Certain Transfers of Property to Regulated Investment Companies [RICs] and Real Estate Investment Trusts [REITs], 26559-26565 [2019-11753]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 110 / Friday, June 7, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
History
The FAA published a notice of
proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register (84 FR 13575, April 5, 2019) for
Docket No. FAA–2019–0206 to amend
Class E airspace extending upward from
700 feet above the surface for MonroeWalton County Airport, Monroe, GA,
due to the decommissioning of the
Monroe NDB and cancellation of the
NDB approach.
Interested parties were invited to
participate in this rulemaking effort by
submitting written comments on the
proposal to the FAA. No comments
were received.
Class E airspace designations are
published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA
Order 7400.11C, dated August 13, 2018,
and effective September 15, 2018, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
part 71.1. The Class E airspace
designation listed in this document will
be published subsequently in the Order.
Availability and Summary of
Documents for Incorporation by
Reference
This document amends FAA Order
7400.11C, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 13,
2018, and effective September 15, 2018.
FAA Order 7400.11C is publicly
available as listed in the ADDRESSES
section of this document. FAA Order
7400.11C lists Class A, B, C, D, and E
airspace areas, air traffic service routes,
and reporting points.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
The Rule
This amendment to Title 14 Code of
Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71
amends Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface
at Monroe-Walton County Airport,
Monroe, GA, by increasing the airport
radius to 6.9 miles (from 6.3 miles), and
eliminating the southwest extension of
the airport to accommodate airspace
reconfiguration due to the
decommissioning of the Monroe NDB
and cancellation of the NDB approach.
Also, the geographic coordinates of the
airport are adjusted to coincide with the
FAA’s aeronautical database. These
changes are necessary for continued
safety and management of IFR
operations at this airport.
Regulatory Notices and Analyses
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current. It, therefore: (1) Is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:25 Jun 06, 2019
Jkt 247001
26559
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)
does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated
impact is so minimal. Since this is a
routine matter that only affects air traffic
procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when
promulgated, does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Issued in College Park, Georgia, on May 31,
2019.
Ryan Almasy,
Manager Operations Support Group, Eastern
Service Center, Air Traffic Organization.
Environmental Review
26 CFR Part 1
The FAA has determined that this
action qualifies for categorical exclusion
under the National Environmental
Policy Act in accordance with FAA
Order 1050.1F, ‘‘Environmental
Impacts: Policies and Procedures,’’
paragraph 5–6.5a. This airspace action
is not expected to cause any potentially
significant environmental impacts, and
no extraordinary circumstances exist
that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.
[TD 9862]
Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
SUMMARY:
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
Adoption of the Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
[FR Doc. 2019–11898 Filed 6–6–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
RIN 1545–BO01
Certain Transfers of Property to
Regulated Investment Companies
[RICs] and Real Estate Investment
Trusts [REITs]
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations and removal of
temporary regulations.
AGENCY:
This document contains final
regulations effecting the repeal of the
General Utilities doctrine by the Tax
Reform Act of 1986 and preventing
abuse of the Protecting Americans from
Tax Hikes Act of 2015 (PATH Act). The
final regulations impose corporate-level
tax on certain transactions in which
property of a C corporation becomes the
property of a REIT. The final regulations
affect RICs, REITs, C corporations the
property of which becomes the property
of a RIC or a REIT, and their
shareholders.
Effective Date: These regulations
are effective on June 7, 2019.
Applicability Dates: For dates of
applicability, see § 1.337(d)–7(g)(2)(ii).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Austin Diamond-Jones, (202) 317–5363
(not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
1. The authority citation for part 71
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103,
40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR,
1959–1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11C,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 13, 2018, effective
September 15, 2018, is amended as
follows:
■
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas
Extending Upward from 700 Feet or More
Above the Surface of the Earth.
*
*
*
ASO GA E5
*
*
Monroe, GA [Amended]
Monroe-Walton County Airport, GA
(Lat. 33°46′57″ N, long. 83°41′34″ W)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 6.9-mile
radius of the Monroe-County Airport.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Background
This document contains amendments
to 26 CFR part 1 under section 337(d)
of the Internal Revenue Code (Code).
In General Utilities & Operating Co. v.
Helvering, 296 U.S. 200 (1935), the
Supreme Court held that corporations
generally could distribute appreciated
property to their shareholders without
the recognition of any corporate-level
gain (General Utilities doctrine).
Beginning with legislation in 1969 and
culminating in the Tax Reform Act of
1986, Public Law 99–514 (100 Stat.
2085), Congress repealed the General
Utilities doctrine by enacting section
336(a) to apply gain and loss recognition
E:\FR\FM\07JNR1.SGM
07JNR1
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
26560
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 110 / Friday, June 7, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
to liquidating distributions. Section
337(d) directs the Secretary of the
Treasury (Secretary) to prescribe
regulations that are necessary or
appropriate to carry out the purposes of
General Utilities repeal, including
‘‘regulations to ensure that such
purposes may not be circumvented
through the use of any provision of law
or regulations (including . . . part III of
this subchapter) or through the use of a
regulated investment company, real
estate investment trust, or tax exempt
entity. . . .’’
On June 8, 2016, the Department of
the Treasury (Treasury Department) and
the IRS published temporary regulations
(TD 9770) under section 337(d)
(Temporary Regulations) in the Federal
Register (81 FR 36793) effecting the
repeal of the General Utilities doctrine
as applied to certain transfers of
property to RICs and REITs. A notice of
proposed rulemaking (REG–126452–15)
was published in the Federal Register
(81 FR 36816) on the same day (2016
Proposed Regulations). The text of the
Temporary Regulations served as the
text for part of the 2016 Proposed
Regulations, which also included an
amendment not included in the
Temporary Regulations. A correction to
the Temporary Regulations was
published in the Federal Register (81
FR 41800) on June 28, 2016.
In response to the 2016 Proposed
Regulations, the Treasury Department
and the IRS received one written
comment and a letter addressed to the
Secretary by the Chairmen and Ranking
Members of the Ways and Means
Committee of the U.S. House of
Representatives and the Finance
Committee of the U.S. Senate (Letter).
The comment requested a public
hearing, which was held on November
9, 2016.
After consideration of the written
comment, the Letter, and comments
made at the public hearing, the Treasury
Department and the IRS adopted the
2016 Proposed Regulations, in part, in
final regulations (TD 9810) published in
the Federal Register (82 FR 5387) on
January 18, 2017 (2017 Final
Regulations). The 2017 Final
Regulations adopted a definition of the
term ‘‘recognition period’’ consistent
with the definition used in section
1374(d), regarding S corporations, and
amended and removed corresponding
provisions in the Temporary
Regulations. The preamble to the 2017
Final Regulations indicated that the
Treasury Department and the IRS would
continue to study other issues addressed
in the Temporary Regulations and the
2016 Proposed Regulations.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:25 Jun 06, 2019
Jkt 247001
Executive Order 13789 (E.O. 13789),
issued on April 21, 2017, instructed the
Secretary to review all significant tax
regulations issued on or after January 1,
2016, and to take concrete action to
alleviate the burdens of regulations that
(i) impose an undue financial burden on
U.S. taxpayers; (ii) add undue
complexity to the Federal tax laws; or
(iii) exceed the statutory authority of the
IRS. E.O. 13789 further instructed the
Secretary to submit to the President
within 60 days an interim report
identifying regulations that meet these
criteria.
Notice 2017–38 (2017–30 I.R.B. 147
(July 24, 2017)) included the Temporary
Regulations in a list of eight regulations
identified by the Secretary in the
interim report as meeting at least one of
the first two criteria specified in E.O.
13789. In particular, Notice 2017–38
mentioned a concern raised by
commenters that the Temporary
Regulations ‘‘could result in overinclusion of gain in some cases,
particularly where a large corporation
acquires a small corporation that
engaged in a Section 355 spinoff and the
large corporation subsequently makes a
REIT election.’’ See also Executive
Order 13789—Second Report to the
President on Identifying and Reducing
Tax Regulatory Burdens (Second
Report), 82 FR 48013 (October 16, 2017)
(stating that the Treasury Department
and the IRS ‘‘agree that the temporary
regulations may produce inappropriate
results in some cases’’). In response to
comments received addressing the
Temporary Regulations and the 2016
Proposed Regulations, the Treasury
Department and the IRS published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (REG–
113943–17) addressing the potential
over-inclusion of gain in the Federal
Register (84 FR 11259) on March 26,
2019 (2019 Proposed Regulations). A
correction to the 2019 Proposed
Regulations was published in the
Federal Register (84 FR 18999) on May
3, 2019. One substantive comment was
received in response to the 2019
Proposed Regulations.
Summary of Comments and
Explanation of Revisions
This Summary of Comments and
Explanation of Revisions discusses the
comments received in response to the
2016 Proposed Regulations, Notice
2017–38, and the 2019 Proposed
Regulations. However, certain
comments received in response to the
2016 Proposed Regulations and Notice
2017–38 were addressed in the
Explanation of Provisions in the
preamble to the 2019 Proposed
Regulations and are not repeated in this
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Summary of Comments and Explanation
of Revisions.
