Section 199A Rules for Cooperatives and Their Patrons, 28668-28706 [2019-11501]
Download as PDF
28668
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG–118425–18]
RIN 1545–B090
Section 199A Rules for Cooperatives
and Their Patrons
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking;
withdrawal of notice of proposed
rulemaking.
AGENCY:
These proposed regulations
provide guidance to cooperatives to
which sections 1381 through 1388 of the
Internal Revenue Code (Code) apply
(Cooperatives) and their patrons
regarding the deduction for qualified
business income (QBI) under section
199A(a) of the Code as well as guidance
to specified agricultural or horticultural
cooperatives (Specified Cooperatives)
and their patrons regarding the
deduction for domestic production
activities under section 199A(g) of the
Code. These proposed regulations also
provide guidance on section 199A(b)(7),
the rule requiring patrons of Specified
Cooperatives to reduce their deduction
for QBI under section 199A(a). In
addition, these proposed regulations
include a single definition of patronage
and nonpatronage under section 1388 of
the Code. Finally, these proposed
regulations propose to remove the final
regulations, and withdraw the proposed
regulations that have not been finalized,
under former section 199. These
proposed regulations affect Cooperatives
as well as patrons that are individuals,
partnerships, S corporations, trusts, and
estates engaged in domestic trades or
businesses.
DATES: Written (including electronic)
comments and requests for a public
hearing must be received by August 19,
2019. As of June 19, 2019, the proposed
rule published on August 27, 2015 (80
FR 51978), is withdrawn.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic
submissions via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov (indicate IRS and
REG–118425–18) by following the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted to the
Federal eRulemaking Portal, comments
cannot be edited or withdrawn. The
Department of the Treasury (Treasury
Department) and the IRS will publish
for public availability any comment
received to its public docket, whether
submitted electronically or in hard
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 Jun 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
copy. Send hard copy submissions to:
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–118425–18), Room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, P.O.
Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044. Submissions
may be hand-delivered Monday through
Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and
4 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–
1118425–18), Courier’s Desk, Internal
Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20224.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the proposed regulations,
James Holmes at (202) 317–4137;
concerning submissions of comments
and requests for hearing, Regina L.
Johnson at (202) 317–6901 (not toll-free
numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document contains proposed
amendments to the Income Tax
Regulations (26 CFR part 1) under
sections 199A and 1388 of the Code.
Section 199A was enacted on
December 22, 2017, by section 11011 of
‘‘An Act to provide for reconciliation
pursuant to titles II and V of the
concurrent resolution on the budget for
fiscal year 2018,’’ Public Law 115–97,
131 Stat. 2054, 2063 (TCJA). Parts of
section 199A were amended on March
23, 2018, as if included in TCJA, by
section 101 of Division T of the
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018,
Public Law 115–141, 132 Stat. 348, 1151
(2018 Act). Section 199A applies to
taxable years beginning after 2017 and
before 2026. Unless otherwise indicated,
all references to section 199A are to
section 199A as amended by the 2018
Act.
In addition, section 13305 of the TCJA
repealed section 199 (former section
199), which provided a deduction for
income attributable to domestic
production activities (section 199
deduction). Public Law 115–97, 131
Stat. 2054, 2126. The repeal of former
section 199 is effective for all taxable
years beginning after 2017. This notice
of proposed rulemaking therefore
proposes to remove the final regulations
under former section 199, and
withdraws proposed regulations under
former section 199.
Section 199A(a) provides taxpayers a
deduction of up to 20 percent of QBI
from a domestic business operated as a
sole proprietorship or through a
partnership, S corporation, trust, or
estate, and up to 20 percent of qualified
real estate investment trust (REIT)
dividends and publicly traded
partnership (PTP) income (section
199A(a) deduction). Section 199A(b)(7)
requires patrons of Specified
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Cooperatives to reduce their section
199A(a) deduction if those patrons
receive certain payments from such
cooperatives. Section 199A(g) provides
a deduction for Specified Cooperatives
and their patrons (section 199A(g)
deduction) that is based on the former
section 199 deduction. Before the
amendments of the 2018 Act, section
199A(g) provided a modified version of
the section 199A(a) deduction for
Specified Cooperatives.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
published proposed regulations (REG–
107892–18) providing guidance on the
section 199A(a) deduction in the
Federal Register (83 FR 40884) on
August 16, 2018 (August 2018 NPRM).
The final regulations were published in
the Federal Register (84 FR 2952) on
February 8, 2019 (TD 9847).
TD 9847 did not address patrons’
treatment of payments received from
Cooperatives for purposes of section
199A(a) or the section 199A(g)
deduction for Specified Cooperatives,
though it did restate the reduction
required under section 199A(b)(7). See
§ 1.199A–1(e)(7). The August 2018
NPRM preamble stated that the Treasury
Department and the IRS would continue
to study the area and intended to issue
separate proposed regulations
describing rules for applying section
199A to Specified Cooperatives and
their patrons. This notice of proposed
rulemaking sets forth those proposed
regulations and provides additional
guidance to patrons calculating their
199A(a) deduction.
Explanation of Provisions
The purpose of these proposed
regulations is to provide guidance
regarding the application of sections
199A(a), 199A(b)(7), and 199A(g) to
Cooperatives and their patrons as well
as to Specified Cooperatives and their
patrons. Whereas section 199A(a) is
generally available to patrons of all
Cooperatives, sections 199A(b)(7) and
199A(g) apply only to Specified
Cooperatives and their patrons.
These proposed regulations are
organized into six sections: Proposed
§§ 1.199A–7 through 1.199A–12.
Proposed § 1.199A–7 describes rules for
patrons of Cooperatives to calculate
their section 199A(a) deduction and
rules for patrons of Specified
Cooperatives to calculate the reduction
to their section 199A(a) deduction as
required by section 199A(b)(7). Unless
otherwise provided in these proposed
regulations, all of the rules set forth in
TD 9847 relating to the section 199A(a)
deduction apply to Cooperatives and
their patrons. Specified Cooperatives are
a subset of Cooperatives; therefore, the
E:\FR\FM\19JNP2.SGM
19JNP2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
requirements of proposed § 1.199A–7
also apply to Specified Cooperatives.
Proposed § 1.199A–8 sets out the
criteria that Specified Cooperatives
must satisfy to qualify for the section
199A(g) deduction, and sets forth four
steps necessary to calculate this
deduction. These proposed regulations
provide that the section 199A(g)
deduction available to Specified
Cooperatives and their patrons is
generally computed only with respect to
patronage gross receipts and related
deductions. Exempt Specified
Cooperatives (those that qualify under
section 521) may compute their section
199A(g) deductions with respect to both
patronage and nonpatronage gross
receipts and related deductions.
Proposed §§ 1.199A–9 through
1.199A–11 provide additional guidance,
based on the regulations under former
section 199, regarding the four steps set
forth in proposed § 1.199A–8. Proposed
§ 1.199A–9 provides additional rules for
determining a Specified Cooperative’s
domestic production gross receipts
(DPGR). Proposed § 1.199A–10 provides
additional rules for calculating costs
(including cost of goods sold (COGS)
and other expenses, losses, and
deductions) allocable to a Specified
Cooperative’s DPGR. Proposed
§ 1.199A–11 provides additional rules
for determining the W–2 wage
limitation in section 199A(g)(1)(B).
Proposed § 1.199A–12 details rules for
applying section 199A(g) in the context
of an expanded affiliated group (EAG)
and other special rules contained in
section 199A(g)(5) that are not otherwise
addressed in these proposed
regulations.
These proposed regulations also
include, under section 1388, a single
definition of patronage and
nonpatronage in proposed § 1.1388–1(f),
which is intended to reflect the current
case law under section 1388. This
Explanation of Provisions describes
each section of the proposed regulations
in more detail.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
I. Proposed § 1.199A–7, Rules for
Patrons of Cooperatives
A. In General
As noted in the Background, section
199A(a) may allow a taxpayer a
deduction of up to 20 percent of QBI
from a domestic business operated as a
sole proprietorship or through a
partnership, S corporation, trust, or
estate, and up to 20 percent of qualified
REIT dividends and PTP income. A
section 199A(a) deduction is not
available for wage income or for
business income earned through a C
corporation.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 Jun 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
C corporations are not eligible for the
section 199A(a) deduction. Cooperatives
are C corporations for Federal income
tax purposes and, therefore, are not
eligible for the section 199A(a)
deduction. Similarly, patrons that are C
corporations are also not eligible for the
section 199A(a) deduction. However,
patrons that are individuals are eligible
for the section 199A(a) deduction.
Section 1.199A–1(a)(2) provides that, for
purposes of applying the rules of
§§ 1.199A–1 through 1.199A–6, a
reference to an individual includes a
reference to a trust (other than a grantor
trust) or an estate to the extent that the
section 199A(a) deduction is
determined by the trust or estate under
the rules of § 1.199A–6. These proposed
regulations apply this same usage of the
term individual.
The benefits of section 199A(a) are
limited to individuals with income from
a trade or business as defined in section
199A(d)(1) and § 1.199A–1(b)(14) (trade
or business) with QBI. To the extent a
patron operating a trade or business has
income directly from that business (as
opposed to receiving a patronage
dividend from a Cooperative), the
patron must follow the rules of
§§ 1.199A–1 through 1.199A–6 to
calculate the section 199A deduction.
However, to the extent a patron receives
patronage dividends or similar
payments from a Cooperative, the
patron must follow the additional
special rules and clarification in
proposed § 1.199A–7 to calculate the
section 199A deduction.
For these purposes, patronage
dividends or similar payments include
money, property, qualified written
notices of allocations, and qualified perunit retain certificates for which an
exempt or nonexempt Cooperative
receives a deduction under section
1382(b), and nonpatronage distributions
paid in money, property, qualified
written notices of allocation as well as
money or property paid in redemption
of a nonqualified written notice of
allocation for which an exempt
Cooperative receives a deduction under
section 1382(c)(2) (hereinafter
collectively referred to as patronage
dividends or similar payments).
Section 1.199A–7(c) and (d) of these
proposed regulations provide that these
patronage dividends or similar
payments may be included in the
patron’s QBI: (i) To the extent that these
payments are related to the patron’s
trade or business, (ii) are qualified items
of income, gain, deduction, or loss at the
Cooperative’s trade or business level,
(iii) are not income from a specified
service trade or business (SSTB), as
defined in section 199A(d)(2), at the
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
28669
Cooperative’s trade or business level
(except as permitted by the threshold
rules, see § 1.199A–5(a)(2)), and (iv)
provided the patron receives certain
information from the Cooperative about
these payments (see proposed § 1.199A–
7(c)(3) and (d)(3)). Proposed § 1.199A–
7(e) provides that in situations in which
a patron conducts a trade or business
that receives patronage dividends or
similar payments from a Cooperative,
the W–2 wages and unadjusted basis
immediately after acquisition (UBIA) of
qualified property considered are those
of the patron’s trade or business and not
of the Cooperative that directly
conducts the trade or business from
which the payments arise. All of these
proposed rules are discussed further in
this section.
B. QBI of Patrons
Although Cooperatives are C
corporations for Federal income tax
purposes, section 1382(b) and (c) allow
Cooperatives to determine taxable
income after deducting distributions of
patronage dividends or similar
payments to patrons. The effect of these
deductions is to remove the
distributions from income taxed at the
Cooperative level leaving it subject to
income tax only at the patron level.
Exempt and nonexempt Cooperatives
are both permitted to deduct patronage
distributions if they satisfy the
requirements described in section
1382(b). Only exempt Cooperatives are
permitted to also deduct nonpatronage
distributions if the requirements under
section 1382(c) are met. Cooperatives
are subject to Federal income tax on
income for which no deduction may be
taken under section 1382(b) or (c), in the
same manner as any C corporation.
Section 1.199A–3(b) contains the
general rules regarding QBI. QBI is the
net amount of qualified items of income,
gain, deduction, and loss with respect to
any trade or business as determined
under those rules. While income from
the ownership of a C corporation is
generally not QBI, section 199A
provides a special rule for patrons
receiving patronage dividends from a
Cooperative.
Section 199A(c)(3)(B)(ii) provides that
any amount described in section
1385(a)(1), which concerns patronage
dividends, is not treated as an exclusion
to a patron’s QBI. The Joint Committee
on Taxation Report (JCX–6–18, released
March 22, 2018) (Joint Committee
Report) states that QBI includes any
patronage dividend (as defined in
section 1388(a)), per-unit retain
allocation (as defined in section
1388(f)), qualified written notice of
allocation (as defined in section
E:\FR\FM\19JNP2.SGM
19JNP2
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
28670
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
1388(c)), or any other similar amount
received from a Cooperative, provided
such amount is otherwise a qualified
item of income, gain, deduction, or loss
(that is, such amount is (i) effectively
connected with the conduct of a trade
or business within the United States,
and (ii) included or allowed in
determining taxable income for the
taxable year). Joint Committee Report,
pages 24–25. As a result, the rules of
proposed § 1.199A–7(c) provide that
patronage dividends or similar
payments (as previously discussed) are
included in calculating QBI for
purposes of the patrons’ section 199A(a)
deduction provided the amounts are
otherwise qualified items. To be
otherwise qualified, these amounts must
be qualified items of income, gain,
deduction, and loss under section
199A(c)(3).
Unlike nonexempt Cooperatives,
exempt Cooperatives are permitted to
deduct nonpatronage distributions
under section 1382(c). As a result, this
income is subject to taxation only at the
patron level. The rules of proposed
§ 1.199A–7(c) provide that a patron’s
QBI can include payments to patrons for
which the exempt Cooperative receives
a deduction under section 1382(c)(2) in
addition to payments for which the
exempt Cooperative receives a
deduction under section 1382(b). That
is, amounts paid under section
1382(c)(2) are treated by a patron as
equivalent to patronage dividends under
section 1382(b) for purposes of QBI.
Amounts paid under section 1382(c)(1)
(dividends on capital stock), however,
are dividends from ownership of C
corporations, which are not included in
QBI.
TD 9847 generally provides that
income is tested at the trade or business
level where it is directly generated.
Accordingly, these proposed regulations
provide that patronage dividends or
similar payments are considered to be
generated from the trade or business the
Cooperative conducts on behalf of or
with the patron, and are tested by the
Cooperative at its trade or business
level.
A patron must determine QBI for each
trade or business it directly conducts.
However, in situations where the patron
receives a distribution from a
Cooperative that is a patronage dividend
or similar payment, the Cooperative
determines whether that distribution
contains qualified items of income, as
defined under section § 1.199A–3(b),
and reports that information to the
patron. The patron needs this
information to determine its section
199A(a) deduction, and the Cooperative
directly conducting the trade or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 Jun 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
business from which the distribution is
derived is in the best position to know
whether the patronage dividend or
similar payment contains qualified
items. The Cooperative must report this
information regardless of whether the
patron’s taxable income does not exceed
the threshold amount ($315,000 in the
case of joint returns and $157,500 for all
other taxpayers for any taxable year
beginning before 2019). For taxable
years beginning after 2018, see Rev.
Proc. 2018–57, 2018–49 IRB 827, or its
successor (relating to inflation
adjustments).
A patron must use that information
when determining the patron’s section
199A(a) deduction. For example, if the
Cooperative determines an entire
distribution does not contain any
qualified item of income, gain,
deduction, and loss because it is not
effectively connected with the conduct
of the Cooperative’s trade or business
within the United States, the
Cooperative does not include such
amount when reporting qualified items
to the patron, and the patron does not
include the distribution in the patron’s
QBI. In addition, to the extent the
distribution includes interest income
that is not properly allocable to the
Cooperative’s trade or business on
behalf of, or with, its patrons, the
distribution is not a qualified item of
income, gain, deduction, and loss. As a
result, the Cooperative does not include
such amount when reporting qualified
items to the patron, and the patron does
not include the income in the patron’s
QBI.
Proposed § 1.199A–7(c)(3) provides
that the Cooperative must report the
amount of qualified items of income,
gain, deduction, or loss in the
distributions made to the patron on an
attachment to or on the Form 1099–
PATR, Taxable Distributions Received
From Cooperatives (Form 1099–PATR)
(or any successor form), issued by the
Cooperative to the patron, unless
otherwise provided by the instructions
to the Form. The Cooperative does not
include any items from an SSTB in
reporting the amount of qualified items
of income, gain, deduction, and loss and
must instead follow the rules in
proposed § 1.199A–7(d) for income from
an SSTB. If a patron does not receive
such information from the Cooperative
on or before the due date of the Form
1099–PATR, the amount of distributions
from the Cooperative that may be
included in the patron’s QBI is
presumed to be zero. This presumption
does not apply to amounts of qualified
items of income, gain, deduction and
loss to the extent that they were not
reported on the Form 1099–PATR or
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
attachment thereto before the
publication of these proposed
regulations in the Federal Register.
These rules apply to both exempt and
nonexempt Cooperatives as well as
patronage and nonpatronage
distributions. The Treasury Department
and the IRS request comments on these
reporting requirements and whether any
additional information from
Cooperatives that make distributions to
their patrons is needed for their patrons
to determine their section 199A(a)
deduction.
C. Specified Service Trade or Business
Section 199A(c)(1) provides that only
items attributable to a qualified trade or
business are taken into account in
determining the section 199A(a)
deduction for QBI. Under section
199A(d)(1) a ‘‘qualified trade or
business’’ excludes (A) an SSTB or (B)
the trade or business of performing
services as an employee. TD 9847
provides that, unless an exception
applies, if a trade or business is an
SSTB, none of its items are to be taken
into account for purposes of
determining a taxpayer’s QBI.
Under section 199A(d)(3), individuals
with taxable income not exceeding the
threshold amount ($315,000 in the case
of joint returns and $157,500 for all
other taxpayers for any taxable year
beginning before 2019), are not subject
to a restriction with respect to SSTBs.
For taxable years beginning after 2018,
see Rev. Proc. 2018–57, 2018–49 IRB
827, or its successor. Therefore, if an
individual has taxable income not
exceeding the threshold amount, the
individual is eligible for the section
199A(a) deduction with respect to
qualified items of income, gain,
deduction, and loss from the SSTB
notwithstanding that the trade or
business is an SSTB. The inapplicability
of the SSTB rules, W–2 wage limitation,
and UBIA of qualified property
limitation in computing the section
199A(a) deduction is subject to a phasein for individuals with taxable income
within the phase-in range. See the rules
in § 1.199A–5 for the rules relating to
SSTBs.
The rules in proposed § 1.199A–7(d)
clarify that a patron (whether the patron
is a relevant passthrough entity (RPE) or
an individual) must determine whether
the trades or businesses it directly
conducts are SSTBs. These proposed
rules also provide that in the case of a
patron’s trade or business that receives
patronage dividends or similar
payments distributed from a
Cooperative, the Cooperative must
determine whether the distributions
from the Cooperative include items of
E:\FR\FM\19JNP2.SGM
19JNP2
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
income, gain, deduction, and loss from
an SSTB directly conducted by the
Cooperative, and whether such items
are qualified items with respect to such
SSTB. The Cooperative must report to
the patron the amount of qualified items
of income, gain, deduction, and loss
from an SSTB directly conducted by the
Cooperative. The patron then
determines if the distribution may be
included in the patron’s QBI depending
on the patron’s taxable income and the
statutory phase-in and threshold
amounts. Because the Cooperative may
not know whether the patron’s taxable
income exceeds the threshold amount,
the Cooperative must report this
information to all patrons. Without this
information, a patron with taxable
income within the phase-in range or
below the threshold amount would not
have the information necessary to take
into account the amount of qualified
items of income, gain, deduction, and
loss from an SSTB in determining the
patron’s section 199A(a) deduction for
QBI. The rules in § 1.199A–5 are
applied by the Cooperative to determine
if the trade or business is an SSTB. For
example, the Cooperative will apply the
gross receipts de minimis rules in
§ 1.199A–5(c)(1) to determine if the
trade or business is an SSTB.
Proposed § 1.199A–7(d)(3) provides
that the Cooperative must report to the
patron the amount of SSTB income,
gain, deduction, and loss in
distributions that is qualified with
respect to any SSTB directly conducted
by the Cooperative on an attachment to
or on the Form 1099–PATR (or any
successor form) issued by the
Cooperative to the patron, unless
otherwise provided by the instructions
to the Form. If the Cooperative does not
report the amount on or before the due
date of the Form 1099–PATR, then only
the amount that a Cooperative reports as
qualified items of income, gain,
deduction, and loss under § 1.199A–
7(c)(3) may be included in the patron’s
QBI, and the remaining amount of
distributions from the Cooperative that
may be included in the patron’s QBI is
presumed to be zero. This presumption
does not apply to amounts of qualified
items of income, gain, deduction and
loss to the extent that they were not
reported on the Form 1099–PATR or
attachment thereto before the
publication of these proposed
regulations in the Federal Register.
These rules apply to both exempt and
nonexempt Cooperatives as well as to
patronage and nonpatronage
distributions. The Treasury Department
and the IRS request comments on these
reporting requirements and whether any
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 Jun 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
additional information from
Cooperatives that make distributions to
their patrons is needed for their patrons
to determine their section 199A(a)
deduction.
D. Determination of W–2 Wages and
UBIA of Qualified Property
Section § 1.199A–1(d) addresses the
calculation of the section 199A(a)
deduction for individuals with taxable
income exceeding the threshold amount
and provides guidance on the
application of these limitations. All of
the rules relating to the REIT dividends
and qualified PTP income component of
the section 199A(a) deduction
applicable to individuals with taxable
income not exceeding the threshold
amount also apply to individuals with
taxable income exceeding the threshold
amount. The QBI component of the
section 199A(a) deduction, however, is
subject to limitations for individuals
with taxable income exceeding the
threshold amount. These include the
limitations based on the W–2 wages of
the trade or business or a combination
of the W–2 wages and the UBIA of
qualified property.
Under § 1.199A–2, W–2 wages and
UBIA of qualified property are
determined by the individual or RPE
that directly conducts the trade or
business. Section 199A(f)(1)(A)(2)(iii)
requires that S corporations and
partnerships allocate W–2 wages and
UBIA of qualified property to their
owners in accordance with each owner’s
applicable share, and § 1.199A–6
contains additional information
regarding these reporting requirements.
Section 199A does not provide a similar
rule for Cooperatives.
Section 199A(c)(3)(B)(ii) provides that
patronage dividends or similar
payments may be treated as qualified
items of income. Only the Cooperative
knows the origin and character of the
patronage dividends or similar
payments. As a result, the Cooperative
must determine if these payments meet
the statutory requirements in section
199A(c)(3), and must provide
information to the patron for it to
compute its section 199A(a) deduction.
In contrast, section 199A contains
special rules for W–2 wages and UBIA
of qualified property. To provide that
Cooperatives allocate their W–2 wages
and UBIA of qualified property to their
patrons would be to treat the
Cooperatives as RPEs when they are C
corporations. Therefore, the rules in
proposed § 1.199A–7(e) provide that
patrons directly conducting trades or
businesses that receive patronage
dividends or similar payments from a
Cooperative calculate the W–2 wage and
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
28671
UBIA of qualified property limitations
at the patron level based on the patrons’
trades or businesses, without any regard
to the Cooperative’s W–2 wages or UBIA
of qualified property.
In summary, a Cooperative must
report to patrons: (i) Whether the
patronage dividends or similar
payments include qualified items of
income, gain, deduction, and loss from
a non-SSTB and (ii) whether the
distributions from the Cooperative
include qualified items of income, gain,
deduction, and loss from an SSTB
directly conducted by the Cooperative,
but a Cooperative does not report any
W–2 wages or UBIA of qualified
property to patrons. The Treasury
Department and the IRS request
comments on these proposed rules
regarding W–2 wages and UBIA of
qualified property and whether it would
be appropriate for Cooperatives to be
required to report such amounts to
patrons to determine their section
199A(a) deduction.
E. Special Rules for Patrons of Specified
Cooperatives
Section 199A provides special rules
for patrons of Specified Cooperatives.
Because patrons of Specified
Cooperatives may be eligible to take
both a section 199A(a) and section
199A(g) deduction, section 199A(b)(7)
provides that if a trade or business of a
patron of a Specified Cooperative
receives qualified payments (as defined
in section 199A(g)(2)(e) and proposed
§ 1.199A–8(d)(2)(ii)) from such
Specified Cooperative that are included
in the patron’s QBI, the patron must
reduce its section 199A(a) deduction by
the lesser of (i) 9 percent of so much of
the QBI with respect to such trade or
business that is properly allocable to
qualified payments from the Specified
Cooperative, or (ii) 50 percent of so
much of the patrons’ W–2 wages
(determined under section 199A(b)(4))
with respect to such trade or business as
are so allocable. This reduction is
required by section 199A(b)(7) whether
the Specified Cooperative passes
through all, some, or none of the
Specified Cooperative’s section 199A(g)
deduction to the patron in that taxable
year.
Section 1.199A–3(b)(5) provides an
allocation method for items of QBI
attributable to more than one trade or
business. That allocation method also
applies to patrons with multiple trades
or businesses. The rules in proposed
§ 1.199A–7(f)(2) provide an additional
similar allocation method in situations
where a patron receives qualified
payments and income that is not a
qualified payment in a trade or
E:\FR\FM\19JNP2.SGM
19JNP2
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
28672
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
business. The patron must allocate those
items using a reasonable method based
on all the facts and circumstances.
Different reasonable methods may be
used for different items of income, gain,
deduction, and loss. The chosen
reasonable method for each item must
be consistently applied from one taxable
year to another and must clearly reflect
the income and expenses of each trade
or business. The overall combination of
methods must also be reasonably based
on all the facts and circumstances. The
books and records maintained for a
trade or business must be consistent
with any allocations. The Treasury
Department and the IRS are open to
considering whether a permissible
‘‘reasonable method’’ should be
specified in regulations or permitted to
include methods based on direct
tracing, allocations based on gross
income, or other methods, within
appropriate parameters. The Treasury
Department and the IRS request
comments on possible reasonable
methods for the allocation of items not
clearly attributable to a single trade or
business, and whether any safe harbors
may be appropriate.
Because the section 199A(b)(7)
reduction applies to the portion of a
patron’s QBI that relates to qualified
payments from a Specified Cooperative,
these proposed rules provide a safe
harbor allocation method for patrons
with taxable income not exceeding the
threshold amounts set forth in section
199A(e)(2) to determine how to
calculate the section 199A(b)(7)
reduction. The safe harbor allocation
method is intended to provide a
straightforward method for patrons if
their trade or business receives qualified
payments from a Specified Cooperative
in addition to other income. To
calculate the required section
199A(b)(7) reduction, the patron must
allocate the aggregate business expenses
and W–2 wages between qualified
payments and other gross receipts. The
safe harbor allocation method allows
patrons to allocate by ratably
apportioning business expenses and W–
2 wages based on the proportion that the
amount of qualified payments bears to
the total gross receipts used to
determine QBI. The Treasury
Department and the IRS request
comments on this safe harbor rule and
whether there are additional or
alternative safe harbors that may be
appropriate.
Further, to make the calculation
required by section 199A(b)(7), the
patron will need to know the qualified
payments allocable to the patron that
were used in calculating a Specified
Cooperative’s section 199A(g)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 Jun 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
deduction. In order to enable the patron
to make this calculation, proposed
§ 1.199A–7(f)(3) requires the Specified
Cooperative to report the amount of
such qualified payments on an
attachment to or on the Form 1099–
PATR, (or any successor form) issued by
the Cooperative to the patron, unless
otherwise provided by the instructions
to the Form.
F. Transition Rule
Congress provided a special transition
rule relating to qualified payments
under former section 199 made by
Specified Cooperatives in section 101 of
the 2018 Act. Under this transition rule,
the repeal of former section 199 for
taxable years beginning after December
31, 2017, does not apply to former
section 199 qualified payments received
by a patron from Specified Cooperatives
in a taxable year beginning after
December 31, 2017, to the extent such
qualified payments are attributable to
qualified production activities income
(QPAI) with respect to which a
deduction is allowable to the Specified
Cooperatives under former section 199
for a taxable year of the Specified
Cooperatives beginning before January
1, 2018. Such qualified payments
remain subject to former section 199,
and any deduction under former section
199 allocated by the Specified
Cooperatives to their patrons related to
such qualified payments may be
deducted by such patrons in accordance
with former section 199. In addition, no
deduction is allowed under section
199A(a) and (g) with respect to such
qualified payments. See Public Law
115–97, title I, § 13305(c), Dec. 22, 2017,
131 Stat. 2054, 2126 (codified as
amended at I.R.C. § 74 Note), as
amended by Public Law 115–141, div.
T, § 101(c), Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 348,
1151, providing a transitional rule for
qualified payments of patrons of
Cooperatives.
Proposed § 1.199A–7(h)(3) and
§ 1.199A–8(h)(3) provide that the
Cooperative must identify in a written
notice to its patrons that a section
199A(a) deduction cannot be claimed
for qualified payments that otherwise
would constitute QBI in the patron’s
trade or business in a taxable year in
which the qualified payments remain
subject to former section 199. The
Cooperative must report this
information on an attachment to or on
the Form 1099–PATR (or any successor
form) issued by the Cooperative to the
patron, unless otherwise provided by
the instructions to the Form.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
II. Proposed § 1.199A–8, Deduction for
Income Attributable to Domestic
Production Activities of Specified
Cooperatives
A. In General
Section 199A(g) provides a deduction
for Specified Cooperatives and their
patrons that is similar in many respects
to the deduction under former section
199. Proposed § 1.199A–8 provides
definitions relating to the section
199A(g) deduction, establishes the
criteria that a Specified Cooperative
must satisfy to be eligible to claim the
section 199A(g) deduction, and sets
forth the necessary steps for a Specified
Cooperative to calculate the section
199A(g) deduction.
B. Definitions
Proposed § 1.199A–8 defines the
terms patron, Specified Cooperative,
and agricultural or horticultural
products. In defining patron, the
Treasury Department and the IRS sought
consistency with the rules under
subchapter T of chapter 1 of subtitle A
of the Code. Thus, the rules in proposed
§ 1.199A–8 cross-reference the
definition of patron found in § 1.1388–
1(e).
The definition of Specified
Cooperative is consistent with the
definition set forth in section
199A(g)(4). This definition is different
from the definition of Specified
Cooperative as originally provided by
section 11011(a) of the TCJA (former
section 199A(g)(3)), as it no longer
includes a Cooperative solely engaged
in the provision of supplies, equipment,
or services to farmers or other Specified
Cooperatives (former section
199A(g)(3)(C)).
Proposed § 1.199A–8(a)(4) defines
agricultural or horticultural products as
agricultural, horticultural, viticultural,
and dairy products, livestock and the
products thereof, the products of
poultry and bee raising, the edible
products of forestry, and any and all
products raised or produced on farms
and processed or manufactured
products thereof within the meaning of
the Cooperative Marketing Act of 1926,
44 Stat. 802 (1926). Agricultural or
horticultural products also include
aquatic products that are farmed
whether by exempt or nonexempt
Specified Cooperatives. See Rev. Rul.
64–246, 1964–2 C.B. 154. In addition,
agricultural or horticultural products
include fertilizer, diesel fuel, and other
supplies used in agricultural or
horticultural production that are
manufactured, produced, grown, or
extracted (MPGE) by the Specified
E:\FR\FM\19JNP2.SGM
19JNP2
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
Cooperative. See Joint Committee
Report, at 23, footnote 120.
Agricultural or horticultural products
do not include intangible property. For
example, an agricultural or horticultural
product includes a seed that is grown,
but does not include an intangible
property right to reproduce a seed for
sale. This exclusion of intangible
property does not apply to intangible
characteristics of any particular
agricultural or horticultural product. For
example, gross receipts from the sale of
different varieties of oranges would all
qualify as DPGR from the disposition of
agricultural or horticultural products
(assuming all other requirements of
section 199A(g) are met). However,
gross receipts from the license of the
right to produce and sell a certain
variety of oranges would be considered
separate from the tangible oranges
themselves and therefore not gross
receipts from an agricultural or
horticultural product. This exclusion is
consistent with former section 199,
which excluded intangible property
other than computer software, any
property described in section 168(f)(4)
(sound recordings), and qualified film
products.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
considered a similar but alternative
definition of agricultural or
horticultural products as agricultural,
horticultural, viticultural, and dairy
products, livestock and poultry, bees,
forest products, fish and shellfish, and
any products thereof, including
processed and manufactured products,
and any and all products raised or
produced on farms and any processed or
manufactured product thereof within
the meaning of the Agricultural
Marketing Act of 1946, 60 Stat. 1091
(1946). While very similar to the
definition set forth in these proposed
rules, the Treasury Department and the
IRS proposed using the definition based
on the Cooperative Marketing Act of
1926, which specifically concerns
cooperatives, unlike the Agricultural
Marketing Act of 1946, which concerns
the marketing and distribution of
agricultural products.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
also considered an alternative definition
of agricultural or horticultural products
based on general regulations under the
Commodity Exchange Act. The
Commodity Futures Trading
Commission defines agricultural
commodities as wheat, cotton, rice,
corn, oats, barley, rye, flaxseed, grain
sorghums, mill feeds, butter, eggs,
Solanum tuberosum (Irish potatoes),
wool, wool tops, fats and oils (including
lard, tallow, cottonseed oil, peanut oil,
soybean oil and all other fats and oils),
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 Jun 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
cottonseed meal, cottonseed, peanuts,
soybeans, soybean meal, livestock,
livestock products, and frozen
concentrated orange juice, but not
onions; other commodities that are, or
once were, or are derived from, living
organisms, including plant, animal and
aquatic life, which are generally
fungible, within their respective classes,
and are used primarily for human food,
shelter, animal feed or natural fiber;
tobacco, products of horticulture, and
such other commodities used or
consumed by animals or humans. 17
CFR 1.3. The Treasury Department and
the IRS concluded that this definition
was too narrow, because it is limited to
products that can be commodities.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
are considering alternative definitions of
agricultural or horticultural products to
address concerns that the definition
could be interpreted inconsistently with
the ordinary meaning of agricultural or
horticultural products. A clarification of
the definition that is under
consideration is the limitation of
agricultural or horticultural products to
products acquired from original
producers, such as farmers, planters,
ranchers, dairy farmers, or nut or fruit
growers, and products thereof that are
MPGE by Specified Cooperatives. The
Treasury Department and the IRS
request comments on whether the
original producer approach being
considered would be appropriate, as
well as other approaches to defining
agricultural or horticultural products.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
also request comments on the impact, if
any, of the proposed definition on
which products are MPGE by Specified
Cooperatives.
A Specified Cooperative’s gross
receipts from the disposition of
agricultural or horticultural products
qualify as DPGR if the products were
MPGE by the Specified Cooperative in
whole or significant part within the
United States. The proposed regulations
define in whole or significant part for
these purposes in proposed § 1.199A–
9(h) and provide a 20 percent safe
harbor for such determination in
proposed § 1.199A–9(h)(3).
The definition of gross receipts in
proposed § 1.199A–8(b)(2)(iii) is
essentially the same as in § 1.199–3(c)
issued under former section 199, except
that this definition has been modified
by removing references to section 1031
(exchange of real property held for
productive use or investment) and taxexempt interest within the meaning of
section 103 (interest on State and local
bonds). The reference to section 1031 is
removed because that provision now
applies only to real property. The
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
28673
section 199A(g) deduction is based on
gross receipts derived from the
disposition of agricultural or
horticultural products and section
199A(g)(3)(D)(i) expressly excludes
gross receipts derived from the
disposition of land from DPGR. The
reference to tax-exempt interest under
section 103 is removed because it is
appropriate for the definition of gross
receipts to include only gross receipts
that are taken into account in computing
gross income under the Cooperative’s
methods of accounting used for Federal
income tax purposes for the taxable
year.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
welcome comments regarding all
aspects of these proposed definitions,
including whether there is an
alternative or more appropriate
definition of Specified Cooperative or
agricultural or horticultural products,
and clarification of when MPGE is
performed in whole or significant part
in the United States that would provide
greater certainty for taxpayers in
complying with, and the IRS in
administering, the requirements for
claiming the section 199A(g) deduction.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
also welcome comments on the
appropriateness of the 20 percent safe
harbor in proposed § 1.199A–9(h)(3).
C. Steps for Calculating Section 199A(g)
Deduction
Proposed § 1.199A–8 sets forth four
required steps to determine the amount
of a nonexempt Specified Cooperative’s
section 199A(g) deduction and provides
rules to determine the amount of an
exempt Specified Cooperative’s section
199A(g) deduction.
i. Patronage/Nonpatronage Split
The first step under the rules of
proposed § 1.199A–8 for calculating the
section 199A(g) deduction requires
nonexempt Specified Cooperatives to
identify the gross receipts and related
deductions (other than a deduction
under section 199A(g)) that are from
patronage sources and from
nonpatronage sources. Specified
Cooperatives must separate their
patronage and nonpatronage gross
receipts and related deductions when
determining taxable income and
allocating expenses between patronage
and nonpatronage income to claim the
tax deductions under section 1382(b)
and (c). Cooperatives that have gross
receipts only from patronage sources
will be unaffected. Accordingly, the
proposed regulations’ requirement to
divide patronage/nonpatronage gross
receipts and related deductions should
not significantly impact the existing
E:\FR\FM\19JNP2.SGM
19JNP2
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
28674
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
allocation requirements applicable to
Specified Cooperatives.
This step is expressly included in
these proposed rules because proposed
§ 1.199A–8 provides that for all
purposes of the section 199A(g)
deduction, nonexempt Specified
Cooperatives may use only patronage
gross receipts and related deductions to
calculate DPGR, QPAI (including oilrelated QPAI), taxable income, and the
W–2 wage limitation.
Separating a nonexempt Specified
Cooperative’s patronage items from its
nonpatronage items is consistent with
the structure and intent of section 199A.
Section 199A in its entirety is structured
to give businesses that are not operating
as C corporations a deduction that
corresponds to the TCJA’s reduction of
the top corporate rate of tax under
section 11. C corporations are expressly
prohibited under section 199A(a) from
claiming a section 199A(a) deduction,
and under section 199A(g)(2)(D)(i) from
claiming a section 199A(g) deduction.
Although section 199A(g) provides a
deduction for Specified Cooperatives,
the statutory prohibitions preventing C
corporations from benefiting under
section 199A(g) (which were absent
from the statutory text of former section
199) are in conflict with permitting a
section 199A(g) deduction for the
nonpatronage business of a nonexempt
Specified Cooperative. Instead,
nonpatronage source income of a
nonexempt Specified Cooperative
receives an alternate benefit shared by
other C corporations: The TCJA’s
reduction of the top rate of tax under
section 11 from 35 percent to 21
percent.
Moreover, the 2018 Act amended
section 199A to address concerns that
the TCJA created an unintended
incentive for farmers and other
producers to sell their agricultural or
horticultural products to Cooperatives
over independent buyers. The
amendment to section 199A was
intended to ensure a level playing field
between Cooperatives and independent
buyers. Without the split between
patronage and nonpatronage businesses,
Specified Cooperatives that may benefit
from both a section 199A(g) deduction
(from which taxpayers other than
Specified Cooperatives cannot benefit)
and the reduced corporate tax rate on
nonpatronage business would be
significantly advantaged over
independent buyers who could benefit
only from the reduced corporate tax rate
under section 11.
Accordingly, the Treasury Department
and the IRS have determined that it is
appropriate to limit the source of the
gross receipts and related deductions
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 Jun 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
taken into account for purposes of the
section 199A(g) deduction for
nonexempt Specified Cooperatives to
items properly allocated to a nonexempt
Specified Cooperative’s patronage
business. The Treasury Department and
the IRS request comments regarding
these proposed rules, including
comments explaining any policy
rationale that would justify treating the
nonpatronage business of a nonexempt
Specified Cooperative differently from
the business operations of any other C
corporation subject to the tax imposed
under section 11.
ii. Identifying Patronage DPGR
The second step set forth in proposed
§ 1.199A–8 is for nonexempt Specified
Cooperatives to identify patronage gross
receipts that qualify as DPGR. The rules
in proposed § 1.199A–8 point
nonexempt Specified Cooperatives to
proposed § 1.199A–9 for additional
information on DPGR. The rules in
proposed § 1.199A–9 do not refer to
gross receipts from patronage or
nonpatronage business because the rules
only provide additional information
supplementing the determination of
DPGR from dispositions of agricultural
or horticultural products. When
applying § 1.199A–9, which occurs after
step 1 in § 1.199A–8, the only gross
receipts of a nonexempt Specified
Cooperative considered would be those
derived from patronage sources.
Proposed § 1.199A–9 is essentially the
same as §§ 1.199–1 and 1.199–3 issued
under former section 199, adjusted to
apply to Specified Cooperatives.
iii. Calculating Patronage QPAI
The third step set forth in proposed
§ 1.199A–8 is for nonexempt Specified
Cooperatives to calculate QPAI
(including oil-related QPAI) from only
their patronage DPGR. To do this,
nonexempt Specified Cooperatives must
determine COGS and other expenses,
losses, or deductions that are allocable
to patronage DPGR. Nonexempt
Specified Cooperatives are directed to
consult proposed § 1.199A–10 for
additional information on making these
allocations. Proposed § 1.199A–10 does
not refer to patronage or nonpatronage
QPAI or DPGR because it only provides
additional information supplementing
the QPAI calculation. Proposed
§ 1.199A–10 is essentially the same as
§ 1.199–4 issued under former section
199, adjusted to apply to Specified
Cooperatives.
iv. Calculating Patronage Section
199A(g) Deduction
The fourth and final step set forth in
proposed § 1.199A–8 is for nonexempt
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Specified Cooperatives to calculate their
section 199A(g) deduction, which is
equal to 9 percent of the lesser of QPAI
or taxable income, and subject to the
W–2 wage limitation. Nonexempt
Specified Cooperatives are directed to
consult proposed § 1.199A–11 for
additional information on the W–2 wage
limitation. Proposed § 1.199A–11 does
not refer to patronage or nonpatronage
QPAI, taxable income, or W–2 wages
because it only provides additional
information supplementing the W–2
wage limitation. Proposed § 1.199A–11
is essentially the same as § 1.199–2
issued under former section 199,
adjusted to apply to Specified
Cooperatives.
v. Exempt Specified Cooperatives
Proposed § 1.199A–8(c) provides that
exempt Specified Cooperatives calculate
two separate section 199A(g)
deductions, one based on gross receipts
and related deductions from patronage
sources, and one based on gross receipts
and related deductions from
nonpatronage sources. Like a
nonexempt Specified Cooperative, an
exempt Specified Cooperative earns
patronage income that is not taxed to
the extent of any section 1382(b)
deduction for patronage distributions
made to patrons. Exempt Specified
Cooperatives are also not taxed on any
nonpatronage income to the extent of
any section 1382(c) deduction for
nonpatronage distributions. Unlike the
usual taxation of C corporations, the
section 1382 deductions allow an
exempt Specified Cooperative to be
treated more like a passthrough entity
by reducing the exempt Specified
Cooperative’s patronage and
nonpatronage income. It is therefore
appropriate that the exempt Specified
Cooperatives may take a section 199A(g)
deduction on both patronage and
nonpatronage income that could be
deducted under section 1382(b) and
(c)(2).
As described earlier, calculating two
section 199A(g) deductions is consistent
with the administration of former
section 199. To calculate the two section
199A(g) deductions, an exempt
Specified Cooperative is required under
proposed § 1.199A–8 to perform steps
two through four twice, first using only
its patronage gross receipts and related
deductions and second using only its
nonpatronage gross receipts and related
deductions. An exempt Specified
Cooperative cannot combine, merge, or
net patronage and nonpatronage items at
any step in determining its patronage
section 199A(g) deduction and its
nonpatronage section 199A(g)
deduction.
E:\FR\FM\19JNP2.SGM
19JNP2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
D. Special Rule for Oil-Related QPAI
Section 199A(g)(5)(E) contains a
special rule for Specified Cooperatives
with oil-related QPAI, which requires a
reduction by 3 percent of the least of oilrelated QPAI, QPAI, or taxable income
of the Specified Cooperative for the
taxable year. The language of this rule
is the same as the language used in
former section 199(d)(9). Former section
199(d)(9), which applied to taxable
years beginning after December 31,
2008, was added by section 401(a),
Division B of the Energy Extension Act
of 2008, Public Law 110–343, 122 Stat.
3765 (2008). These proposed rules
include rules for oil-related QPAI that
are similar to those contained in
proposed regulations (REG–136459–09)
relating to the section 199 deduction
published in the Federal Register (80
FR 51978) on August 27, 2015 (2015
Proposed Regulations).
The 2015 Proposed Regulations
included rules related to a taxpayer’s
determination of oil-related QPAI (with
respect to which no comments were
received). Although not finalized, the
2015 Proposed Regulations are the only
existing guidance concerning a
taxpayer’s determination of oil-related
QPAI. The preamble to the 2015
Proposed Regulations includes an
explanation of the reasons supporting
the proposed provisions, and these
reasons continue to apply. These
include the determination that gross
receipts from transportation and
distribution of oil are not included in
the calculation of oil-related QPAI,
unless the gross receipts are considered
DPGR under the de minimis rule or an
exception for embedded services now
contained in proposed § 1.199A–9.
Gross receipts from transportation and
distribution are not included in QPAI
and DPGR (unless an exception applies),
and therefore it is appropriate to
exclude such gross receipts when
calculating oil-related QPAI.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
E. Rules for Passing Section 199A(g)
Deduction to Patrons
Once a Specified Cooperative
calculates the section 199A(g)
deduction, it may pass on the section
199A(g) deduction to patrons who are
eligible taxpayers as defined in section
199A(g)(2)(D), that is, (i) a patron that is
other than a C corporation or (ii) a
patron that is a Specified Cooperative.
Section 199A(g)(2)(A) requires the
Specified Cooperative to identify the
amount of the section 199A(g)
deduction being passed to a patron in a
notice (required by proposed § 1.199A–
8(d)(3)) mailed to the eligible patron
during the payment period described in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 Jun 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
section 1382(d). The amount of the
section 199A(g) deduction that a
Specified Cooperative can pass through
to an eligible taxpayer is limited to the
portion of the section 199A(g) deduction
that is allowed with respect to the QPAI
to which the qualified payments made
to the eligible taxpayer are attributable.
Section 199A(g)(2)(E) defines qualified
payments as those that are included in
the eligible taxpayer’s income under
section 1385(a)(1) and (3) (referencing
patronage dividends and per-unit retain
allocations). Proposed § 1.199A–8
further provides that a Specified
Cooperative that receives a section
199A(g) deduction as an eligible
taxpayer can take the deduction only
against patronage gross income and
related deductions, or pass on the
deduction to its patrons that are eligible
taxpayers. The proposed rules do not
allow an exempt Specified Cooperative
to pass through any of the section
199A(g) deduction attributable to
nonpatronage activities because no
QPAI is attributable to any qualified
payments. The rules of proposed
§ 1.199A–8 are essentially the same as
the rules of § 1.199–6, adjusted to
include other provisions of the section
199 final regulations as well as
proposed rules set forth in the 2015
Proposed Regulations.
F. Cooperative as a Partner in a
Partnership
Proposed § 1.199A–8(f) provides
guidance regarding circumstances in
which a Specified Cooperative is a
partner in a partnership as described
under section 199A(g)(5)(B). The
proposed rules provide that the
partnership must separately identify
and report on the Schedule K–1 to the
Form 1065, U.S. Return of Partnership
Income, (or any successor form) issued
to its partner, unless otherwise provided
by the instructions to the Form, the
Specified Cooperative’s allocable share
of gross receipts and related deductions.
This allows the Specified Cooperative
partner to apply the four steps in
proposed § 1.199A–8 required to
calculate its patronage section 199A(g)
deduction (or patronage and
nonpatronage section 199A(g)
deductions in the case of an exempt
Specified Cooperative).
III. Proposed § 1.199A–9, Domestic
Production Gross Receipts
A. In General
Section 199A(g)(3)(D) defines the term
domestic production gross receipts to
mean gross receipts of a Specified
Cooperative derived from any lease,
rental, license, sale, exchange, or other
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
28675
disposition (collectively, a
‘‘disposition’’) of any agricultural or
horticultural product which was MPGE
(determined after application of section
199A(g)(4)(B)) by the Specified
Cooperative in whole or significant part
within the United States. Such term
does not include gross receipts of the
Specified Cooperative derived from a
disposition of land or from services.
These proposed regulations are based on
§ 1.199–3 issued under former section
199, but remove provisions that would
not apply to the disposition of
agricultural or horticultural products.
DPGR includes the gross receipts that
a Specified Cooperative derives from
marketing agricultural or horticultural
products for patrons. Section
199A(g)(4)(B) treats marketing Specified
Cooperatives as having MPGE any
agricultural or horticultural product in
whole or significant part within the
United States if their patrons have done
so. The Treasury Department and the
IRS considered whether this rule should
apply between Specified Cooperatives
and patrons taxed as C corporations.
These proposed regulations allow
attribution to apply as provided in
section 199A(g)(4)(B) because the statute
does not distinguish between types of
patrons. However, these proposed
regulations do not allow a Specified
Cooperative to pass through to a C
corporation any of the section 199A(g)
deduction of the Specified Cooperative
attributable to the disposition of such
agricultural or horticultural products.
This is because, under section
199A(g)(2)(D), taxpayers taxed as C
corporations are not eligible to claim a
section 199A(g) deduction from the
Specified Cooperative. These proposed
regulations incorporate the rules from
§ 1.199–1(d)(1) through (3) and (e),
issued under former section 199, as
applicable. These rules relate to the
allocation of gross receipts between
DPGR and non-DPGR, and the
determination of whether an allocation
method is reasonable. Further, the rules
include provisions permitting Specified
Cooperatives to treat de minimis gross
receipts as DPGR or non-DPGR without
allocating such gross receipts, and a
provision permitting the use of
historical data to allocate gross receipts
for certain multiple-year transactions.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
welcome comments regarding all
aspects of these proposed rules. When
incorporating these concepts from the
former section 199 regulations, the
Treasury Department and the IRS
determined that the appropriate section
of these proposed regulations in which
to include such guidance was proposed
E:\FR\FM\19JNP2.SGM
19JNP2
28676
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
§ 1.199A–9. This is not a substantive
change, but rather a reorganization to
improve clarity.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
B. Definition of Manufactured,
Produced, Grown, Extracted
The definition of the term MPGE is
included in proposed § 1.199A–9 and is
generally consistent with the definition
in § 1.199–3(e)(1). However, these
proposed regulations revise the rule in
§ 1.199–3(e)(2) by removing the concept
of minor assembly. In the 2015
Proposed Regulations, the Treasury
Department and the IRS requested
comments on defining the term minor
assembly because of the difficulty in
identifying a widely applicable
objective test. Based on the comments
received and the restriction on the
section 199A(g) deduction to
agricultural or horticultural products,
proposed § 1.199A–9 does not include
the term minor assembly included in
§ 1.199–3(e)(2). This exclusion does not
impact a taxpayer’s obligation to meet
all of the other requirements to qualify
for the section 199A(g) deduction. The
Treasury Department and the IRS
request comments on whether the
concept of minor assembly should be
retained and, if so, how this term should
be defined.
C. By the Taxpayer
With respect to the phrase ‘‘by the
taxpayer’’ as used in section
199A(g)(3)(D)(i), these proposed
regulations adopt the rule from § 1.199–
3(f)(1) as applicable, rather than the rule
in the 2015 Proposed Regulations. In a
contract manufacturing arrangement,
this means that a Specified Cooperative
must have the benefits and burdens of
ownership of the agricultural or
horticultural product during the period
in which the MPGE activity occurs in
order for the Specified Cooperative to be
treated as engaging in such MPGE
activity. The 2015 Proposed Regulations
provided a different rule for contract
manufacturing arrangements. The 2015
Proposed Regulations provided that if a
qualifying activity is performed under a
contract, then the party that performs
the qualifying activity is the taxpayer for
purposes of section 199(c)(4)(A)(i).
Under the rule in the 2015 Proposed
Regulations, a Specified Cooperative
that contracts with another party for the
MPGE of an agricultural or horticultural
product would never qualify as ‘‘the
taxpayer’’ for purposes of the section
199A(g) deduction. This result fails to
provide any incentive for Specified
Cooperatives to retain the benefits and
burdens of ownership and to ensure that
production occurs within the United
States. Therefore, to maintain such an
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 Jun 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
incentive, the proposed regulations
maintain the rule from § 1.199–3(f)(1).
The Treasury Department and the IRS
request comments on the continued use
of the rule from § 1.199–3(f)(1).
D. Other Provisions in Proposed
§ 1.199A–9
The remainder of the rules in
proposed § 1.199A–9 are based on the
existing regulations in § 1.199–3. These
rules should be interpreted in a manner
consistent with the interpretation under
former section 199. The Treasury
Department and the IRS request
comments on any conception or
definition that in application would be
over or under-inclusive under the
proposed regulations, or any instances
where they should interpret the rules
differently from the interpretation under
former section 199.
IV. Proposed § 1.199A–10, Costs
Allocable to DPGR
Proposed § 1.199A–10 provides
guidance on the allocation of costs to
DPGR. This section provides rules for
allocating a taxpayer’s COGS, as well as
other expenses, losses, and deductions
properly allocable to DPGR. These
proposed regulations are based on and
follow the section 199 regulations in
§ 1.199–4.
V. Proposed § 1.199A–11, Wage
Limitation
Proposed § 1.199A–11 provides
guidance regarding the W–2 wage
limitation on the section 199A(g)
deduction. A notice of proposed
revenue procedure, Notice 2019–27,
2019–16 IRB, which proposes a draft
revenue procedure providing three
proposed methods that Specified
Cooperatives may use for calculating
W–2 wages, is being issued concurrently
with this notice of proposed
rulemaking. The guidance contained in
the notice of proposed revenue
procedure is necessary because changes
may be made to the underlying Form
W–2, Wage and Tax Statement, on a
more frequent basis than updates to the
regulations under section 199A(g), for
regulatory and statutory reasons
independent of section 199A. The three
proposed methods for calculating W–2
wages in the notice are substantially
similar to the methods provided in Rev.
Proc. 2006–47, 2006–2 C.B. 869 (relating
to the section 199 deduction), and Rev.
Proc. 2019–11, 2019–09 IRB 742
(relating to the section 199A(a)
deduction). The Treasury Department
and the IRS propose these methods in
a notice of proposed revenue procedure
rather than in the notice of proposed
rulemaking to maintain consistency
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
with the rules under former section 199
and the rules under section 199A. The
notice of proposed revenue procedure
invites comments from the public.
Under the proposed regulations, W–2
wages for the purpose of the wage
limitation in section 199A(g) are
generally determined in a manner that
is similar to the manner in which W–2
wages are determined for the purpose of
the deduction under section 199A(a)
(that is, using the definition of W–2
wages under section 199A(b)(4)), with
three significant differences. First,
section 199A(g)(1)(B)(ii) provides that
W–2 wages are determined without
regard to section 199A(b)(4)(B), which
excludes from the definition amounts
not properly allocable to QBI for
purposes of section 199A(c)(1). Second,
W–2 wages under section 199A(g) do
not include any amount that is not
properly allocable to DPGR. Finally,
W–2 wages under section 199A(g) do
not generally include any remuneration
paid for services in the commonwealth
of Puerto Rico and other United States
territories. Specifically, section
199A(g)(1)(B)(ii) provides that W–2
wages are determined in the same
manner as under section 199A(b)(4),
and section 199A(b)(4)(A) defines wages
as amounts described in section
6051(a)(3) and (8). The amounts
described in section 6051(a)(3) are
‘‘wages as defined in section 3401(a).’’
Section 3401(a)(8) generally excludes
from the definition of wages in section
3401(a) wages paid with respect to
employment in the commonwealth of
Puerto Rico and other United States
territories. Therefore, wages paid with
respect to employment in the
commonwealth of Puerto Rico and other
United States territories are generally
not W–2 wages within the meaning of
section 199A(b)(4)(A). This contrasts
with the section 199A(a) deduction for
which section 199A(f)(1)(C)(ii) allows
certain taxpayers with QBI from sources
within the commonwealth of Puerto
Rico (section 199A(f)(1)(C)(ii) applies
only to Puerto Rico and not to other
United States territories) to compute
section 199A(b)(4) W–2 wages without
regard to section 3401(a)(8). Since the
section 199A(g) deduction is
determined based on QPAI, not QBI,
section 199A(f)(1)(C)(ii) does not apply
to the deduction under section 199A(g).
Given the distinction between QBI and
QPAI on which the section 199A(a) and
section 199A(g) deductions are
respectively provided, and the absence
of a provision similar to 199A(f)(1)(C)(ii)
with respect to QPAI, the Treasury
Department and the IRS have
determined that remuneration paid with
E:\FR\FM\19JNP2.SGM
19JNP2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
respect to employment in the
commonwealth of Puerto Rico cannot be
used in determining W–2 wages for
purposes of section 199A(g). The
Treasury Department and the IRS
request comments with respect to this
determination.
VI. Proposed § 1.199A–12, EAG Rules
Proposed § 1.199A–12 provides
guidance on the application of section
199A(g) to an EAG under section
199A(g)(5)(A)(iii) that includes a
Specified Cooperative. Unlike the
section 199 deduction, the section
199A(g) deduction is limited to
Specified Cooperatives. These proposed
regulations address how the rules
separating patronage and nonpatronage
income and deductions apply in the
context of an EAG. Proposed § 1.199A–
12 provides that in the case of
nonexempt Specified Cooperatives,
attribution between the members of an
EAG is allowed provided the DPGR and
related deductions are patronage. In the
case of exempt Specified Cooperatives,
attribution is allowed in all events
because exempt Specified Cooperatives
are allowed to take a separate 199A(g)
deduction on both their patronage and
nonpatronage income.
Proposed § 1.199A–12 also provides
certain rules for partnerships owned by
an EAG as described in section
199A(g)(5)(A)(ii).
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
VII. Proposed § 1.1388–1(f)
Proposed § 1.1388–1(f) sets forth a
definition of patronage and
nonpatronage that is consistent with the
current case law under section 1388.
Specifically, the proposed definition
adopts the directly related test, which is
a fact specific test for determining
whether income and deductions of a
Cooperative are patronage or
nonpatronage. The Treasury Department
and the IRS request comments with
respect to this definition.
VIII. Proposed Removal of Section 199
Regulations and Withdrawal of 2015
Proposed Regulations
In light of the TCJA, the Treasury
Department and the IRS propose to
remove the section 199 regulations
(§§ 1.199–0 through 1.199–9) and
withdraw the 2015 Proposed
Regulations because the regulations
interpret a provision of the Code that
has been repealed for taxable years
beginning after December 31, 2017.
The proposed removal of these
regulations is unrelated to the substance
of the rules in the regulations, and no
negative inference regarding the stated
rules should be made. Such regulations
are proposed to be removed from the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 Jun 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
solely because they have no future
applicability. Removal of these
regulations is not intended to alter any
non-regulatory guidance that cites to or
relies upon these regulations. These
regulations as contained in 26 CFR part
1, revised April 1, 2019, remain
applicable to determining eligibility for
the section 199 deduction for any
taxable year that began before January 1,
2018. The beginning date of the taxable
year of a partnership, S corporation, or
a non-grantor trust or estate, rather than
the taxable year of a partner,
shareholder, or beneficiary is used to
determine items that are taken into
account for purposes of calculating a
section 199 deduction. This is
consistent with the initial application of
section 199 in 2005. Items arising from
a passthrough entity that had a fiscal
year beginning before 2005 were not
taken into account by calendar-year
partners for purposes of the section 199
deduction. Public Law 109–135, section
102(a) (Gulf Opportunity Zone Act of
2005). Further, when section 199 was
amended to narrow the definition of W–
2 wages, the amendment was effective
for taxable years beginning after May 17,
2006. See Public Law 109–222, section
514(a) (Tax Increase Prevention and
Reconciliation Act of 2005). Under the
transition rule in § 1.199–5(b)(4),
partners and partnerships used the
taxable year of the partnerships to
determine the applicable definition of
W–2 wages, and there are similar rules
in § 1.199–5(c)(4) for S corporations and
§ 1.199–5(e)(3) for non-grantor trusts
and estates.
Proposed Effective/Applicability Date
Section 7805(b)(1)(A) and (B) of the
Code generally provide that no
temporary, proposed, or final regulation
relating to the internal revenue laws
may apply to any taxable period ending
before the earliest of (A) the date on
which such regulation is filed with the
Federal Register, or (B) in the case of a
final regulation, the date on which a
proposed or temporary regulation to
which the final regulation relates was
filed with the Federal Register.
Consistent with authority provided by
section 7805(b)(1)(A), the proposed
regulations are proposed to apply to
taxable years beginning after the date of
publication of a Treasury decision
adopting these rules as final regulations
in the Federal Register. Taxpayers may
rely upon these proposed regulations, in
their entirety, before the date of
publication of the Treasury Decision
adopting these rules as final regulations
in the Federal Register.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
28677
Special Analyses
I. Regulatory Planning and Review—
Economic Analysis
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866
direct agencies to assess costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility.
These proposed regulations have been
designated by the Office of Management
and Budget’s Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) as subject to
review under Executive Order 12866
pursuant to the Memorandum of
Agreement (April 11, 2018) between the
Treasury Department and the Office of
Management and Budget regarding
review of tax regulations. OIRA has
determined that the proposed
rulemaking is significant and subject to
review under Executive Order 12866
and section 1(b) of the Memorandum of
Agreement. Accordingly, the proposed
regulations have been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget.
In addition, the Treasury Department
and the IRS expect the proposed
regulations, when final, to be an
Executive Order 13771 regulatory action
and request comment on this
designation.
