Required Fees for Mining Claims or Sites, 31219-31222 [2019-13963]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 126 / Monday, July 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
(d) Indirect or inadvertent residues.
[Reserved]
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2019–13990 Filed 6–28–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
43 CFR Part 3830
[LLWO320000–L1999000.PP0000]
RIN 1004–AE64
Required Fees for Mining Claims or
Sites
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) is issuing this final
rule to make statutorily required
adjustments to its location and
maintenance fees for unpatented mining
claims, mill sites, and tunnel sites.
These adjustments reflect changes in the
Consumer Price Index (CPI), which is
published by the Bureau of Labor
Statistics.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
The final rule is effective July 1,
2019.
ADDRESSES:
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
Mail: Director (630), Bureau of Land
Management, U.S. Department of the
Interior, 1849 C St. NW, Washington,
DC 20240, Attention: ‘‘RIN 1004–AE64’’.
Personal or messenger delivery: U.S.
Department of the Interior, Bureau of
Land Management, 20 M St. SE, Room
2134LM, Attention: Regulatory Affairs,
Washington, DC 20003.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elaine Guenaga at (775) 861–6539 in the
Solid Minerals Group as to program
matters or the substance of the final
rule, or Chandra Little in the Division of
Regulatory Affairs at (202) 912–7403 for
information relating to the rulemaking
process generally. Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–
8339, 24 hours a day, seven days a week
to contact the above individuals.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
II. Discussion of the Administrative Final
Rule
III. Procedural Matters
I. Background
The Mining Law of 1872 allows
individuals and corporations to stake (or
‘‘locate’’) a claim on the deposits
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:54 Jun 28, 2019
Jkt 247001
discovered. Historically, annual
assessment work and related filings
have been required by statute in order
to maintain an unpatented mining claim
or site. 30 U.S.C. 28–28e; 43 U.S.C.
1744(a) and (c).
Beginning in fiscal year 1993, mining
claimants have been required to pay an
annual fee in lieu of performing annual
assessment work and making annual
filings. Mining claimants locating new
claims or sites must pay an initial
‘‘maintenance’’ fee for the assessment
year in which the mining claim was
located, and also pay a one-time
location fee. See 30 U.S.C. 28f–28l.
This rule implements 30 U.S.C. 28j(c),
which requires adjustments to the
location and maintenance fees ‘‘to
reflect changes in the Consumer Price
Index (CPI) published by the Bureau of
Labor Statistics of the Department of
Labor every 5 years after August 10,
1993, or more frequently if the Secretary
determines an adjustment to be
reasonable.’’ Section 28j(c) also requires
that mining claimants be provided
‘‘notice of any adjustment made under
this subsection not later than July 1 of
any year in which the adjustment is
made,’’ and that any fee adjustment
‘‘shall begin to apply the first
assessment year which begins after
adjustment is made.’’
As enacted in 1993, the one-time
location fee was $25, and the annual
maintenance fee was $100 per mining
claim or site. In 2004, the BLM
increased the amount of the location
and maintenance fees to $30 and $125
respectively, based on the change in the
CPI from September 1, 1993 to
December 31, 2003. (69 FR 40294–40296
(July 1, 2004)). In 2009, the BLM
increased the amount of the location
and maintenance fees to $34 and $140,
respectively, based on the change in the
CPI from December 31, 2003, to
December 31, 2008. (74 FR 30959). On
July 27, 2012, the BLM issued a rule (77
FR 44155 (July 27, 2012)), that also
amended 43 CFR 3830.21, based on a
law that changed the way the
maintenance fee is calculated for
unpatented placer mining claims. Then
in 2014, the BLM increased the amount
of the location fee to $37, and increased
the maintenance fee to $155 for lode
mining claims or sites, and $155 for
each 20 acres or portion thereof for
placer mining claims, based on the
change in the CPI from December 31,
2008, to December 31, 2013. (79 FR
36662).
The adjustments made in this rule are
based upon the change in the CPI from
December 31, 2013, to December 31,
2018, as reported by the Bureau of Labor
Statistics (BLS) in the ‘‘CPI Databases’’
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
31219
(https://www.bls.gov/cpi/data.htm). The
particular series used for this update is
the ‘‘All Urban Consumers (Current
Series) (Consumer Price Index—CPI–
U).’’ This is a change from the last
adjustment to these fees, made in 2014.
The BLM decided to use the CPI–U
series as the basis for this update
(instead of the Chain CPI for All Urban
Consumers (C–CPI–U)), because the
release of the CPI–U data is final and
timely and because it is the more
common series used by Federal agencies
for this type of exercise. By contrast,
using the C–CPI–U series would
necessitate the use of preliminary data.
See the Economic and Threshold
Analysis for this rule for further
explanation of this change.
