Incorporating Alternative Approaches in Clinical Investigations for New Animal Drugs; Public Meeting; Request for Comments, 32749-32751 [2019-14528]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 131 / Tuesday, July 9, 2019 / Notices
recommendations of the 2015–2020
Dietary Guidelines for Americans,
developed for people 2 years and older,
which reflects current science on
nutrition to improve public health. The
Dietary Guidelines for Americans
focuses on dietary patterns and the
effects of food and nutrient
characteristics on health. FDA
recognizes the nutrition science that is
reflected in the guidelines, including
nutrition science that was based on
scientific analysis that considered
evidence regarding the net effects of
seafood consumption. In addition, the
guidelines recommend eating fish as
part of a healthy eating pattern because
there are benefits in doing so.
The process to develop the 2020–2025
Dietary Guidelines is under way, and
per the Agricultural Act of 2014, will
include a comprehensive review of
scientific evidence and development of
guidance for infants and toddlers from
birth to 24 months, as well as for
women who are pregnant. Additionally,
EPA is in the process of updating its
Integrated Risk Information System
(IRIS) Assessment for Methylmercury.
FDA will consider the final products
from these efforts, as appropriate, in any
future updates to the fish advice.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
IV. Request for Comments
FDA intends to develop educational
materials such as simple factsheets,
posters, infographics, and social media
tool-kits on the updated fish advice for
women who are or might become
pregnant, breastfeeding mothers, and
parents of young children. Specific
materials will also be developed for
health care professionals, health
educators, nutritionists, and dietitians.
These resources will be printable and
could be used in physician’s offices,
public health clinics, and stores.
FDA is seeking public comment on:
(1) Additional target populations that
should be considered who may benefit
from this advice;
(2) Additional information that
should be included in these educational
resources; and
(3) Additional effective means of
disseminating and broadening the reach
of this information.
While FDA welcomes comment at any
time, we would appreciate comments on
these questions by September 9, 2019.
V. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the internet
may obtain the advice at either https://
www.fda.gov/food/resources-you-food,
or https://www.regulations.gov. Use the
FDA website listed in the previous
sentence to find the most current
version of the advice.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:47 Jul 08, 2019
Jkt 247001
Dated: July 2, 2019.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019–14524 Filed 7–8–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2019–N–2281]
Incorporating Alternative Approaches
in Clinical Investigations for New
Animal Drugs; Public Meeting;
Request for Comments
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
Notice of public meeting;
request for comment.
ACTION:
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA, the Agency, or
we) is announcing a public meeting
entitled ‘‘Incorporating Alternative
Approaches in Clinical Investigations
for New Animal Drugs.’’ This public
meeting and request for comments is
intended to support FDA guidance
development as required by the Animal
Drug and Animal Generic Drug User Fee
Amendments of 2018. The topics to be
discussed will inform the development
of guidance to assist sponsors in
incorporating complex adaptive and
other novel investigation designs, data
from foreign countries, real world
evidence (including ongoing
surveillance activities, observational
studies, and registry data), biomarkers,
and surrogate endpoints into proposed
clinical investigation protocols and
applications for new animal drugs
under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act). FDA is
seeking comments from stakeholders,
including representatives of regulated
industry, consumer groups, academia,
veterinarians, and food producers.
DATES: The public meeting will be held
on July 16, 2019, from 8:30 a.m. to 5
p.m. Submit either electronic or written
comments on this public meeting by
August 17, 2019.
ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be
held at Johns Hopkins University—
Montgomery County, Gilchrist Hall,
9601 Medical Center Dr., Rockville, MD
20850. Free parking is available on site.
You may submit comments as
follows. Please note that late, untimely
filed comments will not be considered.
Electronic comments must be submitted
on or before August 17, 2019. The
https://www.regulations.gov electronic
filing system will accept comments
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32749
until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time at the end
of August 17, 2019. Comments received
by mail/hand delivery/courier (for
written/paper submissions) will be
considered timely if they are
postmarked or the delivery service
acceptance receipt is on or before that
date.
