Safety Zone; Ohio River, Miles 67.5-68.5, Steubenville, OH, 31723-31724 [2019-14222]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2019–0515]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Ohio River, Miles 67.5–
68.5, Steubenville, OH
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone for
all navigable waters of the Ohio River
from Mile 67.5 to Mile 68.5. The safety
zone is needed to protect personnel,
vessels, and the marine environment
from potential hazards created by a
land-based fireworks display. Entry of
vessels or persons into this zone is
prohibited unless specifically
authorized by Captain of the Port
Marine Safety Unit Pittsburgh.
DATES: This rule is effective from 9 p.m.
through 11:30 p.m. on July 4, 2019.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2019–
0515 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email MST2 Charles Morris, Marine
Safety Unit Pittsburgh, U.S. Coast
Guard, at telephone 412–670–4288,
email Charles.F.Morris@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port Sector Upper
Mississippi River
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:37 Jul 02, 2019
Jkt 247001
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it is
impracticable. The safety zones must be
established by July 4, 2019 and we lack
sufficient time to provide a reasonable
comment period and then consider
those comments before issuing this rule.
The NPRM process would delay the
establishment of the safety zones until
after the scheduled date.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be contrary to the public
interest because this action is necessary
to ensure the safety of vessels and
persons during the fireworks display.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034
(previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The
Captain of the Port Marine Safety Unit
Pittsburgh (COTP) has determined that
a safety zone is needed to protect
personnel, vessels, and the marine
environment from potential hazards
created from a land-based firework
display.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a safety zone on
July 4, 2019, from 9 p.m. through 11:30
p.m. The safety zone will cover all
navigable waters on the Ohio River from
Mile 67.5 to Mile 68.5. The duration of
the safety zone is intended to protect
personnel, vessels, and the marine
environment from potential hazards
created by a land based firework
display.
No vessel or person is permitted to
enter the safety zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP or a
designated representative. A designated
representative is a commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer of the U.S.
Coast Guard (USCG) assigned to units
under the operational control of the
COTP. To seek permission to enter,
contact the COTP or a designated
representative via VHF–FM channel 16,
or through Marine Safety Unit
Pittsburgh at 412–221–0807. Persons
and vessels permitted to enter the safety
zone must comply with all lawful orders
or directions issued by the COTP or
designated representative. The COTP or
a designated representative will inform
the public of the effective period for the
safety zone as well as any changes in the
dates and times of enforcement through
Local Notice to Mariners (LNMs),
Broadcast Notices to Mariners (BNMs),
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
31723
and/or Marine Safety Information
Bulletins (MSIBs), as appropriate.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This rule has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has
not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, and
duration of the temporary safety zone.
This safety zone impacts only a onemile stretch of the Ohio River for a short
amount of time of 2 and one half hours
on one evening. Vessel traffic will be
informed about the safety zone through
local notices to mariners. Moreover, the
Coast Guard will issue LNMs, MSIBs,
and BNMs via VHF–FM marine channel
16 about the zone and the rule allows
vessels to seek permission from the
COTP to transit the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the
temporary safety zone may be small
entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
E:\FR\FM\03JYR1.SGM
03JYR1
31724
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
above.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:37 Jul 02, 2019
Jkt 247001
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01 and Environmental
Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series),
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety
zone lasting two and one half hours that
will prohibit entry on the Ohio River
from mile 67.5 to mile 68.5, during the
land-based firework event. It is
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L60(A) in Table
3–1 of U.S. Coast Guard Environmental
Planning Implementing Procedures
5090.1. A Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this
determination is available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T08–0515 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T08–0515 Safety Zone; Ohio River,
Miles 67.5–68.5, Steubenville, OH.
(a) L/ocation. The following area is a
temporary safety zone: All navigable
waters of the Ohio River from Mile 67.5
to Mile 68.5.
(b) Effective period. This section is
effective from 9 p.m. through 11:30 p.m.
on July 4, 2019.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23, entry
of persons and vessels into this zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Marine Safety Unit
Pittsburgh (COTP) or a designated
representative.
(2) Persons or vessels requiring entry
into or passage through the zone must
request permission from the COTP or a
designated representative. The COTP’s
representative may be contacted at 412–
670–4288.
(3) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
COTP or a designated representative.
Designated COTP representatives
include United States Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant, and petty
officer.
(d) Information broadcasts. The
Captain COTP or a designated
representative will inform the public
through Local Notice to Mariners
(LNMs), Broadcast Notices to Mariners
(BNMs), and/or Marine Safety
Information Bulletins (MSIBs), as
appropriate.
