Removal of Check Pilot Medical Certificate Requirement, 25499-25506 [2019-11086]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 106 / Monday, June 3, 2019 / Proposed Rules
Class E airspace designations are
published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA
Order 7400.11C, dated August 13, 2018,
and effective September 15, 2018, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The Class E airspace designations
listed in this document will be
published subsequently in the Order.
Regulatory Notices and Analyses
The FAA has determined that this
proposed regulation only involves an
established body of technical
regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to
keep them operationally current. It,
therefore: (1) Is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under Executive
Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant
rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February
26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant
preparation of a regulatory evaluation as
the anticipated impact is so minimal.
Since this is a routine matter that will
only affect air traffic procedures and air
navigation, it is certified that this
proposed rule, when promulgated, will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Environmental Review
This proposal would be subject to an
environmental analysis in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F,
‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final
regulatory action.
*
*
*
*
*
AEA NY E5 Cortland, NY [New]
Cortland County Airport-Chase Field, NY
(lat. 42°35′34″ N, long. 76°12′54″ W)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 7-mile radius
of Cortland County Airport-Chase Field.
*
*
*
*
*
AEA NY E5 Elmira/Corning, NY [New]
Elmira/Corning Regional Airport, NY
(lat. 42°9′35″ N, long. 76°53′30″ W)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 12.5-mile
radius of Elmira/Corning Regional Airport.
*
*
*
*
*
AEA NY E5 Ithaca, NY [New]
Ithaca Tompkins Regional Airport, NY
(lat. 42°29′29″ N, long. 76°27′31″ W)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 9.5-mile
radius of Ithaca Tompkins Regional Airport.
*
*
*
*
*
AEA NY E5 Endicott, NY [New]
Tri Cities Airport, NY
(lat. 42°4′43″ N, long. 76°5′47″ W)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within an 8-mile radius
of Tri Cities Airport.
Issued in College Park, Georgia, on May 23,
2019,
Geoff Lelliott,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group,
Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic
Organization.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
[FR Doc. 2019–11496 Filed 5–31–19; 8:45 am]
The Proposed Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as
follows:
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for part 71
continues to read as follows:
■
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.11C,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 13, 2018, and
effective September 15, 2018, is
amended as follows:
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 May 31, 2019
Jkt 247001
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Parts 121 and 135
[Docket No.: FAA–2019–0360; Notice. No.
19–05]
RIN 2120–AL12
Removal of Check Pilot Medical
Certificate Requirement
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103,
40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR,
1959–1963 Comp., p. 389.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas
Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More
Above the Surface of the Earth.
This action would update
regulatory text so as to remove
inconsistencies applicable to check
pilots and flight instructors in domestic,
flag, and supplemental operations and
flight instructors in commuter and on
demand operations so that check pilots
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
25499
and flight instructors can continue to
perform their functions in aircraft
without a medical certificate, unless
they are serving as required flightcrew
members. The FAA also proposes to
remove the medical certificate
requirement for check pilots in
commuter and on demand operations
who perform their functions in aircraft
and are not serving as required
flightcrew members. Removing the
medical certificate requirement would
enable pilots who are otherwise
qualified, to function as check pilots in
aircraft.
DATES: Send comments on or before
August 2, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
by docket number FAA–2019–0360
using any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30; U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Room W12–140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Take
comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12–140 of the West Building
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at 202–493–2251.
Privacy: In accordance with 5 U.S.C.
553(c), DOT solicits comments from the
public to better inform its rulemaking
process. DOT posts these comments,
without edit, including any personal
information the commenter provides, to
https://www.regulations.gov, as
described in the system of records
notice (DOT/ALL–14 FDMS), which can
be reviewed at https://www.dot.gov/
privacy.
Docket: Background documents or
comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov at any time.
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or go to the Docket
Operations in Room W12–140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nancy Lauck Claussen, Aviation Safety
Inspector, Air Transportation Division,
Flight Standards Service, Federal
Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington,
DC 20591; telephone: 202–267–8166;
email: nancy.l.claussen@faa.gov.
E:\FR\FM\03JNP1.SGM
03JNP1
25500
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 106 / Monday, June 3, 2019 / Proposed Rules
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority for This Rulemaking
The FAA’s authority to issue rules on
aviation safety is found in Title 49 of the
United States Code (49 U.S.C.). Subtitle
I, Section 106 describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. The FAA issues
this proposed rule under the authority
Congress granted to the FAA
Administrator in 49 U.S.C. 106. Section
106(f) vests final authority in the
Administrator for carrying out all
functions, powers, and duties of the
administration relating to the
promulgation of regulations and rules.
Subtitle VII of title 49 of the United
States Code, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority. This rule is issued
under the authority granted to the
Administrator by Congress in 49 U.S.C.
44701 and 44705. Section 44701(a)(5)
requires the Administrator to promote
safe flight of civil aircraft in air
commerce by prescribing regulations
and setting minimum standards for
other practices, methods, and
procedures necessary for safety in air
commerce and national security. In
addition, § 44701(d)(1)(A) specifically
requires the Administrator, when
prescribing safety regulations, to
consider ‘‘the duty of an air carrier to
provide service with the highest
possible degree of safety in the public
interest.’’ Finally, § 44705 requires the
Administrator to issue air carrier
operating certificates that contain terms
necessary to ensure safety in air
transportation.
Executive Summary
Currently, the FAA does not require
part 121 check pilots and flight
instructors in airplanes and part 135
flight instructors in aircraft (airplanes
and rotorcraft) to hold medical
certificates, unless serving as required
flightcrew members. However, this
requirement is not clear because of
inconsistencies in the regulatory text in
parts 121 and 135. This action would
amend the regulatory text to remove
these inconsistencies so that it is clear
that check pilots and flight instructors
conducting checking and training
functions in aircraft may serve without
medical certificates, as long as they are
not required flightcrew members.
Additionally, current regulations
require check pilots under part 135 who
perform their duties in aircraft to hold
a medical certificate even if they are not
serving as required flightcrew members.
As a result, some experienced pilots
who would otherwise qualify to perform
part 135 check pilot functions in an
aircraft, but who are not medically
eligible to hold a medical certificate, are
limited to conducting check pilot
functions in flight simulation training
devices (FSTDs). This rule proposes to
eliminate the requirement for a medical
certificate for check pilots who are not
serving as required flightcrew members.
This proposed change would increase
the number of experienced pilots who
would be able to qualify as part 135
check pilots on aircraft.
Table 1 summarizes the provisions
included in this rule, the sections
affected and impacts.
TABLE 1—SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGES, SECTIONS AFFECTED AND IMPACTS
Provision
Summary
Sections affected
Impact
135.337(b)(5), (e) .....................
Possible small cost savings for
pilots who choose to stop obtaining a medical certificate.
Check Pilot Medical Certificate Requirement
Remove the check pilot medical
certificate requirement for 135
check pilots (aircraft).
Update current medical certificate requirements for check
pilots and flight instructors in
part 121 and flight instructors
in part 135.
• Removes the requirement for a medical certificate in part
135 for check pilots (aircraft) who are not serving as required flightcrew members.
• Restructures section to remove duplicative requirements ......
• Removes requirement for third-class medical certificate and
explicitly states that only those part 121 check pilots (airplane) or flight instructors (airplane), or part 135 flight instructors (aircraft), serving as required flightcrew members
must have appropriate medical certificates to serve as such.
• Adds ‘‘required’’ before ‘‘flightcrew member’’ to emphasize
that medical certificates are only required for check pilots
and flight instructors who are serving as required flightcrew
members.
• Restructures section to remove duplicative requirements ......
135.337.
121.411(b)(5);
121.412(b)(5);
135.338(b)(5), (e)
No impact.
135.337(e); 135.338(b)(5), (e)
135.338
Conforming and Miscellaneous Changes
Update nomenclature ................
• Updates nomenclature in part 135 to change ‘‘check airmen’’
to ‘‘check pilots’’, ‘‘check airman’’ to ‘‘check pilot’’, and ‘‘simulator’’ to ‘‘FSTD’’, where appropriate.
• Updates nomenclature to change ‘‘Class I’’, ‘‘Class II’’, and
‘‘Class III’’ medical certificates to ‘‘first-class’’, ‘‘secondclass’’, and ‘‘third-class’’ medical certificates, respectively.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
I. Background
All pilots serving in part 121 and part
135 operations are required to complete
competency checks and proficiency
checks on a regular basis to ensure each
pilot’s competency in operating the
specific aircraft and conducting
instrument operations. These checks are
conducted by check pilots, airmen
approved by the FAA who have the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 May 31, 2019
Jkt 247001
135.113;
135.297(c)(2);
135.321(a)(2); 135.323(a)(1),
(a)(4), (c); 135.324(b)(4);
135.337(a), (b), (e), (f);
135.338(a), (f); 135.339(a),
(c),
(d),
(e),
(g);
135.340(a)(2)
121.411(b)(5);
121.412(b)(5),
(f)(1);
135.337(b)(5);
135.338(b)(5)
appropriate knowledge, training,
experience, and demonstrated ability to
evaluate and to certify the knowledge
and skills of other pilots. The role of the
check pilot is to ensure that the
flightcrew member has met competency
standards before the check pilot releases
the flightcrew member from training
and to ensure that the flightcrew
member maintains those standards
while remaining in line service. A check
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
No impact.
pilot must be knowledgeable in the
applicable requirements of 14 CFR parts
61, 91, 110, 119, and part 121 or 135,
other applicable FAA policies, safe
operating practices, and the certificate
holder’s policies and procedures.
A flight instructor is an airman
designated by a part 121 or part 135
certificate holder who has the
appropriate knowledge, training,
experience, and demonstrated ability to
E:\FR\FM\03JNP1.SGM
03JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 106 / Monday, June 3, 2019 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
instruct flightcrew members in a flight
training segment of that certificate
holder’s training program.
