Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request, 27164-27166 [2019-12289]
Download as PDF
27164
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 112 / Tuesday, June 11, 2019 / Notices
information to be collected; (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology should be
addressed to the points of contact in the
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Title of Collection: Mathematical
Sciences Postdoctoral Research
Fellowship Application Data.
OMB Number: 3145–NEW.
Overview of this Information
Collection: The Division of
Mathematical Sciences within the
Directorate of Mathematical and
Physical Sciences of the National
Science Foundation will use the
Mathematical Sciences Postdoctoral
Research Fellowship Application Forms
mentioned in the solicitation.
Instructions on how to complete the
application forms are provided at the
program web page. All scientists
submitting proposals to the solicitation
will be asked to complete an electronic
version of the Application Forms. The
data collected on the forms does not
duplicate that collected elsewhere in the
same manner in the proposal. The
information consists of PI’s current
institution and position, (expected)
doctoral degree date and institution,
proposed fellowship institution and
mentoring scientist, reference letter
writers, and Mathematics Subject
Classification codes.
Use of the Information: The data
collected will be used to greatly reduce
NSF staff workload in the merit review
process.
Burden on the Public: The Directorate
estimates that an average of 30 minutes
is expended for each proposal
submitted. An estimated 250 proposals
will be submitted and 125 public
burden hours annually.
Expected Respondents: Individuals.
Estimated Number of Responses: 250.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
250.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 125 hours.
Frequency of Responses: Annually.
Dated: June 5, 2019.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2019–12179 Filed 6–10–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:36 Jun 10, 2019
Jkt 247001
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Comment Request
National Science Foundation.
Submission for OMB review;
comment request.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The National Science
Foundation (NSF) has submitted the
following information collection
requirement to OMB for review and
clearance under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. This is the
second notice for public comment; the
first was published in the Federal
Register, and 136 comments were
received from eight different
institutions/individuals, along with one
comment from one institution/
individual on the Financial Data
Collection Tool for Major Facilities. NSF
is forwarding the proposed submission
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for clearance simultaneously
with the publication of this second
notice. The full submission may be
found at: https://www.reginfo.gov/public/
do/PRAMain.
DATES: Comments regarding this
information collection are best assured
of having their full effect if received by
July 11, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs of OMB, Attention: Desk Officer
for National Science Foundation, 725
17th Street NW, Room 10235,
Washington, DC 20503, and Suzanne H.
Plimpton, Reports Clearance Officer,
National Science Foundation, 2415
Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA
22314, or send email to splimpto@
nsf.gov. Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–
8339, which is accessible 24 hours a
day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year
(including federal holidays).
Copies of the submission may be
obtained by calling 703–292–7556.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NSF may
not conduct or sponsor a collection of
information unless the collection of
information displays a currently valid
OMB control number and the agency
informs potential persons who are to
respond to the collection of information
that such persons are not required to
respond to the collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
Comments regarding (a) whether the
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of burden including
the validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility and clarity of the
information to be collected; (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology should be
addressed to the points of contact in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Summary of Comments on the National
Science Foundation’s Major Facilities
Guide:
The draft Major Facilities Guide and
Financial Data Collection Tool for Major
Facilities were made available for
review by the public on the NSF website
at https://www.nsf.gov/bfa/lfo/lfo_
documents.jsp. In response to the
Federal Register notice published
December 21, 2018, at 83 FR 65757, NSF
received 136 comments from 8 different
institutions/individuals on the Major
Facilities Guide and 1 comment on the
Financial Data Collection Tool for Major
Facilities from 1 institution/individual.
A summary of the comments on the
Major Facilities Guide follows:
• 48 requested further guidance on
project management controls and NSF
oversight processes and procedures for
major facilities and mid-scale projects;
• 20 requested clarification on the
processes and requirements associated
with cost and contingency through the
various stage of the facility lifecycle;
• 24 requested clarification on the
guidance for cybersecurity programs for
major facilities;
• 6 requested clarifications on
guidance for mid-scale projects;
• 8 requested clarifications of
requirements during the various stages
of the facility lifecycle;
• 8 provided general observations;
and
• 22 provided editing
recommendations such as typos and
sentence structure.
