Notice of Availability of the Draft Eastern Colorado Resource Management Plan and Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Royal Gorge Field Office, Colorado, 29235-29236 [2019-13087]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 120 / Friday, June 21, 2019 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLCO956000 L14400000.BJ0000 19X]
Notice of Filing of Plats of Survey,
Colorado
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of official filing.
AGENCY:
The plats of survey of the
following described lands are scheduled
to be officially filed in the Bureau of
Land Management (BLM), Colorado
State Office, Lakewood, Colorado, 30
calendar days from the date of this
publication. The surveys, which were
executed at the request of the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, the U.S. Forest
Service, the U.S. National Park Service,
and the BLM, are necessary for the
management of these lands.
DATES: Unless there are protests of this
action, the plats described in this notice
will be filed on July 22, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit written
protests to the BLM Colorado State
Office, Cadastral Survey, 2850
Youngfield Street, Lakewood, CO
80215–7093.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Randy Bloom, Chief Cadastral Surveyor
for Colorado, (303) 239–3856; rbloom@
blm.gov. Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
may call the Federal Relay Service at 1–
800–877–8339 to contact the above
individual during normal business
hours. The Service is available 24 hours
a day, seven days a week, to leave a
message or question with the above
individual. You will receive a reply
during normal business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The plat
and field notes of the dependent
resurvey and survey in Township 7
North, Range 79 West, Sixth Principal
Meridian, Colorado, were accepted on
March 25, 2019.
The plat and field notes of the
dependent resurvey and subdivision of
sections in Township 7 North, Range 80
West, Sixth Principal Meridian,
Colorado, were accepted on March 25,
2019.
The plat incorporating the field notes
of the dependent resurvey in the NW1⁄4
of section 27 in Township 5 North,
Range 72 West, Sixth Principal
Meridian, Colorado, was accepted on
April 25, 2019.
The plat, in 2 sheets, incorporating
the field notes of the dependent
resurvey and survey in Township 36
North, Range 7 West, New Mexico
Principal Meridian, Colorado, was
accepted on May 20, 2019.
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Jun 20, 2019
Jkt 247001
The plat and field notes of the
dependent resurvey and survey of a
portion of Rocky Mountain National
Park in Township 5 North, Range 73
West, Sixth Principal Meridian,
Colorado, were accepted on May 23,
2019.
The plat and field notes of the
dependent resurvey and subdivision of
section 6 in partially surveyed
Township 2 South, Range 90 West,
Sixth Principal Meridian, Colorado,
were accepted on May 29, 2019.
A person or party who wishes to
protest any of the above surveys must
file a written notice of protest within 30
calendar days from the date of this
publication at the address listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this notice. A
statement of reasons for the protest may
be filed with the notice of protest and
must be filed within 30 calendar days
after the protest is filed. If a protest
against the survey is received prior to
the date of official filing, the filing will
be stayed pending consideration of the
protest. A plat will not be officially filed
until the day after all protests have been
dismissed or otherwise resolved.
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
protest, please be aware that your entire
protest, including your personal
identifying information, may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask us in your comment to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Authority: 43 U.S.C. Chap. 3.
Randy A. Bloom,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor.
[FR Doc. 2019–13153 Filed 6–20–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–JB–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLCOF02000.L16100000.DP0000.19X]
Notice of Availability of the Draft
Eastern Colorado Resource
Management Plan and Draft
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Royal Gorge Field Office, Colorado
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended, and the Federal Land
Policy and Management Act of 1976, as
amended, the Bureau of Land
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29235
Management (BLM) has prepared a Draft
Resource Management Plan (RMP) and
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) for the Royal Gorge Field Office
and by this notice is announcing the
opening of the comment period.
DATES: To ensure that comments will be
considered, the BLM must receive
written comments on the Draft RMP/
Draft EIS within 90 days following the
date the Environmental Protection
Agency publishes its notice of
availability in the Federal Register. The
BLM will announce future meetings or
hearings and any other public
participation activities at least 15 days
in advance through public notices,
media releases, and/or mailings.
