Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Foreign Commercial Satellite Services and Certain Items on the Commerce Control List (DFARS Case 2018-D020), 25188-25190 [2019-11306]
Download as PDF
25188
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 105 / Friday, May 31, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Test Program described in DFARS
219.702–70, if the subcontract is
expected to exceed the applicable
threshold specified in Federal
Acquisition Regulation 19.702(a), and to
have further subcontracting
opportunities.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 8. Amend section 252.219–7004 by—
Revising the section heading;
■ a. Removing the clause date of ‘‘(APR
2018)’’ and adding ‘‘(MAY 2019)’’ in its
place;
■ b. Revising paragraph (g) introductory
text.
■ c. In paragraph (g)(1), removing
‘‘252.219–7003’’ and adding ‘‘Defense
Federal Acquisition Regulation
Supplement (DFARS) 252.219–7003’’ in
its place;
■ d. In paragraph (g)(2), removing
‘‘252.219–7003’’ and adding ‘‘DFARS
252.219–7003’’ in its place; and
■ e. In paragraph (g)(3), removing
‘‘252.219–7004’’ and adding ‘‘DFARS
252.219–7004’’ in its place.
The revisions read as follows:
252.219–7004 Small Business
Subcontracting Plan (Test Program).
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Subcontracts. The Contractor shall
include in subcontracts that offer
subcontracting opportunities, are
expected to exceed the applicable
threshold specified in FAR 19.702(a) on
the date of subcontract award, and are
required to include the clause at FAR
52.219–8, Utilization of Small Business
Concerns, the clauses at—
*
*
*
*
*
■ 9. Amend section 252.225–7004 by—
■ a. Removing the clause date of ‘‘(OCT
2015)’’ and adding ‘‘(MAY 2019)’’ in its
place;
■ b. Revising paragraphs (a) and (b)(1).
The revisions read as follows:
252.225–7004 Report of Intended
Performance Outside the United States and
Canada—Submission after Award.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(a) Definition. As used in this clause—
United States means the 50 States, the
District of Columbia, and outlying areas.
(b) * * *
(1) Exceeds the threshold specified in
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation
Supplement 225.870–4(c)(2)(i)(A)(1) on
the date of award of this contract; and
*
*
*
*
*
■ 10. Amend section 252.249–7002 by—
■ a. Revising the section heading;
■ b. Removing the clause date of ‘‘(OCT
2015)’’ and adding ‘‘(MAY 2019)’’ in its
place;
■ c. Revising paragraph (a); and
■ d. Revising paragraphs (d)(1) and
(d)(2).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 May 30, 2019
Jkt 247001
The revisions read as follows:
252.249–7002 Notification of Anticipated
Contract Termination or Reduction.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) Definition. As used in this clause—
Major defense program means a
program that is carried out to produce
or acquire a major system (as defined in
10 U.S.C. 2302(5)).
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) Provide notice of the anticipated
termination or reduction to each firsttier subcontractor with a subcontract
that equals or exceeds the threshold
specified in Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS)
225.870–4(c)(2)(i)(A)(1) at the time of
the notice; and
(2) Require that each such
subcontractor—
(i) Provide notice to each of its
subcontractors with a subcontract that
equals or exceeds the threshold
specified in DFARS 225.870–
4(c)(2)(i)(C) at the time of the notice;
and
(ii) Impose a similar notice and
flowdown requirement to
subcontractors with subcontracts that
equal or exceed the threshold specified
in DFARS 225.870–4(c)(2)(i)(C) at the
time of the notice.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2019–11308 Filed 5–30–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
48 CFR Parts 204, 212, 225, and 252
[Docket DARS–2018–0060]
RIN 0750–AJ82
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement: Foreign
Commercial Satellite Services and
Certain Items on the Commerce
Control List (DFARS Case 2018–D020)
commercial satellite services, such as
cybersecurity risk and source of
satellites and launch vehicles used to
provide the foreign commercial satellite
services, and expands the definition of
‘‘covered foreign country’’ to include
Russia. Another section prohibits
purchase of items originating in the
People’s Republic of China that meet the
definition of goods and services
controlled as munitions items when
moved to the Commerce Control List of
the Export Administration Regulations
of the Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective May 31, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Amy G. Williams, telephone 571–372–
6106.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD published an interim rule in the
Federal Register at 83 FR 66066 on
December 21, 2018, to implement
section 1603 of the National Defense
Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal
Year (FY) 2018 (Pub. L. 115–91) and
section 1296 of the NDAA for FY 2017
(Pub. L. 114–328). Section 1603 amends
10 U.S.C. 2279 to impose additional
prohibitions with regard to acquisition
of certain foreign commercial satellite
services, such as cybersecurity risk and
source of satellites and launch vehicles
used to provide the foreign commercial
satellite services. Section 1603 also
expands the definition of ‘‘Covered
foreign country’’ to include Russia.
