Southern Nuclear Operating Company Inc; Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Units 3 and 4, 27364-27367 [2019-12375]
Download as PDF
27364
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 113 / Wednesday, June 12, 2019 / Notices
Humanities Act of 1965, as amended,
including information given in
confidence to the agency. In accordance
with the determination of the Chairman
of July 5, 2016, these sessions will be
closed to the public pursuant to
subsection (c)(6) of section 552b of title
5, United States Code.
The Upcoming Meetings Are
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
Artist Communities (review of
applications): This meeting will be
closed.
Date and time: July 9, 2019; 12:00
p.m. to 2:00 p.m.
Artist Communities (review of
applications): This meeting will be
closed.
Date and time: July 9, 2019; 3:00 p.m.
to 5:00 p.m.
Museums (review of applications):
This meeting will be closed.
Date and time: July 9, 2019; 11:30
a.m. to 1:30 p.m.
Museums (review of applications):
This meeting will be closed.
Date and time: July 9, 2019; 2:30 p.m.
to 4:30 p.m.
Musical Theater (review of
applications): This meeting will be
closed.
Date and time: July 9, 2019; 1:00 p.m.
to 3:00 p.m.
Theater (review of applications): This
meeting will be closed.
Date and time: July 9, 2019; 4:00 p.m.
to 6:00 p.m.
Museums (review of applications):
This meeting will be closed.
Date and time: July 10, 2019; 11:30
a.m. to 1:30 p.m.
Literature Fellowships (review of
applications): This meeting will be
closed.
Date and time: July 10, 2019; 2:00
p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
Literature Fellowships (review of
applications): This meeting will be
closed.
Date and time: July 11, 2019; 2:00
p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
Arts Education (review of
applications): This meeting will be
closed.
Date and time: July 26, 2019; 11:30
a.m. to 1:30 p.m.
Arts Education (review of
applications): This meeting will be
closed.
Date and time: July 26, 2019; 2:30
p.m. to 4:30 p.m.
Dated: June 7, 2019.
Sherry Hale,
Staff Assistant, National Endowment for the
Arts.
[FR Doc. 2019–12361 Filed 6–11–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:00 Jun 11, 2019
Jkt 247001
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Proposal Review Panel for
International Science and Engineering;
Notice of Meeting
In accordance with the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–
463, as amended), the National Science
Foundation (NSF) announces the
following meeting:
Name and Committee Code: Proposal
Review Panel for Office of International
Science and Engineering—PIRE: U.S.–
East Africa Research and Education
Partnership: Cassava Mosaic Disease—A
Paradigm for the Evolution of InsectTransmitted Plant Virus Pathosystems—
Site Visit (10749).
Date and Time: July 11, 2019; 8:00
a.m.–9:00 p.m.; July 12, 2019; 9:00 a.m.–
4:30 p.m.
Place: North Carolina State
University, Raleigh, North Carolina
27695.
Type of Meeting: Part Open.
Contact Person: Cassandra Dudka,
PIRE Program Manager; National
Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower
Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314;
Telephone 703/292–7250.
Purpose of Meeting: NSF site visit to
conduct a review during year 3 of the
five-year award period. To conduct an
in-depth evaluation of performance, to
assess progress towards goals, and to
provide recommendations.
Agenda: PIRE Site Visit Agenda.
July 11, 2019—Hunt Library IEI 4105
8:00 a.m.–9:30 a.m.
Introductions
PIRE Rationale and Goals
Partnerships
Human Resource and Infrastructure
Development
Institutional Support
9:30 a.m.–10:00 a.m.
Meeting with NCSU and CALS
administration
10:00 a.m.–10:20 a.m.
NSF Executive Session/Break
(CLOSED)
10:20 a.m.–12:00 p.m.
Research
12:00 p.m.–12:30 p.m.
NSF Executive Session (CLOSED)
12:30 p.m.–1:30 p.m.
Lunch—Discussion with Trainees
1:30 p.m.–3:00 p.m.
Training and International Experience
Outreach
Integrating Research and Education
Integrating Diversity
3:00 p.m.–3:30 p.m.
NSF Executive Session/Break
(CLOSED)
3:30 p.m.–4:15 p.m.
Administration, Management, and
PO 00000
Frm 00134
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Budget Plans
4:15 p.m.–5:00 p.m.
Summary
5:00 p.m.–6:00 p.m.
Executive Session/Break—Develop
Issues for Clarification (CLOSED)
6:15 p.m.–6:30 p.m.
Critical Feedback Provided to PIs &
Senior Investigators
7:00 p.m.–9:00 p.m.
NSF Executive Session/Working
Dinner (CLOSED)
Committee organizes on its own at
hotel.