I. Consideration of Limitation for
Planned Transactions
Under proposed § 1.337(d)–7(c)(6), a
C corporation described in paragraph
(f)(1) of that section would be treated as
having made an election under
§ 1.337(d)–7(c)(5) (deemed sale election)
with respect to a conversion transaction
if (i) the conversion transaction occurs
following a related section 355
distribution (as defined in paragraph
(f)(1)(i) of that section), and (ii) the C
corporation has not made such election
(automatic deemed sale rule). Proposed
§ 1.337(d)–7(f)(1) would provide that the
automatic deemed sale rule (or the
corresponding rule in paragraph (b)(4)
of that section) applies to a C
corporation if (i) the C corporation
engages in a conversion transaction
involving a REIT during the twenty-year
period beginning on the date that is ten
years before the date of a related section
355 distribution and (ii) the C
corporation engaging in the related
section 355 distribution is either the
distributing corporation or the
controlled corporation (as those terms
are defined in section 355(a)(1)), or a
member of the separate affiliated group
(as defined in section 355(b)(3)(B))
(SAG) of the distributing corporation or
the controlled corporation. A
conversion transaction occurs through
(i) the qualification of a C corporation as
a RIC or a REIT, or (ii) the transfer of
property owned by a C corporation to a
RIC or a REIT. Section 1.337(d)–
7(a)(2)(ii).
One commenter recommended that
the automatic deemed sale rule apply
only if the conversion transaction and
the related section 355 distribution are
carried out as part of the same plan. To
facilitate the identification of such a
plan, the commenter requested a twoyear presumption rule. Under that rule,
(i) a conversion transaction completed
within two years of a related section 355
distribution would be presumed to have
been carried out as part of a plan that
included the related section 355
distribution, and (ii) a conversion
transaction not completed within two
years of a related section 355
distribution would be presumed not to
have been carried out as part of such a
plan. The commenter also
recommended additional provisions
similar to the section 355(e) safe harbor
rules and the section 707(a)(2)(B)
disguised sale rules.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
agree that the automatic deemed sale
rule could apply to a conversion
transaction and related section 355
E:\FR\FM\07JNR1.SGM
07JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 110 / Friday, June 7, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
distribution carried out as part of the
same plan, but they have determined
that the text and purposes of sections
355(h) and 856(c)(8) do not require the
existence of a plan. Those provisions, as
added by section 311 of the PATH Act,
enacted as Division Q of the
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016,
Public Law 114–113 (129 Stat. 2422),
prevent the circumvention of General
Utilities repeal and apply without
regard to the existence of a plan that
includes both a related section 355
distribution and a conversion
transaction. Under section 355(h), a
distribution of the stock of a controlled
corporation does not qualify for tax-free
treatment under section 355(a) if either
the distributing corporation or the
controlled corporation (but not both) is
a REIT. The section 856(c)(8) limitation
on eligibility for REIT elections focuses
on the ten-year period (rather than a
two-year period) beginning on the date
of a distribution to which section 355
(or so much of section 356 as relates to
section 355) applies. In addition, the
Treasury Department and the IRS have
determined that the introduction of a
plan concept (as well as the
recommended safe harbor and antiabuse rules) into the automatic deemed
sale rule would substantially increase
the rule’s complexity, and thereby
reduce its effectiveness and
predictability.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
II. Time Period Between Conversion
Transaction and Related Section 355
Distribution
As described in part I of this
Summary of Comments and Explanation
of Revisions, application of the
automatic deemed sale rule depends in
part on whether a C corporation engages
in a conversion transaction involving a
REIT during the twenty-year period
beginning on the date that is ten years
before the date of a related section 355
distribution. See proposed § 1.337(d)–
7(c)(6). A commenter requested that
these final regulations reduce that
twenty-year period to a ten-year period.
The commenter relied upon § 1.337(d)–
7(b)(2)(iii), which incorporates the fiveyear recognition period described in
section 1374(d)(7)(A) specifically for
purposes of applying the rules of section
1374 and the regulations thereunder.
The commenter noted that the PATH
Act had reduced the ten-year period
historically required under section
1374(d)(7)(A) to the current five-year
period, and asserted that the automatic
deemed sale rule should employ a fiveyear recognition period, both before and
after a related section 355 distribution,
to maintain consistency with the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:25 Jun 06, 2019
Jkt 247001
recognition rules specific to section
1374.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
recognize the commenter’s preference
for consistency. However, they have
concluded that section 1374 treatment
does not adequately implement the
purposes of General Utilities repeal if a
taxpayer effects a tax-free separation of
REIT-qualifying assets from nonqualifying assets in a section 355
distribution and the REIT-qualifying
assets become the assets of a REIT. See
preamble to the Temporary Regulations
(81 FR at 36795). As an example, the
REIT and its shareholders may realize
the benefit of appreciation on converted
property without a transaction that is
taxable at the corporate level. See id. at
36795–6. Moreover, without a section
355 distribution, a taxpayer generally
could not separate REIT-qualifying
assets from non-qualifying assets and
cause one corporation to hold the REITqualifying assets and another
corporation to hold the non-qualifying
assets except by means of a taxable
transaction. See id. at 36796.
Consequently, the Treasury Department
and the IRS have concluded that a fiveyear recognition period provided
specifically for section 1374 and its
underlying regulations should not affect
the length of the recognition period for
the automatic deemed sale rule.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
have concluded that the ten-year
eligibility limitation regarding REIT
elections under section 856(c)(8)
provides a more appropriate safeguard
for General Utilities repeal, and
supports the twenty-year recognition
period in proposed § 1.337(d)–7(f)(1)(i).
In general, section 856(c)(8) provides
that a corporation may not elect REIT
status during the ten-year period
following a distribution qualifying
under section 355 if such corporation
was the distributing corporation or the
controlled corporation in that
distribution. When describing existing
law prior to the enactment of section
856(c)(8), the staff of the Joint
Committee on Taxation observed that,
following a section 355 distribution,
‘‘income from the assets held in the
REIT is no longer subject to corporate
level tax (unless there is a disposition of
such assets that incurs tax under the
built in gain rules).’’ See Staff, Joint
Committee on Taxation, Technical
Explanation of the Protecting Americans
from Tax Hikes Act of 2015, House
Amendment #2 to the Senate
Amendment to H.R. 2029, JCX–144–15,
at 170 (2015). Consequently, to ensure
the continuing integrity of General
Utilities repeal, the Treasury
Department and the IRS have concluded
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
26561
that the twenty-year period described in
proposed § 1.337(d)–7(f)(1)(i) would
provide a more appropriate recognition
period.
III. Application of Automatic Deemed
Sale Rule to Predecessors and
Successors
Proposed § 1.337(d)–7(f)(2) would
provide that, for purposes of identifying
C corporations to which the automatic
deemed sale rule could apply, ‘‘any
reference to a controlled corporation or
a distributing corporation includes a
reference to any predecessor or
successor of such corporation.’’ The
terms ‘‘predecessor’’ and ‘‘successor’’
would ‘‘include corporations which
succeed to and take into account items
described in section 381(c) of the
distributing corporation or the
controlled corporation, and corporations
having such items to which the
distributing corporation or the
controlled corporation succeeded and
took into account.’’ Proposed
§ 1.337(d)–7(f)(2). Commenters have
expressed concern that the word
‘‘include’’ will create uncertainty
regarding the scope of the terms
‘‘predecessor’’ and ‘‘successor’’ and
consequently would cause difficulties in
performing due diligence. As a result,
these commenters have requested that
the word ‘‘include’’ be clarified or
otherwise limited.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
acknowledge these concerns,
particularly those regarding due
diligence burdens, but have determined
that proposed § 1.337(d)–7(f)(2) strikes
an appropriate balance between
providing sufficiently predictable
application of the automatic deemed
sale rule and preventing avoidance of
that rule. The application of predecessor
and successor concepts to distributing
corporations and controlled
corporations in the 2016 Proposed
Regulations, extended to members of the
SAGs of those corporations in the 2019
Proposed Regulations, limits the
potential avoidance of the automatic
deemed sale rule. The Treasury
Department and the IRS have
determined that the language of
proposed § 1.337(d)–7(f)(2) will provide
sufficient certainty regarding the scope
of the terms ‘‘predecessor’’ and
‘‘successor,’’ particularly in light of the
2019 Proposed Regulations’ policy of
ensuring that gain will be recognized
‘‘only on property that is traceable to the
section 355 distribution.’’ Preamble to
2019 Proposed Regulations (84 FR
11261). Moreover, the distribution
property limitation will reduce
uncertainty as to the consequences of a
E:\FR\FM\07JNR1.SGM
07JNR1
26562
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 110 / Friday, June 7, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
determination that a corporation is a
predecessor or successor.