A. Background and Overview
The TCJA repealed section 199, which
provided a deduction for income
attributable to domestic production
activities. In its place it created section
199A, which provides a deduction for
qualified business income derived from
passthrough businesses—such as sole
proprietorships, partnerships, and S
corporations—engaged in domestic
trades or businesses. While the repealed
section 199 deduction was generally
available to all taxpayers, the section
199A deduction is available only to
taxpayers other than C corporations. On
March 23, 2018, the 2018 Act modified
section 199A(g) to provide deductions
for Specified Cooperatives and their
patrons that are substantially similar to
those under the repealed section 199
deduction. Accordingly, these
regulations generally formalize prior
and current practices based on the rules
under former section 199. The 2018 Act
also added section 199A(b)(7), which
requires patrons of Specified
Cooperatives to reduce their section
E:\FR\FM\19JNP2.SGM
19JNP2
28678
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
199A(a) deduction if those patrons
receive qualified payments from
Specified Cooperatives.
The estimated number of
Cooperatives affected by the 2018 Act
and these proposed regulations is 9,000,
including approximately 2,000
Specified Cooperatives, based on 2017
tax filings.
B. Need for the Proposed Regulations
The proposed regulations provide
guidance regarding the application of
sections 199A(a), 199A(b)(7), and
199A(g) to Cooperatives, Specified
Cooperatives, and their patrons. The
proposed regulations are needed
because the 2018 Act introduced a
number of terms and calculations.
Patrons, Cooperatives, and Specified
Cooperatives would benefit from greater
specificity regarding these and other
items.
C. Economic Analysis
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
1. Baseline
The Treasury Department and the IRS
have assessed the benefits and costs of
the proposed regulations relative to a
no-action baseline reflecting anticipated
Federal income tax-related behavior in
the absence of these proposed
regulations.
2. Economic Rationale for Issuing
Guidance for the 2018 Act
The Treasury Department and the IRS
anticipate that the issuance of guidance
pertaining to sections 199A(a),
199A(b)(7), and 199A(g) of the 2018 Act
to Cooperatives, Specified Cooperatives,
and their patrons will provide a net
economic benefit to the overall U.S.
economy.
The proposed regulations clarify a
number of concepts related to the
section 199A(a) deduction for patrons of
Cooperatives, provide guidance to
patrons of Specified Cooperatives who
may be required to reduce their section
199A(a) deduction under section
199A(b)(7), and provide guidance to
Specified Cooperatives on the section
199A(g) deduction on income
attributable to their domestic
production activities. In the absence of
guidance, affected taxpayers would have
to calculate their tax liability without
the definitions and clarifications
provided by the proposed regulations, a
situation that is generally considered
more burdensome and could lead to
greater conflicts with tax administrators.
Thus, the Treasury Department and the
IRS project that the proposed
regulations will reduce taxpayer
compliance burden and the costs of tax
administration relative to not issuing
any such guidance.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 Jun 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
This guidance also ensures that
section 199A deductions are calculated
similarly across taxpayers, avoiding
situations where one taxpayer receives
preferential treatment over another for
fundamentally similar economic
activity. For example, in the absence of
these proposed regulations, a Specified
Cooperative may have uncertainty over
what type of income is eligible for the
section 199A(g) deduction. If a
Specified Cooperative claimed the
section 199A(g) deduction on income
that already benefits from a lower
corporate tax rate, this would confer an
unintended economic benefit to the
Specified Cooperative over other C
corporations performing identical
activities that only benefit from a lower
corporate tax rate. As discussed further
below, this guidance prevents the
introduction of distortions of economic
decisions in the agricultural or
horticultural sector.
In the absence of these proposed
regulations, uncertainty over statutory
interpretation could lead to economic
losses to the extent that taxpayers
interpret the statute in ways that are
inconsistent with the statute’s intents
and purposes. For example, a Specified
Cooperative may pursue a project
involving a certain product that is only
profitable if that product is deemed
‘‘agricultural or horticultural’’ and thus
eligible for the section 199A(g)
deduction. If, in fact, this product is
ineligible for the deduction based on the
intents and purposes of the statute, then
the project should not have been
pursued and this results in an economic
loss. Alternatively, without a definition
of ‘‘agricultural or horticultural,’’ a
Specified Cooperative may incorrectly
assume that a project is not eligible for
the deduction and not pursue the
project, which could also result in an
economic loss. In such cases, guidance
provides value by bringing economic
decisions closer in line with Congress’
intent or, when such intent is broad,
with decisions that are economically
efficient contingent on the overall Code.
While no guidance can fully curtail all
inaccurate interpretations of the statute,
the proposed regulations significantly
mitigate the chance for such
interpretations and thereby increase
economic efficiency. Due to the lack of
readily available data, the Treasury
Department and the IRS have not
estimated the increase in United States
economic activity that would arise from
the proposed guidance.
The Treasury Department further
projects that the issuance of guidance
will reduce taxpayer compliance burden
and the costs of tax administration
relative to a no-action baseline. Due to
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
the lack of readily available data, the
Treasury Department has not estimated
the decrease in taxpayer compliance
burden nor tax administration costs
arising from the issuance of guidance.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
request comments and information that
can allow estimation of economic
impacts and any changes in taxpayer
compliance burden resulting from the
proposed guidance.
3. Economic Analysis of Specific
Provisions
The proposed regulations embody
certain regulatory decisions that reflect
necessary regulatory discretion. These
decisions specify more fully how the
2018 Act is to be implemented.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
solicit comments on the economic
impacts of each of the items discussed
in this section and of any other items of
the proposed regulations not discussed
in this section. The Treasury
Department and the IRS particularly
solicit comments that provide data,
other evidence, or models that could
enhance the rigor of the process by
which provisions might be developed
for the final regulations.
i. Determining Section 199A(g)
Deduction
Specified Cooperatives are taxed
differently depending on whether they
are exempt (qualified as a cooperative
under section 521) or nonexempt
(qualified under rules elsewhere in the
Code) and also whether their income is
from patronage (generally related to the
cooperative’s marketing, purchasing, or
services activities) or nonpatronage
sources. In the case of exempt Specified
Cooperatives patronage and
nonpatronage source income is subject
to a single level of tax at the patron
level. Whereas, for nonexempt Specified
Cooperatives only patronage source
income is subject to a single level of tax
at the patron level; nonpatronage source
income is subject to a double level of
tax, similar to other C corporations.
Because the Code does not define
patronage and nonpatronage source
income, proposed § 1.1388–1(f) sets
forth a definition of patronage and
nonpatronage that is consistent with the
current state of federal case law.
Specifically, the proposed definition
adopts the directly related test, which is
a fact specific test for determining
whether income and deductions of a
Cooperative are patronage or
nonpatronage. Specifying a definition
that is consistent with current case law
will help to minimize the economic
impacts of these proposed regulations.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
E:\FR\FM\19JNP2.SGM
19JNP2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
request comments with respect to this
definition.
The TCJA reduced the corporate tax
rate for C corporations under section 11
and provided the section 199A
deduction for domestic businesses
operated as sole proprietorships or
through partnerships, S corporations,
trusts, or estates. The TCJA also
repealed section 199, which did not
preclude deductions on income earned
by C corporations. The 2018 Act
amended section 199A to address
concerns that the TCJA created an
unintended incentive for farmers to sell
their agricultural or horticultural
products to Specified Cooperatives over
independent buyers. Specifically, the
2018 Act amended section 199A(g) to
allow Specified Cooperatives and their
patrons a deduction similar to the
former section 199 deduction. Because
the section 199A(g) deduction is not
intended to benefit C corporations and
their shareholders in general, the
proposed regulations specify that the
section 199A(g) deduction can be
claimed on income that can be subject
to tax only at the patron level. Under the
proposed regulations, non-exempt
Specified Cooperatives may not claim
the section 199A(g) deductions on
income that cannot be paid to patrons
and deducted under section 1382(b) and
exempt Specified Cooperatives may not
claim section 199A(g) deductions on
income that cannot be paid to patrons
and deducted under sections 1382(b) or
1382(c)(2).
In the absence of these proposed
regulations, a Specified Cooperative
may have uncertainty as to whether
non-patronage source income, which
would be taxed in the same manner as
a C corporation, could receive both the
lower corporate tax rate and be further
offset by a section 199A(g) deduction.
Other C corporations performing
identical activities would only benefit
from the lower corporate tax rate.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
have determined that this potential
uncertainty as to tax treatment could
distort economic decisions in the
agricultural or horticultural sector. The
proposed regulations avoid this
outcome, promoting a more efficient
allocation of resources by providing
more uniform incentives across
taxpayers.
ii. Definition of Agricultural or
Horticultural Products
Proposed § 1.199A–8(a)(4) defines
agricultural or horticultural products as
agricultural, horticultural, viticultural,
and dairy products, livestock and the
products thereof, the products of
poultry and bee raising, the edible
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 Jun 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
products of forestry, and any and all
products raised or produced on farms
and processed or manufactured
products thereof within the meaning of
the Cooperative Marketing Act of 1926.
Agricultural or horticultural products
also include aquatic products that are
farmed as well as fertilizer, diesel fuel,
and other supplies used in agricultural
or horticultural production that are
MPGE by the Specified Cooperative.
Agricultural or horticultural products,
however, do not include intangible
property, since agricultural or
horticultural products were considered
a subset of tangible property under
former section 199. Intangible property
(defined in § 1.199–3(j)(2)(iii)) was a
separate category of property and gross
receipts from intangible property did
not qualify as DPGR.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
considered other definitions of
agricultural or horticultural products
but determined that taxpayer burden
and tax administration costs would be
lowest under a definition that was
consistent with extant law.
For example, the Treasury
Department and the IRS considered a
similar but alternative definition of
agricultural or horticultural products as
agricultural, horticultural, viticultural,
and dairy products, livestock and
poultry, bees, forest products, fish and
shellfish, and any products thereof,
including processed and manufactured
products, and any and all products
raised or produced on farms and any
processed or manufactured product
thereof within the meaning of the
Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946.
While very similar to the definition in
these proposed rules, the Treasury
Department and the IRS proposed using
the definition based on the Cooperative
Marketing Act of 1926, which
specifically concerns cooperatives and
with which Specified Cooperatives are
familiar, unlike the Agricultural
Marketing Act of 1946, which concerns
the marketing and distribution of
agricultural products without reference
to Cooperatives. The Treasury
Department and the IRS looked to the
United States Department of Agriculture
(USDA) for definitions because there is
no definition of agricultural or
horticultural products in the Internal
Revenue Code or Income Tax
Regulations and because the USDA has
expertise concerning Specified
Cooperatives and because Specified
Cooperatives are likely familiar with
USDA law.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
also considered an alternative definition
of agricultural or horticultural products
based on the definition of agricultural
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
28679
commodities within the meaning of
general regulations under the
Commodity Exchange Act. The Treasury
Department and the IRS concluded that
this definition was too narrow, because
it is limited to products that can be
commodities. The use of this narrow
definition would have restricted the
range of products for which the section
199A(g) deduction would be otherwise
be available.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
request comments on other approaches
to defining agricultural or horticultural
products. The Treasury Department and
the IRS did not attempt to provide
quantitative estimates of the revenue
effects or economic consequences of
different designations of agricultural or
horticultural products because suitable
data are not readily available at this
level of detail. The Treasury Department
and the IRS request comments that can
inform such estimation.
iii. De Minimis Threshold
In general, proposed § 1.199A–9
requires that Specified Cooperatives
allocate gross receipts between domestic
production gross receipts (DPGR) and
non-DPGR. However, proposed
§ 1.199A–9(c)(3) includes a de minimis
provision that allows Specified
Cooperatives to allocate total gross
receipts to DPGR if less than 5 percent
of total gross receipts are non-DPGR or
to allocate total gross receipts to nonDPGR if less than 5 percent of total gross
receipts are DPGR. The Treasury
Department and the IRS chose to
include a de minimis rule to reduce
compliance costs and simplify tax filing
relative to an alternative of no de
minimis rule. The de minimis threshold
modestly reduces compliance costs for
businesses with relatively small
amounts of non-DPGR or DPGR by
allowing them to avoid allocating
receipts between DPGR and non-DPGR
activities. The de minimis threshold is
unlikely to create any substantial effects
on market activity because any change
in the ratio of DPGR to non-DPGR will
be localized around the threshold,
meaning that the movement will be a
small fraction of receipts to get below
the de minimis threshold.
The thresholds provided in the
proposed regulations are based on the
thresholds set forth in § 1.199–1(d)(3).
The Treasury Department and the IRS
maintained the de minimis rule from
the final regulations under former
section 199 because the 2018 Act
directed that regulations concerning the
section 199A(g) deduction be based on
the regulations applicable to
Cooperatives and their patrons under
former section 199. The Treasury
E:\FR\FM\19JNP2.SGM
19JNP2
28680
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
Department and the IRS considered
changes in the de minimis provisions
but determined that changing these from
provisions that were previously
available would lead to taxpayer
confusion. Because the de minimis
provision exempts taxpayers from
having to perform certain allocations,
the Treasury Department and the IRS do
not have sufficient information on
taxpayers’ use of this exemption under
former section 199 to perform a
quantitative analysis of the impacts of
the de minimis provision.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
solicit comments on the de minimis
thresholds and particularly request
comments that provide data, other
evidence, and models that can enhance
the rigor of the process by which such
thresholds might be determined for the
final regulations while maintaining
consistency with the statute’s directive
that the thresholds be based on
regulations issued under former section
199.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
iv. Reporting Requirements
Proposed § 1.199A–7(c) and (d)
provide that, when a patron conducts a
trade or business that receives
distributions from a Cooperative, the
Cooperative is required to provide the
patron with qualified items of income,
gain, deduction, and loss and specified
service trade or business (SSTB)
determinations with respect to those
distributions. This increases the
compliance burden on such
Cooperatives. However, in the absence
of these proposed regulations, the
burden for determination of the amount
of distributions from a Cooperative that
constitute qualified items of income,
gain, deduction, and loss from a nonSSTB and an SSTB would lie with the
patron. Because patrons are less well
positioned to acquire the relevant
information to determine whether
distributions from a Cooperative are
qualified items of income, gain,
deduction, and loss and whether items
that would otherwise qualify are from
an SSTB, the Treasury Department and
the IRS expect that these proposed
regulations will reduce overall
compliance costs relative to an
alternative approach of not introducing
a reporting requirement.
v. Allocation Safe Harbor
If a patron receives both qualified
payments and payments that are not
qualified payments in a qualified trade
or business, the patron must allocate
those items and related deductions
using a reasonable method based on all
of the facts and circumstances. The
proposed regulations provide a safe
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 Jun 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
harbor that allows patrons who receive
qualified payments in addition to other
income to use a simpler method to
allocate business expenses and W–2
wages between qualified payments and
other gross receipts to calculate the
section 199A(b)(7) reduction to the
section 199A(a) deduction. The safe
harbor allocation method allows patrons
to allocate by ratably apportioning
business expenses and W–2 wages
based on the proportion that the amount
of qualified payments bears to the total
gross receipts used to determine QBI.
This safe harbor is available to patrons
with taxable incomes below the
threshold amounts set forth in section
199A(e)(2).
The Treasury Department and the IRS
considered an alternative of not
allowing a safe harbor but determined
that a safe harbor could reduce
compliance costs and simplify tax filing.
The threshold was set at amounts set
forth in section 199A(e)(2) to avoid a
proliferation of thresholds applicable to
taxpayers claiming a section 199A(a)
deduction. Because the threshold
amounts are relatively low, the Treasury
Department and the IRS expect that the
safe harbor would not distort business
decisions or reduce revenue to any
meaningful extent.
II. Paperwork Reduction Act
The collections of information in
these proposed regulations are in
proposed § 1.199A–7(c)(3), (d)(3), (f)(3),
and (h)(3), as well as proposed
§ 1.199A–8(d)(3), (f), and (h)(3). The
collections of information in proposed
§ 1.199A–7(c)(3), (d)(3), (f)(3), and (h)(3),
as well as proposed § 1.199A–8(d)(3)
and (h)(3) will be conducted through
Form 1099–PATR, while the collection
of information in proposed § 1.199A–
8(f) will be conducted through Schedule
K–1 to Form 1065. In 2018, the IRS
released and invited comments on the
draft of Form 1065, Schedule K–1. The
IRS received no comments on the form
during the comment period.
Consequently, the IRS made the form
available December 6, 2018 for use by
the public. On February 26, 2019, the
IRS invited comments on Form 1099–
PATR and the comment period closed
on April 29, 2019. The IRS plans to
issue in the near term an additional
notice with a thirty-day comment period
on Form 1099–PATR. The IRS is
contemplating making additional
changes to those two forms as discussed
below in these proposed regulations.
A. Collections of Information Conducted
Through Form 1099–PATR
The collection of information in
proposed § 1.199A–7(c)(3) requires the
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Cooperative to inform its patron of the
amount of any distribution to the patron
that constitutes qualified items of
income, gain, deduction, and loss from
a non-SSTB conducted directly by the
Cooperative. Not all distributions to
patrons are qualified items of income,
gain, deduction, and loss because the
source of the distribution may not be
effectively connected with the conduct
of a trade or business within the United
States or may include interest income
that is not properly allocable to the
patron’s trade or business. The
Cooperative directly conducting the
trade or business from which the
distribution to the patron originates is in
the best position to know how much of
the distribution is qualified items of
income, gain, deduction, and loss. The
Cooperative is also in the best position
to know if it is generating income from
an SSTB. Accordingly, the collection of
information is necessary for the patron
to calculate correctly the patron’s
section 199A(a) deduction for the
patron’s trade or business.
The collection of information in
proposed § 1.199A–7(d)(3) requires the
Cooperative to inform its patron of the
amount of any distributions to the
patron that constitutes qualified items of
income, gain, deduction, and loss from
an SSTB conducted directly by the
Cooperative. Accordingly, the collection
of information is necessary for the
patron to correctly calculate the patron’s
section 199A(a) deduction for the
patron’s qualified trade or business.
The collection of information in
proposed § 1.199A–7(f)(3) is essential
for the eligible taxpayer’s calculation of
the reduction in the eligible taxpayer’s
section 199A(a) deduction for the
eligible taxpayer’s trade or business that
is required by section 199A(b)(7).
Section 199A(g)(2)(A) requires the
Specified Cooperative to identify the
amount of qualified payments being
distributed to an eligible taxpayer and
identify the portion of the deduction
allowed in a notice mailed to the
eligible taxpayer during the payment
period described in section 1382(d).
Section 199A(b)(7) provides that an
eligible taxpayer who receives qualified
payments from a Specified Cooperative
must reduce the eligible taxpayer’s
section 199A(a) deduction by an amount
set forth in this section. Without the
notice described in proposed § 1.199A–
7(f)(3), the eligible taxpayer cannot
calculate the reduction required by
section 199A(b)(7).
The collection of information in
proposed § 1.199A–8(d)(3) is
necessitated by section 199A(g)(2)(A).
Section 199A(g)(2)(A) permits a
Specified Cooperative to pass through
E:\FR\FM\19JNP2.SGM
19JNP2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
an amount of its section 199A(g)
deduction to an eligible taxpayer. The
amount of the section 199A(g)
deduction that the Specified
Cooperative is permitted to pass through
is an amount that is allocable to the
QPAI generated from qualified
payments distributed to the eligible
taxpayer and identified by such
cooperative in a written notice mailed to
such taxpayer during the payment
period described in section 1382(d).
Without the notice required in proposed
§ 1.199A–8(d)(3) the eligible taxpayer
would not know that the Specified
Cooperative is passing a portion of its
section 199A(g) deduction to the eligible
taxpayer.
The collections of information in
proposed §§ 1.199A–7(h)(3) and
1.199A–8(h)(3) are necessitated by a
special transition rule in section 101 of
the 2018 Act. Under this transition rule,
the repeal of former section 199 for
taxable years beginning after December
31, 2017, does not apply to a qualified
payment received by a patron from a
Specified Cooperative in a taxable year
beginning after December 31, 2017, to
the extent such qualified payment is
attributable to QPAI with respect to
which a deduction is allowable to the
Specified Cooperative under former
section 199 for a taxable year of the
Specified Cooperative beginning before
January 1, 2018. Such qualified payment
remains subject to former section 199
and no deduction is allowed under
section 199A(a) or (g) with respect to
such qualified payment. Without these
collections of information by the
Specified Cooperative, the patron has no
way of knowing that the patron is barred
by the transition rule from using a
qualified payment received that is QBI
for the patron’s trade or business to
claim a section 199A(a) deduction for
the patron’s trade or business.
The collections of information in
proposed § 1.199A–7(c)(3), (d)(3), (f)(3),
and (h)(3) as well as proposed § 1.199A–
8(d)(3) and (h)(3) are satisfied by
providing information about qualified
items of income, SSTB determinations,
qualified payments, the section 199A(g)
deduction, and the use of qualified
payments tied to the former section 199
deduction, as applicable, on an
attachment to or on the Form 1099–
PATR (or any successor form) issued by
the Cooperative to the patron, unless
otherwise provided by the instructions
to the Form.
For purposes of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C.
3507(d)) (PRA), the reporting burden
associated with proposed § 1.199A–
7(c)(3), (d)(3), (f)(3), and (h)(3) as well as
proposed § 1.199A–8(d)(3) and (h)(3)
will be reflected in the PRA Submission
associated with Form 1099–PATR (OMB
control number 1545–0118). As further
discussed in this section, the estimated
number of respondents for the reporting
burden associated with these
information collections is 9,000 based
on 2017 tax filings.
B. Collections of Information Conducted
Through Schedule K–1, Form 1065
The collection of information in
proposed § 1.199A–8(f) is required by
section 199A(g)(5)(B). This section
allows a Specified Cooperative that is a
partner in a partnership to use its
allocable share of gross receipts and
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
Form 1099–PATR ........................................................................................................................
Schedule K–1 (Form 1065) .........................................................................................................
The current status of the PRA
submissions related to the tax forms that
will be revised as a result of the
information collections in the proposed
regulations is provided in the
accompanying table. As described
previously, the burdens associated with
proposed § 1.199A–7(c)(3), (d)(3), (f)(3),
and (h)(3) as well as proposed
§§ 1.199A–8(d)(3) and (h)(3) will be
included in the aggregated burden
estimates for OMB control number
1545–0118, which represents a total
estimated burden time of 509,895 hours
and total estimated monetized costs of
$44.733 million ($2018). The burdens
associated with the information
collection in proposed § 1.199A–8(f)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 Jun 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
will be included in the aggregated
burden estimates for OMB control
number 1545–0123, which represents a
total estimated burden time for all forms
and schedules of 3.157 billion hours
and total estimated monetized costs of
$58.148 billion ($2017). The overall
burden estimates provided for 1545–
0118 and 1545–0123 are aggregate
amounts that relate to all information
collections associated with the
applicable OMB control number.
No burden estimates specific to the
forms affected by the proposed
regulations are currently available. The
Treasury Department and the IRS have
not estimated the burden, including that
of any new information collections,
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
28681
related deductions to calculate its
section 199A(g) deduction. The
proposed rules provide that the
partnership must separately identify
and report the allocable share of gross
receipts and related deductions on or
attached to the Schedule K–1 to the
Form 1065 (or any successor form)
issued to a Specified Cooperative
partner, unless otherwise provided by
the instructions to the Form. Without
this reporting, the Specified Cooperative
partner would not have the information
necessary to calculate its section
199A(g) deduction from its activities
with the partnership.
The Schedule K–1 to the Form 1065
will be modified to include a
mechanism to report the Specified
Cooperative partner’s allocable share of
gross receipts and related deductions.
The collection of information in
proposed § 1.199A–8(f) is satisfied when
the partnership provides the required
information to its Specified Cooperative
partners on or attached to the Schedule
K–1 of Form 1065 (or any successor
form), unless otherwise provided by the
instructions to the Form. For purposes
of the PRA, the reporting burden
associated with proposed § 1.199A–8(f)
will be reflected in the PRA Submission
associated with Form 1065 (OMB
control number 1545–0123). As
provided in this section, the estimated
number of respondents for the reporting
burden associated with these
information collections is 407 based on
2017 tax filings.
C. Revised Tax Forms
The revised tax forms are as follows:
New
Revision of
existing form
........................
........................
✓
✓
Number of
respondents
9,000
407
related to the requirements under the
proposed regulations. Those estimates
would need to capture both changes
made by the 2018 Act and those that
arise out of discretionary authority
exercised in the proposed regulations.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
request comments on all aspects of
information collection burdens related
to the proposed regulations, including
estimates for how much time it would
take to comply with the paperwork
burdens described above for each
relevant form and ways for the IRS to
minimize the paperwork burden.
Proposed revisions to these forms that
reflect the information collections
contained in these proposed regulations
E:\FR\FM\19JNP2.SGM
19JNP2
28682
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
will be made available for public
comment at https://apps.irs.gov/app/
picklist/list/draftTaxForms.htm and will
not be finalized until after these forms
Form
Type of filer
Form 1099–PATR ...................
[Business (Legacy Model)] .....
have been approved by OMB under the
PRA.
OMB No.(s)
1545–0118
Status
Existing collection of information approved by OIRA on 6/3/
2016. Public comments will be sought on a revised collection of information that will be submitted for OIRA review
before 6/30/2019.
Link: https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAViewICR?ref_nbr=201602-1545-024.
Form 1065, Schedule K–1 ......
Business (NEW Model) ..........
1545–0123
Published in the Federal Register on 10/11/18. Public Comment period closed on 12/10/18. Approved by OIRA on 12/
21/18.
Link:https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/10/09/2018-21846/proposed-collection-comment-requestfor-forms-1065-1065-b-1066-1120-1120-c-1120-f-1120-h-1120-nd.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
III. Regulatory Flexibility Act
As described in more detail in this
section, pursuant to the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. chapter
6, the Treasury Department and the IRS
hereby certify that these proposed
regulations will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Notwithstanding this certification, the
Treasury Department and the IRS invite
comments on any impact this rule
would have on small entities.
A. Proposed § 1.199A–7(c)(3) and (d)(3)
Although proposed § 1.199A–7(c)(3)
and (d)(3) will have an impact on a
substantial number of small entities, the
economic impact will not be significant.
The IRS creates the Business Master File
which contains data from Form 1120–C,
U.S. Income Tax Return for Cooperative
Associations. According to the Business
Master File data, in 2017, the IRS
received approximately 9,000 Forms
1120–C from Cooperatives. Under the
North American Industry Classification
System (NAICS), a Cooperative is
considered a small entity if it has less
than $750,000 in annual gross receipts.
Approximately 4,050 (45 percent) of the
9,000 filers of Forms 1120–C reported
annual gross receipts of less than
$750,000. Therefore, a substantial
number of small entities are affected by
the requirements in proposed § 1.199A–
7(c)(3) and (d)(3).
Proposed § 1.199A–7 provides rules
similar to those provided in § 1.199A–
6. In § 1.199A–6, relevant passthrough
entities (RPEs) are not permitted to take
the section 199A deduction but are
required to determine and report the
information necessary for their direct
and indirect owners to determine their
individual section 199A(a) deductions.
Section 1.199A–6 requires RPEs to
determine and report on or attach to the
RPEs’ Schedule K–1s to the Form 1065
for each trade or business in which the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 Jun 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
RPE was directly engaged four items: (1)
The amount of QBI, (2) W–2 wages, (3)
UBIA of qualified property, and (4)
SSTBs.
Although Cooperatives are not RPEs,
Cooperatives make distributions to
patrons that such patrons are permitted
to include in calculating their
individual section 199A(a) deductions.
Proposed § 1.199A–7(c) and (d) require
the Cooperatives to determine and
report to their patrons whether the
distributions for which the Cooperatives
take deductions under section 1382(b)
and/or (c)(2), as applicable, constitute
qualified items of income, gain,
deduction, and loss and whether they
are from an SSTB in which the
Cooperative was directly engaged.
In TD 9847 the Treasury Department
and the IRS determined that the
reporting burden in § 1.199A–6 was
estimated at 30 minutes to 20 hours,
depending on individual circumstances,
with an estimated average of 2.5 hours
for all affected entities, regardless of
size. The burden on entities with
business receipts below $10 million was
expected to be at the lower end of the
range (30 minutes to 2.5 hours). The
estimated compliance burden for
passthrough entities that issue
Schedules K–1 is $53 per hour. This
estimate was derived from the Business
Taxpayer Burden model developed by
the IRS’s Office of Research, Applied
Analytics, and Statistics (RAAS), which
relates time and out-of-pocket costs of
business tax preparation, derived from
survey data, to assets and receipts of
affected taxpayers along with other
relevant variables. See Tax Compliance
Burden (John Guyton et al., July 2018)
at https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/
d13315.pdf. Thus, the annual aggregate
burden on businesses with gross
receipts below $10 million was
estimated to be between $19.50 and
$132.50 per business. The Treasury
Department and the IRS determined in
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
TD 9847 that the requirements in
§ 1.199A–6 imposed no significant
economic impact on affected entities.
The reporting requirements under
proposed § 1.199A–7(c)(3) and (d)(3)
require Specified Cooperatives to report
only two of the four pieces of
information RPEs are required to report
under proposed § 1.199A–6: The
amount of qualified items of income,
gain, deduction, and loss and whether
the distributions are from an SSTB in
which the Cooperative was directly
engaged.
The burden imposed by proposed
§ 1.199A–7(c)(3) and (d)(3) only occurs
when a Cooperative has net income that
it may distribute to its patrons such that
the income will qualify for the income
tax deductions under section 1382(b)
and/or (c), as applicable. With respect to
this net income, Cooperatives already
know the source of their income and
deductions without which information
they would not be able to determine the
correct distributions to their patrons and
to claim the income tax deduction for
these distributions under section
1382(b) and/or (c)(2), as applicable.
Finally, assuming that the
approximately 4,050 filers of Forms
1120–C that reported annual gross
receipts of less than $750,000 in 2017
and that each business incurred half of
the higher figure of $132.50 ($66.25)
determined for the § 1.199A–6
regulations to satisfy the reporting
requirements under proposed § 1.199A–
7(c)(3) and (d)(3), the annual burden
imposed by the reporting requirements
would not exceed $66.25 per business.
Accordingly, the Treasury Department
and the IRS conclude that the
requirements in proposed § 1.199A–
7(c)(3) and (d)(3) will not impose a
significant economic impact on small
entities.
E:\FR\FM\19JNP2.SGM
19JNP2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
B. Proposed § § 1.199A–7(h)(3) and
1.199A–8(h)(3)
Although proposed §§ 1.199A–7(h)(3)
and 1.199A–8(h)(3) will have an impact
on a substantial number of small
entities, this economic impact will not
be significant. As previously noted, in
2017, approximately 45 percent of
Cooperatives reported on Forms 1120–C
gross receipts of less than $750,000.
Therefore, a substantial number of small
entities are affected by proposed
§§ 1.199A–7(h)(3) and 1.199A–8(h)(3).
Proposed §§ 1.199A–7(h)(3) and
1.199A–8(h)(3) requires Cooperatives to
notify patrons if, pursuant to the
transition rule in section 101 of the 2018
Act, the patron is barred from using
certain qualified payments from a
Cooperative to claim a section 199A(a)
deduction in a taxable year because
these qualified payments are
attributable to QPAI with respect to
which a deduction is allowable to the
Cooperative under former section 199 in
a taxable year beginning before January
1, 2018. The Cooperative knows which
patrons are impacted since, in order to
claim its deduction under former
section 199, the Cooperative must
identify which qualified payments to
use. The Treasury Department and the
IRS estimate that the annual burden
imposed by the requirement in
proposed §§ 1.199A–7(h)(3) and
1.199A–8(h)(3) will be far less than the
$66.25 per business estimated for the
requirements in proposed §§ 1.199A–
7(c)(3) and 1.199A–8(c)(3) discussed
above, since the Cooperatives know
which patrons are impacted and the
reporting is limited to informing these
patrons that they cannot use such
qualified payments to calculate their
section 199A(a) deduction.
In addition, absent notice from the
Cooperatives, patrons would have no
way of determining whether they were
barred from claiming the section
199A(a) deduction using such qualified
payments. Finally, Cooperatives are not
able to claim a deduction under former
section 199 for taxable years beginning
after December 31, 2017. Therefore, the
reporting required by proposed
§§ 1.199A–7(h)(3) and 1.199A–8(h)(3)
will be for a short duration and have a
limited impact on Cooperatives.
Accordingly, for all these reasons, the
requirements in proposed §§ 1.199A–
7(h)(3) and 1.199A–8(h)(3) will not
impose a significant economic impact
on small entities.
C. Proposed §§ 1.199A–7(f)(3) and
1.199A–8(d)(3)
Sections 1.199A–7(f)(3) and 1.199A–
8(d)(3) will not have a significant
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 Jun 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This claim is
based on the fact that this rulemaking
will impact a population of Specified
Cooperatives, only a small percentage of
which are considered small entities.
According to the Business Master File
filing data from the transcribed fields
from the Forms 1120–C for 2017, of the
approximately 9,000 Forms 1120–C
filed by Cooperatives, approximately
2,000 filers identified their Cooperatives
as involving agriculture or horticulture
using the NAICS. As noted previously,
a Cooperative is considered small if it
reports less than $750,000 in annual
gross receipts. Of the 2,000 filers of
Forms 1120–C identifying as Specified
Cooperatives, only 175 filers (less than
1 percent) reported annual gross
receipts of less than $750,000.
Accordingly, proposed §§ 1.199A–7(f)(3)
and 1.199A–8(d)(3) will not impose a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
D. Proposed § 1.199A–8(f)
Although proposed § 1.199A–8(f) will
have an impact on a substantial number
of small entities, this impact will not be
economically significant. According to
the Business Master File filing data from
the transcribed fields from the Forms
1065 for 2017, the IRS estimates that
there were 3,954,000 partnerships
reporting their partners’ share of
partnership items on Schedules K–1
(Form 1065). The IRS also identified
approximately 407 different
partnerships that issued a Schedule K–
1 to 680 different Cooperatives in 2017.
The IRS does not have information as to
whether the 680 Cooperatives all
qualified as Specified Cooperatives.
Of the 407 different partnerships, the
IRS determined that 344 of the
partnerships conducted activities in
2017 that would have required the
partnerships to file under proposed
§ 1.199A–8(f). The IRS does not have
sufficient data to determine the type of
business activities of the remaining 63
partnerships. To be as comprehensive
and transparent as possible in analyzing
the potential impact of the proposed
regulations, it is assumed that all 63 of
these partnerships would be required to
file under proposed § 1.199A–8(f) and
would be considered small entities.
Of the 344 partnerships identified as
having both issued a Schedule K–1 to a
Cooperative and conducting eligible
activities in 2017, the IRS determined
that 158 of these partnerships
conducted activities for which the Small
Business Administration (SBA) uses the
number of employees to determine if an
entity is a small entity using the NAICS.
The IRS determined that 153 of these
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
28683
158 partnerships would be small
entities, while five would not be small
entities based on the reported number of
Forms W–2 filed in connection with the
Forms 1065 the partnerships filed in
2017.
The SBA uses income to determine if
an entity is a small entity for the
reported business activities of the
remaining 186 partnerships using the
NAICS. Based upon the reported income
for 2017, 140 of the remaining 186
partnerships are small entities, while 46
partnerships are not small entities.
Therefore, a substantial number of small
entities are affected by requirements in
proposed § 1.199A–8(f).
The economic impact of proposed
§ 1.199A–8(f), however, will not be
significant because the information
required to be reported is gross receipts
and related deductions. This
information is readily available to each
partnership and already known for the
purpose of determining tax obligations.
Because the information required to be
reported is already available and
familiar to each partnership, the
reporting required by proposed
§ 1.199A–8(f) will not impose a
significant economic impact on small
entities.
Accordingly, the Treasury Department
and the IRS hereby certify that the
proposed regulations will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. We
invite public comments with respect to
this conclusion.
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the
Code, this notice of proposed
rulemaking has been submitted to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration for comment
on its impact on small business.
IV. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
requires that agencies assess anticipated
costs and benefits and take certain other
actions before issuing a final rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may
result in expenditures in any one year
by a state, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100 million in 1995 dollars, updated
annually for inflation. In 2018, that
threshold is approximately $150
million. This rule does not include any
Federal mandate that may result in
expenditures by state, local, or tribal
governments, or by the private sector in
excess of that threshold.
V. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (titled
Federalism) prohibits an agency from
publishing any rule that has federalism
E:\FR\FM\19JNP2.SGM
19JNP2
28684
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
implications if the rule either imposes
substantial, direct compliance costs on
state and local governments, and is not
required by statute, or preempts state
law, unless the agency meets the
consultation and funding requirements
of section 6 of the Executive Order. This
proposed rule does not have federalism
implications, and does not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
state and local governments or preempt
state law, within the meaning of the
Executive Order.
Comments and Requests for a Public
Hearing
The Treasury Department and the IRS
request comments on all aspects of the
proposed rules. Before these proposed
regulations are adopted as final
regulations, consideration will be given
to any written or electronic comments
that are submitted timely to the IRS. All
comments will be available for public
inspection and copying. A public
hearing may be scheduled if requested
in writing by any person who timely
submits written comments. If a public
hearing is scheduled, notice of the date,
time, and place for the hearing will be
published in the Federal Register.
Statement of Availability of IRS
Documents
IRS Revenue Procedures, Revenue
Rulings, Notices and other guidance
cited in this document are published in
the Internal Revenue Bulletin and are
available from the Superintendent of
Documents, U.S. Government
Publishing Office, Washington, DC
20402, or by visiting the IRS website at
https://www.irs.gov.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these
proposed regulations is Theresa
Melchiorre, Office of Associate Chief
Counsel (Passthroughs and Special
Industries). Other personnel from the
Treasury Department and the IRS
participated in their development.
Accordingly, under the authority of 26
U.S.C. 7805, the notice of proposed
rulemaking (REG–136459–09) published
in the Federal Register (80 FR 51978) on
August 27, 2015, is withdrawn.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 Jun 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805.
*
*
*
*
*
Section 1.199A–7 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 199A(f)(4) and (g)(6).
Section 1.199A–8 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 199A(g)(6).
Section 1.199A–9 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 199A(g)(6).
Section 1.199A–10 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 199A(g)(6).
Section 1.199A–11 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 199A(g)(6).
Section 1.199A–12 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 199A(g)(6).
*
*
*
*
*
§§ 1.199–0 through 1.199–9
[Removed]
Par. 2. Sections 1.199–0 through
1.199–9 are removed.
■ Par. 3. Sections 1.199A–7 through
1.199A–12 are added to read as follows:
■
Sec.
*
*
*
*
*
1.199A–7 Section 199A(a) Rules for
Cooperatives and their Patrons.
1.199A–8 Deduction for income attributable
to domestic production activities of
specified agricultural or horticultural
cooperatives.
1.199A–9 Domestic production gross
receipts.
1.199A–10 Allocation of costs of goods sold
(COGS) and other deductions to
domestic production gross receipts
(DPGR), and other rules.
1.199A–11 Wage limitation for the section
199A(g) deduction.
1.199A–12 Expanded affiliated groups.
*
*
*
*
§ 1.199A–7 Section 199A(a) Rules for
Cooperatives and their Patrons.
Withdrawal of Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking
Proposed Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR parts 1 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 1 is amended by:
■ 1. Removing the entries for §§ 1.199–
0 through 1.199–9, and
■ 2. Adding entries in numerical order
to read in part as follows:
*
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
■
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
(a) Overview—(1) In general. This
section provides guidance and special
rules on the application of the rules of
§§ 1.199A–1 through 1.199A–6
regarding the deduction for qualified
business income (QBI) under section
199A(a) (section 199A(a) deduction) of
the Internal Revenue Code (Code) by
patrons (patrons) of cooperatives to
which Part I of subchapter T of chapter
1 of subtitle A of the Code applies
(Cooperatives). Unless otherwise
provided in this section, all of the rules
in §§ 1.199A–1 through 1.199A–6
relating to calculating the section
199A(a) deduction apply to patrons and
Cooperatives. Paragraph (b) of this
section provides special rules for
patrons relating to trades or businesses.
Paragraph (c) of this section provides
special rules for patrons and
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Cooperatives relating to the definition of
QBI. Paragraph (d) of this section
provides special rules for patrons and
Cooperatives relating to specified
service trades or businesses (SSTBs).
Paragraph (e) of this section provides
special rules for patrons relating to the
statutory limitations based on W–2
wages and unadjusted basis
immediately after acquisition (UBIA) of
qualified property. Paragraph (f) of this
section provides special rules for
specified agricultural or horticultural
cooperatives (Specified Cooperatives)
and paragraph (g) of this section
provides examples for Specified
Cooperatives and their patrons.
Paragraph (h) of this section sets forth
the applicability date of this section and
a special transition rule relating to
Specified Cooperatives and their
patrons.
(2) At patron level. The section
199A(a) deduction is applied at the
patron level, and patrons who are
individuals (as defined in § 1.199A–
1(a)(2)) may take the section 199A(a)
deduction.
(3) Definitions. For purposes of
section 199A and § 1.199A–7, the
following definitions apply—
(i) Individual is defined in § 1.199A–
1(a)(2).
(ii) Patron is defined in § 1.1388–1(e).
(iii) Patronage and nonpatronage is
defined in § 1.1388–1(f).
(iv) Relevant Passthrough Entity (RPE)
is defined in § 1.199A–1(a)(9).
(v) Qualified payment is defined in
§ 1.199A–8(d)(2)(ii).
(vi) Specified Cooperative is defined
in § 1.199A–8(a)(2) and is a subset of
Cooperatives defined in § 1.199A–
7(a)(1).
(b) Trade or business. A patron
(whether the patron is an RPE or an
individual) must determine whether it
has one or more trades or businesses
that it directly conducts as defined in
§ 1.199A–1(b)(14). To the extent a
patron operating a trade or business has
income directly from that business, the
patron must follow the rules of
§§ 1.199A–1 through 1.199A–6 to
calculate the section 199A deduction.
Patronage dividends or similar
payments are considered to be generated
from the trade or business the
Cooperative conducts on behalf of or
with the patron, and are tested by the
Cooperative at its trade or business
level. A patron that receives patronage
dividends or similar payments, as
described in paragraph (c)(1) of this
section, from a Cooperative must follow
the rules of paragraphs (c) through (e) of
this section to calculate the section
199A deduction.
E:\FR\FM\19JNP2.SGM
19JNP2
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
(c) Qualified Business Income—(1) In
general. QBI means the net amount of
qualified items of income, gain,
deduction, and loss with respect to any
trade or business as determined under
the rules of § 1.199A–3(b). A qualified
item of income includes distributions
for which the Cooperative is allowed a
deduction under section 1382(b) and
(c)(2) (including patronage dividends or
similar payments, such as money,
property, qualified written notices of
allocations, and qualified per-unit retain
certificates, as well as money or
property paid in redemption of a
nonqualified written notice of allocation
(collectively patronage dividends or
similar payments)), provided such
distribution is otherwise a qualified
item of income, gain, deduction, or loss.
See special rule in paragraph (d)(3) of
this section relating to SSTBs that may
affect QBI.
(2) QBI determinations made by
patron. A patron must determine QBI
for each trade or business it directly
conducts. In situations where the patron
receives distributions described in
paragraph (c)(1) of this section, the
Cooperative must determine whether
those distributions include qualified
items of income, gain, deduction, and
loss. These distributions may be
included in the QBI of the patron’s trade
or business:
(i) To the extent that those payments
are related to the patron’s trade or
business;
(ii) Are qualified items of income,
gain, deduction, and loss at the
Cooperative’s trade or business level;
(iii) Are not income from an SSTB at
the Cooperative’s trade or business level
(except as permitted by the threshold
rules (see § 1.199A–5(a)(2)); and
(iv) Provided the patron receives
certain information from the
Cooperative about these payments as
provided in paragraphs (c)(3) and (d)(3)
of this section.
(3) Qualified items of income, gain,
deduction, and loss determinations
made and reported by Cooperatives. In
the case of a Cooperative that makes
distributions described in paragraph
(c)(1) of this section to a patron, the
Cooperative must determine the amount
of qualified items of income, gain,
deduction, and loss in those
distributions. Pursuant to this paragraph
(c)(3), the Cooperative must report the
amounts of qualified items with respect
to any non-SSTB of the Cooperative in
the distributions made to the patron on
an attachment to or on the Form 1099–
PATR, Taxable Distributions Received
From Cooperatives (Form 1099–PATR),
(or any successor form) issued by the
Cooperative to the patron, unless
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 Jun 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
otherwise provided by the instructions
to the Form. If the Cooperative does not
report on or before the due date of the
Form 1099–PATR the amount of such
qualified items of income, gain,
deduction, and loss in the distributions
to the patron, the amount of
distributions from the Cooperative that
may be included in the patron’s QBI is
presumed to be zero. See special rule in
paragraph (d)(3) of this section relating
to reporting of qualified items of
income, gain, deduction, and loss with
respect to SSTBs of the Cooperative.
(d) Specified Service Trades or
Businesses—(1) In general. This section
provides guidance on the determination
of SSTBs. Unless otherwise provided in
this section, all of the rules in § 1.199A–
5 relating to SSTBs apply to patrons of
Cooperatives.
(2) SSTB determinations made by
patron. A patron (whether an RPE or an
individual) must determine whether
each trade or business it directly
conducts is an SSTB.
(3) SSTB determinations made and
reported by Cooperatives. In the case of
a Cooperative that makes distributions
described in paragraph (c)(1) of this
section to a patron, the Cooperative
must determine whether the
distributions from the Cooperative
include items of income, gain,
deduction, and loss from an SSTB
directly conducted by the Cooperative,
and whether such items are qualified
items of income, gain, deduction, and
loss with respect to such SSTB. The
Cooperative must report to the patron
the amount of income, gain, deduction,
and loss in the distributions that is a
qualified item of income, gain,
deduction, and loss with respect to such
SSTB. The Cooperative must report the
amount on an attachment to or on the
Form 1099–PATR (or any successor
form) issued by the Cooperative to the
patron, unless otherwise provided by
the instructions to the Form. If the
Cooperative does not report the amount
on or before the due date of the Form
1099–PATR, then only the amount that
a Cooperative reports as qualified items
of income, gain, deduction, and loss
under § 1.199A–7(c)(3) may be included
in the patron’s QBI, and the remaining
amount of distributions from the
Cooperative that may be included in the
patron’s QBI is presumed to be zero.
(e) W–2 wages and unadjusted basis
immediately after acquisition of
qualified property—(1) In general. This
section provides guidance on
calculating a trade or business’s W–2
wages and the UBIA of qualified
property properly allocable to QBI.
(2) Determinations made by patron.
The determination of W–2 wages and
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
28685
UBIA of qualified property must be
made for each trade or business by the
patron (whether an RPE or individual)
that directly conducts the trade or
business before applying the aggregation
rules of § 1.199A–4. Unlike RPEs,
Cooperatives do not allocate their W–2
wages and UBIA of qualified property to
patrons.
(f) Special rules for patrons of
Specified Cooperatives—(1) Section
199A(b)(7) reduction. A patron of a
Specified Cooperative that receives a
qualified payment must reduce its
section 199A(a) deduction as provided
in § 1.199A–1(e)(7). This reduction
applies whether the Specified
Cooperative passes through all, some, or
none of the Specified Cooperative’s
section 199A(g) deduction to the patron
in that taxable year. The proposed rules
relating to the section 199A(g)
deduction can be found in §§ 1.199A–8
through 1.199A–12.
(2) Deduction Calculation—(i)
Allocation method. If in any taxable
year, a patron receives both qualified
payments and income that is not a
qualified payment in a trade or
business, the patron must allocate those
items and related deductions using a
reasonable method based on all the facts
and circumstances. Different reasonable
methods may be used for different items
and related deductions of income, gain,
deduction, and loss. The chosen
reasonable method for each item must
be consistently applied from one taxable
year of the patron to another, and must
clearly reflect the income and expenses
of each trade or business. The overall
combination of methods must also be
reasonable based on all the facts and
circumstances. The books and records
maintained for a trade or business must
be consistent with any allocations under
this paragraph (f)(2)(i).
(ii) Safe harbor. A patron with taxable
income under the threshold amount set
forth in section 199A(e)(2) is eligible to
use the safe harbor set forth in this
paragraph (f)(2)(ii) instead of the
allocation method set forth in paragraph
(f)(2)(i) of this section for any taxable
year in which the patron receives
qualified payments and income from
other than qualified payments in its
trade or business. Under the safe harbor
the patron may apportion its deductions
and W–2 wages ratably between income
from qualified payments and income
from other than qualified payments for
purposes of calculating the reduction in
paragraph (f)(1) of this section.
Accordingly, the amount of deductions
apportioned to determine QBI allocable
to qualified payments is equal to the
proportion of the total deductions that
the amount of qualified payments bears
E:\FR\FM\19JNP2.SGM
19JNP2
28686
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
to total gross receipts used to determine
QBI. The same proportion applies to
determine the amount of W–2 wages
allocable to the portion of the trade or
business that received qualified
payments.
(3) Qualified payments notice
requirement. A Specified Cooperative
must report the amount of the qualified
payments made to the eligible taxpayer,
as defined in section 199A(g)(2)(D), on
an attachment to or on the Form 1099–
PATR (or any successor form) issued by
the Cooperative to the patron, unless
otherwise provided by the instructions
to the Form.
(g) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the provisions of paragraph (f)
of this section. For purposes of these
examples, assume that the Specified
Cooperative has satisfied the applicable
written notice requirements in
paragraphs (c)(3), (d)(3) and (f)(3) of this
section.
(1) Example 1. Patron of Specified
Cooperative with W–2 wages. (i) P, a grain
farmer and patron of nonexempt Specified
Cooperative (C), delivered to C during 2018
2% of all grain marketed through C during
such year. During 2019, P receives $20,000 in
patronage dividends and $1,000 of allocated
section 199A(g) deduction from C related to
the grain delivered to C during 2018.
(ii) P has taxable income of $75,000 for
2019 (determined without regard to section
199A) and has a filing status of married filing
jointly. P’s QBI related to its grain trade or
business for 2019 is $50,000, which consists
of gross receipts of $150,000 from sales to an
independent grain elevator, per-unit retain
allocations received from C during 2019 of
$80,000, patronage dividends received from
C during 2019 related to C’s 2018 net
earnings of $20,000, and expenses of
$200,000 (including $50,000 of W–2 wages).
(iii) The portion of QBI from P’s grain trade
or business related to qualified payments
received from C during 2019 is $10,000,
which consists of per-unit retain allocations
received from C during 2019 of $80,000,
patronage dividends received from C during
2019 related to C’s 2018 net earnings of
$20,000, and properly allocable expenses of
$90,000 (including $25,000 of W–2 wages).
(iv) P’s deductible amount related to the
grain trade or business is 20% of QBI
($10,000) reduced by the lesser of 9% of QBI
related to qualified payments received from
C ($900) or 50% of W–2 wages related to
qualified payments received from C
($12,500), or $9,100. As P does not have any
other trades or businesses, the combined QBI
amount is also $9,100.
(v) P’s deduction under section 199A for
2019 is $10,100, which consists of the
combined QBI amount of $9,100, plus P’s
deduction passed through from C of $1,000.
(2) Example 2. Patron of Specified
Cooperative without W–2 wages. (i) C and P
have the same facts for 2018 and 2019 as
Example 1, except that P has expenses of
$200,000 that include zero W–2 wages during
2019.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 Jun 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
(ii) P’s deductible amount related to the
grain trade or business is 20% of QBI
($10,000) reduced by the lesser of 9% of QBI
related to qualified payments received from
C ($900) or 50% of W–2 wages related to
qualified payments received from C ($0), or
$10,000.
(iii) P’s deduction under section 199A for
2019 is $11,000, which consists of the
combined QBI amount of $10,000, plus P’s
deduction passed through from C of $1,000.
(3) Example 3. Patron of Specified
Cooperative—Qualified Payments do not
equal QBI and no section 199A(g)
passthrough. (i) P, a grain farmer and a
patron of a nonexempt Specified Cooperative
(C), during 2019, receives $60,000 in
patronage dividends, $100,000 in per-unit
retain allocations, and $0 of allocated section
199A(g) deduction from C related to the grain
delivered to C. C notifies P that only
$150,000 of the patronage dividends and perunit retain allocations are qualified payments
because $10,000 of the payments are not
attributable to C’s qualified production
activities income (QPAI).
(ii) P has taxable income of $90,000
(determined without regard to section 199A)
and has a filing status of married filing
jointly. P’s QBI related to its grain trade or
business is $45,000, which consists of gross
receipts of $95,000 from sales to an
independent grain elevator, plus $160,000
from C (all payments from C qualify as
qualified items of income, gain, deduction,
and loss), less expenses of $210,000
(including $30,000 of W–2 wages).
(iii) The portion of QBI from P’s grain trade
or business related to qualified payments
received from C is $25,000, which consists of
the qualified payments received from C of
$150,000, less the properly allocable
expenses of $125,000 (including $18,000 of
W–2 wages), which were determined using a
reasonable method under paragraph (f)(2)(ii)
of this section.
(iv) P’s patron reduction is $2,250, which
is the lesser of 9% of QBI related to qualified
payments received from C, $2,250 (9% ×
$25,000), or 50% of W–2 wages related to
qualified payments received from C, $9,000
(50% × $18,000). As P does not have any
other trades or businesses, the combined QBI
amount is $6,750 (20% of P’s total QBI,
$9,000 (20% × $45,000), reduced by the
patron reduction of $2,250).
(v) P’s deduction under section 199A is
$6,750, which consists of the combined QBI
amount of $6,750.
(4) Example 4. Patron of Specified
Cooperative—Reasonable Method under
paragraph (f)(2)(ii) of this section. P is a grain
farmer that has $45,000 of QBI related to P’s
grain trade or business in 2019. P’s QBI
consists of $105,000 of sales to an
independent grain elevator, $100,000 of perunit retain allocations, and $50,000 of
patronage dividends from a nonexempt
Specified Cooperative (C), for which C
reports $150,000 of qualified payments to P
as required by paragraph (f)(3) of this section.
P’s grain trade or business has $210,000 of
expenses (including $30,000 of W–2 wages).
P delivered 65x bushels of grain to C and
sold 35x bushels of comparable grain to the
independent grain elevator. To allocate the
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
expenses between qualified payments
($150,000) and other income ($105,000), P
compares the bushels of grain delivered to C
(65x) to the total bushels of grain delivered
to C and sold to the independent grain
elevator (100x). P determines $136,500 (65%
× $210,000) of expenses (including $19,500
of W–2 wages) are properly allocable to the
qualified payments. The portion of QBI from
P’s grain trade or business related to qualified
payments received from C is $13,500, which
consists of qualified payments of $150,000
less the properly allocable expenses of
$136,500 (including $19,500 of W–2 wages).
P’s method of allocating expenses is a
reasonable method under paragraph (f)(2)(ii)
of this section.
(5) Example 5. Patron of Specified
Cooperative using safe harbor to allocate. (i)
P is a grain farmer with taxable income of
$100,000 for 2019 (determined without
regard to section 199A) and has a filing status
of married filing jointly. P’s QBI related to P’s
grain trade or business for 2019 is $50,000,
which consists of gross receipts of $180,000
from sales to an independent grain elevator,
per-unit retain allocations received from a
Specified Cooperative (C) during 2019 of
$15,000, patronage dividends received from
C during 2019 related to C’s 2018 net
earnings of $5,000, and expenses of $150,000
(including $50,000 of W–2 wages). C also
passed through $1,800 of the section 199A(g)
deduction to P, which related to the grain
delivered by P to the Specified Cooperative
during 2018. P uses the safe harbor in
paragraph (f)(2)(iii) of this section to
determine the expenses (including W–2
wages) allocable to the qualified payments.
(ii) Using the safe harbor to allocate P’s
$150,000 of expenses, P allocates $15,000 of
the expenses to the qualified payments
($150,000 of expenses multiplied by the ratio
(0.10) of qualified payments ($20,000) to total
gross receipts ($200,000)). Using the same
ratio, P also determines there are $5,000 of
W–2 wages allocable ($50,000 multiplied by
0.10) to the qualified payments.
(iii) The portion of QBI from P’s grain trade
or business related to qualified payments
received from C during 2019 is $5,000, which
consists of per-unit retain allocations
received from C during 2019 of $15,000,
patronage dividends of $5,000, and properly
allocable expenses of $15,000 (including
$5,000 of W–2 wages).
(iv) P’s QBI related to the grain trade or
business is 20% of QBI ($10,000) reduced by
the lesser of 9% of QBI related to qualified
payments received from C ($450) or 50% of
W–2 wages related to qualified payments
received from C ($2,500), or $9,550. As P
does not have any other trades or businesses,
the combined QBI amount is also $9,550.
(v) P’s deduction under section 199A for
2019 is $11,350, which consists of the
combined QBI amount of $9,550, plus P’s
deduction passed through from C of $1,800.
(h) Effective/Applicability date—(1)
General rule. Except as provided in
paragraph (h)(2) of this section, the
provisions of this section apply to
taxable years ending after the date the
Treasury decision adopting these
regulations as final regulations is
E:\FR\FM\19JNP2.SGM
19JNP2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
published in the Federal Register.
Taxpayers, however, may rely on these
regulations until that date, but only if
the taxpayers apply the rules in their
entirety and in a consistent manner.
(2) Transition rule for qualified
payments of patrons of Cooperatives. No
deductions under section 199A are
allowed to patrons for any qualified
payments that are attributable to QPAI
with respect to which a deduction is
allowable to the Specified Cooperative
under section 199 as in effect on and
before December 31, 2017, for a taxable
year of the Specified Cooperative
beginning before January 1, 2018.
(3) Notice from the Cooperative. If a
patron of a Cooperative cannot claim a
deduction under section 199A for any
qualified payments described in the
transition rule set forth in paragraph
(h)(2) of this section, the Cooperative
must report this information on an
attachment to or on the Form 1099–
PATR (or any successor form) issued by
the Cooperative to the patron, unless
otherwise provided by the instructions
to the Form.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 1.199A–8 Deduction for income
attributable to domestic production
activities of specified agricultural or
horticultural cooperatives.
(a) Overview—(1) In general. This
section provides rules relating to the
deduction for income attributable to
domestic production activities of a
specified agricultural or horticultural
cooperative (Specified Cooperative).
This paragraph (a) provides an overview
and definitions of certain terms.
Paragraph (b) of this section provides
rules explaining the steps a nonexempt
Specified Cooperative performs to
calculate its section 199A(g) deduction
and includes definitions of relevant
terms. Paragraph (c) of this section
provides rules explaining the steps an
exempt Specified Cooperative performs
to calculate its section 199A(g)
deduction. Paragraph (d) of this section
provides rules for Specified
Cooperatives passing through the
section 199A(g) deduction to patrons.
Paragraph (e) of this section provides
examples that illustrate the provisions
of paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this
section. Paragraph (f) of this section
provides guidance for Specified
Cooperatives that are partners in a
partnership. Paragraph (g) of this section
provides guidance on the recapture of a
claimed section 199A(g) deduction.
Paragraph (h) of this section provides
effective dates. For additional rules
addressing an expanded affiliated group
(EAG) see § 1.199A–12. The principles
of this section apply to the EAG rules in
§ 1.199A–12.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 Jun 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
(2) Specified Cooperative—(i) In
general. Specified Cooperative means a
cooperative to which Part I of
subchapter T of chapter 1 of subtitle A
of the Internal Revenue Code (Code)
applies and which—
(A) Manufactures, produces, grows, or
extracts (MPGE) in whole or significant
part within the United States any
agricultural or horticultural product, or
(B) Is engaged in the marketing of
agricultural or horticultural products
that have been MPGE in whole or
significant part within the United States
by the patrons of the cooperative.
(ii) Additional rules. See § 1.199A–9
for rules to determine if a Specified
Cooperative has MPGE an agricultural
or horticultural product in whole or
significant part within the United
States.
(iii) Types of Specified Cooperatives.
A Specified Cooperative that is qualified
as a farmer’s cooperative organization
under section 521 is an exempt
Specified Cooperative, while a Specified
Cooperative not so qualified is a
nonexempt Specified Cooperative.
(3) Patron is defined in § 1.1388–1(e).
(4) Agricultural or horticultural
products are agricultural, horticultural,
viticultural, and dairy products,
livestock and the products thereof, the
products of poultry and bee raising, the
edible products of forestry, and any and
all products raised or produced on
farms and processed or manufactured
products thereof within the meaning of
the Cooperative Marketing Act of 1926,
44 Stat. 802 (1926). Agricultural or
horticultural products also include
aquatic products that are farmed
whether by an exempt or a nonexempt
Specified Cooperative. In addition,
agricultural or horticultural products
include fertilizer, diesel fuel, and other
supplies used in agricultural or
horticultural production that are MPGE
by a Specified Cooperative. Agricultural
or horticultural products, however, do
not include intangible property (other
than as provided in the exception in
§ 1.199A–9(b)(2)); for example, an
agricultural or horticultural product
includes a seed that is grown, but does
not include the intangible property right
to reproduce a seed for sale. This
exclusion of intangible property does
not apply to intangible characteristics of
any particular agricultural or
horticultural product. For example,
gross receipts from the sale of different
varieties of oranges would all qualify as
DPGR from the disposition of
agricultural or horticultural products
(assuming all other requirements of
section 199A(g) are met). However,
gross receipts from the license of the
right to produce and sell a certain
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
28687
variety of an orange would be
considered separate from the orange and
not from an agricultural or horticultural
product.
(b) Steps for a nonexempt Specified
Cooperative in calculating deduction—
(1) In general. Except as provided in
paragraph (c)(3) of this section, this
paragraph (b) applies only to nonexempt
Specified Cooperatives.
(2) Step 1—Gross receipts and related
deductions—(i) Identify. To determine
the section 199A(g) deduction, a
Specified Cooperative first identifies its
patronage and nonpatronage gross
receipts and related cost of goods sold
(COGS), deductible expenses, W–2
wages, etc. (deductions) and allocates
them between patronage and
nonpatronage. A single definition for
the term patronage and nonpatronage is
found in § 1.1388–1(f).
