2018 Tax Information for Use in the Revenue Shortfall Allocation Method, 26714 [2019-12058]

Download as PDF 26714 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 110 / Friday, June 7, 2019 / Notices Correction In the Federal Register of April 15, 2019, 84 FR 15275, on page 15275, in the third column, after SYSTEM NAME AND NUMBER, ‘‘Mass Emergency Notification System (MENS), 60–0383’’ is corrected to read as ‘‘Mass Emergency Notification System (MENS), 60–0386’’. Dated: June 3, 2019. Mary Ann Zimmerman, Acting Executive Director, Office of Privacy and Disclosure, Office of the General Counsel. [FR Doc. 2019–11982 Filed 6–6–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4191–02–P SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD [Docket No. EP 682 (Sub-No. 10)] 2018 Tax Information for Use in the Revenue Shortfall Allocation Method Surface Transportation Board. Notice. AGENCY: ACTION: Comments are due by July 8, 2019. If any comment opposing AAR’s calculation is filed, AAR’s reply will be due by July 29, 2019. If no comments are filed by the due date, AAR’s calculation of the 2018 weighted average state tax rates will be automatically adopted by the Board, effective July 9, 2019. ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted either via the Board’s e-filing format or in traditional paper format. Any person using e-filing should attach a document and otherwise comply with the instructions at the E-Filing link on the Board’s website at https:// www.stb.gov. Any person submitting a filing in paper format should send an original referring to Docket No. EP 682 (Sub-No. 10) to: Surface Transportation Board, 395 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20423–0001. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Ziehm, (202) 245–0391. Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877–8339. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The RSAM figure is one of three benchmarks that together are used to determine the reasonableness of a challenged rate under the Board’s Simplified Standards for Rail Rate Cases, EP 646 (Sub-No. 1), slip op. at 10 (STB served Sept. 5, 2007),1 as further revised in Simplified DATES: The Board is publishing, and providing the public an opportunity to comment on, the 2018 weighted average state tax rates for each Class I railroad, as calculated by the Association of American Railroads (AAR), for use in the Revenue Shortfall Allocation Method (RSAM). SUMMARY: Standards for Rail Rate Cases—Taxes in Revenue Shortfall Allocation Method, EP 646 (Sub-No. 2) (STB served Nov. 21, 2008). RSAM is intended to measure the average markup that the railroad would need to collect from all of its ‘‘potentially captive traffic’’ (traffic with a revenue-to-variable-cost ratio above 180%) to earn adequate revenues as measured by the Board under 49 U.S.C. 10704(a)(2) (i.e., earn a return on investment equal to the railroad industry cost of capital). Simplified Standards—Taxes in RSAM, slip op. at 1. In Simplified Standards—Taxes in RSAM, slip op. at 3, 5, the Board modified its RSAM formula to account for taxes, as the prior formula mistakenly compared pre-tax and aftertax revenues. In that decision, the Board stated that it would institute a separate proceeding in which Class I railroads would be required to submit the annual tax information necessary for the Board’s annual RSAM calculation. Id. at 5–6. Pursuant to 49 CFR 1135.2, AAR is required to annually calculate and submit to the Board the weighted average state tax rate for each Class I railroad for the previous year. On May 30, 2019, AAR filed its calculation of the weighted average state tax