., Level A harassment) is
unlikely to occur for any species or
stock, given the small injury zones.
Since the largest Level A distance is
only 35 m from the source for highfrequency cetaceans (harbor porpoise
and Dall’s porpoise, Table 3), NMFS
expects that WSDOT can effectively
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:32 Jul 09, 2019
Jkt 247001
MF Cetacean
10
10
25
25
25
10
10
10
10
10
monitor such small zones to implement
shutdown measures and avoid Level A
takes. Therefore, no Level A take of
marine mammal is anticipated nor
proposed to be authorized for the pile
driving activities at the Bremerton ferry
terminal.
To inform take estimates in the initial
IHA, marine mammal densities were
taken from the U.S. Navy’s Marine
Species Density Database (MSDD; U.S.
Navy 2015). Since then, the Navy has
published an updated MSDD for the
Phase III Northwest Training and
Testing Study Area with updated
densities for marine mammal species in
the inland waters of Puget Sound (U.S.
Navy 2019). In the 2019 MSDD,
densities of harbor seals, northern
elephant seals, gray whales, and
humpback whales increased from those
presented in the 2015 MSDD, while
densities of harbor porpoises, Dall’s
porpoises, and transient killer whales
decreased. The densities of Steller sea
lion and minke whale remained the
same in both iterations of the MSDD.
While updated densities for marine
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
HF Cetacean
25
10
35
35
25
Phocid
Otariid
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
mammals were used here, the method of
calculating estimated takes remains
identical to that used in the initial IHA.
For all marine mammals except
California sea lions, takes were
calculated by multiplying the ensonified
area by the average animal density in
the area (U.S. Navy 2019) and the
number of days of pile driving (9 days),
rounded up to the nearest integer. Take
of California sea lions was calculated by
multiplying the average number of
California sea lions sighted in daily
monitoring at the U.S. Navy’s Bremerton
Shipyard (69 animals) by the number of
days of pile driving (9 days).
Using the take calculation method
described above (area x density x days)
resulted in estimated zero takes of some
species, despite possible presence in the
project area. In these cases, take was
estimated by incorporating typical
group size and/or potential for
occurrence during the project work
period. Specifically, take of northern
elephant seals was calculated by
assuming one seal may be present each
day for a total of nine takes by Level B
E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM
10JYN1
32885
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 132 / Wednesday, July 10, 2019 / Notices
harassment. Take of transient killer
whales was calculated by assuming one
group of six killer whales (mean group
size (Shields et al., 2018)) may enter the
Level B harassment zone twice over the
course of the project for a total of 12
takes by Level B harassment. Takes of
gray whales, humpback whales, and
minke whales was estimated by
assuming one of each species may be
present every other day during the nine
days of pile driving, for a total of five
takes by Level B harassment for each
species. Dall’s porpoises are considered
rare in Puget Sound waters (U.S. Navy
2019) but a large group of 15 Dall’s
porpoises may enter the Level B
harassment zone once during pile
driving activities. Finally, take of
common dolphins was calculated by
assuming one group of seven dolphins
(mean group size (CRC 2017)) may enter
the Level B harassment zone once over
the course of the project. No takes of
Southern Resident killer whales were
calculated, and due to mitigation
measures proposed by WSDOT
(described in detail below), no takes are
anticipated or requested for this
Renewal.
Here, we describe in summary how
the changes in density estimates affect
the take estimates in this requested
Renewal in relation to the take estimates
in the initial IHA. For some species, the
updated density estimates had no effect
on estimated take. Even with increased
densities, calculated takes of northern
elephant seals, Southern Resident killer
whales, transient killer whales, gray
whales, humpback whales, minke
whales, and common dolphins were
zero animals taken. For these species,
the proposed take was estimated as
described above, and the updated
densities had no effect on the number of
takes. The estimated takes of two
species were affected by the changes in
density estimates, harbor seals and
harbor porpoises.
The estimated density of harbor
porpoises decreased from the 2015
MSDD (used to calculate takes in the
initial IHA) to the 2019 MSDD. As a
result, the calculated take estimate
decreased, from 69 takes by Level B
harassment at the Bremerton ferry
terminal in the initial IHA to 64 takes
by Level B harassment proposed for take
by Level B harassment here. This
represents a seven percent decrease.
Since the number of harbor porpoises
estimated to be taken by Level B
harassment here are fewer than that
authorized in the initial IHA, this
change has no effect on our findings.
The initial IHA authorized a total of
2,286 Level B takes of harbor seals, with
an estimated 145 harbor seals taken at
the Bremerton ferry terminal and 2,141
harbor seals taken at the Edmonds ferry
terminal. Using the updated 2019
MSDD, the calculated takes of harbor
seals at the Bremerton terminal
increased to 465. While this increase is
notable, the total estimated take is well
below that authorized for both the
Bremerton and Edmonds ferry terminals
in the initial IHA. Additionally, the
monitoring report from pile driving
completed at the Edmonds terminal
reports only 37 harbor seals taken by
Level B harassment, indicating that the
actual number of animals that occur are
far below the number of takes
authorized.
TABLE 4—TOTAL TAKES PROPOSED FOR RENEWAL
Species
Level B
Harbor seal ..................................................................................................................................
Northern elephant seal ................................................................................................................
California sea lion ........................................................................................................................
Steller sea lion .............................................................................................................................
Southern Resident killer whale ....................................................................................................
Transient killer whale ...................................................................................................................
Gray whale ...................................................................................................................................
Humpback whale .........................................................................................................................
Minke whale .................................................................................................................................
Harbor porpoise ...........................................................................................................................
Dall’s porpoise .............................................................................................................................
Common dolphin ..........................................................................................................................
a Take
b Take
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a 465
9
621
6
0
12
5
5
5
b 64
15
7
estimate increased from initial IHA due to increased density.
estimate decreased from initial IHA due to decreased density.
Description of Proposed Mitigation,
Monitoring and Reporting Measures
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
465
9
621
6
0
12
5
5
5
64
15
7
Level A
The proposed mitigation, monitoring,
and reporting measures included as
requirements in this authorization are
identical to those included in the Notice
announcing the issuance of the initial
IHA (83 FR 45897; September 11, 2018),
and the discussion of the least
practicable adverse impact included in
that document remains accurate. The
following measures are proposed for
this renewal:
Pre-activity monitoring will take place
from 30 minutes prior to initiation of
pile driving activity and post-activity
monitoring will continue through 30
minutes post-completion of pile driving
activity. Pile driving may commence at
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:32 Jul 09, 2019
Jkt 247001
the end of the 30-minute pre-activity
monitoring period, provided observers
have determined that the shutdown
zone (described below) is clear of
marine mammals, which includes
delaying start of pile driving activities if
a marine mammal is sighted in the zone,
as described below. A determination
that the shutdown zone is clear must be
made during a period of good visibility
(i.e., the entire shutdown zone and
surrounding waters must be visible to
the naked eye).
If a marine mammal approaches or
enters the shutdown zone during
activities or pre-activity monitoring, all
pile driving activities at that location
shall be halted or delayed, respectively.
If pile driving is halted or delayed due
to the presence of a marine mammal, the
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
activity may not resume or commence
until either the animal has voluntarily
left and been visually confirmed beyond
the shutdown zone and 15 or 30
minutes (for pinnipeds/small cetaceans
or large cetaceans, respectively) have
passed without re-detection of the
animal. Pile driving activities include
the time to install or remove a single
pile or series of piles, as long as the time
elapsed between uses of the pile driving
equipment is no more than thirty
minutes.
