Removing Outmoded Regulations Regarding the Health Education Assistance Loan (HEAL) Program, 27969-27970 [2019-12577]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 116 / Monday, June 17, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
authorizing statute, 42 U.S.C. 247e, only
permits the Secretary to provide shortterm care and treatment, including
outpatient care, for Hansen’s Disease
and related complications at or through
the National Hansen’s Disease Programs
Center, with the limited exception of a
small number of patients who were
patients of the Gillis W. Long Hansen’s
Disease Center as of October 1, 1996.
However, Part 32 references inpatient
care, hospitals, hospitalization,
discharge, and hospitalized nonbeneficiaries. See, e.g., 42 CFR 32.6,
32.86, 32.87, 32.89 32.91, and 32.111.
Fifth, section 32.90 contains provisions
regarding notification to health
authorities but such notifications have
been rendered obsolete in light of
changes in management of the disease.
Lastly, the NHDP can rely upon
statutory authority to continue to
operate in the absence of the regulations
at part 22.1 and 32. In light of the
foregoing, we are rescinding the
regulations promulgated under 42 CFR
22.1, ‘‘Hansen’s Disease Duty by
Personnel Other than Commissioned
Officers’’ and 42 CFR part 32, ‘‘Medical
Care for Persons with Hansen’s Disease
and Other Persons In Emergencies’’. We
will continue to operate the NHDP
relying on statutory authority alone.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, 13771,
and 13777
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity).
Section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866
defines a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
as ‘‘any regulatory action that is likely
to result in a rule that may: (1) Have an
annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more or adversely affect in a
material way the economy, a sector of
the economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or
safety or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities; (2) Create
a serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfere with an action taken or
planned by another agency; (3)
Materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the rights and obligations of
recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel
legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or
the principles set forth in th[e]
Executive Order.’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:54 Jun 14, 2019
Jkt 247001
27969
A regulatory impact analysis must be
prepared for major rules with
economically significant effects ($100
million or more in any 1 year). HHS
submits that this final rule is not
economically significant as measured by
the $100 million threshold, and hence
not a major rule under the
Congressional Review Act. This rule has
not been designated as a significant
regulatory action as defined by
Executive Order 12866. As such, it has
not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget.
Executive Order 13771, titled
‘‘Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs,’’ was issued on
January 30, 2017. Pursuant to Executive
Order 13771, HHS identifies this final
rule as a deregulatory action (i.e.,
removing an obsolete rule from the Code
of Federal Regulations). For the
purposes of Executive Order 13771, this
final rule is not a substantive rule;
rather it is administrative in nature and
provides no cost savings.
On February 24, 2017, the President
issued Executive Order 13777 titled
‘‘Enforcing the Regulatory Reform
Agenda’’. As required by Section 3 of
the Executive Order, HHS established a
Regulatory Reform Task Force (HHS
Task Force) to review existing
regulations and make recommendations
regarding their repeal, replacement, or
modification. The HHS Task Force
evaluated the NHDP regulations at 42
CFR 22.1 and 42 CFR 32 and
determined them to be outdated,
unnecessary, or ineffective. Thus, the
HHS Task force advised initiating this
final rule to remove the obsolete
regulations from the Code of Federal
Regulations.
Dated: May 20, 2019.
George Sigounas,
Administrator, Health Resources and Services
Administration.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Removing Outmoded Regulations
Regarding the Health Education
Assistance Loan (HEAL) Program
This action will not have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. Therefore, the regulatory
flexibility analysis provided for under
the Regulatory Flexibility Act is not
required.
This action does not affect any
information collections.
Frm 00063
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
List of Subjects
42 CFR Part 22
Diseases, Government employees,
Health professions, Wages.
42 CFR Part 32
Diseases, Health care.
For reasons stated in the preamble, 42
CFR parts 22 and 32 are amended as
follows:
PART 22—PERSONNEL OTHER THAN
COMMISSIONED OFFICERS
1. The authority citation for part 22
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Sec. 208(e) of the Public Health
Service Act, 42 U.S.C. 210(e); E.O. 11140, 29
FR 1637.
§ 22.1
■
[Removed]
2. Section 22.1 is removed.
PART 32—[REMOVED]
3. Under the authority of 5 U.S.C. 301,
part 32 is removed.
■
[FR Doc. 2019–12578 Filed 6–14–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
42 CFR Part 60
RIN 0906–AB21
Health Resources and Services
Administration (HRSA), Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This action removes the
outmoded HHS regulations for the
HEAL Program. As of July 1, 2014, this
program transferred from HHS to the
Department of Education (ED). On
November 15, 2017, ED published
HEAL Program regulations within its
own regulatory framework. With the
publication of ED’s regulations, the HHS
HEAL Program regulations are rendered
obsolete.
DATES: This rule is effective July 17,
2019.
SUMMARY:
Paperwork Reduction Act
PO 00000
Approved: June 7, 2019.