The full comments and NSF’s
response may be found via: https://
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain
and https://www.nsf.gov/bfa/lfo/lfo_
documents.jsp. NSF is moving forward
with submitting the information
collection request to OMB.
Title of Collection: Major Facilities
Guide.
OMB Number: 3145–0239.
Overview of this Information
Collection: The National Science
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 112 / Tuesday, June 11, 2019 / Notices
Foundation Act of 1950 (Pub. L. 81–507)
set forth NSF’s mission and purpose:
‘‘To promote the progress of science;
to advance the national health,
prosperity, and welfare; to secure the
national defense. * * *’’
The Act authorized and directed NSF
to initiate and support:
• Basic scientific research and
research fundamental to the engineering
process;
• Programs to strengthen scientific
and engineering research potential;
• Science and engineering education
programs at all levels and in all the
various fields of science and
engineering;
• Programs that provide a source of
information for policy formulation; and
• Other activities to promote these
ends.
Among Federal agencies, NSF is a
leader in providing the academic
community with advanced
instrumentation needed to conduct
state-of-the-art research and to educate
the next generation of scientists,
engineers and technical workers. The
knowledge generated by these tools
sustains U.S. leadership in science and
engineering (S&E) to drive the U.S.
economy and secure the future. NSF’s
responsibility is to ensure that the
research and education communities
have access to these resources, and to
provide the support needed to utilize
them optimally and implement timely
upgrades.
The scale of advanced
instrumentation ranges from small
research instruments to shared
resources or facilities that can be used
by entire communities. The demand for
such instrumentation is very high, and
is growing rapidly, along with the pace
of discovery. For major facilities and
shared infrastructure, the need is
particularly high. This trend is expected
to accelerate in the future as increasing
numbers of researchers and educators
rely on such major facilities,
instruments, and databases to provide
the reach to make the next intellectual
leaps.
NSF currently provides support for
facility construction from two accounts:
The Major Research Equipment and
Facility Construction (MREFC) account,
and the Research and Related Activities
(R&RA) account. The MREFC account,
established in FY 1995, is a separate
budget line item that provides an
agency-wide mechanism, permitting
directorates to undertake major facility
projects are roughly $70M or greater.
Smaller projects continue to be
supported from the R&RA Account.
Facilities are defined as shared-use
infrastructure, instrumentation and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:36 Jun 10, 2019
Jkt 247001
equipment that are accessible to a broad
community of researchers and/or
educators. Facilities may be centralized
or may consist of distributed
installations. They may incorporate
large-scale networking or computational
infrastructure, multi-user instruments or
networks of such instruments, or other
infrastructure, instrumentation and
equipment having a major impact on a
broad segment of a scientific or
engineering discipline. Historically,
awards have been made for such diverse
projects as accelerators, telescopes,
research vessels and aircraft, and
geographically distributed but
networked sensors and instrumentation.
The growth and diversification of
major facility projects require that NSF
remain attentive to the ever-changing
issues and challenges inherent in their
planning, construction, operation,
management and oversight. Most
importantly, dedicated, competent NSF
and awardee staff are needed to manage
and oversee these projects; giving the
attention and oversight that good
practice dictates and that proper
accountability to taxpayers and
Congress demands. To this end, there is
also a need for consistent, documented
requirements and procedures to be
understood and used by NSF program
managers and awardees for all such
major projects.
Use of the Information: Facilities are
an essential part of the science and
engineering enterprise, and supporting
them is one major responsibility of the
National Science Foundation (NSF).
NSF makes awards to external entities—
primarily universities, consortia of
universities or non-profit
organizations—to undertake
construction, management and
operation of facilities. Such awards
frequently take the form of cooperative
agreements. NSF does not directly
construct or operate the facilities it
supports. However, NSF retains
responsibility for overseeing their
development, management and
successful performance. The Major
Facilities Guide is intended to:
• Provide step-by-step guidance for
NSF staff and awardees to carry out
effective project planning, management
and oversight of major facilities while
considering the varying requirements of
a diverse portfolio;
• Clearly state the policies, processes
and procedures pertinent at each stage
of a facility’s life cycle from
development through construction,
operations, and termination; and
• Document and disseminate ‘‘good
practices’’ identified over time so that
NSF and awardees can carry out their
responsibilities more effectively.
