Flights To and From Cuba, 29795-29797 [2019-13431]
Download as PDF
29795
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 84, No. 122
Tuesday, June 25, 2019
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
8 CFR Part 234
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
19 CFR Part 122
[Docket No. USCBP–2016–0015; CBP
Decision No. 19–06]
RIN 1651–AB10
Flights To and From Cuba
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule adopts as final,
without change, interim amendments to
the U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) regulations published in the
Federal Register on March 21, 2016,
that removed certain provisions
regarding flights to and from Cuba that
were either obsolete due to intervening
regulatory changes or were duplicative
of regulations applicable to all other
similarly situated international flights.
DATES: This rule is effective on June 25,
2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Arthur A.E. Pitts, Sr., U.S. Customs and
Border Protection, Office of Field
Operations, by phone at (202) 344–2752
or by email at Arthur.A.Pitts@
cbp.dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
I. Background
On March 21, 2016, the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) published an
interim final rule (IFR) in the Federal
Register (81 FR 14948) amending CBP
regulations to remove regulations
previously codified at 19 CFR, part 122,
subpart O. The removed regulations
imposed certain restrictions and
reporting requirements on flights to and
from Cuba. The implementation of
robust reporting requirements that
generally apply to all international
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:28 Jun 24, 2019
Jkt 247001
flights rendered much of subpart O
redundant. Additionally, the
Department of the Treasury’s Office of
Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and the
Department of Commerce’s Bureau of
Industry and Security (BIS) issued
changes to the Cuban Assets Control
Regulations (CACR) and the Export
Administration Regulations (EAR) that
rendered many sections of subpart O
obsolete.1
Despite the removal of subpart O,
flights to and from Cuba continue to be
subject to the same entry and clearance
requirements in 19 CFR part 122 as all
other similarly situated international
flights. Additionally, flights to and from
Cuba continue to be subject to other
legal requirements relating to travel and
trade between the United States and
Cuba including, but not limited to, the
CACR and the EAR.
In the IFR, DHS also amended several
provisions of title 8 CFR (8 CFR 234.2)
and title 19 CFR (19 CFR 122.31 and
122.42) to bring these sections into
conformity with the removal of 19 CFR
part 122, subpart O.
II. Discussion of Comments
A. Overview
Although the interim regulatory
amendments were promulgated without
prior public notice and comment
procedures pursuant to the foreign
affairs exemption in 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1),
the IFR provided for the submission of
public comments that would be
considered before adoption of the
interim regulations as a final rule. The
prescribed 30-day public comment
period closed on April 20, 2016. DHS
received submissions from 30
commenters.
The vast majority of commenters
supported the removal of subpart O.
Those commenters supported the
removal of subpart O based on the
expectation that it would benefit the
U.S. airline industry and other U.S.
businesses hoping to expand to Cuba,
lower the cost of flights to and from
Cuba by increasing flight options
1 Following the publication of the IFR, BIS and
OFAC published additional changes to the CACR
and the EAR in order to implement the National
Security Presidential Memorandum on
Strengthening the Policy of the United States
Toward Cuba (June 16, 2017). See 82 FR 51983
(Nov. 9, 2017) and 82 FR 51998 (Nov. 9, 2017).
These changes did not affect provisions related to
former subpart O and do not require modification
to the IFR.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
available to U.S. consumers, and
potentially lead to future trade
agreements and other economic
cooperation between the United States
and Cuba. Three of the commenters that
supported the rule requested that DHS
impose additional restrictions on
international flights and individuals
arriving in the United States. Two
commenters opposed the IFR due to
legal and policy concerns regarding
Cuba. A summary of the comments and
comment responses follow.
B. Discussion
Comment: One commenter expressed
concern that the removal of subpart O
would encourage the spread of
communist beliefs and stated that DHS
should take steps to continue to isolate
Cuba. Another commenter stated that
the removal of subpart O was
inconsistent with federal laws that
restrict trade with Cuba and with CBP’s
putative duty to prevent trade with
Cuba. Specifically, it is the position of
the commenter that section 6063 of title
22 of the U.S. Code prohibits CBP from
removing subpart O until there is a
transition government in place in Cuba.
Response: DHS disagrees that the
removal of subpart O is inconsistent
with U.S. law or CBP’s obligations
under the law. As noted above and
explained in detail in the IFR, each
section previously codified in subpart O
is either redundant of other regulatory
provisions or is obsolete due to
intervening regulatory changes issued
by OFAC and BIS pursuant to OFAC’s
and BIS’s statutory authority to regulate
travel and trade with Cuba.
