Approval of Air Quality Implementation Plans; New York; Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 Ozone, 2010 Sulfur Dioxide, and 2012 Fine Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards, 27559-27566 [2019-12181]

Download as PDF khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 114 / Thursday, June 13, 2019 / Proposed Rules technique is required or prescribed however, while public notice shall be provided by the SOPA, as required at § 220.4(d), the SOPA shall not to be used as the sole scoping mechanism. (c) Notice of intent. Normally, a notice of intent to prepare an EIS shall be published in the Federal Register as soon as practicable after deciding that an EIS will be prepared. Where there is a lengthy period between the agency’s decision to prepare an EIS and the time of actual preparation, the notice of intent may be published at a reasonable time in advance of preparation of the draft statement. A notice must meet the requirements of 40 CFR 1508.22, and in addition, include the following: (1) Title of the responsible official(s); (2) Any permits or licenses required to implement the proposed action and the issuing authority, to the extent known; (3) Lead, joint lead, or cooperating agencies if identified; and (4) Address(es) to which comments may be sent. (d) Withdrawal notice. A withdrawal notice must be published in the Federal Register if, after publication of the notice of intent or notice of availability, an EIS is no longer necessary. A withdrawal notice must refer to the date and Federal Register page number of the previously published notice(s). (e) Environmental impact statement format and content. The responsible official may use any EIS format and design as long as the statement is in accord with 40 CFR 1502.10. (f) Alternative(s). The EIS shall document the examination of reasonable alternatives to the proposed action. Each alternative other than the no action alternative must meet the purpose and need of the proposed action. No specific number of alternatives is required or prescribed. The responsible official may modify the proposed action and alternative(s) under consideration prior to issuing a draft EIS. In such cases, the responsible official may consider the incremental changes as alternatives considered. The documentation of these incremental changes to a proposed action or alternatives shall be included or incorporated by reference in accord with 40 CFR 1502.21. (g) Circulating and filing draft and final environmental impact statements. (1) The draft and final EISs shall be filed with the Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Federal Activities in Washington, DC (see 40 CFR 1506.9). (2) Requirements at 40 CFR 1506.9 ‘‘Filing requirements,’’ 40 CFR 1506.10 ‘‘Timing of agency action,’’ and 40 CFR 1502.19 ‘‘Circulation of the environmental impact statement’’ shall VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:22 Jun 12, 2019 Jkt 247001 only apply to the last draft and final EIS, and will not apply to material produced prior to the draft EIS or between the draft and final EIS which are filed with EPA. (3) When the responsible official determines that an extension of the review period on a draft EIS is appropriate, notice shall be given in the same manner used for inviting comments on the draft. (h) Distribution of the record of decision. The responsible official shall notify interested or affected parties of the availability of the record of decision as soon as practicable after signing. Dated: May 17, 2019. James E. Hubbard, Undersecretary, Natural Resources and Environment. [FR Doc. 2019–12195 Filed 6–12–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3411–15–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R02–OAR–2018–0511; FRL–9994–92– Region 2] Approval of Air Quality Implementation Plans; New York; Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 Ozone, 2010 Sulfur Dioxide, and 2012 Fine Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve certain elements of New York’s State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions, submitted to demonstrate that the State meets the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) for the 2008 Ozone; 2010 Sulfur Dioxide; and 2012 particulate matter of 2.5 microns or less (PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Section 110(a) of the CAA requires that each state adopt and submit for approval into the SIP a plan for the implementation, maintenance and enforcement of each NAAQS promulgated by the EPA. DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 15, 2019. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA– R02–OAR–2018–0511 at https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 27559 received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edward J. Linky, Air Programs Branch, Environmental Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, New York 10007–1866, (212) 637–3764, or by email at Linky.Edward@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. What action is EPA proposing? II. What is the background information? III. What is a section 110(a)(1) and (2) SIP? IV. What elements are required under section 110(a)(1) and (2)? V. What is EPA’s approach to the review of infrastructure SIP submissions? VI. What did New York submit? VII. How has the State addressed the elements of the section 110(a)(1) and (2) ‘‘infrastructure’’ provisions? VIII. What action is EPA taking? IX. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. What action is EPA proposing? The EPA is proposing to approve certain elements of the State of New York Infrastructure State Implementation Plan (SIP) as meeting the section 110(a) infrastructure requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) for the following National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS or standard): 2008 Ozone, 2010 sulfur dioxide (SO2), and 2012 particulate matter of 2.5 microns or less (PM2.5). As explained below, the EPA is proposing to find that the State has the necessary infrastructure, resources, and general authority to implement the standards noted above. II. What is the background information? Section 110(a)(1) of the CAA requires states to submit for approval into the SIP a plan that provides for the implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of new or revised NAAQS E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM 13JNP1 27560 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 114 / Thursday, June 13, 2019 / Proposed Rules khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS within three years following the promulgation of such NAAQS. The EPA commonly refers to such state plans as ‘‘infrastructure SIPs.’’ • On March 12, 2008, the EPA promulgated a revised NAAQS for ozone. 73 FR 16436 (March 27, 2008). • On June 2, 2010), the EPA promulgated a revised primary NAAQS for SO2. 75 FR 35520 (June 22, 2010). • On December 14, 2012, the EPA promulgated a revised primary NAAQS for PM2.5 for the annual standard. 78 FR 3086 (Jan. 15, 2013). The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) submitted the following revisions to its Infrastructure State Implementation Plan (ISIP): • 2008 Ozone ISIP submitted on April 4, 2013 • 2010 SO2 ISIP submitted on October 3, 2013 • 2012 PM2.5 ISIP submitted on November 30, 2016 On August 26, 2016 (81 FR 58849), the EPA published its action on certain elements of NYSDEC’s April 4, 2013 SIP submittal pertaining to the 2008 Ozone ISIP. The EPA’s action addressed CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) which requires SIPs to include provisions prohibiting any source or other type of emissions activity in one state from contributing significantly to nonattainment of the NAAQS (commonly referred to as prong 1), or interfering with maintenance of the NAAQS (prong 2), in any other state and CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) which requires SIPs to include provisions prohibiting any source or other type of emissions activity in one state from interfering with measures required to protect visibility (prong 4). The EPA disapproved 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) (prongs 1 and 2) and approved 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (prong 4) for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS. 81 FR 58849, 58855 (August 26, 2016). The EPA approved portions of New York’s infrastructure SIP submittals for the 2008 Ozone and 2010 SO2 NAAQS 1 pertaining to CAA sections 110(a)(2)(C), (D)(i)(II) (prong 3), and (J), including PSD interstate transport provisions.2 81 FR 95047 (December 27, 2016). 1 The approval also included the 2008 Lead NAAQS, which is not a subject of this action. 2 CAA 110(a)(2)(C) (requires SIPs to include a program to provide for enforcement of emission limitations and other control measures described in CAA 110(a)(2)(A)); CAA 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (which requires SIPs to include provisions prohibiting any source or other type of emissions activity in one state from interfering with measures required to prevent significant deterioration of air quality in another state); CAA 110(a)(2)(J) (requirements related to consultation, public notification and PSD and visibility protection). VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:22 Jun 12, 2019 Jkt 247001 III. What is a section 110(a)(1) and (2) SIP? Section 110(a)(1) provides the procedural and timing requirements for SIPs. Section 110(a)(2) lists specific elements that states must meet for ‘‘infrastructure’’ SIP requirements related to a newly established or revised NAAQS. Sections 110(a)(1) and (2) of the CAA require, in part, that states submit to the EPA plans to implement, maintain and enforce each of the NAAQS promulgated by the EPA. The EPA interprets this provision to require states to address basic SIP requirements including emission inventories, monitoring, and modeling to assure attainment and maintenance of the standards. By statute, SIPs meeting the requirements of section 110(a)(1) and (2) are to be submitted by states within three years after promulgation of a new or revised standard. IV. What elements are required under section 110(a)(1) and (2)? The infrastructure requirements of CAA sections 110(a)(1) and (2), relevant to this action, are discussed in the following EPA guidance documents: EPA’s October 2, 2007, memorandum entitled ‘‘Guidance on SIP Elements Required Under Section 110(a)(1) and (2) for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone and PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standards;’’ September 25, 2009, memorandum entitled ‘‘Guidance on SIP Elements Required Under Section 110(a)(1) and (2) for the 2006 24-Hour Fine Particle (PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality Standards;’’ September 13, 2013, memorandum entitled ‘‘Guidance on Infrastructure State Implementation Plan (SIP) Elements under Clean Air Act Sections 110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2);’’ 3 and March 17, 2016, ‘‘Information on Interstate Transport ‘‘Good Neighbor’’ provision for the 2012 Fine Particulate Matter (PM) National Ambient Air Quality Standards under Clean Air Act (CAA) Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I).’’ The EPA reviews each infrastructure SIP submission with the applicable statutory provisions of CAA 110(a)(2). The 14 elements required to be addressed by CAA section 110(a)(2) are: • 110(a)(2)(A): Emission limits and other control measures; • 110(a)(2)(B): Ambient air quality monitoring/data system; • 110(a)(2)(C): Program for enforcement of control measures and for 3 ‘‘Guidance on Infrastructure State Implementation Plan (SIP) Elements under Clean Air Act Sections 110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2)’’ can be found at: https://www.epa.gov/airquality/urbanair/ sipstatus/infrastructure.html. PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 construction or modification of stationary sources; • 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) and (II): Interstate pollution transport; • 110(a)(2)(D)(ii): Interstate and international pollution abatement; • 110(a)(2)(E): Adequate resources and authority, conflict of interest, oversight of local governments and local authorities; • 110(a)(2)(F): Stationary source monitoring and reporting; • 110(a)(2)(G): Emergency powers; • 110(a)(2)(H): Future SIP revisions; • 110(a)(2)(I): Plan revisions for nonattainment areas (under part D); • 110(a)(2)(J): Consultation with government officials, public notification, and PSD and visibility protection; • 110(a)(2)(K): Air quality modeling and data; • 110(a)(2)(L): Permitting fees; • 110(a)(2)(M): Consultation/ participation by affected local entities. Two elements identified in section 110(a)(2) are not governed by the 3-year submission deadline of section 110(a)(1) because SIPs incorporating necessary local nonattainment area controls are not due within 3 years after promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS, but rather due at the time that the nonattainment area plan requirements are due pursuant to section 172 of the CAA. See 77 FR 46354 (August 3, 2012) and 77 FR 60308 (October 3, 2012, footnote 1). These requirements are: (1) Submissions required by section 110(a)(2)(C) to the extent that subsection refers to a permit program as required in part D Title I of the CAA, and (2) submissions required by section 110(a)(2)(I) which pertain to the nonattainment planning requirements of part D, Title I of the CAA. As a result, this action does not address the nonattainment permit program requirements of section 110(a)(2)(C) for 2012 PM2.5 or the nonattainment planning requirements related to section 110(a)(2)(I) for the 2008 Ozone, 2010 SO2, or 2012 PM2.5. This action partially addresses Element D (interstate pollution transport, interstate and international pollution abatement). As mentioned in section II, the EPA previously disapproved 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) (prongs 1 and 2) and approved 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (prong 4) for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS. 81 FR 58849 (Aug. 26, 2016). The EPA approved 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (prong 3) for the 2008 Ozone and 2010 SO2 NAAQS. 81 FR 95047 (December 27, 2016). This action addresses the remaining element D provisions for 2008 Ozone, 2010 SO2 and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS, except for 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) (prongs 1 and 2) E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM 13JNP1 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 114 / Thursday, June 13, 2019 / Proposed Rules provisions for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS and the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS, which will be addressed in a subsequent action by the EPA. Therefore, with respect to element D, this action addresses: • 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (prong 3) for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS; and • 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (prong 4) for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS • 110(a)(2)(D)(ii) for 2008 Ozone NAAQS, 2010 SO2 NAAQS and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS V. What is EPA’s approach to the review of infrastructure SIP submissions? khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS The discussion of the EPA’s approach to the review of infrastructure SIP submissions is detailed in the ‘‘Technical Support Document for the EPA’s proposed Rulemaking for the New York State Implementation Plan Revision for Meeting the Infrastructure Requirements in the Clean Air Act’’ dated 2019 (TSD). The TSD is available in the electronic docket (EPA–R02– OAR–2018–0511) at www.regulations.gov. Whenever the EPA promulgates a new or revised NAAQS, CAA section 110(a)(1) requires states to make Infrastructure SIP submissions to provide for the implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of the NAAQS. These submissions must meet the various requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2), as applicable. Due to ambiguity in some of the language of CAA section 110(a)(2), the EPA believes that it is appropriate to interpret these provisions in the specific context of acting on infrastructure SIP submissions. The EPA has previously provided comprehensive guidance on the application of these provisions through a guidance document for infrastructure SIP submissions and through regional actions on infrastructure submissions.4 Unless otherwise noted below, we are following that existing approach in acting on these submissions. In addition, in the context of acting on such infrastructure submissions, the EPA evaluates the submitting state’s SIP for facial compliance with statutory and regulatory requirements, not for the 4 EPA explains and elaborates on these ambiguities and its approach to address them in its September 13, 2013 Infrastructure SIP Guidance (available at https://www3.epa.gov/airquality/ urbanair/sipstatus/docs/Guidance_on_ Infrastructure_SIP_Elements_Multipollutant_ FINAL_Sept_2013.pdf), as well as in numerous agency actions, including EPA’s prior action on New York’s infrastructure SIP to address the Nitrogen Dioxide NAAQS, 85 FR 25066, 25067 (May 2, 2014). VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:22 Jun 12, 2019 Jkt 247001 state’s implementation of its SIP.5 The EPA has other authority to address issues concerning a state’s implementation of its SIP. VI. What did New York submit? NYSDEC submitted the following SIP submittals which address the infrastructure requirements for the identified NAAQS: • 2008 Ozone ISIP submitted on April 4, 2013 • 2010 SO2 ISIP submitted on October 3, 2013 • 2012 PM2.5 ISIP submitted on November 30, 2016 New York’s section 110 submittals demonstrate how the State, where applicable, has a plan in place that meets the requirements of section 110 for the 2008 Ozone, 2010 SO2, and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS. The plans reference the current New York Air Quality SIP, the New York Codes, Rules and Regulations (NYCRR), the New York Environmental Conservation Law (ECL) and the New York Public Officer’s Law (POL). The NYCRR, ECL and POL referenced in the submittal are publicly available. New York’s SIP and air pollution control regulations that have been previously approved by the EPA and incorporated into the New York SIP can be found at 40 CFR 52.1670 and are posted on the internet at https://www.epa.gov/sips-ny. VII. How has the State addressed the elements of the section 110(a)(1) and (2) ‘‘infrastructure’’ provisions? Infrastructure SIPs for different criteria pollutants can have common aspects which are consistent for each NAAQS (e.g., authority to promulgate emission limitations, enforcement, air quality modeling capabilities, adequate personnel, resources and legal authority). The EPA compared New York’s Infrastructure SIP submittals for the 2008 Ozone, 2010 SO2, and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS with New York’s Infrastructure SIP submittals for the 1997 8-hour Ozone and the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS, on which the EPA took final action approving certain elements and sub-elements. 