To prevent Level A harassment of
marine mammals, WSDOT must
establish shutdown zones equivalent to
the Level A harassment zones. If the
Level A harassment zone is less than 10
m, a minimum 10 m shutdown zone
must be enforced. The required
E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM
10JYN1
32886
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 132 / Wednesday, July 10, 2019 / Notices
shutdown zones are presented in Table
5.
TABLE 5—SHUTDOWN DISTANCES FOR PILE DRIVING ACTIVITIES
Shutdown distance (m)
Pile type, size & pile driving method
LF cetacean
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
36-inch
36-inch
36-inch
36-inch
30-inch
indicator pile
indicator pile
steel dolphin
steel dolphin
steel dolphin
installation ..........................................
removal ..............................................
pile removal .......................................
pile installation ...................................
pile installation ...................................
In addition to the Level A shutdown
measures described above, WSDOT
must implement shutdown measures if
Southern Resident killer whales are
sighted within the vicinity of the project
and are approaching the Level B
harassment zone during pile driving
activities. If a killer whale approaches
the Level B harassment zone and it is
unknown if the animal is a Southern
Resident or a transient killer whale, it
must be assumed to be a Southern
Resident killer whale and WSDOT must
implement the shutdown measures
described above. If a Southern Resident
killer whale enters the Level B
harassment zone undetected, pile
driving must cease upon observation of
the animal and must be suspended until
the animal exits the Level B harassment
zone.
If a species for which authorization
has not been granted, or a species for
which authorization has been granted
but the authorized takes are met, is
observed approaching or within the
Level B harassment zones, pile driving
and removal activities must cease
immediately using delay and shutdown
procedures. Similarly, if an animal is
observed approaching or within the
Level A harassment zones, pile driving
and removal activities must cease
immediately. Activities must not
resume until the animal has been
confirmed to have left the area or 15 or
30 minutes (pinniped/small cetacean or
large cetacean, respectively) has
elapsed.
For all pile driving activities, a
minimum of three Protected Species
Observers (PSOs) will be required, two
land-based and one vessel-based. One
PSO must be stationed at the active pile
driving rig or at the best vantage point
practicable to monitor the shutdown
zones for marine mammals and
implement shutdown or delay
procedures when applicable through
communication with the equipment
operator.
Monitoring of pile driving must be
conducted by qualified PSOs (see
below) who have no other assigned
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:32 Jul 09, 2019
Jkt 247001
MF cetacean
10
10
25
25
25
10
10
10
10
10
tasks during monitoring periods.
WSDOT will adhere to the following
conditions when selecting observers:
• Independent PSOs must be used
(i.e., not construction personnel);
• A lead observer or monitoring
coordinator must be designated. The
lead observer must have prior
experience working as a marine
mammal observer during construction;
• Other PSOs may substitute
education (degree in biological science
or related field) or training for
experience; and
• WSDOT must submit PSO CVs for
approval by NMFS.
WSDOT must ensure that observers
have the following additional
qualifications:
• Ability to conduct field
observations and collect data according
to assigned protocols;
• Experience or training in the field
identification of marine mammals,
including the identification of
behaviors;
• Sufficient training, orientation, or
experience with the construction
operation to provide for personal safety
during observations;
• Writing skills sufficient to prepare a
report of observations including but not
limited to the number and species of
marine mammals observed; dates and
times when in-water construction
activities were conducted; dates, times,
and reason for implementation of
mitigation (or why mitigation was not
implemented when required); and
marine mammal behavior; and
• Ability to communicate orally, by
radio or in person, with project
personnel to provide real-time
information on marine mammals
observed in the area as necessary.
PSOs must collect the following
information during marine mammal
monitoring:
• Dates and times (begin and end) of
all marine mammal monitoring;
• Construction activities occurring
during each daily observation period,
including how many and what type of
piles were driven or removed;
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
HF cetacean
25
10
35
35
25
Phocid
Otariid
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
• Weather parameters and water
conditions during each monitoring
period (e.g., wind speed, percent cover,
visibility, sea state);
• The number of marine mammals
observed, by species, relative to the pile
location and if pile driving or removal
was occurring at time of sighting;
• Age and sex class, if possible, of all
marine mammals observed;
• PSO locations during marine
mammal monitoring;
• Distances and bearings of each
marine mammal observed to the pile
being driven or removed for each
sighting (if pile driving or removal was
occurring at time of sighting);
• Description of any marine mammal
behavior patterns during observation,
including direction of travel;
• Number of individuals of each
species (differentiated by month as
appropriate) detected within the
monitoring zone, and estimates of
number of marine mammals taken, by
species (a correction factor may be
applied to total take numbers, as
appropriate);
• Detailed information about any
implementation of any mitigation
triggered (e.g., shutdowns and delays), a
description of specific actions that
ensued, and resulting behavior of the
animal, if any; and
• Description of attempts to
distinguish between the number of
individual animals taken and the
number of incidences of take, such as
ability to track groups or individuals.
WSDOT must submit a draft
monitoring report within 90 days after
completion of the construction work or
the expiration of the IHA, whichever
comes earlier. This report must include
the information described above. A final
report must be prepared and submitted
to NMFS within 30 days following
resolution of comments from NMFS on
the draft report. If NMFS has no
comments on the draft report, the draft
will be considered the final report.
In addition, NMFS would require
WSDOT to notify NMFS’ Office of
Protected Resources and NMFS’ West
E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM
10JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 132 / Wednesday, July 10, 2019 / Notices
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
Coast Region Stranding Coordinator
within 48 hours of sighting an injured
or dead marine mammal in the
construction site. WSDOT must provide
NMFS and the Stranding Network with
the species or description of the
animal(s), the condition of the animal(s)
(including carcass condition, if the
animal is dead), location, time of first
discovery, observed behaviors (if alive),
and photo or video (if available). In the
event that WSDOT finds an injured or
dead marine mammal that is not in the
construction area, WSDOT must report
the same information as listed above to
NMFS as soon as operationally feasible.
Public Comments
As noted previously, NMFS published
a notice of a proposed IHA (83 FR
16330; April 16, 2018) and solicited
public comments on both our proposal
to issue the initial IHA for pile driving
at the Bremerton and Edmonds ferry
terminals and on the potential for a
Renewal, should certain requirements
be met. All public comments were
addressed in the notice announcing the
issuance of the initial IHA (83 FR 45897;
September 11, 2018). Below, we
describe how we have addressed, with
updated information where appropriate,
any comments received that specifically
pertain to the Renewal of the 2018 IHA.
Comment: The Marine Mammal
Commission (Commission) requested
clarification of certain issues associated
with NMFS’s notice that one-year
Renewals can be issued in certain
limited circumstances and expressed
concern that the process would bypass
the public notice and comment
requirements. The Commission also
suggested that NMFS should discuss the
possibility of Renewals through a more
general route, such as a rulemaking,
instead of notice in a specific
authorization. The Commission further
recommended that if NMFS did not
pursue a more general route, that the
agency provide the Commission and the
public with a legal analysis supporting
our conclusion that this process is
consistent with the requirements of
section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA.
Response: The notice of the proposed
initial IHA expressly notified and
invited comment from the public on the
possibility that under certain, limited
conditions the applicant could seek a
Renewal IHA for an additional year. The
notice described the conditions under
which such a Renewal request could be
considered and expressly sought public
comment in the event such a Renewal
were sought for this action. Further,
since issuance of the initial IHA, NMFS
has modified the Renewal process to
provide notice through the Federal
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:32 Jul 09, 2019
Jkt 247001
Register and an additional 15-day
public comment period at the time the
Renewal IHA is requested. NMFS also
will provide direct notice of the
requested Renewal to those who
commented on the initial IHA, to
provide an opportunity to submit any
additional comments.
