Safety Zones; Tug Nancy Anne, Jack-Up Barge JUB-100, and M/V Highland Eagle Operating in the Straits of Mackinac, MI, 28743-28744 [2019-12955]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 119 / Thursday, June 20, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2019–0493]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zones; Tug Nancy Anne, JackUp Barge JUB–100, and M/V Highland
Eagle Operating in the Straits of
Mackinac, MI
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing two temporary safety zones
in the Captain of the Port, Sault Sainte
Marie zone. These temporary safety
zones are necessary to protect the
public, and contractors from potential
hazards associated with geotechnical
sampling by persons conducting bore
hole drilling in the Straits of Mackinac.
Vessels will not be able to operate in
certain U.S. navigable waters in the
Straits of Mackinac within 500 yards of
the Tug Nancy Anne, Jack-Up Barge
JUB–100, and the Motor Vessel (M/V)
Highland Eagle without authorization
from the Captain of the Port.
DATES: This rule is effective without
actual notice from June 20, 2019
through 30 September 2019. For the
purposes of enforcement, actual notice
will be used from June 17, 2019,
through June 20, 2019.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2019–
0493 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on ‘‘Open Docket
Folder’’ on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this rule, call
or email LT Sean V. Murphy, Sector
Sault Sainte Marie Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard
at telephone (906) 635–3223, and email
Sean.V.Murphy@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
M/V Motor Vessel
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary rule without prior notice and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:16 Jun 19, 2019
Jkt 247001
an opportunity to comment, pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and an opportunity
to comment when the agency, for good
cause, finds that those procedures are
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest. Pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds
that good cause exists for not publishing
a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) with respect to this rule
because doing so would be
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest. The final details of the specific
dates, vessel names, and safety zone
distances concerning the safety zones
were not finalized within a sufficient
time to allow for notice and a
subsequent 30-day comment period
before the commencement of
geotechnical sampling operations.
Delaying this rule to allow for a notice
and comment period would be
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest because it would inhibit the
Coast Guard’s ability to protect the
public from the potential hazards
associated with geotechnical sampling.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. For the same reasons
discussed in the preceding paragraph,
delaying the effective date of this rule
would be impracticable and contrary to
public interest because immediate
action is needed to respond to the
potential safety hazards associated with
geotechnical sampling.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034
(previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The
Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie
(COTP) has determined that potential
hazards associated with geotechnical
sampling starting June 17, 2019, will be
a safety concern for anyone within a
500-yard radius of all U.S. navigable
waters of the Tug Nancy Anne, Jack-Up
Barge JUB–100, and the Motor Vessel
(M/V) Highland Eagle conducting bore
hole drilling. This rule is needed to
protect personnel and vessels in the
navigable waters within the safety zones
while geotechnical sampling is
conducted.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes two safety zones
from June 17, 2019 through September
30, 2019. The safety zones will cover all
navigable waters within 500 yards of the
Tug Nancy Anne, Jack-Up Barge JUB–
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
28743
100, and M/V Highland Eagle. The
duration of the zone is intended to
protect personnel and vessels in these
navigable waters while vessels conduct
geotechnical sampling. No vessel or
person will be permitted to enter the
safety zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP or a
designated representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders related to rulemaking.
Below, we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive Orders, and we also discuss
First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This rule has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has
not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size and location of the
safety zones. Vessel traffic will be able
to safely transit around this safety zone
which would impact a small designated
area of the Straits of Mackinac.
Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue
a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via
VHF–FM marine channel 16 about the
zone, and the rule would allow vessels
to seek permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A above, this
E:\FR\FM\20JNR1.SGM
20JNR1
28744
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 119 / Thursday, June 20, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
of the actions of Federal employees who
enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small businesses. If
you wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:16 Jun 19, 2019
Jkt 247001
contact the person listed in the FOR
section.
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01 and Coast Guard
Environmental Planning Policy,
COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which
guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have determined that this action is one
of a category of actions that does not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves two
safety zones that will prohibit entry
within 500 yards of U.S. navigable
waters of vessels, barges, and machinery
being used by personnel to conduct
geotechnical sampling. It is categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph L60[a] in Table 3–1 of U.S.
Coast Guard Environmental Planning
Implementing Procedures 5090.1. A
Record of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and record keeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T09–0493 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T09–0493 Safety Zones; Tug Nancy
Anne, Jack-Up Barge JUB–100, and M/V
Highland Eagle operating in the Straits of
Mackinac, MI.
(a) Location. The following areas are
safety zones: All navigable waters
within 500 yards of Tug Nancy Anne
and Jack-Up Barge JUB–100 while
conducting geotechnical sampling in the
Straits of Mackinac, and all navigable
waters within 500 yards of Motor Vessel
(M/V) Highland Eagle while conducting
geotechnical sampling in the Straits of
Mackinac.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, including a Coast Guard
coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer
designated by or assisting the Captain of
the Port Sault Sainte Marie (COTP) in
the enforcement of the safety zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23, entry
into, transiting, or anchoring within the
safety zone described in paragraph (a) of
this section is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port,
Sault Sainte Marie or his on-scene
representative.
(2) Before a vessel operator may enter
or operate within the safety zones, they
must obtain permission from the
Captain of the Port, Sault Sainte Marie,
or his on-scene representative via VHF
Channel 16 or telephone at (906) 635–
3233. Vessel operators given permission
to enter or operate in the safety zone
must comply with all orders given to
them by the Captain of the Port, Sault
Sainte Marie or his on-scene
representative.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from June 17, 2019
through September 30, 2019.