IV. Application to SAG Members of
Distributing and Controlled
Corporations
One commenter contended that the
2016 Proposed Regulations should not
apply to a member of the SAG of the
distributing corporation or the
controlled corporation because
corporate-level taxation would not be
avoided in such a situation unless the
stock of the SAG member itself were
distributed in a section 355 distribution.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
have determined that corporate-level
taxation could be avoided regardless of
whether the stock of the SAG member
were distributed.
As an example, a distributing
corporation owns all of the stock of a
controlled corporation, the sole assets of
which consist of all of the stock in a
subsidiary that owns only real estate
assets. The distributing corporation
distributes all of the controlled
corporation stock in a distribution
qualifying under section 355. Within ten
years thereafter, the subsidiary elects
REIT status. During the year following
the election, the controlled corporation
merges downstream into the subsidiary
in a reorganization described in section
368(a), with the subsidiary surviving.
Section 856(c)(8) would not apply to
that transaction because the subsidiary
was not a distributing corporation, a
controlled corporation, or a successor to
either corporation at the time of the
REIT election (although the subsidiary
subsequently becomes a successor to the
controlled corporation as a result of the
merger). Accordingly, the Treasury
Department and the IRS have
determined that the application of the
automatic deemed sale rule to SAG
members of the distributing corporation
or a controlled corporation would
further the intent of Congress to prevent
avoidance of General Utilities repeal.
V. Scope of, and Exclusions to, the
Automatic Deemed Sale Rule
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
A. Two-Year Requirement for PostDistribution Distributing and Controlled
REITs
Proposed § 1.337(d)–7(f)(3)(i) would
preclude application of the automatic
deemed sale rule if the distributing
corporation and the controlled
corporation are both REITs immediately
after the related section 355 distribution
and at all times during the two-year
period thereafter. Commenters have
requested the elimination of the twoyear requirement.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:25 Jun 06, 2019
Jkt 247001
The Treasury Department and the IRS
have concluded, however, that the twoyear requirement would appropriately
limit potential avoidance of proposed
§ 1.337(d)–7(f)(3)(i). The two-year
requirement is designed to protect the
purposes of the PATH Act, and
therefore General Utilities repeal, by
ensuring that distributing corporations
and controlled corporations that pursue
the exception provided by section
355(h)(2)(A) continue to operate for a
substantial duration as REITs. The
Treasury Department and the IRS
acknowledge concerns raised by
commenters regarding the risk of
inadvertent terminations of REIT status
during this initial two-year period.
However, section 856 provides
opportunities for a REIT to cure an
inadvertent technical failure to comply
with that section’s requirements without
loss of REIT status. See, for example,
sections 856(c)(6), (c)(7), and (g)(5)
(election of REIT status terminates for
failure to meet REIT requirements
unless failure is due to reasonable cause
and not due to willful neglect).
Consequently, the Treasury Department
and the IRS do not believe that the twoyear requirement would cause the
distributing corporation or the
controlled corporation to recognize gain
as a result of inadvertent
noncompliance.
B. Consideration of Exclusion Involving
REITs and Qualified REIT Subsidiaries
A commenter requested that the
automatic deemed sale rule not apply to
certain section 355 distributions within
corporate groups, after which the
corporate parent of the distributing
corporation and the controlled
corporation elects REIT status, and the
distributing corporation, the controlled
corporation, or both become qualified
REIT subsidiaries (QRS).
The Treasury Department and the IRS
decline to adopt this proposed
exception to the automatic deemed sale
rule based on the determination that
such exception would create
opportunities for circumventing General
Utilities repeal. For example, a section
355 distribution of a controlled
corporation that will be a QRS following
the parent’s election of REIT status
could be used to reduce the value of the
distributing corporation in order for
such corporation to be a taxable REIT
subsidiary following its parent’s
election of REIT status, even though,
without such a reduction, the value of
the distributing corporation would
cause the parent to fail the requirement
of section 856(c)(4)(B)(ii). In addition,
the Treasury Department and the IRS
note that, if the distributing corporation
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
or the controlled corporation had
liquidated (or had been deemed to
liquidate) prior to the parent’s REIT
election, the parent would be a
successor to the liquidated corporation
and therefore ineligible to elect REIT
status as a result of section 856(c)(8).
C. Consideration of Knowledge
Standard for Automatic Deemed Sale
Rule
A commenter requested the
incorporation of a knowledge standard
into the automatic deemed sale rule.
Specifically, the commenter
recommended that the automatic
deemed sale rule should not apply to a
REIT that receives property from a C
corporation if the REIT (i) receives a
representation that the C corporation
(including specified predecessors and
SAG members) has not engaged in a
related section 355 distribution, and (ii)
has no actual knowledge contrary to
such representation. The commenter
contended that, without a knowledge
component, the level of diligence
necessary to apply the automatic
deemed sale rule could prove
burdensome (for example, in situations
that involve predecessors of SAG
members or significant time lapses
between relevant transactions). For
similar reasons, the commenter asserted
that the absence of a knowledge
component could limit the practical
utility of the distribution property
limitation under proposed § 1.337(d)–
7(c)(6)(ii), which would require the
REIT to establish through such diligence
that a subject property is not
distribution property.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
acknowledge the concerns expressed by
the commenter, but have decided not to
adopt this recommendation. The
Treasury Department and the IRS have
concluded that adoption of a knowledge
component would reduce, rather than
increase, certainty regarding the
application of the automatic deemed
sale rule because a knowledge
component would inject subjectivity
into the rule. Moreover, as the
commenter noted, REITs ordinarily
undertake extensive due diligence in
connection with corporate transactions,
such as mergers with C corporations, to
ensure that the transaction will not
terminate REIT status. For example, a
REIT would routinely conduct an
earnings and profits study of the C
corporation. As a result, the Treasury
Department and the IRS believe that
REITs generally will possess adequate
data to determine the appropriate tax
consequences of a conversion
transaction and make use of the
distribution property limitation,
E:\FR\FM\07JNR1.SGM
07JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 110 / Friday, June 7, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
particularly because this limitation will
apply on a property-by-property basis
and thereby apply even if a REIT
possesses incomplete records. In
addition, a contemporaneous
documentation of property owned at the
time of a related section 355 distribution
generally will provide sufficient records
for establishing that any property not
listed in such documentation is not
distribution property.
VI. Definition of the Term ‘‘Converted
Property’’
The 2016 Proposed Regulations
would define the term ‘‘converted
property’’ as ‘‘property owned by a C
corporation that becomes the property
of a RIC or a REIT and any other
property the basis of which is
determined, directly or indirectly, in
whole or in part, by reference to the
basis of the property owned by a C
corporation that becomes the property
of a RIC or a REIT.’’ Proposed
§ 1.337(d)–7(a)(2)(vii). A commenter
requested that the definition be clarified
to confirm the commenter’s
interpretation that the phrase ‘‘any other
property’’ refers only to property of a
RIC or a REIT. The Treasury Department
and the IRS agree with the commenter’s
interpretation and have clarified the
definition accordingly.
VII. Interaction of 2016 Proposed
Regulations With Section 856(c)(8)
A commenter inquired whether the
Treasury Department or the IRS
intended the 2016 Proposed Regulations
to override section 856(c)(8) (described
in part I of this Summary of Comments
and Explanation of Revisions). The 2016
Proposed Regulations do not override
section 856(c)(8). Accordingly, if section
856(c)(8) would prevent a distributing
corporation or a controlled corporation
from electing REIT status, no gain
would be recognized, absent further
action (for example, a merger of the
distributing corporation or the
controlled corporation into a REIT).
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
VIII. Application of 2016 Proposed
Regulations to RICs
The Treasury Department and the IRS
requested comments on whether the
rules set forth in the 2016 Proposed
Regulations (other than the definition of
the term ‘‘converted property’’) should
apply to RICs. No recommendations
were received in response to this
request. The Treasury Department and
the IRS have not become aware of a
need to extend the rules to RICs and
therefore decline to extend such rules to
RICs at this time.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:25 Jun 06, 2019
Jkt 247001
Effective/Applicability Dates
The 2019 proposed regulations
included a proposal to issue the final
rule with a 30-day delayed effective
date. The Treasury Department and the
IRS have concluded, however, that a 30day delay in the effective date of these
final regulations would be unnecessary
and contrary to public interest.
Specifically, the Treasury Department
and the IRS have determined that any
duration between the expiration of the
Temporary Regulations and the effective
date of these final regulations could
cause significant confusion regarding
the current state of the law. In addition,
the Treasury Department and the IRS
have concluded that the benefit of
public notice ordinarily provided by
such 30-day delay is significantly
reduced in this particular instance
because these final regulations adopt the
proposed regulations without
substantive change. In addition, the
Treasury Department and the IRS note
that these final regulations adopt the
distribution property limitation under
proposed § 1.337(d)–7(c)(6)(ii), which
provides an exception to the general
automatic deemed sale rule.
