Brookhaven Rail Partners, LLC, Related Infrastructure, LLC, BRX Transportation Holdings, LLC, and BRX Acquisition Sub, Inc.-Control Exemption-Pioneer Railcorp, et al., 29276-29277 [2019-13204]
Download as PDF
29276
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 120 / Friday, June 21, 2019 / Notices
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
to DSRC, abandonment of the MRC Line
was not consummated and instead the
MRC Line was acquired by the State in
1980. (DSRC Notice 3.) DSRC states that
the portion of the MRC Line west of
Kadoka is now railbanked. See MitchellRapid City Reg’l R.R. Auth.—Modified
Rail Certificate—Between Caputa &
Rapid City, S.D., FD 35149 (STB served
Apr. 28, 2009) (issuing notice of interim
trail use between milepost 659.6 to
milepost 646.0); Sammamish Transp.
Co.—Notice of Interim Trail Use &
Termination of Modified Certificate, FD
33398 (Sub-No. 1) (STB served Feb. 26,
1998) (issuing notice of interim trail use
between milepost 646.0 to milepost
562.53). In addition, DSRC states that, to
the best of its knowledge, two carriers
have obtained modified certificate rights
to operate over portions of the MRC
Line east of Kadoka but no longer
exercise those rights.2
The verified notice indicates that the
State leases the Segment to the MRC
Regional Rail Authority (MRCA), a
political subdivision of the State. In
2012, MRCA entered into a sublease
with DSRC, which provides that DSRC
will be the operator of the Segment and
will assume all common carrier
obligations to provide service on the
Segment. (DSRC Notice Ex. C, 2 ¶ 6.)
Under the terms of the sublease, DSRC
will provide rail service on the Segment
for 20 years from and after the effective
date of January 1, 2012.3 (Id. at 4 ¶ 17.)
According to DSRC, it interchanges
with BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) at
or near Mitchell, pursuant to
interchange, trackage, haulage, and lease
agreements with BNSF.
The Segment qualifies for a modified
certificate of public convenience and
necessity. See Common Carrier Status of
States, State Agencies &
Instrumentalities & Political
Subdivisions, FD 28990F (ICC served
July 16, 1981); 49 CFR 1150.22.
DSRC indicates that no subsidy is
involved and that there are no
preconditions that shippers must meet
to receive rail service; DSRC also
provides information regarding the
nature and extent of its liability
2 See Nobles Rock R.R.—Modified Rail Certificate,
FD 33792 (STB served Sept. 16, 1999); Burlington
N. R.R.—Operations—in States of Iowa & S.D., FD
29672 (ICC served Aug. 17, 1981). DSRC states that,
to the best of its knowledge, Burlington Northern’s
rights were terminated by notice, (see Burlington N.
R.R. Letter, Oct. 14, 1986, Burlington N. R.R., FD
29672), and Nobles Rock became insolvent and no
longer exists. (DSRC Notice 4 n.2.)
3 DSRC states that it has been operating pursuant
to the terms of the sublease since January 1, 2012.
According to DSRC, SDR Holding Company, which
controls DSRC, had been under the impression that
a modified certificate previously had been issued.
(DSRC Notice 2, 4–5.)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Jun 20, 2019
Jkt 247001
insurance coverage. See 49 CFR
1150.23(b)(4)–(5).
This notice will be served on the
Association of American Railroads (Car
Service Division), as agent for all
railroads subscribing to the car-service
and car-hire agreement, at 425 Third
Street SW, Suite 1000, Washington, DC
20024; and on the American Short Line
and Regional Railroad Association at 50
F Street NW, Suite 7020, Washington,
DC 20001.
Board decisions and notices are
available at www.stb.gov.
Decided: June 14, 2019.
By the Board, Allison C. Davis, Director,
Office of Proceedings.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2019–13152 Filed 6–20–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
[Docket No. FD 36306]
Brookhaven Rail Partners, LLC,
Related Infrastructure, LLC, BRX
Transportation Holdings, LLC, and
BRX Acquisition Sub, Inc.—Control
Exemption—Pioneer Railcorp, et al.
