Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Red River, Shreveport, LA, 26764-26766 [2019-12126]
Download as PDF
26764
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 111 / Monday, June 10, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
requests that receive objections,
including adjudication of objections
submitted on exclusion requests and
any rebuttals to objections, and
surrebuttals. The estimated 106-day
period begins on the day the exclusion
request is posted in either
regulations.gov or in the 232 Exclusions
Portal and ends once a decision to grant
or deny is made on the exclusion
request.
*
*
*
*
*
(i) For further information. If you have
questions on this supplement, you may
contact Director, Industrial Studies,
Office of Technology Evaluation, Bureau
of Industry and Security, U.S.
Department of Commerce, at (202) 482–
4757 or Aluminum232@bis.doc.gov
regarding aluminum exclusion requests.
See Annex 1 to Supplements Nos. 1 and
2 to this part for application issues that
are specific to using
www.regulations.gov for submitting
rebuttals and surrebuttals under these
two supplements for exclusion requests
submitted no later than June 12, 2019.
The U.S. Department of Commerce has
posted in regulations.gov training
documents to assist your understanding
when submitting 232 submissions.
These documents include step-by-step
screen shots of the process for using
regulations.gov. The U.S. Department of
Commerce website also includes FAQs
and best practices other companies have
used for submitting exclusion requests
and objections. The U.S. Department of
Commerce has also included a manual
providing instruction on the 232
Exclusions Portal for exclusion requests
submitted on or after June 13, 2019,
titled 232 Exclusions Portal
Comprehensive Guide (‘‘232 Exclusions
Guide’’) and posted online at (https://
www.commerce.gov/page/section-232investigations) to assist your
understanding when making 232
submissions in the 232 Exclusions
Portal.
■ 4. Annex 1 to Supplements No. 1 and
2 to part 705 is amended by adding
introductory text before the phrase
‘‘HOW TO FILE REBUTTAL
COMMENTS’’ to read as follows:
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
Annex 1 to Supplements No. 1 and 2 to
Part 705—Steps for Using
Regulations.gov to File Rebuttals and
Surrebuttals
These steps for how to file rebuttal
and surrebuttal comments are only
applicable to exclusion requests
submitted no later than June 12, 2019 in
regulations.gov. For guidance on how to
file rebuttal and surrebuttal comments
to exclusion requests submitted on or
after June 13, 2019, in the 232
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:41 Jun 07, 2019
Jkt 247001
Exclusions Portal, see the manual, 232
Exclusions Portal Comprehensive Guide
(‘‘232 Exclusions Guide’’) posted online
at (https://www.commerce.gov/page/
section-232-investigations).
*
*
*
*
*
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
Dated: June 6, 2019.
Nazak Nikakhtar,
Assistant Secretary for Industry and Analysis,
performing the nonexclusive functions and
duties of the Under Secretary for Industry
and Security.
On June 21, 2018, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled Drawbridge Operation
Regulation; Red River, Shreveport, LA in
the Federal Register (83 FR 28785). We
received 9 comments on this rule.
[FR Doc. 2019–12254 Filed 6–6–19; 4:15 pm]
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2017–0911]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Red
River, Shreveport, LA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is changing
the operating schedule that governs the
draws of the Union Pacific Railroad
bridge, mile 227.0, and the Midsouth
Railroad bridge, mile 228.2, across the
Red River at Shreveport, LA. This final
rule will allow for the drawbridges to
remain in the closed-to-navigation
position. While there is vessel traffic on
the waterway, no one has requested that
either drawbridge be open since 2007.
Union Pacific Railroad and Midsouth
Railroad, the bridge owners, requested
to update the operating schedule
accordingly.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
This rule is effective on July 10,
2019.