We appreciate the Commission’s
suggestion that NMFS discuss the
potential for IHA Renewals through a
more general route, such as a
rulemaking. However, utilizing the
public comment process associated with
IHAs is more efficient for the agency,
while still providing for appropriate
public input into NMFS’ decisionmaking. Further, NMFS’ recent
modification to the Renewal process
(i.e., soliciting additional public
comment at the time of a Renewal
request) should alleviate the
Commission’s concern about the lack of
additional public comment and need for
a more general rulemaking.
For more information, NMFS has
published a description of the Renewal
process on our website (available at
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/
marine-mammal-protection/incidentalharassment-authorization-renewals).
Preliminary Determinations
WSDOT’s proposed activity is
identical to the activity analyzed in our
previously issued Notices of proposed
IHA and issued IHA (with the exception
of the number of piles proposed for
installation and removal, which is less
than the number analyzed in those
documents). We concluded that the
initial IHA would have a negligible
impact on all marine mammal stocks
and species and that the taking would
be small relative to population sizes.
The marine mammal information,
potential effects, and the mitigation and
monitoring measures remain the same
as those analyzed in the previously
issued Notices of proposed IHA and
issued IHA, therefore the extensive
analysis, as well as the associated
findings, included in the prior
documents remain applicable.
The only differences between the
initial IHA and this requested Renewal
is that the number of piles proposed for
installation and removal, and the
numbers of marine mammal takes
expected to occur incidental to the
proposed activities (including
consideration of changes in marine
mammal density for several stocks), are
lower than the numbers analyzed and
authorized in the previously issued
IHA. As both the number of piles and
the number of takes expected to occur,
and requested, for this Renewal, are
lower than in the initial IHA, we have
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32887
concluded that the effects of the
requested Renewal would be the same
or less than those that were analyzed in
the Notices of the initial proposed IHA
and issued IHA.
NMFS has preliminarily concluded
that there is no new information
suggesting that our analysis or findings
should change from those reached for
the initial IHA. This includes
consideration of the estimated
abundance of California sea lions
decreasing and the estimated
abundances of gray whales and
humpback whales increasing, as well as
the ongoing gray whale Unusual
Mortality Event, none of which are
expected to change our assessment of
the effects of the takes from this activity.
Based on the information and analysis
contained here and in the referenced
documents, NMFS has determined the
following: (1) The required mitigation
measures will effect the least practicable
impact on marine mammal species or
stocks and their habitat; (2) the
authorized takes will have a negligible
impact on the affected marine mammal
species or stocks; (3) the authorized
takes represent small numbers of marine
mammals relative to the affected stock
abundances; (4) WSDOT activities will
not have an unmitigable adverse impact
on taking for subsistence purposes as no
relevant subsistence uses of marine
mammals are implicated by this action,
and; (5) appropriate monitoring and
reporting requirements are included.
Endangered Species Act
Section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973 (ESA: 16 U.S.C.
1531 et seq.) requires that each Federal
agency insure that any action it
authorizes, funds, or carries out is not
likely to jeopardize the continued
existence of any endangered or
threatened species or result in the
destruction or adverse modification of
designated critical habitat. To ensure
ESA compliance for the issuance of
IHAs, NMFS consults internally, in this
case with the West Coast Region
Protected Resources Division, whenever
we propose to authorize take for
endangered or threatened species. The
effects of this proposed federal action
were adequately analyzed in NMFS’
Biological Opinion for the Bremerton
and Edmonds Ferry Terminals Dolphin
Replacement Project, dated March 22,
2018, which concluded that the take
NMFS proposes to authorize through
this IHA would not jeopardize the
continued existence of any endangered
or threatened species or destroy or
adversely modify any designated critical
habitat.
E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM
10JYN1
32888
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 132 / Wednesday, July 10, 2019 / Notices
Requested Renewal and Request for
Public Comment
As a result of these preliminary
determinations, NMFS proposes to issue
an IHA Renewal to WSDOT for
conducting pile driving at the
Bremerton ferry terminal during the
August 1, 2019 through February 15,
2020 in-water work window, provided
the previously described mitigation,
monitoring, and reporting requirements
are incorporated. A draft of the
proposed IHA can be found at https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/permit/
incidental-take-authorizations-undermarine-mammal-protection-act. We
request comment on our analyses, the
proposed Renewal, and any other aspect
of this Notice. Please include with your
comments any supporting data or
literature citations to help inform our
final decision on the request for MMPA
authorization.
Dated: July 5, 2019.
Donna S. Wieting,
Director, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2019–14683 Filed 7–9–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XP001
Pacific Island Fisheries; American
Samoa Bottomfish Fishery Disaster
Relief
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability of a draft
environmental assessment; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS announces the
availability of a draft environmental
assessment (EA) of the potential effects
of two construction projects. The EA
would support the release by NMFS of
Congressionally-appropriated funds for
disaster relief in the American Samoa
(AS) bottomfish fishery. The AS
Department of Marine and Wildlife
Resources (DMWR) would use the funds
to construct a boat ramp and ice house
in Pago Pago Harbor.
DATES: NMFS must receive comments
by July 25, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on this document, identified by NOAA–
NMFS–2019–0075, by either of the
following methods:
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:32 Jul 09, 2019
Jkt 247001
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20190075, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: Send written comments to
Michael D. Tosatto, Regional
Administrator, NMFS Pacific Islands
Region (PIR), 1845 Wasp Blvd., Bldg.
176, Honolulu, HI 96818.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on https://www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/
A’’ in the required fields if you wish to
remain anonymous).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Phyllis Ha, Sustainable Fisheries, NMFS
PIR, tel 808–725–5000.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
September 29, 2009, a submarine
earthquake in the Pacific generated a
tsunami that caused widespread
damage, loss of life, and injuries in AS
and elsewhere. The waves damaged
coastal areas of Tutuila and the other AS
islands. After President Obama declared
a major disaster in the Territory of
American Samoa (DR–1859; September
29, 2009), the Governor of American
Samoa sought fishery disaster assistance
in accordance with processes provided
in the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act) and the Interjurisdictional Fisheries Act (IFA).
Damage assessment reports prepared
by the DMWR, the Western Pacific
Fishery Management Council (Council),
and NMFS documented extensive
damage to the harbor and floating docks
in Pago Pago, damaged and destroyed
alia (small fishing vessels), fishing gear,
infrastructure, as well as lost fishing
opportunities resulting in reduced food
supply and income from the bottomfish
fishery. The formerly productive and
profitable bottomfish fishery was
estimated to have lost 80% of its
revenue after the tsunami. The Council
reported that 17 vessels (50 percent of
the fleet) were damaged or destroyed
and lost income was estimated to be
around $200,000. The AS government
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
estimated the value of the fishery failure
to be approximately $5 million.
After considering results of damage
assessment reports, the Secretary of
Commerce determined that a
commercial fishery failure occurred for
the bottomfish fishery in AS due to a
fisheries resource disaster. The
Secretary noted that the tsunami caused
significant loss of access to the fishery
resource and revenues declines and the
effects met with criteria in MagnusonStevens Act section 312(a) and IFA
section 308(b).
In 2014, Congress appropriated
disaster relief funding for NMFS to
provide assistance to AS. DMWR
proposes to use these funds to build a
small community boat ramp at the
southwestern-most terminus of Pago
Pago Harbor, and a small ice house at
the DMWR administrative work station
in Fagatogo (at Pago Pago Harbor). The
boat ramp would relieve boat traffic
congestion in the area and result in
improved launching and return of
fishing vessels. The ice house would
house and protect ice machines that
produce ice used by bottomfish
fishermen to maintain the quality of the
fish they harvest.
