Notice of Availability of the Draft Southeastern Oregon Resource Management Plan Amendment and Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Malheur Field Office, Vale District, Oregon, 25304-25305 [2019-11290]
Download as PDF
25304
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 105 / Friday, May 31, 2019 / Notices
Dated: May 20, 2019.
John Tahsuda,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian
Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2019–11383 Filed 5–30–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLOR930000.L16100000.DS0000.
LXSS072H0000.19X.HAG 19–0013]
Notice of Availability of the Draft
Southeastern Oregon Resource
Management Plan Amendment and
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
for the Malheur Field Office, Vale
District, Oregon
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Availability.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA), as amended, and the
Federal Land Policy and Management
Act of 1976 (FLPMA), as amended, the
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has
prepared a Draft Southeastern Oregon
Resource Management Plan (RMP)
Amendment and Draft Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) for the Malheur
Field Office of the Vale District and, by
this notice, is announcing the opening
of the comment period.
DATES: To ensure that comments will be
considered, the BLM must receive
written comments on the Draft
Southeastern Oregon RMP Amendment
and Draft EIS within 90 days following
the date the Environmental Protection
Agency publishes its notice of
availability of the Draft Southeastern
Oregon RMP Amendment and Draft EIS
in the Federal Register. The BLM will
announce future meetings or hearings
and any other public participation
activities at least 15 days in advance
through public notices, media releases,
and/or mailings.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
related to the Draft Southeastern Oregon
RMP Amendment and Draft EIS by any
of the following methods:
• Website: https://go.usa.gov/xnsQx.
• Email: BLM_OR_VL_SEORMP@
blm.gov.
• Fax: 541–473–6213.
• Mail: SEORMPA, c/o Vale District
BLM, 100 Oregon Street, Vale, OR
97918.
The Draft Southeastern Oregon RMP
Amendment and Draft EIS and
accompanying background documents
are available at the website: https://
go.usa.gov/xnsQx.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 May 30, 2019
Jkt 247001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Renee Straub, Assistant Field Manager,
541–473–6289; 100 Oregon Street, Vale,
OR 97918; BLM_OR_VL_Mail@blm.gov.
Contact Ms. Straub to have your name
added to our mailing list. Persons who
use a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS) at 1–800–877–8339 to
contact the above individual during
normal business hours. FRS is available
24 hours a day, seven days a week, to
leave a message or a question with the
above individual. You will receive a
reply during normal business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Federal Land Policy and Management
Act of 1976, 43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq., is
the statutory authority that provides the
primary direction to the BLM to
develop, maintain, amend, and revise
land use plans, which provide for the
use of public lands. Further, FLPMA
provides that the BLM shall manage the
public lands under the principles of
multiple use and sustained yield (Sec.
103, 43 U.S.C. 1702; Sec 202, 43 U.S.C.
1712; and Sec. 302, 43 U.S.C. 1732). The
southeastern Oregon planning area
covers approximately 4.6 million acres
of public lands in Malheur, Grant,
Harney, and Baker Counties in Oregon.
The area is characterized by a basin and
range topography, with remote canyons,
desert, and mountain systems. The Draft
Southeastern Oregon RMP Amendment
and Draft EIS includes a range of five
alternatives designed to address three
main issues raised in a 2010 settlement
agreement: Lands with wilderness
characteristics, off highway vehicle
(OHV) use, and livestock grazing.
Resource uses not addressed by the
alternatives in this focused amendment
will continue as defined under the 2002
Southeastern Oregon RMP, as amended
by the 2015 and 2019 Oregon Greater
Sage-Grouse Approved RMP
Amendments.
The following is an overview of the
five alternatives:
• The No Action Alternative
represents the continuation of existing
management under the 2002
Southeastern Oregon RMP and Record
of Decision (ROD) (as amended by the
2015 Oregon Greater Sage-Grouse RMP
Amendment) with the inclusion of
interim management stipulations
outlined in the 2010 settlement
agreement. These stipulations require
the protection of wilderness
characteristics in 76 public land units
where the BLM’s updated inventory
found wilderness characteristics to
exist.