To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2017–
0911. In the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Eric A. Washburn, Bridge
Administrator, Western Rivers, Coast
Guard; telephone 314–269–2378, email
Eric.Washburn@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority 33 U.S.C. 499. This rule
changes the operating schedule for two
bridges by revising the regulations
governing the Red River drawbridge
operating requirements under 33 CFR
117.491(c). Currently, this operating
schedule applies to the draws of all
bridges on the Red River from, mile
105.8 through mile 234.4. The operating
schedule changes will allow the
drawbridges to remain closed to the
passage of vessels. However, pursuant
33 CFR 117.39, this rule includes a
provision that requires the owner or
agency controlling the bridge to bring
the draw into full operational capability
within three months if the District
Commander provides a notification that
needs of navigation require resumed
operation of the spans.
Navigation on the Red River in the
vicinity of these bridges consists
primarily of recreational craft, and
commercial use of the waterway is only
possible during periods of high water.
Moreover, the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers does not maintain any project
depth or navigable channel on this
reach of the Red River, nor does the U.S.
Coast Guard maintain any aids to
navigation above mile 211.4. Under 33
CFR 117.491(d), the bridges above mile
234.4 need not open for the passage of
vessels. There are no alternate routes for
vessels transiting this section of the Red
River.
Union Pacific Railroad owns the
Union Pacific Railroad bridge, mile
227.0, across the Red River at
Shreveport, LA, and has requested that
the drawbridge regulation be amended
to allow the bridge to remain in the
permanently closed position. Union
Pacific provided the Coast Guard with
bridge logs that indicate that there has
been no request for a bridge opening
since 2007. In the closed position, the
Union Pacific Railroad bridge, mile
227.0, provides 15.1 feet of vertical
clearance at mean high water.
Midsouth Railroad owns the
Midsouth Railroad bridge, mile 228.2,
across the Red River at Shreveport, LA,
E:\FR\FM\10JNR1.SGM
10JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 111 / Monday, June 10, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
and has also requested that the
drawbridge remain in the permanently
closed position. Midsouth Railroad
provided the Coast Guard with bridge
logs that indicate that there has been no
request for a bridge opening since 2007.
In the closed position, the Midsouth
Railroad bridge, mile 228.2, provides
37.0 feet of vertical clearance at mean
high water.
Under 33 CFR 117.39, the District
Commander may authorize a
drawbridge to remain in the closed to
navigation position and be untended
when there have been no requests for
drawbridge openings for two years. Due
to the lack of significant navigation on
this portion of the Red River that
requires draws to open and the fact that
there has been no request to open the
draws in over ten years, the Coast Guard
believes that this rule is reasonable and
should continue to meet the present and
future needs of navigation. Based on the
records provided by Union Pacific
Railroad and Midsouth Railroad, it is
expected that the change will have no
known impact to navigation or other
waterway users.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes,
and the Final Rule
The Coast Guard provided a comment
period of 60 days and nine comments
were received. All nine comments were
concerned the drawbridges will be
permanently closed-to-navigation. The
intent for the rule change is not to
permanently close the draws, but allow
for the drawbridges to remain in the
closed-to-navigation position until the
need of navigation resumes, at which
time the draws will be required to open
within three months notice from the
District Commander.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and Executive
Orders and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This rule has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, it has not
been reviewed by the Office of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:41 Jun 07, 2019
Jkt 247001
Management and Budget (OMB) and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the logs that were provided
by the bridge owners indicating that
there has been no request for a bridge
opening since 2007. Moreover, once the
needs of navigation require the resumed
operation of the spans, the owner or
agency of the drawbridges will be
notified by the District Commander to
restore the draws to full operation
within three months.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard received no comments
from the Small Business Administration
on this rule. The Coast Guard certifies
under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. While some owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit
the bridge may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A above this
final rule would not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
26765
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule would call for no new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Government
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a determination that this
action is one of a category of actions
which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This rule
simply promulgates the operating
regulations or procedures for
drawbridges. This action is categorically
excluded from further review, under
E:\FR\FM\10JNR1.SGM
10JNR1
26766
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 111 / Monday, June 10, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of the
Instruction.
A Record of Environmental
Consideration and a Memorandum for
the Record are not required for this rule.
