Availability of Funds and Collection of Checks (Regulation CC), 31687-31701 [2019-13668]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
31687
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 84, No. 128
Wednesday, July 3, 2019
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents.
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
12 CFR Part 229
[Regulation CC; Docket No. R–1637]
RIN 7100–AF 28
BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL
PROTECTION
12 CFR Part 1030
[Docket No. CFPB–2018–0035]
RIN 3170–AA31
Availability of Funds and Collection of
Checks (Regulation CC)
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System (Board) and
Bureau of Consumer Financial
Protection (Bureau).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Board and the Bureau
(Agencies) are amending Regulation CC,
which implements the Expedited Funds
Availability Act (EFA Act), to
implement a statutory requirement in
the EFA Act to adjust the dollar
amounts under the EFA Act for
inflation. The Agencies are also
amending Regulation CC to incorporate
the Economic Growth, Regulatory
Relief, and Consumer Protection Act
(EGRRCPA) amendments to the EFA
Act, which include extending coverage
to American Samoa, the Commonwealth
of the Northern Mariana Islands, and
Guam, and making certain other
technical amendments.
DATES: This rule is effective September
3, 2019, except for the amendments to
12 CFR 229.1, 229.10, 229.11, 229.12(d),
229.21, and appendix E to part 229,
which are effective July 1, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Board: Gavin L. Smith, Senior
Counsel, (202) 452–3474, Legal
Division, or Ian C.B. Spear, Manager,
(202) 452–3959, Division of Reserve
Bank Operations and Payment Systems.
Bureau: Joseph Baressi and Marta
Tanenhaus, Senior Counsels, Office of
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:37 Jul 02, 2019
Jkt 247001
Regulations, at (202) 435–7700. If you
require this document in an alternative
electronic format, please contact
CFPB_accessibility@cfpb.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Regulation CC (12 CFR part 229)
implements the EFA Act and the Check
Clearing for the 21st Century Act (Check
21 Act). 1 Subpart B of Regulation CC
implements the requirements set forth
in the EFA Act regarding the availability
schedules within which banks 2 must
make funds available for withdrawal,
exceptions to those schedules,
disclosure of funds availability policies,
and payment of interest. The EFA Act
and subpart B of Regulation CC contain
specified dollar amounts, including: (1)
The minimum amount of deposited
funds that banks must make available
for withdrawal by opening of business
on the next day for certain check
deposits (‘‘minimum amount’’); 3 (2) the
amount a bank must make available
when using the EFA Act’s permissive
adjustment to the funds-availability
rules for withdrawals by cash or other
means (‘‘cash withdrawal amount’’); 4
(3) the amount of funds deposited by
certain checks in a new account that are
subject to next-day availability (‘‘newaccount amount’’); 5 (4) the threshold for
using an exception to the fundsavailability schedules if the aggregate
amount of checks on any one banking
day exceed the threshold amount
(‘‘large-deposit threshold’’); 6 (5) the
threshold for determining whether an
account has been repeatedly overdrawn
(‘‘repeatedly overdrawn threshold’’); 7
1 Expedited Funds Availability Act, 12 U.S.C.
4001 et seq.; Check Clearing for the 21st Century
Act, 12 U.S.C. 5001 et seq.
2 Section 229.2(e) of Regulation CC defines
‘‘bank’’ to include banks, savings institutions, and
credit unions.
3 The minimum amount is currently $200. See
section 1086(e) of the Dodd-Frank Act; 12 U.S.C.
4002(a)(2)(D).
4 The cash withdrawal amount is currently $400.
12 U.S.C. 4002(b)(3)(B).
5 The new-account amount is currently $5,000. 12
U.S.C. 4003(a)(3).
6 The large-deposit threshold is currently $5,000.
12 U.S.C. 4003(b)(1).
7 The repeatedly overdrawn threshold is currently
$5,000. 12 CFR 229.13(d). This dollar amount is not
specified in the EFA Act, but is a result of the
authority of the Board and the Bureau under section
604(b)(3) of the EFA Act (12 U.S.C. 4003(b)(3)) to
establish reasonable exceptions to time limitations
for deposit accounts that have been overdrawn
repeatedly. The Board and the Bureau proposed to
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
and (6) the civil liability amounts for
failing to comply with the EFA Act’s
requirements.8
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform
and Consumer Protection Act (DoddFrank Act) made certain amendments to
the EFA Act, and these amendments
were effective on July 21, 2011.9 Section
609(a) of the EFA Act,10 as amended by
section 1086(d) of the Dodd-Frank Act,
provides that the Board and the Director
of the Bureau shall jointly prescribe
regulations to carry out the provisions of
the EFA Act, to prevent the
circumvention or evasion of such
provisions, and to facilitate compliance
with such provisions.
Additionally, section 1086(f) of the
Dodd-Frank Act added section 607(f) of
the EFA Act, which provides that the
dollar amounts under the EFA Act shall
be adjusted every five years after
December 31, 2011, by the annual
percentage increase in the Consumer
Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and
Clerical Workers (CPI–W), as published
by the Bureau of Labor Statistics,
rounded to the nearest multiple of
$25.11
Finally, the Economic Growth,
Regulatory Relief, and Consumer
Protection Act (EGRRCPA) made
amendments to the EFA Act to extend
its application to American Samoa, the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, and Guam.12 The effect of these
statutory amendments is to subject
banks in American Samoa, the
use their authority under section 604(b)(3) and also
their authority under section 609(a) (12 U.S.C.
4008(a)), which is discussed below, to index the
repeatedly overdrawn threshold in the same
manner as the other dollar amounts. The Board and
the Bureau stated that they believe that indexing the
repeatedly overdrawn threshold would be
consistent with the need identified by Congress to
prevent such dollar amounts from being eroded by
inflation. The Board and the Bureau did not receive
comments suggesting that they should treat the
repeatedly overdrawn threshold differently from the
other dollar amounts, and they finalize this aspect
of the proposal for the reasons stated in the
proposal.
8 The civil liability amounts are currently ‘‘not
less than $100 nor greater than $1,000’’ for an
individual action and ‘‘not more than $500,000 or
1 percent of the net worth’’ of a depository
institution for a class action. 12 U.S.C. 4010(a).
9 Public Law 111–203, sections 1062, 1086,
1100H, 124 Stat. 2081 (2010); 75 FR 57252 (Sept.
20, 2010).
10 12 U.S.C. 4008(a).
11 12 U.S.C. 4006(f).
12 Public Law 115–174, section 208 (2018). The
amendments that section 208 of the EGRRCPA
made to the EFA Act became effective on June 23,
2018. See section 208(b) of the EGRRCPA.
E:\FR\FM\03JYR1.SGM
03JYR1
31688
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, and Guam to the EFA Act’s
requirements related to funds
availability, payment of interest, and
disclosures. Banks in those territories
would be able to avail themselves of the
one-day extension of the availability
schedules permitted by the EFA Act and
§ 229.12(e) of Regulation CC.
II. Summary of Proposed Rule,
Comments Received, and Final Rule
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
On December 10, 2018, the Agencies
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (proposal) to implement the
statutory requirement in the EFA Act to
adjust the dollar amounts under the Act
for inflation and to implement the
EGRRCPA amendments to the EFA
Act.13 The Agencies received 32
responses to their proposal from a
variety of commenters, including
depository institutions, service
providers, trade associations,
clearinghouses, consumer organizations,
and private individuals.14 Nine
commenters explicitly expressed
general support for the proposal, two
additional trade association commenters
specifically supported the proposal’s
calculation methodology and
timeframes, and twelve commenters
specifically supported the proposed
one-year effective date. As discussed in
more detail below, three institutions
opposed basic tenets of the statutory
requirements based on concerns about
loss to institutions due to customer
fraud: the first disagreed altogether with
need to make inflationary adjustments
for purposes of funds availability; the
second disagreed with adjusting the
statutory dollar amounts every five
years; and the third opposed basing the
hold amount on the CPI, stating that
individual check amounts are not
reflective of inflation.15 Some
commenters addressed other specific
aspects of the proposal. As discussed in
more detail below, the Agencies
considered all of the comments received
13 83 FR 63431, Dec. 10, 2018. In their December
2018 Federal Register notice, the Agencies also
provided an additional opportunity for public
comment on certain amendments to the fundsavailability provisions in Regulation CC that the
Board proposed in 2011. The Agencies are not
herein addressing the Board’s 2011 proposal or the
comments received thereon.
14 The Board received 18 comments and the
Bureau received 23. Of the 41 total comments
received, nine commenters submitted identical
comment letters to both Agencies.
15 Because the statute is clear in its directives to
make inflationary adjustments to dollar amounts
under the EFA Act every five years based on the
CPI–W, the Agencies are finalizing the rule as
proposed with regard to these fundamental
statutory requirements.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:37 Jul 02, 2019
Jkt 247001
and are adopting the amendments to
Regulation CC described below.
A. Effective Dates for Inflation
Adjustments
The Agencies continue to believe, as
stated in the proposal, that section
607(f) of the EFA Act is reasonably
interpreted to provide for five years to
elapse between a given set of
adjustments and the next set of
adjustments, with the first set of
adjustments occurring sometime after
December 31, 2011. The Agencies
believe that Congress intended to
balance its concern about changes being
too frequent or abrupt with the need to
prevent the EFA Act’s dollar amounts
from being eroded by inflation. As
regulators of depository institutions, the
Agencies are likewise familiar with the
challenges that institutions can face if
changes to regulatory requirements are
too frequent or abrupt. Congress
balanced these concerns by providing
that the adjustments would be effective
at five-year intervals; by providing that
the first set of adjustments would not
occur until after December 31, 2011,
which ensured that at least a full
calendar year would elapse after the
Dodd-Frank Act’s enactment in mid2010; and by providing that the
adjustments would be rounded to the
nearest multiple of $25.
In their December 2018 proposal, the
Agencies stated they expected to
publish the first set of adjustments as a
final rule in the first quarter of 2019,
with a proposed effective date of April
1, 2020. The Agencies further stated
they expected to publish the second set
of adjustments in the first quarter of
2024, with an effective date of April 1,
2025. For each subsequent set of
adjustment, the Agencies proposed an
effective date of April 1 of every fifth
year after 2025. The Agencies stated
their belief that the proposed effective
dates would provide institutions with
sufficient time to make any necessary
disclosure and software changes and the
Agencies requested comment on the
proposed effective dates for the
adjustments.
Fourteen commenters addressed the
amount of time between the Agencies’
publication of a final rule setting forth
the inflation adjustments and the rule’s
effective date. Of those, twelve
commenters supported the Agencies’
proposed one-year interim, one
commenter requested 18 months, and
another requested two years. Two of the
commenters that supported the one-year
interim recommended that, if the
Agencies do not release the final rule by
April 1, 2019, the effective date should
be extended such that it is at least one
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
year after the release date of the final
rule.
For the reasons set forth in the
proposal and above, the Agencies are
finalizing as proposed the one-year
interim between publication of the first
set of adjustments and the adjustments’
effective date. Because the Agencies are
releasing this final rule in June 2019, the
effective date for the final rule is July 1,
2020. Further, the Agencies anticipate
carrying this one-year interim forward
for future adjustments. Specifically,
§ 229.11(a) of the final rule states that
the relevant EFA Act dollar amounts, as
reflected in Regulation CC, shall be
adjusted effective on July 1, 2020, on
July 1, 2025, and on July 1 of every fifth
year after 2025. The Agencies anticipate
issuing a rule in the Federal Register
setting forth the inflation adjustments at
least one year before the effective date
of each ensuing adjustment. For
example, the Agencies anticipate
publishing in the first half of 2024 the
second set of inflation adjustments,
which will become effective July 1,
2025.16
In addition to expressing general
support for the timeframes in the
proposal, one commenter specifically
stated that the industry will benefit from
having a predetermined schedule for
making future updates to the EFA Act
dollar amounts. Two commenters
additionally requested that the Agencies
tie the inflation adjustment effective
dates to the effective dates of any other
disclosure changes so depository
institutions would not have to make
other changes to disclosures in the
interim years.
The Agencies believe that institutions
will benefit from having their
implementation of the statutorilyrequired inflation adjustments occur on
a predetermined five-year cycle and, as
noted above, that section 607(f) of the
EFA Act is reasonably interpreted to
provide for five years to elapse between
a given set of adjustments and the next
set of adjustments. Thus, the Agencies
are finalizing the rule as proposed with
the five-year cycle between inflation
adjustments. Nonetheless, as stated
above, the Agencies are cognizant of the
potential burden on institutions if
16 The effective dates are consistent with section
302 of the Riegle Community Development and
Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994 (Pub. L. 103–
325, 108 Stat. 2160, 12 U.S.C. 4802). That section
provides that new regulations and amendments to
regulations prescribed by Federal banking agencies,
including the Board (but not the Bureau), that
impose additional reporting, disclosures, or other
new requirements on insured depository
institutions shall take effect on the first day of a
calendar quarter which begins on or after the date
on which the regulations are published in final
form (with certain exceptions).
E:\FR\FM\03JYR1.SGM
03JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
regulatory changes are too frequent or
abrupt. Accordingly, the Agencies
recognize the benefit of making efforts,
if appropriate and feasible, to coordinate
the effective dates of future rulemakings
effecting changes to disclosures required
by the funds-availability provisions in
Regulation CC subpart B with the
predetermined effective dates for the
inflation adjustments to the dollar
amounts in Regulation CC subpart B
that are set forth herein.
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
B. Methodology for Inflation
Adjustments
1. Measurement of Underlying Inflation
EFA Act section 607(f) does not
specify which month’s CPI–W should be
used to measure inflation. The Agencies
proposed to use the July CPI–W, which
is released by the Bureau of Labor
Statistics in August. The Agencies
proposed to use the aggregate
percentage change in the CPI–W from
July 2011 to July 2018 as the initial
inflation measurement period for the
first set of adjustments. The Agencies
proposed that the second set of
adjustments would be based on the
aggregate percentage change in the CPI–
W for an inflation measurement period
that begins in July 2018 and ends in July
2023. And, the Agencies proposed that
each subsequent set of adjustments
would be based on the aggregate
percentage change in the CPI–W for an
inflation measurement period that
begins in July of every fifth year after
2018 and ends in July of every fifth year
after 2023. The Agencies stated in their
proposal that this use of July CPI–W,
starting with the July 2011 CPI–W,
aligns with section 607(f)’s effective
date of July 21, 2011. The Agencies
specifically requested comment on this
approach.
Most commenters that addressed the
issue supported the Agencies’ proposed
inflation calculation methodology.
However, one commenter recommended
that the Agencies base the calculation of
inflation on the change in the CPI–W
from July 2013 to July 2018 on the
grounds that it would result in a lower
aggregate percentage change for the first
set of adjustments. The Agencies are
finalizing the rule as proposed with the
first set of inflation adjustments—
published herein and effective July 1,
2020—based on inflation, as measured
by the CPI–W, from July 2011 to July
2018. As discussed in the proposal, the
Agencies continue to believe it is
appropriate for the inflation adjustments
to be based on underlying inflation
since the effective date of the relevant
Dodd-Frank Act provisions, which is
July 21, 2011. The Agencies do not
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:37 Jul 02, 2019
Jkt 247001
believe that the need identified by
Congress to prevent the relevant dollar
amounts from being eroded by inflation
would be served by omitting the period
of July 2011 to July 2013 from the
Agencies’ calculation, as the commenter
advocated. The second set of inflation
adjustments—which the Agencies
anticipate publishing in the first half of
2024 and which will be effective July 1,
2025—will be based on underlying
inflation from July 2018 through July
2023. The third set of adjustments—
which the Agencies anticipate
publishing in the first half of 2029 and
which will be effective July 1, 2030—
will be based on inflation from July
2023 through July 2028.
2. Aggregate Percentage Increase
Section 607(f) of the EFA Act
provides that the adjustments must be
based on the ‘‘annual percentage
increase’’ in the CPI–W, but does not
specify how the adjustment must be
made in the event that the CPI–W is
negative for one or more years in the
inflation measurement period. The
Agencies maintain their position from
the proposal 17 that it is a reasonable
interpretation of section 607(f) to
account for negative movements in the
CPI–W on a year-to-year basis and to
include those movements when
measuring the underlying inflation that
is the basis for calculating adjustments
to the dollar amounts in subpart B of
Regulation CC. Of the few commenters
that addressed this issue, most
supported the Agencies’ proposed
approach, and the Agencies are
adopting it in the final rule.
Further, the Agencies proposed an
approach under which the five-year
adjustments to the dollar amounts in
Regulation CC subpart B would always
be zero or upward, never downward.
Specifically, the Agencies proposed that
if there is no aggregate percentage
increase (zero increase) in the CPI–W or
an aggregate percentage decrease
(negative increase) in the CPI–W during
the five-year inflation measurement
period, then there would be no
downward adjustments to the dollar
amounts in Regulation CC subpart B.
One depository institution
commented that the proposed approach
could cause funds-availability risks to
institutions under certain economic
scenarios of sustained deflation
(negative inflation). Another institution
characterized the Agencies’ proposed
approach as being somewhat arbitrary
but generally agreed that the aggregate
change would most likely be zero or
positive. Conversely, a consumer
PO 00000
17 See
83 FR 63431 at 63433, Dec. 10, 2018.
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
31689
organization explicitly agreed with the
proposed approach and stated that
negative inflation should not result in
decreased funds availability to
consumers.
Under the Agencies’ final rule, as
proposed, the adjustments to the dollar
amounts in Regulation CC subpart B
will always be zero or upward, never
downward. The Agencies continue to
believe this approach is a reasonable
interpretation of the phrase ‘‘annual
percentage increase’’ in EFA Act section
607(f), in that reading out the word
‘‘increase’’ from the statute would not
be consistent with the statutory scheme.
Further, as noted in their proposal,18 the
Agencies reiterate that, since 1939, no
aggregate change in the CPI–W across a
five-year period has been negative.
Nonetheless, if it were to become
necessary and appropriate in the future,
the Agencies could consider steps to
address the funds-availability risks to
institutions that could be associated
with a sustained—i.e., more-than-fiveyear—period of deflation, if any such
period of deflation were ever to actually
occur.
3. Rounding to the Nearest Multiple of
$25
EFA Act section 607(f) states that the
dollar amounts under the Act shall be
adjusted every five years for inflation, as
measured by the CPI–W, ‘‘rounded to
the nearest multiple of $25.’’ In keeping
with that statutory directive, the
Agencies proposed that, if there is an
aggregate percentage increase in any
five-year inflation measurement period,
then the aggregate percentage change
would be applied to the dollar amounts
in Regulation CC, and those amounts
would be rounded to the nearest
multiple of $25 to determine the new
adjusted dollar amounts that appear in
the regulation.19
Two depository institutions and two
trade associations recommended
rounding to a different value than $25,
including rounding to the nearest $100
or to the nearest place value or setting
the minimum amount at $300, on the
grounds of reducing institutions’ costs
by reducing the frequency of the
inflation adjustments and reducing
consumer confusion. The Agencies
18 See 83 FR 63431 at 63433 footnote 14, Dec. 10,
2018.
19 For example, if the CPI–W in July of Year X and
in July of Year X + 5 were 100 and 114.7,
respectively, the aggregate percentage change that
results from the change in the CPI–W would be
14.7%. If the applicable dollar amount in the
regulation was $200 for the prior period, then the
adjusted figure in the regulation would become
$225, because the calculated change of 14.7 percent
of $200, which is $29.40, results in rounding to
$225 as that would be the nearest multiple of $25.
E:\FR\FM\03JYR1.SGM
03JYR1
31690
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
believe that this suggested approach
would be inconsistent with the language
of section 607(f) of the EFA Act that
expressly refers to ‘‘rounded to the
nearest multiple of $25.’’ Accordingly,
the Agencies are adopting a final rule
under which the adjusted dollar
amounts in the regulation are rounded
to the nearest multiple of $25.
4. Notice and Comment
One depository institution suggested
that the Agencies allow for public
comment each time the Agencies adjust
the dollar amounts in the regulation for
inflation. The commenter stated that
this approach would allow institutions
and the Agencies to consider whether
the adjustments continue to be cost
effective and to ensure that the
adjustments benefit consumers enough
to justify the additional costs to
institutions.
Congress has required the Agencies to
adjust dollar amounts under the EFA
Act for inflation. If, as the commenter
suggests, the Agencies were to obtain
public comment in advance of future
five-year inflation adjustments, those
comments could not serve as a legal
basis for the Agencies to override the
fundamental statutory requirement to
effectuate inflation adjustments. In
addition, the Agencies are herein
adopting the methodology for the
calculations underlying the statutorilyrequired inflation adjustments,
including future five-year adjustments,
and the Agencies have adopted that
methodology through notice-andcomment rulemaking. Accordingly, and
as stated in the Agencies’ proposal,20
with respect to future inflation
adjustments for subsequent five-year
periods, the Agencies continue to expect
to find that notice and opportunity for
public comment for the adjustments is
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest, because the
calculation methodology for the
adjustments is set forth herein and
future execution of the adjustments will
be technical and non-discretionary. See
5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). For example, the
Agencies have determined in the final
rule set forth herein that the second set
of inflation adjustments to the dollar
amounts in Regulation CC will be based
on inflation as measured by the CPI–W
from July 2018 through July 2023. As
noted above, the Agencies anticipate
publishing those adjustments in the
Federal Register in the first half of 2024,
to be effective July 1, 2025, so that
institutions will have sufficient time to
implement the inflation adjustments.
20 See 83 FR 63431 at 63433 footnote 17, Dec. 10,
2018.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:37 Jul 02, 2019
Jkt 247001
Further, the Agencies are always open
to feedback about how their rules could
be improved, and they take appropriate
steps in response to such feedback.
C. Burden on Institutions From
Implementing the Inflation Adjustments
Many commenters, including credit
unions and credit union trade
associations, expressed concern
regarding the burden imposed on
institutions to implement the inflation
adjustments. Several credit union
commenters stated that the cost burden
imposed on institutions to implement
the inflation indexing could exceed the
Agencies’ estimate in the proposal,
noting in particular the printing and
distribution costs associated with
sending notices to customers of the
changes in the institutions’ fundsavailability policies (commonly referred
to as ‘‘change-in-terms’’ notices). 21 One
credit union commenter summarized
this position by stating that the
Agencies’ cost estimate constitutes a
‘‘basic approximation’’ that left out
other potential costs, including
communication with members before
each change. This section discusses
commenter concerns and suggestions
regarding the burden imposed by the
inflation indexing. Those concerns are
also discussed below in the Agencies’
analyses pursuant to the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, the Board’s analysis
pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act, and the Bureau’s analysis pursuant
to section 1022 of the Dodd-Frank Act.
