Schedule for Rating Disabilities; Infectious Diseases, Immune Disorders, and Nutritional Deficiencies, 28227-28235 [2019-12682]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 117 / Tuesday, June 18, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: June 12, 2019.
Jeffrey W. Novak,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Detroit.
[FR Doc. 2019–12844 Filed 6–17–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 4
RIN 2900–AQ43
Schedule for Rating Disabilities;
Infectious Diseases, Immune
Disorders, and Nutritional Deficiencies
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This document amends the
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
Schedule for Rating Disabilities
(VASRD) by revising the portion of the
schedule that addresses infectious
diseases, immune disorders, and
nutritional deficiencies. The effect of
this action is to ensure that the rating
schedule uses current medical
terminology and to provide detailed and
updated criteria for evaluation of
infectious diseases, immune disorders,
and nutritional deficiencies for
disability rating purposes.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is
effective August 11, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ioulia Vvedenskaya, M.D., M.B.A.,
Medical Officer, Part 4 VASRD
Regulations Staff (211C), Compensation
Service, Veterans Benefits
Administration, Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20420,
Ioulia.Vvedenskaya@va.gov, (202) 461–
9700 (This is not a toll-free telephone
number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VA
published a proposed rule in the
Federal Register at 84 FR 1678 on
February 5, 2019, to amend 38 CFR
4.88a and 4.88b, the portion of the
VASRD dealing with infectious
diseases, immune disorders, and
nutritional deficiencies. VA provided a
60-day public comment period, and
interested persons were invited to
submit written comments on or before
April 8, 2019. VA received 32
comments.
One commenter supported VA’s
intent to eliminate obsolete terminology
and substitute the most up-to-date terms
and definitions for conditions such as
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. The
commenter noted that this rule would
help to achieve the important public
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Jun 17, 2019
Jkt 247001
policy goal of clear, effective
communication among veterans, their
health care providers, and the
Department. Additionally, the
commenter observed that it is important
that what appears to be ‘‘catch-all’’
language appended to the respective
disease evaluation categories be
correctly phrased to minimize the
likelihood that deserving patients will
be excluded from care. The commenter
suggested that VA should consider
identifying the ‘‘residual effects’’
categories explicitly so the rating
decisions and appeals would be most
favorable to the veterans seeking care.
The commenter further suggested that
VA consider expressly recognizing that
any ambiguity in the rules regarding
covered residual effects should be
resolved in the veteran’s favor. VA
makes no changes based on these
comments. The proposed diagnostic
codes provided examples of common
residuals of specific diseases, but also
made clear that the instruction to rate
‘‘any residual disability’’ from a disease
‘‘includes, but is not limited to’’ the
listed examples. We believe this
language is sufficiently clear and broad
to ensure that any residuals identified in
individual cases may be appropriately
evaluated. We do not believe it is
necessary or advisable to seek to list in
these regulations all of the conditions
that may be found to be residuals of
diseases in specific cases. Further,
because these rules do not restrict the
conditions that may be found in
individual cases to be residuals of a
disease, we do not believe the regulation
is restrictive or ambiguous on that issue.
We note also that the principle of
resolving reasonable doubt in favor of
veterans is established in 38 CFR 3.102
and 4.3.
One commenter expressed an opinion
that this regulatory update can be
viewed as a bureaucratic move to
disenfranchise veterans eligible for
unspecified services. The commenter
did not offer any specific
recommendations and did not propose
any actions. VA makes no changes
based on this comment.
One commenter stated that vectorborne diseases (VBD) are of major
importance to human health both
locally and globally. In addition, the
commenter highlighted that the precise
diagnoses of many of these diseases
remains a major challenge because of
the lack of comprehensive data available
on accurate and reliable diagnostic
methods, specifically for borreliosis
(Lyme disease). The commenter did not
offer a specific recommendation or a
course of action. VA makes no changes
based on this comment.
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
28227
Two commenters were concerned that
by implementing a General Rating
Formula (GRF) for infectious diseases,
VA would drastically change veterans’
ratings from 100 percent to zero percent,
dependent upon whether the disease is
deemed active or resolved based upon a
laboratory test. Commenters noted that
there is considerable evidence that
laboratory tests may not always be
deemed reliable and that each
laboratory may have differing references
ranges leading to improper reading of
results. However, VA’s proposed GRF
did not alter the rating principles for
infectious diseases, which currently
provide—in individual diagnostic codes
rather than a GRF—for evaluation of
active diseases and residuals. Instead,
we updated the format of the rating
schedule to indicate that the GFR for
infectious diseases would be consistent
for rating these conditions and also be
similar to the use of a GFR in other
sections of the VASRD, such as in 38
CFR 4.97, 4.116, 4.130, and others.
Currently, VA assigns a 100-percent
evaluation for each specific infectious
disease during an active period;
thereafter, any residual functional
impairment from the infectious disease
determines the level of disability. VA
pointed out that its proposed GFR
would be a familiar concept for Veterans
Benefits Administration (VBA)
employees and minimize the risk for
error by providing one criterion
applicable to multiple diagnostic codes
(DCs). Additionally, VA did not propose
any laboratory testing in its GFR, but
instead we proposed to confirm the
recurrence of active infection for certain
conditions (DCs 6301, 6304, 6311, 6312,
6316) with overlapping clinical
symptoms such as pallor, fever and
hepatosplenomegaly. By adding a
specific reference to laboratory testing
for each infection, we made an effort to
distinguish one infection from another.
VA makes no changes based on this
comment.
Additionally, commenters were
concerned that the proposed GRF would
not consider veterans’ ability to
maintain gainful employment because
many infectious diseases, even after
negative laboratory test results, can
cause long-lasting residual symptoms
that may last up to eight weeks or longer
and that lingering, residual symptoms
would adversely affect a veteran’s
normal functioning and his/her ability
to maintain gainful employment. The
proposed GRF is designed to assess
permanent functional impairment that
resulted from long-lasting residual
symptoms rather than rely solely on a
specific laboratory test. The proposed
E:\FR\FM\18JNR1.SGM
18JNR1
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
28228
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 117 / Tuesday, June 18, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
GFR directs rating personnel to rate any
residual effect of acute and/or chronic
infection and to determine the degree of
disability within the appropriate body
system using the same principles as
they exist in the current rating schedule.
VA’s disability compensation benefits
are based on the extent of average
impairment of earning capacity from the
service-connected injury or disease and
this focus is reflected throughout the
rating schedule. Therefore, VA makes
no changes based on this comment.
One commenter expressed concern
regarding West Nile Virus infection,
stating infected individuals could
experience headaches, body aches, joint
pains, vomiting, diarrhea, or rash during
an acute phase of the disease and that
the residual symptoms could last for an
extended period. The commenter
specifically noted a severe complication
of the West Nile Virus infection that
affects the central nervous system in its
acute phase and that such complications
could become clinically permanent. The
commenter proposed to list specific
neuroinvasive diseases such as
meningitis and encephalitis as residuals
of West Nile Virus in § 4.88b and to be
rated under the applicable DC code(s).
The commenter further interpreted the
note under DC 6335 that VA would rate
West Nile virus infection residuals and
residuals listed in § 3.317 together and
was concerned that this approach would
cause confusion and limit this DC to
only a subset of Persian Gulf veterans
who served in the Southwest Asia
Theater of Operations and are entitled to
presumptive service connection. VA
clarifies that the note under DC 6335
concerning § 3.317 is intended solely to
serve as a reference that provides
guidance to the adjudicator in rating a
disease under this DC. The reference to
§ 3.317 is not intended nor can it be
read to restrict application of DC 6335
to veterans with Southwest Asia service.
As West Nile infection and other similar
infectious diseases have complex
disability pictures that are not
commonly seen by VA adjudicators, the
inclusion of the § 3.317(d) reference
under DC 6335 is specifically meant to
assist our adjudicators in understanding
the nature of the disease and, most
critically, the usual residual disabilities
of the disease. Referencing § 3.317(d) in
the note for infectious diseases like the
West Nile virus serves to impart
understanding to VA adjudicators that
such infectious diseases may result in
various residuals or complications with
physical, functional, or cognitive effects
and enables adjudicators to accurately
rate veterans with these diseases. In
response and in order to minimize any
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Jun 17, 2019
Jkt 247001
confusion, VA has removed the notes
that reference 38 CFR 3.317(d) from the
Infectious Diseases rating criteria for
DCs 6301, 6304, 6316, 6330, 6331,
6333–6335. VA has added the reference
to 38 CFR 3.317(d) as a note in a new
introductory paragraph before the rating
schedule for infectious diseases,
immune disorders, and nutritional
deficiencies in 38 CFR 4.88b.
Additionally, commenters expressed a
concern that the proposed GRF will
negatively affect veterans’ care and
treatment. VA appreciates commenters’
concerns; however, VA’s Rating
Schedule for Disabilities does not
regulate veterans’ access to clinical care.
Further, as explained above, the
provisions in the proposed GRF for
rating active diseases and residuals are
consistent with the existing provisions
under individual diagnostic codes in
§ 4.88b and will not significantly change
how VA evaluates these conditions. VA
makes no changes based on these
comments.
One commenter supported the need
for greater simplification of the rating
schedule and disability determination
process and was concerned that this
proposed update to the schedule for
infectious disease, immune disorders
and nutritional deficiencies excludes
nurse practitioners and their patients.
Specifically, the commenter noted that
the proposed criteria for determining
incapacitation related to systemic
exertion intolerance disease (SEID)/
chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) require
bed rest and treatment prescribed by a
licensed physician and that a physician
who administered diagnostic tests ruled
out ongoing exertion or other medical
conditions associated with fatigue. The
commenter requested that the Veterans
Health Administration (VHA) revise this
proposed rating schedule update and
add ‘‘or nurse practitioner’’ after the
word ‘‘physician’’ in all sections. The
commenter also asked that, in future
revisions of the rating schedule, VHA
recognize that thousands of veterans
receive care from nurse practitioners
and to include nurse practitioners in the
language of the rating schedule. VA
clarifies that this rulemaking pertains to
the Veterans Benefits Administration
(VBA) and addresses disability
evaluations due to the functional
impairment related to service-connected
health conditions. This rulemaking does
not address the scope of clinical
practice for nurse practitioners.