NMFS has produced a draft EA to
evaluate the environmental effects of
building the boat ramp and ice house.
The draft EA shows that the
construction includes several provisions
intended to protect water quality in the
harbor and prevent large adverse effects
on wildlife. NMFS is seeking public
comments on the draft EA.
Dated: July 5, 2019.
Jennifer M. Wallace,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2019–14668 Filed 7–9–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING
COMMISSION
Request for Nominations for the
Climate-Related Market Risk
Subcommittee Under the Market Risk
Advisory Committee
Commodity Futures Trading
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Commodity Futures
Trading Commission (CFTC or
Commission) is requesting nominations
for membership on the Climate-Related
Market Risk Subcommittee
(Subcommittee) under the Market Risk
Advisory Committee (MRAC). The
MRAC is a discretionary advisory
committee established by the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM
10JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 132 (Wednesday, July 10, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32881-32888]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-14683]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XR014
Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities;
Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Bremerton Ferry Terminal Dolphin
Relocation Project in Washington State
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; incidental harassment authorization; request for
comments on proposed renewal.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS received a request from the Washington State Department
of Transportation (WSDOT) for the Renewal of their currently active
incidental harassment authorization (IHA) to take marine mammals
incidental to the dolphin (a man-made structure that protects other
structures from being struck by boats) relocation project at the
Bremerton Ferry Terminal in Washington State. These activities consist
of activities that are covered by the current authorization but will
not be completed prior to its expiration. Pursuant to the Marine Mammal
Protection Act (MMPA), prior to issuing the currently active IHA, NMFS
requested comments on both the proposed IHA and the potential for
renewing the initial authorization if certain requirements were
satisfied. The Renewal requirements have been satisfied, and NMFS is
now providing an additional 15-day comment period to allow for any
additional comments on the requested Renewal not previously provided
during the initial 30-day comment period.
DATES: Comments and information must be received no later than July 25,
2019.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to Jolie Harrison, Chief,
Permits and Conservation Division, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service. Physical comments should be sent to
1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910 and electronic comments
should be sent to [email protected].
Instructions: NMFS is not responsible for comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or individual, or received after the
end of the comment period. Comments received electronically, including
all attachments, must not exceed a 25-megabyte file size. Attachments
to electronic comments will be accepted in Microsoft Word or Excel or
Adobe PDF file formats only. All comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be posted online at https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/permit/incidental-take-authorizations-under-marine-mammal-protection-act without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address) voluntarily submitted by the
commenter may be publicly accessible. Do not submit confidential
business information or otherwise sensitive or protected information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Fowler, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, (301) 427-8401. Electronic copies of the original
application, Renewal request, and supporting documents (including NMFS
Federal Register notices of the original proposed and final
authorizations, and the previous IHA), as well as a list of the
references cited in this document, may be obtained online at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/permit/incidental-take-authorizations-under-marine-mammal-protection-act. In case of problems accessing these
documents, please call the contact listed above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The MMPA prohibits the ``take'' of marine mammals, with certain
exceptions. Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361
et seq.) direct the Secretary of Commerce (as delegated to NMFS) to
allow, upon request, the incidental, but not intentional, taking of
small numbers of marine mammals by U.S. citizens who engage in a
specified activity (other than commercial fishing) within a specified
geographical region if certain findings are made and either regulations
are issued or, if the taking is limited to harassment, a notice of a
proposed incidental take authorization is provided to the public for
review.
Authorization for incidental takings shall be granted if NMFS finds
that the taking will have a negligible impact on the species or
stock(s) and will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for taking for subsistence uses
(where relevant). Further, NMFS must prescribe the permissible methods
of taking and other ``means of effecting the least practicable adverse
impact'' on the affected species or stocks and their habitat, paying
particular attention to rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of similar
significance, and on the availability of such species or stocks for
taking for certain subsistence uses (referred to here as ``mitigation
measures''). Monitoring and reporting of such takings are also
required. The meaning of key terms such as ``take,'' ``harassment,''
and ``negligible impact'' can be found in section 3 of the MMPA (16
U.S.C. 1362) and the agency's regulations at 50 CFR 216.103.
NMFS' regulations implementing the MMPA at 50 CFR 216.107(e)
indicate that IHAs may be renewed for additional periods of time not to
exceed one year for each reauthorization. In the notice of proposed IHA
for the initial authorization, NMFS described the circumstances under
which we would consider issuing a Renewal for this activity, and
requested public comment on a potential Renewal under those
circumstances. Specifically, on a case-by-case basis, NMFS may issue a
one-year IHA Renewal when (1) another year of identical or nearly
identical activities as described in the Specified Activities section
is planned or (2) the activities would not be completed by the time the
IHA expires and a second IHA would allow for completion of the
activities beyond that described in the Dates and Duration section of
the initial IHA. All of the following conditions must be met in order
to issue a Renewal:
A request for Renewal is received no later than 60 days
prior to expiration of the current IHA;
The request for Renewal must include the following:
(1) An explanation that the activities to be conducted beyond the
initial dates either are identical to the previously analyzed
activities or include changes so minor (e.g., reduction in pile size)
that the changes do not affect the previous analyses, take estimates,
or mitigation and monitoring requirements; and
(2) A preliminary monitoring report showing the results of the
required monitoring to date and an explanation showing that the
monitoring results do not indicate impacts of a scale or nature not
previously analyzed or authorized.
Upon review of the request for Renewal, the status of the
affected species or stocks, and any other pertinent information, NMFS
[[Page 32882]]
determines that there are no more than minor changes in the activities,
the mitigation and monitoring measures remain the same and appropriate,
and the initial findings remain valid.
An additional public comment period of 15 days (for a total of 45
days), with direct notice by email, phone, or postal service to
commenters on the initial IHA, is provided to allow for any additional
comments on the proposed Renewal. A description of the Renewal process
may be found on our website at: www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/incidental-harassment-authorization-renewals. Any
comments received on the potential Renewal, along with relevant
comments on the initial IHA, have been considered in the development of
this proposed IHA Renewal, and a summary of agency responses to
applicable comments is included in this notice. NMFS will consider any
additional public comments prior to making any final decision on the
issuance of the requested Renewal, and agency responses will be
summarized in the final notice of our decision.
National Environmental Policy Act
Issuance of an MMPA 101(a)(5)(D) authorization requires compliance
with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
NMFS preliminary determined the issuance of the proposed Renewal is
consistent with categories of activities identified in CE B4 (issuance
of incidental harassment authorizations under section 101(a)(5)(A) and
(D) of the MMPA for which no serious injury or mortality is
anticipated) of NOAA's Companion Manual for NAO 216-6A, and we have not
identified any extraordinary circumstances listed in Chapter 4 of the
Companion Manual for NAO 216-6A that would preclude this categorical
exclusion under NEPA.
We will review all comments submitted in response to this notice
prior to making a final decision as to whether application of this CE
is appropriate in this circumstance.
History of Request
On August 24, 2018, NMFS issued an IHA to WSDOT to take marine
mammals incidental to Bremerton and Edmonds Ferry Terminal Dolphin
Relocation Project in Washington State (83 FR 45897; September 11,
2018), effective from October 1, 2018 through September 31, 2019. On
May 8, 2019, NMFS received a request for the Renewal of that initial
IHA. As described in the request for Renewal, the activities for which
incidental take is requested consist of activities that are covered by
the initial authorization but will not be completed prior to its
expiration. As required, the applicant also provided a preliminary
monitoring report (available at https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/permit/incidental-take-authorizations-under-marine-mammal-protection-act),
which confirms that the applicant has implemented the required
mitigation and monitoring, and which also shows that no impacts of a
scale or nature not previously analyzed or authorized have occurred as
a result of the activities conducted.