Special Analyses
This regulation is not subject to
review under section 6(b) of Executive
Order 12866 pursuant to the
Memorandum of Agreement (April 11,
2018) between the Treasury Department
and the Office of Management and
Budget regarding review of tax
regulations. Pursuant to the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6), it is
hereby certified that these final
regulations will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. These final
regulations would affect transactions in
which property of a C corporation
becomes the property of a REIT
following a section 355 distribution of
controlled C corporation stock.
Generally, these section 355
distributions involve publicly traded C
corporations, which typically are not
small entities as defined by the
Regulatory Flexibility Act. Transactions
in which the property of such C
corporation becomes the property of a
REIT generally involve the transfer of all
of the assets of the C corporation.
Therefore, the transferee REIT likely
also would not be a small entity, as
defined by the Regulatory Flexibility
Act. As a result, this certification is
based on the conclusion that these final
regulations would primarily affect large
C corporations and REITs that have
substantial numbers of shareholders.
Therefore, a regulatory flexibility
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
26563
analysis is not required. Pursuant to
section 7805(f) of the Code, the
proposed rule preceding this final
regulation was submitted to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration for comment
on its impact on small business and no
comments were received.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these
regulations is Austin Diamond-Jones,
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Corporate). However, other personnel
from the Treasury Department and the
IRS participated in their development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Adoption of Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is
amended as follows:
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 1 continues to read in part as
follows:
■
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 2. Section 1.337(d)–7 is amended
by:
■ 1. Revising paragraphs (a)(1) and
(a)(2)(vi) through (vii).
■ 2. Adding paragraph (a)(2)(viii).
■ 3. Revising paragraphs (b)(4), (c)(1)
and (6), (f), and (g)(2)(ii).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
■
§ 1.337(d)–7 Tax on property owned by a C
corporation that becomes property of a RIC
or REIT.
(a) General rule—(1) Property owned
by a C corporation that becomes
property of a RIC or a REIT. If property
owned by a C corporation (as defined in
paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section)
becomes the property of a RIC or a REIT
in a conversion transaction (as defined
in paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this section),
then section 1374 treatment will apply
as described in paragraph (b) of this
section, unless the C corporation elects,
or is treated as electing, deemed sale
treatment with respect to the conversion
transaction as provided in paragraph (c)
of this section. See paragraph (d) of this
section for exceptions to this paragraph
(a).
(2) * * *
(vi) Section 355 distribution. The term
section 355 distribution means any
distribution to which section 355 (or so
much of section 356 as relates to section
355) applies, including a distribution on
which the distributing corporation
E:\FR\FM\07JNR1.SGM
07JNR1
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
26564
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 110 / Friday, June 7, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
recognizes gain pursuant to sections
355(d) or 355(e).
(vii) Converted property. The term
converted property means—
(A) Property owned by a C
corporation that becomes the property
of a RIC or a REIT; and
(B) Any other property of a RIC or a
REIT the basis of which is determined,
directly or indirectly, in whole or in
part, by reference to the basis of
property described in paragraph
(a)(2)(vii)(A) of this section.
(viii) Distribution property. The term
distribution property means—
(A) Property owned immediately after
a section 355 distribution by the
distributing corporation, a controlled
corporation (as those terms are defined
in section 355(a)(1)), or a member of a
separate affiliated group (as defined in
section 355(b)(3)(B)) of which the
distributing corporation or a controlled
corporation is the common parent (but
no formulation of the step transaction
doctrine will be used to determine
whether property acquired after the
distribution is distribution property
pursuant to this paragraph
(a)(2)(viii)(A)); and
(B) Property with a basis determined,
directly or indirectly, in whole or in
part, by reference to property described
in paragraph (a)(2)(viii)(A) of this
section.
(b) * * *
(4) Section 355 distribution following
a conversion transaction—(i) In general.
If a REIT is described in paragraph (f)(1)
of this section and the related section
355 distribution (as defined in
paragraph (f)(1)(i) of this section)
follows a conversion transaction, then
for the taxable year in which the related
section 355 distribution occurs,
§ 1.1374–2(a)(1) and (2) (as modified by
paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section) do not
apply, and the REIT’s net recognized
built-in gain for such taxable year is the
amount of its net unrealized built-in
gain limitation (as defined in § 1.1374–
2(a)(3)) for such taxable year.
(ii) Basis adjustment—(A) In general.
If a REIT recognizes gain under
paragraph (b)(4)(i) of this section, the
aggregate basis of the converted
property held by the REIT at the end of
the taxable year in which the related
section 355 distribution occurs shall be
increased by an amount equal to the
amount of gain so recognized, increased
by the amount of the REIT’s recognized
built-in loss for such taxable year, and
reduced by the amount of the REIT’s
recognized built-in gain and recognized
built-in gain carryover for such taxable
year.
(B) Allocation of basis increase. The
aggregate increase in basis by reason of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:25 Jun 06, 2019
Jkt 247001
paragraph (b)(4)(ii)(A) of this section
shall be allocated among the converted
property in proportion to their
respective built-in gains on the date of
the conversion transaction.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Election of deemed sale
treatment—(1) In general. Paragraph (b)
of this section does not apply if the C
corporation that qualifies as a RIC or a
REIT or transfers property to a RIC or a
REIT makes the election described in
paragraph (c)(5) of this section or is
treated as making such election under
paragraph (c)(6) of this section, except
to the extent permitted by paragraph
(c)(6)(ii) of this section. A C corporation
that makes, or that is treated as making,
such an election recognizes gain and
loss as if it sold the converted property
to an unrelated party at fair market
value on the deemed sale date (as
defined in paragraph (c)(3) of this
section). See paragraph (c)(4) of this
section concerning limitations on the
use of loss in computing gain. Paragraph
(c) of this section does not apply if its
application would result in the
recognition of a net loss. For this
purpose, net loss is the excess of
aggregate losses over aggregate gains
(including items of income), without
regard to character.
*
*
*
*
*
(6) Conversion transaction following a
section 355 distribution—(i) In general.
Except as provided in paragraph
(c)(6)(ii) of this section, a C corporation
described in paragraph (f)(1) of this
section is treated as having made the
election under paragraph (c)(5) of this
section with respect to a conversion
transaction if the conversion transaction
occurs following the related section 355
distribution (as defined in paragraph
(f)(1)(i) of this section) and the C
corporation has not made such an
election.
(ii) Limitation. A C corporation
treated as having made the election
under paragraph (c)(5) of this section as
a result of paragraph (c)(6)(i) of this
section is not treated as having made the
election with respect to property that
the taxpayer establishes is not
distribution property with respect to the
related section 355 distribution. For
purposes of this paragraph (c)(6)(ii), any
property with an adjusted basis in
excess of its fair market value as of the
date of the conversion transaction will
not be treated as distribution property
unless the taxpayer establishes that it
owned such asset immediately after the
related section 355 distribution.
Paragraph (b) of this section will apply
to property with respect to which the
taxpayer is not treated as having made
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the election under paragraph (c)(5) of
this section as a result of this paragraph
(c)(6)(ii).
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Conversion transaction preceding
or following a section 355 distribution—
(1) In general. A C corporation or a REIT
is described in this paragraph (f)(1) if—
(i) The C corporation or the REIT
engages in a conversion transaction
involving a REIT during the twenty-year
period beginning on the date that is ten
years before the date of a section 355
distribution (the related section 355
distribution); and
(ii) The C corporation or the REIT
engaging in the related section 355
distribution is either—
(A) The distributing corporation or
the controlled corporation, as those
terms are defined in section 355(a)(1); or
(B) A member of the separate
affiliated group (as defined in section
355(b)(3)(B)) of the distributing
corporation or the controlled
corporation.
(2) Predecessors and successors. For
purposes of this paragraph (f), any
reference to a controlled corporation, a
distributing corporation, or a member of
the separate affiliated group of a
distributing corporation or a controlled
corporation includes a reference to any
predecessor or successor of such
corporation. Successors include
corporations which succeed to and take
into account items described in section
381(c) of the distributing corporation or
the controlled corporation. Predecessors
include corporations having such items
to which the distributing corporation or
the controlled corporation succeeded
and took into account.
(3) Exclusion of certain conversion
transactions. A C corporation or a REIT
is not described in paragraph (f)(1) of
this section if—
(i) The distributing corporation and
the controlled corporation are both
REITs immediately after the related
section 355 distribution (including by
reason of elections under section
856(c)(1) made after the related section
355 distribution that are effective before
the related section 355 distribution) and
at all times during the two years
thereafter;
(ii) Section 355(h)(1) does not apply
to the related section 355 distribution by
reason of section 355(h)(2)(B); or
(iii) The related section 355
distribution occurred before December
7, 2015, or is described in a ruling
request referred to in section 311(c) of
Division Q of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2016, Public Law
114–113, 129 Stat. 2422.
(g) * * *
E:\FR\FM\07JNR1.SGM
07JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 110 / Friday, June 7, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
(2) * * *
(ii) Conversion transactions occurring
on or after June 7, 2019, and certain
prior conversion transactions.
Paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2)(vi), (vii), and
(viii), (b)(4), (c)(1) and (6), and (f) of this
section apply to conversion transactions
occurring on or after June 7, 2019, and
to conversion transactions and related
section 355 distributions for which the
conversion transaction occurs before,
and the related section 355 distribution
occurs on or after, June 7, 2019. For
conversion transactions that occurred
on or after June 7, 2016, and before June
7, 2019 (other than conversion
transactions and related section 355
distributions for which the conversion
transaction occurs before, and the
related section 355 distribution occurs
on or after, June 7, 2019), see
§§ 1.337(d)–7 and 1.337(d)–7T as
contained in 26 CFR part 1 in effect on
April 1, 2019.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 1.337(d)–7T
[Removed]
Par. 3. Section 1.337(d)–7T is
removed.
■
Kirsten Wielobob,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
Approved: May 29, 2019.
David J. Kautter,
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax
Policy).
[FR Doc. 2019–11753 Filed 6–3–19; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket Number USCG–2019–0443]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulation; Great
Western Tube Float; Colorado River,
Parker, AZ
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is issuing
this rulemaking to change the location
of the special local regulation for the
annual Great Western Tube Float, which
is held on the navigable waters of the
Colorado River in Parker, AZ. The
change of the location for the special
local regulation is necessary to provide
for the safety of life on the navigable
waters during the event.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Jun 06, 2019
Jkt 247001
This rule is effective from 7:00
a.m. through 6:00 p.m. on June 8, 2019.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2019–
0443 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Lieutenant Briana Biagas, Coast
Guard; telephone 619–278–7656, email
D11MarineEventsSD@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because doing
so would be impracticable. We were
notified that the event location would
be changed permanently on April 26,
2019. Due to the timing of the event we
are unable to issue a NPRM before the
event is scheduled.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable
because the immediate implementation
is necessary to ensure the safety of life
during the Great Western Tube Float
event.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Great Western Tube Float is an
annual recurring event listed in Table 1,
Item 9 of 33 CFR 100.1102, Annual
Marine Events on the Colorado River,
between Davis Dam (Bullhead City,
Arizona) and Headgate Dam (Parker,
Arizona). Special local regulations exist
for the marine event to allow for special
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
26565
use of the Colorado River, Parker, AZ for
this event.
Section 100.1102 of title 33 of the CFR
lists the annual marine events and
special local regulations on the
Colorado River, between Davis Dam
(Bullhead City, Arizona) and Headgate
Dam (Parker, Arizona). The enforcement
date and regulated location for this
marine event are listed in Table 1, Item
9 of § 100.1102. The location listed in
the Table indicates that the marine
event will occur on the navigable waters
of the Colorado River from La Paz
County Park to the BlueWater Resort
and Casino, immediately before the
Headgate Dam. However, due to a
change of the location of this year’s
event from Buckskin Mountain State
Park to La Paz County Park, a temporary
rule is needed to reflect the actual
location of this year’s event.
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70041,
which authorizes the Coast Guard to
establish and define special local
regulations. The COTP San Diego is
establishing a special local regulation
for the waters of the Colorado River,
Parker, AZ. The purpose of this rule is
to ensure safety of participants, vessels
and the navigable waters in the
regulated area before, during, and after
the scheduled event.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
The Coast Guard is temporarily
suspending the regulations in 33 CFR
100.1102 for Table 1, Item 9 of that
Section and is inserting a temporary
regulation as Item 100.1102T11–0443 of
that Section in order to reflect that the
special local regulation will be effective
and enforced from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
on June 8, 2019. This change is needed
to accommodate the sponsor’s event
plan and ensure that adequate
regulations are in place to protect the
safety of vessels and individuals that
may be present in the regulated area. No
other portion of Table 1 of § 100.1102 or
other provisions in § 100.1102 shall be
affected by this regulation.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
E:\FR\FM\07JNR1.SGM
07JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 110 (Friday, June 7, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 26559-26565]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-11753]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 9862]
RIN 1545-BO01
Certain Transfers of Property to Regulated Investment Companies
[RICs] and Real Estate Investment Trusts [REITs]
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations and removal of temporary regulations.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains final regulations effecting the repeal
of the General Utilities doctrine by the Tax Reform Act of 1986 and
preventing abuse of the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act of 2015
(PATH Act). The final regulations impose corporate-level tax on certain
transactions in which property of a C corporation becomes the property
of a REIT. The final regulations affect RICs, REITs, C corporations the
property of which becomes the property of a RIC or a REIT, and their
shareholders.
DATES: Effective Date: These regulations are effective on June 7, 2019.
Applicability Dates: For dates of applicability, see Sec.
1.337(d)-7(g)(2)(ii).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Austin Diamond-Jones, (202) 317-5363
(not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document contains amendments to 26 CFR part 1 under section
337(d) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code).
In General Utilities & Operating Co. v. Helvering, 296 U.S. 200
(1935), the Supreme Court held that corporations generally could
distribute appreciated property to their shareholders without the
recognition of any corporate-level gain (General Utilities doctrine).
Beginning with legislation in 1969 and culminating in the Tax Reform
Act of 1986, Public Law 99-514 (100 Stat. 2085), Congress repealed the
General Utilities doctrine by enacting section 336(a) to apply gain and
loss recognition
[[Page 26560]]
to liquidating distributions. Section 337(d) directs the Secretary of
the Treasury (Secretary) to prescribe regulations that are necessary or
appropriate to carry out the purposes of General Utilities repeal,
including ``regulations to ensure that such purposes may not be
circumvented through the use of any provision of law or regulations
(including . . . part III of this subchapter) or through the use of a
regulated investment company, real estate investment trust, or tax
exempt entity. . . .''
On June 8, 2016, the Department of the Treasury (Treasury
Department) and the IRS published temporary regulations (TD 9770) under
section 337(d) (Temporary Regulations) in the Federal Register (81 FR
36793) effecting the repeal of the General Utilities doctrine as
applied to certain transfers of property to RICs and REITs. A notice of
proposed rulemaking (REG-126452-15) was published in the Federal
Register (81 FR 36816) on the same day (2016 Proposed Regulations). The
text of the Temporary Regulations served as the text for part of the
2016 Proposed Regulations, which also included an amendment not
included in the Temporary Regulations. A correction to the Temporary
Regulations was published in the Federal Register (81 FR 41800) on June
28, 2016.
In response to the 2016 Proposed Regulations, the Treasury
Department and the IRS received one written comment and a letter
addressed to the Secretary by the Chairmen and Ranking Members of the
Ways and Means Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives and the
Finance Committee of the U.S. Senate (Letter). The comment requested a
public hearing, which was held on November 9, 2016.
After consideration of the written comment, the Letter, and
comments made at the public hearing, the Treasury Department and the
IRS adopted the 2016 Proposed Regulations, in part, in final
regulations (TD 9810) published in the Federal Register (82 FR 5387) on
January 18, 2017 (2017 Final Regulations). The 2017 Final Regulations
adopted a definition of the term ``recognition period'' consistent with
the definition used in section 1374(d), regarding S corporations, and
amended and removed corresponding provisions in the Temporary
Regulations. The preamble to the 2017 Final Regulations indicated that
the Treasury Department and the IRS would continue to study other
issues addressed in the Temporary Regulations and the 2016 Proposed
Regulations.
Executive Order 13789 (E.O. 13789), issued on April 21, 2017,
instructed the Secretary to review all significant tax regulations
issued on or after January 1, 2016, and to take concrete action to
alleviate the burdens of regulations that (i) impose an undue financial
burden on U.S. taxpayers; (ii) add undue complexity to the Federal tax
laws; or (iii) exceed the statutory authority of the IRS. E.O. 13789
further instructed the Secretary to submit to the President within 60
days an interim report identifying regulations that meet these
criteria.
Notice 2017-38 (2017-30 I.R.B. 147 (July 24, 2017)) included the
Temporary Regulations in a list of eight regulations identified by the
Secretary in the interim report as meeting at least one of the first
two criteria specified in E.O. 13789. In particular, Notice 2017-38
mentioned a concern raised by commenters that the Temporary Regulations
``could result in over-inclusion of gain in some cases, particularly
where a large corporation acquires a small corporation that engaged in
a Section 355 spinoff and the large corporation subsequently makes a
REIT election.'' See also Executive Order 13789--Second Report to the
President on Identifying and Reducing Tax Regulatory Burdens (Second
Report), 82 FR 48013 (October 16, 2017) (stating that the Treasury
Department and the IRS ``agree that the temporary regulations may
produce inappropriate results in some cases''). In response to comments
received addressing the Temporary Regulations and the 2016 Proposed
Regulations, the Treasury Department and the IRS published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (REG-113943-17) addressing the potential over-
inclusion of gain in the Federal Register (84 FR 11259) on March 26,
2019 (2019 Proposed Regulations). A correction to the 2019 Proposed
Regulations was published in the Federal Register (84 FR 18999) on May
3, 2019. One substantive comment was received in response to the 2019
Proposed Regulations.