Brookhaven Rail Partners, LLC
(Brookhaven), Related Infrastructure,
LLC (Related Infrastructure), BRX
Transportation Holdings, LLC (BRX
Transportation), and BRX Acquisition
Sub, Inc. (BRX Acquisition)
(collectively, Applicants), filed a
verified notice of exemption under 49
CFR 1180.2(d)(2) to acquire control of
Pioneer Railcorp (Pioneer), a noncarrier
holding company that controls 15 Class
III railroad subsidiaries: Alabama &
Florida Railway Co., Inc.; Alabama
Railroad Co., Inc.; Decatur Junction
Railway Co.; Elkhart & Western Railroad
Co.; Fort Smith Railroad Co.; The
Garden City Western Railway, Inc.;
Georgia Southern Railway Co.;
Gettysburg & Northern Railroad Co.;
Indiana Southwestern Railway Co.;
Kendallville Terminal Railway Co.;
Keokuk Junction Railway Co.; Michigan
Southern Railroad Company;
Mississippi Central Railroad Co.;
Pioneer Industrial Railway Co.; and
Vandalia Railroad Company
(collectively, Pioneer Railroads).
According to the verified notice,
Applicants intend to acquire 100% of
the equity interests of Pioneer pursuant
to an Agreement and Plan of Merger
dated May 16, 2019.1 As a result of the
1 A redacted version of the agreement was filed
with the notice of exemption. An unredacted
version was filed concurrently under seal, along
with Applicants’ motion for protective order under
PO 00000
Frm 00120
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
proposed transaction, BRX Acquisition
will merge with and into Pioneer, with
Pioneer the surviving corporation.
Pioneer will become a wholly owned
subsidiary of BRX Transportation, and,
indirectly, Brookhaven and Related
Infrastructure will thereby acquire
control of the Pioneer Railroads.2
The verified notice states that the
parties contemplate that the transaction
will be consummated during the third
quarter of 2019. The earliest the
transaction may be consummated is July
7, 2019, the effective date of the
exemption (30 days after the verified
notice was filed).
The verified notice states that: (i)
Applicants do not own or control any
rail line that connect with any of the
Pioneer Railroads; (ii) the proposed
transaction is not part of a series of
anticipated transactions that would
connect any railroad owned or
controlled by Applicants with the
Pioneer Railroads or connect any of the
Pioneer Railroads with one another; and
(iii) the proposed transaction does not
involve a Class I carrier. Therefore, the
transaction is exempt from the prior
approval requirements of 49 U.S.C.
11323. See 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(2).
Under 49 U.S.C. 10502(g), the Board
may not use its exemption authority to
relieve a rail carrier of its statutory
obligation to protect the interests of its
employees. However, 49 U.S.C. 11326(c)
does not provide for labor protection for
transactions under 49 U.S.C. 11324 and
11325 that involve only Class III rail
carriers. Because this transaction
involves Class III rail carriers only, the
Board, under the statute, may not
impose labor protective conditions for
this transaction.
If the verified notice contains false or
misleading information, the exemption
is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the
exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d)
may be filed at any time. The filing of
a petition to revoke will not
automatically stay the effectiveness of
the exemption. Petitions to stay must be
filed no later than June 28, 2019 (at least
seven days before the exemption
becomes effective).
All pleadings, referring to Docket No.
FD 36306, must be filed with the
Surface Transportation Board via efiling or in writing addressed to 395 E
Street SW, Washington, DC 20423–0001.
In addition, a copy of each pleading
must be served on Applicants’
49 CFR 1104.14(b). The motion for protective order
will be addressed in a separate decision.
2 The verified notice states that Brookhaven and
Related Infrastructure are separate unaffiliated
entities, except for their joint ownership of BRX
Transportation, which is the parent of BRX
Acquisition.
E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM
21JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 120 / Friday, June 21, 2019 / Notices
representative, David F. Rifkind,
Stinson LLP, 1775 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW, Suite 800, Washington, DC 20006.
Board decisions and notices are
available at www.stb.gov.
Decided: June 18, 2019.
By the Board, Allison C. Davis, Director,
Office of Proceedings.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2019–13204 Filed 6–20–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
[FHWA Docket No. FHWA–2017–0023]
RIN 2125–ZA11
Guidance on Safe Harbor Rate
Streamlining for Engineering and
Design Services Consultant Contracts
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This Notice announces and
outlines the final guidance for the
implementation of a Safe Harbor
indirect cost rate for certain engineering
design service firms that find
establishing such rates to be costly and
a barrier to participating in engineering
and design service contracts reimbursed
with Federal-aid Highway Program
(FAHP) funds.
DATES: This guidance is effective June
21, 2019.