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
27165
This version of the Major Facilities
Guide (previously referred to as the
Large Facilities Manual) reflects changes
in terminology to align with the
American Innovation and
Competitiveness Act (AICA)
terminology; adds a section for guidance
on mid-scale research infrastructure
projects; updates NSF policy on
research infrastructure, roles and
responsibilities for NSF staff,
divestment stage, earned value
management, cybersecurity, and
property management; and clarifies cost
estimating requirements. The Guide
does not replace existing formal
procedures required for all NSF awards,
which are described in the, Proposal &
Award Policies & Procedures Guide
(PAPPG). Instead, it draws upon and
supplements it for the purpose of
providing detailed guidance on NSF
policy and procedures related to the
planning and management of Major
Facilities. All facilities projects require
merit and technical review, as well as
approval of certain deliverables. The
level of review and approval varies
substantially from standard grants, as
does the level of oversight needed to
ensure appropriate and proper
accountability for federal funds. The
requirements, recommended procedures
and best practices presented in the
Guide apply to any facility significant
enough to require close and substantial
interaction with the Foundation and the
National Science Board.
This Guide will be updated
periodically to reflect changes in
requirements, policies and/or
procedures. Award Recipients are
expected to monitor and adopt the
requirements and best practices
included in the Guide which are aimed
at improving management and oversight
of major facilities projects and at
enabling the most efficient and costeffective delivery of tools to the research
and education communities.
The submission of proposals and
subsequent project documentation to
the Foundation related to the
development, construction and
operations of Major Facilities is part of
the collection of information. This
information is used to help NSF fulfill
this responsibility in supporting meritbased research and education projects in
all the scientific and engineering
disciplines. The Foundation also has a
continuing commitment to provide
oversight on facilities development and
construction which must be balanced
against monitoring its information
collection so as to identify and address
any excessive reporting burdens.
NSF has approximately twenty-four
(24) Major Facilities in various stages of
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
27166
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 112 / Tuesday, June 11, 2019 / Notices
development, construction, operations
and termination. Facilities undergoing a
major upgrade may be classified in both
design or construction and operations at
the same time. Two to four (2 to 4) new
awards are made approximately every
five (5) years based on science
community infrastructure needs and
availability of funding. Among the
twenty-four major facilities, there are
approximately seven (7) facilities
annually that are either in development
or construction. These stages require the
highest level of reporting and
management documentation per the
Major Facilities Guide. NSF estimates
there will be four (4) mid-scale projects
in progress at a given time.
Burden on the Public: The Foundation
estimates that approximately five (5)
Full Time Equivalents (FTEs) are
necessary for each major facility project
in design or construction to respond to
NSF performance and financial
reporting and project management
documentation requirements on an
annual basis; or 10,400 hours per year.
The Foundation estimates
approximately one and half (1.5) FTE
for a major facility in operations to
respond to NSF performance and
financial reporting on an annual basis;
or 3,120 hours per year. For mid-scale
projects, the Foundation estimates
approximately one (1) FTE is necessary
for each mid-scale project to respond to
NSF project management
documentation requirements on an
annual basis; or 2,080 hours per year.
With seven (7) major facilities in design
or construction and twenty-one (21) in
operations and four (4) mid-scale
projects, this equates to roughly 150,000
public burden hours annually.
Dated: June 6, 2019.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2019–12289 Filed 6–10–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. MC2019–146 and CP2019–162;
MC2019–147 and CP2019–163]
New Postal Products
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commission is noticing a
recent Postal Service filing for the
Commission’s consideration concerning
negotiated service agreements. This
notice informs the public of the filing,
invites public comment, and takes other
administrative steps.
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:36 Jun 10, 2019
Jkt 247001
DATES:
Comments are due: June 13,
2019.
Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit
comments electronically should contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by
telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202–789–6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Docketed Proceeding(s)
I. Introduction
The Commission gives notice that the
Postal Service filed request(s) for the
Commission to consider matters related
to negotiated service agreement(s). The
request(s) may propose the addition or
removal of a negotiated service
agreement from the market dominant or
the competitive product list, or the
modification of an existing product
currently appearing on the market
dominant or the competitive product
list.