• Alternative A is the BLM’s
preferred alternative and reflects the
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
continuation of existing management
under the 2002 Southeastern Oregon
RMP and ROD (as amended by the 2015
Oregon Greater Sage-Grouse RMP
Amendment) without the restrictions of
the 2010 settlement agreement. The
2002 Southeastern Oregon RMP and
ROD did not provide specific
management for, or protection of, lands
with wilderness characteristics. If this
alternative were selected, the 2002
Southeastern Oregon RMP and ROD
would not prioritize protection of lands
with wilderness characteristics outside
of existing wilderness study areas.
Processing voluntary grazing permit
relinquishment and implementation of
measures to address standards and
guidelines for rangeland health would
continue as under current management
and policy. Management of all other
resources would continue under the
2002 Southeastern Oregon RMP, as
amended. Existing allocations at the
land use planning level (such as visual
resource management classes, OHV
categories, and rights-of-way
authorizations) across the planning area
would not change. Under Alternative A,
the BLM would continue to provide for
a sustainable yield of forage for
livestock grazing while maintaining
resource values for long-term multiple
use, consistent with management
objectives, and would be unchanged
from current practices.
Alternatives B, C, and D would
establish new management protections
for units of public land (outside of
existing wilderness study areas) that
have been identified as having
wilderness characteristics. The specific
units identified for protection varies by
alternative.
• Alternative B reflects the highest
level of protection required by the 2010
settlement agreement. Alternative B
prioritizes protection of wilderness
characteristics in all 76 units
determined to possess wilderness
characteristics. The 76 wilderness
characteristics units and all wilderness
study areas would be managed as closed
to OHV use, and existing primitive
routes would be closed to motorized
travel. In addition, in all other units
where off-road vehicle use is currently
allowed (referred to as ‘‘open’’), OHV
use would be limited to existing roads
and primitive routes. To address the
2010 settlement agreement in this
alternative, where existing livestock
grazing practices are found to be
significant causal factors for nonattainment of standards and guidelines
for rangeland health, the BLM would
suspend grazing permits, either at the
allotment- or pasture-scale, for the
duration of the RMP in units identified
E:\FR\FM\31MYN1.SGM
31MYN1
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 105 / Friday, May 31, 2019 / Notices
in the 2010 settlement agreement.
Should the BLM receive a voluntary
permit relinquishment in a wilderness
study area, designated national wild and
scenic river corridor, designated
national historic trail, area of critical
environmental concern, research natural
area, a unit found to possess wilderness
characteristics, or designated critical
habitat, the BLM would designate the
units as unavailable to grazing (or
reduced grazing use where common use
by multiple permittees occurs) for the
life of the Draft Southeastern Oregon
RMP Amendment and Draft EIS.
• Alternative C prioritizes protection
of 27 of the 76 units found to have
wilderness characteristics. Use of OHVs
in these 27 units would be limited to
existing roads and primitive routes,
unless currently designated as limited to
designated routes or closed to OHV use.
This alternative would continue existing
OHV open management in eight specific
units located in the north half of the
planning area. For all other units
currently managed as open to OHV use,
Alternative C would change
management to limited to existing roads
and primitive routes for motorized
vehicle use. The BLM would continue
to follow existing policy when livestock
grazing practices are found to be
significant causal factors for nonattainment of standards and guidelines
for rangeland health. The BLM would
also continue to follow existing policy
when a voluntary grazing permit
relinquishment is received.
• Alternative D reflects an alternative
method for addressing lands with
wilderness characteristic units, OHV
use, and livestock grazing that is
required by the 2010 settlement
agreement. This alternative is less
protective than Alternative B.
Alternative D prioritizes the protection
of 33 of the 76 units found to have
wilderness characteristics. As required
by the 2010 settlement agreement, all 76
units with wilderness characteristics
would be managed as OHV limited,
unless currently allocated as limited to
designated routes or closed to OHV use.
Wilderness study areas would continue
to be managed under the 2002
Southeastern Oregon RMP, as amended,
as limited to designated routes under
this alternative. To address the 2010
settlement agreement in Alternative D,
where existing livestock grazing
practices are found to be a significant
causal factor for non-attainment of
standards and guidelines for rangeland
health, the BLM would suspend term
grazing permits, either at the allotmentor pasture-scale, for the duration of the
term permit (generally up to 10 years) or
until monitoring indicates that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 May 30, 2019
Jkt 247001
significant progress is made toward
meeting standards and guidelines in
units identified in the 2010 settlement
agreement. Should the BLM receive a
permit relinquishment in a wilderness
study area, designated national wild and
scenic river corridor, or designated
national historic trail, the BLM would
designate the unit as unavailable to
grazing (or reduced grazing use where
common use by multiple permittees
occurs) for the life of the document.