1. Notices to Customers of Changes to
Institutions’ Funds-Availability Policies
As noted above, commenters
expressed concern regarding the burden
associated with the requirement to send
customers a change-in-terms notice
reflecting the inflation-adjusted
Regulation CC funds-availability
amounts. One commenter specifically
voiced concern about the
disproportionate cost impact on smaller
credit unions for printing and mailing
notices in general and, in specific, the
change-in-terms notice. To reduce that
burden, the commenter also urged the
Agencies to reduce the length of the
required funds-availability disclosures
or permit them to accompany monthly
account statements. Another commenter
suggested reducing burden by
establishing an exception within the
21 Regulation CC § 229.18(e) requires a depository
institution to send customers a written notice
regarding a change to the bank’s funds-availability
policy. The changes to the availability policies to
reflect the statutorily-required inflation
adjustments, as implemented by this final rule,
would trigger the requirement to send a change-interms notice.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Regulation CC provision, § 229.18(e),
that requires the change-in-terms notice.
Specifically, the commenter suggested
that an institution not be required to
provide a change-in-terms notice when
its funds-availability policy changes due
to the periodic inflation adjustments to
the Regulation CC funds-availability
dollar amounts that are mandated by
section 607(f) of the EFA Act.
The Regulation CC change-in-terms
provision (§ 229.18(e)) mirrors the
statutory change-in-terms provision,
which is set forth in EFA Act section
605(c)(2). That statutory provision
requires an institution to send a written
notice to consumer account holders at
least 30 days before implementing a
change to the institution’s fundsavailability policy and further states that
‘‘any change which expedites the
availability of such funds shall be
disclosed not later than 30 days after
implementation.’’ See EFA Act section
605(c)(2) (12 U.S.C. 4004(c)(2)).
In their final rule, the Agencies
decline to establish in Regulation CC an
exception to the requirement to send a
change-in-terms notice, as this
requirement is established by statute.
However, the Agencies note several
ways that depository institutions may
lower their costs under the rule,
including providing the required notice
electronically and sending it with the
monthly account statement, as follows.
Electronic delivery is permitted where
the institution has complied with the
requirements of the Electronic
Signatures in Global and National
Commerce Act (15 U.S.C. 7001 et seq.
(‘‘E-Sign Act’’)). See comment
229.15(a)–1. Further, the regulation
already permits an institution to send a
required change-in-terms notice on or
with a monthly account statement, and
this is so irrespective of whether the
institution sends the notice and
statement electronically or in paper
form. See comment 229.18(e)–1 (stating
that the change-in-terms notice required
by § 229.18(e) ‘‘may be given in any
form as long as it is clear and
conspicuous’’). In addition, an
institution need not set forth the
entirety of its revised funds-availability
policy in its change-in-terms notice. If
an institution chooses to provide the
notice by sending a complete new
availability disclosure, the institution
must direct the customer to the changed
terms in the disclosure by use of a letter
or insert, or by highlighting the changed
terms in the disclosure. See comment
229.18(e)–1. And finally, as discussed
above, the Agencies anticipate
providing one year between the date of
publication in the Federal Register of
the inflation-adjusted amounts and the
E:\FR\FM\03JYR1.SGM
03JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
date on which the adjusted amounts
become effective. The Agencies believe
that this one-year timeframe provides
institutions with a sufficient interim in
which to plan to send their change-interms notices in a way that minimizes
the burden associated with doing so. In
light of all of these factors, and given
that the inflation adjustments are
statutorily required and will occur only
once every five years, the Agencies do
not believe that the burden concerns
raised warrant any modification to the
requirement to send change-in-terms
notices.
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
2. Minimum Availability Amounts
Required by the Regulation
To obviate the need to send a changein-terms notice to consumers every five
years when the dollar amounts in
Regulation CC are adjusted for inflation,
one depository institution commented
that the regulation should permit
institutions to provide to customers a
funds-availability policy disclosure that
includes a phrase such as ‘‘minimum
amount required by regulation,’’ rather
than setting forth an actual dollar figure
that potentially (if inflation is sufficient)
must be updated every five years. The
Agencies decline to adopt this approach
because they believe it would result in
consumer confusion. Specifically, the
Agencies believe that one of the
purposes of the statute, that consumers
be informed of the specific amount of
deposits available to them under an
institution’s funds-availability policy,
would be foreclosed under the
commenter’s suggested approach.
3. Overall Opposition to the Inflation
Adjustments
Three commenters opposed making
inflation adjustments altogether. One
commenter disagreed with adjusting the
statutory dollar amounts every five
years, because it opens institutions up
to increased losses from fraud. Another
stated that it does not make sense to
base the funds-availability hold
amounts on the CPI–W, because
individual check amounts are not
reflective of inflation. And, another
stated that making higher dollar
amounts available would end up
imposing costs on consumers, because
institutions would inevitably pass on to
consumers their higher costs from fraud
losses that would result from the higher
funds-availability amounts.
While the Agencies are cognizant of
the burden regulations place on
institutions, the inflation adjustments to
the dollar amounts under the EFA Act
are required by statute. The Agencies
understand that Congress, in providing
for a five-year cycle between inflation
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:37 Jul 02, 2019
Jkt 247001
adjustments, intended to balance
concerns regarding burden with the
need to prevent the EFA Act’s dollar
amounts from being eroded by
inflation.22 Congress also specified that
the CPI–W should be used.
D. Regulation CC Changes To
Implement the EGRRCPA Amendments
to the EFA Act
Two commenters supported the
Agencies’ proposed changes to
Regulation CC to implement the
EGRRCPA amendments to the EFA Act
that extended its application to
American Samoa, the Commonwealth of
the Northern Mariana Islands, and
Guam. The proposed changes included
updating the definitions of ‘‘state’’ and
‘‘United States’’ in Regulation CC to
include these territories as well as other
conforming amendments. No
commenters opposed the proposed
changes. In their final rule, the Agencies
adopt these changes as proposed.
E. Technical Amendments to Appendix
A of Regulation DD
The Bureau proposed a technical,
non-substantive amendment to its
Regulation DD, 12 CFR part 1030, to add
a new paragraph (e) to § 1030.1 that
would cross-reference the Bureau’s joint
authority with the Board to issue
regulations under certain provisions of
the EFA Act that are codified within
Regulation CC. The Bureau also
proposed related technical, nonsubstantive amendments to § 1030.7(c),
and the commentary thereto, which
states that interest shall begin to accrue
not later than the business day specified
for interest-bearing accounts in the EFA
Act and Regulation CC. In addition, the
Bureau proposed to fix technical errors
in Appendix A to Regulation DD within
the formulas that demonstrate how to
calculate annual percentage yield (APY)
and annual percentage yield earned
(APYE). Specifically, certain terms
within the formulas should be shown as
exponents but currently are erroneously
not shown as exponents. These
typographical errors were inadvertently
introduced into the APY and APYE
formulas in Appendix A when the
Bureau issued its restatement of
Regulation DD in December 2011.23
22 Consistent with this view, the EFA Act’s
legislative history shows that one intent of the Act
was to ‘‘provide a fairer balance between the banks’
interest in avoiding fraud and consumers’ interests
in having speedy access to their funds.’’ S. Rep. No.
100–19, at 28 (1987); see also H.R. Rep. No. 100–
52, at 14 (1987) (describing the efforts ‘‘to protect
depository institutions while furthering the original
goals of the legislation to provide shorter time
periods for funds availability.’’)
23 76 FR 79276 (Dec. 21, 2011).
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
31691
The Bureau received one comment
regarding its proposed correction of
technical errors in Appendix A to
Regulation DD, recommending that the
Bureau consult with the National Credit
Union Association (NCUA) to determine
whether it is necessary to amend
Appendix A within credit unions’
equivalent regulation under the Truth in
Savings Act (TISA), specifically,
Appendix A to 12 CFR part 707. The
technical errors that are present in
Appendix A to Regulation DD are not
present in Appendix A to 12 CFR part
707. Thus, the Bureau has no reason to
believe it is necessary for the NCUA to
amend Appendix A to 12 CFR part 707.
In addition, as described below, the
Bureau has performed interagency
consultations regarding this final rule,
including with the NCUA.
The Bureau is adopting as proposed
the above-described technical, nonsubstantive amendments to Regulation
DD and Appendix A thereto.
III. Legal Authority
In issuing the final rule, the Agencies
are exercising their authority under
section 609(a) of the EFA Act (12 U.S.C.
4008(a)) to amend subpart B and, in
connection therewith, subpart A, of
Regulation CC to prescribe regulations
to carry out the provisions of the EFA
Act, to prevent the circumvention or
evasion of such provisions, and to
facilitate compliance with such
provisions.24 Additionally, with respect
to the technical amendments to
Regulation DD, the Bureau is exercising
its authority under section 269(a) of
TISA (12 U.S.C. 4308(a)) to prescribe
regulations to carry out the purpose and
provisions of TISA.
IV. Administrative Law Matters
A. Bureau’s Dodd-Frank Act Section
1022(b)(2)(A) Analysis
1. Overview
Section 1022(b)(2)(A) of the DoddFrank Act provides that in prescribing a
rule under the Federal consumer
financial laws, the Bureau shall
consider the potential benefits and costs
to consumers and covered persons,
including the potential reduction of
access by consumers to consumer
financial products or services resulting
from such rule; the impact on
depository institutions and credit
unions with $10 billion or less in total
24 Additionally, section 604(b)(3) of the EFA Act
(12 U.S.C. 4003(b)(3)) authorizes the Agencies to
establish reasonable exceptions to time limitations
for deposit accounts that have been overdrawn
repeatedly. As noted above, the Agencies also rely
on this authority in adjusting the repeatedly
overdrawn threshold in 12 CFR 229.13(d).
E:\FR\FM\03JYR1.SGM
03JYR1
31692
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
assets as described in section 1026 of
the Dodd-Frank Act; and the impact on
consumers in rural areas.25 The Bureau
requested comment on the preliminary
analysis as well as the submission of
additional data that could inform the
Bureau’s analysis of the benefits, costs,
and impacts of the rule. The Bureau
received four comments on the
preliminary analysis, which it has
considered in developing this final
analysis.
This analysis considers the benefits,
costs, and impacts of this final rule
using a pre-statutory baseline. That is,
the Bureau’s analysis below considers
the benefits, costs, and impacts of the
relevant provisions of the EGRRCPA
combined with this final rule relative to
the regulatory regime that pre-dates the
EGRRCPA.26
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
2. Potential Benefits and Costs to
Consumers and Covered Persons
This final rule adjusts for inflation the
funds that must be available as required
by the EFA Act and Regulation CC.
Moreover, depository institutions
located in American Samoa, the
Northern Mariana Islands, and Guam
will now be required to comply with the
provisions in the EFA Act and subpart
B of Regulation CC related to funds
availability, payment of interest, and
disclosures to their customers. The final
rule keeps the expected losses to
depository institutions constant in real
terms by adjusting for inflation the
funds that must be available. Thus, the
Bureau does not expect any potential
benefits, costs, or impacts to consumers
or covered persons as a result of the
adjustment methodology, other than the
paperwork costs discussed below. The
adjustments and methodology in this
rule are technical, and they merely
apply the statutory method for adjusting
amounts that must be available to
consumers.
The Bureau estimates that covered
persons will face an average paperwork
cost of approximately $2,241 every five
years to update notices already sent to
consumers.27 Specifically, the Bureau
25 12 U.S.C. 5512(b)(2)(A). Although the manner
and extent to which section 1022(b)(2)(A) applies
to a joint Bureau and Board rulemaking under the
EFA Act is unclear, to inform this rulemaking more
fully the Bureau performed the described analysis.
26 The Bureau has discretion in future
rulemakings to choose the most appropriate
baseline for that particular rulemaking. Also note
that the Bureau’s analysis excludes the Board’s final
amendments to subpart C of Regulation CC.
Additionally, the Bureau’s amendments to
Regulation DD are technical and non-substantive
and so do not affect the benefits, costs, or impacts
of the final rule.
27 In the proposed 1022(b)(2) analysis, the Bureau
stated that covered persons would face an average
paperwork cost of $398.04 every five years. The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:37 Jul 02, 2019
Jkt 247001
estimates that compliance will require
60 hours every five years. The Bureau
further assumes an average hourly wage
of $37.35, as explained below.
In the proposed 1022(b)(2) analysis,
the Bureau used the average hourly
wage rate for compliance officers of
$33.17. The revised average hourly wage
rate reflects two adjustments. First, the
Bureau is using figures reported in the
Occupational Employment Statistics for
May 2018 instead of May 2016. Second,
two commenters observed that
implementation requires staff besides
compliance officers to make system
updates and that technical staff might
have a higher average hourly wage. The
Bureau does not have representative
data on the combinations of staff that
would be used in recurring system
changes of the type required by this
rule. The Bureau agrees, however, that
the prior estimate likely underestimated
the average hourly cost. The second
adjustment takes some account of
differences in staff and costs to mitigate
any underestimation.28
Two commenters stated that the rule
would trigger the regulation’s
requirement to provide a change-interms notice and that this would create
costs for printing and mailing. However,
the change-in-terms notice can be
provided on the monthly account
statement (the notice can also be
provided electronically if the institution
has the consumer’s E-Sign consent). The
Bureau therefore does not agree that the
rule would necessitate an increase in
printing and mailing costs.
Additionally, the EGRRCPA made
amendments to the EFA Act to extend
its application to American Samoa, the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, and Guam.29 The final rule
implements the EGRRCPA by extending
the application of Regulation CC’s
requirements related to funds
availability, payment of interest, and
disclosures to institutions in American
Bureau received comments that the total and the
assumed number of hours were too low. To be
consistent with the PRA analysis, the Bureau
should have stated that covered persons would face
an average paperwork cost of $398.04 every year,
which would be $1,990.20 every five years.
28 See Bureau of Labor Statistics, National
Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates
(May 2018), available at https://www.bls.gov/oes/
current/oes_nat.htm. The average hourly wage is a
weighted average of 40% of the average annual
wage for compliance officers ($34.86), 40% for
operations staff ($36.98), and 20% for computer
programmers ($43.07). In addition, one commenter
said that the wage should take into account benefits
as well as salary. Given that the required changes
occur just once every five years, the Bureau expects
that there would be large differences across
institutions in use of contractors and salaried
employees. The Bureau does not have the data
required to take these differences into account.
29 Public Law 115–174, section 208 (2018).
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Samoa, the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands, and Guam.
Consumers of depository institutions in
American Samoa, Guam, and the
Northern Mariana Islands will generally
receive the same benefits of consumers
of institutions already complying with
subpart B of Regulation CC. This
includes policies and other disclosures
regarding funds availability and timely
access to their funds. Consumers will
generally not experience any costs
associated with changes to existing
policies or with receiving these
disclosures.
Based on regulatory filings, the
Bureau has identified five institutions
headquartered in American Samoa, the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, and Guam that are newly
subject to Regulation CC as a result of
the amendments made to the EFA Act
by the EGRRCPA, and that may
therefore face compliance costs
associated with this final rule. Although
these institutions will incur costs to
comply with the requirements of
Regulation CC, the Bureau does not
have data on the impact of the
requirements of this final rule on these
institutions. The Bureau specifically
requested information from commenters
on the costs of complying with
Regulation CC for institutions in
American Samoa, the Commonwealth of
the Northern Mariana Islands, and
Guam and on those institutions’ prestatutory practices regarding funds
availability. No comments provided
data or other information in response to
this request.
3. Impact on Depository Institutions
With No More Than $10 Billion in
Assets
The final rule’s inflation adjustments
and changes to disclosures will impact
all depository institutions, including
those with no more than $10 billion in
assets. The Bureau expects that all
depository institutions will experience
an average cost of approximately $2,241
to update quinquennial notices.
The EGRRCPA amended the EFA Act
to extend its application to institutions
in American Samoa, the Commonwealth
of the Northern Mariana Islands, and
Guam. The Bureau identified five
institutions that are now required to
comply with Regulation CC, and all
have no more than $10 billion in assets.
The Bureau requested information from
commenters on the total cost that would
be experienced by these depository
institutions to comply with Regulation
CC. No comments provided data or
other information in response to this
request.
E:\FR\FM\03JYR1.SGM
03JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
4. Impact on Access to Credit
The Bureau does not expect the final
rule to affect consumers’ access to
credit. The scope of this rulemaking is
limited to funds availability in
depository accounts and is not directly
related to credit access.
5. Impact on Rural Areas
The Bureau does not believe that the
final rule will have a unique impact on
consumers in rural areas.
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Board: The Regulatory Flexibility Act
(RFA) requires an agency to publish a
final regulatory flexibility analysis with
a final rule or certify that the rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. Based on its analysis, and for
the reasons stated below, the Board
believes that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Nevertheless, the Board is publishing a
final regulatory flexibility analysis.
1. Statement of the need for, and
objectives of, the proposed rule. The
final rule memorializes the calculation
method used to adjust the EFA Act
dollar amounts every five years in
accordance with section 607(f) of the
EFA Act, as amended by section 1086(f)
of the Dodd-Frank Act. The final rule
also implements the statutory
amendments to the EFA Act to extend
its application to American Samoa, the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, and Guam.
2. Small entities affected by the
proposed rule. The final rule applies to
all depository institutions regardless of
their size. Pursuant to regulations issued
by the Small Business Administration
(13 CFR 121.201), a ‘‘small banking
organization’’ includes a depository
institution with $550 million or less in
total assets. Based on call report data,
there are approximately 9,460
depository institutions that have total
domestic assets of $550 million or less
and thus are considered small entities
for purposes of the RFA. All institutions
will be required to update existing
disclosures to their customers with any
adjustments in the dollar amounts and
update their software to adjust the
availability amounts where necessary.
As discussed above, while some
commenters suggested the cost burden
on institutions implementing the
inflation indexing could be greater than
the proposal estimated, the Board does
not believe the final rule will have a
significant economic impact on the
entities that it affects. Specifically, the
extent of impact on small entities may
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:37 Jul 02, 2019
Jkt 247001
depend on the contents of the
institution’s funds availability policy
and the frequency of the institution’s
regularly scheduled re-prints of its
availability policy disclosures. Small
depository institutions that already
make funds available the next day and
do not utilize the exceptions for new
accounts, large deposits, or repeated
overdrafts may be less affected by the
final rule. The economic impact on
small entities from the final rule may
include technology, labor, and other
associated costs incurred to update their
disclosures with the adjusted dollar
amounts, if those cannot be
accomplished within the institution’s
regular cycle. However, as noted above,
the Agencies anticipate providing one
year between the date of publication in
the Federal Register of the inflationadjusted amounts and the date on which
the adjusted amounts become effective.
The Agencies believe that this one-year
timeframe provides institutions with a
sufficient interim in which to plan to
send their change-in-terms notices in a
way that minimizes the burden
associated with doing so. In addition,
depository institutions located in
American Samoa, the Northern Mariana
Islands, and Guam will now be required
to comply with the provisions in the
EFA Act and Regulation CC related to
funds availability, payment of interest,
and disclosures to their customers.
3. Recordkeeping, reporting, and
compliance requirements. The final rule
requires institutions to update their
existing EFA Act disclosures to their
customers with the adjusted dollar
amount as well as update software that
determines availability, as applicable.
No other additional recordkeeping,
reporting, or compliance requirements
would be required by the proposed rule.
4. Other Federal rules. The Board has
not identified any likely duplication,
overlap and/or potential conflict
between the final rule and any other
Federal rule.
5. Significant alternatives to the
proposed revisions. As discussed above
and after reviewing the comments
submitted, the Board has not identified
any significant alternatives that would
reduce the regulatory burden of this rule
on small entities.
Bureau: The Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) generally requires an agency
to conduct an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis (IRFA) and a final
regulatory flexibility analysis (FRFA) of
any rule subject to notice-and-comment
rulemaking requirements.30 These
analyses must ‘‘describe the impact of
PO 00000
30 5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
31693
the proposed rule on small entities.’’ 31
Neither an IRFA nor FRFA is required
if the agency certifies that the rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities.32 The Bureau also is subject to
certain additional procedures under the
RFA involving the convening of a panel
to consult with small business
representatives prior to proposing a rule
for which an IRFA is required.
At the proposed rule stage, the Bureau
determined that an IRFA was not
required because the proposal, if
adopted, would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. For this final
rule, the Bureau continues to believe
that that determination is accurate. As
discussed in the Bureau’s section
1022(b)(2) analysis above, the Bureau
believes the final rule’s inflation
adjustments hold real expected losses
fixed by adjusting for inflation the
amount of funds that must be made
available for withdrawal in accordance
with the EFA Act and Regulation CC.
Accordingly, these adjustments for
inflation do not introduce costs for
entities, including small entities, other
than the paperwork costs discussed
below. In addition, the final rule would
implement in Regulation CC the
EGRRCPA extension of the EFA Act’s
requirements to institutions in
American Samoa, the Commonwealth of
the Northern Mariana Islands, and
Guam. The Bureau identified five
institutions that will be required to
comply with Regulation CC due to the
EGRRCPA amendments to the EFA Act.
Thus, the Bureau concludes that a
substantial number of small entities is
not impacted by the proposal to
implement in Regulation CC the
EGRRCPA amendments to the EFA Act.
The Bureau recognizes that the final
rule will have some impact on some
entities, including those that are small.
The Small Business Administration
(SBA) defines small depository
institutions as those with less than $550
31 Id. at 603(a). For purposes of assessing the
impacts of the final rule on small entities, ‘‘small
entities’’ is defined in the RFA to include small
businesses, small not-for-profit organizations, and
small government jurisdictions. Id. at 601(6). A
‘‘small business’’ is determined by application of
Small Business Administration regulations and
reference to the North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS) classifications and
size standards. Id. at 601(3). A ‘‘small organization’’
is any ‘‘not-for-profit enterprise which is
independently owned and operated and is not
dominant in its field.’’ Id. at 601(4). A ‘‘small
governmental jurisdiction’’ is the government of a
city, county, town, township, village, school
district, or special district with a population of less
than 50,000. Id. at 601(5).
32 Id. at 605(b).
E:\FR\FM\03JYR1.SGM
03JYR1
31694
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
million in assets.33 Following guidance
from the Small Business
Administration, the Bureau averaged the
total assets reported in quarterly call
reports during quarters 1 through 4 of
2018. The Bureau identified 9,460
entities that had average total assets less
than $550 million. These are considered
small for the purposes of the RFA. Using
the methodology outlined in the Board’s
Paperwork Reduction Act analysis, the
Bureau estimates that the quinquennial
adjustments will have an average
quinquennial cost of approximately
$2,241 for depository institutions. The
Bureau estimates that about 3% of small
entities face a significant economic
impact from the quinquennial
information collection.
In addition, the Bureau estimates the
impact of all subpart B provisions for
those covered persons required to
comply with subpart B of Regulation CC
as a result of the amendments the
EGRRCPA made to the EFA Act. The
EGRRCPA amended the EFA Act to
extend its application to institutions in
American Samoa, the Commonwealth of
the Northern Mariana Islands, and
Guam. The Bureau identified five
institutions that will be required to
comply with Regulation CC due to the
EGRRCPA amendments to the EFA Act.
Thus, the Bureau concludes that a
substantial number of small entities is
not impacted by the proposal to
implement the EGRRCPA amendments
to the EFA Act in Regulation CC.