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Dockets
Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Dockets Management
Staff, FDA will post your comment, as
well as any attachments, except for
information submitted, marked and
identified, as confidential, if submitted
as detailed in ‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2019–N–2281 for ‘‘Incorporating
Alternative Approaches in Clinical
Investigations for New Animal Drugs.’’
Received comments, those filed in a
timely manner (see ADDRESSES), will be
placed in the docket and, except for
those submitted as ‘‘Confidential
Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the
Dockets Management Staff between 9
E:\FR\FM\09JYN1.SGM
09JYN1
32750
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 131 / Tuesday, July 9, 2019 / Notices
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
comments only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The
Agency will review this copy, including
the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The
second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information
redacted/blacked out, will be available
for public viewing and posted on
https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
both copies to the Dockets Management
Staff. If you do not wish your name and
contact information to be made publicly
available, you can provide this
information on the cover sheet and not
in the body of your comments and you
must identify this information as
‘‘confidential.’’ Any information marked
as ‘‘confidential’’ will not be disclosed
except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20
and other applicable disclosure law. For
more information about FDA’s posting
of comments to public dockets, see 80
FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://www.gpo.gov/
fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/201523389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Dockets Management
Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan Storey, Center for Veterinary
Medicine, Food and Drug
Administration, 7500 Standish Pl.,
HFV–131, Rockville, MD 20855, 240–
402–0578, susan.storey@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
I. Background
FDA is announcing a public meeting
entitled ‘‘Incorporating Alternative
Approaches in Clinical Investigations
for New Animal Drugs.’’ This public
meeting and request for comment is
intended to support FDA guidance
development as required under section
305 of the Animal Drug and Animal
Generic Drug User Fee Amendments of
2018 (Pub. L. 115–234). Section 305
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:47 Jul 08, 2019
Jkt 247001
directs FDA to develop guidance to
address several alternative approaches
in clinical investigations for new animal
drugs, including incorporating complex
adaptive and other novel investigation
designs, data from foreign countries,
real world evidence (including ongoing
surveillance activities, observational
studies, and registry data), biomarkers,
and surrogate endpoints into proposed
clinical investigation protocols and
applications for new animal drugs
under sections 512 and 571 of the FD&C
Act (21 U.S.C. 360b, 360ccc). Section
305 also directs FDA to conduct a
public meeting to allow the Agency to
gather input from stakeholders,
including representatives of regulated
industry, consumer groups, academia,
veterinarians, and food producers before
developing the guidance.
II. Topics for Discussion at the Public
Meeting
The purpose of this public meeting is
to facilitate discussion and obtain input
from stakeholders about the use of
complex adaptive and other novel
investigation designs, data from foreign
countries, real world evidence, and
biomarkers and surrogate endpoints in
drug development and regulatory
decision making.
The meeting is expected to include
four sessions that focus on the following
topics: (1) Complex adaptive and other
novel investigation designs; (2) data
from foreign countries; (3) real world
evidence; and, (4) biomarkers and
surrogate endpoints. Within each
session and following all sessions there
will be an opportunity for public
comment. To facilitate the development
of guidance on these topics, please
consider the following questions. When
responding please identify the topic and
question in your response.
Topic 1: Complex Adaptive and Other
Novel Investigation Designs
1. In September 2018, FDA published
draft Guidance for Industry: Adaptive
Designs for Clinical Trials of Drugs and
Biologics, which applies to human
drugs and biologics (https://
www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/
search-fda-guidance-documents/
adaptive-design-clinical-trials-drugsand-biologics). How should these apply
to study designs for animal drugs? What
are the potential study adaptation
features that could be applied to animal
drug investigations? What are the
challenges and possible solutions to
apply these adaptations to studies for
animal drugs? To what type of studies
for animal drugs would these study
designs be most applicable?