Flight instructors and check pilots
typically do not serve as required
crewmembers during training or
checking in an FSTD. This is because
they are typically staffing an instructor
station from which they can oversee the
simulation. They may serve as required
flightcrew members during training or
checking in aircraft, provided they are
qualified as a pilot in command
(including medical certificate
requirements), and are also designated
and authorized to perform training or
checking functions in the specific
aircraft being used. A flight instructor or
check pilot is considered a required
flightcrew member if the person
receiving instruction is not qualified to
act as pilot in command or if the type
certificate of the aircraft on which
instruction is being given requires more
than one pilot flightcrew member and
no other qualified pilot is on board.1
Prior to 1996, the agency required
medical certificates for flight instructors
and check pilots performing such
functions, even if not serving as
required flightcrew members.2 In 1996,
the FAA published the final rule,
Training and Qualification
Requirements for Check Pilots and
Flight Instructors.3 The rule recognized
that some experienced part 121 and 135
pilots who would otherwise qualify as
flight instructors or check pilots but
were not medically eligible to hold a
medical certificate could not perform
their functions even in simulators.4 The
rule removed the medical certificate
requirement altogether for flight
instructors and check pilots in parts 135
and 121 who perform their functions in
flight simulators.5 However, the
regulatory text was less clear as to the
medical certificate requirement for flight
instructors who perform their functions
1 Letter of Interpretation to Willmot White from
Carl Schellenberg, Assistant Chief Counsel,
Regulations and Enforcement Division (Oct 5,
1978). Letter of Interpretation to Ivan Grau from
Rebecca B. MacPherson, Assistant Chief Counsel for
Regulations (Oct. 1, 2010); Letter of Interpretation
to Louis Glenn from Rebeca B. MacPherson,
Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations (Dec. 1,
2009). (https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/
headquarters_offices/agc/practice_areas/
regulations/interpretations/).
2 See e.g., Air Taxi Operators and Commercial
Operators, 42 FR 43490 (Aug. 29, 1977) and Air
Taxi Operators and Commercial Operators, 43 FR
46742, 46777 (Oct. 10, 1978).
3 Training and Qualification Requirements for
Check Pilots and Flight Instructors, 61 FR 30734
(June 17, 1996).
4 Id. at 30734.
5 Id. at 30735.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 May 31, 2019
Jkt 247001
in aircraft in parts 135 and 121, and part
121 check pilots.
II. Discussion of the Proposed Rule
A. Part 121 Check Pilot/Flight Instructor
and Part 135 Flight Instructor Medical
Certificate Requirements
Currently, the agency implements
§§ 121.411, 121.412, and 135.338 such
that part 121 check airmen (airplane),
part 121 flight instructors (airplane),
and part 135 flight instructors (aircraft) 6
are not required to hold a medical
certificate unless serving as required
flightcrew members. There are,
however, inconsistencies within the
regulatory text of these provisions that
has caused confusion. The agency
proposes to resolve these
inconsistencies with this NPRM.
Amendments to the regulatory text
implementing the medical certificate
requirements for check airmen and
flight instructors in part 121 training
programs (§§ 121.411 and 121.412) and
flight instructors serving in aircraft in
part 135 training programs (§ 135.338),
have resulted in inconsistencies within
each of these sections. For example,
§§ 121.411(b)(5) and 121.412(b)(5) state
that check pilots and flight instructors
(airplane) must hold at least a thirdclass medical certificate unless serving
as required crewmembers; however,
§§ 121.411(e) and 121.412(e) state that
check pilots and flight instructors who
do not hold an appropriate medical
certificate may function as check
airmen, but may not serve as flightcrew
members in operations under this part.
In part 135, § 135.338(b)(5) states that
flight instructors (aircraft) must hold at
least a third-class medical certificate;
however, § 135.338(e) states that an
airman who does not hold a medical
certificate may function as flight
instructor in an aircraft if functioning as
a non-required crewmember.
Allowing a part 121 check pilot, or a
part 121 or part 135 flight instructor to
serve as such in an airplane, without a
medical certificate, when not serving as
a required flightcrew member, has no
negative effect on safety. Except in some
circumstances in aircraft in part 135
operations, neither the check pilot nor
the flight instructor sit at the controls
for the aircraft unless serving as a
required flightcrew member. Further,
pilots serving as required flightcrew
members must be fully qualified to
serve as such, and must have the
appropriate medical certificate. If a
6 The FAA’s regulations distinguish between
check pilots or flight instructors performing their
functions in an airplane (under part 121) or aircraft
(airplanes or rotorcraft under part 135), or in a flight
simulator.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
25501
check pilot or flight instructor is not a
required flightcrew member, they are
not necessary for the operation and the
flight may proceed whether or not they
are present. Thus, requiring a medical
certificate for check pilots and flight
instructors who are not serving as
required flightcrew members is an
unnecessary burden. Moreover, there
has been no degradation in the safe
operation of aircraft resulting from the
current application of the regulations
during the estimated 8 years the agency
has allowed eligible check airmen and
flight instructors to serve without
medical certificates if not serving as
required crewmembers. Therefore, the
FAA has determined the changes in this
proposed rule would have no adverse
impact on safety.
Accordingly, the FAA proposes to
amend §§ 121.411(b)(5) and
121.412(b)(5) to remove the language
requiring the check pilots and flight
instructors to hold at least a third-class
medical certificate unless serving as a
required crewmember. These
paragraphs will retain the requirement
that the check pilots and flight
instructors must hold a first- or secondclass medical certificate, as appropriate,
if serving as required flightcrew
members.
Similarly, the FAA proposes to amend
§ 135.338(b)(5) to remove the language
requiring flight instructors to hold at
least a third-class medical certificate.
For clarity and consistency with part
135 requirements to serve as a required
flightcrew member, the FAA proposes to
add the requirement that the flight
instructor must hold a first or secondclass medical certificate, as appropriate,
if serving as a required flightcrew
member.
B. Part 135 Check Pilot Medical
Certificate Requirement
Currently, § 135.337, requires check
airmen serving in part 135 in an aircraft
to hold a third-class medical certificate,
even if the check pilot is not serving as
a required flightcrew member. Unlike
the three previously discussed sections
of 14 CFR (i.e., §§ 121.411, 121.412 and
135.338), § 135.337 is unambiguous in
establishing this third-class medical
certificate requirement.
The FAA proposes to remove the
requirement for a check pilot serving in
part 135 in an aircraft to hold a thirdclass medical certificate unless the
check pilot is serving as a required
flightcrew member. A check pilot would
need to hold an appropriate medical
certificate only if serving as a required
flightcrew member. Removing the
requirement for a third-class medical
certificate for check pilots (aircraft) who
E:\FR\FM\03JNP1.SGM
03JNP1
25502
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 106 / Monday, June 3, 2019 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
are not serving as required flightcrew
members would not negatively affect
safety for the same reasons provided in
explaining the proposal to remove the
third-class medical certificate
requirement for check pilots in part 121
training and similarly, would provide
regulatory relief from an unnecessary
burden.
This proposal would reduce
regulatory burdens for part 135
operators. Removing the medical
certificate requirement would provide
greater operational flexibility to
certificate holders and ensure that
otherwise qualified, experienced
persons who meet all of the training and
qualification requirements necessary to
function as check pilots would have the
opportunity to do so.
A. Miscellaneous and Conforming
Amendments
The FAA proposes the following
amendments to improve the clarity and
consistency of parts 135 and 121. This
action proposes to change ‘‘check
airmen’’ and ‘‘check airman’’ to ‘‘check
pilots’’ and ‘‘check pilot’’, respectively,
throughout part 135, as appropriate. In
addition, this rule proposes to update
the text in §§ 135.337 and 135.338 by
changing ‘‘simulator’’ to ‘‘FSTD’’ where
appropriate.
This action proposes to change ‘‘Class
I’’, ‘‘Class II’’, and ‘‘Class III’’ medical
certificates to ‘‘first-class’’, ‘‘secondclass’’, and ‘‘third-class’’ medical
certificates respectively, to align with
the terminology used in part 61.
This action proposes to add
‘‘required’’ before ‘‘flightcrew member’’
in §§ 135.337(e) and 135.338(b)(5) and
(e) to emphasize that medical
certificates are only required for check
pilots and flight instructors who are
serving as required flightcrew members.
This action proposes to change the
structure of §§ 135.337 and 135.338,
which currently list the check pilot and
flight instructor (aircraft) and check
pilot and flight instructor (simulator)
requirements separately. Since this
proposed rule would remove the
medical certificate requirement
altogether, the only difference in the
requirements between check pilot
(aircraft) and check pilot (simulator)
would be the recency of experience
requirement. Therefore, the
requirements for both check pilot
(aircraft) and check pilot (simulator)
would be listed once in § 135.337(b),
and the recency of experience
requirement for check pilot (aircraft)
would be listed separately in
§ 135.337(c). Similarly, the requirements
for flight instructor (aircraft) and flight
instructor (simulator) would be listed
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 May 31, 2019
Jkt 247001
once in § 135.338(b), and the recency of
experience requirement for flight
instructor (aircraft) would be listed
separately in § 135.338(c).
The FAA acknowledges that similar
types of miscellaneous and conforming
changes that are necessary for part 135
may be necessary for part 121. The FAA
will consider proposing those changes
to § 121.411 and § 121.412 in a separate
rulemaking action.
III. Regulatory Notices and Analyses
A. Regulatory Evaluation
Changes to Federal regulations must
undergo several economic analyses.
First, Executive Order 12866 and
Executive Order 13563 direct that each
Federal agency shall propose or adopt a
regulation only upon a reasoned
determination that the benefits of the
intended regulation justify its costs.
Second, the Regulatory Flexibility Act
of 1980 (Pub. L. 96–354) requires
agencies to analyze the economic
impact of regulatory changes on small
entities. Third, the Trade Agreements
Act (Pub. L. 96–39) prohibits agencies
from setting standards that create
unnecessary obstacles to the foreign
commerce of the United States. In
developing U.S. standards, this Trade
Act requires agencies to consider
international standards and, where
appropriate, that they be the basis of
U.S. standards. Fourth, the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104–4) requires agencies to prepare a
written assessment of the costs, benefits,
and other effects of proposed or final
rules that include a Federal mandate
likely to result in the expenditure by
State, local, or tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100 million or more annually (adjusted
for inflation with base year of 1995).
This portion of the preamble
summarizes the FAA’s analysis of the
economic impacts of this proposed rule.
In conducting these analyses, the FAA
has determined that this proposed rule
would: (1) Have savings and no
additional costs, (2) not be an
economically ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ as defined in section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, (3) not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities; (4)
not create unnecessary obstacles to the
foreign commerce of the United States;
and (5) not impose an unfunded
mandate on state, local, or tribal
governments, or on the private sector by
exceeding the threshold identified
above. These analyses are summarized
below.
