Final Modification to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Stormwater Discharges From Construction Activities, 24503-24506 [2019-11075]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 28, 2019 / Notices
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless a
comment includes information claimed
to be Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information for which
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do
not submit information through https://
www.regulations.gov or email that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected. The https://
www.regulations.gov website is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an email comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
Docket: Documents in the docket are
listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
materials, such as copyrighted material,
are publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or hard copy at the
ORD Docket in the EPA Headquarters
Docket Center.
Dated: May 16, 2019.
Tina Bahadori,
Director, National Center for Environmental
Assessment.
[FR Doc. 2019–11072 Filed 5–24–19; 8:45 am]
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 May 24, 2019
Jkt 247001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OW–2015–0828; FRL9994–23–
OW]
Final Modification to National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) General Permit for
Stormwater Discharges From
Construction Activities
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of final permit
modification.
AGENCY:
All ten of the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) Regions today
are issuing a final modification to the
2017 National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) general
permit for stormwater discharges from
construction activities, also referred to
as the ‘‘2017 Construction General
Permit (CGP)’’ or ‘‘2017 CGP,’’ which
became effective on February 16, 2017.
The modified permit, hereinafter known
as the ‘‘modified 2017 CGP’’ or ‘‘final
modified permit,’’ replaces several
conditions in the original 2017 CGP and
relevant fact sheet sections. The scope
of the modification is limited to only
these conditions; all other conditions
remain the same. The permit term also
remains the same, meaning the modified
2017 CGP will still expire on February
16, 2022. This Federal Register notice
describes the final permit modification
and changes that were made from the
proposed modified permit to the final
modified permit based on public
comments. The modified 2017 CGP and
accompanying fact sheet can be found
in the Docket (EPA–HQ–OW–2015–
0828) as well as on the EPA’s
construction stormwater website at
https://www.epa.gov/npdes/stormwaterdischarges-construction-activities.
DATES: The modified 2017 CGP will
become effective on June 27, 2019. In
accordance with 40 CFR part 23,
specifically 23.2, this modified permit
shall be considered issued for the
purpose of judicial review on May 28,
2019. Under section 509(b) of the Clean
Water Act, judicial review of this
modified general permit can be
requested by filing a petition for review
in the United States Court of Appeals
within 120 days after the modified
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24503
permit is considered issued. Under
section 509(b)(2) of the Clean Water Act,
this modified permit may not be
challenged later in civil or criminal
proceedings to enforce this permit. In
addition, this modified permit may not
be challenged in any other agency
proceedings. Deadlines for submittal of
Notices of Intent are provided in Part
1.4.3 of the permit. The permit also
provides additional dates for
compliance with the terms of the
permit.
For
further information on the permit,
contact the appropriate EPA Regional
office listed in Section I.F of this notice,
or Emily Halter, EPA Headquarters,
Office of Water, Office of Wastewater
Management at tel.: 202–564–3324 or
email: halter.emily@epa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
This
section is organized as follows:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
B. How Can I Get Copies of these
Documents and Other Related
Information?
C. Who are the EPA Regional Contacts for
the Final Modified Permit?
II. Background on the Permit and Final
Modification
III. Summary of the Final Modification
IV. Analysis of Economic Impacts
V. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
VI. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions
To Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
VII. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and
Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
1. Entities Covered by This Permit
The scope of EPA’s action to modify
the 2017 CGP did not include the types
of entities eligible to be covered under
the original 2017 CGP. The CGP
continues to be available to cover the
following entities, as categorized in the
North American Industry Classification
System (NAICS):
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
24504
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 28, 2019 / Notices
TABLE 1—ENTITIES COVERED BY THIS PERMIT
Category
North
American
Industry Classification System (NAICS)
code
Examples of affected entities
Industry .....................................................
Construction site operators disturbing 1 or more acres of land, or less than 1 acre but part of a larger common plan of development or sale if the larger common plan will ultimately disturb 1 acre
or more, and performing the following activities:
Construction of Buildings .............................................................................................
Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction ..................................................................
The EPA does not intend the
preceding table to be exhaustive, but
provides it as a guide for readers
regarding the types of activities of
which the Agency is now aware that
could potentially be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed
in the table could also be affected. To
determine whether your site could be
affected by this action, you should
carefully examine the definition of
‘‘construction activity’’ and ‘‘small
construction activity’’ in existing EPA
regulations at 40 CFR 122.26(b)(14)(x)
and 122.26(b)(15), respectively. If you
have questions regarding the
applicability of this action to a
particular entity, consult the person
listed for technical information in the
preceding FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
2. Coverage Area of the Permit
The scope of EPA’s action to modify
the 2017 CGP did not include the
coverage area of the permit under the
original 2017 CGP. Coverage remains
available to operators of eligible projects
for stormwater discharges from
construction activities located in those
areas where the EPA is the NPDES
permitting authority. A list of eligible
areas can be found in Appendix B of the
modified 2017 CGP and includes the
states of New Hampshire,
Massachusetts, New Mexico, and Idaho,
as well as most Indian country lands,
and areas in selected states operated by
a federal operator. Permit coverage is
also available to operators in Puerto
Rico, the District of Columbia, and the
Pacific Island territories, among others.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
B. How can I get copies of these
documents and other related
information?
