Melamine Formaldehyde Polycondensate Resin; Tolerance Exemption, 28747-28750 [2019-12994]
Download as PDF
28747
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 119 / Thursday, June 20, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under CAA section 307(b)(1),
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by August 19, 2019. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See CAA
section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: June 4, 2019.
Cheryl L Newton,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
2. In § 52.720, the table in paragraph
(e) is amended under the heading
‘‘Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure
Requirements’’ by adding an entry at the
end of the table for ‘‘2012 PM2.5 NAAQS
Infrastructure Requirements’’ to read as
follows:
■
§ 52.720
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED ILLINOIS NONREGULATORY AND QUASI-REGULATORY PROVISIONS
Applicable geographic or
nonattainment area
Name of SIP provision
*
*
State submittal
date
EPA approval date
*
*
*
Comments
*
*
Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements
*
*
2012 PM2.5 NAAQS Infrastructure Requirements.
*
Statewide .....................................
[FR Doc. 2019–13033 Filed 6–19–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2018–0845; FRL–9994–34]
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
Melamine Formaldehyde
Polycondensate Resin; Tolerance
Exemption
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This regulation establishes an
exemption from the requirement of a
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:16 Jun 19, 2019
Jkt 247001
*
9/29/2017
*
*
6/20/2019, [Insert Federal
Register citation].
tolerance for residues of formaldehyde,
reaction products with melamine; 1,3,5triazine-2,4,6-triamine, polymer with
formaldehyde; formaldehyde reaction
products with melamine and methanol;
and 1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triamine,
polymer with formaldehyde,
methylated; collectively referred to as
melamine formaldehyde
polycondensate resin; when used as an
inert ingredient in a pesticide chemical
formulation. BASF Corporation
submitted a petition to EPA under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA), requesting an exemption from
the requirement of a tolerance. This
regulation eliminates the need to
establish a maximum permissible level
for residues of formaldehyde, reaction
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
Fully approving CAA
transport requirements
of (D)(i)(I).
products with melamine; 1,3,5-triazine2,4,6-triamine, polymer with
formaldehyde; formaldehyde reaction
products with melamine and methanol;
1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triamine, polymer
with formaldehyde, methylated on food
or feed commodities.
DATES: This regulation is effective June
20, 2019. Objections and requests for
hearings must be received on or before
August 19, 2019, and must be filed in
accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2018–0845, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
E:\FR\FM\20JNR1.SGM
20JNR1
28748
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 119 / Thursday, June 20, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Goodis, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001; main telephone number:
(703) 305–7090; email address:
RDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to
other related information?
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of 40 CFR part 180
through the Government Publishing
Office’s e-CFR site at https://
www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?
&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_
02.tpl.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
C. Can I file an objection or hearing
request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. You must file your objection
or request a hearing on this regulation
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:16 Jun 19, 2019
Jkt 247001
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2018–0845 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
objections and requests for a hearing
must be in writing, and must be
received by the Hearing Clerk on or
before August 19, 2019. Addresses for
mail and hand delivery of objections
and hearing requests are provided in 40
CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing (excluding
any Confidential Business Information
(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
objection or hearing request, identified
by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
2018–0845, by one of the following
methods.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be CBI or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on commenting
or visiting the docket, along with more
information about dockets generally, is
available at https://www.epa.gov/
dockets.
II. Background and Statutory Findings
In the Federal Register of March 18,
2019 (84 FR 9735) (FRL–9989–90), EPA
issued a document pursuant to FFDCA
section 408, 21 U.S.C. 346a, announcing
the receipt of a pesticide petition (PP
IN–11260) filed by BASF Corporation,
26 Davis Drive, Research Triangle Park,
NC 27709. The petition requested that
40 CFR 180.960 be amended by
establishing an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance for residues
of formaldehyde, reaction products with
melamine (CAS Reg. No. 94645–56–4);
1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triamine, polymer
with formaldehyde (CAS Reg. No. 9003–
08–1); formaldehyde reaction products
with melamine and methanol (CAS Reg.
