IMLS Grant Regulations To Reflect the Museum and Library Services Act of 2018, 27703-27704 [2019-12519]
Download as PDF
27703
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 84, No. 115
Friday, June 14, 2019
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents.
NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE
ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES
Institute of Museum and Library
Services
RIN 3137–AA26
IMLS Grant Regulations To Reflect the
Museum and Library Services Act of
2018
Institute of Museum and
Library Services (IMLS or Institute).
ACTION: Final rule; technical
amendments.
AGENCY:
This rule amends the IMLS
grant regulations to revise the definition
of ‘‘museum’’ to include ‘‘tribal’’ and
‘‘cultural heritage.’’ These amendments
are necessitated by changes to the
definition of ‘‘museum’’ in the recent
reauthorization of the corresponding
statute, namely the Museum and Library
Services Act of 2018.
DATES: This rule is effective June 14,
2019.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Calvin D. Trowbridge III, Deputy
General Counsel, Institute of Museum
and Library Services, (202) 653–4675.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
I. Background Information
On December 31, 2018, the Museum
and Library Services Act of 2018 (the
Act) became law (Pub. L. 115–410). In
addition to reauthorizing the Institute of
Museum and Library Services (the
Institute or IMLS) and effectuating other
amendments, the Act revised the
definition of ‘‘museum’’ for subchapter
III Museum Services. The revised
definition of ‘‘museum’’ now includes
‘‘tribal’’ and ‘‘cultural heritage.’’ In
order to align the agency’s regulations
with the changes to the revised statutory
definition, this rule makes
corresponding revisions to the
16:06 Jun 13, 2019
Jkt 247001
II. Discussion of the Final Rule
A. Non-Discretionary Changes Resulting
From the Museum and Library Services
Act of 2018 (Pub. L. 115–410)
To reflect the Museum and Library
Services Act of 2018 (Pub. L. 115–410)
(the Act), the Institute has made changes
to the definition of ‘‘museum’’ in the
IMLS grant regulations.
B. Response to Comment and Changes
From Proposed Rule
Because these amendments are made
to correspond with the changes in the
Act, there was no proposed rule; this is
the final rule.
2 CFR Part 3187
VerDate Sep<11>2014
definition of ‘‘museum’’ in the IMLS
grant regulations in 2 CFR part 3187.
III. Regulatory Analyses
Regulatory Planning and Review (E.O.
12866)
Under Executive Order 12866, the
Institute must determine whether the
regulatory action is ‘‘significant’’ and
therefore subject to OMB review and the
requirements of the Executive Order.
The Order defines a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ as one that is likely
to result in a rule that may: (1) Have an
annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more or adversely affect in a
material way the economy, a sector of
the economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities; (2) create
a serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfere with an action taken or
planned by another agency; (3)
materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the rights and obligations of
recipients thereof; or (4) raise novel
legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or
the principles set forth in the Executive
Order.
This rule updates the Institute’s grant
regulations to reflect revisions to the
definition of ‘‘museum’’ made by the
Museum and Library Services Act of
2018 (Pub. L. 115–410) (the Act). The
revised ‘‘museum’’ definition is
expanded to include ‘‘tribal’’ and
‘‘cultural heritage.’’ As such, it does not
impose a compliance burden on the
economy generally or on any person or
entity. Accordingly, this rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ from an
economic standpoint, and it does not
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
otherwise create any inconsistences or
budgetary impacts to any other agency
or Federal Program.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Because this rule would update
existing regulations, the Institute has
determined in Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) review that this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities because it
simply makes amendments to reflect the
Museum and Library Services Act of
2018 (Pub. L. 115–410).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule is exempt from the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501–3521),
since it amends existing IMLS grant
regulations to reflect the Museum and
Library Services Act of 2018 (Pub. L.
115–410). An OMB form 83–1 is not
required.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
For purposes of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C.
1501–1571), this rule will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments and will not result in
increased expenditures by State, local,
or tribal governments, or by the private
sector, of $100 million or more (as
adjusted for inflation) in any one year.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act (SBREFA)
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule will not have an annual effect
on the economy of $100 million or
more; a major increase in costs or prices;
or significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the
ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises
in domestic and export markets.
Takings (E.O. 12630)
In accordance with Executive Order
12630, this rule does not have
significant takings implications. No
rights, property or compensation has
been, or will be, taken. A takings
implication assessment is not required.
Federalism (E.O. 13132)
In accordance with Executive Order
13132, this rule does not have
E:\FR\FM\14JNR1.SGM
14JNR1
27704
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 115 / Friday, June 14, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
federalism implications that warrant the
preparation of a federalism assessment.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
8 CFR Part 235
In accordance with Executive Order
12988, the Institute has determined that
this rule does not unduly burden the
judicial system and meets the
requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of the Order.
[CBP Dec. 19–05]
Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribes (E.O. 13175)
AGENCY:
In accordance with Executive Order
13175, the Institute has evaluated this
rule and determined that it has no
potential negative effects on federally
recognized Indian tribes.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not constitute a major
Federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment.