78 FR 37122 (June 20, 2013). Certain elements of the infrastructure SIP submittals are not pollutant specific. Based upon the EPA’s comparison, the EPA is proposing to determine that the information provided in New York’s Infrastructure SIP submittal for the 2008 Ozone, 2010 SO2 and the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS for elements E, F, H, K, L, and M is consistent with or identical to the 5 See U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decision in Montana Environmental Information Center v. Thomas, 902 F.3d 971 (Aug. 30, 2018). PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 27561 information provided in New York’s Infrastructure SIP submittal for the 1997 8-hour ozone, 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. The EPA’s rationale for approving certain elements of New York’s Infrastructure SIP for 2008 Ozone, 2010 SO2, and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS is the same as the rationale for approving those elements of New York’s 1997 8-hour ozone and 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 Infrastructure SIPs, so the EPA is not repeating this evaluation in today’s proposal. Instead, the reader is referred to the EPA’s evaluation of the SIP submittals for the 1997 8-hour ozone and 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 Infrastructure SIPs detailed in the following documents: (1) Three documents titled ‘‘Technical Support Document for EPA’s Proposed Rulemaking for the New York’s State Implementation Plan Revision: State Implementation Plan Revision For Meeting the Infrastructure Requirements In the Clean Air Act’’ dated December 13, 2007, October 2, 2008 and March 15, 2010; (2) the EPA’s rulemaking proposing approval of certain elements of New York’s Infrastructure SIP submittal for the 1997 8-hour ozone and the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS, 78 FR 25236 (April 30, 2013); (3) the EPA’s final rule approving certain elements of New York’s Infrastructure SIPs for the 1997 8-hour ozone and the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS, 78 FR 37122 (June 20, 2013). These documents are available in the electronic docket for today’s proposed action at www.regulations.gov. We are, of course, accepting comments on that rationale as it applies to this proposed approval of New York’s Infrastructure SIP for the 2008 Ozone, 2010 SO2 and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS. As discussed in the following sections, the EPA is providing a more detailed analysis of the remaining elements of New York’s 2008 Ozone, 2010 SO2, and 2012 PM2.5 Infrastructure SIP submittals namely elements A, B, C, D, G, and J. In summary, the EPA is proposing approval of the following elements and sub-elements of New York’s Infrastructure SIP submittal for 2008 Ozone, 2010 SO2, and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS (except as indicated): 110(a)(A) [emission limits and other control measures]; 110(a)(2)(B) [ambient air quality monitoring/data system]; 110(a)(2)(C) [program for enforcement of control measures] for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS only; 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) [interstate transport], Prong 3 for 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS, and Prong 4 for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS and the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS; 110(a)(2)(D)(ii) [interstate and international pollution abatement]; 110(a)(2)(E) [adequate resources, state E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM 13JNP1 khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS 27562 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 114 / Thursday, June 13, 2019 / Proposed Rules boards/conflict of interest, oversight of local governments and local authorities]; 110(a)(2)(F) [stationary source monitoring]; 110(a)(2)(G) [emergency power]; 110(a)(2)(H) [future SIP revisions]; 110(a)(2)(J) [consultation with government official, public notification, and PSD for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS only]; 110(a)(2)(K) [air quality and modeling/data]; 110(a)(2)(L) [permitting fees]; and 110(a)(2)(M) [consultation/participation by affected local entities]. The EPA is not acting on New York’s submittal for 2012 PM2.5 as it relates to nonattainment provisions, including the nonattainment NSR program required by part D, in section 110(a)(2)(C) and is not acting on New York’s submittals for 2008 Ozone, 2010 SO2 and 2012 PM2.5 as they relate to the measures for attainment required by section 110(a)(2)(I) because the State’s Infrastructure SIP submittals do not include nonattainment requirements and the EPA will act on them when and if necessary. The EPA is also not acting on the visibility protection portion of element J for the 2012 PM2.5 submittal. Element A: Emission Limits and Other Control Measures: Section 110(a)(2)(A) requires SIPs to include enforceable emission limits and other control measures, measures, means, or techniques, and schedules for compliance. In each of the submittals, New York identifies provisions of its federally enforceable SIP that contain enforceable emission limits and other control measures. The EPA is proposing to determine that New York has met the requirements of 110(a)(2)(A) of the CAA with respect to the 2008 Ozone, 2010 SO2 and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS. Element B: Ambient air quality monitoring/data system: Section 110(a)(2)(B) requires SIPs to include provisions to provide for establishment and operation of ambient air quality monitors, to monitor, compile and analyze ambient air quality data, and to make these data available to EPA upon request. NYSDEC submittal for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS details the State’s authority to adopt and enforce provisions of the SIP. The EPA proposes to find that these provisions demonstrate that NYSDEC has the requisite authority to support element B. NYSDEC states that it will continue to operate an air quality monitoring network that complies with the EPA requirements and will submit this data to the EPA’s Air Quality System (AQS). NYSDEC’s submittals state that they measure air pollutants at more than 50 sites across the State using continuous and/or manual instrumentation, in accordance with 40 CFR part 53 and 58. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:22 Jun 12, 2019 Jkt 247001 These sites are part of the federallymandated National Cores Sites (NCORE) and the State and Local Air Monitoring Stations (SLAMS) network. Near real time direct reading measurements include gaseous criteria pollutants (ozone, SO2, NOX and carbon monoxide, PM2.5 and meteorological data). Filter based PM2.5 samples are collected and shipped to a laboratory for analysis. In January 2017, in accord with the Data Requirements Rule for the 2010 SO2 standard,6 NYSDEC established four monitors near two large sources, one in St. Lawrence County (Alcoa Massena Aluminum Plant) and the other in Tompkins County (Cayuga Power Plant) to characterize SO2 air quality in the area. NYSDEC prepares an Annual Monitoring Network Plan that describes in detail the specifics of the monitoring network as required by 40 CFR 58.10. The EPA is therefore proposing that New York has met the requirements of section 110(a)(2)(B) of the CAA with respect to the 2008 Ozone, 2010 SO2 7 and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS. Element C: Program for enforcement of control measures and for construction or modification of stationary sources: Section 110(a)(2)(C) requires states to have a plan that includes a program providing for enforcement of all SIP measures and the regulation of the modification and construction of any stationary source, including a program to meet Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) of Air Quality and minor source new source review. This element is being evaluated for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS only. Enforcement of SIP Measures New York’s PM2.5 infrastructure SIP submittal explains that its SIP is a compilation of rules and regulations that have been duly promulgated by NYSDEC in accordance with its statutory authority and consistent with the New York State Administrative Procedures Act. New York cites Environmental Conservation Law (ECL) section 19–0305, which authorizes the Commissioner to enforce NYSDEC codes, rules and regulations established in accordance with ECL Articles 19 and 71. This includes all control measures that have been adopted into the SIP. New York states that its authority for enforcement of emission limits and control measures is provided for in ‘‘Enforcement of Article 19 and Air 6 August 21, 2015 (80 FR 50152). notes that designations for the 2010 SO2 standards were finalized in three rounds on July 25, 2013 (78 FR 47191), August 5, 2013 (78 FR 47191), July 12, 2016 (81 FR 45039), December 13, 2016 (81 FR 89870), and January 9, 2018 (83 FR 1098). 7 EPA PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Pollution Emergency Rules and Regulations.’’ ECL Article 71, Title 21. New York also identifies the enforcement provisions included in 6 NYCRR Part 201, specifically 201–1.13 which gives NYSDEC access to regulated facilities in order to determine compliance. Regulation of Minor Sources and Minor Modifications New York states that it permits minor sources of air pollution through 6 NYCRR Subparts 201–4, ‘‘Minor Facility Registration’’ and 201–5, ‘‘State Facility Permits’’ and applicable State and Federal regulations. PSD Permitting of Major Sources New York references the State’s PSD and Nonattainment New Source Review (NNSR) permitting program contained in 6 NYCRR Part 231, ‘‘New Source Review for New and Modified Facilities’’ and the State’s permitting program contained in 6 NYCRR 201, ‘‘Permits and Registrations.’’ The EPA approved New York’s PSD and NNSR program into the SIP on November 17, 2010 (75 FR 70140). New York adopted revisions to Part 231 and 201 to implement PM2.5 provisions that were not included in the earlier rule and submitted them to the EPA on October 12, 2011. The EPA approved the SIP revision on December 27, 2016 (81 FR 95047). The EPA is proposing to approve New York’s Infrastructure SIP for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS with respect to the program for enforcement of control measures requirements of element C. The EPA proposes to find that the State has adequate authority and regulations to ensure that SIP-approved control measures are enforced. The EPA is proposing to find that New York meets the requirement to have a SIP approved minor new source review program. The EPA also finds that, based on the approval of New York’s PSD program, New York has the authority to regulate the construction of new or modified stationary sources to meet the PSD program requirements. As discussed in Section IV, the EPA is not addressing the nonattainment permit program requirements of section 110(a)(2)(C) for 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS. The EPA proposes to determine that New York has met the requirements of section 110(a)(2)(C) of the CAA with respect to the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS. Element D: Interstate transport: Section 110(a)(2)(D) of the CAA is divided into two subsections, 110(a)(2)(D)(i) and 110(a)(2)(D)(ii). The first of these, 110(a)(2)(D)(i), in turn, contains four ‘‘prongs’’ the first two of E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM 13JNP1 khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 114 / Thursday, June 13, 2019 / Proposed Rules which appear in 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) and the second two of which appear in 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II). The two prongs in 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) prohibit any source or other type of emissions activity within the State from emitting any air pollutants in amounts which will contribute significantly to nonattainment in any other state with respect to any primary or secondary NAAQS (prong 1), or interfere with maintenance by any other state with respect to any primary or secondary NAAQS (prong 2). Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) is not being reviewed in this action. Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) prohibits any source or other type of emissions activity within the State from emitting any air pollutants in amounts which will interfere with measures required to be included in the applicable implementation plan for any other state under part C to prevent significant deterioration of air quality (prong 3) or to protect visibility (prong 4). Subsection 110(a)(2)(D)(ii) addresses interstate and international pollution abatement and requires SIPs to include provisions insuring compliance with sections 115 and 126 of the CAA, relating to interstate and international pollution abatement. The EPA acted on portions of 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) and (II) with respect to 2008 Ozone and 2010 SO2 NAAQS. The EPA disapproved the portion of the 2008 Ozone infrastructure SIP submittal addressing CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I), concerning nonattainment of the NAAQS (prong 1), and interfering with maintenance of the NAAQS (prong 2) and approved the portion of the 2008 Ozone infrastructure SIP submittal addressing CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) concerning visibility (prong 4).8 With respect to the requirements of 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (prong 3), the EPA previously approved 9 this portion of New York’s SIP submissions for 2008 Ozone and 2010 SO2 NAAQS. New York’s SIP submissions that address section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) [prongs 1 and 2] for 2010 SO2 NAAQS, and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS are currently being reviewed by the EPA, and the Agency will take action at a later date. Our evaluation of New York’s submittals is limited to assessing whether New York’s submittals meet the requirements of 110(a)(2)(D) under review in this proposal. For the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS, the EPA is proposing that New York satisfies the 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) requirement for prong 3. New York relies on its PSD program to prevent significant deterioration of air 8 August 26, 2016 (81 FR 58849). 27, 2016 (81 FR 95047). 9 December VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:22 Jun 12, 2019 Jkt 247001 quality within the state and in other nearby states. New York’s SIP approved 6 NYCRR Part 231 includes both PSD permitting requirements, which regulate major sources in attainment areas, and Nonattainment New Source Review requirements, which regulate major sources in nonattainment areas. New York has affirmed that the program remains in effect and applies to PM2.5. New York adopted revisions to Part 231, which included provisions to implement PSD/Nonattainment New Source Review requirements for PM2.5 and submitted them to EPA in October 12, 2011. The EPA approved these State revisions to Part 231 in the December 27, 2016 Federal Register issue. The EPA is proposing that New York satisfies the 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) requirement for visibility (prong 4). New York addresses visibility protection requirements for both the 2010 SO2 and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS through its EPAapproved Regional Haze SIP.10 The EPA’s regional haze rule requires that a state participating in a regional planning process include all measures needed to achieve its apportionment of emission reduction obligations agreed upon through that process.11 The regional haze rule also requires the state to submit periodic reports describing progress towards reasonable progress goals established for regional haze and the adequacy of the state’s regional haze SIP. Thus, New York’s approved Regional Haze SIP and approved reasonable progress plan ensure that emissions from sources within the State are not interfering with measures to protect visibility in other states. The EPA notes that New York’s Regional Haze SIP was supplemented with a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) to address two sources, Danskammer Generating Station, Unit No. 4 (Danskammer) and Roseton Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 (Roseton), where the Agency disapproved New York’s BART determinations. Following the EPA’s action on New York’s Regional Haze Plan, the Title V permits for Danskammer and Roseton were updated by New York to incorporate the FIP limits established by the EPA. The Title V permits for Danskammer and Roseton were submitted to the EPA as SIP revisions on August 20, 2015, and April 18, 2017, respectively. The EPA published the SIP approval for Danskammer on December 4, 2017 (82 FR 57126) and the SIP approval for Roseton on February 16, 2018 (83 FR 6970). 