No. 94645–53–1); 1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6triamine, polymer with formaldehyde,
methylated (CAS Reg. No. 68002–20–0).
That document included a summary of
the petition prepared by the petitioner
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
and solicited comments on the
petitioner’s request. One comment was
received on the notice of filing. EPA’s
response to these comments is
discussed in Unit VIII.B.
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA
allows EPA to establish an exemption
from the requirement for a tolerance (the
legal limit for a pesticide chemical
residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the exemption is ‘‘safe.’’
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA
defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue, including
all anticipated dietary exposures and all
other exposures for which there is
reliable information.’’ This includes
exposure through drinking water and
use in residential settings, but does not
include occupational exposure. Section
408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to
give special consideration to exposure
of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to infants and children from
aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue . . .’’ and specifies
factors EPA is to consider in
establishing an exemption.
III. Risk Assessment and Statutory
Findings
EPA establishes exemptions from the
requirement of a tolerance only in those
cases where it can be shown that the
risks from aggregate exposure to
pesticide chemical residues under
reasonably foreseeable circumstances
will pose no appreciable risks to human
health. In order to determine the risks
from aggregate exposure to pesticide
inert ingredients, the Agency considers
the toxicity of the inert in conjunction
with possible exposure to residues of
the inert ingredient through food,
drinking water, and through other
exposures that occur as a result of
pesticide use in residential settings. If
EPA is able to determine that a finite
tolerance is not necessary to ensure that
there is a reasonable certainty that no
harm will result from aggregate
exposure to the inert ingredient, an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance may be established.
Consistent with FFDCA section
408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the
available scientific data and other
relevant information in support of this
action and considered its validity,
completeness and reliability and the
relationship of this information to
human risk. EPA has also considered
available information concerning the
E:\FR\FM\20JNR1.SGM
20JNR1
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 119 / Thursday, June 20, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
variability of the sensitivities of major
identifiable subgroups of consumers,
including infants and children. In the
case of certain chemical substances that
are defined as polymers, the Agency has
established a set of criteria to identify
categories of polymers expected to
present minimal or no risk. The
definition of a polymer is given in 40
CFR 723.250(b) and the exclusion
criteria for identifying these low-risk
polymers are described in 40 CFR
723.250(d). Melamine formaldehyde
polycondensate resin conforms to the
definition of a polymer given in 40 CFR
723.250(b) and meets the following
criteria that are used to identify low-risk
polymers.
1. The polymer is not a cationic
polymer nor is it reasonably anticipated
to become a cationic polymer in a
natural aquatic environment.
2. The polymer does contain as an
integral part of its composition at least
two of the atomic elements carbon,
hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, silicon, and
sulfur.
3. The polymer does not contain as an
integral part of its composition, except
as impurities, any element other than
those listed in 40 CFR 723.250(d)(2)(ii).
4. The polymer is neither designed
nor can it be reasonably anticipated to
substantially degrade, decompose, or
depolymerize.
5. The polymer is manufactured or
imported from monomers and/or
reactants that are already included on
the TSCA Chemical Substance
Inventory or manufactured under an
applicable TSCA section 5 exemption.
6. The polymer is not a water
absorbing polymer with a number
average molecular weight (MW) greater
than or equal to 10,000 daltons.
7. The polymer does not contain
certain perfluoroalkyl moieties
consisting of a CF3- or longer chain
length as listed in 40 CFR 723.250(d)(6).
Additionally, the polymer also meets
as required the following exemption
criteria specified in 40 CFR 723.250(e).
8. The polymer’s number average MW
of 10,000 is greater than or equal to
10,000 daltons. The polymer contains
less than 2% oligomeric material below
MW 500 and less than 5% oligomeric
material below MW 1,000.
Thus, melamine formaldehyde
polycondensate resin meet the criteria
for a polymer to be considered low risk
under 40 CFR 723.250. Based on its
conformance to the criteria in this unit,
no mammalian toxicity is anticipated
from dietary, inhalation, or dermal
exposure to melamine formaldehyde
polycondensate resin.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:16 Jun 19, 2019
Jkt 247001
IV. Aggregate Exposures
For the purposes of assessing
potential exposure under this
exemption, EPA considered that
melamine formaldehyde
polycondensate resin could be present
in all raw and processed agricultural
commodities and drinking water, and
that non-occupational non-dietary
exposure was possible. The number
average MW of melamine formaldehyde
polycondensate resin is 10,000 daltons.