1. Docket. The EPA has established an
official public docket for this action
under Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OW–
2015–0828. The official public docket is
the collection of materials that is
available for public viewing at the Water
Docket in the EPA Docket Center, (EPA/
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 May 24, 2019
Jkt 247001
DC) WJC West Building, Room 3334,
1301 Constitution Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20460. Although all
documents in the docket are listed in an
index, some information is not publicly
available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Publicly available docket materials are
available in hard copy at the EPA
Docket Center Public Reading Room,
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744
and the telephone number for the Water
Docket is (202) 566–2426.
2. Electronic Access. You may access
this Federal Register notice
electronically through the United States
government on-line source for Federal
regulations at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Electronic versions of this final
modified permit and accompanying fact
sheet are available on the EPA’s NPDES
website at https://www.epa.gov/npdes/
stormwater-discharges-constructionactivities.
An electronic version of the public
docket is available through the EPA’s
electronic public docket and comment
system, EPA Dockets. You may use EPA
Dockets at https://www.regulations.gov
to view public comments, access the
index listing of the contents of the
official public docket, and to access
those documents in the public docket
that are available electronically. For
additional information about the EPA’s
public docket, visit the Agency’s Docket
Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets. Although not all
docket materials may be available
electronically, you may still access any
of the publicly available docket
materials through the Docket Facility
identified in Section I.B.1.
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
236
237
C. Who are the EPA regional contacts
for the final modified permit?
For EPA Region 1, contact Suzanne
Warner at tel.: (617) 918–1383 or email
at warner.suzanne@epa.gov.
For EPA Region 2, contact Stephen
Venezia at tel.: (212) 637–3856 or email
at venezia.stephen@epa.gov, or for
Puerto Rico, contact Sergio Bosques at
tel.: (787) 977–5838 or email at
bosques.sergio@epa.gov.
For EPA Region 3, contact Carissa
Moncavage at tel.: (215) 814–5798 or
email at moncavage.carissa@epa.gov.
For EPA Region 4, contact Michael
Mitchell at tel.: (404) 562–9303 or email
at mitchell.michael@epa.gov.
For EPA Region 5, contact Brian Bell
at tel.: (312) 886–0981 or email at
bell.brianc@epa.gov.
For EPA Region 6, contact Suzanna
Perea at tel.: (214) 665–7217 or email at:
perea.suzanna@epa.gov.
For EPA Region 7, contact Mark
Matthews at tel.: (913) 551–7635 or
email at: matthews.mark@epa.gov.
For EPA Region 8, contact Amy Clark
at tel.: (303) 312–7014 or email at:
clark.amy@epa.gov.
For EPA Region 9, contact Eugene
Bromley at tel.: (415) 972–3510 or email
at bromley.eugene@epa.gov.
For EPA Region 10, contact Margaret
McCauley at tel.: (206) 553–1772 or
email at mccauley.margaret@epa.gov.
II. Background on the Permit and Final
Modification
Section 402(p) of the Clean Water Act
(CWA) directs the EPA to regulate
certain stormwater discharges under the
NPDES program, including discharges
from regulated construction sites. The
EPA’s NPDES regulations further
specify that permits are required for
stormwater discharges from
construction activities that disturb at
least one acre, including smaller sites
that are part of a larger common plan of
development or sale that will ultimately
disturb at least one acre. See 40 CFR
122.26(a)(1)(ii), (a)(9)(i)(B), (b)(14)(x),
and (b)(15)(i). Under the statutory and
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 28, 2019 / Notices
regulatory authority cited above, the
EPA issued the original 2017 CGP on
January 19, 2017 (82 FR 6534) and the
permit became effective on February 16,
2017.
In accordance with 40 CFR 23.2, the
original 2017 CGP was considered
issued for the purposes of judicial
review on January 25, 2017. Within the
120-day period of judicial review under
section 509(b) of the CWA, both the
National Association of Home Builders
(NAHB) and the Chesapeake Bay
Foundation (CBF) filed petitions for
review of the original 2017 CGP in the
United States Court of Appeals in the
D.C. Circuit.