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2. How does complex adaptive design
differ from adaptive design? What
constitutes other novel investigation
designs? What examples are directly
applicable to animal drug development?
3. Are there partnerships that can be
formed between FDA and the regulated
industry, academia, or other groups to
facilitate the development or use of
these novel investigational designs for
animal drug development? What
strategic work is needed to enable the
regulated industry to make full use of
these novel investigational designs for
animal drug development? What
methods are needed, such as the use of
simulations or modeling, to facilitate the
use of these novel investigational
designs for animal drug development?
Topic 2: Data From Foreign Countries
For the purposes of this meeting, FDA
considers data from foreign countries to
be data from investigations or studies
conducted outside the United States
(U.S.). FDA can accept data from studies
conducted outside the United States to
support a new animal drug application,
provided the applicant demonstrates
that the data are adequate under
applicable standards to support
approval (section 569B of the FD&C Act;
21 U.S.C. 360bbb–8b). FDA also accepts
data from studies conducted outside the
United States to support a food additive
petition for a food additive intended for
use in animal food, when provided by
the petitioner (section 409(k)(1) of the
FD&C Act; 21 U.S.C. 348(k)(1)). While
the regulatory standards for approval
differ between animal drugs and animal
food additives, data from foreign
countries can be used to support either
approval if the data meet the
appropriate regulatory standards.
1. What challenges and potential
solutions do you have in meeting the
requirements of substantial evidence of
effectiveness, as defined in 21 CFR
514.4, when using data from foreign
countries for an animal drug?
2. Typically in the United States,
when we wish to show a test drug is no
worse than an active control, that active
control is an approved animal drug in
the United States. A non-inferiority
analysis is used to statistically
demonstrate this relationship. In studies
conducted outside the United States, an
active control may be used that is not
approved for that use in the United
States. In the absence of a U.S. approval
for the active control, FDA cannot
interpret non-inferiority to the
unapproved active control. What
challenges exist in utilizing these
studies? What criteria should FDA use
to accept a study where the active
control is not approved in the United
E:\FR\FM\09JYN1.SGM
09JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 131 / Tuesday, July 9, 2019 / Notices
States? What are potential options or
solutions to enable FDA to use these
studies?
3. What challenges exist in
demonstrating that data from foreign
countries were generated under
conditions representative of typical
conditions in the United States for an
animal drug or food additive? What are
potential solutions to these challenges?
4. What challenges exist in designing
studies for an animal drug or food
additive to meet the approval
requirements of different jurisdictions?
What are possible solutions to these
challenges?
5. What challenges exist in study
conduct and the collection and
interpretability of data from foreign
countries (both manual and electronic)
that may influence study quality and
data integrity to support the approval of
an animal drug or food additive? What
are possible solutions to these
challenges?
6. What other challenges have you
encountered and what potential
solutions would you propose with
regard to providing data from foreign
countries to FDA?
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Topic 3: Real World Evidence
There is significant activity within
FDA aimed at clarifying how to
determine if real-world data (RWD) are
sufficient to generate real-world
evidence (RWE) that could be used for
regulatory decision making by the
Agency. In August 2017, FDA published
a guidance document entitled,
‘‘Guidance for Industry and Food and
Drug Administration Staff: Use of RealWorld Evidence to Support Regulatory
Decision-Making for Medical Devices’’
(available at https://www.fda.gov/
media/99447/download) and, in
accordance with the 21st Century Cures
Act (Pub. L. 114–255), released a draft
framework entitled ‘‘Framework for
FDA’s Real-World Evidence Program’’
(available at https://www.fda.gov/
media/120060/download) in December
2018 for human drug and biological
products.
1. How should FDA define RWE for
making regulatory decisions for animal
drugs? What sources of RWD should
FDA consider to generate RWE for
animal drugs?
2. What challenges exist for the use of
RWE for animal drug approvals? What
are possible solutions to these
challenges?