Section II identifies the docket
number(s) associated with each Postal
Service request, the title of each Postal
Service request, the request’s acceptance
date, and the authority cited by the
Postal Service for each request. For each
request, the Commission appoints an
officer of the Commission to represent
the interests of the general public in the
proceeding, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505
(Public Representative). Section II also
establishes comment deadline(s)
pertaining to each request.
The public portions of the Postal
Service’s request(s) can be accessed via
the Commission’s website (https://
www.prc.gov). Non-public portions of
the Postal Service’s request(s), if any,
can be accessed through compliance
with the requirements of 39 CFR
3007.301.1
The Commission invites comments on
whether the Postal Service’s request(s)
in the captioned docket(s) are consistent
with the policies of title 39. For
request(s) that the Postal Service states
concern market dominant product(s),
applicable statutory and regulatory
requirements include 39 U.S.C. 3622, 39
U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR part 3010, and 39
CFR part 3020, subpart B. For request(s)
1 See Docket No. RM2018–3, Order Adopting
Final Rules Relating to Non-Public Information,
June 27, 2018, Attachment A at 19–22 (Order No.
4679).
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
that the Postal Service states concern
competitive product(s), applicable
statutory and regulatory requirements
include 39U.S.C. 3632, 39 U.S.C. 3633,
39 U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR part 3015, and
39 CFR part 3020, subpart B. Comment
deadline(s) for each request appear in
section II.
II. Docketed Proceeding(s)
1. Docket No(s).: MC2019–146 and
CP2019–162; Filing Title: USPS Request
to Add Priority Mail Express & Priority
Mail Contract 93 to Competitive Product
List and Notice of Filing Materials
Under Seal; Filing Acceptance Date:
June 5, 2019; Filing Authority: 39 U.S.C.
3642, 39 CFR 3020.30 et seq., and 39
CFR 3015.5; Public Representative:
Kenneth R. Moeller; Comments Due:
June 13, 2019.
2. Docket No(s).: MC2019–147 and
CP2019–163; Filing Title: USPS Request
to Add Priority Mail Contract 531 to
Competitive Product List and Notice of
Filing Materials Under Seal; Filing
Acceptance Date: June 5, 2019; Filing
Authority: 39 U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR
3020.30 et seq., and 39 CFR 3015.5;
Public Representative: Christopher C
Mohr; Comments Due: June 13, 2019.
This Notice will be published in the
Federal Register.
Stacy L. Ruble,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–12252 Filed 6–10–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
POSTAL SERVICE
Product Change—Priority Mail
Negotiated Service Agreement
Postal ServiceTM.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Postal Service gives
notice of filing a request with the Postal
Regulatory Commission to add a
domestic shipping services contract to
the list of Negotiated Service
Agreements in the Mail Classification
Schedule’s Competitive Products List.
DATES: Date of required notice: June 11,
2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Reed, 202–268–3179.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
United States Postal Service® hereby
gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C.
3642 and 3632(b)(3), on June 5, 2019, it
filed with the Postal Regulatory
Commission a USPS Request to Add
Priority Mail Contract 531 to
Competitive Product List. Documents
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 112 (Tuesday, June 11, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27164-27166]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-12289]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request
AGENCY: National Science Foundation.
ACTION: Submission for OMB review; comment request.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) has submitted the
following information collection requirement to OMB for review and
clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This is the second
notice for public comment; the first was published in the Federal
Register, and 136 comments were received from eight different
institutions/individuals, along with one comment from one institution/
individual on the Financial Data Collection Tool for Major Facilities.
NSF is forwarding the proposed submission to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for clearance simultaneously with the publication of
this second notice. The full submission may be found at: https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
DATES: Comments regarding this information collection are best assured
of having their full effect if received by July 11, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs of OMB, Attention: Desk Officer for National Science
Foundation, 725 17th Street NW, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503, and
Suzanne H. Plimpton, Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314, or send email
to [email protected]. Individuals who use a telecommunications device
for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339, which is accessible 24 hours a day, 7 days a
week, 365 days a year (including federal holidays).