Under Alternatives B, C, and D, units
that are identified for the protection of
wilderness characteristics would be
designated as visual resource
management class II, land tenure zone 1
(retention in public ownership), and as
exclusion units for major rights-of-way
and commercial renewable energy
projects. Under Alternatives B, C, and D,
a 250-foot setback unit would be
established to provide the BLM with
management flexibility to adapt to
resources needs, threats, and
opportunities along boundary roads,
while maintaining or enhancing the
values within the protected units.
Alternative A has been identified as
the preferred alternative per 40 CFR
1502.14(e). However, identification of a
preferred alternative does not represent
the final agency decision. For this
reason, the BLM encourages comments
on all alternatives and management
actions described in the Draft
Southeastern Oregon RMP Amendment
and Draft EIS.
Following the 90-day comment
period, the BLM will develop a
Proposed Southeastern Oregon RMP
Amendment and Final EIS which will
reflect changes or adjustments based on
public comments.
You may submit comments on the
Draft Southeastern Oregon RMP
Amendment and Draft EIS in writing to
the BLM at any public meeting or
through any of the methods identified in
the ADDRESSES section above. All
comments must be received by the end
of the comment period. Comments
submitted must include the
commenter’s name and street address.
Whenever possible, please include
reference to either the page or section in
the document to which the comment
applies.
This notice begins the 90-day
comment period for the Draft
Southeastern Oregon RMP Amendment
and Draft EIS. Please note that public
comments and information submitted,
including names, street addresses, and
email addresses of persons who submit
comments, will be available for public
review and disclosure at the above
address during regular business hours (8
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
25305
a.m. to 4 p.m.), Monday through Friday,
except holidays.
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personally identifiable information in
your comment, you should be aware
that your entire comment—including
your personally identifiable
information—may be made publicly
available at any time. While you can ask
the BLM in your comment to withhold
your personally identifiable information
from public review, we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to do so.
All submissions from organizations or
businesses, and from individuals
identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, are
available for public inspection in their
entirety.
Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10,
and 43 CFR 1610.2.
Theresa M. Hanley,
Acting State Director, Oregon/Washington.
[FR Doc. 2019–11290 Filed 5–30–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–33–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLWO260000 L10600000.HG0000]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission to the Office of
Management and Budget for Review
and Approval; Protection,
Management, and Control of Wild
Horses and Burros
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: 30-Day notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) has submitted an
information collection request to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) to continue the collection of
information from those who wish to
adopt and obtain title to wild horses and
burros. The OMB previously approved
this information collection activity, and
assigned it control number 1004–0042.
DATES: The OMB is required to respond
to this information collection request
within 60 days but may respond after 30
days. For maximum consideration,
written comments should be received
on or before July 1, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Please submit comments
directly to the Desk Officer for the
Department of the Interior (OMB #1004–
0042), Office of Management and
Budget, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, fax 202–395–5806,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\31MYN1.SGM
31MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 105 (Friday, May 31, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25304-25305]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-11290]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLOR930000.L16100000.DS0000.LXSS072H0000.19X.HAG 19-0013]
Notice of Availability of the Draft Southeastern Oregon Resource
Management Plan Amendment and Draft Environmental Impact Statement for
the Malheur Field Office, Vale District, Oregon
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA), as amended, and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act
of 1976 (FLPMA), as amended, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has
prepared a Draft Southeastern Oregon Resource Management Plan (RMP)
Amendment and Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the
Malheur Field Office of the Vale District and, by this notice, is
announcing the opening of the comment period.
DATES: To ensure that comments will be considered, the BLM must receive
written comments on the Draft Southeastern Oregon RMP Amendment and
Draft EIS within 90 days following the date the Environmental
Protection Agency publishes its notice of availability of the Draft
Southeastern Oregon RMP Amendment and Draft EIS in the Federal
Register. The BLM will announce future meetings or hearings and any
other public participation activities at least 15 days in advance
through public notices, media releases, and/or mailings.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments related to the Draft Southeastern
Oregon RMP Amendment and Draft EIS by any of the following methods:
Website: https://go.usa.gov/xnsQx.
Email: [email protected].
Fax: 541-473-6213.
Mail: SEORMPA, c/o Vale District BLM, 100 Oregon Street,
Vale, OR 97918.