The calculated change is 7.80 percent
from December 31, 2013, through
December 31, 2018. A calculated value
for the fees was obtained by inflating the
location and maintenance fees
established in the 2014 rulemaking by
7.80 percent. The new location fee is
$40, and the new maintenance fee is
$165 per lode mining claim or site and
$165 for each 20 acres or portion thereof
for placer mining claims. The new
location fee is based on rounding the
calculated value to the nearest $1. The
maintenance fee is based on rounding
the calculated value to the nearest $5.
Mining claimants must pay the new
location fee and maintenance fee for any
mining claim or site located on or after
September 1, 2019. Mining claimants
must pay the new maintenance fee to
maintain existing mining claims and
sites beginning with the 2020
maintenance year. The maintenance fee
is due on or before September 1, 2019.
Under 43 CFR 3834.23(d), mining
claimants who have already submitted
maintenance fees for the 2020
assessment year, and those who timely
pay the 2020 assessment year
maintenance fee based on the fee in
effect immediately before the
adjustment was made, will be given an
opportunity to pay the additional
amount without penalty upon notice
from the BLM. The BLM will also give
claimants the opportunity to cure
deficient maintenance and location fee
payments for new claims or sites located
on or after September 1, 2019, and
timely received on or before December
31, 2019.
II. Discussion of the Administrative
Final Rule
Why the Rule Is Being Published on a
Final Basis
The BLM is adopting this final rule
solely to adjust the location and
maintenance fee amounts in section
E:\FR\FM\01JYR1.SGM
01JYR1
31220
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 126 / Monday, July 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
3830.21. The BLM for good cause finds
under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) that notice
and an opportunity for public comment
for this rule are unnecessary, and that
this rule may properly take effect upon
publication. The reason is that this rule
implements a statutory requirement to
adjust the location and annual
maintenance fees at least every 5 years,
and the last adjustment was made in
2014. The statute specifies the method
of calculation of the fee adjustments and
prescribes the form and manner of
notice of the fee adjustment, and the
BLM has no discretion in implementing
the statute. The BLM also determines
under 5 U.S.C. 553(d) that there is good
cause to place the rule into effect on the
date of publication, because the
adjustments made in the rule are
explicitly authorized by statute.
Organization of the Final Rule
This final rule contains only the
specific amendments necessary to
conform to the requirements of the
statute. The amendments appear as
modifications of the fee transaction
table at 43 CFR 3830.21 to change the
amount of the location and annual
maintenance fees required to be paid for
each lode mining claim, mill site, or
tunnel site and for each 20 acres or
portion thereof for a placer mining
claim.
III. Procedural Matters
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review
Executive Order 12866 provides that
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (OIRA) will review all significant
rules. This rule is not significant and
OIRA will not formally review it
because it does not meet one or more of
the Executive Order 12866 criteria for
significance as follows:
(a) This rule will not have an effect of
$100 million or more on the economy.
It will not adversely affect in a material
way the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment,
public health or safety, or State, local,
or tribal governments or communities.
The rule increases the maintenance and
location fees as provided for by statute.
We estimate that the rule will likely
result in a small increase in transfer
payments from mining claimants to the
Federal government. The fee adjustment
does not change the substance of current
mining claim administration within the
BLM. The total amount of fees to be
collected, including the effects of the
adjustment, is estimated to be $76
million annually, of which
approximately $5.51 million will be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:54 Jun 28, 2019
Jkt 247001
attributable to the adjustments made in
this rule.
(b) This rule will not create an
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another agency. The rule affects only the
BLM’s administration of its minerals
program and does not change the
relationships of the BLM to other
agencies and their actions.
(c) This rule does not change the
budgetary effects of entitlements, grants,
user fees, or loan programs or the rights
or obligations of their recipients.
(d) This rule does not raise novel legal
or policy issues. It merely updates the
maintenance and location fees that BLM
assesses.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the
principles of Executive Order 12866
while calling for improvements in the
nation’s regulatory system to promote
predictability, to reduce uncertainty,
and to use the best, most innovative,
and least burdensome tools for
achieving regulatory ends. The
executive order directs agencies to
consider regulatory approaches that
reduce burdens and maintain flexibility
and freedom of choice for the public
where these approaches are relevant,
feasible, and consistent with regulatory
objectives. Executive Order 13563
emphasizes further that regulations
must be based on the best available
science and that the rulemaking process
must allow for public participation and
an open exchange of ideas. This rule has
been developed in a manner consistent
with these requirements.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The rule would affect business
entities across many industries. The
BLM reviewed the potentially affected
entities and determined the industries
to which they identify. The BLM also
evaluated the extent to which the
proposed rule would affect entities that
are small businesses, as defined by the
Small Business Administration (SBA).
See the Economic and Threshold
Analysis for this rule for a discussion of
SBA size standards.
The entities potentially affected by
the rule locate mining claims or sites,
and may be actively involved in the
exploration and development of
locatable minerals 1 on Federal lands.