July 12, 2019—Partners III, Room 202
9:00 a.m.–10:00 a.m.
Summary/PI Team Response to
Critical Feedback (CLOSED)
10:00 a.m.–4:00 p.m.
Site Review Team Prepares Site Visit
Report (CLOSED)
(Working Lunch Provided)
4:00 p.m.–4:30 p.m.
Presentation of Site Visit Report to
Principal Investigator (CLOSED)
Reason for Closing: Topics to be
discussed and evaluated during closed
portions of the site review will include
information of a proprietary or
confidential nature, including technical
information; and information on
personnel. These matters are exempt
under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the
Government in the Sunshine Act.
Dated: June 6, 2019.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2019–12347 Filed 6–11–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 52–025 and 52–026; NRC–
2008–0252]
Southern Nuclear Operating Company
Inc; Vogtle Electric Generating Plant
Units 3 and 4
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Exemption; issuance.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is issuing an
exemption in response to a December 6,
2018, request from Southern Nuclear
Operating Company, Inc. (SNC), as
applicable to Vogtle Electric Generating
Plant (VEGP) Units 3 and 4.
Specifically, SNC requested an
exemption that would modify the
requirement for individuals who
construct or direct the construction of
safety- or security-related structures,
systems, and components (SSCs) to be
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM
12JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 113 / Wednesday, June 12, 2019 / Notices
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
subject to a fitness-for-duty (FFD)
program at nuclear power reactors
under construction.
DATES: This exemption was issued on
June 12, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2008–0252 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may obtain publicly-available
information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2008–0252. Address
questions about NRC docket IDs in
Regulations.gov to Jennifer Borges;
telephone: 301–287–9127; email:
Jennifer.Borges@nrc.gov. For technical
questions, contact the individual listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For
problems with ADAMS, please contact
the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR)
reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–
415–4737, or by email to pdr.resource@
nrc.gov. The ADAMS accession number
for each document referenced (if it is
available in ADAMS) is provided the
first time that it is mentioned in this
document. The request for the
exemption was submitted by letter
dated December 6, 2018, and available
in ADAMS under Accession No.
ML18340A280.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Donald Habib, Office of New Reactors,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001; telephone:
301–415–1035; email: Donald.Habib@
nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Southern Nuclear Operating
Company, Inc., Georgia Power
Company, Oglethorpe Power
Corporation, MEAG Power SPVM, LLC,
MEAG Power SPVJ, LLC, MEAG Power
SPVP, LLC, and the City of Dalton,
Georgia (collectively SNC) are the
holders of facility Combined License
(COL) Nos. NFP–91 and NPF–92, which
authorize the construction and
operation of VEGP Units 3 and 4. The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:00 Jun 11, 2019
Jkt 247001
COLs, issued under part 52 of title 10
of the Code of Federal Regulations (10
CFR), ‘‘Licenses, Certifications, and
Approvals for Nuclear Power Plants,’’
provide, among other things, that the
facilities are subject to all rules,
regulations, and orders of the NRC or
the Commission now or hereafter in
effect. The facilities consist of two
AP1000 pressurized-water reactors
located in Burke County, Georgia.
Because the Commission has not
made the finding under section
52.103(g) for VEGP Units 3 and 4, 10
CFR 26.3(c) requires, in part, before the
receipt of special nuclear material
(SNM) in the form of fuel assemblies,
that SNC comply with the requirements
of 10 CFR part 26, ‘‘Fitness for Duty
Programs,’’ except for subpart I,
‘‘Managing Fatigue,’’ and, no later than
the receipt of SNM in the form of fuel
assemblies, that SNC implement a 10
CFR part 26 program. Section 26.4(f) of
10 CFR requires, for VEGP Units 3 and
4, that any individual who is
constructing or directing the
construction of safety- or securityrelated SSCs shall be subject to an FFD
program that meets the requirements of
10 CFR part 26, subpart K, ‘‘FFD
Program for Construction.’’
II. Request/Action
Pursuant to 10 CFR 26.9, ‘‘Specific
exemptions,’’ SNC requested, by letter
dated December 6, 2018 (ADAMS
Accession No. ML18340A280), and by a
supplement dated March 8, 2019
(ADAMS Accession No. ML19067A173),
an exemption from the requirements of
10 CFR 26.4(f), as applicable to VEGP
Units 3 and 4. Specifically, SNC
requested an exemption that would
modify the requirement for a limited
number of individuals who are needed
for a short period of time (30 days or
fewer in a 60-day period) to construct or
direct the construction of safety- or
security-related SSCs such that those
individuals would be allowed to come
onsite under escort prior to the
establishment of an operational
protected area or the 10 CFR 52.103(g)
finding. The exemption for VEGP Unit
3 would expire when a protected area is
established for VEGP Unit 3, and the
exemption for VEGP Unit 4 would
expire when a protected area is
established for VEGP Unit 4.