After receiving the petitions for
review, the EPA engaged in multiple
discussions with both NAHB and CBF
in which the parties discussed their
concerns and provided new information
to the Agency on how certain permit
requirements might be misinterpreted
by construction site operators permitted
under the original 2017 CGP. Under 40
CFR 122.62(a)(2), the EPA may modify
a permit if the Agency is presented with
new information during the permit term
that was not available at the time of
issuance and would have justified the
application of different permit
conditions at the time of issuance.
Based on the information the petitioners
provided to the EPA following the
issuance of the original 2017 CGP, the
Agency proposed a permit modification
for a 45-day public comment period
beginning on December 12, 2018 and
ending on January 28, 2019. The
purpose of the proposed modification
was to clarify the Agency’s intent of
certain permit requirements.
In the proposed permit modification,
the EPA proposed to remove examples
of operators in the definition of
operator; align three permit
requirements that implement the
Effluent Limitations Guidelines (ELGs)
and New Source Performance Standards
(NSPS) for Construction and
Development (40 CFR part 450) (referred
to collectively as ‘‘the C&D rule’’) more
closely with the ELG text; and clarify
the roles and responsibilities of
individual operators on construction
sites with multiple operators. The
proposed changes were intended to
simplify the permit language and
accompanying fact sheet explanation
without changing the underlying
requirements, applicability,
implementation, or enforceability of the
original permit’s requirements. Only
those requirements that the EPA
proposed to modify were reopened in
the proposed modified permit for public
comment (40 CFR 122.62).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 May 24, 2019
Jkt 247001
The final modified 2017 CGP is
substantially similar to the proposed
modified permit. The final modified
2017 CGP replaces several existing
conditions in the original 2017 CGP and
relevant fact sheet sections, but retains
all other terms and conditions of the
original permit unchanged. For
instance, the modified 2017 CGP does
not affect the eligible coverage area, the
number or type of entities eligible to be
covered by the permit, nor the five-year
permit term of the original 2017 CGP,
meaning the modified 2017 CGP will
still expire on February 16, 2022. The
final modification is summarized in
more detail below.
III. Summary of the Final Modification
During the public comment period for
the proposed permit modification, the
EPA received a total of 14 comment
letters. Three industry groups, one
environmental group, three states, and
seven anonymous commenters
submitted comments to the Agency. The
majority of comments were generally
supportive of the proposed
modification, with some commenters
suggesting further changes to the
wording or phrasing of some elements
of the proposed modification. The EPA
considered all comments before
finalizing the permit modification. The
EPA’s response to comments is available
in the Docket (EPA–HQ–OW–2015–
0828). The modified 2017 CGP contains
the following finalized changes from the
original 2017 CGP:
1. Removed examples in the
definition of ‘‘operator’’—The EPA
removed two parenthetical examples
that appeared in Part 1.1.1 of the
original 2017 CGP showing examples of
the type of entity that would be
considered an ‘‘operator’’ and therefore
would be eligible for coverage under the
permit. The EPA has determined after
further consideration that providing
these examples may cause unintended
confusion since there may be instances
where a party technically fits the
description used in the example yet
would not qualify as an operator as
intended by the permit. Therefore,
rather than suggesting who might be
considered an operator ‘‘in most cases,’’
the EPA removed the examples from
both Part 1.1.1(a) and (b) so that entities
determining if they should seek permit
coverage under the modified 2017 CGP
can focus solely on the substantive
definition of operator. See Part 1.1.1 of
the final modified permit.
2. Aligned language of three
requirements with the C&D rule—The
EPA adjusted the wording of two
erosion and sediment control
requirements and one pollution
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24505
prevention requirement in the permit to
clarify their intent and to align their text
with the C&D ELG at 40 CFR part 450.
See Part 2.2.6 on minimizing dust; Part
2.2.11 on minimizing channel and
streambank erosion and scour in the
immediate vicinity of discharge points;
and Part 2.3.3(a) on storage, handling,
and disposal of building products,
materials, and wastes.
3. Clarified individual operator
responsibility in multiple operator
arrangements—The EPA clarified an
individual operator’s legal
responsibility for permit compliance in
situations where there are multiple
operators who divide permit
responsibilities among themselves. In
particular, the EPA removed references
to ‘‘joint and several liability’’ from the
original permit since they may have
provided, in the Agency’s view, an
inaccurate explanation of what the
permit compliance duties are for
multiple operators who share
implementation responsibilities under
the permit.