(ii) Applicable gross receipts and
deductions. For all purposes of the
section 199A(g) deduction, a Specified
Cooperative can use only patronage
gross receipts and related deductions to
calculate qualified production activities
income (QPAI) as defined in paragraph
(b)(4)(ii) of this section, oil-related QPAI
as defined in paragraph (b)(7)(ii) of this
section, or the W–2 wage limitation in
paragraph (b)(5)(ii)(B) of this section. A
Specified Cooperative cannot use its
nonpatronage gross receipts and related
deductions to calculate its section
199A(g) deduction.
(iii) Gross receipts are the Specified
Cooperative’s receipts for the taxable
year that are recognized under the
Specified Cooperative’s methods of
accounting used for Federal income tax
purposes for the taxable year. See
§ 1.199A–12 if the gross receipts are
recognized in an intercompany
transaction within the meaning of
§ 1.1502–13. Gross receipts include total
sales (net of returns and allowances)
and all amounts received for services. In
addition, gross receipts include any
income from investments and from
incidental or outside sources. For
example, gross receipts include interest
(except interest under section 103 but
including original issue discount),
dividends, rents, royalties, and
annuities, regardless of whether the
amounts are derived in the ordinary
course of the Specified Cooperative’s
trade or business. Gross receipts are not
reduced by COGS or by the cost of
property sold if such property is
described in section 1221(a)(1), (2), (3),
(4), or (5). Finally, gross receipts do not
include amounts received by the
Specified Cooperative with respect to
sales tax or other similar state or local
taxes if, under the applicable state or
local law, the tax is legally imposed on
E:\FR\FM\19JNP2.SGM
19JNP2
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
28688
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
the purchaser of the good or service and
the Specified Cooperative merely
collects and remits the tax to the taxing
authority. If, in contrast, the tax is
imposed on the Specified Cooperative
under the applicable law, then gross
receipts include the amounts received
that are allocable to the payment of such
tax.
(3) Step 2—Determine gross receipts
that are DPGR—(i) In general. A
Specified Cooperative examines its
patronage gross receipts to determine
which of these are DPGR. A Specified
Cooperative does not use nonpatronage
gross receipts to determine DPGR.
(ii) DPGR are the gross receipts of the
Specified Cooperative that are derived
from any lease, rental, license, sale,
exchange, or other disposition of an
agricultural or horticultural product that
is MPGE by the Specified Cooperative or
its patrons in whole or significant part
within the United States. DPGR does not
include gross receipts derived from
services or the lease, rental, license,
sale, exchange, or other disposition of
land unless a de minimis or other
exception applies. See § 1.199A–9 for
additional rules on determining if gross
receipts are DPGR.
(4) Step 3—Determine QPAI—(i) In
general. A Specified Cooperative
determines QPAI from patronage DPGR
and patronage deductions identified in
paragraphs (b)(3)(ii) and (b)(2)(i) of this
section, respectively. A Specified
Cooperative does not use nonpatronage
gross receipts or deductions to
determine QPAI.
(ii) QPAI for the taxable year means
an amount equal to the excess (if any)
of—
(A) DPGR for the taxable year, over
(B) The sum of—
(1) COGS that are allocable to DPGR,
and
(2) Other expenses, losses, or
deductions (other than the section
199A(g) deduction) that are properly
allocable to DPGR.
(C) QPAI computational rules. QPAI
is computed without taking into account
the section 199A(g) deduction or any
deduction allowed under section
1382(b). See § 1.199A–10 for additional
rules on calculating QPAI.
(5) Step 4—Calculate deduction—(i)
In general. From QPAI and taxable
income, a Specified Cooperative
calculates its section 199A(g) deduction
as provided in paragraph (b)(5)(ii) of
this section.
(ii) Deduction—(A) In general. A
Specified Cooperative is allowed a
deduction equal to 9 percent of the
lesser of—
(1) QPAI of the Specified Cooperative
for the taxable year, or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 Jun 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
(2) Taxable income of the Specified
Cooperative for the taxable year.
(B) W–2 wage limitation. The
deduction allowed under paragraph
(b)(5)(ii)(A) of this section for any
taxable year cannot exceed 50 percent of
the patronage W–2 wages attributable to
DPGR for the taxable year. See
§ 1.199A–11 for additional rules on
calculating the patronage W–2 wage
limitation.
(C) Taxable income. Taxable income
is defined in section 1382 and § 1.1382–
1 and § 1.1382–2. For purposes of
determining the amount of the
deduction allowed under paragraph
(b)(5)(ii) of this section, taxable income
is limited to taxable income and related
deductions from patronage sources.
Patronage net operating losses (NOLs)
reduce taxable income. Taxable income
is computed without taking into account
the section 199A(g) deduction or any
deduction allowable under section
1382(b). Taxable income is determined
using the same method of accounting
used to determine distributions under
section 1382(b) and qualified payments
to eligible taxpayers.
(6) Use of patronage section 199A(g)
deduction. Except as provided in
§ 1.199A–12(c)(2) related to the rules for
EAGs, the patronage section 199A(g)
deduction cannot create or increase a
patronage or nonpatronage NOL or the
amount of a patronage or nonpatronage
NOL carryover or carryback, if
applicable, in accordance with section
172. A patronage section 199A(g)
deduction can be applied only against
patronage income and deductions. A
patronage section 199A(g) deduction
that is not used in the appropriate
taxable year is lost.
(7) Special rules for nonexempt
Specified Cooperatives that have oilrelated QPAI—(i) Reduction of section
199A(g) deduction. If a Specified
Cooperative has oil-related QPAI for any
taxable year, the amount otherwise
allowable as a deduction under
paragraph (b)(5)(ii) of this section must
be reduced by 3 percent of the least of—
(A) Oil-related QPAI of the Specified
Cooperative for the taxable year,
(B) QPAI of the Specified Cooperative
for the taxable year, or
(C) Taxable income of the Specified
Cooperative for the taxable year.
(ii) Oil-related QPAI means, for any
taxable year, the patronage QPAI that is
attributable to the production, refining,
processing, transportation, or
distribution of oil, gas, or any primary
product thereof (within the meaning of
section 927(a)(2)(C), as in effect before
its repeal) during such taxable year. Oilrelated QPAI for any taxable year is an
amount equal to the excess (if any) of
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
patronage DPGR derived from the
production, refining or processing of oil,
gas, or any primary product thereof (oilrelated DPGR) over the sum of—
(A) COGS of the Specified
Cooperative that is allocable to such
receipts; and
(B) Other expenses, losses, or
deductions (other than the section
199A(g) deduction) that are properly
allocable to such receipts.
(iii) Special rule for patronage oilrelated DPGR. Oil-related DPGR does
not include gross receipts derived from
the transportation or distribution of oil,
gas, or any primary product thereof.
However, to the extent that the
nonexempt Specified Cooperative treats
gross receipts derived from
transportation or distribution of oil, gas,
or any primary product thereof as part
of DPGR under § 1.199A–9(j)(3)(i), or
under § 1.199A–9(j)(3)(i)(B), then the
Specified Cooperative must treat those
patronage gross receipts as oil-related
DGPR.
(iv) Oil includes oil recovered from
both conventional and nonconventional recovery methods,
including crude oil, shale oil, and oil
recovered from tar/oil sands. The
primary product from oil includes all
products derived from the destructive
distillation of oil, including volatile
products, light oils such as motor fuel
and kerosene, distillates such as
naphtha, lubricating oils, greases and
waxes, and residues such as fuel oil.
The primary product from gas means all
gas and associated hydrocarbon
components from gas wells or oil wells,
whether recovered at the lease or upon
further processing, including natural
gas, condensates, liquefied petroleum
gases such as ethane, propane, and
butane, and liquid products such as
natural gasoline. The primary products
from oil and gas provided in this
paragraph (b)(7)(iv) are not intended to
represent either the only primary
products from oil or gas, or the only
processes from which primary products
may be derived under existing and
future technologies. Examples of nonprimary products include, but are not
limited to, petrochemicals, medicinal
products, insecticides, and alcohols.
(c) Exempt Specified Cooperatives—
(1) In general. This paragraph (c) applies
only to exempt Specified Cooperatives.
(2) Two section 199A(g) deductions.
The Specified Cooperative must
calculate two separate section 199A(g)
deductions, one patronage sourced and
the other nonpatronage sourced.
Patronage and nonpatronage gross
receipts, related COGS that are allocable
to DPGR, and other expenses, losses, or
deductions (other than the section
E:\FR\FM\19JNP2.SGM
19JNP2
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
199A(g) deduction) that are properly
allocable to DPGR (deductions), DPGR,
QPAI, NOLs, W–2 wages, etc. are not
netted to calculate these two separate
section 199A(g) deductions.
(3) Exempt Specified Cooperative
patronage section 199A(g) deduction.
The Specified Cooperative calculates its
patronage section 199A(g) deduction
following steps 1 through 4 in
paragraphs (b)(2) through (5) of this
section as if it were a nonexempt
Specified Cooperative.
(4) Exempt Specified Cooperative
nonpatronage section 199A(g)
deduction—(i) In general. The Specified
Cooperative calculates its nonpatronage
section 199A(g) deduction following
steps 2 through 4 in paragraphs (b)(2)
through (5) of this section using only
nonpatronage gross receipts and related
nonpatronage deductions. For purposes
of determining the amount of the
nonpatronage section 199A(g) deduction
allowed under paragraph (b)(5)(ii) of
this section, taxable income is limited to
taxable income and related deductions
from nonpatronage sources.
Nonpatronage NOLs reduce taxable
income. Taxable income is computed
without taking into account the section
199A(g) deduction or any deduction
allowable under section 1382(c).
Taxable income is determined using the
same method of accounting used to
determine distributions under section
1382(c)(2).
(ii) Use of nonpatronage section
199A(g) deduction. Except as provided
in § 1.199A–12(c)(2) related to the rules
for EAGs, the nonpatronage section
199A(g) deduction cannot create or
increase a nonpatronage NOL or the
amount of nonpatronage NOL carryover
or carryback, if applicable, in
accordance with section 172. A
Specified Cooperative cannot allocate
its nonpatronage section 199A(g)
deduction under paragraph (d) of this
section and can apply the nonpatronage
section 199A(g) deduction only against
its nonpatronage income and
deductions. As is the case for the
patronage section 199A(g) deduction,
the nonpatronage section 199A(g)
deduction that a Specified Cooperative
does not use in the appropriate taxable
year is lost.
(d) Discretion to pass through
deduction—(1) In general. A Specified
Cooperative may, at its discretion, pass
through all, some, or none of its
patronage section 199A(g) deduction to
an eligible taxpayer. An eligible
taxpayer is a patron other than a C
corporation or a Specified Cooperative.
A Specified Cooperative member of a
federated cooperative may pass through
the patronage section 199A(g) deduction
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 Jun 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
it receives from the federated
cooperative to its member patrons that
are eligible taxpayers.
(2) Amount of deduction being passed
through—(i) In general. A Specified
Cooperative is permitted to pass through
to an eligible taxpayer an amount equal
to the portion of the Specified
Cooperative’s section 199A(g) deduction
that is allowed with respect to the
portion of the cooperative’s QPAI that is
attributable to the qualified payments
the Specified Cooperative distributed to
the eligible taxpayer during the taxable
year and identified on the notice
required in § 1.199A–7(f)(3) on an
attachment to or on the Form 1099–
PATR, Taxable Distributions Received
From Cooperatives (Form 1099–PATR),
(or any successor form) issued by the
Specified Cooperative to the eligible
taxpayer, unless otherwise provided by
the instructions to the Form. The notice
requirement to pass through the section
199A(g) deduction is in paragraph (d)(3)
of this section.
(ii) Qualified payment means any
amount of a patronage dividend or perunit retain allocation, as described in
section 1385(a)(1) or (3) received by a
patron from a Specified Cooperative that
is attributable to the portion of the
Specified Cooperative’s QPAI, for which
the cooperative is allowed a section
199A(g) deduction. For this purpose,
patronage dividends include any
advances on patronage and per-unit
retain allocations include per-unit
retains paid in money during the taxable
year. A Specified Cooperative calculates
its qualified payment using the same
method of accounting it uses to
calculate its taxable income.
(3) Notice requirement to pass
through deduction. A Specified
Cooperative must identify in a written
notice the amount of the section 199A(g)
deduction being passed through to the
eligible taxpayer. This written notice
must be mailed by the Specified
Cooperative to the eligible taxpayer no
later than the 15th day of the ninth
month following the close of the taxable
year of the Specified Cooperative. The
Specified Cooperative may use the same
written notice, if any, that it uses to
notify the eligible taxpayer of the
eligible taxpayer’s respective allocations
of patronage distributions, or may use a
separate timely written notice(s) to
comply with this section. The Specified
Cooperative must report the amount of
section 199A(g) deduction passed
through to the eligible taxpayer on an
attachment to or on the Form 1099–
PATR (or any successor form) issued by
the Specified Cooperative to the eligible
taxpayer, unless otherwise provided by
the instructions to the Form.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
28689
(4) Section 199A(g) deduction
allocated to eligible taxpayer. An
eligible taxpayer may deduct the lesser
of the section 199A(g) deduction
identified on the notice described in
paragraph (d)(3) of this section or the
eligible taxpayer’s taxable income in the
taxable year in which the eligible
taxpayer receives the timely written
notice described in paragraph (d)(3) of
this section. For this purpose, the
eligible taxpayer’s taxable income is
determined without taking into account
the section 199A(g) deduction being
passed through to the eligible taxpayer
and after taking into account any section
199A(a) deduction allowed to the
eligible taxpayer. Any section 199A(g)
deduction the eligible taxpayer does not
use in the taxable year in which the
eligible taxpayer receives the notice
(received on or before the due date of
the Form 1099–PATR) is lost and cannot
be carried forward or back to other
taxable years. The taxable income
limitation for the section 199A(a)
deduction set forth in section 199A(b)(3)
and § 1.199A–1(a) and (b) does not
apply to limit the deductibility of the
section 199A(g) deduction passed
through to the eligible taxpayer.
(5) Special rules for eligible taxpayers
that are Specified Cooperatives. A
Specified Cooperative that receives a
section 199A(g) deduction as an eligible
taxpayer can take the deduction only
against patronage gross income and
related deductions.
(6) W–2 wage limitation. The W–2
wage limitation described in paragraph
(b)(5)(ii)(B) of this section is applied at
the cooperative level whether or not the
Specified Cooperative chooses to pass
through some or all of the section
199A(g) deduction. Any section 199A(g)
deduction that has been passed through
by a Specified Cooperative to an eligible
taxpayer is not subject to the W–2 wage
limitation a second time at the eligible
taxpayer’s level.
(7) Specified Cooperative denied
section 1382 deduction for portion of
qualified payments. A Specified
Cooperative must reduce its section
1382 deduction under section 1382(b)
and/or (c), as applicable) by an amount
equal to the portion of any qualified
payment that is attributable to the
Specified Cooperative’s section 199A(g)
deduction passed through to the eligible
taxpayer. This means the Specified
Cooperative must reduce its section
1382 deduction in an amount equal to
the section 199A(g) deduction passed
through to its eligible taxpayers.
(8) No double counting. A qualified
payment received by a Specified
Cooperative that is a patron of a
Specified Cooperative is not taken into
E:\FR\FM\19JNP2.SGM
19JNP2
28690
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
account by the patron for purposes of
section 199A(g).
(e) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the application of paragraphs
(b), (c), and (d) of this section. Assume
for each example that the Specified
Cooperative sent all required notices to
patrons on or before the due date of the
Form 1099–PATR.
(1) Example 1. Nonexempt Specified
Cooperative calculating section 199A(g)
deduction. (i) C is a grain marketing
nonexempt Specified Cooperative, with
$5,250,000 in gross receipts during 2018 from
the sale of grain grown by its patrons. C paid
$4,000,000 to its patrons at the time the grain
was delivered in the form of per-unit retain
allocations pursuant to an agreement and
another $1,000,000 in patronage dividends
after the close of the 2018 taxable year. C has
other expenses of $250,000 during 2018,
including $100,000 of W–2 wages.
(ii) C has DPGR of $5,250,000 and QPAI as
defined in § 1.199A–8(b)(4)(ii) of $5,000,000
for 2018. C’s section 199A(g) deduction is
equal to the least of 9% of QPAI ($450,000),
9% of taxable income ($450,000), or 50% of
W–2 wages ($50,000). C passes through the
entire section 199A(g) deduction to its
patrons. Accordingly, C reduces its
$5,000,000 deduction allowable under
section 1382(b) (relating to the $1,000,000
patronage dividends and $4,000,000 per-unit
retain allocations) by $50,000.
(2) Example 2. Nonexempt Specified
Cooperative calculating section 199A(g)
deduction with purchases. Same facts as
Example 1, except C purchased grain from its
patrons for $4,000,000 and these purchases
are not per-unit retain allocations described
in section 1388(f). C allocated and reported
the $1,000,000 patronage dividends to its
patrons and provided notification (in
accordance with the requirements of
§ 1.199A–7(f)(3)) that only the patronage
dividends are treated as qualified payments
for purposes of its section 199A(g) deduction.
C has QPAI and taxable income of $1,000,000
($5,250,000—$4,000,000—$250,000). C’s
section 199A(g) deduction is the lesser of 9%
of QPAI ($90,000), 9% of taxable income
without taking into account any deduction
under section 1382(b) ($90,000), or 50% of
W–2 wages ($50,000). C passes through the
entire section 199A(g) deduction to its
patrons. Accordingly, C reduces its
$1,000,000 deduction allowable under
section 1382(b) by $50,000. Patrons do not
include any of the $4,000,000 of payments
when determining the reduction amount
under section 199A(b)(7).
(3) Example 3. Nonexempt Specified
Cooperative determines amounts included in
QPAI and taxable income. (i) C, a nonexempt
Specified Cooperative, offers harvesting
services and markets the grain of patrons and
nonpatrons. C had gross receipts from
harvesting services and grain sales, and
expenses related to both. All of C’s harvesting
services were performed for their patrons,
and 75% of the grain sales were for patrons.
(ii) C identifies 75% of the gross receipts
and related expenses from grain sales and
100% of the gross receipts and related
expenses from the harvesting services as
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 Jun 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
patronage sourced. C identifies 25% of the
gross receipts and related expenses from
grain sales as nonpatronage sourced.
(iii) C does not include any nonpatronage
gross receipts or related expenses from grain
sales in either QPAI or taxable income when
calculating the section 199A(g) deduction.
C’s QPAI includes the patronage DPGR, less
related expenses (allocable COGS, wages and
other expenses). C’s taxable income includes
the patronage gross receipts, whether such
gross receipts are DPGR or non-DPGR.
(iv) C allocates and reports patronage
dividends to its harvesting patrons and grain
marketing patrons. C also notifies its grain
marketing patrons (in accordance with the
requirements of § 1.199A–7(f)(3)) that their
patronage dividends are qualified payments
used in C’s section 199A(g) computation. The
patrons must use this information for
purposes of computing their section
199A(b)(7) reduction to their section 199A(a)
deduction (see § 1.199A–7(f)).
(4) Example 4. Nonexempt Specified
Cooperative with patronage and
nonpatronage gross receipts and related
deductions. (i) C, a nonexempt Specified
Cooperative, markets corn grown by its
patrons in the United States. For the calendar
year ending December 31, 2020, C derives
gross receipts from the marketing activity of
$1,800. Such gross receipts qualify as DPGR.
Assume C has $800 of expenses (including
COGS, other expenses, and $400 of W–2
wages) properly allocable to DPGR, and a
$1,000 deduction allowed under section
1382(b). C also derives gross receipts from
nonpatronage sources in the amount of $500,
and has nonpatronage deductions in the
amount of $400 (including COGS, other
expenses, and $100 of W–2 wages).
(ii) C does not include any gross receipts
or deductions from nonpatronage sources
when calculating the deduction under
paragraph (b)(5)(ii) of this section. C’s QPAI
and taxable income both equal $1,000
($1,800—800). C’s deduction under
paragraph (b)(5)(ii) of this section for the
taxable year is equal to $90 (9% of $1,000),
which does not exceed $200 (50% of C’s W–
2 wages properly allocable to DPGR). C
passes through $90 of the deduction to
patrons and C reduces its section 1382(b)
deduction by $90.
(5) Example 5. Exempt Specified
Cooperative with patronage and
nonpatronage income and deductions. (i) C,
an exempt Specified Cooperative, markets
corn MPGE by its patrons in the United
States. For the calendar year ending
December 31, 2020, C derives gross receipts
from the marketing activity of $1,800. For
this activity assume C has $800 of expenses
(including COGS, other expenses, and $400
of W–2 wages) properly allocable to DPGR,
and a $1,000 deduction under section
1382(b). C also derives gross receipts from
nonpatronage sources in the amount of $500.
Assume the gross receipts qualify as DPGR.
For this activity assume C has $400 of
expenses (including COGS, other expenses,
and $20 of W–2 wages) properly allocable to
DPGR and no deduction under section
1382(c).
(ii) C calculates two separate section
199A(g) deduction amounts. C’s section
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
199A(g) deduction attributable to patronage
sources is the same as the deduction
calculated by the nonexempt Specified
Cooperative in Example 1 in paragraph (e)(1)
of this section.
(iii) C’s nonpatronage QPAI and taxable
income is equal to $100 ($500¥$400). C’s
deduction under paragraph (c)(3) of this
section that directs C to use paragraph
(b)(5)(ii) of this section attributable to
nonpatronage sources is equal to $9 (9% of
$100), which does not exceed $10 (50% of
C’s W–2 wages properly allocable to DPGR).
C cannot pass through any of the
nonpatronage section 199A(g) deduction
amount to its patrons.
(6) Example 6. NOL. C, a nonexempt
Specified Cooperative, MPGE agricultural or
horticultural products. C is not part of an
EAG as defined in § 1.199A–12. In 2018, C
generates QPAI and taxable income is $600,
without taking into account any of its
deductions under section 1382(b), the
deduction under section 199A(g), or an NOL
deduction. During 2018, C incurs W–2 wages
as defined in § 1.199A–11 of $300. C has an
NOL carryover to 2018 of $500. C’s deduction
under this section for 2018 is $9 (9% × (lesser
of QPAI of $600 and taxable income of $100
($600 taxable income¥$500 NOL)). Under
these facts the wage limitation does not act
to limit the deduction because the wage
limitation is $150 (50% × $300).
(7) Example 7. NOL. (i) C, a nonexempt
Specified Cooperative, MPGE agricultural or
horticultural products. C is not part of an
EAG. In 2018, C generates QPAI and taxable
income of $100, without taking into account
any of its deductions under section 1382(b),
the deduction under section 199A(g), or an
NOL deduction. C has an NOL carryover to
2018 of $500 that reduces its taxable income
for 2018 to $0. C’s section 199A(g) deduction
for 2018 is $0 (9% × (lesser of QPAI of $100
and taxable income of $0)).
(ii) Carryover to 2019. C’s taxable income
for purposes of determining its NOL
carryover to 2019 is $100. Accordingly, for
purposes of section 199A(g), C’s NOL
carryover to 2019 is $400 ($500 NOL
carryover to 2018—$100 NOL used in 2018).
(f) Special rule for Specified
Cooperative partners. In the case
described in section 199A(g)(5)(B),
where a Specified Cooperative is a
partner in a partnership, the partnership
must separately identify and report on
the Schedule K–1 of the Form 1065,
U.S. Return of Partnership Income (or
any successor form) issued to the
Specified Cooperative the cooperative’s
share of gross receipts and related
deductions, unless otherwise provided
by the instructions to the Form. The
Specified Cooperative determines what
gross receipts reported by the
partnership qualify as DPGR and
includes these gross receipts and related
deductions to calculate one section
199A(g) deduction (in the case of a
nonexempt Specified Cooperative) or
two section 199A(g) deductions (in the
case of an exempt Specified
E:\FR\FM\19JNP2.SGM
19JNP2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
Cooperative) using the steps set forth in
paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
(g) Recapture of section 199A(g)
deduction. If the amount of the section
199A(g) deduction that was passed
through to eligible taxpayers exceeds
the amount allowable as a section
199A(g) deduction as determined on
examination or reported on an amended
return, then recapture of the excess will
occur at the Specified Cooperative level
in the taxable year the Specified
Cooperative took the excess section
199A(g) deduction.
(h) Applicability date. Except as
provided in paragraph (h)(2) of
§ 1.199A–7, the provisions of this
section apply to taxable years ending
after the date the Treasury decision
adopting these regulations as final
regulations is published in the Federal
Register. Taxpayers, however, may rely
on these regulations until that date, but
only if the taxpayers apply the rules in
their entirety and in a consistent
manner.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 1.199A–9
receipts.
Domestic production gross
(a) Domestic production gross
receipts—(1) In general. The provisions
of this section apply solely for purposes
of section 199A(g) of the Internal
Revenue Code (Code). The provisions of
this section provide guidance to
determine what gross receipts (defined
in § 1.199A–8(b)(2)(iii)) are domestic
production gross receipts (DPGR)
(defined in § 1.199A–8(b)(3)(ii)). DPGR
does not include gross receipts derived
from services or the lease, rental,
license, sale, exchange, or other
disposition of land unless a de minimis
or other exception applies. Partners,
including partners in an EAG
partnership described in § 1.199A–
12(i)(1), may not treat guaranteed
payments under section 707(c) as DPGR.
(2) Application to marketing
cooperatives. For purposes of
determining DPGR, a Specified
Cooperative (defined in § 1.199A–
8(a)(2)) will be treated as having
manufactured, produced, grown, or
extracted (MPGE) (defined in paragraph
(f) of this section) in whole or
significant part (defined in paragraph
(h) of this section) any agricultural or
horticultural product (defined in
§ 1.199A–8(a)(4)) within the United
States (defined in paragraph (i) of this
section) marketed by the Specified
Cooperative which its patrons (defined
in § 1.1388–1(e)) have so MPGE.
(b) Related persons—(1) In general.
Pursuant to 199A(g)(3)(D)(ii), DPGR
does not include any gross receipts
derived from agricultural or
horticultural products leased, licensed,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 Jun 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
or rented by the Specified Cooperative
for use by any related person. A person
is treated as related to another person if
both persons are treated as a single
employer under either section 52(a) or
(b) (without regard to section 1563(b)),
or section 414(m) or (o). Any other
person is an unrelated person for
purposes of the section 199A(g)
deduction.
(2) Exceptions. Notwithstanding
paragraph (b)(1) of this section, gross
receipts derived from any agricultural or
horticultural product leased or rented
by the Specified Cooperative to a related
person may qualify as DPGR if the
agricultural or horticultural product is
held for sublease or rent, or is subleased
or rented, by the related person to an
unrelated person for the ultimate use of
the unrelated person. Similarly,
notwithstanding paragraph (b)(1) of this
section, gross receipts derived from a
license of the right to reproduce an
agricultural or horticultural product to a
related person for reproduction and
sale, exchange, lease, or rental to an
unrelated person for the ultimate use of
the unrelated person are treated as gross
receipts from a disposition of an
agricultural or horticultural product and
may qualify as DPGR.
(c) Allocating gross receipts—(1) In
general. A Specified Cooperative must
determine the portion of its gross
receipts for the taxable year that is
DPGR and the portion of its gross
receipts that is non-DPGR using a
reasonable method based on all the facts
and circumstances. Applicable Federal
income tax principles apply to
determine whether a transaction is, in
substance, a lease, rental, license, sale,
exchange, or other disposition the gross
receipts of which may constitute DPGR,
whether it is a service the gross receipts
of which may constitute non-DPGR, or
some combination thereof. For example,
if a Specified Cooperative sells an
agricultural or horticultural product
and, in connection with that sale, also
provides services, the Specified
Cooperative must allocate its gross
receipts from the transaction using a
reasonable method based on all the facts
and circumstances that accurately
identifies the gross receipts that
constitute DPGR and non-DPGR in
accordance with the requirements of
§§ 1.199A–8(b) and/or (c). The chosen
reasonable method must be consistently
applied from one taxable year to another
and must clearly reflect the portion of
gross receipts for the taxable year that is
DPGR and the portion of gross receipts
that is non-DPGR. The books and
records maintained for gross receipts
must be consistent with any allocations
under this paragraph (c)(1).
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
28691
(2) Reasonable method of allocation.
If a Specified Cooperative has the
information readily available and can,
without undue burden or expense,
specifically identify whether the gross
receipts are derived from an item (and
thus, are DPGR), then the Specified
Cooperative must use that specific
identification to determine DPGR. If the
Specified Cooperative does not have
information readily available to
specifically identify whether gross
receipts are derived from an item or
cannot, without undue burden or
expense, specifically identify whether
gross receipts are derived from an item,
then the Specified Cooperative is not
required to use a method that
specifically identifies whether the gross
receipts are derived from an item but
can use a reasonable allocation method.
Factors taken into consideration in
determining whether the Specified
Cooperative’s method of allocating gross
receipts between DPGR and non-DPGR
is reasonable include whether the
Specified Cooperative uses the most
accurate information available; the
relationship between the gross receipts
and the method used; the accuracy of
the method chosen as compared with
other possible methods; whether the
method is used by the Specified
Cooperative for internal management or
other business purposes; whether the
method is used for other Federal or state
income tax purposes; the time, burden,
and cost of using alternative methods;
and whether the Specified Cooperative
applies the method consistently from
year to year.
(3) De minimis rules—(i) DPGR. A
Specified Cooperative’s applicable gross
receipts as provided in §§ 1.199A–8(b)
and/or (c) may be treated as DPGR if less
than 5 percent of the Specified
Cooperative’s total gross receipts are
non-DPGR (after application of the
exceptions provided in § 1.199A–
9(j)(3)). If the amount of the Specified
Cooperative’s gross receipts that are
non-DPGR equals or exceeds 5 percent
of the Specified Cooperative’s total gross
receipts, then, except as provided in
paragraph (c)(3)(ii) of this section, the
Specified Cooperative is required to
allocate all gross receipts between DPGR
and non-DPGR in accordance with
paragraph (c)(1) of this section. If a
Specified Cooperative is a member of an
expanded affiliated group (EAG)
(defined in § 1.199A–12), but is not a
member of a consolidated group, then
the determination of whether less than
5 percent of the Specified Cooperative’s
total gross receipts are non-DPGR is
made at the Specified Cooperative level.
If a Specified Cooperative is a member
E:\FR\FM\19JNP2.SGM
19JNP2
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
28692
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
of a consolidated group, then the
determination of whether less than 5
percent of the Specified Cooperative’s
total gross receipts are non-DPGR is
made at the consolidated group level.
See § 1.199A–12(d).
(ii) Non-DPGR. A Specified
Cooperative’s applicable gross receipts
as provided in §§ 1.199A–8(b) and/or (c)
may be treated as non-DPGR if less than
5 percent of the Specified Cooperative’s
total gross receipts are DPGR. If a
Specified Cooperative is a member of an
EAG, but is not a member of a
consolidated group, then the
determination of whether less than 5
percent of the Specified Cooperative’s
total gross receipts are DPGR is made at
the Specified Cooperative level. If a
Specified Cooperative is a member of a
consolidated group, then the
determination of whether less than 5
percent of the Specified Cooperative’s
total gross receipts are DPGR is made at
the consolidated group level.
(d) Use of historical data for multipleyear transactions. If a Specified
Cooperative recognizes and reports
gross receipts from upfront payments or
other similar payments on a Federal
income tax return for a taxable year,
then the Specified Cooperative’s use of
historical data in making an allocation
of gross receipts from the transaction
between DPGR and non-DPGR may
constitute a reasonable method. If a
Specified Cooperative makes allocations
using historical data, and subsequently
updates the data, then the Specified
Cooperative must use the more recent or
updated data, starting in the taxable
year in which the update is made.
(e) Determining DPGR item-by-item—
(1) In general. For purposes of the
section 199A(g) deduction, a Specified
Cooperative determines, using a
reasonable method based on all the facts
and circumstances, whether gross
receipts qualify as DPGR on an item-byitem basis (and not, for example, on a
division-by-division, product line-byproduct line, or transaction-bytransaction basis). The chosen
reasonable method must be consistently
applied from one taxable year to another
and must clearly reflect the portion of
gross receipts that is DPGR. The books
and records maintained for gross
receipts must be consistent with any
allocations under this paragraph (e)(1).
(i) The term item means the
agricultural or horticultural product
offered by the Specified Cooperative in
the normal course of its trade or
business for lease, rental, license, sale,
exchange, or other disposition (for
purposes of this paragraph (e),
collectively referred to as disposition) to
customers, if the gross receipts from the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 Jun 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
disposition of such product qualify as
DPGR; or
(ii) If paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section
does not apply to the product, then any
component of the product described in
paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section is
treated as the item, provided that the
gross receipts from the disposition of
the product described in paragraph
(e)(1)(i) of this section that are
attributable to such component qualify
as DPGR. Each component that meets
the requirements under this paragraph
(e)(1)(ii) must be treated as a separate
item and a component that meets the
requirements under this paragraph
(e)(1)(ii) may not be combined with a
component that does not meet these
requirements.
(2) Special rules. (i) For purposes of
paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section, in no
event may a single item consist of two
or more products unless those products
are offered for disposition, in the normal
course of the Specified Cooperative’s
trade or business, as a single item
(regardless of how the products are
packaged).
(ii) In the case of agricultural or
horticultural products customarily sold
by weight or by volume, the item is
determined using the most common
custom of the industry (for example,
barrels of oil).
(3) Exception. If the Specified
Cooperative MPGE agricultural or
horticultural products within the United
States that it disposes of, and the
Specified Cooperative leases, rents,
licenses, purchases, or otherwise
acquires property that contains or may
contain the agricultural or horticultural
products (or a portion thereof), and the
Specified Cooperative cannot
reasonably determine, without undue
burden and expense, whether the
acquired property contains any of the
original agricultural or horticultural
products MPGE by the Specified
Cooperative, then the Specified
Cooperative is not required to determine
whether any portion of the acquired
property qualifies as an item for
purposes of paragraph (e)(1) of this
section. Therefore, the gross receipts
derived from the disposition of the
acquired property may be treated as
non-DPGR. Similarly, the preceding
sentences apply if the Specified
Cooperative can reasonably determine
that the acquired property contains
agricultural or horticultural products (or
a portion thereof) MPGE by the
Specified Cooperative, but cannot
reasonably determine, without undue
burden or expense, how much, or what
type, grade, etc., of the agricultural or
horticultural MPGE by the Specified
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Cooperative the acquired property
contains.
(f) Definition of manufactured,
produced, grown, or extracted (MPGE)—
(1) In general. Except as provided in
paragraphs (f)(2) and (3) of this section,
the term MPGE includes manufacturing,
producing, growing, extracting,
installing, developing, improving, and
creating agricultural or horticultural
products; making agricultural or
horticultural products out of material by
processing, manipulating, refining, or
changing the form of an article, or by
combining or assembling two or more
articles; cultivating soil, raising
livestock, and farming aquatic products.
The term MPGE also includes storage,
handling, or other processing activities
(other than transportation activities)
within the United States related to the
sale, exchange, or other disposition of
agricultural or horticultural products
only if the products are consumed in
connection with or incorporated into
the MPGE of agricultural or
horticultural products, whether or not
by the Specified Cooperative. The
Specified Cooperative (or the patron if
section 1.199A–9(a)(2) applies) must
have the benefits and burdens of
ownership of the agricultural or
horticultural products under Federal
income tax principles during the period
the MPGE activity occurs in order for
the gross receipts derived from the
MPGE of the agricultural or
horticultural products to qualify as
DPGR.
(2) Packaging, repackaging, or
labeling. If the Specified Cooperative
packages, repackages, or labels
agricultural or horticultural products
and engages in no other MPGE activity
with respect to those agricultural or
horticultural products, the packaging,
repackaging, or labeling does not qualify
as MPGE with respect to those
agricultural or horticultural products.
(3) Installing. If a Specified
Cooperative installs agricultural or
horticultural products and engages in no
other MPGE activity with respect to the
agricultural or horticultural products,
the Specified Cooperative’s installing
activity does not qualify as an MPGE
activity. Notwithstanding paragraph
(j)(3)(i)(A) of this section, if the
Specified Cooperative installs
agricultural or horticultural products
MPGE by the Specified Cooperative and
the Specified Cooperative has the
benefits and burdens of ownership of
the agricultural or horticultural
products under Federal income tax
principles during the period the
installing activity occurs, then the
portion of the installing activity that
relates to the agricultural or
E:\FR\FM\19JNP2.SGM
19JNP2
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
horticultural products is an MPGE
activity.
(4) Consistency with section 263A. A
Specified Cooperative that has MPGE
agricultural or horticultural products for
the taxable year must treat itself as a
producer under section 263A with
respect to the agricultural or
horticultural products unless the
Specified Cooperative is not subject to
section 263A. A Specified Cooperative
that currently is not properly accounting
for its production activities under
section 263A, and wishes to change its
method of accounting to comply with
the producer requirements of section
263A, must follow the applicable
administrative procedures issued under
§ 1.446–1(e)(3)(ii) for obtaining the
Commissioner’s consent to a change in
accounting method (for further
guidance, for example, see Rev. Proc.
2015–13, 2015–5 IRB 419, or any
applicable subsequent guidance (see
§ 601.601(d)(2) of this chapter)).
(g) By the taxpayer. With respect to
the exception of the rules applicable to
an EAG and EAG partnerships under
§ 1.199A–12, only one Specified
Cooperative may claim the section
199A(g) deduction with respect to any
qualifying activity under paragraph (f)
of this section performed in connection
with the same agricultural or
horticultural product. If an unrelated
party performs a qualifying activity
under paragraph (f) of this section
pursuant to a contract with a Specified
Cooperative (or its patron as relevant
under paragraph (a)(2) of this section),
then only if the Specified Cooperative
(or its patron) has the benefits and
burdens of ownership of the agricultural
or horticultural product under Federal
income tax principles during the period
in which the qualifying activity occurs
is the Specified Cooperative (or its
patron) treated as engaging in the
qualifying activity.
(h) In whole or significant part
defined—(1) In general. Agricultural or
horticultural products must be MPGE in
whole or significant part by the
Specified Cooperative (or its patrons in
the case described in paragraph (a)(2) of
this section) and in whole or significant
part within the United States to qualify
under section 199A(g)(3)(D)(i). If a
Specified Cooperative enters into a
contract with an unrelated person for
the unrelated person to MPGE
agricultural or horticultural products for
the Specified Cooperative and the
Specified Cooperative has the benefits
and burdens of ownership of the
agricultural or horticultural products
under applicable Federal income tax
principles during the period the MPGE
activity occurs, then, pursuant to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 Jun 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
paragraph (g) of this section, the
Specified Cooperative is considered to
MPGE the agricultural or horticultural
products under this section. The
unrelated person must perform the
MPGE activity on behalf of the Specified
Cooperative in whole or significant part
within the United States in order for the
Specified Cooperative to satisfy the
requirements of this paragraph (h)(1).
(2) Substantial in nature. Agricultural
or horticultural products will be treated
as MPGE in whole or in significant part
by the Specified Cooperative (or its
patrons in the case described in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section) within
the United States for purposes of
paragraph (h)(1) of this section if the
MPGE of the agricultural or
horticultural products by the Specified
Cooperative within the United States is
substantial in nature taking into account
all the facts and circumstances,
including the relative value added by,
and relative cost of, the Specified
Cooperative’s MPGE within the United
States, the nature of the agricultural or
horticultural products, and the nature of
the MPGE activity that the Specified
Cooperative performs within the United
States. The MPGE of a key component
of an agricultural or horticultural
product does not, in itself, meet the
substantial-in-nature requirement with
respect to an agricultural or
horticultural product under this
paragraph (h)(2). In the case of an
agricultural or horticultural product,
research and experimental activities
under section 174 and the creation of
intangible assets are not taken into
account in determining whether the
MPGE of the agricultural or
horticultural product is substantial in
nature.
(3) Safe harbor—(i) In general. A
Specified Cooperative (or its patrons in
the case described in paragraph (a)(2) of
this section) will be treated as having
MPGE an agricultural or horticultural
product in whole or in significant part
within the United States for purposes of
paragraph (h)(1) of this section if the
direct labor and overhead of such
Specified Cooperative to MPGE the
agricultural or horticultural product
within the United States account for 20
percent or more of the Specified
Cooperative’s COGS of the agricultural
or horticultural product, or in a
transaction without COGS (for example,
a lease, rental, or license), account for
20 percent or more of the Specified
Cooperative’s unadjusted depreciable
basis (as defined in paragraph (h)(3)(ii)
of this section) in property included in
the definition of agricultural or
horticultural products. For Specified
Cooperatives subject to section 263A,
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
28693
overhead is all costs required to be
capitalized under section 263A except
direct materials and direct labor. For
Specified Cooperatives not subject to
section 263A, overhead may be
computed using a reasonable method
based on all the facts and
circumstances, but may not include any
cost, or amount of any cost, that would
not be required to be capitalized under
section 263A if the Specified
Cooperative were subject to section
263A. Research and experimental
expenditures under section 174 and the
costs of creating intangible assets are not
taken into account in determining direct
labor or overhead for any agricultural or
horticultural product. In the case of
agricultural or horticultural products,
research and experimental expenditures
under section 174 and any other costs
incurred in the creation of intangible
assets may be excluded from COGS or
unadjusted depreciable basis for
purposes of determining whether the
Specified Cooperative meets the safe
harbor under this paragraph (h)(3). For
Specified Cooperatives not subject to
section 263A, the chosen reasonable
method to compute overhead must be
consistently applied from one taxable
year to another and must clearly reflect
the Specified Cooperative’s portion of
overhead not subject to section 263A.
The method must also be reasonable
based on all the facts and
circumstances. The books and records
maintained for overhead must be
consistent with any allocations under
this paragraph (h)(3)(i).
(ii) Unadjusted depreciable basis. The
term unadjusted depreciable basis
means the basis of property for purposes
of section 1011 without regard to any
adjustments described in section
1016(a)(2) and (3). This basis does not
reflect the reduction in basis for—
(A) Any portion of the basis the
Specified Cooperative properly elects to
treat as an expense under sections 179
or 179C; or
(B) Any adjustments to basis provided
by other provisions of the Code and the
regulations under the Code (for
example, a reduction in basis by the
amount of the disabled access credit
pursuant to section 44(d)(7)).
(4) Special rules—(i) Contract with an
unrelated person. If a Specified
Cooperative enters into a contract with
an unrelated person for the unrelated
person to MPGE an agricultural or
horticultural product within the United
States for the Specified Cooperative, and
the Specified Cooperative is considered
to MPGE the agricultural or
horticultural product pursuant to
paragraph (f)(1) of this section, then, for
purposes of the substantial-in-nature
E:\FR\FM\19JNP2.SGM
19JNP2
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
28694
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
requirement under paragraph (h)(2) of
this section and the safe harbor under
paragraph (h)(3)(i) of this section, the
Specified Cooperative’s MPGE activities
or direct labor and overhead must
include both the Specified Cooperative’s
MPGE activities or direct labor and
overhead to MPGE the agricultural or
horticultural product within the United
States as well as the MPGE activities or
direct labor and overhead of the
unrelated person to MPGE the
agricultural or horticultural product
within the United States under the
contract.
(ii) Aggregation. In determining
whether the substantial-in-nature
requirement under paragraph (h)(2) of
this section or the safe harbor under
paragraph (h)(3)(i) of this section is met
at the time the Specified Cooperative
disposes of an agricultural or
horticultural product—
(A) An EAG member must take into
account all of the previous MPGE
activities or direct labor and overhead of
the other members of the EAG;
(B) An EAG partnership as defined in
§ 1.199A–12(i)(1) must take into account
all of the previous MPGE activities or
direct labor and overhead of all
members of the EAG in which the
partners of the EAG partnership are
members (as well as the previous MPGE
activities of any other EAG partnerships
owned by members of the same EAG);
and
(C) A member of an EAG in which the
partners of an EAG partnership are
members must take into account all of
the previous MPGE activities or direct
labor and overhead of the EAG
partnership (as well as those of any
other members of the EAG and any
previous MPGE activities of any other
EAG partnerships owned by members of
the same EAG).
(i) United States defined. For
purposes of section 199A(g), the term
United States includes the 50 states, the
District of Columbia, the territorial
waters of the United States, and the
seabed and subsoil of those submarine
areas that are adjacent to the territorial
waters of the United States and over
which the United States has exclusive
rights, in accordance with international
law, with respect to the exploration and
exploitation of natural resources.
Consistent with its definition in section
7701(a)(9), the term United States does
not include possessions and territories
of the United States or the airspace or
space over the United States and these
areas.
(j) Derived from the lease, rental,
license, sale, exchange, or other
disposition—(1) In general—(i)
Definition. The term derived from the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 Jun 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
lease, rental, license, sale, exchange, or
other disposition is defined as, and
limited to, the gross receipts directly
derived from the lease, rental, license,
sale, exchange, or other disposition of
agricultural or horticultural products
even if the Specified Cooperative has
already recognized receipts from a
previous lease, rental, license, sale,
exchange, or other disposition of the
same agricultural or horticultural
products. Applicable Federal income
tax principles apply to determine
whether a transaction is, in substance, a
lease, rental, license, sale, exchange, or
other disposition, whether it is a
service, or whether it is some
combination thereof.
(ii) Lease income. The financing and
interest components of a lease of
agricultural or horticultural products are
considered to be derived from the lease
of such agricultural or horticultural
products. However, any portion of the
lease income that is attributable to
services or non-qualified property as
defined in paragraph (j)(3) of this
section is not derived from the lease of
agricultural or horticultural products.
(iii) Income substitutes. The proceeds
from business interruption insurance,
governmental subsidies, and
governmental payments not to produce
are treated as gross receipts derived
from the lease, rental, license, sale,
exchange, or other disposition to the
extent they are substitutes for gross
receipts that would qualify as DPGR.
(iv) Exchange of property—(A)
Taxable exchanges. The value of
property received by the Specified
Cooperative in a taxable exchange of
agricultural or horticultural products
MPGE in whole or in significant part by
the Specified Cooperative within the
United States is DPGR for the Specified
Cooperative (assuming all the other
requirements of this section are met).
However, unless the Specified
Cooperative meets all of the
requirements under this section with
respect to any additional MPGE by the
Specified Cooperative of the agricultural
or horticultural products received in the
taxable exchange, any gross receipts
derived from the sale by the Specified
Cooperative of the property received in
the taxable exchange are non-DPGR,
because the Specified Cooperative did
not MPGE such property, even if the
property was an agricultural or
horticultural product in the hands of the
other party to the transaction.
(B) Safe harbor. For purposes of
paragraph (j)(1)(iv)(A) of this section,
the gross receipts derived by the
Specified Cooperative from the sale of
eligible property (as defined in
paragraph (j)(1)(iv)(C) of this section)
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
received in a taxable exchange, net of
any adjustments between the parties
involved in the taxable exchange to
account for differences in the eligible
property exchanged (for example,
location differentials and product
differentials), may be treated as the
value of the eligible property received
by the Specified Cooperative in the
taxable exchange. For purposes of the
preceding sentence, the taxable
exchange is deemed to occur on the date
of the sale of the eligible property
received in the taxable exchange by the
Specified Cooperative, to the extent the
sale occurs no later than the last day of
the month following the month in
which the exchanged eligible property
is received by the Specified
Cooperative. In addition, if the
Specified Cooperative engages in any
further MPGE activity with respect to
the eligible property received in the
taxable exchange, then, unless the
Specified Cooperative meets the inwhole-or-in-significant-part requirement
under paragraph (h)(1) of this section
with respect to the property sold, for
purposes of this paragraph (j)(1)(iv)(B),
the Specified Cooperative must also
value the property sold without taking
into account the gross receipts
attributable to the further MPGE
activity.
(C) Eligible property. For purposes of
paragraph (j)(1)(iv)(B) of this section,
eligible property is—
(1) Oil, natural gas, or petrochemicals,
or products derived from oil, natural
gas, or petrochemicals; or
(2) Any other property or product
designated by publication in the
Internal Revenue Bulletin (see
§ 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of this chapter).
(3) For this purpose, the term natural
gas includes only natural gas extracted
from a natural deposit and does not
include, for example, methane gas
extracted from a landfill. In the case of
natural gas, production activities
include all activities involved in
extracting natural gas from the ground
and processing the gas into pipeline
quality gas.
(2) Hedging transactions—(i) In
general. For purposes of this section, if
a transaction is a hedging transaction
within the meaning of section
1221(b)(2)(A) and § 1.1221–2(b), is
properly identified as a hedging
transaction in accordance with
§ 1.1221–2(f), and the risk being hedged
relates to property described in section
1221(a)(1) that gives rise to DPGR or to
property described in section 1221(a)(8)
that is consumed in an activity that
gives rise to DPGR, then—
(A) In the case of a hedge of purchases
of property described in section
E:\FR\FM\19JNP2.SGM
19JNP2
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
1221(a)(1), income, deduction, gain, or
loss on the hedging transaction must be
taken into account in determining
COGS;
(B) In the case of a hedge of sales of
property described in section 1221(a)(1),
income, deduction, gain, or loss on the
hedging transaction must be taken into
account in determining DPGR; and
(C) In the case of a hedge of purchases
of property described in section
1221(a)(8), income, deduction, gain, or
loss on the hedging transaction must be
taken into account in determining
DPGR.
(ii) Allocation. The income,
deduction, gain and loss from hedging
transactions described in paragraph
(j)(2) of this section must be allocated
between the patronage and
nonpatronage (defined in § 1.1388–1(f))
sourced income and related deductions
of the Specified Cooperatives consistent
with the cooperative’s method for
determining patronage and
nonpatronage income and deductions.
(iii) Effect of identification and
nonidentification. The principles of
§ 1.1221–2(g) apply to a Specified
Cooperative that identifies or fails to
identify a transaction as a hedging
transaction, except that the consequence
of identifying as a hedging transaction a
transaction that is not in fact a hedging
transaction described in paragraph (j)(2)
of this section, or of failing to identify
a transaction that the Specified
Cooperative has no reasonable grounds
for treating as other than a hedging
transaction described in paragraph (j)(2)
of this section, is that deduction or loss
(but not income or gain) from the
transaction is taken into account under
paragraph (j)(2) of this section.
(iv) Other rules. See § 1.1221–2(e) for
rules applicable to hedging by members
of a consolidated group and § 1.446–4
for rules regarding the timing of income,
deductions, gains or losses with respect
to hedging transactions.
(3) Allocation of gross receipts to
embedded services and non-qualified
property—(i) Embedded services and
non-qualified property—(A) In general.
Except as otherwise provided in
paragraph (j)(3)(i)(B) of this section,
gross receipts derived from the
performance of services do not qualify
as DPGR. In the case of an embedded
service, that is, a service the price of
which, in the normal course of the
business, is not separately stated from
the amount charged for the lease, rental,
license, sale, exchange, or other
disposition of agricultural or
horticultural products, DPGR includes
only the gross receipts derived from the
lease, rental, license, sale, exchange, or
other disposition of agricultural or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 Jun 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
horticultural products (assuming all the
other requirements of this section are
met) and not any receipts attributable to
the embedded service. In addition,
DPGR does not include gross receipts
derived from the lease, rental, license,
sale, exchange, or other disposition of
property that does not meet all of the
requirements under this section (nonqualified property). The allocation of
the gross receipts attributable to the
embedded services or non-qualified
property will be deemed to be
reasonable if the allocation reflects the
fair market value of the embedded
services or non-qualified property.
(B) Exceptions. There are five
exceptions to the rules under paragraph
(j)(3)(i)(A) of this section regarding
embedded services and non-qualified
property. A Specified Cooperative may
include in DPGR, if all the other
requirements of this section are met
with respect to the underlying item of
agricultural or horticultural products to
which the embedded services or nonqualified property relate, the gross
receipts derived from—
(1) A qualified warranty, that is, a
warranty that is provided in connection
with the lease, rental, license, sale,
exchange, or other disposition of
agricultural or horticultural products if,
in the normal course of the Specified
Cooperative’s business—
(i) The price for the warranty is not
separately stated from the amount
charged for the lease, rental, license,
sale, exchange, or other disposition of
the agricultural or horticultural
products; and
(ii) The warranty is neither separately
offered by the Specified Cooperative nor
separately bargained for with customers
(that is, a customer cannot purchase the
agricultural or horticultural products
without the warranty);
(2) A qualified delivery, that is, a
delivery or distribution service that is
provided in connection with the lease,
rental, license, sale, exchange, or other
disposition of agricultural or
horticultural products if, in the normal
course of the Specified Cooperative’s
business—
(i) The price for the delivery or
distribution service is not separately
stated from the amount charged for the
lease, rental, license, sale, exchange, or
other disposition of the agricultural or
horticultural products; and
(ii) The delivery or distribution
service is neither separately offered by
the Specified Cooperative nor separately
bargained for with customers (that is, a
customer cannot purchase the
agricultural or horticultural products
without the delivery or distribution
service).
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
28695
(3) A qualified operating manual, that
is, a manual of instructions that is
provided in connection with the lease,
rental, license, sale, exchange, or other
disposition of the agricultural or
horticultural products if, in the normal
course of the Specified Cooperative’s
business—
(i) The price for the manual is not
separately stated from the amount
charged for the lease, rental, license,
sale, exchange, or other disposition of
the agricultural or horticultural
products;
(ii) The manual is neither separately
offered by the Specified Cooperative nor
separately bargained for with customers
(that is, a customer cannot purchase the
agricultural or horticultural products
without the manual); and
(iii) The manual is not provided in
connection with a training course for
customers.
(4) A qualified installation, that is, an
installation service for agricultural or
horticultural products that is provided
in connection with the lease, rental,
license, sale, exchange, or other
disposition of the agricultural or
horticultural products if, in the normal
course of the Specified Cooperative’s
business—
(i) The price for the installation
service is not separately stated from the
amount charged for the lease, rental,
license, sale, exchange, or other
disposition of the agricultural or
horticultural products; and
(ii) The installation is neither
separately offered by the Specified
Cooperative nor separately bargained for
with customers (that is, a customer
cannot purchase the agricultural or
horticultural products without the
installation service).
(5) A de minimis amount of gross
receipts from embedded services and
non-qualified property for each item of
agricultural or horticultural products
may qualify. For purposes of this
exception, a de minimis amount of gross
receipts from embedded services and
non-qualified property is less than 5
percent of the total gross receipts
derived from the lease, rental, license,
sale, exchange, or other disposition of
each item of agricultural or horticultural
products. In the case of gross receipts
derived from the lease, rental, license,
sale, exchange, or other disposition of
agricultural or horticultural products
that are received over a period of time
(for example, a multi-year lease or
installment sale), this de minimis
exception is applied by taking into
account the total gross receipts for the
entire period derived (and to be derived)
from the lease, rental, license, sale,
exchange, or other disposition of the
E:\FR\FM\19JNP2.SGM
19JNP2
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
28696
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
item of agricultural or horticultural
products. For purposes of the preceding
sentence, if a Specified Cooperative
treats gross receipts as DPGR under this
de minimis exception, then the
Specified Cooperative must treat the
gross receipts recognized in each taxable
year consistently as DPGR. The gross
receipts that the Specified Cooperative
treats as DPGR under paragraphs
(j)(3)(i)(B)(1) through (4) of this section
are treated as DPGR for purposes of
applying this de minimis exception.
This de minimis exception does not
apply if the price of a service or nonqualified property is separately stated
by the Specified Cooperative, or if the
service or non-qualified property is
separately offered or separately
bargained for with the customer (that is,
the customer can purchase the
agricultural or horticultural products
without the service or non-qualified
property).
(ii) Non-DPGR. Applicable gross
receipts as provided in §§ 1.199A–8(b)
and/or (c) derived from the lease, rental,
license, sale, exchange or other
disposition of an item of agricultural or
horticultural products may be treated as
non-DPGR if less than 5 percent of the
Specified Cooperative’s total gross
receipts derived from the lease, rental,
license, sale, exchange or other
disposition of that item are DPGR
(taking into account embedded services
and non-qualified property included in
such disposition, but not part of the
item). In the case of gross receipts
derived from the lease, rental, license,
sale, exchange, or other disposition of
agricultural or horticultural products
that are received over a period of time
(for example, a multi-year lease or
installment sale), this paragraph (j)(5)(ii)
is applied by taking into account the
total gross receipts for the entire period
derived (and to be derived) from the
lease, rental, license, sale, exchange, or
other disposition of the item of
agricultural or horticultural products.
For purposes of the preceding sentence,
if the Specified Cooperative treats gross
receipts as non-DPGR under this de
minimis exception, then the Specified
Cooperative must treat the gross receipts
recognized in each taxable year
consistently as non-DPGR.
(k) Applicability date. The provisions
of this section apply to taxable years
ending after the date the Treasury
decision adopting these regulations as
final regulations is published in the
Federal Register. Taxpayers, however,
may rely on these regulations until that
date, but only if the taxpayers apply the
rules in their entirety and in a
consistent manner.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 Jun 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
§ 1.199A–10 Allocation of costs of goods
sold (COGS) and other deductions to
domestic production gross receipts
(DPGR), and other rules.
(a) In general. The provisions of this
section apply solely for purposes of
section 199A(g) of the Internal Revenue
Code (Code). The provisions of this
section provide additional guidance on
determining qualified production
activities income (QPAI) as described
and defined in § 1.199A–8(b)(4)(ii).
(b) COGS allocable to DPGR—(1) In
general. When determining its QPAI,
the Specified Cooperative (defined in
§ 1.199A–8(a)(2)) must subtract from its
DPGR (defined in § 1.199A–8(b)(3)(ii))
the COGS allocable to its DPGR. The
Specified Cooperative determines its
COGS allocable to DPGR in accordance
with this paragraph (b)(1) or, if
applicable, paragraph (f) of this section.
In the case of a sale, exchange, or other
disposition of inventory, COGS is equal
to beginning inventory of the Specified
Cooperative plus purchases and
production costs incurred during the
taxable year and included in inventory
costs by the Specified Cooperative, less
ending inventory of the Specified
Cooperative. In determining its QPAI,
the Specified Cooperative does not
include in COGS any payment made,
whether during the taxable year, or
included in beginning inventory, for
which a deduction is allowed under
section 1382(b) and/or (c), as applicable.
See § 1.199A–8(b)(4)(C). COGS is
determined under the methods of
accounting that the Specified
Cooperative uses to compute taxable
income. See sections 263A, 471, and
472. If section 263A requires the
Specified Cooperative to include
additional section 263A costs (as
defined in § 1.263A–1(d)(3)) in
inventory, additional section 263A costs
must be included in determining COGS.
COGS also includes the Specified
Cooperative’s inventory valuation
adjustments such as write-downs under
the lower of cost or market method. In
the case of a sale, exchange, or other
disposition (including, for example,
theft, casualty, or abandonment) by the
Specified Cooperative of non-inventory
property, COGS for purposes of this
section includes the adjusted basis of
the property.
(2) Allocating COGS—(i) In general. A
Specified Cooperative must use a
reasonable method based on all the facts
and circumstances to allocate COGS
between DPGR and non-DPGR. Whether
an allocation method is reasonable is
based on all the facts and
circumstances, including whether the
Specified Cooperative uses the most
accurate information available; the
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
relationship between COGS and the
method used; the accuracy of the
method chosen as compared with other
possible methods; whether the method
is used by the Specified Cooperative for
internal management or other business
purposes; whether the method is used
for other Federal or state income tax
purposes; the availability of costing
information; the time, burden, and cost
of using alternative methods; and
whether the Specified Cooperative
applies the method consistently from
year to year. Depending on the facts and
circumstances, reasonable methods may
include methods based on gross receipts
(defined in § 1.199A–8(b)(2)(iii)),
number of units sold, number of units
produced, or total production costs.
Ordinarily, if a Specified Cooperative
uses a method to allocate gross receipts
between DPGR and non-DPGR, then the
use of a different method to allocate
COGS that is not demonstrably more
accurate than the method used to
allocate gross receipts will not be
considered reasonable. However, if a
Specified Cooperative has information
readily available to specifically identify
COGS allocable to DPGR and can
specifically identify that amount
without undue burden or expense,
COGS allocable to DPGR is that amount
irrespective of whether the Specified
Cooperative uses another allocation
method to allocate gross receipts
between DPGR and non-DPGR. A
Specified Cooperative that does not
have information readily available to
specifically identify COGS allocable to
DPGR and that cannot, without undue
burden or expense, specifically identify
that amount is not required to use a
method that specifically identifies
COGS allocable to DPGR. The chosen
reasonable method must be consistently
applied from one taxable year to another
and must clearly reflect the portion of
COGS between DPGR and non-DPGR.
The method must also be reasonable
based on all the facts and
circumstances. The books and records
maintained for COGS must be consistent
with any allocations under this
paragraph (b)(2).
(ii) Gross receipts recognized in an
earlier taxable year. If the Specified
Cooperative (other than a Specified
Cooperative that uses the small business
simplified overall method of paragraph
(f) of this section) recognizes and reports
gross receipts on a Federal income tax
return for a taxable year, and incurs
COGS related to such gross receipts in
a subsequent taxable year, then
regardless of whether the gross receipts
ultimately qualify as DPGR, the
E:\FR\FM\19JNP2.SGM
19JNP2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
Specified Cooperative must allocate the
COGS to—
(A) DPGR if the Specified Cooperative
identified the related gross receipts as
DPGR in the prior taxable year; or
(B) Non-DPGR if the Specified
Cooperative identified the related gross
receipts as non-DPGR in the prior
taxable year or if the Specified
Cooperative recognized under the
Specified Cooperative’s methods of
accounting those gross receipts in a
taxable year to which section 199A(g)
does not apply.
(iii) COGS associated with activities
undertaken in an earlier taxable year—
(A) In general. A Specified Cooperative
must allocate its COGS between DPGR
and non-DPGR under the rules provided
in paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and (iii) of this
section, regardless of whether certain
costs included in its COGS can be
associated with activities undertaken in
an earlier taxable year (including a year
prior to the effective date of section
199A(g)). A Specified Cooperative may
not segregate its COGS into component
costs and allocate those component
costs between DPGR and non-DPGR.