As previously discussed, the FAA has
determined the changes in this
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
proposed rule would have no adverse
impact on safety. The FAA has found
that by allowing a part 121 check pilot,
or a part 121 or part 135 flight instructor
to serve as such in an airplane, without
a medical certificate, when not serving
as a required flightcrew member, has no
negative effect on safety. Except in some
circumstances in aircraft in part 135
operations, neither the check pilot nor
the flight instructor sit at the controls
for the aircraft unless serving as a
required flightcrew member. Further,
pilots serving as required flightcrew
members must be fully qualified to
serve as such, and must have the
appropriate medical certificate. If a
check pilot or flight instructor is not a
required flightcrew member, they are
not even necessary for the operation and
the flight may proceed whether or not
they are present. Thus, requiring a
medical certificate for check pilots and
flight instructors who are not serving as
required flightcrew members would
result in an unnecessary burden.
Moreover, there has been no
degradation in the safe operation of
aircraft resulting from the current
application of the regulations during the
estimated 8 years the agency has
allowed check airmen and flight
instructors to serve without medical
certificates if not serving as required
crewmembers.
As of June of 2018, there are roughly
1,035 part 135 check pilots.7 Out of
1,035 part 135 check pilots, there are
roughly 496 part 135 check pilots, who
do not hold a medical certificate and
who are therefore limited to performing
check pilot duties in a flight simulator.
This proposed rule would enable these
check pilots, who are otherwise
qualified, but may have become
ineligible for a medical certificate
during their employment, to function as
check pilots in aircraft. While this
proposed rule would expand the
opportunities for these check pilots,
there is not enough information on the
demand for check pilots to perform their
duties in an aircraft to quantify the
impacts of this enabling opportunity.
For example, some companies only use
simulators to perform check pilots
duties while others use a combination of
simulators and aircraft. The FAA
requests additional information and
data on the expanded opportunities for
affected check pilots.
Additionally, removing the
requirement for a medical certificate
could generate cost savings by allowing
part 135 check pilots, with valid
medical certificates, to discontinue
7 National Vital Information Subsystem (NVIS)
database, June 2018.
E:\FR\FM\03JNP1.SGM
03JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 106 / Monday, June 3, 2019 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
obtaining medical certificates. There are
approximately 539 part 135 check pilots
with valid medical certificates. Based on
age and a pilot’s medical condition,
which determines the frequency of a
medical examination, check pilots
would save approximately 0.5 hours per
pilot to complete the medical
application (MedXpress), 0.5 hours per
pilot in travel time to see an Aviation
Medical Examiner (AME), and one hour
for the actual medical examination.8
Additional savings include vehicle
operating costs of 0.17 cents per mile 9
based on 40 miles traveled to and from
the examination, and $117 paid to the
AME for the medical examination.10
The estimated value of time for a check
pilot is $111 per hour 11 resulting in
potential savings per affected check
pilot of $346 per medical certificate.12
Approximately 457 check pilots, out
of the 539 check pilots with valid
medical certificates, are age 40 and over.
Pilots under the age of 40 renew their
third-class medical certificate every five
years compared to every two years for
pilots age 40 and over. The FAA
assumes that most pilots who would
voluntarily discontinue their medical
certificates are age 40 and over as this
age bracket accounts for 85 percent of
the check pilot population with valid
medical certificates. Additionally, older
applicants are more likely to apply for
special issuance medical certificates,
granted to applicants who do not meet
the established medical standards but
demonstrate they can perform without
endangering public safety, than their
younger counterparts.13 Information is
8 Estimated durations of time and miles traveled
to and from examinations taken from Alternative
Pilot Physical Examination and Education
Requirements Regulatory Evaluation. https://
www.regulations.gov/document?D=FAA-2016-91570009.
9 Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Standard Mileage
Rate for 2017, 0.17 cents per mile driven for
medical or moving purposes; https://www.irs.gov/
newsroom/2017-standard-mileage-rates-forbusiness-medical-and-moving-announced Dec.13,
2016.
10 $117 aid to AME taken from Alternative Pilot
Physical Examination and Education Requirements
Regulatory Evaluation. https://
www.regulations.gov/document?D=FAA-2016-91570009.
11 Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), National
Industry-Specific Occupational Employment and
Wage Estimates, Occupational Code 53–2011
Airline Pilots, Copilots, and Flight Engineers, May
2017 https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics4_
488100.htm—includes BLS Employee
Compensation as of June 2017.
12 Total savings per check pilot per medical
certificate = $117 fee per pilot + $55.5 per pilot to
complete the application + $111 per pilot to
complete the examination + $55.5 per pilot to travel
to and from the examination + $6.8 in vehicle
operating costs.
13 https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/
2007/04/10/E7-6652/modification-of-certain-
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 May 31, 2019
Jkt 247001
limited on the number of check pilots
that would allow their medical
certificates to expire. However, the FAA
estimates that only 5 to 10 percent
would no longer obtain medical
certificates since check pilots still need
to maintain a valid medical certificate to
pilot an aircraft professionally and
recreationally or serve as required flight
crew. The FAA requests comment on
this estimate. At 5 percent this would be
23 check pilots and at 10 percent this
would be 46 check pilots. For affected
check pilots age 40 and over, who
would potentially take advantage of this
proposed rule, this could result in
undiscounted savings of $23,874 or
$47,748 respectively, over a five year
period of analysis as shown in the table
below.14
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED YEARLY
SAVINGS
FOR
UNDISCOUNTED
CHECK PILOTS AGE 40 AND OVER—
MEDICAL CERTIFICATE RENEWAL
EVERY 2 YEARS
23 Check
pilots
46 Check
pilots
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
$7,958
....................
7,958
....................
7,958
$15,916
....................
15,916
....................
15,916
Total ...........
$23,874
$47,748
Year
1
2
3
4
5
This proposed rule also updates the
current regulatory text under which, the
FAA allows check pilots in part 121 and
flight instructors in parts 121 and 135 to
serve without a medical certificate,
unless they are required flightcrew
members, and updates nomenclature.
While the FAA does not currently
require that part 121 check pilots and
flight instructors and part 135 flight
instructors hold medical certificates, as
discussed earlier, these regulations are
not clear.
The FAA has, therefore, determined
that this proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ as
defined in section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Determination
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(Public Law 96–354) (RFA) establishes
‘‘as a principle of regulatory issuance
that agencies shall endeavor, consistent
with the objectives of the rule and of
applicable statutes, to fit regulatory and
informational requirements to the scale
medical-standards-and-procedures-and-durationof-certain-medical.
14 This savings to part 135 check pilots would be
at the expense of the medical practitioner.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
25503
of the businesses, organizations, and
governmental jurisdictions subject to
regulation. To achieve this principle,
agencies are required to solicit and
consider flexible regulatory proposals
and to explain the rationale for their
actions to assure that such proposals are
given serious consideration.’’ The RFA
covers a wide-range of small entities,
including small businesses, not-forprofit organizations, and small
governmental jurisdictions.
Agencies must perform a review to
determine whether a rule will have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. If
the agency determines that it will, the
agency must prepare a regulatory
flexibility analysis as described in the
RFA. However, if an agency determines
that a rule is not expected to have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities,
section 605(b) of the RFA provides that
the head of the agency may so certify
and a regulatory flexibility analysis is
not required. The certification must
include a statement providing the
factual basis for this determination, and
the reasoning should be clear.
This proposed rule would relieve part
135 check pilots from having to obtain
at least a third-class medical certificate
when performing check pilot duties, in
an aircraft, as long as they are not
required flight crew. This change could
provide cost savings to a few part 135
check pilots without additional costs.
The proposed rule also would clarify
related FAA regulations without
substantive effect. Thus, the expected
outcome would be a small positive
impact on any small entity affected by
this rulemaking action.
Therefore, as provided in section
605(b), the head of the FAA certifies
that this rulemaking would not result in
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
C. International Trade Impact
Assessment
The Trade Agreements Act of 1979
(Pub. L. 96–39), as amended by the
Uruguay Round Agreements Act (Pub.
L. 103–465), prohibits Federal agencies
from establishing standards or engaging
in related activities that create
unnecessary obstacles to the foreign
commerce of the United States.
Pursuant to these Acts, the
establishment of standards is not
considered an unnecessary obstacle to
the foreign commerce of the United
States, so long as the standard has a
legitimate domestic objective, such as
the protection of safety, and does not
operate in a manner that excludes
imports that meet this objective. The
E:\FR\FM\03JNP1.SGM
03JNP1
25504
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 106 / Monday, June 3, 2019 / Proposed Rules
statute also requires consideration of
international standards and, where
appropriate, that they be the basis for
U.S. standards. The FAA has assessed
the potential effect of this proposed rule
and determined that it would have only
a domestic impact and therefore no
effect on international trade.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
D. Unfunded Mandates Assessment
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4)
requires each Federal agency to prepare
a written statement assessing the effects
of any Federal mandate in a proposed or
final agency rule that may result in an
expenditure of $100 million or more (in
1995 dollars) in any one year by State,
local, and tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector; such
a mandate is deemed to be a ‘‘significant
regulatory action.’’ The FAA currently
uses an inflation-adjusted value of
$155.0 million in lieu of $100 million.
This rule would not contain such a
mandate. Therefore, the requirements of
Title II of the Act do not apply.
E. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3507(d)) requires that the
FAA consider the impact of paperwork
and other information collection
burdens imposed on the public.
According to the 1995 amendments to
the Paperwork Reduction Act (5 CFR
1320.8(b)(2)(vi)), an agency may not
collect or sponsor the collection of
information, nor may it impose an
information collection requirement
unless it displays a currently valid
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) control number.
The existing information collection
associated with all check pilot and flight
instructor medical certificates in parts
121 and 135 was approved under OMB
control number 2120–0034. The
information collection is used to collect
medical certificate information to
determine whether applicants are
medically qualified to perform the
duties associated with the class of
medical certificate sought. The FAA has
determined that removing the medical
certificate requirement for part 135
check pilots (aircraft) who are currently
eligible for a medical certificate, but
may choose to allow their certificate to
expire, would result in a negligible
reduction in the information collection,
as pilots would still need to maintain a
valid medical certificate to pilot an
aircraft or serve as required flight crew.
The FAA has determined that there
would be no reduction in the
information collection associated with
part 121 check pilots and flight
instructors and part 135 flight
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 May 31, 2019
Jkt 247001
instructors. The FAA has also
determined that there would be no new
requirement for information collection
associated with this rule.