Additionally, none of the regulatory
requirements previously codified in
subpart O is mandated by statute.
Rather, subpart O was promulgated
pursuant to the Secretary of Homeland
Security’s broad authority to regulate all
aircraft arriving to and departing from
the United States. See 19 U.S.C. 1433,
1644, and 1644a. The elimination of
subpart O, therefore, merely updates
CBP’s regulations to conform to OFAC’s
and BIS’s regulations and does not
conflict with the existing statutory or
regulatory scheme restricting travel or
trade with Cuba.
The removal of subpart O also does
not conflict with title II of the Cuban
Liberty and Democratic Solidarity
(LIBERTAD) Act of 1996, Public Law
104–114, sections 201–207, 110 Stat.
E:\FR\FM\25JNR1.SGM
25JNR1
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
29796
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 122 / Tuesday, June 25, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
785, 805–814, which includes the
provisions codified at 22 U.S.C. 6063.
Those provisions do not specifically
address DHS’s authority to regulate
aircraft flying to or from Cuba. The
President is authorized to suspend
aspects of the economic embargo of
Cuba only if certain conditions are met,
including the determination that ‘‘a
transition government in Cuba is in
power.’’ 22 U.S.C. 6064(a). As explained
above, however, the removal of the
provisions in subpart O, which are
either redundant or obsolete, merely
conforms CBP’s regulations to the BIS
and OFAC requirements. It does not
affect the existing embargo, and
therefore does not require a
determination that a transition
government is in power in Cuba.
Comment: Two commenters
expressed support for the removal of
subpart O but requested that individuals
arriving in the United States from any
foreign place, including individuals
arriving from Cuba, be subject to
criminal background checks in order to
enter the United States. One commenter
requested that additional restrictions be
placed on flights to and from any
foreign place.
Response: The requirements
applicable to foreign individuals
seeking entry into the United States are
beyond the scope of this rule. However,
DHS notes that despite the removal of
subpart O, all travelers arriving in the
United States from Cuba must still
report to a CBP officer and undergo a
customs and immigration inspection, as
required by various provisions in the
United States Code and titles 8 and 19
and of the CFR. DHS and its component
agencies also work closely with the
Department of State and other agencies
responsible for enforcing the sanctions
regime against Cuba, including OFAC
and BIS, to ensure that individuals on
the Specially Designated National (SDN)
list are prohibited entry into the United
States.
In addition, despite the removal of
subpart O, all aircraft arriving in the
United States from Cuba are subject to
the various reporting and inspection
requirements of title 19 CFR.
Comment: One commenter requested
that DHS amend section 122.153(c) of
title 19 (19 CFR 122.153) to permit Key
West International Airport to receive
flights to and from Cuba.
Response: Section 122.153 of title 19
is within subpart O and, therefore, has
been removed. However, it is not
necessary to amend the list of airports
authorized to accept flights to and from
Cuba previously contained in 122.153(c)
to add Key West International Airport,
or any other airport, in order for that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:28 Jun 24, 2019
Jkt 247001
airport to receive flights to and from
Cuba. With the removal of subpart O,
any airport, including Key West
International Airport, may request a
new international flight to or from Cuba
under the same procedures and
requirements applicable to all other
similarly situated airports and aircraft
operators seeking to conduct
international flights. In order to operate
flights between the United States and
Cuba, all airports and aircraft operators
must comply with applicable regulatory
requirements of DHS and its component
agencies, such as CBP, the
Transportation Security Administration
(TSA), U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement (ICE) and the U.S. Coast
Guard, as well as the regulatory
requirements of OFAC, BIS, and the
Department of Transportation’s Federal
Aviation Administration.
III. Conclusions—Regulatory
Amendments
After careful consideration of the
comments received, DHS is adopting the
interim regulations, as set forth in the
IFR published in the Federal Register at
81 FR 14948 on March 21, 2016, as final
without change.
Statutory and Regulatory Requirements
A. Statutory Requirements
The Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) requirements in 5 U.S.C. 553
govern agency rulemaking procedures.