In addition, the EPA clarified that,
where multiple operators divide permit
responsibilities among themselves, each
operator remains responsible for
compliance with the permit, but that
they do not have to duplicate those
permit-related functions if one of the
other operators is appropriately
implementing the relevant requirement
in full compliance with the permit. The
EPA received some public comments
indicating that the italicized part of the
following sentence proposed in the
permit footnote 52 and in the fact sheet
may be construed in ways that the EPA
did not intend: ‘‘Regardless of whether
there is a group SWPPP or multiple
individual SWPPPs, each operator is
responsible for compliance with the
permit’s terms and conditions,
notwithstanding how the SWPPP(s) may
divide each operator’s responsibilities.’’
Given that this phrase is not imperative
to the objective of the sentence, which
describes that all operators have an
individual responsibility to comply
with the permit, the EPA agreed to
remove it in the final modified permit.
Additionally, the EPA added the
‘‘Operator A/B’’ example that was
proposed in the fact sheet, which
explains how operators do not have to
duplicate divided responsibilities, to the
permit footnote 52 to reinforce the
Agency’s position. The example reads,
‘‘In other words, if Operator A relies on
Operator B to satisfy its permit
obligations, Operator A does not have to
duplicate those permit-related functions
if Operator B is implementing them for
both operators to be in compliance with
the permit. However, Operator A
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
24506
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 28, 2019 / Notices
remains responsible for permit
compliance if Operator B fails to
implement any measures necessary for
Operator A to comply with the permit.’’
See Part 1.1.1, footnote 1; Part 7.1,
footnote 52; and Appendix A definition
for ‘‘shared control’’; and the
accompanying fact sheet explanation for
these Parts.
IV. Analysis of Economic Impacts
Due to the narrow scope of this permit
modification and the focus on clarifying
the intent of certain requirements rather
than changing the underlying
requirement itself, the EPA does not
expect any change in economic impact
from this permit modification. It is
therefore unnecessary for the EPA to
revise the economic analysis that was
prepared for the original 2017 CGP. A
copy of the EPA’s economic analysis,
titled ‘‘Cost Impact Analysis for the
2017 Construction General Permit
(CGP),’’ is available in the docket for
this permit modification.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
V. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) determined that this action is not
significant under Executive Orders
12866 and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January
21, 2011).
VI. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
Executive Order (E.O.) 12898 (59 FR
7629 (February 16, 1994)) establishes
federal executive policy on
environmental justice. Its main
provision directs federal agencies, to the
greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law, to make
environmental justice part of their
mission by identifying and addressing,
as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
Consistent with the EPA’s previous
determination for the original 2017 CGP,
this final modification to the 2017 CGP
will not have disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects on minority or
low-income populations because the
requirements in the modified permit
apply equally to all construction
projects that disturb one or more acres
in areas where the Agency is the
permitting authority, and the erosion
and sediment control provisions
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 May 24, 2019
Jkt 247001
increase the level of environmental
protection for all affected populations.
VII. Executive Order 13175:
Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13175. It does not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes. Thus, Executive Order
13175 does not apply to this action.
In compliance with Executive Order
13175, the EPA consulted with tribal
officials during the development of the
original 2017 CGP to gain an
understanding of and, where necessary,
address any areas of the original draft
permit that may affect tribal interest. In
the course of this consultation, the EPA
conducted several outreach activities
with tribal officials which are detailed
in the Federal Register notice for the
final 2017 CGP (82 FR 6534). During the
finalization of the original 2017 CGP,
the EPA also completed the CWA
Section 401 certification procedures
with all applicable tribes where the
permit applies (see Appendix B of the
modified 2017 CGP).
As part of the proposal for this
modification, the EPA reviewed the
tribal conditions that were incorporated
into the original 2017 CGP under
Section 401 certifications to identify any
requirements that the proposed action
might affect. See Part 9 of the original
2017 CGP. Only two tribal conditions
referenced a permit requirement that
was the subject of the proposed
modification, Part 2.2.11 (Minimize
erosion of stormwater conveyance
channels and their embankments . . .).
The EPA also completed the CWA
Section 401 certification procedures
with all applicable tribes where the
permit applies for the final permit
modification. Due to the narrow scope
of the permit modification and the focus
on clarifying the intent of certain
requirements rather than changing the
underlying requirement itself, the EPA
determined that the final action will not
change the interpretation or
implementation of the tribal conditions
referencing Part 2.2.11, and therefore
any tribal impacts from this
modification will be limited.
Authority: Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C.
1251 et seq.
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: May 14, 2019.
Deborah A. Szaro,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA Region
1.
Dated: May 14, 2019.
Jeff Gratz,
Deputy Director, Water Division, EPA Region
2.
Dated: May 14, 2019.
Jose C. Font,
Acting Director, Caribbean Environmental
Protection Division, EPA Region 2.
Dated: May 14, 2019.
Catharine McManus,
Deputy Director, Water Division, EPA Region
3.