Dated: June 13, 2019.
P.S. Nelson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sault Sainte Marie.
[FR Doc. 2019–12955 Filed 6–19–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
E:\FR\FM\20JNR1.SGM
20JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 119 (Thursday, June 20, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 28743-28744]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-12955]
[[Page 28743]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2019-0493]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zones; Tug Nancy Anne, Jack-Up Barge JUB-100, and M/V
Highland Eagle Operating in the Straits of Mackinac, MI
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing two temporary safety zones in
the Captain of the Port, Sault Sainte Marie zone. These temporary
safety zones are necessary to protect the public, and contractors from
potential hazards associated with geotechnical sampling by persons
conducting bore hole drilling in the Straits of Mackinac. Vessels will
not be able to operate in certain U.S. navigable waters in the Straits
of Mackinac within 500 yards of the Tug Nancy Anne, Jack-Up Barge JUB-
100, and the Motor Vessel (M/V) Highland Eagle without authorization
from the Captain of the Port.
DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from June 20, 2019
through 30 September 2019. For the purposes of enforcement, actual
notice will be used from June 17, 2019, through June 20, 2019.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2019-0493 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Open
Docket Folder'' on the line associated with this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this rule,
call or email LT Sean V. Murphy, Sector Sault Sainte Marie Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard at telephone (906) 635-3223, and
email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
M/V Motor Vessel
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and an opportunity to comment, pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
an opportunity to comment when the agency, for good cause, finds that
those procedures are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the
public interest. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds
that good cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this rule because doing so would be
impracticable and contrary to the public interest. The final details of
the specific dates, vessel names, and safety zone distances concerning
the safety zones were not finalized within a sufficient time to allow
for notice and a subsequent 30-day comment period before the
commencement of geotechnical sampling operations. Delaying this rule to
allow for a notice and comment period would be impracticable and
contrary to the public interest because it would inhibit the Coast
Guard's ability to protect the public from the potential hazards
associated with geotechnical sampling.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. For the same reasons discussed in
the preceding paragraph, delaying the effective date of this rule would
be impracticable and contrary to public interest because immediate
action is needed to respond to the potential safety hazards associated
with geotechnical sampling.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The Captain of the Port Sault Sainte
Marie (COTP) has determined that potential hazards associated with
geotechnical sampling starting June 17, 2019, will be a safety concern
for anyone within a 500-yard radius of all U.S. navigable waters of the
Tug Nancy Anne, Jack-Up Barge JUB-100, and the Motor Vessel (M/V)
Highland Eagle conducting bore hole drilling. This rule is needed to
protect personnel and vessels in the navigable waters within the safety
zones while geotechnical sampling is conducted.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes two safety zones from June 17, 2019 through
September 30, 2019. The safety zones will cover all navigable waters
within 500 yards of the Tug Nancy Anne, Jack-Up Barge JUB-100, and M/V
Highland Eagle. The duration of the zone is intended to protect
personnel and vessels in these navigable waters while vessels conduct
geotechnical sampling. No vessel or person will be permitted to enter
the safety zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a
designated representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below, we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive Orders, and
we also discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination is based on the size and
location of the safety zones. Vessel traffic will be able to safely
transit around this safety zone which would impact a small designated
area of the Straits of Mackinac. Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue
a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the
zone, and the rule would allow vessels to seek permission to enter the
zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this
[[Page 28744]]
rule will not have a significant economic impact on any vessel owner or
operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments of the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small businesses. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01 and Coast Guard Environmental Planning Policy,
COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-
4370f), and have determined that this action is one of a category of
actions that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This rule involves two safety zones
that will prohibit entry within 500 yards of U.S. navigable waters of
vessels, barges, and machinery being used by personnel to conduct
geotechnical sampling. It is categorically excluded from further review
under paragraph L60[a] in Table 3-1 of U.S. Coast Guard Environmental
Planning Implementing Procedures 5090.1. A Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record
keeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T09-0493 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T09-0493 Safety Zones; Tug Nancy Anne, Jack-Up Barge JUB-
100, and M/V Highland Eagle operating in the Straits of Mackinac, MI.
(a) Location. The following areas are safety zones: All navigable
waters within 500 yards of Tug Nancy Anne and Jack-Up Barge JUB-100
while conducting geotechnical sampling in the Straits of Mackinac, and
all navigable waters within 500 yards of Motor Vessel (M/V) Highland
Eagle while conducting geotechnical sampling in the Straits of
Mackinac.
(b) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain,
petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie (COTP) in the enforcement of the
safety zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec. 165.23, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety
zone described in paragraph (a) of this section is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port, Sault Sainte Marie or his on-
scene representative.
(2) Before a vessel operator may enter or operate within the safety
zones, they must obtain permission from the Captain of the Port, Sault
Sainte Marie, or his on-scene representative via VHF Channel 16 or
telephone at (906) 635-3233. Vessel operators given permission to enter
or operate in the safety zone must comply with all orders given to them
by the Captain of the Port, Sault Sainte Marie or his on-scene
representative.
(d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from June 17,
2019 through September 30, 2019.
Dated: June 13, 2019.
P.S. Nelson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie.
[FR Doc. 2019-12955 Filed 6-19-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P