S. Miros,
Lieutenant Commander, U.S. Coast Guard,
Acting Captain of the Port Marine Safety Unit
Pittsburgh.
[FR Doc. 2019–14222 Filed 7–2–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2019–0471]
Safety Zone; Southern California
Annual Firework Events for the San
Diego Captain of the Port Zone; San
Diego Bay South Embarcadero, San
Diego, CA.
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of enforcement of
regulation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
E:\FR\FM\03JYR1.SGM
03JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 128 (Wednesday, July 3, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31723-31724]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-14222]
[[Page 31723]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2019-0515]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Ohio River, Miles 67.5-68.5, Steubenville, OH
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
all navigable waters of the Ohio River from Mile 67.5 to Mile 68.5. The
safety zone is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine
environment from potential hazards created by a land-based fireworks
display. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited
unless specifically authorized by Captain of the Port Marine Safety
Unit Pittsburgh.
DATES: This rule is effective from 9 p.m. through 11:30 p.m. on July 4,
2019.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2019-0515 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email MST2 Charles Morris, Marine Safety Unit Pittsburgh, U.S.
Coast Guard, at telephone 412-670-4288, email
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port Sector Upper Mississippi River
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it is impracticable. The safety zones
must be established by July 4, 2019 and we lack sufficient time to
provide a reasonable comment period and then consider those comments
before issuing this rule. The NPRM process would delay the
establishment of the safety zones until after the scheduled date.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be contrary to the public interest because this action
is necessary to ensure the safety of vessels and persons during the
fireworks display.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The Captain of the Port Marine
Safety Unit Pittsburgh (COTP) has determined that a safety zone is
needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment from
potential hazards created from a land-based firework display.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a safety zone on July 4, 2019, from 9 p.m.
through 11:30 p.m. The safety zone will cover all navigable waters on
the Ohio River from Mile 67.5 to Mile 68.5. The duration of the safety
zone is intended to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine
environment from potential hazards created by a land based firework
display.
No vessel or person is permitted to enter the safety zone without
obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated representative. A
designated representative is a commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
of the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) assigned to units under the operational
control of the COTP. To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or a
designated representative via VHF-FM channel 16, or through Marine
Safety Unit Pittsburgh at 412-221-0807. Persons and vessels permitted
to enter the safety zone must comply with all lawful orders or
directions issued by the COTP or designated representative. The COTP or
a designated representative will inform the public of the effective
period for the safety zone as well as any changes in the dates and
times of enforcement through Local Notice to Mariners (LNMs), Broadcast
Notices to Mariners (BNMs), and/or Marine Safety Information Bulletins
(MSIBs), as appropriate.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, and duration of the temporary safety zone. This safety zone
impacts only a one-mile stretch of the Ohio River for a short amount of
time of 2 and one half hours on one evening. Vessel traffic will be
informed about the safety zone through local notices to mariners.
Moreover, the Coast Guard will issue LNMs, MSIBs, and BNMs via VHF-FM
marine channel 16 about the zone and the rule allows vessels to seek
permission from the COTP to transit the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
temporary safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in
section V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
[[Page 31724]]
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01 and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series),
which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety zone lasting two and one half
hours that will prohibit entry on the Ohio River from mile 67.5 to mile
68.5, during the land-based firework event. It is categorically
excluded from further review under paragraph L60(A) in Table 3-1 of
U.S. Coast Guard Environmental Planning Implementing Procedures 5090.1.
A Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this determination
is available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T08-0515 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T08-0515 Safety Zone; Ohio River, Miles 67.5-68.5,
Steubenville, OH.
(a) L/ocation. The following area is a temporary safety zone: All
navigable waters of the Ohio River from Mile 67.5 to Mile 68.5.
(b) Effective period. This section is effective from 9 p.m. through
11:30 p.m. on July 4, 2019.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec. 165.23, entry of persons and vessels into this zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Marine Safety Unit
Pittsburgh (COTP) or a designated representative.
(2) Persons or vessels requiring entry into or passage through the
zone must request permission from the COTP or a designated
representative. The COTP's representative may be contacted at 412-670-
4288.
(3) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of
the COTP or a designated representative. Designated COTP
representatives include United States Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, and petty officer.
(d) Information broadcasts. The Captain COTP or a designated
representative will inform the public through Local Notice to Mariners
(LNMs), Broadcast Notices to Mariners (BNMs), and/or Marine Safety
Information Bulletins (MSIBs), as appropriate.
S. Miros,
Lieutenant Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port
Marine Safety Unit Pittsburgh.
[FR Doc. 2019-14222 Filed 7-2-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P