Dated: May 14, 2019.
Jeaneanne M. Gettle,
Director, Water Division, EPA Region 4.
Dated: May 14, 2019.
Joan M. Tanaka,
Acting Director, Water Division, EPA Region
5.
Dated: May 14, 2019.
Charles W. Maguire,
Director, Water Division, EPA Region 6.
Dated: May 14, 2019.
Jeffery Robichaud,
Director, Water Division, EPA Region 7.
Dated: May 14, 2019.
Darcy O’Connor,
Director, Water Division, EPA Region 8.
Dated: May 14, 2019.
Toma´s Torres,
Director, Water Division, EPA Region 9.
Dated: May 14, 2019.
Daniel D. Opalski,
Director, Water Division, EPA Region 10.
[FR Doc. 2019–11075 Filed 5–24–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–9994–45–OAR]
Allocations of Cross-State Air
Pollution Rule Allowances From New
Unit Set-Asides for 2019 Control
Periods
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of data availability.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is providing notice of the
availability of data on emission
allowance allocations to certain units
under the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule
(CSAPR) trading programs. EPA has
completed preliminary calculations for
the first round of allocations of
allowances from the CSAPR new unit
set-asides (NUSAs) for the 2019 control
periods and has posted spreadsheets
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 102 (Tuesday, May 28, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24503-24506]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-11075]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OW-2015-0828; FRL9994-23-OW]
Final Modification to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) General Permit for Stormwater Discharges From
Construction Activities
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of final permit modification.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: All ten of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Regions
today are issuing a final modification to the 2017 National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) general permit for stormwater
discharges from construction activities, also referred to as the ``2017
Construction General Permit (CGP)'' or ``2017 CGP,'' which became
effective on February 16, 2017. The modified permit, hereinafter known
as the ``modified 2017 CGP'' or ``final modified permit,'' replaces
several conditions in the original 2017 CGP and relevant fact sheet
sections. The scope of the modification is limited to only these
conditions; all other conditions remain the same. The permit term also
remains the same, meaning the modified 2017 CGP will still expire on
February 16, 2022. This Federal Register notice describes the final
permit modification and changes that were made from the proposed
modified permit to the final modified permit based on public comments.
The modified 2017 CGP and accompanying fact sheet can be found in the
Docket (EPA-HQ-OW-2015-0828) as well as on the EPA's construction
stormwater website at https://www.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater-discharges-construction-activities.
DATES: The modified 2017 CGP will become effective on June 27, 2019. In
accordance with 40 CFR part 23, specifically 23.2, this modified permit
shall be considered issued for the purpose of judicial review on May
28, 2019. Under section 509(b) of the Clean Water Act, judicial review
of this modified general permit can be requested by filing a petition
for review in the United States Court of Appeals within 120 days after
the modified permit is considered issued. Under section 509(b)(2) of
the Clean Water Act, this modified permit may not be challenged later
in civil or criminal proceedings to enforce this permit. In addition,
this modified permit may not be challenged in any other agency
proceedings. Deadlines for submittal of Notices of Intent are provided
in Part 1.4.3 of the permit. The permit also provides additional dates
for compliance with the terms of the permit.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information on the permit,
contact the appropriate EPA Regional office listed in Section I.F of
this notice, or Emily Halter, EPA Headquarters, Office of Water, Office
of Wastewater Management at tel.: 202-564-3324 or email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This section is organized as follows:
Table of Contents
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
B. How Can I Get Copies of these Documents and Other Related
Information?
C. Who are the EPA Regional Contacts for the Final Modified
Permit?
II. Background on the Permit and Final Modification
III. Summary of the Final Modification
IV. Analysis of Economic Impacts
V. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and
Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
VI. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
VII. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
1. Entities Covered by This Permit
The scope of EPA's action to modify the 2017 CGP did not include
the types of entities eligible to be covered under the original 2017
CGP. The CGP continues to be available to cover the following entities,
as categorized in the North American Industry Classification System
(NAICS):
[[Page 24504]]
Table 1--Entities Covered by This Permit
------------------------------------------------------------------------
North
American
Examples of affected Industry
Category entities Classification
System (NAICS)
code
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Industry....................... Construction site operators disturbing
1 or more acres of land, or less than
1 acre but part of a larger common
plan of development or sale if the
larger common plan will ultimately
disturb 1 acre or more, and performing
the following activities:
----------------------------------------
Construction of 236
Buildings.
Heavy and Civil 237
Engineering
Construction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The EPA does not intend the preceding table to be exhaustive, but
provides it as a guide for readers regarding the types of activities of
which the Agency is now aware that could potentially be affected by
this action. Other types of entities not listed in the table could also
be affected. To determine whether your site could be affected by this
action, you should carefully examine the definition of ``construction
activity'' and ``small construction activity'' in existing EPA
regulations at 40 CFR 122.26(b)(14)(x) and 122.26(b)(15), respectively.