3. In what contexts might RWD/RWE
be used to generate clinical evidence for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:47 Jul 08, 2019
Jkt 247001
regulatory decision making for animal
drugs?
4. What factors should FDA consider
when evaluating RWE for animal drugs?
Topic 4: Biomarkers and Surrogate
Endpoints
Biomarkers have long been a part of
veterinary medicine. Examples include
routine tests such as body temperature,
heart rate, complete blood cell count
and clinical chemistry, radiographs, and
intraocular pressure. Numerous
technological advancements have
greatly increased the number of
available biomarkers while reducing
their cost. Unfortunately, many
potential biomarkers are not validated
for their use and interpretation in
clinical investigations. FDA’s Center for
Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)
has a formal Biomarker Qualification
Program, related guidance, and affiliated
consortia to support the development
and use of biomarkers in regulatory
decision making for human drugs
(https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drugdevelopment-tool-qualificationprograms/cder-biomarker-qualificationprogram). FDA is seeking stakeholder
feedback on how to best support the
identification and development of new
biomarkers for new animal drug
applications and on ways to better
incorporate biomarkers and surrogate
endpoints into animal drug
development.
1. What are the expectations of
sponsors, researchers, veterinarians, and
producers for the use of biomarkers in
the context of animal drug regulation
and how might biomarkers be used in
addition to surrogate endpoints in the
design and conduct of clinical studies?
2. Biomarkers are commonly used for
diagnosing disease to enroll patients,
sample size estimations, and pilot/
proof-of-concept studies. What
information should be provided to FDA
to support their use in these contexts
(e.g., analytical validation, clinical
validation, establishing clinical utility,
companion diagnostics etc.)?
3. What are the major challenges in
translating potential biomarkers and/or
surrogate endpoints into practical tools
in clinical trials? What are possible
solutions to these challenges?
4. How do we determine the
evidentiary criteria for evaluating
biomarker use?
5. Should FDA’s Center for Veterinary
Medicine develop a biomarker
qualification program like CDER’s?
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32751
Would such a program be beneficial,
and is it something that stakeholders
(e.g., drug sponsors) would use? Are
there other approaches to the
development and acceptance of
biomarkers for animal drugs?
III. Information About the Public
Meeting
Additional information about the
public meeting is available on our
website at https://www.fda.gov/animalveterinary/workshops-conferencesmeetings/public-meeting-incorporatingalternative-approaches-clinicalinvestigations-new-animal-drugs. If time
and space permit, onsite registration on
the day of the public meeting will be
provided beginning at 8 a.m. We will
post a notice on the above website no
later than July 12 as to whether onsite
registration is available.
Streaming Webcast of the Public
Meeting: This public meeting will also
be webcast. Registration for the webcast
is required. Information to register for
the webcast is available at https://
www.fda.gov/animal-veterinary/
workshops-conferences-meetings/
public-meeting-incorporatingalternative-approaches-clinicalinvestigations-new-animal-drugs. You
can register for the webcast up until the
time of the meeting.
If you have never attended a Connect
Pro event before, test your connection at
https://collaboration.fda.gov/common/
help/en/support/meeting_test.htm. For a
quick overview of the Connect Pro
program, visit https://www.adobe.com/
go/connectpro_overview. FDA has
verified the website addresses in this
document, as of the date this document
publishes in the Federal Register, but
websites are subject to change over time.
Transcripts: Please be advised that as
soon as a transcript of the public
meeting is available, it will be accessible
at https://www.regulations.gov. It may
be viewed at the Dockets Management
Staff (see ADDRESSES). A link to the
transcript will also be available at
https://www.fda.gov/animal-veterinary/
workshops-conferences-meetings/
public-meeting-incorporatingalternative-approaches-clinicalinvestigations-new-animal-drugs.