(B) Example. The following example
illustrates an application of paragraph
(b)(2)(iii)(A) of this section.
(1) Example. During the 2018 taxable year,
nonexempt Specified Cooperative X grew
and sold Horticultural Product A. All of the
patronage gross receipts from sales
recognized by X in 2018 were from the sale
of Horticultural Product A and qualified as
DPGR. Employee 1 of X was involved in X’s
production process until he retired in 2013.
In 2018, X paid $30 directly from its general
assets for Employee 1’s medical expenses
pursuant to an unfunded, self-insured plan
for retired X employees. For purposes of
computing X’s 2018 taxable income, X
capitalized those medical costs to inventory
under section 263A. In 2018, the COGS for
a unit of Horticultural Product A was $100
(including the applicable portion of the $30
paid for Employee 1’s medical costs that was
allocated to COGS under X’s allocation
method for additional section 263A costs). X
has information readily available to
specifically identify COGS allocable to DPGR
and can identify that amount without undue
burden and expense because all of X’s gross
receipts from sales in 2018 are attributable to
the sale of Horticultural Product A and
qualify as DPGR. The inventory cost of each
unit of Horticultural Product A sold in 2018,
including the applicable portion of retiree
medical costs, is related to X’s gross receipts
from the sale of Horticultural Product A in
2018. X may not segregate the 2018 COGS by
separately allocating the retiree medical
costs, which are components of COGS, to
DPGR and non-DPGR. Thus, even though the
retiree medical costs can be associated with
activities undertaken in prior years, $100 of
inventory cost of each unit of Horticultural
Product A sold in 2018, including the
applicable portion of the retiree medical
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 Jun 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
expense cost component, is allocable to
DPGR in 2018.
(3) Special allocation rules. Section
199A(g)(3)(C) provides the following
two special rules—
(i) For purposes of determining the
COGS that are allocable to DPGR, any
item or service brought into the United
States (defined in § 1.199A–9(i)) is
treated as acquired by purchase, and its
cost is treated as not less than its value
immediately after it entered the United
States. A similar rule applies in
determining the adjusted basis of leased
or rented property where the lease or
rental gives rise to DPGR.
(ii) In the case of any property
described in paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this
section that has been exported by the
Specified Cooperative for further
manufacture, the increase in cost or
adjusted basis under paragraph (b)(3)(i)
of this section cannot exceed the
difference between the value of the
property when exported and the value
of the property when brought back into
the United States after the further
manufacture. For the purposes of this
paragraph (b)(3), the value of property is
its customs value as defined in section
1059A(b)(1).
(4) Rules for inventories valued at
market or bona fide selling prices. If part
of COGS is attributable to the Specified
Cooperative’s inventory valuation
adjustments, then COGS allocable to
DPGR includes inventory adjustments to
agricultural or horticultural products
that are MPGE in whole or significant
part within the United States.
Accordingly, a Specified Cooperative
that values its inventory under § 1.471–
4 (inventories at cost or market,
whichever is lower) or § 1.471–2(c)
(subnormal goods at bona fide selling
prices) must allocate a proper share of
such adjustments (for example, writedowns) to DPGR based on a reasonable
method based on all the facts and
circumstances. Factors taken into
account in determining whether the
method is reasonable include whether
the Specified Cooperative uses the most
accurate information available; the
relationship between the adjustment
and the allocation base chosen; the
accuracy of the method chosen as
compared with other possible methods;
whether the method is used by the
Specified Cooperative for internal
management or other business purposes;
whether the method is used for other
Federal or state income tax purposes;
the time, burden, and cost of using
alternative methods; and whether the
Specified Cooperative applies the
method consistently from year to year.
If the Specified Cooperative has
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
28697
information readily available to
specifically identify the proper amount
of inventory valuation adjustments
allocable to DPGR, then the Specified
Cooperative must allocate that amount
to DPGR. The Specified Cooperative that
does not have information readily
available to specifically identify the
proper amount of its inventory
valuation adjustments allocable to
DPGR and that cannot, without undue
burden or expense, specifically identify
the proper amount of its inventory
valuation adjustments allocable to
DPGR, is not required to use a method
that specifically identifies inventory
valuation adjustments to DPGR. The
chosen reasonable method must be
consistently applied from one taxable
year to another and must clearly reflect
inventory adjustments. The method
must also be reasonable based on all the
facts and circumstances. The books and
records maintained for inventory
adjustments must be consistent with
any allocations under this paragraph
(b)(4).
(5) Rules applicable to inventories
accounted for under the last-in, first-out
inventory method—(i) In general. This
paragraph (b)(5) applies to inventories
accounted for using the specific goods
last-in, first-out (LIFO) method or the
dollar-value LIFO method. Whenever a
specific goods grouping or a dollarvalue pool contains agricultural or
horticultural products that produce
DPGR and goods that do not, the
Specified Cooperative must allocate
COGS attributable to that grouping or
pool between DPGR and non-DPGR
using a reasonable method based on all
the facts and circumstances. Whether a
method of allocating COGS between
DPGR and non-DPGR is reasonable must
be determined in accordance with
paragraph (b)(2) of this section. In
addition, this paragraph (b)(5) provides
methods that a Specified Cooperative
may use to allocate COGS for a
Specified Cooperative’s inventories
accounted for using the LIFO method. If
the Specified Cooperative uses the
LIFO/FIFO ratio method provided in
paragraph (b)(5)(ii) of this section or the
change in relative base-year cost method
provided in paragraph (b)(5)(iii) of this
section, then the Specified Cooperative
must use that method for all of the
Specified Cooperative’s inventory
accounted for under the LIFO method.
The chosen reasonable method must be
consistently applied from one taxable
year to another and must clearly reflect
the inventory method. The method must
also be reasonable based on all the facts
and circumstances. The books and
records maintained for the inventory
E:\FR\FM\19JNP2.SGM
19JNP2
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
28698
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
method must be consistent with any
allocations under this paragraph (b)(5).
(ii) LIFO/FIFO ratio method. The
LIFO/FIFO ratio method is applied with
respect to the LIFO inventory on a
grouping-by-grouping or pool-by-pool
basis. Under the LIFO/FIFO ratio
method, a Specified Cooperative
computes the COGS of a grouping or
pool allocable to DPGR by multiplying
the COGS of agricultural or horticultural
products (defined in § 1.199A–8(a)(4))
in the grouping or pool that produced
DPGR computed using the FIFO method
by the LIFO/FIFO ratio of the grouping
or pool. The LIFO/FIFO ratio of a
grouping or pool is equal to the total
COGS of the grouping or pool computed
using the LIFO method over the total
COGS of the grouping or pool computed
using the FIFO method.
(iii) Change in relative base-year cost
method. A Specified Cooperative using
the dollar-value LIFO method may use
the change in relative base-year cost
method. The change in relative baseyear cost method for a Specified
Cooperative using the dollar-value LIFO
method is applied to all LIFO inventory
on a pool-by-pool basis. The change in
relative base-year cost method
determines the COGS allocable to DPGR
by increasing or decreasing the total
production costs (section 471 costs and
additional section 263A costs) of
agricultural or horticultural products
that generate DPGR by a portion of any
increment or liquidation of the dollarvalue pool. The portion of an increment
or liquidation allocable to DPGR is
determined by multiplying the LIFO
value of the increment or liquidation
(expressed as a positive number) by the
ratio of the change in total base-year
cost (expressed as a positive number) of
agricultural or horticultural products
that will generate DPGR in ending
inventory to the change in total baseyear cost (expressed as a positive
number) of all goods in ending
inventory. The portion of an increment
or liquidation allocable to DPGR may be
zero but cannot exceed the amount of
the increment or liquidation. Thus, a
ratio in excess of 1.0 must be treated as
1.0.
(6) Specified Cooperative using a
simplified method for additional section
263A costs to ending inventory. A
Specified Cooperative that uses a
simplified method specifically
described in the section 263A
regulations to allocate additional section
263A costs to ending inventory must
follow the rules in paragraph (b)(2) of
this section to determine the amount of
additional section 263A costs allocable
to DPGR. Allocable additional section
263A costs include additional section
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 Jun 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
263A costs included in the Specified
Cooperative’s beginning inventory as
well as additional section 263A costs
incurred during the taxable year by the
Specified Cooperative. Ordinarily, if the
Specified Cooperative uses a simplified
method specifically described in the
section 263A regulations to allocate its
additional section 263A costs to its
ending inventory, the additional section
263A costs must be allocated in the
same proportion as section 471 costs are
allocated.
(c) Other deductions properly
allocable to DPGR or gross income
attributable to DPGR—(1) In general. In
determining its QPAI, the Specified
Cooperative must subtract from its
DPGR (in addition to the COGS), the
deductions that are properly allocable
and apportioned to DPGR. A Specified
Cooperative generally must allocate and
apportion these deductions using the
rules of the section 861 method
provided in paragraph (d) of this
section. In lieu of the section 861
method, an eligible Specified
Cooperative may apportion these
deductions using the simplified
deduction method provided in
paragraph (e) of this section. Paragraph
(f) of this section provides a small
business simplified overall method that
may be used by a qualifying small
Specified Cooperative. A Specified
Cooperative using the simplified
deduction method or the small business
simplified overall method must use that
method for all deductions. A Specified
Cooperative eligible to use the small
business simplified overall method may
choose at any time for any taxable year
to use the small business simplified
overall method or the simplified
deduction method for a taxable year.
(2) Treatment of net operating losses.
A deduction under section 172 for a net
operating loss (NOL) is not allocated or
apportioned to DPGR or gross income
attributable to DPGR.
(3) W–2 wages. Although only W–2
wages as described in § 1.199A–11 are
taken into account in computing the W–
2 wage limitation, all wages paid (or
incurred in the case of an accrual
method taxpayer) in the taxable year are
taken into account in computing QPAI
for that taxable year.
(d) Section 861 method. Under the
section 861 method, the Specified
Cooperative must allocate and apportion
its deductions using the allocation and
apportionment rules provided under the
section 861 regulations under which
section 199A(g) is treated as an
operative section described in § 1.861–
8(f). Accordingly, the Specified
Cooperative applies the rules of the
section 861 regulations to allocate and
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
apportion deductions (including, if
applicable, its distributive share of
deductions from passthrough entities) to
gross income attributable to DPGR. If the
Specified Cooperative applies the
allocation and apportionment rules of
the section 861 regulations for section
199A(g) and another operative section,
then the Specified Cooperative must use
the same method of allocation and the
same principles of apportionment for
purposes of all operative sections.
Research and experimental
expenditures must be allocated and
apportioned in accordance with
§ 1.861–17 without taking into account
the exclusive apportionment rule of
§ 1.861–17(b). Deductions for charitable
contributions (as allowed under section
170 and section 873(b)(2) or
882(c)(1)(B)) must be ratably
apportioned between gross income
attributable to DPGR and gross income
attributable to non-DPGR based on the
relative amounts of gross income.
(e) Simplified deduction method—(1)
In general. An eligible Specified
Cooperative (defined in paragraph (e)(2)
of this section) may use the simplified
deduction method to apportion business
deductions between DPGR and nonDPGR. The simplified deduction
method does not apply to COGS. Under
the simplified deduction method, the
business deductions (except the NOL
deduction) are ratably apportioned
between DPGR and non-DPGR based on
relative gross receipts. Accordingly, the
amount of deductions for the current
taxable year apportioned to DPGR is
equal to the proportion of the total
business deductions for the current
taxable year that the amount of DPGR
bears to total gross receipts.
(2) Eligible Specified Cooperative. For
purposes of this paragraph (e), an
eligible Specified Cooperative is—
(i) A Specified Cooperative that has
average annual total gross receipts (as
defined in paragraph (g) of this section)
of $100,000,000 or less; or
(ii) A Specified Cooperative that has
total assets (as defined in paragraph
(e)(3) of this section) of $10,000,000 or
less.
(3) Total assets.—(i) In general. For
purposes of the simplified deduction
method, total assets mean the total
assets the Specified Cooperative has at
the end of the taxable year.
(ii) Members of an expanded affiliated
group. To compute the total assets of an
expanded affiliated group (EAG) at the
end of the taxable year, the total assets
at the end of the taxable year of each
member of the EAG at the end of the
taxable year that ends with or within the
taxable year of the computing member
E:\FR\FM\19JNP2.SGM
19JNP2
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
(as described in § 1.199A–12(g)) are
aggregated.
(4) Members of an expanded affiliated
group—(i) In general. Whether the
members of an EAG may use the
simplified deduction method is
determined by reference to all the
members of the EAG. If the average
annual gross receipts of the EAG are less
than or equal to $100,000,000 or the
total assets of the EAG are less than or
equal to $10,000,000, then each member
of the EAG may individually determine
whether to use the simplified deduction
method, regardless of the cost allocation
method used by the other members.
(ii) Exception. Notwithstanding
paragraph (e)(4)(i) of this section, all
members of the same consolidated
group must use the same cost allocation
method.
(f) Small business simplified overall
method—(1) In general. A qualifying
small Specified Cooperative may use the
small business simplified overall
method to apportion COGS and
deductions between DPGR and nonDPGR. Under the small business
simplified overall method, a Specified
Cooperative’s total costs for the current
taxable year (as defined in paragraph
(f)(3) of this section) are apportioned
between DPGR and non-DPGR based on
relative gross receipts. Accordingly, the
amount of total costs for the current
taxable year apportioned to DPGR is
equal to the proportion of total costs for
the current taxable year that the amount
of DPGR bears to total gross receipts.
(2) Qualifying small Specified
Cooperative. For purposes of this
paragraph (f), a qualifying small
Specified Cooperative is a Specified
Cooperative that has average annual
total gross receipts (as defined in
paragraph (g) of this section) of
$25,000,000 or less.
(3) Total costs for the current taxable
year. For purposes of the small business
simplified overall method, total costs for
the current taxable year means the total
COGS and deductions for the current
taxable year. Total costs for the current
taxable year are determined under the
methods of accounting that the
Specified Cooperative uses to compute
taxable income.
(4) Members of an expanded affiliated
group—(i) In general. Whether the
members of an EAG may use the small
business simplified overall method is
determined by reference to all the
members of the EAG. If the average
annual gross receipts of the EAG are less
than or equal to $25,000,000 then each
member of the EAG may individually
determine whether to use the small
business simplified overall method,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 Jun 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
regardless of the cost allocation method
used by the other members.
(ii) Exception. Notwithstanding
paragraph (f)(4)(i) of this section, all
members of the same consolidated
group must use the same cost allocation
method.
(g) Average annual gross receipts—(1)
In general. For purposes of the
simplified deduction method and the
small business simplified overall
method, average annual gross receipts
means the average annual gross receipts
of the Specified Cooperative for the 3
taxable years (or, if fewer, the taxable
years during which the taxpayer was in
existence) preceding the current taxable
year, even if one or more of such taxable
years began before the effective date of
section 199A(g). In the case of any
taxable year of less than 12 months (a
short taxable year), the gross receipts of
the Specified Cooperative are
annualized by multiplying the gross
receipts for the short period by 12 and
dividing the result by the number of
months in the short period.
(2) Members of an expanded affiliated
group—(i) In general. To compute the
average annual gross receipts of an EAG,
the gross receipts for the entire taxable
year of each member that is a member
of the EAG at the end of its taxable year
that ends with or within the taxable year
are aggregated. For purposes of this
paragraph (g)(2), a consolidated group is
treated as one member of an EAG.
(ii) Exception. Notwithstanding
paragraph (g)(1)(i) of this section, all
members of the same consolidated
group must use the same cost allocation
method.
(h) Cost allocation methods for
determining oil-related QPAI—(1)
Section 861 method. A Specified
Cooperative that uses the section 861
method to determine deductions that
are allocated and apportioned to gross
income attributable to DPGR must use
the section 861 method to determine
deductions that are allocated and
apportioned to gross income attributable
to oil-related DPGR.
(2) Simplified deduction method. A
Specified Cooperative that uses the
simplified deduction method to
apportion deductions between DPGR
and non-DPGR must determine the
portion of deductions allocable to oilrelated DPGR by multiplying the
deductions allocable to DPGR by the
ratio of oil-related DPGR to DPGR from
all activities.
(3) Small business simplified overall
method. A Specified Cooperative that
uses the small business simplified
overall method to apportion total costs
(COGS and deductions) between DPGR
and non-DPGR must determine the
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
28699
portion of total costs allocable to oilrelated DPGR by multiplying the total
costs allocable to DPGR by the ratio of
oil-related DPGR to DPGR from all
activities.
(i) Applicability date. The provisions
of this section apply to taxable years
ending after the date the Treasury
decision adopting these regulations as
final regulations is published in the
Federal Register. Taxpayers, however,
may rely on these regulations until that
date, but only if the taxpayers apply the
rules in their entirety and in a
consistent manner.
§ 1.199A–11 Wage limitation for the
section 199A(g) deduction.
(a) Rules of application—(1) In
general. The provisions of this section
apply solely for purposes of section
199A(g) of the Internal Revenue Code
(Code). The provisions of this section
provide guidance on determining the
W–2 wage limitation as defined in
§ 1.199A–8(b)(5)(ii)(B). Except as
provided in paragraph (d)(2) of this
section, the Form W–2, Wage and Tax
Statement, or any subsequent form or
document used in determining the
amount of W–2 wages, are those issued
for the calendar year ending during the
taxable year of the Specified
Cooperative (defined in § 1.199A–
8(a)(2)) for wages paid to employees (or
former employees) of the Specified
Cooperative for employment by the
Specified Cooperative. Employees are
limited to employees defined in section
3121(d)(1) and (2) (that is, officers of a
corporate taxpayer and employees of the
taxpayer under the common law rules).
See paragraph (a)(5) of this section for
the requirement that W–2 wages must
have been included in a return filed
with the Social Security Administration
(SSA) within 60 days after the due date
(including extensions) of the return. See
also section 199A(a)(4)(C).
(2) Wage limitation for section
199A(g) deduction. The amount of the
deduction allowable under section
199A(g) to the Specified Cooperative for
any taxable year cannot exceed 50
percent of the W–2 wages (as defined in
section 199A(g)(1)(B)(ii) and paragraph
(b) of this section) for the taxable year
that are attributable to domestic
production gross receipts (DPGR),
defined in § 1.199A–8(b)(3)(ii), of
agricultural or horticultural products
defined in § 1.199A–8(a)(4).
(3) Wages paid by entity other than
common law employer. In determining
W–2 wages, the Specified Cooperative
may take into account any W–2 wages
paid by another entity and reported by
the other entity on Forms W–2 with the
other entity as the employer listed in
E:\FR\FM\19JNP2.SGM
19JNP2
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
28700
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
Box c of the Forms W–2, provided that
the W–2 wages were paid to common
law employees or officers of the
Specified Cooperative for employment
by the Specified Cooperative. In such
cases, the entity paying the W–2 wages
and reporting the W–2 wages on Forms
W–2 is precluded from taking into
account such wages for purposes of
determining W–2 wages with respect to
that entity. For purposes of this
paragraph (a)(4), entities that pay and
report W–2 wages on behalf of or with
respect to other taxpayers can include,
but are not limited to, certified
professional employer organizations
under section 7705, statutory employers
under section 3401(d)(1), and agents
under section 3504.
(4) Requirement that wages must be
reported on return filed with the Social
Security Administration—(i) In general.
Pursuant to section 199A(g)(1)(B)(ii) and
section 199A(b)(4)(C), the term W–2
wages does not include any amount that
is not properly included in a return filed
with SSA on or before the 60th day after
the due date (including extensions) for
such return. Under § 31.6051–2 of this
chapter, each Form W–2 and the
transmittal Form W–3, Transmittal of
Wage and Tax Statements, together
constitute an information return to be
filed with SSA. Similarly, each Form
W–2c, Corrected Wage and Tax
Statement, and the transmittal Form W–
3 or W–3c, Transmittal of Corrected
Wage and Tax Statements, together
constitute an information return to be
filed with SSA. In determining whether
any amount has been properly included
in a return filed with SSA on or before
the 60th day after the due date
(including extensions) for such return,
each Form W–2 together with its
accompanying Form W–3 is considered
a separate information return and each
Form W–2c together with its
accompanying Form W–3 or Form W–3c
is considered a separate information
return. Section 6071(c) provides that
Forms W–2 and W–3 must be filed on
or before January 31 of the year
following the calendar year to which
such returns relate (but see the special
rule in § 31.6071(a)–1T(a)(3)(1) of this
chapter for monthly returns filed under
§ 31.6011(a)–5(a) of this chapter).
Corrected Forms W–2 are required to be
filed with SSA on or before January 31
of the year following the year in which
the correction is made.
(ii) Corrected return filed to correct a
return that was filed within 60 days of
the due date. If a corrected information
return (Return B) is filed with SSA on
or before the 60th day after the due date
(including extensions) of Return B to
correct an information return (Return A)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 Jun 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
that was filed with SSA on or before the
60th day after the due date (including
extensions) of the information return
(Return A) and paragraph (a)(5)(iii) of
this section does not apply, then the
wage information on Return B must be
included in determining W–2 wages. If
a corrected information return (Return
D) is filed with SSA later than the 60th
day after the due date (including
extensions) of Return D to correct an
information return (Return C) that was
filed with SSA on or before the 60th day
after the due date (including extensions)
of the information return (Return C),
then if Return D reports an increase (or
increases) in wages included in
determining W–2 wages from the wage
amounts reported on Return C, such
increase (or increases) on Return D is
disregarded in determining W–2 wages
(and only the wage amounts on Return
C may be included in determining W–
2 wages). If Return D reports a decrease
(or decreases) in wages included in
determining W–2 wages from the
amounts reported on Return C, then, in
determining W–2 wages, the wages
reported on Return C must be reduced
by the decrease (or decreases) reflected
on Return D.
(iii) Corrected return filed to correct a
return that was filed later than 60 days
after the due date. If an information
return (Return F) is filed to correct an
information return (Return E) that was
not filed with SSA on or before the 60th
day after the due date (including
extensions) of Return E, then Return F
(and any subsequent information
returns filed with respect to Return E)
will not be considered filed on or before
the 60th day after the due date
(including extensions) of Return F (or
the subsequent corrected information
return). Thus, if a Form W–2c is filed to
correct a Form W–2 that was not filed
with SSA on or before the 60th day after
the due date (including extensions) of
the Form W–2 (or to correct a Form W–
2c relating to a Form W–2 that had not
been filed with SSA on or before the
60th day after the due date (including
extensions) of the Form W–2), then this
Form W–2c is not to be considered to
have been filed with SSA on or before
the 60th day after the due date
(including extensions) for this Form W–
2c, regardless of when the Form W–2c
is filed.
(b) Definition of W–2 wages—(1) In
general. Section 199A(g)(1)(B)(ii)
provides that the W–2 wages of the
Specified Cooperative must be
determined in the same manner as
under section 199A(b)(4) (without
regard to section 199A(b)(4)(B) and after
application of section 199A(b)(5)).
Section 199A(b)(4)(A) provides that the
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
term W–2 wages means with respect to
any person for any taxable year of such
person, the amounts described in
paragraphs (3) and (8) of section 6051(a)
paid by such person with respect to
employment of employees by such
person during the calendar year ending
during such taxable year. Thus, the term
W–2 wages includes the total amount of
wages as defined in section 3401(a); the
total amount of elective deferrals
(within the meaning of section
402(g)(3)); the compensation deferred
under section 457; and the amount of
designated Roth contributions (as
defined in section 402A).
(2) Section 199A(g) deduction.
Pursuant to section 199A(g)(3)(A), W–2
wages do not include any amount which
is not properly allocable to DPGR for
purposes of calculating qualified
production activities income (QPAI) as
defined in § 1.199A–8(b)(4)(ii). The
Specified Cooperative may determine
the amount of wages that is properly
allocable to DPGR using a reasonable
method based on all the facts and
circumstances. The chosen reasonable
method must be consistently applied
from one taxable year to another and
must clearly reflect the wages allocable
to DPGR for purposes of QPAI. The
books and records maintained for wages
allocable to DPGR for purposes of QPAI
must be consistent with any allocations
under this paragraph (b)(2).
(c) Methods for calculating W–2
wages. The Secretary may provide for
methods to be used in calculating W–2
wages, including W–2 wages for short
taxable years by publication in the
Internal Revenue Bulletin (see
§ 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of this chapter).
(d) Wage limitation—acquisitions,
dispositions, and short taxable years—
(1) In general. For purposes of
computing the deduction under section
199A(g) of the Specified Cooperative, in
the case of an acquisition or disposition
(as defined in section 199A(b)(5) and
paragraph (d)(3) of this section) that
causes more than one Specified
Cooperative to be an employer of the
employees of the acquired or disposed
of Specified Cooperative during the
calendar year, the W–2 wages of the
Specified Cooperative for the calendar
year of the acquisition or disposition are
allocated between or among each
Specified Cooperative based on the
period during which the employees of
the acquired or disposed of Specified
Cooperatives were employed by the
Specified Cooperative, regardless of
which permissible method is used for
reporting predecessor and successor
wages on Form W–2, Wage and Tax
Statement.
E:\FR\FM\19JNP2.SGM
19JNP2
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
(2) Short taxable year that does not
include December 31. If the Specified
Cooperative has a short taxable year that
does not contain a calendar year ending
during such short taxable year, wages
paid to employees for employment by
the Specified Cooperative during the
short taxable year are treated as W–2
wages for such short taxable year for
purposes of paragraph (a) of this section
(if the wages would otherwise meet the
requirements to be W–2 wages under
this section but for the requirement that
a calendar year must end during the
short taxable year).
(3) Acquisition or disposition. For
purposes of paragraph (d)(1) and (2) of
this section, the terms acquisition and
disposition include an incorporation, a
liquidation, a reorganization, or a
purchase or sale of assets.
(e) Application in the case of a
Specified Cooperative with a short
taxable year. In the case of a Specified
Cooperative with a short taxable year,
subject to the rules of paragraph (a) of
this section, the W–2 wages of the
Specified Cooperative for the short
taxable year can include only those
wages paid during the short taxable year
to employees of the Specified
Cooperative, only those elective
deferrals (within the meaning of section
402(g)(3)) made during the short taxable
year by employees of the Specified
Cooperative, and only compensation
actually deferred under section 457
during the short taxable year with
respect to employees of the Specified
Cooperative.
(f) Non-duplication rule. Amounts
that are treated as W–2 wages for a
taxable year under any method cannot
be treated as W–2 wages of any other
taxable year. Also, an amount cannot be
treated as W–2 wages by more than one
taxpayer. Finally, an amount cannot be
treated as W–2 wages by the Specified
Cooperative both in determining
patronage and nonpatronage W–2
wages.
(g) Wage expense safe harbor—(1) In
general. A Specified Cooperative using
either the section 861 method of cost
allocation under § 1.199A–10(d) or the
simplified deduction method under
§ 1.199A–10(e) may determine the
amount of W–2 wages that are properly
allocable to DPGR for a taxable year by
multiplying the amount of W–2 wages
determined under paragraph (b)(1) of
this section for the taxable year by the
ratio of the Specified Cooperative’s
wage expense included in calculating
QPAI for the taxable year to the
Specified Cooperative’s total wage
expense used in calculating the
Specified Cooperative’s taxable income
for the taxable year, without regard to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 Jun 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
any wage expense disallowed by section
465, 469, 704(d), or 1366(d). A Specified
Cooperative that uses either the section
861 method of cost allocation or the
simplified deduction method to
determine QPAI must use the same
expense allocation and apportionment
methods that it uses to determine QPAI
to allocate and apportion wage expense
for purposes of this safe harbor. For
purposes of this paragraph (g)(1), the
term wage expense means wages (that
is, compensation paid by the employer
in the active conduct of a trade or
business to its employees) that are
properly taken into account under the
Specified Cooperative’s method of
accounting.
(2) Wage expense included in cost of
goods sold. For purposes of paragraph
(g)(1) of this section, a Specified
Cooperative may determine its wage
expense included in cost of goods sold
(COGS) using a reasonable method
based on all the facts and
circumstances, such as using the
amount of direct labor included in
COGS or using section 263A labor costs
(as defined in § 1.263A–1(h)(4)(ii))
included in COGS. The chosen
reasonable method must be consistently
applied from one taxable year to another
and must clearly reflect the portion of
wage expense included in COGS. The
method must also be reasonable based
on all the facts and circumstances. The
books and records maintained for wage
expense included in COGS must be
consistent with any allocations under
this paragraph (g)(2).
(3) Small business simplified overall
method safe harbor. The Specified
Cooperative that uses the small business
simplified overall method under
§ 1.199A–10(f) may use the small
business simplified overall method safe
harbor for determining the amount of
W–2 wages determined under paragraph
(b)(1) of this section that is properly
allocable to DPGR. Under this safe
harbor, the amount of W–2 wages
determined under paragraph (b)(1) of
this section that is properly allocable to
DPGR is equal to the same proportion of
W–2 wages determined under paragraph
(b)(1) of this section that the amount of
DPGR bears to the Specified
Cooperative’s total gross receipts.
(h) Applicability date. The provisions
of this section apply to taxable years
ending after the date the Treasury
decision adopting these regulations as
final regulations is published in the
Federal Register. Taxpayers, however,
may rely on these regulations until that
date, but only if the taxpayers apply the
rules in their entirety and in a
consistent manner.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
§ 1.199A–12
28701
Expanded affiliated groups.
(a) In general. The provisions of this
section apply solely for purposes of
section 199A(g) of the Internal Revenue
Code (Code). Except as otherwise
provided in the Code or regulations
issued under the relevant section of the
Code (for example, sections
199A(g)(3)(D)(ii) and 267, § 1.199A–8(c),
paragraph (a)(3) of this section, and the
consolidated return regulations under
section 1502, each Specified
Cooperative whether exempt or
nonexempt (as defined in § 1.199A–
8(a)(2)(iii)) that is a member of an
expanded affiliated group (EAG)
(defined in paragraph (a)(1) of this
section) computes its own taxable
income or loss, qualified production
activities income (QPAI) (defined in
§ 1.199A–8(b)(4)(ii)), and W–2 wages
(defined in § 1.199A–11(b)). If a
Specified Cooperative is also a member
of a consolidated group, see paragraph
(d) of this section.
(1) Definition of an expanded
affiliated group. An EAG is an affiliated
group as defined in section 1504(a),
determined by substituting ‘‘more than
50 percent’’ for ‘‘at least 80 percent’’ in
each place it appears and without regard
to section 1504(b)(2) and (4).
(2) Identification of members of an
expanded affiliated group—(i) In
general. Each Specified Cooperative
must determine if it is a member of an
EAG on a daily basis.
(ii) Becoming or ceasing to be a
member of an expanded affiliated
group. If a Specified Cooperative
becomes or ceases to be a member of an
EAG, the Specified Cooperative is
treated as becoming or ceasing to be a
member of the EAG at the end of the day
on which its status as a member
changes.
(3) Attribution of activities—(i) In
general. Except as provided in
paragraph (a)(3)(iv) of this section, if a
Specified Cooperative that is a member
of an EAG (disposing member) derives
gross receipts (defined in § 1.199A–
8(b)(2)(iii)) from the lease, rental,
license, sale, exchange, or other
disposition (defined in § 1.199A–9(j)) of
agricultural or horticultural products
(defined in § 1.199A–8(a)(4)) that were
manufactured, produced, grown or
extracted (MPGE) (as defined in
§ 1.199A–9(f)), in whole or significant
part (as defined in § 1.199A–9(h)) in the
United States (as defined in § 1.199A–
9(i)) by another Specified Cooperative,
then the disposing member is treated as
conducting the previous activities
conducted by such other Specified
Cooperative with respect to the
agricultural or horticultural products in
determining whether its gross receipts
E:\FR\FM\19JNP2.SGM
19JNP2
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
28702
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
are domestic production gross receipts
(DPGR) (defined in § 1.199A–8(b)(3)(ii))
if—
(A) Such property was MPGE by such
other Specified Cooperative, and
(B) The disposing member is a
member of the same EAG as such other
Specified Cooperative at the time that
the disposing member disposes of the
agricultural or horticultural products.
(ii) Date of disposition for leases,
rentals, or licenses. Except as provided
in paragraph (a)(3)(iv) of this section,
with respect to a lease, rental, or license,
the disposing member described in
paragraph (a)(3)(i) of this section is
treated as having disposed of the
agricultural or horticultural products on
the date or dates on which it takes into
account the gross receipts derived from
the lease, rental, or license under its
methods of accounting.
(iii) Date of disposition for sales,
exchanges, or other dispositions. Except
as provided in paragraph (a)(3)(iv) of
this section, with respect to a sale,
exchange, or other disposition, the
disposing member is treated as having
disposed of the agricultural or
horticultural products on the date on
which it ceases to own the agricultural
or horticultural products for Federal
income tax purposes, even if no gain or
loss is taken into account.
(iv) Exception. Nonexempt Specified
Cooperatives. A nonexempt Specified
Cooperative is not attributed
nonpatronage activities conducted by
another Specified Cooperative. See
§ 1.199A–8(b)(2)(ii).
(4) Marketing Specified Cooperatives.
A Specified Cooperative will be treated
as having MPGE in whole or significant
part any agricultural or horticultural
product within the United States
marketed by the Specified Cooperative
which its patrons have so MPGE.
Patrons are defined in § 1.1388–1(e).
(5) Anti-avoidance rule. If a
transaction between members of an EAG
is engaged in or structured with a
principal purpose of qualifying for, or
increasing the amount of, the section
199A(g) deduction of the EAG or the
portion of the section 199A(g) deduction
allocated to one or more members of the
EAG, the Secretary may make
adjustments to eliminate the effect of
the transaction on the computation of
the section 199A(g) deduction.
(b) Computation of EAG’s section
199A(g) deduction.—(1) In general. The
section 199A(g) deduction for an EAG is
determined by separately computing the
section 199A(g) deduction from the
patronage sources of Specified
Cooperatives that are members of the
EAG and the section 199A(g) deduction
from the nonpatronage sources of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 Jun 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
exempt Specified Cooperatives that are
members of the EAG. The section
199A(g) deduction from patronage
sources of Specified Cooperatives is
determined by aggregating the income
or loss, QPAI, and W–2 wages, if any,
of each patronage source of a Specified
Cooperative that is a member of the EAG
(whether an exempt or nonexempt
Specified Cooperative). The section
199A(g) deduction from nonpatronage
sources of exempt Specified
Cooperatives is determined by
aggregating the income or loss, QPAI,
and W–2 wages, if any, of each
nonpatronage source of exempt
Specified Cooperatives that are
members of the EAG. For purposes of
this determination, a member’s QPAI
may be positive or negative. A Specified
Cooperative’s taxable income or loss
and QPAI will be determined by
reference to the Specified Cooperative’s
method of accounting. For purposes of
determining the section 199A(g)
deduction for an EAG, taxable income
or loss, QPAI, and W–2 wages of a
nonexempt Specified Cooperative from
nonpatronage sources are considered to
be zero. See § 1.199A–8(b)(2)(ii).
(2) Example. The following examples
illustrates the application of paragraph
(b)(1) of this section.
(i) Example. Nonexempt Specified
Cooperatives X, Y, and Z, calendar year
taxpayers, are the only members of an EAG
and are not members of a consolidated group.
X’s patronage source has taxable income of
$50,000, QPAI of $15,000, and W–2 wages of
$0. Y has patronage source taxable income of
($20,000), QPAI of ($1,000), and W–2 wages
of $750. Z’s patronage source has taxable
income of $0, QPAI of $0, and W–2 wages
of $3,000. In determining the EAG’s section
199A(g) deduction, the EAG aggregates each
member’s patronage source’s taxable income
or loss, QPAI, and W–2 wages. Thus, the
EAG’s patronage source has taxable income
of $30,000, the sum of X’s patronage source
taxable income of $50,000, Y’s patronage
source taxable income of ($20,000), and Z’s
patronage source taxable income of $0. The
EAG has QPAI of $14,000, the sum of X’s
QPAI of $15,000, Y’s QPAI of ($1,000), and
Z’s QPAI of $0. The EAG has W–2 wages of
$3,750, the sum of X’s W–2 wages of $0, Y’s
W–2 wages of $750, and Z’s W–2 wages of
$3,000. Accordingly, the EAG’s section
199A(g) deduction equals $1,260, 9% of
$14,000, the lesser of the QPAI and patronage
source taxable income, but not greater than
$1,875, 50% of its W–2 wages of $3,750. This
result would be the same if X had a
nonpatronage source income or loss, because
nonpatronage source income of a nonexempt
Specified Cooperative is not taken into
account in determining the section 199A(g)
deduction.
(3) Net operating loss carryovers/
carrybacks. In determining the taxable
income of an EAG, if a Specified
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Cooperative has a net operating loss
(NOL) from its patronage sources that
may be carried over or carried back, if
applicable, (in accordance with section
172), to the taxable year, then for
purposes of determining the taxable
income of the Specified Cooperative, the
amount of the NOL used to offset
taxable income cannot exceed the
taxable income of the patronage source
of that Specified Cooperative. Similarly,
if a Specified Cooperative has an NOL
from its nonpatronage sources that may
be carried over to the taxable year, then
for purposes of determining the taxable
income of the Specified Cooperative, the
amount of the NOL used to offset
taxable income cannot exceed the
taxable income of the nonpatronage
sources of that Specified Cooperative.
(4) Losses used to reduce taxable
income of an expanded affiliated group.
The amount of an NOL sustained by a
Specified Cooperative member of an
EAG that is used in the year sustained
in determining an EAG’s taxable income
limitation under § 1.199A–8(b)(5)(ii)(C)
(for nonexempt Specified Cooperatives)
or § 1.199A–8(c)(4)(i) (for exempt
Specified Cooperatives), as applicable,
is not treated as an NOL carryover to
any taxable year in determining the
taxable income limitation under
§ 1.199A–8(b)(5)(ii)(C) or § 1.199A–
8(c)(4)(i), as applicable. For purposes of
this paragraph (b)(4), an NOL is
considered to be used if it reduces an
EAG’s aggregate taxable income from
patronage source or nonpatronage
source, as the case may be, regardless of
whether the use of the NOL actually
reduces the amount of the section
199A(g) deduction that the EAG would
otherwise derive. An NOL is not
considered to be used to the extent that
it reduces an EAG’s aggregate taxable
income from patronage source or
nonpatronage source, as the case may
be, to an amount less than zero. If more
than one Specified Cooperative has an
NOL used in the same taxable year to
reduce the EAG’s taxable income from
patronage or nonpatronage sources, as
the case may be, the respective NOLs
are deemed used in proportion to the
amount of each Specified Cooperative’s
NOL.
(5) Example. The following example
illustrates the application of paragraph
(b)(4) of this section.
(i) Example—(A) Facts. Nonexempt
Specified Cooperatives A and B are the only
two members of an EAG. A and B are both
calendar year taxpayers and they do not join
in the filing of a consolidated Federal income
tax return. Neither A nor B had taxable
income or loss prior to 2018. In 2018, A has
patronage QPAI and taxable income of $1,000
and B has patronage QPAI of $1,000 and a
E:\FR\FM\19JNP2.SGM
19JNP2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
patronage NOL of $1,500. A also has
nonpatronage income of $3,000. B has no
activities other than from its patronage
activities. In 2019, A has patronage QPAI of
$2,000 and patronage taxable income of
$1,000 and B has patronage QPAI of $2,000
and patronage taxable income prior to the
NOL deduction allowed under section 172 of
$2,000. Neither A nor B has nonpatronage
activities in 2019. A’s and B’s patronage
activities have aggregate W–2 wages in excess
of the section 199A(g)(1)(B) wage limitation
in both 2018 and 2019.
(B) Section 199A(g) deduction for 2018. In
determining the EAG’s section 199A(g)
deduction for 2018, A’s $1,000 of QPAI and
B’s $1,000 of QPAI are aggregated, as are A’s
$1,000 of taxable income from its patronage
activities and B’s $1,500 NOL from its
patronage activities. A’s nonpatronage
income is not included. Thus, for 2018, the
EAG has patronage QPAI of $2,000 and
patronage taxable income of ($500). The
EAG’s section 199A(g) deduction for 2018 is
9% of the lesser of its patronage QPAI or its
patronage taxable income. Because the EAG
has a taxable loss from patronage sources in
2018, the EAG’s section 199A(g) deduction is
$0.
(C) Section 199A(a) deduction for 2019. In
determining the EAG’s section 199A
deduction for 2019, A’s patronage QPAI of
$2,000 and B’s patronage QPAI of $2,000 are
aggregated, resulting in the EAG having
patronage QPAI of $4,000. Also, $1,000 of B’s
patronage NOL from 2018 was used in 2018
to reduce the EAG’s taxable income from
patronage sources to $0. The remaining $500
of B’s patronage NOL from 2018 is not
considered to have been used in 2018
because it reduced the EAG’s patronage
taxable income to less than $0. Accordingly,
for purposes of determining the EAG’s
taxable income limitation under § 1.199A–
8(b)(5) in 2019, B is deemed to have only a
$500 NOL carryover from its patronage
sources from 2018 to offset a portion of its
2019 taxable income from its patronage
sources. Thus, B’s taxable income from its
patronage sources in 2019 is $1,500, which
is aggregated with A’s $1,000 of taxable
income from its patronage sources. The
EAG’s taxable income limitation in 2019 is
$2,500. The EAG’s section 199A(g) deduction
is 9% of the lesser of its patronage sourced
QPAI of $4,000 and its taxable income from
patronage sources of $2,500. Thus, the EAG’s
section 199A(g) deduction in 2019 is 9% of
$2,500, or $225. The results for 2019 would
be the same if neither A nor B had patronage
sourced QPAI in 2018.
(c) Allocation of an expanded
affiliated group’s section 199A(g)
deduction among members of the
expanded affiliated group—(1) In
general. An EAG’s section 199A(g)
deduction from its patronage sources, as
determined in paragraph (b) of this
section, is allocated among the
Specified Cooperatives that are
members of the EAG in proportion to
each Specified Cooperative’s patronage
QPAI, regardless of whether the
Specified Cooperative has patronage
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 Jun 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
taxable income or W–2 wages for the
taxable year. An EAG’s section 199A(g)
deduction from its nonpatronage
sources, as determined in paragraph (b)
of this section, is allocated among the
Specified Cooperatives that are
members of the EAG in proportion to
each Specified Cooperative’s
nonpatronage QPAI, regardless of
whether the Specified Cooperative has
nonpatronage taxable income or W–2
wages for the taxable year. For these
purposes, if a Specified Cooperative has
negative patronage or nonpatronage
QPAI, such QPAI is treated as zero.
Pursuant to § 1.199A–8(b)(6), a
patronage section 199A(g) deduction
can be applied only against patronage
income and deductions. Pursuant to
§ 1.199A–8(c)(ii), a nonpatronage
section 199A(g) deduction and can be
applied only against nonpatronage
income and deductions.
(2) Use of section 199A(g) deduction
to create or increase a net operating
loss. If a Specified Cooperative that is a
member of an EAG has some or all of
the EAG’s section 199A(g) deduction
allocated to it under paragraph (c)(1) of
this section and the amount allocated
exceeds patronage or nonpatronage
taxable income, determined as
described in this section and prior to
allocation of the section 199A(g)
deduction, the section 199A(g)
deduction will create an NOL for the
patronage source or nonpatronage
source. Similarly, if a Specified
Cooperative that is a member of an EAG,
prior to the allocation of some or all of
the EAG’s section 199A(g) deduction to
the member, has a patronage or
nonpatronage NOL for the taxable year,
the portion of the EAG’s section 199A(g)
deduction allocated to the member will
increase such NOL.
(d) Special rules for members of the
same consolidated group—(1)
Intercompany transactions. In the case
of an intercompany transaction between
consolidated group members S and B (as
the terms intercompany transaction, S
and B are defined in § 1.1502–13(b)(1)),
S takes the intercompany transaction
into account in computing the section
199A(g) deduction at the same time and
in the same proportion as S takes into
account the income, gain, deduction, or
loss from the intercompany transaction
under § 1.1502–13.
(2) Application of the simplified
deduction method and the small
business simplified overall method. For
purposes of applying the simplified
deduction method under § 1.199A–10(e)
and the small business simplified
overall method under § 1.199A–10(f), a
Specified Cooperative that is part of a
consolidated group determines its QPAI
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
28703
using its members’ DPGR, non-DPGR,
cost of goods sold (COGS), and all other
deductions, expenses, or losses
(hereinafter deductions), determined
after application of § 1.1502–13.
(3) Determining the section 199A(g)
deduction—(i) Expanded affiliated
group consists of consolidated group
and non-consolidated group members.
In determining the section 199A(g)
deduction, if an EAG includes Specified
Cooperatives that are members of the
same consolidated group and Specified
Cooperatives that are not members of
the same consolidated group, the
consolidated taxable income or loss,
QPAI, and W–2 wages, from patronage
sources, if any, of the consolidated
group (and not the separate taxable
income or loss, QPAI, and W–2 wages
from patronage sources of the members
of the consolidated group), are
aggregated with the taxable income or
loss, QPAI, and W–2 wages, from
patronage sources, if any, of the nonconsolidated group members. A similar
rule applies with respect to
nonpatronage taxable income or loss,
QPAI, and W–2 wages. For example, if
A, B, C, S1, and S2 are Specified
Cooperatives that are members of the
same EAG, and A, S1, and S2 are
members of the same consolidated
group (the A consolidated group), then
the A consolidated group is treated as
one member of the EAG. Accordingly,
the EAG is considered to have three
members, the A consolidated group, B,
and C. The consolidated taxable income
or loss, QPAI, and W–2 wages from
patronage sources, if any, of the A
consolidated group are aggregated with
the taxable income or loss from
patronage sources, QPAI, and W–2
wages, if any, of B and C in determining
the EAG’s section 199A(g) deduction
from patronage sources. Similarly, the
consolidated taxable income or loss,
QPAI, and W–2 wages from
nonpatronage sources, if any, of the A
consolidated group are aggregated with
the taxable income or loss from
nonpatronage sources, QPAI, and W–2
wages, if any, of B and C in determining
the EAG’s section 199A(g) deduction
from nonpatronage sources. Pursuant to
§ 1.199A–8(b)(6), a patronage section
199A(g) deduction can be applied only
against patronage income and
deductions. Pursuant to § 1.199A–
8(c)(ii), a nonpatronage section 199A(g)
deduction and can be applied only
against nonpatronage income and
deductions.
(ii) Expanded affiliated group consists
only of members of a single
consolidated group. If all of the
Specified Cooperatives that are
members of an EAG are also members of
E:\FR\FM\19JNP2.SGM
19JNP2
28704
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
the same consolidated group, the
consolidated group’s section 199A(g)
deduction is determined using the
consolidated group’s consolidated
taxable income or loss, QPAI, and W–
2 wages, from patronage sources or
nonpatronage sources, as the case may
be, rather than the separate taxable
income or loss, QPAI, and W–2 wages
from patronage sources or nonpatronage
sources of its members.
(4) Allocation of the section 199A(g)
deduction of a consolidated group
among its members. The section
199A(g) deduction from patronage
sources of a consolidated group (or the
section 199A(g) deduction allocated to a
consolidated group that is a member of
an EAG) is allocated among the
patronage sources of Specified
Cooperatives in proportion to each
Specified Cooperative’s patronage QPAI,
regardless of whether the Specified
Cooperative has patronage separate
taxable income or W–2 wages for the
taxable year. In allocating the section
199A(g) deduction of a patronage source
of a Specified Cooperative that is part of
a consolidated group among patronage
sources of other members of the same
group, any redetermination of a
member’s patronage receipts, COGS, or
other deductions from an intercompany
transaction under § 1.1502–13(c)(1)(i) or
(c)(4) is not taken into account for
purposes of section 199A(g). Also, for
purposes of this allocation, if a
patronage source of a Specified
Cooperative that is a member of a
consolidated group has negative QPAI,
the QPAI of the patronage source is
treated as zero.
(e) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the application of paragraphs
(a) through (d) of this section.
(i) Example 1. Specified Cooperatives X, Y,
and Z are members of the same EAG but are
not members of a consolidated group. X, Y,
and Z each files Federal income tax returns
on a calendar year basis. None of X, Y, or Z
have activities other than from its patronage
sources. Prior to 2018, X had no taxable
income or loss. In 2018, X has taxable income
of $0, QPAI of $2,000, and W–2 wages of $0,
Y has taxable income of $4,000, QPAI of
$3,000, and W–2 wages of $500, and Z has
taxable income of $4,000, QPAI of $5,000,
and W–2 wages of $2,500. Accordingly, the
EAG’s patronage source taxable income is
$8,000, the sum of X’s taxable income of $0,
Y’s taxable income of $4,000, and Z’s taxable
income of $4,000. The EAG has QPAI of
$10,000, the sum of X’s QPAI of $2,000, Y’s
QPAI of $3,000, and Z’s QPAI of $5,000. The
EAG’s W–2 wages are $3,000, the sum of X’s
W–2 wages of $0, Y’s W–2 wages of $500,
and Z’s W–2 wages of $2,500. Thus, the
EAG’s section 199A(g) deduction for 2018 is
$720 (9% of the lesser of the EAG’s patronage
source taxable income of $8,000 and the
EAG’s QPAI of $10,000, but no greater than
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 Jun 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
50% of its W–2 wages of $3,000, i.e., $1,500).
Pursuant to paragraph (c)(1) of this section,
the $720 section 199A(g) deduction is
allocated to X, Y, and Z in proportion to their
respective amounts of QPAI, that is $144 to
X ($720 × $2,000/$10,000), $216 to Y ($720
× $3,000/$10,000), and $360 to Z ($720 ×
$5,000/$10,000). Although X’s patronage
source taxable income for 2018 determined
prior to allocation of a portion of the EAG’s
section 199A(g) deduction to it was $0,
pursuant to paragraph (c)(2) of this section,
X will have an NOL from its patronage source
for 2018 equal to $144, which will be a
carryover to 2019.
(ii) Example 2. (A) Facts. Corporation X is
the common parent of a consolidated group,
consisting of X and Y, which has filed a
consolidated Federal income tax return for
many years. Corporation P is the common
parent of a consolidated group, consisting of
P and S, which has filed a consolidated
Federal income tax return for many years.
The X and P consolidated groups each file
their consolidated Federal income tax returns
on a calendar year basis. X, Y, P, and S are
each Specified Cooperatives, and none of X,
Y, P, or S has ever had activities other than
from its patronage sources. The X
consolidated group and the P consolidated
group are members of the same EAG in 2019.
In 2018, the X consolidated group incurred
a consolidated net operating loss (CNOL) of
$25,000. Neither P nor S (nor the P
consolidated group) has ever incurred an
NOL. In 2019, the X consolidated group has
(prior to the deduction under section 172)
taxable income of $8,000 and the P
consolidated group has taxable income of
$20,000. X’s QPAI is $8,000, Y’s QPAI is
($13,000), P’s QPAI is $16,000 and S’s QPAI
is $4,000. There are sufficient W–2 wages to
exceed the section 199A(g)(1)(B) limitation.
(B) Analysis. The X consolidated group
uses $8,000 of its CNOL from 2018 to offset
the X consolidated group’s taxable income in
2019. None of the X consolidated group’s
remaining CNOL may be used to offset
taxable income of the P consolidated group
under paragraph (b)(3) of this section.
Accordingly, for purposes of determining the
EAG’s section 199A(g) deduction for 2019,
the EAG has taxable income of $20,000 (the
X consolidated group’s taxable income, after
the deduction under section 172, of $0 plus
the P consolidated group’s taxable income of
$20,000). The EAG has QPAI of $15,000 (the
X consolidated group’s QPAI of ($5,000) (X’s
$8,000 + Y’s ($13,000)), and the P
consolidated group’s QPAI of $20,000 (P’s
$16,000 + S’s $4,000)). The EAG’s section
199A(g) deduction equals $1,350, 9% of the
lesser of its taxable income of $20,000 and its
QPAI of $15,000. The section 199A(g)
deduction is allocated between the X and P
consolidated groups in proportion to their
respective QPAI. Because the X consolidated
group has negative QPAI, all of the section
199A(g) deduction of $1,350 is allocated to
the P consolidated group. This $1,350 is
allocated between P and S, the members of
the P consolidated group, in proportion to
their QPAI. Accordingly, P is allocated
$1,080 ($1,350 × ($16,000/$20,000) and S is
allocated $270 ($1,350 × $4,000/$20,000)).
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(f) Allocation of patronage income
and loss by a Specified Cooperative that
is a member of the expanded affiliated
group for only a portion of the year—(1)
In general. A Specified Cooperative that
becomes or ceases to be a member of an
EAG during its taxable year must
allocate its taxable income or loss,
QPAI, and W–2 wages between the
portion of the taxable year that the
Specified Cooperative is a member of
the EAG and the portion of the taxable
year that the Specified Cooperative is
not a member of the EAG. This
allocation of items is made by using the
pro rata allocation method described in
this paragraph (f)(1). Under the pro rata
allocation method, an equal portion of
patronage taxable income or loss, QPAI,
and W–2 wages, and nonpatronage
taxable income or loss, QPAI, and W–
2 wages for the taxable year is assigned
to each day of the Specified
Cooperative’s taxable year. Those items
assigned to those days that the Specified
Cooperative was a member of the EAG
are then aggregated.
(2) Coordination with rules relating to
the allocation of income under
§ 1.1502–76(b). If § 1.1502–76(b)
(relating to items included in a
consolidated return) applies to a
Specified Cooperative that is a member
of an EAG, then any allocation of items
required under this paragraph (f) is
made only after the allocation of the
items pursuant to § 1.1502–76(b).
(g) Total section 199A(g) deduction
for a Specified Cooperative that is a
member of an expanded affiliated group
for some or all of its taxable year—(1)
Member of the same EAG for the entire
taxable year. If a Specified Cooperative
is a member of the same EAG for its
entire taxable year, the Specified
Cooperative’s section 199A(g) deduction
for the taxable year (whether patronage
sourced or nonpatronage sourced) is the
amount of the section 199A(g)
deduction allocated to it by the EAG
under paragraph (c)(1) of this section.
(2) Member of the expanded affiliated
group for a portion of the taxable year.
If a Specified Cooperative is a member
of an EAG for only a portion of its
taxable year and is either not a member
of any EAG or is a member of another
EAG, or both, for another portion of the
taxable year, the Specified Cooperative’s
section 199A(g) deduction for the
taxable year (whether patronage sourced
or nonpatronage sourced) is the sum of
its section 199A(g) deductions for each
portion of the taxable year.
(3) Example. The following example
illustrates the application of paragraphs
(f) and (g) of this section.
E:\FR\FM\19JNP2.SGM
19JNP2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
(i) Example—(A) Facts. Specified
Cooperatives X and Y, calendar year
taxpayers, are members of the same EAG for
the entire 2018 taxable year. Specified
Cooperative Z, also a calendar year taxpayer,
is a member of the EAG of which X and Y
are members for the first half of 2018 and not
a member of any EAG for the second half of
2018. Assume that X, Y, and Z each has W–
2 wages in excess of the section 199A(g)(1)(B)
wage limitation for all relevant periods. In
2018, X’s patronage source has taxable
income of $2,000 and QPAI of $600, Y’s
patronage source has a taxable loss of $400
and QPAI of ($200), and Z’s patronage source
has taxable income of $1,400 and QPAI of
$2,400.
(B) Analysis. Pursuant to the pro rata
allocation method, $700 of Z’s 2018
patronage taxable income and $1,200 of its
2018 QPAI are allocated to the first half of
the 2018 taxable year (the period in which Z
is a member of the EAG) and $700 of Z’s 2018
patronage taxable income and $1,200 of its
2018 QPAI are allocated to the second half
of the 2018 taxable year (the period in which
Z is not a member of any EAG). Accordingly,
in 2018, the EAG has taxable income from
patronage source of $2,300 (X’s $2,000 + Y’s
($400) + Z’s $700) and QPAI of $1,600 (X’s
$600 + Y’s ($200) + Z’s $1,200). The EAG’s
section 199A(g) deduction for 2018 is $144
(9% of the lesser of the EAG’s taxable income
from patronage source of $2,300 or QPAI of
$1,600). Pursuant to § 1.199A–14(c)(1), this
$144 deduction is allocated to X’s, Y’s, and
Z’s patronage source in proportion to their
respective QPAI. Accordingly, X’s patronage
source is allocated $48 of the EAG’s section
199A(g) deduction ($144 × ($600/($600 + $0
+ $1,200))), Y’s patronage source is allocated
$0 of the EAG’s section 199A(g) deduction
($144 × ($0/($600 + $0 + $1,200))), and Z’s
patronage source is allocated $96 of the
EAG’s section 199A(g) deduction ($144 ×
($1,200/($600 + $0 + $1,200))). For the
second half of 2018, Z’s patronage source has
taxable income of $700 and QPAI of $1,200.
Therefore, for the second half of 2018, Z’s
patronage source has a section 199A(g)
deduction of $63 (9% of the lesser of its
taxable income of $700 or its QPAI of $1,200
for the second half of 2018). Accordingly, X’s
2018 section 199A(g) deduction is $48 and
Y’s 2018 section 199A(g) deduction is $0. Z’s
2018 section 199A(g) deduction is $159, the
sum of the $96 section 199A(g) deduction of
the EAG allocated to Z for the first half of
2018 and Z’s $63 section 199A(g) deduction
for the second half of 2018.
(h) Computation of section 199A(g)
deduction for members of an expanded
affiliated group with different taxable
years—(1) In general. If Specified
Cooperatives that are members of an
EAG have different taxable years, in
determining the section 199A(g)
deduction of a member (the computing
member), the computing member is
required to take into account the taxable
income or loss, determined without
regard to the section 199A(g) deduction,
QPAI, and W–2 wages of each other
group member that are both—
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 Jun 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
(i) Attributable to the period that each
other member of the EAG and the
computing member are members of the
EAG; and
(ii) Taken into account in a taxable
year that begins after the effective date
of section 199A(g) and ends with or
within the taxable year of the computing
member with respect to which the
section 199A(g) deduction is computed.
(2) Example. The following example
illustrates the application of this
paragraph (h).
(i) Example. (A) Specified Cooperatives X,
Y, and Z are members of the same EAG.
Neither X, Y, nor Z is a member of a
consolidated group. X and Y are calendar
year taxpayers and Z is a June 30 fiscal year
taxpayer. Z came into existence on July 1,
2017. All of X, Y’s, and Z’s activities are
patronage sourced. Each Specified
Cooperative has taxable income that exceeds
its QPAI and W–2 wages in excess of the
section 199A(g)(1)(B) wage limitation. For the
taxable year ending December 31, 2018, X’s
QPAI is $8,000 and Y’s QPAI is ($6,000). For
its taxable year ending June 30, 2019, Z’s
QPAI is $2,000.
(B) In computing X’s and Y’s respective
section 199A(g) deductions for their taxable
years ending December 31, 2018, X’s taxable
income or loss, QPAI and W–2 wages and Y’s
taxable income or loss, QPAI, and W–2 wages
from their respective taxable years ending
December 31, 2018, are aggregated. The
EAG’s QPAI for this purpose is $2,000 (X’s
QPAI of $8,000 + Y’s QPAI of ($6,000)). The
$180 deduction is allocated to each of X and
Y in proportion to their respective QPAI as
a percentage of the QPAI of each member of
the EAG that was taken into account in
computing the EAG’s section 199A(g)
deduction. Pursuant to paragraph (c)(1) of
this section, in allocating the section 199A(g)
deduction between X and Y, because Y’s
QPAI is negative, Y’s QPAI is treated as being
$0. Accordingly, X’s section 199A(g)
deduction for its taxable year ending
December 31, 2018, is $180 ($180 × $8,000/
($8,000 + $0)). Y’s section 199A(g) deduction
for its taxable year ending December 31,
2018, is $0 ($180 × $0/($8,000 + $0)).
(C) In computing Z’s section 199A(g)
deduction for its taxable year ending June 30,
2019, X’s and Y’s items from their respective
taxable years ending December 31, 2018, are
taken into account. Therefore, X’s taxable
income or loss and Y’s taxable income or
loss, determined without regard to the
section 199A(g) deduction, QPAI, and W–2
wages from their taxable years ending
December 31, 2018, are aggregated with Z’s
taxable income or loss, QPAI, and W–2 wages
from its taxable year ending June 30, 2019.
The EAG’s QPAI is $4,000 (X’s QPAI of
$8,000 + Y’s QPAI of ($6,000) + Z’s QPAI of
$2,000). The EAG’s section 199A(g)
deduction is $360 (9% × $4,000). A portion
of the $360 deduction is allocated to Z in
proportion to its QPAI as a percentage of the
QPAI of each member of the EAG that was
taken into account in computing the EAG’s
section 199A(g) deduction. Pursuant to
paragraph (c)(1) of this section, in allocating
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
28705
a portion of the $360 deduction to Z, Y’s
QPAI is treated as being $0 because Y’s QPAI
is negative. Z’s section 199A(g) deduction for
its taxable year ending June 30, 2019, is $72
($360 × ($2,000/($8,000 + $0 + $2,000))).
(i) Partnership owned by expanded
affiliated group—(1) In general. For
purposes of section 199A(g)(3)(D)
relating to DPGR, if all of the interests
in the capital and profits of a
partnership are owned by members of a
single EAG at all times during the
taxable year of such partnership (EAG
partnership), then the EAG partnership
and all members of that EAG are treated
as a single taxpayer during such period.