If you have questions regarding the applicability of this action to a
particular entity, consult the person listed for technical information
in the preceding FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
2. Coverage Area of the Permit
The scope of EPA's action to modify the 2017 CGP did not include
the coverage area of the permit under the original 2017 CGP. Coverage
remains available to operators of eligible projects for stormwater
discharges from construction activities located in those areas where
the EPA is the NPDES permitting authority. A list of eligible areas can
be found in Appendix B of the modified 2017 CGP and includes the states
of New Hampshire, Massachusetts, New Mexico, and Idaho, as well as most
Indian country lands, and areas in selected states operated by a
federal operator. Permit coverage is also available to operators in
Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia, and the Pacific Island
territories, among others.
B. How can I get copies of these documents and other related
information?
1. Docket. The EPA has established an official public docket for
this action under Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2015-0828. The official
public docket is the collection of materials that is available for
public viewing at the Water Docket in the EPA Docket Center, (EPA/DC)
WJC West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20460. Although all documents in the docket are listed in an index,
some information is not publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Publicly available docket materials are available in hard
copy at the EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room, open from 8:30 a.m.
to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744 and the
telephone number for the Water Docket is (202) 566-2426.
2. Electronic Access. You may access this Federal Register notice
electronically through the United States government on-line source for
Federal regulations at https://www.regulations.gov.
Electronic versions of this final modified permit and accompanying
fact sheet are available on the EPA's NPDES website at https://www.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater-discharges-construction-activities.
An electronic version of the public docket is available through the
EPA's electronic public docket and comment system, EPA Dockets. You may
use EPA Dockets at https://www.regulations.gov to view public comments,
access the index listing of the contents of the official public docket,
and to access those documents in the public docket that are available
electronically. For additional information about the EPA's public
docket, visit the Agency's Docket Center homepage at https://www.epa.gov/dockets. Although not all docket materials may be available
electronically, you may still access any of the publicly available
docket materials through the Docket Facility identified in Section
I.B.1.
C. Who are the EPA regional contacts for the final modified permit?
For EPA Region 1, contact Suzanne Warner at tel.: (617) 918-1383 or
email at [email protected].
For EPA Region 2, contact Stephen Venezia at tel.: (212) 637-3856
or email at [email protected], or for Puerto Rico, contact Sergio
Bosques at tel.: (787) 977-5838 or email at [email protected].
For EPA Region 3, contact Carissa Moncavage at tel.: (215) 814-5798
or email at [email protected].
For EPA Region 4, contact Michael Mitchell at tel.: (404) 562-9303
or email at [email protected].
For EPA Region 5, contact Brian Bell at tel.: (312) 886-0981 or
email at [email protected].
For EPA Region 6, contact Suzanna Perea at tel.: (214) 665-7217 or
email at: [email protected].
For EPA Region 7, contact Mark Matthews at tel.: (913) 551-7635 or
email at: [email protected].
For EPA Region 8, contact Amy Clark at tel.: (303) 312-7014 or
email at: [email protected].
For EPA Region 9, contact Eugene Bromley at tel.: (415) 972-3510 or
email at [email protected].
For EPA Region 10, contact Margaret McCauley at tel.: (206) 553-
1772 or email at [email protected].
II. Background on the Permit and Final Modification
Section 402(p) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) directs the EPA to
regulate certain stormwater discharges under the NPDES program,
including discharges from regulated construction sites. The EPA's NPDES
regulations further specify that permits are required for stormwater
discharges from construction activities that disturb at least one acre,
including smaller sites that are part of a larger common plan of
development or sale that will ultimately disturb at least one acre. See
40 CFR 122.26(a)(1)(ii), (a)(9)(i)(B), (b)(14)(x), and (b)(15)(i).
Under the statutory and
[[Page 24505]]
regulatory authority cited above, the EPA issued the original 2017 CGP
on January 19, 2017 (82 FR 6534) and the permit became effective on
February 16, 2017.
In accordance with 40 CFR 23.2, the original 2017 CGP was
considered issued for the purposes of judicial review on January 25,
2017. Within the 120-day period of judicial review under section 509(b)
of the CWA, both the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) and
the Chesapeake Bay Foundation (CBF) filed petitions for review of the
original 2017 CGP in the United States Court of Appeals in the D.C.
Circuit.