However, VBA will assess whether
amendments to the list of qualifying
heath care providers are necessary and
such amendments, if any, will be
addressed in a future proposal. VA
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
makes no changes based on this
comment.
One commenter stated that it is unfair
that a National Guard soldier who was
called to active duty and then
immediately released upon return from
the Middle East has to have manifested
one of the infectious diseases listed in
§ 3.317 within one year from separation
(aside from three exceptions), whereas
an active duty solider who redeploys
from Iraq or Afghanistan and serves
several more years on active duty only
has to show the disease within a year
after separation, which may be several
years after service in Iraq or
Afghanistan. This comment relates to
the time period prescribed in 38 CFR
3.317(c)(3) for applying the presumption
of service connection for infectious
diseases in veterans who served in the
Southwest Asia theater of operations
during the Persian Gulf War. The
proposed rules pertained only to the
criteria for evaluating the severity of
service-connected infectious diseases,
immune disorders, and nutritional
deficiencies. They did not propose to
address matters concerning the
establishment of service connection or
the operation of presumptions of service
connection for any diseases.
Accordingly, the comment is beyond the
scope of this rulemaking. VA makes no
changes based on this comment.
Multiple commenters including
individual veterans, Veterans Advocacy
Organizations, Veterans Service
Organizations, and other professional
organizations expressed a wide range of
concerns regarding the proposed
changes to the definition of chronic
fatigue syndrome (CFS) under § 4.88a
and the name change for DC 6354.
Commenters thought the name change
of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) to
Systemic Exertion Intolerance Disease/
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (SEID/CFS)
was unwarranted and that it would
create unnecessary confusion among
medical providers, including non-VA
medical providers. Commenters also
stated that that the new name, Systemic
Exertion Intolerance Disease (SEID), has
not been adopted by any federal agency,
nor by researchers and clinicians and
that the CDC, National Institutes of
Health (NIH), research publications, and
materials for patients and health care
providers all use the term ME/CFS.
Commenters felt that VA’s use of the
term SEID/CFS would introduce
confusion among medical providers and
patients at VA and reduce VA’s ability
to coordinate with other federal
agencies.
Commenters expressed that the
proposed changes to the definition of
CFS does not conform to the Kansas
E:\FR\FM\18JNR1.SGM
18JNR1
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 117 / Tuesday, June 18, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Criteria (2000), the Centers for Disease
Control (CDC) Chronic Multisymptom
Illness (CMI) criteria, and to those used
in VA-funded research into Gulf War
Illness (GWI) and that the proposed
definition is not compatible with the
department of Defense (DoD)
Congressionally Directed Medical
Research Programs (CDMRP) for CMI.
Commenters stated that VA’s proposed
combination of the Institute of Medicine
(IOM) reevaluation of CFS as SEID with
the 1994 Fukuda criteria for CFS
presents an amalgamation that is not
based in evidence nor discussed in any
publications. The commenters
expressed concern that VA did not
follow any recommendations from the
IOM, the Gulf War Research Advisory
Committee (RAC), CDC, or other
agencies and this combination is for an
entirely new entity that is not known by
World Health Organization,
International Classification of Diseases,
Tenth Revision (ICD–10) or other
medical classification system and that
the VA proposed definition is not
compatible with the one mandated by
DoD’s CDMRP for CMI and the Kansas
Criteria to qualify for GWI research
funding.
Commenters noted that VA did not
consult the RAC on these proposed
changes and stated that the RAC is
responsible for understanding the
definitions and entirety of the
condition. Commenters also were
concerned that the proposed changes
would leave those Gulf War veterans
who receive care and services for CFS,
vulnerable to VA manipulation of their
care and services. The commenters
suggested that CFS should be studied by
the Gulf War research community, the
veteran community, CFS researchers,
the RAC, and independent medical
professionals and that VA rely on the
recommendations from these parties as
a guide for new criteria updates and to
ascertain if these changes are even
warranted. Commenters also stated that
VA would be directly and negatively
impacting more than 300,000 Gulf War
veterans suffering from Gulf War Illness
by not relying on the studies from these
parties and by combining, in whole or
in part, the 2015 Systemic Exertion
Intolerance Disease (SEID) and the 1994
Fukuda CDC criteria for Chronic Fatigue
Syndrome (CFS) into what would be
called SEID/CFS.
Commenters felt that VA’s adoption of
the Fukuda criteria is a step backwards
that will perpetuate diagnostic
inaccuracy and cause harm to Myalgic
Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue
Syndrome (ME/CFS) patients served by
the VA. Commenters referenced the
2015 IOM Report to state that the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Jun 17, 2019
Jkt 247001
Fukuda criteria were overly broad
because they do not require the
hallmark symptom of post-exertional
malaise and should not be used because
of the possibility of misdiagnosing
patients with other conditions.
Commenters believed that VA’s reliance
on outdated Fukuda diagnostic criteria
would cause harm to veterans with ME/
CFS through misdiagnosis and cause a
mismatch with the diagnostic criteria in
use elsewhere. Commenters suggested
that VA adopt ME/CFS or ME/CFS/SEID
title for the illness to stay in alignment
with the greater ME/CFS community, to
include patients, doctors, and
researchers. Commenters felt that VA’s
proposed revisions were based on
financial reasons in order to revoke
benefits from existing veterans and
prevent other veterans from receiving
this combined diagnosis of SEID/CFS.
Commenters also provided questions
and recommended that VA adopt ME/
CFS instead of SEID/CFS; reject the
Fukuda criteria; and adopt the IOM
diagnostic criteria.
Another recommendation was for VA
to revise § 4.88a to more closely mirror
the diagnostic standard endorsed by the
IOM and CDC and eliminate the listed
exclusions to allow the veterans’
examining and/or treating physician to
make a final determination as to the
appropriate diagnosis for veterans. In
addition, commenters recommended
that VA should broaden the group of
medical professionals authorized to
prescribe bed rest and treatment to meet
the incapacitation standard.
While VA received some support for
updating its definition of CFS, VA
considered these comments and
concerns and concluded that this
proposed update to § 4.88a is premature
and that additional research is needed
to provide a more comprehensive way
to determine the disabling effects of CFS
and associated conditions. Therefore,
VA is withdrawing its proposal to
amend § 4.88a Chronic Fatigue
Syndrome. To ensure that the full range
of relevant factors is adequately
addressed, VA intends to establish a
work group to specifically address this
condition. Upon assessment of the work
group’s findings, VA will determine
whether amendments to § 4.88a are
necessary and such amendments, if any,
will be addressed in a future proposal.
VA makes one clarifying change to the
criteria for a 10 percent disability rating
under DC 6351, HIV-related illness. In
the proposed rule, VA proposed to
replace the phrase ‘‘definite medical
symptoms’’ with ‘‘HIV-related
constitutional symptoms’’ but stated
that we would otherwise make no
change to the criteria for a 10 percent
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
28229
evaluation. The prior criteria for a 10
percent evaluation read: ‘‘Following
development of definite medical
symptoms, T4 cells of 200 or more and
less than 500, and on approved
medication(s), or with evidence of
depression or memory loss with
employment limitations.’’ We proposed
to revise this to read: ‘‘Following
development of HIV-related
constitutional symptoms; T4 cell count
between 200 and 500, and use of
approved medication(s); or with
evidence of depression or memory loss
with employment limitations.’’ In its
review of the final rule, VA realized that
the prior text for a 10 percent disability
rating was unclear because it listed four
criteria, separated by commas, but used
‘‘and’’ between the second and third
criteria, while using ‘‘or’’ between the
third and fourth criteria. The proposed
text listed three criteria, separated by
semicolons, with the second of those
criteria encompassing both the second
and third criteria of the prior text,
joined by the word ‘‘and’’. We recognize
that the combination of punctuation and
conjunctions in both the prior and the
propsed text could create confusion.
Accordingly, VA revises the text for a 10
percent disability rating to read:
‘‘Following development of HIV-related
constitutional symptoms; T4 cell count
between 200 and 500; use of approved
medication(s); or with evidence of
depression or memory loss with
employment limitations.’’ This clarifies
that the text includes four separate
criteria, consistent with the prior text,
but will eliminate the potential
confusion caused by the term ‘‘and’’
between two of those criteria. This will
ensure that the provision is
implemented in the manner most
consistent with VA’s intent and most
favorable to veterans. VA appreciates
the comments submitted in response to
the proposed rule. Based on the
rationale stated in the proposed rule and
in this document, the proposed rule is
adopted as a final rule with the changes
noted above.
Effective Date of Final Rule
VBA personnel utilize the Veterans
Benefit Management System for Rating
(VBMS–R) to process disability
compensation claims that involve
disability evaluations made under the
VASRD. In order to ensure that there is
no delay in processing veterans’ claims,
VA must coordinate the effective date of
this final rule with corresponding
VBMS–R system updates. As such, this
final rule will apply effective August 11,
2019, the date VBMS–R system updates
related to this final rule will be
complete.
E:\FR\FM\18JNR1.SGM
18JNR1
28230
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 117 / Tuesday, June 18, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and
13771
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity).
Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review)
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. Executive Order
12866 (Regulatory Planning and
Review) defines a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ which requires
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB), as any regulatory action
that is likely to result in a rule that may:
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities; (2) Create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another agency; (3) Materially alter the
budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in the Executive Order.
The economic, interagency,
budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this regulatory action
have been examined and it has been
determined not to be a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866. VA’s impact analysis can be
found as a supporting document at
https://www.regulations.gov, usually
within 48 hours after the rulemaking
document is published. Additionally, a
copy of the rulemaking and its impact
analysis are available on VA’s website at
https://www.va.gov/orpm by following
the link for VA Regulations Published
from FY 2004 through FYTD. This rule
is not an E.O. 13771 regulatory action
because this rule is not significant under
E.O. 12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that
this final rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities as they are
defined in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612. This final rule
will not affect any small entities.
Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b),
this rulemaking is exempt from the
initial and final regulatory flexibility
analysis requirements of sections 603
and 604.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
one year. This final rule will have no
such effect on State, local, and tribal
governments, or on the private sector.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule contains no provisions
constituting a collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3521).
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance program numbers and titles
for this rule are 64.102, Compensation
for Service-Connected Deaths for
Veterans’ Dependents; 64.105, Pension
to Veterans, Surviving Spouses, and
Children; 64.109, Veterans
Compensation for Service-Connected
Disability; and 64.110, Veterans
Dependency and Indemnity
Compensation for Service-Connected
Death.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 4
Disability benefits, Pensions,
Veterans.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs
approved this document and authorized
the undersigned to sign and submit the
document to the Office of the Federal
Register for publication electronically as
an official document of the Department
of Veterans Affairs. Robert L. Wilkie,
Secretary, Department of Veterans
Affairs, approved this document on May
20, 2019, for publication.
Dated: May 20, 2019.
Jeffrey M. Martin,
Assistant Director, Office of Regulation Policy
& Management, Office of the Secretary,
Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Department of Veterans
Affairs amends 38 CFR part 4 as set
forth below:
PART 4—SCHEDULE FOR RATING
DISABILITIES
1. The authority citation for part 4
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1155, unless
otherwise noted.
2. Amend § 4.88b by:
a. Adding introductory text;
b. Adding the entry ‘‘General Rating
Formula for Infectious Diseases:’’ before
the entry for diagnostic code 6300;
■ c. Revising the entries for diagnostic
codes 6300 through 6302 and 6304
through 6311;
■ d. Adding in numerical order an entry
for diagnostic code 6312;
■ e. Revising the entries for diagnostic
codes 6316 through 6320;
■ f. Adding in numerical order entries
for diagnostic codes 6325, 6326, 6329
through 6331, and 6333 through 6335;
and
■ g. Revising the entries for diagnostic
codes 6351 and 6354.
The additions and revisions read as
follows:
■
■
■
§ 4.88b Schedule of ratings-infectious
diseases, immune disorders, and nutritional
deficiencies.
Note: Rate any residual disability of
infection within the appropriate body system
as indicated by the notes in the evaluation
criteria. As applicable, consider the longterm health effects potentially associated
with infectious diseases as listed in
§ 3.317(d) of this chapter, specifically
Brucellosis, Campylobacter jejuni, Coxiella
burnetii (Q fever), Malaria, Mycobacterium
Tuberculosis, Nontyphoid Salmonella,
Shigella, Visceral Leishmaniasis, and West
Nile virus.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
Rating
General Rating Formula for Infectious Diseases:
For active disease ............................................................................................................................................................................
After active disease has resolved, rate at 0 percent for infection. Rate any residual disability of infection within the appropriate
body system.
6300 Vibriosis (Cholera, Non-cholera):
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Jun 17, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\18JNR1.SGM
18JNR1
100
28231
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 117 / Tuesday, June 18, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Rating
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
Note: Rate residuals of cholera and non-cholera vibrio infections, such as renal failure, skin, and musculoskeletal conditions,
within the appropriate body system.
6301 Visceral leishmaniasis:
As active disease .............................................................................................................................................................................
Note 1: Continue a 100 percent evaluation beyond the cessation of treatment for active disease. Six months after discontinuance of such treatment, determine the appropriate disability rating by mandatory VA examination. Any change in evaluation
based upon that or any subsequent examination shall be subject to the provisions of § 3.105(e) of this chapter. Thereafter,
rate under the appropriate body system any residual disability of infection, which includes, but is not limited to liver damage
and bone marrow disease.
Note 2: Confirm the recurrence of active infection by culture, histopathology, or other diagnostic laboratory testing.
6302 Leprosy (Hansen’s disease):
As active disease .............................................................................................................................................................................
Note: Continue a 100 percent evaluation beyond the cessation of treatment for active disease. Six months after discontinuance of such treatment, determine the appropriate disability rating by mandatory VA examination. Any change in evaluation
based upon that or any subsequent examination shall be subject to the provisions of § 3.105(e) of this chapter. Thereafter,
rate under the appropriate body system any residual disability of infection, which includes, but is not limited to, skin lesions,
peripheral neuropathy, or amputations.
6304 Malaria:
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula.
Note 1: The diagnosis of malaria, both initially and during relapse, depends on the identification of the malarial parasites in
blood smears or other specific diagnostic laboratory tests such as antigen detection, immunologic
(immunochromatographic) tests, and molecular testing such as polymerase chain reaction tests.
Note 2: Rate under the appropriate body system any residual disability of infection, which includes, but is not limited to, liver
or splenic damage, and central nervous system conditions.
6305 Lymphatic filariasis, to include elephantiasis:
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula.
Note: Rate under the appropriate body system any residual disability of infection, which includes, but is not limited to,
epididymitis, lymphangitis, lymphatic obstruction, or lymphedema affecting extremities, genitals, and/or breasts.
6306 Bartonellosis:
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula.
Note: Rate under the appropriate body system any residual disability of infection, which includes, but is not limited to, endocarditis or skin lesions.
6307 Plague:
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula.
Note: Rate under the appropriate body system any residual disability of infection.
6308 Relapsing Fever:
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula.
Note: Rate under the appropriate body system any residual disability of infection, which includes, but is not limited to, liver or
spleen damage, iritis, uveitis, or central nervous system involvement.
6309 Rheumatic fever:
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula.
Note: Rate under the appropriate body system any residual disability of infection, which includes, but is not limited to, heart
damage.
6310 Syphilis, and other treponema infections:
Note: Rate under the appropriate body system any residual disability of infection, which includes, but is not limited to, diseases of the nervous system, vascular system, eyes, or ears (see DC 7004, DC 8013, DC 8014, DC 8015, and DC 9301).
6311 Tuberculosis, miliary:
As active disease .............................................................................................................................................................................
Inactive disease: See §§ 4.88c and 4.89.
Note 1: Confirm the recurrence of active infection by culture, histopathology, or other diagnostic laboratory testing.
Note 2: Rate under the appropriate body system any residual disability of infection which includes, but is not limited to, skin
conditions and conditions of the respiratory, central nervous, musculoskeletal, ocular, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary
systems and those residuals listed in § 4.88c.
6312 Nontuberculosis mycobacterium infection:
As active disease .............................................................................................................................................................................
Note 1: Continue the rating of 100 percent for the duration of treatment for active disease followed by a mandatory VA exam.
If there is no relapse, rate on residuals. Any change in evaluation based upon that or any subsequent examination shall be
subject to the provisions of § 3.105(e) of this chapter.
Note 2: Confirm the recurrence of active infection by culture, histopathology, or other diagnostic laboratory testing.
Note 3: Rate under the appropriate body system any residual disability of infection which includes, but is not limited to, skin
conditions and conditions of the respiratory, central nervous, musculoskeletal, ocular, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary
systems and those residuals listed in § 4.88c.
*
*
*
*
*
*
6316 Brucellosis:
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula.
Note 1: Culture, serologic testing, or both must confirm the initial diagnosis and recurrence of active infection.
Note 2: Rate under the appropriate body system any residual disability of infection, which includes, but is not limited to, meningitis, liver, spleen and musculoskeletal conditions.
6317 Rickettsial, ehrlichia, and anaplasma infections:
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula.
Note 1: Rate under the appropriate body system any residual disability of infection, which includes, but is not limited to, bone
marrow, spleen, central nervous system, and skin conditions.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Jun 17, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\18JNR1.SGM
18JNR1
100
100
100
100
*
28232
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 117 / Tuesday, June 18, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Rating
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
Note 2: This diagnostic code includes, but is not limited to, scrub typhus, Rickettsial pox, African tick-borne fever, Rocky
Mountain spotted fever, ehrlichiosis, or anaplasmosis.
6318 Melioidosis:
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula.
Note 1: Confirm by culture or other specific diagnostic laboratory tests the initial diagnosis and any relapse or chronic activity
of infection.
Note 2: Rate under the appropriate body system any residual disability of infection, which includes, but is not limited to, arthritis, lung lesions, or meningitis.
6319 Lyme disease:
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula.
Note: Rate under the appropriate body system any residual disability of infection, which includes, but is not limited to, arthritis,
Bell’s palsy, radiculopathy, ocular, or cognitive dysfunction.
6320 Parasitic diseases otherwise not specified:
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula.
Note: Rate under the appropriate body system any residual disability of infection.
6325 Hyperinfection syndrome or disseminated strongyloidiasis:
As active disease .............................................................................................................................................................................
Note: Continue the rating of 100 percent through active disease followed by a mandatory VA exam. If there is no relapse, rate
on residual disability. Any change in evaluation based upon that or any subsequent examination shall be subject to the provisions of § 3.105(e) of this chapter.
6326 Schistosomiasis:
As acute or asymptomatic chronic disease .....................................................................................................................................
Note: Rate under the appropriate body system any residual disability of infection, which includes, but is not limited to, conditions of the liver, intestinal system, female genital tract, genitourinary tract, or central nervous system.
6329 Hemorrhagic fevers, including dengue, yellow fever, and others:
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula.
Note: Rate under the appropriate body system any residual disability of infection, which includes, but is not limited to, conditions of the central nervous system, liver, or kidney.
6330 Campylobacter jejuni infection:
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula.
Note: Rate under the appropriate body system any residual disability of infection, which includes, but is not limited to, GuillainBarre syndrome, reactive arthritis, or uveitis.
6331 Coxiella burnetii infection (Q fever):
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula.
Note: Rate under the appropriate body system any residual disability of infection, which includes, but is not limited to, chronic
hepatitis, endocarditis, osteomyelitis, post Q-fever chronic fatigue syndrome, or vascular infections.
6333 Nontyphoid salmonella infections:
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula.
Note: Rate under the appropriate body system any residual disability of infection, which includes, but is not limited to, reactive
arthritis.
6334 Shigella infections:
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula.
Note: Rate under the appropriate body system any residual disability of infection, which includes, but is not limited to, hemolytic-uremic syndrome or reactive arthritis.
