Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (Halifax River), Daytona Beach, FL, 29065-29066 [2019-13207]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 120 / Friday, June 21, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
[Docket No. USCG–2019–0388]
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (Halifax
River), Daytona Beach, FL
RIN 1625–AA09
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
and Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
ACTION:
2. Amend § 117.325 by adding
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
■
§ 117.325
St. Johns River.
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
(c) The draw for the Buffalo Bluff CSX
automated Railroad Bridge, St. Johns
River, mile 94.5 at Satsuma, Putnam
County, FL shall operate as follows:
(1) The bridge is not tendered locally,
but will be operated and monitored by
a remote tender.
(2) The bridge shall have local and
mechanical override capabilities over
the remote operation.
(3) Marine radio communication shall
be maintained with mariners near the
bridge for the safety of navigation.
Visual monitoring of the waterway shall
be maintained with the use of cameras
and the detection of vessels under the
span shall be accomplished with
detection sensors.
(4) The span is normally in the fully
open position and will display green
lights to indicate that the span is fully
open.
(5) When a train approaches, the
remote tender shall monitor for vessels
approaching the bridge. The remote
tender shall warn approaching vessels
via marine radio, channel 9 VHF of a
bridge lowering. The remote tender may
also be contacted via telephone at (386)
649–8538.
(6) Provided the sensors do not detect
a vessel under the span, the tender shall
initiate the span lowering sequence,
which includes the sounding of a horn
and the displaying of red lights. The
span will remain in the down position
for a minimum of eight minutes or for
the entire time the approach track
circuit is occupied.
(7) After the train has cleared the
bridge track circuit, the span shall open
and the green lights will be displayed.
Dated: June 11, 2019.
Peter J. Brown,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Seventh Coast Guard District.
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 Jun 20, 2019
Jkt 247001
The Coast Guard is removing
the existing drawbridge operation
regulation for the Memorial Bridge
(Veteran’s Memorial/Orange Ave/CR
4050) across the Atlantic Intracoastal
Waterway (Halifax River), mile 830.6, at
Daytona Beach, FL. The drawbridge was
removed in 2018 and is being replaced
with a fixed bridge. The operating
regulation is no longer applicable or
necessary.
SUMMARY:
*
[FR Doc. 2019–13205 Filed 6–20–19; 8:45 am]
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
DATES:
This rule is effective June 21,
2019.
To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2019–
0388. In the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Ms. Jennifer Zercher, Bridge
Administration Branch, United States
Coast Guard District Seven; telephone
305–415–6740, email
jennifer.n.zercher@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FL Florida
FR Federal Register
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this final
rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
29065
553(b), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice
of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with
respect to this rule because Veteran’s
Memorial Bridge, that once required
draw operations in 33 CFR 117.261(g),
was removed from the Atlantic
Intracoastal Waterway (Halifax River) in
2018 and is being replaced with a fixed
bridge. Therefore, the regulation is no
longer applicable and shall be removed
from publication. It is unnecessary to
publish an NPRM because this
regulatory action does not purport to
place any restrictions on mariners but
rather removes a restriction that has no
further use or value.
We are issuing this rule under 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds
that good cause exists for making this
rule effective in less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. The
bridge has been removed from the
waterway for one year and this rule
merely requires an administrative
change to the Federal Register, in order
to omit a regulatory requirement that is
no longer applicable or necessary. The
modification has already taken place
and the removal of the regulation will
not affect mariners currently operating
on this waterway. Therefore, a delayed
effective date is unnecessary.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority 33 U.S.C. 499.
The Veteran’s Memorial Bridge was
removed in 2018 and is being replaced
with a fixed bridge in 2019. The
elimination of this drawbridge
necessitates the removal of the
drawbridge operation regulation, 33
CFR 117.261(g), pertaining to the former
drawbridge.
IV. Discussion of Final Rule
The Coast Guard is changing
regulation in 33 CFR 117.261 by
removing restrictions and the regulatory
burden related to draw operations for a
bridge that is no longer a drawbridge.
The change removes § 117.261(g) of the
regulation governing the Veteran’s
Memorial Bridge, since the bridge has
been removed from the waterway and is
being replaced with a fixed bridge. This
Final Rule seeks to update the Code of
Federal Regulations by removing
language that governs the operation of
the Veteran’s Memorial Bridge, which is
no longer a drawbridge. This change
does not affect waterway or land traffic.
This change does not affect nor does it
alter the operating schedules in 33 CFR
117.261 governing the remaining active
drawbridges on the Atlantic Intracoastal
Waterway from St. Marys River to Key
Largo.