10 August 11 40 PO 00000 28, 2012 (77 FR 51915). CFR part 51, subpart P. Frm 00021 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 27563 Regarding section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii), which relates to interstate and international pollution abatement, the EPA is proposing to approve New York’s submissions for infrastructure element 110(a)(2)(D)(ii) for the 2008 Ozone, 2012 PM2.5 and the 2010 SO2 NAAQS. New York’s SIP-approved PSD program is consistent with 40 CFR 51.166(q)(2)(iv) and requires a source to notify air agencies whose lands may be affected by emissions from that source. (See 78 FR 25236, 25239; 6 NYCRR 231– 7.4(f) and 8.5(f)). New York has no pending obligations under section 115 or 126 of the CAA. Element E: Adequate Resources: Section 110(a)(2)(E) requires each state to provide necessary assurances that the state will (i) have adequate personnel, funding, and authority under state law to carry out the SIP (and is not prohibited by any provision of federal or state law from carrying out the SIP or portion thereof), (ii) will comply with the requirements respecting state boards under CAA section 128, and (iii) where the state has relied on a local or regional government, agency, or instrumentality for the implementation of any SIP provision, the state has responsibility for ensuring adequate implementation of such SIP provision. This element of the submittals is common to New York infrastructure submittals that the EPA has previously approved and, therefore, as discussed in Section VII, the EPA is not repeating the rationale for approving this element of the submittals. See 78 FR 37122 (June 20, 2013). The EPA proposes to approve the submittals for the 2012 PM2.5, 2008 Ozone, and 2010 SO2 NAAQS. Element F: Stationary Source Monitoring and Reporting: Section 110(a)(2)(F) requires states to establish a system to monitor emissions from stationary sources and to submit periodic emission reports. This element of the submittals is common to New York infrastructure submittals that the EPA has previously approved and, as discussed in Section VII, EPA, therefore, is not repeating the rationale for proposing to approve this element of the submittals. New York’s submittal for the 2012 NAAQS PM2.5 NAAQS provides more detailed information regarding their authority for stationary source monitoring and reporting in further support of the EPA’s proposed approval of this element. Element G: Emergency power: Section 110(a)(2)(G) requires states to provide for emergency authority to address activities causing imminent and substantial endangerment to public health and requires states to submit adequate contingency plans to E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM 13JNP1 khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS 27564 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 114 / Thursday, June 13, 2019 / Proposed Rules implement the emergency episode provisions in their SIPs. The EPA requires that Infrastructure SIP submittals should meet the applicable contingency plan requirements of 40 CFR part 51, subpart H (40 CFR 51.150 through 51.153) (‘‘Prevention of Air Pollution Emergency Episodes’’). Subpart H requires states that have air quality control regions identified as either Priority I, Priority IA or Priority II to develop emergency episode contingency plans. Articles 3 and 19 of the ECL provide New York State with the authority to address air pollution emergencies. ECL section 3–0301, entitled ‘‘General functions power and duties of the DEC and the commissioner,’’ authorizes NYSDEC to prevent and control air pollution emergencies as defined in ECL section 1–0303. ECL articles 3 and 19 are implemented through 6 NYCRR part 207, ‘‘Control Measures for Air Pollution Episodes’’ which the EPA approved as part of the New York SIP. See 46 FR 55690 (November 12, 1981). The EPA also notes that the NYSDEC maintains Air Pollution Episode Procedures (APEPs) also called Alert Criteria (updated December 2018 at https://www.dec.ny.gov/chemical/ 60440.html). In October 2009, NYSDEC completed a comprehensive revision of the APEPs to address updated PM2.5 significant harm levels (SHLs) along with revised values for ozone episodes. This revision involved updating contact information for the Bureaus of Air Quality Assurance, Stationary Sources, and Air Quality Surveillance, and the Impact Assessment and Meteorology Section. Local level emergency contacts were also updated. NYSDEC’s APEPs include air pollution episode criteria for PM2.5, coarse PM10, ozone, carbon monoxide, SO2 and nitrogen dioxide, based on SHLs established by the EPA. The EPA proposes that New York has met the requirements of section 110(a)(2)(G) for the 2008 Ozone, 2010 SO2 and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS. Element H: Future SIP Revisions: Section 110(a)(2)(H) requires states to have authority to revise their SIPs in response to changes in the NAAQS or availability of improved methods for attaining the NAAQS and whenever the EPA finds that the SIP is substantially inadequate. This element of the submittals is common to New York infrastructure submittals that the EPA has previously approved and, as discussed in Section VII, the EPA is not repeating the rationale for proposing to approve this element of the submittals. Element I: Plan Revisions for Nonattainment Areas (under part D): VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:22 Jun 12, 2019 Jkt 247001 Section 110(a)(2)(I) requires that each plan or plan revision for an area designated as a nonattainment area meet the applicable requirements of part D of the CAA. Part D relates to nonattainment areas. The EPA has determined that CAA 110(a)(2)(D)(I) (Element I) is not applicable to the infrastructure SIP process. The EPA takes action on part D nonattainment plans through a separate process. Element J: Section 110(a)(2)(J): Consultation with Government Officials, Public Notification, and PSD and Visibility Protection: As mentioned above, the EPA previously approved portions of New York’s infrastructure SIP submittals for the 2008 Ozone and 2010 SO2 NAAQS 12 pertaining to CAA sections 110(a)(2)(J). See 81 FR 95047 (December 27, 2016). Therefore, this proposal only pertains to the EPA’s review of element J as it applies to 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS. Consultation With Government Officials The CAA Section 110(a)(2)(J) requires states to meet the applicable requirements of CAA 121 relating to consultation. CAA Section 121 requires states to provide a satisfactory process of consultation with general purpose local governments, designated organizations of elected officials of local governments, Tribal Nations, Federal Land Managers (FLMs) and Regional Organizations. NYSDEC has participated in the consultation process of the Regional Haze SIP (40 CFR 51.308) with the FLMs, states, and Tribal Nations of the Mid Atlantic/Northeast Visibility Union (MANE/VU) and other regional planning organizations where emissions from New York State are reasonably anticipated to contribute to visibility in Class 1 Areas. NYSDEC’s Regional Haze SIP was submitted to the EPA on March 15, 2010. In a Federal Register notice dated August 28, 2012 (77 FR 51915), the EPA issued a final rule, effective September 27, 2012, partially approving the New York State Regional Haze SIP and promulgated a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) to address two sources (Danskammer Generation Station Unit No. 4 and Roseton Generation Station). On December 4, 2017 (82 FR 57126) the EPA approved a source specific revision to the New York State SIP that established BART emissions limits for the Danskammer Generation Station Unit No. 4 that are identical to the emission limits established by the EPA’s FIP for Danskammer Unit No. 4. In 12 The approval also included the 2008 Lead NAAQS, which is not a subject of this action. PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 conjunction with this SIP approval the EPA withdrew those portions of the FIP that address BART for Danskammer Unit No. 4. (82 FR 57126, December 4, 2012). On February 16, 2018 (83 FR 6970), the EPA approved a source specific SIP revision for Roseton Generation Station Units 1 and 2. This SIP revision established BART emissions limits for the Roseton Generation Station Units 1 and 2 that are identical to those established by the FIP. The EPA’s February 16, 2018 final rule for Roseton Units 1 and 2 withdrew the FIP that addressed BART for these two units. On December 22, 2005, NYSDEC established a SIP Coordinating Council consisting of senior policy representatives from 19 state agencies and authorities, and a SIP Task Force consisting of officials from 37 local governments and designated organizations of elected officials. The SIP Coordinating Council provides a means to keep state agencies and local governments informed of planned SIP activities and deadlines, and also provides a forum for discussion of SIP requirements and implications, such as effects on transportation planning. The SIP Task Force provides a means of facilitating local involvement at the MPO and county level. Periodic meetings of both groups were held during the ozone and PM2.5 SIP development period for the 1997 NAAQS and continue as necessary to address nonattainment of the PM2.5 NAAQS and other revised standards. The EPA proposes to find that New York has met the requirements of CAA 110(a)(2)(J) for consultation with government officials. Public Notification CAA section 110(a)(2)(J) also requires state plans to meet the public notification requirements of CAA 127: To notify the public if NAAQS are exceeded in an area, advise the public of health hazards associated with exceedances, and enhance public awareness of measures that can be taken to prevent exceedances and of ways in which the public can participate in regulatory and other efforts to improve air quality. All ambient air concentrations captured by the State’s PM2.5 monitoring network are submitted to the Air Quality System for public access. Municipalities have emergency response plans recommended by the New York State Office of Emergency Management and the Federal Emergency Management Agency that provide for public information and notification in the case of large-scale emergencies. E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM 13JNP1 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 114 / Thursday, June 13, 2019 / Proposed Rules khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS The NYSDEC’s website at https:// www.dec.ny.gov/chemical/34985.html contains an Air Quality Index (AQI) for reporting daily air quality to the public. It describes how clean or polluted the air is and what associated health effects might be a concern. When levels of ozone and/or fine particles exceed an AQI of 100, an Air Quality Health Advisory is issued alerting sensitive groups to take necessary precautions. The NYSDEC in cooperation with the New York State Department of Health posts warnings on the above referenced website and issues press releases to local media outlets if dangerous conditions are expected to occur. The Air Quality Index displays the predicted AQI value for eight regions in New York State. It also displays the observed values for the previous day. Air Quality measurements from New York’s continuous monitoring network are updated hourly where available. Parameters monitored include ozone, fine particulate, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, methane/hydrocarbons and meteorological data. Emissions of PM2.5 come from mobile sources, stationary sources, aviation sources, wildfires and fires prescribed and open burning and woodstoves. Control measure includes public education on proper burning and consumer recycling and disposal of waste in landfills. Programs to replace outdated stoves, low sulfur fuel, diesel engine retrofits and idling of mobile sources are also included as part of the public awareness program. The public is afforded the opportunity to participate in the regulatory process by submitting written comments on each major SIP revision and petitioning for a public hearing on such revisions. The EPA proposes to find that New York has met the requirements of CAA 110(a)(2)(J) for public notification. Prevention of Significant Deterioration New York has a SIP approved PSD/ NSR program that covers all criteria pollutants including PM2.5. 6 NYCRR Part 231 ‘‘New Source Review for New and Modified Facilities’’ was approved by the EPA on November 17, 2010 (75 FR 70142). 6 NYCRR Part 231 regulates major sources under NSR (when the source is located in a nonattainment area) and PSD (when the source is located in an attainment area). NYSDEC adopted a revision to 6 NYCRR Part 231 to implement PM2.5 provisions in 2011. These revisions were submitted to the EPA for inclusion in the SIP on October 12, 2011. The EPA approved the State’s revision to Part 231 in a December 27, 2016 action (81 FR 95047). VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:22 Jun 12, 2019 Jkt 247001 The EPA proposes to approve New York’s infrastructure SIP with respect to the requirements of the PSD subelement of CAA 110(a)(2)(J). Visibility Protection Visibility Protection and regional haze program requirements under Section 169A and B of Part C are being met by NYSDEC through separate efforts. In the event of the establishment of a new NAAQS, the visibility and regional haze program requirements under Part C do not change. As noted in the EPA’s 2013 guidance, we find that there is not new visibility obligation triggered under Section 110(a)(2)(J) when a new NAAQS becomes effective. There are thus no new applicable visibility protection obligations under Section 110(a)(2)(J) resulting from 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS revision and the EPA, therefore, is not acting on the visibility aspect of Element J. Element K: Air Quality Modeling/ Data: Section 110(a)(2)(K) requires that SIPs provide for air quality modeling for predicting effects on air quality of emissions from any NAAQS pollutant and submission of such data to EPA upon request. This element of the submittals is common to New York infrastructure submittals that the EPA has previously approved and, as discussed in Section VII, the EPA is not repeating the rationale for proposing to approve this element of the submittals.13 The reader is referred to the EPA’s analysis evaluation of the SIP submittals identified in Section VII. Element L: Permitting Fees: Section 110(a)(2)(L) requires SIPs to mandate that each major stationary source pay permitting fees to cover the cost of reviewing, approving, implementing and enforcing a permit, until such time as the SIP fee requirement is superseded by the EPA’s approval of the state’s operating permit program. This element of the submittals is common to New York infrastructure submittals that the EPA has previously approved and, as discussed in Section VII, the EPA is not repeating the rationale for proposing to approve this element of the submittals. Element M: Consultation/ Participation by Affected Local Entities: Section 110(a)(2)(M) requires states to provide for consultation and participation in SIP development by local political subdivisions affected by the SIP. This element of the submittals is common to New York infrastructure submittals that the EPA has previously 13 Due to State revisions to 6 NYCRR 201–6, section 201–6.5(a)(7) in the EPA-approved NY Title V program is now numbered in the State’s regulation as 6 NYCRR 201–6.4(a)(7). PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 27565 approved and therefore the EPA is not repeating the rationale for proposing to approve this element of the submittals. The EPA notes that the submittals provide more detailed information regarding NYSDEC’s authority to provide for consultation and participation in SIP development, in further support of the EPA’s proposed approval of this element. The submittals identify the SIP Task Force, consisting of officials from 37 local governments and designated organizations of elected officials, as allowing for consultation by local political subdivisions affected by the SIP and the submittals for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS and 2008 Ozone NAAQS also cite the Inter-agency Consultation Group, established pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 240, and the State Environmental Quality Review process, 6 NYCRR Part 617. VIII. What action is the EPA taking? The EPA is proposing to approve New York’s submittals as meeting the infrastructure requirements for the 2008 Ozone, 2010 SO2 and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS for all section 110(a)(2) elements and sub-elements, as follows: (A), (B), (C) [enforcement measures and PSD program for major sources for 2012 PM2.5 only], (D)(i)(II) prong 3 [for 2012 PM2.5 only], (D)(i)(II) prong 4 [for 2010 SO2 and 2012 PM2.5 only], D(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J) [for consultation, public notification and prevention of significant deterioration 2012 PM2.5 only], (K), (L) and (M). The EPA is not acting on New York’s submittal for 2012 PM2.5 as it relates to nonattainment provisions, the NSR program required by part D, in section 110(a)(2)(C) and is not acting on New York’s submittals for 2008 Ozone, 2010 SO2 and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS as they relate to the measures for attainment required by section 110(a)(2)(I), as part of this proposed approval because the State’s infrastructure SIP submittals do not include nonattainment requirements and the EPA will act on them when, if necessary, they are submitted. The EPA is also not acting on 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) provisions (prongs 1 and 2) for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS and the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS, which will be addressed in a subsequent action by the EPA. The EPA is soliciting public comments on the issues discussed in this proposal. These comments will be considered before the EPA takes final action. Interested parties may participate in the Federal rulemaking procedure by submitting written comments to the EPA Regional Office listed in the ADDRESSES section of this Federal Register, or by submitting E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM 13JNP1 27566 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 114 / Thursday, June 13, 2019 / Proposed Rules comments electronically, by mail, or through hand delivery or courier following the directions in the ADDRESSES section of this Federal Register. khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS IX. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action: • Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); • Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); • Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); • Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); • Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); • Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and • Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:22 Jun 12, 2019 Jkt 247001 This proposed rulemaking pertaining to New York’s section 110(a)(2) infrastructure requirements for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS, 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS, and 2010 SO2 NAAQS does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the State, and EPA notes it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: May 28, 2019. Peter D. Lopez, Regional Administrator, Region 2. [FR Doc. 2019–12181 Filed 6–12–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 [EPA–R9–OAR–2018–0821 FRL–9995–11– Region 9] Determination of Attainment by the Attainment Date for the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards; Phoenix-Mesa, Arizona Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to determine that the Phoenix-Mesa ozone nonattainment area (‘‘Phoenix NAA’’), which is classified as ‘‘Moderate’’ for the 2008 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS or ‘‘standards’’), attained the NAAQS by its Moderate area attainment date of July 20, 2018. This determination is based on complete, quality-assured, and certified data for 2015–2017. This proposed action is necessary to fulfill the EPA’s statutory obligation to determine whether ozone nonattainment areas attained the NAAQS by the attainment date. DATES: Any comments must arrive by July 15, 2019. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09– OAR–2018–0821 at https:// www.regulations.gov. For comments SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/ commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Levin, EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105. By phone: (415) 972–3848 or by email at levin.nancy@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. Table of Contents I. What is the Background for this action? A. Ozone NAAQS, Area Designations, and Classifications B. Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Data II. What is the EPA’s analysis of the relevant air quality data? A. Monitoring Network and Data Considerations B. Evaluation of the Ambient Air Quality Data III. Proposed Action IV. Environmental Justice Considerations V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. What is the background for this action? A. Ozone NAAQS, Area Designations, and Classifications The Clean Air Act (CAA or ‘‘Act’’) requires the EPA to establish national primary and secondary standards for certain widespread pollutants, such as ozone, which cause or contribute to air pollution that is reasonably anticipated to endanger public health or welfare.1 In 1 CAA sections 108 and 109. Primary standards represent ambient air quality standards the attainment and maintenance of which the EPA has determined, including a margin of safety, are E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM 13JNP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 114 (Thursday, June 13, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 27559-27566]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-12181]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R02-OAR-2018-0511; FRL-9994-92-Region 2]