ADDRESSES: This document, the request
for comments, and the comments
received may be viewed online through
the Federal eRulemaking portal at:
https://www.regulations.gov. An
electronic copy of this document may
also be downloaded from the Office of
the Federal Register’s website at: https://
www.federalregister.gov and the
Government Publishing Office’s website
at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
John McAvoy, Consultant Services
Program Manager, Office of
Infrastructure, Federal Highway
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590–
9898, (202) 853–5593. For legal
questions: Mr. Steven Rochlis, Office of
the Chief Counsel, Federal Highway
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590–
9898, (202) 366–1395. Office hours are
from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. E.T.,
Monday through Friday, except for
Federal holidays.
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Jun 20, 2019
Jkt 247001
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Summary Discussion of Comments
The FHWA published a Federal
Register Notice on July 17, 2018, at 83
FR 33288, seeking public comment on
its proposed guidance for
implementation of a Safe Harbor
indirect cost rate and, its intention to
notify all contracting agencies receiving
FAHP funds that an agency-developed
Safe Harbor indirect cost rate for eligible
consulting firms may be used as a
component of a risk-based oversight
process to provide reasonable assurance
to FHWA that consultant costs on
FAHP-funded contracts are allowable in
accordance with the Federal regulations.
In preparing this guidance to assist in
the implementation of a Safe Harbor
program, FHWA considered all public
comments submitted to the Federal
Register Notice.
Based on the comments received,
FHWA is finalizing the guidance. Since
compliance with this guidance is
voluntary for both the contracting
agency and the consulting firm, it is not
anticipated to impose any costs. Entities
that choose to use this guidance would
do so only if they anticipate a net
positive impact. In particular,
consulting firms that voluntarily comply
could experience expanded business
opportunities because they become
eligible to work on contracts funded by
a Federal grant, which they previously
were not. This guidance may also result
in cost savings due to a reduction in
resources needed to conduct oversight
and audits of small consulting firms.
Commenters included several State
departments of transportation (State
DOT), the American Council of
Engineering Companies, and one
individual. The respondents were in
favor of the implementation of a Safe
Harbor indirect cost rate program.
Several commenters provided
suggestions on how to make the
program operate most efficiently. The
following summarizes the comments
and FHWA’s response.
General Comments
• Multiple commenters expressed
support for expansion of the Safe Harbor
indirect cost rate program beyond the 10
States that are currently piloting the
program. Multiple commenters noted
that they were a pilot State for the Safe
Harbor Indirect Cost Rate Experiment
and Test and that the program is
effectively meeting its stated goals.
• One commenter suggested that each
State DOT implement its own Safe
Harbor indirect cost rate, and that the
rate apply to agreements within the
respective State DOT only. If a Safe
PO 00000
Frm 00121
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29277
Harbor firm does work for multiple
State DOTs, the Safe Harbor indirect
cost rate for the respective State DOT
would take precedence.
The FHWA agrees with the suggestion
that each State DOT implement its own
Safe Harbor indirect cost rate and that
the rate apply to agreements within the
respective State DOT only. The Safe
Harbor indirect cost rate is applicable to
individual specific contracts, and if a
Safe Harbor firm does work on multiple
contracts in multiple States, the Safe
Harbor indirect cost rate for the
respective State DOT should take
precedent.
• Multiple commenters made
recommendations regarding the indirect
cost rate to be used in the Safe Harbor
Program. One suggested a nationwide
rate of 110 percent as was tested in the
pilot program. Another suggested that
States determine their own rate with a
floor of 110 percent.
The FHWA disagrees with the
recommendation that one nationwide
Safe Harbor indirect cost rate be
established. The FHWA believes that
State DOTs should be able to determine
their policy for accepting eligible firms
into their program, applying the Safe
Harbor indirect cost rate, and graduating
firms into a cognizant agency approved
indirect cost rate. This would be
consistent with current indirect cost rate
procedures where contracting agencies
develop their own policy pertaining to
application of cognizant agency
approved indirect cost rates. A rate that
is set too low will not achieve the
desired result of incentivizing new,
small, or disadvantaged business
enterprises into the professional
services market. A rate that is set too
high is at risk for overpaying consultant
actual costs.
• Multiple commenters suggested that
once a firm has established a cognizant
agency indirect cost, that firm should be
allowed to immediately start using the
new rate on existing contracts.
The FHWA agrees that the State DOT
should be allowed to develop criteria for
transitioning firms out of the program
based on its own risk assessment.
• Multiple commenters suggested that
the guidance should clearly indicate the
Safe Harbor indirect cost rate program is
voluntary for both the contracting
agency and consultant and temporary in
nature, intended to provide the
consultant a window to work on
Government contracts while developing
its cost accounting procedures.