The Draft Southeastern Oregon RMP Amendment and Draft EIS and
accompanying background documents are available at the website: https://go.usa.gov/xnsQx.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Renee Straub, Assistant Field Manager,
541-473-6289; 100 Oregon Street, Vale, OR 97918;
[email protected]. Contact Ms. Straub to have your name added to
our mailing list. Persons who use a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1-800-877-8339
to contact the above individual during normal business hours. FRS is
available 24 hours a day, seven days a week, to leave a message or a
question with the above individual. You will receive a reply during
normal business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Land Policy and Management Act
of 1976, 43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq., is the statutory authority that
provides the primary direction to the BLM to develop, maintain, amend,
and revise land use plans, which provide for the use of public lands.
Further, FLPMA provides that the BLM shall manage the public lands
under the principles of multiple use and sustained yield (Sec. 103, 43
U.S.C. 1702; Sec 202, 43 U.S.C. 1712; and Sec. 302, 43 U.S.C. 1732).
The southeastern Oregon planning area covers approximately 4.6 million
acres of public lands in Malheur, Grant, Harney, and Baker Counties in
Oregon. The area is characterized by a basin and range topography, with
remote canyons, desert, and mountain systems. The Draft Southeastern
Oregon RMP Amendment and Draft EIS includes a range of five
alternatives designed to address three main issues raised in a 2010
settlement agreement: Lands with wilderness characteristics, off
highway vehicle (OHV) use, and livestock grazing. Resource uses not
addressed by the alternatives in this focused amendment will continue
as defined under the 2002 Southeastern Oregon RMP, as amended by the
2015 and 2019 Oregon Greater Sage-Grouse Approved RMP Amendments.
The following is an overview of the five alternatives:
The No Action Alternative represents the continuation of
existing management under the 2002 Southeastern Oregon RMP and Record
of Decision (ROD) (as amended by the 2015 Oregon Greater Sage-Grouse
RMP Amendment) with the inclusion of interim management stipulations
outlined in the 2010 settlement agreement. These stipulations require
the protection of wilderness characteristics in 76 public land units
where the BLM's updated inventory found wilderness characteristics to
exist.
Alternative A is the BLM's preferred alternative and
reflects the continuation of existing management under the 2002
Southeastern Oregon RMP and ROD (as amended by the 2015 Oregon Greater
Sage-Grouse RMP Amendment) without the restrictions of the 2010
settlement agreement. The 2002 Southeastern Oregon RMP and ROD did not
provide specific management for, or protection of, lands with
wilderness characteristics. If this alternative were selected, the 2002
Southeastern Oregon RMP and ROD would not prioritize protection of
lands with wilderness characteristics outside of existing wilderness
study areas. Processing voluntary grazing permit relinquishment and
implementation of measures to address standards and guidelines for
rangeland health would continue as under current management and policy.
Management of all other resources would continue under the 2002
Southeastern Oregon RMP, as amended. Existing allocations at the land
use planning level (such as visual resource management classes, OHV
categories, and rights-of-way authorizations) across the planning area
would not change. Under Alternative A, the BLM would continue to
provide for a sustainable yield of forage for livestock grazing while
maintaining resource values for long-term multiple use, consistent with
management objectives, and would be unchanged from current practices.
Alternatives B, C, and D would establish new management protections
for units of public land (outside of existing wilderness study areas)
that have been identified as having wilderness characteristics. The
specific units identified for protection varies by alternative.
Alternative B reflects the highest level of protection
required by the 2010 settlement agreement. Alternative B prioritizes
protection of wilderness characteristics in all 76 units determined to
possess wilderness characteristics. The 76 wilderness characteristics
units and all wilderness study areas would be managed as closed to OHV
use, and existing primitive routes would be closed to motorized travel.
In addition, in all other units where off-road vehicle use is currently
allowed (referred to as ``open''), OHV use would be limited to existing
roads and primitive routes. To address the 2010 settlement agreement in
this alternative, where existing livestock grazing practices are found
to be significant causal factors for non-attainment of standards and
guidelines for rangeland health, the BLM would suspend grazing permits,
either at the allotment- or pasture-scale, for the duration of the RMP
in units identified
[[Page 25305]]
in the 2010 settlement agreement. Should the BLM receive a voluntary
permit relinquishment in a wilderness study area, designated national
wild and scenic river corridor, designated national historic trail,
area of critical environmental concern, research natural area, a unit
found to possess wilderness characteristics, or designated critical
habitat, the BLM would designate the units as unavailable to grazing
(or reduced grazing use where common use by multiple permittees occurs)
for the life of the Draft Southeastern Oregon RMP Amendment and Draft
EIS.