Dated: April 29, 2019.
P.F. Thomas,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2019–12126 Filed 6–7–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
and Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Amend § 117.491 by revising
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
■
Red River.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
(c) The draws of the bridges above
mile 105.8 through mile 234.4 need not
open for passage of vessels. The owner
or agency controlling the bridge must
restore the draw to full operation within
three months if notified by the District
Commander that the needs of navigation
require resumed operation of the spans.
*
*
*
*
*
Jkt 247001
RIN 0648–GAR–A004
NMFS announces that the
State of North Carolina is transferring a
portion of its 2019 commercial summer
flounder quota to the Commonwealth of
Virginia. This quota adjustment is
necessary to comply with the Summer
Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass
Fishery Management Plan quota transfer
provisions. This announcement informs
the public of the revised commercial
quotas for North Carolina and Virginia.
DATES: Effective June 7, 2019, through
December 31, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cynthia Ferrio, Fishery Management
Specialist, (978) 281–9180.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulations governing the summer
flounder fishery are found in 50 CFR
648.100 through 648.110. These
regulations require annual specification
of a commercial quota that is
SUMMARY:
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
15:41 Jun 07, 2019
[Docket No. 190312234–9412–01]
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; quota transfer.
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
50 CFR Part 648
AGENCY:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
*
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; Summer Flounder Fishery;
Quota Transfer From NC to VA
Bridges.
§ 117.491
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
apportioned among the coastal states
from Maine through North Carolina. The
process to set the annual commercial
quota and the percent allocated to each
state is described in § 648.102, and the
revised 2019 allocations were published
on May 17, 2019 (84 FR 22392).
The final rule implementing
Amendment 5 to the Summer Flounder
Fishery Management Plan, as published
in the Federal Register on December 17,
1993 (58 FR 65936), provided a
mechanism for transferring summer
flounder commercial quota from one
state to another. Two or more states,
under mutual agreement and with the
concurrence of the NMFS Greater
Atlantic Regional Administrator, can
transfer or combine summer flounder
commercial quota under § 648.102(c)(2).
The Regional Administrator is required
to consider the criteria in
§ 648.102(c)(2)(i)(A) through (C) in the
evaluation of requests for quota transfers
or combinations.
North Carolina is transferring 36,990
lb (16,778 kg) of summer flounder
commercial quota to Virginia through
mutual agreement of the states. This
transfer was requested to repay landings
made by North Carolina-permitted
vessels in Virginia under a safe harbor
agreement. The revised summer
flounder quotas for fishing year 2019 are
now: North Carolina, 2,974,117 lb
(1,349,037 kg); and Virginia, 2,378,210
lb (1,078,738 kg).
Classification
This action is taken under 50 CFR
part 648 and is exempt from review
under Executive Order 12866.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: June 5, 2019.
Jennifer M. Wallace,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2019–12155 Filed 6–7–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\10JNR1.SGM
10JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 111 (Monday, June 10, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 26764-26766]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-12126]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG-2017-0911]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Red River, Shreveport, LA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is changing the operating schedule that
governs the draws of the Union Pacific Railroad bridge, mile 227.0, and
the Midsouth Railroad bridge, mile 228.2, across the Red River at
Shreveport, LA. This final rule will allow for the drawbridges to
remain in the closed-to-navigation position. While there is vessel
traffic on the waterway, no one has requested that either drawbridge be
open since 2007. Union Pacific Railroad and Midsouth Railroad, the
bridge owners, requested to update the operating schedule accordingly.
DATES: This rule is effective on July 10, 2019.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2017-0911. In the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Eric A. Washburn, Bridge Administrator, Western Rivers,
Coast Guard; telephone 314-269-2378, email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
On June 21, 2018, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Red River, Shreveport,
LA in the Federal Register (83 FR 28785). We received 9 comments on
this rule.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority 33 U.S.C. 499.