6335 West Nile virus infection:
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula.
Note: Rate under the appropriate body system any residual disability of infection, which includes, but is not limited to, variable
physical, functional, or cognitive disabilities.
*
*
*
*
*
*
6351 HIV-related illness:
AIDS with recurrent opportunistic infections (see Note 3) or with secondary diseases afflicting multiple body systems; HIV-related illness with debility and progressive weight loss .................................................................................................................
Refractory constitutional symptoms, diarrhea, and pathological weight loss; or minimum rating following development of AIDSrelated opportunistic infection or neoplasm ..................................................................................................................................
Recurrent constitutional symptoms, intermittent diarrhea, and use of approved medication(s); or minimum rating with T4 cell
count less than 200 ......................................................................................................................................................................
Following development of HIV-related constitutional symptoms; T4 cell count between 200 and 500; use of approved medication(s); or with evidence of depression or memory loss with employment limitations .................................................................
Asymptomatic, following initial diagnosis of HIV infection, with or without lymphadenopathy or decreased T4 cell count ............
Note 1: In addition to standard therapies and regimens, the term ‘‘approved medication(s)’’ includes treatment regimens and
medications prescribed as part of a research protocol at an accredited medical institution.
Note 2: Diagnosed psychiatric illness, central nervous system manifestations, opportunistic infections, and neoplasms may be
rated separately under the appropriate diagnostic codes if a higher overall evaluation results, provided the disability symptoms do not overlap with evaluations otherwise assignable above.
Note 3: The following list of opportunistic infections are considered AIDS-defining conditions, that is, a diagnosis of AIDS follows if a person has HIV and one more of these infections, regardless of the CD4 count—candidiasis of the bronchi, trachea, esophagus, or lungs; invasive cervical cancer; coccidioidomycosis; cryptococcosis; cryptosporidiosis; cytomegalovirus
(particularly CMV retinitis); HIV-related encephalopathy; herpes simplex-chronic ulcers for greater than one month, or bronchitis, pneumonia, or esophagitis; histoplasmosis; isosporiasis (chronic intestinal); Kaposi’s sarcoma; lymphoma;
mycobacterium avium complex; tuberculosis; pneumocystis jirovecii (carinii) pneumonia; pneumonia, recurrent; progressive
multifocal leukoencephalopathy; salmonella septicemia, recurrent; toxoplasmosis of the brain; and wasting syndrome due to
HIV.
6354 Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS):
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Jun 17, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\18JNR1.SGM
18JNR1
100
0
*
100
60
30
10
0
28233
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 117 / Tuesday, June 18, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Rating
Debilitating fatigue, cognitive impairments (such as inability to concentrate, forgetfulness, or confusion), or a combination of
other signs and symptoms:
Which are nearly constant and so severe as to restrict routine daily activities almost completely and which may occasionally preclude self-care ............................................................................................................................................................
Which are nearly constant and restrict routine daily activities to less than 50 percent of the pre-illness level; or which wax
and wane, resulting in periods of incapacitation of at least six weeks total duration per year ............................................
Which are nearly constant and restrict routine daily activities from 50 to 75 percent of the pre-illness level; or which wax
and wane, resulting in periods of incapacitation of at least four but less than six weeks total duration per year ...............
Which are nearly constant and restrict routine daily activities by less than 25 percent of the pre-illness level; or which wax
and wane, resulting in periods of incapacitation of at least two but less than four weeks total duration per year ..............
Which wax and wane but result in periods of incapacitation of at least one but less than two weeks total duration per
year; or symptoms controlled by continuous medication ......................................................................................................
Note: For the purpose of evaluating this disability, incapacitation exists only when a licensed physician prescribes bed
rest and treatment.
3. In appendix A to part 4, amend
entry 4.88b by:
■ a. Revising the entry before the entry
for diagnostic code 6300;
■ b. Revising the entry for diagnostic
code 6300;
■ c. Adding in numerical order an entry
for diagnostic code 6301;
■
d. Revising the entries for diagnostic
codes 6302 and 6304 through 6309;
■ e. Adding in numerical order entries
for diagnostic codes 6310 through 6312;
■ f. Revising the entries for diagnostic
codes 6316 through 6320;
■ g. Adding in numerical order entries
for diagnostic codes 6325, 6326, 6329
■
100
60
40
20
10
through 6331, and 6333 through 6335;
and
■ h. Revising the entries for diagnostic
codes 6351 and 6354.
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
APPENDIX A TO PART 4—TABLE OF AMENDMENTS AND EFFECTIVE DATES SINCE 1946
Sec.
Diagnostic
code No.
*
4.88b ..............
*
........................
6300
6301
6302
6304
6305
6306
6307
6308
6309
6310
6311
6312
*
*
*
*
*
Added March 11, 1969; re-designated § 4.88c November 29, 1994; § 4.88a re-designated to § 4.88b November 29, 1994; General Rating Formula for Infectious Diseases added August 11, 2019.
Criterion August 30, 1996; title, criterion, and note August 11, 2019.
Criterion, note August 11, 2019.
Criterion September 22, 1978; criterion August 30, 1996; criterion, note August 11, 2019.
Evaluation August 30, 1996; criterion, note August 11, 2019.
Criterion March 1, 1989; evaluation August 30, 1996; title, criterion, note August 11, 2019.
Evaluation August 30, 1996; criterion, note August 11, 2019.
Criterion May 13, 2018; criterion, note August 11, 2019.
Criterion August 30, 1996; criterion, note August 11, 2019.
Added March 1, 1963; criterion March 1, 1989; criterion August 30, 1996; criterion, note August 11, 2019.
Criterion, note August 11, 2019.
Criterion, note August 11, 2019.
Added August 11, 2019.
*
*
6316
6317
6318
6319
6320
6325
6326
6329
6330
6331
6333
6334
6335
*
*
*
*
Evaluation March 1, 1989; evaluation August 30, 1996; criterion, note August 11, 2019.
Criterion August 30, 1996; title, criterion, note August 11, 2019.
Added March 1, 1989; criterion August 30, 1996; criterion, note August 11, 2019.
Added August 30, 1996; criterion, note August 11, 2019.
Added August 30, 1996; criterion, note August 11, 2019.
Added August 11, 2019.
Added August 11, 2019.
Added August 11, 2019.
Added August 11, 2019.
Added August 11, 2019.
Added August 11, 2019.
Added August 11, 2019.
Added August 11, 2019.
*
*
6351
*
*
*
*
*
Added March 1, 1989; evaluation March 24, 1992; criterion August 30, 1996; criterion, note August 11, 2019.
*
*
6354
*
*
*
*
Added November 29, 1994; criterion August 30, 1996; title, criterion, note August 11, 2019.
*
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Jun 17, 2019
*
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
*
Frm 00063
Fmt 4700
*
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\18JNR1.SGM
*
18JNR1
*
*
*
28234
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 117 / Tuesday, June 18, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
4. Amend appendix B to part 4 by:
a. Revising the entries for diagnostic
codes 6300 and 6305;
■ b. Adding in numerical order an entry
for diagnostic code 6312;
■
■
c. Revising the entry for diagnostic
code 6317; and
■ d. Adding in numerical order entries
for diagnostic codes 6325, 6326, 6329
through 6331, and 6333 through 6335.
■
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
APPENDIX B TO PART 4—NUMERICAL INDEX OF DISABILITIES
Diagnostic code No.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Infectious Diseases, Immune Disorders and Nutrional Deficiencies
6300 .............................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
6305 .............................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
6325
6326
6329
6330
6331
6333
6334
6335
*
*
*
*
5. Amend appendix C to part 4 by:
a. Adding in alphabetical order an
entry for ‘‘Campylobacter jejuni
infection’’;
■ b. Removing the entry for ‘‘Cholera,
Asiatic’’;
■ c. Adding in alphabetical order entries
for ‘‘Coxiella burnetii infection (Q
Fever)’’, ‘‘Hemorrhagic fevers, including
dengue, yellow fever, and others’’, and
■
■
*
*
*
Nontuberculosis mycobacterium infection.
*
*
*
Rickettsial, ehrlichia, and anaplasma infections.
*
.............................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................
*
Lymphatic filariasis, to include elephantiasis.
*
6317 .............................................................................................................
*
*
*
6312 .............................................................................................................
*
Vibriosis (Cholera, Non-cholera).
*
*
*
Hyperinfection syndrome or disseminated strongyloidiasis.
Schistosomiasis.
Hemorrhagic fevers, including dengue, yellow fever, and others.
Campylobacter jejuni infection.
Coxiella burnetii infection (Q Fever).
Nontyphoid salmonella infections.
Shigella infections.
West Nile virus infection.
*
*
‘‘Hyperinfection syndrome or
disseminated strongyloidiasis’’;
■ d. Removing the entry for ‘‘Lymphatic
filariasis’’;
■ e. Adding in alphabetical order entries
for ‘‘Lymphatic filariasis, to include
elephantiasis’’, ‘‘Nontuberculosis
mycobacterium infection’’,
‘‘Nontyphoid salmonella infection’’,
‘‘Rickettsial, erlichial, and Anaplasma
*
*
infections’’, ‘‘Schistosomiasis’’ and
‘‘Shigella infections’’;
■ f. Removing the entry for ‘‘Typhus,
scrub’’; and
■ g. Adding in alphabetical order entries
for ‘‘Vibriosis (Cholera, Non-cholera)’’
and ‘‘West Nile virus infection’’.
The additions and revisions read as
follows:
APPENDIX C TO PART 4—ALPHABETICAL INDEX OF DISABILITIES
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
Diagnostic code
No.
*
*
*
*
*
*
Campylobacter jejuni infection .....................................................................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Coxiella burnetii infection (Q Fever) ............................................................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Hemorrhagic fevers, including dengue, yellow fever, and others ...............................................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Hyperinfection syndrome or disseminated strongyloidiasis .........................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Lymphatic filariasis, to include elephantiasis ..............................................................................................................................
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Jun 17, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\18JNR1.SGM
18JNR1
6330
6331
6329
6325
6305
28235
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 117 / Tuesday, June 18, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
APPENDIX C TO PART 4—ALPHABETICAL INDEX OF DISABILITIES—Continued
Diagnostic code
No.