F. International Compatibility and
Cooperation
In keeping with U.S. obligations
under the Convention on International
Civil Aviation, it is FAA policy to
conform to International Civil Aviation
Organization Standards and
Recommended Practices to the
maximum extent practicable. The FAA
has reviewed the corresponding ICAO
Standards and Recommended Practices
and has identified no differences with
these regulations.
G. Environmental Analysis
FAA Order 1050.1F identifies FAA
actions that are categorically excluded
from preparation of an environmental
assessment or environmental impact
statement under the National
Environmental Policy Act in the
absence of extraordinary circumstances.
The FAA has determined this
rulemaking action qualifies for the
categorical exclusion identified in
paragraph 5–6.6f and involves no
extraordinary circumstances.
IV. Executive Order Determinations
A. Executive Order 13132, Federalism
The FAA has analyzed this proposed
rule under the principles and criteria of
Executive Order 13132, Federalism. The
agency has determined that this action
would not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, or the relationship
between the Federal Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, and,
therefore, would not have Federalism
implications.
B. Executive Order 13211, Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
The FAA analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations that
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (May 18, 2001). The
agency has determined that it would not
be a ‘‘significant energy action’’ under
the executive order and would not be
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy.
C. Executive Order 13609, Promoting
International Regulatory Cooperation
Executive Order 13609, Promoting
International Regulatory Cooperation,
(77 FR 26413, May 4, 2012) promotes
international regulatory cooperation to
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
meet shared challenges involving
health, safety, labor, security,
environmental, and other issues and to
reduce, eliminate, or prevent
unnecessary differences in regulatory
requirements. The FAA has analyzed
this action under the policies and
agency responsibilities of Executive
Order 13609, and has determined that
this action would have no effect on
international regulatory cooperation.
D. Executive Order 13771, Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs
This proposed rule is expected to be
an Executive Order 13771 deregulatory
action. Details on the estimated cost
savings of this proposed rule can be
found in the rule’s economic analysis.
IV. Additional Information
A. Comments Invited
The FAA invites interested persons to
participate in this rulemaking by
submitting written comments, data, or
views. The agency also invites
comments relating to the economic,
environmental, energy, or federalism
impacts that might result from adopting
the proposals in this document. The
most helpful comments reference a
specific portion of the proposal, explain
the reason for any recommended
change, and include supporting data. To
ensure the docket does not contain
duplicate comments, commenters
should send only one copy of written
comments, or if comments are filed
electronically, commenters should
submit only one time.
The FAA will file in the docket all
comments it receives, as well as a report
summarizing each substantive public
contact with FAA personnel concerning
this proposed rulemaking. Before acting
on this proposal, the FAA will consider
all comments it receives on or before the
closing date for comments. The agency
may change this proposal in light of the
comments it receives.
Proprietary or Confidential Business
Information: Commenters should not
file proprietary or confidential business
information in the docket. Such
information must be sent or delivered
directly to the person identified in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of this document, and marked as
proprietary or confidential. If submitting
information on a disk or CD ROM, mark
the outside of the disk or CD ROM, and
identify electronically within the disk or
CD ROM the specific information that is
proprietary or confidential.
Under 14 CFR 11.35(b), if the FAA is
aware of proprietary information filed
with a comment, the agency does not
E:\FR\FM\03JNP1.SGM
03JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 106 / Monday, June 3, 2019 / Proposed Rules
place it in the docket. It is held in a
separate file to which the public does
not have access, and the FAA places a
note in the docket that it has received
it. If the FAA receives a request to
examine or copy this information, it
treats it as any other request under the
Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C.
552). The FAA processes such a request
under Department of Transportation
procedures found in 49 CFR part 7.
B. Availability of Rulemaking
Documents
An electronic copy of rulemaking
documents may be obtained from the
internet by—
• Searching the Federal eRulemaking
Portal (https://www.regulations.gov);
• Visiting the FAA’s Regulations and
Policies web page at https://
www.faa.gov/regulations_policies or
• Accessing the Government
Publishing Office’s web page at https://
www.fdsys.gov.
Copies may also be obtained by
sending a request to the Federal
Aviation Administration, Office of
Rulemaking, ARM–1, 800 Independence
Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591, or
by calling (202) 267–9677. Commenters
must identify the docket or notice
number of this rulemaking.
All documents the FAA considered in
developing this proposed rule,
including economic analyses and
technical reports, may be accessed from
the internet through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal referenced above.
List of Subjects
14 CFR Part 135
Air taxies, Aircraft, Airmen, Aviation
safety.
The Proposed Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
proposes to amend chapter I of title 14,
Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 121—OPERATING
REQUIREMENTS: DOMESTIC, FLAG,
AND SUPPLEMENTAL OPERATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 121
continues to read as follows:
■
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(5) Holds a first-class or second-class
medical certificate, as appropriate, if
serving as a required flightcrew
member;
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Amend § 121.412 by revising
paragraphs (b)(5) and (f)(1) to read as
follows:
§ 121.412 Qualifications: Flight instructors
(airplane) and flight instructors (simulator).
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(5) Holds a first-class or second-class
medical certificate, as appropriate, if
serving as a required flightcrew
member; and
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(1) Fly at least two flight segments as
a required crewmember for the type of
airplane within the 12-month period
preceding the performance of any flight
instructor duty in a flight simulator (and
must hold a first-class or second-class
medical certificate as appropriate); or
*
*
*
*
*
PART 135—OPERATING
REQUIREMENTS: COMMUTER AND
ON DEMAND OPERATIONS AND
RULES GOVERNING PERSONS ON
BOARD SUCH AIRCRAFT
4. The authority citation for part 135
continues to read as follows:
Air carriers, Aircraft, Airmen,
Aviation safety, Transportation.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103,
40113, 40119, 41706, 42301 preceding note
added by Pub. L. 112–95, sec. 412, 126 Stat.
89, 44101, 44701–44702, 44705, 44709–
44711, 44713, 44716–44717, 44722, 44729,
44732; 46105; Pub. L. 111–216, 124 Stat.
2348 (49 U.S.C. 44701 note); Pub. L. 112–95
126, Stat 62 (49 U.S.C. 44732 note).
16:08 May 31, 2019
§ 121.411 Qualifications: Check airmen
(airplane) and check airmen (simulator).
■
14 CFR Part 121
VerDate Sep<11>2014
2. Amend § 121.411 by revising
paragraph (b)(5) to read as follows:
■
Jkt 247001
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40113,
41706, 44701–44702, 44705, 44709, 44711–
44713, 44715–44717, 44722, 44730, 45101–
45105; Pub. L. 112–95, 126 Stat. 58 (49 U.S.C.
44730).
5. Amend § 135.337 by revising the
section heading and paragraphs (a)(1)
through (a)(3), the introductory text of
paragraph (b), and (b)(5) through (f) to
read as follows:
■
§ 135.337
Qualifications: Check pilots.
(a) * * *
(1) A check pilot (aircraft) is a person
who is qualified to conduct flight
checks in an aircraft or FSTD for a
particular type aircraft.
(2) A check pilot (simulator) is a
person who is qualified to conduct
flight checks in an FSTD for a particular
type aircraft.
(3) Check pilot (aircraft) and check
pilot (simulator) are those persons who
perform the functions described in
§§ 135.321(a) and 135.323(a)(4) and (c).
(b) No certificate holder may use a
person, nor may any person serve as a
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
25505
check pilot in a training program
established under this subpart unless,
with respect to the aircraft type
involved, that person—
*
*
*
*
*
(5) Holds a first-class or second-class
medical certificate, as appropriate, if
serving as a required flightcrew
member; and
(6) Has been approved by the
Administrator for the check pilot duties
involved.
(c) No certificate holder may use a
person, nor may any person serve as a
check pilot (aircraft) in a training
program established under this subpart
unless, with respect to the aircraft type
involved, that person has satisfied the
recency of experience requirements of
§ 135.247.
(d) Completion of the requirements in
paragraphs (b) (2), (3), and (4) of this
section, as applicable, must be entered
in the individual’s training record
maintained by the certificate holder.
(e) A medical certificate is not
required for a person to serve as a check
pilot, unless that check pilot is a
required flightcrew member in an
operation under this part.
(f) A check pilot (simulator) must
accomplish the following—
(1) Fly at least two flight segments as
a required crewmember for the type,
class, or category aircraft involved
within the 12-month preceding the
performance of any check pilot duty in
an FSTD; or
(2) Satisfactorily complete an
approved line-observation program
within the period prescribed by that
program and that must precede the
performance of any check pilot duty in
an FSTD.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 6. Amend § 135.338 by revising the
section heading and paragraphs (a)(1)
through (a)(2), the introductory text of
paragraph (b), and (b)(4) through (f) to
read as follows:
§ 135.338 Qualifications: Flight
instructors.
(a) * * *
(1) A flight instructor (aircraft) is a
person who is qualified to instruct in an
aircraft, or FSTD for a particular type,
class, or category aircraft.
(2) A flight instructor (simulator) is a
person who is qualified to instruct in an
FSTD for a particular type, class, or
category aircraft.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) No certificate holder may use a
person, nor may any person serve as a
flight instructor in a training program
established under this subpart unless,
E:\FR\FM\03JNP1.SGM
03JNP1
25506
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 106 / Monday, June 3, 2019 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
with respect to the type, class, or
category aircraft involved, that person—
*
*
*
*
*
(4) Has satisfactorily completed the
applicable training requirements of
§ 135.340; and
(5) Holds a first-class or second-class
medical certificate, as appropriate, if
serving as a required flightcrew
member.
(c) No certificate holder may use a
person, nor may any person serve as a
flight instructor (aircraft) in a training
program established under this subpart
unless, with respect to the type, class,
or category aircraft involved, that person
has satisfied the recency of experience
requirements of § 135.247.
(d) Completion of the requirements in
paragraphs (b)(2), (3), and (4) of this
section, as applicable, must be entered
in the individual’s training record
maintained by the certificate holder.
(e) A medical certificate is not
required for a person to serve as a check
pilot, unless that check pilot is a
required flightcrew member in an
operation under this part.