(2) Attribution of activities—(i) In
general. If a Specified Cooperative
which is a member of an EAG
(disposing member) derives gross
receipts from the lease, rental, license,
sale, exchange, or other disposition of
property that was MPGE by an EAG
partnership, all the partners of which
are members of the same EAG to which
the disposing member belongs at the
time that the disposing member
disposes of such property, then the
disposing member is treated as
conducting the MPGE activities
previously conducted by the EAG
partnership with respect to that
property. The previous sentence applies
only for those taxable years in which the
disposing member is a member of the
EAG of which all the partners of the
EAG partnership are members for the
entire taxable year of the EAG
partnership. With respect to a lease,
rental, or license, the disposing member
is treated as having disposed of the
property on the date or dates on which
it takes into account its gross receipts
from the lease, rental, or license under
its method of accounting. With respect
to a sale, exchange, or other disposition,
the disposing member is treated as
having disposed of the property on the
date it ceases to own the property for
Federal income tax purposes, even if no
gain or loss is taken into account.
Likewise, if an EAG partnership derives
gross receipts from the lease, rental,
license, sale, exchange, or other
disposition of property that was MPGE
by a member (or members) of the same
EAG (the producing member) to which
all the partners of the EAG partnership
belong at the time that the EAG
partnership disposes of such property,
then the EAG partnership is treated as
conducting the MPGE activities
previously conducted by the producing
member with respect to that property.
The previous sentence applies only for
those taxable years in which the
producing member is a member of the
EAG of which all the partners of the
EAG partnership are members for the
E:\FR\FM\19JNP2.SGM
19JNP2
28706
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
entire taxable year of the EAG
partnership. With respect to a lease,
rental, or license, the EAG partnership
is treated as having disposed of the
property on the date or dates on which
it takes into account its gross receipts
derived from the lease, rental, or license
under its method of accounting. With
respect to a sale, exchange, or other
disposition, the EAG partnership is
treated as having disposed of the
property on the date it ceases to own the
property for Federal income tax
purposes, even if no gain or loss is taken
into account.
(ii) Attribution between expanded
affiliated group partnerships. If an EAG
partnership (disposing partnership)
derives gross receipts from the lease,
rental, license, sale, exchange, or other
disposition of property that was MPGE
by another EAG partnership (producing
partnership), then the disposing
partnership is treated as conducting the
MPGE activities previously conducted
by the producing partnership with
respect to that property, provided that
each of these partnerships (the
producing partnership and the
disposing partnership) is owned for its
entire taxable year in which the
disposing partnership disposes of such
property by members of the same EAG.
With respect to a lease, rental, or
license, the disposing partnership is
treated as having disposed of the
property on the date or dates on which
it takes into account its gross receipts
from the lease, rental, or license under
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 Jun 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
its method of accounting. With respect
to a sale, exchange, or other disposition,
the disposing partnership is treated as
having disposed of the property on the
date it ceases to own the property for
Federal income tax purposes, even if no
gain or loss is taken into account.
(iii) Exception. No member of an EAG
other than an exempt Specified
Cooperative is attributed nonpatronage
activities conducted by an EAG
partnership. An EAG partnership is not
attributed nonpatronage activities
conducted by any member of the EAG
or by another EAG partnership.
(j) Applicability date. The provisions
of this section apply to taxable years
ending after the date the Treasury
decision adopting these regulations as
final regulations is published in the
Federal Register. Taxpayers, however,
may rely on these regulations until that
date, but only if the taxpayers apply the
rules in their entirety and in a
consistent manner.
■ Par. 3. Section 1.1388–1 is amended
by adding paragraphs (f) and (g).
The additions read as follows:
§ 1.1388–1
Definitions and special rules.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Patronage and nonpatronage.
Whether an item of income or deduction
is patronage or nonpatronage sourced is
determined by applying the directly
related use test. The directly related use
test provides that if the income or
deduction is produced by a transaction
that actually facilitates the
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
accomplishment of the cooperative’s
marketing, purchasing, or services
activities, the income or deduction is
from patronage sources. However, if the
transaction producing the income or
deduction does not actually facilitate
the accomplishment of these activities
but merely enhances the overall
profitability of the cooperative, being
merely incidental to the association’s
cooperative operation, the income or
deduction is from nonpatronage
sources. Patronage and nonpatronage
income or deductions cannot be netted
unless otherwise permitted by the
Internal Revenue Code or regulations
issued under the relevant section of the
Internal Revenue Code, or guidance
published in the Internal Revenue
Bulletin (see § 601.601(d)(2) of this
chapter).
(g) Effective/applicability date. The
provisions of paragraph (f) of this
section apply to taxable years ending
after the date the Treasury decision
adopting these regulations as final
regulations is published in the Federal
Register. However, taxpayers may rely
on the provisions of paragraph (f) of this
section until the date the Treasury
decision adopting these regulations as
final regulations is published in the
Federal Register.
Kirsten Wielobob,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2019–11501 Filed 6–18–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
E:\FR\FM\19JNP2.SGM
19JNP2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 118 (Wednesday, June 19, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 28668-28706]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-11501]
[[Page 28667]]
Vol. 84
Wednesday,
No. 118
June 19, 2019
Part III
Department of the Treasury
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Internal Revenue Service
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
26 CFR Part 1
Section 199A Rules for Cooperatives and Their Patrons; Proposed Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 19, 2019 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 28668]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG-118425-18]
RIN 1545-B090
Section 199A Rules for Cooperatives and Their Patrons
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; withdrawal of notice of proposed
rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: These proposed regulations provide guidance to cooperatives to
which sections 1381 through 1388 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code)
apply (Cooperatives) and their patrons regarding the deduction for
qualified business income (QBI) under section 199A(a) of the Code as
well as guidance to specified agricultural or horticultural
cooperatives (Specified Cooperatives) and their patrons regarding the
deduction for domestic production activities under section 199A(g) of
the Code. These proposed regulations also provide guidance on section
199A(b)(7), the rule requiring patrons of Specified Cooperatives to
reduce their deduction for QBI under section 199A(a). In addition,
these proposed regulations include a single definition of patronage and
nonpatronage under section 1388 of the Code. Finally, these proposed
regulations propose to remove the final regulations, and withdraw the
proposed regulations that have not been finalized, under former section
199. These proposed regulations affect Cooperatives as well as patrons
that are individuals, partnerships, S corporations, trusts, and estates
engaged in domestic trades or businesses.
DATES: Written (including electronic) comments and requests for a
public hearing must be received by August 19, 2019. As of June 19,
2019, the proposed rule published on August 27, 2015 (80 FR 51978), is
withdrawn.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic submissions via the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at www.regulations.gov (indicate IRS and REG-118425-18) by
following the online instructions for submitting comments. Once
submitted to the Federal eRulemaking Portal, comments cannot be edited
or withdrawn. The Department of the Treasury (Treasury Department) and
the IRS will publish for public availability any comment received to
its public docket, whether submitted electronically or in hard copy.
Send hard copy submissions to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-118425-18), Room 5203,
Internal Revenue Service, P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044. Submissions may be hand-delivered Monday through
Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-
1118425-18), Courier's Desk, Internal Revenue Service, 1111
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20224.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the proposed regulations,
James Holmes at (202) 317-4137; concerning submissions of comments and
requests for hearing, Regina L. Johnson at (202) 317-6901 (not toll-
free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document contains proposed amendments to the Income Tax
Regulations (26 CFR part 1) under sections 199A and 1388 of the Code.
Section 199A was enacted on December 22, 2017, by section 11011 of
``An Act to provide for reconciliation pursuant to titles II and V of
the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2018,'' Public
Law 115-97, 131 Stat. 2054, 2063 (TCJA). Parts of section 199A were
amended on March 23, 2018, as if included in TCJA, by section 101 of
Division T of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018, Public Law
115-141, 132 Stat. 348, 1151 (2018 Act). Section 199A applies to
taxable years beginning after 2017 and before 2026. Unless otherwise
indicated, all references to section 199A are to section 199A as
amended by the 2018 Act.
In addition, section 13305 of the TCJA repealed section 199 (former
section 199), which provided a deduction for income attributable to
domestic production activities (section 199 deduction). Public Law 115-
97, 131 Stat. 2054, 2126. The repeal of former section 199 is effective
for all taxable years beginning after 2017. This notice of proposed
rulemaking therefore proposes to remove the final regulations under
former section 199, and withdraws proposed regulations under former
section 199.
Section 199A(a) provides taxpayers a deduction of up to 20 percent
of QBI from a domestic business operated as a sole proprietorship or
through a partnership, S corporation, trust, or estate, and up to 20
percent of qualified real estate investment trust (REIT) dividends and
publicly traded partnership (PTP) income (section 199A(a) deduction).
Section 199A(b)(7) requires patrons of Specified Cooperatives to reduce
their section 199A(a) deduction if those patrons receive certain
payments from such cooperatives. Section 199A(g) provides a deduction
for Specified Cooperatives and their patrons (section 199A(g)
deduction) that is based on the former section 199 deduction. Before
the amendments of the 2018 Act, section 199A(g) provided a modified
version of the section 199A(a) deduction for Specified Cooperatives.
The Treasury Department and the IRS published proposed regulations
(REG-107892-18) providing guidance on the section 199A(a) deduction in
the Federal Register (83 FR 40884) on August 16, 2018 (August 2018
NPRM). The final regulations were published in the Federal Register (84
FR 2952) on February 8, 2019 (TD 9847).
TD 9847 did not address patrons' treatment of payments received
from Cooperatives for purposes of section 199A(a) or the section
199A(g) deduction for Specified Cooperatives, though it did restate the
reduction required under section 199A(b)(7). See Sec. 1.199A-1(e)(7).
The August 2018 NPRM preamble stated that the Treasury Department and
the IRS would continue to study the area and intended to issue separate
proposed regulations describing rules for applying section 199A to
Specified Cooperatives and their patrons. This notice of proposed
rulemaking sets forth those proposed regulations and provides
additional guidance to patrons calculating their 199A(a) deduction.
Explanation of Provisions
The purpose of these proposed regulations is to provide guidance
regarding the application of sections 199A(a), 199A(b)(7), and 199A(g)
to Cooperatives and their patrons as well as to Specified Cooperatives
and their patrons. Whereas section 199A(a) is generally available to
patrons of all Cooperatives, sections 199A(b)(7) and 199A(g) apply only
to Specified Cooperatives and their patrons.
These proposed regulations are organized into six sections:
Proposed Sec. Sec. 1.199A-7 through 1.199A-12. Proposed Sec. 1.199A-7
describes rules for patrons of Cooperatives to calculate their section
199A(a) deduction and rules for patrons of Specified Cooperatives to
calculate the reduction to their section 199A(a) deduction as required
by section 199A(b)(7). Unless otherwise provided in these proposed
regulations, all of the rules set forth in TD 9847 relating to the
section 199A(a) deduction apply to Cooperatives and their patrons.
Specified Cooperatives are a subset of Cooperatives; therefore, the
[[Page 28669]]
requirements of proposed Sec. 1.199A-7 also apply to Specified
Cooperatives.
Proposed Sec. 1.199A-8 sets out the criteria that Specified
Cooperatives must satisfy to qualify for the section 199A(g) deduction,
and sets forth four steps necessary to calculate this deduction. These
proposed regulations provide that the section 199A(g) deduction
available to Specified Cooperatives and their patrons is generally
computed only with respect to patronage gross receipts and related
deductions. Exempt Specified Cooperatives (those that qualify under
section 521) may compute their section 199A(g) deductions with respect
to both patronage and nonpatronage gross receipts and related
deductions.
Proposed Sec. Sec. 1.199A-9 through 1.199A-11 provide additional
guidance, based on the regulations under former section 199, regarding
the four steps set forth in proposed Sec. 1.199A-8. Proposed Sec.
1.199A-9 provides additional rules for determining a Specified
Cooperative's domestic production gross receipts (DPGR). Proposed Sec.
1.199A-10 provides additional rules for calculating costs (including
cost of goods sold (COGS) and other expenses, losses, and deductions)
allocable to a Specified Cooperative's DPGR. Proposed Sec. 1.199A-11
provides additional rules for determining the W-2 wage limitation in
section 199A(g)(1)(B). Proposed Sec. 1.199A-12 details rules for
applying section 199A(g) in the context of an expanded affiliated group
(EAG) and other special rules contained in section 199A(g)(5) that are
not otherwise addressed in these proposed regulations.
These proposed regulations also include, under section 1388, a
single definition of patronage and nonpatronage in proposed Sec.
1.1388-1(f), which is intended to reflect the current case law under
section 1388. This Explanation of Provisions describes each section of
the proposed regulations in more detail.
I. Proposed Sec. 1.199A-7, Rules for Patrons of Cooperatives
A. In General
As noted in the Background, section 199A(a) may allow a taxpayer a
deduction of up to 20 percent of QBI from a domestic business operated
as a sole proprietorship or through a partnership, S corporation,
trust, or estate, and up to 20 percent of qualified REIT dividends and
PTP income. A section 199A(a) deduction is not available for wage
income or for business income earned through a C corporation.
C corporations are not eligible for the section 199A(a) deduction.
Cooperatives are C corporations for Federal income tax purposes and,
therefore, are not eligible for the section 199A(a) deduction.
Similarly, patrons that are C corporations are also not eligible for
the section 199A(a) deduction. However, patrons that are individuals
are eligible for the section 199A(a) deduction. Section 1.199A-1(a)(2)
provides that, for purposes of applying the rules of Sec. Sec. 1.199A-
1 through 1.199A-6, a reference to an individual includes a reference
to a trust (other than a grantor trust) or an estate to the extent that
the section 199A(a) deduction is determined by the trust or estate
under the rules of Sec. 1.199A-6. These proposed regulations apply
this same usage of the term individual.
The benefits of section 199A(a) are limited to individuals with
income from a trade or business as defined in section 199A(d)(1) and
Sec. 1.199A-1(b)(14) (trade or business) with QBI. To the extent a
patron operating a trade or business has income directly from that
business (as opposed to receiving a patronage dividend from a
Cooperative), the patron must follow the rules of Sec. Sec. 1.199A-1
through 1.199A-6 to calculate the section 199A deduction. However, to
the extent a patron receives patronage dividends or similar payments
from a Cooperative, the patron must follow the additional special rules
and clarification in proposed Sec. 1.199A-7 to calculate the section
199A deduction.
For these purposes, patronage dividends or similar payments include
money, property, qualified written notices of allocations, and
qualified per-unit retain certificates for which an exempt or nonexempt
Cooperative receives a deduction under section 1382(b), and
nonpatronage distributions paid in money, property, qualified written
notices of allocation as well as money or property paid in redemption
of a nonqualified written notice of allocation for which an exempt
Cooperative receives a deduction under section 1382(c)(2) (hereinafter
collectively referred to as patronage dividends or similar payments).
Section 1.199A-7(c) and (d) of these proposed regulations provide
that these patronage dividends or similar payments may be included in
the patron's QBI: (i) To the extent that these payments are related to
the patron's trade or business, (ii) are qualified items of income,
gain, deduction, or loss at the Cooperative's trade or business level,
(iii) are not income from a specified service trade or business (SSTB),
as defined in section 199A(d)(2), at the Cooperative's trade or
business level (except as permitted by the threshold rules, see Sec.
1.199A-5(a)(2)), and (iv) provided the patron receives certain
information from the Cooperative about these payments (see proposed
Sec. 1.199A-7(c)(3) and (d)(3)). Proposed Sec. 1.199A-7(e) provides
that in situations in which a patron conducts a trade or business that
receives patronage dividends or similar payments from a Cooperative,
the W-2 wages and unadjusted basis immediately after acquisition (UBIA)
of qualified property considered are those of the patron's trade or
business and not of the Cooperative that directly conducts the trade or
business from which the payments arise. All of these proposed rules are
discussed further in this section.
B. QBI of Patrons
Although Cooperatives are C corporations for Federal income tax
purposes, section 1382(b) and (c) allow Cooperatives to determine
taxable income after deducting distributions of patronage dividends or
similar payments to patrons. The effect of these deductions is to
remove the distributions from income taxed at the Cooperative level
leaving it subject to income tax only at the patron level. Exempt and
nonexempt Cooperatives are both permitted to deduct patronage
distributions if they satisfy the requirements described in section
1382(b). Only exempt Cooperatives are permitted to also deduct
nonpatronage distributions if the requirements under section 1382(c)
are met. Cooperatives are subject to Federal income tax on income for
which no deduction may be taken under section 1382(b) or (c), in the
same manner as any C corporation.
Section 1.199A-3(b) contains the general rules regarding QBI. QBI
is the net amount of qualified items of income, gain, deduction, and
loss with respect to any trade or business as determined under those
rules. While income from the ownership of a C corporation is generally
not QBI, section 199A provides a special rule for patrons receiving
patronage dividends from a Cooperative.
Section 199A(c)(3)(B)(ii) provides that any amount described in
section 1385(a)(1), which concerns patronage dividends, is not treated
as an exclusion to a patron's QBI. The Joint Committee on Taxation
Report (JCX-6-18, released March 22, 2018) (Joint Committee Report)
states that QBI includes any patronage dividend (as defined in section
1388(a)), per-unit retain allocation (as defined in section 1388(f)),
qualified written notice of allocation (as defined in section
[[Page 28670]]
1388(c)), or any other similar amount received from a Cooperative,
provided such amount is otherwise a qualified item of income, gain,
deduction, or loss (that is, such amount is (i) effectively connected
with the conduct of a trade or business within the United States, and
(ii) included or allowed in determining taxable income for the taxable
year). Joint Committee Report, pages 24-25. As a result, the rules of
proposed Sec. 1.199A-7(c) provide that patronage dividends or similar
payments (as previously discussed) are included in calculating QBI for
purposes of the patrons' section 199A(a) deduction provided the amounts
are otherwise qualified items. To be otherwise qualified, these amounts
must be qualified items of income, gain, deduction, and loss under
section 199A(c)(3).
Unlike nonexempt Cooperatives, exempt Cooperatives are permitted to
deduct nonpatronage distributions under section 1382(c). As a result,
this income is subject to taxation only at the patron level. The rules
of proposed Sec. 1.199A-7(c) provide that a patron's QBI can include
payments to patrons for which the exempt Cooperative receives a
deduction under section 1382(c)(2) in addition to payments for which
the exempt Cooperative receives a deduction under section 1382(b). That
is, amounts paid under section 1382(c)(2) are treated by a patron as
equivalent to patronage dividends under section 1382(b) for purposes of
QBI. Amounts paid under section 1382(c)(1) (dividends on capital
stock), however, are dividends from ownership of C corporations, which
are not included in QBI.
TD 9847 generally provides that income is tested at the trade or
business level where it is directly generated. Accordingly, these
proposed regulations provide that patronage dividends or similar
payments are considered to be generated from the trade or business the
Cooperative conducts on behalf of or with the patron, and are tested by
the Cooperative at its trade or business level.
A patron must determine QBI for each trade or business it directly
conducts. However, in situations where the patron receives a
distribution from a Cooperative that is a patronage dividend or similar
payment, the Cooperative determines whether that distribution contains
qualified items of income, as defined under section Sec. 1.199A-3(b),
and reports that information to the patron. The patron needs this
information to determine its section 199A(a) deduction, and the
Cooperative directly conducting the trade or business from which the
distribution is derived is in the best position to know whether the
patronage dividend or similar payment contains qualified items. The
Cooperative must report this information regardless of whether the
patron's taxable income does not exceed the threshold amount ($315,000
in the case of joint returns and $157,500 for all other taxpayers for
any taxable year beginning before 2019). For taxable years beginning
after 2018, see Rev. Proc. 2018-57, 2018-49 IRB 827, or its successor
(relating to inflation adjustments).
A patron must use that information when determining the patron's
section 199A(a) deduction. For example, if the Cooperative determines
an entire distribution does not contain any qualified item of income,
gain, deduction, and loss because it is not effectively connected with
the conduct of the Cooperative's trade or business within the United
States, the Cooperative does not include such amount when reporting
qualified items to the patron, and the patron does not include the
distribution in the patron's QBI. In addition, to the extent the
distribution includes interest income that is not properly allocable to
the Cooperative's trade or business on behalf of, or with, its patrons,
the distribution is not a qualified item of income, gain, deduction,
and loss. As a result, the Cooperative does not include such amount
when reporting qualified items to the patron, and the patron does not
include the income in the patron's QBI.
Proposed Sec. 1.199A-7(c)(3) provides that the Cooperative must
report the amount of qualified items of income, gain, deduction, or
loss in the distributions made to the patron on an attachment to or on
the Form 1099-PATR, Taxable Distributions Received From Cooperatives
(Form 1099-PATR) (or any successor form), issued by the Cooperative to
the patron, unless otherwise provided by the instructions to the Form.
The Cooperative does not include any items from an SSTB in reporting
the amount of qualified items of income, gain, deduction, and loss and
must instead follow the rules in proposed Sec. 1.199A-7(d) for income
from an SSTB. If a patron does not receive such information from the
Cooperative on or before the due date of the Form 1099-PATR, the amount
of distributions from the Cooperative that may be included in the
patron's QBI is presumed to be zero. This presumption does not apply to
amounts of qualified items of income, gain, deduction and loss to the
extent that they were not reported on the Form 1099-PATR or attachment
thereto before the publication of these proposed regulations in the
Federal Register. These rules apply to both exempt and nonexempt
Cooperatives as well as patronage and nonpatronage distributions. The
Treasury Department and the IRS request comments on these reporting
requirements and whether any additional information from Cooperatives
that make distributions to their patrons is needed for their patrons to
determine their section 199A(a) deduction.
C. Specified Service Trade or Business
Section 199A(c)(1) provides that only items attributable to a
qualified trade or business are taken into account in determining the
section 199A(a) deduction for QBI. Under section 199A(d)(1) a
``qualified trade or business'' excludes (A) an SSTB or (B) the trade
or business of performing services as an employee. TD 9847 provides
that, unless an exception applies, if a trade or business is an SSTB,
none of its items are to be taken into account for purposes of
determining a taxpayer's QBI.
Under section 199A(d)(3), individuals with taxable income not
exceeding the threshold amount ($315,000 in the case of joint returns
and $157,500 for all other taxpayers for any taxable year beginning
before 2019), are not subject to a restriction with respect to SSTBs.
For taxable years beginning after 2018, see Rev. Proc. 2018-57, 2018-49
IRB 827, or its successor. Therefore, if an individual has taxable
income not exceeding the threshold amount, the individual is eligible
for the section 199A(a) deduction with respect to qualified items of
income, gain, deduction, and loss from the SSTB notwithstanding that
the trade or business is an SSTB. The inapplicability of the SSTB
rules, W-2 wage limitation, and UBIA of qualified property limitation
in computing the section 199A(a) deduction is subject to a phase-in for
individuals with taxable income within the phase-in range. See the
rules in Sec. 1.199A-5 for the rules relating to SSTBs.
The rules in proposed Sec. 1.199A-7(d) clarify that a patron
(whether the patron is a relevant passthrough entity (RPE) or an
individual) must determine whether the trades or businesses it directly
conducts are SSTBs. These proposed rules also provide that in the case
of a patron's trade or business that receives patronage dividends or
similar payments distributed from a Cooperative, the Cooperative must
determine whether the distributions from the Cooperative include items
of
[[Page 28671]]
income, gain, deduction, and loss from an SSTB directly conducted by
the Cooperative, and whether such items are qualified items with
respect to such SSTB. The Cooperative must report to the patron the
amount of qualified items of income, gain, deduction, and loss from an
SSTB directly conducted by the Cooperative. The patron then determines
if the distribution may be included in the patron's QBI depending on
the patron's taxable income and the statutory phase-in and threshold
amounts. Because the Cooperative may not know whether the patron's
taxable income exceeds the threshold amount, the Cooperative must
report this information to all patrons. Without this information, a
patron with taxable income within the phase-in range or below the
threshold amount would not have the information necessary to take into
account the amount of qualified items of income, gain, deduction, and
loss from an SSTB in determining the patron's section 199A(a) deduction
for QBI. The rules in Sec. 1.199A-5 are applied by the Cooperative to
determine if the trade or business is an SSTB. For example, the
Cooperative will apply the gross receipts de minimis rules in Sec.
1.199A-5(c)(1) to determine if the trade or business is an SSTB.
Proposed Sec. 1.199A-7(d)(3) provides that the Cooperative must
report to the patron the amount of SSTB income, gain, deduction, and
loss in distributions that is qualified with respect to any SSTB
directly conducted by the Cooperative on an attachment to or on the
Form 1099-PATR (or any successor form) issued by the Cooperative to the
patron, unless otherwise provided by the instructions to the Form. If
the Cooperative does not report the amount on or before the due date of
the Form 1099-PATR, then only the amount that a Cooperative reports as
qualified items of income, gain, deduction, and loss under Sec.
1.199A-7(c)(3) may be included in the patron's QBI, and the remaining
amount of distributions from the Cooperative that may be included in
the patron's QBI is presumed to be zero. This presumption does not
apply to amounts of qualified items of income, gain, deduction and loss
to the extent that they were not reported on the Form 1099-PATR or
attachment thereto before the publication of these proposed regulations
in the Federal Register. These rules apply to both exempt and nonexempt
Cooperatives as well as to patronage and nonpatronage distributions.
The Treasury Department and the IRS request comments on these reporting
requirements and whether any additional information from Cooperatives
that make distributions to their patrons is needed for their patrons to
determine their section 199A(a) deduction.
D. Determination of W-2 Wages and UBIA of Qualified Property
Section Sec. 1.199A-1(d) addresses the calculation of the section
199A(a) deduction for individuals with taxable income exceeding the
threshold amount and provides guidance on the application of these
limitations. All of the rules relating to the REIT dividends and
qualified PTP income component of the section 199A(a) deduction
applicable to individuals with taxable income not exceeding the
threshold amount also apply to individuals with taxable income
exceeding the threshold amount. The QBI component of the section
199A(a) deduction, however, is subject to limitations for individuals
with taxable income exceeding the threshold amount. These include the
limitations based on the W-2 wages of the trade or business or a
combination of the W-2 wages and the UBIA of qualified property.
Under Sec. 1.199A-2, W-2 wages and UBIA of qualified property are
determined by the individual or RPE that directly conducts the trade or
business. Section 199A(f)(1)(A)(2)(iii) requires that S corporations
and partnerships allocate W-2 wages and UBIA of qualified property to
their owners in accordance with each owner's applicable share, and
Sec. 1.199A-6 contains additional information regarding these
reporting requirements. Section 199A does not provide a similar rule
for Cooperatives.
Section 199A(c)(3)(B)(ii) provides that patronage dividends or
similar payments may be treated as qualified items of income. Only the
Cooperative knows the origin and character of the patronage dividends
or similar payments. As a result, the Cooperative must determine if
these payments meet the statutory requirements in section 199A(c)(3),
and must provide information to the patron for it to compute its
section 199A(a) deduction. In contrast, section 199A contains special
rules for W-2 wages and UBIA of qualified property. To provide that
Cooperatives allocate their W-2 wages and UBIA of qualified property to
their patrons would be to treat the Cooperatives as RPEs when they are
C corporations. Therefore, the rules in proposed Sec. 1.199A-7(e)
provide that patrons directly conducting trades or businesses that
receive patronage dividends or similar payments from a Cooperative
calculate the W-2 wage and UBIA of qualified property limitations at
the patron level based on the patrons' trades or businesses, without
any regard to the Cooperative's W-2 wages or UBIA of qualified
property.
In summary, a Cooperative must report to patrons: (i) Whether the
patronage dividends or similar payments include qualified items of
income, gain, deduction, and loss from a non-SSTB and (ii) whether the
distributions from the Cooperative include qualified items of income,
gain, deduction, and loss from an SSTB directly conducted by the
Cooperative, but a Cooperative does not report any W-2 wages or UBIA of
qualified property to patrons. The Treasury Department and the IRS
request comments on these proposed rules regarding W-2 wages and UBIA
of qualified property and whether it would be appropriate for
Cooperatives to be required to report such amounts to patrons to
determine their section 199A(a) deduction.
E. Special Rules for Patrons of Specified Cooperatives
Section 199A provides special rules for patrons of Specified
Cooperatives. Because patrons of Specified Cooperatives may be eligible
to take both a section 199A(a) and section 199A(g) deduction, section
199A(b)(7) provides that if a trade or business of a patron of a
Specified Cooperative receives qualified payments (as defined in
section 199A(g)(2)(e) and proposed Sec. 1.199A-8(d)(2)(ii)) from such
Specified Cooperative that are included in the patron's QBI, the patron
must reduce its section 199A(a) deduction by the lesser of (i) 9
percent of so much of the QBI with respect to such trade or business
that is properly allocable to qualified payments from the Specified
Cooperative, or (ii) 50 percent of so much of the patrons' W-2 wages
(determined under section 199A(b)(4)) with respect to such trade or
business as are so allocable. This reduction is required by section
199A(b)(7) whether the Specified Cooperative passes through all, some,
or none of the Specified Cooperative's section 199A(g) deduction to the
patron in that taxable year.
Section 1.199A-3(b)(5) provides an allocation method for items of
QBI attributable to more than one trade or business. That allocation
method also applies to patrons with multiple trades or businesses. The
rules in proposed Sec. 1.199A-7(f)(2) provide an additional similar
allocation method in situations where a patron receives qualified
payments and income that is not a qualified payment in a trade or
[[Page 28672]]
business. The patron must allocate those items using a reasonable
method based on all the facts and circumstances. Different reasonable
methods may be used for different items of income, gain, deduction, and
loss. The chosen reasonable method for each item must be consistently
applied from one taxable year to another and must clearly reflect the
income and expenses of each trade or business. The overall combination
of methods must also be reasonably based on all the facts and
circumstances. The books and records maintained for a trade or business
must be consistent with any allocations. The Treasury Department and
the IRS are open to considering whether a permissible ``reasonable
method'' should be specified in regulations or permitted to include
methods based on direct tracing, allocations based on gross income, or
other methods, within appropriate parameters. The Treasury Department
and the IRS request comments on possible reasonable methods for the
allocation of items not clearly attributable to a single trade or
business, and whether any safe harbors may be appropriate.
Because the section 199A(b)(7) reduction applies to the portion of
a patron's QBI that relates to qualified payments from a Specified
Cooperative, these proposed rules provide a safe harbor allocation
method for patrons with taxable income not exceeding the threshold
amounts set forth in section 199A(e)(2) to determine how to calculate
the section 199A(b)(7) reduction. The safe harbor allocation method is
intended to provide a straightforward method for patrons if their trade
or business receives qualified payments from a Specified Cooperative in
addition to other income. To calculate the required section 199A(b)(7)
reduction, the patron must allocate the aggregate business expenses and
W-2 wages between qualified payments and other gross receipts. The safe
harbor allocation method allows patrons to allocate by ratably
apportioning business expenses and W-2 wages based on the proportion
that the amount of qualified payments bears to the total gross receipts
used to determine QBI. The Treasury Department and the IRS request
comments on this safe harbor rule and whether there are additional or
alternative safe harbors that may be appropriate.
Further, to make the calculation required by section 199A(b)(7),
the patron will need to know the qualified payments allocable to the
patron that were used in calculating a Specified Cooperative's section
199A(g) deduction. In order to enable the patron to make this
calculation, proposed Sec. 1.199A-7(f)(3) requires the Specified
Cooperative to report the amount of such qualified payments on an
attachment to or on the Form 1099-PATR, (or any successor form) issued
by the Cooperative to the patron, unless otherwise provided by the
instructions to the Form.
F. Transition Rule
Congress provided a special transition rule relating to qualified
payments under former section 199 made by Specified Cooperatives in
section 101 of the 2018 Act. Under this transition rule, the repeal of
former section 199 for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017,
does not apply to former section 199 qualified payments received by a
patron from Specified Cooperatives in a taxable year beginning after
December 31, 2017, to the extent such qualified payments are
attributable to qualified production activities income (QPAI) with
respect to which a deduction is allowable to the Specified Cooperatives
under former section 199 for a taxable year of the Specified
Cooperatives beginning before January 1, 2018. Such qualified payments
remain subject to former section 199, and any deduction under former
section 199 allocated by the Specified Cooperatives to their patrons
related to such qualified payments may be deducted by such patrons in
accordance with former section 199. In addition, no deduction is
allowed under section 199A(a) and (g) with respect to such qualified
payments. See Public Law 115-97, title I, Sec. 13305(c), Dec. 22,
2017, 131 Stat. 2054, 2126 (codified as amended at I.R.C. Sec. 74
Note), as amended by Public Law 115-141, div. T, Sec. 101(c), Mar. 23,
2018, 132 Stat. 348, 1151, providing a transitional rule for qualified
payments of patrons of Cooperatives.
Proposed Sec. 1.199A-7(h)(3) and Sec. 1.199A-8(h)(3) provide that
the Cooperative must identify in a written notice to its patrons that a
section 199A(a) deduction cannot be claimed for qualified payments that
otherwise would constitute QBI in the patron's trade or business in a
taxable year in which the qualified payments remain subject to former
section 199. The Cooperative must report this information on an
attachment to or on the Form 1099-PATR (or any successor form) issued
by the Cooperative to the patron, unless otherwise provided by the
instructions to the Form.
II. Proposed Sec. 1.199A-8, Deduction for Income Attributable to
Domestic Production Activities of Specified Cooperatives
A. In General
Section 199A(g) provides a deduction for Specified Cooperatives and
their patrons that is similar in many respects to the deduction under
former section 199. Proposed Sec. 1.199A-8 provides definitions
relating to the section 199A(g) deduction, establishes the criteria
that a Specified Cooperative must satisfy to be eligible to claim the
section 199A(g) deduction, and sets forth the necessary steps for a
Specified Cooperative to calculate the section 199A(g) deduction.
B. Definitions
Proposed Sec. 1.199A-8 defines the terms patron, Specified
Cooperative, and agricultural or horticultural products. In defining
patron, the Treasury Department and the IRS sought consistency with the
rules under subchapter T of chapter 1 of subtitle A of the Code. Thus,
the rules in proposed Sec. 1.199A-8 cross-reference the definition of
patron found in Sec. 1.1388-1(e).
The definition of Specified Cooperative is consistent with the
definition set forth in section 199A(g)(4). This definition is
different from the definition of Specified Cooperative as originally
provided by section 11011(a) of the TCJA (former section 199A(g)(3)),
as it no longer includes a Cooperative solely engaged in the provision
of supplies, equipment, or services to farmers or other Specified
Cooperatives (former section 199A(g)(3)(C)).
Proposed Sec. 1.199A-8(a)(4) defines agricultural or horticultural
products as agricultural, horticultural, viticultural, and dairy
products, livestock and the products thereof, the products of poultry
and bee raising, the edible products of forestry, and any and all
products raised or produced on farms and processed or manufactured
products thereof within the meaning of the Cooperative Marketing Act of
1926, 44 Stat. 802 (1926). Agricultural or horticultural products also
include aquatic products that are farmed whether by exempt or nonexempt
Specified Cooperatives. See Rev. Rul. 64-246, 1964-2 C.B. 154. In
addition, agricultural or horticultural products include fertilizer,
diesel fuel, and other supplies used in agricultural or horticultural
production that are manufactured, produced, grown, or extracted (MPGE)
by the Specified
[[Page 28673]]
Cooperative. See Joint Committee Report, at 23, footnote 120.
Agricultural or horticultural products do not include intangible
property. For example, an agricultural or horticultural product
includes a seed that is grown, but does not include an intangible
property right to reproduce a seed for sale. This exclusion of
intangible property does not apply to intangible characteristics of any
particular agricultural or horticultural product. For example, gross
receipts from the sale of different varieties of oranges would all
qualify as DPGR from the disposition of agricultural or horticultural
products (assuming all other requirements of section 199A(g) are met).
However, gross receipts from the license of the right to produce and
sell a certain variety of oranges would be considered separate from the
tangible oranges themselves and therefore not gross receipts from an
agricultural or horticultural product. This exclusion is consistent
with former section 199, which excluded intangible property other than
computer software, any property described in section 168(f)(4) (sound
recordings), and qualified film products.
The Treasury Department and the IRS considered a similar but
alternative definition of agricultural or horticultural products as
agricultural, horticultural, viticultural, and dairy products,
livestock and poultry, bees, forest products, fish and shellfish, and
any products thereof, including processed and manufactured products,
and any and all products raised or produced on farms and any processed
or manufactured product thereof within the meaning of the Agricultural
Marketing Act of 1946, 60 Stat. 1091 (1946). While very similar to the
definition set forth in these proposed rules, the Treasury Department
and the IRS proposed using the definition based on the Cooperative
Marketing Act of 1926, which specifically concerns cooperatives, unlike
the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946, which concerns the marketing
and distribution of agricultural products.
The Treasury Department and the IRS also considered an alternative
definition of agricultural or horticultural products based on general
regulations under the Commodity Exchange Act. The Commodity Futures
Trading Commission defines agricultural commodities as wheat, cotton,
rice, corn, oats, barley, rye, flaxseed, grain sorghums, mill feeds,
butter, eggs, Solanum tuberosum (Irish potatoes), wool, wool tops, fats
and oils (including lard, tallow, cottonseed oil, peanut oil, soybean
oil and all other fats and oils), cottonseed meal, cottonseed, peanuts,
soybeans, soybean meal, livestock, livestock products, and frozen
concentrated orange juice, but not onions; other commodities that are,
or once were, or are derived from, living organisms, including plant,
animal and aquatic life, which are generally fungible, within their
respective classes, and are used primarily for human food, shelter,
animal feed or natural fiber; tobacco, products of horticulture, and
such other commodities used or consumed by animals or humans. 17 CFR
1.3. The Treasury Department and the IRS concluded that this definition
was too narrow, because it is limited to products that can be
commodities.
The Treasury Department and the IRS are considering alternative
definitions of agricultural or horticultural products to address
concerns that the definition could be interpreted inconsistently with
the ordinary meaning of agricultural or horticultural products. A
clarification of the definition that is under consideration is the
limitation of agricultural or horticultural products to products
acquired from original producers, such as farmers, planters, ranchers,
dairy farmers, or nut or fruit growers, and products thereof that are
MPGE by Specified Cooperatives. The Treasury Department and the IRS
request comments on whether the original producer approach being
considered would be appropriate, as well as other approaches to
defining agricultural or horticultural products. The Treasury
Department and the IRS also request comments on the impact, if any, of
the proposed definition on which products are MPGE by Specified
Cooperatives.
A Specified Cooperative's gross receipts from the disposition of
agricultural or horticultural products qualify as DPGR if the products
were MPGE by the Specified Cooperative in whole or significant part
within the United States. The proposed regulations define in whole or
significant part for these purposes in proposed Sec. 1.199A-9(h) and
provide a 20 percent safe harbor for such determination in proposed
Sec. 1.199A-9(h)(3).
The definition of gross receipts in proposed Sec. 1.199A-
8(b)(2)(iii) is essentially the same as in Sec. 1.199-3(c) issued
under former section 199, except that this definition has been modified
by removing references to section 1031 (exchange of real property held
for productive use or investment) and tax-exempt interest within the
meaning of section 103 (interest on State and local bonds). The
reference to section 1031 is removed because that provision now applies
only to real property. The section 199A(g) deduction is based on gross
receipts derived from the disposition of agricultural or horticultural
products and section 199A(g)(3)(D)(i) expressly excludes gross receipts
derived from the disposition of land from DPGR. The reference to tax-
exempt interest under section 103 is removed because it is appropriate
for the definition of gross receipts to include only gross receipts
that are taken into account in computing gross income under the
Cooperative's methods of accounting used for Federal income tax
purposes for the taxable year.
The Treasury Department and the IRS welcome comments regarding all
aspects of these proposed definitions, including whether there is an
alternative or more appropriate definition of Specified Cooperative or
agricultural or horticultural products, and clarification of when MPGE
is performed in whole or significant part in the United States that
would provide greater certainty for taxpayers in complying with, and
the IRS in administering, the requirements for claiming the section
199A(g) deduction. The Treasury Department and the IRS also welcome
comments on the appropriateness of the 20 percent safe harbor in
proposed Sec. 1.199A-9(h)(3).
C. Steps for Calculating Section 199A(g) Deduction
Proposed Sec. 1.199A-8 sets forth four required steps to determine
the amount of a nonexempt Specified Cooperative's section 199A(g)
deduction and provides rules to determine the amount of an exempt
Specified Cooperative's section 199A(g) deduction.
i. Patronage/Nonpatronage Split
The first step under the rules of proposed Sec. 1.199A-8 for
calculating the section 199A(g) deduction requires nonexempt Specified
Cooperatives to identify the gross receipts and related deductions
(other than a deduction under section 199A(g)) that are from patronage
sources and from nonpatronage sources. Specified Cooperatives must
separate their patronage and nonpatronage gross receipts and related
deductions when determining taxable income and allocating expenses
between patronage and nonpatronage income to claim the tax deductions
under section 1382(b) and (c). Cooperatives that have gross receipts
only from patronage sources will be unaffected. Accordingly, the
proposed regulations' requirement to divide patronage/nonpatronage
gross receipts and related deductions should not significantly impact
the existing
[[Page 28674]]
allocation requirements applicable to Specified Cooperatives.
This step is expressly included in these proposed rules because
proposed Sec. 1.199A-8 provides that for all purposes of the section
199A(g) deduction, nonexempt Specified Cooperatives may use only
patronage gross receipts and related deductions to calculate DPGR, QPAI
(including oil-related QPAI), taxable income, and the W-2 wage
limitation.
Separating a nonexempt Specified Cooperative's patronage items from
its nonpatronage items is consistent with the structure and intent of
section 199A. Section 199A in its entirety is structured to give
businesses that are not operating as C corporations a deduction that
corresponds to the TCJA's reduction of the top corporate rate of tax
under section 11. C corporations are expressly prohibited under section
199A(a) from claiming a section 199A(a) deduction, and under section
199A(g)(2)(D)(i) from claiming a section 199A(g) deduction. Although
section 199A(g) provides a deduction for Specified Cooperatives, the
statutory prohibitions preventing C corporations from benefiting under
section 199A(g) (which were absent from the statutory text of former
section 199) are in conflict with permitting a section 199A(g)
deduction for the nonpatronage business of a nonexempt Specified
Cooperative. Instead, nonpatronage source income of a nonexempt
Specified Cooperative receives an alternate benefit shared by other C
corporations: The TCJA's reduction of the top rate of tax under section
11 from 35 percent to 21 percent.
Moreover, the 2018 Act amended section 199A to address concerns
that the TCJA created an unintended incentive for farmers and other
producers to sell their agricultural or horticultural products to
Cooperatives over independent buyers. The amendment to section 199A was
intended to ensure a level playing field between Cooperatives and
independent buyers. Without the split between patronage and
nonpatronage businesses, Specified Cooperatives that may benefit from
both a section 199A(g) deduction (from which taxpayers other than
Specified Cooperatives cannot benefit) and the reduced corporate tax
rate on nonpatronage business would be significantly advantaged over
independent buyers who could benefit only from the reduced corporate
tax rate under section 11.
Accordingly, the Treasury Department and the IRS have determined
that it is appropriate to limit the source of the gross receipts and
related deductions taken into account for purposes of the section
199A(g) deduction for nonexempt Specified Cooperatives to items
properly allocated to a nonexempt Specified Cooperative's patronage
business. The Treasury Department and the IRS request comments
regarding these proposed rules, including comments explaining any
policy rationale that would justify treating the nonpatronage business
of a nonexempt Specified Cooperative differently from the business
operations of any other C corporation subject to the tax imposed under
section 11.
ii. Identifying Patronage DPGR
The second step set forth in proposed Sec. 1.199A-8 is for
nonexempt Specified Cooperatives to identify patronage gross receipts
that qualify as DPGR. The rules in proposed Sec. 1.199A-8 point
nonexempt Specified Cooperatives to proposed Sec. 1.199A-9 for
additional information on DPGR. The rules in proposed Sec. 1.199A-9 do
not refer to gross receipts from patronage or nonpatronage business
because the rules only provide additional information supplementing the
determination of DPGR from dispositions of agricultural or
horticultural products. When applying Sec. 1.199A-9, which occurs
after step 1 in Sec. 1.199A-8, the only gross receipts of a nonexempt
Specified Cooperative considered would be those derived from patronage
sources. Proposed Sec. 1.199A-9 is essentially the same as Sec. Sec.
1.199-1 and 1.199-3 issued under former section 199, adjusted to apply
to Specified Cooperatives.
iii. Calculating Patronage QPAI
The third step set forth in proposed Sec. 1.199A-8 is for
nonexempt Specified Cooperatives to calculate QPAI (including oil-
related QPAI) from only their patronage DPGR. To do this, nonexempt
Specified Cooperatives must determine COGS and other expenses, losses,
or deductions that are allocable to patronage DPGR. Nonexempt Specified
Cooperatives are directed to consult proposed Sec. 1.199A-10 for
additional information on making these allocations. Proposed Sec.
1.199A-10 does not refer to patronage or nonpatronage QPAI or DPGR
because it only provides additional information supplementing the QPAI
calculation. Proposed Sec. 1.199A-10 is essentially the same as Sec.
1.199-4 issued under former section 199, adjusted to apply to Specified
Cooperatives.
iv. Calculating Patronage Section 199A(g) Deduction
The fourth and final step set forth in proposed Sec. 1.199A-8 is
for nonexempt Specified Cooperatives to calculate their section 199A(g)
deduction, which is equal to 9 percent of the lesser of QPAI or taxable
income, and subject to the W-2 wage limitation. Nonexempt Specified
Cooperatives are directed to consult proposed Sec. 1.199A-11 for
additional information on the W-2 wage limitation. Proposed Sec.
1.199A-11 does not refer to patronage or nonpatronage QPAI, taxable
income, or W-2 wages because it only provides additional information
supplementing the W-2 wage limitation. Proposed Sec. 1.199A-11 is
essentially the same as Sec. 1.199-2 issued under former section 199,
adjusted to apply to Specified Cooperatives.
v. Exempt Specified Cooperatives
Proposed Sec. 1.199A-8(c) provides that exempt Specified
Cooperatives calculate two separate section 199A(g) deductions, one
based on gross receipts and related deductions from patronage sources,
and one based on gross receipts and related deductions from
nonpatronage sources. Like a nonexempt Specified Cooperative, an exempt
Specified Cooperative earns patronage income that is not taxed to the
extent of any section 1382(b) deduction for patronage distributions
made to patrons. Exempt Specified Cooperatives are also not taxed on
any nonpatronage income to the extent of any section 1382(c) deduction
for nonpatronage distributions. Unlike the usual taxation of C
corporations, the section 1382 deductions allow an exempt Specified
Cooperative to be treated more like a passthrough entity by reducing
the exempt Specified Cooperative's patronage and nonpatronage income.
It is therefore appropriate that the exempt Specified Cooperatives may
take a section 199A(g) deduction on both patronage and nonpatronage
income that could be deducted under section 1382(b) and (c)(2).
As described earlier, calculating two section 199A(g) deductions is
consistent with the administration of former section 199. To calculate
the two section 199A(g) deductions, an exempt Specified Cooperative is
required under proposed Sec. 1.199A-8 to perform steps two through
four twice, first using only its patronage gross receipts and related
deductions and second using only its nonpatronage gross receipts and
related deductions. An exempt Specified Cooperative cannot combine,
merge, or net patronage and nonpatronage items at any step in
determining its patronage section 199A(g) deduction and its
nonpatronage section 199A(g) deduction.
[[Page 28675]]
D. Special Rule for Oil-Related QPAI
Section 199A(g)(5)(E) contains a special rule for Specified
Cooperatives with oil-related QPAI, which requires a reduction by 3
percent of the least of oil-related QPAI, QPAI, or taxable income of
the Specified Cooperative for the taxable year. The language of this
rule is the same as the language used in former section 199(d)(9).
Former section 199(d)(9), which applied to taxable years beginning
after December 31, 2008, was added by section 401(a), Division B of the
Energy Extension Act of 2008, Public Law 110-343, 122 Stat. 3765
(2008). These proposed rules include rules for oil-related QPAI that
are similar to those contained in proposed regulations (REG-136459-09)
relating to the section 199 deduction published in the Federal Register
(80 FR 51978) on August 27, 2015 (2015 Proposed Regulations).
The 2015 Proposed Regulations included rules related to a
taxpayer's determination of oil-related QPAI (with respect to which no
comments were received). Although not finalized, the 2015 Proposed
Regulations are the only existing guidance concerning a taxpayer's
determination of oil-related QPAI. The preamble to the 2015 Proposed
Regulations includes an explanation of the reasons supporting the
proposed provisions, and these reasons continue to apply. These include
the determination that gross receipts from transportation and
distribution of oil are not included in the calculation of oil-related
QPAI, unless the gross receipts are considered DPGR under the de
minimis rule or an exception for embedded services now contained in
proposed Sec. 1.199A-9. Gross receipts from transportation and
distribution are not included in QPAI and DPGR (unless an exception
applies), and therefore it is appropriate to exclude such gross
receipts when calculating oil-related QPAI.
E. Rules for Passing Section 199A(g) Deduction to Patrons
Once a Specified Cooperative calculates the section 199A(g)
deduction, it may pass on the section 199A(g) deduction to patrons who
are eligible taxpayers as defined in section 199A(g)(2)(D), that is,
(i) a patron that is other than a C corporation or (ii) a patron that
is a Specified Cooperative. Section 199A(g)(2)(A) requires the
Specified Cooperative to identify the amount of the section 199A(g)
deduction being passed to a patron in a notice (required by proposed
Sec. 1.199A-8(d)(3)) mailed to the eligible patron during the payment
period described in section 1382(d). The amount of the section 199A(g)
deduction that a Specified Cooperative can pass through to an eligible
taxpayer is limited to the portion of the section 199A(g) deduction
that is allowed with respect to the QPAI to which the qualified
payments made to the eligible taxpayer are attributable. Section
199A(g)(2)(E) defines qualified payments as those that are included in
the eligible taxpayer's income under section 1385(a)(1) and (3)
(referencing patronage dividends and per-unit retain allocations).
Proposed Sec. 1.199A-8 further provides that a Specified Cooperative
that receives a section 199A(g) deduction as an eligible taxpayer can
take the deduction only against patronage gross income and related
deductions, or pass on the deduction to its patrons that are eligible
taxpayers. The proposed rules do not allow an exempt Specified
Cooperative to pass through any of the section 199A(g) deduction
attributable to nonpatronage activities because no QPAI is attributable
to any qualified payments. The rules of proposed Sec. 1.199A-8 are
essentially the same as the rules of Sec. 1.199-6, adjusted to include
other provisions of the section 199 final regulations as well as
proposed rules set forth in the 2015 Proposed Regulations.
F. Cooperative as a Partner in a Partnership
Proposed Sec. 1.199A-8(f) provides guidance regarding
circumstances in which a Specified Cooperative is a partner in a
partnership as described under section 199A(g)(5)(B). The proposed
rules provide that the partnership must separately identify and report
on the Schedule K-1 to the Form 1065, U.S. Return of Partnership
Income, (or any successor form) issued to its partner, unless otherwise
provided by the instructions to the Form, the Specified Cooperative's
allocable share of gross receipts and related deductions. This allows
the Specified Cooperative partner to apply the four steps in proposed
Sec. 1.199A-8 required to calculate its patronage section 199A(g)
deduction (or patronage and nonpatronage section 199A(g) deductions in
the case of an exempt Specified Cooperative).
III. Proposed Sec. 1.199A-9, Domestic Production Gross Receipts
A. In General
Section 199A(g)(3)(D) defines the term domestic production gross
receipts to mean gross receipts of a Specified Cooperative derived from
any lease, rental, license, sale, exchange, or other disposition
(collectively, a ``disposition'') of any agricultural or horticultural
product which was MPGE (determined after application of section
199A(g)(4)(B)) by the Specified Cooperative in whole or significant
part within the United States. Such term does not include gross
receipts of the Specified Cooperative derived from a disposition of
land or from services. These proposed regulations are based on Sec.
1.199-3 issued under former section 199, but remove provisions that
would not apply to the disposition of agricultural or horticultural
products.
DPGR includes the gross receipts that a Specified Cooperative
derives from marketing agricultural or horticultural products for
patrons. Section 199A(g)(4)(B) treats marketing Specified Cooperatives
as having MPGE any agricultural or horticultural product in whole or
significant part within the United States if their patrons have done
so. The Treasury Department and the IRS considered whether this rule
should apply between Specified Cooperatives and patrons taxed as C
corporations. These proposed regulations allow attribution to apply as
provided in section 199A(g)(4)(B) because the statute does not
distinguish between types of patrons. However, these proposed
regulations do not allow a Specified Cooperative to pass through to a C
corporation any of the section 199A(g) deduction of the Specified
Cooperative attributable to the disposition of such agricultural or
horticultural products. This is because, under section 199A(g)(2)(D),
taxpayers taxed as C corporations are not eligible to claim a section
199A(g) deduction from the Specified Cooperative. These proposed
regulations incorporate the rules from Sec. 1.199-1(d)(1) through (3)
and (e), issued under former section 199, as applicable. These rules
relate to the allocation of gross receipts between DPGR and non-DPGR,
and the determination of whether an allocation method is reasonable.
Further, the rules include provisions permitting Specified Cooperatives
to treat de minimis gross receipts as DPGR or non-DPGR without
allocating such gross receipts, and a provision permitting the use of
historical data to allocate gross receipts for certain multiple-year
transactions. The Treasury Department and the IRS welcome comments
regarding all aspects of these proposed rules. When incorporating these
concepts from the former section 199 regulations, the Treasury
Department and the IRS determined that the appropriate section of these
proposed regulations in which to include such guidance was proposed
[[Page 28676]]
Sec. 1.199A-9. This is not a substantive change, but rather a
reorganization to improve clarity.
B. Definition of Manufactured, Produced, Grown, Extracted
The definition of the term MPGE is included in proposed Sec.
1.199A-9 and is generally consistent with the definition in Sec.
1.199-3(e)(1). However, these proposed regulations revise the rule in
Sec. 1.199-3(e)(2) by removing the concept of minor assembly. In the
2015 Proposed Regulations, the Treasury Department and the IRS
requested comments on defining the term minor assembly because of the
difficulty in identifying a widely applicable objective test. Based on
the comments received and the restriction on the section 199A(g)
deduction to agricultural or horticultural products, proposed Sec.
1.199A-9 does not include the term minor assembly included in Sec.
1.199-3(e)(2). This exclusion does not impact a taxpayer's obligation
to meet all of the other requirements to qualify for the section
199A(g) deduction. The Treasury Department and the IRS request comments
on whether the concept of minor assembly should be retained and, if so,
how this term should be defined.
C. By the Taxpayer
With respect to the phrase ``by the taxpayer'' as used in section
199A(g)(3)(D)(i), these proposed regulations adopt the rule from Sec.
1.199-3(f)(1) as applicable, rather than the rule in the 2015 Proposed
Regulations. In a contract manufacturing arrangement, this means that a
Specified Cooperative must have the benefits and burdens of ownership
of the agricultural or horticultural product during the period in which
the MPGE activity occurs in order for the Specified Cooperative to be
treated as engaging in such MPGE activity. The 2015 Proposed
Regulations provided a different rule for contract manufacturing
arrangements. The 2015 Proposed Regulations provided that if a
qualifying activity is performed under a contract, then the party that
performs the qualifying activity is the taxpayer for purposes of
section 199(c)(4)(A)(i). Under the rule in the 2015 Proposed
Regulations, a Specified Cooperative that contracts with another party
for the MPGE of an agricultural or horticultural product would never
qualify as ``the taxpayer'' for purposes of the section 199A(g)
deduction. This result fails to provide any incentive for Specified
Cooperatives to retain the benefits and burdens of ownership and to
ensure that production occurs within the United States. Therefore, to
maintain such an incentive, the proposed regulations maintain the rule
from Sec. 1.199-3(f)(1). The Treasury Department and the IRS request
comments on the continued use of the rule from Sec. 1.199-3(f)(1).
D. Other Provisions in Proposed Sec. 1.199A-9
The remainder of the rules in proposed Sec. 1.199A-9 are based on
the existing regulations in Sec. 1.199-3. These rules should be
interpreted in a manner consistent with the interpretation under former
section 199. The Treasury Department and the IRS request comments on
any conception or definition that in application would be over or
under-inclusive under the proposed regulations, or any instances where
they should interpret the rules differently from the interpretation
under former section 199.
IV. Proposed Sec. 1.199A-10, Costs Allocable to DPGR
Proposed Sec. 1.199A-10 provides guidance on the allocation of
costs to DPGR. This section provides rules for allocating a taxpayer's
COGS, as well as other expenses, losses, and deductions properly
allocable to DPGR. These proposed regulations are based on and follow
the section 199 regulations in Sec. 1.199-4.
V. Proposed Sec. 1.199A-11, Wage Limitation
Proposed Sec. 1.199A-11 provides guidance regarding the W-2 wage
limitation on the section 199A(g) deduction. A notice of proposed
revenue procedure, Notice 2019-27, 2019-16 IRB, which proposes a draft
revenue procedure providing three proposed methods that Specified
Cooperatives may use for calculating W-2 wages, is being issued
concurrently with this notice of proposed rulemaking. The guidance
contained in the notice of proposed revenue procedure is necessary
because changes may be made to the underlying Form W-2, Wage and Tax
Statement, on a more frequent basis than updates to the regulations
under section 199A(g), for regulatory and statutory reasons independent
of section 199A. The three proposed methods for calculating W-2 wages
in the notice are substantially similar to the methods provided in Rev.
Proc. 2006-47, 2006-2 C.B. 869 (relating to the section 199 deduction),
and Rev. Proc. 2019-11, 2019-09 IRB 742 (relating to the section
199A(a) deduction). The Treasury Department and the IRS propose these
methods in a notice of proposed revenue procedure rather than in the
notice of proposed rulemaking to maintain consistency with the rules
under former section 199 and the rules under section 199A. The notice
of proposed revenue procedure invites comments from the public.
Under the proposed regulations, W-2 wages for the purpose of the
wage limitation in section 199A(g) are generally determined in a manner
that is similar to the manner in which W-2 wages are determined for the
purpose of the deduction under section 199A(a) (that is, using the
definition of W-2 wages under section 199A(b)(4)), with three
significant differences. First, section 199A(g)(1)(B)(ii) provides that
W-2 wages are determined without regard to section 199A(b)(4)(B), which
excludes from the definition amounts not properly allocable to QBI for
purposes of section 199A(c)(1). Second, W-2 wages under section 199A(g)
do not include any amount that is not properly allocable to DPGR.
Finally, W-2 wages under section 199A(g) do not generally include any
remuneration paid for services in the commonwealth of Puerto Rico and
other United States territories. Specifically, section
199A(g)(1)(B)(ii) provides that W-2 wages are determined in the same
manner as under section 199A(b)(4), and section 199A(b)(4)(A) defines
wages as amounts described in section 6051(a)(3) and (8). The amounts
described in section 6051(a)(3) are ``wages as defined in section
3401(a).'' Section 3401(a)(8) generally excludes from the definition of
wages in section 3401(a) wages paid with respect to employment in the
commonwealth of Puerto Rico and other United States territories.
Therefore, wages paid with respect to employment in the commonwealth of
Puerto Rico and other United States territories are generally not W-2
wages within the meaning of section 199A(b)(4)(A). This contrasts with
the section 199A(a) deduction for which section 199A(f)(1)(C)(ii)
allows certain taxpayers with QBI from sources within the commonwealth
of Puerto Rico (section 199A(f)(1)(C)(ii) applies only to Puerto Rico
and not to other United States territories) to compute section
199A(b)(4) W-2 wages without regard to section 3401(a)(8). Since the
section 199A(g) deduction is determined based on QPAI, not QBI, section
199A(f)(1)(C)(ii) does not apply to the deduction under section
199A(g). Given the distinction between QBI and QPAI on which the
section 199A(a) and section 199A(g) deductions are respectively
provided, and the absence of a provision similar to 199A(f)(1)(C)(ii)
with respect to QPAI, the Treasury Department and the IRS have
determined that remuneration paid with
[[Page 28677]]
respect to employment in the commonwealth of Puerto Rico cannot be used
in determining W-2 wages for purposes of section 199A(g). The Treasury
Department and the IRS request comments with respect to this
determination.
VI. Proposed Sec. 1.199A-12, EAG Rules
Proposed Sec. 1.199A-12 provides guidance on the application of
section 199A(g) to an EAG under section 199A(g)(5)(A)(iii) that
includes a Specified Cooperative. Unlike the section 199 deduction, the
section 199A(g) deduction is limited to Specified Cooperatives. These
proposed regulations address how the rules separating patronage and
nonpatronage income and deductions apply in the context of an EAG.
Proposed Sec. 1.199A-12 provides that in the case of nonexempt
Specified Cooperatives, attribution between the members of an EAG is
allowed provided the DPGR and related deductions are patronage. In the
case of exempt Specified Cooperatives, attribution is allowed in all
events because exempt Specified Cooperatives are allowed to take a
separate 199A(g) deduction on both their patronage and nonpatronage
income.
Proposed Sec. 1.199A-12 also provides certain rules for
partnerships owned by an EAG as described in section 199A(g)(5)(A)(ii).
VII. Proposed Sec. 1.1388-1(f)
Proposed Sec. 1.1388-1(f) sets forth a definition of patronage and
nonpatronage that is consistent with the current case law under section
1388. Specifically, the proposed definition adopts the directly related
test, which is a fact specific test for determining whether income and
deductions of a Cooperative are patronage or nonpatronage. The Treasury
Department and the IRS request comments with respect to this
definition.
VIII. Proposed Removal of Section 199 Regulations and Withdrawal of
2015 Proposed Regulations
In light of the TCJA, the Treasury Department and the IRS propose
to remove the section 199 regulations (Sec. Sec. 1.199-0 through
1.199-9) and withdraw the 2015 Proposed Regulations because the
regulations interpret a provision of the Code that has been repealed
for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017.