III. Discussion
Pursuant to 10 CFR 26.9, the
Commission may, upon application by
any interested person or upon its own
initiative, grant exemptions from the
requirements of 10 CFR part 26 when
the exemptions (1) are authorized by
law, (2) will not endanger life or
PO 00000
Frm 00135
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
27365
property, (3) will not endanger the
common defense and security, and (4)
are in the public interest.
1. The exemption is authorized by
law.
The regulation in 10 CFR 26.9 states,
in part, that upon application of any
interested person or on its own
initiative, the Commission may grant
such exemptions from the requirements
of the regulations in 10 CFR part 26 as
it determines are authorized by law. The
NRC staff has determined that granting
SNC’s proposed exemption will not
result in a violation of the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954, as amended, the
Energy Reorganization Act of 1979, as
amended, or the Commission’s
regulations. Therefore, this exemption is
authorized by law.
2. The exemption will not endanger
life or property.
The exemption from the 10 CFR
26.4(f) requirement would allow SNC to
construct or direct the construction of
safety- or security-related SSCs at VEGP
Units 3 and 4 using individuals who
would not be subject to a 10 CFR part
26 FFD program, but who would be
under direct observation of an escort.
Because the exemption only enables the
escorting of construction workers, the
exemption does not, in part, change any
SSC, any existing natural or man-made
geological/biological feature, or other
material property on the construction
site nor does the exemption introduce
any new industrial, chemical, or
radiological hazard that would present
itself as a latent or apparent adverse
effect on life or property. The exemption
also does not request any relaxation in
work controls, processes, quality
assurance, quality verification, or the
training, qualification, and personal
injury protections afforded to
individuals constructing or directing the
construction of safety- or securityrelated SSCs.
To provide assurance that individuals
who are escorted and construct or direct
the construction of safety- or securityrelated SSCs only perform assigned
duties and responsibilities, SNC stated
that the escorts will be trained, in part,
to: Stop work if the escort identifies
conditions that adversely affect a safetyor security-related SSC; immediately
communicate with security if a problem
arises; maintain control of their
construction workers under escort; and
observe workers for unsafe and
improper actions and for aberrant
behavior. The escorts will also be
trained in behavioral observation
techniques. SNC also stated that
construction workers who are escorted
will be escorted for a limited period of
time (30 days or fewer in a 60-day
E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM
12JNN1
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
27366
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 113 / Wednesday, June 12, 2019 / Notices
period) and if this SNC-proposed
administrative limit will be exceeded,
SNC would remove the construction
worker from the escort program and
place him/her in the FFD program.
Consequently, the exemption does not
endanger life or property principally
because SNC’s proposal would not
result in a change that diminishes the
personal safety protections provided to
individuals on the construction site and
would not result in a physical or
material condition detrimental to the
use or value of property. This occurs
because the exemption is administrative
and SNC has stated that construction
workers will be escorted by individuals
who are subject to the FFD program,
trained, and empowered to ensure that
individuals performing activities that
would otherwise subject them to 10 CFR
26.4(f) follow SNC-established work
processes and do not demonstrate
physical and mental impairment that
could adversely affect their ability to
safely and competently perform their
duties. This provides assurance that
VEGP Units 3 and 4 will continue to be
constructed, inspected, tested, accepted,
maintained, and ultimately operated in
accordance with applicable
requirements by individuals who can
safely and competently perform
assigned duties and responsibilities.
Accordingly, the exemption will not
endanger life or property.
3. The exemption will not endanger
the common defense and security.
The exemption from the 10 CFR
26.4(f) requirement would allow SNC to
construct VEGP Units 3 and 4 using
individuals who are not subject to a 10
CFR part 26 FFD program, but who
would be under direct observation of an
escort who is trained and empowered to
ensure that individuals performing 10
CFR 26.4(f) duties and responsibilities
follow SNC-established work processes
and are not afforded unauthorized
access to sensitive information. The
exemption would not remove or relax
any requirement for the design,
construction, inspection, test,
acceptance, maintenance, or operation
of a physical protection system which
will have capabilities for the protection
of SNM at this fixed site and in transit
or any safeguards system designed to
protect against acts of radiological
sabotage, nor will the exemption relax
the safeguarding of sensitive
information.
The implementation of the SNC escort
program would not endanger the
common defense and security
principally because SNC’s proposal
would not result in a change that
diminishes the physical protection
plans, policies, procedures, or security
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:00 Jun 11, 2019
Jkt 247001
related SSCs or programs at the site.