*
*
*
*
*
*
Nontuberculosis mycobacterium infection ...................................................................................................................................
Nontyphoid salmonella infection ..................................................................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Rickettsial, ehrlichia, and anaplasma Infections .........................................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Schistosomiasis ...........................................................................................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Shigella infections ........................................................................................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Vibriosis (Cholera, Non-cholera) .................................................................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
West Nile virus infection ..............................................................................................................................................................
*
[FR Doc. 2019–12682 Filed 6–17–19; 8:45 am]
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
INFORMATION).
The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0560, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert McNally, Biopesticides and
Pollution Prevention Division (7511P),
Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001; main telephone number:
(703) 305–7090; email address:
BPPDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0560; FRL–9994–90]
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subspecies
plantarum strain FZB42; Exemption
From the Requirement of a Tolerance
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of Bacillus
amyloliquefaciens subspecies
plantarum strain FZB42 in or on all
food commodities when used in
accordance with label directions and
good agricultural practices. Andermatt
Biocontrol AG (c/o SciReg, Inc.)
submitted a petition to EPA under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA), requesting an exemption from
the requirement of a tolerance. This
regulation eliminates the need to
establish a maximum permissible level
for residues of Bacillus
amyloliquefaciens subspecies
plantarum strain FZB42 in or on all
food commodities under FFDCA.
DATES: This regulation is effective June
18, 2019. Objections and requests for
hearings must be received on or before
August 19, 2019 and must be filed in
accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Jun 17, 2019
Jkt 247001
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
6312
6333
6317
6326
6334
6300
6335
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to
other related information?
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of 40 CFR part 180
through the Government Printing
Office’s e-CFR site at https://
www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/textidx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/
40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing
request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. You must file your objection
or request a hearing on this regulation
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2014–0560 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
objections and requests for a hearing
must be in writing and must be received
by the Hearing Clerk on or before
August 19, 2019. Addresses for mail and
hand delivery of objections and hearing
requests are provided in 40 CFR
178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
E:\FR\FM\18JNR1.SGM
18JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 117 (Tuesday, June 18, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 28227-28235]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-12682]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 4
RIN 2900-AQ43
Schedule for Rating Disabilities; Infectious Diseases, Immune
Disorders, and Nutritional Deficiencies
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document amends the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) by revising the portion of the
schedule that addresses infectious diseases, immune disorders, and
nutritional deficiencies. The effect of this action is to ensure that
the rating schedule uses current medical terminology and to provide
detailed and updated criteria for evaluation of infectious diseases,
immune disorders, and nutritional deficiencies for disability rating
purposes.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is effective August 11, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ioulia Vvedenskaya, M.D., M.B.A.,
Medical Officer, Part 4 VASRD Regulations Staff (211C), Compensation
Service, Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20420,
[email protected], (202) 461-9700 (This is not a toll-free
telephone number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VA published a proposed rule in the Federal
Register at 84 FR 1678 on February 5, 2019, to amend 38 CFR 4.88a and
4.88b, the portion of the VASRD dealing with infectious diseases,
immune disorders, and nutritional deficiencies. VA provided a 60-day
public comment period, and interested persons were invited to submit
written comments on or before April 8, 2019. VA received 32 comments.
One commenter supported VA's intent to eliminate obsolete
terminology and substitute the most up-to-date terms and definitions
for conditions such as Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. The commenter noted
that this rule would help to achieve the important public policy goal
of clear, effective communication among veterans, their health care
providers, and the Department. Additionally, the commenter observed
that it is important that what appears to be ``catch-all'' language
appended to the respective disease evaluation categories be correctly
phrased to minimize the likelihood that deserving patients will be
excluded from care. The commenter suggested that VA should consider
identifying the ``residual effects'' categories explicitly so the
rating decisions and appeals would be most favorable to the veterans
seeking care. The commenter further suggested that VA consider
expressly recognizing that any ambiguity in the rules regarding covered
residual effects should be resolved in the veteran's favor. VA makes no
changes based on these comments. The proposed diagnostic codes provided
examples of common residuals of specific diseases, but also made clear
that the instruction to rate ``any residual disability'' from a disease
``includes, but is not limited to'' the listed examples. We believe
this language is sufficiently clear and broad to ensure that any
residuals identified in individual cases may be appropriately
evaluated. We do not believe it is necessary or advisable to seek to
list in these regulations all of the conditions that may be found to be
residuals of diseases in specific cases. Further, because these rules
do not restrict the conditions that may be found in individual cases to
be residuals of a disease, we do not believe the regulation is
restrictive or ambiguous on that issue. We note also that the principle
of resolving reasonable doubt in favor of veterans is established in 38
CFR 3.102 and 4.3.
One commenter expressed an opinion that this regulatory update can
be viewed as a bureaucratic move to disenfranchise veterans eligible
for unspecified services. The commenter did not offer any specific
recommendations and did not propose any actions. VA makes no changes
based on this comment.
One commenter stated that vector-borne diseases (VBD) are of major
importance to human health both locally and globally. In addition, the
commenter highlighted that the precise diagnoses of many of these
diseases remains a major challenge because of the lack of comprehensive
data available on accurate and reliable diagnostic methods,
specifically for borreliosis (Lyme disease). The commenter did not
offer a specific recommendation or a course of action. VA makes no
changes based on this comment.
Two commenters were concerned that by implementing a General Rating
Formula (GRF) for infectious diseases, VA would drastically change
veterans' ratings from 100 percent to zero percent, dependent upon
whether the disease is deemed active or resolved based upon a
laboratory test. Commenters noted that there is considerable evidence
that laboratory tests may not always be deemed reliable and that each
laboratory may have differing references ranges leading to improper
reading of results. However, VA's proposed GRF did not alter the rating
principles for infectious diseases, which currently provide--in
individual diagnostic codes rather than a GRF--for evaluation of active
diseases and residuals. Instead, we updated the format of the rating
schedule to indicate that the GFR for infectious diseases would be
consistent for rating these conditions and also be similar to the use
of a GFR in other sections of the VASRD, such as in 38 CFR 4.97, 4.116,
4.130, and others. Currently, VA assigns a 100-percent evaluation for
each specific infectious disease during an active period; thereafter,
any residual functional impairment from the infectious disease
determines the level of disability. VA pointed out that its proposed
GFR would be a familiar concept for Veterans Benefits Administration
(VBA) employees and minimize the risk for error by providing one
criterion applicable to multiple diagnostic codes (DCs). Additionally,
VA did not propose any laboratory testing in its GFR, but instead we
proposed to confirm the recurrence of active infection for certain
conditions (DCs 6301, 6304, 6311, 6312, 6316) with overlapping clinical
symptoms such as pallor, fever and hepatosplenomegaly. By adding a
specific reference to laboratory testing for each infection, we made an
effort to distinguish one infection from another. VA makes no changes
based on this comment.
Additionally, commenters were concerned that the proposed GRF would
not consider veterans' ability to maintain gainful employment because
many infectious diseases, even after negative laboratory test results,
can cause long-lasting residual symptoms that may last up to eight
weeks or longer and that lingering, residual symptoms would adversely
affect a veteran's normal functioning and his/her ability to maintain
gainful employment. The proposed GRF is designed to assess permanent
functional impairment that resulted from long-lasting residual symptoms
rather than rely solely on a specific laboratory test. The proposed
[[Page 28228]]
GFR directs rating personnel to rate any residual effect of acute and/
or chronic infection and to determine the degree of disability within
the appropriate body system using the same principles as they exist in
the current rating schedule. VA's disability compensation benefits are
based on the extent of average impairment of earning capacity from the
service-connected injury or disease and this focus is reflected
throughout the rating schedule. Therefore, VA makes no changes based on
this comment.
One commenter expressed concern regarding West Nile Virus
infection, stating infected individuals could experience headaches,
body aches, joint pains, vomiting, diarrhea, or rash during an acute
phase of the disease and that the residual symptoms could last for an
extended period. The commenter specifically noted a severe complication
of the West Nile Virus infection that affects the central nervous
system in its acute phase and that such complications could become
clinically permanent. The commenter proposed to list specific
neuroinvasive diseases such as meningitis and encephalitis as residuals
of West Nile Virus in Sec. 4.88b and to be rated under the applicable
DC code(s). The commenter further interpreted the note under DC 6335
that VA would rate West Nile virus infection residuals and residuals
listed in Sec. 3.317 together and was concerned that this approach
would cause confusion and limit this DC to only a subset of Persian
Gulf veterans who served in the Southwest Asia Theater of Operations
and are entitled to presumptive service connection. VA clarifies that
the note under DC 6335 concerning Sec. 3.317 is intended solely to
serve as a reference that provides guidance to the adjudicator in
rating a disease under this DC. The reference to Sec. 3.317 is not
intended nor can it be read to restrict application of DC 6335 to
veterans with Southwest Asia service. As West Nile infection and other
similar infectious diseases have complex disability pictures that are
not commonly seen by VA adjudicators, the inclusion of the Sec.
3.317(d) reference under DC 6335 is specifically meant to assist our
adjudicators in understanding the nature of the disease and, most
critically, the usual residual disabilities of the disease. Referencing
Sec. 3.317(d) in the note for infectious diseases like the West Nile
virus serves to impart understanding to VA adjudicators that such
infectious diseases may result in various residuals or complications
with physical, functional, or cognitive effects and enables
adjudicators to accurately rate veterans with these diseases. In
response and in order to minimize any confusion, VA has removed the
notes that reference 38 CFR 3.317(d) from the Infectious Diseases
rating criteria for DCs 6301, 6304, 6316, 6330, 6331, 6333-6335. VA has
added the reference to 38 CFR 3.317(d) as a note in a new introductory
paragraph before the rating schedule for infectious diseases, immune
disorders, and nutritional deficiencies in 38 CFR 4.88b.