Approval of Air Quality Implementation Plans; New York; 
Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 Ozone, 2010 Sulfur Dioxide, 
and 2012 Fine Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to 
approve certain elements of New York's State Implementation Plan (SIP) 
revisions, submitted to demonstrate that the State meets the 
requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) for the 2008 Ozone; 2010 Sulfur 
Dioxide; and 2012 particulate matter of 2.5 microns or less 
(PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). 
Section 110(a) of the CAA requires that each state adopt and submit for 
approval into the SIP a plan for the implementation, maintenance and 
enforcement of each NAAQS promulgated by the EPA.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 15, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-
R02-OAR-2018-0511 at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot 
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any 
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any 
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) 
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a 
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment 
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA 
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located 
outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other 
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA 
public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, 
and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edward J. Linky, Air Programs Branch, 
Environmental Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, 
New York 10007-1866, (212) 637-3764, or by email at 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. What action is EPA proposing?
II. What is the background information?
III. What is a section 110(a)(1) and (2) SIP?
IV. What elements are required under section 110(a)(1) and (2)?
V. What is EPA's approach to the review of infrastructure SIP 
submissions?
VI. What did New York submit?
VII. How has the State addressed the elements of the section 
110(a)(1) and (2) ``infrastructure'' provisions?
VIII. What action is EPA taking?
IX. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. What action is EPA proposing?