Section 1296 prohibits purchase of
items from a Communist Chinese
military company. One respondent
submitted a public comment in
response to the interim rule.
II. Discussion and Analysis
DoD reviewed the public comment
received. It was favorable to
implementation of the rule. No changes
from the interim rule are made in the
final rule.
AGENCY:
III. Applicability to Contracts at or
Below the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold and for Commercial Items,
Including Commercially Available Offthe-Shelf Items
DoD has adopted as final,
without change, an interim rule
amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement
(DFARS) to implement sections of the
National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Years 2017 and 2018. One section
imposes additional prohibitions with
regard to acquisition of certain foreign
A. The Interim Rule Amended the
Applicability of Existing DFARS
Solicitation Provisions and Contract
Clauses and Added a New Clause as
Follows
• To implement section 1603 of the
NDAA for FY 2018, this rule amended
the provision at DFARS 252.225–7049,
Prohibition on Acquisition of
Commercial Satellite Services from
Certain Foreign Entities—
Representation, and added a clause to
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\31MYR1.SGM
31MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 105 / Friday, May 31, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
enforce compliance with the
representations in the associated
provisions. This provision and clause
apply to acquisitions not greater than
the simplified acquisition threshold
(SAT) and acquisitions of commercial
items.
• To implement section 1296 of the
NDAA for FY 2017, this rule modified
the clause at DFARS 252.225–7007,
Prohibition on Acquisition of United
States Munitions List Items from
Communist Chinese Military
Companies, to prohibit contractors or
subcontractors from acquiring items
listed on the 600 series of the CCL that
are to be delivered under the contract
from any Communist Chinese military
company. The rule continues to
prescribe the use of this clause for use
in solicitations and contracts for items
valued at or below the SAT. However,
the clause now applies to the
acquisition of commercial items,
including Commercially Available Offthe-Shelf (COTS) items, if the items are
600 series items on the CCL, or USML
items. Although most 600 series items
are not commercial items, and USML
items are even less likely to be
commercial items, it is possible that
some of these covered items will be
commercial items and must not be
purchased from a Communist Chinese
military company.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
B. Determinations
• Section 1603 of the NDAA for FY
2018. A determination and finding was
signed by the Director, Defense
Procurement and Acquisition Policy, on
June 23, 2014, that due to potential risk
to national security it would not be in
the best interest of the United States to
exempt acquisitions not greater than the
SAT and acquisitions of commercial
items from the applicability of 10 U.S.C.
2279.
• Section 1296 of the NDAA for FY
2017. A determination under 41 U.S.C.
1905 was not required to prescribe
DFARS 252.225–7012 for use in
solicitations and contracts valued at or
below the SAT, because this is
consistent with the current applicability
of the clause DFARS 252.225–7007,
which prohibits acquisitions of items on
the USML from Communist Chinese
Military companies. The Principal
Director, DPC, determined that it is in
the best interest of the Government to
apply the requirements of section 1296
to contracts for the acquisition of
commercial items, including COTS
items, to prevent insertion of malicious
items into U.S. weapons platforms,
information technology systems, and
other areas, presenting a threat to our
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 May 30, 2019
Jkt 247001
warfighters and their ability to defend
national security.