Description of the Specified Activities and Anticipated Impacts
WSDOT proposes to relocate one dolphin to improve safety at the
Bremerton Ferry Terminal. The Olympic Class ferries have an atypical
shape, which at some terminals causes the vessels to make contact with
the inner dolphin prior to the stern of the vessel reaching the
intermediate or outer dolphin. This tends to cause rotation of the
vessel away from the wingwalls, which presents a safety issue.
Relocating the dolphin will reduce the risk of landing issues for
Olympic Class ferries at the Bremerton ferry terminal. Due to NMFS and
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) in-water work timing
restrictions to protect ESA-listed salmonids, planned WSDOT in-water
construction at the Bremerton ferry terminal is limited to August 1,
2019 through February 15, 2020. All work proposed by WSDOT would be
conducted within this window.
The specified activities described for this Renewal are an
identical subset of the activities covered by the initial IHA. NMFS
previously published notices of proposed IHA (83 FR 16330; April 16,
2018) and issued IHA (83 FR 45897; September 11, 2018). These
documents, as well as WSDOT's initial IHA application and the
preliminary monitoring report for the previously issued IHA, are
available at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/action/incidental-take-authorization-washington-state-department-transportation-ferry-terminal.
Similarly, the anticipated impacts are identical to those described
in the initial IHA. Specifically, we anticipate the take of individuals
of eleven marine mammal stocks (including four pinniped and seven
cetacean stocks), by Level B harassment only, incidental to noise
resulting from pile driving associated with the proposed activities.
WSDOT was not able to complete the pile driving activities analyzed in
the initial IHA by the date that IHA is set to expire and anticipates
the need for additional pile driving to complete the project.
The following documents are referenced in this notice and include
important supporting information, and may be found at the indicated
location:
Initial Proposed IHA: Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental
to Specified Activities; Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Bremerton
and Edmonds Ferry Terminals Dolphin Relocation Project in Washington
State (83 FR 16330; April 16, 2018). Available at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/action/incidental-take-authorization-washington-state-department-transportation-ferry-terminal;
Initial Final IHA: Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to
Specified Activities; Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Bremerton and
Edmonds Ferry Terminals Dolphin Relocation Project in Washington State
(83 FR 45897; September 11, 2018). Available at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/action/incidental-take-authorization-washington-state-department-transportation-ferry-terminal; and
Preliminary Monitoring Report from Initial IHA. Available
at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/action/incidental-take-authorization-washington-state-department-transportation-ferry-terminal.
Detailed Description of the Activity
As described above, WSDOT was not able to complete the activities
analyzed in the initial IHA by the date that IHA is set to expire
(September 30, 2019). As such, the activities WSDOT proposes to conduct
between August 1, 2019 and February 15, 2020 would be a continuation of
the activities as described in the initial 2018 IHA and would be
identical to the activities analyzed in the initial IHA (e.g., same
location, equipment, methods, seasonality). The initial IHA analyzed
the potential impacts to marine mammals from the relocation of one
dolphin each at the Edmonds and Bremerton ferry terminals to
accommodate the Olympic Class ferries.
WSDOT completed all planned activities at the Edmonds ferry
terminal in the 2018-2019 in-water work period but no work was
conducted at the Bremerton ferry terminal. The numbers of each pile
size that were planned to be driven during the 2018-2019 work window is
shown in Table 1 of the initial proposed IHA (83 FR 16330; April 16,
2018). WETA planned to install and remove a total of 30 piles in the
2018-2019 work window (11 at the Edmonds ferry terminal and 19 at the
Bremerton ferry terminal). However, as described above, WSDOT was only
able
[[Page 32883]]
to complete pile driving at the Edmonds ferry terminal. Four 36-inch
steel pipe piles were removed with a vibratory hammer and seven steel
pipe piles (three 30-inch and four 36-inch) were installed with a
vibratory hammer at the Edmonds ferry terminal. Construction occurred
on six days between January 29 and February 7, 2019. WSDOT therefore
proposes to complete pile driving activities at the Bremerton ferry
terminal in the 2019-2020 work window.
The proposed activities at the Bremerton ferry terminal include
vibratory installation and removal of steel pipe piles. A total of 19
steel pipe piles will be installed and removed at the Bremerton ferry
terminal. One temporary 36-inch indicator pile will be installed with a
vibratory hammer. The temporary indicator pile will be used as a visual
landing aid for vessel captains during construction. Once the indicator
pile is in place, the 6 36-inch piles that comprise the left outer
dolphin will be removed with a vibratory hammer and/or by direct pull
and clamshell removal. Using a vibratory hammer, three 30-inch reaction
piles will be installed as a back group of piles to provide stability
to the dolphin. A concrete diaphragm atop the back piles will be
installed, followed by four additional 30-inch reaction piles installed
with a vibratory hammer. Three 36-inch steel pipe fender piles will be
installed with a vibratory hammer. Fenders and rub panels will be
installed to absorb energy from the vessel as it makes contact with the
dolphin. Finally, using a vibratory hammer, the 36-inch temporary
indicator pile will be removed and reinstalled as the last fender pile.
Vibratory removal of both 30- and 36-inch piles is expected to take up
to 15 minutes per pile. Vibratory installation of 30- and 36-inch piles
is expected to take up to 20 minutes per pile. Underwater sound
resulting from pile driving could result in the harassment of marine
mammals. The proposed Renewal would be effective from August 1, 2019
through July 31, 2020.
Description of Marine Mammals
A description of the marine mammals in the area of the activities
for which authorization of take is proposed here, including information
on abundance, status, distribution, and hearing, may be found in the
Notices of the proposed IHA for the initial authorization (83 FR 16330;
April 16, 2018). The marine mammal species for which take was
authorized in the initial IHA, and for which take is proposed in this
requested Renewal are: Pacific harbor seal (Phoca vitulina richardii),
Northern elephant seal (Mirounga angustirostris), California sea lion
(Zalophus californianus), eastern Distinct Population Segment (eDPS)
Steller sea lion (Eumetopias jubatus), transient killer whales (Orcinus
orca), gray whale (Eschrichtius robustus), humpback whale (Megaptera
novaeangliae), minke whale (Balaenoptera acutorostrata), harbor
porpoise (Phocoena phocoena), Dall's porpoise (Phocoenoides dalli), and
common dolphin (Delphinus delphis).
NMFS has reviewed the monitoring data from the initial IHA, recent
draft Stock Assessment Reports, information on relevant Unusual
Mortality Events, and other scientific literature. The 2018 Stock
Assessment Report notes that the estimated abundance of California sea
lions has decreased slightly and the estimated abundances of Eastern
North Pacific gray whales and California/Oregon/Washington humpback
whales increased slightly. Additionally, since January 1, 2019,
elevated gray whale strandings have occurred along the west coast of
North America from Mexico through Alaska. NMFS declared an Unusual
Mortality Event on May 31, 2019. As of June 27, 2019, a total of 85
gray whales have stranded along the U.S. coast, with a combined
additional 86 whales stranded in Mexico and Canada. Full or partial
necropsy examinations have been conducted on a subset of the stranded
gray whales. Preliminary findings in several of the whales have shown
evidence of emaciation. However, neither this nor any other new
information affects which species or stocks have the potential to be
affected or the pertinent information in the Description of the Marine
Mammals in the Area of Specified Activities contained in the supporting
documents for the initial IHA.