    The EPA is proposing to approve certain elements of the State of 
New York Infrastructure State Implementation Plan (SIP) as meeting the 
section 110(a) infrastructure requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) 
for the following National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS or 
standard): 2008 Ozone, 2010 sulfur dioxide (SO2), and 2012 
particulate matter of 2.5 microns or less (PM2.5). As 
explained below, the EPA is proposing to find that the State has the 
necessary infrastructure, resources, and general authority to implement 
the standards noted above.

II. What is the background information?

    Section 110(a)(1) of the CAA requires states to submit for approval 
into the SIP a plan that provides for the implementation, maintenance, 
and enforcement of new or revised NAAQS

[[Page 27560]]

within three years following the promulgation of such NAAQS. The EPA 
commonly refers to such state plans as ``infrastructure SIPs.''
     On March 12, 2008, the EPA promulgated a revised NAAQS for 
ozone. 73 FR 16436 (March 27, 2008).
     On June 2, 2010), the EPA promulgated a revised primary 
NAAQS for SO2. 75 FR 35520 (June 22, 2010).
     On December 14, 2012, the EPA promulgated a revised 
primary NAAQS for PM2.5 for the annual standard. 78 FR 3086 
(Jan. 15, 2013).
    The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 
(NYSDEC) submitted the following revisions to its Infrastructure State 
Implementation Plan (ISIP):

 2008 Ozone ISIP submitted on April 4, 2013
 2010 SO2 ISIP submitted on October 3, 2013
 2012 PM2.5 ISIP submitted on November 30, 2016

    On August 26, 2016 (81 FR 58849), the EPA published its action on 
certain elements of NYSDEC's April 4, 2013 SIP submittal pertaining to 
the 2008 Ozone ISIP. The EPA's action addressed CAA section 
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) which requires SIPs to include provisions 
prohibiting any source or other type of emissions activity in one state 
from contributing significantly to nonattainment of the NAAQS (commonly 
referred to as prong 1), or interfering with maintenance of the NAAQS 
(prong 2), in any other state and CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) which 
requires SIPs to include provisions prohibiting any source or other 
type of emissions activity in one state from interfering with measures 
required to protect visibility (prong 4). The EPA disapproved 
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) (prongs 1 and 2) and approved 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) 
(prong 4) for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS. 81 FR 58849, 58855 (August 26, 
2016).
    The EPA approved portions of New York's infrastructure SIP 
submittals for the 2008 Ozone and 2010 SO2 NAAQS \1\ 
pertaining to CAA sections 110(a)(2)(C), (D)(i)(II) (prong 3), and (J), 
including PSD interstate transport provisions.\2\ 81 FR 95047 (December 
27, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The approval also included the 2008 Lead NAAQS, which is not 
a subject of this action.
    \2\ CAA 110(a)(2)(C) (requires SIPs to include a program to 
provide for enforcement of emission limitations and other control 
measures described in CAA 110(a)(2)(A)); CAA 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) 
(which requires SIPs to include provisions prohibiting any source or 
other type of emissions activity in one state from interfering with 
measures required to prevent significant deterioration of air 
quality in another state); CAA 110(a)(2)(J) (requirements related to 
consultation, public notification and PSD and visibility 
protection).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. What is a section 110(a)(1) and (2) SIP?

    Section 110(a)(1) provides the procedural and timing requirements 
for SIPs. Section 110(a)(2) lists specific elements that states must 
meet for ``infrastructure'' SIP requirements related to a newly 
established or revised NAAQS.
    Sections 110(a)(1) and (2) of the CAA require, in part, that states 
submit to the EPA plans to implement, maintain and enforce each of the 
NAAQS promulgated by the EPA. The EPA interprets this provision to 
require states to address basic SIP requirements including emission 
inventories, monitoring, and modeling to assure attainment and 
maintenance of the standards. By statute, SIPs meeting the requirements 
of section 110(a)(1) and (2) are to be submitted by states within three 
years after promulgation of a new or revised standard.

IV. What elements are required under section 110(a)(1) and (2)?

    The infrastructure requirements of CAA sections 110(a)(1) and (2), 
relevant to this action, are discussed in the following EPA guidance 
documents: EPA's October 2, 2007, memorandum entitled ``Guidance on SIP 
Elements Required Under Section 110(a)(1) and (2) for the 1997 8-Hour 
Ozone and PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standards;'' 
September 25, 2009, memorandum entitled ``Guidance on SIP Elements 
Required Under Section 110(a)(1) and (2) for the 2006 24-Hour Fine 
Particle (PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality Standards;'' 
September 13, 2013, memorandum entitled ``Guidance on Infrastructure 
State Implementation Plan (SIP) Elements under Clean Air Act Sections 
110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2);'' \3\ and March 17, 2016, ``Information on 
Interstate Transport ``Good Neighbor'' provision for the 2012 Fine 
Particulate Matter (PM) National Ambient Air Quality Standards under 
Clean Air Act (CAA) Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I).''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ ``Guidance on Infrastructure State Implementation Plan (SIP) 
Elements under Clean Air Act Sections 110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2)'' can 
be found at: https://www.epa.gov/airquality/urbanair/sipstatus/infrastructure.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The EPA reviews each infrastructure SIP submission with the 
applicable statutory provisions of CAA 110(a)(2). The 14 elements 
required to be addressed by CAA section 110(a)(2) are:
     110(a)(2)(A): Emission limits and other control measures;
     110(a)(2)(B): Ambient air quality monitoring/data system;
     110(a)(2)(C): Program for enforcement of control measures 
and for construction or modification of stationary sources;
     110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) and (II): Interstate pollution 
transport;
     110(a)(2)(D)(ii): Interstate and international pollution 
abatement;
     110(a)(2)(E): Adequate resources and authority, conflict 
of interest, oversight of local governments and local authorities;
     110(a)(2)(F): Stationary source monitoring and reporting;
     110(a)(2)(G): Emergency powers;
     110(a)(2)(H): Future SIP revisions;
     110(a)(2)(I): Plan revisions for nonattainment areas 
(under part D);
     110(a)(2)(J): Consultation with government officials, 
public notification, and PSD and visibility protection;
     110(a)(2)(K): Air quality modeling and data;
     110(a)(2)(L): Permitting fees;
     110(a)(2)(M): Consultation/participation by affected local 
entities.
    Two elements identified in section 110(a)(2) are not governed by 
the 3-year submission deadline of section 110(a)(1) because SIPs 
incorporating necessary local nonattainment area controls are not due 
within 3 years after promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS, but rather 
due at the time that the nonattainment area plan requirements are due 
pursuant to section 172 of the CAA. See 77 FR 46354 (August 3, 2012) 
and 77 FR 60308 (October 3, 2012, footnote 1). These requirements are: 
(1) Submissions required by section 110(a)(2)(C) to the extent that 
subsection refers to a permit program as required in part D Title I of 
the CAA, and (2) submissions required by section 110(a)(2)(I) which 
pertain to the nonattainment planning requirements of part D, Title I 
of the CAA. As a result, this action does not address the nonattainment 
permit program requirements of section 110(a)(2)(C) for 2012 
PM2.5 or the nonattainment planning requirements related to 
section 110(a)(2)(I) for the 2008 Ozone, 2010 SO2, or 2012 
PM2.5.
    This action partially addresses Element D (interstate pollution 
transport, interstate and international pollution abatement). As 
mentioned in section II, the EPA previously disapproved 
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) (prongs 1 and 2) and approved 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) 
(prong 4) for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS. 81 FR 58849 (Aug. 26, 2016). The 
EPA approved 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (prong 3) for the 2008 Ozone and 2010 
SO2 NAAQS. 81 FR 95047 (December 27, 2016). This action 
addresses the remaining element D provisions for 2008 Ozone, 2010 
SO2 and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS, except for 
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) (prongs 1 and 2)

[[Page 27561]]

provisions for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS and the 2012 
PM2.5 NAAQS, which will be addressed in a subsequent action 
by the EPA. Therefore, with respect to element D, this action 
addresses:

 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (prong 3) for the 2012 PM2.5 
NAAQS; and
 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (prong 4) for the 2010 SO2 
NAAQS and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS
 110(a)(2)(D)(ii) for 2008 Ozone NAAQS, 2010 SO2 
NAAQS and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS

V. What is EPA's approach to the review of infrastructure SIP 
submissions?

    The discussion of the EPA's approach to the review of 
infrastructure SIP submissions is detailed in the ``Technical Support 
Document for the EPA's proposed Rulemaking for the New York State 
Implementation Plan Revision for Meeting the Infrastructure 
Requirements in the Clean Air Act'' dated 2019 (TSD). The TSD is 
available in the electronic docket (EPA-R02-OAR-2018-0511) at 
www.regulations.gov.
    Whenever the EPA promulgates a new or revised NAAQS, CAA section 
110(a)(1) requires states to make Infrastructure SIP submissions to 
provide for the implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of the 
NAAQS. These submissions must meet the various requirements of CAA 
section 110(a)(2), as applicable. Due to ambiguity in some of the 
language of CAA section 110(a)(2), the EPA believes that it is 
appropriate to interpret these provisions in the specific context of 
acting on infrastructure SIP submissions. The EPA has previously 
provided comprehensive guidance on the application of these provisions 
through a guidance document for infrastructure SIP submissions and 
through regional actions on infrastructure submissions.\4\ Unless 
otherwise noted below, we are following that existing approach in 
acting on these submissions. In addition, in the context of acting on 
such infrastructure submissions, the EPA evaluates the submitting 
state's SIP for facial compliance with statutory and regulatory 
requirements, not for the state's implementation of its SIP.\5\ The EPA 
has other authority to address issues concerning a state's 
implementation of its SIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ EPA explains and elaborates on these ambiguities and its 
approach to address them in its September 13, 2013 Infrastructure 
SIP Guidance (available at https://www3.epa.gov/airquality/urbanair/sipstatus/docs/Guidance_on_Infrastructure_SIP_Elements_Multipollutant_FINAL_Sept_2013.pdf), as well as in numerous agency actions, including EPA's prior 
action on New York's infrastructure SIP to address the Nitrogen 
Dioxide NAAQS, 85 FR 25066, 25067 (May 2, 2014).
    \5\ See U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decision in 
Montana Environmental Information Center v. Thomas, 902 F.3d 971 
(Aug. 30, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

VI. What did New York submit?

    NYSDEC submitted the following SIP submittals which address the 
infrastructure requirements for the identified NAAQS:

 2008 Ozone ISIP submitted on April 4, 2013
 2010 SO2 ISIP submitted on October 3, 2013
 2012 PM2.5 ISIP submitted on November 30, 2016

    New York's section 110 submittals demonstrate how the State, where 
applicable, has a plan in place that meets the requirements of section 
110 for the 2008 Ozone, 2010 SO2, and 2012 PM2.5 
NAAQS. The plans reference the current New York Air Quality SIP, the 
New York Codes, Rules and Regulations (NYCRR), the New York 
Environmental Conservation Law (ECL) and the New York Public Officer's 
Law (POL). The NYCRR, ECL and POL referenced in the submittal are 
publicly available. New York's SIP and air pollution control 
regulations that have been previously approved by the EPA and 
incorporated into the New York SIP can be found at 40 CFR 52.1670 and 
are posted on the internet at https://www.epa.gov/sips-ny.

VII. How has the State addressed the elements of the section 110(a)(1) 
and (2) ``infrastructure'' provisions?

    Infrastructure SIPs for different criteria pollutants can have 
common aspects which are consistent for each NAAQS (e.g., authority to 
promulgate emission limitations, enforcement, air quality modeling 
capabilities, adequate personnel, resources and legal authority). The 
EPA compared New York's Infrastructure SIP submittals for the 2008 
Ozone, 2010 SO2, and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS with New 
York's Infrastructure SIP submittals for the 1997 8-hour Ozone and the 
1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS, on which the EPA took final 
action approving certain elements and sub-elements. 78 FR 37122 (June 
20, 2013). Certain elements of the infrastructure SIP submittals are 
not pollutant specific. Based upon the EPA's comparison, the EPA is 
proposing to determine that the information provided in New York's 
Infrastructure SIP submittal for the 2008 Ozone, 2010 SO2 
and the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS for elements E, F, H, K, L, and M 
is consistent with or identical to the information provided in New 
York's Infrastructure SIP submittal for the 1997 8-hour ozone, 1997 and 
2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. The EPA's rationale for approving certain 
elements of New York's Infrastructure SIP for 2008 Ozone, 2010 
SO2, and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS is the same as the 
rationale for approving those elements of New York's 1997 8-hour ozone 
and 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 Infrastructure SIPs, so the EPA is 
not repeating this evaluation in today's proposal. Instead, the reader 
is referred to the EPA's evaluation of the SIP submittals for the 1997 
8-hour ozone and 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 Infrastructure SIPs 
detailed in the following documents: (1) Three documents titled 
``Technical Support Document for EPA's Proposed Rulemaking for the New 
York's State Implementation Plan Revision: State Implementation Plan 
Revision For Meeting the Infrastructure Requirements In the Clean Air 
Act'' dated December 13, 2007, October 2, 2008 and March 15, 2010; (2) 
the EPA's rulemaking proposing approval of certain elements of New 
York's Infrastructure SIP submittal for the 1997 8-hour ozone and the 
1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS, 78 FR 25236 (April 30, 2013); (3) 
the EPA's final rule approving certain elements of New York's 
Infrastructure SIPs for the 1997 8-hour ozone and the 1997 and 2006 
PM2.5 NAAQS, 78 FR 37122 (June 20, 2013). These documents 
are available in the electronic docket for today's proposed action at 
www.regulations.gov. We are, of course, accepting comments on that 
rationale as it applies to this proposed approval of New York's 
Infrastructure SIP for the 2008 Ozone, 2010 SO2 and 2012 
PM2.5 NAAQS.
    As discussed in the following sections, the EPA is providing a more 
detailed analysis of the remaining elements of New York's 2008 Ozone, 
2010 SO2, and 2012 PM2.5 Infrastructure SIP 
submittals namely elements A, B, C, D, G, and J.
    In summary, the EPA is proposing approval of the following elements 
and sub-elements of New York's Infrastructure SIP submittal for 2008 
Ozone, 2010 SO2, and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS (except as 
indicated): 110(a)(A) [emission limits and other control measures]; 
110(a)(2)(B) [ambient air quality monitoring/data system]; 110(a)(2)(C) 
[program for enforcement of control measures] for the 2012 
PM2.5 NAAQS only; 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) [interstate 
transport], Prong 3 for 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS, and Prong 4 for 
the 2010 SO2 NAAQS and the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS; 
110(a)(2)(D)(ii) [interstate and international pollution abatement]; 
110(a)(2)(E) [adequate resources, state

[[Page 27562]]

boards/conflict of interest, oversight of local governments and local 
authorities]; 110(a)(2)(F) [stationary source monitoring]; 110(a)(2)(G) 
[emergency power]; 110(a)(2)(H) [future SIP revisions]; 110(a)(2)(J) 
[consultation with government official, public notification, and PSD 
for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS only]; 110(a)(2)(K) [air quality 
and modeling/data]; 110(a)(2)(L) [permitting fees]; and 110(a)(2)(M) 
[consultation/participation by affected local entities].
    The EPA is not acting on New York's submittal for 2012 
PM2.5 as it relates to nonattainment provisions, including 
the nonattainment NSR program required by part D, in section 
110(a)(2)(C) and is not acting on New York's submittals for 2008 Ozone, 
2010 SO2 and 2012 PM2.5 as they relate to the 
measures for attainment required by section 110(a)(2)(I) because the 
State's Infrastructure SIP submittals do not include nonattainment 
requirements and the EPA will act on them when and if necessary. The 
EPA is also not acting on the visibility protection portion of element 
J for the 2012 PM2.5 submittal.
    Element A: Emission Limits and Other Control Measures: Section 
110(a)(2)(A) requires SIPs to include enforceable emission limits and 
other control measures, measures, means, or techniques, and schedules 
for compliance. In each of the submittals, New York identifies 
provisions of its federally enforceable SIP that contain enforceable 
emission limits and other control measures. The EPA is proposing to 
determine that New York has met the requirements of 110(a)(2)(A) of the 
CAA with respect to the 2008 Ozone, 2010 SO2 and 2012 
PM2.5 NAAQS.
    Element B: Ambient air quality monitoring/data system: Section 
110(a)(2)(B) requires SIPs to include provisions to provide for 
establishment and operation of ambient air quality monitors, to 
monitor, compile and analyze ambient air quality data, and to make 
these data available to EPA upon request. NYSDEC submittal for the 2012 
PM2.5 NAAQS details the State's authority to adopt and 
enforce provisions of the SIP. The EPA proposes to find that these 
provisions demonstrate that NYSDEC has the requisite authority to 
support element B. NYSDEC states that it will continue to operate an 
air quality monitoring network that complies with the EPA requirements 
and will submit this data to the EPA's Air Quality System (AQS). 
NYSDEC's submittals state that they measure air pollutants at more than 
50 sites across the State using continuous and/or manual 
instrumentation, in accordance with 40 CFR part 53 and 58. These sites 
are part of the federally-mandated National Cores Sites (NCORE) and the 
State and Local Air Monitoring Stations (SLAMS) network. Near real time 
direct reading measurements include gaseous criteria pollutants (ozone, 
SO2, NOX and carbon monoxide, PM2.5 
and meteorological data). Filter based PM2.5 samples are 
collected and shipped to a laboratory for analysis. In January 2017, in 
accord with the Data Requirements Rule for the 2010 SO2 
standard,\6\ NYSDEC established four monitors near two large sources, 
one in St. Lawrence County (Alcoa Massena Aluminum Plant) and the other 
in Tompkins County (Cayuga Power Plant) to characterize SO2 
air quality in the area.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ August 21, 2015 (80 FR 50152).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NYSDEC prepares an Annual Monitoring Network Plan that describes in 
detail the specifics of the monitoring network as required by 40 CFR 
58.10. The EPA is therefore proposing that New York has met the 
requirements of section 110(a)(2)(B) of the CAA with respect to the 
2008 Ozone, 2010 SO2 \7\ and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ EPA notes that designations for the 2010 SO2 
standards were finalized in three rounds on July 25, 2013 (78 FR 
47191), August 5, 2013 (78 FR 47191), July 12, 2016 (81 FR 45039), 
December 13, 2016 (81 FR 89870), and January 9, 2018 (83 FR 1098).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Element C: Program for enforcement of control measures and for 
construction or modification of stationary sources: Section 
110(a)(2)(C) requires states to have a plan that includes a program 
providing for enforcement of all SIP measures and the regulation of the 
modification and construction of any stationary source, including a 
program to meet Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) of Air 
Quality and minor source new source review. This element is being 
evaluated for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS only.

Enforcement of SIP Measures

    New York's PM2.5 infrastructure SIP submittal explains 
that its SIP is a compilation of rules and regulations that have been 
duly promulgated by NYSDEC in accordance with its statutory authority 
and consistent with the New York State Administrative Procedures Act. 
New York cites Environmental Conservation Law (ECL) section 19-0305, 
which authorizes the Commissioner to enforce NYSDEC codes, rules and 
regulations established in accordance with ECL Articles 19 and 71. This 
includes all control measures that have been adopted into the SIP. New 
York states that its authority for enforcement of emission limits and 
control measures is provided for in ``Enforcement of Article 19 and Air 
Pollution Emergency Rules and Regulations.'' ECL Article 71, Title 21. 
New York also identifies the enforcement provisions included in 6 NYCRR 
Part 201, specifically 201-1.13 which gives NYSDEC access to regulated 
facilities in order to determine compliance.

Regulation of Minor Sources and Minor Modifications

    New York states that it permits minor sources of air pollution 
through 6 NYCRR Subparts 201-4, ``Minor Facility Registration'' and 
201-5, ``State Facility Permits'' and applicable State and Federal 
regulations.