Dated: July 2, 2019.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019–14528 Filed 7–8–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
E:\FR\FM\09JYN1.SGM
09JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 131 (Tuesday, July 9, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32749-32751]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-14528]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2019-N-2281]
Incorporating Alternative Approaches in Clinical Investigations
for New Animal Drugs; Public Meeting; Request for Comments
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting; request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA, the Agency, or we) is
announcing a public meeting entitled ``Incorporating Alternative
Approaches in Clinical Investigations for New Animal Drugs.'' This
public meeting and request for comments is intended to support FDA
guidance development as required by the Animal Drug and Animal Generic
Drug User Fee Amendments of 2018. The topics to be discussed will
inform the development of guidance to assist sponsors in incorporating
complex adaptive and other novel investigation designs, data from
foreign countries, real world evidence (including ongoing surveillance
activities, observational studies, and registry data), biomarkers, and
surrogate endpoints into proposed clinical investigation protocols and
applications for new animal drugs under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act). FDA is seeking comments from stakeholders,
including representatives of regulated industry, consumer groups,
academia, veterinarians, and food producers.
DATES: The public meeting will be held on July 16, 2019, from 8:30 a.m.
to 5 p.m. Submit either electronic or written comments on this public
meeting by August 17, 2019.
ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be held at Johns Hopkins
University--Montgomery County, Gilchrist Hall, 9601 Medical Center Dr.,
Rockville, MD 20850. Free parking is available on site.
You may submit comments as follows. Please note that late, untimely
filed comments will not be considered. Electronic comments must be
submitted on or before August 17, 2019. The https://www.regulations.gov
electronic filing system will accept comments until 11:59 p.m. Eastern
Time at the end of August 17, 2019. Comments received by mail/hand
delivery/courier (for written/paper submissions) will be considered
timely if they are postmarked or the delivery service acceptance
receipt is on or before that date.
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2019-N-2281 for ``Incorporating Alternative Approaches in Clinical
Investigations for New Animal Drugs.'' Received comments, those filed
in a timely manner (see ADDRESSES), will be placed in the docket and,
except for those submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly
viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets Management
Staff between 9
[[Page 32750]]
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish
your name and contact information to be made publicly available, you
can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of
your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Storey, Center for Veterinary
Medicine, Food and Drug Administration, 7500 Standish Pl., HFV-131,
Rockville, MD 20855, 240-402-0578, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
FDA is announcing a public meeting entitled ``Incorporating
Alternative Approaches in Clinical Investigations for New Animal
Drugs.'' This public meeting and request for comment is intended to
support FDA guidance development as required under section 305 of the
Animal Drug and Animal Generic Drug User Fee Amendments of 2018 (Pub.
L. 115-234). Section 305 directs FDA to develop guidance to address
several alternative approaches in clinical investigations for new
animal drugs, including incorporating complex adaptive and other novel
investigation designs, data from foreign countries, real world evidence
(including ongoing surveillance activities, observational studies, and
registry data), biomarkers, and surrogate endpoints into proposed
clinical investigation protocols and applications for new animal drugs
under sections 512 and 571 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360b, 360ccc).
Section 305 also directs FDA to conduct a public meeting to allow the
Agency to gather input from stakeholders, including representatives of
regulated industry, consumer groups, academia, veterinarians, and food
producers before developing the guidance.
II. Topics for Discussion at the Public Meeting
The purpose of this public meeting is to facilitate discussion and
obtain input from stakeholders about the use of complex adaptive and
other novel investigation designs, data from foreign countries, real
world evidence, and biomarkers and surrogate endpoints in drug
development and regulatory decision making.
The meeting is expected to include four sessions that focus on the
following topics: (1) Complex adaptive and other novel investigation
designs; (2) data from foreign countries; (3) real world evidence; and,
(4) biomarkers and surrogate endpoints. Within each session and
following all sessions there will be an opportunity for public comment.
To facilitate the development of guidance on these topics, please
consider the following questions. When responding please identify the
topic and question in your response.