(f) * * *
(1) Fly at least two flight segments as
a required crewmember for the type,
class, or category aircraft involved
within the 12-month period preceding
the performance of any flight instructor
duty in an FSTD; or
(2) Satisfactorily complete an
approved line-observation program
within the period prescribed by that
program preceding the performance of
any flight instructor duty in an FSTD.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. In part 135, remove the word
‘‘airmen’’ and add, in its place, the word
‘‘pilots’’ in the following places:
■ a. Section 135.321 paragraph (a)(2);
■ b. Section 135.323 paragraph (a)(4);
■ c. Section 135.324 paragraph (b)(4);
and
■ d. Section 135.339 section heading,
and paragraphs (c) through (e) and (g).
■ 8. In part 135, remove the word
‘‘airman’’ and add, in its place, the word
‘‘pilot’’ in the following places:
■ a. Section 135.113 introductory text;
■ b. Section 135.297 paragraph (c)(2);
■ c. Section 135.323 paragraphs (a)(1)
and (c);
■ d. Section 135.339 paragraphs (a),
(c)(1), (d); and
■ e. Section 135.340 paragraph (a)(2).
Issued in Washington, DC, under the
authority of 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 44701(a)(5), and
44705, on May 17, 2019.
Robert C. Carty,
Deputy Executive Director, Flight Standards
Service.
[FR Doc. 2019–11086 Filed 5–31–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 May 31, 2019
Jkt 247001
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2018–0648]
RIN 1625–AA11
Revision for Regulated Navigation
Area; Savannah River, GA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is proposing
to amend the regulated navigation area
(RNA) on the Savannah River located
between Fort Jackson, GA (32°04.93 N,
081°02.19 W) and the Savannah River
Channel Entrance Sea Buoy. This
document proposes to remove
inapplicable and/or outdated
definitions, processes and requirements
in the RNA following a change in
capability, infrastructure and layout of
the Southern Liquefied Natural Gas
(LNG) facility on the Savannah River.
We invite your comments on this
proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before August 2, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2018–0648 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
SUMMARY:
If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email LT Joseph
Palmquist, Coast Guard; telephone 912–
652–4353 ext. 221, email
joseph.b.palmquist@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
GT Gross tons
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
RNA Regulated Navigation Area
COTP Captain of the Port
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
On September 10, 2007, the Coast
Guard published a final rule titled
‘‘Regulated Navigation Area: Savannah
River, Savannah, GA’’ at 33 CFR
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
165.756. (72 FR 51555). That rule
established a RNA around the Southern
LNG facility on the Savannah River at
Elba Island. Since publishing the
previous rule, there have been changes
both to the facility layout and to the
types of vessels that make calls to the
facility. United States Coast Guard
Marine Safety Unit Savannah, GA held
a public meeting to solicit public input
on suggested changes to this RNA. The
public input we received is described in
the Public Participation and Request for
Comments section of this NPRM.
Therefore, the U.S. Coast Guard
proposes revision of and amendments to
the RNA to account for these changes
and to ensure the safety and security of
the marine environment during LNG
tankship operations. The Coast Guard
proposes this rulemaking under
authority in 46 U.S.C. 70041 (previously
33 U.S.C. 1231).
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Commander of the Seventh Coast
Guard District proposes to amend the
Southern LNG facility RNA (33 CFR
165.756) as follows. The proposed rule
removes the definitions of ‘‘Fire Wire’’,
‘‘Made-up’’, and ‘‘Make-up’’ because
these terms do not align with the
updated Oil Companies International
Maine Forum (OCIMF) guidance.
Additionally, the proposed rule removes
requirements for LNG tankships moored
inside the LNG facility slip because the
facility layout and capabilities changed,
rendering the requirements
unnecessary. LNG tankships no longer
moor outside Southern LNG facility
slip; they only moor inside the facility
slip.
The current regulation prohibits
vessels 1600 gross tons (GT) or greater
from overtaking within 1000 yards of
the LNG facility slip when a LNG
tankship is present within the slip. This
proposed rule would instead not allow
these vessels to meet nor overtake
within the area adjacent to either side of
the Southern LNG facility slip when an
LNG tankship is present within the slip.
The purpose of changing the language to
‘‘adjacent to either side of the LNG
facility’’ rather than an exact distance is
due to the changes of the facility layout,
including the facility no longer having
the capabilities or infrastructure to moor
an LNG tankship outside of the
Southern LNG facility slip.
This proposed rule removes the
requirements for an LNG tankship that
is moored outside of the Southern LNG
facility slip. Since publishing the
previous rule, there have been changes
both to the facility infrastructure and to
the types of vessels that make calls to
the facility. The LNG tankships visiting
E:\FR\FM\03JNP1.SGM
03JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 106 (Monday, June 3, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 25499-25506]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-11086]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Parts 121 and 135
[Docket No.: FAA-2019-0360; Notice. No. 19-05]
RIN 2120-AL12
Removal of Check Pilot Medical Certificate Requirement
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action would update regulatory text so as to remove
inconsistencies applicable to check pilots and flight instructors in
domestic, flag, and supplemental operations and flight instructors in
commuter and on demand operations so that check pilots and flight
instructors can continue to perform their functions in aircraft without
a medical certificate, unless they are serving as required flightcrew
members. The FAA also proposes to remove the medical certificate
requirement for check pilots in commuter and on demand operations who
perform their functions in aircraft and are not serving as required
flightcrew members. Removing the medical certificate requirement would
enable pilots who are otherwise qualified, to function as check pilots
in aircraft.
DATES: Send comments on or before August 2, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2019-0360
using any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30; U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at 202-493-2251.
Privacy: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments
from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts
these comments, without edit, including any personal information the
commenter provides, to https://www.regulations.gov, as described in the
system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
https://www.dot.gov/privacy.
Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140
of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Lauck Claussen, Aviation Safety
Inspector, Air Transportation Division, Flight Standards Service,
Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW,
Washington, DC 20591; telephone: 202-267-8166; email:
[email protected].
[[Page 25500]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority for This Rulemaking
The FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code (49 U.S.C.). Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. The FAA issues this
proposed rule under the authority Congress granted to the FAA
Administrator in 49 U.S.C. 106. Section 106(f) vests final authority in
the Administrator for carrying out all functions, powers, and duties of
the administration relating to the promulgation of regulations and
rules.
Subtitle VII of title 49 of the United States Code, Aviation
Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority.
This rule is issued under the authority granted to the Administrator by
Congress in 49 U.S.C. 44701 and 44705. Section 44701(a)(5) requires the
Administrator to promote safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce
by prescribing regulations and setting minimum standards for other
practices, methods, and procedures necessary for safety in air commerce
and national security. In addition, Sec. 44701(d)(1)(A) specifically
requires the Administrator, when prescribing safety regulations, to
consider ``the duty of an air carrier to provide service with the
highest possible degree of safety in the public interest.'' Finally,
Sec. 44705 requires the Administrator to issue air carrier operating
certificates that contain terms necessary to ensure safety in air
transportation.
Executive Summary
Currently, the FAA does not require part 121 check pilots and
flight instructors in airplanes and part 135 flight instructors in
aircraft (airplanes and rotorcraft) to hold medical certificates,
unless serving as required flightcrew members. However, this
requirement is not clear because of inconsistencies in the regulatory
text in parts 121 and 135. This action would amend the regulatory text
to remove these inconsistencies so that it is clear that check pilots
and flight instructors conducting checking and training functions in
aircraft may serve without medical certificates, as long as they are
not required flightcrew members.
Additionally, current regulations require check pilots under part
135 who perform their duties in aircraft to hold a medical certificate
even if they are not serving as required flightcrew members. As a
result, some experienced pilots who would otherwise qualify to perform
part 135 check pilot functions in an aircraft, but who are not
medically eligible to hold a medical certificate, are limited to
conducting check pilot functions in flight simulation training devices
(FSTDs). This rule proposes to eliminate the requirement for a medical
certificate for check pilots who are not serving as required flightcrew
members. This proposed change would increase the number of experienced
pilots who would be able to qualify as part 135 check pilots on
aircraft.
Table 1 summarizes the provisions included in this rule, the
sections affected and impacts.
Table 1--Summary of Proposed Changes, Sections Affected and Impacts
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Provision Summary Sections affected Impact
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check Pilot Medical Certificate Requirement
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remove the check pilot medical Removes the 135.337(b)(5), (e).... Possible small cost
certificate requirement for 135 requirement for a medical savings for pilots
check pilots (aircraft). certificate in part 135 who choose to stop
for check pilots obtaining a medical
(aircraft) who are not certificate.
serving as required
flightcrew members.
Restructures 135.337...............
section to remove
duplicative requirements.
Update current medical certificate Removes 121.411(b)(5); No impact.
requirements for check pilots and requirement for third- 121.412(b)(5);
flight instructors in part 121 and class medical certificate 135.338(b)(5), (e)
flight instructors in part 135. and explicitly states that
only those part 121 check
pilots (airplane) or
flight instructors
(airplane), or part 135
flight instructors
(aircraft), serving as
required flightcrew
members must have
appropriate medical
certificates to serve as
such.
Adds ``required'' 135.337(e);
before ``flightcrew 135.338(b)(5), (e)
member'' to emphasize that
medical certificates are
only required for check
pilots and flight
instructors who are
serving as required
flightcrew members.
Restructures 135.338
section to remove
duplicative requirements.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Conforming and Miscellaneous Changes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Update nomenclature................ Updates 135.113; No impact.
nomenclature in part 135 135.297(c)(2);
to change ``check airmen'' 135.321(a)(2);
to ``check pilots'', 135.323(a)(1),
``check airman'' to (a)(4), (c);
``check pilot'', and 135.324(b)(4);
``simulator'' to ``FSTD'', 135.337(a), (b), (e),
where appropriate. (f); 135.338(a), (f);
135.339(a), (c), (d),
(e), (g);
135.340(a)(2)
Updates 121.411(b)(5);
nomenclature to change 121.412(b)(5),
``Class I'', ``Class II'', (f)(1);
and ``Class III'' medical 135.337(b)(5);
certificates to ``first- 135.338(b)(5)
class'', ``second-class'',
and ``third-class''
medical certificates,
respectively.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Background
All pilots serving in part 121 and part 135 operations are required
to complete competency checks and proficiency checks on a regular basis
to ensure each pilot's competency in operating the specific aircraft
and conducting instrument operations. These checks are conducted by
check pilots, airmen approved by the FAA who have the appropriate
knowledge, training, experience, and demonstrated ability to evaluate
and to certify the knowledge and skills of other pilots. The role of
the check pilot is to ensure that the flightcrew member has met
competency standards before the check pilot releases the flightcrew
member from training and to ensure that the flightcrew member maintains
those standards while remaining in line service. A check pilot must be
knowledgeable in the applicable requirements of 14 CFR parts 61, 91,
110, 119, and part 121 or 135, other applicable FAA policies, safe
operating practices, and the certificate holder's policies and
procedures.