The proposed removal of these regulations is unrelated to the
substance of the rules in the regulations, and no negative inference
regarding the stated rules should be made. Such regulations are
proposed to be removed from the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
solely because they have no future applicability. Removal of these
regulations is not intended to alter any non-regulatory guidance that
cites to or relies upon these regulations. These regulations as
contained in 26 CFR part 1, revised April 1, 2019, remain applicable to
determining eligibility for the section 199 deduction for any taxable
year that began before January 1, 2018. The beginning date of the
taxable year of a partnership, S corporation, or a non-grantor trust or
estate, rather than the taxable year of a partner, shareholder, or
beneficiary is used to determine items that are taken into account for
purposes of calculating a section 199 deduction. This is consistent
with the initial application of section 199 in 2005. Items arising from
a passthrough entity that had a fiscal year beginning before 2005 were
not taken into account by calendar-year partners for purposes of the
section 199 deduction. Public Law 109-135, section 102(a) (Gulf
Opportunity Zone Act of 2005). Further, when section 199 was amended to
narrow the definition of W-2 wages, the amendment was effective for
taxable years beginning after May 17, 2006. See Public Law 109-222,
section 514(a) (Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act of
2005). Under the transition rule in Sec. 1.199-5(b)(4), partners and
partnerships used the taxable year of the partnerships to determine the
applicable definition of W-2 wages, and there are similar rules in
Sec. 1.199-5(c)(4) for S corporations and Sec. 1.199-5(e)(3) for non-
grantor trusts and estates.
Proposed Effective/Applicability Date
Section 7805(b)(1)(A) and (B) of the Code generally provide that no
temporary, proposed, or final regulation relating to the internal
revenue laws may apply to any taxable period ending before the earliest
of (A) the date on which such regulation is filed with the Federal
Register, or (B) in the case of a final regulation, the date on which a
proposed or temporary regulation to which the final regulation relates
was filed with the Federal Register.
Consistent with authority provided by section 7805(b)(1)(A), the
proposed regulations are proposed to apply to taxable years beginning
after the date of publication of a Treasury decision adopting these
rules as final regulations in the Federal Register. Taxpayers may rely
upon these proposed regulations, in their entirety, before the date of
publication of the Treasury Decision adopting these rules as final
regulations in the Federal Register.
Special Analyses
I. Regulatory Planning and Review--Economic Analysis
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess costs
and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
These proposed regulations have been designated by the Office of
Management and Budget's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs
(OIRA) as subject to review under Executive Order 12866 pursuant to the
Memorandum of Agreement (April 11, 2018) between the Treasury
Department and the Office of Management and Budget regarding review of
tax regulations. OIRA has determined that the proposed rulemaking is
significant and subject to review under Executive Order 12866 and
section 1(b) of the Memorandum of Agreement. Accordingly, the proposed
regulations have been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
In addition, the Treasury Department and the IRS expect the
proposed regulations, when final, to be an Executive Order 13771
regulatory action and request comment on this designation.
A. Background and Overview
The TCJA repealed section 199, which provided a deduction for
income attributable to domestic production activities. In its place it
created section 199A, which provides a deduction for qualified business
income derived from passthrough businesses--such as sole
proprietorships, partnerships, and S corporations--engaged in domestic
trades or businesses. While the repealed section 199 deduction was
generally available to all taxpayers, the section 199A deduction is
available only to taxpayers other than C corporations. On March 23,
2018, the 2018 Act modified section 199A(g) to provide deductions for
Specified Cooperatives and their patrons that are substantially similar
to those under the repealed section 199 deduction. Accordingly, these
regulations generally formalize prior and current practices based on
the rules under former section 199. The 2018 Act also added section
199A(b)(7), which requires patrons of Specified Cooperatives to reduce
their section
[[Page 28678]]
199A(a) deduction if those patrons receive qualified payments from
Specified Cooperatives.
The estimated number of Cooperatives affected by the 2018 Act and
these proposed regulations is 9,000, including approximately 2,000
Specified Cooperatives, based on 2017 tax filings.
B. Need for the Proposed Regulations
The proposed regulations provide guidance regarding the application
of sections 199A(a), 199A(b)(7), and 199A(g) to Cooperatives, Specified
Cooperatives, and their patrons. The proposed regulations are needed
because the 2018 Act introduced a number of terms and calculations.
Patrons, Cooperatives, and Specified Cooperatives would benefit from
greater specificity regarding these and other items.
C. Economic Analysis
1. Baseline
The Treasury Department and the IRS have assessed the benefits and
costs of the proposed regulations relative to a no-action baseline
reflecting anticipated Federal income tax-related behavior in the
absence of these proposed regulations.
2. Economic Rationale for Issuing Guidance for the 2018 Act
The Treasury Department and the IRS anticipate that the issuance of
guidance pertaining to sections 199A(a), 199A(b)(7), and 199A(g) of the
2018 Act to Cooperatives, Specified Cooperatives, and their patrons
will provide a net economic benefit to the overall U.S. economy.
The proposed regulations clarify a number of concepts related to
the section 199A(a) deduction for patrons of Cooperatives, provide
guidance to patrons of Specified Cooperatives who may be required to
reduce their section 199A(a) deduction under section 199A(b)(7), and
provide guidance to Specified Cooperatives on the section 199A(g)
deduction on income attributable to their domestic production
activities. In the absence of guidance, affected taxpayers would have
to calculate their tax liability without the definitions and
clarifications provided by the proposed regulations, a situation that
is generally considered more burdensome and could lead to greater
conflicts with tax administrators. Thus, the Treasury Department and
the IRS project that the proposed regulations will reduce taxpayer
compliance burden and the costs of tax administration relative to not
issuing any such guidance.
This guidance also ensures that section 199A deductions are
calculated similarly across taxpayers, avoiding situations where one
taxpayer receives preferential treatment over another for fundamentally
similar economic activity. For example, in the absence of these
proposed regulations, a Specified Cooperative may have uncertainty over
what type of income is eligible for the section 199A(g) deduction. If a
Specified Cooperative claimed the section 199A(g) deduction on income
that already benefits from a lower corporate tax rate, this would
confer an unintended economic benefit to the Specified Cooperative over
other C corporations performing identical activities that only benefit
from a lower corporate tax rate. As discussed further below, this
guidance prevents the introduction of distortions of economic decisions
in the agricultural or horticultural sector.
In the absence of these proposed regulations, uncertainty over
statutory interpretation could lead to economic losses to the extent
that taxpayers interpret the statute in ways that are inconsistent with
the statute's intents and purposes. For example, a Specified
Cooperative may pursue a project involving a certain product that is
only profitable if that product is deemed ``agricultural or
horticultural'' and thus eligible for the section 199A(g) deduction.
If, in fact, this product is ineligible for the deduction based on the
intents and purposes of the statute, then the project should not have
been pursued and this results in an economic loss. Alternatively,
without a definition of ``agricultural or horticultural,'' a Specified
Cooperative may incorrectly assume that a project is not eligible for
the deduction and not pursue the project, which could also result in an
economic loss. In such cases, guidance provides value by bringing
economic decisions closer in line with Congress' intent or, when such
intent is broad, with decisions that are economically efficient
contingent on the overall Code. While no guidance can fully curtail all
inaccurate interpretations of the statute, the proposed regulations
significantly mitigate the chance for such interpretations and thereby
increase economic efficiency. Due to the lack of readily available
data, the Treasury Department and the IRS have not estimated the
increase in United States economic activity that would arise from the
proposed guidance.
The Treasury Department further projects that the issuance of
guidance will reduce taxpayer compliance burden and the costs of tax
administration relative to a no-action baseline. Due to the lack of
readily available data, the Treasury Department has not estimated the
decrease in taxpayer compliance burden nor tax administration costs
arising from the issuance of guidance. The Treasury Department and the
IRS request comments and information that can allow estimation of
economic impacts and any changes in taxpayer compliance burden
resulting from the proposed guidance.
3. Economic Analysis of Specific Provisions
The proposed regulations embody certain regulatory decisions that
reflect necessary regulatory discretion. These decisions specify more
fully how the 2018 Act is to be implemented.
The Treasury Department and the IRS solicit comments on the
economic impacts of each of the items discussed in this section and of
any other items of the proposed regulations not discussed in this
section. The Treasury Department and the IRS particularly solicit
comments that provide data, other evidence, or models that could
enhance the rigor of the process by which provisions might be developed
for the final regulations.
i. Determining Section 199A(g) Deduction
Specified Cooperatives are taxed differently depending on whether
they are exempt (qualified as a cooperative under section 521) or
nonexempt (qualified under rules elsewhere in the Code) and also
whether their income is from patronage (generally related to the
cooperative's marketing, purchasing, or services activities) or
nonpatronage sources. In the case of exempt Specified Cooperatives
patronage and nonpatronage source income is subject to a single level
of tax at the patron level. Whereas, for nonexempt Specified
Cooperatives only patronage source income is subject to a single level
of tax at the patron level; nonpatronage source income is subject to a
double level of tax, similar to other C corporations. Because the Code
does not define patronage and nonpatronage source income, proposed
Sec. 1.1388-1(f) sets forth a definition of patronage and nonpatronage
that is consistent with the current state of federal case law.
Specifically, the proposed definition adopts the directly related test,
which is a fact specific test for determining whether income and
deductions of a Cooperative are patronage or nonpatronage. Specifying a
definition that is consistent with current case law will help to
minimize the economic impacts of these proposed regulations. The
Treasury Department and the IRS
[[Page 28679]]
request comments with respect to this definition.
The TCJA reduced the corporate tax rate for C corporations under
section 11 and provided the section 199A deduction for domestic
businesses operated as sole proprietorships or through partnerships, S
corporations, trusts, or estates. The TCJA also repealed section 199,
which did not preclude deductions on income earned by C corporations.
The 2018 Act amended section 199A to address concerns that the TCJA
created an unintended incentive for farmers to sell their agricultural
or horticultural products to Specified Cooperatives over independent
buyers. Specifically, the 2018 Act amended section 199A(g) to allow
Specified Cooperatives and their patrons a deduction similar to the
former section 199 deduction. Because the section 199A(g) deduction is
not intended to benefit C corporations and their shareholders in
general, the proposed regulations specify that the section 199A(g)
deduction can be claimed on income that can be subject to tax only at
the patron level. Under the proposed regulations, non-exempt Specified
Cooperatives may not claim the section 199A(g) deductions on income
that cannot be paid to patrons and deducted under section 1382(b) and
exempt Specified Cooperatives may not claim section 199A(g) deductions
on income that cannot be paid to patrons and deducted under sections
1382(b) or 1382(c)(2).
In the absence of these proposed regulations, a Specified
Cooperative may have uncertainty as to whether non-patronage source
income, which would be taxed in the same manner as a C corporation,
could receive both the lower corporate tax rate and be further offset
by a section 199A(g) deduction. Other C corporations performing
identical activities would only benefit from the lower corporate tax
rate.
The Treasury Department and the IRS have determined that this
potential uncertainty as to tax treatment could distort economic
decisions in the agricultural or horticultural sector. The proposed
regulations avoid this outcome, promoting a more efficient allocation
of resources by providing more uniform incentives across taxpayers.
ii. Definition of Agricultural or Horticultural Products
Proposed Sec. 1.199A-8(a)(4) defines agricultural or horticultural
products as agricultural, horticultural, viticultural, and dairy
products, livestock and the products thereof, the products of poultry
and bee raising, the edible products of forestry, and any and all
products raised or produced on farms and processed or manufactured
products thereof within the meaning of the Cooperative Marketing Act of
1926. Agricultural or horticultural products also include aquatic
products that are farmed as well as fertilizer, diesel fuel, and other
supplies used in agricultural or horticultural production that are MPGE
by the Specified Cooperative. Agricultural or horticultural products,
however, do not include intangible property, since agricultural or
horticultural products were considered a subset of tangible property
under former section 199. Intangible property (defined in Sec. 1.199-
3(j)(2)(iii)) was a separate category of property and gross receipts
from intangible property did not qualify as DPGR.
The Treasury Department and the IRS considered other definitions of
agricultural or horticultural products but determined that taxpayer
burden and tax administration costs would be lowest under a definition
that was consistent with extant law.
For example, the Treasury Department and the IRS considered a
similar but alternative definition of agricultural or horticultural
products as agricultural, horticultural, viticultural, and dairy
products, livestock and poultry, bees, forest products, fish and
shellfish, and any products thereof, including processed and
manufactured products, and any and all products raised or produced on
farms and any processed or manufactured product thereof within the
meaning of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946. While very similar
to the definition in these proposed rules, the Treasury Department and
the IRS proposed using the definition based on the Cooperative
Marketing Act of 1926, which specifically concerns cooperatives and
with which Specified Cooperatives are familiar, unlike the Agricultural
Marketing Act of 1946, which concerns the marketing and distribution of
agricultural products without reference to Cooperatives. The Treasury
Department and the IRS looked to the United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA) for definitions because there is no definition of
agricultural or horticultural products in the Internal Revenue Code or
Income Tax Regulations and because the USDA has expertise concerning
Specified Cooperatives and because Specified Cooperatives are likely
familiar with USDA law.
The Treasury Department and the IRS also considered an alternative
definition of agricultural or horticultural products based on the
definition of agricultural commodities within the meaning of general
regulations under the Commodity Exchange Act. The Treasury Department
and the IRS concluded that this definition was too narrow, because it
is limited to products that can be commodities. The use of this narrow
definition would have restricted the range of products for which the
section 199A(g) deduction would be otherwise be available.
The Treasury Department and the IRS request comments on other
approaches to defining agricultural or horticultural products. The
Treasury Department and the IRS did not attempt to provide quantitative
estimates of the revenue effects or economic consequences of different
designations of agricultural or horticultural products because suitable
data are not readily available at this level of detail. The Treasury
Department and the IRS request comments that can inform such
estimation.
iii. De Minimis Threshold
In general, proposed Sec. 1.199A-9 requires that Specified
Cooperatives allocate gross receipts between domestic production gross
receipts (DPGR) and non-DPGR. However, proposed Sec. 1.199A-9(c)(3)
includes a de minimis provision that allows Specified Cooperatives to
allocate total gross receipts to DPGR if less than 5 percent of total
gross receipts are non-DPGR or to allocate total gross receipts to non-
DPGR if less than 5 percent of total gross receipts are DPGR. The
Treasury Department and the IRS chose to include a de minimis rule to
reduce compliance costs and simplify tax filing relative to an
alternative of no de minimis rule. The de minimis threshold modestly
reduces compliance costs for businesses with relatively small amounts
of non-DPGR or DPGR by allowing them to avoid allocating receipts
between DPGR and non-DPGR activities. The de minimis threshold is
unlikely to create any substantial effects on market activity because
any change in the ratio of DPGR to non-DPGR will be localized around
the threshold, meaning that the movement will be a small fraction of
receipts to get below the de minimis threshold.
The thresholds provided in the proposed regulations are based on
the thresholds set forth in Sec. 1.199-1(d)(3). The Treasury
Department and the IRS maintained the de minimis rule from the final
regulations under former section 199 because the 2018 Act directed that
regulations concerning the section 199A(g) deduction be based on the
regulations applicable to Cooperatives and their patrons under former
section 199. The Treasury
[[Page 28680]]
Department and the IRS considered changes in the de minimis provisions
but determined that changing these from provisions that were previously
available would lead to taxpayer confusion. Because the de minimis
provision exempts taxpayers from having to perform certain allocations,
the Treasury Department and the IRS do not have sufficient information
on taxpayers' use of this exemption under former section 199 to perform
a quantitative analysis of the impacts of the de minimis provision.
The Treasury Department and the IRS solicit comments on the de
minimis thresholds and particularly request comments that provide data,
other evidence, and models that can enhance the rigor of the process by
which such thresholds might be determined for the final regulations
while maintaining consistency with the statute's directive that the
thresholds be based on regulations issued under former section 199.
iv. Reporting Requirements
Proposed Sec. 1.199A-7(c) and (d) provide that, when a patron
conducts a trade or business that receives distributions from a
Cooperative, the Cooperative is required to provide the patron with
qualified items of income, gain, deduction, and loss and specified
service trade or business (SSTB) determinations with respect to those
distributions. This increases the compliance burden on such
Cooperatives. However, in the absence of these proposed regulations,
the burden for determination of the amount of distributions from a
Cooperative that constitute qualified items of income, gain, deduction,
and loss from a non-SSTB and an SSTB would lie with the patron. Because
patrons are less well positioned to acquire the relevant information to
determine whether distributions from a Cooperative are qualified items
of income, gain, deduction, and loss and whether items that would
otherwise qualify are from an SSTB, the Treasury Department and the IRS
expect that these proposed regulations will reduce overall compliance
costs relative to an alternative approach of not introducing a
reporting requirement.
v. Allocation Safe Harbor
If a patron receives both qualified payments and payments that are
not qualified payments in a qualified trade or business, the patron
must allocate those items and related deductions using a reasonable
method based on all of the facts and circumstances. The proposed
regulations provide a safe harbor that allows patrons who receive
qualified payments in addition to other income to use a simpler method
to allocate business expenses and W-2 wages between qualified payments
and other gross receipts to calculate the section 199A(b)(7) reduction
to the section 199A(a) deduction. The safe harbor allocation method
allows patrons to allocate by ratably apportioning business expenses
and W-2 wages based on the proportion that the amount of qualified
payments bears to the total gross receipts used to determine QBI. This
safe harbor is available to patrons with taxable incomes below the
threshold amounts set forth in section 199A(e)(2).
The Treasury Department and the IRS considered an alternative of
not allowing a safe harbor but determined that a safe harbor could
reduce compliance costs and simplify tax filing. The threshold was set
at amounts set forth in section 199A(e)(2) to avoid a proliferation of
thresholds applicable to taxpayers claiming a section 199A(a)
deduction. Because the threshold amounts are relatively low, the
Treasury Department and the IRS expect that the safe harbor would not
distort business decisions or reduce revenue to any meaningful extent.
II. Paperwork Reduction Act
The collections of information in these proposed regulations are in
proposed Sec. 1.199A-7(c)(3), (d)(3), (f)(3), and (h)(3), as well as
proposed Sec. 1.199A-8(d)(3), (f), and (h)(3). The collections of
information in proposed Sec. 1.199A-7(c)(3), (d)(3), (f)(3), and
(h)(3), as well as proposed Sec. 1.199A-8(d)(3) and (h)(3) will be
conducted through Form 1099-PATR, while the collection of information
in proposed Sec. 1.199A-8(f) will be conducted through Schedule K-1 to
Form 1065. In 2018, the IRS released and invited comments on the draft
of Form 1065, Schedule K-1. The IRS received no comments on the form
during the comment period. Consequently, the IRS made the form
available December 6, 2018 for use by the public. On February 26, 2019,
the IRS invited comments on Form 1099-PATR and the comment period
closed on April 29, 2019. The IRS plans to issue in the near term an
additional notice with a thirty-day comment period on Form 1099-PATR.
The IRS is contemplating making additional changes to those two forms
as discussed below in these proposed regulations.
A. Collections of Information Conducted Through Form 1099-PATR
The collection of information in proposed Sec. 1.199A-7(c)(3)
requires the Cooperative to inform its patron of the amount of any
distribution to the patron that constitutes qualified items of income,
gain, deduction, and loss from a non-SSTB conducted directly by the
Cooperative. Not all distributions to patrons are qualified items of
income, gain, deduction, and loss because the source of the
distribution may not be effectively connected with the conduct of a
trade or business within the United States or may include interest
income that is not properly allocable to the patron's trade or
business. The Cooperative directly conducting the trade or business
from which the distribution to the patron originates is in the best
position to know how much of the distribution is qualified items of
income, gain, deduction, and loss. The Cooperative is also in the best
position to know if it is generating income from an SSTB. Accordingly,
the collection of information is necessary for the patron to calculate
correctly the patron's section 199A(a) deduction for the patron's trade
or business.
The collection of information in proposed Sec. 1.199A-7(d)(3)
requires the Cooperative to inform its patron of the amount of any
distributions to the patron that constitutes qualified items of income,
gain, deduction, and loss from an SSTB conducted directly by the
Cooperative. Accordingly, the collection of information is necessary
for the patron to correctly calculate the patron's section 199A(a)
deduction for the patron's qualified trade or business.
The collection of information in proposed Sec. 1.199A-7(f)(3) is
essential for the eligible taxpayer's calculation of the reduction in
the eligible taxpayer's section 199A(a) deduction for the eligible
taxpayer's trade or business that is required by section 199A(b)(7).
Section 199A(g)(2)(A) requires the Specified Cooperative to identify
the amount of qualified payments being distributed to an eligible
taxpayer and identify the portion of the deduction allowed in a notice
mailed to the eligible taxpayer during the payment period described in
section 1382(d). Section 199A(b)(7) provides that an eligible taxpayer
who receives qualified payments from a Specified Cooperative must
reduce the eligible taxpayer's section 199A(a) deduction by an amount
set forth in this section. Without the notice described in proposed
Sec. 1.199A-7(f)(3), the eligible taxpayer cannot calculate the
reduction required by section 199A(b)(7).
The collection of information in proposed Sec. 1.199A-8(d)(3) is
necessitated by section 199A(g)(2)(A). Section 199A(g)(2)(A) permits a
Specified Cooperative to pass through
[[Page 28681]]
an amount of its section 199A(g) deduction to an eligible taxpayer. The
amount of the section 199A(g) deduction that the Specified Cooperative
is permitted to pass through is an amount that is allocable to the QPAI
generated from qualified payments distributed to the eligible taxpayer
and identified by such cooperative in a written notice mailed to such
taxpayer during the payment period described in section 1382(d).
Without the notice required in proposed Sec. 1.199A-8(d)(3) the
eligible taxpayer would not know that the Specified Cooperative is
passing a portion of its section 199A(g) deduction to the eligible
taxpayer.
The collections of information in proposed Sec. Sec. 1.199A-
7(h)(3) and 1.199A-8(h)(3) are necessitated by a special transition
rule in section 101 of the 2018 Act. Under this transition rule, the
repeal of former section 199 for taxable years beginning after December
31, 2017, does not apply to a qualified payment received by a patron
from a Specified Cooperative in a taxable year beginning after December
31, 2017, to the extent such qualified payment is attributable to QPAI
with respect to which a deduction is allowable to the Specified
Cooperative under former section 199 for a taxable year of the
Specified Cooperative beginning before January 1, 2018. Such qualified
payment remains subject to former section 199 and no deduction is
allowed under section 199A(a) or (g) with respect to such qualified
payment. Without these collections of information by the Specified
Cooperative, the patron has no way of knowing that the patron is barred
by the transition rule from using a qualified payment received that is
QBI for the patron's trade or business to claim a section 199A(a)
deduction for the patron's trade or business.
The collections of information in proposed Sec. 1.199A-7(c)(3),
(d)(3), (f)(3), and (h)(3) as well as proposed Sec. 1.199A-8(d)(3) and
(h)(3) are satisfied by providing information about qualified items of
income, SSTB determinations, qualified payments, the section 199A(g)
deduction, and the use of qualified payments tied to the former section
199 deduction, as applicable, on an attachment to or on the Form 1099-
PATR (or any successor form) issued by the Cooperative to the patron,
unless otherwise provided by the instructions to the Form.
For purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C.
3507(d)) (PRA), the reporting burden associated with proposed Sec.
1.199A-7(c)(3), (d)(3), (f)(3), and (h)(3) as well as proposed Sec.
1.199A-8(d)(3) and (h)(3) will be reflected in the PRA Submission
associated with Form 1099-PATR (OMB control number 1545-0118). As
further discussed in this section, the estimated number of respondents
for the reporting burden associated with these information collections
is 9,000 based on 2017 tax filings.
B. Collections of Information Conducted Through Schedule K-1, Form 1065
The collection of information in proposed Sec. 1.199A-8(f) is
required by section 199A(g)(5)(B). This section allows a Specified
Cooperative that is a partner in a partnership to use its allocable
share of gross receipts and related deductions to calculate its section
199A(g) deduction. The proposed rules provide that the partnership must
separately identify and report the allocable share of gross receipts
and related deductions on or attached to the Schedule K-1 to the Form
1065 (or any successor form) issued to a Specified Cooperative partner,
unless otherwise provided by the instructions to the Form. Without this
reporting, the Specified Cooperative partner would not have the
information necessary to calculate its section 199A(g) deduction from
its activities with the partnership.
The Schedule K-1 to the Form 1065 will be modified to include a
mechanism to report the Specified Cooperative partner's allocable share
of gross receipts and related deductions. The collection of information
in proposed Sec. 1.199A-8(f) is satisfied when the partnership
provides the required information to its Specified Cooperative partners
on or attached to the Schedule K-1 of Form 1065 (or any successor
form), unless otherwise provided by the instructions to the Form. For
purposes of the PRA, the reporting burden associated with proposed
Sec. 1.199A-8(f) will be reflected in the PRA Submission associated
with Form 1065 (OMB control number 1545-0123). As provided in this
section, the estimated number of respondents for the reporting burden
associated with these information collections is 407 based on 2017 tax
filings.
C. Revised Tax Forms
The revised tax forms are as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revision of Number of
New existing form respondents
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Form 1099-PATR.............................. ................................. [check] 9,000
Schedule K-1 (Form 1065).................... ................................. [check] 407
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The current status of the PRA submissions related to the tax forms
that will be revised as a result of the information collections in the
proposed regulations is provided in the accompanying table. As
described previously, the burdens associated with proposed Sec.
1.199A-7(c)(3), (d)(3), (f)(3), and (h)(3) as well as proposed
Sec. Sec. 1.199A-8(d)(3) and (h)(3) will be included in the aggregated
burden estimates for OMB control number 1545-0118, which represents a
total estimated burden time of 509,895 hours and total estimated
monetized costs of $44.733 million ($2018). The burdens associated with
the information collection in proposed Sec. 1.199A-8(f) will be
included in the aggregated burden estimates for OMB control number
1545-0123, which represents a total estimated burden time for all forms
and schedules of 3.157 billion hours and total estimated monetized
costs of $58.148 billion ($2017). The overall burden estimates provided
for 1545-0118 and 1545-0123 are aggregate amounts that relate to all
information collections associated with the applicable OMB control
number.
No burden estimates specific to the forms affected by the proposed
regulations are currently available. The Treasury Department and the
IRS have not estimated the burden, including that of any new
information collections, related to the requirements under the proposed
regulations. Those estimates would need to capture both changes made by
the 2018 Act and those that arise out of discretionary authority
exercised in the proposed regulations. The Treasury Department and the
IRS request comments on all aspects of information collection burdens
related to the proposed regulations, including estimates for how much
time it would take to comply with the paperwork burdens described above
for each relevant form and ways for the IRS to minimize the paperwork
burden. Proposed revisions to these forms that reflect the information
collections contained in these proposed regulations
[[Page 28682]]
will be made available for public comment at https://apps.irs.gov/app/picklist/list/draftTaxForms.htm and will not be finalized until after
these forms have been approved by OMB under the PRA.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Form Type of filer OMB No.(s) Status
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Form 1099-PATR........................ [Business (Legacy Model)] 1545-0118 Existing collection of
information approved by OIRA
on 6/3/2016. Public comments
will be sought on a revised
collection of information
that will be submitted for
OIRA review before 6/30/
2019.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Link: https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAViewICR?ref_nbr=201602-1545-024 024.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Form 1065, Schedule K-1............... Business (NEW Model)..... 1545-0123 Published in the Federal
Register on 10/11/18. Public
Comment period closed on 12/
10/18. Approved by OIRA on
12/21/18.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Link:https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/10/09/2018-21846/proposed-collection-comment-request-for-forms-1065-1065-b-1066-1120-1120-c-1120-f-1120-h-1120-nd.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Regulatory Flexibility Act
As described in more detail in this section, pursuant to the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. chapter 6, the Treasury
Department and the IRS hereby certify that these proposed regulations
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. Notwithstanding this certification, the Treasury
Department and the IRS invite comments on any impact this rule would
have on small entities.
A. Proposed Sec. 1.199A-7(c)(3) and (d)(3)
Although proposed Sec. 1.199A-7(c)(3) and (d)(3) will have an
impact on a substantial number of small entities, the economic impact
will not be significant. The IRS creates the Business Master File which
contains data from Form 1120-C, U.S. Income Tax Return for Cooperative
Associations. According to the Business Master File data, in 2017, the
IRS received approximately 9,000 Forms 1120-C from Cooperatives. Under
the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS), a
Cooperative is considered a small entity if it has less than $750,000
in annual gross receipts. Approximately 4,050 (45 percent) of the 9,000
filers of Forms 1120-C reported annual gross receipts of less than
$750,000. Therefore, a substantial number of small entities are
affected by the requirements in proposed Sec. 1.199A-7(c)(3) and
(d)(3).
Proposed Sec. 1.199A-7 provides rules similar to those provided in
Sec. 1.199A-6. In Sec. 1.199A-6, relevant passthrough entities (RPEs)
are not permitted to take the section 199A deduction but are required
to determine and report the information necessary for their direct and
indirect owners to determine their individual section 199A(a)
deductions. Section 1.199A-6 requires RPEs to determine and report on
or attach to the RPEs' Schedule K-1s to the Form 1065 for each trade or
business in which the RPE was directly engaged four items: (1) The
amount of QBI, (2) W-2 wages, (3) UBIA of qualified property, and (4)
SSTBs.
Although Cooperatives are not RPEs, Cooperatives make distributions
to patrons that such patrons are permitted to include in calculating
their individual section 199A(a) deductions. Proposed Sec. 1.199A-7(c)
and (d) require the Cooperatives to determine and report to their
patrons whether the distributions for which the Cooperatives take
deductions under section 1382(b) and/or (c)(2), as applicable,
constitute qualified items of income, gain, deduction, and loss and
whether they are from an SSTB in which the Cooperative was directly
engaged.
In TD 9847 the Treasury Department and the IRS determined that the
reporting burden in Sec. 1.199A-6 was estimated at 30 minutes to 20
hours, depending on individual circumstances, with an estimated average
of 2.5 hours for all affected entities, regardless of size. The burden
on entities with business receipts below $10 million was expected to be
at the lower end of the range (30 minutes to 2.5 hours). The estimated
compliance burden for passthrough entities that issue Schedules K-1 is
$53 per hour. This estimate was derived from the Business Taxpayer
Burden model developed by the IRS's Office of Research, Applied
Analytics, and Statistics (RAAS), which relates time and out-of-pocket
costs of business tax preparation, derived from survey data, to assets
and receipts of affected taxpayers along with other relevant variables.
See Tax Compliance Burden (John Guyton et al., July 2018) at https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/d13315.pdf. Thus, the annual aggregate burden
on businesses with gross receipts below $10 million was estimated to be
between $19.50 and $132.50 per business. The Treasury Department and
the IRS determined in TD 9847 that the requirements in Sec. 1.199A-6
imposed no significant economic impact on affected entities.
The reporting requirements under proposed Sec. 1.199A-7(c)(3) and
(d)(3) require Specified Cooperatives to report only two of the four
pieces of information RPEs are required to report under proposed Sec.
1.199A-6: The amount of qualified items of income, gain, deduction, and
loss and whether the distributions are from an SSTB in which the
Cooperative was directly engaged.
The burden imposed by proposed Sec. 1.199A-7(c)(3) and (d)(3) only
occurs when a Cooperative has net income that it may distribute to its
patrons such that the income will qualify for the income tax deductions
under section 1382(b) and/or (c), as applicable. With respect to this
net income, Cooperatives already know the source of their income and
deductions without which information they would not be able to
determine the correct distributions to their patrons and to claim the
income tax deduction for these distributions under section 1382(b) and/
or (c)(2), as applicable. Finally, assuming that the approximately
4,050 filers of Forms 1120-C that reported annual gross receipts of
less than $750,000 in 2017 and that each business incurred half of the
higher figure of $132.50 ($66.25) determined for the Sec. 1.199A-6
regulations to satisfy the reporting requirements under proposed Sec.
1.199A-7(c)(3) and (d)(3), the annual burden imposed by the reporting
requirements would not exceed $66.25 per business. Accordingly, the
Treasury Department and the IRS conclude that the requirements in
proposed Sec. 1.199A-7(c)(3) and (d)(3) will not impose a significant
economic impact on small entities.
[[Page 28683]]
B. Proposed Sec. Sec. 1.199A-7(h)(3) and 1.199A-8(h)(3)
Although proposed Sec. Sec. 1.199A-7(h)(3) and 1.199A-8(h)(3) will
have an impact on a substantial number of small entities, this economic
impact will not be significant. As previously noted, in 2017,
approximately 45 percent of Cooperatives reported on Forms 1120-C gross
receipts of less than $750,000. Therefore, a substantial number of
small entities are affected by proposed Sec. Sec. 1.199A-7(h)(3) and
1.199A-8(h)(3).
Proposed Sec. Sec. 1.199A-7(h)(3) and 1.199A-8(h)(3) requires
Cooperatives to notify patrons if, pursuant to the transition rule in
section 101 of the 2018 Act, the patron is barred from using certain
qualified payments from a Cooperative to claim a section 199A(a)
deduction in a taxable year because these qualified payments are
attributable to QPAI with respect to which a deduction is allowable to
the Cooperative under former section 199 in a taxable year beginning
before January 1, 2018. The Cooperative knows which patrons are
impacted since, in order to claim its deduction under former section
199, the Cooperative must identify which qualified payments to use. The
Treasury Department and the IRS estimate that the annual burden imposed
by the requirement in proposed Sec. Sec. 1.199A-7(h)(3) and 1.199A-
8(h)(3) will be far less than the $66.25 per business estimated for the
requirements in proposed Sec. Sec. 1.199A-7(c)(3) and 1.199A-8(c)(3)
discussed above, since the Cooperatives know which patrons are impacted
and the reporting is limited to informing these patrons that they
cannot use such qualified payments to calculate their section 199A(a)
deduction.
In addition, absent notice from the Cooperatives, patrons would
have no way of determining whether they were barred from claiming the
section 199A(a) deduction using such qualified payments. Finally,
Cooperatives are not able to claim a deduction under former section 199
for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017. Therefore, the
reporting required by proposed Sec. Sec. 1.199A-7(h)(3) and 1.199A-
8(h)(3) will be for a short duration and have a limited impact on
Cooperatives. Accordingly, for all these reasons, the requirements in
proposed Sec. Sec. 1.199A-7(h)(3) and 1.199A-8(h)(3) will not impose a
significant economic impact on small entities.
C. Proposed Sec. Sec. 1.199A-7(f)(3) and 1.199A-8(d)(3)
Sections 1.199A-7(f)(3) and 1.199A-8(d)(3) will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This claim is based on the fact that this rulemaking will impact a
population of Specified Cooperatives, only a small percentage of which
are considered small entities. According to the Business Master File
filing data from the transcribed fields from the Forms 1120-C for 2017,
of the approximately 9,000 Forms 1120-C filed by Cooperatives,
approximately 2,000 filers identified their Cooperatives as involving
agriculture or horticulture using the NAICS. As noted previously, a
Cooperative is considered small if it reports less than $750,000 in
annual gross receipts. Of the 2,000 filers of Forms 1120-C identifying
as Specified Cooperatives, only 175 filers (less than 1 percent)
reported annual gross receipts of less than $750,000. Accordingly,
proposed Sec. Sec. 1.199A-7(f)(3) and 1.199A-8(d)(3) will not impose a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
D. Proposed Sec. 1.199A-8(f)
Although proposed Sec. 1.199A-8(f) will have an impact on a
substantial number of small entities, this impact will not be
economically significant. According to the Business Master File filing
data from the transcribed fields from the Forms 1065 for 2017, the IRS
estimates that there were 3,954,000 partnerships reporting their
partners' share of partnership items on Schedules K-1 (Form 1065). The
IRS also identified approximately 407 different partnerships that
issued a Schedule K-1 to 680 different Cooperatives in 2017. The IRS
does not have information as to whether the 680 Cooperatives all
qualified as Specified Cooperatives.
Of the 407 different partnerships, the IRS determined that 344 of
the partnerships conducted activities in 2017 that would have required
the partnerships to file under proposed Sec. 1.199A-8(f). The IRS does
not have sufficient data to determine the type of business activities
of the remaining 63 partnerships. To be as comprehensive and
transparent as possible in analyzing the potential impact of the
proposed regulations, it is assumed that all 63 of these partnerships
would be required to file under proposed Sec. 1.199A-8(f) and would be
considered small entities.
Of the 344 partnerships identified as having both issued a Schedule
K-1 to a Cooperative and conducting eligible activities in 2017, the
IRS determined that 158 of these partnerships conducted activities for
which the Small Business Administration (SBA) uses the number of
employees to determine if an entity is a small entity using the NAICS.
The IRS determined that 153 of these 158 partnerships would be small
entities, while five would not be small entities based on the reported
number of Forms W-2 filed in connection with the Forms 1065 the
partnerships filed in 2017.
The SBA uses income to determine if an entity is a small entity for
the reported business activities of the remaining 186 partnerships
using the NAICS. Based upon the reported income for 2017, 140 of the
remaining 186 partnerships are small entities, while 46 partnerships
are not small entities. Therefore, a substantial number of small
entities are affected by requirements in proposed Sec. 1.199A-8(f).
The economic impact of proposed Sec. 1.199A-8(f), however, will
not be significant because the information required to be reported is
gross receipts and related deductions. This information is readily
available to each partnership and already known for the purpose of
determining tax obligations. Because the information required to be
reported is already available and familiar to each partnership, the
reporting required by proposed Sec. 1.199A-8(f) will not impose a
significant economic impact on small entities.
Accordingly, the Treasury Department and the IRS hereby certify
that the proposed regulations will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. We invite public
comments with respect to this conclusion.
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code, this notice of proposed
rulemaking has been submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration for comment on its impact on small
business.
IV. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
requires that agencies assess anticipated costs and benefits and take
certain other actions before issuing a final rule that includes any
Federal mandate that may result in expenditures in any one year by a
state, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private
sector, of $100 million in 1995 dollars, updated annually for
inflation. In 2018, that threshold is approximately $150 million. This
rule does not include any Federal mandate that may result in
expenditures by state, local, or tribal governments, or by the private
sector in excess of that threshold.
V. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (titled Federalism) prohibits an agency from
publishing any rule that has federalism
[[Page 28684]]
implications if the rule either imposes substantial, direct compliance
costs on state and local governments, and is not required by statute,
or preempts state law, unless the agency meets the consultation and
funding requirements of section 6 of the Executive Order. This proposed
rule does not have federalism implications, and does not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on state and local governments or
preempt state law, within the meaning of the Executive Order.
Comments and Requests for a Public Hearing
The Treasury Department and the IRS request comments on all aspects
of the proposed rules. Before these proposed regulations are adopted as
final regulations, consideration will be given to any written or
electronic comments that are submitted timely to the IRS. All comments
will be available for public inspection and copying. A public hearing
may be scheduled if requested in writing by any person who timely
submits written comments. If a public hearing is scheduled, notice of
the date, time, and place for the hearing will be published in the
Federal Register.
Statement of Availability of IRS Documents
IRS Revenue Procedures, Revenue Rulings, Notices and other guidance
cited in this document are published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin
and are available from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government
Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20402, or by visiting the IRS website
at https://www.irs.gov.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these proposed regulations is Theresa
Melchiorre, Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special
Industries). Other personnel from the Treasury Department and the IRS
participated in their development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Withdrawal of Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
0
Accordingly, under the authority of 26 U.S.C. 7805, the notice of
proposed rulemaking (REG-136459-09) published in the Federal Register
(80 FR 51978) on August 27, 2015, is withdrawn.
Proposed Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR parts 1 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 1--INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 is amended by:
0
1. Removing the entries for Sec. Sec. 1.199-0 through 1.199-9, and
0
2. Adding entries in numerical order to read in part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805.
* * * * *
Section 1.199A-7 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 199A(f)(4) and
(g)(6).
Section 1.199A-8 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 199A(g)(6).
Section 1.199A-9 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 199A(g)(6).
Section 1.199A-10 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 199A(g)(6).
Section 1.199A-11 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 199A(g)(6).
Section 1.199A-12 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 199A(g)(6).
* * * * *
Sec. Sec. 1.199-0 through 1.199-9 [Removed]
0
Par. 2. Sections 1.199-0 through 1.199-9 are removed.
0
Par. 3. Sections 1.199A-7 through 1.199A-12 are added to read as
follows:
Sec.
* * * * *
1.199A-7 Section 199A(a) Rules for Cooperatives and their Patrons.
1.199A-8 Deduction for income attributable to domestic production
activities of specified agricultural or horticultural cooperatives.
1.199A-9 Domestic production gross receipts.
1.199A-10 Allocation of costs of goods sold (COGS) and other
deductions to domestic production gross receipts (DPGR), and other
rules.
1.199A-11 Wage limitation for the section 199A(g) deduction.
1.199A-12 Expanded affiliated groups.
* * * * *
Sec. 1.199A-7 Section 199A(a) Rules for Cooperatives and their
Patrons.
(a) Overview--(1) In general. This section provides guidance and
special rules on the application of the rules of Sec. Sec. 1.199A-1
through 1.199A-6 regarding the deduction for qualified business income
(QBI) under section 199A(a) (section 199A(a) deduction) of the Internal
Revenue Code (Code) by patrons (patrons) of cooperatives to which Part
I of subchapter T of chapter 1 of subtitle A of the Code applies
(Cooperatives). Unless otherwise provided in this section, all of the
rules in Sec. Sec. 1.199A-1 through 1.199A-6 relating to calculating
the section 199A(a) deduction apply to patrons and Cooperatives.
Paragraph (b) of this section provides special rules for patrons
relating to trades or businesses. Paragraph (c) of this section
provides special rules for patrons and Cooperatives relating to the
definition of QBI. Paragraph (d) of this section provides special rules
for patrons and Cooperatives relating to specified service trades or
businesses (SSTBs). Paragraph (e) of this section provides special
rules for patrons relating to the statutory limitations based on W-2
wages and unadjusted basis immediately after acquisition (UBIA) of
qualified property. Paragraph (f) of this section provides special
rules for specified agricultural or horticultural cooperatives
(Specified Cooperatives) and paragraph (g) of this section provides
examples for Specified Cooperatives and their patrons. Paragraph (h) of
this section sets forth the applicability date of this section and a
special transition rule relating to Specified Cooperatives and their
patrons.
(2) At patron level. The section 199A(a) deduction is applied at
the patron level, and patrons who are individuals (as defined in Sec.
1.199A-1(a)(2)) may take the section 199A(a) deduction.
(3) Definitions. For purposes of section 199A and Sec. 1.199A-7,
the following definitions apply--
(i) Individual is defined in Sec. 1.199A-1(a)(2).
(ii) Patron is defined in Sec. 1.1388-1(e).
(iii) Patronage and nonpatronage is defined in Sec. 1.1388-1(f).
(iv) Relevant Passthrough Entity (RPE) is defined in Sec. 1.199A-
1(a)(9).
(v) Qualified payment is defined in Sec. 1.199A-8(d)(2)(ii).
(vi) Specified Cooperative is defined in Sec. 1.199A-8(a)(2) and
is a subset of Cooperatives defined in Sec. 1.199A-7(a)(1).
(b) Trade or business. A patron (whether the patron is an RPE or an
individual) must determine whether it has one or more trades or
businesses that it directly conducts as defined in Sec. 1.199A-
1(b)(14). To the extent a patron operating a trade or business has
income directly from that business, the patron must follow the rules of
Sec. Sec. 1.199A-1 through 1.199A-6 to calculate the section 199A
deduction. Patronage dividends or similar payments are considered to be
generated from the trade or business the Cooperative conducts on behalf
of or with the patron, and are tested by the Cooperative at its trade
or business level. A patron that receives patronage dividends or
similar payments, as described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section,
from a Cooperative must follow the rules of paragraphs (c) through (e)
of this section to calculate the section 199A deduction.
[[Page 28685]]
(c) Qualified Business Income--(1) In general. QBI means the net
amount of qualified items of income, gain, deduction, and loss with
respect to any trade or business as determined under the rules of Sec.
1.199A-3(b). A qualified item of income includes distributions for
which the Cooperative is allowed a deduction under section 1382(b) and
(c)(2) (including patronage dividends or similar payments, such as
money, property, qualified written notices of allocations, and
qualified per-unit retain certificates, as well as money or property
paid in redemption of a nonqualified written notice of allocation
(collectively patronage dividends or similar payments)), provided such
distribution is otherwise a qualified item of income, gain, deduction,
or loss. See special rule in paragraph (d)(3) of this section relating
to SSTBs that may affect QBI.
(2) QBI determinations made by patron. A patron must determine QBI
for each trade or business it directly conducts. In situations where
the patron receives distributions described in paragraph (c)(1) of this
section, the Cooperative must determine whether those distributions
include qualified items of income, gain, deduction, and loss. These
distributions may be included in the QBI of the patron's trade or
business:
(i) To the extent that those payments are related to the patron's
trade or business;
(ii) Are qualified items of income, gain, deduction, and loss at
the Cooperative's trade or business level;
(iii) Are not income from an SSTB at the Cooperative's trade or
business level (except as permitted by the threshold rules (see Sec.
1.199A-5(a)(2)); and
(iv) Provided the patron receives certain information from the
Cooperative about these payments as provided in paragraphs (c)(3) and
(d)(3) of this section.
(3) Qualified items of income, gain, deduction, and loss
determinations made and reported by Cooperatives. In the case of a
Cooperative that makes distributions described in paragraph (c)(1) of
this section to a patron, the Cooperative must determine the amount of
qualified items of income, gain, deduction, and loss in those
distributions. Pursuant to this paragraph (c)(3), the Cooperative must
report the amounts of qualified items with respect to any non-SSTB of
the Cooperative in the distributions made to the patron on an
attachment to or on the Form 1099-PATR, Taxable Distributions Received
From Cooperatives (Form 1099-PATR), (or any successor form) issued by
the Cooperative to the patron, unless otherwise provided by the
instructions to the Form. If the Cooperative does not report on or
before the due date of the Form 1099-PATR the amount of such qualified
items of income, gain, deduction, and loss in the distributions to the
patron, the amount of distributions from the Cooperative that may be
included in the patron's QBI is presumed to be zero. See special rule
in paragraph (d)(3) of this section relating to reporting of qualified
items of income, gain, deduction, and loss with respect to SSTBs of the
Cooperative.
(d) Specified Service Trades or Businesses--(1) In general. This
section provides guidance on the determination of SSTBs. Unless
otherwise provided in this section, all of the rules in Sec. 1.199A-5
relating to SSTBs apply to patrons of Cooperatives.
(2) SSTB determinations made by patron. A patron (whether an RPE or
an individual) must determine whether each trade or business it
directly conducts is an SSTB.
(3) SSTB determinations made and reported by Cooperatives. In the
case of a Cooperative that makes distributions described in paragraph
(c)(1) of this section to a patron, the Cooperative must determine
whether the distributions from the Cooperative include items of income,
gain, deduction, and loss from an SSTB directly conducted by the
Cooperative, and whether such items are qualified items of income,
gain, deduction, and loss with respect to such SSTB. The Cooperative
must report to the patron the amount of income, gain, deduction, and
loss in the distributions that is a qualified item of income, gain,
deduction, and loss with respect to such SSTB. The Cooperative must
report the amount on an attachment to or on the Form 1099-PATR (or any
successor form) issued by the Cooperative to the patron, unless
otherwise provided by the instructions to the Form. If the Cooperative
does not report the amount on or before the due date of the Form 1099-
PATR, then only the amount that a Cooperative reports as qualified
items of income, gain, deduction, and loss under Sec. 1.199A-7(c)(3)
may be included in the patron's QBI, and the remaining amount of
distributions from the Cooperative that may be included in the patron's
QBI is presumed to be zero.
(e) W-2 wages and unadjusted basis immediately after acquisition of
qualified property--(1) In general. This section provides guidance on
calculating a trade or business's W-2 wages and the UBIA of qualified
property properly allocable to QBI.
(2) Determinations made by patron. The determination of W-2 wages
and UBIA of qualified property must be made for each trade or business
by the patron (whether an RPE or individual) that directly conducts the
trade or business before applying the aggregation rules of Sec.
1.199A-4. Unlike RPEs, Cooperatives do not allocate their W-2 wages and
UBIA of qualified property to patrons.
(f) Special rules for patrons of Specified Cooperatives--(1)
Section 199A(b)(7) reduction. A patron of a Specified Cooperative that
receives a qualified payment must reduce its section 199A(a) deduction
as provided in Sec. 1.199A-1(e)(7). This reduction applies whether the
Specified Cooperative passes through all, some, or none of the
Specified Cooperative's section 199A(g) deduction to the patron in that
taxable year. The proposed rules relating to the section 199A(g)
deduction can be found in Sec. Sec. 1.199A-8 through 1.199A-12.
(2) Deduction Calculation--(i) Allocation method. If in any taxable
year, a patron receives both qualified payments and income that is not
a qualified payment in a trade or business, the patron must allocate
those items and related deductions using a reasonable method based on
all the facts and circumstances. Different reasonable methods may be
used for different items and related deductions of income, gain,
deduction, and loss. The chosen reasonable method for each item must be
consistently applied from one taxable year of the patron to another,
and must clearly reflect the income and expenses of each trade or
business. The overall combination of methods must also be reasonable
based on all the facts and circumstances. The books and records
maintained for a trade or business must be consistent with any
allocations under this paragraph (f)(2)(i).
(ii) Safe harbor. A patron with taxable income under the threshold
amount set forth in section 199A(e)(2) is eligible to use the safe
harbor set forth in this paragraph (f)(2)(ii) instead of the allocation
method set forth in paragraph (f)(2)(i) of this section for any taxable
year in which the patron receives qualified payments and income from
other than qualified payments in its trade or business. Under the safe
harbor the patron may apportion its deductions and W-2 wages ratably
between income from qualified payments and income from other than
qualified payments for purposes of calculating the reduction in
paragraph (f)(1) of this section. Accordingly, the amount of deductions
apportioned to determine QBI allocable to qualified payments is equal
to the proportion of the total deductions that the amount of qualified
payments bears
[[Page 28686]]
to total gross receipts used to determine QBI. The same proportion
applies to determine the amount of W-2 wages allocable to the portion
of the trade or business that received qualified payments.
(3) Qualified payments notice requirement. A Specified Cooperative
must report the amount of the qualified payments made to the eligible
taxpayer, as defined in section 199A(g)(2)(D), on an attachment to or
on the Form 1099-PATR (or any successor form) issued by the Cooperative
to the patron, unless otherwise provided by the instructions to the
Form.
(g) Examples. The following examples illustrate the provisions of
paragraph (f) of this section. For purposes of these examples, assume
that the Specified Cooperative has satisfied the applicable written
notice requirements in paragraphs (c)(3), (d)(3) and (f)(3) of this
section.
(1) Example 1. Patron of Specified Cooperative with W-2 wages.
(i) P, a grain farmer and patron of nonexempt Specified Cooperative
(C), delivered to C during 2018 2% of all grain marketed through C
during such year. During 2019, P receives $20,000 in patronage
dividends and $1,000 of allocated section 199A(g) deduction from C
related to the grain delivered to C during 2018.
(ii) P has taxable income of $75,000 for 2019 (determined
without regard to section 199A) and has a filing status of married
filing jointly. P's QBI related to its grain trade or business for
2019 is $50,000, which consists of gross receipts of $150,000 from
sales to an independent grain elevator, per-unit retain allocations
received from C during 2019 of $80,000, patronage dividends received
from C during 2019 related to C's 2018 net earnings of $20,000, and
expenses of $200,000 (including $50,000 of W-2 wages).
(iii) The portion of QBI from P's grain trade or business
related to qualified payments received from C during 2019 is
$10,000, which consists of per-unit retain allocations received from
C during 2019 of $80,000, patronage dividends received from C during
2019 related to C's 2018 net earnings of $20,000, and properly
allocable expenses of $90,000 (including $25,000 of W-2 wages).
(iv) P's deductible amount related to the grain trade or
business is 20% of QBI ($10,000) reduced by the lesser of 9% of QBI
related to qualified payments received from C ($900) or 50% of W-2
wages related to qualified payments received from C ($12,500), or
$9,100. As P does not have any other trades or businesses, the
combined QBI amount is also $9,100.
(v) P's deduction under section 199A for 2019 is $10,100, which
consists of the combined QBI amount of $9,100, plus P's deduction
passed through from C of $1,000.
(2) Example 2. Patron of Specified Cooperative without W-2
wages. (i) C and P have the same facts for 2018 and 2019 as Example
1, except that P has expenses of $200,000 that include zero W-2
wages during 2019.
(ii) P's deductible amount related to the grain trade or
business is 20% of QBI ($10,000) reduced by the lesser of 9% of QBI
related to qualified payments received from C ($900) or 50% of W-2
wages related to qualified payments received from C ($0), or
$10,000.
(iii) P's deduction under section 199A for 2019 is $11,000,
which consists of the combined QBI amount of $10,000, plus P's
deduction passed through from C of $1,000.
(3) Example 3. Patron of Specified Cooperative--Qualified
Payments do not equal QBI and no section 199A(g) passthrough. (i) P,
a grain farmer and a patron of a nonexempt Specified Cooperative
(C), during 2019, receives $60,000 in patronage dividends, $100,000
in per-unit retain allocations, and $0 of allocated section 199A(g)
deduction from C related to the grain delivered to C. C notifies P
that only $150,000 of the patronage dividends and per-unit retain
allocations are qualified payments because $10,000 of the payments
are not attributable to C's qualified production activities income
(QPAI).
(ii) P has taxable income of $90,000 (determined without regard
to section 199A) and has a filing status of married filing jointly.
P's QBI related to its grain trade or business is $45,000, which
consists of gross receipts of $95,000 from sales to an independent
grain elevator, plus $160,000 from C (all payments from C qualify as
qualified items of income, gain, deduction, and loss), less expenses
of $210,000 (including $30,000 of W-2 wages).
(iii) The portion of QBI from P's grain trade or business
related to qualified payments received from C is $25,000, which
consists of the qualified payments received from C of $150,000, less
the properly allocable expenses of $125,000 (including $18,000 of W-
2 wages), which were determined using a reasonable method under
paragraph (f)(2)(ii) of this section.
(iv) P's patron reduction is $2,250, which is the lesser of 9%
of QBI related to qualified payments received from C, $2,250 (9% x
$25,000), or 50% of W-2 wages related to qualified payments received
from C, $9,000 (50% x $18,000). As P does not have any other trades
or businesses, the combined QBI amount is $6,750 (20% of P's total
QBI, $9,000 (20% x $45,000), reduced by the patron reduction of
$2,250).
(v) P's deduction under section 199A is $6,750, which consists
of the combined QBI amount of $6,750.
(4) Example 4. Patron of Specified Cooperative--Reasonable
Method under paragraph (f)(2)(ii) of this section. P is a grain
farmer that has $45,000 of QBI related to P's grain trade or
business in 2019. P's QBI consists of $105,000 of sales to an
independent grain elevator, $100,000 of per-unit retain allocations,
and $50,000 of patronage dividends from a nonexempt Specified
Cooperative (C), for which C reports $150,000 of qualified payments
to P as required by paragraph (f)(3) of this section. P's grain
trade or business has $210,000 of expenses (including $30,000 of W-2
wages). P delivered 65x bushels of grain to C and sold 35x bushels
of comparable grain to the independent grain elevator. To allocate
the expenses between qualified payments ($150,000) and other income
($105,000), P compares the bushels of grain delivered to C (65x) to
the total bushels of grain delivered to C and sold to the
independent grain elevator (100x). P determines $136,500 (65% x
$210,000) of expenses (including $19,500 of W-2 wages) are properly
allocable to the qualified payments. The portion of QBI from P's
grain trade or business related to qualified payments received from
C is $13,500, which consists of qualified payments of $150,000 less
the properly allocable expenses of $136,500 (including $19,500 of W-
2 wages). P's method of allocating expenses is a reasonable method
under paragraph (f)(2)(ii) of this section.
(5) Example 5. Patron of Specified Cooperative using safe harbor
to allocate. (i) P is a grain farmer with taxable income of $100,000
for 2019 (determined without regard to section 199A) and has a
filing status of married filing jointly. P's QBI related to P's
grain trade or business for 2019 is $50,000, which consists of gross
receipts of $180,000 from sales to an independent grain elevator,
per-unit retain allocations received from a Specified Cooperative
(C) during 2019 of $15,000, patronage dividends received from C
during 2019 related to C's 2018 net earnings of $5,000, and expenses
of $150,000 (including $50,000 of W-2 wages). C also passed through
$1,800 of the section 199A(g) deduction to P, which related to the
grain delivered by P to the Specified Cooperative during 2018. P
uses the safe harbor in paragraph (f)(2)(iii) of this section to
determine the expenses (including W-2 wages) allocable to the
qualified payments.
(ii) Using the safe harbor to allocate P's $150,000 of expenses,
P allocates $15,000 of the expenses to the qualified payments
($150,000 of expenses multiplied by the ratio (0.10) of qualified
payments ($20,000) to total gross receipts ($200,000)). Using the
same ratio, P also determines there are $5,000 of W-2 wages
allocable ($50,000 multiplied by 0.10) to the qualified payments.
(iii) The portion of QBI from P's grain trade or business
related to qualified payments received from C during 2019 is $5,000,
which consists of per-unit retain allocations received from C during
2019 of $15,000, patronage dividends of $5,000, and properly
allocable expenses of $15,000 (including $5,000 of W-2 wages).
(iv) P's QBI related to the grain trade or business is 20% of
QBI ($10,000) reduced by the lesser of 9% of QBI related to
qualified payments received from C ($450) or 50% of W-2 wages
related to qualified payments received from C ($2,500), or $9,550.
As P does not have any other trades or businesses, the combined QBI
amount is also $9,550.
(v) P's deduction under section 199A for 2019 is $11,350, which
consists of the combined QBI amount of $9,550, plus P's deduction
passed through from C of $1,800.
(h) Effective/Applicability date--(1) General rule. Except as
provided in paragraph (h)(2) of this section, the provisions of this
section apply to taxable years ending after the date the Treasury
decision adopting these regulations as final regulations is
[[Page 28687]]
published in the Federal Register. Taxpayers, however, may rely on
these regulations until that date, but only if the taxpayers apply the
rules in their entirety and in a consistent manner.
(2) Transition rule for qualified payments of patrons of
Cooperatives. No deductions under section 199A are allowed to patrons
for any qualified payments that are attributable to QPAI with respect
to which a deduction is allowable to the Specified Cooperative under
section 199 as in effect on and before December 31, 2017, for a taxable
year of the Specified Cooperative beginning before January 1, 2018.
(3) Notice from the Cooperative. If a patron of a Cooperative
cannot claim a deduction under section 199A for any qualified payments
described in the transition rule set forth in paragraph (h)(2) of this
section, the Cooperative must report this information on an attachment
to or on the Form 1099-PATR (or any successor form) issued by the
Cooperative to the patron, unless otherwise provided by the
instructions to the Form.
Sec. 1.199A-8 Deduction for income attributable to domestic
production activities of specified agricultural or horticultural
cooperatives.
(a) Overview--(1) In general. This section provides rules relating
to the deduction for income attributable to domestic production
activities of a specified agricultural or horticultural cooperative
(Specified Cooperative). This paragraph (a) provides an overview and
definitions of certain terms. Paragraph (b) of this section provides
rules explaining the steps a nonexempt Specified Cooperative performs
to calculate its section 199A(g) deduction and includes definitions of
relevant terms. Paragraph (c) of this section provides rules explaining
the steps an exempt Specified Cooperative performs to calculate its
section 199A(g) deduction. Paragraph (d) of this section provides rules
for Specified Cooperatives passing through the section 199A(g)
deduction to patrons. Paragraph (e) of this section provides examples
that illustrate the provisions of paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this
section. Paragraph (f) of this section provides guidance for Specified
Cooperatives that are partners in a partnership. Paragraph (g) of this
section provides guidance on the recapture of a claimed section 199A(g)
deduction. Paragraph (h) of this section provides effective dates. For
additional rules addressing an expanded affiliated group (EAG) see
Sec. 1.199A-12. The principles of this section apply to the EAG rules
in Sec. 1.199A-12.
(2) Specified Cooperative--(i) In general. Specified Cooperative
means a cooperative to which Part I of subchapter T of chapter 1 of
subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) applies and which--
(A) Manufactures, produces, grows, or extracts (MPGE) in whole or
significant part within the United States any agricultural or
horticultural product, or
(B) Is engaged in the marketing of agricultural or horticultural
products that have been MPGE in whole or significant part within the
United States by the patrons of the cooperative.
(ii) Additional rules. See Sec. 1.199A-9 for rules to determine if
a Specified Cooperative has MPGE an agricultural or horticultural
product in whole or significant part within the United States.
(iii) Types of Specified Cooperatives. A Specified Cooperative that
is qualified as a farmer's cooperative organization under section 521
is an exempt Specified Cooperative, while a Specified Cooperative not
so qualified is a nonexempt Specified Cooperative.
(3) Patron is defined in Sec. 1.1388-1(e).
(4) Agricultural or horticultural products are agricultural,
horticultural, viticultural, and dairy products, livestock and the
products thereof, the products of poultry and bee raising, the edible
products of forestry, and any and all products raised or produced on
farms and processed or manufactured products thereof within the meaning
of the Cooperative Marketing Act of 1926, 44 Stat. 802 (1926).
Agricultural or horticultural products also include aquatic products
that are farmed whether by an exempt or a nonexempt Specified
Cooperative. In addition, agricultural or horticultural products
include fertilizer, diesel fuel, and other supplies used in
agricultural or horticultural production that are MPGE by a Specified
Cooperative. Agricultural or horticultural products, however, do not
include intangible property (other than as provided in the exception in
Sec. 1.199A-9(b)(2)); for example, an agricultural or horticultural
product includes a seed that is grown, but does not include the
intangible property right to reproduce a seed for sale. This exclusion
of intangible property does not apply to intangible characteristics of
any particular agricultural or horticultural product. For example,
gross receipts from the sale of different varieties of oranges would
all qualify as DPGR from the disposition of agricultural or
horticultural products (assuming all other requirements of section
199A(g) are met). However, gross receipts from the license of the right
to produce and sell a certain variety of an orange would be considered
separate from the orange and not from an agricultural or horticultural
product.