ADDRESSES: Comments related to the
Draft Eastern Colorado RMP/EIS must
be submitted by the following methods:
• Electronic comments must be
submitted via the ePlanning website at
https://go.usa.gov/xQcZT.
• Hard copy comments must be
submitted via mail or hand-delivered to
the Royal Gorge Field Office, 3028 E.
Main St., Can˜on City, CO 81212.
A copy of the Draft Eastern Colorado
RMP/EIS is available at the Royal Gorge
Field Office at the address above or on
the RMP ePlanning website at: https://
go.usa.gov/xQcZT. Click the Documents
& Reports link on the left side of the
screen to find the electronic version of
these materials.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Smeins, Project Manager, telephone:
719–269–8581; email: jsmeins@blm.gov.
Persons who use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) may call the
Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1–800–
877–8339 to contact Mr. Smeins during
normal business hours. FRS is available
24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave
a message or question. You will receive
a reply during normal business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The BLM
prepared the Draft Eastern Colorado
RMP/EIS to evaluate and revise the
management strategy for resources,
resource uses, and special designations
within the Royal Gorge Field Office,
which is the planning area for the RMP.
Existing management decisions for
public lands and resources in the Royal
Gorge Field Office are currently
described in two documents: The 1986
Northeast RMP, as amended; and the
1996 Royal Gorge RMP, as amended.
The Royal Gorge Field Office
encompasses approximately 35 million
acres of land under various
jurisdictions, including the BLM, U.S.
Forest Service, National Park Service,
State of Colorado, and local and private
lands in 37 counties across southcentral and eastern Colorado. The
E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM
21JNN1
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
29236
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 120 / Friday, June 21, 2019 / Notices
Browns Canyon National Monument is
not part of the planning area for this
RMP/EIS. The Eastern Colorado RMP
will determine management for
approximately 658,200 acres of BLMadministered surface land and
approximately 3,311,900 acres of BLMadministered mineral estate located
throughout south-central and eastern
Colorado. Planning decisions for
Federal minerals underlying National
Forests and Grasslands are contained in
separate documents prepared by the
U.S. Forest Service.
The formal public scoping process for
the Eastern Colorado RMP/EIS began on
June 1, 2015, with the publication of a
Notice of Intent in the Federal Register
(80 FR 31063). The BLM held eight
open-house scoping meetings in June
and July 2015. The BLM used public
scoping comments to help identify
planning issues to formulate alternatives
and frame the scope of analysis in the
Draft RMP/EIS. The BLM also used the
scoping process to introduce the public
to the preliminary planning criteria,
which defined the scope of the Draft
RMP/EIS. Following the formal scoping
period, the BLM made the Preliminary
Alternatives and Draft Basis for Analysis
available for public review to obtain
feedback on the alternatives and the
analysis strategy. The BLM held eight
public meetings to review the
alternatives. Based on information
received during this review, the BLM
modified the alternatives and the
analysis.
Major issues considered in the Draft
RMP/EIS are management of biological
resources, special status species,
renewable and nonrenewable energy,
minerals, human activities, and uses
including recreation and livestock
grazing, utility/energy corridors and
rights-of-way, and cultural resources.
The RMP also considers decisions
regarding wild and scenic rivers, areas
of critical environmental concern
(ACECs), and management of lands with
wilderness characteristics. The Draft
RMP/EIS evaluates in detail the No
Action Alternative (Alternative A) and
three action alternatives (Alternatives B,
C and D). The BLM identified
Alternative D as the Preferred
Alternative. This alternative, however,
does not represent the final agency
direction. After the public comment
period closes, the BLM will prepare a
Proposed RMP, which may reflect
changes or adjustments based on
information received during public
comment on the Draft RMP/EIS, new
information, or changes in BLM policies
or priorities. The Proposed RMP may
include objectives and actions described
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Jun 20, 2019
Jkt 247001
in any of the alternatives analyzed in
the Draft.