A flight instructor is an airman designated by a part 121 or part
135 certificate holder who has the appropriate knowledge, training,
experience, and demonstrated ability to
[[Page 25501]]
instruct flightcrew members in a flight training segment of that
certificate holder's training program.
Flight instructors and check pilots typically do not serve as
required crewmembers during training or checking in an FSTD. This is
because they are typically staffing an instructor station from which
they can oversee the simulation. They may serve as required flightcrew
members during training or checking in aircraft, provided they are
qualified as a pilot in command (including medical certificate
requirements), and are also designated and authorized to perform
training or checking functions in the specific aircraft being used. A
flight instructor or check pilot is considered a required flightcrew
member if the person receiving instruction is not qualified to act as
pilot in command or if the type certificate of the aircraft on which
instruction is being given requires more than one pilot flightcrew
member and no other qualified pilot is on board.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Letter of Interpretation to Willmot White from Carl
Schellenberg, Assistant Chief Counsel, Regulations and Enforcement
Division (Oct 5, 1978). Letter of Interpretation to Ivan Grau from
Rebecca B. MacPherson, Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations (Oct.
1, 2010); Letter of Interpretation to Louis Glenn from Rebeca B.
MacPherson, Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations (Dec. 1, 2009).
(https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/agc/practice_areas/regulations/interpretations/).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prior to 1996, the agency required medical certificates for flight
instructors and check pilots performing such functions, even if not
serving as required flightcrew members.\2\ In 1996, the FAA published
the final rule, Training and Qualification Requirements for Check
Pilots and Flight Instructors.\3\ The rule recognized that some
experienced part 121 and 135 pilots who would otherwise qualify as
flight instructors or check pilots but were not medically eligible to
hold a medical certificate could not perform their functions even in
simulators.\4\ The rule removed the medical certificate requirement
altogether for flight instructors and check pilots in parts 135 and 121
who perform their functions in flight simulators.\5\ However, the
regulatory text was less clear as to the medical certificate
requirement for flight instructors who perform their functions in
aircraft in parts 135 and 121, and part 121 check pilots.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See e.g., Air Taxi Operators and Commercial Operators, 42 FR
43490 (Aug. 29, 1977) and Air Taxi Operators and Commercial
Operators, 43 FR 46742, 46777 (Oct. 10, 1978).
\3\ Training and Qualification Requirements for Check Pilots and
Flight Instructors, 61 FR 30734 (June 17, 1996).
\4\ Id. at 30734.
\5\ Id. at 30735.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Discussion of the Proposed Rule
A. Part 121 Check Pilot/Flight Instructor and Part 135 Flight
Instructor Medical Certificate Requirements
Currently, the agency implements Sec. Sec. 121.411, 121.412, and
135.338 such that part 121 check airmen (airplane), part 121 flight
instructors (airplane), and part 135 flight instructors (aircraft) \6\
are not required to hold a medical certificate unless serving as
required flightcrew members. There are, however, inconsistencies within
the regulatory text of these provisions that has caused confusion. The
agency proposes to resolve these inconsistencies with this NPRM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The FAA's regulations distinguish between check pilots or
flight instructors performing their functions in an airplane (under
part 121) or aircraft (airplanes or rotorcraft under part 135), or
in a flight simulator.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amendments to the regulatory text implementing the medical
certificate requirements for check airmen and flight instructors in
part 121 training programs (Sec. Sec. 121.411 and 121.412) and flight
instructors serving in aircraft in part 135 training programs (Sec.
135.338), have resulted in inconsistencies within each of these
sections. For example, Sec. Sec. 121.411(b)(5) and 121.412(b)(5) state
that check pilots and flight instructors (airplane) must hold at least
a third-class medical certificate unless serving as required
crewmembers; however, Sec. Sec. 121.411(e) and 121.412(e) state that
check pilots and flight instructors who do not hold an appropriate
medical certificate may function as check airmen, but may not serve as
flightcrew members in operations under this part. In part 135, Sec.
135.338(b)(5) states that flight instructors (aircraft) must hold at
least a third-class medical certificate; however, Sec. 135.338(e)
states that an airman who does not hold a medical certificate may
function as flight instructor in an aircraft if functioning as a non-
required crewmember.
Allowing a part 121 check pilot, or a part 121 or part 135 flight
instructor to serve as such in an airplane, without a medical
certificate, when not serving as a required flightcrew member, has no
negative effect on safety. Except in some circumstances in aircraft in
part 135 operations, neither the check pilot nor the flight instructor
sit at the controls for the aircraft unless serving as a required
flightcrew member. Further, pilots serving as required flightcrew
members must be fully qualified to serve as such, and must have the
appropriate medical certificate. If a check pilot or flight instructor
is not a required flightcrew member, they are not necessary for the
operation and the flight may proceed whether or not they are present.
Thus, requiring a medical certificate for check pilots and flight
instructors who are not serving as required flightcrew members is an
unnecessary burden. Moreover, there has been no degradation in the safe
operation of aircraft resulting from the current application of the
regulations during the estimated 8 years the agency has allowed
eligible check airmen and flight instructors to serve without medical
certificates if not serving as required crewmembers. Therefore, the FAA
has determined the changes in this proposed rule would have no adverse
impact on safety.
Accordingly, the FAA proposes to amend Sec. Sec. 121.411(b)(5) and
121.412(b)(5) to remove the language requiring the check pilots and
flight instructors to hold at least a third-class medical certificate
unless serving as a required crewmember. These paragraphs will retain
the requirement that the check pilots and flight instructors must hold
a first- or second-class medical certificate, as appropriate, if
serving as required flightcrew members.
Similarly, the FAA proposes to amend Sec. 135.338(b)(5) to remove
the language requiring flight instructors to hold at least a third-
class medical certificate. For clarity and consistency with part 135
requirements to serve as a required flightcrew member, the FAA proposes
to add the requirement that the flight instructor must hold a first or
second-class medical certificate, as appropriate, if serving as a
required flightcrew member.
B. Part 135 Check Pilot Medical Certificate Requirement
Currently, Sec. 135.337, requires check airmen serving in part 135
in an aircraft to hold a third-class medical certificate, even if the
check pilot is not serving as a required flightcrew member. Unlike the
three previously discussed sections of 14 CFR (i.e., Sec. Sec.
121.411, 121.412 and 135.338), Sec. 135.337 is unambiguous in
establishing this third-class medical certificate requirement.
The FAA proposes to remove the requirement for a check pilot
serving in part 135 in an aircraft to hold a third-class medical
certificate unless the check pilot is serving as a required flightcrew
member. A check pilot would need to hold an appropriate medical
certificate only if serving as a required flightcrew member. Removing
the requirement for a third-class medical certificate for check pilots
(aircraft) who
[[Page 25502]]
are not serving as required flightcrew members would not negatively
affect safety for the same reasons provided in explaining the proposal
to remove the third-class medical certificate requirement for check
pilots in part 121 training and similarly, would provide regulatory
relief from an unnecessary burden.
This proposal would reduce regulatory burdens for part 135
operators. Removing the medical certificate requirement would provide
greater operational flexibility to certificate holders and ensure that
otherwise qualified, experienced persons who meet all of the training
and qualification requirements necessary to function as check pilots
would have the opportunity to do so.
A. Miscellaneous and Conforming Amendments
The FAA proposes the following amendments to improve the clarity
and consistency of parts 135 and 121. This action proposes to change
``check airmen'' and ``check airman'' to ``check pilots'' and ``check
pilot'', respectively, throughout part 135, as appropriate. In
addition, this rule proposes to update the text in Sec. Sec. 135.337
and 135.338 by changing ``simulator'' to ``FSTD'' where appropriate.
This action proposes to change ``Class I'', ``Class II'', and
``Class III'' medical certificates to ``first-class'', ``second-
class'', and ``third-class'' medical certificates respectively, to
align with the terminology used in part 61.
This action proposes to add ``required'' before ``flightcrew
member'' in Sec. Sec. 135.337(e) and 135.338(b)(5) and (e) to
emphasize that medical certificates are only required for check pilots
and flight instructors who are serving as required flightcrew members.
This action proposes to change the structure of Sec. Sec. 135.337
and 135.338, which currently list the check pilot and flight instructor
(aircraft) and check pilot and flight instructor (simulator)
requirements separately. Since this proposed rule would remove the
medical certificate requirement altogether, the only difference in the
requirements between check pilot (aircraft) and check pilot (simulator)
would be the recency of experience requirement. Therefore, the
requirements for both check pilot (aircraft) and check pilot
(simulator) would be listed once in Sec. 135.337(b), and the recency
of experience requirement for check pilot (aircraft) would be listed
separately in Sec. 135.337(c). Similarly, the requirements for flight
instructor (aircraft) and flight instructor (simulator) would be listed
once in Sec. 135.338(b), and the recency of experience requirement for
flight instructor (aircraft) would be listed separately in Sec.
135.338(c).
The FAA acknowledges that similar types of miscellaneous and
conforming changes that are necessary for part 135 may be necessary for
part 121. The FAA will consider proposing those changes to Sec.
121.411 and Sec. 121.412 in a separate rulemaking action.
III. Regulatory Notices and Analyses
A. Regulatory Evaluation
Changes to Federal regulations must undergo several economic
analyses. First, Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563 direct
that each Federal agency shall propose or adopt a regulation only upon
a reasoned determination that the benefits of the intended regulation
justify its costs. Second, the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (Pub.
L. 96-354) requires agencies to analyze the economic impact of
regulatory changes on small entities. Third, the Trade Agreements Act
(Pub. L. 96-39) prohibits agencies from setting standards that create
unnecessary obstacles to the foreign commerce of the United States. In
developing U.S. standards, this Trade Act requires agencies to consider
international standards and, where appropriate, that they be the basis
of U.S. standards. Fourth, the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104-4) requires agencies to prepare a written assessment of
the costs, benefits, and other effects of proposed or final rules that
include a Federal mandate likely to result in the expenditure by State,
local, or tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private
sector, of $100 million or more annually (adjusted for inflation with
base year of 1995). This portion of the preamble summarizes the FAA's
analysis of the economic impacts of this proposed rule.