rates for 2018, listed below for each Class I railroad: WEIGHTED AVERAGE STATE TAX RATES 2018 (%) Railroad jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES BNSF Railway Company ............................................................................................................. CSX Transportation, Inc .............................................................................................................. Grand Trunk Corporation ............................................................................................................. The Kansas City Southern Railway ............................................................................................. Norfolk Southern Combined ........................................................................................................ Soo Line Corporation ................................................................................................................... Union Pacific Railroad Company ................................................................................................. Any party wishing to comment on AAR’s calculation of the 2018 weighted average state tax rates should file a comment by July 8, 2019. See 49 CFR 1135.2(c). If any comments opposing AAR’s calculations are filed, AAR’s reply will be due by July 29, 2019. Id. If any comments are filed, the Board will review AAR’s submission, together with the comments, and serve a decision within 60 days of the close of the record that either accepts, rejects, or modifies AAR’s railroad-specific tax information. Id. If no comments are filed by July 8, 2019, AAR’s submitted weighted average state tax rates will be automatically adopted by the Board, effective July 9, 2019. Id. 1 Aff’d sub nom. CSX Transp., Inc. v. STB, 568 F.3d 236 (D.C. Cir. 2009), vacated in part on reh’g, CSX Transp., Inc. v. STB, 584 F.3d 1076 (D.C. Cir. 2009). 2 As explained in Simplified Standards for Rail Rate Cases—2017 RSAM and R/VC>180 Calculations, EP 689 (Sub-No. 10), slip op. at 1 n.1 (STB served Apr. 22, 2019), adjustments to R–1 reporting schedules were made to remove the accounting impacts of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, Public Law 115–97, 131 Stat. 2054 (2017), and that decision stated that the revised schedules impact the weighted average state tax rates for 2017. For RSAM and R/VC>180 calculation purposes, the 2017 adjusted rates for BNSF Railway Company, CSX Transportation, Inc., Norfolk Southern Combined, VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:13 Jun 06, 2019 Jkt 247001 2017 2 (%) 5.312 5.238 8.130 5.422 5.753 8.193 5.726 5.289 5.628 7.961 5.409 6.194 8.134 5.666 % Change 0.023 ¥0.390 0.169 0.013 ¥0.441 0.059 0.060 By the Board, Allison C. Davis, Acting Director, Office of Proceedings. Jeffrey Herzig, Clearance Clerk. [FR Doc. 2019–12058 Filed 6–6–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4915–01–P Decided: June 4, 2019. PO 00000 Frm 00074 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 and Union Pacific Railroad Company are 5.292%, 5.296%, 5.692%, and 5.672%, respectively. The workpapers for that decision are available on the Board’s website at: https://www.stb.gov/stb/ industry/econ_reports.html, under the paragraph titled ‘‘Revenue Shortfall Allocation Method (RSAM)’’ and the ‘‘2017 RSAM Computation’’ hyperlink. E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM 07JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 110 (Friday, June 7, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 26714]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-12058]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD

[Docket No. EP 682 (Sub-No. 10)]


2018 Tax Information for Use in the Revenue Shortfall Allocation 
Method

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board is publishing, and providing the public an 
opportunity to comment on, the 2018 weighted average state tax rates 
for each Class I railroad, as calculated by the Association of American 
Railroads (AAR), for use in the Revenue Shortfall Allocation Method 
(RSAM).

DATES: Comments are due by July 8, 2019. If any comment opposing AAR's 
calculation is filed, AAR's reply will be due by July 29, 2019. If no 
comments are filed by the due date, AAR's calculation of the 2018 
weighted average state tax rates will be automatically adopted by the 
Board, effective July 9, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted either via the Board's e-filing 
format or in traditional paper format. Any person using e-filing should 
attach a document and otherwise comply with the instructions at the E-
Filing link on the Board's website at https://www.stb.gov. Any person 
submitting a filing in paper format should send an original referring 
to Docket No. EP 682 (Sub-No. 10) to: Surface Transportation Board, 395 
E Street SW, Washington, DC 20423-0001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Ziehm, (202) 245-0391. Assistance 
for the hearing impaired is available through the Federal Relay Service 
at (800) 877-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The RSAM figure is one of three benchmarks 
that together are used to determine the reasonableness of a challenged 
rate under the Board's Simplified Standards for Rail Rate Cases, EP 646 
(Sub-No. 1), slip op. at 10 (STB served Sept. 5, 2007),\1\ as further 
revised in Simplified Standards for Rail Rate Cases--Taxes in Revenue 
Shortfall Allocation Method, EP 646 (Sub-No. 2) (STB served Nov. 21, 
2008). RSAM is intended to measure the average markup that the railroad 
would need to collect from all of its ``potentially captive traffic'' 
(traffic with a revenue-to-variable-cost ratio above 180%) to earn 
adequate revenues as measured by the Board under 49 U.S.C. 10704(a)(2) 
(i.e., earn a return on investment equal to the railroad industry cost 
of capital). Simplified Standards--Taxes in RSAM, slip op. at 1. In 
Simplified Standards--Taxes in RSAM, slip op. at 3, 5, the Board 
modified its RSAM formula to account for taxes, as the prior formula 
mistakenly compared pre-tax and after-tax revenues. In that decision, 
the Board stated that it would institute a separate proceeding in which 
Class I railroads would be required to submit the annual tax 
information necessary for the Board's annual RSAM calculation. Id. at 
5-6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Aff'd sub nom. CSX Transp., Inc. v. STB, 568 F.3d 236 (D.C. 
Cir. 2009), vacated in part on reh'g, CSX Transp., Inc. v. STB, 584 
F.3d 1076 (D.C. Cir. 2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to 49 CFR 1135.2, AAR is required to annually calculate 
and submit to the Board the weighted average state tax rate for each 
Class I railroad for the previous year. On May 30, 2019, AAR filed its 
calculation of the weighted average state tax rates for 2018, listed 
below for each Class I railroad:

                                        Weighted Average State Tax Rates
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                            Railroad                                 2018 (%)      2017 \2\ (%)      % Change
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BNSF Railway Company............................................           5.312           5.289           0.023
CSX Transportation, Inc.........................................           5.238           5.628          -0.390
Grand Trunk Corporation.........................................           8.130           7.961           0.169
The Kansas City Southern Railway................................           5.422           5.409           0.013
Norfolk Southern Combined.......................................           5.753           6.194          -0.441
Soo Line Corporation............................................           8.193           8.134           0.059
Union Pacific Railroad Company..................................           5.726           5.666           0.060
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any party wishing to comment on AAR's calculation of the 2018 
weighted average state tax rates should file a comment by July 8, 2019. 
See 49 CFR 1135.2(c). If any comments opposing AAR's calculations are 
filed, AAR's reply will be due by July 29, 2019. Id. If any comments 
are filed, the Board will review AAR's submission, together with the 
comments, and serve a decision within 60 days of the close of the 
record that either accepts, rejects, or modifies AAR's railroad-
specific tax information. Id. If no comments are filed by July 8, 2019, 
AAR's submitted weighted average state tax rates will be automatically 
adopted by the Board, effective July 9, 2019. Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ As explained in Simplified Standards for Rail Rate Cases--
2017 RSAM and R/VC>180 Calculations, EP 689 (Sub-No. 10), slip op. 
at 1 n.1 (STB served Apr. 22, 2019), adjustments to R-1 reporting 
schedules were made to remove the accounting impacts of the Tax Cuts 
and Jobs Act, Public Law 115-97, 131 Stat. 2054 (2017), and that 
decision stated that the revised schedules impact the weighted 
average state tax rates for 2017. For RSAM and R/VC>180 
calculation purposes, the 2017 adjusted rates for BNSF Railway 
Company, CSX Transportation, Inc., Norfolk Southern Combined, and 
Union Pacific Railroad Company are 5.292%, 5.296%, 5.692%, and 
5.672%, respectively. The workpapers for that decision are available 
on the Board's website at: https://www.stb.gov/stb/industry/econ_reports.html, under the paragraph titled ``Revenue Shortfall 
Allocation Method (RSAM)'' and the ``2017 RSAM Computation'' 
hyperlink.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Decided: June 4, 2019.

    By the Board, Allison C. Davis, Acting Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2019-12058 Filed 6-6-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.