Alternative A retains the current
management goals, objectives, and
direction specified in the 1986
Northeast RMP and the 1996 Royal
Gorge RMP. Alternative B emphasizes
improving, rehabilitating, and restoring
resources; sustaining the ecological
integrity of habitats for all priority plant,
wildlife and fish species; and allowing
appropriate development scenarios for
allowable uses (such as mineral leasing,
recreation, communication sites and
livestock grazing). Alternative C
emphasizes a mix of uses that
maximizes utilization of resources while
protecting land health. The
development scenarios for allowable
uses in this alternative emphasize
maximizing resource production in an
environmentally responsible manner
while maintaining the basic protection
needed to sustain resources, including
mitigating impacts on land health.
Alternative D emphasizes balancing
resources and resource use among
competing human interests, land uses,
and the conservation of natural and
cultural resource values, while
sustaining and enhancing ecological
integrity across the landscape, including
plant, wildlife, and fish habitat. This
alternative has four geographic
landscapes with distinct management,
and incorporates a balanced level of
protection, restoration and
enhancement, as well as use of
resources and services to meet ongoing
programs and land uses with an
emphasis on local community visions
for the future of public lands.
Pursuant to 43 CFR 3461.2–1(a)(2),
this notice announces a concurrent
public comment period on the
application of unsuitability criteria to
lands with coal development potential.
Maps and other information describing
the results of the application of
unsuitability criteria are available on the
RMP ePlanning website and at the BLM
Royal Gorge Field Office (see contact
information above).
Pursuant to 43 CFR 1610.7–2(b), this
notice announces a concurrent public
comment period on the proposed
designation of ACECs. The BLM
analyzed ten potential ACECs meeting
the relevance and importance criteria
within the range of action alternatives:
• Alternative B would retain four
ACECs in their current size—Arkansas
Canyonlands (23,700 acres), Droney
Gulch (700 acres), Grape Creek (16,600
acres) and Ruby Mountain/Railroad
Gulch (1,800 acres); would expand three
existing ACECs—Cucharas Canyon
(6,100 acres), Garden Park (3,100 acres)
and Top of the World (8,700 acres); and
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
expand two existing ACECs into a single
area—South Pikes Peak (40,400 acres).
• Alternative C would retain three
current ACECs in their current size—
Cucharas Canyon (1,400 acres), Garden
Park (2,700 acres) and Top of the World
(Mosquito Pass existing) (4,200 acres);
reduce three existing ACECs—Arkansas
Canyonlands (18,700 acres), Grape
Creek (2,300 acres) and Phantom
Canyon (5,500 acres); and eliminate
three ACECs—Beaver Creek (12,100
acres), Droney Gulch (700 acres) and
Ruby Mountain/Railroad Gulch (1,800
acres).
• Alternative D would retain one
ACEC in its current size—Droney Gulch
(700 acres); propose one new ACEC—
Castle Gardens (300 acres); expand three
existing ACECs—Cucharas Canyon
(6,100), Garden Park (3,100 acres) and
Top of the World (8,700 acres); reduce
three existing ACECs—Arkansas
Canyonlands (19,600 acres), Grape
Creek (2,300 acres) and Phantom
Canyon (5,500 acres); and eliminate two
existing ACECs—Beaver Creek (12,100
acres) and portions of the Browns
Canyon ACEC outside the National
Monument (Ruby Mountain/Railroad
Gulch (1,800 acres).
The following management
prescriptions may apply to the
individual ACECs under consideration
if designated: Avoid rights-of-way, close
or restrict fluid mineral development,
close to mineral material disposal,
restrict vehicles and bicycles to
designated roads and trails, prohibit
fuelwood permits and retain in public
ownership. Please note that public
comments and information submitted,
including names, street addresses, and
email addresses of persons who submit
comments, will be available for public
review and disclosure at the above
address during regular business hours (8
a.m. to 4 p.m.), Monday through Friday,
except holidays.
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10,
43 CFR 1610.2)
Jamie E. Connell,
BLM Colorado State Director.