Generally, a polymer of this size would
be poorly absorbed through the intact
gastrointestinal tract or through intact
human skin. Since melamine
formaldehyde polycondensate resin
conform to the criteria that identify a
low-risk polymer, there are no concerns
for risks associated with any potential
exposure scenarios that are reasonably
foreseeable. The Agency has determined
that a tolerance is not necessary to
protect the public health.
V. Cumulative Effects From Substances
With a Common Mechanism of Toxicity
Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA
requires that, when considering whether
to establish, modify, or revoke a
tolerance, the Agency consider
‘‘available information’’ concerning the
cumulative effects of a particular
pesticide’s residues and ‘‘other
substances that have a common
mechanism of toxicity.’’
EPA has not found melamine
formaldehyde polycondensate resin to
share a common mechanism of toxicity
with any other substances, and
melamine formaldehyde
polycondensate resin does not appear to
produce a toxic metabolite produced by
other substances. For the purposes of
this tolerance action, therefore, EPA has
assumed that melamine formaldehyde
polycondensate resin does not have a
common mechanism of toxicity with
other substances. For information
regarding EPA’s efforts to determine
which chemicals have a common
mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate
the cumulative effects of such
chemicals, see EPA’s website at https://
www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative.
VI. Additional Safety Factor for the
Protection of Infants and Children
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA
provides that EPA shall apply an
additional tenfold margin of safety for
infants and children in the case of
threshold effects to account for prenatal
and postnatal toxicity and the
completeness of the data base unless
EPA concludes that a different margin of
safety will be safe for infants and
children. Due to the expected low
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
28749
toxicity of melamine formaldehyde
polycondensate resin, EPA has not used
a safety factor analysis to assess the risk.
For the same reasons the additional
tenfold safety factor is unnecessary.
VII. Determination of Safety
Based on the conformance to the
criteria used to identify a low-risk
polymer, EPA concludes that there is a
reasonable certainty of no harm to the
U.S. population, including infants and
children, from aggregate exposure to
residues of melamine formaldehyde
polycondensate resin.
VIII. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
An analytical method is not required
for enforcement purposes since the
Agency is establishing an exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance
without any numerical limitation.
B. Response to Comments
One comment was received in
response to the Notice of Filing,
generally stating that exposure to
pesticides needs to be decreased. The
Agency recognizes that some
individuals believe that pesticides
should be limited or banned on
agricultural crops. However, the existing
legal framework provided by section
408 of the Federal Food, Drug and
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) states that
tolerances may be set when persons
seeking such tolerances or exemptions
have demonstrated that the pesticide
meets the safety standard imposed by
that statute. This citizen’s comment
appears to be directed at the underlying
statute and not EPA’s implementation of
it; the citizen has provided no
information that would support a
conclusion that these exemptions are
not safe.
IX. Conclusion
Accordingly, EPA finds that
exempting residues of melamine
formaldehyde polycondensate resin
from the requirement of a tolerance will
be safe.
X. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This action establishes a tolerance
under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to the
Agency. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted these types
of actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this action
has been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this action is
not subject to Executive Order 13211,
E:\FR\FM\20JNR1.SGM
20JNR1
28750
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 119 / Thursday, June 20, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive
Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997). This action does not
contain any information collections
subject to OMB approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require
any special considerations under
Executive Order 12898, entitled
‘‘Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under FFDCA section 408(d), such as
the tolerance in this final rule, do not
require the issuance of a proposed rule,
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers,
food processors, food handlers, and food
retailers, not States or tribes, nor does
this action alter the relationships or
distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress
in the preemption provisions of FFDCA
section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency
has determined that this action will not
have a substantial direct effect on States
or tribal governments, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States or tribal
governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined
that Executive Order 13132, entitled
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999) and Executive Order 13175,
entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply
to this action. In addition, this action
does not impose any enforceable duty or
contain any unfunded mandate as
described under Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C.