(b) Steps for a nonexempt Specified Cooperative in calculating
deduction--(1) In general. Except as provided in paragraph (c)(3) of
this section, this paragraph (b) applies only to nonexempt Specified
Cooperatives.
(2) Step 1--Gross receipts and related deductions--(i) Identify. To
determine the section 199A(g) deduction, a Specified Cooperative first
identifies its patronage and nonpatronage gross receipts and related
cost of goods sold (COGS), deductible expenses, W-2 wages, etc.
(deductions) and allocates them between patronage and nonpatronage. A
single definition for the term patronage and nonpatronage is found in
Sec. 1.1388-1(f).
(ii) Applicable gross receipts and deductions. For all purposes of
the section 199A(g) deduction, a Specified Cooperative can use only
patronage gross receipts and related deductions to calculate qualified
production activities income (QPAI) as defined in paragraph (b)(4)(ii)
of this section, oil-related QPAI as defined in paragraph (b)(7)(ii) of
this section, or the W-2 wage limitation in paragraph (b)(5)(ii)(B) of
this section. A Specified Cooperative cannot use its nonpatronage gross
receipts and related deductions to calculate its section 199A(g)
deduction.
(iii) Gross receipts are the Specified Cooperative's receipts for
the taxable year that are recognized under the Specified Cooperative's
methods of accounting used for Federal income tax purposes for the
taxable year. See Sec. 1.199A-12 if the gross receipts are recognized
in an intercompany transaction within the meaning of Sec. 1.1502-13.
Gross receipts include total sales (net of returns and allowances) and
all amounts received for services. In addition, gross receipts include
any income from investments and from incidental or outside sources. For
example, gross receipts include interest (except interest under section
103 but including original issue discount), dividends, rents,
royalties, and annuities, regardless of whether the amounts are derived
in the ordinary course of the Specified Cooperative's trade or
business. Gross receipts are not reduced by COGS or by the cost of
property sold if such property is described in section 1221(a)(1), (2),
(3), (4), or (5). Finally, gross receipts do not include amounts
received by the Specified Cooperative with respect to sales tax or
other similar state or local taxes if, under the applicable state or
local law, the tax is legally imposed on
[[Page 28688]]
the purchaser of the good or service and the Specified Cooperative
merely collects and remits the tax to the taxing authority. If, in
contrast, the tax is imposed on the Specified Cooperative under the
applicable law, then gross receipts include the amounts received that
are allocable to the payment of such tax.
(3) Step 2--Determine gross receipts that are DPGR--(i) In general.
A Specified Cooperative examines its patronage gross receipts to
determine which of these are DPGR. A Specified Cooperative does not use
nonpatronage gross receipts to determine DPGR.
(ii) DPGR are the gross receipts of the Specified Cooperative that
are derived from any lease, rental, license, sale, exchange, or other
disposition of an agricultural or horticultural product that is MPGE by
the Specified Cooperative or its patrons in whole or significant part
within the United States. DPGR does not include gross receipts derived
from services or the lease, rental, license, sale, exchange, or other
disposition of land unless a de minimis or other exception applies. See
Sec. 1.199A-9 for additional rules on determining if gross receipts
are DPGR.
(4) Step 3--Determine QPAI--(i) In general. A Specified Cooperative
determines QPAI from patronage DPGR and patronage deductions identified
in paragraphs (b)(3)(ii) and (b)(2)(i) of this section, respectively. A
Specified Cooperative does not use nonpatronage gross receipts or
deductions to determine QPAI.
(ii) QPAI for the taxable year means an amount equal to the excess
(if any) of--
(A) DPGR for the taxable year, over
(B) The sum of--
(1) COGS that are allocable to DPGR, and
(2) Other expenses, losses, or deductions (other than the section
199A(g) deduction) that are properly allocable to DPGR.
(C) QPAI computational rules. QPAI is computed without taking into
account the section 199A(g) deduction or any deduction allowed under
section 1382(b). See Sec. 1.199A-10 for additional rules on
calculating QPAI.
(5) Step 4--Calculate deduction--(i) In general. From QPAI and
taxable income, a Specified Cooperative calculates its section 199A(g)
deduction as provided in paragraph (b)(5)(ii) of this section.
(ii) Deduction--(A) In general. A Specified Cooperative is allowed
a deduction equal to 9 percent of the lesser of--
(1) QPAI of the Specified Cooperative for the taxable year, or
(2) Taxable income of the Specified Cooperative for the taxable
year.
(B) W-2 wage limitation. The deduction allowed under paragraph
(b)(5)(ii)(A) of this section for any taxable year cannot exceed 50
percent of the patronage W-2 wages attributable to DPGR for the taxable
year. See Sec. 1.199A-11 for additional rules on calculating the
patronage W-2 wage limitation.
(C) Taxable income. Taxable income is defined in section 1382 and
Sec. 1.1382-1 and Sec. 1.1382-2. For purposes of determining the
amount of the deduction allowed under paragraph (b)(5)(ii) of this
section, taxable income is limited to taxable income and related
deductions from patronage sources. Patronage net operating losses
(NOLs) reduce taxable income. Taxable income is computed without taking
into account the section 199A(g) deduction or any deduction allowable
under section 1382(b). Taxable income is determined using the same
method of accounting used to determine distributions under section
1382(b) and qualified payments to eligible taxpayers.
(6) Use of patronage section 199A(g) deduction. Except as provided
in Sec. 1.199A-12(c)(2) related to the rules for EAGs, the patronage
section 199A(g) deduction cannot create or increase a patronage or
nonpatronage NOL or the amount of a patronage or nonpatronage NOL
carryover or carryback, if applicable, in accordance with section 172.
A patronage section 199A(g) deduction can be applied only against
patronage income and deductions. A patronage section 199A(g) deduction
that is not used in the appropriate taxable year is lost.
(7) Special rules for nonexempt Specified Cooperatives that have
oil-related QPAI--(i) Reduction of section 199A(g) deduction. If a
Specified Cooperative has oil-related QPAI for any taxable year, the
amount otherwise allowable as a deduction under paragraph (b)(5)(ii) of
this section must be reduced by 3 percent of the least of--
(A) Oil-related QPAI of the Specified Cooperative for the taxable
year,
(B) QPAI of the Specified Cooperative for the taxable year, or
(C) Taxable income of the Specified Cooperative for the taxable
year.
(ii) Oil-related QPAI means, for any taxable year, the patronage
QPAI that is attributable to the production, refining, processing,
transportation, or distribution of oil, gas, or any primary product
thereof (within the meaning of section 927(a)(2)(C), as in effect
before its repeal) during such taxable year. Oil-related QPAI for any
taxable year is an amount equal to the excess (if any) of patronage
DPGR derived from the production, refining or processing of oil, gas,
or any primary product thereof (oil-related DPGR) over the sum of--
(A) COGS of the Specified Cooperative that is allocable to such
receipts; and
(B) Other expenses, losses, or deductions (other than the section
199A(g) deduction) that are properly allocable to such receipts.
(iii) Special rule for patronage oil-related DPGR. Oil-related DPGR
does not include gross receipts derived from the transportation or
distribution of oil, gas, or any primary product thereof. However, to
the extent that the nonexempt Specified Cooperative treats gross
receipts derived from transportation or distribution of oil, gas, or
any primary product thereof as part of DPGR under Sec. 1.199A-
9(j)(3)(i), or under Sec. 1.199A-9(j)(3)(i)(B), then the Specified
Cooperative must treat those patronage gross receipts as oil-related
DGPR.
(iv) Oil includes oil recovered from both conventional and non-
conventional recovery methods, including crude oil, shale oil, and oil
recovered from tar/oil sands. The primary product from oil includes all
products derived from the destructive distillation of oil, including
volatile products, light oils such as motor fuel and kerosene,
distillates such as naphtha, lubricating oils, greases and waxes, and
residues such as fuel oil. The primary product from gas means all gas
and associated hydrocarbon components from gas wells or oil wells,
whether recovered at the lease or upon further processing, including
natural gas, condensates, liquefied petroleum gases such as ethane,
propane, and butane, and liquid products such as natural gasoline. The
primary products from oil and gas provided in this paragraph (b)(7)(iv)
are not intended to represent either the only primary products from oil
or gas, or the only processes from which primary products may be
derived under existing and future technologies. Examples of non-primary
products include, but are not limited to, petrochemicals, medicinal
products, insecticides, and alcohols.
(c) Exempt Specified Cooperatives--(1) In general. This paragraph
(c) applies only to exempt Specified Cooperatives.
(2) Two section 199A(g) deductions. The Specified Cooperative must
calculate two separate section 199A(g) deductions, one patronage
sourced and the other nonpatronage sourced. Patronage and nonpatronage
gross receipts, related COGS that are allocable to DPGR, and other
expenses, losses, or deductions (other than the section
[[Page 28689]]
199A(g) deduction) that are properly allocable to DPGR (deductions),
DPGR, QPAI, NOLs, W-2 wages, etc. are not netted to calculate these two
separate section 199A(g) deductions.
(3) Exempt Specified Cooperative patronage section 199A(g)
deduction. The Specified Cooperative calculates its patronage section
199A(g) deduction following steps 1 through 4 in paragraphs (b)(2)
through (5) of this section as if it were a nonexempt Specified
Cooperative.
(4) Exempt Specified Cooperative nonpatronage section 199A(g)
deduction--(i) In general. The Specified Cooperative calculates its
nonpatronage section 199A(g) deduction following steps 2 through 4 in
paragraphs (b)(2) through (5) of this section using only nonpatronage
gross receipts and related nonpatronage deductions. For purposes of
determining the amount of the nonpatronage section 199A(g) deduction
allowed under paragraph (b)(5)(ii) of this section, taxable income is
limited to taxable income and related deductions from nonpatronage
sources. Nonpatronage NOLs reduce taxable income. Taxable income is
computed without taking into account the section 199A(g) deduction or
any deduction allowable under section 1382(c). Taxable income is
determined using the same method of accounting used to determine
distributions under section 1382(c)(2).
(ii) Use of nonpatronage section 199A(g) deduction. Except as
provided in Sec. 1.199A-12(c)(2) related to the rules for EAGs, the
nonpatronage section 199A(g) deduction cannot create or increase a
nonpatronage NOL or the amount of nonpatronage NOL carryover or
carryback, if applicable, in accordance with section 172. A Specified
Cooperative cannot allocate its nonpatronage section 199A(g) deduction
under paragraph (d) of this section and can apply the nonpatronage
section 199A(g) deduction only against its nonpatronage income and
deductions. As is the case for the patronage section 199A(g) deduction,
the nonpatronage section 199A(g) deduction that a Specified Cooperative
does not use in the appropriate taxable year is lost.
(d) Discretion to pass through deduction--(1) In general. A
Specified Cooperative may, at its discretion, pass through all, some,
or none of its patronage section 199A(g) deduction to an eligible
taxpayer. An eligible taxpayer is a patron other than a C corporation
or a Specified Cooperative. A Specified Cooperative member of a
federated cooperative may pass through the patronage section 199A(g)
deduction it receives from the federated cooperative to its member
patrons that are eligible taxpayers.
(2) Amount of deduction being passed through--(i) In general. A
Specified Cooperative is permitted to pass through to an eligible
taxpayer an amount equal to the portion of the Specified Cooperative's
section 199A(g) deduction that is allowed with respect to the portion
of the cooperative's QPAI that is attributable to the qualified
payments the Specified Cooperative distributed to the eligible taxpayer
during the taxable year and identified on the notice required in Sec.
1.199A-7(f)(3) on an attachment to or on the Form 1099-PATR, Taxable
Distributions Received From Cooperatives (Form 1099-PATR), (or any
successor form) issued by the Specified Cooperative to the eligible
taxpayer, unless otherwise provided by the instructions to the Form.
The notice requirement to pass through the section 199A(g) deduction is
in paragraph (d)(3) of this section.
(ii) Qualified payment means any amount of a patronage dividend or
per-unit retain allocation, as described in section 1385(a)(1) or (3)
received by a patron from a Specified Cooperative that is attributable
to the portion of the Specified Cooperative's QPAI, for which the
cooperative is allowed a section 199A(g) deduction. For this purpose,
patronage dividends include any advances on patronage and per-unit
retain allocations include per-unit retains paid in money during the
taxable year. A Specified Cooperative calculates its qualified payment
using the same method of accounting it uses to calculate its taxable
income.
(3) Notice requirement to pass through deduction. A Specified
Cooperative must identify in a written notice the amount of the section
199A(g) deduction being passed through to the eligible taxpayer. This
written notice must be mailed by the Specified Cooperative to the
eligible taxpayer no later than the 15th day of the ninth month
following the close of the taxable year of the Specified Cooperative.
The Specified Cooperative may use the same written notice, if any, that
it uses to notify the eligible taxpayer of the eligible taxpayer's
respective allocations of patronage distributions, or may use a
separate timely written notice(s) to comply with this section. The
Specified Cooperative must report the amount of section 199A(g)
deduction passed through to the eligible taxpayer on an attachment to
or on the Form 1099-PATR (or any successor form) issued by the
Specified Cooperative to the eligible taxpayer, unless otherwise
provided by the instructions to the Form.
(4) Section 199A(g) deduction allocated to eligible taxpayer. An
eligible taxpayer may deduct the lesser of the section 199A(g)
deduction identified on the notice described in paragraph (d)(3) of
this section or the eligible taxpayer's taxable income in the taxable
year in which the eligible taxpayer receives the timely written notice
described in paragraph (d)(3) of this section. For this purpose, the
eligible taxpayer's taxable income is determined without taking into
account the section 199A(g) deduction being passed through to the
eligible taxpayer and after taking into account any section 199A(a)
deduction allowed to the eligible taxpayer. Any section 199A(g)
deduction the eligible taxpayer does not use in the taxable year in
which the eligible taxpayer receives the notice (received on or before
the due date of the Form 1099-PATR) is lost and cannot be carried
forward or back to other taxable years. The taxable income limitation
for the section 199A(a) deduction set forth in section 199A(b)(3) and
Sec. 1.199A-1(a) and (b) does not apply to limit the deductibility of
the section 199A(g) deduction passed through to the eligible taxpayer.
(5) Special rules for eligible taxpayers that are Specified
Cooperatives. A Specified Cooperative that receives a section 199A(g)
deduction as an eligible taxpayer can take the deduction only against
patronage gross income and related deductions.
(6) W-2 wage limitation. The W-2 wage limitation described in
paragraph (b)(5)(ii)(B) of this section is applied at the cooperative
level whether or not the Specified Cooperative chooses to pass through
some or all of the section 199A(g) deduction. Any section 199A(g)
deduction that has been passed through by a Specified Cooperative to an
eligible taxpayer is not subject to the W-2 wage limitation a second
time at the eligible taxpayer's level.
(7) Specified Cooperative denied section 1382 deduction for portion
of qualified payments. A Specified Cooperative must reduce its section
1382 deduction under section 1382(b) and/or (c), as applicable) by an
amount equal to the portion of any qualified payment that is
attributable to the Specified Cooperative's section 199A(g) deduction
passed through to the eligible taxpayer. This means the Specified
Cooperative must reduce its section 1382 deduction in an amount equal
to the section 199A(g) deduction passed through to its eligible
taxpayers.
(8) No double counting. A qualified payment received by a Specified
Cooperative that is a patron of a Specified Cooperative is not taken
into
[[Page 28690]]
account by the patron for purposes of section 199A(g).
(e) Examples. The following examples illustrate the application of
paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this section. Assume for each example
that the Specified Cooperative sent all required notices to patrons on
or before the due date of the Form 1099-PATR.
(1) Example 1. Nonexempt Specified Cooperative calculating
section 199A(g) deduction. (i) C is a grain marketing nonexempt
Specified Cooperative, with $5,250,000 in gross receipts during 2018
from the sale of grain grown by its patrons. C paid $4,000,000 to
its patrons at the time the grain was delivered in the form of per-
unit retain allocations pursuant to an agreement and another
$1,000,000 in patronage dividends after the close of the 2018
taxable year. C has other expenses of $250,000 during 2018,
including $100,000 of W-2 wages.
(ii) C has DPGR of $5,250,000 and QPAI as defined in Sec.
1.199A-8(b)(4)(ii) of $5,000,000 for 2018. C's section 199A(g)
deduction is equal to the least of 9% of QPAI ($450,000), 9% of
taxable income ($450,000), or 50% of W-2 wages ($50,000). C passes
through the entire section 199A(g) deduction to its patrons.
Accordingly, C reduces its $5,000,000 deduction allowable under
section 1382(b) (relating to the $1,000,000 patronage dividends and
$4,000,000 per-unit retain allocations) by $50,000.
(2) Example 2. Nonexempt Specified Cooperative calculating
section 199A(g) deduction with purchases. Same facts as Example 1,
except C purchased grain from its patrons for $4,000,000 and these
purchases are not per-unit retain allocations described in section
1388(f). C allocated and reported the $1,000,000 patronage dividends
to its patrons and provided notification (in accordance with the
requirements of Sec. 1.199A-7(f)(3)) that only the patronage
dividends are treated as qualified payments for purposes of its
section 199A(g) deduction. C has QPAI and taxable income of
$1,000,000 ($5,250,000--$4,000,000--$250,000). C's section 199A(g)
deduction is the lesser of 9% of QPAI ($90,000), 9% of taxable
income without taking into account any deduction under section
1382(b) ($90,000), or 50% of W-2 wages ($50,000). C passes through
the entire section 199A(g) deduction to its patrons. Accordingly, C
reduces its $1,000,000 deduction allowable under section 1382(b) by
$50,000. Patrons do not include any of the $4,000,000 of payments
when determining the reduction amount under section 199A(b)(7).
(3) Example 3. Nonexempt Specified Cooperative determines
amounts included in QPAI and taxable income. (i) C, a nonexempt
Specified Cooperative, offers harvesting services and markets the
grain of patrons and nonpatrons. C had gross receipts from
harvesting services and grain sales, and expenses related to both.
All of C's harvesting services were performed for their patrons, and
75% of the grain sales were for patrons.
(ii) C identifies 75% of the gross receipts and related expenses
from grain sales and 100% of the gross receipts and related expenses
from the harvesting services as patronage sourced. C identifies 25%
of the gross receipts and related expenses from grain sales as
nonpatronage sourced.
(iii) C does not include any nonpatronage gross receipts or
related expenses from grain sales in either QPAI or taxable income
when calculating the section 199A(g) deduction. C's QPAI includes
the patronage DPGR, less related expenses (allocable COGS, wages and
other expenses). C's taxable income includes the patronage gross
receipts, whether such gross receipts are DPGR or non-DPGR.
(iv) C allocates and reports patronage dividends to its
harvesting patrons and grain marketing patrons. C also notifies its
grain marketing patrons (in accordance with the requirements of
Sec. 1.199A-7(f)(3)) that their patronage dividends are qualified
payments used in C's section 199A(g) computation. The patrons must
use this information for purposes of computing their section
199A(b)(7) reduction to their section 199A(a) deduction (see Sec.
1.199A-7(f)).
(4) Example 4. Nonexempt Specified Cooperative with patronage
and nonpatronage gross receipts and related deductions. (i) C, a
nonexempt Specified Cooperative, markets corn grown by its patrons
in the United States. For the calendar year ending December 31,
2020, C derives gross receipts from the marketing activity of
$1,800. Such gross receipts qualify as DPGR. Assume C has $800 of
expenses (including COGS, other expenses, and $400 of W-2 wages)
properly allocable to DPGR, and a $1,000 deduction allowed under
section 1382(b). C also derives gross receipts from nonpatronage
sources in the amount of $500, and has nonpatronage deductions in
the amount of $400 (including COGS, other expenses, and $100 of W-2
wages).
(ii) C does not include any gross receipts or deductions from
nonpatronage sources when calculating the deduction under paragraph
(b)(5)(ii) of this section. C's QPAI and taxable income both equal
$1,000 ($1,800--800). C's deduction under paragraph (b)(5)(ii) of
this section for the taxable year is equal to $90 (9% of $1,000),
which does not exceed $200 (50% of C's W-2 wages properly allocable
to DPGR). C passes through $90 of the deduction to patrons and C
reduces its section 1382(b) deduction by $90.
(5) Example 5. Exempt Specified Cooperative with patronage and
nonpatronage income and deductions. (i) C, an exempt Specified
Cooperative, markets corn MPGE by its patrons in the United States.
For the calendar year ending December 31, 2020, C derives gross
receipts from the marketing activity of $1,800. For this activity
assume C has $800 of expenses (including COGS, other expenses, and
$400 of W-2 wages) properly allocable to DPGR, and a $1,000
deduction under section 1382(b). C also derives gross receipts from
nonpatronage sources in the amount of $500. Assume the gross
receipts qualify as DPGR. For this activity assume C has $400 of
expenses (including COGS, other expenses, and $20 of W-2 wages)
properly allocable to DPGR and no deduction under section 1382(c).
(ii) C calculates two separate section 199A(g) deduction
amounts. C's section 199A(g) deduction attributable to patronage
sources is the same as the deduction calculated by the nonexempt
Specified Cooperative in Example 1 in paragraph (e)(1) of this
section.
(iii) C's nonpatronage QPAI and taxable income is equal to $100
($500-$400). C's deduction under paragraph (c)(3) of this section
that directs C to use paragraph (b)(5)(ii) of this section
attributable to nonpatronage sources is equal to $9 (9% of $100),
which does not exceed $10 (50% of C's W-2 wages properly allocable
to DPGR). C cannot pass through any of the nonpatronage section
199A(g) deduction amount to its patrons.
(6) Example 6. NOL. C, a nonexempt Specified Cooperative, MPGE
agricultural or horticultural products. C is not part of an EAG as
defined in Sec. 1.199A-12. In 2018, C generates QPAI and taxable
income is $600, without taking into account any of its deductions
under section 1382(b), the deduction under section 199A(g), or an
NOL deduction. During 2018, C incurs W-2 wages as defined in Sec.
1.199A-11 of $300. C has an NOL carryover to 2018 of $500. C's
deduction under this section for 2018 is $9 (9% x (lesser of QPAI of
$600 and taxable income of $100 ($600 taxable income-$500 NOL)).
Under these facts the wage limitation does not act to limit the
deduction because the wage limitation is $150 (50% x $300).
(7) Example 7. NOL. (i) C, a nonexempt Specified Cooperative,
MPGE agricultural or horticultural products. C is not part of an
EAG. In 2018, C generates QPAI and taxable income of $100, without
taking into account any of its deductions under section 1382(b), the
deduction under section 199A(g), or an NOL deduction. C has an NOL
carryover to 2018 of $500 that reduces its taxable income for 2018
to $0. C's section 199A(g) deduction for 2018 is $0 (9% x (lesser of
QPAI of $100 and taxable income of $0)).
(ii) Carryover to 2019. C's taxable income for purposes of
determining its NOL carryover to 2019 is $100. Accordingly, for
purposes of section 199A(g), C's NOL carryover to 2019 is $400 ($500
NOL carryover to 2018--$100 NOL used in 2018).
(f) Special rule for Specified Cooperative partners. In the case
described in section 199A(g)(5)(B), where a Specified Cooperative is a
partner in a partnership, the partnership must separately identify and
report on the Schedule K-1 of the Form 1065, U.S. Return of Partnership
Income (or any successor form) issued to the Specified Cooperative the
cooperative's share of gross receipts and related deductions, unless
otherwise provided by the instructions to the Form. The Specified
Cooperative determines what gross receipts reported by the partnership
qualify as DPGR and includes these gross receipts and related
deductions to calculate one section 199A(g) deduction (in the case of a
nonexempt Specified Cooperative) or two section 199A(g) deductions (in
the case of an exempt Specified
[[Page 28691]]
Cooperative) using the steps set forth in paragraphs (b) and (c) of
this section.
(g) Recapture of section 199A(g) deduction. If the amount of the
section 199A(g) deduction that was passed through to eligible taxpayers
exceeds the amount allowable as a section 199A(g) deduction as
determined on examination or reported on an amended return, then
recapture of the excess will occur at the Specified Cooperative level
in the taxable year the Specified Cooperative took the excess section
199A(g) deduction.
(h) Applicability date. Except as provided in paragraph (h)(2) of
Sec. 1.199A-7, the provisions of this section apply to taxable years
ending after the date the Treasury decision adopting these regulations
as final regulations is published in the Federal Register. Taxpayers,
however, may rely on these regulations until that date, but only if the
taxpayers apply the rules in their entirety and in a consistent manner.
Sec. 1.199A-9 Domestic production gross receipts.
(a) Domestic production gross receipts--(1) In general. The
provisions of this section apply solely for purposes of section 199A(g)
of the Internal Revenue Code (Code). The provisions of this section
provide guidance to determine what gross receipts (defined in Sec.
1.199A-8(b)(2)(iii)) are domestic production gross receipts (DPGR)
(defined in Sec. 1.199A-8(b)(3)(ii)). DPGR does not include gross
receipts derived from services or the lease, rental, license, sale,
exchange, or other disposition of land unless a de minimis or other
exception applies. Partners, including partners in an EAG partnership
described in Sec. 1.199A-12(i)(1), may not treat guaranteed payments
under section 707(c) as DPGR.
(2) Application to marketing cooperatives. For purposes of
determining DPGR, a Specified Cooperative (defined in Sec. 1.199A-
8(a)(2)) will be treated as having manufactured, produced, grown, or
extracted (MPGE) (defined in paragraph (f) of this section) in whole or
significant part (defined in paragraph (h) of this section) any
agricultural or horticultural product (defined in Sec. 1.199A-8(a)(4))
within the United States (defined in paragraph (i) of this section)
marketed by the Specified Cooperative which its patrons (defined in
Sec. 1.1388-1(e)) have so MPGE.
(b) Related persons--(1) In general. Pursuant to 199A(g)(3)(D)(ii),
DPGR does not include any gross receipts derived from agricultural or
horticultural products leased, licensed, or rented by the Specified
Cooperative for use by any related person. A person is treated as
related to another person if both persons are treated as a single
employer under either section 52(a) or (b) (without regard to section
1563(b)), or section 414(m) or (o). Any other person is an unrelated
person for purposes of the section 199A(g) deduction.
(2) Exceptions. Notwithstanding paragraph (b)(1) of this section,
gross receipts derived from any agricultural or horticultural product
leased or rented by the Specified Cooperative to a related person may
qualify as DPGR if the agricultural or horticultural product is held
for sublease or rent, or is subleased or rented, by the related person
to an unrelated person for the ultimate use of the unrelated person.
Similarly, notwithstanding paragraph (b)(1) of this section, gross
receipts derived from a license of the right to reproduce an
agricultural or horticultural product to a related person for
reproduction and sale, exchange, lease, or rental to an unrelated
person for the ultimate use of the unrelated person are treated as
gross receipts from a disposition of an agricultural or horticultural
product and may qualify as DPGR.
(c) Allocating gross receipts--(1) In general. A Specified
Cooperative must determine the portion of its gross receipts for the
taxable year that is DPGR and the portion of its gross receipts that is
non-DPGR using a reasonable method based on all the facts and
circumstances. Applicable Federal income tax principles apply to
determine whether a transaction is, in substance, a lease, rental,
license, sale, exchange, or other disposition the gross receipts of
which may constitute DPGR, whether it is a service the gross receipts
of which may constitute non-DPGR, or some combination thereof. For
example, if a Specified Cooperative sells an agricultural or
horticultural product and, in connection with that sale, also provides
services, the Specified Cooperative must allocate its gross receipts
from the transaction using a reasonable method based on all the facts
and circumstances that accurately identifies the gross receipts that
constitute DPGR and non-DPGR in accordance with the requirements of
Sec. Sec. 1.199A-8(b) and/or (c). The chosen reasonable method must be
consistently applied from one taxable year to another and must clearly
reflect the portion of gross receipts for the taxable year that is DPGR
and the portion of gross receipts that is non-DPGR. The books and
records maintained for gross receipts must be consistent with any
allocations under this paragraph (c)(1).
(2) Reasonable method of allocation. If a Specified Cooperative has
the information readily available and can, without undue burden or
expense, specifically identify whether the gross receipts are derived
from an item (and thus, are DPGR), then the Specified Cooperative must
use that specific identification to determine DPGR. If the Specified
Cooperative does not have information readily available to specifically
identify whether gross receipts are derived from an item or cannot,
without undue burden or expense, specifically identify whether gross
receipts are derived from an item, then the Specified Cooperative is
not required to use a method that specifically identifies whether the
gross receipts are derived from an item but can use a reasonable
allocation method. Factors taken into consideration in determining
whether the Specified Cooperative's method of allocating gross receipts
between DPGR and non-DPGR is reasonable include whether the Specified
Cooperative uses the most accurate information available; the
relationship between the gross receipts and the method used; the
accuracy of the method chosen as compared with other possible methods;
whether the method is used by the Specified Cooperative for internal
management or other business purposes; whether the method is used for
other Federal or state income tax purposes; the time, burden, and cost
of using alternative methods; and whether the Specified Cooperative
applies the method consistently from year to year.
(3) De minimis rules--(i) DPGR. A Specified Cooperative's
applicable gross receipts as provided in Sec. Sec. 1.199A-8(b) and/or
(c) may be treated as DPGR if less than 5 percent of the Specified
Cooperative's total gross receipts are non-DPGR (after application of
the exceptions provided in Sec. 1.199A-9(j)(3)). If the amount of the
Specified Cooperative's gross receipts that are non-DPGR equals or
exceeds 5 percent of the Specified Cooperative's total gross receipts,
then, except as provided in paragraph (c)(3)(ii) of this section, the
Specified Cooperative is required to allocate all gross receipts
between DPGR and non-DPGR in accordance with paragraph (c)(1) of this
section. If a Specified Cooperative is a member of an expanded
affiliated group (EAG) (defined in Sec. 1.199A-12), but is not a
member of a consolidated group, then the determination of whether less
than 5 percent of the Specified Cooperative's total gross receipts are
non-DPGR is made at the Specified Cooperative level. If a Specified
Cooperative is a member
[[Page 28692]]
of a consolidated group, then the determination of whether less than 5
percent of the Specified Cooperative's total gross receipts are non-
DPGR is made at the consolidated group level. See Sec. 1.199A-12(d).
(ii) Non-DPGR. A Specified Cooperative's applicable gross receipts
as provided in Sec. Sec. 1.199A-8(b) and/or (c) may be treated as non-
DPGR if less than 5 percent of the Specified Cooperative's total gross
receipts are DPGR. If a Specified Cooperative is a member of an EAG,
but is not a member of a consolidated group, then the determination of
whether less than 5 percent of the Specified Cooperative's total gross
receipts are DPGR is made at the Specified Cooperative level. If a
Specified Cooperative is a member of a consolidated group, then the
determination of whether less than 5 percent of the Specified
Cooperative's total gross receipts are DPGR is made at the consolidated
group level.
(d) Use of historical data for multiple-year transactions. If a
Specified Cooperative recognizes and reports gross receipts from
upfront payments or other similar payments on a Federal income tax
return for a taxable year, then the Specified Cooperative's use of
historical data in making an allocation of gross receipts from the
transaction between DPGR and non-DPGR may constitute a reasonable
method. If a Specified Cooperative makes allocations using historical
data, and subsequently updates the data, then the Specified Cooperative
must use the more recent or updated data, starting in the taxable year
in which the update is made.
(e) Determining DPGR item-by-item--(1) In general. For purposes of
the section 199A(g) deduction, a Specified Cooperative determines,
using a reasonable method based on all the facts and circumstances,
whether gross receipts qualify as DPGR on an item-by-item basis (and
not, for example, on a division-by-division, product line-by-product
line, or transaction-by-transaction basis). The chosen reasonable
method must be consistently applied from one taxable year to another
and must clearly reflect the portion of gross receipts that is DPGR.
The books and records maintained for gross receipts must be consistent
with any allocations under this paragraph (e)(1).
(i) The term item means the agricultural or horticultural product
offered by the Specified Cooperative in the normal course of its trade
or business for lease, rental, license, sale, exchange, or other
disposition (for purposes of this paragraph (e), collectively referred
to as disposition) to customers, if the gross receipts from the
disposition of such product qualify as DPGR; or
(ii) If paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section does not apply to the
product, then any component of the product described in paragraph
(e)(1)(i) of this section is treated as the item, provided that the
gross receipts from the disposition of the product described in
paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section that are attributable to such
component qualify as DPGR. Each component that meets the requirements
under this paragraph (e)(1)(ii) must be treated as a separate item and
a component that meets the requirements under this paragraph (e)(1)(ii)
may not be combined with a component that does not meet these
requirements.
(2) Special rules. (i) For purposes of paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this
section, in no event may a single item consist of two or more products
unless those products are offered for disposition, in the normal course
of the Specified Cooperative's trade or business, as a single item
(regardless of how the products are packaged).
(ii) In the case of agricultural or horticultural products
customarily sold by weight or by volume, the item is determined using
the most common custom of the industry (for example, barrels of oil).
(3) Exception. If the Specified Cooperative MPGE agricultural or
horticultural products within the United States that it disposes of,
and the Specified Cooperative leases, rents, licenses, purchases, or
otherwise acquires property that contains or may contain the
agricultural or horticultural products (or a portion thereof), and the
Specified Cooperative cannot reasonably determine, without undue burden
and expense, whether the acquired property contains any of the original
agricultural or horticultural products MPGE by the Specified
Cooperative, then the Specified Cooperative is not required to
determine whether any portion of the acquired property qualifies as an
item for purposes of paragraph (e)(1) of this section. Therefore, the
gross receipts derived from the disposition of the acquired property
may be treated as non-DPGR. Similarly, the preceding sentences apply if
the Specified Cooperative can reasonably determine that the acquired
property contains agricultural or horticultural products (or a portion
thereof) MPGE by the Specified Cooperative, but cannot reasonably
determine, without undue burden or expense, how much, or what type,
grade, etc., of the agricultural or horticultural MPGE by the Specified
Cooperative the acquired property contains.
(f) Definition of manufactured, produced, grown, or extracted
(MPGE)--(1) In general. Except as provided in paragraphs (f)(2) and (3)
of this section, the term MPGE includes manufacturing, producing,
growing, extracting, installing, developing, improving, and creating
agricultural or horticultural products; making agricultural or
horticultural products out of material by processing, manipulating,
refining, or changing the form of an article, or by combining or
assembling two or more articles; cultivating soil, raising livestock,
and farming aquatic products. The term MPGE also includes storage,
handling, or other processing activities (other than transportation
activities) within the United States related to the sale, exchange, or
other disposition of agricultural or horticultural products only if the
products are consumed in connection with or incorporated into the MPGE
of agricultural or horticultural products, whether or not by the
Specified Cooperative. The Specified Cooperative (or the patron if
section 1.199A-9(a)(2) applies) must have the benefits and burdens of
ownership of the agricultural or horticultural products under Federal
income tax principles during the period the MPGE activity occurs in
order for the gross receipts derived from the MPGE of the agricultural
or horticultural products to qualify as DPGR.
(2) Packaging, repackaging, or labeling. If the Specified
Cooperative packages, repackages, or labels agricultural or
horticultural products and engages in no other MPGE activity with
respect to those agricultural or horticultural products, the packaging,
repackaging, or labeling does not qualify as MPGE with respect to those
agricultural or horticultural products.
(3) Installing. If a Specified Cooperative installs agricultural or
horticultural products and engages in no other MPGE activity with
respect to the agricultural or horticultural products, the Specified
Cooperative's installing activity does not qualify as an MPGE activity.
Notwithstanding paragraph (j)(3)(i)(A) of this section, if the
Specified Cooperative installs agricultural or horticultural products
MPGE by the Specified Cooperative and the Specified Cooperative has the
benefits and burdens of ownership of the agricultural or horticultural
products under Federal income tax principles during the period the
installing activity occurs, then the portion of the installing activity
that relates to the agricultural or
[[Page 28693]]
horticultural products is an MPGE activity.
(4) Consistency with section 263A. A Specified Cooperative that has
MPGE agricultural or horticultural products for the taxable year must
treat itself as a producer under section 263A with respect to the
agricultural or horticultural products unless the Specified Cooperative
is not subject to section 263A. A Specified Cooperative that currently
is not properly accounting for its production activities under section
263A, and wishes to change its method of accounting to comply with the
producer requirements of section 263A, must follow the applicable
administrative procedures issued under Sec. 1.446-1(e)(3)(ii) for
obtaining the Commissioner's consent to a change in accounting method
(for further guidance, for example, see Rev. Proc. 2015-13, 2015-5 IRB
419, or any applicable subsequent guidance (see Sec. 601.601(d)(2) of
this chapter)).
(g) By the taxpayer. With respect to the exception of the rules
applicable to an EAG and EAG partnerships under Sec. 1.199A-12, only
one Specified Cooperative may claim the section 199A(g) deduction with
respect to any qualifying activity under paragraph (f) of this section
performed in connection with the same agricultural or horticultural
product. If an unrelated party performs a qualifying activity under
paragraph (f) of this section pursuant to a contract with a Specified
Cooperative (or its patron as relevant under paragraph (a)(2) of this
section), then only if the Specified Cooperative (or its patron) has
the benefits and burdens of ownership of the agricultural or
horticultural product under Federal income tax principles during the
period in which the qualifying activity occurs is the Specified
Cooperative (or its patron) treated as engaging in the qualifying
activity.
(h) In whole or significant part defined--(1) In general.
Agricultural or horticultural products must be MPGE in whole or
significant part by the Specified Cooperative (or its patrons in the
case described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section) and in whole or
significant part within the United States to qualify under section
199A(g)(3)(D)(i). If a Specified Cooperative enters into a contract
with an unrelated person for the unrelated person to MPGE agricultural
or horticultural products for the Specified Cooperative and the
Specified Cooperative has the benefits and burdens of ownership of the
agricultural or horticultural products under applicable Federal income
tax principles during the period the MPGE activity occurs, then,
pursuant to paragraph (g) of this section, the Specified Cooperative is
considered to MPGE the agricultural or horticultural products under
this section. The unrelated person must perform the MPGE activity on
behalf of the Specified Cooperative in whole or significant part within
the United States in order for the Specified Cooperative to satisfy the
requirements of this paragraph (h)(1).
(2) Substantial in nature. Agricultural or horticultural products
will be treated as MPGE in whole or in significant part by the
Specified Cooperative (or its patrons in the case described in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section) within the United States for purposes
of paragraph (h)(1) of this section if the MPGE of the agricultural or
horticultural products by the Specified Cooperative within the United
States is substantial in nature taking into account all the facts and
circumstances, including the relative value added by, and relative cost
of, the Specified Cooperative's MPGE within the United States, the
nature of the agricultural or horticultural products, and the nature of
the MPGE activity that the Specified Cooperative performs within the
United States. The MPGE of a key component of an agricultural or
horticultural product does not, in itself, meet the substantial-in-
nature requirement with respect to an agricultural or horticultural
product under this paragraph (h)(2). In the case of an agricultural or
horticultural product, research and experimental activities under
section 174 and the creation of intangible assets are not taken into
account in determining whether the MPGE of the agricultural or
horticultural product is substantial in nature.
(3) Safe harbor--(i) In general. A Specified Cooperative (or its
patrons in the case described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section) will
be treated as having MPGE an agricultural or horticultural product in
whole or in significant part within the United States for purposes of
paragraph (h)(1) of this section if the direct labor and overhead of
such Specified Cooperative to MPGE the agricultural or horticultural
product within the United States account for 20 percent or more of the
Specified Cooperative's COGS of the agricultural or horticultural
product, or in a transaction without COGS (for example, a lease,
rental, or license), account for 20 percent or more of the Specified
Cooperative's unadjusted depreciable basis (as defined in paragraph
(h)(3)(ii) of this section) in property included in the definition of
agricultural or horticultural products. For Specified Cooperatives
subject to section 263A, overhead is all costs required to be
capitalized under section 263A except direct materials and direct
labor. For Specified Cooperatives not subject to section 263A, overhead
may be computed using a reasonable method based on all the facts and
circumstances, but may not include any cost, or amount of any cost,
that would not be required to be capitalized under section 263A if the
Specified Cooperative were subject to section 263A. Research and
experimental expenditures under section 174 and the costs of creating
intangible assets are not taken into account in determining direct
labor or overhead for any agricultural or horticultural product. In the
case of agricultural or horticultural products, research and
experimental expenditures under section 174 and any other costs
incurred in the creation of intangible assets may be excluded from COGS
or unadjusted depreciable basis for purposes of determining whether the
Specified Cooperative meets the safe harbor under this paragraph
(h)(3). For Specified Cooperatives not subject to section 263A, the
chosen reasonable method to compute overhead must be consistently
applied from one taxable year to another and must clearly reflect the
Specified Cooperative's portion of overhead not subject to section
263A. The method must also be reasonable based on all the facts and
circumstances. The books and records maintained for overhead must be
consistent with any allocations under this paragraph (h)(3)(i).
(ii) Unadjusted depreciable basis. The term unadjusted depreciable
basis means the basis of property for purposes of section 1011 without
regard to any adjustments described in section 1016(a)(2) and (3). This
basis does not reflect the reduction in basis for--
(A) Any portion of the basis the Specified Cooperative properly
elects to treat as an expense under sections 179 or 179C; or
(B) Any adjustments to basis provided by other provisions of the
Code and the regulations under the Code (for example, a reduction in
basis by the amount of the disabled access credit pursuant to section
44(d)(7)).
(4) Special rules--(i) Contract with an unrelated person. If a
Specified Cooperative enters into a contract with an unrelated person
for the unrelated person to MPGE an agricultural or horticultural
product within the United States for the Specified Cooperative, and the
Specified Cooperative is considered to MPGE the agricultural or
horticultural product pursuant to paragraph (f)(1) of this section,
then, for purposes of the substantial-in-nature
[[Page 28694]]
requirement under paragraph (h)(2) of this section and the safe harbor
under paragraph (h)(3)(i) of this section, the Specified Cooperative's
MPGE activities or direct labor and overhead must include both the
Specified Cooperative's MPGE activities or direct labor and overhead to
MPGE the agricultural or horticultural product within the United States
as well as the MPGE activities or direct labor and overhead of the
unrelated person to MPGE the agricultural or horticultural product
within the United States under the contract.
(ii) Aggregation. In determining whether the substantial-in-nature
requirement under paragraph (h)(2) of this section or the safe harbor
under paragraph (h)(3)(i) of this section is met at the time the
Specified Cooperative disposes of an agricultural or horticultural
product--
(A) An EAG member must take into account all of the previous MPGE
activities or direct labor and overhead of the other members of the
EAG;
(B) An EAG partnership as defined in Sec. 1.199A-12(i)(1) must
take into account all of the previous MPGE activities or direct labor
and overhead of all members of the EAG in which the partners of the EAG
partnership are members (as well as the previous MPGE activities of any
other EAG partnerships owned by members of the same EAG); and
(C) A member of an EAG in which the partners of an EAG partnership
are members must take into account all of the previous MPGE activities
or direct labor and overhead of the EAG partnership (as well as those
of any other members of the EAG and any previous MPGE activities of any
other EAG partnerships owned by members of the same EAG).
(i) United States defined. For purposes of section 199A(g), the
term United States includes the 50 states, the District of Columbia,
the territorial waters of the United States, and the seabed and subsoil
of those submarine areas that are adjacent to the territorial waters of
the United States and over which the United States has exclusive
rights, in accordance with international law, with respect to the
exploration and exploitation of natural resources. Consistent with its
definition in section 7701(a)(9), the term United States does not
include possessions and territories of the United States or the
airspace or space over the United States and these areas.
(j) Derived from the lease, rental, license, sale, exchange, or
other disposition--(1) In general--(i) Definition. The term derived
from the lease, rental, license, sale, exchange, or other disposition
is defined as, and limited to, the gross receipts directly derived from
the lease, rental, license, sale, exchange, or other disposition of
agricultural or horticultural products even if the Specified
Cooperative has already recognized receipts from a previous lease,
rental, license, sale, exchange, or other disposition of the same
agricultural or horticultural products. Applicable Federal income tax
principles apply to determine whether a transaction is, in substance, a
lease, rental, license, sale, exchange, or other disposition, whether
it is a service, or whether it is some combination thereof.
(ii) Lease income. The financing and interest components of a lease
of agricultural or horticultural products are considered to be derived
from the lease of such agricultural or horticultural products. However,
any portion of the lease income that is attributable to services or
non-qualified property as defined in paragraph (j)(3) of this section
is not derived from the lease of agricultural or horticultural
products.
(iii) Income substitutes. The proceeds from business interruption
insurance, governmental subsidies, and governmental payments not to
produce are treated as gross receipts derived from the lease, rental,
license, sale, exchange, or other disposition to the extent they are
substitutes for gross receipts that would qualify as DPGR.
(iv) Exchange of property--(A) Taxable exchanges. The value of
property received by the Specified Cooperative in a taxable exchange of
agricultural or horticultural products MPGE in whole or in significant
part by the Specified Cooperative within the United States is DPGR for
the Specified Cooperative (assuming all the other requirements of this
section are met). However, unless the Specified Cooperative meets all
of the requirements under this section with respect to any additional
MPGE by the Specified Cooperative of the agricultural or horticultural
products received in the taxable exchange, any gross receipts derived
from the sale by the Specified Cooperative of the property received in
the taxable exchange are non-DPGR, because the Specified Cooperative
did not MPGE such property, even if the property was an agricultural or
horticultural product in the hands of the other party to the
transaction.
(B) Safe harbor. For purposes of paragraph (j)(1)(iv)(A) of this
section, the gross receipts derived by the Specified Cooperative from
the sale of eligible property (as defined in paragraph (j)(1)(iv)(C) of
this section) received in a taxable exchange, net of any adjustments
between the parties involved in the taxable exchange to account for
differences in the eligible property exchanged (for example, location
differentials and product differentials), may be treated as the value
of the eligible property received by the Specified Cooperative in the
taxable exchange. For purposes of the preceding sentence, the taxable
exchange is deemed to occur on the date of the sale of the eligible
property received in the taxable exchange by the Specified Cooperative,
to the extent the sale occurs no later than the last day of the month
following the month in which the exchanged eligible property is
received by the Specified Cooperative. In addition, if the Specified
Cooperative engages in any further MPGE activity with respect to the
eligible property received in the taxable exchange, then, unless the
Specified Cooperative meets the in-whole-or-in-significant-part
requirement under paragraph (h)(1) of this section with respect to the
property sold, for purposes of this paragraph (j)(1)(iv)(B), the
Specified Cooperative must also value the property sold without taking
into account the gross receipts attributable to the further MPGE
activity.
(C) Eligible property. For purposes of paragraph (j)(1)(iv)(B) of
this section, eligible property is--
(1) Oil, natural gas, or petrochemicals, or products derived from
oil, natural gas, or petrochemicals; or
(2) Any other property or product designated by publication in the
Internal Revenue Bulletin (see Sec. 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of this
chapter).
(3) For this purpose, the term natural gas includes only natural
gas extracted from a natural deposit and does not include, for example,
methane gas extracted from a landfill. In the case of natural gas,
production activities include all activities involved in extracting
natural gas from the ground and processing the gas into pipeline
quality gas.
(2) Hedging transactions--(i) In general. For purposes of this
section, if a transaction is a hedging transaction within the meaning
of section 1221(b)(2)(A) and Sec. 1.1221-2(b), is properly identified
as a hedging transaction in accordance with Sec. 1.1221-2(f), and the
risk being hedged relates to property described in section 1221(a)(1)
that gives rise to DPGR or to property described in section 1221(a)(8)
that is consumed in an activity that gives rise to DPGR, then--
(A) In the case of a hedge of purchases of property described in
section
[[Page 28695]]
1221(a)(1), income, deduction, gain, or loss on the hedging transaction
must be taken into account in determining COGS;
(B) In the case of a hedge of sales of property described in
section 1221(a)(1), income, deduction, gain, or loss on the hedging
transaction must be taken into account in determining DPGR; and
(C) In the case of a hedge of purchases of property described in
section 1221(a)(8), income, deduction, gain, or loss on the hedging
transaction must be taken into account in determining DPGR.
(ii) Allocation. The income, deduction, gain and loss from hedging
transactions described in paragraph (j)(2) of this section must be
allocated between the patronage and nonpatronage (defined in Sec.
1.1388-1(f)) sourced income and related deductions of the Specified
Cooperatives consistent with the cooperative's method for determining
patronage and nonpatronage income and deductions.
(iii) Effect of identification and nonidentification. The
principles of Sec. 1.1221-2(g) apply to a Specified Cooperative that
identifies or fails to identify a transaction as a hedging transaction,
except that the consequence of identifying as a hedging transaction a
transaction that is not in fact a hedging transaction described in
paragraph (j)(2) of this section, or of failing to identify a
transaction that the Specified Cooperative has no reasonable grounds
for treating as other than a hedging transaction described in paragraph
(j)(2) of this section, is that deduction or loss (but not income or
gain) from the transaction is taken into account under paragraph (j)(2)
of this section.
(iv) Other rules. See Sec. 1.1221-2(e) for rules applicable to
hedging by members of a consolidated group and Sec. 1.446-4 for rules
regarding the timing of income, deductions, gains or losses with
respect to hedging transactions.
(3) Allocation of gross receipts to embedded services and non-
qualified property--(i) Embedded services and non-qualified property--
(A) In general. Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (j)(3)(i)(B)
of this section, gross receipts derived from the performance of
services do not qualify as DPGR. In the case of an embedded service,
that is, a service the price of which, in the normal course of the
business, is not separately stated from the amount charged for the
lease, rental, license, sale, exchange, or other disposition of
agricultural or horticultural products, DPGR includes only the gross
receipts derived from the lease, rental, license, sale, exchange, or
other disposition of agricultural or horticultural products (assuming
all the other requirements of this section are met) and not any
receipts attributable to the embedded service. In addition, DPGR does
not include gross receipts derived from the lease, rental, license,
sale, exchange, or other disposition of property that does not meet all
of the requirements under this section (non-qualified property). The
allocation of the gross receipts attributable to the embedded services
or non-qualified property will be deemed to be reasonable if the
allocation reflects the fair market value of the embedded services or
non-qualified property.
(B) Exceptions. There are five exceptions to the rules under
paragraph (j)(3)(i)(A) of this section regarding embedded services and
non-qualified property. A Specified Cooperative may include in DPGR, if
all the other requirements of this section are met with respect to the
underlying item of agricultural or horticultural products to which the
embedded services or non-qualified property relate, the gross receipts
derived from--
(1) A qualified warranty, that is, a warranty that is provided in
connection with the lease, rental, license, sale, exchange, or other
disposition of agricultural or horticultural products if, in the normal
course of the Specified Cooperative's business--
(i) The price for the warranty is not separately stated from the
amount charged for the lease, rental, license, sale, exchange, or other
disposition of the agricultural or horticultural products; and
(ii) The warranty is neither separately offered by the Specified
Cooperative nor separately bargained for with customers (that is, a
customer cannot purchase the agricultural or horticultural products
without the warranty);
(2) A qualified delivery, that is, a delivery or distribution
service that is provided in connection with the lease, rental, license,
sale, exchange, or other disposition of agricultural or horticultural
products if, in the normal course of the Specified Cooperative's
business--
(i) The price for the delivery or distribution service is not
separately stated from the amount charged for the lease, rental,
license, sale, exchange, or other disposition of the agricultural or
horticultural products; and
(ii) The delivery or distribution service is neither separately
offered by the Specified Cooperative nor separately bargained for with
customers (that is, a customer cannot purchase the agricultural or
horticultural products without the delivery or distribution service).
(3) A qualified operating manual, that is, a manual of instructions
that is provided in connection with the lease, rental, license, sale,
exchange, or other disposition of the agricultural or horticultural
products if, in the normal course of the Specified Cooperative's
business--
(i) The price for the manual is not separately stated from the
amount charged for the lease, rental, license, sale, exchange, or other
disposition of the agricultural or horticultural products;
(ii) The manual is neither separately offered by the Specified
Cooperative nor separately bargained for with customers (that is, a
customer cannot purchase the agricultural or horticultural products
without the manual); and
(iii) The manual is not provided in connection with a training
course for customers.
(4) A qualified installation, that is, an installation service for
agricultural or horticultural products that is provided in connection
with the lease, rental, license, sale, exchange, or other disposition
of the agricultural or horticultural products if, in the normal course
of the Specified Cooperative's business--
(i) The price for the installation service is not separately stated
from the amount charged for the lease, rental, license, sale, exchange,
or other disposition of the agricultural or horticultural products; and
(ii) The installation is neither separately offered by the
Specified Cooperative nor separately bargained for with customers (that
is, a customer cannot purchase the agricultural or horticultural
products without the installation service).
(5) A de minimis amount of gross receipts from embedded services
and non-qualified property for each item of agricultural or
horticultural products may qualify. For purposes of this exception, a
de minimis amount of gross receipts from embedded services and non-
qualified property is less than 5 percent of the total gross receipts
derived from the lease, rental, license, sale, exchange, or other
disposition of each item of agricultural or horticultural products. In
the case of gross receipts derived from the lease, rental, license,
sale, exchange, or other disposition of agricultural or horticultural
products that are received over a period of time (for example, a multi-
year lease or installment sale), this de minimis exception is applied
by taking into account the total gross receipts for the entire period
derived (and to be derived) from the lease, rental, license, sale,
exchange, or other disposition of the
[[Page 28696]]
item of agricultural or horticultural products. For purposes of the
preceding sentence, if a Specified Cooperative treats gross receipts as
DPGR under this de minimis exception, then the Specified Cooperative
must treat the gross receipts recognized in each taxable year
consistently as DPGR. The gross receipts that the Specified Cooperative
treats as DPGR under paragraphs (j)(3)(i)(B)(1) through (4) of this
section are treated as DPGR for purposes of applying this de minimis
exception. This de minimis exception does not apply if the price of a
service or non-qualified property is separately stated by the Specified
Cooperative, or if the service or non-qualified property is separately
offered or separately bargained for with the customer (that is, the
customer can purchase the agricultural or horticultural products
without the service or non-qualified property).
(ii) Non-DPGR. Applicable gross receipts as provided in Sec. Sec.
1.199A-8(b) and/or (c) derived from the lease, rental, license, sale,
exchange or other disposition of an item of agricultural or
horticultural products may be treated as non-DPGR if less than 5
percent of the Specified Cooperative's total gross receipts derived
from the lease, rental, license, sale, exchange or other disposition of
that item are DPGR (taking into account embedded services and non-
qualified property included in such disposition, but not part of the
item). In the case of gross receipts derived from the lease, rental,
license, sale, exchange, or other disposition of agricultural or
horticultural products that are received over a period of time (for
example, a multi-year lease or installment sale), this paragraph
(j)(5)(ii) is applied by taking into account the total gross receipts
for the entire period derived (and to be derived) from the lease,
rental, license, sale, exchange, or other disposition of the item of
agricultural or horticultural products. For purposes of the preceding
sentence, if the Specified Cooperative treats gross receipts as non-
DPGR under this de minimis exception, then the Specified Cooperative
must treat the gross receipts recognized in each taxable year
consistently as non-DPGR.
(k) Applicability date. The provisions of this section apply to
taxable years ending after the date the Treasury decision adopting
these regulations as final regulations is published in the Federal
Register. Taxpayers, however, may rely on these regulations until that
date, but only if the taxpayers apply the rules in their entirety and
in a consistent manner.
Sec. 1.199A-10 Allocation of costs of goods sold (COGS) and other
deductions to domestic production gross receipts (DPGR), and other
rules.
(a) In general. The provisions of this section apply solely for
purposes of section 199A(g) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code). The
provisions of this section provide additional guidance on determining
qualified production activities income (QPAI) as described and defined
in Sec. 1.199A-8(b)(4)(ii).
(b) COGS allocable to DPGR--(1) In general. When determining its
QPAI, the Specified Cooperative (defined in Sec. 1.199A-8(a)(2)) must
subtract from its DPGR (defined in Sec. 1.199A-8(b)(3)(ii)) the COGS
allocable to its DPGR. The Specified Cooperative determines its COGS
allocable to DPGR in accordance with this paragraph (b)(1) or, if
applicable, paragraph (f) of this section. In the case of a sale,
exchange, or other disposition of inventory, COGS is equal to beginning
inventory of the Specified Cooperative plus purchases and production
costs incurred during the taxable year and included in inventory costs
by the Specified Cooperative, less ending inventory of the Specified
Cooperative. In determining its QPAI, the Specified Cooperative does
not include in COGS any payment made, whether during the taxable year,
or included in beginning inventory, for which a deduction is allowed
under section 1382(b) and/or (c), as applicable. See Sec. 1.199A-
8(b)(4)(C). COGS is determined under the methods of accounting that the
Specified Cooperative uses to compute taxable income. See sections
263A, 471, and 472. If section 263A requires the Specified Cooperative
to include additional section 263A costs (as defined in Sec. 1.263A-
1(d)(3)) in inventory, additional section 263A costs must be included
in determining COGS. COGS also includes the Specified Cooperative's
inventory valuation adjustments such as write-downs under the lower of
cost or market method. In the case of a sale, exchange, or other
disposition (including, for example, theft, casualty, or abandonment)
by the Specified Cooperative of non-inventory property, COGS for
purposes of this section includes the adjusted basis of the property.
(2) Allocating COGS--(i) In general. A Specified Cooperative must
use a reasonable method based on all the facts and circumstances to
allocate COGS between DPGR and non-DPGR. Whether an allocation method
is reasonable is based on all the facts and circumstances, including
whether the Specified Cooperative uses the most accurate information
available; the relationship between COGS and the method used; the
accuracy of the method chosen as compared with other possible methods;
whether the method is used by the Specified Cooperative for internal
management or other business purposes; whether the method is used for
other Federal or state income tax purposes; the availability of costing
information; the time, burden, and cost of using alternative methods;
and whether the Specified Cooperative applies the method consistently
from year to year. Depending on the facts and circumstances, reasonable
methods may include methods based on gross receipts (defined in Sec.
1.199A-8(b)(2)(iii)), number of units sold, number of units produced,
or total production costs. Ordinarily, if a Specified Cooperative uses
a method to allocate gross receipts between DPGR and non-DPGR, then the
use of a different method to allocate COGS that is not demonstrably
more accurate than the method used to allocate gross receipts will not
be considered reasonable. However, if a Specified Cooperative has
information readily available to specifically identify COGS allocable
to DPGR and can specifically identify that amount without undue burden
or expense, COGS allocable to DPGR is that amount irrespective of
whether the Specified Cooperative uses another allocation method to
allocate gross receipts between DPGR and non-DPGR. A Specified
Cooperative that does not have information readily available to
specifically identify COGS allocable to DPGR and that cannot, without
undue burden or expense, specifically identify that amount is not
required to use a method that specifically identifies COGS allocable to
DPGR. The chosen reasonable method must be consistently applied from
one taxable year to another and must clearly reflect the portion of
COGS between DPGR and non-DPGR. The method must also be reasonable
based on all the facts and circumstances. The books and records
maintained for COGS must be consistent with any allocations under this
paragraph (b)(2).
(ii) Gross receipts recognized in an earlier taxable year. If the
Specified Cooperative (other than a Specified Cooperative that uses the
small business simplified overall method of paragraph (f) of this
section) recognizes and reports gross receipts on a Federal income tax
return for a taxable year, and incurs COGS related to such gross
receipts in a subsequent taxable year, then regardless of whether the
gross receipts ultimately qualify as DPGR, the
[[Page 28697]]
Specified Cooperative must allocate the COGS to--
(A) DPGR if the Specified Cooperative identified the related gross
receipts as DPGR in the prior taxable year; or
(B) Non-DPGR if the Specified Cooperative identified the related
gross receipts as non-DPGR in the prior taxable year or if the
Specified Cooperative recognized under the Specified Cooperative's
methods of accounting those gross receipts in a taxable year to which
section 199A(g) does not apply.
(iii) COGS associated with activities undertaken in an earlier
taxable year--(A) In general. A Specified Cooperative must allocate its
COGS between DPGR and non-DPGR under the rules provided in paragraphs
(b)(2)(i) and (iii) of this section, regardless of whether certain
costs included in its COGS can be associated with activities undertaken
in an earlier taxable year (including a year prior to the effective
date of section 199A(g)). A Specified Cooperative may not segregate its
COGS into component costs and allocate those component costs between
DPGR and non-DPGR.
(B) Example. The following example illustrates an application of
paragraph (b)(2)(iii)(A) of this section.
(1) Example. During the 2018 taxable year, nonexempt Specified
Cooperative X grew and sold Horticultural Product A. All of the
patronage gross receipts from sales recognized by X in 2018 were
from the sale of Horticultural Product A and qualified as DPGR.
Employee 1 of X was involved in X's production process until he
retired in 2013. In 2018, X paid $30 directly from its general
assets for Employee 1's medical expenses pursuant to an unfunded,
self-insured plan for retired X employees. For purposes of computing
X's 2018 taxable income, X capitalized those medical costs to
inventory under section 263A. In 2018, the COGS for a unit of
Horticultural Product A was $100 (including the applicable portion
of the $30 paid for Employee 1's medical costs that was allocated to
COGS under X's allocation method for additional section 263A costs).
X has information readily available to specifically identify COGS
allocable to DPGR and can identify that amount without undue burden
and expense because all of X's gross receipts from sales in 2018 are
attributable to the sale of Horticultural Product A and qualify as
DPGR. The inventory cost of each unit of Horticultural Product A
sold in 2018, including the applicable portion of retiree medical
costs, is related to X's gross receipts from the sale of
Horticultural Product A in 2018. X may not segregate the 2018 COGS
by separately allocating the retiree medical costs, which are
components of COGS, to DPGR and non-DPGR. Thus, even though the
retiree medical costs can be associated with activities undertaken
in prior years, $100 of inventory cost of each unit of Horticultural
Product A sold in 2018, including the applicable portion of the
retiree medical expense cost component, is allocable to DPGR in
2018.