IV. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is not a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
V. Regulatory Flexibility Act
A final regulatory flexibility analysis
(FRFA) has been prepared consistent
with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601, et seq. The FRFA is
summarized as follows:
The reason for this rule is to
implement section 1603 of the National
Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for
Fiscal Year (FY) 2018 and section 1296
of the NDAA for FY 2017. Section 1603
of the NDAA for FY 2018 amends 10
U.S.C. 2279, which prohibits acquisition
of certain foreign commercial satellite
services. Section 1296 of the NDAA for
FY 2017 amends section 1211 of the
NDAA for FY 2006 to prohibit purchase
from any Communist Chinese military
company, through a contract or
subcontract (at any tier), of goods and
services controlled as munitions items
on the 600 series of the Commerce
Control List (CCL) of the Export
Administration Regulations of the
Department of Commerce.
The objectives of the rule are as
follows:
• Section 1603. To prohibit award of
contracts for commercial satellite
services to a foreign entity if entering
into such contract would create an
unacceptable cybersecurity risk. In
addition, the definition of covered
foreign country is expanded to include
Russia (other covered foreign countries
are China, North Korea, Iran, Sudan,
and Syria). New restrictions are also
added with regard to the satellites and
launch vehicles to be used to provide
the satellite services, but these
restrictions do not apply to launches
that occur prior to December 31, 2022.
• Section 1296. To prohibit purchase
of items originating in the People’s
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
25189
Republic of China that meet the
definition of goods and services
controlled as munitions items when
moved to the 600 series of the CCL of
the Export Administration Regulations
of the Department of Commerce.
There were no significant issues
raised by the public comments in
response to the initial regulatory
flexibility analysis.
DoD estimates that this rule applies to
small entities as follows:
• Section 1603. This part of the rule
applies to less than 86 small entities.
According to Federal Procurement Data
System (FPDS) data for FY 2016, 86
small entities were awarded contracts or
orders for services under Product
Service Code D304 (ADP
Telecommunications and Transmission
Services), of which commercial satellite
services are a subset. Although the focus
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act is
protection of domestic small business
entities that are eligible for assistance
from the Small Business
Administration, there may be domestic
small business entities in the United
States that offer the satellite services of
a foreign entity that would be restricted
by this rule.
• Section 1296. This part of the rule
applies to any small entities that intend
to provide items on the 600 series of the
Commerce Control List under a DoD
contract or subcontract. The 600 series
consists of items on the Commerce
Control List that have an export control
classification number of which the third
character is a ‘‘6’’. These items were
transitioned from the United States
Munitions List (USML) to the 600 series,
because they have less than a critical
military or intelligence capability than
the items that remain on the USML, but
they are not currently in normal
commercial use. Data on the number of
entities that can provide such items, and
whether they are small or other than
small entities, is not available in FPDS,
because these items are not readily
identifiable in FPDS and are often
acquired through subcontracts.