Summary of Comments and Explanation of Revisions
This Summary of Comments and Explanation of Revisions discusses the
comments received in response to the 2016 Proposed Regulations, Notice
2017-38, and the 2019 Proposed Regulations. However, certain comments
received in response to the 2016 Proposed Regulations and Notice 2017-
38 were addressed in the Explanation of Provisions in the preamble to
the 2019 Proposed Regulations and are not repeated in this Summary of
Comments and Explanation of Revisions.
I. Consideration of Limitation for Planned Transactions
Under proposed Sec. 1.337(d)-7(c)(6), a C corporation described in
paragraph (f)(1) of that section would be treated as having made an
election under Sec. 1.337(d)-7(c)(5) (deemed sale election) with
respect to a conversion transaction if (i) the conversion transaction
occurs following a related section 355 distribution (as defined in
paragraph (f)(1)(i) of that section), and (ii) the C corporation has
not made such election (automatic deemed sale rule). Proposed Sec.
1.337(d)-7(f)(1) would provide that the automatic deemed sale rule (or
the corresponding rule in paragraph (b)(4) of that section) applies to
a C corporation if (i) the C corporation engages in a conversion
transaction involving a REIT during the twenty-year period beginning on
the date that is ten years before the date of a related section 355
distribution and (ii) the C corporation engaging in the related section
355 distribution is either the distributing corporation or the
controlled corporation (as those terms are defined in section
355(a)(1)), or a member of the separate affiliated group (as defined in
section 355(b)(3)(B)) (SAG) of the distributing corporation or the
controlled corporation. A conversion transaction occurs through (i) the
qualification of a C corporation as a RIC or a REIT, or (ii) the
transfer of property owned by a C corporation to a RIC or a REIT.
Section 1.337(d)-7(a)(2)(ii).
One commenter recommended that the automatic deemed sale rule apply
only if the conversion transaction and the related section 355
distribution are carried out as part of the same plan. To facilitate
the identification of such a plan, the commenter requested a two-year
presumption rule. Under that rule, (i) a conversion transaction
completed within two years of a related section 355 distribution would
be presumed to have been carried out as part of a plan that included
the related section 355 distribution, and (ii) a conversion transaction
not completed within two years of a related section 355 distribution
would be presumed not to have been carried out as part of such a plan.
The commenter also recommended additional provisions similar to the
section 355(e) safe harbor rules and the section 707(a)(2)(B) disguised
sale rules.
The Treasury Department and the IRS agree that the automatic deemed
sale rule could apply to a conversion transaction and related section
355
[[Page 26561]]
distribution carried out as part of the same plan, but they have
determined that the text and purposes of sections 355(h) and 856(c)(8)
do not require the existence of a plan. Those provisions, as added by
section 311 of the PATH Act, enacted as Division Q of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2016, Public Law 114-113 (129 Stat. 2422), prevent
the circumvention of General Utilities repeal and apply without regard
to the existence of a plan that includes both a related section 355
distribution and a conversion transaction. Under section 355(h), a
distribution of the stock of a controlled corporation does not qualify
for tax-free treatment under section 355(a) if either the distributing
corporation or the controlled corporation (but not both) is a REIT. The
section 856(c)(8) limitation on eligibility for REIT elections focuses
on the ten-year period (rather than a two-year period) beginning on the
date of a distribution to which section 355 (or so much of section 356
as relates to section 355) applies. In addition, the Treasury
Department and the IRS have determined that the introduction of a plan
concept (as well as the recommended safe harbor and anti-abuse rules)
into the automatic deemed sale rule would substantially increase the
rule's complexity, and thereby reduce its effectiveness and
predictability.
II. Time Period Between Conversion Transaction and Related Section 355
Distribution
As described in part I of this Summary of Comments and Explanation
of Revisions, application of the automatic deemed sale rule depends in
part on whether a C corporation engages in a conversion transaction
involving a REIT during the twenty-year period beginning on the date
that is ten years before the date of a related section 355
distribution. See proposed Sec. 1.337(d)-7(c)(6). A commenter
requested that these final regulations reduce that twenty-year period
to a ten-year period. The commenter relied upon Sec. 1.337(d)-
7(b)(2)(iii), which incorporates the five-year recognition period
described in section 1374(d)(7)(A) specifically for purposes of
applying the rules of section 1374 and the regulations thereunder. The
commenter noted that the PATH Act had reduced the ten-year period
historically required under section 1374(d)(7)(A) to the current five-
year period, and asserted that the automatic deemed sale rule should
employ a five-year recognition period, both before and after a related
section 355 distribution, to maintain consistency with the recognition
rules specific to section 1374.
The Treasury Department and the IRS recognize the commenter's
preference for consistency. However, they have concluded that section
1374 treatment does not adequately implement the purposes of General
Utilities repeal if a taxpayer effects a tax-free separation of REIT-
qualifying assets from non-qualifying assets in a section 355
distribution and the REIT-qualifying assets become the assets of a
REIT. See preamble to the Temporary Regulations (81 FR at 36795). As an
example, the REIT and its shareholders may realize the benefit of
appreciation on converted property without a transaction that is
taxable at the corporate level. See id. at 36795-6. Moreover, without a
section 355 distribution, a taxpayer generally could not separate REIT-
qualifying assets from non-qualifying assets and cause one corporation
to hold the REIT-qualifying assets and another corporation to hold the
non-qualifying assets except by means of a taxable transaction. See id.
at 36796. Consequently, the Treasury Department and the IRS have
concluded that a five-year recognition period provided specifically for
section 1374 and its underlying regulations should not affect the
length of the recognition period for the automatic deemed sale rule.
The Treasury Department and the IRS have concluded that the ten-
year eligibility limitation regarding REIT elections under section
856(c)(8) provides a more appropriate safeguard for General Utilities
repeal, and supports the twenty-year recognition period in proposed
Sec. 1.337(d)-7(f)(1)(i). In general, section 856(c)(8) provides that
a corporation may not elect REIT status during the ten-year period
following a distribution qualifying under section 355 if such
corporation was the distributing corporation or the controlled
corporation in that distribution. When describing existing law prior to
the enactment of section 856(c)(8), the staff of the Joint Committee on
Taxation observed that, following a section 355 distribution, ``income
from the assets held in the REIT is no longer subject to corporate
level tax (unless there is a disposition of such assets that incurs tax
under the built in gain rules).'' See Staff, Joint Committee on
Taxation, Technical Explanation of the Protecting Americans from Tax
Hikes Act of 2015, House Amendment #2 to the Senate Amendment to H.R.
2029, JCX-144-15, at 170 (2015). Consequently, to ensure the continuing
integrity of General Utilities repeal, the Treasury Department and the
IRS have concluded that the twenty-year period described in proposed
Sec. 1.337(d)-7(f)(1)(i) would provide a more appropriate recognition
period.
III. Application of Automatic Deemed Sale Rule to Predecessors and
Successors
Proposed Sec. 1.337(d)-7(f)(2) would provide that, for purposes of
identifying C corporations to which the automatic deemed sale rule
could apply, ``any reference to a controlled corporation or a
distributing corporation includes a reference to any predecessor or
successor of such corporation.'' The terms ``predecessor'' and
``successor'' would ``include corporations which succeed to and take
into account items described in section 381(c) of the distributing
corporation or the controlled corporation, and corporations having such
items to which the distributing corporation or the controlled
corporation succeeded and took into account.'' Proposed Sec. 1.337(d)-
7(f)(2). Commenters have expressed concern that the word ``include''
will create uncertainty regarding the scope of the terms
``predecessor'' and ``successor'' and consequently would cause
difficulties in performing due diligence. As a result, these commenters
have requested that the word ``include'' be clarified or otherwise
limited.
The Treasury Department and the IRS acknowledge these concerns,
particularly those regarding due diligence burdens, but have determined
that proposed Sec. 1.337(d)-7(f)(2) strikes an appropriate balance
between providing sufficiently predictable application of the automatic
deemed sale rule and preventing avoidance of that rule. The application
of predecessor and successor concepts to distributing corporations and
controlled corporations in the 2016 Proposed Regulations, extended to
members of the SAGs of those corporations in the 2019 Proposed
Regulations, limits the potential avoidance of the automatic deemed
sale rule. The Treasury Department and the IRS have determined that the
language of proposed Sec. 1.337(d)-7(f)(2) will provide sufficient
certainty regarding the scope of the terms ``predecessor'' and
``successor,'' particularly in light of the 2019 Proposed Regulations'
policy of ensuring that gain will be recognized ``only on property that
is traceable to the section 355 distribution.'' Preamble to 2019
Proposed Regulations (84 FR 11261). Moreover, the distribution property
limitation will reduce uncertainty as to the consequences of a
[[Page 26562]]
determination that a corporation is a predecessor or successor.