These entities are defined by the SBA as
an individual, limited partnership, or
1 Locatable minerals are minerals that may be
‘‘located’’ with a mining claim under the Mining
Law of 1872, (Act of May 10, 1872 (17 Stat. 92; 30
U.S.C. 28)), as amended. Locatable minerals
include, but are not limited to, gold, silver,
platinum, precious gems, uranium, bentonite,
chemical grade limestone, chemical grade silica
sand and gypsum.
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
small company considered being at
‘‘arm’s length’’ from the control of any
parent companies. The BLM does not
have the authority to collect information
concerning the number of employees,
whether for companies locating mining
claims or sites, or for companies
actively involved in the exploration and
development of locatable minerals on
Federal lands. However, by reviewing
U.S. Census Bureau data on entities
involved in the development of
locatable type minerals, we can make a
reasonable conclusion about the extent
to which the rule will affect small
business as defined by the SBA.
Based on statistics from the U.S.
Census Bureau’s 2012 Economic
Census, all of the potentially affected
industries are overwhelmingly
comprised of small businesses, as
defined by the SBA. Based on this
information, the rule could impact a
substantial number of small entities.
In addition to determining if a
substantial number of small entities are
likely to be impacted by this final rule,
the BLM must also determine whether
the final rule is anticipated to have a
significant economic impact on those
small entities. The Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) does not define
‘‘significant.’’ Significance must be
determined on a case-by-case basis.
Significance should not be viewed in
absolute terms, but should be seen as
relative to the size of the business, the
size of the competitor’s business, and
the impact the regulation has on larger
competitors.
An analysis that looks at the
individual financial circumstances, i.e.,
profit margin, for each firm within an
industry would help in answering the
significance question. However, such
financial information on individual
claimants is not available. Even
assessing an individual entity’s ability
to pay is problematic as there is limited
information on most claimants. Most
entities holding mining claims or sites
are either individuals or privately held
companies.
At the end of Fiscal Year (FY) 2018,
there were approximately 27,800
claimants holding approximately
413,000 mining claims and sites. This
works out to be an average of 15 claims
or sites per claimant. Assuming that the
number of claims and sites, and the
number of claimants who do not file a
fee waiver, do not significantly change
because of the rule, we estimate a total
maintenance fee increase of about $5.34
million per year. This represents an
average maintenance fee increase of
about $192 per claimant. The actual
impact on an individual claimant will
depend on a number of factors,
E:\FR\FM\01JYR1.SGM
01JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 126 / Monday, July 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
including the number of claims or sites
that are actually held. However, the
average number of claims and sites
actually held by individuals and
companies that would be considered
small entities by SBA would likely be
significantly less than the 15 claims or
sites per claimant figure. This average
claims-per-claimant figure is skewed by
the large number of claims and sites
held by a few large mining companies.
For example, the three companies
holding the most mining claims or sites
at the end of FY 2018 each held over
10,000 claims or sites. All three of those
companies were large multi-national
corporations.
For the location fee increase, we
estimate a total annual fee increase of
about $172,000. Assuming 57,000 new
filings per year and using the average
figure of 15 claims or sites per claimant,
we estimate approximately 3,800
claimants will be impacted by the
change in the location fee. The average
location fee increase will be
approximately $45 per claimant. As
with the maintenance fee increase, the
actual location fee increase per claimant
that classifies as a small entity by SBA
will likely be significantly less than this
$45 figure.
Therefore, the BLM has determined
that this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule:
Will not have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more. The
revised regulation will not materially
alter current BLM policy. The fee
adjustments are authorized by statute.
The total amount of fees collected,
including the effects of the adjustment,
is estimated to be $76 million annually,
of which $5.51 million is attributable to
the adjustments made in this rule.
Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions.
Will not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
In accordance with the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1501 et
seq.):
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:54 Jun 28, 2019
Jkt 247001
This rule will not ‘‘significantly or
uniquely’’ affect small governments. A
Small Government Agency Plan is
unnecessary.
This rule will not produce a Federal
mandate of $100 million or greater in
any year. It is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act. The changes
implemented in this rule do not require
anything of any non-Federal
governmental entity.
Executive Order 12630, Takings
In accordance with Executive Order
12630, the BLM finds that the rule does
not have takings implications. A takings
implication assessment is not required.
This rule does not substantially change
BLM policy. Nothing in this rule
constitutes a taking. The Federal courts
have heard a number of suits
challenging the imposition of the rental
and maintenance fees as a taking of a
right, or, alternatively, as an
unconstitutional tax. The courts have
upheld the fee legislation and the BLM
regulations as a proper exercise of
Congressional and Executive
authorities.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
The final rule will not have a
substantial direct effect on the states, on
the relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 13132,
the BLM has determined that the final
rule does not have sufficient Federalism
implications to warrant preparation of a
Federalism Assessment.
