Air Plan Approval; California; Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District, 31684-31686 [2019-13498]
Download as PDF
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES3
31684
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 127 / Tuesday, July 2, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
this section and now deleted with
replacement in paragraph
(c)(520)(i)(A)(1) of this section in the
Mojave Desert Air Quality Management
District, Rule 102 (except for the
definition of ‘‘agricultural burning’’).
*
*
*
*
*
(44) * * *
(v) * * *
(C) Previously approved on March 28,
1979 in paragraph (c)(44)(v)(A) of this
section and now deleted with
replacement in paragraph
(c)(520)(i)(A)(1) of this section in the
Mojave Desert Air Quality Management
District, Rule 102, amended November
4, 1977.
*
*
*
*
*
(179) * * *
(i) * * *
(B) * * *
(3) Previously approved on November
27, 1990 in paragraph (c)(179)(i)(B)(1) of
this section and now deleted with
replacement in paragraph
(c)(520)(i)(A)(1) of this section, Rule 102
(except fugitive liquid leak and fugitive
vapor leak), amended on December 19,
1988.
*
*
*
*
*
(188) * * *
(i) * * *
(C) * * *
(3) Previously approved on December
20, 1993 in paragraph (c)(188)(i)(C)(1) of
this section and now deleted with
replacement in paragraph
(c)(519)(i)(A)(1) of this section in the
Mojave Desert Air Quality Management
District, Rule 1171, adopted August 2,
1991.
*
*
*
*
*
(207) * * *
(i) * * *
(D) * * *
(4) Previously approved on April 30,
1996 in paragraph (c)(207)(i)(D)(2) of
this section and now deleted with
replacement in paragraph
(c)(519)(i)(A)(1) of this section, Rule
1104, adopted on September 28, 1994.
*
*
*
*
*
(244) * * *
(i) * * *
(C) * * *
(3) Previously approved on August 18,
1998 in (c)(244)(i)(C)(1) of this section
and now deleted with replacement in
(c)(518)(i)(A)(1) of this section, Rule
1114, amended on November 25, 1996.
*
*
*
*
*
(518) New and amended regulations
for the following APCDs were submitted
on May 23, 2018 by the Governor’s
designee.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A)
Mojave Desert Air Quality Management
District.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:20 Jul 01, 2019
Jkt 247001
(1) Rule 1114, ‘‘Wood Products
Coating Operations,’’ amended on
January 22, 2018.
(2) [Reserved]
(B) [Reserved]
(ii) [Reserved]
(519) New and amended regulations
for the following APCDs were submitted
on July 16, 2018 by the Governor’s
designee.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A)
Mojave Desert Air Quality Management
District.
(1) Rule 1104, ‘‘Organic Solvent
Degreasing Operations,’’ amended on
April 23, 2018.
(2) [Reserved]
(B) [Reserved]
(ii) [Reserved]
(520) New and amended regulations
for the following APCDs were submitted
on August 22, 2018 by the Governor’s
designee.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A)
Mojave Desert Air Quality Management
District.
(1) Rule 102, ‘‘Definition of Terms,’’
amended on April 23, 2018.
(2) [Reserved]
(B) [Reserved]
(ii) [Reserved]
■ 3. Section 52.248 is amended by
revising paragraph (d) to read as
follows:
§ 52.248 Identification of plan—conditional
approval.
*
*
*
*
*
(d)(1) The EPA is conditionally
approving portions of the California SIP
revisions submitted on July 11, 2007
and September 9, 2015, demonstrating
control measures in the Mojave Desert
portion of the Los Angeles-San
Bernardino Counties (West Mojave
Desert) nonattainment area implement
RACT for the 1997 and 2008 ozone
standards. The conditional approval is
based on a commitment from the state
to submit new or revised rules that will
correct deficiencies in the following
rules for the Mojave Desert Air Quality
Management District:
(i) Rule 461, Gasoline Transfer and
Dispensing;
(ii) Rule 462, Organic Liquid Loading;
(iii) Rule 463, Storage of Organic
Liquids;
(iv)–(v) [Reserved]
(vi) Rule 1115, Metal Parts and
Product Coating Operations;
(vii) Rule 1157, Boilers and Process
Heaters;
(viii) Rule 1160, Internal Combustion
Engines;
(ix) Rule 1161, Portland Cement Kilns;
and
(x) Rule 1162, Polyester Resin
Operations.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(2) If the State fails to meet its
commitment by January 31, 2019, the
conditional approval is treated as a
disapproval.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2019–13497 Filed 7–1–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2018–0802; FRL–9994–20–
Region 9]
Air Plan Approval; California; Antelope
Valley Air Quality Management District
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve a revision to the Antelope
Valley Air Quality Management District
(AVAQMD) portion of the California
State Implementation Plan (SIP). This
revision concerns emissions of volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) from solvent
cleaning operations. We are approving a
local rule that regulates these emission
sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA
or the Act).