Accordingly, the Bureau Director, by
signing below, certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
Board: Certain provisions of the final
rule contain ‘‘collection of information’’
requirements within the meaning of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3521). In accordance
with the requirements of the PRA, the
Board may not conduct or sponsor, and
the respondent is not required to
respond to, an information collection
unless it displays a currently-valid
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) control number. The OMB
control number for the Board is 7100–
0235 and will be extended, with
revision. The Board reviewed the final
rule under the authority delegated to the
Board by OMB. The Board invited
comments on: (a) Whether the
collections of information are necessary
33 Small Business Administration, Table of Small
Business Standards (2016), available at https://
www.sba.gov/contracting/getting-started-contractor/
make-sure-you-meet-sba-size-standards/tablesmall-business-size-standards.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:37 Jul 02, 2019
Jkt 247001
for the proper performance of the
Board’s functions, including whether
the information has practical utility; (b)
The accuracy of the estimates of the
burden of the information collections,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c)
Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; (d) Ways to minimize the
burden of the information collections on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology;
and (e) Estimates of capital or start-up
costs and costs of operation,
maintenance, and purchase of services
to provide information.
Eight commenters, including credit
unions and credit union trade
associations, expressed concern
regarding the burden imposed on
institutions to implement the inflation
adjustments. Several credit union
commenters stated that the cost burden
imposed on institutions to implement
the inflation indexing could exceed the
Agencies’ estimate in the proposal,
noting in particular the printing and
distribution costs associated with
sending notices to customers of the
changes in the institutions’ fundsavailability policies (commonly referred
to as ‘‘change-in-terms’’ notices). One
commenter specifically voiced concern
about the disproportionate cost impact
on smaller credit unions for printing
and mailing notices in general and, in
specific, the change-in-terms notice. To
reduce that burden, the commenter also
urged the Agencies to reduce the length
of the required funds-availability
disclosures or permit them to
accompany monthly account
statements. Another commenter
suggested reducing burden by
establishing an exception within the
Regulation CC provision, § 229.18(e),
that requires the change-in-terms notice.
Specifically, the commenter suggested
that an institution not be required to
provide a change-in-terms notice when
its funds-availability policy changes due
to the periodic inflation adjustments to
the Regulation CC funds-availability
dollar amounts that are mandated by
section 607(f) of the EFA Act.
In their final rule, the Agencies
decline to establish in Regulation CC an
exception to the requirement to send a
change-in-terms notice, as this
requirement is established by statute.
However, the Agencies note several
ways that depository institutions may
lower their costs under the rule,
including providing the required notice
electronically and sending it with the
monthly account statement, as follows.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Electronic delivery is permitted where
the institution has complied with the
requirements of the Electronic
Signatures in Global and National
Commerce Act (15 U.S.C. 7001 et seq.
(‘‘E-Sign Act’’)). See comment
229.15(a)–1. Further, the regulation
already permits an institution to send a
required change-in-terms notice on or
with a monthly account statement, and
this is so irrespective of whether the
institution sends the notice and
statement electronically or in paper
form. See comment 229.18(e)–1 (stating
that the change-in-terms notice required
by § 229.18(e) ‘‘may be given in any
form as long as it is clear and
conspicuous’’). In addition, an
institution need not set forth the
entirety of its revised funds-availability
policy in its change-in-terms notice. If
an institution chooses to provide the
notice by sending a complete new
availability disclosure, the institution
must direct the customer to the changed
terms in the disclosure by use of a letter
or insert, or by highlighting the changed
terms in the disclosure. See comment
229.18(e)–1. And finally, as discussed
above, the Agencies anticipate
providing one year between the date of
publication in the Federal Register of
the inflation-adjusted amounts and the
date on which the adjusted amounts
become effective. The Agencies believe
that this one-year timeframe provides
institutions with a sufficient interim in
which to plan to send their change-interms notices in a way that minimizes
the burden associated with doing so. In
light of all of these factors, and given
that the inflation adjustments are
statutorily required and will occur only
once every five years, the Agencies
believe that the burden on institutions
to send change-in-terms notices
reflecting the inflation-adjusted
amounts is reasonable.
Proposed Information Collection
Title of Information Collection:
Disclosure Requirements Associated
with Availability of Funds and
Collection of Checks (Regulation CC).
Frequency of Response:
Quinquennial.
Affected Public: Businesses or other
for-profit.
Respondents: State member banks and
uninsured state branches and agencies
of foreign banks.
Abstract: Regulation CC (12 CFR part
229) implements the Expedited Funds
Availability Act of 1987 (EFA Act) and
the Check Clearing for the 21st Century
Act of 2003 (Check 21 Act). The EFA
Act was enacted to provide depositors
of checks with prompt funds availability
and to foster improvements in the check
E:\FR\FM\03JYR1.SGM
03JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
collection and return processes. Subpart
B of Regulation CC implements the EFA
Act’s funds-availability provisions and
specifies availability schedules within
which banks must make funds available
for withdrawal. Subpart B also
implements the EFA Act’s rules
regarding exceptions to the schedules,
disclosure of funds-availability policies,
and payment of interest.
Current Action: The Agencies are
adding § 229.11 to provide the CPI–W
calculation methodology, which
includes an explanation of how annual
and cumulative changes (positive or
negative) in the CPI–W will be taken
into account, for the dollar amounts in
§ 229.10(c)(1)(vii) regarding the
minimum amount, § 229.12(d) for the
cash withdrawal amount, section
229.13(a) for the new-account amount,
§ 229.13(b) for the large-deposit
threshold, § 229.13(d) for repeatedly
overdrawn threshold, and § 229.21(a) for
the civil liability amounts.
PRA Burden Estimates
Number of respondents: 940
respondents (100 respondents for
changes in policy).
Estimated average hours per response:
Specific availability policy disclosure
and initial disclosures, .02 hours; Notice
in specific policy disclosure, .05 hours;
Notice of exceptions, .05 hours;
Locations where employees accept
consumer deposits, .25 hours;
Quinquennial inflation adjustments for
disclosures (annualized), 8 hours;
Annual notice of new ATMs, 5 hours;
Changes in policy, 20 hours;
Notification of quinquennial inflation
adjustments, 4 hours; Notice of
nonpayment on paying bank, .02 hours;
Notification to customer, .02 hours;
Expedited recredit for consumers, .25
hours; Expedited recredit for banks, .25
hours; Consumer awareness, .02 hours;
and Expedited recredit claim notice, .25
hours.
Estimated annual burden hours:
Specific availability policy disclosure
and initial disclosures, 9,400 hours;
Notice in specific policy disclosure,
32,900 hours; Notice of exceptions,
94,000 hours; Locations where
employees accept consumer deposits,
235 hours; Quinquennial inflation
adjustments for disclosures
(annualized), 7,520 hours; Annual
notice of new ATMs, 4,700 hours;
Changes in policy, 4,000 hours;
Notification of quinquennial inflation
adjustments, 3,760 hours; Notice of
nonpayment on paying bank, 658 hours;
Notification to customer, 6,956 hours;
Expedited recredit for consumers, 8,225
hours; Expedited recredit for banks,
3,525 hours; Consumer awareness, 5,640
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:37 Jul 02, 2019
Jkt 247001
hours; and Expedited recredit claim
notice, 5,875 hours.
Current Total Estimated Annual
Burden: 176,114 hours.
Proposed Total Estimated Annual
Burden: 187,394 hours.
Bureau: As noted in the proposal, the
Bureau was not required to seek OMB
approval for the information collection
requirements already accounted for by
the Board above, or for which other
agencies are responsible. Moreover, the
Bureau’s technical, non-substantive
amendments to Regulation DD as
discussed above in Section II.E do not
impose any new or additional
information collection requirements that
would require OMB approval.34
D. Plain Language Used
Section 722 of the Gramm-LeachBliley Act (Pub. L. 106–102, 113 Stat.
1338, 1471, 12 U.S.C. 4809) requires the
Federal banking agencies to use plain
language in all proposed and final rules
published after January 1, 2000. The
Board sought to present the proposed
rule in a simple and straightforward
manner, and invited comment on the
use of plain language and whether any
part of the rule could be more clearly
stated. No commenters commented on
use of plain language in the proposed
rule, and the Board has adopted
proposed plain language in the final
rule.
E. Interagency Consultations
The Board and the Bureau have
performed interagency consultations
regarding this final rule consistent with
section 609(e) of the EFA Act, section
269(a)(1) of TISA, and section
1022(b)(2)(B) of the Dodd-Frank Act.
Section 609(e) of the EFA Act provides
that in prescribing regulations under
section 609(a), the Board and the
Director of the Bureau shall consult
with the Comptroller of the Currency,
the Board of Directors of the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the
National Credit Union Administration
Board.35 Section 269(a)(1) of TISA
provides that in prescribing regulations
under section 269(a)(1), the Bureau shall
consult with each agency referred to in
TISA section 270(a) (12 U.S.C.
4309(a)).36 Section 1022(b)(2)(B) of the
Dodd-Frank Act provides that in
prescribing a rule under the Federal
consumer financial laws, the Bureau
shall consult with the appropriate
prudential regulators or other Federal
agencies prior to proposing a rule and
34 The OMB control number for the information
collection requirements contained in Regulation DD
is 3170–0004.
35 12 U.S.C. 4008(a).
36 12 U.S.C. 4308(a)(1).
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
31695
during the comment process regarding
consistency with prudential, market, or
systemic objectives administered by
such agencies.37
F. Bureau Congressional Review Act
Statement
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), the Bureau
will submit a report containing this rule
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to the
rule taking effect. The Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs
(OIRA) has designated this rule as not
a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
List of Subjects in
12 CFR Part 229
Banks, Banking, Federal Reserve
System, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
12 CFR Part 1030
Advertising, Banks, Banking,
Consumer protection, National banks,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Savings associations.
Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System amends
Regulation CC, 12 CFR part 229, as set
forth below:
PART 229—AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS
AND COLLECTIONS OF CHECKS
(REGULATION CC)
1. The authority citation for part 229
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 4001–4010, 12 U.S.C.
5001–5018.
Subpart A—General
*
*
*
*
*
2. In § 229.1, paragraph (a) is revised
to read as follows:
■
§ 229.1 Authority and purpose;
organization.
(a) Authority and purpose—(1) In
general. This part is issued by the Board
of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System (Board) to implement the
Expedited Funds Availability Act (12
U.S.C. 4001–4010) (EFA Act) and the
37 12 U.S.C. 5512(b)(2)(B). Although the manner
and extent to which section 1022(b)(2)(B) applies to
a rulemaking of this kind is unclear, in order to
inform this rulemaking more fully, the Bureau
performed the described consultations.
E:\FR\FM\03JYR1.SGM
03JYR1
31696
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act
(12 U.S.C. 5001–5018) (Check 21 Act).
(2) Joint authority of the Bureau. The
Board issues regulations under Sections
603(d)(1), 604, 605, and 609(a) of the
EFA Act (12 U.S.C. 4002(d)(1), 4003,
4004, 4008(a)) jointly with the Director
of the Bureau of Consumer Financial
Protection (Bureau).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. In § 229.2, revise paragraphs (c), (ff),
and (jj) to read as follows:
§ 229.2
September 1, 2019 Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Automated teller machine or ATM
means an electronic device located in
the United States at which a natural
person may make deposits to an account
by cash or check and perform other
account transactions.
*
*
*
*
*
(ff) State means a state, the District of
Columbia, Puerto Rico, American
Samoa, the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, or the
U.S. Virgin Islands. For purposes of
subpart D of this part and, in connection
therewith, this subpart A, state also
means the Trust Territory of the Pacific
Islands and any other territory of the
United States.
*
*
*
*
*
(jj) United States means the states,
including the District of Columbia, the
U.S. Virgin Islands, American Samoa,
the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands, Guam, and Puerto
Rico.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart B—Availability of Funds and
Disclosure of Funds Availability
Policies
§ 229.10
[Amended]
4. In § 229.10, remove ‘‘$100’’ and add
in its place ‘‘$225’’ in paragraph
(c)(1)(vii)(A).
■ 5. Add § 229.11 to read as follows:
■
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
§ 229.11
Adjustment of dollar amounts.
(a) Dollar amounts indexed. The
dollar amounts specified in
§§ 229.10(c)(1)(vii), 229.12(d), 229.13(a),
229.13(b), 229.13(d), and 229.21(a) shall
be adjusted effective on July 1, 2020, on
July 1, 2025, and on July 1 of every fifth
year after 2025, in accordance with the
procedure set forth in paragraph (b) of
this section using the Consumer Price
Index for Urban Wage Earners and
Clerical Workers (CPI–W), as published
by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
(b) Indexing procedure—(1) Inflation
measurement periods. For dollar
amount adjustments that are effective on
July 1, 2020, the inflation measurement
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:37 Jul 02, 2019
Jkt 247001
period begins in July 2011 and ends in
July 2018. For dollar amount
adjustments that are effective on July 1,
2025, the inflation measurement period
begins in July 2018 and ends in July
2023. For dollar amount adjustments
that are effective on July 1 of every fifth
year after 2025, the inflation
measurement period begins in July of
every fifth year after 2018 and ends in
July of every fifth year after 2023.
Following each inflation measurement
period, the dollar amount adjustments
will be published in the Federal
Register.
(2) Percentage change. Any dollar
amount adjustment under this section
shall be calculated across an inflation
measurement period by the aggregate
percentage change in the CPI–W,
including both positive and negative
percentage changes. The aggregate
percentage change over the inflation
measurement period will be rounded to
one decimal place, using the CPI–W
value for July (which is generally
released by the Bureau of Labor
Statistics in August).
(3) Adjustment amount. The
adjustment amount for each dollar
amount listed in paragraph (a) of this
section shall be equal to the aggregate
percentage change multiplied by the
existing dollar amount listed in
paragraph (c) of this section and
rounded to the nearest multiple of $25.
The adjusted dollar amount will be
equal to the sum of the existing dollar
amount and the adjustment amount. No
dollar adjustment will be made when
the aggregate percentage change is zero
or a negative percentage change, or
when the aggregate percentage change
multiplied by the existing dollar amount
listed in paragraph (c) and rounded to
the nearest multiple of $25 results in no
change.
(4) Carry-forward. When there is an
aggregate negative percentage change
over an inflation measurement period,
or when an aggregate positive
percentage change over an inflation
measurement period multiplied by the
existing dollar amount listed in
paragraph (c) of this section and
rounded to the nearest multiple of $25
results in no change, the aggregate
percentage change over the inflation
measurement period will be included in
the calculation to determine the
percentage change at the end of the
subsequent inflation measurement
period. That is, the cumulative change
in the CPI–W over the two (or more)
inflation measurement periods will be
used in the calculation until the
cumulative change results in
publication of an adjusted dollar
amount in the regulation.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(c) Amounts. (1) For purposes of
§ 229.10(c)(1)(vii), the dollar amount in
effect during a particular period is the
amount stated in this paragraph (c)(1)
for that period.
(i) Prior to July 21, 2011, the amount
is $100.
(ii) From July 21, 2011, through June
30, 2020, by operation of section
603(a)(2)(D) of the EFA Act (12 U.S.C.
4002(a)(2)(D)) the amount is $200.
(iii) Effective July 1, 2020, the amount
is $225.
(2) For purposes of § 229.12(d), the
dollar amount in effect during a
particular period is the amount stated in
this paragraph (c)(2) for that period.
(i) Prior to July 1, 2020, the amount
is $400.
(ii) Effective July 1, 2020, the amount
is $450.
(3) For purposes of § 229.13(a), (b),
and (d), the dollar amount in effect
during a particular period is the amount
stated in this paragraph (c)(3) for that
period.
(i) Prior to July 1, 2020, the amount
is $5,000.
(ii) Effective July 1, 2020, the amount
is $5,525.
(4) For purposes of § 229.21(a), the
dollar amounts in effect during a
particular period are the amounts stated
in this paragraph (c)(4) for the period.
(i) Prior to July 1, 2020, the amounts
are $100, $1,000, and $500,000
respectively.
(ii) Effective July 1, 2020, the amounts
are $100, $1,100, and $552,500
respectively.
■ 6. In § 229.12:
■ a. Remove ‘‘$100’’ and add in its place
‘‘$225’’ in paragraph (d); and
■ b. Revise paragraphs (e) introductory
text and (e)(1).
The revisions read as follows:
§ 229.12
Availability schedule.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Extension of schedule for certain
deposits in Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico,
American Samoa, the Commonwealth of
the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam,
and the U.S. Virgin Islands. The
depositary bank may extend the time
periods set forth in this section by one
business day in the case of any deposit,
other than a deposit described in
§ 229.10, that is—
(1) Deposited in an account at a
branch of a depositary bank if the
branch is located in Alaska, Hawaii,
Puerto Rico, American Samoa, the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, Guam, or the U.S. Virgin
Islands; and
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\03JYR1.SGM
03JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
§ 229.21
IV. * * *
[Amended]
7. In § 229.21, remove ‘‘$100’’ and add
in its place ‘‘$225’’ in paragraph
(a)(2)(i).
■
§ 229.43
[Removed and Reserved]
8. Section 229.43 is removed and
reserved.
■ 9. Amend appendix E to part 229 as
follows:
■ a. Remove the dollar amounts in the
‘‘Remove’’ column wherever they
appear and add in their place the dollar
amounts in the ‘‘Add’’ column in the
following table:
■
Section
Remove
229.10(c) ...........
229.12(d) ..........
229.13(a), (b),
and (d) ...........
Add
$5,000
400
$5,525
450
5,000
5,525
b. In Section II.D, revise paragraph 1.
c. In Section IV.D, revise paragraph 5
and add paragraph 7.
■ d. Section V is revised.
■ e. In Section VI.B, paragraph 4 is
added.
■ f In Section VI.E paragraphs 1 and 2
are revised.
■ g. Section VII.C, paragraph 2 is revised
and paragraph 4 is added.
■ h. In Section VII.E, paragraph 5 is
added.
■ i. In Section VII.H, paragraph 2(b) is
revised.
■ j. In Section XIV.C, paragraph 2 is
revised.
■ k. In Section XV.A, paragraph 2 is
added.
■ l. Section XXIX is removed and
reserved.
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
■
■
Appendix E to Part 229—Commentary
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
II. Section 229.2
Definitions
*
*
*
*
*
D. * * *
1. ATM is not defined in the EFA Act. The
regulation defines an ATM as an electronic
device located in the United States at which
a natural person may make deposits to an
account by cash or check and perform other
account transactions. Point-of-sale terminals,
machines that only dispense cash, night
depositories, and lobby deposit boxes are not
ATMs within the meaning of the definition,
either because they do not accept deposits of
cash or checks (e.g., point-of-sale terminals
and cash dispensers) or because they only
accept deposits (e.g., night depositories and
lobby boxes) and cannot perform other
transactions. A lobby deposit box or similar
receptacle in which written payment orders
or deposits may be placed is not an ATM.
*
*
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
*
16:37 Jul 02, 2019
Jkt 247001
D. * * *
5. First $225
a. The EFA Act and regulation also require
that up to $225 of the aggregate deposit by
check or checks not subject to next-day
availability on any one banking day be made
available on the next business day. For
example, if $70 were deposited in an account
by check(s) on a Monday, the entire $70 must
be available for withdrawal at the start of
business on Tuesday. If $400 were deposited
by check(s) on a Monday, this section
requires that $225 of the funds be available
for withdrawal at the start of business on
Tuesday. The portion of the customer’s
deposit to which the $225 must be applied
is at the discretion of the depositary bank, as
long as it is not applied to any checks subject
to next-day availability. The $225 next-day
availability rule does not apply to deposits at
nonproprietary ATMs.
b. The $225 that must be made available
under this rule is in addition to the amount
that must be made available for withdrawal
on the business day after deposit under other
provisions of this section. For example, if a
customer deposits a $1,000 Treasury check
and a $1,000 local check in its account on
Monday, $1,225 must be made available for
withdrawal on Tuesday—the proceeds of the
$1,000 Treasury check, as well as the first
$225 of the local check.
c. A depositary bank may aggregate all
local and nonlocal check deposits made by
a customer on a given banking day for the
purposes of the $225 next-day availability
rule. Thus, if a customer has two accounts at
the depositary bank, and on a particular
banking day makes deposits to each account,
$225 of the total deposited to the two
accounts must be made available on the
business day after deposit. Banks may
aggregate deposits to individual and joint
accounts for the purposes of this provision.
d. If the customer deposits a $500 local
check and gets $225 cash back at the time of
deposit, the bank need not make an
additional $225 available for withdrawal on
the following day. Similarly, if the customer
depositing the local check has a negative
book balance, or negative available balance in
its account at the time of deposit, the $225
that must be available on the next business
day may be made available by applying the
$225 to the negative balance, rather than
making the $225 available for withdrawal by
cash or check on the following day.
*
*
*
*
*
7. Dollar Amount Adjustment—See section
229.11 for the rules regarding adjustments for
inflation every five years to the dollar
amounts used in this section.
*
*
*
*
*
V. Section 229.11 Adjustment of Dollar
Amounts
1. Example of a positive adjustment. If the
CPI–W for July (and released in August) of
the base year and the adjustment year were
100 and 114.7, respectively, the aggregate
percentage change for the period would be
14.7%. If the applicable dollar amount was
$200 for the prior period, then the adjusted
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
31697
figure would become $225, as the change of
$29.40 results in rounding to $25.
2. Example of no adjustment. If the CPI–
W for July (and released in August) of the
base year and the adjustment year were 100
and 104, respectively, the aggregate
percentage change would be 4.0%. If the
applicable dollar amount was $200 for the
prior period, then the adjusted figure would
remain $200, as the change of $8.00 does not
result in rounding to $25.
3. Example of accounting for aggregate
decrease in subsequent period. If the CPI–W
for July (and released in August) of the base
year and the adjustment year were 100 and
95, respectively, the aggregate percentage
change would be ¥5%, and no adjustment
to the dollar amounts would occur. The CPI–
W for July (and released in August) of the
base year would be the starting point for
calculating any CPI–W increase across
subsequent five-year periods. Therefore, if
the CPI–W in July (and released in August)
of the base year and the CPI–W in July (and
released in August) of the years at the end
of the next two five-year periods were 100,
95, and 109, respectively, the aggregate
percentage change for the entire period
would be 9.0%. If the applicable dollar
amount was $5,000 for the prior period, then
the adjusted figure would become $5,450 as
the change of $450 does not require rounding
because it is a multiple of $25.
4. Example of accounting for aggregate lack
of dollar amount change in subsequent
period. If the CPI–W for July (and released in
August) of the base year and the year at the
end of the subsequent five-year period were
100 and 105, respectively, the aggregate
change over the five-year period would be
5%, and no adjustment to the $200 amount
would occur, as the change of $10 does not
result in rounding to $225. Nonetheless, the
CPI–W for July (and released in August) of
the base year would be the starting point for
calculating any CPI–W percentage increase
across the subsequent five-year period.