This occurs because, under the SNCproposed exemption, SNC will establish
procedures that will require escorts to
be trained and empowered to ensure
that individuals performing 10 CFR
26.4(f) duties and responsibilities are
acting in accordance with SNCestablished work processes and do not
demonstrate characteristics of an insider
threat. Such a threat could be an
individual who possesses both intent
and access to sensitive information or
SSCs, to aid or cause an attack,
condition, or theft inimical to public
health and safety or the common
defense and security. Accordingly, the
exemption will not endanger the
common defense and security.
4. The exemption is otherwise in the
public interest.
In a letter dated December 6, 2018,
SNC stated, in part, that requiring all
individuals who perform 10 CFR 26.4(f)
duties and responsibilities to be subject
to a 10 CFR part 26, subpart K, FFD
program prior to the 10 CFR 52.103(g)
finding is costly and an unnecessary
burden. As supplemented by a letter
dated March 8, 2019, SNC stated that
the exemption would result in a
schedule benefit because individuals
would be immediately available to
perform emergent work activities
‘‘directly related to construction critical
path . . . which would allow the
licensee to bring the unit online earlier,
resulting in reduced construction costs
. . .’’ Furthermore, SNC stated that
there would be a reduction in burden
because the exemption would increase
flexibility in the manner in which
workers can be brought onsite during
emergent construction activities.
The NRC staff finds that it is in the
public’s interest that SNC be allowed to
escort certain individuals who direct or
perform 10 CFR 26.4(f) duties and
responsibilities because the SNCproposed exemption has a direct nexus
to improved flexibility in construction
scheduling, work planning, and conduct
of construction activities. This occurs
because the exemption would enable
SNC to implement process and
procedural changes in a manner that
leverages immediately available
construction workers for short duration
construction activities without a
reduction in the assurance of public
health and safety or the common
defense and security because of the
SNC-proposed administrative controls
for its escort program. This flexibility
could enable SNC to implement
methods to use public finances more
effectively and efficiently to construct
the facility while meeting licensing and
regulatory requirements. For these
PO 00000
Frm 00136
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
reasons, the exemption is in the public
interest.
5. Environmental Considerations.
The NRC staff determined that the
exemption discussed herein meets the
eligibility criteria for the categorical
exclusion set forth in 10 CFR
51.22(c)(25). Under 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25),
granting of an exemption from the
requirements of any regulation of
chapter I of 10 CFR is a categorical
exclusion provided that (i) there is no
significant hazards consideration; (ii)
there is no significant change in the
types or significant increase in the
amounts of any effluents that may be
released offsite; (iii) there is no
significant increase in individual or
cumulative public or occupational
radiation exposure; (iv) there is no
significant construction impact; (v)
there is no significant increase in the
potential for or consequences from
radiological accidents; and (vi) the
requirements from which an exemption
is sought involve certain categories of
requirements, such as administrative
and managerial requirements.
As required by 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(i),
and using the criteria set out in 10 CFR
50.92(c), the NRC staff reviewed
whether the exemption request involves
no significant hazards consideration.
(1) Does the requested exemption
involve a significant increase in the
probability or consequences of an
accident previously evaluated?
The proposed exemption from the
requirements of 10 CFR 26.4(f) would
allow SNC to use escorted construction
workers to construct or direct the
construction of safety- or securityrelated SSCs. The requested exemption
does not alter the design, function, or
operation of any plant equipment.
Therefore, granting this exemption
would not involve a significant increase
in the probability or consequences of an
accident previously evaluated.
(2) Does the requested exemption
create the possibility of a new or
different kind of accident from any
accident previously evaluated?
The requested exemption does not
alter the design, function, or operation
of any plant equipment. The requested
exemption does not create any new
failure mechanisms, malfunctions, or
accident initiators. Therefore, granting
this exemption does not create the
possibility of a new or different kind of
accident from any accident previously
evaluated.
(3) Does the requested exemption
involve a significant reduction in a
margin of safety?
The requested exemption does not
affect an SSC, SSC design function, or
method of performing or controlling a
E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM
12JNN1
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 113 / Wednesday, June 12, 2019 / Notices
design function. Construction FFD
requirements are not related to or used
to establish the design bases of an SSC
nor are they considered in the safety
analyses. Furthermore, the requested
exemption does not exceed or alter a
design basis or safety limit. Therefore,
granting this exemption does not
involve a significant reduction in a
margin of safety.
As all of the responses to the above
questions are in the negative, under 10
CFR 51.22(c)(25)(i), the NRC staff has
concluded that the requested exemption
involves no significant hazards
consideration.
To grant the exemption, the requested
exemption must not involve a
significant change in the types or
significant increase in the amounts of
any effluents that may be released
offsite [10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(ii)]. The
requested exemption does not alter the
design, function, or operation of any
plant equipment. There are no changes
to effluent types, plant radiological or
non-radiological effluent release
quantities, any effluent release path, or
the functionality of any design or
operational features credited with
controlling the release of effluents
during plant operation or construction.