DATES: This rule will be effective on
August 1, 2019.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R09–OAR–2018–0802. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Schwartz, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105, (415) 972–3286,
schwartz.robert@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
SUMMARY:
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
E:\FR\FM\02JYR3.SGM
02JYR3
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 127 / Tuesday, July 2, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On March 22, 2019 (84 FR 10748), the
EPA proposed to approve the following
rule into the California SIP.
Local agency
Rule No.
Rule title
Amended
Submitted
AVAQMD .................
1171
Solvent Cleaning Operations .................................................................
8/21/2018
10/30/2018
We proposed to approve this rule
because we determined that it complies
with the relevant CAA requirements.
Our proposed action contains more
information on the rule and our
evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA
Responses
The EPA’s proposed action provided
a 30-day public comment period. During
this period, we received no comments.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted.
Therefore, as authorized in section
110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully
approving this rule into the California
SIP. The EPA is also converting the
conditional approval of the AVAQMD
reasonably available control technology
(RACT) SIPs for the 1997 and 2008
ozone standards with respect to Rule
1171 into a full approval. In this final
action, the EPA is also making a nonsubstantive revision to § 52.248(b) of
title 40 of the Code of Federal
Regulations. Due to a previous drafting
error, the text stating that ‘‘[i]f the State
fails to meet its commitment by
November 9, 2018, the conditional
approval is treated as a disapproval’’
was included in paragraph (b)(4) as
opposed to in paragraph (b)
introductory text. The EPA’s rephrasing
of paragraph (b) moves this provision up
to paragraph (b) introductory, allowing
the text of paragraph (b)(4), referring to
Rule 1171, to be removed and reserved
because the District has now met its
commitment for Rule 1171.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES3
31685
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the
incorporation by reference of the
AVAQMD rules described in the
amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. The EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these documents
available through www.regulations.gov
and at the EPA Region IX Office (please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this preamble for more information).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:20 Jul 01, 2019
Jkt 247001
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, the EPA’s role is to
approve state choices, provided that
they meet the criteria of the Clean Air
Act. Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by September 3,
2019. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this action for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
E:\FR\FM\02JYR3.SGM
02JYR3
31686
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 127 / Tuesday, July 2, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: May 14, 2019.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraphs (c)(262)(i)(E)(4) and
(c)(521) to read as follows:
■
§ 52.220
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES3
*
*
Identification of plan-in part.
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
*
17:20 Jul 01, 2019
Jkt 247001
(c) * * *
(262) * * *
(i) * * *
(E) * * *
(4) Previously approved on May 24,
2001 in paragraph (c)(262)(i)(E)(1) of
this section and now deleted with
replacement in (c)(521)(i)(A)(1) of this
section, Rule 1171, adopted on
November 17, 1998.
*
*
*
*
*
(521) New and amended regulations
for the following APCDs were submitted
on October 30, 2018 by the Governor’s
designee.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A)
Antelope Valley Air Quality
Management District.
(1) Rule 1171, ‘‘Solvent Cleaning
Operations,’’ amended on August 21,
2018.
(2) [Reserved]
(B) [Reserved]
(ii) [Reserved]
■ 3. Section 52.248 is amended by
revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
(b) The EPA is conditionally
approving portions of the California SIP
revisions submitted on January 31, 2007
and October 23, 2015, demonstrating
control measures in the Antelope Valley
portion of the Los Angeles-San
Bernardino Counties (West Mojave
Desert) nonattainment area implement
RACT for the 1997 and 2008 ozone
standards. The conditional approval is
based on a commitment from the state
to submit new or revised rules that will
correct deficiencies in the rules listed in
paragraphs (b)(1) through (4) of this
section by November 9, 2018. If the
State fails to meet its commitment by
November 9, 2018, the conditional
approval is treated as a disapproval.