Therefore, if the CPI–W in July (and released
in August) of the base year and the CPI–W
in July (and released in August) of the years
at the end of the next two five-year periods
were 100, 105, and 112.6, respectively, the
aggregate percentage change for the entire
period would be 12.6%. If the applicable
dollar amount was $200 for the prior period,
then the adjusted figure would become $225
as the change of $25.20 results in rounding
to $225, the nearest multiple of $25.
VI. * * *
B. 229.12(d) Time Period Adjustment for
Withdrawal by Cash or Similar Means
*
*
*
*
*
4. Dollar Amount Adjustment—See section
229.11 for the rules regarding adjustments for
inflation every five years to the dollar
amounts in this section.
*
*
*
*
*
E. 229.12(e) Extension of Schedule for
Certain Deposits in Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto
Rico, American Samoa, the Commonwealth
of the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, and
the U.S. Virgin Islands
1. The EFA Act and regulation provide an
extension of the availability schedules for
E:\FR\FM\03JYR1.SGM
03JYR1
31698
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
check deposits at a branch of a bank if the
branch is located in Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto
Rico, American Samoa, the Commonwealth
of the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, or
the U.S. Virgin Islands. The schedules for
local checks, nonlocal checks (including
nonlocal checks subject to the reduced
schedules of appendix B), and deposits at
nonproprietary ATMs are extended by one
business day for checks deposited to
accounts in banks located in these
jurisdictions that are drawn on or payable at
or through a paying bank not located in the
same jurisdiction as the depositary bank. For
example, a check deposited in a bank in
Hawaii and drawn on a San Francisco paying
bank must be made available for withdrawal
not later than the third business day
following deposit. This extension does not
apply to deposits that must be made available
for withdrawal on the next business day.
2. The Congress did not provide this
extension of the schedules to checks drawn
on a paying bank located in Alaska, Hawaii,
Puerto Rico, American Samoa, the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, Guam, or the U.S. Virgin Islands and
deposited in an account at a depositary bank
in the 48 contiguous states. Therefore, a
check deposited in a San Francisco bank
drawn on a Hawaii paying bank must be
made available for withdrawal not later than
the second rather than the third business day
following deposit.
VII. Section 229.13
Exceptions
B. * * *
4. Dollar Amount Adjustment—See section
229.11 for the rules regarding adjustments for
inflation every five years to the dollar
amounts in this section.
C. * * *
2. The following example illustrates the
operation of the large-deposit exception. If a
customer deposits $2,000 in cash and a
$9,000 local check on a Monday, $2,225 (the
proceeds of the cash deposit and $225 from
the local-check deposit) must be made
available for withdrawal on Tuesday. An
additional $5,300 of the proceeds of the local
check must be available for withdrawal on
Wednesday in accordance with the local
schedule, and the remaining $3,475 may be
held for an additional period of time under
the large-deposit exception.
*
*
*
*
*
4. Dollar Amount Adjustment—See section
229.11 for the rules regarding adjustments for
inflation every five years to the dollar
amounts in this section.
*
*
*
*
*
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
E. * * *
5. Dollar Amount Adjustment—See section
229.11 for the calculation method used to
adjust the dollar amounts in this section
every five years.
*
*
*
*
*
H. * * *
2. * * *
b. In the case of a deposit of multiple
checks, the depositary bank has the
discretion to place an exception hold on any
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:37 Jul 02, 2019
Jkt 247001
combination of checks in excess of $5,525.
The notice should enable a customer to
determine the availability of the deposit in
the case of a deposit of multiple checks. For
example, if a customer deposits a $5,525
local check and a $5,525 nonlocal check,
under the large-deposit exception, the
depositary bank may make funds available in
the amount of (1) $225 on the first business
day after deposit, $5,300 on the second
business day after deposit (local check), and
$5,525 on the eleventh business day after
deposit (nonlocal check with six-day
exception hold), or (2) $225 on the first
business day after deposit, $5,300 on the fifth
business day after deposit (nonlocal check),
and $5,525 on the seventh business day after
deposit (local check with five-day exception
hold). The notice should reflect the bank’s
priorities in placing exception holds on nextday (or second-day), local, and nonlocal
checks.
*
*
*
*
*
XIV. Section 229.20
*
*
*
Relation to State Law
*
*
C. * * *
2. Under a state law, some categories of
deposits could be available for withdrawal
sooner or later than the time required by this
subpart, depending on the composition of the
deposit. For example, the EFA Act and this
regulation (§ 229.10(c)(1)(vii)) require nextday availability for the first $225 of the
aggregate deposit of local or nonlocal checks
on any day, and a state law could require
next-day availability for any check of $200 or
less that is deposited. Under the EFA Act and
this regulation, if either one $300 check or
three $100 checks are deposited on a given
day, $225 must be made available for
withdrawal on the next business day, and
$75 must be made available in accordance
with the local or nonlocal schedule. Under
the state law, however, the two deposits
would be subject to different availability
rules. In the first case, none of the proceeds
of the deposit would be subject to next-day
availability; in the second case, the entire
proceeds of the deposit would be subject to
next-day availability. In this example,
because the state law would, in some
situations, permit a hold longer than the
maximum permitted by the EFA Act, this
provision of state law is inconsistent and
preempted in its entirety.
*
*
*
*
XV. Section 229.21
*
Civil Liability
A. * * *
2. Dollar Amount Adjustment—See section
229.11 for the rules regarding adjustments for
inflation every five years to the dollar
amounts in this section.
*
*
*
*
*
Bureau of Consumer Financial
Protection
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Bureau of Consumer
Financial Protection amends Regulation
DD, 12 CFR part 1030, as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
PART 1030—TRUTH IN SAVINGS
(REGULATION DD)
10. The authority citation for part
1030 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 4302–4304, 4308,
5512, 5581.
11. In § 1030.1, paragraph (e) is added
to read as follows:
■
§ 1030.1 Authority, purpose, coverage, and
effect on state laws.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Relationship to Regulation CC. The
Director of the Bureau and the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve
System jointly issue regulations under
sections 603(d)(1), 604, 605, and 609(a)
of the Expedited Funds Availability Act
(12 U.S.C. 4002(d)(1), 4003, 4004,
4008(a)) that are codified within
Regulation CC (12 CFR part 229).
■ 12. In § 1030.7, paragraph (c) is
revised to read as follows:
§ 1030.7
Payment of interest.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Date interest begins to accrue.
Interest shall begin to accrue not later
than the business day specified for
interest-bearing accounts in section 606
of the Expedited Funds Availability Act
(12 U.S.C. 4005) and in § 229.14 of that
act’s implementing Regulation CC (12
CFR part 229). Interest shall accrue until
the day funds are withdrawn.
■ 13. Appendix A to part 1030 is revised
to read as follows:
Appendix A to Part 1030—Annual
Percentage Yield Calculation
The annual percentage yield measures the
total amount of interest paid on an account
based on the interest rate and the frequency
of compounding. The annual percentage
yield reflects only interest and does not
include the value of any bonus (or other
consideration worth $10 or less) that may be
provided to the consumer to open, maintain,
increase or renew an account. Interest or
other earnings are not to be included in the
annual percentage yield if such amounts are
determined by circumstances that may or
may not occur in the future. The annual
percentage yield is expressed as an
annualized rate, based on a 365-day year.
Institutions may calculate the annual
percentage yield based on a 365-day or a 366day year in a leap year. Part I of this
appendix discusses the annual percentage
yield calculations for account disclosures
and advertisements, while part II discusses
annual percentage yield earned calculations
for periodic statements.
Part I. Annual Percentage Yield for Account
Disclosures and Advertising Purposes
In general, the annual percentage yield for
account disclosures under §§ 1030.4 and
1030.5 and for advertising under § 1030.8 is
an annualized rate that reflects the
relationship between the amount of interest
E:\FR\FM\03JYR1.SGM
03JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
that would be earned by the consumer for the
term of the account and the amount of
principal used to calculate that interest.
Special rules apply to accounts with tiered
and stepped interest rates, and to certain time
accounts with a stated maturity greater than
one year.
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
A. General Rules
Except as provided in part I.E. of this
appendix, the annual percentage yield shall
be calculated by the formula shown below.
Institutions shall calculate the annual
percentage yield based on the actual number
of days in the term of the account. For
accounts without a stated maturity date (such
as a typical savings or transaction account),
the calculation shall be based on an assumed
term of 365 days. In determining the total
interest figure to be used in the formula,
institutions shall assume that all principal
and interest remain on deposit for the entire
term and that no other transactions (deposits
or withdrawals) occur during the term. This
assumption shall not be used if an institution
requires, as a condition of the account, that
consumers withdraw interest during the
term. In such a case, the interest (and annual
percentage yield calculation) shall reflect that
requirement. For time accounts that are
offered in multiples of months, institutions
may base the number of days on either the
actual number of days during the applicable
period, or the number of days that would
occur for any actual sequence of that many
calendar months. If institutions choose to use
the latter rule, they must use the same
number of days to calculate the dollar
amount of interest earned on the account that
is used in the annual percentage yield
formula (where ‘‘Interest’’ is divided by
‘‘Principal’’).
The annual percentage yield is calculated
by use of the following general formula
(‘‘APY’’ is used for convenience in the
formulas):
APY=100 [(1+Interest/Principal)(365/Days in
term)¥1]
‘‘Principal’’ is the amount of funds
assumed to have been deposited at the
beginning of the account.
‘‘Interest’’ is the total dollar amount of
interest earned on the Principal for the term
of the account.
‘‘Days in term’’ is the actual number of
days in the term of the account. When the
‘‘days in term’’ is 365 (that is, where the
stated maturity is 365 days or where the
account does not have a stated maturity), the
annual percentage yield can be calculated by
use of the following simple formula:
APY=100 (Interest/Principal)
Examples:
(1) If an institution pays $61.68 in interest
for a 365-day year on $1,000 deposited into
a NOW account, using the general formula
above, the annual percentage yield is 6.17%:
APY=100[(1+61.68/1,000)(365/365)¥1]
APY=6.17%
Or, using the simple formula above (since,
as an account without a stated term, the term
is deemed to be 365 days):
APY=100(61.68/1,000)
APY=6.17%
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:37 Jul 02, 2019
Jkt 247001
(2) If an institution pays $30.37 in interest
on a $1,000 six-month certificate of deposit
(where the six-month period used by the
institution contains 182 days), using the
general formula above, the annual percentage
yield is 6.18%:
APY=100[(1+30.37/1,000)(365/182)¥1]
APY=6.18%
B. Stepped-Rate Accounts (Different Rates
Apply in Succeeding Periods)
For accounts with two or more interest
rates applied in succeeding periods (where
the rates are known at the time the account
is opened), an institution shall assume each
interest rate is in effect for the length of time
provided for in the deposit contract.
Examples:
(1) If an institution offers a $1,000 6-month
certificate of deposit on which it pays a 5%
interest rate, compounded daily, for the first
three months (which contain 91 days), and a
5.5% interest rate, compounded daily, for the
next three months (which contain 92 days),
the total interest for six months is $26.68
and, using the general formula above, the
annual percentage yield is 5.39%:
APY=100[(1+26.68/1,000)(365/183)¥1]
APY=5.39%
(2) If an institution offers a $1,000 two-year
certificate of deposit on which it pays a 6%
interest rate, compounded daily, for the first
year, and a 6.5% interest rate, compounded
daily, for the next year, the total interest for
two years is $133.13, and, using the general
formula above, the annual percentage yield is
6.45%:
APY=100[(1+133.13/1,000)(365/730)¥1]
APY=6.45%
C. Variable-Rate Accounts
For variable-rate accounts without an
introductory premium or discounted rate, an
institution must base the calculation only on
the initial interest rate in effect when the
account is opened (or advertised), and
assume that this rate will not change during
the year.
Variable-rate accounts with an
introductory premium (or discount) rate must
be calculated like a stepped-rate account.
Thus, an institution shall assume that:
(1) The introductory interest rate is in
effect for the length of time provided for in
the deposit contract; and
(2) The variable interest rate that would
have been in effect when the account is
opened or advertised (but for the
introductory rate) is in effect for the
remainder of the year. If the variable rate is
tied to an index, the index-based rate in
effect at the time of disclosure must be used
for the remainder of the year. If the rate is
not tied to an index, the rate in effect for
existing consumers holding the same account
(who are not receiving the introductory
interest rate) must be used for the remainder
of the year.
For example, if an institution offers an
account on which it pays a 7% interest rate,
compounded daily, for the first three months
(which, for example, contain 91 days), while
the variable interest rate that would have
been in effect when the account was opened
was 5%, the total interest for a 365-day year
for a $1,000 deposit is $56.52 (based on 91
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
31699
days at 7% followed by 274 days at 5%).
Using the simple formula, the annual
percentage yield is 5.65%:
APY=100(56.52/1,000)
APY=5.65%
D. Tiered-Rate Accounts (Different Rates
Apply to Specified Balance Levels)
For accounts in which two or more interest
rates paid on the account are applicable to
specified balance levels, the institution must
calculate the annual percentage yield in
accordance with the method described below
that it uses to calculate interest. In all cases,
an annual percentage yield (or a range of
annual percentage yields, if appropriate)
must be disclosed for each balance tier.
For purposes of the examples discussed
below, assume the following:
Interest rate
(percent)
5.25 ...................
5.50 ...................
5.75 ...................
Deposit balance required
to earn rate
Up to but not exceeding
$2,500.
Above $2,500 but not exceeding $15,000.
Above $15,000.
Tiering Method A. (1) Under this method,
an institution pays on the full balance in the
account the stated interest rate that
corresponds to the applicable deposit tier.
For example, if a consumer deposits $8,000,
the institution pays the 5.50% interest rate
on the entire $8,000.
When this method is used to determine
interest, only one annual percentage yield
will apply to each tier. Within each tier, the
annual percentage yield will not vary with
the amount of principal assumed to have
been deposited.
For the interest rates and deposit balances
assumed above, the institution will state
three annual percentage yields—one
corresponding to each balance tier.
Calculation of each annual percentage yield
is similar for this type of account as for
accounts with a single interest rate. Thus, the
calculation is based on the total amount of
interest that would be received by the
consumer for each tier of the account for a
year and the principal assumed to have been
deposited to earn that amount of interest.
First tier. Assuming daily compounding,
the institution will pay $53.90 in interest on
a $1,000 deposit. Using the general formula,
for the first tier, the annual percentage yield
is 5.39%:
APY=100[(1+53.90/1,000)(365/365)¥1]
APY=5.39%
Using the simple formula:
APY=100(53.90/1,000)
APY=5.39%
Second tier. The institution will pay
$452.29 in interest on an $8,000 deposit.
Thus, using the simple formula, the annual
percentage yield for the second tier is 5.65%:
APY=100(452.29/8,000)
APY=5.65%
Third tier. The institution will pay
$1,183.61 in interest on a $20,000 deposit.
Thus, using the simple formula, the annual
percentage yield for the third tier is 5.92%:
APY=100(1,183.61/20,000)
E:\FR\FM\03JYR1.SGM
03JYR1
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
31700
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
APY=5.92%
Tiering Method B. Under this method, an
institution pays the stated interest rate only
on that portion of the balance within the
specified tier. For example, if a consumer
deposits $8,000, the institution pays 5.25%
on $2,500 and 5.50% on $5,500 (the
difference between $8,000 and the first tier
cut-off of $2,500).
The institution that computes interest in
this manner must provide a range that shows
the lowest and the highest annual percentage
yields for each tier (other than for the first
tier, which, like the tiers in Method A, has
the same annual percentage yield
throughout). The low figure for an annual
percentage yield range is calculated based on
the total amount of interest earned for a year
assuming the minimum principal required to
earn the interest rate for that tier. The high
figure for an annual percentage yield range is
based on the amount of interest the
institution would pay on the highest
principal that could be deposited to earn that
same interest rate. If the account does not
have a limit on the maximum amount that
can be deposited, the institution may assume
any amount.
For the tiering structure assumed above,
the institution would state a total of five
annual percentage yields—one figure for the
first tier and two figures stated as a range for
the other two tiers.
First tier. Assuming daily compounding,
the institution would pay $53.90 in interest
on a $1,000 deposit. For this first tier, using
the simple formula, the annual percentage
yield is 5.39%:
APY=100(53.90/1,000)
APY=5.39%
Second tier. For the second tier, the
institution would pay between $134.75 and
$841.45 in interest, based on assumed
balances of $2,500.01 and $15,000,
respectively. For $2,500.01, interest would be
figured on $2,500 at 5.25% interest rate plus
interest on $.01 at 5.50%. For the low end
of the second tier, therefore, the annual
percentage yield is 5.39%, using the simple
formula:
APY=100(134.75/2,500)
APY=5.39%
For $15,000, interest is figured on $2,500
at 5.25% interest rate plus interest on
$12,500 at 5.50% interest rate. For the high
end of the second tier, the annual percentage
yield, using the simple formula, is 5.61%:
APY=100(841.45/15,000)
APY=5.61%
Thus, the annual percentage yield range for
the second tier is 5.39% to 5.61%.
Third tier. For the third tier, the institution
would pay $841.45 in interest on the low end
of the third tier (a balance of $15,000.01). For
$15,000.01, interest would be figured on
$2,500 at 5.25% interest rate, plus interest on
$12,500 at 5.50% interest rate, plus interest
on $.01 at 5.75% interest rate. For the low
end of the third tier, therefore, the annual
percentage yield (using the simple formula)
is 5.61%:
APY=100 (841.45/15,000)
APY=5.61%
Since the institution does not limit the
account balance, it may assume any
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:37 Jul 02, 2019
Jkt 247001
maximum amount for the purposes of
computing the annual percentage yield for
the high end of the third tier. For an assumed
maximum balance amount of $100,000,
interest would be figured on $2,500 at 5.25%
interest rate, plus interest on $12,500 at
5.50% interest rate, plus interest on $85,000
at 5.75% interest rate. For the high end of the
third tier, therefore, the annual percentage
yield, using the simple formula, is 5.87%.
APY=100 (5,871.79/100,000)
APY=5.87%
Thus, the annual percentage yield range
that would be stated for the third tier is
5.61% to 5.87%.
If the assumed maximum balance amount
is $1,000,000 instead of $100,000, the
institution would use $985,000 rather than
$85,000 in the last calculation. In that case,
for the high end of the third tier the annual
percentage yield, using the simple formula, is
5.91%:
APY=100 (59134.22/1,000,000)
APY=5.91%
Thus, the annual percentage yield range
that would be stated for the third tier is
5.61% to 5.91%.
E. Time Accounts With a Stated Maturity
Greater Than One Year That Pay Interest at
Least Annually
1. For time accounts with a stated maturity
greater than one year that do not compound
interest on an annual or more frequent basis,
and that require the consumer to withdraw
interest at least annually, the annual
percentage yield may be disclosed as equal
to the interest rate.
Example
(1) If an institution offers a $1,000 two-year
certificate of deposit that does not compound
and that pays out interest semi-annually by
check or transfer at a 6.00% interest rate, the
annual percentage yield may be disclosed as
6.00%.
(2) For time accounts covered by this
paragraph that are also stepped-rate accounts,
the annual percentage yield may be disclosed
as equal to the composite interest rate.
Example
(1) If an institution offers a $1,000 threeyear certificate of deposit that does not
compound and that pays out interest
annually by check or transfer at a 5.00%
interest rate for the first year, 6.00% interest
rate for the second year, and 7.00% interest
rate for the third year, the institution may
compute the composite interest rate and APY
as follows:
(a) Multiply each interest rate by the
number of days it will be in effect;
(b) Add these figures together; and
(c) Divide by the total number of days in
the term.
(2) Applied to the example, the products of
the interest rates and days the rates are in
effect are (5.00%×365 days) 1825,
(6.00%×365 days) 2190, and (7.00%×365
days) 2555, respectively. The sum of these
products, 6570, is divided by 1095, the total
number of days in the term. The composite
interest rate and APY are both 6.00%.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Part II. Annual Percentage Yield Earned for
Periodic Statements
The annual percentage yield earned for
periodic statements under § 1030.6(a) is an
annualized rate that reflects the relationship
between the amount of interest actually
earned on the consumer’s account during the
statement period and the average daily
balance in the account for the statement
period. Pursuant to § 1030.6(b), however, if
an institution uses the average daily balance
method and calculates interest for a period
other than the statement period, the annual
percentage yield earned shall reflect the
relationship between the amount of interest
earned and the average daily balance in the
account for that other period.
The annual percentage yield earned shall
be calculated by using the following formulas
(‘‘APY Earned’’ is used for convenience in
the formulas):
A. General Formula
APY Earned=100 [(1+Interest earned/
Balance)(365/Days in period)¥1]
‘‘Balance’’ is the average daily balance in
the account for the period.
‘‘Interest earned’’ is the actual amount of
interest earned on the account for the period.
‘‘Days in period’’ is the actual number of
days for the period.
Examples
(1) Assume an institution calculates
interest for the statement period (and uses
either the daily balance or the average daily
balance method), and the account has a
balance of $1,500 for 15 days and a balance
of $500 for the remaining 15 days of a 30day statement period. The average daily
balance for the period is $1,000. The interest
earned (under either balance computation
method) is $5.25 during the period. The
annual percentage yield earned (using the
formula above) is 6.58%:
APY Earned=100 [(1+5.25/1,000)(365/30)¥1]
APY Earned=6.58%
(2) Assume an institution calculates
interest on the average daily balance for the
calendar month and provides periodic
statements that cover the period from the
16th of one month to the 15th of the next
month. The account has a balance of $2,000
September 1 through September 15 and a
balance of $1,000 for the remaining 15 days
of September. The average daily balance for
the month of September is $1,500, which
results in $6.50 in interest earned for the
month. The annual percentage yield earned
for the month of September would be shown
on the periodic statement covering
September 16 through October 15. The
annual percentage yield earned (using the
formula above) is 5.40%:
APY Earned=100 [(6.50/1,500)(365/30)¥1]
APY Earned=5.40%
(3) Assume an institution calculates
interest on the average daily balance for a
quarter (for example, the calendar months of
September through November), and provides
monthly periodic statements covering
calendar months. The account has a balance
of $1,000 throughout the 30 days of
September, a balance of $2,000 throughout
the 31 days of October, and a balance of
E:\FR\FM\03JYR1.SGM
03JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
$3,000 throughout the 30 days of November.
The average daily balance for the quarter is
$2,000, which results in $21 in interest
earned for the quarter. The annual percentage
yield earned would be shown on the periodic
statement for November. The annual
percentage yield earned (using the formula
above) is 4.28%:
APY Earned=100 [(1+21/2,000) (365/91)¥1]
APY Earned=4.28%
The following definition applies for use in
this formula (all other terms are defined
under part II):
‘‘Compounding’’ is the number of days in
each compounding period.
Assume an institution calculates interest
for the statement period using the daily
balance method, pays a 5.00% interest rate,
compounded annually, and provides
periodic statements for each monthly cycle.