Among other procedural requirements,
the APA generally requires that a final
rule have a 30-day delayed effective
date. The APA provides a full
exemption from the requirements of
section 553 for rules involving the
foreign affairs function of the United
States. See 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1). This final
rule is excluded from the rulemaking
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553 as a foreign
affairs function of the United States
because it concerns international flights
between the United States and Cuba,
consistent with U.S. foreign policy
goals. These amendments clarify and
simplify the regulations regarding air
travel between the United States and
Cuba and are consistent with President
Trump’s continued efforts to ensure that
engagement between the United States
and Cuba advances the interests of the
United States and the Cuban people,
including the mutual interest in
facilitating lawful travel and safe civil
aviation.2 See 82 FR 48875.
Accordingly, this final rule is not
2 National Security Presidential Memorandum on
Strengthening the Policy of the United States
Toward Cuba (June 16, 2017) § 2(d), (f).
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
subject to the 30-day delayed effective
date requirement.
Additionally, because this rule is not
subject to the requirements of 5 U.S.C.
553, it is not subject to the provisions
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
B. Executive Orders 12866 and 13771
Executive Order 12866 (‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’) directs agencies
to assess the costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Rules involving the foreign
affairs function of the United States are
exempt from the requirements of
Executive Order 12866. Executive Order
13771 (‘‘Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs’’) requires
that whenever an agency promulgates a
new regulation, it must identify at least
two existing regulations to be repealed.
It further directs that any new
incremental costs associated with new
regulations must be offset by the
elimination of existing costs associated
with two prior regulations. Pursuant to
section 4(a), Executive Order 13771
does not apply to regulations issued
with respect to a foreign affairs function
of the United States.
As discussed above, DHS has
concluded that clarifying and
simplifying the regulations regarding
restrictions on travel between the
United States and Cuba is a foreign
affairs function of the United States
Government. Accordingly, this rule is
exempt from the requirements of
Executive Orders 12866 and 13771.
Signing Authority
This final rule is being issued in
accordance with 8 CFR 2.1 and 19 CFR
0.2(a). Accordingly, this final rule is
signed by the Secretary of Homeland
Security.
List of Subjects
8 CFR Part 234
Air carriers, Aircraft, Airports, Aliens,
Cuba.
19 CFR Part 122
Administrative practice and
procedure, Air carriers, Aircraft,
Airports, Alcohol and alcoholic
beverages, Cigars and cigarettes, Cuba,
Customs duties and inspection, Drug
traffic control, Freight, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures.
Amendments to Regulations
For the reasons set forth above, the
IFR amending part 122 of the CBP
regulations (19 CFR part 122), which
E:\FR\FM\25JNR1.SGM
25JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 122 / Tuesday, June 25, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
was published in the Federal Register at
81 FR 14948 on March 21, 2016, is
adopted as a final rule without change.
Dated: June 14, 2019.
Kevin K. McAleenan,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–13431 Filed 6–24–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2018–0737; Product
Identifier 2017–SW–096–AD; Amendment
39–19661; AD 2019–12–06]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Leonardo
S.p.A. Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
Discussion
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for
Leonardo S.p.A. (type certificate
previously held by Finmeccanica S.p.A.,
AgustaWestland S.p.A.) Model AW139
helicopters. This AD requires inspecting
and altering the number 1 driveshaft
(driveshaft). This AD was prompted by
reports of scratches that were found on
the driveshaft. The actions of this AD
are intended to address an unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective July 30,
2019.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain document listed in this AD
as of July 30, 2019.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this final rule, contact
Leonardo S.p.A. Helicopters, Matteo
Ragazzi, Head of Airworthiness, Viale G.
Agusta 520, 21017 C. Costa di Samarate
(Va) Italy; telephone +39–0331–711756;
fax +39–0331–229046; or at https://
www.leonardocompany.com/en/home.
You may review the referenced service
information at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region,
10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N–321,
Fort Worth, TX 76177. It is also
available on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2018–
0737.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:28 Jun 24, 2019
Jkt 247001
and locating Docket No. FAA–2018–
0737; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this AD, the
European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) AD, any incorporated-byreference service information, the
economic evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for Docket Operations is
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Hatfield, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Safety Management Section,
Rotorcraft Standards Branch, FAA,
10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX
76177; telephone (817) 222–5110; email
david.hatfield@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
On August 27, 2018, at 83 FR 43561,
the Federal Register published our
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM),
which proposed to amend 14 CFR part
39 by adding an AD that would apply
to Model AW139 helicopters, serial
numbers 31499, 31504, 31507, 31509,
31512, 31518, 31519, 31524, 31529,
31533, 31535 through 31564, 31567,
31569, 31570, 31589, 41363, 41368
through 41370, 41372 through 41375,
41378, 41381, and 41384, with a tunnel
assembly part number (P/N)
3G7130A13431 installed. The NPRM
proposed to require repetitively
inspecting the driveshaft tube P/N
3G6510A00832 for a scratch and
indentation. If there is a scratch or
indentation, the NPRM proposed to
require, before further flight, repairing
the driveshaft tube and performing a
depth check of the repaired area.