The FHWA agrees that use of the Safe
Harbor indirect cost rate is voluntary for
both the contracting agency and
consultant. Existing regulations found at
23 CFR 172.11(b)(1)(iii) allow for the
E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM
21JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 120 (Friday, June 21, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29276-29277]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-13204]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
[Docket No. FD 36306]
Brookhaven Rail Partners, LLC, Related Infrastructure, LLC, BRX
Transportation Holdings, LLC, and BRX Acquisition Sub, Inc.--Control
Exemption--Pioneer Railcorp, et al.
Brookhaven Rail Partners, LLC (Brookhaven), Related Infrastructure,
LLC (Related Infrastructure), BRX Transportation Holdings, LLC (BRX
Transportation), and BRX Acquisition Sub, Inc. (BRX Acquisition)
(collectively, Applicants), filed a verified notice of exemption under
49 CFR 1180.2(d)(2) to acquire control of Pioneer Railcorp (Pioneer), a
noncarrier holding company that controls 15 Class III railroad
subsidiaries: Alabama & Florida Railway Co., Inc.; Alabama Railroad
Co., Inc.; Decatur Junction Railway Co.; Elkhart & Western Railroad
Co.; Fort Smith Railroad Co.; The Garden City Western Railway, Inc.;
Georgia Southern Railway Co.; Gettysburg & Northern Railroad Co.;
Indiana Southwestern Railway Co.; Kendallville Terminal Railway Co.;
Keokuk Junction Railway Co.; Michigan Southern Railroad Company;
Mississippi Central Railroad Co.; Pioneer Industrial Railway Co.; and
Vandalia Railroad Company (collectively, Pioneer Railroads).
According to the verified notice, Applicants intend to acquire 100%
of the equity interests of Pioneer pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of
Merger dated May 16, 2019.\1\ As a result of the proposed transaction,
BRX Acquisition will merge with and into Pioneer, with Pioneer the
surviving corporation. Pioneer will become a wholly owned subsidiary of
BRX Transportation, and, indirectly, Brookhaven and Related
Infrastructure will thereby acquire control of the Pioneer
Railroads.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ A redacted version of the agreement was filed with the
notice of exemption. An unredacted version was filed concurrently
under seal, along with Applicants' motion for protective order under
49 CFR 1104.14(b). The motion for protective order will be addressed
in a separate decision.
\2\ The verified notice states that Brookhaven and Related
Infrastructure are separate unaffiliated entities, except for their
joint ownership of BRX Transportation, which is the parent of BRX
Acquisition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The verified notice states that the parties contemplate that the
transaction will be consummated during the third quarter of 2019. The
earliest the transaction may be consummated is July 7, 2019, the
effective date of the exemption (30 days after the verified notice was
filed).
The verified notice states that: (i) Applicants do not own or
control any rail line that connect with any of the Pioneer Railroads;
(ii) the proposed transaction is not part of a series of anticipated
transactions that would connect any railroad owned or controlled by
Applicants with the Pioneer Railroads or connect any of the Pioneer
Railroads with one another; and (iii) the proposed transaction does not
involve a Class I carrier. Therefore, the transaction is exempt from
the prior approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. 11323. See 49 CFR
1180.2(d)(2).
Under 49 U.S.C. 10502(g), the Board may not use its exemption
authority to relieve a rail carrier of its statutory obligation to
protect the interests of its employees. However, 49 U.S.C. 11326(c)
does not provide for labor protection for transactions under 49 U.S.C.
11324 and 11325 that involve only Class III rail carriers. Because this
transaction involves Class III rail carriers only, the Board, under the
statute, may not impose labor protective conditions for this
transaction.
If the verified notice contains false or misleading information,
the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption
under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a
petition to revoke will not automatically stay the effectiveness of the
exemption. Petitions to stay must be filed no later than June 28, 2019
(at least seven days before the exemption becomes effective).
All pleadings, referring to Docket No. FD 36306, must be filed with
the Surface Transportation Board via e-filing or in writing addressed
to 395 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of
each pleading must be served on Applicants'
[[Page 29277]]
representative, David F. Rifkind, Stinson LLP, 1775 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW, Suite 800, Washington, DC 20006.
Board decisions and notices are available at www.stb.gov.
Decided: June 18, 2019.
By the Board, Allison C. Davis, Director, Office of Proceedings.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2019-13204 Filed 6-20-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P