The account has a daily balance of $1,000 for
a 30-day statement period. The interest
earned is $4.11 for the period, and the annual
percentage yield earned (using the special
formula above) is 5.00%:
APY Earned=5.00%
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
for competition after including deposits
of qualifying credit unions weighted at
50 percent and deposits of
‘‘commercially active’’ thrift institutions
weighted in most cases at 100 percent.
In a limited number of cases, deposits
of all thrifts would be weighted at 100
percent. To ensure the Board’s
delegation rules are consistent, the rule
also revises or rescinds, as appropriate,
certain existing delegations to the
Federal Reserve Banks, the Secretary of
the Board, and the Director of the
Division of Supervision and Regulation.
DATES: Effective July 3, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alison Thro, Assistant General Counsel,
(202) 452–3236, Scott Tkacz, Senior
Counsel, (202) 452–2744, or Jonah Kind,
Attorney, (202) 452–2045, Legal
Division, Susan Motyka, Deputy
Associate Director, (202) 452–5280,
Division of Supervision and Regulation,
Anthony Iwuji, Manager, (202) 452–
3254, Division of Consumer and
Community Affairs, Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System, 20th
Street and C Street NW, Washington, DC
20551.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
*
*
*
*
*
Section 1030.7—Payment of Interest
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Date interest begins to accrue.
1. Relation to Regulation CC. Institutions
may rely on the Expedited Funds Availability
Act (EFAA) and Regulation CC (12 CFR part
229) to determine, for example, when a
deposit is considered made for purposes of
interest accrual, or when interest need not be
paid on funds because a deposited check is
later returned unpaid.
2. Ledger and collected balances.
Institutions may calculate interest by using a
‘‘ledger’’ or ‘‘collected’’ balance method, as
long as the crediting requirements of the
EFAA are met (12 CFR 229.14).
3. Withdrawal of principal. Institutions
must accrue interest on funds until the funds
are withdrawn from the account. For
example, if a check is debited to an account
on a Tuesday, the institution must accrue
interest on those funds through Monday.
*
*
*
*
*
By order of the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, June 20, 2019.
Ann E. Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
Dated: June 10, 2019.
Kathleen L. Kraninger,
Director, Bureau of Consumer Financial
Protection.
[FR Doc. 2019–13668 Filed 7–1–19; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:37 Jul 02, 2019
Jkt 247001
12 CFR Part 265
[Docket No. R–1667]
RIN No. 7100–AF 52
Rules Regarding Delegation of
Authority: Delegation of Authority to
the Secretary of the Board, Director of
the Division of Supervision of
Regulation, and Federal Reserve
Banks
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System (Board).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Board is amending its
rules regarding delegation of authority
to delegate to Federal Reserve Banks
authority to approve certain types of
applications, notices, and requests.
Under the rule, Federal Reserve Banks
are delegated authority to waive a
requirement to file certain applications
under the Bank Holding Company Act
and the Home Owners’ Loan Act; grant
or deny requests for modifying certain
commitments; authorize a state member
bank to make a public welfare
investment in accordance with section 9
of the Federal Reserve Act under certain
circumstances; and approve certain
requests, applications, and notices
relating to international banking
operations filed pursuant to the Board’s
Regulation K. The rule also modifies the
delegation rules by authorizing the
Federal Reserve Banks to approve
applications and notices concerning
mergers and acquisitions that do not
exceed the Board’s delegation criteria
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
I. Discussion
Section 11(k) of the Federal Reserve
Act provides that the Board, by
published order or rule, may delegate
any of its functions, other than those
related to rulemaking or principally to
monetary and credit policies.1 Pursuant
to this authority, the Board is amending
its Rules Regarding Delegation of
1 12
E:\FR\FM\03JYR1.SGM
U.S.C. 248(k).
03JYR1
ER03JY19.002</GPH>
Supplement I to Part 1030—Official
Interpretations
B. Special Formula for Use Where Periodic
Statement Is Sent More Often Than the
Period for Which Interest Is Compounded
Institutions that use the daily balance
method to accrue interest and that issue
periodic statements more often than the
period for which interest is compounded
shall use the following special formula:
ER03JY19.001</GPH>
14. In Supplement I to part 1030,
under Section 1030.7—Payment of
Interest, paragraph 7(c)—Date interest
begins to accrue is revised to read as
follows:
■
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
31701
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 128 (Wednesday, July 3, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31687-31701]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-13668]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2019 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 31687]]
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
12 CFR Part 229
[Regulation CC; Docket No. R-1637]
RIN 7100-AF 28
BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION
12 CFR Part 1030
[Docket No. CFPB-2018-0035]
RIN 3170-AA31
Availability of Funds and Collection of Checks (Regulation CC)
AGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board) and
Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (Bureau).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Board and the Bureau (Agencies) are amending Regulation
CC, which implements the Expedited Funds Availability Act (EFA Act), to
implement a statutory requirement in the EFA Act to adjust the dollar
amounts under the EFA Act for inflation. The Agencies are also amending
Regulation CC to incorporate the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief,
and Consumer Protection Act (EGRRCPA) amendments to the EFA Act, which
include extending coverage to American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands, and Guam, and making certain other technical
amendments.
DATES: This rule is effective September 3, 2019, except for the
amendments to 12 CFR 229.1, 229.10, 229.11, 229.12(d), 229.21, and
appendix E to part 229, which are effective July 1, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Board: Gavin L. Smith, Senior Counsel, (202) 452-3474, Legal
Division, or Ian C.B. Spear, Manager, (202) 452-3959, Division of
Reserve Bank Operations and Payment Systems.
Bureau: Joseph Baressi and Marta Tanenhaus, Senior Counsels, Office
of Regulations, at (202) 435-7700. If you require this document in an
alternative electronic format, please contact
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Regulation CC (12 CFR part 229) implements the EFA Act and the
Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act (Check 21 Act). \1\ Subpart B
of Regulation CC implements the requirements set forth in the EFA Act
regarding the availability schedules within which banks \2\ must make
funds available for withdrawal, exceptions to those schedules,
disclosure of funds availability policies, and payment of interest. The
EFA Act and subpart B of Regulation CC contain specified dollar
amounts, including: (1) The minimum amount of deposited funds that
banks must make available for withdrawal by opening of business on the
next day for certain check deposits (``minimum amount''); \3\ (2) the
amount a bank must make available when using the EFA Act's permissive
adjustment to the funds-availability rules for withdrawals by cash or
other means (``cash withdrawal amount''); \4\ (3) the amount of funds
deposited by certain checks in a new account that are subject to next-
day availability (``new-account amount''); \5\ (4) the threshold for
using an exception to the funds-availability schedules if the aggregate
amount of checks on any one banking day exceed the threshold amount
(``large-deposit threshold''); \6\ (5) the threshold for determining
whether an account has been repeatedly overdrawn (``repeatedly
overdrawn threshold''); \7\ and (6) the civil liability amounts for
failing to comply with the EFA Act's requirements.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Expedited Funds Availability Act, 12 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.;
Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act, 12 U.S.C. 5001 et seq.
\2\ Section 229.2(e) of Regulation CC defines ``bank'' to
include banks, savings institutions, and credit unions.
\3\ The minimum amount is currently $200. See section 1086(e) of
the Dodd-Frank Act; 12 U.S.C. 4002(a)(2)(D).
\4\ The cash withdrawal amount is currently $400. 12 U.S.C.
4002(b)(3)(B).
\5\ The new-account amount is currently $5,000. 12 U.S.C.
4003(a)(3).
\6\ The large-deposit threshold is currently $5,000. 12 U.S.C.
4003(b)(1).
\7\ The repeatedly overdrawn threshold is currently $5,000. 12
CFR 229.13(d). This dollar amount is not specified in the EFA Act,
but is a result of the authority of the Board and the Bureau under
section 604(b)(3) of the EFA Act (12 U.S.C. 4003(b)(3)) to establish
reasonable exceptions to time limitations for deposit accounts that
have been overdrawn repeatedly. The Board and the Bureau proposed to
use their authority under section 604(b)(3) and also their authority
under section 609(a) (12 U.S.C. 4008(a)), which is discussed below,
to index the repeatedly overdrawn threshold in the same manner as
the other dollar amounts. The Board and the Bureau stated that they
believe that indexing the repeatedly overdrawn threshold would be
consistent with the need identified by Congress to prevent such
dollar amounts from being eroded by inflation. The Board and the
Bureau did not receive comments suggesting that they should treat
the repeatedly overdrawn threshold differently from the other dollar
amounts, and they finalize this aspect of the proposal for the
reasons stated in the proposal.
\8\ The civil liability amounts are currently ``not less than
$100 nor greater than $1,000'' for an individual action and ``not
more than $500,000 or 1 percent of the net worth'' of a depository
institution for a class action. 12 U.S.C. 4010(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
(Dodd-Frank Act) made certain amendments to the EFA Act, and these
amendments were effective on July 21, 2011.\9\ Section 609(a) of the
EFA Act,\10\ as amended by section 1086(d) of the Dodd-Frank Act,
provides that the Board and the Director of the Bureau shall jointly
prescribe regulations to carry out the provisions of the EFA Act, to
prevent the circumvention or evasion of such provisions, and to
facilitate compliance with such provisions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Public Law 111-203, sections 1062, 1086, 1100H, 124 Stat.
2081 (2010); 75 FR 57252 (Sept. 20, 2010).
\10\ 12 U.S.C. 4008(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, section 1086(f) of the Dodd-Frank Act added section
607(f) of the EFA Act, which provides that the dollar amounts under the
EFA Act shall be adjusted every five years after December 31, 2011, by
the annual percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index for Urban
Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W), as published by the Bureau
of Labor Statistics, rounded to the nearest multiple of $25.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 12 U.S.C. 4006(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer
Protection Act (EGRRCPA) made amendments to the EFA Act to extend its
application to American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, and Guam.\12\ The effect of these statutory amendments is to
subject banks in American Samoa, the
[[Page 31688]]
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and Guam to the EFA Act's
requirements related to funds availability, payment of interest, and
disclosures. Banks in those territories would be able to avail
themselves of the one-day extension of the availability schedules
permitted by the EFA Act and Sec. 229.12(e) of Regulation CC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ Public Law 115-174, section 208 (2018). The amendments that
section 208 of the EGRRCPA made to the EFA Act became effective on
June 23, 2018. See section 208(b) of the EGRRCPA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Summary of Proposed Rule, Comments Received, and Final Rule
On December 10, 2018, the Agencies published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (proposal) to implement the statutory requirement in the EFA
Act to adjust the dollar amounts under the Act for inflation and to
implement the EGRRCPA amendments to the EFA Act.\13\ The Agencies
received 32 responses to their proposal from a variety of commenters,
including depository institutions, service providers, trade
associations, clearinghouses, consumer organizations, and private
individuals.\14\ Nine commenters explicitly expressed general support
for the proposal, two additional trade association commenters
specifically supported the proposal's calculation methodology and
timeframes, and twelve commenters specifically supported the proposed
one-year effective date. As discussed in more detail below, three
institutions opposed basic tenets of the statutory requirements based
on concerns about loss to institutions due to customer fraud: the first
disagreed altogether with need to make inflationary adjustments for
purposes of funds availability; the second disagreed with adjusting the
statutory dollar amounts every five years; and the third opposed basing
the hold amount on the CPI, stating that individual check amounts are
not reflective of inflation.\15\ Some commenters addressed other
specific aspects of the proposal. As discussed in more detail below,
the Agencies considered all of the comments received and are adopting
the amendments to Regulation CC described below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 83 FR 63431, Dec. 10, 2018. In their December 2018 Federal
Register notice, the Agencies also provided an additional
opportunity for public comment on certain amendments to the funds-
availability provisions in Regulation CC that the Board proposed in
2011. The Agencies are not herein addressing the Board's 2011
proposal or the comments received thereon.
\14\ The Board received 18 comments and the Bureau received 23.
Of the 41 total comments received, nine commenters submitted
identical comment letters to both Agencies.
\15\ Because the statute is clear in its directives to make
inflationary adjustments to dollar amounts under the EFA Act every
five years based on the CPI-W, the Agencies are finalizing the rule
as proposed with regard to these fundamental statutory requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Effective Dates for Inflation Adjustments
The Agencies continue to believe, as stated in the proposal, that
section 607(f) of the EFA Act is reasonably interpreted to provide for
five years to elapse between a given set of adjustments and the next
set of adjustments, with the first set of adjustments occurring
sometime after December 31, 2011. The Agencies believe that Congress
intended to balance its concern about changes being too frequent or
abrupt with the need to prevent the EFA Act's dollar amounts from being
eroded by inflation. As regulators of depository institutions, the
Agencies are likewise familiar with the challenges that institutions
can face if changes to regulatory requirements are too frequent or
abrupt. Congress balanced these concerns by providing that the
adjustments would be effective at five-year intervals; by providing
that the first set of adjustments would not occur until after December
31, 2011, which ensured that at least a full calendar year would elapse
after the Dodd-Frank Act's enactment in mid-2010; and by providing that
the adjustments would be rounded to the nearest multiple of $25.
In their December 2018 proposal, the Agencies stated they expected
to publish the first set of adjustments as a final rule in the first
quarter of 2019, with a proposed effective date of April 1, 2020. The
Agencies further stated they expected to publish the second set of
adjustments in the first quarter of 2024, with an effective date of
April 1, 2025. For each subsequent set of adjustment, the Agencies
proposed an effective date of April 1 of every fifth year after 2025.
The Agencies stated their belief that the proposed effective dates
would provide institutions with sufficient time to make any necessary
disclosure and software changes and the Agencies requested comment on
the proposed effective dates for the adjustments.
Fourteen commenters addressed the amount of time between the
Agencies' publication of a final rule setting forth the inflation
adjustments and the rule's effective date. Of those, twelve commenters
supported the Agencies' proposed one-year interim, one commenter
requested 18 months, and another requested two years. Two of the
commenters that supported the one-year interim recommended that, if the
Agencies do not release the final rule by April 1, 2019, the effective
date should be extended such that it is at least one year after the
release date of the final rule.
For the reasons set forth in the proposal and above, the Agencies
are finalizing as proposed the one-year interim between publication of
the first set of adjustments and the adjustments' effective date.
Because the Agencies are releasing this final rule in June 2019, the
effective date for the final rule is July 1, 2020. Further, the
Agencies anticipate carrying this one-year interim forward for future
adjustments. Specifically, Sec. 229.11(a) of the final rule states
that the relevant EFA Act dollar amounts, as reflected in Regulation
CC, shall be adjusted effective on July 1, 2020, on July 1, 2025, and
on July 1 of every fifth year after 2025. The Agencies anticipate
issuing a rule in the Federal Register setting forth the inflation
adjustments at least one year before the effective date of each ensuing
adjustment. For example, the Agencies anticipate publishing in the
first half of 2024 the second set of inflation adjustments, which will
become effective July 1, 2025.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ The effective dates are consistent with section 302 of the
Riegle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994
(Pub. L. 103-325, 108 Stat. 2160, 12 U.S.C. 4802). That section
provides that new regulations and amendments to regulations
prescribed by Federal banking agencies, including the Board (but not
the Bureau), that impose additional reporting, disclosures, or other
new requirements on insured depository institutions shall take
effect on the first day of a calendar quarter which begins on or
after the date on which the regulations are published in final form
(with certain exceptions).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition to expressing general support for the timeframes in the
proposal, one commenter specifically stated that the industry will
benefit from having a predetermined schedule for making future updates
to the EFA Act dollar amounts. Two commenters additionally requested
that the Agencies tie the inflation adjustment effective dates to the
effective dates of any other disclosure changes so depository
institutions would not have to make other changes to disclosures in the
interim years.
The Agencies believe that institutions will benefit from having
their implementation of the statutorily-required inflation adjustments
occur on a predetermined five-year cycle and, as noted above, that
section 607(f) of the EFA Act is reasonably interpreted to provide for
five years to elapse between a given set of adjustments and the next
set of adjustments. Thus, the Agencies are finalizing the rule as
proposed with the five-year cycle between inflation adjustments.
Nonetheless, as stated above, the Agencies are cognizant of the
potential burden on institutions if
[[Page 31689]]
regulatory changes are too frequent or abrupt. Accordingly, the
Agencies recognize the benefit of making efforts, if appropriate and
feasible, to coordinate the effective dates of future rulemakings
effecting changes to disclosures required by the funds-availability
provisions in Regulation CC subpart B with the predetermined effective
dates for the inflation adjustments to the dollar amounts in Regulation
CC subpart B that are set forth herein.
B. Methodology for Inflation Adjustments
1. Measurement of Underlying Inflation
EFA Act section 607(f) does not specify which month's CPI-W should
be used to measure inflation. The Agencies proposed to use the July
CPI-W, which is released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics in August.
The Agencies proposed to use the aggregate percentage change in the
CPI-W from July 2011 to July 2018 as the initial inflation measurement
period for the first set of adjustments. The Agencies proposed that the
second set of adjustments would be based on the aggregate percentage
change in the CPI-W for an inflation measurement period that begins in
July 2018 and ends in July 2023. And, the Agencies proposed that each
subsequent set of adjustments would be based on the aggregate
percentage change in the CPI-W for an inflation measurement period that
begins in July of every fifth year after 2018 and ends in July of every
fifth year after 2023. The Agencies stated in their proposal that this
use of July CPI-W, starting with the July 2011 CPI-W, aligns with
section 607(f)'s effective date of July 21, 2011. The Agencies
specifically requested comment on this approach.
Most commenters that addressed the issue supported the Agencies'
proposed inflation calculation methodology. However, one commenter
recommended that the Agencies base the calculation of inflation on the
change in the CPI-W from July 2013 to July 2018 on the grounds that it
would result in a lower aggregate percentage change for the first set
of adjustments. The Agencies are finalizing the rule as proposed with
the first set of inflation adjustments--published herein and effective
July 1, 2020--based on inflation, as measured by the CPI-W, from July
2011 to July 2018. As discussed in the proposal, the Agencies continue
to believe it is appropriate for the inflation adjustments to be based
on underlying inflation since the effective date of the relevant Dodd-
Frank Act provisions, which is July 21, 2011. The Agencies do not
believe that the need identified by Congress to prevent the relevant
dollar amounts from being eroded by inflation would be served by
omitting the period of July 2011 to July 2013 from the Agencies'
calculation, as the commenter advocated. The second set of inflation
adjustments--which the Agencies anticipate publishing in the first half
of 2024 and which will be effective July 1, 2025--will be based on
underlying inflation from July 2018 through July 2023. The third set of
adjustments--which the Agencies anticipate publishing in the first half
of 2029 and which will be effective July 1, 2030--will be based on
inflation from July 2023 through July 2028.
2. Aggregate Percentage Increase
Section 607(f) of the EFA Act provides that the adjustments must be
based on the ``annual percentage increase'' in the CPI-W, but does not
specify how the adjustment must be made in the event that the CPI-W is
negative for one or more years in the inflation measurement period. The
Agencies maintain their position from the proposal \17\ that it is a
reasonable interpretation of section 607(f) to account for negative
movements in the CPI-W on a year-to-year basis and to include those
movements when measuring the underlying inflation that is the basis for
calculating adjustments to the dollar amounts in subpart B of
Regulation CC. Of the few commenters that addressed this issue, most
supported the Agencies' proposed approach, and the Agencies are
adopting it in the final rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See 83 FR 63431 at 63433, Dec. 10, 2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further, the Agencies proposed an approach under which the five-
year adjustments to the dollar amounts in Regulation CC subpart B would
always be zero or upward, never downward. Specifically, the Agencies
proposed that if there is no aggregate percentage increase (zero
increase) in the CPI-W or an aggregate percentage decrease (negative
increase) in the CPI-W during the five-year inflation measurement
period, then there would be no downward adjustments to the dollar
amounts in Regulation CC subpart B.
One depository institution commented that the proposed approach
could cause funds-availability risks to institutions under certain
economic scenarios of sustained deflation (negative inflation). Another
institution characterized the Agencies' proposed approach as being
somewhat arbitrary but generally agreed that the aggregate change would
most likely be zero or positive. Conversely, a consumer organization
explicitly agreed with the proposed approach and stated that negative
inflation should not result in decreased funds availability to
consumers.
Under the Agencies' final rule, as proposed, the adjustments to the
dollar amounts in Regulation CC subpart B will always be zero or
upward, never downward. The Agencies continue to believe this approach
is a reasonable interpretation of the phrase ``annual percentage
increase'' in EFA Act section 607(f), in that reading out the word
``increase'' from the statute would not be consistent with the
statutory scheme. Further, as noted in their proposal,\18\ the Agencies
reiterate that, since 1939, no aggregate change in the CPI-W across a
five-year period has been negative. Nonetheless, if it were to become
necessary and appropriate in the future, the Agencies could consider
steps to address the funds-availability risks to institutions that
could be associated with a sustained--i.e., more-than-five-year--period
of deflation, if any such period of deflation were ever to actually
occur.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See 83 FR 63431 at 63433 footnote 14, Dec. 10, 2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Rounding to the Nearest Multiple of $25
EFA Act section 607(f) states that the dollar amounts under the Act
shall be adjusted every five years for inflation, as measured by the
CPI-W, ``rounded to the nearest multiple of $25.'' In keeping with that
statutory directive, the Agencies proposed that, if there is an
aggregate percentage increase in any five-year inflation measurement
period, then the aggregate percentage change would be applied to the
dollar amounts in Regulation CC, and those amounts would be rounded to
the nearest multiple of $25 to determine the new adjusted dollar
amounts that appear in the regulation.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ For example, if the CPI-W in July of Year X and in July of
Year X + 5 were 100 and 114.7, respectively, the aggregate
percentage change that results from the change in the CPI-W would be
14.7%. If the applicable dollar amount in the regulation was $200
for the prior period, then the adjusted figure in the regulation
would become $225, because the calculated change of 14.7 percent of
$200, which is $29.40, results in rounding to $225 as that would be
the nearest multiple of $25.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Two depository institutions and two trade associations recommended
rounding to a different value than $25, including rounding to the
nearest $100 or to the nearest place value or setting the minimum
amount at $300, on the grounds of reducing institutions' costs by
reducing the frequency of the inflation adjustments and reducing
consumer confusion. The Agencies
[[Page 31690]]
believe that this suggested approach would be inconsistent with the
language of section 607(f) of the EFA Act that expressly refers to
``rounded to the nearest multiple of $25.'' Accordingly, the Agencies
are adopting a final rule under which the adjusted dollar amounts in
the regulation are rounded to the nearest multiple of $25.
4. Notice and Comment
One depository institution suggested that the Agencies allow for
public comment each time the Agencies adjust the dollar amounts in the
regulation for inflation. The commenter stated that this approach would
allow institutions and the Agencies to consider whether the adjustments
continue to be cost effective and to ensure that the adjustments
benefit consumers enough to justify the additional costs to
institutions.