IV. Application to SAG Members of Distributing and Controlled
Corporations
One commenter contended that the 2016 Proposed Regulations should
not apply to a member of the SAG of the distributing corporation or the
controlled corporation because corporate-level taxation would not be
avoided in such a situation unless the stock of the SAG member itself
were distributed in a section 355 distribution. The Treasury Department
and the IRS have determined that corporate-level taxation could be
avoided regardless of whether the stock of the SAG member were
distributed.
As an example, a distributing corporation owns all of the stock of
a controlled corporation, the sole assets of which consist of all of
the stock in a subsidiary that owns only real estate assets. The
distributing corporation distributes all of the controlled corporation
stock in a distribution qualifying under section 355. Within ten years
thereafter, the subsidiary elects REIT status. During the year
following the election, the controlled corporation merges downstream
into the subsidiary in a reorganization described in section 368(a),
with the subsidiary surviving. Section 856(c)(8) would not apply to
that transaction because the subsidiary was not a distributing
corporation, a controlled corporation, or a successor to either
corporation at the time of the REIT election (although the subsidiary
subsequently becomes a successor to the controlled corporation as a
result of the merger). Accordingly, the Treasury Department and the IRS
have determined that the application of the automatic deemed sale rule
to SAG members of the distributing corporation or a controlled
corporation would further the intent of Congress to prevent avoidance
of General Utilities repeal.
V. Scope of, and Exclusions to, the Automatic Deemed Sale Rule
A. Two-Year Requirement for Post-Distribution Distributing and
Controlled REITs
Proposed Sec. 1.337(d)-7(f)(3)(i) would preclude application of
the automatic deemed sale rule if the distributing corporation and the
controlled corporation are both REITs immediately after the related
section 355 distribution and at all times during the two-year period
thereafter. Commenters have requested the elimination of the two-year
requirement.
The Treasury Department and the IRS have concluded, however, that
the two-year requirement would appropriately limit potential avoidance
of proposed Sec. 1.337(d)-7(f)(3)(i). The two-year requirement is
designed to protect the purposes of the PATH Act, and therefore General
Utilities repeal, by ensuring that distributing corporations and
controlled corporations that pursue the exception provided by section
355(h)(2)(A) continue to operate for a substantial duration as REITs.
The Treasury Department and the IRS acknowledge concerns raised by
commenters regarding the risk of inadvertent terminations of REIT
status during this initial two-year period. However, section 856
provides opportunities for a REIT to cure an inadvertent technical
failure to comply with that section's requirements without loss of REIT
status. See, for example, sections 856(c)(6), (c)(7), and (g)(5)
(election of REIT status terminates for failure to meet REIT
requirements unless failure is due to reasonable cause and not due to
willful neglect). Consequently, the Treasury Department and the IRS do
not believe that the two-year requirement would cause the distributing
corporation or the controlled corporation to recognize gain as a result
of inadvertent noncompliance.
B. Consideration of Exclusion Involving REITs and Qualified REIT
Subsidiaries
A commenter requested that the automatic deemed sale rule not apply
to certain section 355 distributions within corporate groups, after
which the corporate parent of the distributing corporation and the
controlled corporation elects REIT status, and the distributing
corporation, the controlled corporation, or both become qualified REIT
subsidiaries (QRS).
The Treasury Department and the IRS decline to adopt this proposed
exception to the automatic deemed sale rule based on the determination
that such exception would create opportunities for circumventing
General Utilities repeal. For example, a section 355 distribution of a
controlled corporation that will be a QRS following the parent's
election of REIT status could be used to reduce the value of the
distributing corporation in order for such corporation to be a taxable
REIT subsidiary following its parent's election of REIT status, even
though, without such a reduction, the value of the distributing
corporation would cause the parent to fail the requirement of section
856(c)(4)(B)(ii). In addition, the Treasury Department and the IRS note
that, if the distributing corporation or the controlled corporation had
liquidated (or had been deemed to liquidate) prior to the parent's REIT
election, the parent would be a successor to the liquidated corporation
and therefore ineligible to elect REIT status as a result of section
856(c)(8).
C. Consideration of Knowledge Standard for Automatic Deemed Sale Rule
A commenter requested the incorporation of a knowledge standard
into the automatic deemed sale rule. Specifically, the commenter
recommended that the automatic deemed sale rule should not apply to a
REIT that receives property from a C corporation if the REIT (i)
receives a representation that the C corporation (including specified
predecessors and SAG members) has not engaged in a related section 355
distribution, and (ii) has no actual knowledge contrary to such
representation. The commenter contended that, without a knowledge
component, the level of diligence necessary to apply the automatic
deemed sale rule could prove burdensome (for example, in situations
that involve predecessors of SAG members or significant time lapses
between relevant transactions). For similar reasons, the commenter
asserted that the absence of a knowledge component could limit the
practical utility of the distribution property limitation under
proposed Sec. 1.337(d)-7(c)(6)(ii), which would require the REIT to
establish through such diligence that a subject property is not
distribution property.
The Treasury Department and the IRS acknowledge the concerns
expressed by the commenter, but have decided not to adopt this
recommendation. The Treasury Department and the IRS have concluded that
adoption of a knowledge component would reduce, rather than increase,
certainty regarding the application of the automatic deemed sale rule
because a knowledge component would inject subjectivity into the rule.
Moreover, as the commenter noted, REITs ordinarily undertake extensive
due diligence in connection with corporate transactions, such as
mergers with C corporations, to ensure that the transaction will not
terminate REIT status. For example, a REIT would routinely conduct an
earnings and profits study of the C corporation. As a result, the
Treasury Department and the IRS believe that REITs generally will
possess adequate data to determine the appropriate tax consequences of
a conversion transaction and make use of the distribution property
limitation,
[[Page 26563]]
particularly because this limitation will apply on a property-by-
property basis and thereby apply even if a REIT possesses incomplete
records. In addition, a contemporaneous documentation of property owned
at the time of a related section 355 distribution generally will
provide sufficient records for establishing that any property not
listed in such documentation is not distribution property.
VI. Definition of the Term ``Converted Property''
The 2016 Proposed Regulations would define the term ``converted
property'' as ``property owned by a C corporation that becomes the
property of a RIC or a REIT and any other property the basis of which
is determined, directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, by
reference to the basis of the property owned by a C corporation that
becomes the property of a RIC or a REIT.'' Proposed Sec. 1.337(d)-
7(a)(2)(vii). A commenter requested that the definition be clarified to
confirm the commenter's interpretation that the phrase ``any other
property'' refers only to property of a RIC or a REIT. The Treasury
Department and the IRS agree with the commenter's interpretation and
have clarified the definition accordingly.
VII. Interaction of 2016 Proposed Regulations With Section 856(c)(8)
A commenter inquired whether the Treasury Department or the IRS
intended the 2016 Proposed Regulations to override section 856(c)(8)
(described in part I of this Summary of Comments and Explanation of
Revisions). The 2016 Proposed Regulations do not override section
856(c)(8). Accordingly, if section 856(c)(8) would prevent a
distributing corporation or a controlled corporation from electing REIT
status, no gain would be recognized, absent further action (for
example, a merger of the distributing corporation or the controlled
corporation into a REIT).
VIII. Application of 2016 Proposed Regulations to RICs
The Treasury Department and the IRS requested comments on whether
the rules set forth in the 2016 Proposed Regulations (other than the
definition of the term ``converted property'') should apply to RICs. No
recommendations were received in response to this request. The Treasury
Department and the IRS have not become aware of a need to extend the
rules to RICs and therefore decline to extend such rules to RICs at
this time.
Effective/Applicability Dates
The 2019 proposed regulations included a proposal to issue the
final rule with a 30-day delayed effective date. The Treasury
Department and the IRS have concluded, however, that a 30-day delay in
the effective date of these final regulations would be unnecessary and
contrary to public interest. Specifically, the Treasury Department and
the IRS have determined that any duration between the expiration of the
Temporary Regulations and the effective date of these final regulations
could cause significant confusion regarding the current state of the
law. In addition, the Treasury Department and the IRS have concluded
that the benefit of public notice ordinarily provided by such 30-day
delay is significantly reduced in this particular instance because
these final regulations adopt the proposed regulations without
substantive change. In addition, the Treasury Department and the IRS
note that these final regulations adopt the distribution property
limitation under proposed Sec. 1.337(d)-7(c)(6)(ii), which provides an
exception to the general automatic deemed sale rule.