1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act
(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
XI. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: June 10, 2019.
Michael Goodis,
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
PART 180—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. In § 180.960, add alphabetically the
polymers ’’Formaldehyde, reaction
products with melamine, minimum
number average molecular weight (in
amu), 10000’’; ’’Formaldehyde, reaction
products with melamine and methanol,
minimum number average molecular
weight (in amu), 10000’’; ‘‘1,3,5-triazine2,4,6-triamine, polymer with
formaldehyde, minimum number
average molecular weight (in amu),
10000’’; and ‘‘1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6triamine, polymer with formaldehyde,
methylated, minimum number average
molecular weight (in amu), 10000’’ to
the table to read as follows:
■
§ 180.960 Polymers; exemptions from the
requirement of a tolerance.
*
*
*
*
*
Polymer
CAS No.
*
*
*
*
*
*
formaldehyde, reaction products with melamine, minimum number average molecular weight (in amu), 10000 .............................
*
94645–56–4
*
*
*
*
*
*
formaldehyde, reaction products with melamine and methanol, minimum number average molecular weight (in amu), 10000 ......
*
94645–53–1
*
*
*
*
*
*
1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triamine, polymer with formaldehyde, minimum number average molecular weight (in amu), 10000 ................
*
9003–08–1
*
*
*
*
*
*
1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triamine, polymer with formaldehyde, methylated, minimum number average molecular weight (in amu),
10000 ...............................................................................................................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2019–12994 Filed 6–19–19; 8:45 am]
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:16 Jun 19, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\20JNR1.SGM
20JNR1
*
68002–20–0
*
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 119 (Thursday, June 20, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 28747-28750]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-12994]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0845; FRL-9994-34]
Melamine Formaldehyde Polycondensate Resin; Tolerance Exemption
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance for residues of formaldehyde, reaction products with
melamine; 1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triamine, polymer with formaldehyde;
formaldehyde reaction products with melamine and methanol; and 1,3,5-
triazine-2,4,6-triamine, polymer with formaldehyde, methylated;
collectively referred to as melamine formaldehyde polycondensate resin;
when used as an inert ingredient in a pesticide chemical formulation.
BASF Corporation submitted a petition to EPA under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance. This regulation eliminates the need to
establish a maximum permissible level for residues of formaldehyde,
reaction products with melamine; 1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triamine, polymer
with formaldehyde; formaldehyde reaction products with melamine and
methanol; 1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triamine, polymer with formaldehyde,
methylated on food or feed commodities.
DATES: This regulation is effective June 20, 2019. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before August 19, 2019,
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0845, is available at https://www.regulations.gov
[[Page 28748]]
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory Public Docket (OPP
Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC),
West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.
NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public Reading Room is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202)
566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP Docket is (703) 305-
5805. Please review the visitor instructions and additional information
about the docket available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Goodis, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001; main telephone
number: (703) 305-7090; email address: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?
You may access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR
part 180 through the Government Publishing Office's e-CFR site at
https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl.
C. Can I file an objection or hearing request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0845 in the subject line on the first
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must
be in writing, and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before
August 19, 2019. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and
hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0845, by one of
the following methods.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. Additional
instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more
information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Background and Statutory Findings
In the Federal Register of March 18, 2019 (84 FR 9735) (FRL-9989-
90), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408, 21 U.S.C.
346a, announcing the receipt of a pesticide petition (PP IN-11260)
filed by BASF Corporation, 26 Davis Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC
27709. The petition requested that 40 CFR 180.960 be amended by
establishing an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for
residues of formaldehyde, reaction products with melamine (CAS Reg. No.
94645-56-4); 1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triamine, polymer with formaldehyde
(CAS Reg. No. 9003-08-1); formaldehyde reaction products with melamine
and methanol (CAS Reg. No. 94645-53-1); 1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triamine,
polymer with formaldehyde, methylated (CAS Reg. No. 68002-20-0). That
document included a summary of the petition prepared by the petitioner
and solicited comments on the petitioner's request. One comment was
received on the notice of filing. EPA's response to these comments is
discussed in Unit VIII.B.