Congress has required the Agencies to adjust dollar amounts under
the EFA Act for inflation. If, as the commenter suggests, the Agencies
were to obtain public comment in advance of future five-year inflation
adjustments, those comments could not serve as a legal basis for the
Agencies to override the fundamental statutory requirement to
effectuate inflation adjustments. In addition, the Agencies are herein
adopting the methodology for the calculations underlying the
statutorily-required inflation adjustments, including future five-year
adjustments, and the Agencies have adopted that methodology through
notice-and-comment rulemaking. Accordingly, and as stated in the
Agencies' proposal,\20\ with respect to future inflation adjustments
for subsequent five-year periods, the Agencies continue to expect to
find that notice and opportunity for public comment for the adjustments
is impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest,
because the calculation methodology for the adjustments is set forth
herein and future execution of the adjustments will be technical and
non-discretionary. See 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). For example, the Agencies
have determined in the final rule set forth herein that the second set
of inflation adjustments to the dollar amounts in Regulation CC will be
based on inflation as measured by the CPI-W from July 2018 through July
2023. As noted above, the Agencies anticipate publishing those
adjustments in the Federal Register in the first half of 2024, to be
effective July 1, 2025, so that institutions will have sufficient time
to implement the inflation adjustments. Further, the Agencies are
always open to feedback about how their rules could be improved, and
they take appropriate steps in response to such feedback.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See 83 FR 63431 at 63433 footnote 17, Dec. 10, 2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Burden on Institutions From Implementing the Inflation Adjustments
Many commenters, including credit unions and credit union trade
associations, expressed concern regarding the burden imposed on
institutions to implement the inflation adjustments. Several credit
union commenters stated that the cost burden imposed on institutions to
implement the inflation indexing could exceed the Agencies' estimate in
the proposal, noting in particular the printing and distribution costs
associated with sending notices to customers of the changes in the
institutions' funds-availability policies (commonly referred to as
``change-in-terms'' notices). \21\ One credit union commenter
summarized this position by stating that the Agencies' cost estimate
constitutes a ``basic approximation'' that left out other potential
costs, including communication with members before each change. This
section discusses commenter concerns and suggestions regarding the
burden imposed by the inflation indexing. Those concerns are also
discussed below in the Agencies' analyses pursuant to the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, the Board's analysis pursuant to the Paperwork
Reduction Act, and the Bureau's analysis pursuant to section 1022 of
the Dodd-Frank Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ Regulation CC Sec. 229.18(e) requires a depository
institution to send customers a written notice regarding a change to
the bank's funds-availability policy. The changes to the
availability policies to reflect the statutorily-required inflation
adjustments, as implemented by this final rule, would trigger the
requirement to send a change-in-terms notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Notices to Customers of Changes to Institutions' Funds-Availability
Policies
As noted above, commenters expressed concern regarding the burden
associated with the requirement to send customers a change-in-terms
notice reflecting the inflation-adjusted Regulation CC funds-
availability amounts. One commenter specifically voiced concern about
the disproportionate cost impact on smaller credit unions for printing
and mailing notices in general and, in specific, the change-in-terms
notice. To reduce that burden, the commenter also urged the Agencies to
reduce the length of the required funds-availability disclosures or
permit them to accompany monthly account statements. Another commenter
suggested reducing burden by establishing an exception within the
Regulation CC provision, Sec. 229.18(e), that requires the change-in-
terms notice. Specifically, the commenter suggested that an institution
not be required to provide a change-in-terms notice when its funds-
availability policy changes due to the periodic inflation adjustments
to the Regulation CC funds-availability dollar amounts that are
mandated by section 607(f) of the EFA Act.
The Regulation CC change-in-terms provision (Sec. 229.18(e))
mirrors the statutory change-in-terms provision, which is set forth in
EFA Act section 605(c)(2). That statutory provision requires an
institution to send a written notice to consumer account holders at
least 30 days before implementing a change to the institution's funds-
availability policy and further states that ``any change which
expedites the availability of such funds shall be disclosed not later
than 30 days after implementation.'' See EFA Act section 605(c)(2) (12
U.S.C. 4004(c)(2)).
In their final rule, the Agencies decline to establish in
Regulation CC an exception to the requirement to send a change-in-terms
notice, as this requirement is established by statute. However, the
Agencies note several ways that depository institutions may lower their
costs under the rule, including providing the required notice
electronically and sending it with the monthly account statement, as
follows.
Electronic delivery is permitted where the institution has complied
with the requirements of the Electronic Signatures in Global and
National Commerce Act (15 U.S.C. 7001 et seq. (``E-Sign Act'')). See
comment 229.15(a)-1. Further, the regulation already permits an
institution to send a required change-in-terms notice on or with a
monthly account statement, and this is so irrespective of whether the
institution sends the notice and statement electronically or in paper
form. See comment 229.18(e)-1 (stating that the change-in-terms notice
required by Sec. 229.18(e) ``may be given in any form as long as it is
clear and conspicuous''). In addition, an institution need not set
forth the entirety of its revised funds-availability policy in its
change-in-terms notice. If an institution chooses to provide the notice
by sending a complete new availability disclosure, the institution must
direct the customer to the changed terms in the disclosure by use of a
letter or insert, or by highlighting the changed terms in the
disclosure. See comment 229.18(e)-1. And finally, as discussed above,
the Agencies anticipate providing one year between the date of
publication in the Federal Register of the inflation-adjusted amounts
and the
[[Page 31691]]
date on which the adjusted amounts become effective. The Agencies
believe that this one-year timeframe provides institutions with a
sufficient interim in which to plan to send their change-in-terms
notices in a way that minimizes the burden associated with doing so. In
light of all of these factors, and given that the inflation adjustments
are statutorily required and will occur only once every five years, the
Agencies do not believe that the burden concerns raised warrant any
modification to the requirement to send change-in-terms notices.
2. Minimum Availability Amounts Required by the Regulation
To obviate the need to send a change-in-terms notice to consumers
every five years when the dollar amounts in Regulation CC are adjusted
for inflation, one depository institution commented that the regulation
should permit institutions to provide to customers a funds-availability
policy disclosure that includes a phrase such as ``minimum amount
required by regulation,'' rather than setting forth an actual dollar
figure that potentially (if inflation is sufficient) must be updated
every five years. The Agencies decline to adopt this approach because
they believe it would result in consumer confusion. Specifically, the
Agencies believe that one of the purposes of the statute, that
consumers be informed of the specific amount of deposits available to
them under an institution's funds-availability policy, would be
foreclosed under the commenter's suggested approach.
3. Overall Opposition to the Inflation Adjustments
Three commenters opposed making inflation adjustments altogether.
One commenter disagreed with adjusting the statutory dollar amounts
every five years, because it opens institutions up to increased losses
from fraud. Another stated that it does not make sense to base the
funds-availability hold amounts on the CPI-W, because individual check
amounts are not reflective of inflation. And, another stated that
making higher dollar amounts available would end up imposing costs on
consumers, because institutions would inevitably pass on to consumers
their higher costs from fraud losses that would result from the higher
funds-availability amounts.
While the Agencies are cognizant of the burden regulations place on
institutions, the inflation adjustments to the dollar amounts under the
EFA Act are required by statute. The Agencies understand that Congress,
in providing for a five-year cycle between inflation adjustments,
intended to balance concerns regarding burden with the need to prevent
the EFA Act's dollar amounts from being eroded by inflation.\22\
Congress also specified that the CPI-W should be used.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ Consistent with this view, the EFA Act's legislative
history shows that one intent of the Act was to ``provide a fairer
balance between the banks' interest in avoiding fraud and consumers'
interests in having speedy access to their funds.'' S. Rep. No. 100-
19, at 28 (1987); see also H.R. Rep. No. 100-52, at 14 (1987)
(describing the efforts ``to protect depository institutions while
furthering the original goals of the legislation to provide shorter
time periods for funds availability.'')
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Regulation CC Changes To Implement the EGRRCPA Amendments to the EFA
Act
Two commenters supported the Agencies' proposed changes to
Regulation CC to implement the EGRRCPA amendments to the EFA Act that
extended its application to American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands, and Guam. The proposed changes included
updating the definitions of ``state'' and ``United States'' in
Regulation CC to include these territories as well as other conforming
amendments. No commenters opposed the proposed changes. In their final
rule, the Agencies adopt these changes as proposed.
E. Technical Amendments to Appendix A of Regulation DD
The Bureau proposed a technical, non-substantive amendment to its
Regulation DD, 12 CFR part 1030, to add a new paragraph (e) to Sec.
1030.1 that would cross-reference the Bureau's joint authority with the
Board to issue regulations under certain provisions of the EFA Act that
are codified within Regulation CC. The Bureau also proposed related
technical, non-substantive amendments to Sec. 1030.7(c), and the
commentary thereto, which states that interest shall begin to accrue
not later than the business day specified for interest-bearing accounts
in the EFA Act and Regulation CC. In addition, the Bureau proposed to
fix technical errors in Appendix A to Regulation DD within the formulas
that demonstrate how to calculate annual percentage yield (APY) and
annual percentage yield earned (APYE). Specifically, certain terms
within the formulas should be shown as exponents but currently are
erroneously not shown as exponents. These typographical errors were
inadvertently introduced into the APY and APYE formulas in Appendix A
when the Bureau issued its restatement of Regulation DD in December
2011.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ 76 FR 79276 (Dec. 21, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Bureau received one comment regarding its proposed correction
of technical errors in Appendix A to Regulation DD, recommending that
the Bureau consult with the National Credit Union Association (NCUA) to
determine whether it is necessary to amend Appendix A within credit
unions' equivalent regulation under the Truth in Savings Act (TISA),
specifically, Appendix A to 12 CFR part 707. The technical errors that
are present in Appendix A to Regulation DD are not present in Appendix
A to 12 CFR part 707. Thus, the Bureau has no reason to believe it is
necessary for the NCUA to amend Appendix A to 12 CFR part 707. In
addition, as described below, the Bureau has performed interagency
consultations regarding this final rule, including with the NCUA.
The Bureau is adopting as proposed the above-described technical,
non-substantive amendments to Regulation DD and Appendix A thereto.
III. Legal Authority
In issuing the final rule, the Agencies are exercising their
authority under section 609(a) of the EFA Act (12 U.S.C. 4008(a)) to
amend subpart B and, in connection therewith, subpart A, of Regulation
CC to prescribe regulations to carry out the provisions of the EFA Act,
to prevent the circumvention or evasion of such provisions, and to
facilitate compliance with such provisions.\24\ Additionally, with
respect to the technical amendments to Regulation DD, the Bureau is
exercising its authority under section 269(a) of TISA (12 U.S.C.
4308(a)) to prescribe regulations to carry out the purpose and
provisions of TISA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ Additionally, section 604(b)(3) of the EFA Act (12 U.S.C.
4003(b)(3)) authorizes the Agencies to establish reasonable
exceptions to time limitations for deposit accounts that have been
overdrawn repeatedly. As noted above, the Agencies also rely on this
authority in adjusting the repeatedly overdrawn threshold in 12 CFR
229.13(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Administrative Law Matters
A. Bureau's Dodd-Frank Act Section 1022(b)(2)(A) Analysis
1. Overview
Section 1022(b)(2)(A) of the Dodd-Frank Act provides that in
prescribing a rule under the Federal consumer financial laws, the
Bureau shall consider the potential benefits and costs to consumers and
covered persons, including the potential reduction of access by
consumers to consumer financial products or services resulting from
such rule; the impact on depository institutions and credit unions with
$10 billion or less in total
[[Page 31692]]
assets as described in section 1026 of the Dodd-Frank Act; and the
impact on consumers in rural areas.\25\ The Bureau requested comment on
the preliminary analysis as well as the submission of additional data
that could inform the Bureau's analysis of the benefits, costs, and
impacts of the rule. The Bureau received four comments on the
preliminary analysis, which it has considered in developing this final
analysis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ 12 U.S.C. 5512(b)(2)(A). Although the manner and extent to
which section 1022(b)(2)(A) applies to a joint Bureau and Board
rulemaking under the EFA Act is unclear, to inform this rulemaking
more fully the Bureau performed the described analysis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This analysis considers the benefits, costs, and impacts of this
final rule using a pre-statutory baseline. That is, the Bureau's
analysis below considers the benefits, costs, and impacts of the
relevant provisions of the EGRRCPA combined with this final rule
relative to the regulatory regime that pre-dates the EGRRCPA.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ The Bureau has discretion in future rulemakings to choose
the most appropriate baseline for that particular rulemaking. Also
note that the Bureau's analysis excludes the Board's final
amendments to subpart C of Regulation CC. Additionally, the Bureau's
amendments to Regulation DD are technical and non-substantive and so
do not affect the benefits, costs, or impacts of the final rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Potential Benefits and Costs to Consumers and Covered Persons
This final rule adjusts for inflation the funds that must be
available as required by the EFA Act and Regulation CC. Moreover,
depository institutions located in American Samoa, the Northern Mariana
Islands, and Guam will now be required to comply with the provisions in
the EFA Act and subpart B of Regulation CC related to funds
availability, payment of interest, and disclosures to their customers.
The final rule keeps the expected losses to depository institutions
constant in real terms by adjusting for inflation the funds that must
be available. Thus, the Bureau does not expect any potential benefits,
costs, or impacts to consumers or covered persons as a result of the
adjustment methodology, other than the paperwork costs discussed below.
The adjustments and methodology in this rule are technical, and they
merely apply the statutory method for adjusting amounts that must be
available to consumers.
The Bureau estimates that covered persons will face an average
paperwork cost of approximately $2,241 every five years to update
notices already sent to consumers.\27\ Specifically, the Bureau
estimates that compliance will require 60 hours every five years. The
Bureau further assumes an average hourly wage of $37.35, as explained
below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ In the proposed 1022(b)(2) analysis, the Bureau stated that
covered persons would face an average paperwork cost of $398.04
every five years. The Bureau received comments that the total and
the assumed number of hours were too low. To be consistent with the
PRA analysis, the Bureau should have stated that covered persons
would face an average paperwork cost of $398.04 every year, which
would be $1,990.20 every five years.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the proposed 1022(b)(2) analysis, the Bureau used the average
hourly wage rate for compliance officers of $33.17. The revised average
hourly wage rate reflects two adjustments. First, the Bureau is using
figures reported in the Occupational Employment Statistics for May 2018
instead of May 2016. Second, two commenters observed that
implementation requires staff besides compliance officers to make
system updates and that technical staff might have a higher average
hourly wage. The Bureau does not have representative data on the
combinations of staff that would be used in recurring system changes of
the type required by this rule. The Bureau agrees, however, that the
prior estimate likely underestimated the average hourly cost. The
second adjustment takes some account of differences in staff and costs
to mitigate any underestimation.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ See Bureau of Labor Statistics, National Occupational
Employment and Wage Estimates (May 2018), available at https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_nat.htm. The average hourly wage is a
weighted average of 40% of the average annual wage for compliance
officers ($34.86), 40% for operations staff ($36.98), and 20% for
computer programmers ($43.07). In addition, one commenter said that
the wage should take into account benefits as well as salary. Given
that the required changes occur just once every five years, the
Bureau expects that there would be large differences across
institutions in use of contractors and salaried employees. The
Bureau does not have the data required to take these differences
into account.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Two commenters stated that the rule would trigger the regulation's
requirement to provide a change-in-terms notice and that this would
create costs for printing and mailing. However, the change-in-terms
notice can be provided on the monthly account statement (the notice can
also be provided electronically if the institution has the consumer's
E-Sign consent). The Bureau therefore does not agree that the rule
would necessitate an increase in printing and mailing costs.
Additionally, the EGRRCPA made amendments to the EFA Act to extend
its application to American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands, and Guam.\29\ The final rule implements the EGRRCPA by
extending the application of Regulation CC's requirements related to
funds availability, payment of interest, and disclosures to
institutions in American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands, and Guam. Consumers of depository institutions in
American Samoa, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands will generally
receive the same benefits of consumers of institutions already
complying with subpart B of Regulation CC. This includes policies and
other disclosures regarding funds availability and timely access to
their funds. Consumers will generally not experience any costs
associated with changes to existing policies or with receiving these
disclosures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ Public Law 115-174, section 208 (2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on regulatory filings, the Bureau has identified five
institutions headquartered in American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands, and Guam that are newly subject to Regulation
CC as a result of the amendments made to the EFA Act by the EGRRCPA,
and that may therefore face compliance costs associated with this final
rule. Although these institutions will incur costs to comply with the
requirements of Regulation CC, the Bureau does not have data on the
impact of the requirements of this final rule on these institutions.
The Bureau specifically requested information from commenters on the
costs of complying with Regulation CC for institutions in American
Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and Guam and
on those institutions' pre-statutory practices regarding funds
availability. No comments provided data or other information in
response to this request.
3. Impact on Depository Institutions With No More Than $10 Billion in
Assets
The final rule's inflation adjustments and changes to disclosures
will impact all depository institutions, including those with no more
than $10 billion in assets. The Bureau expects that all depository
institutions will experience an average cost of approximately $2,241 to
update quinquennial notices.
The EGRRCPA amended the EFA Act to extend its application to
institutions in American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands, and Guam. The Bureau identified five institutions that
are now required to comply with Regulation CC, and all have no more
than $10 billion in assets. The Bureau requested information from
commenters on the total cost that would be experienced by these
depository institutions to comply with Regulation CC. No comments
provided data or other information in response to this request.
[[Page 31693]]
4. Impact on Access to Credit
The Bureau does not expect the final rule to affect consumers'
access to credit. The scope of this rulemaking is limited to funds
availability in depository accounts and is not directly related to
credit access.
5. Impact on Rural Areas
The Bureau does not believe that the final rule will have a unique
impact on consumers in rural areas.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Board: The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) requires an agency to
publish a final regulatory flexibility analysis with a final rule or
certify that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. Based on its analysis, and for
the reasons stated below, the Board believes that the rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. Nevertheless, the Board is publishing a final regulatory
flexibility analysis.
1. Statement of the need for, and objectives of, the proposed rule.
The final rule memorializes the calculation method used to adjust the
EFA Act dollar amounts every five years in accordance with section
607(f) of the EFA Act, as amended by section 1086(f) of the Dodd-Frank
Act. The final rule also implements the statutory amendments to the EFA
Act to extend its application to American Samoa, the Commonwealth of
the Northern Mariana Islands, and Guam.
2. Small entities affected by the proposed rule. The final rule
applies to all depository institutions regardless of their size.
Pursuant to regulations issued by the Small Business Administration (13
CFR 121.201), a ``small banking organization'' includes a depository
institution with $550 million or less in total assets. Based on call
report data, there are approximately 9,460 depository institutions that
have total domestic assets of $550 million or less and thus are
considered small entities for purposes of the RFA. All institutions
will be required to update existing disclosures to their customers with
any adjustments in the dollar amounts and update their software to
adjust the availability amounts where necessary. As discussed above,
while some commenters suggested the cost burden on institutions
implementing the inflation indexing could be greater than the proposal
estimated, the Board does not believe the final rule will have a
significant economic impact on the entities that it affects.
Specifically, the extent of impact on small entities may depend on the
contents of the institution's funds availability policy and the
frequency of the institution's regularly scheduled re-prints of its
availability policy disclosures. Small depository institutions that
already make funds available the next day and do not utilize the
exceptions for new accounts, large deposits, or repeated overdrafts may
be less affected by the final rule. The economic impact on small
entities from the final rule may include technology, labor, and other
associated costs incurred to update their disclosures with the adjusted
dollar amounts, if those cannot be accomplished within the
institution's regular cycle. However, as noted above, the Agencies
anticipate providing one year between the date of publication in the
Federal Register of the inflation-adjusted amounts and the date on
which the adjusted amounts become effective. The Agencies believe that
this one-year timeframe provides institutions with a sufficient interim
in which to plan to send their change-in-terms notices in a way that
minimizes the burden associated with doing so. In addition, depository
institutions located in American Samoa, the Northern Mariana Islands,
and Guam will now be required to comply with the provisions in the EFA
Act and Regulation CC related to funds availability, payment of
interest, and disclosures to their customers.
3. Recordkeeping, reporting, and compliance requirements. The final
rule requires institutions to update their existing EFA Act disclosures
to their customers with the adjusted dollar amount as well as update
software that determines availability, as applicable. No other
additional recordkeeping, reporting, or compliance requirements would
be required by the proposed rule.
4. Other Federal rules. The Board has not identified any likely
duplication, overlap and/or potential conflict between the final rule
and any other Federal rule.
5. Significant alternatives to the proposed revisions. As discussed
above and after reviewing the comments submitted, the Board has not
identified any significant alternatives that would reduce the
regulatory burden of this rule on small entities.
Bureau: The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires an
agency to conduct an initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA) and
a final regulatory flexibility analysis (FRFA) of any rule subject to
notice-and-comment rulemaking requirements.\30\ These analyses must
``describe the impact of the proposed rule on small entities.'' \31\
Neither an IRFA nor FRFA is required if the agency certifies that the
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.\32\ The Bureau also is subject to certain
additional procedures under the RFA involving the convening of a panel
to consult with small business representatives prior to proposing a
rule for which an IRFA is required.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.
\31\ Id. at 603(a). For purposes of assessing the impacts of the
final rule on small entities, ``small entities'' is defined in the
RFA to include small businesses, small not-for-profit organizations,
and small government jurisdictions. Id. at 601(6). A ``small
business'' is determined by application of Small Business
Administration regulations and reference to the North American
Industry Classification System (NAICS) classifications and size
standards. Id. at 601(3). A ``small organization'' is any ``not-for-
profit enterprise which is independently owned and operated and is
not dominant in its field.'' Id. at 601(4). A ``small governmental
jurisdiction'' is the government of a city, county, town, township,
village, school district, or special district with a population of
less than 50,000. Id. at 601(5).
\32\ Id. at 605(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At the proposed rule stage, the Bureau determined that an IRFA was
not required because the proposal, if adopted, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
For this final rule, the Bureau continues to believe that that
determination is accurate. As discussed in the Bureau's section
1022(b)(2) analysis above, the Bureau believes the final rule's
inflation adjustments hold real expected losses fixed by adjusting for
inflation the amount of funds that must be made available for
withdrawal in accordance with the EFA Act and Regulation CC.
Accordingly, these adjustments for inflation do not introduce costs for
entities, including small entities, other than the paperwork costs
discussed below. In addition, the final rule would implement in
Regulation CC the EGRRCPA extension of the EFA Act's requirements to
institutions in American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands, and Guam. The Bureau identified five institutions that
will be required to comply with Regulation CC due to the EGRRCPA
amendments to the EFA Act. Thus, the Bureau concludes that a
substantial number of small entities is not impacted by the proposal to
implement in Regulation CC the EGRRCPA amendments to the EFA Act.