Projected reporting or recordkeeping
requirements of this rule are as follows:
• Section 1603. In addition to the
current annual representations as to
whether the offeror is, or is not, a
foreign entity subject to the prohibitions
of the statute; or is, or is not, offering
commercial satellite services provided
by such a foreign entity, this rule adds
five more annual representations as to
whether the offeror—
Æ Is, or is not offering commercial
satellite services using satellites,
launched on or after December 31, 2022,
that will be designed or manufactured
in a covered foreign country;
E:\FR\FM\31MYR1.SGM
31MYR1
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
25190
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 105 / Friday, May 31, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Æ Is, or is not offering commercial
satellite services using satellites,
launched on or after December 31, 2022,
that will be designed or manufactured
by an entity controlled in whole or in
part by, or acting on behalf of, the
government of a covered foreign
country;
Æ Is, or is not offering commercial
satellite services using satellites,
launched outside the United States on
or after December 31, 2022, using a
launch vehicle that is designed or
manufactured in a covered foreign
country;
Æ Is, or is not offering commercial
satellite services using satellites,
launched outside the United States on
or after December 31, 2022, using a
launch vehicle that is provided by the
government of a covered foreign
country; and
Æ Is, or is not offering commercial
satellite services using satellites,
launched outside the United States on
or after December 31, 2022, using a
launch vehicle that is provided by an
entity controlled in whole or in part by,
or acting on behalf of, the government
of a covered foreign country.
Further information is required if the
offeror provides an affirmative response
to any of the representations, but such
affirmative response and further
submission is expected to be extremely
rare because of the statutory prohibition
and the expected rarity of a waiver by
the Under Secretary of Defense for
Acquisition and Sustainment or for
Policy. Furthermore, this prohibition is
only applicable to launches on or after
December 31, 2022.
If the satellite service provider
responded affirmatively to any of the
new representations regarding launch
vehicles, if such launches are covered in
whole or in part by a contract or other
agreement relating to launch services
that, prior to June 10, 2018, was either
fully paid by the satellite service
provider or covered by a legally binding
commitment of the satellite service
provider to pay for such services, a de
minimis amount of information is
required with regard to such contract or
agreement in order to establish an
exception to the associated prohibitions.
• Section 1296. There are no
projected reporting or recordkeeping
requirements relating to implementation
of section 1296. The only compliance
requirements are to not purchase 600
series items that originate in the
People’s Republic of China.
This rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any small entities,
unless they are offering commercial
satellite services subject to the
restrictions of this rule or providing 600
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 May 30, 2019
Jkt 247001
series items that originate in the Peoples
Republic of China. DoD was not able to
identify any alternatives that would
reduce the burden on small entities and
meet the objectives of the rule.
in solicitations to be justified and
approved.
DATES: Effective May 31, 2019.
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act
Ms.
Carrie Moore, telephone 571–372–6093.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The interim rule affected the
information collection requirements in
the provision at DFARS 252.225–7049,
currently approved through March 31,
2021, under OMB Control Number
0704–0525, entitled Prohibition on
Acquisition of Commercial Satellite
Services from Certain Foreign Entities,
in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
The impact, however, is negligible at
this time, because the prohibition on
use of certain foreign satellites and
launch vehicles only applies to
launches outside the United States on or
after December 31, 2022. The
information collection will be updated
to reflect these changes when renewed.
I. Background
DoD published a proposed rule in the
Federal Register at 83 FR 54696 on
October 31, 2018, to implement section
888(a) of the National Defense
Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal
Year (FY) 2017 (Pub. L. 114–328), which
requires that competition on DoD
contracts not be limited through the use
of brand name or equal descriptions, or
proprietary specifications or standards,
in solicitations, unless a justification for
such specification is provided and
approved in accordance with 10 U.S.C.
2304(f). Six respondents submitted
public comments in response to the
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 201,
212, 225, and 252
II. Discussion and Analysis
DoD reviewed the public comments in
the development of the final rule. A
discussion of the comments and the
changes made to the rule as a result of
those comments is provided, as follows:
Government procurement.
Accordingly, the interim rule
amending 48 CFR parts 201, 212, 225,
and 252, which was published at 83 FR
66066 on December 21, 2018, is adopted
as final without change.
■
Jennifer Lee Hawes,
Regulatory Control Officer, Defense
Acquisition Regulations System.