Additionally, commenters expressed a concern that the proposed GRF
will negatively affect veterans' care and treatment. VA appreciates
commenters' concerns; however, VA's Rating Schedule for Disabilities
does not regulate veterans' access to clinical care. Further, as
explained above, the provisions in the proposed GRF for rating active
diseases and residuals are consistent with the existing provisions
under individual diagnostic codes in Sec. 4.88b and will not
significantly change how VA evaluates these conditions. VA makes no
changes based on these comments.
One commenter supported the need for greater simplification of the
rating schedule and disability determination process and was concerned
that this proposed update to the schedule for infectious disease,
immune disorders and nutritional deficiencies excludes nurse
practitioners and their patients. Specifically, the commenter noted
that the proposed criteria for determining incapacitation related to
systemic exertion intolerance disease (SEID)/chronic fatigue syndrome
(CFS) require bed rest and treatment prescribed by a licensed physician
and that a physician who administered diagnostic tests ruled out
ongoing exertion or other medical conditions associated with fatigue.
The commenter requested that the Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
revise this proposed rating schedule update and add ``or nurse
practitioner'' after the word ``physician'' in all sections. The
commenter also asked that, in future revisions of the rating schedule,
VHA recognize that thousands of veterans receive care from nurse
practitioners and to include nurse practitioners in the language of the
rating schedule. VA clarifies that this rulemaking pertains to the
Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) and addresses disability
evaluations due to the functional impairment related to service-
connected health conditions. This rulemaking does not address the scope
of clinical practice for nurse practitioners. However, VBA will assess
whether amendments to the list of qualifying heath care providers are
necessary and such amendments, if any, will be addressed in a future
proposal. VA makes no changes based on this comment.
One commenter stated that it is unfair that a National Guard
soldier who was called to active duty and then immediately released
upon return from the Middle East has to have manifested one of the
infectious diseases listed in Sec. 3.317 within one year from
separation (aside from three exceptions), whereas an active duty
solider who redeploys from Iraq or Afghanistan and serves several more
years on active duty only has to show the disease within a year after
separation, which may be several years after service in Iraq or
Afghanistan. This comment relates to the time period prescribed in 38
CFR 3.317(c)(3) for applying the presumption of service connection for
infectious diseases in veterans who served in the Southwest Asia
theater of operations during the Persian Gulf War. The proposed rules
pertained only to the criteria for evaluating the severity of service-
connected infectious diseases, immune disorders, and nutritional
deficiencies. They did not propose to address matters concerning the
establishment of service connection or the operation of presumptions of
service connection for any diseases. Accordingly, the comment is beyond
the scope of this rulemaking. VA makes no changes based on this
comment.
Multiple commenters including individual veterans, Veterans
Advocacy Organizations, Veterans Service Organizations, and other
professional organizations expressed a wide range of concerns regarding
the proposed changes to the definition of chronic fatigue syndrome
(CFS) under Sec. 4.88a and the name change for DC 6354. Commenters
thought the name change of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) to Systemic
Exertion Intolerance Disease/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (SEID/CFS) was
unwarranted and that it would create unnecessary confusion among
medical providers, including non-VA medical providers. Commenters also
stated that that the new name, Systemic Exertion Intolerance Disease
(SEID), has not been adopted by any federal agency, nor by researchers
and clinicians and that the CDC, National Institutes of Health (NIH),
research publications, and materials for patients and health care
providers all use the term ME/CFS. Commenters felt that VA's use of the
term SEID/CFS would introduce confusion among medical providers and
patients at VA and reduce VA's ability to coordinate with other federal
agencies.
Commenters expressed that the proposed changes to the definition of
CFS does not conform to the Kansas
[[Page 28229]]
Criteria (2000), the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Chronic
Multisymptom Illness (CMI) criteria, and to those used in VA-funded
research into Gulf War Illness (GWI) and that the proposed definition
is not compatible with the department of Defense (DoD) Congressionally
Directed Medical Research Programs (CDMRP) for CMI. Commenters stated
that VA's proposed combination of the Institute of Medicine (IOM)
reevaluation of CFS as SEID with the 1994 Fukuda criteria for CFS
presents an amalgamation that is not based in evidence nor discussed in
any publications. The commenters expressed concern that VA did not
follow any recommendations from the IOM, the Gulf War Research Advisory
Committee (RAC), CDC, or other agencies and this combination is for an
entirely new entity that is not known by World Health Organization,
International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) or
other medical classification system and that the VA proposed definition
is not compatible with the one mandated by DoD's CDMRP for CMI and the
Kansas Criteria to qualify for GWI research funding.
Commenters noted that VA did not consult the RAC on these proposed
changes and stated that the RAC is responsible for understanding the
definitions and entirety of the condition. Commenters also were
concerned that the proposed changes would leave those Gulf War veterans
who receive care and services for CFS, vulnerable to VA manipulation of
their care and services. The commenters suggested that CFS should be
studied by the Gulf War research community, the veteran community, CFS
researchers, the RAC, and independent medical professionals and that VA
rely on the recommendations from these parties as a guide for new
criteria updates and to ascertain if these changes are even warranted.
Commenters also stated that VA would be directly and negatively
impacting more than 300,000 Gulf War veterans suffering from Gulf War
Illness by not relying on the studies from these parties and by
combining, in whole or in part, the 2015 Systemic Exertion Intolerance
Disease (SEID) and the 1994 Fukuda CDC criteria for Chronic Fatigue
Syndrome (CFS) into what would be called SEID/CFS.
Commenters felt that VA's adoption of the Fukuda criteria is a step
backwards that will perpetuate diagnostic inaccuracy and cause harm to
Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) patients
served by the VA. Commenters referenced the 2015 IOM Report to state
that the Fukuda criteria were overly broad because they do not require
the hallmark symptom of post-exertional malaise and should not be used
because of the possibility of misdiagnosing patients with other
conditions. Commenters believed that VA's reliance on outdated Fukuda
diagnostic criteria would cause harm to veterans with ME/CFS through
misdiagnosis and cause a mismatch with the diagnostic criteria in use
elsewhere. Commenters suggested that VA adopt ME/CFS or ME/CFS/SEID
title for the illness to stay in alignment with the greater ME/CFS
community, to include patients, doctors, and researchers. Commenters
felt that VA's proposed revisions were based on financial reasons in
order to revoke benefits from existing veterans and prevent other
veterans from receiving this combined diagnosis of SEID/CFS.
Commenters also provided questions and recommended that VA adopt
ME/CFS instead of SEID/CFS; reject the Fukuda criteria; and adopt the
IOM diagnostic criteria.
Another recommendation was for VA to revise Sec. 4.88a to more
closely mirror the diagnostic standard endorsed by the IOM and CDC and
eliminate the listed exclusions to allow the veterans' examining and/or
treating physician to make a final determination as to the appropriate
diagnosis for veterans. In addition, commenters recommended that VA
should broaden the group of medical professionals authorized to
prescribe bed rest and treatment to meet the incapacitation standard.
While VA received some support for updating its definition of CFS,
VA considered these comments and concerns and concluded that this
proposed update to Sec. 4.88a is premature and that additional
research is needed to provide a more comprehensive way to determine the
disabling effects of CFS and associated conditions. Therefore, VA is
withdrawing its proposal to amend Sec. 4.88a Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.
To ensure that the full range of relevant factors is adequately
addressed, VA intends to establish a work group to specifically address
this condition. Upon assessment of the work group's findings, VA will
determine whether amendments to Sec. 4.88a are necessary and such
amendments, if any, will be addressed in a future proposal.
VA makes one clarifying change to the criteria for a 10 percent
disability rating under DC 6351, HIV-related illness. In the proposed
rule, VA proposed to replace the phrase ``definite medical symptoms''
with ``HIV-related constitutional symptoms'' but stated that we would
otherwise make no change to the criteria for a 10 percent evaluation.
The prior criteria for a 10 percent evaluation read: ``Following
development of definite medical symptoms, T4 cells of 200 or more and
less than 500, and on approved medication(s), or with evidence of
depression or memory loss with employment limitations.'' We proposed to
revise this to read: ``Following development of HIV-related
constitutional symptoms; T4 cell count between 200 and 500, and use of
approved medication(s); or with evidence of depression or memory loss
with employment limitations.'' In its review of the final rule, VA
realized that the prior text for a 10 percent disability rating was
unclear because it listed four criteria, separated by commas, but used
``and'' between the second and third criteria, while using ``or''
between the third and fourth criteria. The proposed text listed three
criteria, separated by semicolons, with the second of those criteria
encompassing both the second and third criteria of the prior text,
joined by the word ``and''. We recognize that the combination of
punctuation and conjunctions in both the prior and the propsed text
could create confusion. Accordingly, VA revises the text for a 10
percent disability rating to read: ``Following development of HIV-
related constitutional symptoms; T4 cell count between 200 and 500; use
of approved medication(s); or with evidence of depression or memory
loss with employment limitations.'' This clarifies that the text
includes four separate criteria, consistent with the prior text, but
will eliminate the potential confusion caused by the term ``and''
between two of those criteria. This will ensure that the provision is
implemented in the manner most consistent with VA's intent and most
favorable to veterans. VA appreciates the comments submitted in
response to the proposed rule. Based on the rationale stated in the
proposed rule and in this document, the proposed rule is adopted as a
final rule with the changes noted above.
Effective Date of Final Rule
VBA personnel utilize the Veterans Benefit Management System for
Rating (VBMS-R) to process disability compensation claims that involve
disability evaluations made under the VASRD. In order to ensure that
there is no delay in processing veterans' claims, VA must coordinate
the effective date of this final rule with corresponding VBMS-R system
updates. As such, this final rule will apply effective August 11, 2019,
the date VBMS-R system updates related to this final rule will be
complete.
[[Page 28230]]
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 13771
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, and other advantages; distributive impacts;
and equity). Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review) emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility.
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) defines a
``significant regulatory action,'' which requires review by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB), as any regulatory action that is likely
to result in a rule that may: (1) Have an annual effect on the economy
of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a material way the
economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities; (2) Create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user
fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in
the Executive Order.