Special Analyses
This regulation is not subject to review under section 6(b) of
Executive Order 12866 pursuant to the Memorandum of Agreement (April
11, 2018) between the Treasury Department and the Office of Management
and Budget regarding review of tax regulations. Pursuant to the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6), it is hereby certified
that these final regulations will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. These final
regulations would affect transactions in which property of a C
corporation becomes the property of a REIT following a section 355
distribution of controlled C corporation stock. Generally, these
section 355 distributions involve publicly traded C corporations, which
typically are not small entities as defined by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. Transactions in which the property of such C
corporation becomes the property of a REIT generally involve the
transfer of all of the assets of the C corporation. Therefore, the
transferee REIT likely also would not be a small entity, as defined by
the Regulatory Flexibility Act. As a result, this certification is
based on the conclusion that these final regulations would primarily
affect large C corporations and REITs that have substantial numbers of
shareholders. Therefore, a regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code, the proposed rule
preceding this final regulation was submitted to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment on its impact
on small business and no comments were received.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these regulations is Austin Diamond-Jones,
Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate). However, other personnel
from the Treasury Department and the IRS participated in their
development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Adoption of Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is amended as follows:
PART 1--INCOME TAXES
0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read in
part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
0
Par. 2. Section 1.337(d)-7 is amended by:
0
1. Revising paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2)(vi) through (vii).
0
2. Adding paragraph (a)(2)(viii).
0
3. Revising paragraphs (b)(4), (c)(1) and (6), (f), and (g)(2)(ii).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 1.337(d)-7 Tax on property owned by a C corporation that
becomes property of a RIC or REIT.
(a) General rule--(1) Property owned by a C corporation that
becomes property of a RIC or a REIT. If property owned by a C
corporation (as defined in paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section) becomes
the property of a RIC or a REIT in a conversion transaction (as defined
in paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this section), then section 1374 treatment
will apply as described in paragraph (b) of this section, unless the C
corporation elects, or is treated as electing, deemed sale treatment
with respect to the conversion transaction as provided in paragraph (c)
of this section. See paragraph (d) of this section for exceptions to
this paragraph (a).
(2) * * *
(vi) Section 355 distribution. The term section 355 distribution
means any distribution to which section 355 (or so much of section 356
as relates to section 355) applies, including a distribution on which
the distributing corporation
[[Page 26564]]
recognizes gain pursuant to sections 355(d) or 355(e).
(vii) Converted property. The term converted property means--
(A) Property owned by a C corporation that becomes the property of
a RIC or a REIT; and
(B) Any other property of a RIC or a REIT the basis of which is
determined, directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, by reference
to the basis of property described in paragraph (a)(2)(vii)(A) of this
section.
(viii) Distribution property. The term distribution property
means--
(A) Property owned immediately after a section 355 distribution by
the distributing corporation, a controlled corporation (as those terms
are defined in section 355(a)(1)), or a member of a separate affiliated
group (as defined in section 355(b)(3)(B)) of which the distributing
corporation or a controlled corporation is the common parent (but no
formulation of the step transaction doctrine will be used to determine
whether property acquired after the distribution is distribution
property pursuant to this paragraph (a)(2)(viii)(A)); and
(B) Property with a basis determined, directly or indirectly, in
whole or in part, by reference to property described in paragraph
(a)(2)(viii)(A) of this section.
(b) * * *
(4) Section 355 distribution following a conversion transaction--
(i) In general. If a REIT is described in paragraph (f)(1) of this
section and the related section 355 distribution (as defined in
paragraph (f)(1)(i) of this section) follows a conversion transaction,
then for the taxable year in which the related section 355 distribution
occurs, Sec. 1.1374-2(a)(1) and (2) (as modified by paragraph
(b)(2)(i) of this section) do not apply, and the REIT's net recognized
built-in gain for such taxable year is the amount of its net unrealized
built-in gain limitation (as defined in Sec. 1.1374-2(a)(3)) for such
taxable year.
(ii) Basis adjustment--(A) In general. If a REIT recognizes gain
under paragraph (b)(4)(i) of this section, the aggregate basis of the
converted property held by the REIT at the end of the taxable year in
which the related section 355 distribution occurs shall be increased by
an amount equal to the amount of gain so recognized, increased by the
amount of the REIT's recognized built-in loss for such taxable year,
and reduced by the amount of the REIT's recognized built-in gain and
recognized built-in gain carryover for such taxable year.
(B) Allocation of basis increase. The aggregate increase in basis
by reason of paragraph (b)(4)(ii)(A) of this section shall be allocated
among the converted property in proportion to their respective built-in
gains on the date of the conversion transaction.
* * * * *
(c) Election of deemed sale treatment--(1) In general. Paragraph
(b) of this section does not apply if the C corporation that qualifies
as a RIC or a REIT or transfers property to a RIC or a REIT makes the
election described in paragraph (c)(5) of this section or is treated as
making such election under paragraph (c)(6) of this section, except to
the extent permitted by paragraph (c)(6)(ii) of this section. A C
corporation that makes, or that is treated as making, such an election
recognizes gain and loss as if it sold the converted property to an
unrelated party at fair market value on the deemed sale date (as
defined in paragraph (c)(3) of this section). See paragraph (c)(4) of
this section concerning limitations on the use of loss in computing
gain. Paragraph (c) of this section does not apply if its application
would result in the recognition of a net loss. For this purpose, net
loss is the excess of aggregate losses over aggregate gains (including
items of income), without regard to character.
* * * * *
(6) Conversion transaction following a section 355 distribution--
(i) In general. Except as provided in paragraph (c)(6)(ii) of this
section, a C corporation described in paragraph (f)(1) of this section
is treated as having made the election under paragraph (c)(5) of this
section with respect to a conversion transaction if the conversion
transaction occurs following the related section 355 distribution (as
defined in paragraph (f)(1)(i) of this section) and the C corporation
has not made such an election.
(ii) Limitation. A C corporation treated as having made the
election under paragraph (c)(5) of this section as a result of
paragraph (c)(6)(i) of this section is not treated as having made the
election with respect to property that the taxpayer establishes is not
distribution property with respect to the related section 355
distribution. For purposes of this paragraph (c)(6)(ii), any property
with an adjusted basis in excess of its fair market value as of the
date of the conversion transaction will not be treated as distribution
property unless the taxpayer establishes that it owned such asset
immediately after the related section 355 distribution. Paragraph (b)
of this section will apply to property with respect to which the
taxpayer is not treated as having made the election under paragraph
(c)(5) of this section as a result of this paragraph (c)(6)(ii).
* * * * *
(f) Conversion transaction preceding or following a section 355
distribution--(1) In general. A C corporation or a REIT is described in
this paragraph (f)(1) if--
(i) The C corporation or the REIT engages in a conversion
transaction involving a REIT during the twenty-year period beginning on
the date that is ten years before the date of a section 355
distribution (the related section 355 distribution); and
(ii) The C corporation or the REIT engaging in the related section
355 distribution is either--
(A) The distributing corporation or the controlled corporation, as
those terms are defined in section 355(a)(1); or
(B) A member of the separate affiliated group (as defined in
section 355(b)(3)(B)) of the distributing corporation or the controlled
corporation.
(2) Predecessors and successors. For purposes of this paragraph
(f), any reference to a controlled corporation, a distributing
corporation, or a member of the separate affiliated group of a
distributing corporation or a controlled corporation includes a
reference to any predecessor or successor of such corporation.
Successors include corporations which succeed to and take into account
items described in section 381(c) of the distributing corporation or
the controlled corporation. Predecessors include corporations having
such items to which the distributing corporation or the controlled
corporation succeeded and took into account.
(3) Exclusion of certain conversion transactions. A C corporation
or a REIT is not described in paragraph (f)(1) of this section if--
(i) The distributing corporation and the controlled corporation are
both REITs immediately after the related section 355 distribution
(including by reason of elections under section 856(c)(1) made after
the related section 355 distribution that are effective before the
related section 355 distribution) and at all times during the two years
thereafter;
(ii) Section 355(h)(1) does not apply to the related section 355
distribution by reason of section 355(h)(2)(B); or
(iii) The related section 355 distribution occurred before December
7, 2015, or is described in a ruling request referred to in section
311(c) of Division Q of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016,
Public Law 114-113, 129 Stat. 2422.
(g) * * *
[[Page 26565]]
(2) * * *
(ii) Conversion transactions occurring on or after June 7, 2019,
and certain prior conversion transactions. Paragraphs (a)(1),
(a)(2)(vi), (vii), and (viii), (b)(4), (c)(1) and (6), and (f) of this
section apply to conversion transactions occurring on or after June 7,
2019, and to conversion transactions and related section 355
distributions for which the conversion transaction occurs before, and
the related section 355 distribution occurs on or after, June 7, 2019.
For conversion transactions that occurred on or after June 7, 2016, and
before June 7, 2019 (other than conversion transactions and related
section 355 distributions for which the conversion transaction occurs
before, and the related section 355 distribution occurs on or after,
June 7, 2019), see Sec. Sec. 1.337(d)-7 and 1.337(d)-7T as contained
in 26 CFR part 1 in effect on April 1, 2019.
* * * * *
Sec. 1.337(d)-7T [Removed]
0
Par. 3. Section 1.337(d)-7T is removed.
Kirsten Wielobob,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
Approved: May 29, 2019.
David J. Kautter,
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. 2019-11753 Filed 6-3-19; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P