After receiving the petitions for review, the EPA engaged in
multiple discussions with both NAHB and CBF in which the parties
discussed their concerns and provided new information to the Agency on
how certain permit requirements might be misinterpreted by construction
site operators permitted under the original 2017 CGP. Under 40 CFR
122.62(a)(2), the EPA may modify a permit if the Agency is presented
with new information during the permit term that was not available at
the time of issuance and would have justified the application of
different permit conditions at the time of issuance. Based on the
information the petitioners provided to the EPA following the issuance
of the original 2017 CGP, the Agency proposed a permit modification for
a 45-day public comment period beginning on December 12, 2018 and
ending on January 28, 2019. The purpose of the proposed modification
was to clarify the Agency's intent of certain permit requirements.
In the proposed permit modification, the EPA proposed to remove
examples of operators in the definition of operator; align three permit
requirements that implement the Effluent Limitations Guidelines (ELGs)
and New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for Construction and
Development (40 CFR part 450) (referred to collectively as ``the C&D
rule'') more closely with the ELG text; and clarify the roles and
responsibilities of individual operators on construction sites with
multiple operators. The proposed changes were intended to simplify the
permit language and accompanying fact sheet explanation without
changing the underlying requirements, applicability, implementation, or
enforceability of the original permit's requirements. Only those
requirements that the EPA proposed to modify were reopened in the
proposed modified permit for public comment (40 CFR 122.62).
The final modified 2017 CGP is substantially similar to the
proposed modified permit. The final modified 2017 CGP replaces several
existing conditions in the original 2017 CGP and relevant fact sheet
sections, but retains all other terms and conditions of the original
permit unchanged. For instance, the modified 2017 CGP does not affect
the eligible coverage area, the number or type of entities eligible to
be covered by the permit, nor the five-year permit term of the original
2017 CGP, meaning the modified 2017 CGP will still expire on February
16, 2022. The final modification is summarized in more detail below.
III. Summary of the Final Modification
During the public comment period for the proposed permit
modification, the EPA received a total of 14 comment letters. Three
industry groups, one environmental group, three states, and seven
anonymous commenters submitted comments to the Agency. The majority of
comments were generally supportive of the proposed modification, with
some commenters suggesting further changes to the wording or phrasing
of some elements of the proposed modification. The EPA considered all
comments before finalizing the permit modification. The EPA's response
to comments is available in the Docket (EPA-HQ-OW-2015-0828). The
modified 2017 CGP contains the following finalized changes from the
original 2017 CGP:
1. Removed examples in the definition of ``operator''--The EPA
removed two parenthetical examples that appeared in Part 1.1.1 of the
original 2017 CGP showing examples of the type of entity that would be
considered an ``operator'' and therefore would be eligible for coverage
under the permit. The EPA has determined after further consideration
that providing these examples may cause unintended confusion since
there may be instances where a party technically fits the description
used in the example yet would not qualify as an operator as intended by
the permit. Therefore, rather than suggesting who might be considered
an operator ``in most cases,'' the EPA removed the examples from both
Part 1.1.1(a) and (b) so that entities determining if they should seek
permit coverage under the modified 2017 CGP can focus solely on the
substantive definition of operator. See Part 1.1.1 of the final
modified permit.
2. Aligned language of three requirements with the C&D rule--The
EPA adjusted the wording of two erosion and sediment control
requirements and one pollution prevention requirement in the permit to
clarify their intent and to align their text with the C&D ELG at 40 CFR
part 450. See Part 2.2.6 on minimizing dust; Part 2.2.11 on minimizing
channel and streambank erosion and scour in the immediate vicinity of
discharge points; and Part 2.3.3(a) on storage, handling, and disposal
of building products, materials, and wastes.
3. Clarified individual operator responsibility in multiple
operator arrangements--The EPA clarified an individual operator's legal
responsibility for permit compliance in situations where there are
multiple operators who divide permit responsibilities among themselves.
In particular, the EPA removed references to ``joint and several
liability'' from the original permit since they may have provided, in
the Agency's view, an inaccurate explanation of what the permit
compliance duties are for multiple operators who share implementation
responsibilities under the permit.