PSD Permitting of Major Sources

    New York references the State's PSD and Nonattainment New Source 
Review (NNSR) permitting program contained in 6 NYCRR Part 231, ``New 
Source Review for New and Modified Facilities'' and the State's 
permitting program contained in 6 NYCRR 201, ``Permits and 
Registrations.'' The EPA approved New York's PSD and NNSR program into 
the SIP on November 17, 2010 (75 FR 70140). New York adopted revisions 
to Part 231 and 201 to implement PM2.5 provisions that were 
not included in the earlier rule and submitted them to the EPA on 
October 12, 2011. The EPA approved the SIP revision on December 27, 
2016 (81 FR 95047).
    The EPA is proposing to approve New York's Infrastructure SIP for 
the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS with respect to the program for 
enforcement of control measures requirements of element C. The EPA 
proposes to find that the State has adequate authority and regulations 
to ensure that SIP-approved control measures are enforced. The EPA is 
proposing to find that New York meets the requirement to have a SIP 
approved minor new source review program. The EPA also finds that, 
based on the approval of New York's PSD program, New York has the 
authority to regulate the construction of new or modified stationary 
sources to meet the PSD program requirements.
    As discussed in Section IV, the EPA is not addressing the 
nonattainment permit program requirements of section 110(a)(2)(C) for 
2012 PM2.5 NAAQS.
    The EPA proposes to determine that New York has met the 
requirements of section 110(a)(2)(C) of the CAA with respect to the 
2012 PM2.5 NAAQS.
    Element D: Interstate transport: Section 110(a)(2)(D) of the CAA is 
divided into two subsections, 110(a)(2)(D)(i) and 110(a)(2)(D)(ii). The 
first of these, 110(a)(2)(D)(i), in turn, contains four ``prongs'' the 
first two of

[[Page 27563]]

which appear in 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) and the second two of which appear 
in 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II). The two prongs in 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) prohibit 
any source or other type of emissions activity within the State from 
emitting any air pollutants in amounts which will contribute 
significantly to nonattainment in any other state with respect to any 
primary or secondary NAAQS (prong 1), or interfere with maintenance by 
any other state with respect to any primary or secondary NAAQS (prong 
2). Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) is not being reviewed in this action. 
Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) prohibits any source or other type of 
emissions activity within the State from emitting any air pollutants in 
amounts which will interfere with measures required to be included in 
the applicable implementation plan for any other state under part C to 
prevent significant deterioration of air quality (prong 3) or to 
protect visibility (prong 4). Subsection 110(a)(2)(D)(ii) addresses 
interstate and international pollution abatement and requires SIPs to 
include provisions insuring compliance with sections 115 and 126 of the 
CAA, relating to interstate and international pollution abatement.
    The EPA acted on portions of 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) and (II) with 
respect to 2008 Ozone and 2010 SO2 NAAQS. The EPA 
disapproved the portion of the 2008 Ozone infrastructure SIP submittal 
addressing CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I), concerning nonattainment of 
the NAAQS (prong 1), and interfering with maintenance of the NAAQS 
(prong 2) and approved the portion of the 2008 Ozone infrastructure SIP 
submittal addressing CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) concerning 
visibility (prong 4).\8\ With respect to the requirements of 
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (prong 3), the EPA previously approved \9\ this 
portion of New York's SIP submissions for 2008 Ozone and 2010 
SO2 NAAQS. New York's SIP submissions that address section 
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) [prongs 1 and 2] for 2010 SO2 NAAQS, and 
2012 PM2.5 NAAQS are currently being reviewed by the EPA, 
and the Agency will take action at a later date. Our evaluation of New 
York's submittals is limited to assessing whether New York's submittals 
meet the requirements of 110(a)(2)(D) under review in this proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ August 26, 2016 (81 FR 58849).
    \9\ December 27, 2016 (81 FR 95047).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS, the EPA is proposing that New 
York satisfies the 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) requirement for prong 3. New 
York relies on its PSD program to prevent significant deterioration of 
air quality within the state and in other nearby states. New York's SIP 
approved 6 NYCRR Part 231 includes both PSD permitting requirements, 
which regulate major sources in attainment areas, and Nonattainment New 
Source Review requirements, which regulate major sources in 
nonattainment areas. New York has affirmed that the program remains in 
effect and applies to PM2.5. New York adopted revisions to 
Part 231, which included provisions to implement PSD/Nonattainment New 
Source Review requirements for PM2.5 and submitted them to 
EPA in October 12, 2011. The EPA approved these State revisions to Part 
231 in the December 27, 2016 Federal Register issue.
    The EPA is proposing that New York satisfies the 
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) requirement for visibility (prong 4). New York 
addresses visibility protection requirements for both the 2010 
SO2 and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS through its EPA-approved 
Regional Haze SIP.\10\ The EPA's regional haze rule requires that a 
state participating in a regional planning process include all measures 
needed to achieve its apportionment of emission reduction obligations 
agreed upon through that process.\11\ The regional haze rule also 
requires the state to submit periodic reports describing progress 
towards reasonable progress goals established for regional haze and the 
adequacy of the state's regional haze SIP. Thus, New York's approved 
Regional Haze SIP and approved reasonable progress plan ensure that 
emissions from sources within the State are not interfering with 
measures to protect visibility in other states.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ August 28, 2012 (77 FR 51915).
    \11\ 40 CFR part 51, subpart P.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The EPA notes that New York's Regional Haze SIP was supplemented 
with a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) to address two sources, 
Danskammer Generating Station, Unit No. 4 (Danskammer) and Roseton 
Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 (Roseton), where the Agency 
disapproved New York's BART determinations. Following the EPA's action 
on New York's Regional Haze Plan, the Title V permits for Danskammer 
and Roseton were updated by New York to incorporate the FIP limits 
established by the EPA. The Title V permits for Danskammer and Roseton 
were submitted to the EPA as SIP revisions on August 20, 2015, and 
April 18, 2017, respectively. The EPA published the SIP approval for 
Danskammer on December 4, 2017 (82 FR 57126) and the SIP approval for 
Roseton on February 16, 2018 (83 FR 6970).
    Regarding section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii), which relates to interstate and 
international pollution abatement, the EPA is proposing to approve New 
York's submissions for infrastructure element 110(a)(2)(D)(ii) for the 
2008 Ozone, 2012 PM2.5 and the 2010 SO2 NAAQS. 
New York's SIP-approved PSD program is consistent with 40 CFR 
51.166(q)(2)(iv) and requires a source to notify air agencies whose 
lands may be affected by emissions from that source. (See 78 FR 25236, 
25239; 6 NYCRR 231-7.4(f) and 8.5(f)). New York has no pending 
obligations under section 115 or 126 of the CAA.
    Element E: Adequate Resources: Section 110(a)(2)(E) requires each 
state to provide necessary assurances that the state will (i) have 
adequate personnel, funding, and authority under state law to carry out 
the SIP (and is not prohibited by any provision of federal or state law 
from carrying out the SIP or portion thereof), (ii) will comply with 
the requirements respecting state boards under CAA section 128, and 
(iii) where the state has relied on a local or regional government, 
agency, or instrumentality for the implementation of any SIP provision, 
the state has responsibility for ensuring adequate implementation of 
such SIP provision. This element of the submittals is common to New 
York infrastructure submittals that the EPA has previously approved 
and, therefore, as discussed in Section VII, the EPA is not repeating 
the rationale for approving this element of the submittals. See 78 FR 
37122 (June 20, 2013). The EPA proposes to approve the submittals for 
the 2012 PM2.5, 2008 Ozone, and 2010 SO2 NAAQS.
    Element F: Stationary Source Monitoring and Reporting: Section 
110(a)(2)(F) requires states to establish a system to monitor emissions 
from stationary sources and to submit periodic emission reports. This 
element of the submittals is common to New York infrastructure 
submittals that the EPA has previously approved and, as discussed in 
Section VII, EPA, therefore, is not repeating the rationale for 
proposing to approve this element of the submittals. New York's 
submittal for the 2012 NAAQS PM2.5 NAAQS provides more 
detailed information regarding their authority for stationary source 
monitoring and reporting in further support of the EPA's proposed 
approval of this element.
    Element G: Emergency power: Section 110(a)(2)(G) requires states to 
provide for emergency authority to address activities causing imminent 
and substantial endangerment to public health and requires states to 
submit adequate contingency plans to

[[Page 27564]]

implement the emergency episode provisions in their SIPs.
    The EPA requires that Infrastructure SIP submittals should meet the 
applicable contingency plan requirements of 40 CFR part 51, subpart H 
(40 CFR 51.150 through 51.153) (``Prevention of Air Pollution Emergency 
Episodes''). Subpart H requires states that have air quality control 
regions identified as either Priority I, Priority IA or Priority II to 
develop emergency episode contingency plans.
    Articles 3 and 19 of the ECL provide New York State with the 
authority to address air pollution emergencies. ECL section 3-0301, 
entitled ``General functions power and duties of the DEC and the 
commissioner,'' authorizes NYSDEC to prevent and control air pollution 
emergencies as defined in ECL section 1-0303. ECL articles 3 and 19 are 
implemented through 6 NYCRR part 207, ``Control Measures for Air 
Pollution Episodes'' which the EPA approved as part of the New York 
SIP. See 46 FR 55690 (November 12, 1981).
    The EPA also notes that the NYSDEC maintains Air Pollution Episode 
Procedures (APEPs) also called Alert Criteria (updated December 2018 at 
https://www.dec.ny.gov/chemical/60440.html). In October 2009, NYSDEC 
completed a comprehensive revision of the APEPs to address updated 
PM2.5 significant harm levels (SHLs) along with revised 
values for ozone episodes. This revision involved updating contact 
information for the Bureaus of Air Quality Assurance, Stationary 
Sources, and Air Quality Surveillance, and the Impact Assessment and 
Meteorology Section. Local level emergency contacts were also updated. 
NYSDEC's APEPs include air pollution episode criteria for 
PM2.5, coarse PM10, ozone, carbon monoxide, 
SO2 and nitrogen dioxide, based on SHLs established by the 
EPA.
    The EPA proposes that New York has met the requirements of section 
110(a)(2)(G) for the 2008 Ozone, 2010 SO2 and 2012 
PM2.5 NAAQS.
    Element H: Future SIP Revisions: Section 110(a)(2)(H) requires 
states to have authority to revise their SIPs in response to changes in 
the NAAQS or availability of improved methods for attaining the NAAQS 
and whenever the EPA finds that the SIP is substantially inadequate. 
This element of the submittals is common to New York infrastructure 
submittals that the EPA has previously approved and, as discussed in 
Section VII, the EPA is not repeating the rationale for proposing to 
approve this element of the submittals.
    Element I: Plan Revisions for Nonattainment Areas (under part D): 
Section 110(a)(2)(I) requires that each plan or plan revision for an 
area designated as a nonattainment area meet the applicable 
requirements of part D of the CAA. Part D relates to nonattainment 
areas. The EPA has determined that CAA 110(a)(2)(D)(I) (Element I) is 
not applicable to the infrastructure SIP process. The EPA takes action 
on part D nonattainment plans through a separate process.
    Element J: Section 110(a)(2)(J): Consultation with Government 
Officials, Public Notification, and PSD and Visibility Protection: As 
mentioned above, the EPA previously approved portions of New York's 
infrastructure SIP submittals for the 2008 Ozone and 2010 
SO2 NAAQS \12\ pertaining to CAA sections 110(a)(2)(J). See 
81 FR 95047 (December 27, 2016). Therefore, this proposal only pertains 
to the EPA's review of element J as it applies to 2012 PM2.5 
NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ The approval also included the 2008 Lead NAAQS, which is 
not a subject of this action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Consultation With Government Officials