Copies of the submission may be obtained by calling 703-292-7556.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NSF may not conduct or sponsor a collection
of information unless the collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB control number and the agency informs potential
persons who are to respond to the collection of information that such
persons are not required to respond to the collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
Comments regarding (a) whether the collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the
accuracy of the agency's estimate of burden including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility and clarity of the information to be collected; (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are
to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology should be addressed to the points
of contact in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Summary of Comments on the National Science Foundation's Major
Facilities Guide:
The draft Major Facilities Guide and Financial Data Collection Tool
for Major Facilities were made available for review by the public on
the NSF website at https://www.nsf.gov/bfa/lfo/lfo_documents.jsp. In
response to the Federal Register notice published December 21, 2018, at
83 FR 65757, NSF received 136 comments from 8 different institutions/
individuals on the Major Facilities Guide and 1 comment on the
Financial Data Collection Tool for Major Facilities from 1 institution/
individual. A summary of the comments on the Major Facilities Guide
follows:
48 requested further guidance on project management
controls and NSF oversight processes and procedures for major
facilities and mid-scale projects;
20 requested clarification on the processes and
requirements associated with cost and contingency through the various
stage of the facility lifecycle;
24 requested clarification on the guidance for
cybersecurity programs for major facilities;
6 requested clarifications on guidance for mid-scale
projects;
8 requested clarifications of requirements during the
various stages of the facility lifecycle;
8 provided general observations; and
22 provided editing recommendations such as typos and
sentence structure.
The full comments and NSF's response may be found via: https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain and https://www.nsf.gov/bfa/lfo/lfo_documents.jsp. NSF is moving forward with submitting the
information collection request to OMB.
Title of Collection: Major Facilities Guide.
OMB Number: 3145-0239.
Overview of this Information Collection: The National Science
[[Page 27165]]
Foundation Act of 1950 (Pub. L. 81-507) set forth NSF's mission and
purpose:
``To promote the progress of science; to advance the national
health, prosperity, and welfare; to secure the national defense. * *
*''
The Act authorized and directed NSF to initiate and support:
Basic scientific research and research fundamental to the
engineering process;
Programs to strengthen scientific and engineering research
potential;
Science and engineering education programs at all levels
and in all the various fields of science and engineering;
Programs that provide a source of information for policy
formulation; and
Other activities to promote these ends.
Among Federal agencies, NSF is a leader in providing the academic
community with advanced instrumentation needed to conduct state-of-the-
art research and to educate the next generation of scientists,
engineers and technical workers. The knowledge generated by these tools
sustains U.S. leadership in science and engineering (S&E) to drive the
U.S. economy and secure the future. NSF's responsibility is to ensure
that the research and education communities have access to these
resources, and to provide the support needed to utilize them optimally
and implement timely upgrades.
The scale of advanced instrumentation ranges from small research
instruments to shared resources or facilities that can be used by
entire communities. The demand for such instrumentation is very high,
and is growing rapidly, along with the pace of discovery. For major
facilities and shared infrastructure, the need is particularly high.
This trend is expected to accelerate in the future as increasing
numbers of researchers and educators rely on such major facilities,
instruments, and databases to provide the reach to make the next
intellectual leaps.
NSF currently provides support for facility construction from two
accounts: The Major Research Equipment and Facility Construction
(MREFC) account, and the Research and Related Activities (R&RA)
account. The MREFC account, established in FY 1995, is a separate
budget line item that provides an agency-wide mechanism, permitting
directorates to undertake major facility projects are roughly $70M or
greater. Smaller projects continue to be supported from the R&RA
Account.
Facilities are defined as shared-use infrastructure,
instrumentation and equipment that are accessible to a broad community
of researchers and/or educators. Facilities may be centralized or may
consist of distributed installations. They may incorporate large-scale
networking or computational infrastructure, multi-user instruments or
networks of such instruments, or other infrastructure, instrumentation
and equipment having a major impact on a broad segment of a scientific
or engineering discipline. Historically, awards have been made for such
diverse projects as accelerators, telescopes, research vessels and
aircraft, and geographically distributed but networked sensors and
instrumentation.
The growth and diversification of major facility projects require
that NSF remain attentive to the ever-changing issues and challenges
inherent in their planning, construction, operation, management and
oversight. Most importantly, dedicated, competent NSF and awardee staff
are needed to manage and oversee these projects; giving the attention
and oversight that good practice dictates and that proper
accountability to taxpayers and Congress demands. To this end, there is
also a need for consistent, documented requirements and procedures to
be understood and used by NSF program managers and awardees for all
such major projects.