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with Executive Order
13175, the BLM finds that the final rule
does not include policies that have
Tribal implications. Because this rule
does not make significant substantive
changes in the regulations and does not
specifically involve Indian reservation
lands (which are closed to the operation
of the Mining Law), the BLM finds that
the rule will have no implications for
Indians, Indian Tribes, and Tribal
governments.
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This rule is not a significant energy
action under the definition in Executive
Order 13211. A Statement of Energy
Effects is not required.
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
31221
Executive Order 13771 Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action as defined in Section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and,
therefore, is not a regulatory action
under Executive Order 13711, per OMB
issued guidance for implementing that
executive order. As such, the BLM is not
required to identify at least two existing
regulations to be repealed, ensure that
the costs of the rule are less than or
equal to $0, or offset the costs of the rule
by the elimination of existing costs
associated with at least two prior
regulations.
The BLM has complied with
Executive Order 13711 and the OMB
implementation guidance for that order.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform
In accordance with Executive Order
12988, the BLM finds that the final rule
does not unduly burden the judicial
system, and therefore meets the
requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of the Order. The BLM consulted with
the Department of the Interior’s Office of
the Solicitor during the drafting process.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The BLM has determined this final
rule does not contain any information
collection requirements that the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) must
approve under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)
This final rule does not constitute a
major Federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human
environment. A detailed statement
under the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) is not
required because this rule is part of the
routine administration of the fee
legislation and is covered by a
categorical exclusion. This rule will
result in no new surface disturbing
activities and therefore will have no
effect on ecological or cultural
resources. In promulgating this rule, the
government is conducting routine and
continuing government business of an
administrative nature having limited
context and intensity. Therefore, it is
categorically excluded from
environmental review under section
102(2)(C) of NEPA, pursuant to 43 CFR
46.205. The rule does not meet any of
the extraordinary circumstances criteria
for categorical exclusions listed at 43
CFR 46.215. Under Council on
Environmental Quality regulations (40
CFR 1508.4) and the environmental
E:\FR\FM\01JYR1.SGM
01JYR1
31222
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 126 / Monday, July 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
policies and procedures of the
Department, the term ‘‘categorical
exclusion’’ means a category of actions
which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment and which
have been found to have no such effect
on procedures adopted by a Federal
agency and for which, therefore, neither
an environmental assessment nor an
environmental impact statement is
required.
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This rule is not a significant energy
action. It will not have an adverse effect
on energy supplies. To the extent that
the rule affects the mining of energy
minerals (i.e., uranium and other
Author
The principal author of this final rule
is Elaine Guenaga in the Solid Minerals
Group assisted by the Division of
Regulatory Affairs, Washington Office,
BLM.
List of Subjects in 43 CFR Part 3830
Mines; Public lands—mineral
resources; Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the BLM amends 43 CFR part
3830 as follows:
PART 3830—LOCATING, RECORDING,
AND MAINTAINING MINING CLAIMS
OR SITES; GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. The authority citation for part 3830
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 18 U.S.C. 1001, 3571; 30 U.S.C.
22, 28, 28k, 242, 611; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 43
U.S.C. 2, 1201, 1212, 1457, 1474, 1740, 1744;
115 Stat. 414; Pub. L. 112–74, 125 Stat. 786.
Subpart D—BLM Service Charge and
Fee Requirements
2. Amend § 3830.21 by revising
paragraphs (a) and (d) of the table to
read as follows:
■
§ 3830.21 What are the different types of
service charges and fees?
*
*
*
*
*
Transaction
Amount due per mining claim or site
(a) Recording a mining claim or site location (part 3833) ..
A total sum which includes:
(1) The processing fee for notices of location found in the
fee schedule in § 3000.12 of this chapter;.
(2) A one-time $40 location fee; and
(3)(i) For lode claims, mill sites and tunnel sites, an initial
$165 maintenance fee; or
(ii) For placer claims, an initial $165 maintenance fee for
each 20 acres of the placer claim or portion thereof.
No.
*
*
*
(d) Maintaining a mining claim or site for one assessment
year (part 3834).
*
*
*
(1) For lode claims, mill sites and tunnel sites, an annual
maintenance fee of $165 must be paid on or before
September 1 each year.
(2) For placer claims, a $165 annual maintenance fee for
each 20 acres of the placer claim or portion thereof
must be paid on or before September 1 each year.
*
Yes. See part 3835.
*
*
*
Dated: June 24, 2019.