(3) Special allocation rules. Section 199A(g)(3)(C) provides the
following two special rules--
(i) For purposes of determining the COGS that are allocable to
DPGR, any item or service brought into the United States (defined in
Sec. 1.199A-9(i)) is treated as acquired by purchase, and its cost is
treated as not less than its value immediately after it entered the
United States. A similar rule applies in determining the adjusted basis
of leased or rented property where the lease or rental gives rise to
DPGR.
(ii) In the case of any property described in paragraph (b)(3)(i)
of this section that has been exported by the Specified Cooperative for
further manufacture, the increase in cost or adjusted basis under
paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this section cannot exceed the difference
between the value of the property when exported and the value of the
property when brought back into the United States after the further
manufacture. For the purposes of this paragraph (b)(3), the value of
property is its customs value as defined in section 1059A(b)(1).
(4) Rules for inventories valued at market or bona fide selling
prices. If part of COGS is attributable to the Specified Cooperative's
inventory valuation adjustments, then COGS allocable to DPGR includes
inventory adjustments to agricultural or horticultural products that
are MPGE in whole or significant part within the United States.
Accordingly, a Specified Cooperative that values its inventory under
Sec. 1.471-4 (inventories at cost or market, whichever is lower) or
Sec. 1.471-2(c) (subnormal goods at bona fide selling prices) must
allocate a proper share of such adjustments (for example, write-downs)
to DPGR based on a reasonable method based on all the facts and
circumstances. Factors taken into account in determining whether the
method is reasonable include whether the Specified Cooperative uses the
most accurate information available; the relationship between the
adjustment and the allocation base chosen; the accuracy of the method
chosen as compared with other possible methods; whether the method is
used by the Specified Cooperative for internal management or other
business purposes; whether the method is used for other Federal or
state income tax purposes; the time, burden, and cost of using
alternative methods; and whether the Specified Cooperative applies the
method consistently from year to year. If the Specified Cooperative has
information readily available to specifically identify the proper
amount of inventory valuation adjustments allocable to DPGR, then the
Specified Cooperative must allocate that amount to DPGR. The Specified
Cooperative that does not have information readily available to
specifically identify the proper amount of its inventory valuation
adjustments allocable to DPGR and that cannot, without undue burden or
expense, specifically identify the proper amount of its inventory
valuation adjustments allocable to DPGR, is not required to use a
method that specifically identifies inventory valuation adjustments to
DPGR. The chosen reasonable method must be consistently applied from
one taxable year to another and must clearly reflect inventory
adjustments. The method must also be reasonable based on all the facts
and circumstances. The books and records maintained for inventory
adjustments must be consistent with any allocations under this
paragraph (b)(4).
(5) Rules applicable to inventories accounted for under the last-
in, first-out inventory method--(i) In general. This paragraph (b)(5)
applies to inventories accounted for using the specific goods last-in,
first-out (LIFO) method or the dollar-value LIFO method. Whenever a
specific goods grouping or a dollar-value pool contains agricultural or
horticultural products that produce DPGR and goods that do not, the
Specified Cooperative must allocate COGS attributable to that grouping
or pool between DPGR and non-DPGR using a reasonable method based on
all the facts and circumstances. Whether a method of allocating COGS
between DPGR and non-DPGR is reasonable must be determined in
accordance with paragraph (b)(2) of this section. In addition, this
paragraph (b)(5) provides methods that a Specified Cooperative may use
to allocate COGS for a Specified Cooperative's inventories accounted
for using the LIFO method. If the Specified Cooperative uses the LIFO/
FIFO ratio method provided in paragraph (b)(5)(ii) of this section or
the change in relative base-year cost method provided in paragraph
(b)(5)(iii) of this section, then the Specified Cooperative must use
that method for all of the Specified Cooperative's inventory accounted
for under the LIFO method. The chosen reasonable method must be
consistently applied from one taxable year to another and must clearly
reflect the inventory method. The method must also be reasonable based
on all the facts and circumstances. The books and records maintained
for the inventory
[[Page 28698]]
method must be consistent with any allocations under this paragraph
(b)(5).
(ii) LIFO/FIFO ratio method. The LIFO/FIFO ratio method is applied
with respect to the LIFO inventory on a grouping-by-grouping or pool-
by-pool basis. Under the LIFO/FIFO ratio method, a Specified
Cooperative computes the COGS of a grouping or pool allocable to DPGR
by multiplying the COGS of agricultural or horticultural products
(defined in Sec. 1.199A-8(a)(4)) in the grouping or pool that produced
DPGR computed using the FIFO method by the LIFO/FIFO ratio of the
grouping or pool. The LIFO/FIFO ratio of a grouping or pool is equal to
the total COGS of the grouping or pool computed using the LIFO method
over the total COGS of the grouping or pool computed using the FIFO
method.
(iii) Change in relative base-year cost method. A Specified
Cooperative using the dollar-value LIFO method may use the change in
relative base-year cost method. The change in relative base-year cost
method for a Specified Cooperative using the dollar-value LIFO method
is applied to all LIFO inventory on a pool-by-pool basis. The change in
relative base-year cost method determines the COGS allocable to DPGR by
increasing or decreasing the total production costs (section 471 costs
and additional section 263A costs) of agricultural or horticultural
products that generate DPGR by a portion of any increment or
liquidation of the dollar-value pool. The portion of an increment or
liquidation allocable to DPGR is determined by multiplying the LIFO
value of the increment or liquidation (expressed as a positive number)
by the ratio of the change in total base-year cost (expressed as a
positive number) of agricultural or horticultural products that will
generate DPGR in ending inventory to the change in total base-year cost
(expressed as a positive number) of all goods in ending inventory. The
portion of an increment or liquidation allocable to DPGR may be zero
but cannot exceed the amount of the increment or liquidation. Thus, a
ratio in excess of 1.0 must be treated as 1.0.
(6) Specified Cooperative using a simplified method for additional
section 263A costs to ending inventory. A Specified Cooperative that
uses a simplified method specifically described in the section 263A
regulations to allocate additional section 263A costs to ending
inventory must follow the rules in paragraph (b)(2) of this section to
determine the amount of additional section 263A costs allocable to
DPGR. Allocable additional section 263A costs include additional
section 263A costs included in the Specified Cooperative's beginning
inventory as well as additional section 263A costs incurred during the
taxable year by the Specified Cooperative. Ordinarily, if the Specified
Cooperative uses a simplified method specifically described in the
section 263A regulations to allocate its additional section 263A costs
to its ending inventory, the additional section 263A costs must be
allocated in the same proportion as section 471 costs are allocated.
(c) Other deductions properly allocable to DPGR or gross income
attributable to DPGR--(1) In general. In determining its QPAI, the
Specified Cooperative must subtract from its DPGR (in addition to the
COGS), the deductions that are properly allocable and apportioned to
DPGR. A Specified Cooperative generally must allocate and apportion
these deductions using the rules of the section 861 method provided in
paragraph (d) of this section. In lieu of the section 861 method, an
eligible Specified Cooperative may apportion these deductions using the
simplified deduction method provided in paragraph (e) of this section.
Paragraph (f) of this section provides a small business simplified
overall method that may be used by a qualifying small Specified
Cooperative. A Specified Cooperative using the simplified deduction
method or the small business simplified overall method must use that
method for all deductions. A Specified Cooperative eligible to use the
small business simplified overall method may choose at any time for any
taxable year to use the small business simplified overall method or the
simplified deduction method for a taxable year.
(2) Treatment of net operating losses. A deduction under section
172 for a net operating loss (NOL) is not allocated or apportioned to
DPGR or gross income attributable to DPGR.
(3) W-2 wages. Although only W-2 wages as described in Sec.
1.199A-11 are taken into account in computing the W-2 wage limitation,
all wages paid (or incurred in the case of an accrual method taxpayer)
in the taxable year are taken into account in computing QPAI for that
taxable year.
(d) Section 861 method. Under the section 861 method, the Specified
Cooperative must allocate and apportion its deductions using the
allocation and apportionment rules provided under the section 861
regulations under which section 199A(g) is treated as an operative
section described in Sec. 1.861-8(f). Accordingly, the Specified
Cooperative applies the rules of the section 861 regulations to
allocate and apportion deductions (including, if applicable, its
distributive share of deductions from passthrough entities) to gross
income attributable to DPGR. If the Specified Cooperative applies the
allocation and apportionment rules of the section 861 regulations for
section 199A(g) and another operative section, then the Specified
Cooperative must use the same method of allocation and the same
principles of apportionment for purposes of all operative sections.
Research and experimental expenditures must be allocated and
apportioned in accordance with Sec. 1.861-17 without taking into
account the exclusive apportionment rule of Sec. 1.861-17(b).
Deductions for charitable contributions (as allowed under section 170
and section 873(b)(2) or 882(c)(1)(B)) must be ratably apportioned
between gross income attributable to DPGR and gross income attributable
to non-DPGR based on the relative amounts of gross income.
(e) Simplified deduction method--(1) In general. An eligible
Specified Cooperative (defined in paragraph (e)(2) of this section) may
use the simplified deduction method to apportion business deductions
between DPGR and non-DPGR. The simplified deduction method does not
apply to COGS. Under the simplified deduction method, the business
deductions (except the NOL deduction) are ratably apportioned between
DPGR and non-DPGR based on relative gross receipts. Accordingly, the
amount of deductions for the current taxable year apportioned to DPGR
is equal to the proportion of the total business deductions for the
current taxable year that the amount of DPGR bears to total gross
receipts.
(2) Eligible Specified Cooperative. For purposes of this paragraph
(e), an eligible Specified Cooperative is--
(i) A Specified Cooperative that has average annual total gross
receipts (as defined in paragraph (g) of this section) of $100,000,000
or less; or
(ii) A Specified Cooperative that has total assets (as defined in
paragraph (e)(3) of this section) of $10,000,000 or less.
(3) Total assets.--(i) In general. For purposes of the simplified
deduction method, total assets mean the total assets the Specified
Cooperative has at the end of the taxable year.
(ii) Members of an expanded affiliated group. To compute the total
assets of an expanded affiliated group (EAG) at the end of the taxable
year, the total assets at the end of the taxable year of each member of
the EAG at the end of the taxable year that ends with or within the
taxable year of the computing member
[[Page 28699]]
(as described in Sec. 1.199A-12(g)) are aggregated.
(4) Members of an expanded affiliated group--(i) In general.
Whether the members of an EAG may use the simplified deduction method
is determined by reference to all the members of the EAG. If the
average annual gross receipts of the EAG are less than or equal to
$100,000,000 or the total assets of the EAG are less than or equal to
$10,000,000, then each member of the EAG may individually determine
whether to use the simplified deduction method, regardless of the cost
allocation method used by the other members.
(ii) Exception. Notwithstanding paragraph (e)(4)(i) of this
section, all members of the same consolidated group must use the same
cost allocation method.
(f) Small business simplified overall method--(1) In general. A
qualifying small Specified Cooperative may use the small business
simplified overall method to apportion COGS and deductions between DPGR
and non-DPGR. Under the small business simplified overall method, a
Specified Cooperative's total costs for the current taxable year (as
defined in paragraph (f)(3) of this section) are apportioned between
DPGR and non-DPGR based on relative gross receipts. Accordingly, the
amount of total costs for the current taxable year apportioned to DPGR
is equal to the proportion of total costs for the current taxable year
that the amount of DPGR bears to total gross receipts.
(2) Qualifying small Specified Cooperative. For purposes of this
paragraph (f), a qualifying small Specified Cooperative is a Specified
Cooperative that has average annual total gross receipts (as defined in
paragraph (g) of this section) of $25,000,000 or less.
(3) Total costs for the current taxable year. For purposes of the
small business simplified overall method, total costs for the current
taxable year means the total COGS and deductions for the current
taxable year. Total costs for the current taxable year are determined
under the methods of accounting that the Specified Cooperative uses to
compute taxable income.
(4) Members of an expanded affiliated group--(i) In general.
Whether the members of an EAG may use the small business simplified
overall method is determined by reference to all the members of the
EAG. If the average annual gross receipts of the EAG are less than or
equal to $25,000,000 then each member of the EAG may individually
determine whether to use the small business simplified overall method,
regardless of the cost allocation method used by the other members.
(ii) Exception. Notwithstanding paragraph (f)(4)(i) of this
section, all members of the same consolidated group must use the same
cost allocation method.
(g) Average annual gross receipts--(1) In general. For purposes of
the simplified deduction method and the small business simplified
overall method, average annual gross receipts means the average annual
gross receipts of the Specified Cooperative for the 3 taxable years
(or, if fewer, the taxable years during which the taxpayer was in
existence) preceding the current taxable year, even if one or more of
such taxable years began before the effective date of section 199A(g).
In the case of any taxable year of less than 12 months (a short taxable
year), the gross receipts of the Specified Cooperative are annualized
by multiplying the gross receipts for the short period by 12 and
dividing the result by the number of months in the short period.
(2) Members of an expanded affiliated group--(i) In general. To
compute the average annual gross receipts of an EAG, the gross receipts
for the entire taxable year of each member that is a member of the EAG
at the end of its taxable year that ends with or within the taxable
year are aggregated. For purposes of this paragraph (g)(2), a
consolidated group is treated as one member of an EAG.
(ii) Exception. Notwithstanding paragraph (g)(1)(i) of this
section, all members of the same consolidated group must use the same
cost allocation method.
(h) Cost allocation methods for determining oil-related QPAI--(1)
Section 861 method. A Specified Cooperative that uses the section 861
method to determine deductions that are allocated and apportioned to
gross income attributable to DPGR must use the section 861 method to
determine deductions that are allocated and apportioned to gross income
attributable to oil-related DPGR.
(2) Simplified deduction method. A Specified Cooperative that uses
the simplified deduction method to apportion deductions between DPGR
and non-DPGR must determine the portion of deductions allocable to oil-
related DPGR by multiplying the deductions allocable to DPGR by the
ratio of oil-related DPGR to DPGR from all activities.
(3) Small business simplified overall method. A Specified
Cooperative that uses the small business simplified overall method to
apportion total costs (COGS and deductions) between DPGR and non-DPGR
must determine the portion of total costs allocable to oil-related DPGR
by multiplying the total costs allocable to DPGR by the ratio of oil-
related DPGR to DPGR from all activities.
(i) Applicability date. The provisions of this section apply to
taxable years ending after the date the Treasury decision adopting
these regulations as final regulations is published in the Federal
Register. Taxpayers, however, may rely on these regulations until that
date, but only if the taxpayers apply the rules in their entirety and
in a consistent manner.
Sec. 1.199A-11 Wage limitation for the section 199A(g) deduction.
(a) Rules of application--(1) In general. The provisions of this
section apply solely for purposes of section 199A(g) of the Internal
Revenue Code (Code). The provisions of this section provide guidance on
determining the W-2 wage limitation as defined in Sec. 1.199A-
8(b)(5)(ii)(B). Except as provided in paragraph (d)(2) of this section,
the Form W-2, Wage and Tax Statement, or any subsequent form or
document used in determining the amount of W-2 wages, are those issued
for the calendar year ending during the taxable year of the Specified
Cooperative (defined in Sec. 1.199A-8(a)(2)) for wages paid to
employees (or former employees) of the Specified Cooperative for
employment by the Specified Cooperative. Employees are limited to
employees defined in section 3121(d)(1) and (2) (that is, officers of a
corporate taxpayer and employees of the taxpayer under the common law
rules). See paragraph (a)(5) of this section for the requirement that
W-2 wages must have been included in a return filed with the Social
Security Administration (SSA) within 60 days after the due date
(including extensions) of the return. See also section 199A(a)(4)(C).
(2) Wage limitation for section 199A(g) deduction. The amount of
the deduction allowable under section 199A(g) to the Specified
Cooperative for any taxable year cannot exceed 50 percent of the W-2
wages (as defined in section 199A(g)(1)(B)(ii) and paragraph (b) of
this section) for the taxable year that are attributable to domestic
production gross receipts (DPGR), defined in Sec. 1.199A-8(b)(3)(ii),
of agricultural or horticultural products defined in Sec. 1.199A-
8(a)(4).
(3) Wages paid by entity other than common law employer. In
determining W-2 wages, the Specified Cooperative may take into account
any W-2 wages paid by another entity and reported by the other entity
on Forms W-2 with the other entity as the employer listed in
[[Page 28700]]
Box c of the Forms W-2, provided that the W-2 wages were paid to common
law employees or officers of the Specified Cooperative for employment
by the Specified Cooperative. In such cases, the entity paying the W-2
wages and reporting the W-2 wages on Forms W-2 is precluded from taking
into account such wages for purposes of determining W-2 wages with
respect to that entity. For purposes of this paragraph (a)(4), entities
that pay and report W-2 wages on behalf of or with respect to other
taxpayers can include, but are not limited to, certified professional
employer organizations under section 7705, statutory employers under
section 3401(d)(1), and agents under section 3504.
(4) Requirement that wages must be reported on return filed with
the Social Security Administration--(i) In general. Pursuant to section
199A(g)(1)(B)(ii) and section 199A(b)(4)(C), the term W-2 wages does
not include any amount that is not properly included in a return filed
with SSA on or before the 60th day after the due date (including
extensions) for such return. Under Sec. 31.6051-2 of this chapter,
each Form W-2 and the transmittal Form W-3, Transmittal of Wage and Tax
Statements, together constitute an information return to be filed with
SSA. Similarly, each Form W-2c, Corrected Wage and Tax Statement, and
the transmittal Form W-3 or W-3c, Transmittal of Corrected Wage and Tax
Statements, together constitute an information return to be filed with
SSA. In determining whether any amount has been properly included in a
return filed with SSA on or before the 60th day after the due date
(including extensions) for such return, each Form W-2 together with its
accompanying Form W-3 is considered a separate information return and
each Form W-2c together with its accompanying Form W-3 or Form W-3c is
considered a separate information return. Section 6071(c) provides that
Forms W-2 and W-3 must be filed on or before January 31 of the year
following the calendar year to which such returns relate (but see the
special rule in Sec. 31.6071(a)-1T(a)(3)(1) of this chapter for
monthly returns filed under Sec. 31.6011(a)-5(a) of this chapter).
Corrected Forms W-2 are required to be filed with SSA on or before
January 31 of the year following the year in which the correction is
made.
(ii) Corrected return filed to correct a return that was filed
within 60 days of the due date. If a corrected information return
(Return B) is filed with SSA on or before the 60th day after the due
date (including extensions) of Return B to correct an information
return (Return A) that was filed with SSA on or before the 60th day
after the due date (including extensions) of the information return
(Return A) and paragraph (a)(5)(iii) of this section does not apply,
then the wage information on Return B must be included in determining
W-2 wages. If a corrected information return (Return D) is filed with
SSA later than the 60th day after the due date (including extensions)
of Return D to correct an information return (Return C) that was filed
with SSA on or before the 60th day after the due date (including
extensions) of the information return (Return C), then if Return D
reports an increase (or increases) in wages included in determining W-2
wages from the wage amounts reported on Return C, such increase (or
increases) on Return D is disregarded in determining W-2 wages (and
only the wage amounts on Return C may be included in determining W-2
wages). If Return D reports a decrease (or decreases) in wages included
in determining W-2 wages from the amounts reported on Return C, then,
in determining W-2 wages, the wages reported on Return C must be
reduced by the decrease (or decreases) reflected on Return D.
(iii) Corrected return filed to correct a return that was filed
later than 60 days after the due date. If an information return (Return
F) is filed to correct an information return (Return E) that was not
filed with SSA on or before the 60th day after the due date (including
extensions) of Return E, then Return F (and any subsequent information
returns filed with respect to Return E) will not be considered filed on
or before the 60th day after the due date (including extensions) of
Return F (or the subsequent corrected information return). Thus, if a
Form W-2c is filed to correct a Form W-2 that was not filed with SSA on
or before the 60th day after the due date (including extensions) of the
Form W-2 (or to correct a Form W-2c relating to a Form W-2 that had not
been filed with SSA on or before the 60th day after the due date
(including extensions) of the Form W-2), then this Form W-2c is not to
be considered to have been filed with SSA on or before the 60th day
after the due date (including extensions) for this Form W-2c,
regardless of when the Form W-2c is filed.
(b) Definition of W-2 wages--(1) In general. Section
199A(g)(1)(B)(ii) provides that the W-2 wages of the Specified
Cooperative must be determined in the same manner as under section
199A(b)(4) (without regard to section 199A(b)(4)(B) and after
application of section 199A(b)(5)). Section 199A(b)(4)(A) provides that
the term W-2 wages means with respect to any person for any taxable
year of such person, the amounts described in paragraphs (3) and (8) of
section 6051(a) paid by such person with respect to employment of
employees by such person during the calendar year ending during such
taxable year. Thus, the term W-2 wages includes the total amount of
wages as defined in section 3401(a); the total amount of elective
deferrals (within the meaning of section 402(g)(3)); the compensation
deferred under section 457; and the amount of designated Roth
contributions (as defined in section 402A).
(2) Section 199A(g) deduction. Pursuant to section 199A(g)(3)(A),
W-2 wages do not include any amount which is not properly allocable to
DPGR for purposes of calculating qualified production activities income
(QPAI) as defined in Sec. 1.199A-8(b)(4)(ii). The Specified
Cooperative may determine the amount of wages that is properly
allocable to DPGR using a reasonable method based on all the facts and
circumstances. The chosen reasonable method must be consistently
applied from one taxable year to another and must clearly reflect the
wages allocable to DPGR for purposes of QPAI. The books and records
maintained for wages allocable to DPGR for purposes of QPAI must be
consistent with any allocations under this paragraph (b)(2).
(c) Methods for calculating W-2 wages. The Secretary may provide
for methods to be used in calculating W-2 wages, including W-2 wages
for short taxable years by publication in the Internal Revenue Bulletin
(see Sec. 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of this chapter).
(d) Wage limitation--acquisitions, dispositions, and short taxable
years--(1) In general. For purposes of computing the deduction under
section 199A(g) of the Specified Cooperative, in the case of an
acquisition or disposition (as defined in section 199A(b)(5) and
paragraph (d)(3) of this section) that causes more than one Specified
Cooperative to be an employer of the employees of the acquired or
disposed of Specified Cooperative during the calendar year, the W-2
wages of the Specified Cooperative for the calendar year of the
acquisition or disposition are allocated between or among each
Specified Cooperative based on the period during which the employees of
the acquired or disposed of Specified Cooperatives were employed by the
Specified Cooperative, regardless of which permissible method is used
for reporting predecessor and successor wages on Form W-2, Wage and Tax
Statement.
[[Page 28701]]
(2) Short taxable year that does not include December 31. If the
Specified Cooperative has a short taxable year that does not contain a
calendar year ending during such short taxable year, wages paid to
employees for employment by the Specified Cooperative during the short
taxable year are treated as W-2 wages for such short taxable year for
purposes of paragraph (a) of this section (if the wages would otherwise
meet the requirements to be W-2 wages under this section but for the
requirement that a calendar year must end during the short taxable
year).
(3) Acquisition or disposition. For purposes of paragraph (d)(1)
and (2) of this section, the terms acquisition and disposition include
an incorporation, a liquidation, a reorganization, or a purchase or
sale of assets.
(e) Application in the case of a Specified Cooperative with a short
taxable year. In the case of a Specified Cooperative with a short
taxable year, subject to the rules of paragraph (a) of this section,
the W-2 wages of the Specified Cooperative for the short taxable year
can include only those wages paid during the short taxable year to
employees of the Specified Cooperative, only those elective deferrals
(within the meaning of section 402(g)(3)) made during the short taxable
year by employees of the Specified Cooperative, and only compensation
actually deferred under section 457 during the short taxable year with
respect to employees of the Specified Cooperative.
(f) Non-duplication rule. Amounts that are treated as W-2 wages for
a taxable year under any method cannot be treated as W-2 wages of any
other taxable year. Also, an amount cannot be treated as W-2 wages by
more than one taxpayer. Finally, an amount cannot be treated as W-2
wages by the Specified Cooperative both in determining patronage and
nonpatronage W-2 wages.
(g) Wage expense safe harbor--(1) In general. A Specified
Cooperative using either the section 861 method of cost allocation
under Sec. 1.199A-10(d) or the simplified deduction method under Sec.
1.199A-10(e) may determine the amount of W-2 wages that are properly
allocable to DPGR for a taxable year by multiplying the amount of W-2
wages determined under paragraph (b)(1) of this section for the taxable
year by the ratio of the Specified Cooperative's wage expense included
in calculating QPAI for the taxable year to the Specified Cooperative's
total wage expense used in calculating the Specified Cooperative's
taxable income for the taxable year, without regard to any wage expense
disallowed by section 465, 469, 704(d), or 1366(d). A Specified
Cooperative that uses either the section 861 method of cost allocation
or the simplified deduction method to determine QPAI must use the same
expense allocation and apportionment methods that it uses to determine
QPAI to allocate and apportion wage expense for purposes of this safe
harbor. For purposes of this paragraph (g)(1), the term wage expense
means wages (that is, compensation paid by the employer in the active
conduct of a trade or business to its employees) that are properly
taken into account under the Specified Cooperative's method of
accounting.
(2) Wage expense included in cost of goods sold. For purposes of
paragraph (g)(1) of this section, a Specified Cooperative may determine
its wage expense included in cost of goods sold (COGS) using a
reasonable method based on all the facts and circumstances, such as
using the amount of direct labor included in COGS or using section 263A
labor costs (as defined in Sec. 1.263A-1(h)(4)(ii)) included in COGS.
The chosen reasonable method must be consistently applied from one
taxable year to another and must clearly reflect the portion of wage
expense included in COGS. The method must also be reasonable based on
all the facts and circumstances. The books and records maintained for
wage expense included in COGS must be consistent with any allocations
under this paragraph (g)(2).
(3) Small business simplified overall method safe harbor. The
Specified Cooperative that uses the small business simplified overall
method under Sec. 1.199A-10(f) may use the small business simplified
overall method safe harbor for determining the amount of W-2 wages
determined under paragraph (b)(1) of this section that is properly
allocable to DPGR. Under this safe harbor, the amount of W-2 wages
determined under paragraph (b)(1) of this section that is properly
allocable to DPGR is equal to the same proportion of W-2 wages
determined under paragraph (b)(1) of this section that the amount of
DPGR bears to the Specified Cooperative's total gross receipts.
(h) Applicability date. The provisions of this section apply to
taxable years ending after the date the Treasury decision adopting
these regulations as final regulations is published in the Federal
Register. Taxpayers, however, may rely on these regulations until that
date, but only if the taxpayers apply the rules in their entirety and
in a consistent manner.
Sec. 1.199A-12 Expanded affiliated groups.
(a) In general. The provisions of this section apply solely for
purposes of section 199A(g) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code). Except
as otherwise provided in the Code or regulations issued under the
relevant section of the Code (for example, sections 199A(g)(3)(D)(ii)
and 267, Sec. 1.199A-8(c), paragraph (a)(3) of this section, and the
consolidated return regulations under section 1502, each Specified
Cooperative whether exempt or nonexempt (as defined in Sec. 1.199A-
8(a)(2)(iii)) that is a member of an expanded affiliated group (EAG)
(defined in paragraph (a)(1) of this section) computes its own taxable
income or loss, qualified production activities income (QPAI) (defined
in Sec. 1.199A-8(b)(4)(ii)), and W-2 wages (defined in Sec. 1.199A-
11(b)). If a Specified Cooperative is also a member of a consolidated
group, see paragraph (d) of this section.
(1) Definition of an expanded affiliated group. An EAG is an
affiliated group as defined in section 1504(a), determined by
substituting ``more than 50 percent'' for ``at least 80 percent'' in
each place it appears and without regard to section 1504(b)(2) and (4).
(2) Identification of members of an expanded affiliated group--(i)
In general. Each Specified Cooperative must determine if it is a member
of an EAG on a daily basis.
(ii) Becoming or ceasing to be a member of an expanded affiliated
group. If a Specified Cooperative becomes or ceases to be a member of
an EAG, the Specified Cooperative is treated as becoming or ceasing to
be a member of the EAG at the end of the day on which its status as a
member changes.
(3) Attribution of activities--(i) In general. Except as provided
in paragraph (a)(3)(iv) of this section, if a Specified Cooperative
that is a member of an EAG (disposing member) derives gross receipts
(defined in Sec. 1.199A-8(b)(2)(iii)) from the lease, rental, license,
sale, exchange, or other disposition (defined in Sec. 1.199A-9(j)) of
agricultural or horticultural products (defined in Sec. 1.199A-
8(a)(4)) that were manufactured, produced, grown or extracted (MPGE)
(as defined in Sec. 1.199A-9(f)), in whole or significant part (as
defined in Sec. 1.199A-9(h)) in the United States (as defined in Sec.
1.199A-9(i)) by another Specified Cooperative, then the disposing
member is treated as conducting the previous activities conducted by
such other Specified Cooperative with respect to the agricultural or
horticultural products in determining whether its gross receipts
[[Page 28702]]
are domestic production gross receipts (DPGR) (defined in Sec. 1.199A-
8(b)(3)(ii)) if--
(A) Such property was MPGE by such other Specified Cooperative, and
(B) The disposing member is a member of the same EAG as such other
Specified Cooperative at the time that the disposing member disposes of
the agricultural or horticultural products.
(ii) Date of disposition for leases, rentals, or licenses. Except
as provided in paragraph (a)(3)(iv) of this section, with respect to a
lease, rental, or license, the disposing member described in paragraph
(a)(3)(i) of this section is treated as having disposed of the
agricultural or horticultural products on the date or dates on which it
takes into account the gross receipts derived from the lease, rental,
or license under its methods of accounting.
(iii) Date of disposition for sales, exchanges, or other
dispositions. Except as provided in paragraph (a)(3)(iv) of this
section, with respect to a sale, exchange, or other disposition, the
disposing member is treated as having disposed of the agricultural or
horticultural products on the date on which it ceases to own the
agricultural or horticultural products for Federal income tax purposes,
even if no gain or loss is taken into account.
(iv) Exception. Nonexempt Specified Cooperatives. A nonexempt
Specified Cooperative is not attributed nonpatronage activities
conducted by another Specified Cooperative. See Sec. 1.199A-
8(b)(2)(ii).
(4) Marketing Specified Cooperatives. A Specified Cooperative will
be treated as having MPGE in whole or significant part any agricultural
or horticultural product within the United States marketed by the
Specified Cooperative which its patrons have so MPGE. Patrons are
defined in Sec. 1.1388-1(e).
(5) Anti-avoidance rule. If a transaction between members of an EAG
is engaged in or structured with a principal purpose of qualifying for,
or increasing the amount of, the section 199A(g) deduction of the EAG
or the portion of the section 199A(g) deduction allocated to one or
more members of the EAG, the Secretary may make adjustments to
eliminate the effect of the transaction on the computation of the
section 199A(g) deduction.
(b) Computation of EAG's section 199A(g) deduction.--(1) In
general. The section 199A(g) deduction for an EAG is determined by
separately computing the section 199A(g) deduction from the patronage
sources of Specified Cooperatives that are members of the EAG and the
section 199A(g) deduction from the nonpatronage sources of exempt
Specified Cooperatives that are members of the EAG. The section 199A(g)
deduction from patronage sources of Specified Cooperatives is
determined by aggregating the income or loss, QPAI, and W-2 wages, if
any, of each patronage source of a Specified Cooperative that is a
member of the EAG (whether an exempt or nonexempt Specified
Cooperative). The section 199A(g) deduction from nonpatronage sources
of exempt Specified Cooperatives is determined by aggregating the
income or loss, QPAI, and W-2 wages, if any, of each nonpatronage
source of exempt Specified Cooperatives that are members of the EAG.
For purposes of this determination, a member's QPAI may be positive or
negative. A Specified Cooperative's taxable income or loss and QPAI
will be determined by reference to the Specified Cooperative's method
of accounting. For purposes of determining the section 199A(g)
deduction for an EAG, taxable income or loss, QPAI, and W-2 wages of a
nonexempt Specified Cooperative from nonpatronage sources are
considered to be zero. See Sec. 1.199A-8(b)(2)(ii).
(2) Example. The following examples illustrates the application of
paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
(i) Example. Nonexempt Specified Cooperatives X, Y, and Z,
calendar year taxpayers, are the only members of an EAG and are not
members of a consolidated group. X's patronage source has taxable
income of $50,000, QPAI of $15,000, and W-2 wages of $0. Y has
patronage source taxable income of ($20,000), QPAI of ($1,000), and
W-2 wages of $750. Z's patronage source has taxable income of $0,
QPAI of $0, and W-2 wages of $3,000. In determining the EAG's
section 199A(g) deduction, the EAG aggregates each member's
patronage source's taxable income or loss, QPAI, and W-2 wages.
Thus, the EAG's patronage source has taxable income of $30,000, the
sum of X's patronage source taxable income of $50,000, Y's patronage
source taxable income of ($20,000), and Z's patronage source taxable
income of $0. The EAG has QPAI of $14,000, the sum of X's QPAI of
$15,000, Y's QPAI of ($1,000), and Z's QPAI of $0. The EAG has W-2
wages of $3,750, the sum of X's W-2 wages of $0, Y's W-2 wages of
$750, and Z's W-2 wages of $3,000. Accordingly, the EAG's section
199A(g) deduction equals $1,260, 9% of $14,000, the lesser of the
QPAI and patronage source taxable income, but not greater than
$1,875, 50% of its W-2 wages of $3,750. This result would be the
same if X had a nonpatronage source income or loss, because
nonpatronage source income of a nonexempt Specified Cooperative is
not taken into account in determining the section 199A(g) deduction.
(3) Net operating loss carryovers/carrybacks. In determining the
taxable income of an EAG, if a Specified Cooperative has a net
operating loss (NOL) from its patronage sources that may be carried
over or carried back, if applicable, (in accordance with section 172),
to the taxable year, then for purposes of determining the taxable
income of the Specified Cooperative, the amount of the NOL used to
offset taxable income cannot exceed the taxable income of the patronage
source of that Specified Cooperative. Similarly, if a Specified
Cooperative has an NOL from its nonpatronage sources that may be
carried over to the taxable year, then for purposes of determining the
taxable income of the Specified Cooperative, the amount of the NOL used
to offset taxable income cannot exceed the taxable income of the
nonpatronage sources of that Specified Cooperative.
(4) Losses used to reduce taxable income of an expanded affiliated
group. The amount of an NOL sustained by a Specified Cooperative member
of an EAG that is used in the year sustained in determining an EAG's
taxable income limitation under Sec. 1.199A-8(b)(5)(ii)(C) (for
nonexempt Specified Cooperatives) or Sec. 1.199A-8(c)(4)(i) (for
exempt Specified Cooperatives), as applicable, is not treated as an NOL
carryover to any taxable year in determining the taxable income
limitation under Sec. 1.199A-8(b)(5)(ii)(C) or Sec. 1.199A-
8(c)(4)(i), as applicable. For purposes of this paragraph (b)(4), an
NOL is considered to be used if it reduces an EAG's aggregate taxable
income from patronage source or nonpatronage source, as the case may
be, regardless of whether the use of the NOL actually reduces the
amount of the section 199A(g) deduction that the EAG would otherwise
derive. An NOL is not considered to be used to the extent that it
reduces an EAG's aggregate taxable income from patronage source or
nonpatronage source, as the case may be, to an amount less than zero.
If more than one Specified Cooperative has an NOL used in the same
taxable year to reduce the EAG's taxable income from patronage or
nonpatronage sources, as the case may be, the respective NOLs are
deemed used in proportion to the amount of each Specified Cooperative's
NOL.
(5) Example. The following example illustrates the application of
paragraph (b)(4) of this section.
(i) Example--(A) Facts. Nonexempt Specified Cooperatives A and B
are the only two members of an EAG. A and B are both calendar year
taxpayers and they do not join in the filing of a consolidated
Federal income tax return. Neither A nor B had taxable income or
loss prior to 2018. In 2018, A has patronage QPAI and taxable income
of $1,000 and B has patronage QPAI of $1,000 and a
[[Page 28703]]
patronage NOL of $1,500. A also has nonpatronage income of $3,000. B
has no activities other than from its patronage activities. In 2019,
A has patronage QPAI of $2,000 and patronage taxable income of
$1,000 and B has patronage QPAI of $2,000 and patronage taxable
income prior to the NOL deduction allowed under section 172 of
$2,000. Neither A nor B has nonpatronage activities in 2019. A's and
B's patronage activities have aggregate W-2 wages in excess of the
section 199A(g)(1)(B) wage limitation in both 2018 and 2019.
(B) Section 199A(g) deduction for 2018. In determining the EAG's
section 199A(g) deduction for 2018, A's $1,000 of QPAI and B's
$1,000 of QPAI are aggregated, as are A's $1,000 of taxable income
from its patronage activities and B's $1,500 NOL from its patronage
activities. A's nonpatronage income is not included. Thus, for 2018,
the EAG has patronage QPAI of $2,000 and patronage taxable income of
($500). The EAG's section 199A(g) deduction for 2018 is 9% of the
lesser of its patronage QPAI or its patronage taxable income.
Because the EAG has a taxable loss from patronage sources in 2018,
the EAG's section 199A(g) deduction is $0.
(C) Section 199A(a) deduction for 2019. In determining the EAG's
section 199A deduction for 2019, A's patronage QPAI of $2,000 and
B's patronage QPAI of $2,000 are aggregated, resulting in the EAG
having patronage QPAI of $4,000. Also, $1,000 of B's patronage NOL
from 2018 was used in 2018 to reduce the EAG's taxable income from
patronage sources to $0. The remaining $500 of B's patronage NOL
from 2018 is not considered to have been used in 2018 because it
reduced the EAG's patronage taxable income to less than $0.
Accordingly, for purposes of determining the EAG's taxable income
limitation under Sec. 1.199A-8(b)(5) in 2019, B is deemed to have
only a $500 NOL carryover from its patronage sources from 2018 to
offset a portion of its 2019 taxable income from its patronage
sources. Thus, B's taxable income from its patronage sources in 2019
is $1,500, which is aggregated with A's $1,000 of taxable income
from its patronage sources. The EAG's taxable income limitation in
2019 is $2,500. The EAG's section 199A(g) deduction is 9% of the
lesser of its patronage sourced QPAI of $4,000 and its taxable
income from patronage sources of $2,500. Thus, the EAG's section
199A(g) deduction in 2019 is 9% of $2,500, or $225. The results for
2019 would be the same if neither A nor B had patronage sourced QPAI
in 2018.
(c) Allocation of an expanded affiliated group's section 199A(g)
deduction among members of the expanded affiliated group--(1) In
general. An EAG's section 199A(g) deduction from its patronage sources,
as determined in paragraph (b) of this section, is allocated among the
Specified Cooperatives that are members of the EAG in proportion to
each Specified Cooperative's patronage QPAI, regardless of whether the
Specified Cooperative has patronage taxable income or W-2 wages for the
taxable year. An EAG's section 199A(g) deduction from its nonpatronage
sources, as determined in paragraph (b) of this section, is allocated
among the Specified Cooperatives that are members of the EAG in
proportion to each Specified Cooperative's nonpatronage QPAI,
regardless of whether the Specified Cooperative has nonpatronage
taxable income or W-2 wages for the taxable year. For these purposes,
if a Specified Cooperative has negative patronage or nonpatronage QPAI,
such QPAI is treated as zero. Pursuant to Sec. 1.199A-8(b)(6), a
patronage section 199A(g) deduction can be applied only against
patronage income and deductions. Pursuant to Sec. 1.199A-8(c)(ii), a
nonpatronage section 199A(g) deduction and can be applied only against
nonpatronage income and deductions.
(2) Use of section 199A(g) deduction to create or increase a net
operating loss. If a Specified Cooperative that is a member of an EAG
has some or all of the EAG's section 199A(g) deduction allocated to it
under paragraph (c)(1) of this section and the amount allocated exceeds
patronage or nonpatronage taxable income, determined as described in
this section and prior to allocation of the section 199A(g) deduction,
the section 199A(g) deduction will create an NOL for the patronage
source or nonpatronage source. Similarly, if a Specified Cooperative
that is a member of an EAG, prior to the allocation of some or all of
the EAG's section 199A(g) deduction to the member, has a patronage or
nonpatronage NOL for the taxable year, the portion of the EAG's section
199A(g) deduction allocated to the member will increase such NOL.
(d) Special rules for members of the same consolidated group--(1)
Intercompany transactions. In the case of an intercompany transaction
between consolidated group members S and B (as the terms intercompany
transaction, S and B are defined in Sec. 1.1502-13(b)(1)), S takes the
intercompany transaction into account in computing the section 199A(g)
deduction at the same time and in the same proportion as S takes into
account the income, gain, deduction, or loss from the intercompany
transaction under Sec. 1.1502-13.
(2) Application of the simplified deduction method and the small
business simplified overall method. For purposes of applying the
simplified deduction method under Sec. 1.199A-10(e) and the small
business simplified overall method under Sec. 1.199A-10(f), a
Specified Cooperative that is part of a consolidated group determines
its QPAI using its members' DPGR, non-DPGR, cost of goods sold (COGS),
and all other deductions, expenses, or losses (hereinafter deductions),
determined after application of Sec. 1.1502-13.
(3) Determining the section 199A(g) deduction--(i) Expanded
affiliated group consists of consolidated group and non-consolidated
group members. In determining the section 199A(g) deduction, if an EAG
includes Specified Cooperatives that are members of the same
consolidated group and Specified Cooperatives that are not members of
the same consolidated group, the consolidated taxable income or loss,
QPAI, and W-2 wages, from patronage sources, if any, of the
consolidated group (and not the separate taxable income or loss, QPAI,
and W-2 wages from patronage sources of the members of the consolidated
group), are aggregated with the taxable income or loss, QPAI, and W-2
wages, from patronage sources, if any, of the non-consolidated group
members. A similar rule applies with respect to nonpatronage taxable
income or loss, QPAI, and W-2 wages. For example, if A, B, C, S1, and
S2 are Specified Cooperatives that are members of the same EAG, and A,
S1, and S2 are members of the same consolidated group (the A
consolidated group), then the A consolidated group is treated as one
member of the EAG. Accordingly, the EAG is considered to have three
members, the A consolidated group, B, and C. The consolidated taxable
income or loss, QPAI, and W-2 wages from patronage sources, if any, of
the A consolidated group are aggregated with the taxable income or loss
from patronage sources, QPAI, and W-2 wages, if any, of B and C in
determining the EAG's section 199A(g) deduction from patronage sources.
Similarly, the consolidated taxable income or loss, QPAI, and W-2 wages
from nonpatronage sources, if any, of the A consolidated group are
aggregated with the taxable income or loss from nonpatronage sources,
QPAI, and W-2 wages, if any, of B and C in determining the EAG's
section 199A(g) deduction from nonpatronage sources. Pursuant to Sec.
1.199A-8(b)(6), a patronage section 199A(g) deduction can be applied
only against patronage income and deductions. Pursuant to Sec. 1.199A-
8(c)(ii), a nonpatronage section 199A(g) deduction and can be applied
only against nonpatronage income and deductions.
(ii) Expanded affiliated group consists only of members of a single
consolidated group. If all of the Specified Cooperatives that are
members of an EAG are also members of
[[Page 28704]]
the same consolidated group, the consolidated group's section 199A(g)
deduction is determined using the consolidated group's consolidated
taxable income or loss, QPAI, and W-2 wages, from patronage sources or
nonpatronage sources, as the case may be, rather than the separate
taxable income or loss, QPAI, and W-2 wages from patronage sources or
nonpatronage sources of its members.
(4) Allocation of the section 199A(g) deduction of a consolidated
group among its members. The section 199A(g) deduction from patronage
sources of a consolidated group (or the section 199A(g) deduction
allocated to a consolidated group that is a member of an EAG) is
allocated among the patronage sources of Specified Cooperatives in
proportion to each Specified Cooperative's patronage QPAI, regardless
of whether the Specified Cooperative has patronage separate taxable
income or W-2 wages for the taxable year. In allocating the section
199A(g) deduction of a patronage source of a Specified Cooperative that
is part of a consolidated group among patronage sources of other
members of the same group, any redetermination of a member's patronage
receipts, COGS, or other deductions from an intercompany transaction
under Sec. 1.1502-13(c)(1)(i) or (c)(4) is not taken into account for
purposes of section 199A(g). Also, for purposes of this allocation, if
a patronage source of a Specified Cooperative that is a member of a
consolidated group has negative QPAI, the QPAI of the patronage source
is treated as zero.
(e) Examples. The following examples illustrate the application of
paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section.
(i) Example 1. Specified Cooperatives X, Y, and Z are members of
the same EAG but are not members of a consolidated group. X, Y, and
Z each files Federal income tax returns on a calendar year basis.
None of X, Y, or Z have activities other than from its patronage
sources. Prior to 2018, X had no taxable income or loss. In 2018, X
has taxable income of $0, QPAI of $2,000, and W-2 wages of $0, Y has
taxable income of $4,000, QPAI of $3,000, and W-2 wages of $500, and
Z has taxable income of $4,000, QPAI of $5,000, and W-2 wages of
$2,500. Accordingly, the EAG's patronage source taxable income is
$8,000, the sum of X's taxable income of $0, Y's taxable income of
$4,000, and Z's taxable income of $4,000. The EAG has QPAI of
$10,000, the sum of X's QPAI of $2,000, Y's QPAI of $3,000, and Z's
QPAI of $5,000. The EAG's W-2 wages are $3,000, the sum of X's W-2
wages of $0, Y's W-2 wages of $500, and Z's W-2 wages of $2,500.
Thus, the EAG's section 199A(g) deduction for 2018 is $720 (9% of
the lesser of the EAG's patronage source taxable income of $8,000
and the EAG's QPAI of $10,000, but no greater than 50% of its W-2
wages of $3,000, i.e., $1,500). Pursuant to paragraph (c)(1) of this
section, the $720 section 199A(g) deduction is allocated to X, Y,
and Z in proportion to their respective amounts of QPAI, that is
$144 to X ($720 x $2,000/$10,000), $216 to Y ($720 x $3,000/
$10,000), and $360 to Z ($720 x $5,000/$10,000). Although X's
patronage source taxable income for 2018 determined prior to
allocation of a portion of the EAG's section 199A(g) deduction to it
was $0, pursuant to paragraph (c)(2) of this section, X will have an
NOL from its patronage source for 2018 equal to $144, which will be
a carryover to 2019.
(ii) Example 2. (A) Facts. Corporation X is the common parent of
a consolidated group, consisting of X and Y, which has filed a
consolidated Federal income tax return for many years. Corporation P
is the common parent of a consolidated group, consisting of P and S,
which has filed a consolidated Federal income tax return for many
years. The X and P consolidated groups each file their consolidated
Federal income tax returns on a calendar year basis. X, Y, P, and S
are each Specified Cooperatives, and none of X, Y, P, or S has ever
had activities other than from its patronage sources. The X
consolidated group and the P consolidated group are members of the
same EAG in 2019. In 2018, the X consolidated group incurred a
consolidated net operating loss (CNOL) of $25,000. Neither P nor S
(nor the P consolidated group) has ever incurred an NOL. In 2019,
the X consolidated group has (prior to the deduction under section
172) taxable income of $8,000 and the P consolidated group has
taxable income of $20,000. X's QPAI is $8,000, Y's QPAI is
($13,000), P's QPAI is $16,000 and S's QPAI is $4,000. There are
sufficient W-2 wages to exceed the section 199A(g)(1)(B) limitation.
(B) Analysis. The X consolidated group uses $8,000 of its CNOL
from 2018 to offset the X consolidated group's taxable income in
2019. None of the X consolidated group's remaining CNOL may be used
to offset taxable income of the P consolidated group under paragraph
(b)(3) of this section. Accordingly, for purposes of determining the
EAG's section 199A(g) deduction for 2019, the EAG has taxable income
of $20,000 (the X consolidated group's taxable income, after the
deduction under section 172, of $0 plus the P consolidated group's
taxable income of $20,000). The EAG has QPAI of $15,000 (the X
consolidated group's QPAI of ($5,000) (X's $8,000 + Y's ($13,000)),
and the P consolidated group's QPAI of $20,000 (P's $16,000 + S's
$4,000)). The EAG's section 199A(g) deduction equals $1,350, 9% of
the lesser of its taxable income of $20,000 and its QPAI of $15,000.
The section 199A(g) deduction is allocated between the X and P
consolidated groups in proportion to their respective QPAI. Because
the X consolidated group has negative QPAI, all of the section
199A(g) deduction of $1,350 is allocated to the P consolidated
group. This $1,350 is allocated between P and S, the members of the
P consolidated group, in proportion to their QPAI. Accordingly, P is
allocated $1,080 ($1,350 x ($16,000/$20,000) and S is allocated $270
($1,350 x $4,000/$20,000)).
(f) Allocation of patronage income and loss by a Specified
Cooperative that is a member of the expanded affiliated group for only
a portion of the year--(1) In general. A Specified Cooperative that
becomes or ceases to be a member of an EAG during its taxable year must
allocate its taxable income or loss, QPAI, and W-2 wages between the
portion of the taxable year that the Specified Cooperative is a member
of the EAG and the portion of the taxable year that the Specified
Cooperative is not a member of the EAG. This allocation of items is
made by using the pro rata allocation method described in this
paragraph (f)(1). Under the pro rata allocation method, an equal
portion of patronage taxable income or loss, QPAI, and W-2 wages, and
nonpatronage taxable income or loss, QPAI, and W-2 wages for the
taxable year is assigned to each day of the Specified Cooperative's
taxable year. Those items assigned to those days that the Specified
Cooperative was a member of the EAG are then aggregated.
(2) Coordination with rules relating to the allocation of income
under Sec. 1.1502-76(b). If Sec. 1.1502-76(b) (relating to items
included in a consolidated return) applies to a Specified Cooperative
that is a member of an EAG, then any allocation of items required under
this paragraph (f) is made only after the allocation of the items
pursuant to Sec. 1.1502-76(b).
(g) Total section 199A(g) deduction for a Specified Cooperative
that is a member of an expanded affiliated group for some or all of its
taxable year--(1) Member of the same EAG for the entire taxable year.
If a Specified Cooperative is a member of the same EAG for its entire
taxable year, the Specified Cooperative's section 199A(g) deduction for
the taxable year (whether patronage sourced or nonpatronage sourced) is
the amount of the section 199A(g) deduction allocated to it by the EAG
under paragraph (c)(1) of this section.
(2) Member of the expanded affiliated group for a portion of the
taxable year. If a Specified Cooperative is a member of an EAG for only
a portion of its taxable year and is either not a member of any EAG or
is a member of another EAG, or both, for another portion of the taxable
year, the Specified Cooperative's section 199A(g) deduction for the
taxable year (whether patronage sourced or nonpatronage sourced) is the
sum of its section 199A(g) deductions for each portion of the taxable
year.
(3) Example. The following example illustrates the application of
paragraphs (f) and (g) of this section.
[[Page 28705]]
(i) Example--(A) Facts. Specified Cooperatives X and Y, calendar
year taxpayers, are members of the same EAG for the entire 2018
taxable year. Specified Cooperative Z, also a calendar year
taxpayer, is a member of the EAG of which X and Y are members for
the first half of 2018 and not a member of any EAG for the second
half of 2018. Assume that X, Y, and Z each has W-2 wages in excess
of the section 199A(g)(1)(B) wage limitation for all relevant
periods. In 2018, X's patronage source has taxable income of $2,000
and QPAI of $600, Y's patronage source has a taxable loss of $400
and QPAI of ($200), and Z's patronage source has taxable income of
$1,400 and QPAI of $2,400.
(B) Analysis. Pursuant to the pro rata allocation method, $700
of Z's 2018 patronage taxable income and $1,200 of its 2018 QPAI are
allocated to the first half of the 2018 taxable year (the period in
which Z is a member of the EAG) and $700 of Z's 2018 patronage
taxable income and $1,200 of its 2018 QPAI are allocated to the
second half of the 2018 taxable year (the period in which Z is not a
member of any EAG). Accordingly, in 2018, the EAG has taxable income
from patronage source of $2,300 (X's $2,000 + Y's ($400) + Z's $700)
and QPAI of $1,600 (X's $600 + Y's ($200) + Z's $1,200). The EAG's
section 199A(g) deduction for 2018 is $144 (9% of the lesser of the
EAG's taxable income from patronage source of $2,300 or QPAI of
$1,600). Pursuant to Sec. 1.199A-14(c)(1), this $144 deduction is
allocated to X's, Y's, and Z's patronage source in proportion to
their respective QPAI. Accordingly, X's patronage source is
allocated $48 of the EAG's section 199A(g) deduction ($144 x ($600/
($600 + $0 + $1,200))), Y's patronage source is allocated $0 of the
EAG's section 199A(g) deduction ($144 x ($0/($600 + $0 + $1,200))),
and Z's patronage source is allocated $96 of the EAG's section
199A(g) deduction ($144 x ($1,200/($600 + $0 + $1,200))). For the
second half of 2018, Z's patronage source has taxable income of $700
and QPAI of $1,200. Therefore, for the second half of 2018, Z's
patronage source has a section 199A(g) deduction of $63 (9% of the
lesser of its taxable income of $700 or its QPAI of $1,200 for the
second half of 2018). Accordingly, X's 2018 section 199A(g)
deduction is $48 and Y's 2018 section 199A(g) deduction is $0. Z's
2018 section 199A(g) deduction is $159, the sum of the $96 section
199A(g) deduction of the EAG allocated to Z for the first half of
2018 and Z's $63 section 199A(g) deduction for the second half of
2018.
(h) Computation of section 199A(g) deduction for members of an
expanded affiliated group with different taxable years--(1) In general.
If Specified Cooperatives that are members of an EAG have different
taxable years, in determining the section 199A(g) deduction of a member
(the computing member), the computing member is required to take into
account the taxable income or loss, determined without regard to the
section 199A(g) deduction, QPAI, and W-2 wages of each other group
member that are both--
(i) Attributable to the period that each other member of the EAG
and the computing member are members of the EAG; and
(ii) Taken into account in a taxable year that begins after the
effective date of section 199A(g) and ends with or within the taxable
year of the computing member with respect to which the section 199A(g)
deduction is computed.
(2) Example. The following example illustrates the application of
this paragraph (h).
(i) Example. (A) Specified Cooperatives X, Y, and Z are members
of the same EAG. Neither X, Y, nor Z is a member of a consolidated
group. X and Y are calendar year taxpayers and Z is a June 30 fiscal
year taxpayer. Z came into existence on July 1, 2017. All of X, Y's,
and Z's activities are patronage sourced. Each Specified Cooperative
has taxable income that exceeds its QPAI and W-2 wages in excess of
the section 199A(g)(1)(B) wage limitation. For the taxable year
ending December 31, 2018, X's QPAI is $8,000 and Y's QPAI is
($6,000). For its taxable year ending June 30, 2019, Z's QPAI is
$2,000.
(B) In computing X's and Y's respective section 199A(g)
deductions for their taxable years ending December 31, 2018, X's
taxable income or loss, QPAI and W-2 wages and Y's taxable income or
loss, QPAI, and W-2 wages from their respective taxable years ending
December 31, 2018, are aggregated. The EAG's QPAI for this purpose
is $2,000 (X's QPAI of $8,000 + Y's QPAI of ($6,000)). The $180
deduction is allocated to each of X and Y in proportion to their
respective QPAI as a percentage of the QPAI of each member of the
EAG that was taken into account in computing the EAG's section
199A(g) deduction. Pursuant to paragraph (c)(1) of this section, in
allocating the section 199A(g) deduction between X and Y, because
Y's QPAI is negative, Y's QPAI is treated as being $0. Accordingly,
X's section 199A(g) deduction for its taxable year ending December
31, 2018, is $180 ($180 x $8,000/($8,000 + $0)). Y's section 199A(g)
deduction for its taxable year ending December 31, 2018, is $0 ($180
x $0/($8,000 + $0)).
(C) In computing Z's section 199A(g) deduction for its taxable
year ending June 30, 2019, X's and Y's items from their respective
taxable years ending December 31, 2018, are taken into account.
Therefore, X's taxable income or loss and Y's taxable income or
loss, determined without regard to the section 199A(g) deduction,
QPAI, and W-2 wages from their taxable years ending December 31,
2018, are aggregated with Z's taxable income or loss, QPAI, and W-2
wages from its taxable year ending June 30, 2019. The EAG's QPAI is
$4,000 (X's QPAI of $8,000 + Y's QPAI of ($6,000) + Z's QPAI of
$2,000). The EAG's section 199A(g) deduction is $360 (9% x $4,000).
A portion of the $360 deduction is allocated to Z in proportion to
its QPAI as a percentage of the QPAI of each member of the EAG that
was taken into account in computing the EAG's section 199A(g)
deduction. Pursuant to paragraph (c)(1) of this section, in
allocating a portion of the $360 deduction to Z, Y's QPAI is treated
as being $0 because Y's QPAI is negative. Z's section 199A(g)
deduction for its taxable year ending June 30, 2019, is $72 ($360 x
($2,000/($8,000 + $0 + $2,000))).
(i) Partnership owned by expanded affiliated group--(1) In general.
For purposes of section 199A(g)(3)(D) relating to DPGR, if all of the
interests in the capital and profits of a partnership are owned by
members of a single EAG at all times during the taxable year of such
partnership (EAG partnership), then the EAG partnership and all members
of that EAG are treated as a single taxpayer during such period.
(2) Attribution of activities--(i) In general. If a Specified
Cooperative which is a member of an EAG (disposing member) derives
gross receipts from the lease, rental, license, sale, exchange, or
other disposition of property that was MPGE by an EAG partnership, all
the partners of which are members of the same EAG to which the
disposing member belongs at the time that the disposing member disposes
of such property, then the disposing member is treated as conducting
the MPGE activities previously conducted by the EAG partnership with
respect to that property. The previous sentence applies only for those
taxable years in which the disposing member is a member of the EAG of
which all the partners of the EAG partnership are members for the
entire taxable year of the EAG partnership. With respect to a lease,
rental, or license, the disposing member is treated as having disposed
of the property on the date or dates on which it takes into account its
gross receipts from the lease, rental, or license under its method of
accounting. With respect to a sale, exchange, or other disposition, the
disposing member is treated as having disposed of the property on the
date it ceases to own the property for Federal income tax purposes,
even if no gain or loss is taken into account. Likewise, if an EAG
partnership derives gross receipts from the lease, rental, license,
sale, exchange, or other disposition of property that was MPGE by a
member (or members) of the same EAG (the producing member) to which all
the partners of the EAG partnership belong at the time that the EAG
partnership disposes of such property, then the EAG partnership is
treated as conducting the MPGE activities previously conducted by the
producing member with respect to that property. The previous sentence
applies only for those taxable years in which the producing member is a
member of the EAG of which all the partners of the EAG partnership are
members for the
[[Page 28706]]
entire taxable year of the EAG partnership. With respect to a lease,
rental, or license, the EAG partnership is treated as having disposed
of the property on the date or dates on which it takes into account its
gross receipts derived from the lease, rental, or license under its
method of accounting. With respect to a sale, exchange, or other
disposition, the EAG partnership is treated as having disposed of the
property on the date it ceases to own the property for Federal income
tax purposes, even if no gain or loss is taken into account.
(ii) Attribution between expanded affiliated group partnerships. If
an EAG partnership (disposing partnership) derives gross receipts from
the lease, rental, license, sale, exchange, or other disposition of
property that was MPGE by another EAG partnership (producing
partnership), then the disposing partnership is treated as conducting
the MPGE activities previously conducted by the producing partnership
with respect to that property, provided that each of these partnerships
(the producing partnership and the disposing partnership) is owned for
its entire taxable year in which the disposing partnership disposes of
such property by members of the same EAG. With respect to a lease,
rental, or license, the disposing partnership is treated as having
disposed of the property on the date or dates on which it takes into
account its gross receipts from the lease, rental, or license under its
method of accounting. With respect to a sale, exchange, or other
disposition, the disposing partnership is treated as having disposed of
the property on the date it ceases to own the property for Federal
income tax purposes, even if no gain or loss is taken into account.
(iii) Exception. No member of an EAG other than an exempt Specified
Cooperative is attributed nonpatronage activities conducted by an EAG
partnership. An EAG partnership is not attributed nonpatronage
activities conducted by any member of the EAG or by another EAG
partnership.
(j) Applicability date. The provisions of this section apply to
taxable years ending after the date the Treasury decision adopting
these regulations as final regulations is published in the Federal
Register. Taxpayers, however, may rely on these regulations until that
date, but only if the taxpayers apply the rules in their entirety and
in a consistent manner.
0
Par. 3. Section 1.1388-1 is amended by adding paragraphs (f) and (g).
The additions read as follows:
Sec. 1.1388-1 Definitions and special rules.
* * * * *
(f) Patronage and nonpatronage. Whether an item of income or
deduction is patronage or nonpatronage sourced is determined by
applying the directly related use test. The directly related use test
provides that if the income or deduction is produced by a transaction
that actually facilitates the accomplishment of the cooperative's
marketing, purchasing, or services activities, the income or deduction
is from patronage sources. However, if the transaction producing the
income or deduction does not actually facilitate the accomplishment of
these activities but merely enhances the overall profitability of the
cooperative, being merely incidental to the association's cooperative
operation, the income or deduction is from nonpatronage sources.
Patronage and nonpatronage income or deductions cannot be netted unless
otherwise permitted by the Internal Revenue Code or regulations issued
under the relevant section of the Internal Revenue Code, or guidance
published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin (see Sec. 601.601(d)(2) of
this chapter).
(g) Effective/applicability date. The provisions of paragraph (f)
of this section apply to taxable years ending after the date the
Treasury decision adopting these regulations as final regulations is
published in the Federal Register. However, taxpayers may rely on the
provisions of paragraph (f) of this section until the date the Treasury
decision adopting these regulations as final regulations is published
in the Federal Register.
Kirsten Wielobob,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2019-11501 Filed 6-18-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P