The economic, interagency, budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this regulatory action have been examined and it has
been determined not to be a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866. VA's impact analysis can be found as a
supporting document at https://www.regulations.gov, usually within 48
hours after the rulemaking document is published. Additionally, a copy
of the rulemaking and its impact analysis are available on VA's website
at https://www.va.gov/orpm by following the link for VA Regulations
Published from FY 2004 through FYTD. This rule is not an E.O. 13771
regulatory action because this rule is not significant under E.O.
12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that this final rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-
612. This final rule will not affect any small entities. Therefore,
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this rulemaking is exempt from the initial
and final regulatory flexibility analysis requirements of sections 603
and 604.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C.
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year. This final rule will have no such effect on
State, local, and tribal governments, or on the private sector.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule contains no provisions constituting a collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3521).
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance program numbers and
titles for this rule are 64.102, Compensation for Service-Connected
Deaths for Veterans' Dependents; 64.105, Pension to Veterans, Surviving
Spouses, and Children; 64.109, Veterans Compensation for Service-
Connected Disability; and 64.110, Veterans Dependency and Indemnity
Compensation for Service-Connected Death.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 4
Disability benefits, Pensions, Veterans.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs approved this document and
authorized the undersigned to sign and submit the document to the
Office of the Federal Register for publication electronically as an
official document of the Department of Veterans Affairs. Robert L.
Wilkie, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, approved this
document on May 20, 2019, for publication.
Dated: May 20, 2019.
Jeffrey M. Martin,
Assistant Director, Office of Regulation Policy & Management, Office of
the Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department of Veterans
Affairs amends 38 CFR part 4 as set forth below:
PART 4--SCHEDULE FOR RATING DISABILITIES
0
1. The authority citation for part 4 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1155, unless otherwise noted.
0
2. Amend Sec. 4.88b by:
0
a. Adding introductory text;
0
b. Adding the entry ``General Rating Formula for Infectious Diseases:''
before the entry for diagnostic code 6300;
0
c. Revising the entries for diagnostic codes 6300 through 6302 and 6304
through 6311;
0
d. Adding in numerical order an entry for diagnostic code 6312;
0
e. Revising the entries for diagnostic codes 6316 through 6320;
0
f. Adding in numerical order entries for diagnostic codes 6325, 6326,
6329 through 6331, and 6333 through 6335; and
0
g. Revising the entries for diagnostic codes 6351 and 6354.
The additions and revisions read as follows:
Sec. 4.88b Schedule of ratings-infectious diseases, immune disorders,
and nutritional deficiencies.
Note: Rate any residual disability of infection within the
appropriate body system as indicated by the notes in the evaluation
criteria. As applicable, consider the long-term health effects
potentially associated with infectious diseases as listed in Sec.
3.317(d) of this chapter, specifically Brucellosis, Campylobacter
jejuni, Coxiella burnetii (Q fever), Malaria, Mycobacterium
Tuberculosis, Nontyphoid Salmonella, Shigella, Visceral
Leishmaniasis, and West Nile virus.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rating
------------------------------------------------------------------------
General Rating Formula for Infectious Diseases:
For active disease..................................... 100
After active disease has resolved, rate at 0 percent
for infection. Rate any residual disability of
infection within the appropriate body system.
6300 Vibriosis (Cholera, Non-cholera):
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula.
[[Page 28231]]
Note: Rate residuals of cholera and non-cholera vibrio
infections, such as renal failure, skin, and
musculoskeletal conditions, within the appropriate
body system.
6301 Visceral leishmaniasis:
As active disease...................................... 100
Note 1: Continue a 100 percent evaluation beyond the
cessation of treatment for active disease. Six months
after discontinuance of such treatment, determine the
appropriate disability rating by mandatory VA
examination. Any change in evaluation based upon that
or any subsequent examination shall be subject to the
provisions of Sec. 3.105(e) of this chapter.
Thereafter, rate under the appropriate body system any
residual disability of infection, which includes, but
is not limited to liver damage and bone marrow
disease.
Note 2: Confirm the recurrence of active infection by
culture, histopathology, or other diagnostic
laboratory testing.
6302 Leprosy (Hansen's disease):
As active disease...................................... 100
Note: Continue a 100 percent evaluation beyond the
cessation of treatment for active disease. Six months
after discontinuance of such treatment, determine the
appropriate disability rating by mandatory VA
examination. Any change in evaluation based upon that
or any subsequent examination shall be subject to the
provisions of Sec. 3.105(e) of this chapter.
Thereafter, rate under the appropriate body system any
residual disability of infection, which includes, but
is not limited to, skin lesions, peripheral
neuropathy, or amputations.
6304 Malaria:
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula.
Note 1: The diagnosis of malaria, both initially and
during relapse, depends on the identification of the
malarial parasites in blood smears or other specific
diagnostic laboratory tests such as antigen detection,
immunologic (immunochromatographic) tests, and
molecular testing such as polymerase chain reaction
tests.
Note 2: Rate under the appropriate body system any
residual disability of infection, which includes, but
is not limited to, liver or splenic damage, and
central nervous system conditions.
6305 Lymphatic filariasis, to include elephantiasis:
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula.
Note: Rate under the appropriate body system any
residual disability of infection, which includes, but
is not limited to, epididymitis, lymphangitis,
lymphatic obstruction, or lymphedema affecting
extremities, genitals, and/or breasts.
6306 Bartonellosis:
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula.
Note: Rate under the appropriate body system any
residual disability of infection, which includes, but
is not limited to, endocarditis or skin lesions.
6307 Plague:
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula.
Note: Rate under the appropriate body system any
residual disability of infection.
6308 Relapsing Fever:
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula.
Note: Rate under the appropriate body system any
residual disability of infection, which includes, but
is not limited to, liver or spleen damage, iritis,
uveitis, or central nervous system involvement.
6309 Rheumatic fever:
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula.
Note: Rate under the appropriate body system any
residual disability of infection, which includes, but
is not limited to, heart damage.
6310 Syphilis, and other treponema infections:
Note: Rate under the appropriate body system any
residual disability of infection, which includes, but
is not limited to, diseases of the nervous system,
vascular system, eyes, or ears (see DC 7004, DC 8013,
DC 8014, DC 8015, and DC 9301).
6311 Tuberculosis, miliary:
As active disease...................................... 100
Inactive disease: See Sec. Sec. 4.88c and 4.89.
Note 1: Confirm the recurrence of active infection by
culture, histopathology, or other diagnostic
laboratory testing.
Note 2: Rate under the appropriate body system any
residual disability of infection which includes, but
is not limited to, skin conditions and conditions of
the respiratory, central nervous, musculoskeletal,
ocular, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary systems
and those residuals listed in Sec. 4.88c.
6312 Nontuberculosis mycobacterium infection:
As active disease...................................... 100
Note 1: Continue the rating of 100 percent for the
duration of treatment for active disease followed by a
mandatory VA exam. If there is no relapse, rate on
residuals. Any change in evaluation based upon that or
any subsequent examination shall be subject to the
provisions of Sec. 3.105(e) of this chapter.
Note 2: Confirm the recurrence of active infection by
culture, histopathology, or other diagnostic
laboratory testing.
Note 3: Rate under the appropriate body system any
residual disability of infection which includes, but
is not limited to, skin conditions and conditions of
the respiratory, central nervous, musculoskeletal,
ocular, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary systems
and those residuals listed in Sec. 4.88c.
* * * * * * *
6316 Brucellosis:
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula.
Note 1: Culture, serologic testing, or both must
confirm the initial diagnosis and recurrence of active
infection.
Note 2: Rate under the appropriate body system any
residual disability of infection, which includes, but
is not limited to, meningitis, liver, spleen and
musculoskeletal conditions.
6317 Rickettsial, ehrlichia, and anaplasma infections:
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula.
Note 1: Rate under the appropriate body system any
residual disability of infection, which includes, but
is not limited to, bone marrow, spleen, central
nervous system, and skin conditions.
[[Page 28232]]
Note 2: This diagnostic code includes, but is not
limited to, scrub typhus, Rickettsial pox, African
tick-borne fever, Rocky Mountain spotted fever,
ehrlichiosis, or anaplasmosis.
6318 Melioidosis:
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula.
Note 1: Confirm by culture or other specific diagnostic
laboratory tests the initial diagnosis and any relapse
or chronic activity of infection.
Note 2: Rate under the appropriate body system any
residual disability of infection, which includes, but
is not limited to, arthritis, lung lesions, or
meningitis.
6319 Lyme disease:
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula.
Note: Rate under the appropriate body system any
residual disability of infection, which includes, but
is not limited to, arthritis, Bell's palsy,
radiculopathy, ocular, or cognitive dysfunction.
6320 Parasitic diseases otherwise not specified:
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula.
Note: Rate under the appropriate body system any
residual disability of infection.
6325 Hyperinfection syndrome or disseminated
strongyloidiasis:
As active disease...................................... 100
Note: Continue the rating of 100 percent through active
disease followed by a mandatory VA exam. If there is
no relapse, rate on residual disability. Any change in
evaluation based upon that or any subsequent
examination shall be subject to the provisions of Sec.
3.105(e) of this chapter.
6326 Schistosomiasis:
As acute or asymptomatic chronic disease............... 0
Note: Rate under the appropriate body system any
residual disability of infection, which includes, but
is not limited to, conditions of the liver, intestinal
system, female genital tract, genitourinary tract, or
central nervous system.
6329 Hemorrhagic fevers, including dengue, yellow fever,
and others:
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula.
Note: Rate under the appropriate body system any
residual disability of infection, which includes, but
is not limited to, conditions of the central nervous
system, liver, or kidney.
6330 Campylobacter jejuni infection:
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula.
Note: Rate under the appropriate body system any
residual disability of infection, which includes, but
is not limited to, Guillain-Barre syndrome, reactive
arthritis, or uveitis.
6331 Coxiella burnetii infection (Q fever):
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula.
Note: Rate under the appropriate body system any
residual disability of infection, which includes, but
is not limited to, chronic hepatitis, endocarditis,
osteomyelitis, post Q-fever chronic fatigue syndrome,
or vascular infections.
6333 Nontyphoid salmonella infections:
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula.