Depending on the repaired area depth,
the NPRM proposed to require replacing
the driveshaft tube and altering the rear
exhaust module and tunnel assembly
before further flight or performing an
eddy current inspection of the tube for
a crack. If there is a crack, the NPRM
proposed to require replacing the
driveshaft tube and altering the rear
exhaust module and tunnel assembly
before further flight. The NPRM also
proposed to require altering the rear
exhaust module and tunnel assembly, if
not previously done as a result of the
inspections, and re-identifying the
tunnel assembly P/N after it is altered,
which would be terminating action for
the repetitive inspections. The proposed
requirements were intended to prevent
a crack in the driveshaft, failure of the
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
29797
tail rotor drive system, and subsequent
loss of control of the helicopter.
The NPRM was prompted by AD No.
2017–0011, dated January 25, 2017,
issued by EASA, which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, to correct an unsafe
condition for certain serial-numbered
Leonardo S.p.A. (formerly Finmeccanica
S.p.A, AgustaWestland S.p.A.) Model
AW139 helicopters. EASA advises of
several helicopters found with scratches
on the driveshaft P/N 3G6510A01132
and that an investigation determined
only helicopters equipped with rear
exhaust module assembly P/N
3G7810A00431 and tunnel assembly P/
N 3G7130A13431 are affected.
According to EASA, the scratches
resulted from insufficient clearance
between the driveshaft and the rear
exhaust module and tunnel assemblies.
EASA further advises that if not
corrected, these scratches could lead to
a crack in the driveshaft, failure of the
tail rotor drive system, and subsequent
reduced control of the helicopter.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD, but
we did not receive any comments on the
NPRM.
FAA’s Determination
These helicopters have been approved
by EASA and are approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the European
Union, EASA, has notified us of the
unsafe condition described in its AD.
We are issuing this AD because we
evaluated all information provided by
EASA and determined the unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other helicopters of the same
type designs.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
We reviewed Leonardo Helicopters
Bollettino Tecnico No. 139–465,
Revision A, dated January 25, 2017,
which contains procedures for visual
and eddy-current inspections of the
driveshaft. This service information also
contains procedures for modifying the
exhaust module and tunnel assembly.
This service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties
have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 55
helicopters of U.S. Registry. We estimate
that operators may incur the following
costs in order to comply with this AD.
E:\FR\FM\25JNR1.SGM
25JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 122 (Tuesday, June 25, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29795-29797]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-13431]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 122 / Tuesday, June 25, 2019 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 29795]]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
8 CFR Part 234
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
19 CFR Part 122
[Docket No. USCBP-2016-0015; CBP Decision No. 19-06]
RIN 1651-AB10
Flights To and From Cuba
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule adopts as final, without change, interim amendments
to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) regulations published
in the Federal Register on March 21, 2016, that removed certain
provisions regarding flights to and from Cuba that were either obsolete
due to intervening regulatory changes or were duplicative of
regulations applicable to all other similarly situated international
flights.
DATES: This rule is effective on June 25, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arthur A.E. Pitts, Sr., U.S. Customs
and Border Protection, Office of Field Operations, by phone at (202)
344-2752 or by email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On March 21, 2016, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
published an interim final rule (IFR) in the Federal Register (81 FR
14948) amending CBP regulations to remove regulations previously
codified at 19 CFR, part 122, subpart O. The removed regulations
imposed certain restrictions and reporting requirements on flights to
and from Cuba. The implementation of robust reporting requirements that
generally apply to all international flights rendered much of subpart O
redundant. Additionally, the Department of the Treasury's Office of
Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and the Department of Commerce's Bureau
of Industry and Security (BIS) issued changes to the Cuban Assets
Control Regulations (CACR) and the Export Administration Regulations
(EAR) that rendered many sections of subpart O obsolete.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Following the publication of the IFR, BIS and OFAC published
additional changes to the CACR and the EAR in order to implement the
National Security Presidential Memorandum on Strengthening the
Policy of the United States Toward Cuba (June 16, 2017). See 82 FR
51983 (Nov. 9, 2017) and 82 FR 51998 (Nov. 9, 2017). These changes
did not affect provisions related to former subpart O and do not
require modification to the IFR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Despite the removal of subpart O, flights to and from Cuba continue
to be subject to the same entry and clearance requirements in 19 CFR
part 122 as all other similarly situated international flights.