[FR Doc. 2019–11306 Filed 5–30–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
48 CFR Parts 206, 211, and 213
[Docket DARS–2018–0052]
RIN 0750–AJ50
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement: Brand Name
or Equal (DFARS Case 2017–D040)
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
DoD is issuing a final rule
amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement
(DFARS) to implement a section of the
National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2017 that requires the use of
brand name or equal descriptions, or
proprietary specifications or standards,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
A. Summary of Significant Changes
From the Proposed Rule
The paragraphs at DFARS 211.104
and DFARS 211.170 have been updated
to clarify that the use brand name or
equal descriptions or proprietary
specifications and standards shall be
justified and approved when using
sealed bidding procedures, negotiated
procedures, or simplified procedures for
certain commercial items.
B. Analysis of Public Comments
1. Support for the Rule
Comment: Several respondents
expressed support for the rule.
Response: DoD acknowledges the
support for the rule.
2. Restrictions on Brand Name or Equal
Descriptions
Comment: A respondent expressed
concern that subjecting brand name or
equal descriptions to the justification
and approval process will discourage
the use of solicitations that signal a
preference for, but do not require, a
specific brand or product.
Response: The language in the rule
meets the intent of the statute at section
888(a) of the NDAA for FY 2017. When
contracting without providing for full
and open competition (e.g., requiring a
specific brand or product particular to
one manufacturer, or requiring
specifications or standards that are
E:\FR\FM\31MYR1.SGM
31MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 105 (Friday, May 31, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 25188-25190]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-11306]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations System
48 CFR Parts 204, 212, 225, and 252
[Docket DARS-2018-0060]
RIN 0750-AJ82
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Foreign
Commercial Satellite Services and Certain Items on the Commerce Control
List (DFARS Case 2018-D020)
AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense
(DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD has adopted as final, without change, an interim rule
amending the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS)
to implement sections of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Years 2017 and 2018. One section imposes additional prohibitions
with regard to acquisition of certain foreign commercial satellite
services, such as cybersecurity risk and source of satellites and
launch vehicles used to provide the foreign commercial satellite
services, and expands the definition of ``covered foreign country'' to
include Russia. Another section prohibits purchase of items originating
in the People's Republic of China that meet the definition of goods and
services controlled as munitions items when moved to the Commerce
Control List of the Export Administration Regulations of the Department
of Commerce.
DATES: Effective May 31, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Amy G. Williams, telephone 571-
372-6106.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD published an interim rule in the Federal Register at 83 FR
66066 on December 21, 2018, to implement section 1603 of the National
Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2018 (Pub. L.
115-91) and section 1296 of the NDAA for FY 2017 (Pub. L. 114-328).
Section 1603 amends 10 U.S.C. 2279 to impose additional prohibitions
with regard to acquisition of certain foreign commercial satellite
services, such as cybersecurity risk and source of satellites and
launch vehicles used to provide the foreign commercial satellite
services. Section 1603 also expands the definition of ``Covered foreign
country'' to include Russia. Section 1296 prohibits purchase of items
from a Communist Chinese military company. One respondent submitted a
public comment in response to the interim rule.
II. Discussion and Analysis
DoD reviewed the public comment received. It was favorable to
implementation of the rule. No changes from the interim rule are made
in the final rule.
III. Applicability to Contracts at or Below the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold and for Commercial Items, Including Commercially Available
Off-the-Shelf Items
A. The Interim Rule Amended the Applicability of Existing DFARS
Solicitation Provisions and Contract Clauses and Added a New Clause as
Follows
To implement section 1603 of the NDAA for FY 2018, this
rule amended the provision at DFARS 252.225-7049, Prohibition on
Acquisition of Commercial Satellite Services from Certain Foreign
Entities--Representation, and added a clause to
[[Page 25189]]
enforce compliance with the representations in the associated
provisions. This provision and clause apply to acquisitions not greater
than the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT) and acquisitions of
commercial items.