    The CAA Section 110(a)(2)(J) requires states to meet the applicable 
requirements of CAA 121 relating to consultation. CAA Section 121 
requires states to provide a satisfactory process of consultation with 
general purpose local governments, designated organizations of elected 
officials of local governments, Tribal Nations, Federal Land Managers 
(FLMs) and Regional Organizations.
    NYSDEC has participated in the consultation process of the Regional 
Haze SIP (40 CFR 51.308) with the FLMs, states, and Tribal Nations of 
the Mid Atlantic/Northeast Visibility Union (MANE/VU) and other 
regional planning organizations where emissions from New York State are 
reasonably anticipated to contribute to visibility in Class 1 Areas.
    NYSDEC's Regional Haze SIP was submitted to the EPA on March 15, 
2010. In a Federal Register notice dated August 28, 2012 (77 FR 51915), 
the EPA issued a final rule, effective September 27, 2012, partially 
approving the New York State Regional Haze SIP and promulgated a 
Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) to address two sources (Danskammer 
Generation Station Unit No. 4 and Roseton Generation Station).
    On December 4, 2017 (82 FR 57126) the EPA approved a source 
specific revision to the New York State SIP that established BART 
emissions limits for the Danskammer Generation Station Unit No. 4 that 
are identical to the emission limits established by the EPA's FIP for 
Danskammer Unit No. 4. In conjunction with this SIP approval the EPA 
withdrew those portions of the FIP that address BART for Danskammer 
Unit No. 4. (82 FR 57126, December 4, 2012).
    On February 16, 2018 (83 FR 6970), the EPA approved a source 
specific SIP revision for Roseton Generation Station Units 1 and 2. 
This SIP revision established BART emissions limits for the Roseton 
Generation Station Units 1 and 2 that are identical to those 
established by the FIP. The EPA's February 16, 2018 final rule for 
Roseton Units 1 and 2 withdrew the FIP that addressed BART for these 
two units.
    On December 22, 2005, NYSDEC established a SIP Coordinating Council 
consisting of senior policy representatives from 19 state agencies and 
authorities, and a SIP Task Force consisting of officials from 37 local 
governments and designated organizations of elected officials. The SIP 
Coordinating Council provides a means to keep state agencies and local 
governments informed of planned SIP activities and deadlines, and also 
provides a forum for discussion of SIP requirements and implications, 
such as effects on transportation planning. The SIP Task Force provides 
a means of facilitating local involvement at the MPO and county level. 
Periodic meetings of both groups were held during the ozone and 
PM2.5 SIP development period for the 1997 NAAQS and continue 
as necessary to address nonattainment of the PM2.5 NAAQS and 
other revised standards.
    The EPA proposes to find that New York has met the requirements of 
CAA 110(a)(2)(J) for consultation with government officials.

Public Notification

    CAA section 110(a)(2)(J) also requires state plans to meet the 
public notification requirements of CAA 127: To notify the public if 
NAAQS are exceeded in an area, advise the public of health hazards 
associated with exceedances, and enhance public awareness of measures 
that can be taken to prevent exceedances and of ways in which the 
public can participate in regulatory and other efforts to improve air 
quality.
    All ambient air concentrations captured by the State's 
PM2.5 monitoring network are submitted to the Air Quality 
System for public access. Municipalities have emergency response plans 
recommended by the New York State Office of Emergency Management and 
the Federal Emergency Management Agency that provide for public 
information and notification in the case of large-scale emergencies.

[[Page 27565]]

    The NYSDEC's website at https://www.dec.ny.gov/chemical/34985.html 
contains an Air Quality Index (AQI) for reporting daily air quality to 
the public. It describes how clean or polluted the air is and what 
associated health effects might be a concern. When levels of ozone and/
or fine particles exceed an AQI of 100, an Air Quality Health Advisory 
is issued alerting sensitive groups to take necessary precautions. The 
NYSDEC in cooperation with the New York State Department of Health 
posts warnings on the above referenced website and issues press 
releases to local media outlets if dangerous conditions are expected to 
occur. The Air Quality Index displays the predicted AQI value for eight 
regions in New York State. It also displays the observed values for the 
previous day. Air Quality measurements from New York's continuous 
monitoring network are updated hourly where available. Parameters 
monitored include ozone, fine particulate, carbon monoxide, sulfur 
dioxide, nitrogen oxides, methane/hydrocarbons and meteorological data.
    Emissions of PM2.5 come from mobile sources, stationary 
sources, aviation sources, wildfires and fires prescribed and open 
burning and woodstoves. Control measure includes public education on 
proper burning and consumer recycling and disposal of waste in 
landfills. Programs to replace outdated stoves, low sulfur fuel, diesel 
engine retrofits and idling of mobile sources are also included as part 
of the public awareness program.
    The public is afforded the opportunity to participate in the 
regulatory process by submitting written comments on each major SIP 
revision and petitioning for a public hearing on such revisions.
    The EPA proposes to find that New York has met the requirements of 
CAA 110(a)(2)(J) for public notification.

Prevention of Significant Deterioration

    New York has a SIP approved PSD/NSR program that covers all 
criteria pollutants including PM2.5. 6 NYCRR Part 231 ``New 
Source Review for New and Modified Facilities'' was approved by the EPA 
on November 17, 2010 (75 FR 70142). 6 NYCRR Part 231 regulates major 
sources under NSR (when the source is located in a nonattainment area) 
and PSD (when the source is located in an attainment area). NYSDEC 
adopted a revision to 6 NYCRR Part 231 to implement PM2.5 
provisions in 2011. These revisions were submitted to the EPA for 
inclusion in the SIP on October 12, 2011. The EPA approved the State's 
revision to Part 231 in a December 27, 2016 action (81 FR 95047).
    The EPA proposes to approve New York's infrastructure SIP with 
respect to the requirements of the PSD sub-element of CAA 110(a)(2)(J).

Visibility Protection

    Visibility Protection and regional haze program requirements under 
Section 169A and B of Part C are being met by NYSDEC through separate 
efforts. In the event of the establishment of a new NAAQS, the 
visibility and regional haze program requirements under Part C do not 
change. As noted in the EPA's 2013 guidance, we find that there is not 
new visibility obligation triggered under Section 110(a)(2)(J) when a 
new NAAQS becomes effective. There are thus no new applicable 
visibility protection obligations under Section 110(a)(2)(J) resulting 
from 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS revision and the EPA, therefore, is 
not acting on the visibility aspect of Element J.
    Element K: Air Quality Modeling/Data: Section 110(a)(2)(K) requires 
that SIPs provide for air quality modeling for predicting effects on 
air quality of emissions from any NAAQS pollutant and submission of 
such data to EPA upon request. This element of the submittals is common 
to New York infrastructure submittals that the EPA has previously 
approved and, as discussed in Section VII, the EPA is not repeating the 
rationale for proposing to approve this element of the submittals.\13\ 
The reader is referred to the EPA's analysis evaluation of the SIP 
submittals identified in Section VII.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ Due to State revisions to 6 NYCRR 201-6, section 201-
6.5(a)(7) in the EPA-approved NY Title V program is now numbered in 
the State's regulation as 6 NYCRR 201-6.4(a)(7).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Element L: Permitting Fees: Section 110(a)(2)(L) requires SIPs to 
mandate that each major stationary source pay permitting fees to cover 
the cost of reviewing, approving, implementing and enforcing a permit, 
until such time as the SIP fee requirement is superseded by the EPA's 
approval of the state's operating permit program. This element of the 
submittals is common to New York infrastructure submittals that the EPA 
has previously approved and, as discussed in Section VII, the EPA is 
not repeating the rationale for proposing to approve this element of 
the submittals.
    Element M: Consultation/Participation by Affected Local Entities: 
Section 110(a)(2)(M) requires states to provide for consultation and 
participation in SIP development by local political subdivisions 
affected by the SIP. This element of the submittals is common to New 
York infrastructure submittals that the EPA has previously approved and 
therefore the EPA is not repeating the rationale for proposing to 
approve this element of the submittals. The EPA notes that the 
submittals provide more detailed information regarding NYSDEC's 
authority to provide for consultation and participation in SIP 
development, in further support of the EPA's proposed approval of this 
element. The submittals identify the SIP Task Force, consisting of 
officials from 37 local governments and designated organizations of 
elected officials, as allowing for consultation by local political 
subdivisions affected by the SIP and the submittals for the 2010 
SO2 NAAQS and 2008 Ozone NAAQS also cite the Inter-agency 
Consultation Group, established pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 240, and the 
State Environmental Quality Review process, 6 NYCRR Part 617.

VIII. What action is the EPA taking?

    The EPA is proposing to approve New York's submittals as meeting 
the infrastructure requirements for the 2008 Ozone, 2010 SO2 
and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS for all section 110(a)(2) elements and 
sub-elements, as follows: (A), (B), (C) [enforcement measures and PSD 
program for major sources for 2012 PM2.5 only], (D)(i)(II) 
prong 3 [for 2012 PM2.5 only], (D)(i)(II) prong 4 [for 2010 
SO2 and 2012 PM2.5 only], D(ii), (E), (F), (G), 
(H), (J) [for consultation, public notification and prevention of 
significant deterioration 2012 PM2.5 only], (K), (L) and 
(M).
    The EPA is not acting on New York's submittal for 2012 
PM2.5 as it relates to nonattainment provisions, the NSR 
program required by part D, in section 110(a)(2)(C) and is not acting 
on New York's submittals for 2008 Ozone, 2010 SO2 and 2012 
PM2.5 NAAQS as they relate to the measures for attainment 
required by section 110(a)(2)(I), as part of this proposed approval 
because the State's infrastructure SIP submittals do not include 
nonattainment requirements and the EPA will act on them when, if 
necessary, they are submitted.
    The EPA is also not acting on 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) provisions (prongs 
1 and 2) for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS and the 2012 
PM2.5 NAAQS, which will be addressed in a subsequent action 
by the EPA.
    The EPA is soliciting public comments on the issues discussed in 
this proposal. These comments will be considered before the EPA takes 
final action. Interested parties may participate in the Federal 
rulemaking procedure by submitting written comments to the EPA Regional 
Office listed in the ADDRESSES section of this Federal Register, or by 
submitting

[[Page 27566]]

comments electronically, by mail, or through hand delivery or courier 
following the directions in the ADDRESSES section of this Federal 
Register.

IX. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a 
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and 
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state 
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. 
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal 
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those 
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to 
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 
2011);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to 
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental 
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under 
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    This proposed rulemaking pertaining to New York's section 110(a)(2) 
infrastructure requirements for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS, 2012 
PM2.5 NAAQS, and 2010 SO2 NAAQS does not have 
tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian 
country located in the State, and EPA notes it will not impose 
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Particulate matter, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile 
organic compounds.

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: May 28, 2019.
Peter D. Lopez,
Regional Administrator, Region 2.
[FR Doc. 2019-12181 Filed 6-12-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.