Joseph R. Balash,
Assistant Secretary, Land and Minerals
Management.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 190409351–9512–02]
RIN 0648–XG972
Fisheries Off West Coast States;
Coastal Pelagic Species Fisheries;
Annual Specifications
Jkt 247001
Effective July 1, 2019, through
June 30, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lynn Massey, West Coast Region,
NMFS, (562) 436–2462, lynn.massey@
noaa.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Waiver available
*
Sfmt 4700
*
NMFS
manages the Pacific sardine fishery in
the U.S. exclusive economic zone (EEZ)
off the Pacific Coast (California, Oregon,
and Washington) in accordance with the
Coastal Pelagic Species (CPS) Fishery
Management Plan (FMP). The FMP and
its implementing regulations require
NMFS to set annual catch levels for the
Pacific sardine fishery based on the
annual specification framework and
control rules in the FMP. These control
rules include the harvest guideline (HG)
control rule, which, in conjunction with
the overfishing limit (OFL) and
acceptable biological catch (ABC) rules
in the FMP, are used to manage harvest
levels for Pacific sardine, in accordance
with the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act), 16 U.S.C. 1801
et seq.
This final rule implements the annual
catch levels and reference points for the
2019–2020 fishing year. The final rule
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
15:54 Jun 28, 2019
Final rule.
NMFS issues this final rule to
implement annual management
measures and catch limits for the
northern subpopulation of Pacific
sardine for the fishing year from July 1,
2019, through June 30, 2020. This action
prohibits directed commercial fishing
for Pacific sardine off the U.S. Pacific
Coast, except in the live bait or minor
directed fisheries, or as part of
exempted fishing permit activities, and
establishes limits on the incidental
harvest of Pacific sardine in other
fisheries. This action is intended to
conserve and manage the Pacific sardine
stock off the U.S. West Coast.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
SUMMARY:
BILLING CODE 4310–84–P
AGENCY:
*
ACTION:
[FR Doc. 2019–13963 Filed 6–28–19; 8:45 am]
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
fissionable metals), the rule applies only
a statutory adjustment of the mining
claim location and maintenance fees
that the BLM has been collecting for
many years. It will not significantly
change financial obligations of the
mining industry.
E:\FR\FM\01JYR1.SGM
01JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 126 (Monday, July 1, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31219-31222]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-13963]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
43 CFR Part 3830
[LLWO320000-L1999000.PP0000]
RIN 1004-AE64
Required Fees for Mining Claims or Sites
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is issuing this final rule
to make statutorily required adjustments to its location and
maintenance fees for unpatented mining claims, mill sites, and tunnel
sites. These adjustments reflect changes in the Consumer Price Index
(CPI), which is published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
DATES: The final rule is effective July 1, 2019.
ADDRESSES:
Mail: Director (630), Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Department of
the Interior, 1849 C St. NW, Washington, DC 20240, Attention: ``RIN
1004-AE64''.
Personal or messenger delivery: U.S. Department of the Interior,
Bureau of Land Management, 20 M St. SE, Room 2134LM, Attention:
Regulatory Affairs, Washington, DC 20003.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elaine Guenaga at (775) 861-6539 in
the Solid Minerals Group as to program matters or the substance of the
final rule, or Chandra Little in the Division of Regulatory Affairs at
(202) 912-7403 for information relating to the rulemaking process
generally. Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-
877-8339, 24 hours a day, seven days a week to contact the above
individuals.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
II. Discussion of the Administrative Final Rule
III. Procedural Matters
I. Background
The Mining Law of 1872 allows individuals and corporations to stake
(or ``locate'') a claim on the deposits discovered. Historically,
annual assessment work and related filings have been required by
statute in order to maintain an unpatented mining claim or site. 30
U.S.C. 28-28e; 43 U.S.C. 1744(a) and (c).
Beginning in fiscal year 1993, mining claimants have been required
to pay an annual fee in lieu of performing annual assessment work and
making annual filings. Mining claimants locating new claims or sites
must pay an initial ``maintenance'' fee for the assessment year in
which the mining claim was located, and also pay a one-time location
fee. See 30 U.S.C. 28f-28l.
This rule implements 30 U.S.C. 28j(c), which requires adjustments
to the location and maintenance fees ``to reflect changes in the
Consumer Price Index (CPI) published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics
of the Department of Labor every 5 years after August 10, 1993, or more
frequently if the Secretary determines an adjustment to be
reasonable.'' Section 28j(c) also requires that mining claimants be
provided ``notice of any adjustment made under this subsection not
later than July 1 of any year in which the adjustment is made,'' and
that any fee adjustment ``shall begin to apply the first assessment
year which begins after adjustment is made.''
As enacted in 1993, the one-time location fee was $25, and the
annual maintenance fee was $100 per mining claim or site. In 2004, the
BLM increased the amount of the location and maintenance fees to $30
and $125 respectively, based on the change in the CPI from September 1,
1993 to December 31, 2003. (69 FR 40294-40296 (July 1, 2004)). In 2009,
the BLM increased the amount of the location and maintenance fees to
$34 and $140, respectively, based on the change in the CPI from
December 31, 2003, to December 31, 2008. (74 FR 30959). On July 27,
2012, the BLM issued a rule (77 FR 44155 (July 27, 2012)), that also
amended 43 CFR 3830.21, based on a law that changed the way the
maintenance fee is calculated for unpatented placer mining claims. Then
in 2014, the BLM increased the amount of the location fee to $37, and
increased the maintenance fee to $155 for lode mining claims or sites,
and $155 for each 20 acres or portion thereof for placer mining claims,
based on the change in the CPI from December 31, 2008, to December 31,
2013. (79 FR 36662).