Therefore, the NRC concludes that the
proposed exemption does not involve a
significant change in the types or
significant increase in the amounts of
any effluents that may be released
offsite.
The requested exemption must not
involve a significant increase in
individual or cumulative public or
occupational radiation exposure [10
CFR 51.22(c)(25)(iii)]. There are no
changes to plant radiation zones, nor
any change to controls required under
10 CFR part 20, ‘‘Standards for
Protection Against Radiation,’’ which
preclude a significant increase in
occupational radiation exposure.
Therefore, the NRC concludes that the
proposed exemption does not involve a
significant increase in individual or
cumulative public or occupational
radiation exposure.
To grant the exemption, the requested
exemption must not involve a
significant construction impact [10 CFR
51.22(c)(25)(iv)]. The requested
exemption does not alter the materials
or methods of constructing or testing of
any SSCs. No change to the construction
of the facility is being made as a result
of this exemption. Therefore, the NRC
concludes that the proposed exemption
does not involve a significant
construction impact.
To grant the exemption, the requested
exemption must not involve a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:23 Jun 11, 2019
Jkt 247001
significant increase in the potential for
or consequences from radiological
accidents [10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(v)]. The
requested exemption does not alter the
design, function, or operation of any
plant equipment. There are no changes
to plant radiation zones, nor any change
to controls required under 10 CFR part
20 which preclude a significant increase
in occupational radiation exposure.
Therefore, the NRC concludes that the
proposed exemption does not involve a
significant increase in the potential for
or consequences from radiological
accidents.
The requested exemption involves
employment suitability requirements
related to FFD programs, as obtaining an
FFD authorization is a prerequisite for
working on or directing work on safetyor security-related SSCs [10 CFR
51.22(c)(25)(vi)(E)].
Based on the evaluation above, the
NRC staff concludes that the exemption
meets the criteria of 10 CFR 51.22(c).
Therefore, in accordance with 10 CFR
51.22(b), an environmental impact
statement or environmental assessment
is not required for the NRC staff’s
consideration of this exemption request.
IV. Conclusions
Accordingly, the Commission has
determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR
26.9, the exemption is authorized by
law, will not endanger life or property
or the common defense and security,
and is otherwise in the public interest.
Therefore, the Commission hereby
grants SNC an exemption from 10 CFR
26.4(f) related to the FFD program for
construction for a limited number of
individuals who construct or direct the
construction of safety- or securityrelated SSCs.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 7th day
of June 2019.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Robert M. Taylor,
Director, Division of Licensing, Siting, and
Environmental Analysis, Office of New
Reactors.
[FR Doc. 2019–12375 Filed 6–11–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
[Docket No. 50–412; NRC–2019–0122]
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating
Company; Beaver Valley Power
Station, Unit 2
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Exemption; issuance.
PO 00000
Frm 00137
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) has issued an
exemption from its regulations in
response to a December 18, 2018,
request from FirstEnergy Nuclear
Operating Company regarding removal
of Capsule Y from the Beaver Valley
Power Station, Unit 2, reactor vessel and
the associated testing and report
submittal activities.
SUMMARY:
The exemption was issued on
June 5, 2019.
DATES:
Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2019–0122 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may obtain publicly-available
information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2019–0122. Address
questions about NRC docket IDs in
Regulations.gov to Jennifer Borges;
telephone: 301–287–9127; email:
Jennifer.Borges@nrc.gov. For technical
questions, contact the individual listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For
problems with ADAMS, please contact
the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR)
reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–
415–4737, or by email to pdr.resource@
nrc.gov. For the convenience of the
reader, instructions about obtaining
materials referenced in this document
are provided in the ‘‘Availability of
Documents’’ section.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
AGENCY:
27367
Carleen J. Parker, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001; telephone: 301–415–
1603, email: Carleen.Parker@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The text of
the exemption is attached.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 6th day
of June 2019.
E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM
12JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 113 (Wednesday, June 12, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27364-27367]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-12375]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 52-025 and 52-026; NRC-2008-0252]
Southern Nuclear Operating Company Inc; Vogtle Electric
Generating Plant Units 3 and 4
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Exemption; issuance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing an
exemption in response to a December 6, 2018, request from Southern
Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. (SNC), as applicable to Vogtle Electric
Generating Plant (VEGP) Units 3 and 4. Specifically, SNC requested an
exemption that would modify the requirement for individuals who
construct or direct the construction of safety- or security-related
structures, systems, and components (SSCs) to be
[[Page 27365]]
subject to a fitness-for-duty (FFD) program at nuclear power reactors
under construction.