Use of the Information: Facilities are an essential part of the
science and engineering enterprise, and supporting them is one major
responsibility of the National Science Foundation (NSF). NSF makes
awards to external entities--primarily universities, consortia of
universities or non-profit organizations--to undertake construction,
management and operation of facilities. Such awards frequently take the
form of cooperative agreements. NSF does not directly construct or
operate the facilities it supports. However, NSF retains responsibility
for overseeing their development, management and successful
performance. The Major Facilities Guide is intended to:
Provide step-by-step guidance for NSF staff and awardees
to carry out effective project planning, management and oversight of
major facilities while considering the varying requirements of a
diverse portfolio;
Clearly state the policies, processes and procedures
pertinent at each stage of a facility's life cycle from development
through construction, operations, and termination; and
Document and disseminate ``good practices'' identified
over time so that NSF and awardees can carry out their responsibilities
more effectively.
This version of the Major Facilities Guide (previously referred to
as the Large Facilities Manual) reflects changes in terminology to
align with the American Innovation and Competitiveness Act (AICA)
terminology; adds a section for guidance on mid-scale research
infrastructure projects; updates NSF policy on research infrastructure,
roles and responsibilities for NSF staff, divestment stage, earned
value management, cybersecurity, and property management; and clarifies
cost estimating requirements. The Guide does not replace existing
formal procedures required for all NSF awards, which are described in
the, Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG). Instead, it
draws upon and supplements it for the purpose of providing detailed
guidance on NSF policy and procedures related to the planning and
management of Major Facilities. All facilities projects require merit
and technical review, as well as approval of certain deliverables. The
level of review and approval varies substantially from standard grants,
as does the level of oversight needed to ensure appropriate and proper
accountability for federal funds. The requirements, recommended
procedures and best practices presented in the Guide apply to any
facility significant enough to require close and substantial
interaction with the Foundation and the National Science Board.
This Guide will be updated periodically to reflect changes in
requirements, policies and/or procedures. Award Recipients are expected
to monitor and adopt the requirements and best practices included in
the Guide which are aimed at improving management and oversight of
major facilities projects and at enabling the most efficient and cost-
effective delivery of tools to the research and education communities.
The submission of proposals and subsequent project documentation to
the Foundation related to the development, construction and operations
of Major Facilities is part of the collection of information. This
information is used to help NSF fulfill this responsibility in
supporting merit-based research and education projects in all the
scientific and engineering disciplines. The Foundation also has a
continuing commitment to provide oversight on facilities development
and construction which must be balanced against monitoring its
information collection so as to identify and address any excessive
reporting burdens.
NSF has approximately twenty-four (24) Major Facilities in various
stages of
[[Page 27166]]
development, construction, operations and termination. Facilities
undergoing a major upgrade may be classified in both design or
construction and operations at the same time. Two to four (2 to 4) new
awards are made approximately every five (5) years based on science
community infrastructure needs and availability of funding. Among the
twenty-four major facilities, there are approximately seven (7)
facilities annually that are either in development or construction.
These stages require the highest level of reporting and management
documentation per the Major Facilities Guide. NSF estimates there will
be four (4) mid-scale projects in progress at a given time.
Burden on the Public: The Foundation estimates that approximately
five (5) Full Time Equivalents (FTEs) are necessary for each major
facility project in design or construction to respond to NSF
performance and financial reporting and project management
documentation requirements on an annual basis; or 10,400 hours per
year. The Foundation estimates approximately one and half (1.5) FTE for
a major facility in operations to respond to NSF performance and
financial reporting on an annual basis; or 3,120 hours per year. For
mid-scale projects, the Foundation estimates approximately one (1) FTE
is necessary for each mid-scale project to respond to NSF project
management documentation requirements on an annual basis; or 2,080
hours per year. With seven (7) major facilities in design or
construction and twenty-one (21) in operations and four (4) mid-scale
projects, this equates to roughly 150,000 public burden hours annually.
Dated: June 6, 2019.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2019-12289 Filed 6-10-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P