Alex M. Azar II,
Secretary, Department of Health and Human
Services.
E:\FR\FM\17JNR1.SGM
17JNR1
27970
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 116 / Monday, June 17, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michelle Goodman, Public Health
Analyst, Division of Policy and Shortage
Designation, Bureau of Health
Workforce, HRSA, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Room 11W54, Rockville, MD 20857, by
phone at (301) 443–7440, or by email at
mgoodman@hrsa.gov.
In
response to Executive Order 13563,
Section 6(a), which urges agencies to
repeal existing regulations that are
outmoded from the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR), HHS is removing 42
CFR part 60. HHS believes that there is
good cause to bypass notice and
comment and proceed to a final rule,
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). The
action is non-controversial, as it merely
removes an obsolete provision from the
CFR. This rule poses no new substantive
requirements on the public. Thus, we
view notice and comment as
unnecessary.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
Background
The HEAL Program is authorized by
sections 701–720 of the Public Health
Service Act (the Act), 42 U.S.C. 292–
292p, and was first administered by the
Office of Education in the former
Department of Health, Education, and
Welfare (HEW). From Fiscal Year (FY)
1978 through FY 1998, the HEAL
Program insured loans made by
participating lenders to eligible graduate
students in schools of medicine,
osteopathy, dentistry, veterinary
medicine, optometry, podiatry, public
health, pharmacy, and chiropractic, and
in programs in health administration
and clinical psychology.
The HEAL Program regulations were
originally published on August 26,
1983. Authorization to fund new HEAL
loans to students expired on September
30, 1998. Provisions of the HEAL
legislation allowing for the refinancing
or consolidation of existing HEAL loans
expired on September 30, 2004.
However, the reporting, notification,
and recordkeeping burden associated
with refinancing HEAL loans, servicing
outstanding loans, and administering
and monitoring of the HEAL Program
regulations continues.
On July 1, 2014, Congress transferred
the program to ED pursuant to Division
H, title V, section 525 of the
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014
(Pub. L. 113–76) (Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2014). On
November 15, 2017, ED published
HEAL Program regulations rendering
the HHS HEAL Program regulations
obsolete. See 82 FR 53378 (adding 34
CFR part 681).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:54 Jun 14, 2019
Jkt 247001
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, 13771,
and 13777
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity).
Section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866
defines a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
as ‘‘any regulatory action that is likely
to result in a rule that may: (1) Have an
annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more or adversely affect in a
material way the economy, a sector of
the economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or
safety or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities; (2) Create
a serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfere with an action taken or
planned by another agency; (3)
Materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the rights and obligations of
recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel
legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or
the principles set forth in th[e]
Executive Order.’’
A regulatory impact analysis must be
prepared for major rules with
economically significant effects ($100
million or more in any 1 year). HHS
submits that this final rule is not
economically significant as measured by
the $100 million threshold, and hence
not a major rule under the
Congressional Review Act. This rule has
not been designated as a significant
regulatory action as defined by
Executive Order 12866. As such, it has
not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget.
Executive Order 13771, titled
‘‘Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs,’’ was issued on
January 30, 2017. Pursuant to Executive
Order 13771, HHS identifies this final
rule as a deregulatory action (i.e.,
removing an obsolete rule from the Code
of Federal Regulations). For the
purposes of Executive Order 13771, this
final rule is not a substantive rule;
rather it is administrative in nature and
provides no cost savings.
On February 24, 2017, the President
issued Executive Order 13777 titled
‘‘Enforcing the Regulatory Reform
Agenda’’. As required by Section 3 of
the Executive Order, HHS established a
Regulatory Reform Task Force (HHS
Task Force) to review existing
regulations and make recommendations
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
regarding their repeal, replacement, or
modification. The HHS Task Force
evaluated the HEAL Program
regulations and determined them to be
outdated, unnecessary, or ineffective.
Thus, the HHS Task force advised
initiating this final rule to remove the
obsolete regulations from the Code of
Federal Regulations.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Therefore, the
regulatory flexibility analysis provided
for under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
is not required.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not affect any
information collections.
Dated: May 20, 2019.
George Sigounas,
Administrator, Health Resources and Services
Administration.
Approved: June 7, 2019.
Alex M. Azar II,
Secretary, Department of Health and Human
Services.
List of Subjects in 42 CFR 60
Educational study programs, Health
professions, Loan programs—education,
Loan programs—health, Medical and
dental schools, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Student
aid.
PART 60—[REMOVED]
For reasons set out in the preamble,
and under the authority at 5 U.S.C. 301,
HHS amends 42 CFR chapter I,
subchapter D, by removing part 60.