Potential Effects on Marine Mammals and Their Habitat
A description of the potential effects of the specified activity on
marine mammals and their habitat for the activities for which take is
proposed here may be found in the Notices of the proposed IHA for the
initial authorization (83 FR 16330; April 16, 2018). NMFS has reviewed
the monitoring data from the initial IHA, recent draft Stock Assessment
Reports, information on relevant Unusual Mortality Events, and other
scientific literature, and determined that neither this nor any other
new information affects our initial analysis of impacts on marine
mammals and their habitat.
Estimated Take
A detailed description of the methods and inputs used to estimate
take for the specified activity are found in the Notice of proposed IHA
(83 FR 16330; April 16, 2018) and issued IHA (83 FR 45897; September
11, 2018) for the initial authorization. The pile driving equipment
that may result in take, as well as the source levels, marine mammal
stocks taken, and the methods of take estimation remain unchanged from
the previously issued IHA. Changes in the density of seven stocks are
indicated below, though they result in only minor changes in the take
estimates that do not affect our findings, as described.
Authorized takes would be by Level B harassment only, in the form
of disruption of behavioral patterns for individual marine mammals
resulting from exposure to acoustic sources (i.e., vibratory pile
driving). Based on the nature of the activity and the anticipated
effectiveness of the mitigation measures (i.e., shutdowns) discussed in
detail below in Proposed Mitigation section, Level A harassment is
neither anticipated nor proposed to be authorized.
As described above, WSDOT completed all pile driving activities at
the Edmonds ferry terminal in the 2018-2019 in-water work period and
proposes to install and remove a total of 19 piles at the Bremerton
ferry terminal in the 2019-2020 work period to complete the project.
All piles to be installed and removed at the Bremerton ferry terminal
would be 30- and 36-inch steel pipe piles. The number of piles for each
respective size and element are shown in Table 1.
Table 1--Number and Sizes of Piles Proposed for Installation and Removal, and Estimated Duration of Pile Driving
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Duration/pile Number of Duration
Pile element Method Size (inch) piles (min) piles per day (days)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicator pile............................ Vibratory install........... 36 1 20 1 1
[[Page 32884]]
Indicator pile............................ Vibratory removal........... 36 1 15 1 1
Existing dolphin.......................... Vibratory removal........... 36 6 15 3 2
Relocate dolphin install.................. Vibratory install........... 36 4 20 3 2
Relocated dolphin install................. Vibratory install........... 30 7 20 3 3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total................................. ............................ .............. 19 345 .............. 9
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Distances to the isopleths corresponding to the Level B harassment
threshold for each pile size are shown in Table 2. Distances to the
isopleths corresponding to the Level A harassment thresholds for the
various marine mammal functional hearing groups, by pile size and
duration of pile driving, are shown in Table 3. Descriptions of the
modeling methods used to determine the distances shown in Tables 2 and
3 are described in detail in the Notice of proposed IHA (83 FR 16330;
April 16, 2018) for the initial IHA. These methods have not changed
from the initial IHA, and all values shown in Tables 2 and 3 have not
changed from the initial IHA.
Table 2--Distances to Isopleths Corresponding to the Level B Harassment
Threshold
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Distance to
Level B
Pile driving activity harassment
threshold
(m)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
36-inch steel pile (installation and removal).............. 63,100
30-inch steel pile (installation).......................... 39,800
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 3--Distances to Isopleths Corresponding to Level A Harassment Thresholds
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Distance to Level A harassment threshold (m)
Pile driving activity -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LF Cetacean MF Cetacean HF Cetacean Phocid Otariid
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
36-inch indicator pile install 10 10 25 10 10
(1 pile/day)...................
36-inch indicator pile removal 10 10 10 10 10
(1 pile/day)...................
36-inch steel pile (existing 25 10 35 10 10
dolphin) removal (3 piles/day).
36-inch steel pile (relocated 25 10 35 10 10
dolphin) install (3 piles/day).
30-inch steel pile (relocated 25 10 25 10 10
dolphin) install (3 piles/day).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As the number of pile driving days that would occur in this year of
activity is less than the number of pile driving days analyzed in the
initial IHA, the number of takes estimated to occur in the 2019-2020
work season, and requested for this Renewal, has changed from the
number of takes authorized in the initial IHA. Take numbers authorized
in the initial IHA are shown in Table 7 in the Notice of issued IHA (83
FR 45897; September 11, 2018), available at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/action/incidental-take-authorization-washington-state-department-transportation-ferry-terminal.
The number of takes requested for this Renewal, for each marine
mammal stock, are shown in Table 4. Auditory injury (i.e., Level A
harassment) is unlikely to occur for any species or stock, given the
small injury zones. Since the largest Level A distance is only 35 m
from the source for high-frequency cetaceans (harbor porpoise and
Dall's porpoise, Table 3), NMFS expects that WSDOT can effectively
monitor such small zones to implement shutdown measures and avoid Level
A takes. Therefore, no Level A take of marine mammal is anticipated nor
proposed to be authorized for the pile driving activities at the
Bremerton ferry terminal.
To inform take estimates in the initial IHA, marine mammal
densities were taken from the U.S. Navy's Marine Species Density
Database (MSDD; U.S. Navy 2015). Since then, the Navy has published an
updated MSDD for the Phase III Northwest Training and Testing Study
Area with updated densities for marine mammal species in the inland
waters of Puget Sound (U.S. Navy 2019). In the 2019 MSDD, densities of
harbor seals, northern elephant seals, gray whales, and humpback whales
increased from those presented in the 2015 MSDD, while densities of
harbor porpoises, Dall's porpoises, and transient killer whales
decreased. The densities of Steller sea lion and minke whale remained
the same in both iterations of the MSDD. While updated densities for
marine mammals were used here, the method of calculating estimated
takes remains identical to that used in the initial IHA. For all marine
mammals except California sea lions, takes were calculated by
multiplying the ensonified area by the average animal density in the
area (U.S. Navy 2019) and the number of days of pile driving (9 days),
rounded up to the nearest integer. Take of California sea lions was
calculated by multiplying the average number of California sea lions
sighted in daily monitoring at the U.S. Navy's Bremerton Shipyard (69
animals) by the number of days of pile driving (9 days).
Using the take calculation method described above (area x density x
days) resulted in estimated zero takes of some species, despite
possible presence in the project area. In these cases, take was
estimated by incorporating typical group size and/or potential for
occurrence during the project work period. Specifically, take of
northern elephant seals was calculated by assuming one seal may be
present each day for a total of nine takes by Level B
[[Page 32885]]
harassment. Take of transient killer whales was calculated by assuming
one group of six killer whales (mean group size (Shields et al., 2018))
may enter the Level B harassment zone twice over the course of the
project for a total of 12 takes by Level B harassment. Takes of gray
whales, humpback whales, and minke whales was estimated by assuming one
of each species may be present every other day during the nine days of
pile driving, for a total of five takes by Level B harassment for each
species. Dall's porpoises are considered rare in Puget Sound waters
(U.S. Navy 2019) but a large group of 15 Dall's porpoises may enter the
Level B harassment zone once during pile driving activities. Finally,
take of common dolphins was calculated by assuming one group of seven
dolphins (mean group size (CRC 2017)) may enter the Level B harassment
zone once over the course of the project. No takes of Southern Resident
killer whales were calculated, and due to mitigation measures proposed
by WSDOT (described in detail below), no takes are anticipated or
requested for this Renewal.