Additionally, flights to and from Cuba continue to be subject to other
legal requirements relating to travel and trade between the United
States and Cuba including, but not limited to, the CACR and the EAR.
In the IFR, DHS also amended several provisions of title 8 CFR (8
CFR 234.2) and title 19 CFR (19 CFR 122.31 and 122.42) to bring these
sections into conformity with the removal of 19 CFR part 122, subpart
O.
II. Discussion of Comments
A. Overview
Although the interim regulatory amendments were promulgated without
prior public notice and comment procedures pursuant to the foreign
affairs exemption in 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1), the IFR provided for the
submission of public comments that would be considered before adoption
of the interim regulations as a final rule. The prescribed 30-day
public comment period closed on April 20, 2016. DHS received
submissions from 30 commenters.
The vast majority of commenters supported the removal of subpart O.
Those commenters supported the removal of subpart O based on the
expectation that it would benefit the U.S. airline industry and other
U.S. businesses hoping to expand to Cuba, lower the cost of flights to
and from Cuba by increasing flight options available to U.S. consumers,
and potentially lead to future trade agreements and other economic
cooperation between the United States and Cuba. Three of the commenters
that supported the rule requested that DHS impose additional
restrictions on international flights and individuals arriving in the
United States. Two commenters opposed the IFR due to legal and policy
concerns regarding Cuba. A summary of the comments and comment
responses follow.
B. Discussion
Comment: One commenter expressed concern that the removal of
subpart O would encourage the spread of communist beliefs and stated
that DHS should take steps to continue to isolate Cuba. Another
commenter stated that the removal of subpart O was inconsistent with
federal laws that restrict trade with Cuba and with CBP's putative duty
to prevent trade with Cuba. Specifically, it is the position of the
commenter that section 6063 of title 22 of the U.S. Code prohibits CBP
from removing subpart O until there is a transition government in place
in Cuba.
Response: DHS disagrees that the removal of subpart O is
inconsistent with U.S. law or CBP's obligations under the law. As noted
above and explained in detail in the IFR, each section previously
codified in subpart O is either redundant of other regulatory
provisions or is obsolete due to intervening regulatory changes issued
by OFAC and BIS pursuant to OFAC's and BIS's statutory authority to
regulate travel and trade with Cuba. Additionally, none of the
regulatory requirements previously codified in subpart O is mandated by
statute. Rather, subpart O was promulgated pursuant to the Secretary of
Homeland Security's broad authority to regulate all aircraft arriving
to and departing from the United States. See 19 U.S.C. 1433, 1644, and
1644a. The elimination of subpart O, therefore, merely updates CBP's
regulations to conform to OFAC's and BIS's regulations and does not
conflict with the existing statutory or regulatory scheme restricting
travel or trade with Cuba.
The removal of subpart O also does not conflict with title II of
the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act of 1996,
Public Law 104-114, sections 201-207, 110 Stat.
[[Page 29796]]
785, 805-814, which includes the provisions codified at 22 U.S.C. 6063.
Those provisions do not specifically address DHS's authority to
regulate aircraft flying to or from Cuba. The President is authorized
to suspend aspects of the economic embargo of Cuba only if certain
conditions are met, including the determination that ``a transition
government in Cuba is in power.'' 22 U.S.C. 6064(a). As explained
above, however, the removal of the provisions in subpart O, which are
either redundant or obsolete, merely conforms CBP's regulations to the
BIS and OFAC requirements. It does not affect the existing embargo, and
therefore does not require a determination that a transition government
is in power in Cuba.
Comment: Two commenters expressed support for the removal of
subpart O but requested that individuals arriving in the United States
from any foreign place, including individuals arriving from Cuba, be
subject to criminal background checks in order to enter the United
States. One commenter requested that additional restrictions be placed
on flights to and from any foreign place.
Response: The requirements applicable to foreign individuals
seeking entry into the United States are beyond the scope of this rule.
However, DHS notes that despite the removal of subpart O, all travelers
arriving in the United States from Cuba must still report to a CBP
officer and undergo a customs and immigration inspection, as required
by various provisions in the United States Code and titles 8 and 19 and
of the CFR. DHS and its component agencies also work closely with the
Department of State and other agencies responsible for enforcing the
sanctions regime against Cuba, including OFAC and BIS, to ensure that
individuals on the Specially Designated National (SDN) list are
prohibited entry into the United States.