To implement section 1296 of the NDAA for FY 2017, this
rule modified the clause at DFARS 252.225-7007, Prohibition on
Acquisition of United States Munitions List Items from Communist
Chinese Military Companies, to prohibit contractors or subcontractors
from acquiring items listed on the 600 series of the CCL that are to be
delivered under the contract from any Communist Chinese military
company. The rule continues to prescribe the use of this clause for use
in solicitations and contracts for items valued at or below the SAT.
However, the clause now applies to the acquisition of commercial items,
including Commercially Available Off-the-Shelf (COTS) items, if the
items are 600 series items on the CCL, or USML items. Although most 600
series items are not commercial items, and USML items are even less
likely to be commercial items, it is possible that some of these
covered items will be commercial items and must not be purchased from a
Communist Chinese military company.
B. Determinations
Section 1603 of the NDAA for FY 2018. A determination and
finding was signed by the Director, Defense Procurement and Acquisition
Policy, on June 23, 2014, that due to potential risk to national
security it would not be in the best interest of the United States to
exempt acquisitions not greater than the SAT and acquisitions of
commercial items from the applicability of 10 U.S.C. 2279.
Section 1296 of the NDAA for FY 2017. A determination
under 41 U.S.C. 1905 was not required to prescribe DFARS 252.225-7012
for use in solicitations and contracts valued at or below the SAT,
because this is consistent with the current applicability of the clause
DFARS 252.225-7007, which prohibits acquisitions of items on the USML
from Communist Chinese Military companies. The Principal Director, DPC,
determined that it is in the best interest of the Government to apply
the requirements of section 1296 to contracts for the acquisition of
commercial items, including COTS items, to prevent insertion of
malicious items into U.S. weapons platforms, information technology
systems, and other areas, presenting a threat to our warfighters and
their ability to defend national security.
IV. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning
and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule
under 5 U.S.C. 804.
V. Regulatory Flexibility Act
A final regulatory flexibility analysis (FRFA) has been prepared
consistent with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.
The FRFA is summarized as follows:
The reason for this rule is to implement section 1603 of the
National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2018 and
section 1296 of the NDAA for FY 2017. Section 1603 of the NDAA for FY
2018 amends 10 U.S.C. 2279, which prohibits acquisition of certain
foreign commercial satellite services. Section 1296 of the NDAA for FY
2017 amends section 1211 of the NDAA for FY 2006 to prohibit purchase
from any Communist Chinese military company, through a contract or
subcontract (at any tier), of goods and services controlled as
munitions items on the 600 series of the Commerce Control List (CCL) of
the Export Administration Regulations of the Department of Commerce.
The objectives of the rule are as follows:
Section 1603. To prohibit award of contracts for
commercial satellite services to a foreign entity if entering into such
contract would create an unacceptable cybersecurity risk. In addition,
the definition of covered foreign country is expanded to include Russia
(other covered foreign countries are China, North Korea, Iran, Sudan,
and Syria). New restrictions are also added with regard to the
satellites and launch vehicles to be used to provide the satellite
services, but these restrictions do not apply to launches that occur
prior to December 31, 2022.
Section 1296. To prohibit purchase of items originating in
the People's Republic of China that meet the definition of goods and
services controlled as munitions items when moved to the 600 series of
the CCL of the Export Administration Regulations of the Department of
Commerce.
There were no significant issues raised by the public comments in
response to the initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
DoD estimates that this rule applies to small entities as follows:
Section 1603. This part of the rule applies to less than
86 small entities. According to Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS)
data for FY 2016, 86 small entities were awarded contracts or orders
for services under Product Service Code D304 (ADP Telecommunications
and Transmission Services), of which commercial satellite services are
a subset. Although the focus of the Regulatory Flexibility Act is
protection of domestic small business entities that are eligible for
assistance from the Small Business Administration, there may be
domestic small business entities in the United States that offer the
satellite services of a foreign entity that would be restricted by this
rule.