Here, we describe in summary how the changes in density estimates
affect the take estimates in this requested Renewal in relation to the
take estimates in the initial IHA. For some species, the updated
density estimates had no effect on estimated take. Even with increased
densities, calculated takes of northern elephant seals, Southern
Resident killer whales, transient killer whales, gray whales, humpback
whales, minke whales, and common dolphins were zero animals taken. For
these species, the proposed take was estimated as described above, and
the updated densities had no effect on the number of takes. The
estimated takes of two species were affected by the changes in density
estimates, harbor seals and harbor porpoises.
The estimated density of harbor porpoises decreased from the 2015
MSDD (used to calculate takes in the initial IHA) to the 2019 MSDD. As
a result, the calculated take estimate decreased, from 69 takes by
Level B harassment at the Bremerton ferry terminal in the initial IHA
to 64 takes by Level B harassment proposed for take by Level B
harassment here. This represents a seven percent decrease. Since the
number of harbor porpoises estimated to be taken by Level B harassment
here are fewer than that authorized in the initial IHA, this change has
no effect on our findings.
The initial IHA authorized a total of 2,286 Level B takes of harbor
seals, with an estimated 145 harbor seals taken at the Bremerton ferry
terminal and 2,141 harbor seals taken at the Edmonds ferry terminal.
Using the updated 2019 MSDD, the calculated takes of harbor seals at
the Bremerton terminal increased to 465. While this increase is
notable, the total estimated take is well below that authorized for
both the Bremerton and Edmonds ferry terminals in the initial IHA.
Additionally, the monitoring report from pile driving completed at the
Edmonds terminal reports only 37 harbor seals taken by Level B
harassment, indicating that the actual number of animals that occur are
far below the number of takes authorized.
Table 4--Total Takes Proposed for Renewal
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Species Level B Level A Total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Harbor seal..................................................... 465 0 \a\ 465
Northern elephant seal.......................................... 9 0 9
California sea lion............................................. 621 0 621
Steller sea lion................................................ 6 0 6
Southern Resident killer whale.................................. 0 0 0
Transient killer whale.......................................... 12 0 12
Gray whale...................................................... 5 0 5
Humpback whale.................................................. 5 0 5
Minke whale..................................................... 5 0 5
Harbor porpoise................................................. 64 0 \b\ 64
Dall's porpoise................................................. 15 0 15
Common dolphin.................................................. 7 0 7
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Take estimate increased from initial IHA due to increased density.
\b\ Take estimate decreased from initial IHA due to decreased density.
Description of Proposed Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Measures
The proposed mitigation, monitoring, and reporting measures
included as requirements in this authorization are identical to those
included in the Notice announcing the issuance of the initial IHA (83
FR 45897; September 11, 2018), and the discussion of the least
practicable adverse impact included in that document remains accurate.
The following measures are proposed for this renewal:
Pre-activity monitoring will take place from 30 minutes prior to
initiation of pile driving activity and post-activity monitoring will
continue through 30 minutes post-completion of pile driving activity.
Pile driving may commence at the end of the 30-minute pre-activity
monitoring period, provided observers have determined that the shutdown
zone (described below) is clear of marine mammals, which includes
delaying start of pile driving activities if a marine mammal is sighted
in the zone, as described below. A determination that the shutdown zone
is clear must be made during a period of good visibility (i.e., the
entire shutdown zone and surrounding waters must be visible to the
naked eye).
If a marine mammal approaches or enters the shutdown zone during
activities or pre-activity monitoring, all pile driving activities at
that location shall be halted or delayed, respectively. If pile driving
is halted or delayed due to the presence of a marine mammal, the
activity may not resume or commence until either the animal has
voluntarily left and been visually confirmed beyond the shutdown zone
and 15 or 30 minutes (for pinnipeds/small cetaceans or large cetaceans,
respectively) have passed without re-detection of the animal. Pile
driving activities include the time to install or remove a single pile
or series of piles, as long as the time elapsed between uses of the
pile driving equipment is no more than thirty minutes.
To prevent Level A harassment of marine mammals, WSDOT must
establish shutdown zones equivalent to the Level A harassment zones. If
the Level A harassment zone is less than 10 m, a minimum 10 m shutdown
zone must be enforced. The required
[[Page 32886]]
shutdown zones are presented in Table 5.
Table 5--Shutdown Distances for Pile Driving Activities
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shutdown distance (m)
Pile type, size & pile driving -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
method LF cetacean MF cetacean HF cetacean Phocid Otariid
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
36-inch indicator pile 10 10 25 10 10
installation...................
36-inch indicator pile removal.. 10 10 10 10 10
36-inch steel dolphin pile 25 10 35 10 10
removal........................
36-inch steel dolphin pile 25 10 35 10 10
installation...................
30-inch steel dolphin pile 25 10 25 10 10
installation...................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition to the Level A shutdown measures described above, WSDOT
must implement shutdown measures if Southern Resident killer whales are
sighted within the vicinity of the project and are approaching the
Level B harassment zone during pile driving activities. If a killer
whale approaches the Level B harassment zone and it is unknown if the
animal is a Southern Resident or a transient killer whale, it must be
assumed to be a Southern Resident killer whale and WSDOT must implement
the shutdown measures described above. If a Southern Resident killer
whale enters the Level B harassment zone undetected, pile driving must
cease upon observation of the animal and must be suspended until the
animal exits the Level B harassment zone.
If a species for which authorization has not been granted, or a
species for which authorization has been granted but the authorized
takes are met, is observed approaching or within the Level B harassment
zones, pile driving and removal activities must cease immediately using
delay and shutdown procedures. Similarly, if an animal is observed
approaching or within the Level A harassment zones, pile driving and
removal activities must cease immediately. Activities must not resume
until the animal has been confirmed to have left the area or 15 or 30
minutes (pinniped/small cetacean or large cetacean, respectively) has
elapsed.
For all pile driving activities, a minimum of three Protected
Species Observers (PSOs) will be required, two land-based and one
vessel-based. One PSO must be stationed at the active pile driving rig
or at the best vantage point practicable to monitor the shutdown zones
for marine mammals and implement shutdown or delay procedures when
applicable through communication with the equipment operator.
Monitoring of pile driving must be conducted by qualified PSOs (see
below) who have no other assigned tasks during monitoring periods.
WSDOT will adhere to the following conditions when selecting observers:
Independent PSOs must be used (i.e., not construction
personnel);
A lead observer or monitoring coordinator must be
designated. The lead observer must have prior experience working as a
marine mammal observer during construction;
Other PSOs may substitute education (degree in biological
science or related field) or training for experience; and
WSDOT must submit PSO CVs for approval by NMFS.
WSDOT must ensure that observers have the following additional
qualifications:
Ability to conduct field observations and collect data
according to assigned protocols;
Experience or training in the field identification of
marine mammals, including the identification of behaviors;
Sufficient training, orientation, or experience with the
construction operation to provide for personal safety during
observations;
Writing skills sufficient to prepare a report of
observations including but not limited to the number and species of
marine mammals observed; dates and times when in-water construction
activities were conducted; dates, times, and reason for implementation
of mitigation (or why mitigation was not implemented when required);
and marine mammal behavior; and
Ability to communicate orally, by radio or in person, with
project personnel to provide real-time information on marine mammals
observed in the area as necessary.