DATES: This exemption was issued on June 12, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2008-0252 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You
may obtain publicly-available information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2008-0252. Address
questions about NRC docket IDs in Regulations.gov to Jennifer Borges;
telephone: 301-287-9127; email: [email protected]. For technical
questions, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or
by email to [email protected]. The ADAMS accession number for each
document referenced (if it is available in ADAMS) is provided the first
time that it is mentioned in this document. The request for the
exemption was submitted by letter dated December 6, 2018, and available
in ADAMS under Accession No. ML18340A280.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald Habib, Office of New Reactors,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001;
telephone: 301-415-1035; email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc., Georgia Power Company,
Oglethorpe Power Corporation, MEAG Power SPVM, LLC, MEAG Power SPVJ,
LLC, MEAG Power SPVP, LLC, and the City of Dalton, Georgia
(collectively SNC) are the holders of facility Combined License (COL)
Nos. NFP-91 and NPF-92, which authorize the construction and operation
of VEGP Units 3 and 4. The COLs, issued under part 52 of title 10 of
the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), ``Licenses, Certifications,
and Approvals for Nuclear Power Plants,'' provide, among other things,
that the facilities are subject to all rules, regulations, and orders
of the NRC or the Commission now or hereafter in effect. The facilities
consist of two AP1000 pressurized-water reactors located in Burke
County, Georgia.
Because the Commission has not made the finding under section
52.103(g) for VEGP Units 3 and 4, 10 CFR 26.3(c) requires, in part,
before the receipt of special nuclear material (SNM) in the form of
fuel assemblies, that SNC comply with the requirements of 10 CFR part
26, ``Fitness for Duty Programs,'' except for subpart I, ``Managing
Fatigue,'' and, no later than the receipt of SNM in the form of fuel
assemblies, that SNC implement a 10 CFR part 26 program. Section
26.4(f) of 10 CFR requires, for VEGP Units 3 and 4, that any individual
who is constructing or directing the construction of safety- or
security-related SSCs shall be subject to an FFD program that meets the
requirements of 10 CFR part 26, subpart K, ``FFD Program for
Construction.''
II. Request/Action
Pursuant to 10 CFR 26.9, ``Specific exemptions,'' SNC requested, by
letter dated December 6, 2018 (ADAMS Accession No. ML18340A280), and by
a supplement dated March 8, 2019 (ADAMS Accession No. ML19067A173), an
exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 26.4(f), as applicable to
VEGP Units 3 and 4. Specifically, SNC requested an exemption that would
modify the requirement for a limited number of individuals who are
needed for a short period of time (30 days or fewer in a 60-day period)
to construct or direct the construction of safety- or security-related
SSCs such that those individuals would be allowed to come onsite under
escort prior to the establishment of an operational protected area or
the 10 CFR 52.103(g) finding. The exemption for VEGP Unit 3 would
expire when a protected area is established for VEGP Unit 3, and the
exemption for VEGP Unit 4 would expire when a protected area is
established for VEGP Unit 4.
III. Discussion
Pursuant to 10 CFR 26.9, the Commission may, upon application by
any interested person or upon its own initiative, grant exemptions from
the requirements of 10 CFR part 26 when the exemptions (1) are
authorized by law, (2) will not endanger life or property, (3) will not
endanger the common defense and security, and (4) are in the public
interest.
1. The exemption is authorized by law.
The regulation in 10 CFR 26.9 states, in part, that upon
application of any interested person or on its own initiative, the
Commission may grant such exemptions from the requirements of the
regulations in 10 CFR part 26 as it determines are authorized by law.
The NRC staff has determined that granting SNC's proposed exemption
will not result in a violation of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as
amended, the Energy Reorganization Act of 1979, as amended, or the
Commission's regulations. Therefore, this exemption is authorized by
law.
2. The exemption will not endanger life or property.
The exemption from the 10 CFR 26.4(f) requirement would allow SNC
to construct or direct the construction of safety- or security-related
SSCs at VEGP Units 3 and 4 using individuals who would not be subject
to a 10 CFR part 26 FFD program, but who would be under direct
observation of an escort. Because the exemption only enables the
escorting of construction workers, the exemption does not, in part,
change any SSC, any existing natural or man-made geological/biological
feature, or other material property on the construction site nor does
the exemption introduce any new industrial, chemical, or radiological
hazard that would present itself as a latent or apparent adverse effect
on life or property. The exemption also does not request any relaxation
in work controls, processes, quality assurance, quality verification,
or the training, qualification, and personal injury protections
afforded to individuals constructing or directing the construction of
safety- or security-related SSCs.