Section 1296. This part of the rule applies to any small
entities that intend to provide items on the 600 series of the Commerce
Control List under a DoD contract or subcontract. The 600 series
consists of items on the Commerce Control List that have an export
control classification number of which the third character is a ``6''.
These items were transitioned from the United States Munitions List
(USML) to the 600 series, because they have less than a critical
military or intelligence capability than the items that remain on the
USML, but they are not currently in normal commercial use. Data on the
number of entities that can provide such items, and whether they are
small or other than small entities, is not available in FPDS, because
these items are not readily identifiable in FPDS and are often acquired
through subcontracts.
Projected reporting or recordkeeping requirements of this rule are
as follows:
Section 1603. In addition to the current annual
representations as to whether the offeror is, or is not, a foreign
entity subject to the prohibitions of the statute; or is, or is not,
offering commercial satellite services provided by such a foreign
entity, this rule adds five more annual representations as to whether
the offeror--
[cir] Is, or is not offering commercial satellite services using
satellites, launched on or after December 31, 2022, that will be
designed or manufactured in a covered foreign country;
[[Page 25190]]
[cir] Is, or is not offering commercial satellite services using
satellites, launched on or after December 31, 2022, that will be
designed or manufactured by an entity controlled in whole or in part
by, or acting on behalf of, the government of a covered foreign
country;
[cir] Is, or is not offering commercial satellite services using
satellites, launched outside the United States on or after December 31,
2022, using a launch vehicle that is designed or manufactured in a
covered foreign country;
[cir] Is, or is not offering commercial satellite services using
satellites, launched outside the United States on or after December 31,
2022, using a launch vehicle that is provided by the government of a
covered foreign country; and
[cir] Is, or is not offering commercial satellite services using
satellites, launched outside the United States on or after December 31,
2022, using a launch vehicle that is provided by an entity controlled
in whole or in part by, or acting on behalf of, the government of a
covered foreign country.
Further information is required if the offeror provides an
affirmative response to any of the representations, but such
affirmative response and further submission is expected to be extremely
rare because of the statutory prohibition and the expected rarity of a
waiver by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and
Sustainment or for Policy. Furthermore, this prohibition is only
applicable to launches on or after December 31, 2022.
If the satellite service provider responded affirmatively to any of
the new representations regarding launch vehicles, if such launches are
covered in whole or in part by a contract or other agreement relating
to launch services that, prior to June 10, 2018, was either fully paid
by the satellite service provider or covered by a legally binding
commitment of the satellite service provider to pay for such services,
a de minimis amount of information is required with regard to such
contract or agreement in order to establish an exception to the
associated prohibitions.
Section 1296. There are no projected reporting or
recordkeeping requirements relating to implementation of section 1296.
The only compliance requirements are to not purchase 600 series items
that originate in the People's Republic of China.
This rule will not have a significant economic impact on any small
entities, unless they are offering commercial satellite services
subject to the restrictions of this rule or providing 600 series items
that originate in the Peoples Republic of China. DoD was not able to
identify any alternatives that would reduce the burden on small
entities and meet the objectives of the rule.
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act
The interim rule affected the information collection requirements
in the provision at DFARS 252.225-7049, currently approved through
March 31, 2021, under OMB Control Number 0704-0525, entitled
Prohibition on Acquisition of Commercial Satellite Services from
Certain Foreign Entities, in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction
Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35). The impact, however, is negligible at this
time, because the prohibition on use of certain foreign satellites and
launch vehicles only applies to launches outside the United States on
or after December 31, 2022. The information collection will be updated
to reflect these changes when renewed.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 201, 212, 225, and 252
Government procurement.
0
Accordingly, the interim rule amending 48 CFR parts 201, 212, 225, and
252, which was published at 83 FR 66066 on December 21, 2018, is
adopted as final without change.
Jennifer Lee Hawes,
Regulatory Control Officer, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
[FR Doc. 2019-11306 Filed 5-30-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P