In conducting these analyses, the FAA has determined that this
proposed rule would: (1) Have savings and no additional costs, (2) not
be an economically ``significant regulatory action'' as defined in
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, (3) not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities; (4) not
create unnecessary obstacles to the foreign commerce of the United
States; and (5) not impose an unfunded mandate on state, local, or
tribal governments, or on the private sector by exceeding the threshold
identified above. These analyses are summarized below.
As previously discussed, the FAA has determined the changes in this
proposed rule would have no adverse impact on safety. The FAA has found
that by allowing a part 121 check pilot, or a part 121 or part 135
flight instructor to serve as such in an airplane, without a medical
certificate, when not serving as a required flightcrew member, has no
negative effect on safety. Except in some circumstances in aircraft in
part 135 operations, neither the check pilot nor the flight instructor
sit at the controls for the aircraft unless serving as a required
flightcrew member. Further, pilots serving as required flightcrew
members must be fully qualified to serve as such, and must have the
appropriate medical certificate. If a check pilot or flight instructor
is not a required flightcrew member, they are not even necessary for
the operation and the flight may proceed whether or not they are
present. Thus, requiring a medical certificate for check pilots and
flight instructors who are not serving as required flightcrew members
would result in an unnecessary burden. Moreover, there has been no
degradation in the safe operation of aircraft resulting from the
current application of the regulations during the estimated 8 years the
agency has allowed check airmen and flight instructors to serve without
medical certificates if not serving as required crewmembers.
As of June of 2018, there are roughly 1,035 part 135 check
pilots.\7\ Out of 1,035 part 135 check pilots, there are roughly 496
part 135 check pilots, who do not hold a medical certificate and who
are therefore limited to performing check pilot duties in a flight
simulator. This proposed rule would enable these check pilots, who are
otherwise qualified, but may have become ineligible for a medical
certificate during their employment, to function as check pilots in
aircraft. While this proposed rule would expand the opportunities for
these check pilots, there is not enough information on the demand for
check pilots to perform their duties in an aircraft to quantify the
impacts of this enabling opportunity. For example, some companies only
use simulators to perform check pilots duties while others use a
combination of simulators and aircraft. The FAA requests additional
information and data on the expanded opportunities for affected check
pilots.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ National Vital Information Subsystem (NVIS) database, June
2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, removing the requirement for a medical certificate
could generate cost savings by allowing part 135 check pilots, with
valid medical certificates, to discontinue
[[Page 25503]]
obtaining medical certificates. There are approximately 539 part 135
check pilots with valid medical certificates. Based on age and a
pilot's medical condition, which determines the frequency of a medical
examination, check pilots would save approximately 0.5 hours per pilot
to complete the medical application (MedXpress), 0.5 hours per pilot in
travel time to see an Aviation Medical Examiner (AME), and one hour for
the actual medical examination.\8\ Additional savings include vehicle
operating costs of 0.17 cents per mile \9\ based on 40 miles traveled
to and from the examination, and $117 paid to the AME for the medical
examination.\10\ The estimated value of time for a check pilot is $111
per hour \11\ resulting in potential savings per affected check pilot
of $346 per medical certificate.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Estimated durations of time and miles traveled to and from
examinations taken from Alternative Pilot Physical Examination and
Education Requirements Regulatory Evaluation. https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=FAA-2016-9157-0009.
\9\ Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Standard Mileage Rate for
2017, 0.17 cents per mile driven for medical or moving purposes;
https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/2017-standard-mileage-rates-for-business-medical-and-moving-announced Dec.13, 2016.
\10\ $117 aid to AME taken from Alternative Pilot Physical
Examination and Education Requirements Regulatory Evaluation.
https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=FAA-2016-9157-0009.
\11\ Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), National Industry-
Specific Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates, Occupational
Code 53-2011 Airline Pilots, Copilots, and Flight Engineers, May
2017 https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics4_488100.htm--includes BLS
Employee Compensation as of June 2017.
\12\ Total savings per check pilot per medical certificate =
$117 fee per pilot + $55.5 per pilot to complete the application +
$111 per pilot to complete the examination + $55.5 per pilot to
travel to and from the examination + $6.8 in vehicle operating
costs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Approximately 457 check pilots, out of the 539 check pilots with
valid medical certificates, are age 40 and over. Pilots under the age
of 40 renew their third-class medical certificate every five years
compared to every two years for pilots age 40 and over. The FAA assumes
that most pilots who would voluntarily discontinue their medical
certificates are age 40 and over as this age bracket accounts for 85
percent of the check pilot population with valid medical certificates.
Additionally, older applicants are more likely to apply for special
issuance medical certificates, granted to applicants who do not meet
the established medical standards but demonstrate they can perform
without endangering public safety, than their younger counterparts.\13\
Information is limited on the number of check pilots that would allow
their medical certificates to expire. However, the FAA estimates that
only 5 to 10 percent would no longer obtain medical certificates since
check pilots still need to maintain a valid medical certificate to
pilot an aircraft professionally and recreationally or serve as
required flight crew. The FAA requests comment on this estimate. At 5
percent this would be 23 check pilots and at 10 percent this would be
46 check pilots. For affected check pilots age 40 and over, who would
potentially take advantage of this proposed rule, this could result in
undiscounted savings of $23,874 or $47,748 respectively, over a five
year period of analysis as shown in the table below.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2007/04/10/E7-6652/modification-of-certain-medical-standards-and-procedures-and-duration-of-certain-medical.
\14\ This savings to part 135 check pilots would be at the
expense of the medical practitioner.
Table 1--Estimated Yearly Undiscounted Savings for Check Pilots Age 40
and Over--Medical Certificate Renewal Every 2 Years
------------------------------------------------------------------------
23 Check 46 Check
Year pilots pilots
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1............................................. $7,958 $15,916
2............................................. ........... ...........
3............................................. 7,958 15,916
4............................................. ........... ...........
5............................................. 7,958 15,916
-------------------------
Total..................................... $23,874 $47,748
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This proposed rule also updates the current regulatory text under
which, the FAA allows check pilots in part 121 and flight instructors
in parts 121 and 135 to serve without a medical certificate, unless
they are required flightcrew members, and updates nomenclature. While
the FAA does not currently require that part 121 check pilots and
flight instructors and part 135 flight instructors hold medical
certificates, as discussed earlier, these regulations are not clear.
The FAA has, therefore, determined that this proposed rule is not a
``significant regulatory action'' as defined in section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Determination
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (Public Law 96-354) (RFA)
establishes ``as a principle of regulatory issuance that agencies shall
endeavor, consistent with the objectives of the rule and of applicable
statutes, to fit regulatory and informational requirements to the scale
of the businesses, organizations, and governmental jurisdictions
subject to regulation. To achieve this principle, agencies are required
to solicit and consider flexible regulatory proposals and to explain
the rationale for their actions to assure that such proposals are given
serious consideration.'' The RFA covers a wide-range of small entities,
including small businesses, not-for-profit organizations, and small
governmental jurisdictions.
Agencies must perform a review to determine whether a rule will
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. If the agency determines that it will, the agency must
prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis as described in the RFA.
However, if an agency determines that a rule is not expected to have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities,
section 605(b) of the RFA provides that the head of the agency may so
certify and a regulatory flexibility analysis is not required. The
certification must include a statement providing the factual basis for
this determination, and the reasoning should be clear.
This proposed rule would relieve part 135 check pilots from having
to obtain at least a third-class medical certificate when performing
check pilot duties, in an aircraft, as long as they are not required
flight crew. This change could provide cost savings to a few part 135
check pilots without additional costs. The proposed rule also would
clarify related FAA regulations without substantive effect. Thus, the
expected outcome would be a small positive impact on any small entity
affected by this rulemaking action.
Therefore, as provided in section 605(b), the head of the FAA
certifies that this rulemaking would not result in a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
C. International Trade Impact Assessment
The Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (Pub. L. 96-39), as amended by the
Uruguay Round Agreements Act (Pub. L. 103-465), prohibits Federal
agencies from establishing standards or engaging in related activities
that create unnecessary obstacles to the foreign commerce of the United
States. Pursuant to these Acts, the establishment of standards is not
considered an unnecessary obstacle to the foreign commerce of the
United States, so long as the standard has a legitimate domestic
objective, such as the protection of safety, and does not operate in a
manner that excludes imports that meet this objective. The
[[Page 25504]]
statute also requires consideration of international standards and,
where appropriate, that they be the basis for U.S. standards. The FAA
has assessed the potential effect of this proposed rule and determined
that it would have only a domestic impact and therefore no effect on
international trade.
D. Unfunded Mandates Assessment
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-
4) requires each Federal agency to prepare a written statement
assessing the effects of any Federal mandate in a proposed or final
agency rule that may result in an expenditure of $100 million or more
(in 1995 dollars) in any one year by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector; such a mandate
is deemed to be a ``significant regulatory action.'' The FAA currently
uses an inflation-adjusted value of $155.0 million in lieu of $100
million.
This rule would not contain such a mandate. Therefore, the
requirements of Title II of the Act do not apply.
E. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)) requires
that the FAA consider the impact of paperwork and other information
collection burdens imposed on the public. According to the 1995
amendments to the Paperwork Reduction Act (5 CFR 1320.8(b)(2)(vi)), an
agency may not collect or sponsor the collection of information, nor
may it impose an information collection requirement unless it displays
a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number.
The existing information collection associated with all check pilot
and flight instructor medical certificates in parts 121 and 135 was
approved under OMB control number 2120-0034. The information collection
is used to collect medical certificate information to determine whether
applicants are medically qualified to perform the duties associated
with the class of medical certificate sought. The FAA has determined
that removing the medical certificate requirement for part 135 check
pilots (aircraft) who are currently eligible for a medical certificate,
but may choose to allow their certificate to expire, would result in a
negligible reduction in the information collection, as pilots would
still need to maintain a valid medical certificate to pilot an aircraft
or serve as required flight crew. The FAA has determined that there
would be no reduction in the information collection associated with
part 121 check pilots and flight instructors and part 135 flight
instructors. The FAA has also determined that there would be no new
requirement for information collection associated with this rule.
F. International Compatibility and Cooperation
In keeping with U.S. obligations under the Convention on
International Civil Aviation, it is FAA policy to conform to
International Civil Aviation Organization Standards and Recommended
Practices to the maximum extent practicable. The FAA has reviewed the
corresponding ICAO Standards and Recommended Practices and has
identified no differences with these regulations.