The adjustments made in this rule are based upon the change in the
CPI from December 31, 2013, to December 31, 2018, as reported by the
Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) in the ``CPI Databases'' (https://www.bls.gov/cpi/data.htm). The particular series used for this update
is the ``All Urban Consumers (Current Series) (Consumer Price Index--
CPI-U).'' This is a change from the last adjustment to these fees, made
in 2014. The BLM decided to use the CPI-U series as the basis for this
update (instead of the Chain CPI for All Urban Consumers (C-CPI-U)),
because the release of the CPI-U data is final and timely and because
it is the more common series used by Federal agencies for this type of
exercise. By contrast, using the C-CPI-U series would necessitate the
use of preliminary data. See the Economic and Threshold Analysis for
this rule for further explanation of this change.
The calculated change is 7.80 percent from December 31, 2013,
through December 31, 2018. A calculated value for the fees was obtained
by inflating the location and maintenance fees established in the 2014
rulemaking by 7.80 percent. The new location fee is $40, and the new
maintenance fee is $165 per lode mining claim or site and $165 for each
20 acres or portion thereof for placer mining claims. The new location
fee is based on rounding the calculated value to the nearest $1. The
maintenance fee is based on rounding the calculated value to the
nearest $5.
Mining claimants must pay the new location fee and maintenance fee
for any mining claim or site located on or after September 1, 2019.
Mining claimants must pay the new maintenance fee to maintain existing
mining claims and sites beginning with the 2020 maintenance year. The
maintenance fee is due on or before September 1, 2019. Under 43 CFR
3834.23(d), mining claimants who have already submitted maintenance
fees for the 2020 assessment year, and those who timely pay the 2020
assessment year maintenance fee based on the fee in effect immediately
before the adjustment was made, will be given an opportunity to pay the
additional amount without penalty upon notice from the BLM. The BLM
will also give claimants the opportunity to cure deficient maintenance
and location fee payments for new claims or sites located on or after
September 1, 2019, and timely received on or before December 31, 2019.
II. Discussion of the Administrative Final Rule
Why the Rule Is Being Published on a Final Basis
The BLM is adopting this final rule solely to adjust the location
and maintenance fee amounts in section
[[Page 31220]]
3830.21. The BLM for good cause finds under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) that
notice and an opportunity for public comment for this rule are
unnecessary, and that this rule may properly take effect upon
publication. The reason is that this rule implements a statutory
requirement to adjust the location and annual maintenance fees at least
every 5 years, and the last adjustment was made in 2014. The statute
specifies the method of calculation of the fee adjustments and
prescribes the form and manner of notice of the fee adjustment, and the
BLM has no discretion in implementing the statute. The BLM also
determines under 5 U.S.C. 553(d) that there is good cause to place the
rule into effect on the date of publication, because the adjustments
made in the rule are explicitly authorized by statute.
Organization of the Final Rule
This final rule contains only the specific amendments necessary to
conform to the requirements of the statute. The amendments appear as
modifications of the fee transaction table at 43 CFR 3830.21 to change
the amount of the location and annual maintenance fees required to be
paid for each lode mining claim, mill site, or tunnel site and for each
20 acres or portion thereof for a placer mining claim.
III. Procedural Matters
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Order 12866 provides that the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) will review all significant rules. This rule
is not significant and OIRA will not formally review it because it does
not meet one or more of the Executive Order 12866 criteria for
significance as follows:
(a) This rule will not have an effect of $100 million or more on
the economy. It will not adversely affect in a material way the
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or
communities. The rule increases the maintenance and location fees as
provided for by statute. We estimate that the rule will likely result
in a small increase in transfer payments from mining claimants to the
Federal government. The fee adjustment does not change the substance of
current mining claim administration within the BLM. The total amount of
fees to be collected, including the effects of the adjustment, is
estimated to be $76 million annually, of which approximately $5.51
million will be attributable to the adjustments made in this rule.
(b) This rule will not create an inconsistency or otherwise
interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency. The rule
affects only the BLM's administration of its minerals program and does
not change the relationships of the BLM to other agencies and their
actions.
(c) This rule does not change the budgetary effects of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights or
obligations of their recipients.