Topic 1: Complex Adaptive and Other Novel Investigation Designs
1. In September 2018, FDA published draft Guidance for Industry:
Adaptive Designs for Clinical Trials of Drugs and Biologics, which
applies to human drugs and biologics (https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/adaptive-design-clinical-trials-drugs-and-biologics). How should these apply to study designs
for animal drugs? What are the potential study adaptation features that
could be applied to animal drug investigations? What are the challenges
and possible solutions to apply these adaptations to studies for animal
drugs? To what type of studies for animal drugs would these study
designs be most applicable?
2. How does complex adaptive design differ from adaptive design?
What constitutes other novel investigation designs? What examples are
directly applicable to animal drug development?
3. Are there partnerships that can be formed between FDA and the
regulated industry, academia, or other groups to facilitate the
development or use of these novel investigational designs for animal
drug development? What strategic work is needed to enable the regulated
industry to make full use of these novel investigational designs for
animal drug development? What methods are needed, such as the use of
simulations or modeling, to facilitate the use of these novel
investigational designs for animal drug development?
Topic 2: Data From Foreign Countries
For the purposes of this meeting, FDA considers data from foreign
countries to be data from investigations or studies conducted outside
the United States (U.S.). FDA can accept data from studies conducted
outside the United States to support a new animal drug application,
provided the applicant demonstrates that the data are adequate under
applicable standards to support approval (section 569B of the FD&C Act;
21 U.S.C. 360bbb-8b). FDA also accepts data from studies conducted
outside the United States to support a food additive petition for a
food additive intended for use in animal food, when provided by the
petitioner (section 409(k)(1) of the FD&C Act; 21 U.S.C. 348(k)(1)).
While the regulatory standards for approval differ between animal drugs
and animal food additives, data from foreign countries can be used to
support either approval if the data meet the appropriate regulatory
standards.
1. What challenges and potential solutions do you have in meeting
the requirements of substantial evidence of effectiveness, as defined
in 21 CFR 514.4, when using data from foreign countries for an animal
drug?
2. Typically in the United States, when we wish to show a test drug
is no worse than an active control, that active control is an approved
animal drug in the United States. A non-inferiority analysis is used to
statistically demonstrate this relationship. In studies conducted
outside the United States, an active control may be used that is not
approved for that use in the United States. In the absence of a U.S.
approval for the active control, FDA cannot interpret non-inferiority
to the unapproved active control. What challenges exist in utilizing
these studies? What criteria should FDA use to accept a study where the
active control is not approved in the United
[[Page 32751]]
States? What are potential options or solutions to enable FDA to use
these studies?
3. What challenges exist in demonstrating that data from foreign
countries were generated under conditions representative of typical
conditions in the United States for an animal drug or food additive?
What are potential solutions to these challenges?
4. What challenges exist in designing studies for an animal drug or
food additive to meet the approval requirements of different
jurisdictions? What are possible solutions to these challenges?
5. What challenges exist in study conduct and the collection and
interpretability of data from foreign countries (both manual and
electronic) that may influence study quality and data integrity to
support the approval of an animal drug or food additive? What are
possible solutions to these challenges?
6. What other challenges have you encountered and what potential
solutions would you propose with regard to providing data from foreign
countries to FDA?
Topic 3: Real World Evidence
There is significant activity within FDA aimed at clarifying how to
determine if real-world data (RWD) are sufficient to generate real-
world evidence (RWE) that could be used for regulatory decision making
by the Agency. In August 2017, FDA published a guidance document
entitled, ``Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration
Staff: Use of Real-World Evidence to Support Regulatory Decision-Making
for Medical Devices'' (available at https://www.fda.gov/media/99447/download) and, in accordance with the 21st Century Cures Act (Pub. L.
114-255), released a draft framework entitled ``Framework for FDA's
Real-World Evidence Program'' (available at https://www.fda.gov/media/120060/download) in December 2018 for human drug and biological
products.