PSOs must collect the following information during marine mammal
monitoring:
Dates and times (begin and end) of all marine mammal
monitoring;
Construction activities occurring during each daily
observation period, including how many and what type of piles were
driven or removed;
Weather parameters and water conditions during each
monitoring period (e.g., wind speed, percent cover, visibility, sea
state);
The number of marine mammals observed, by species,
relative to the pile location and if pile driving or removal was
occurring at time of sighting;
Age and sex class, if possible, of all marine mammals
observed;
PSO locations during marine mammal monitoring;
Distances and bearings of each marine mammal observed to
the pile being driven or removed for each sighting (if pile driving or
removal was occurring at time of sighting);
Description of any marine mammal behavior patterns during
observation, including direction of travel;
Number of individuals of each species (differentiated by
month as appropriate) detected within the monitoring zone, and
estimates of number of marine mammals taken, by species (a correction
factor may be applied to total take numbers, as appropriate);
Detailed information about any implementation of any
mitigation triggered (e.g., shutdowns and delays), a description of
specific actions that ensued, and resulting behavior of the animal, if
any; and
Description of attempts to distinguish between the number
of individual animals taken and the number of incidences of take, such
as ability to track groups or individuals.
WSDOT must submit a draft monitoring report within 90 days after
completion of the construction work or the expiration of the IHA,
whichever comes earlier. This report must include the information
described above. A final report must be prepared and submitted to NMFS
within 30 days following resolution of comments from NMFS on the draft
report. If NMFS has no comments on the draft report, the draft will be
considered the final report.
In addition, NMFS would require WSDOT to notify NMFS' Office of
Protected Resources and NMFS' West
[[Page 32887]]
Coast Region Stranding Coordinator within 48 hours of sighting an
injured or dead marine mammal in the construction site. WSDOT must
provide NMFS and the Stranding Network with the species or description
of the animal(s), the condition of the animal(s) (including carcass
condition, if the animal is dead), location, time of first discovery,
observed behaviors (if alive), and photo or video (if available). In
the event that WSDOT finds an injured or dead marine mammal that is not
in the construction area, WSDOT must report the same information as
listed above to NMFS as soon as operationally feasible.
Public Comments
As noted previously, NMFS published a notice of a proposed IHA (83
FR 16330; April 16, 2018) and solicited public comments on both our
proposal to issue the initial IHA for pile driving at the Bremerton and
Edmonds ferry terminals and on the potential for a Renewal, should
certain requirements be met. All public comments were addressed in the
notice announcing the issuance of the initial IHA (83 FR 45897;
September 11, 2018). Below, we describe how we have addressed, with
updated information where appropriate, any comments received that
specifically pertain to the Renewal of the 2018 IHA.
Comment: The Marine Mammal Commission (Commission) requested
clarification of certain issues associated with NMFS's notice that one-
year Renewals can be issued in certain limited circumstances and
expressed concern that the process would bypass the public notice and
comment requirements. The Commission also suggested that NMFS should
discuss the possibility of Renewals through a more general route, such
as a rulemaking, instead of notice in a specific authorization. The
Commission further recommended that if NMFS did not pursue a more
general route, that the agency provide the Commission and the public
with a legal analysis supporting our conclusion that this process is
consistent with the requirements of section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA.
Response: The notice of the proposed initial IHA expressly notified
and invited comment from the public on the possibility that under
certain, limited conditions the applicant could seek a Renewal IHA for
an additional year. The notice described the conditions under which
such a Renewal request could be considered and expressly sought public
comment in the event such a Renewal were sought for this action.
Further, since issuance of the initial IHA, NMFS has modified the
Renewal process to provide notice through the Federal Register and an
additional 15-day public comment period at the time the Renewal IHA is
requested. NMFS also will provide direct notice of the requested
Renewal to those who commented on the initial IHA, to provide an
opportunity to submit any additional comments.
We appreciate the Commission's suggestion that NMFS discuss the
potential for IHA Renewals through a more general route, such as a
rulemaking. However, utilizing the public comment process associated
with IHAs is more efficient for the agency, while still providing for
appropriate public input into NMFS' decision-making. Further, NMFS'
recent modification to the Renewal process (i.e., soliciting additional
public comment at the time of a Renewal request) should alleviate the
Commission's concern about the lack of additional public comment and
need for a more general rulemaking.
For more information, NMFS has published a description of the
Renewal process on our website (available at www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/incidental-harassment-authorization-renewals).
Preliminary Determinations
WSDOT's proposed activity is identical to the activity analyzed in
our previously issued Notices of proposed IHA and issued IHA (with the
exception of the number of piles proposed for installation and removal,
which is less than the number analyzed in those documents). We
concluded that the initial IHA would have a negligible impact on all
marine mammal stocks and species and that the taking would be small
relative to population sizes. The marine mammal information, potential
effects, and the mitigation and monitoring measures remain the same as
those analyzed in the previously issued Notices of proposed IHA and
issued IHA, therefore the extensive analysis, as well as the associated
findings, included in the prior documents remain applicable.
The only differences between the initial IHA and this requested
Renewal is that the number of piles proposed for installation and
removal, and the numbers of marine mammal takes expected to occur
incidental to the proposed activities (including consideration of
changes in marine mammal density for several stocks), are lower than
the numbers analyzed and authorized in the previously issued IHA. As
both the number of piles and the number of takes expected to occur, and
requested, for this Renewal, are lower than in the initial IHA, we have
concluded that the effects of the requested Renewal would be the same
or less than those that were analyzed in the Notices of the initial
proposed IHA and issued IHA.
NMFS has preliminarily concluded that there is no new information
suggesting that our analysis or findings should change from those
reached for the initial IHA. This includes consideration of the
estimated abundance of California sea lions decreasing and the
estimated abundances of gray whales and humpback whales increasing, as
well as the ongoing gray whale Unusual Mortality Event, none of which
are expected to change our assessment of the effects of the takes from
this activity. Based on the information and analysis contained here and
in the referenced documents, NMFS has determined the following: (1) The
required mitigation measures will effect the least practicable impact
on marine mammal species or stocks and their habitat; (2) the
authorized takes will have a negligible impact on the affected marine
mammal species or stocks; (3) the authorized takes represent small
numbers of marine mammals relative to the affected stock abundances;
(4) WSDOT activities will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on
taking for subsistence purposes as no relevant subsistence uses of
marine mammals are implicated by this action, and; (5) appropriate
monitoring and reporting requirements are included.
Endangered Species Act
Section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA: 16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) requires that each Federal agency insure that any
action it authorizes, funds, or carries out is not likely to jeopardize
the continued existence of any endangered or threatened species or
result in the destruction or adverse modification of designated
critical habitat. To ensure ESA compliance for the issuance of IHAs,
NMFS consults internally, in this case with the West Coast Region
Protected Resources Division, whenever we propose to authorize take for
endangered or threatened species. The effects of this proposed federal
action were adequately analyzed in NMFS' Biological Opinion for the
Bremerton and Edmonds Ferry Terminals Dolphin Replacement Project,
dated March 22, 2018, which concluded that the take NMFS proposes to
authorize through this IHA would not jeopardize the continued existence
of any endangered or threatened species or destroy or adversely modify
any designated critical habitat.
[[Page 32888]]
Requested Renewal and Request for Public Comment
As a result of these preliminary determinations, NMFS proposes to
issue an IHA Renewal to WSDOT for conducting pile driving at the
Bremerton ferry terminal during the August 1, 2019 through February 15,
2020 in-water work window, provided the previously described
mitigation, monitoring, and reporting requirements are incorporated. A
draft of the proposed IHA can be found at https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/permit/incidental-take-authorizations-under-marine-mammal-protection-act. We request comment on our analyses, the
proposed Renewal, and any other aspect of this Notice. Please include
with your comments any supporting data or literature citations to help
inform our final decision on the request for MMPA authorization.
Dated: July 5, 2019.
Donna S. Wieting,
Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-14683 Filed 7-9-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P