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish an
exemption from the requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a
pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that
the exemption is ``safe.'' Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines
``safe'' to mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm
will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue,
including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for
which there is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through
drinking water and use in residential settings, but does not include
occupational exposure. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to
give special consideration to exposure of infants and children to the
pesticide chemical residue in establishing an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance and to ``ensure that there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm will result to infants and children from
aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue . . .'' and
specifies factors EPA is to consider in establishing an exemption.
III. Risk Assessment and Statutory Findings
EPA establishes exemptions from the requirement of a tolerance only
in those cases where it can be shown that the risks from aggregate
exposure to pesticide chemical residues under reasonably foreseeable
circumstances will pose no appreciable risks to human health. In order
to determine the risks from aggregate exposure to pesticide inert
ingredients, the Agency considers the toxicity of the inert in
conjunction with possible exposure to residues of the inert ingredient
through food, drinking water, and through other exposures that occur as
a result of pesticide use in residential settings. If EPA is able to
determine that a finite tolerance is not necessary to ensure that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate
exposure to the inert ingredient, an exemption from the requirement of
a tolerance may be established.
Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the
available scientific data and other relevant information in support of
this action and considered its validity, completeness and reliability
and the relationship of this information to human risk. EPA has also
considered available information concerning the
[[Page 28749]]
variability of the sensitivities of major identifiable subgroups of
consumers, including infants and children. In the case of certain
chemical substances that are defined as polymers, the Agency has
established a set of criteria to identify categories of polymers
expected to present minimal or no risk. The definition of a polymer is
given in 40 CFR 723.250(b) and the exclusion criteria for identifying
these low-risk polymers are described in 40 CFR 723.250(d). Melamine
formaldehyde polycondensate resin conforms to the definition of a
polymer given in 40 CFR 723.250(b) and meets the following criteria
that are used to identify low-risk polymers.
1. The polymer is not a cationic polymer nor is it reasonably
anticipated to become a cationic polymer in a natural aquatic
environment.
2. The polymer does contain as an integral part of its composition
at least two of the atomic elements carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen,
silicon, and sulfur.
3. The polymer does not contain as an integral part of its
composition, except as impurities, any element other than those listed
in 40 CFR 723.250(d)(2)(ii).
4. The polymer is neither designed nor can it be reasonably
anticipated to substantially degrade, decompose, or depolymerize.
5. The polymer is manufactured or imported from monomers and/or
reactants that are already included on the TSCA Chemical Substance
Inventory or manufactured under an applicable TSCA section 5 exemption.
6. The polymer is not a water absorbing polymer with a number
average molecular weight (MW) greater than or equal to 10,000 daltons.
7. The polymer does not contain certain perfluoroalkyl moieties
consisting of a CF3- or longer chain length as listed in 40 CFR
723.250(d)(6).
Additionally, the polymer also meets as required the following
exemption criteria specified in 40 CFR 723.250(e).
8. The polymer's number average MW of 10,000 is greater than or
equal to 10,000 daltons. The polymer contains less than 2% oligomeric
material below MW 500 and less than 5% oligomeric material below MW
1,000.
Thus, melamine formaldehyde polycondensate resin meet the criteria
for a polymer to be considered low risk under 40 CFR 723.250. Based on
its conformance to the criteria in this unit, no mammalian toxicity is
anticipated from dietary, inhalation, or dermal exposure to melamine
formaldehyde polycondensate resin.
IV. Aggregate Exposures
For the purposes of assessing potential exposure under this
exemption, EPA considered that melamine formaldehyde polycondensate
resin could be present in all raw and processed agricultural
commodities and drinking water, and that non-occupational non-dietary
exposure was possible. The number average MW of melamine formaldehyde
polycondensate resin is 10,000 daltons. Generally, a polymer of this
size would be poorly absorbed through the intact gastrointestinal tract
or through intact human skin. Since melamine formaldehyde
polycondensate resin conform to the criteria that identify a low-risk
polymer, there are no concerns for risks associated with any potential
exposure scenarios that are reasonably foreseeable. The Agency has
determined that a tolerance is not necessary to protect the public
health.