■
[FR Doc. 2019–12577 Filed 6–14–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
44 CFR Part 64
[Docket ID FEMA–2019–0003; Internal
Agency Docket No. FEMA–8583]
Suspension of Community Eligibility
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule identifies
communities where the sale of flood
insurance has been authorized under
the National Flood Insurance Program
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17JNR1.SGM
17JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 116 (Monday, June 17, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 27969-27970]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-12577]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
42 CFR Part 60
RIN 0906-AB21
Removing Outmoded Regulations Regarding the Health Education
Assistance Loan (HEAL) Program
AGENCY: Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), Department
of Health and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action removes the outmoded HHS regulations for the HEAL
Program. As of July 1, 2014, this program transferred from HHS to the
Department of Education (ED). On November 15, 2017, ED published HEAL
Program regulations within its own regulatory framework. With the
publication of ED's regulations, the HHS HEAL Program regulations are
rendered obsolete.
DATES: This rule is effective July 17, 2019.
[[Page 27970]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Goodman, Public Health
Analyst, Division of Policy and Shortage Designation, Bureau of Health
Workforce, HRSA, 5600 Fishers Lane, Room 11W54, Rockville, MD 20857, by
phone at (301) 443-7440, or by email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In response to Executive Order 13563,
Section 6(a), which urges agencies to repeal existing regulations that
are outmoded from the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), HHS is
removing 42 CFR part 60. HHS believes that there is good cause to
bypass notice and comment and proceed to a final rule, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B). The action is non-controversial, as it merely removes
an obsolete provision from the CFR. This rule poses no new substantive
requirements on the public. Thus, we view notice and comment as
unnecessary.
Background
The HEAL Program is authorized by sections 701-720 of the Public
Health Service Act (the Act), 42 U.S.C. 292-292p, and was first
administered by the Office of Education in the former Department of
Health, Education, and Welfare (HEW). From Fiscal Year (FY) 1978
through FY 1998, the HEAL Program insured loans made by participating
lenders to eligible graduate students in schools of medicine,
osteopathy, dentistry, veterinary medicine, optometry, podiatry, public
health, pharmacy, and chiropractic, and in programs in health
administration and clinical psychology.
The HEAL Program regulations were originally published on August
26, 1983. Authorization to fund new HEAL loans to students expired on
September 30, 1998. Provisions of the HEAL legislation allowing for the
refinancing or consolidation of existing HEAL loans expired on
September 30, 2004. However, the reporting, notification, and
recordkeeping burden associated with refinancing HEAL loans, servicing
outstanding loans, and administering and monitoring of the HEAL Program
regulations continues.
On July 1, 2014, Congress transferred the program to ED pursuant to
Division H, title V, section 525 of the Consolidated Appropriations
Act, 2014 (Pub. L. 113-76) (Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014). On
November 15, 2017, ED published HEAL Program regulations rendering the
HHS HEAL Program regulations obsolete. See 82 FR 53378 (adding 34 CFR
part 681).
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, 13771, and 13777
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity).
Section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 defines a ``significant
regulatory action'' as ``any regulatory action that is likely to result
in a rule that may: (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more or adversely affect in a material way the economy, a
sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities; (2) Create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user
fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in
th[e] Executive Order.''
A regulatory impact analysis must be prepared for major rules with
economically significant effects ($100 million or more in any 1 year).
HHS submits that this final rule is not economically significant as
measured by the $100 million threshold, and hence not a major rule
under the Congressional Review Act. This rule has not been designated
as a significant regulatory action as defined by Executive Order 12866.
As such, it has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and
Budget.
Executive Order 13771, titled ``Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs,'' was issued on January 30, 2017. Pursuant to
Executive Order 13771, HHS identifies this final rule as a deregulatory
action (i.e., removing an obsolete rule from the Code of Federal
Regulations). For the purposes of Executive Order 13771, this final
rule is not a substantive rule; rather it is administrative in nature
and provides no cost savings.
On February 24, 2017, the President issued Executive Order 13777
titled ``Enforcing the Regulatory Reform Agenda''. As required by
Section 3 of the Executive Order, HHS established a Regulatory Reform
Task Force (HHS Task Force) to review existing regulations and make
recommendations regarding their repeal, replacement, or modification.
The HHS Task Force evaluated the HEAL Program regulations and
determined them to be outdated, unnecessary, or ineffective. Thus, the
HHS Task force advised initiating this final rule to remove the
obsolete regulations from the Code of Federal Regulations.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This action will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. Therefore, the regulatory
flexibility analysis provided for under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
is not required.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not affect any information collections.
Dated: May 20, 2019.
George Sigounas,
Administrator, Health Resources and Services Administration.
Approved: June 7, 2019.
Alex M. Azar II,
Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services.
List of Subjects in 42 CFR 60
Educational study programs, Health professions, Loan programs--
education, Loan programs--health, Medical and dental schools, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Student aid.
PART 60--[REMOVED]
0
For reasons set out in the preamble, and under the authority at 5
U.S.C. 301, HHS amends 42 CFR chapter I, subchapter D, by removing part
60.
[FR Doc. 2019-12577 Filed 6-14-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165-15-P