[FR Doc. 2019–13087 Filed 6–20–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–JB–P
E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM
21JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 120 (Friday, June 21, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29235-29236]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-13087]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLCOF02000.L16100000.DP0000.19X]
Notice of Availability of the Draft Eastern Colorado Resource
Management Plan and Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Royal
Gorge Field Office, Colorado
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended, and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of
1976, as amended, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has prepared a
Draft Resource Management Plan (RMP) and Draft Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) for the Royal Gorge Field Office and by this notice is
announcing the opening of the comment period.
DATES: To ensure that comments will be considered, the BLM must receive
written comments on the Draft RMP/Draft EIS within 90 days following
the date the Environmental Protection Agency publishes its notice of
availability in the Federal Register. The BLM will announce future
meetings or hearings and any other public participation activities at
least 15 days in advance through public notices, media releases, and/or
mailings.
ADDRESSES: Comments related to the Draft Eastern Colorado RMP/EIS must
be submitted by the following methods:
Electronic comments must be submitted via the ePlanning
website at https://go.usa.gov/xQcZT.
Hard copy comments must be submitted via mail or hand-
delivered to the Royal Gorge Field Office, 3028 E. Main St.,
Ca[ntilde]on City, CO 81212.
A copy of the Draft Eastern Colorado RMP/EIS is available at the Royal
Gorge Field Office at the address above or on the RMP ePlanning website
at: https://go.usa.gov/xQcZT. Click the Documents & Reports link on the
left side of the screen to find the electronic version of these
materials.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Smeins, Project Manager,
telephone: 719-269-8581; email: [email protected]. Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to contact Mr. Smeins during normal
business hours. FRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to
leave a message or question. You will receive a reply during normal
business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The BLM prepared the Draft Eastern Colorado
RMP/EIS to evaluate and revise the management strategy for resources,
resource uses, and special designations within the Royal Gorge Field
Office, which is the planning area for the RMP. Existing management
decisions for public lands and resources in the Royal Gorge Field
Office are currently described in two documents: The 1986 Northeast
RMP, as amended; and the 1996 Royal Gorge RMP, as amended.
The Royal Gorge Field Office encompasses approximately 35 million
acres of land under various jurisdictions, including the BLM, U.S.
Forest Service, National Park Service, State of Colorado, and local and
private lands in 37 counties across south-central and eastern Colorado.
The
[[Page 29236]]
Browns Canyon National Monument is not part of the planning area for
this RMP/EIS. The Eastern Colorado RMP will determine management for
approximately 658,200 acres of BLM-administered surface land and
approximately 3,311,900 acres of BLM-administered mineral estate
located throughout south-central and eastern Colorado. Planning
decisions for Federal minerals underlying National Forests and
Grasslands are contained in separate documents prepared by the U.S.
Forest Service.
The formal public scoping process for the Eastern Colorado RMP/EIS
began on June 1, 2015, with the publication of a Notice of Intent in
the Federal Register (80 FR 31063). The BLM held eight open-house
scoping meetings in June and July 2015. The BLM used public scoping
comments to help identify planning issues to formulate alternatives and
frame the scope of analysis in the Draft RMP/EIS. The BLM also used the
scoping process to introduce the public to the preliminary planning
criteria, which defined the scope of the Draft RMP/EIS. Following the
formal scoping period, the BLM made the Preliminary Alternatives and
Draft Basis for Analysis available for public review to obtain feedback
on the alternatives and the analysis strategy. The BLM held eight
public meetings to review the alternatives. Based on information
received during this review, the BLM modified the alternatives and the
analysis.
Major issues considered in the Draft RMP/EIS are management of
biological resources, special status species, renewable and
nonrenewable energy, minerals, human activities, and uses including
recreation and livestock grazing, utility/energy corridors and rights-
of-way, and cultural resources. The RMP also considers decisions
regarding wild and scenic rivers, areas of critical environmental
concern (ACECs), and management of lands with wilderness
characteristics. The Draft RMP/EIS evaluates in detail the No Action
Alternative (Alternative A) and three action alternatives (Alternatives
B, C and D). The BLM identified Alternative D as the Preferred
Alternative. This alternative, however, does not represent the final
agency direction. After the public comment period closes, the BLM will
prepare a Proposed RMP, which may reflect changes or adjustments based
on information received during public comment on the Draft RMP/EIS, new
information, or changes in BLM policies or priorities. The Proposed RMP
may include objectives and actions described in any of the alternatives
analyzed in the Draft.