1. How should FDA define RWE for making regulatory decisions for
animal drugs? What sources of RWD should FDA consider to generate RWE
for animal drugs?
2. What challenges exist for the use of RWE for animal drug
approvals? What are possible solutions to these challenges?
3. In what contexts might RWD/RWE be used to generate clinical
evidence for regulatory decision making for animal drugs?
4. What factors should FDA consider when evaluating RWE for animal
drugs?
Topic 4: Biomarkers and Surrogate Endpoints
Biomarkers have long been a part of veterinary medicine. Examples
include routine tests such as body temperature, heart rate, complete
blood cell count and clinical chemistry, radiographs, and intraocular
pressure. Numerous technological advancements have greatly increased
the number of available biomarkers while reducing their cost.
Unfortunately, many potential biomarkers are not validated for their
use and interpretation in clinical investigations. FDA's Center for
Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) has a formal Biomarker
Qualification Program, related guidance, and affiliated consortia to
support the development and use of biomarkers in regulatory decision
making for human drugs (https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-development-tool-qualification-programs/cder-biomarker-qualification-program). FDA
is seeking stakeholder feedback on how to best support the
identification and development of new biomarkers for new animal drug
applications and on ways to better incorporate biomarkers and surrogate
endpoints into animal drug development.
1. What are the expectations of sponsors, researchers,
veterinarians, and producers for the use of biomarkers in the context
of animal drug regulation and how might biomarkers be used in addition
to surrogate endpoints in the design and conduct of clinical studies?
2. Biomarkers are commonly used for diagnosing disease to enroll
patients, sample size estimations, and pilot/proof-of-concept studies.
What information should be provided to FDA to support their use in
these contexts (e.g., analytical validation, clinical validation,
establishing clinical utility, companion diagnostics etc.)?
3. What are the major challenges in translating potential
biomarkers and/or surrogate endpoints into practical tools in clinical
trials? What are possible solutions to these challenges?
4. How do we determine the evidentiary criteria for evaluating
biomarker use?
5. Should FDA's Center for Veterinary Medicine develop a biomarker
qualification program like CDER's? Would such a program be beneficial,
and is it something that stakeholders (e.g., drug sponsors) would use?
Are there other approaches to the development and acceptance of
biomarkers for animal drugs?
III. Information About the Public Meeting
Additional information about the public meeting is available on our
website at https://www.fda.gov/animal-veterinary/workshops-conferences-meetings/public-meeting-incorporating-alternative-approaches-clinical-investigations-new-animal-drugs. If time and space permit, onsite
registration on the day of the public meeting will be provided
beginning at 8 a.m. We will post a notice on the above website no later
than July 12 as to whether onsite registration is available.
Streaming Webcast of the Public Meeting: This public meeting will
also be webcast. Registration for the webcast is required. Information
to register for the webcast is available at https://www.fda.gov/animal-veterinary/workshops-conferences-meetings/public-meeting-incorporating-alternative-approaches-clinical-investigations-new-animal-drugs. You
can register for the webcast up until the time of the meeting.
If you have never attended a Connect Pro event before, test your
connection at https://collaboration.fda.gov/common/help/en/support/meeting_test.htm. For a quick overview of the Connect Pro program,
visit https://www.adobe.com/go/connectpro_overview. FDA has verified
the website addresses in this document, as of the date this document
publishes in the Federal Register, but websites are subject to change
over time.
Transcripts: Please be advised that as soon as a transcript of the
public meeting is available, it will be accessible at https://www.regulations.gov. It may be viewed at the Dockets Management Staff
(see ADDRESSES). A link to the transcript will also be available at
https://www.fda.gov/animal-veterinary/workshops-conferences-meetings/public-meeting-incorporating-alternative-approaches-clinical-investigations-new-animal-drugs.
Dated: July 2, 2019.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-14528 Filed 7-8-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P