V. Cumulative Effects From Substances With a Common Mechanism of
Toxicity
Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when considering
whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the Agency
consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative effects of
a particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances that have a
common mechanism of toxicity.''
EPA has not found melamine formaldehyde polycondensate resin to
share a common mechanism of toxicity with any other substances, and
melamine formaldehyde polycondensate resin does not appear to produce a
toxic metabolite produced by other substances. For the purposes of this
tolerance action, therefore, EPA has assumed that melamine formaldehyde
polycondensate resin does not have a common mechanism of toxicity with
other substances. For information regarding EPA's efforts to determine
which chemicals have a common mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate the
cumulative effects of such chemicals, see EPA's website at https://www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative.
VI. Additional Safety Factor for the Protection of Infants and Children
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA provides that EPA shall apply an
additional tenfold margin of safety for infants and children in the
case of threshold effects to account for prenatal and postnatal
toxicity and the completeness of the data base unless EPA concludes
that a different margin of safety will be safe for infants and
children. Due to the expected low toxicity of melamine formaldehyde
polycondensate resin, EPA has not used a safety factor analysis to
assess the risk. For the same reasons the additional tenfold safety
factor is unnecessary.
VII. Determination of Safety
Based on the conformance to the criteria used to identify a low-
risk polymer, EPA concludes that there is a reasonable certainty of no
harm to the U.S. population, including infants and children, from
aggregate exposure to residues of melamine formaldehyde polycondensate
resin.
VIII. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
An analytical method is not required for enforcement purposes since
the Agency is establishing an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance without any numerical limitation.
B. Response to Comments
One comment was received in response to the Notice of Filing,
generally stating that exposure to pesticides needs to be decreased.
The Agency recognizes that some individuals believe that pesticides
should be limited or banned on agricultural crops. However, the
existing legal framework provided by section 408 of the Federal Food,
Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) states that tolerances may be set when
persons seeking such tolerances or exemptions have demonstrated that
the pesticide meets the safety standard imposed by that statute. This
citizen's comment appears to be directed at the underlying statute and
not EPA's implementation of it; the citizen has provided no information
that would support a conclusion that these exemptions are not safe.
IX. Conclusion
Accordingly, EPA finds that exempting residues of melamine
formaldehyde polycondensate resin from the requirement of a tolerance
will be safe.
X. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This action establishes a tolerance under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and
Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
[[Page 28750]]
entitled ``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or
Executive Order 13045, entitled ``Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997). This action does not contain any information collections subject
to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), nor does it require any special considerations under
Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance in this
final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or
tribal governments, on the relationship between the national government
and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this
action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded
mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
XI. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: June 10, 2019.
Michael Goodis,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. In Sec. 180.960, add alphabetically the polymers ''Formaldehyde,
reaction products with melamine, minimum number average molecular
weight (in amu), 10000''; ''Formaldehyde, reaction products with
melamine and methanol, minimum number average molecular weight (in
amu), 10000''; ``1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triamine, polymer with
formaldehyde, minimum number average molecular weight (in amu),
10000''; and ``1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triamine, polymer with
formaldehyde, methylated, minimum number average molecular weight (in
amu), 10000'' to the table to read as follows:
Sec. 180.960 Polymers; exemptions from the requirement of a
tolerance.
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Polymer CAS No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
formaldehyde, reaction products with melamine, minimum 94645-56-4
number average molecular weight (in amu), 10000........
* * * * * * *
formaldehyde, reaction products with melamine and 94645-53-1
methanol, minimum number average molecular weight (in
amu), 10000............................................
* * * * * * *
1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triamine, polymer with 9003-08-1
formaldehyde, minimum number average molecular weight
(in amu), 10000........................................
* * * * * * *
1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triamine, polymer with 68002-20-0
formaldehyde, methylated, minimum number average
molecular weight (in amu), 10000.......................
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2019-12994 Filed 6-19-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P