G. Environmental Analysis
FAA Order 1050.1F identifies FAA actions that are categorically
excluded from preparation of an environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement under the National Environmental Policy
Act in the absence of extraordinary circumstances. The FAA has
determined this rulemaking action qualifies for the categorical
exclusion identified in paragraph 5-6.6f and involves no extraordinary
circumstances.
IV. Executive Order Determinations
A. Executive Order 13132, Federalism
The FAA has analyzed this proposed rule under the principles and
criteria of Executive Order 13132, Federalism. The agency has
determined that this action would not have a substantial direct effect
on the States, or the relationship between the Federal Government and
the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among
the various levels of government, and, therefore, would not have
Federalism implications.
B. Executive Order 13211, Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use
The FAA analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations that Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (May 18, 2001). The agency has determined that it
would not be a ``significant energy action'' under the executive order
and would not be likely to have a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy.
C. Executive Order 13609, Promoting International Regulatory
Cooperation
Executive Order 13609, Promoting International Regulatory
Cooperation, (77 FR 26413, May 4, 2012) promotes international
regulatory cooperation to meet shared challenges involving health,
safety, labor, security, environmental, and other issues and to reduce,
eliminate, or prevent unnecessary differences in regulatory
requirements. The FAA has analyzed this action under the policies and
agency responsibilities of Executive Order 13609, and has determined
that this action would have no effect on international regulatory
cooperation.
D. Executive Order 13771, Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs
This proposed rule is expected to be an Executive Order 13771
deregulatory action. Details on the estimated cost savings of this
proposed rule can be found in the rule's economic analysis.
IV. Additional Information
A. Comments Invited
The FAA invites interested persons to participate in this
rulemaking by submitting written comments, data, or views. The agency
also invites comments relating to the economic, environmental, energy,
or federalism impacts that might result from adopting the proposals in
this document. The most helpful comments reference a specific portion
of the proposal, explain the reason for any recommended change, and
include supporting data. To ensure the docket does not contain
duplicate comments, commenters should send only one copy of written
comments, or if comments are filed electronically, commenters should
submit only one time.
The FAA will file in the docket all comments it receives, as well
as a report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed rulemaking. Before acting on this
proposal, the FAA will consider all comments it receives on or before
the closing date for comments. The agency may change this proposal in
light of the comments it receives.
Proprietary or Confidential Business Information: Commenters should
not file proprietary or confidential business information in the
docket. Such information must be sent or delivered directly to the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this document, and marked as proprietary or confidential. If submitting
information on a disk or CD ROM, mark the outside of the disk or CD
ROM, and identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the specific
information that is proprietary or confidential.
Under 14 CFR 11.35(b), if the FAA is aware of proprietary
information filed with a comment, the agency does not
[[Page 25505]]
place it in the docket. It is held in a separate file to which the
public does not have access, and the FAA places a note in the docket
that it has received it. If the FAA receives a request to examine or
copy this information, it treats it as any other request under the
Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552). The FAA processes such a
request under Department of Transportation procedures found in 49 CFR
part 7.
B. Availability of Rulemaking Documents
An electronic copy of rulemaking documents may be obtained from the
internet by--
Searching the Federal eRulemaking Portal (https://www.regulations.gov);
Visiting the FAA's Regulations and Policies web page at
https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies or
Accessing the Government Publishing Office's web page at
https://www.fdsys.gov.
Copies may also be obtained by sending a request to the Federal
Aviation Administration, Office of Rulemaking, ARM-1, 800 Independence
Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591, or by calling (202) 267-9677.
Commenters must identify the docket or notice number of this
rulemaking.
All documents the FAA considered in developing this proposed rule,
including economic analyses and technical reports, may be accessed from
the internet through the Federal eRulemaking Portal referenced above.
List of Subjects
14 CFR Part 121
Air carriers, Aircraft, Airmen, Aviation safety, Transportation.
14 CFR Part 135
Air taxies, Aircraft, Airmen, Aviation safety.
The Proposed Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend chapter I of title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations as follows:
PART 121--OPERATING REQUIREMENTS: DOMESTIC, FLAG, AND SUPPLEMENTAL
OPERATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 121 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40119, 41706,
42301 preceding note added by Pub. L. 112-95, sec. 412, 126 Stat.
89, 44101, 44701-44702, 44705, 44709-44711, 44713, 44716-44717,
44722, 44729, 44732; 46105; Pub. L. 111-216, 124 Stat. 2348 (49
U.S.C. 44701 note); Pub. L. 112-95 126, Stat 62 (49 U.S.C. 44732
note).
0
2. Amend Sec. 121.411 by revising paragraph (b)(5) to read as follows:
Sec. 121.411 Qualifications: Check airmen (airplane) and check
airmen (simulator).
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(5) Holds a first-class or second-class medical certificate, as
appropriate, if serving as a required flightcrew member;
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Sec. 121.412 by revising paragraphs (b)(5) and (f)(1) to read
as follows:
Sec. 121.412 Qualifications: Flight instructors (airplane) and
flight instructors (simulator).
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(5) Holds a first-class or second-class medical certificate, as
appropriate, if serving as a required flightcrew member; and
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(1) Fly at least two flight segments as a required crewmember for
the type of airplane within the 12-month period preceding the
performance of any flight instructor duty in a flight simulator (and
must hold a first-class or second-class medical certificate as
appropriate); or
* * * * *
PART 135--OPERATING REQUIREMENTS: COMMUTER AND ON DEMAND OPERATIONS
AND RULES GOVERNING PERSONS ON BOARD SUCH AIRCRAFT
0
4. The authority citation for part 135 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40113, 41706, 44701-44702,
44705, 44709, 44711-44713, 44715-44717, 44722, 44730, 45101-45105;
Pub. L. 112-95, 126 Stat. 58 (49 U.S.C. 44730).
0
5. Amend Sec. 135.337 by revising the section heading and paragraphs
(a)(1) through (a)(3), the introductory text of paragraph (b), and
(b)(5) through (f) to read as follows:
Sec. 135.337 Qualifications: Check pilots.
(a) * * *
(1) A check pilot (aircraft) is a person who is qualified to
conduct flight checks in an aircraft or FSTD for a particular type
aircraft.
(2) A check pilot (simulator) is a person who is qualified to
conduct flight checks in an FSTD for a particular type aircraft.
(3) Check pilot (aircraft) and check pilot (simulator) are those
persons who perform the functions described in Sec. Sec. 135.321(a)
and 135.323(a)(4) and (c).
(b) No certificate holder may use a person, nor may any person
serve as a check pilot in a training program established under this
subpart unless, with respect to the aircraft type involved, that
person--
* * * * *
(5) Holds a first-class or second-class medical certificate, as
appropriate, if serving as a required flightcrew member; and
(6) Has been approved by the Administrator for the check pilot
duties involved.
(c) No certificate holder may use a person, nor may any person
serve as a check pilot (aircraft) in a training program established
under this subpart unless, with respect to the aircraft type involved,
that person has satisfied the recency of experience requirements of
Sec. 135.247.
(d) Completion of the requirements in paragraphs (b) (2), (3), and
(4) of this section, as applicable, must be entered in the individual's
training record maintained by the certificate holder.
(e) A medical certificate is not required for a person to serve as
a check pilot, unless that check pilot is a required flightcrew member
in an operation under this part.
(f) A check pilot (simulator) must accomplish the following--
(1) Fly at least two flight segments as a required crewmember for
the type, class, or category aircraft involved within the 12-month
preceding the performance of any check pilot duty in an FSTD; or
(2) Satisfactorily complete an approved line-observation program
within the period prescribed by that program and that must precede the
performance of any check pilot duty in an FSTD.
* * * * *
0
6. Amend Sec. 135.338 by revising the section heading and paragraphs
(a)(1) through (a)(2), the introductory text of paragraph (b), and
(b)(4) through (f) to read as follows:
Sec. 135.338 Qualifications: Flight instructors.
(a) * * *
(1) A flight instructor (aircraft) is a person who is qualified to
instruct in an aircraft, or FSTD for a particular type, class, or
category aircraft.
(2) A flight instructor (simulator) is a person who is qualified to
instruct in an FSTD for a particular type, class, or category aircraft.
* * * * *
(b) No certificate holder may use a person, nor may any person
serve as a flight instructor in a training program established under
this subpart unless,
[[Page 25506]]
with respect to the type, class, or category aircraft involved, that
person--
* * * * *
(4) Has satisfactorily completed the applicable training
requirements of Sec. 135.340; and
(5) Holds a first-class or second-class medical certificate, as
appropriate, if serving as a required flightcrew member.
(c) No certificate holder may use a person, nor may any person
serve as a flight instructor (aircraft) in a training program
established under this subpart unless, with respect to the type, class,
or category aircraft involved, that person has satisfied the recency of
experience requirements of Sec. 135.247.
(d) Completion of the requirements in paragraphs (b)(2), (3), and
(4) of this section, as applicable, must be entered in the individual's
training record maintained by the certificate holder.
(e) A medical certificate is not required for a person to serve as
a check pilot, unless that check pilot is a required flightcrew member
in an operation under this part.
(f) * * *
(1) Fly at least two flight segments as a required crewmember for
the type, class, or category aircraft involved within the 12-month
period preceding the performance of any flight instructor duty in an
FSTD; or
(2) Satisfactorily complete an approved line-observation program
within the period prescribed by that program preceding the performance
of any flight instructor duty in an FSTD.
* * * * *
0
7. In part 135, remove the word ``airmen'' and add, in its place, the
word ``pilots'' in the following places:
0
a. Section 135.321 paragraph (a)(2);
0
b. Section 135.323 paragraph (a)(4);
0
c. Section 135.324 paragraph (b)(4); and
0
d. Section 135.339 section heading, and paragraphs (c) through (e) and
(g).
0
8. In part 135, remove the word ``airman'' and add, in its place, the
word ``pilot'' in the following places:
0
a. Section 135.113 introductory text;
0
b. Section 135.297 paragraph (c)(2);
0
c. Section 135.323 paragraphs (a)(1) and (c);
0
d. Section 135.339 paragraphs (a), (c)(1), (d); and
0
e. Section 135.340 paragraph (a)(2).
Issued in Washington, DC, under the authority of 49 U.S.C.
106(f), 44701(a)(5), and 44705, on May 17, 2019.
Robert C. Carty,
Deputy Executive Director, Flight Standards Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-11086 Filed 5-31-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P