To provide assurance that individuals who are escorted and
construct or direct the construction of safety- or security-related
SSCs only perform assigned duties and responsibilities, SNC stated that
the escorts will be trained, in part, to: Stop work if the escort
identifies conditions that adversely affect a safety- or security-
related SSC; immediately communicate with security if a problem arises;
maintain control of their construction workers under escort; and
observe workers for unsafe and improper actions and for aberrant
behavior. The escorts will also be trained in behavioral observation
techniques. SNC also stated that construction workers who are escorted
will be escorted for a limited period of time (30 days or fewer in a
60-day
[[Page 27366]]
period) and if this SNC-proposed administrative limit will be exceeded,
SNC would remove the construction worker from the escort program and
place him/her in the FFD program.
Consequently, the exemption does not endanger life or property
principally because SNC's proposal would not result in a change that
diminishes the personal safety protections provided to individuals on
the construction site and would not result in a physical or material
condition detrimental to the use or value of property. This occurs
because the exemption is administrative and SNC has stated that
construction workers will be escorted by individuals who are subject to
the FFD program, trained, and empowered to ensure that individuals
performing activities that would otherwise subject them to 10 CFR
26.4(f) follow SNC-established work processes and do not demonstrate
physical and mental impairment that could adversely affect their
ability to safely and competently perform their duties. This provides
assurance that VEGP Units 3 and 4 will continue to be constructed,
inspected, tested, accepted, maintained, and ultimately operated in
accordance with applicable requirements by individuals who can safely
and competently perform assigned duties and responsibilities.
Accordingly, the exemption will not endanger life or property.
3. The exemption will not endanger the common defense and security.
The exemption from the 10 CFR 26.4(f) requirement would allow SNC
to construct VEGP Units 3 and 4 using individuals who are not subject
to a 10 CFR part 26 FFD program, but who would be under direct
observation of an escort who is trained and empowered to ensure that
individuals performing 10 CFR 26.4(f) duties and responsibilities
follow SNC-established work processes and are not afforded unauthorized
access to sensitive information. The exemption would not remove or
relax any requirement for the design, construction, inspection, test,
acceptance, maintenance, or operation of a physical protection system
which will have capabilities for the protection of SNM at this fixed
site and in transit or any safeguards system designed to protect
against acts of radiological sabotage, nor will the exemption relax the
safeguarding of sensitive information.
The implementation of the SNC escort program would not endanger the
common defense and security principally because SNC's proposal would
not result in a change that diminishes the physical protection plans,
policies, procedures, or security related SSCs or programs at the site.
This occurs because, under the SNC-proposed exemption, SNC will
establish procedures that will require escorts to be trained and
empowered to ensure that individuals performing 10 CFR 26.4(f) duties
and responsibilities are acting in accordance with SNC-established work
processes and do not demonstrate characteristics of an insider threat.
Such a threat could be an individual who possesses both intent and
access to sensitive information or SSCs, to aid or cause an attack,
condition, or theft inimical to public health and safety or the common
defense and security. Accordingly, the exemption will not endanger the
common defense and security.
4. The exemption is otherwise in the public interest.
In a letter dated December 6, 2018, SNC stated, in part, that
requiring all individuals who perform 10 CFR 26.4(f) duties and
responsibilities to be subject to a 10 CFR part 26, subpart K, FFD
program prior to the 10 CFR 52.103(g) finding is costly and an
unnecessary burden. As supplemented by a letter dated March 8, 2019,
SNC stated that the exemption would result in a schedule benefit
because individuals would be immediately available to perform emergent
work activities ``directly related to construction critical path . . .
which would allow the licensee to bring the unit online earlier,
resulting in reduced construction costs . . .'' Furthermore, SNC stated
that there would be a reduction in burden because the exemption would
increase flexibility in the manner in which workers can be brought
onsite during emergent construction activities.
The NRC staff finds that it is in the public's interest that SNC be
allowed to escort certain individuals who direct or perform 10 CFR
26.4(f) duties and responsibilities because the SNC-proposed exemption
has a direct nexus to improved flexibility in construction scheduling,
work planning, and conduct of construction activities. This occurs
because the exemption would enable SNC to implement process and
procedural changes in a manner that leverages immediately available
construction workers for short duration construction activities without
a reduction in the assurance of public health and safety or the common
defense and security because of the SNC-proposed administrative
controls for its escort program. This flexibility could enable SNC to
implement methods to use public finances more effectively and
efficiently to construct the facility while meeting licensing and
regulatory requirements. For these reasons, the exemption is in the
public interest.