List of Subjects in 2 CFR Part 3187
Federal awards, Definitions.
For the reasons stated in the preamble
and under the authority of 20 U.S.C.
9101 et seq., the Institute of Museum
and Library Services amends 2 CFR part
3187 as follows:
PART 3187—UNIFORM
ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS,
COST PRINCIPLES, AND AUDIT
REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL
AWARDS
1. The authority citation for part 3187
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 20 U.S.C. 9101–9176, 9103(h);
20 U.S.C. 80r–5; 2 CFR part 200.
2. In § 3187.3, amend paragraph (a)
introductory text by adding ‘‘, tribal,’’
after ‘‘Museum means a public’’, and by
adding ‘‘, cultural heritage,’’ after
‘‘educational’’.
Dated: June 10, 2019.
Kim Miller,
Grants Management Specialist, Institute of
Museum and Library Services.
[FR Doc. 2019–12519 Filed 6–13–19; 8:45 am]
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 7036–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Jun 13, 2019
Jkt 247001
U.S. Asia-Pacific Economic
Cooperation (APEC) Business Travel
Card Program Regulations
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, U.S. Department of
Homeland Security.
ACTION: Final rule; conforming
amendment.
This document amends the
Department of Homeland Security’s
(DHS) regulations pertaining to the U.S.
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation
(APEC) Business Travel Card Program to
conform to the Asia-Pacific Economic
Cooperation Business Travel Cards Act
of 2017 (APEC Act of 2017). Among
other conforming changes, it removes
the sunset provision and adds a
definition of trusted traveler program. It
also updates the regulations to correct
two minor errors.
DATES: The final rule is effective June
14, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Eddy (Rafael) R. Henry, Office of Field
Operations, (202) 344–3251,
rafael.e.henry@cbp.dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Table of Contents
■
■
RIN 1651–AB24
I. Background
A. Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation
(APEC)
B. The APEC Business Travel Card (ABTC)
C. U.S. Participation in the ABTC Program
II. Discussion of Regulatory Changes
III. Inapplicability of Notice and Delayed
Effective Date
IV. Statutory and Regulatory Requirements
A. Executive Orders 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review), 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review) and
13771 (Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs)
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
List of Subjects
Amendments to the Regulations
I. Background
The Asia-Pacific Economic
Cooperation Business Travel Cards Act
of 2011 (APEC Act of 2011) established
the U.S. APEC Business Travel Card
(ABTC) Program and authorized the
Secretary of Homeland Security to issue
ABTCs through September 30, 2018.
Public Law 112–54, 125 Stat. 550. It also
authorized DHS to issue implementing
regulations. The U.S. ABTC Program
provides qualified U.S. business
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
travelers engaged in business in the
APEC region, or U.S. Government
officials actively engaged in APEC
business, the ability to access fast-track
immigration lanes at participating
airports in foreign APEC member
economies. DHS implemented the
program, including the general
eligibility requirements, through an
interim final rule (IFR) published in the
Federal Register (79 FR 27161) on May
13, 2014. This interim rule was adopted
as a final rule published in the Federal
Register (81 FR 84403) on November 23,
2016. On November 2, 2017, the
President signed into law the AsiaPacific Economic Cooperation Business
Travel Cards Act of 2017 (APEC Act of
2017). Public Law 115–79, 131 Stat.
1258. The APEC Act of 2017 replaced
the APEC Act of 2011, setting forth,
without changing, the general eligibility
requirements for the U.S. ABTC and
making the U.S. ABTC Program an
ongoing program. In addition, the APEC
Act of 2017 included some clarifying
provisions, such as a definition of a
trusted traveler program. APEC, the U.S.
ABTC Program, and the new law are
discussed in more detail below.
A. Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation
(APEC)
The United States is a member of
APEC, which is an economic forum
comprised of twenty-one members.1
APEC’s primary goal is to support
sustainable economic growth and
prosperity in the Asia-Pacific region.
One way APEC promotes this is by
facilitating a favorable and sustainable
business environment. APEC also
promotes regional connectivity through
better physical and institutional
linkages to ensure goods, services, and
people move quickly and efficiently
across borders. The ABTC Program
discussed in Section B makes it simpler
for business people to travel, thus
enabling them to conduct their business,
trade, and investment.
B. The APEC Business Travel Card
(ABTC)
One of APEC’s business facilitation
initiatives is the ABTC Program.
Pursuant to the ABTC Program, APEC
members can issue ABTC cards to
1 APEC members are also referred to as
‘economies’ since the APEC process is primarily
concerned with trade and economic issues with the
members engaging each other as economic entities.
The most recently updated list of members is
available at the APEC website at https://
www.apec.org/About-Us/About-APEC/MemberEconomies (last accessed Oct. 22, 2018). For
simplicity, we will generally refer to them in the
preamble of this document as APEC ‘‘members,’’
except where the term ‘‘member economy’’ or
‘‘member economies’’ is more appropriate.