The Bureau recognizes that the final rule will have some impact on
some entities, including those that are small. The Small Business
Administration (SBA) defines small depository institutions as those
with less than $550
[[Page 31694]]
million in assets.\33\ Following guidance from the Small Business
Administration, the Bureau averaged the total assets reported in
quarterly call reports during quarters 1 through 4 of 2018. The Bureau
identified 9,460 entities that had average total assets less than $550
million. These are considered small for the purposes of the RFA. Using
the methodology outlined in the Board's Paperwork Reduction Act
analysis, the Bureau estimates that the quinquennial adjustments will
have an average quinquennial cost of approximately $2,241 for
depository institutions. The Bureau estimates that about 3% of small
entities face a significant economic impact from the quinquennial
information collection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ Small Business Administration, Table of Small Business
Standards (2016), available at https://www.sba.gov/contracting/getting-started-contractor/make-sure-you-meet-sba-size-standards/table-small-business-size-standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, the Bureau estimates the impact of all subpart B
provisions for those covered persons required to comply with subpart B
of Regulation CC as a result of the amendments the EGRRCPA made to the
EFA Act. The EGRRCPA amended the EFA Act to extend its application to
institutions in American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands, and Guam. The Bureau identified five institutions that
will be required to comply with Regulation CC due to the EGRRCPA
amendments to the EFA Act.
Thus, the Bureau concludes that a substantial number of small
entities is not impacted by the proposal to implement the EGRRCPA
amendments to the EFA Act in Regulation CC.
Accordingly, the Bureau Director, by signing below, certifies that
this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
Board: Certain provisions of the final rule contain ``collection of
information'' requirements within the meaning of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521). In accordance with
the requirements of the PRA, the Board may not conduct or sponsor, and
the respondent is not required to respond to, an information collection
unless it displays a currently-valid Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) control number. The OMB control number for the Board is 7100-0235
and will be extended, with revision. The Board reviewed the final rule
under the authority delegated to the Board by OMB. The Board invited
comments on: (a) Whether the collections of information are necessary
for the proper performance of the Board's functions, including whether
the information has practical utility; (b) The accuracy of the
estimates of the burden of the information collections, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) Ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected;
(d) Ways to minimize the burden of the information collections on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology; and (e) Estimates
of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and
purchase of services to provide information.
Eight commenters, including credit unions and credit union trade
associations, expressed concern regarding the burden imposed on
institutions to implement the inflation adjustments. Several credit
union commenters stated that the cost burden imposed on institutions to
implement the inflation indexing could exceed the Agencies' estimate in
the proposal, noting in particular the printing and distribution costs
associated with sending notices to customers of the changes in the
institutions' funds-availability policies (commonly referred to as
``change-in-terms'' notices). One commenter specifically voiced concern
about the disproportionate cost impact on smaller credit unions for
printing and mailing notices in general and, in specific, the change-
in-terms notice. To reduce that burden, the commenter also urged the
Agencies to reduce the length of the required funds-availability
disclosures or permit them to accompany monthly account statements.
Another commenter suggested reducing burden by establishing an
exception within the Regulation CC provision, Sec. 229.18(e), that
requires the change-in-terms notice. Specifically, the commenter
suggested that an institution not be required to provide a change-in-
terms notice when its funds-availability policy changes due to the
periodic inflation adjustments to the Regulation CC funds-availability
dollar amounts that are mandated by section 607(f) of the EFA Act.
In their final rule, the Agencies decline to establish in
Regulation CC an exception to the requirement to send a change-in-terms
notice, as this requirement is established by statute. However, the
Agencies note several ways that depository institutions may lower their
costs under the rule, including providing the required notice
electronically and sending it with the monthly account statement, as
follows.
Electronic delivery is permitted where the institution has complied
with the requirements of the Electronic Signatures in Global and
National Commerce Act (15 U.S.C. 7001 et seq. (``E-Sign Act'')). See
comment 229.15(a)-1. Further, the regulation already permits an
institution to send a required change-in-terms notice on or with a
monthly account statement, and this is so irrespective of whether the
institution sends the notice and statement electronically or in paper
form. See comment 229.18(e)-1 (stating that the change-in-terms notice
required by Sec. 229.18(e) ``may be given in any form as long as it is
clear and conspicuous''). In addition, an institution need not set
forth the entirety of its revised funds-availability policy in its
change-in-terms notice. If an institution chooses to provide the notice
by sending a complete new availability disclosure, the institution must
direct the customer to the changed terms in the disclosure by use of a
letter or insert, or by highlighting the changed terms in the
disclosure. See comment 229.18(e)-1. And finally, as discussed above,
the Agencies anticipate providing one year between the date of
publication in the Federal Register of the inflation-adjusted amounts
and the date on which the adjusted amounts become effective. The
Agencies believe that this one-year timeframe provides institutions
with a sufficient interim in which to plan to send their change-in-
terms notices in a way that minimizes the burden associated with doing
so. In light of all of these factors, and given that the inflation
adjustments are statutorily required and will occur only once every
five years, the Agencies believe that the burden on institutions to
send change-in-terms notices reflecting the inflation-adjusted amounts
is reasonable.
Proposed Information Collection
Title of Information Collection: Disclosure Requirements Associated
with Availability of Funds and Collection of Checks (Regulation CC).
Frequency of Response: Quinquennial.
Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profit.
Respondents: State member banks and uninsured state branches and
agencies of foreign banks.
Abstract: Regulation CC (12 CFR part 229) implements the Expedited
Funds Availability Act of 1987 (EFA Act) and the Check Clearing for the
21st Century Act of 2003 (Check 21 Act). The EFA Act was enacted to
provide depositors of checks with prompt funds availability and to
foster improvements in the check
[[Page 31695]]
collection and return processes. Subpart B of Regulation CC implements
the EFA Act's funds-availability provisions and specifies availability
schedules within which banks must make funds available for withdrawal.
Subpart B also implements the EFA Act's rules regarding exceptions to
the schedules, disclosure of funds-availability policies, and payment
of interest.
Current Action: The Agencies are adding Sec. 229.11 to provide the
CPI-W calculation methodology, which includes an explanation of how
annual and cumulative changes (positive or negative) in the CPI-W will
be taken into account, for the dollar amounts in Sec.
229.10(c)(1)(vii) regarding the minimum amount, Sec. 229.12(d) for the
cash withdrawal amount, section 229.13(a) for the new-account amount,
Sec. 229.13(b) for the large-deposit threshold, Sec. 229.13(d) for
repeatedly overdrawn threshold, and Sec. 229.21(a) for the civil
liability amounts.
PRA Burden Estimates
Number of respondents: 940 respondents (100 respondents for changes
in policy).
Estimated average hours per response: Specific availability policy
disclosure and initial disclosures, .02 hours; Notice in specific
policy disclosure, .05 hours; Notice of exceptions, .05 hours;
Locations where employees accept consumer deposits, .25 hours;
Quinquennial inflation adjustments for disclosures (annualized), 8
hours; Annual notice of new ATMs, 5 hours; Changes in policy, 20 hours;
Notification of quinquennial inflation adjustments, 4 hours; Notice of
nonpayment on paying bank, .02 hours; Notification to customer, .02
hours; Expedited recredit for consumers, .25 hours; Expedited recredit
for banks, .25 hours; Consumer awareness, .02 hours; and Expedited
recredit claim notice, .25 hours.
Estimated annual burden hours: Specific availability policy
disclosure and initial disclosures, 9,400 hours; Notice in specific
policy disclosure, 32,900 hours; Notice of exceptions, 94,000 hours;
Locations where employees accept consumer deposits, 235 hours;
Quinquennial inflation adjustments for disclosures (annualized), 7,520
hours; Annual notice of new ATMs, 4,700 hours; Changes in policy, 4,000
hours; Notification of quinquennial inflation adjustments, 3,760 hours;
Notice of nonpayment on paying bank, 658 hours; Notification to
customer, 6,956 hours; Expedited recredit for consumers, 8,225 hours;
Expedited recredit for banks, 3,525 hours; Consumer awareness, 5,640
hours; and Expedited recredit claim notice, 5,875 hours.
Current Total Estimated Annual Burden: 176,114 hours.
Proposed Total Estimated Annual Burden: 187,394 hours.
Bureau: As noted in the proposal, the Bureau was not required to
seek OMB approval for the information collection requirements already
accounted for by the Board above, or for which other agencies are
responsible. Moreover, the Bureau's technical, non-substantive
amendments to Regulation DD as discussed above in Section II.E do not
impose any new or additional information collection requirements that
would require OMB approval.\34\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ The OMB control number for the information collection
requirements contained in Regulation DD is 3170-0004.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Plain Language Used
Section 722 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (Pub. L. 106-102, 113
Stat. 1338, 1471, 12 U.S.C. 4809) requires the Federal banking agencies
to use plain language in all proposed and final rules published after
January 1, 2000. The Board sought to present the proposed rule in a
simple and straightforward manner, and invited comment on the use of
plain language and whether any part of the rule could be more clearly
stated. No commenters commented on use of plain language in the
proposed rule, and the Board has adopted proposed plain language in the
final rule.
E. Interagency Consultations
The Board and the Bureau have performed interagency consultations
regarding this final rule consistent with section 609(e) of the EFA
Act, section 269(a)(1) of TISA, and section 1022(b)(2)(B) of the Dodd-
Frank Act. Section 609(e) of the EFA Act provides that in prescribing
regulations under section 609(a), the Board and the Director of the
Bureau shall consult with the Comptroller of the Currency, the Board of
Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the
National Credit Union Administration Board.\35\ Section 269(a)(1) of
TISA provides that in prescribing regulations under section 269(a)(1),
the Bureau shall consult with each agency referred to in TISA section
270(a) (12 U.S.C. 4309(a)).\36\ Section 1022(b)(2)(B) of the Dodd-Frank
Act provides that in prescribing a rule under the Federal consumer
financial laws, the Bureau shall consult with the appropriate
prudential regulators or other Federal agencies prior to proposing a
rule and during the comment process regarding consistency with
prudential, market, or systemic objectives administered by such
agencies.\37\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\35\ 12 U.S.C. 4008(a).
\36\ 12 U.S.C. 4308(a)(1).
\37\ 12 U.S.C. 5512(b)(2)(B). Although the manner and extent to
which section 1022(b)(2)(B) applies to a rulemaking of this kind is
unclear, in order to inform this rulemaking more fully, the Bureau
performed the described consultations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
F. Bureau Congressional Review Act Statement
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
the Bureau will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to the rule taking
effect. The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) has
designated this rule as not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
List of Subjects in
12 CFR Part 229
Banks, Banking, Federal Reserve System, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
12 CFR Part 1030
Advertising, Banks, Banking, Consumer protection, National banks,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Savings associations.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System amends Regulation CC, 12 CFR part 229, as
set forth below:
PART 229--AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS AND COLLECTIONS OF CHECKS
(REGULATION CC)
0
1. The authority citation for part 229 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 4001-4010, 12 U.S.C. 5001-5018.
Subpart A--General
* * * * *
0
2. In Sec. 229.1, paragraph (a) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 229.1 Authority and purpose; organization.
(a) Authority and purpose--(1) In general. This part is issued by
the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board) to
implement the Expedited Funds Availability Act (12 U.S.C. 4001-4010)
(EFA Act) and the
[[Page 31696]]
Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act (12 U.S.C. 5001-5018) (Check 21
Act).
(2) Joint authority of the Bureau. The Board issues regulations
under Sections 603(d)(1), 604, 605, and 609(a) of the EFA Act (12
U.S.C. 4002(d)(1), 4003, 4004, 4008(a)) jointly with the Director of
the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (Bureau).
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 229.2, revise paragraphs (c), (ff), and (jj) to read as
follows:
Sec. 229.2 September 1, 2019 Definitions.
* * * * *
(c) Automated teller machine or ATM means an electronic device
located in the United States at which a natural person may make
deposits to an account by cash or check and perform other account
transactions.
* * * * *
(ff) State means a state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico,
American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam,
or the U.S. Virgin Islands. For purposes of subpart D of this part and,
in connection therewith, this subpart A, state also means the Trust
Territory of the Pacific Islands and any other territory of the United
States.
* * * * *
(jj) United States means the states, including the District of
Columbia, the U.S. Virgin Islands, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of
the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, and Puerto Rico.
* * * * *
Subpart B--Availability of Funds and Disclosure of Funds
Availability Policies
Sec. 229.10 [Amended]
0
4. In Sec. 229.10, remove ``$100'' and add in its place ``$225'' in
paragraph (c)(1)(vii)(A).
0
5. Add Sec. 229.11 to read as follows:
Sec. 229.11 Adjustment of dollar amounts.
(a) Dollar amounts indexed. The dollar amounts specified in
Sec. Sec. 229.10(c)(1)(vii), 229.12(d), 229.13(a), 229.13(b),
229.13(d), and 229.21(a) shall be adjusted effective on July 1, 2020,
on July 1, 2025, and on July 1 of every fifth year after 2025, in
accordance with the procedure set forth in paragraph (b) of this
section using the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and
Clerical Workers (CPI-W), as published by the Bureau of Labor
Statistics.
(b) Indexing procedure--(1) Inflation measurement periods. For
dollar amount adjustments that are effective on July 1, 2020, the
inflation measurement period begins in July 2011 and ends in July 2018.
For dollar amount adjustments that are effective on July 1, 2025, the
inflation measurement period begins in July 2018 and ends in July 2023.
For dollar amount adjustments that are effective on July 1 of every
fifth year after 2025, the inflation measurement period begins in July
of every fifth year after 2018 and ends in July of every fifth year
after 2023. Following each inflation measurement period, the dollar
amount adjustments will be published in the Federal Register.
(2) Percentage change. Any dollar amount adjustment under this
section shall be calculated across an inflation measurement period by
the aggregate percentage change in the CPI-W, including both positive
and negative percentage changes. The aggregate percentage change over
the inflation measurement period will be rounded to one decimal place,
using the CPI-W value for July (which is generally released by the
Bureau of Labor Statistics in August).
(3) Adjustment amount. The adjustment amount for each dollar amount
listed in paragraph (a) of this section shall be equal to the aggregate
percentage change multiplied by the existing dollar amount listed in
paragraph (c) of this section and rounded to the nearest multiple of
$25. The adjusted dollar amount will be equal to the sum of the
existing dollar amount and the adjustment amount. No dollar adjustment
will be made when the aggregate percentage change is zero or a negative
percentage change, or when the aggregate percentage change multiplied
by the existing dollar amount listed in paragraph (c) and rounded to
the nearest multiple of $25 results in no change.
(4) Carry-forward. When there is an aggregate negative percentage
change over an inflation measurement period, or when an aggregate
positive percentage change over an inflation measurement period
multiplied by the existing dollar amount listed in paragraph (c) of
this section and rounded to the nearest multiple of $25 results in no
change, the aggregate percentage change over the inflation measurement
period will be included in the calculation to determine the percentage
change at the end of the subsequent inflation measurement period. That
is, the cumulative change in the CPI-W over the two (or more) inflation
measurement periods will be used in the calculation until the
cumulative change results in publication of an adjusted dollar amount
in the regulation.
(c) Amounts. (1) For purposes of Sec. 229.10(c)(1)(vii), the
dollar amount in effect during a particular period is the amount stated
in this paragraph (c)(1) for that period.
(i) Prior to July 21, 2011, the amount is $100.
(ii) From July 21, 2011, through June 30, 2020, by operation of
section 603(a)(2)(D) of the EFA Act (12 U.S.C. 4002(a)(2)(D)) the
amount is $200.
(iii) Effective July 1, 2020, the amount is $225.
(2) For purposes of Sec. 229.12(d), the dollar amount in effect
during a particular period is the amount stated in this paragraph
(c)(2) for that period.
(i) Prior to July 1, 2020, the amount is $400.
(ii) Effective July 1, 2020, the amount is $450.
(3) For purposes of Sec. 229.13(a), (b), and (d), the dollar
amount in effect during a particular period is the amount stated in
this paragraph (c)(3) for that period.
(i) Prior to July 1, 2020, the amount is $5,000.
(ii) Effective July 1, 2020, the amount is $5,525.
(4) For purposes of Sec. 229.21(a), the dollar amounts in effect
during a particular period are the amounts stated in this paragraph
(c)(4) for the period.
(i) Prior to July 1, 2020, the amounts are $100, $1,000, and
$500,000 respectively.
(ii) Effective July 1, 2020, the amounts are $100, $1,100, and
$552,500 respectively.
0
6. In Sec. 229.12:
0
a. Remove ``$100'' and add in its place ``$225'' in paragraph (d); and
0
b. Revise paragraphs (e) introductory text and (e)(1).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 229.12 Availability schedule.
* * * * *
(e) Extension of schedule for certain deposits in Alaska, Hawaii,
Puerto Rico, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, Guam, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. The depositary bank may
extend the time periods set forth in this section by one business day
in the case of any deposit, other than a deposit described in Sec.
229.10, that is--
(1) Deposited in an account at a branch of a depositary bank if the
branch is located in Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, or the U.S. Virgin
Islands; and
* * * * *
[[Page 31697]]
Sec. 229.21 [Amended]
0
7. In Sec. 229.21, remove ``$100'' and add in its place ``$225'' in
paragraph (a)(2)(i).
Sec. 229.43 [Removed and Reserved]
0
8. Section 229.43 is removed and reserved.
0
9. Amend appendix E to part 229 as follows:
0
a. Remove the dollar amounts in the ``Remove'' column wherever they
appear and add in their place the dollar amounts in the ``Add'' column
in the following table:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section Remove Add
------------------------------------------------------------------------
229.10(c)..................................... $5,000 $5,525
229.12(d)..................................... 400 450
229.13(a), (b), and (d)....................... 5,000 5,525
------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
b. In Section II.D, revise paragraph 1.
0
c. In Section IV.D, revise paragraph 5 and add paragraph 7.
0
d. Section V is revised.
0
e. In Section VI.B, paragraph 4 is added.
0
f In Section VI.E paragraphs 1 and 2 are revised.
0
g. Section VII.C, paragraph 2 is revised and paragraph 4 is added.
0
h. In Section VII.E, paragraph 5 is added.
0
i. In Section VII.H, paragraph 2(b) is revised.
0
j. In Section XIV.C, paragraph 2 is revised.
0
k. In Section XV.A, paragraph 2 is added.
0
l. Section XXIX is removed and reserved.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Appendix E to Part 229--Commentary
* * * * *
II. Section 229.2 Definitions
* * * * *
D. * * *
1. ATM is not defined in the EFA Act. The regulation defines an
ATM as an electronic device located in the United States at which a
natural person may make deposits to an account by cash or check and
perform other account transactions. Point-of-sale terminals,
machines that only dispense cash, night depositories, and lobby
deposit boxes are not ATMs within the meaning of the definition,
either because they do not accept deposits of cash or checks (e.g.,
point-of-sale terminals and cash dispensers) or because they only
accept deposits (e.g., night depositories and lobby boxes) and
cannot perform other transactions. A lobby deposit box or similar
receptacle in which written payment orders or deposits may be placed
is not an ATM.
* * * * *
IV. * * *
D. * * *
5. First $225
a. The EFA Act and regulation also require that up to $225 of
the aggregate deposit by check or checks not subject to next-day
availability on any one banking day be made available on the next
business day. For example, if $70 were deposited in an account by
check(s) on a Monday, the entire $70 must be available for
withdrawal at the start of business on Tuesday. If $400 were
deposited by check(s) on a Monday, this section requires that $225
of the funds be available for withdrawal at the start of business on
Tuesday. The portion of the customer's deposit to which the $225
must be applied is at the discretion of the depositary bank, as long
as it is not applied to any checks subject to next-day availability.
The $225 next-day availability rule does not apply to deposits at
nonproprietary ATMs.
b. The $225 that must be made available under this rule is in
addition to the amount that must be made available for withdrawal on
the business day after deposit under other provisions of this
section. For example, if a customer deposits a $1,000 Treasury check
and a $1,000 local check in its account on Monday, $1,225 must be
made available for withdrawal on Tuesday--the proceeds of the $1,000
Treasury check, as well as the first $225 of the local check.
c. A depositary bank may aggregate all local and nonlocal check
deposits made by a customer on a given banking day for the purposes
of the $225 next-day availability rule. Thus, if a customer has two
accounts at the depositary bank, and on a particular banking day
makes deposits to each account, $225 of the total deposited to the
two accounts must be made available on the business day after
deposit. Banks may aggregate deposits to individual and joint
accounts for the purposes of this provision.
d. If the customer deposits a $500 local check and gets $225
cash back at the time of deposit, the bank need not make an
additional $225 available for withdrawal on the following day.
Similarly, if the customer depositing the local check has a negative
book balance, or negative available balance in its account at the
time of deposit, the $225 that must be available on the next
business day may be made available by applying the $225 to the
negative balance, rather than making the $225 available for
withdrawal by cash or check on the following day.
* * * * *
7. Dollar Amount Adjustment--See section 229.11 for the rules
regarding adjustments for inflation every five years to the dollar
amounts used in this section.
* * * * *
V. Section 229.11 Adjustment of Dollar Amounts
1. Example of a positive adjustment. If the CPI-W for July (and
released in August) of the base year and the adjustment year were
100 and 114.7, respectively, the aggregate percentage change for the
period would be 14.7%. If the applicable dollar amount was $200 for
the prior period, then the adjusted figure would become $225, as the
change of $29.40 results in rounding to $25.
2. Example of no adjustment. If the CPI-W for July (and released
in August) of the base year and the adjustment year were 100 and
104, respectively, the aggregate percentage change would be 4.0%. If
the applicable dollar amount was $200 for the prior period, then the
adjusted figure would remain $200, as the change of $8.00 does not
result in rounding to $25.
3. Example of accounting for aggregate decrease in subsequent
period. If the CPI-W for July (and released in August) of the base
year and the adjustment year were 100 and 95, respectively, the
aggregate percentage change would be -5%, and no adjustment to the
dollar amounts would occur. The CPI-W for July (and released in
August) of the base year would be the starting point for calculating
any CPI-W increase across subsequent five-year periods. Therefore,
if the CPI-W in July (and released in August) of the base year and
the CPI-W in July (and released in August) of the years at the end
of the next two five-year periods were 100, 95, and 109,
respectively, the aggregate percentage change for the entire period
would be 9.0%. If the applicable dollar amount was $5,000 for the
prior period, then the adjusted figure would become $5,450 as the
change of $450 does not require rounding because it is a multiple of
$25.
4. Example of accounting for aggregate lack of dollar amount
change in subsequent period. If the CPI-W for July (and released in
August) of the base year and the year at the end of the subsequent
five-year period were 100 and 105, respectively, the aggregate
change over the five-year period would be 5%, and no adjustment to
the $200 amount would occur, as the change of $10 does not result in
rounding to $225. Nonetheless, the CPI-W for July (and released in
August) of the base year would be the starting point for calculating
any CPI-W percentage increase across the subsequent five-year
period. Therefore, if the CPI-W in July (and released in August) of
the base year and the CPI-W in July (and released in August) of the
years at the end of the next two five-year periods were 100, 105,
and 112.6, respectively, the aggregate percentage change for the
entire period would be 12.6%. If the applicable dollar amount was
$200 for the prior period, then the adjusted figure would become
$225 as the change of $25.20 results in rounding to $225, the
nearest multiple of $25.