Note: Rate under the appropriate body system any
residual disability of infection, which includes, but
is not limited to, reactive arthritis.
6334 Shigella infections:
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula.
Note: Rate under the appropriate body system any
residual disability of infection, which includes, but
is not limited to, hemolytic-uremic syndrome or
reactive arthritis.
6335 West Nile virus infection:
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula.
Note: Rate under the appropriate body system any
residual disability of infection, which includes, but
is not limited to, variable physical, functional, or
cognitive disabilities.
* * * * * * *
6351 HIV-related illness:
AIDS with recurrent opportunistic infections (see Note 100
3) or with secondary diseases afflicting multiple body
systems; HIV-related illness with debility and
progressive weight loss...............................
Refractory constitutional symptoms, diarrhea, and 60
pathological weight loss; or minimum rating following
development of AIDS-related opportunistic infection or
neoplasm..............................................
Recurrent constitutional symptoms, intermittent 30
diarrhea, and use of approved medication(s); or
minimum rating with T4 cell count less than 200.......
Following development of HIV-related constitutional 10
symptoms; T4 cell count between 200 and 500; use of
approved medication(s); or with evidence of depression
or memory loss with employment limitations............
Asymptomatic, following initial diagnosis of HIV 0
infection, with or without lymphadenopathy or
decreased T4 cell count...............................
Note 1: In addition to standard therapies and regimens,
the term ``approved medication(s)'' includes treatment
regimens and medications prescribed as part of a
research protocol at an accredited medical
institution.
Note 2: Diagnosed psychiatric illness, central nervous
system manifestations, opportunistic infections, and
neoplasms may be rated separately under the
appropriate diagnostic codes if a higher overall
evaluation results, provided the disability symptoms
do not overlap with evaluations otherwise assignable
above.
Note 3: The following list of opportunistic infections
are considered AIDS-defining conditions, that is, a
diagnosis of AIDS follows if a person has HIV and one
more of these infections, regardless of the CD4 count--
candidiasis of the bronchi, trachea, esophagus, or
lungs; invasive cervical cancer; coccidioidomycosis;
cryptococcosis; cryptosporidiosis; cytomegalovirus
(particularly CMV retinitis); HIV-related
encephalopathy; herpes simplex-chronic ulcers for
greater than one month, or bronchitis, pneumonia, or
esophagitis; histoplasmosis; isosporiasis (chronic
intestinal); Kaposi's sarcoma; lymphoma; mycobacterium
avium complex; tuberculosis; pneumocystis jirovecii
(carinii) pneumonia; pneumonia, recurrent; progressive
multifocal leukoencephalopathy; salmonella septicemia,
recurrent; toxoplasmosis of the brain; and wasting
syndrome due to HIV.
6354 Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS):
[[Page 28233]]
Debilitating fatigue, cognitive impairments (such as
inability to concentrate, forgetfulness, or
confusion), or a combination of other signs and
symptoms:
Which are nearly constant and so severe as to 100
restrict routine daily activities almost
completely and which may occasionally preclude
self-care.........................................
Which are nearly constant and restrict routine 60
daily activities to less than 50 percent of the
pre-illness level; or which wax and wane,
resulting in periods of incapacitation of at least
six weeks total duration per year.................
Which are nearly constant and restrict routine 40
daily activities from 50 to 75 percent of the pre-
illness level; or which wax and wane, resulting in
periods of incapacitation of at least four but
less than six weeks total duration per year.......
Which are nearly constant and restrict routine 20
daily activities by less than 25 percent of the
pre-illness level; or which wax and wane,
resulting in periods of incapacitation of at least
two but less than four weeks total duration per
year..............................................
Which wax and wane but result in periods of 10
incapacitation of at least one but less than two
weeks total duration per year; or symptoms
controlled by continuous medication...............
Note: For the purpose of evaluating this
disability, incapacitation exists only when a
licensed physician prescribes bed rest and
treatment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
3. In appendix A to part 4, amend entry 4.88b by:
0
a. Revising the entry before the entry for diagnostic code 6300;
0
b. Revising the entry for diagnostic code 6300;
0
c. Adding in numerical order an entry for diagnostic code 6301;
0
d. Revising the entries for diagnostic codes 6302 and 6304 through
6309;
0
e. Adding in numerical order entries for diagnostic codes 6310 through
6312;
0
f. Revising the entries for diagnostic codes 6316 through 6320;
0
g. Adding in numerical order entries for diagnostic codes 6325, 6326,
6329 through 6331, and 6333 through 6335; and
0
h. Revising the entries for diagnostic codes 6351 and 6354.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Appendix A to Part 4--Table of Amendments and Effective Dates Since 1946
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diagnostic
Sec. code No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
4.88b..................... .............. Added March 11, 1969; re-
designated Sec. 4.88c
November 29, 1994; Sec.
4.88a re-designated to Sec.
4.88b November 29, 1994;
General Rating Formula for
Infectious Diseases added
August 11, 2019.
6300 Criterion August 30, 1996;
title, criterion, and note
August 11, 2019.
6301 Criterion, note August 11,
2019.
6302 Criterion September 22,
1978; criterion August 30,
1996; criterion, note
August 11, 2019.
6304 Evaluation August 30, 1996;
criterion, note August 11,
2019.
6305 Criterion March 1, 1989;
evaluation August 30, 1996;
title, criterion, note
August 11, 2019.
6306 Evaluation August 30, 1996;
criterion, note August 11,
2019.
6307 Criterion May 13, 2018;
criterion, note August 11,
2019.
6308 Criterion August 30, 1996;
criterion, note August 11,
2019.
6309 Added March 1, 1963;
criterion March 1, 1989;
criterion August 30, 1996;
criterion, note August 11,
2019.
6310 Criterion, note August 11,
2019.
6311 Criterion, note August 11,
2019.
6312 Added August 11, 2019.
* * * * * * *
6316 Evaluation March 1, 1989;
evaluation August 30, 1996;
criterion, note August 11,
2019.
6317 Criterion August 30, 1996;
title, criterion, note
August 11, 2019.
6318 Added March 1, 1989;
criterion August 30, 1996;
criterion, note August 11,
2019.
6319 Added August 30, 1996;
criterion, note August 11,
2019.
6320 Added August 30, 1996;
criterion, note August 11,
2019.
6325 Added August 11, 2019.
6326 Added August 11, 2019.
6329 Added August 11, 2019.
6330 Added August 11, 2019.
6331 Added August 11, 2019.
6333 Added August 11, 2019.
6334 Added August 11, 2019.
6335 Added August 11, 2019.
* * * * * * *
6351 Added March 1, 1989;
evaluation March 24, 1992;
criterion August 30, 1996;
criterion, note August 11,
2019.
* * * * * * *
6354 Added November 29, 1994;
criterion August 30, 1996;
title, criterion, note
August 11, 2019.
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 28234]]
0
4. Amend appendix B to part 4 by:
0
a. Revising the entries for diagnostic codes 6300 and 6305;
0
b. Adding in numerical order an entry for diagnostic code 6312;
0
c. Revising the entry for diagnostic code 6317; and
0
d. Adding in numerical order entries for diagnostic codes 6325, 6326,
6329 through 6331, and 6333 through 6335.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Appendix B to Part 4--Numerical Index of Disabilities
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diagnostic code No.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Infectious Diseases, Immune Disorders and Nutrional Deficiencies
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6300............................................. Vibriosis (Cholera, Non-cholera).
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6305............................................. Lymphatic filariasis, to include elephantiasis.
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6312............................................. Nontuberculosis mycobacterium infection.
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6317............................................. Rickettsial, ehrlichia, and anaplasma infections.
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6325............................................. Hyperinfection syndrome or disseminated strongyloidiasis.
6326............................................. Schistosomiasis.
6329............................................. Hemorrhagic fevers, including dengue, yellow fever, and others.
6330............................................. Campylobacter jejuni infection.
6331............................................. Coxiella burnetii infection (Q Fever).
6333............................................. Nontyphoid salmonella infections.
6334............................................. Shigella infections.
6335............................................. West Nile virus infection.
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
5. Amend appendix C to part 4 by:
0
a. Adding in alphabetical order an entry for ``Campylobacter jejuni
infection'';
0
b. Removing the entry for ``Cholera, Asiatic'';
0
c. Adding in alphabetical order entries for ``Coxiella burnetii
infection (Q Fever)'', ``Hemorrhagic fevers, including dengue, yellow
fever, and others'', and ``Hyperinfection syndrome or disseminated
strongyloidiasis'';
0
d. Removing the entry for ``Lymphatic filariasis'';
0
e. Adding in alphabetical order entries for ``Lymphatic filariasis, to
include elephantiasis'', ``Nontuberculosis mycobacterium infection'',
``Nontyphoid salmonella infection'', ``Rickettsial, erlichial, and
Anaplasma infections'', ``Schistosomiasis'' and ``Shigella
infections'';
0
f. Removing the entry for ``Typhus, scrub''; and
0
g. Adding in alphabetical order entries for ``Vibriosis (Cholera, Non-
cholera)'' and ``West Nile virus infection''.
The additions and revisions read as follows:
Appendix C to Part 4--Alphabetical Index of Disabilities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diagnostic code
No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Campylobacter jejuni infection...................... 6330
* * * * * * *
Coxiella burnetii infection (Q Fever)............... 6331
* * * * * * *
Hemorrhagic fevers, including dengue, yellow fever, 6329
and others.........................................
* * * * * * *
Hyperinfection syndrome or disseminated 6325
strongyloidiasis...................................
* * * * * * *
Lymphatic filariasis, to include elephantiasis...... 6305
[[Page 28235]]
* * * * * * *
Nontuberculosis mycobacterium infection............. 6312
Nontyphoid salmonella infection..................... 6333
* * * * * * *
Rickettsial, ehrlichia, and anaplasma Infections.... 6317
* * * * * * *
Schistosomiasis..................................... 6326
* * * * * * *
Shigella infections................................. 6334
* * * * * * *
Vibriosis (Cholera, Non-cholera).................... 6300
* * * * * * *
West Nile virus infection........................... 6335
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2019-12682 Filed 6-17-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P