In addition, the EPA clarified that, where multiple operators
divide permit responsibilities among themselves, each operator remains
responsible for compliance with the permit, but that they do not have
to duplicate those permit-related functions if one of the other
operators is appropriately implementing the relevant requirement in
full compliance with the permit. The EPA received some public comments
indicating that the italicized part of the following sentence proposed
in the permit footnote 52 and in the fact sheet may be construed in
ways that the EPA did not intend: ``Regardless of whether there is a
group SWPPP or multiple individual SWPPPs, each operator is responsible
for compliance with the permit's terms and conditions, notwithstanding
how the SWPPP(s) may divide each operator's responsibilities.'' Given
that this phrase is not imperative to the objective of the sentence,
which describes that all operators have an individual responsibility to
comply with the permit, the EPA agreed to remove it in the final
modified permit. Additionally, the EPA added the ``Operator A/B''
example that was proposed in the fact sheet, which explains how
operators do not have to duplicate divided responsibilities, to the
permit footnote 52 to reinforce the Agency's position. The example
reads, ``In other words, if Operator A relies on Operator B to satisfy
its permit obligations, Operator A does not have to duplicate those
permit-related functions if Operator B is implementing them for both
operators to be in compliance with the permit. However, Operator A
[[Page 24506]]
remains responsible for permit compliance if Operator B fails to
implement any measures necessary for Operator A to comply with the
permit.'' See Part 1.1.1, footnote 1; Part 7.1, footnote 52; and
Appendix A definition for ``shared control''; and the accompanying fact
sheet explanation for these Parts.
IV. Analysis of Economic Impacts
Due to the narrow scope of this permit modification and the focus
on clarifying the intent of certain requirements rather than changing
the underlying requirement itself, the EPA does not expect any change
in economic impact from this permit modification. It is therefore
unnecessary for the EPA to revise the economic analysis that was
prepared for the original 2017 CGP. A copy of the EPA's economic
analysis, titled ``Cost Impact Analysis for the 2017 Construction
General Permit (CGP),'' is available in the docket for this permit
modification.
V. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) determined that this
action is not significant under Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 (76 FR
3821, January 21, 2011).
VI. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
Executive Order (E.O.) 12898 (59 FR 7629 (February 16, 1994))
establishes federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main
provision directs federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable
and permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their
mission by identifying and addressing, as appropriate,
disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects of their programs, policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income populations in the United States.
Consistent with the EPA's previous determination for the original
2017 CGP, this final modification to the 2017 CGP will not have
disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects on minority or low-income populations because the requirements
in the modified permit apply equally to all construction projects that
disturb one or more acres in areas where the Agency is the permitting
authority, and the erosion and sediment control provisions increase the
level of environmental protection for all affected populations.
VII. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal implications as specified in
Executive Order 13175. It does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply
to this action.
In compliance with Executive Order 13175, the EPA consulted with
tribal officials during the development of the original 2017 CGP to
gain an understanding of and, where necessary, address any areas of the
original draft permit that may affect tribal interest. In the course of
this consultation, the EPA conducted several outreach activities with
tribal officials which are detailed in the Federal Register notice for
the final 2017 CGP (82 FR 6534). During the finalization of the
original 2017 CGP, the EPA also completed the CWA Section 401
certification procedures with all applicable tribes where the permit
applies (see Appendix B of the modified 2017 CGP).
As part of the proposal for this modification, the EPA reviewed the
tribal conditions that were incorporated into the original 2017 CGP
under Section 401 certifications to identify any requirements that the
proposed action might affect. See Part 9 of the original 2017 CGP. Only
two tribal conditions referenced a permit requirement that was the
subject of the proposed modification, Part 2.2.11 (Minimize erosion of
stormwater conveyance channels and their embankments . . .). The EPA
also completed the CWA Section 401 certification procedures with all
applicable tribes where the permit applies for the final permit
modification. Due to the narrow scope of the permit modification and
the focus on clarifying the intent of certain requirements rather than
changing the underlying requirement itself, the EPA determined that the
final action will not change the interpretation or implementation of
the tribal conditions referencing Part 2.2.11, and therefore any tribal
impacts from this modification will be limited.
Authority: Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.
Dated: May 14, 2019.
Deborah A. Szaro,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1.
Dated: May 14, 2019.
Jeff Gratz,
Deputy Director, Water Division, EPA Region 2.
Dated: May 14, 2019.
Jose C. Font,
Acting Director, Caribbean Environmental Protection Division, EPA
Region 2.
Dated: May 14, 2019.
Catharine McManus,
Deputy Director, Water Division, EPA Region 3.
Dated: May 14, 2019.
Jeaneanne M. Gettle,
Director, Water Division, EPA Region 4.
Dated: May 14, 2019.
Joan M. Tanaka,
Acting Director, Water Division, EPA Region 5.
Dated: May 14, 2019.
Charles W. Maguire,
Director, Water Division, EPA Region 6.
Dated: May 14, 2019.
Jeffery Robichaud,
Director, Water Division, EPA Region 7.
Dated: May 14, 2019.
Darcy O'Connor,
Director, Water Division, EPA Region 8.
Dated: May 14, 2019.
Tom[aacute]s Torres,
Director, Water Division, EPA Region 9.
Dated: May 14, 2019.
Daniel D. Opalski,
Director, Water Division, EPA Region 10.
[FR Doc. 2019-11075 Filed 5-24-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P