VI. * * *
B. 229.12(d) Time Period Adjustment for Withdrawal by Cash or
Similar Means
* * * * *
4. Dollar Amount Adjustment--See section 229.11 for the rules
regarding adjustments for inflation every five years to the dollar
amounts in this section.
* * * * *
E. 229.12(e) Extension of Schedule for Certain Deposits in Alaska,
Hawaii, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, and the U.S. Virgin Islands
1. The EFA Act and regulation provide an extension of the
availability schedules for
[[Page 31698]]
check deposits at a branch of a bank if the branch is located in
Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, or the U.S. Virgin Islands. The
schedules for local checks, nonlocal checks (including nonlocal
checks subject to the reduced schedules of appendix B), and deposits
at nonproprietary ATMs are extended by one business day for checks
deposited to accounts in banks located in these jurisdictions that
are drawn on or payable at or through a paying bank not located in
the same jurisdiction as the depositary bank. For example, a check
deposited in a bank in Hawaii and drawn on a San Francisco paying
bank must be made available for withdrawal not later than the third
business day following deposit. This extension does not apply to
deposits that must be made available for withdrawal on the next
business day.
2. The Congress did not provide this extension of the schedules
to checks drawn on a paying bank located in Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto
Rico, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, Guam, or the U.S. Virgin Islands and deposited in an
account at a depositary bank in the 48 contiguous states. Therefore,
a check deposited in a San Francisco bank drawn on a Hawaii paying
bank must be made available for withdrawal not later than the second
rather than the third business day following deposit.
VII. Section 229.13 Exceptions
B. * * *
4. Dollar Amount Adjustment--See section 229.11 for the rules
regarding adjustments for inflation every five years to the dollar
amounts in this section.
C. * * *
2. The following example illustrates the operation of the large-
deposit exception. If a customer deposits $2,000 in cash and a
$9,000 local check on a Monday, $2,225 (the proceeds of the cash
deposit and $225 from the local-check deposit) must be made
available for withdrawal on Tuesday. An additional $5,300 of the
proceeds of the local check must be available for withdrawal on
Wednesday in accordance with the local schedule, and the remaining
$3,475 may be held for an additional period of time under the large-
deposit exception.
* * * * *
4. Dollar Amount Adjustment--See section 229.11 for the rules
regarding adjustments for inflation every five years to the dollar
amounts in this section.
* * * * *
E. * * *
5. Dollar Amount Adjustment--See section 229.11 for the
calculation method used to adjust the dollar amounts in this section
every five years.
* * * * *
H. * * *
2. * * *
b. In the case of a deposit of multiple checks, the depositary
bank has the discretion to place an exception hold on any
combination of checks in excess of $5,525. The notice should enable
a customer to determine the availability of the deposit in the case
of a deposit of multiple checks. For example, if a customer deposits
a $5,525 local check and a $5,525 nonlocal check, under the large-
deposit exception, the depositary bank may make funds available in
the amount of (1) $225 on the first business day after deposit,
$5,300 on the second business day after deposit (local check), and
$5,525 on the eleventh business day after deposit (nonlocal check
with six-day exception hold), or (2) $225 on the first business day
after deposit, $5,300 on the fifth business day after deposit
(nonlocal check), and $5,525 on the seventh business day after
deposit (local check with five-day exception hold). The notice
should reflect the bank's priorities in placing exception holds on
next-day (or second-day), local, and nonlocal checks.
* * * * *
XIV. Section 229.20 Relation to State Law
* * * * *
C. * * *
2. Under a state law, some categories of deposits could be
available for withdrawal sooner or later than the time required by
this subpart, depending on the composition of the deposit. For
example, the EFA Act and this regulation (Sec. 229.10(c)(1)(vii))
require next-day availability for the first $225 of the aggregate
deposit of local or nonlocal checks on any day, and a state law
could require next-day availability for any check of $200 or less
that is deposited. Under the EFA Act and this regulation, if either
one $300 check or three $100 checks are deposited on a given day,
$225 must be made available for withdrawal on the next business day,
and $75 must be made available in accordance with the local or
nonlocal schedule. Under the state law, however, the two deposits
would be subject to different availability rules. In the first case,
none of the proceeds of the deposit would be subject to next-day
availability; in the second case, the entire proceeds of the deposit
would be subject to next-day availability. In this example, because
the state law would, in some situations, permit a hold longer than
the maximum permitted by the EFA Act, this provision of state law is
inconsistent and preempted in its entirety.
* * * * *
XV. Section 229.21 Civil Liability
A. * * *
2. Dollar Amount Adjustment--See section 229.11 for the rules
regarding adjustments for inflation every five years to the dollar
amounts in this section.
* * * * *
Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Bureau of Consumer
Financial Protection amends Regulation DD, 12 CFR part 1030, as
follows:
PART 1030--TRUTH IN SAVINGS (REGULATION DD)
0
10. The authority citation for part 1030 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 4302-4304, 4308, 5512, 5581.
0
11. In Sec. 1030.1, paragraph (e) is added to read as follows:
Sec. 1030.1 Authority, purpose, coverage, and effect on state laws.
* * * * *
(e) Relationship to Regulation CC. The Director of the Bureau and
the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System jointly issue
regulations under sections 603(d)(1), 604, 605, and 609(a) of the
Expedited Funds Availability Act (12 U.S.C. 4002(d)(1), 4003, 4004,
4008(a)) that are codified within Regulation CC (12 CFR part 229).
0
12. In Sec. 1030.7, paragraph (c) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 1030.7 Payment of interest.
* * * * *
(c) Date interest begins to accrue. Interest shall begin to accrue
not later than the business day specified for interest-bearing accounts
in section 606 of the Expedited Funds Availability Act (12 U.S.C. 4005)
and in Sec. 229.14 of that act's implementing Regulation CC (12 CFR
part 229). Interest shall accrue until the day funds are withdrawn.
0
13. Appendix A to part 1030 is revised to read as follows:
Appendix A to Part 1030--Annual Percentage Yield Calculation
The annual percentage yield measures the total amount of
interest paid on an account based on the interest rate and the
frequency of compounding. The annual percentage yield reflects only
interest and does not include the value of any bonus (or other
consideration worth $10 or less) that may be provided to the
consumer to open, maintain, increase or renew an account. Interest
or other earnings are not to be included in the annual percentage
yield if such amounts are determined by circumstances that may or
may not occur in the future. The annual percentage yield is
expressed as an annualized rate, based on a 365-day year.
Institutions may calculate the annual percentage yield based on a
365-day or a 366-day year in a leap year. Part I of this appendix
discusses the annual percentage yield calculations for account
disclosures and advertisements, while part II discusses annual
percentage yield earned calculations for periodic statements.
Part I. Annual Percentage Yield for Account Disclosures and Advertising
Purposes
In general, the annual percentage yield for account disclosures
under Sec. Sec. 1030.4 and 1030.5 and for advertising under Sec.
1030.8 is an annualized rate that reflects the relationship between
the amount of interest
[[Page 31699]]
that would be earned by the consumer for the term of the account and
the amount of principal used to calculate that interest. Special
rules apply to accounts with tiered and stepped interest rates, and
to certain time accounts with a stated maturity greater than one
year.
A. General Rules
Except as provided in part I.E. of this appendix, the annual
percentage yield shall be calculated by the formula shown below.
Institutions shall calculate the annual percentage yield based on
the actual number of days in the term of the account. For accounts
without a stated maturity date (such as a typical savings or
transaction account), the calculation shall be based on an assumed
term of 365 days. In determining the total interest figure to be
used in the formula, institutions shall assume that all principal
and interest remain on deposit for the entire term and that no other
transactions (deposits or withdrawals) occur during the term. This
assumption shall not be used if an institution requires, as a
condition of the account, that consumers withdraw interest during
the term. In such a case, the interest (and annual percentage yield
calculation) shall reflect that requirement. For time accounts that
are offered in multiples of months, institutions may base the number
of days on either the actual number of days during the applicable
period, or the number of days that would occur for any actual
sequence of that many calendar months. If institutions choose to use
the latter rule, they must use the same number of days to calculate
the dollar amount of interest earned on the account that is used in
the annual percentage yield formula (where ``Interest'' is divided
by ``Principal'').
The annual percentage yield is calculated by use of the
following general formula (``APY'' is used for convenience in the
formulas):
APY=100 [(1+Interest/Principal)(365/Days in term)-1]
``Principal'' is the amount of funds assumed to have been
deposited at the beginning of the account.
``Interest'' is the total dollar amount of interest earned on
the Principal for the term of the account.
``Days in term'' is the actual number of days in the term of the
account. When the ``days in term'' is 365 (that is, where the stated
maturity is 365 days or where the account does not have a stated
maturity), the annual percentage yield can be calculated by use of
the following simple formula:
APY=100 (Interest/Principal)
Examples:
(1) If an institution pays $61.68 in interest for a 365-day year
on $1,000 deposited into a NOW account, using the general formula
above, the annual percentage yield is 6.17%:
APY=100[(1+61.68/1,000)(365/365)-1]
APY=6.17%
Or, using the simple formula above (since, as an account without
a stated term, the term is deemed to be 365 days):
APY=100(61.68/1,000)
APY=6.17%
(2) If an institution pays $30.37 in interest on a $1,000 six-
month certificate of deposit (where the six-month period used by the
institution contains 182 days), using the general formula above, the
annual percentage yield is 6.18%:
APY=100[(1+30.37/1,000)(365/182)-1]
APY=6.18%
B. Stepped-Rate Accounts (Different Rates Apply in Succeeding
Periods)
For accounts with two or more interest rates applied in
succeeding periods (where the rates are known at the time the
account is opened), an institution shall assume each interest rate
is in effect for the length of time provided for in the deposit
contract.
Examples:
(1) If an institution offers a $1,000 6-month certificate of
deposit on which it pays a 5% interest rate, compounded daily, for
the first three months (which contain 91 days), and a 5.5% interest
rate, compounded daily, for the next three months (which contain 92
days), the total interest for six months is $26.68 and, using the
general formula above, the annual percentage yield is 5.39%:
APY=100[(1+26.68/1,000)(365/183)-1]
APY=5.39%
(2) If an institution offers a $1,000 two-year certificate of
deposit on which it pays a 6% interest rate, compounded daily, for
the first year, and a 6.5% interest rate, compounded daily, for the
next year, the total interest for two years is $133.13, and, using
the general formula above, the annual percentage yield is 6.45%:
APY=100[(1+133.13/1,000)(365/730)-1]
APY=6.45%
C. Variable-Rate Accounts
For variable-rate accounts without an introductory premium or
discounted rate, an institution must base the calculation only on
the initial interest rate in effect when the account is opened (or
advertised), and assume that this rate will not change during the
year.
Variable-rate accounts with an introductory premium (or
discount) rate must be calculated like a stepped-rate account. Thus,
an institution shall assume that:
(1) The introductory interest rate is in effect for the length
of time provided for in the deposit contract; and
(2) The variable interest rate that would have been in effect
when the account is opened or advertised (but for the introductory
rate) is in effect for the remainder of the year. If the variable
rate is tied to an index, the index-based rate in effect at the time
of disclosure must be used for the remainder of the year. If the
rate is not tied to an index, the rate in effect for existing
consumers holding the same account (who are not receiving the
introductory interest rate) must be used for the remainder of the
year.
For example, if an institution offers an account on which it
pays a 7% interest rate, compounded daily, for the first three
months (which, for example, contain 91 days), while the variable
interest rate that would have been in effect when the account was
opened was 5%, the total interest for a 365-day year for a $1,000
deposit is $56.52 (based on 91 days at 7% followed by 274 days at
5%). Using the simple formula, the annual percentage yield is 5.65%:
APY=100(56.52/1,000)
APY=5.65%
D. Tiered-Rate Accounts (Different Rates Apply to Specified Balance
Levels)
For accounts in which two or more interest rates paid on the
account are applicable to specified balance levels, the institution
must calculate the annual percentage yield in accordance with the
method described below that it uses to calculate interest. In all
cases, an annual percentage yield (or a range of annual percentage
yields, if appropriate) must be disclosed for each balance tier.
For purposes of the examples discussed below, assume the
following:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deposit balance required to earn
Interest rate (percent) rate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
5.25.................................. Up to but not exceeding $2,500.
5.50.................................. Above $2,500 but not exceeding
$15,000.
5.75.................................. Above $15,000.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tiering Method A. (1) Under this method, an institution pays on
the full balance in the account the stated interest rate that
corresponds to the applicable deposit tier. For example, if a
consumer deposits $8,000, the institution pays the 5.50% interest
rate on the entire $8,000.
When this method is used to determine interest, only one annual
percentage yield will apply to each tier. Within each tier, the
annual percentage yield will not vary with the amount of principal
assumed to have been deposited.
For the interest rates and deposit balances assumed above, the
institution will state three annual percentage yields--one
corresponding to each balance tier. Calculation of each annual
percentage yield is similar for this type of account as for accounts
with a single interest rate. Thus, the calculation is based on the
total amount of interest that would be received by the consumer for
each tier of the account for a year and the principal assumed to
have been deposited to earn that amount of interest.
First tier. Assuming daily compounding, the institution will pay
$53.90 in interest on a $1,000 deposit. Using the general formula,
for the first tier, the annual percentage yield is 5.39%:
APY=100[(1+53.90/1,000)(365/365)-1]
APY=5.39%
Using the simple formula:
APY=100(53.90/1,000)
APY=5.39%
Second tier. The institution will pay $452.29 in interest on an
$8,000 deposit. Thus, using the simple formula, the annual
percentage yield for the second tier is 5.65%:
APY=100(452.29/8,000)
APY=5.65%
Third tier. The institution will pay $1,183.61 in interest on a
$20,000 deposit. Thus, using the simple formula, the annual
percentage yield for the third tier is 5.92%:
APY=100(1,183.61/20,000)
[[Page 31700]]
APY=5.92%
Tiering Method B. Under this method, an institution pays the
stated interest rate only on that portion of the balance within the
specified tier. For example, if a consumer deposits $8,000, the
institution pays 5.25% on $2,500 and 5.50% on $5,500 (the difference
between $8,000 and the first tier cut-off of $2,500).
The institution that computes interest in this manner must
provide a range that shows the lowest and the highest annual
percentage yields for each tier (other than for the first tier,
which, like the tiers in Method A, has the same annual percentage
yield throughout). The low figure for an annual percentage yield
range is calculated based on the total amount of interest earned for
a year assuming the minimum principal required to earn the interest
rate for that tier. The high figure for an annual percentage yield
range is based on the amount of interest the institution would pay
on the highest principal that could be deposited to earn that same
interest rate. If the account does not have a limit on the maximum
amount that can be deposited, the institution may assume any amount.
For the tiering structure assumed above, the institution would
state a total of five annual percentage yields--one figure for the
first tier and two figures stated as a range for the other two
tiers.
First tier. Assuming daily compounding, the institution would
pay $53.90 in interest on a $1,000 deposit. For this first tier,
using the simple formula, the annual percentage yield is 5.39%:
APY=100(53.90/1,000)
APY=5.39%
Second tier. For the second tier, the institution would pay
between $134.75 and $841.45 in interest, based on assumed balances
of $2,500.01 and $15,000, respectively. For $2,500.01, interest
would be figured on $2,500 at 5.25% interest rate plus interest on
$.01 at 5.50%. For the low end of the second tier, therefore, the
annual percentage yield is 5.39%, using the simple formula:
APY=100(134.75/2,500)
APY=5.39%
For $15,000, interest is figured on $2,500 at 5.25% interest
rate plus interest on $12,500 at 5.50% interest rate. For the high
end of the second tier, the annual percentage yield, using the
simple formula, is 5.61%:
APY=100(841.45/15,000)
APY=5.61%
Thus, the annual percentage yield range for the second tier is
5.39% to 5.61%.
Third tier. For the third tier, the institution would pay
$841.45 in interest on the low end of the third tier (a balance of
$15,000.01). For $15,000.01, interest would be figured on $2,500 at
5.25% interest rate, plus interest on $12,500 at 5.50% interest
rate, plus interest on $.01 at 5.75% interest rate. For the low end
of the third tier, therefore, the annual percentage yield (using the
simple formula) is 5.61%:
APY=100 (841.45/15,000)
APY=5.61%
Since the institution does not limit the account balance, it may
assume any maximum amount for the purposes of computing the annual
percentage yield for the high end of the third tier. For an assumed
maximum balance amount of $100,000, interest would be figured on
$2,500 at 5.25% interest rate, plus interest on $12,500 at 5.50%
interest rate, plus interest on $85,000 at 5.75% interest rate. For
the high end of the third tier, therefore, the annual percentage
yield, using the simple formula, is 5.87%.
APY=100 (5,871.79/100,000)
APY=5.87%
Thus, the annual percentage yield range that would be stated for
the third tier is 5.61% to 5.87%.
If the assumed maximum balance amount is $1,000,000 instead of
$100,000, the institution would use $985,000 rather than $85,000 in
the last calculation. In that case, for the high end of the third
tier the annual percentage yield, using the simple formula, is
5.91%:
APY=100 (59134.22/1,000,000)
APY=5.91%
Thus, the annual percentage yield range that would be stated for
the third tier is 5.61% to 5.91%.
E. Time Accounts With a Stated Maturity Greater Than One Year That
Pay Interest at Least Annually
1. For time accounts with a stated maturity greater than one
year that do not compound interest on an annual or more frequent
basis, and that require the consumer to withdraw interest at least
annually, the annual percentage yield may be disclosed as equal to
the interest rate.
Example
(1) If an institution offers a $1,000 two-year certificate of
deposit that does not compound and that pays out interest semi-
annually by check or transfer at a 6.00% interest rate, the annual
percentage yield may be disclosed as 6.00%.
(2) For time accounts covered by this paragraph that are also
stepped-rate accounts, the annual percentage yield may be disclosed
as equal to the composite interest rate.
Example
(1) If an institution offers a $1,000 three-year certificate of
deposit that does not compound and that pays out interest annually
by check or transfer at a 5.00% interest rate for the first year,
6.00% interest rate for the second year, and 7.00% interest rate for
the third year, the institution may compute the composite interest
rate and APY as follows:
(a) Multiply each interest rate by the number of days it will be
in effect;
(b) Add these figures together; and
(c) Divide by the total number of days in the term.
(2) Applied to the example, the products of the interest rates
and days the rates are in effect are (5.00%x365 days) 1825,
(6.00%x365 days) 2190, and (7.00%x365 days) 2555, respectively. The
sum of these products, 6570, is divided by 1095, the total number of
days in the term. The composite interest rate and APY are both
6.00%.
Part II. Annual Percentage Yield Earned for Periodic Statements
The annual percentage yield earned for periodic statements under
Sec. 1030.6(a) is an annualized rate that reflects the relationship
between the amount of interest actually earned on the consumer's
account during the statement period and the average daily balance in
the account for the statement period. Pursuant to Sec. 1030.6(b),
however, if an institution uses the average daily balance method and
calculates interest for a period other than the statement period,
the annual percentage yield earned shall reflect the relationship
between the amount of interest earned and the average daily balance
in the account for that other period.
The annual percentage yield earned shall be calculated by using
the following formulas (``APY Earned'' is used for convenience in
the formulas):
A. General Formula
APY Earned=100 [(1+Interest earned/
Balance)(365/Days in period)-1]
``Balance'' is the average daily balance in the account for the
period.
``Interest earned'' is the actual amount of interest earned on
the account for the period.
``Days in period'' is the actual number of days for the period.
Examples
(1) Assume an institution calculates interest for the statement
period (and uses either the daily balance or the average daily
balance method), and the account has a balance of $1,500 for 15 days
and a balance of $500 for the remaining 15 days of a 30-day
statement period. The average daily balance for the period is
$1,000. The interest earned (under either balance computation
method) is $5.25 during the period. The annual percentage yield
earned (using the formula above) is 6.58%:
APY Earned=100 [(1+5.25/1,000)(365/30)-1]
APY Earned=6.58%
(2) Assume an institution calculates interest on the average
daily balance for the calendar month and provides periodic
statements that cover the period from the 16th of one month to the
15th of the next month. The account has a balance of $2,000
September 1 through September 15 and a balance of $1,000 for the
remaining 15 days of September. The average daily balance for the
month of September is $1,500, which results in $6.50 in interest
earned for the month. The annual percentage yield earned for the
month of September would be shown on the periodic statement covering
September 16 through October 15. The annual percentage yield earned
(using the formula above) is 5.40%:
APY Earned=100 [(6.50/1,500)(365/30)-1]
APY Earned=5.40%
(3) Assume an institution calculates interest on the average
daily balance for a quarter (for example, the calendar months of
September through November), and provides monthly periodic
statements covering calendar months. The account has a balance of
$1,000 throughout the 30 days of September, a balance of $2,000
throughout the 31 days of October, and a balance of
[[Page 31701]]
$3,000 throughout the 30 days of November. The average daily balance
for the quarter is $2,000, which results in $21 in interest earned
for the quarter. The annual percentage yield earned would be shown
on the periodic statement for November. The annual percentage yield
earned (using the formula above) is 4.28%:
APY Earned=100 [(1+21/2,000) (365/91)-1]
APY Earned=4.28%
B. Special Formula for Use Where Periodic Statement Is Sent More
Often Than the Period for Which Interest Is Compounded
Institutions that use the daily balance method to accrue
interest and that issue periodic statements more often than the
period for which interest is compounded shall use the following
special formula:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR03JY19.001
The following definition applies for use in this formula (all
other terms are defined under part II):
``Compounding'' is the number of days in each compounding
period.
Assume an institution calculates interest for the statement
period using the daily balance method, pays a 5.00% interest rate,
compounded annually, and provides periodic statements for each
monthly cycle. The account has a daily balance of $1,000 for a 30-
day statement period. The interest earned is $4.11 for the period,
and the annual percentage yield earned (using the special formula
above) is 5.00%:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR03JY19.002
APY Earned=5.00%
0
14. In Supplement I to part 1030, under Section 1030.7--Payment of
Interest, paragraph 7(c)--Date interest begins to accrue is revised to
read as follows:
Supplement I to Part 1030--Official Interpretations
* * * * *
Section 1030.7--Payment of Interest
* * * * *
(c) Date interest begins to accrue.
1. Relation to Regulation CC. Institutions may rely on the
Expedited Funds Availability Act (EFAA) and Regulation CC (12 CFR
part 229) to determine, for example, when a deposit is considered
made for purposes of interest accrual, or when interest need not be
paid on funds because a deposited check is later returned unpaid.
2. Ledger and collected balances. Institutions may calculate
interest by using a ``ledger'' or ``collected'' balance method, as
long as the crediting requirements of the EFAA are met (12 CFR
229.14).
3. Withdrawal of principal. Institutions must accrue interest on
funds until the funds are withdrawn from the account. For example,
if a check is debited to an account on a Tuesday, the institution
must accrue interest on those funds through Monday.
* * * * *
By order of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, June 20, 2019.
Ann E. Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
Dated: June 10, 2019.
Kathleen L. Kraninger,
Director, Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.
[FR Doc. 2019-13668 Filed 7-1-19; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