5. Environmental Considerations.
The NRC staff determined that the exemption discussed herein meets
the eligibility criteria for the categorical exclusion set forth in 10
CFR 51.22(c)(25). Under 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25), granting of an exemption
from the requirements of any regulation of chapter I of 10 CFR is a
categorical exclusion provided that (i) there is no significant hazards
consideration; (ii) there is no significant change in the types or
significant increase in the amounts of any effluents that may be
released offsite; (iii) there is no significant increase in individual
or cumulative public or occupational radiation exposure; (iv) there is
no significant construction impact; (v) there is no significant
increase in the potential for or consequences from radiological
accidents; and (vi) the requirements from which an exemption is sought
involve certain categories of requirements, such as administrative and
managerial requirements.
As required by 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(i), and using the criteria set
out in 10 CFR 50.92(c), the NRC staff reviewed whether the exemption
request involves no significant hazards consideration.
(1) Does the requested exemption involve a significant increase in
the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated?
The proposed exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 26.4(f)
would allow SNC to use escorted construction workers to construct or
direct the construction of safety- or security-related SSCs. The
requested exemption does not alter the design, function, or operation
of any plant equipment. Therefore, granting this exemption would not
involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an
accident previously evaluated.
(2) Does the requested exemption create the possibility of a new or
different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated?
The requested exemption does not alter the design, function, or
operation of any plant equipment. The requested exemption does not
create any new failure mechanisms, malfunctions, or accident
initiators. Therefore, granting this exemption does not create the
possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident
previously evaluated.
(3) Does the requested exemption involve a significant reduction in
a margin of safety?
The requested exemption does not affect an SSC, SSC design
function, or method of performing or controlling a
[[Page 27367]]
design function. Construction FFD requirements are not related to or
used to establish the design bases of an SSC nor are they considered in
the safety analyses. Furthermore, the requested exemption does not
exceed or alter a design basis or safety limit. Therefore, granting
this exemption does not involve a significant reduction in a margin of
safety.
As all of the responses to the above questions are in the negative,
under 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(i), the NRC staff has concluded that the
requested exemption involves no significant hazards consideration.
To grant the exemption, the requested exemption must not involve a
significant change in the types or significant increase in the amounts
of any effluents that may be released offsite [10 CFR
51.22(c)(25)(ii)]. The requested exemption does not alter the design,
function, or operation of any plant equipment. There are no changes to
effluent types, plant radiological or non-radiological effluent release
quantities, any effluent release path, or the functionality of any
design or operational features credited with controlling the release of
effluents during plant operation or construction. Therefore, the NRC
concludes that the proposed exemption does not involve a significant
change in the types or significant increase in the amounts of any
effluents that may be released offsite.
The requested exemption must not involve a significant increase in
individual or cumulative public or occupational radiation exposure [10
CFR 51.22(c)(25)(iii)]. There are no changes to plant radiation zones,
nor any change to controls required under 10 CFR part 20, ``Standards
for Protection Against Radiation,'' which preclude a significant
increase in occupational radiation exposure. Therefore, the NRC
concludes that the proposed exemption does not involve a significant
increase in individual or cumulative public or occupational radiation
exposure.
To grant the exemption, the requested exemption must not involve a
significant construction impact [10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(iv)]. The
requested exemption does not alter the materials or methods of
constructing or testing of any SSCs. No change to the construction of
the facility is being made as a result of this exemption. Therefore,
the NRC concludes that the proposed exemption does not involve a
significant construction impact.
To grant the exemption, the requested exemption must not involve a
significant increase in the potential for or consequences from
radiological accidents [10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(v)]. The requested
exemption does not alter the design, function, or operation of any
plant equipment. There are no changes to plant radiation zones, nor any
change to controls required under 10 CFR part 20 which preclude a
significant increase in occupational radiation exposure. Therefore, the
NRC concludes that the proposed exemption does not involve a
significant increase in the potential for or consequences from
radiological accidents.
The requested exemption involves employment suitability
requirements related to FFD programs, as obtaining an FFD authorization
is a prerequisite for working on or directing work on safety- or
security-related SSCs [10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(vi)(E)].
Based on the evaluation above, the NRC staff concludes that the
exemption meets the criteria of 10 CFR 51.22(c). Therefore, in
accordance with 10 CFR 51.22(b), an environmental impact statement or
environmental assessment is not required for the NRC staff's
consideration of this exemption request.
IV. Conclusions
Accordingly, the Commission has determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR
26.9, the exemption is authorized by law, will not endanger life or
property or the common defense and security, and is otherwise in the
public interest. Therefore, the Commission hereby grants SNC an
exemption from 10 CFR 26.4(f) related to the FFD program for
construction for a limited number of individuals who construct or
direct the construction of safety- or security-related SSCs.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 7th day of June 2019.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Robert M. Taylor,
Director, Division of Licensing, Siting, and Environmental Analysis,
Office of New Reactors.
[FR Doc. 2019-12375 Filed 6-11-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P