This rule changes the operating schedule for two bridges by revising
the regulations governing the Red River drawbridge operating
requirements under 33 CFR 117.491(c). Currently, this operating
schedule applies to the draws of all bridges on the Red River from,
mile 105.8 through mile 234.4. The operating schedule changes will
allow the drawbridges to remain closed to the passage of vessels.
However, pursuant 33 CFR 117.39, this rule includes a provision that
requires the owner or agency controlling the bridge to bring the draw
into full operational capability within three months if the District
Commander provides a notification that needs of navigation require
resumed operation of the spans.
Navigation on the Red River in the vicinity of these bridges
consists primarily of recreational craft, and commercial use of the
waterway is only possible during periods of high water. Moreover, the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers does not maintain any project depth or
navigable channel on this reach of the Red River, nor does the U.S.
Coast Guard maintain any aids to navigation above mile 211.4. Under 33
CFR 117.491(d), the bridges above mile 234.4 need not open for the
passage of vessels. There are no alternate routes for vessels
transiting this section of the Red River.
Union Pacific Railroad owns the Union Pacific Railroad bridge, mile
227.0, across the Red River at Shreveport, LA, and has requested that
the drawbridge regulation be amended to allow the bridge to remain in
the permanently closed position. Union Pacific provided the Coast Guard
with bridge logs that indicate that there has been no request for a
bridge opening since 2007. In the closed position, the Union Pacific
Railroad bridge, mile 227.0, provides 15.1 feet of vertical clearance
at mean high water.
Midsouth Railroad owns the Midsouth Railroad bridge, mile 228.2,
across the Red River at Shreveport, LA,
[[Page 26765]]
and has also requested that the drawbridge remain in the permanently
closed position. Midsouth Railroad provided the Coast Guard with bridge
logs that indicate that there has been no request for a bridge opening
since 2007. In the closed position, the Midsouth Railroad bridge, mile
228.2, provides 37.0 feet of vertical clearance at mean high water.
Under 33 CFR 117.39, the District Commander may authorize a
drawbridge to remain in the closed to navigation position and be
untended when there have been no requests for drawbridge openings for
two years. Due to the lack of significant navigation on this portion of
the Red River that requires draws to open and the fact that there has
been no request to open the draws in over ten years, the Coast Guard
believes that this rule is reasonable and should continue to meet the
present and future needs of navigation. Based on the records provided
by Union Pacific Railroad and Midsouth Railroad, it is expected that
the change will have no known impact to navigation or other waterway
users.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Final Rule
The Coast Guard provided a comment period of 60 days and nine
comments were received. All nine comments were concerned the
drawbridges will be permanently closed-to-navigation. The intent for
the rule change is not to permanently close the draws, but allow for
the drawbridges to remain in the closed-to-navigation position until
the need of navigation resumes, at which time the draws will be
required to open within three months notice from the District
Commander.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and Executive Orders and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, it has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination is based on the logs that were
provided by the bridge owners indicating that there has been no request
for a bridge opening since 2007. Moreover, once the needs of navigation
require the resumed operation of the spans, the owner or agency of the
drawbridges will be notified by the District Commander to restore the
draws to full operation within three months.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small Business
Administration on this rule. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the bridge may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A above this final rule would not have a
significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule would call for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Government
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a
determination that this action is one of a category of actions which do
not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule simply promulgates the operating regulations or
procedures for drawbridges. This action is categorically excluded from
further review, under
[[Page 26766]]
figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction.
A Record of Environmental Consideration and a Memorandum for the
Record are not required for this rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; and Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Amend Sec. 117.491 by revising paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 117.491 Red River.
* * * * *
(c) The draws of the bridges above mile 105.8 through mile 234.4
need not open for passage of vessels. The owner or agency controlling
the bridge must restore the draw to full operation within three months
if notified by the District Commander that the needs of navigation
require resumed operation of the spans.
* * * * *
Dated: April 29, 2019.
P.F. Thomas,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2019-12126 Filed 6-7-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P