(d) This rule does not raise novel legal or policy issues. It
merely updates the maintenance and location fees that BLM assesses.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the principles of Executive Order
12866 while calling for improvements in the nation's regulatory system
to promote predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best,
most innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory
ends. The executive order directs agencies to consider regulatory
approaches that reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of
choice for the public where these approaches are relevant, feasible,
and consistent with regulatory objectives. Executive Order 13563
emphasizes further that regulations must be based on the best available
science and that the rulemaking process must allow for public
participation and an open exchange of ideas. This rule has been
developed in a manner consistent with these requirements.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The rule would affect business entities across many industries. The
BLM reviewed the potentially affected entities and determined the
industries to which they identify. The BLM also evaluated the extent to
which the proposed rule would affect entities that are small
businesses, as defined by the Small Business Administration (SBA). See
the Economic and Threshold Analysis for this rule for a discussion of
SBA size standards.
The entities potentially affected by the rule locate mining claims
or sites, and may be actively involved in the exploration and
development of locatable minerals \1\ on Federal lands. These entities
are defined by the SBA as an individual, limited partnership, or small
company considered being at ``arm's length'' from the control of any
parent companies. The BLM does not have the authority to collect
information concerning the number of employees, whether for companies
locating mining claims or sites, or for companies actively involved in
the exploration and development of locatable minerals on Federal lands.
However, by reviewing U.S. Census Bureau data on entities involved in
the development of locatable type minerals, we can make a reasonable
conclusion about the extent to which the rule will affect small
business as defined by the SBA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Locatable minerals are minerals that may be ``located'' with
a mining claim under the Mining Law of 1872, (Act of May 10, 1872
(17 Stat. 92; 30 U.S.C. 28)), as amended. Locatable minerals
include, but are not limited to, gold, silver, platinum, precious
gems, uranium, bentonite, chemical grade limestone, chemical grade
silica sand and gypsum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on statistics from the U.S. Census Bureau's 2012 Economic
Census, all of the potentially affected industries are overwhelmingly
comprised of small businesses, as defined by the SBA. Based on this
information, the rule could impact a substantial number of small
entities.
In addition to determining if a substantial number of small
entities are likely to be impacted by this final rule, the BLM must
also determine whether the final rule is anticipated to have a
significant economic impact on those small entities. The Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) does not define ``significant.'' Significance
must be determined on a case-by-case basis. Significance should not be
viewed in absolute terms, but should be seen as relative to the size of
the business, the size of the competitor's business, and the impact the
regulation has on larger competitors.
An analysis that looks at the individual financial circumstances,
i.e., profit margin, for each firm within an industry would help in
answering the significance question. However, such financial
information on individual claimants is not available. Even assessing an
individual entity's ability to pay is problematic as there is limited
information on most claimants. Most entities holding mining claims or
sites are either individuals or privately held companies.
At the end of Fiscal Year (FY) 2018, there were approximately
27,800 claimants holding approximately 413,000 mining claims and sites.
This works out to be an average of 15 claims or sites per claimant.
Assuming that the number of claims and sites, and the number of
claimants who do not file a fee waiver, do not significantly change
because of the rule, we estimate a total maintenance fee increase of
about $5.34 million per year. This represents an average maintenance
fee increase of about $192 per claimant. The actual impact on an
individual claimant will depend on a number of factors,
[[Page 31221]]
including the number of claims or sites that are actually held.
However, the average number of claims and sites actually held by
individuals and companies that would be considered small entities by
SBA would likely be significantly less than the 15 claims or sites per
claimant figure. This average claims-per-claimant figure is skewed by
the large number of claims and sites held by a few large mining
companies. For example, the three companies holding the most mining
claims or sites at the end of FY 2018 each held over 10,000 claims or
sites. All three of those companies were large multi-national
corporations.
For the location fee increase, we estimate a total annual fee
increase of about $172,000. Assuming 57,000 new filings per year and
using the average figure of 15 claims or sites per claimant, we
estimate approximately 3,800 claimants will be impacted by the change
in the location fee. The average location fee increase will be
approximately $45 per claimant. As with the maintenance fee increase,
the actual location fee increase per claimant that classifies as a
small entity by SBA will likely be significantly less than this $45
figure.
Therefore, the BLM has determined that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule:
Will not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or
more. The revised regulation will not materially alter current BLM
policy. The fee adjustments are authorized by statute. The total amount
of fees collected, including the effects of the adjustment, is
estimated to be $76 million annually, of which $5.51 million is
attributable to the adjustments made in this rule.
Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or
geographic regions.
Will not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
In accordance with the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1501
et seq.):
This rule will not ``significantly or uniquely'' affect small
governments. A Small Government Agency Plan is unnecessary.
This rule will not produce a Federal mandate of $100 million or
greater in any year. It is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act. The changes implemented in this
rule do not require anything of any non-Federal governmental entity.
Executive Order 12630, Takings
In accordance with Executive Order 12630, the BLM finds that the
rule does not have takings implications. A takings implication
assessment is not required. This rule does not substantially change BLM
policy. Nothing in this rule constitutes a taking. The Federal courts
have heard a number of suits challenging the imposition of the rental
and maintenance fees as a taking of a right, or, alternatively, as an
unconstitutional tax. The courts have upheld the fee legislation and
the BLM regulations as a proper exercise of Congressional and Executive
authorities.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
The final rule will not have a substantial direct effect on the
states, on the relationship between the national government and the
states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive
Order 13132, the BLM has determined that the final rule does not have
sufficient Federalism implications to warrant preparation of a
Federalism Assessment.