E:\FR\FM\21JNR1.SGM
21JNR1
29066
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 120 / Friday, June 21, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive Orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protesters.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This rule has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, it has not
been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the fact the bridge was
removed from the waterway and the
replacement structure will be a fixed
bridge. The removal of the operating
schedule from 33 CFR 117 subpart B
will have no effect on the movement of
waterway or land traffic.
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
For the reasons stated in section IV.A
above this final rule would not have a
significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 Jun 20, 2019
Jkt 247001
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Government
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a determination that this
action is one of a category of actions
which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This rule
simply promulgates the operating
regulations or procedures for
drawbridges. This action is categorically
excluded from further review, under
figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of the
Instruction.
A Record of Environmental
Consideration and a Memorandum for
the Record are not required for this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
§ 117.261
[Amended]
2. Amend § 117.261 by removing and
reserving paragraph (g).
■
Dated: June 11, 2019.
Peter J. Brown,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Seventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2019–13207 Filed 6–20–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Coast Guard
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
33 CFR Part 165
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
[Docket No. USCG–2019–0461]
Safety Zone; Chicago Harbor, Navy
Pier Southeast, Chicago, IL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of enforcement of
regulation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard will enforce
the Navy Pier Southeast Safety Zone
within the Chicago Harbor during
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21JNR1.SGM
21JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 120 (Friday, June 21, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29065-29066]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-13207]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG-2019-0388]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway
(Halifax River), Daytona Beach, FL
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is removing the existing drawbridge operation
regulation for the Memorial Bridge (Veteran's Memorial/Orange Ave/CR
4050) across the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (Halifax River), mile
830.6, at Daytona Beach, FL. The drawbridge was removed in 2018 and is
being replaced with a fixed bridge. The operating regulation is no
longer applicable or necessary.
DATES: This rule is effective June 21, 2019.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2019-0388. In the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Ms. Jennifer Zercher, Bridge Administration Branch,
United States Coast Guard District Seven; telephone 305-415-6740, email
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FL Florida
FR Federal Register
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this final rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because Veteran's Memorial Bridge, that once
required draw operations in 33 CFR 117.261(g), was removed from the
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (Halifax River) in 2018 and is being
replaced with a fixed bridge. Therefore, the regulation is no longer
applicable and shall be removed from publication. It is unnecessary to
publish an NPRM because this regulatory action does not purport to
place any restrictions on mariners but rather removes a restriction
that has no further use or value.
We are issuing this rule under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard
finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective in less
than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. The bridge has
been removed from the waterway for one year and this rule merely
requires an administrative change to the Federal Register, in order to
omit a regulatory requirement that is no longer applicable or
necessary. The modification has already taken place and the removal of
the regulation will not affect mariners currently operating on this
waterway. Therefore, a delayed effective date is unnecessary.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority 33 U.S.C. 499.
The Veteran's Memorial Bridge was removed in 2018 and is being
replaced with a fixed bridge in 2019. The elimination of this
drawbridge necessitates the removal of the drawbridge operation
regulation, 33 CFR 117.261(g), pertaining to the former drawbridge.
IV. Discussion of Final Rule
The Coast Guard is changing regulation in 33 CFR 117.261 by
removing restrictions and the regulatory burden related to draw
operations for a bridge that is no longer a drawbridge. The change
removes Sec. 117.261(g) of the regulation governing the Veteran's
Memorial Bridge, since the bridge has been removed from the waterway
and is being replaced with a fixed bridge. This Final Rule seeks to
update the Code of Federal Regulations by removing language that
governs the operation of the Veteran's Memorial Bridge, which is no
longer a drawbridge. This change does not affect waterway or land
traffic. This change does not affect nor does it alter the operating
schedules in 33 CFR 117.261 governing the remaining active drawbridges
on the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway from St. Marys River to Key
Largo.
[[Page 29066]]
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive Orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protesters.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, it has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination is based on the fact the
bridge was removed from the waterway and the replacement structure will
be a fixed bridge. The removal of the operating schedule from 33 CFR
117 subpart B will have no effect on the movement of waterway or land
traffic.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
For the reasons stated in section IV.A above this final rule would
not have a significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Government
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a
determination that this action is one of a category of actions which do
not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule simply promulgates the operating regulations or
procedures for drawbridges. This action is categorically excluded from
further review, under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the
Instruction.
A Record of Environmental Consideration and a Memorandum for the
Record are not required for this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
Sec. 117.261 [Amended]
0
2. Amend Sec. 117.261 by removing and reserving paragraph (g).
Dated: June 11, 2019.
Peter J. Brown,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Seventh Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 2019-13207 Filed 6-20-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P