In addition, despite the removal of subpart O, all aircraft
arriving in the United States from Cuba are subject to the various
reporting and inspection requirements of title 19 CFR.
Comment: One commenter requested that DHS amend section 122.153(c)
of title 19 (19 CFR 122.153) to permit Key West International Airport
to receive flights to and from Cuba.
Response: Section 122.153 of title 19 is within subpart O and,
therefore, has been removed. However, it is not necessary to amend the
list of airports authorized to accept flights to and from Cuba
previously contained in 122.153(c) to add Key West International
Airport, or any other airport, in order for that airport to receive
flights to and from Cuba. With the removal of subpart O, any airport,
including Key West International Airport, may request a new
international flight to or from Cuba under the same procedures and
requirements applicable to all other similarly situated airports and
aircraft operators seeking to conduct international flights. In order
to operate flights between the United States and Cuba, all airports and
aircraft operators must comply with applicable regulatory requirements
of DHS and its component agencies, such as CBP, the Transportation
Security Administration (TSA), U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
(ICE) and the U.S. Coast Guard, as well as the regulatory requirements
of OFAC, BIS, and the Department of Transportation's Federal Aviation
Administration.
III. Conclusions--Regulatory Amendments
After careful consideration of the comments received, DHS is
adopting the interim regulations, as set forth in the IFR published in
the Federal Register at 81 FR 14948 on March 21, 2016, as final without
change.
Statutory and Regulatory Requirements
A. Statutory Requirements
The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) requirements in 5 U.S.C. 553
govern agency rulemaking procedures. Among other procedural
requirements, the APA generally requires that a final rule have a 30-
day delayed effective date. The APA provides a full exemption from the
requirements of section 553 for rules involving the foreign affairs
function of the United States. See 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1). This final rule
is excluded from the rulemaking provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553 as a foreign
affairs function of the United States because it concerns international
flights between the United States and Cuba, consistent with U.S.
foreign policy goals. These amendments clarify and simplify the
regulations regarding air travel between the United States and Cuba and
are consistent with President Trump's continued efforts to ensure that
engagement between the United States and Cuba advances the interests of
the United States and the Cuban people, including the mutual interest
in facilitating lawful travel and safe civil aviation.\2\ See 82 FR
48875. Accordingly, this final rule is not subject to the 30-day
delayed effective date requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ National Security Presidential Memorandum on Strengthening
the Policy of the United States Toward Cuba (June 16, 2017) Sec.
2(d), (f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, because this rule is not subject to the requirements
of 5 U.S.C. 553, it is not subject to the provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
B. Executive Orders 12866 and 13771
Executive Order 12866 (``Regulatory Planning and Review'') directs
agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits. Rules involving the foreign
affairs function of the United States are exempt from the requirements
of Executive Order 12866. Executive Order 13771 (``Reducing Regulation
and Controlling Regulatory Costs'') requires that whenever an agency
promulgates a new regulation, it must identify at least two existing
regulations to be repealed. It further directs that any new incremental
costs associated with new regulations must be offset by the elimination
of existing costs associated with two prior regulations. Pursuant to
section 4(a), Executive Order 13771 does not apply to regulations
issued with respect to a foreign affairs function of the United States.
As discussed above, DHS has concluded that clarifying and
simplifying the regulations regarding restrictions on travel between
the United States and Cuba is a foreign affairs function of the United
States Government. Accordingly, this rule is exempt from the
requirements of Executive Orders 12866 and 13771.
Signing Authority
This final rule is being issued in accordance with 8 CFR 2.1 and 19
CFR 0.2(a). Accordingly, this final rule is signed by the Secretary of
Homeland Security.
List of Subjects
8 CFR Part 234
Air carriers, Aircraft, Airports, Aliens, Cuba.
19 CFR Part 122
Administrative practice and procedure, Air carriers, Aircraft,
Airports, Alcohol and alcoholic beverages, Cigars and cigarettes, Cuba,
Customs duties and inspection, Drug traffic control, Freight,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures.
Amendments to Regulations
For the reasons set forth above, the IFR amending part 122 of the
CBP regulations (19 CFR part 122), which
[[Page 29797]]
was published in the Federal Register at 81 FR 14948 on March 21, 2016,
is adopted as a final rule without change.
Dated: June 14, 2019.
Kevin K. McAleenan,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-13431 Filed 6-24-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P