Alternative A retains the current management goals, objectives, and
direction specified in the 1986 Northeast RMP and the 1996 Royal Gorge
RMP. Alternative B emphasizes improving, rehabilitating, and restoring
resources; sustaining the ecological integrity of habitats for all
priority plant, wildlife and fish species; and allowing appropriate
development scenarios for allowable uses (such as mineral leasing,
recreation, communication sites and livestock grazing). Alternative C
emphasizes a mix of uses that maximizes utilization of resources while
protecting land health. The development scenarios for allowable uses in
this alternative emphasize maximizing resource production in an
environmentally responsible manner while maintaining the basic
protection needed to sustain resources, including mitigating impacts on
land health. Alternative D emphasizes balancing resources and resource
use among competing human interests, land uses, and the conservation of
natural and cultural resource values, while sustaining and enhancing
ecological integrity across the landscape, including plant, wildlife,
and fish habitat. This alternative has four geographic landscapes with
distinct management, and incorporates a balanced level of protection,
restoration and enhancement, as well as use of resources and services
to meet ongoing programs and land uses with an emphasis on local
community visions for the future of public lands.
Pursuant to 43 CFR 3461.2-1(a)(2), this notice announces a
concurrent public comment period on the application of unsuitability
criteria to lands with coal development potential. Maps and other
information describing the results of the application of unsuitability
criteria are available on the RMP ePlanning website and at the BLM
Royal Gorge Field Office (see contact information above).
Pursuant to 43 CFR 1610.7-2(b), this notice announces a concurrent
public comment period on the proposed designation of ACECs. The BLM
analyzed ten potential ACECs meeting the relevance and importance
criteria within the range of action alternatives:
Alternative B would retain four ACECs in their current
size--Arkansas Canyonlands (23,700 acres), Droney Gulch (700 acres),
Grape Creek (16,600 acres) and Ruby Mountain/Railroad Gulch (1,800
acres); would expand three existing ACECs--Cucharas Canyon (6,100
acres), Garden Park (3,100 acres) and Top of the World (8,700 acres);
and expand two existing ACECs into a single area--South Pikes Peak
(40,400 acres).
Alternative C would retain three current ACECs in their
current size--Cucharas Canyon (1,400 acres), Garden Park (2,700 acres)
and Top of the World (Mosquito Pass existing) (4,200 acres); reduce
three existing ACECs--Arkansas Canyonlands (18,700 acres), Grape Creek
(2,300 acres) and Phantom Canyon (5,500 acres); and eliminate three
ACECs--Beaver Creek (12,100 acres), Droney Gulch (700 acres) and Ruby
Mountain/Railroad Gulch (1,800 acres).
Alternative D would retain one ACEC in its current size--
Droney Gulch (700 acres); propose one new ACEC--Castle Gardens (300
acres); expand three existing ACECs--Cucharas Canyon (6,100), Garden
Park (3,100 acres) and Top of the World (8,700 acres); reduce three
existing ACECs--Arkansas Canyonlands (19,600 acres), Grape Creek (2,300
acres) and Phantom Canyon (5,500 acres); and eliminate two existing
ACECs--Beaver Creek (12,100 acres) and portions of the Browns Canyon
ACEC outside the National Monument (Ruby Mountain/Railroad Gulch (1,800
acres).
The following management prescriptions may apply to the individual
ACECs under consideration if designated: Avoid rights-of-way, close or
restrict fluid mineral development, close to mineral material disposal,
restrict vehicles and bicycles to designated roads and trails, prohibit
fuelwood permits and retain in public ownership. Please note that
public comments and information submitted, including names, street
addresses, and email addresses of persons who submit comments, will be
available for public review and disclosure at the above address during
regular business hours (8 a.m. to 4 p.m.), Monday through Friday,
except holidays.
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10, 43 CFR 1610.2)
Jamie E. Connell,
BLM Colorado State Director.
[FR Doc. 2019-13087 Filed 6-20-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P