E:\FR\FM\14JNR1.SGM
14JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 115 (Friday, June 14, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 27703-27704]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-12519]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 115 / Friday, June 14, 2019 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 27703]]
NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES
Institute of Museum and Library Services
2 CFR Part 3187
RIN 3137-AA26
IMLS Grant Regulations To Reflect the Museum and Library Services
Act of 2018
AGENCY: Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS or Institute).
ACTION: Final rule; technical amendments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule amends the IMLS grant regulations to revise the
definition of ``museum'' to include ``tribal'' and ``cultural
heritage.'' These amendments are necessitated by changes to the
definition of ``museum'' in the recent reauthorization of the
corresponding statute, namely the Museum and Library Services Act of
2018.
DATES: This rule is effective June 14, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Calvin D. Trowbridge III, Deputy
General Counsel, Institute of Museum and Library Services, (202) 653-
4675.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background Information
On December 31, 2018, the Museum and Library Services Act of 2018
(the Act) became law (Pub. L. 115-410). In addition to reauthorizing
the Institute of Museum and Library Services (the Institute or IMLS)
and effectuating other amendments, the Act revised the definition of
``museum'' for subchapter III Museum Services. The revised definition
of ``museum'' now includes ``tribal'' and ``cultural heritage.'' In
order to align the agency's regulations with the changes to the revised
statutory definition, this rule makes corresponding revisions to the
definition of ``museum'' in the IMLS grant regulations in 2 CFR part
3187.
II. Discussion of the Final Rule
A. Non-Discretionary Changes Resulting From the Museum and Library
Services Act of 2018 (Pub. L. 115-410)
To reflect the Museum and Library Services Act of 2018 (Pub. L.
115-410) (the Act), the Institute has made changes to the definition of
``museum'' in the IMLS grant regulations.
B. Response to Comment and Changes From Proposed Rule
Because these amendments are made to correspond with the changes in
the Act, there was no proposed rule; this is the final rule.
III. Regulatory Analyses
Regulatory Planning and Review (E.O. 12866)
Under Executive Order 12866, the Institute must determine whether
the regulatory action is ``significant'' and therefore subject to OMB
review and the requirements of the Executive Order. The Order defines a
``significant regulatory action'' as one that is likely to result in a
rule that may: (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million
or more or adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of
the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or
communities; (2) create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by another agency; (3) materially alter
the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4)
raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President's priorities, or the principles set forth in the Executive
Order.
This rule updates the Institute's grant regulations to reflect
revisions to the definition of ``museum'' made by the Museum and
Library Services Act of 2018 (Pub. L. 115-410) (the Act). The revised
``museum'' definition is expanded to include ``tribal'' and ``cultural
heritage.'' As such, it does not impose a compliance burden on the
economy generally or on any person or entity. Accordingly, this rule is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' from an economic standpoint,
and it does not otherwise create any inconsistences or budgetary
impacts to any other agency or Federal Program.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Because this rule would update existing regulations, the Institute
has determined in Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)
review that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities because it simply makes amendments
to reflect the Museum and Library Services Act of 2018 (Pub. L. 115-
410).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule is exempt from the requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521), since it amends existing IMLS
grant regulations to reflect the Museum and Library Services Act of
2018 (Pub. L. 115-410). An OMB form 83-1 is not required.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
For purposes of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C.
1501-1571), this rule will not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments and will not result in increased expenditures by State,
local, or tribal governments, or by the private sector, of $100 million
or more (as adjusted for inflation) in any one year.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA)
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule will not have
an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; a major
increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based
enterprises in domestic and export markets.
Takings (E.O. 12630)
In accordance with Executive Order 12630, this rule does not have
significant takings implications. No rights, property or compensation
has been, or will be, taken. A takings implication assessment is not
required.
Federalism (E.O. 13132)
In accordance with Executive Order 13132, this rule does not have
[[Page 27704]]
federalism implications that warrant the preparation of a federalism
assessment.
Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
In accordance with Executive Order 12988, the Institute has
determined that this rule does not unduly burden the judicial system
and meets the requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of the Order.
Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribes (E.O. 13175)
In accordance with Executive Order 13175, the Institute has
evaluated this rule and determined that it has no potential negative
effects on federally recognized Indian tribes.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not constitute a major Federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human environment.
List of Subjects in 2 CFR Part 3187
Federal awards, Definitions.
For the reasons stated in the preamble and under the authority of
20 U.S.C. 9101 et seq., the Institute of Museum and Library Services
amends 2 CFR part 3187 as follows:
PART 3187--UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES,
AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL AWARDS
0
1. The authority citation for part 3187 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 20 U.S.C. 9101-9176, 9103(h); 20 U.S.C. 80r-5; 2 CFR
part 200.
0
2. In Sec. 3187.3, amend paragraph (a) introductory text by adding ``,
tribal,'' after ``Museum means a public'', and by adding ``, cultural
heritage,'' after ``educational''.
Dated: June 10, 2019.
Kim Miller,
Grants Management Specialist, Institute of Museum and Library Services.
[FR Doc. 2019-12519 Filed 6-13-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7036-01-P