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with Executive Order 13175, the BLM finds that the
final rule does not include policies that have Tribal implications.
Because this rule does not make significant substantive changes in the
regulations and does not specifically involve Indian reservation lands
(which are closed to the operation of the Mining Law), the BLM finds
that the rule will have no implications for Indians, Indian Tribes, and
Tribal governments.
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
This rule is not a significant energy action under the definition
in Executive Order 13211. A Statement of Energy Effects is not
required.
Executive Order 13771 Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs
This rule is not a significant regulatory action as defined in
Section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, is not a
regulatory action under Executive Order 13711, per OMB issued guidance
for implementing that executive order. As such, the BLM is not required
to identify at least two existing regulations to be repealed, ensure
that the costs of the rule are less than or equal to $0, or offset the
costs of the rule by the elimination of existing costs associated with
at least two prior regulations.
The BLM has complied with Executive Order 13711 and the OMB
implementation guidance for that order.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform
In accordance with Executive Order 12988, the BLM finds that the
final rule does not unduly burden the judicial system, and therefore
meets the requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of the Order. The
BLM consulted with the Department of the Interior's Office of the
Solicitor during the drafting process.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The BLM has determined this final rule does not contain any
information collection requirements that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) must approve under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
This final rule does not constitute a major Federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. A
detailed statement under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) is not required because this rule is part of the routine
administration of the fee legislation and is covered by a categorical
exclusion. This rule will result in no new surface disturbing
activities and therefore will have no effect on ecological or cultural
resources. In promulgating this rule, the government is conducting
routine and continuing government business of an administrative nature
having limited context and intensity. Therefore, it is categorically
excluded from environmental review under section 102(2)(C) of NEPA,
pursuant to 43 CFR 46.205. The rule does not meet any of the
extraordinary circumstances criteria for categorical exclusions listed
at 43 CFR 46.215. Under Council on Environmental Quality regulations
(40 CFR 1508.4) and the environmental
[[Page 31222]]
policies and procedures of the Department, the term ``categorical
exclusion'' means a category of actions which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment and
which have been found to have no such effect on procedures adopted by a
Federal agency and for which, therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
This rule is not a significant energy action. It will not have an
adverse effect on energy supplies. To the extent that the rule affects
the mining of energy minerals (i.e., uranium and other fissionable
metals), the rule applies only a statutory adjustment of the mining
claim location and maintenance fees that the BLM has been collecting
for many years. It will not significantly change financial obligations
of the mining industry.
Author
The principal author of this final rule is Elaine Guenaga in the
Solid Minerals Group assisted by the Division of Regulatory Affairs,
Washington Office, BLM.
List of Subjects in 43 CFR Part 3830
Mines; Public lands--mineral resources; Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the BLM amends 43 CFR part
3830 as follows:
PART 3830--LOCATING, RECORDING, AND MAINTAINING MINING CLAIMS OR
SITES; GENERAL PROVISIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 3830 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 18 U.S.C. 1001, 3571; 30 U.S.C. 22, 28, 28k, 242,
611; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 43 U.S.C. 2, 1201, 1212, 1457, 1474, 1740,
1744; 115 Stat. 414; Pub. L. 112-74, 125 Stat. 786.
Subpart D--BLM Service Charge and Fee Requirements
0
2. Amend Sec. 3830.21 by revising paragraphs (a) and (d) of the table
to read as follows:
Sec. 3830.21 What are the different types of service charges and
fees?
* * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amount due per mining claim or
Transaction site Waiver available
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(a) Recording a mining claim or site A total sum which includes: No.
location (part 3833). (1) The processing fee for
notices of location found in
the fee schedule in Sec.
3000.12 of this chapter;.
(2) A one-time $40 location
fee; and
(3)(i) For lode claims, mill
sites and tunnel sites, an
initial $165 maintenance fee;
or
(ii) For placer claims, an
initial $165 maintenance fee
for each 20 acres of the
placer claim or portion
thereof.
* * * * * * *
(d) Maintaining a mining claim or site (1) For lode claims, mill Yes. See part 3835.
for one assessment year (part 3834). sites and tunnel sites, an
annual maintenance fee of
$165 must be paid on or
before September 1 each year.
(2) For placer claims, a $165
annual maintenance fee for
each 20 acres of the placer
claim or portion thereof must
be paid on or before
September 1 each year.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated: June 24, 2019.
Joseph R. Balash,
Assistant Secretary, Land and Minerals Management.
[FR Doc. 2019-13963 Filed 6-28-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-84-P