(1) [Reserved]
(2) Rule 1110.2, Emissions from
Stationary, Non-road & Portable
Internal Combustion Engines;
(3) Rule 1151, Motor Vehicle and
Mobile Equipment Coating Operations;
and
(4) [Reserved]
*
*
*
*
*
§ 52.248 Identification of plan—conditional
approval.
[FR Doc. 2019–13498 Filed 7–1–19; 8:45 am]
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
*
Frm 00006
*
*
Fmt 4701
*
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\02JYR3.SGM
02JYR3
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 127 (Tuesday, July 2, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31684-31686]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-13498]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2018-0802; FRL-9994-20-Region 9]
Air Plan Approval; California; Antelope Valley Air Quality
Management District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve a revision to the Antelope Valley Air Quality
Management District (AVAQMD) portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision concerns emissions of volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) from solvent cleaning operations. We are
approving a local rule that regulates these emission sources under the
Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act).
DATES: This rule will be effective on August 1, 2019.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2018-0802. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section for additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Schwartz, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105, (415) 972-3286,
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
[[Page 31685]]
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On March 22, 2019 (84 FR 10748), the EPA proposed to approve the
following rule into the California SIP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local agency Rule No. Rule title Amended Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AVAQMD............................ 1171 Solvent Cleaning 8/21/2018 10/30/2018
Operations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We proposed to approve this rule because we determined that it
complies with the relevant CAA requirements. Our proposed action
contains more information on the rule and our evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we received no comments.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted. Therefore, as authorized in section
110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully approving this rule into the
California SIP. The EPA is also converting the conditional approval of
the AVAQMD reasonably available control technology (RACT) SIPs for the
1997 and 2008 ozone standards with respect to Rule 1171 into a full
approval. In this final action, the EPA is also making a non-
substantive revision to Sec. 52.248(b) of title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations. Due to a previous drafting error, the text stating
that ``[i]f the State fails to meet its commitment by November 9, 2018,
the conditional approval is treated as a disapproval'' was included in
paragraph (b)(4) as opposed to in paragraph (b) introductory text. The
EPA's rephrasing of paragraph (b) moves this provision up to paragraph
(b) introductory, allowing the text of paragraph (b)(4), referring to
Rule 1171, to be removed and reserved because the District has now met
its commitment for Rule 1171.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the
AVAQMD rules described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents
available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region IX Office
(please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by September 3, 2019. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
[[Page 31686]]
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: May 14, 2019.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F--California
0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(262)(i)(E)(4) and
(c)(521) to read as follows:
Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan-in part.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(262) * * *
(i) * * *
(E) * * *
(4) Previously approved on May 24, 2001 in paragraph
(c)(262)(i)(E)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in
(c)(521)(i)(A)(1) of this section, Rule 1171, adopted on November 17,
1998.
* * * * *
(521) New and amended regulations for the following APCDs were
submitted on October 30, 2018 by the Governor's designee.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Antelope Valley Air Quality
Management District.
(1) Rule 1171, ``Solvent Cleaning Operations,'' amended on August
21, 2018.
(2) [Reserved]
(B) [Reserved]
(ii) [Reserved]
0
3. Section 52.248 is amended by revising paragraph (b) to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.248 Identification of plan--conditional approval.
* * * * *
(b) The EPA is conditionally approving portions of the California
SIP revisions submitted on January 31, 2007 and October 23, 2015,
demonstrating control measures in the Antelope Valley portion of the
Los Angeles-San Bernardino Counties (West Mojave Desert) nonattainment
area implement RACT for the 1997 and 2008 ozone standards. The
conditional approval is based on a commitment from the state to submit
new or revised rules that will correct deficiencies in the rules listed
in paragraphs (b)(1) through (4) of this section by November 9, 2018.
If the State fails to meet its commitment by November 9, 2018, the
conditional approval is treated as a disapproval.
(1) [Reserved]
(2) Rule 1110.2, Emissions from Stationary, Non-road & Portable
Internal Combustion Engines;
(3) Rule 1151, Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating
Operations; and
(4) [Reserved]
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2019-13498 Filed 7-1-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P