Alternative C prioritizes protection of 27 of the 76 units
found to have wilderness characteristics. Use of OHVs in these 27 units
would be limited to existing roads and primitive routes, unless
currently designated as limited to designated routes or closed to OHV
use. This alternative would continue existing OHV open management in
eight specific units located in the north half of the planning area.
For all other units currently managed as open to OHV use, Alternative C
would change management to limited to existing roads and primitive
routes for motorized vehicle use. The BLM would continue to follow
existing policy when livestock grazing practices are found to be
significant causal factors for non-attainment of standards and
guidelines for rangeland health. The BLM would also continue to follow
existing policy when a voluntary grazing permit relinquishment is
received.
Alternative D reflects an alternative method for
addressing lands with wilderness characteristic units, OHV use, and
livestock grazing that is required by the 2010 settlement agreement.
This alternative is less protective than Alternative B. Alternative D
prioritizes the protection of 33 of the 76 units found to have
wilderness characteristics. As required by the 2010 settlement
agreement, all 76 units with wilderness characteristics would be
managed as OHV limited, unless currently allocated as limited to
designated routes or closed to OHV use. Wilderness study areas would
continue to be managed under the 2002 Southeastern Oregon RMP, as
amended, as limited to designated routes under this alternative. To
address the 2010 settlement agreement in Alternative D, where existing
livestock grazing practices are found to be a significant causal factor
for non-attainment of standards and guidelines for rangeland health,
the BLM would suspend term grazing permits, either at the allotment- or
pasture-scale, for the duration of the term permit (generally up to 10
years) or until monitoring indicates that significant progress is made
toward meeting standards and guidelines in units identified in the 2010
settlement agreement. Should the BLM receive a permit relinquishment in
a wilderness study area, designated national wild and scenic river
corridor, or designated national historic trail, the BLM would
designate the unit as unavailable to grazing (or reduced grazing use
where common use by multiple permittees occurs) for the life of the
document.
Under Alternatives B, C, and D, units that are identified for the
protection of wilderness characteristics would be designated as visual
resource management class II, land tenure zone 1 (retention in public
ownership), and as exclusion units for major rights-of-way and
commercial renewable energy projects. Under Alternatives B, C, and D, a
250-foot setback unit would be established to provide the BLM with
management flexibility to adapt to resources needs, threats, and
opportunities along boundary roads, while maintaining or enhancing the
values within the protected units.
Alternative A has been identified as the preferred alternative per
40 CFR 1502.14(e). However, identification of a preferred alternative
does not represent the final agency decision. For this reason, the BLM
encourages comments on all alternatives and management actions
described in the Draft Southeastern Oregon RMP Amendment and Draft EIS.
Following the 90-day comment period, the BLM will develop a
Proposed Southeastern Oregon RMP Amendment and Final EIS which will
reflect changes or adjustments based on public comments.
You may submit comments on the Draft Southeastern Oregon RMP
Amendment and Draft EIS in writing to the BLM at any public meeting or
through any of the methods identified in the ADDRESSES section above.
All comments must be received by the end of the comment period.
Comments submitted must include the commenter's name and street
address. Whenever possible, please include reference to either the page
or section in the document to which the comment applies.
This notice begins the 90-day comment period for the Draft
Southeastern Oregon RMP Amendment and Draft EIS. Please note that
public comments and information submitted, including names, street
addresses, and email addresses of persons who submit comments, will be
available for public review and disclosure at the above address during
regular business hours (8 a.m. to 4 p.m.), Monday through Friday,
except holidays.
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personally identifiable information in your comment, you should
be aware that your entire comment--including your personally
identifiable information--may be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask the BLM in your comment to withhold your personally
identifiable information from public review, we cannot guarantee that
we will be able to do so. All submissions from organizations or
businesses, and from individuals identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of organizations or businesses, are
available for public inspection in their entirety.
Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10, and 43 CFR 1610.2.
Theresa M. Hanley,
Acting State Director, Oregon/Washington.
[FR Doc. 2019-11290 Filed 5-30-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-P