Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and Spa Safety Act; Incorporation by Reference of Successor Standard, 24021-24027 [2019-10845]
Download as PDF
24021
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 101 / Friday, May 24, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
2. Supplement No. 1 to Part 738 is
amended by revising the entry for
‘‘Venezuela’’ to read as follows:
■
SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 TO PART 738—COMMERCE COUNTRY CHART
[Reason for control]
Chemical and biological
weapons
Countries
CB 1
CB 2
X
X
*
Venezuela ...............................
*
*
*
X
National
security
Missile
tech
Regional
stability
NP 1
NP 2
NS 1
NS 2
MT 1
RS 1
X
*
X
X
*
X
X
X
*
*
*
CB 3
Nuclear nonproliferation
*
*
PART 740—LICENSE EXCEPTIONS
3. The authority citation for part 740
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: Pub. L. 115–232, 132 Stat. 2208
(50 U.S.C. 4801 et seq.); 50 U.S.C. 4601 et
Anti-terrorism
FC 1
CC 1
CC 2
CC 3
AT 1
AT 2
X
*
X
X
*
............
X
............
............
*
*
Crime control
RS 2
*
*
seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7201
et seq.; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996
Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3
CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice of August
8, 2018, 83 FR 39871 (August 13, 2018).
*
Firearms
convention
4. Supplement No. 1 to Part 740 is
amended by:
■
*
a. Removing Venezuela from the table
labeled ‘‘Country Group B—Countries;’’
and
■ b. Revising the entry for ‘‘Venezuela’’
under ‘‘Country Group D’’ to read as
follows:
*
*
*
*
*
■
SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 TO PART 740—COUNTRY GROUPS
[Country Group D]
[D: 1]
National
security
Country
*
*
*
*
Venezuela .................................................................................................
*
*
*
[D: 2]
Nuclear
[D: 3]
Chemical
and
biological
*
X
*
X
*
[D: 4]
Missile
technology
X
*
[D: 5]
U.S. arms
embargoed
countries 1
*
X
*
X
*
1 Note
to Country Group D:5: Countries subject to U.S. arms embargoes are identified by the State Department through notices published in
the Federal Register. The list of arms embargoed destinations in this paragraph is drawn from 22 CFR 126.1 and State Department Federal
Register notices related to arms embargoes (compiled at https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/embargoed_countries/) and will be amended
when the State Department publishes subsequent notices. If there are any discrepancies between the list of countries in this paragraph and the
countries identified by the State Department as subject to a U.S. arms embargo (in the Federal Register), the State Department’s list of countries subject to U.S. arms embargoes shall be controlling.
*
*
*
*
*
21238, in the issue of Tuesday, May 14,
2019, make the following correction:
Dated: May 17, 2019.
Richard E. Ashooh,
Assistant Secretary for Export
Administration.
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
16 CFR Part 1450
DATES:
SUMMARY:
[CORRECTED]
On page 21236, in the table labeled
‘‘Supplement No. 4 to Part 744—Entity
List’’, in the second column, in the third
entry ‘‘Multi-Mart Electronics
Technology Co, Ltd.,’’ in the second
line, ‘‘S/F’’ should read ‘‘5/F’’.
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[FR Doc. C1–2019–09945 Filed 5–23–19; 8:45 am]
Bureau of Industry and Security
BILLING CODE 1301–00–D
15 CFR Part 744
[Docket No. 181219999–8999–01]
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
RIN 0694–AH72
Addition of Certain Entities to the
Entity List, Revision of an Entry on the
Entity List, and Removal of an Entity
From the Entity List
Correction
In rule document 2019–09945,
appearing on pages 21233 through
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:56 May 23, 2019
Jkt 247001
Direct final rule.
The Virginia Graeme Baker
Pool and Spa Act (VGBA, or Act)
requires that drain covers must comply
with entrapment protection
requirements specified by the joint
American Society of Mechanical
Engineers (ASME) and American
National Standards Institute (ANSI)
ASME/ANSI A112.19.8 performance
standard, or any successor standard.
The Consumer Product Safety
Commission incorporates sections of
APSP–16 2017 as the successor drain
cover standard.
PART 744
[FR Doc. 2019–11034 Filed 5–22–19; 4:15 pm]
ACTION:
[Docket No. CPSC–2019–0012]
Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and Spa
Safety Act; Incorporation by Reference
of Successor Standard
Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The rule is effective November
24, 2020, unless we receive significant
adverse comment by June 24, 2019. If
we receive timely significant adverse
comments, we will publish notification
in the Federal Register, withdrawing
this direct final rule before its effective
date. The incorporation by reference of
the publication listed in this rule is
E:\FR\FM\24MYR1.SGM
24MYR1
24022
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 101 / Friday, May 24, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
approved by the Director of the Federal
Register as of November 24, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. CPSC–2019–
0012, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit
electronic comments in the following
way: Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
To ensure timely processing of
comments, please submit all electronic
(email) comments through
www.regulations.gov rather than to
CPSC. CPSC encourages you to submit
electronic comments by using the
Federal eRulemaking Portal, as
described above.
Written Submissions: Submit written
comments in the following way: Mail/
Hand delivery/Courier (for paper, disk
or CD–ROM submissions), preferably in
five copies, to: Division of the
Secretariat, Consumer Product Safety
Commission, Room 820, 4330 East West
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814;
telephone (301) 504–7923.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this notice. All
comments received may be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal identifiers, contact
information, or other personal
information provided. Do not submit
confidential business information, trade
secret information, or other sensitive or
protected information that you do not
want to be available to the public. If
furnished at all, such information
should be submitted by mail/hand
delivery/courier.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to: https://
www.regulations.gov, insert docket
number CPSC–2019–0012 into the
‘‘Search’’ box, and follow the prompts.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Troy
Whitfield, Lead Compliance Officer,
Directorate for Compliance Regulatory
Enforcement, Consumer Product Safety
Commission, 4330 East West Highway,
Bethesda, MD 20814; telephone: 301–
504–7548; email: twhitfield@cpsc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
I. Background and Statutory Authority
The VGBA, 15 U.S.C. 8001 et seq.,
took effect on December 19, 2008. The
VGBA’s purpose is to prevent drain
entrapment and child drowning in
swimming pools and spas. In part, the
Act requires that drain covers must
comply with entrapment protection
requirements specified by the joint
ASME/ANSI A112.19.8 performance
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 May 23, 2019
Jkt 247001
standard, or any successor standard.
The VGBA also states that public pools 1
must be equipped with drain covers that
meet the requirements of the ASME/
ANSI or any successor standard. The
VGBA provides that if a successor
standard to ASME/ANSI/A112.19.8 is
proposed and the Commission
determines the successor standard is in
the public interest, the Commission
must incorporate the revision into the
mandatory drain cover standard.
On August 5, 2011, the Commission
recognized the Association of Pool and
Spa Professionals (APSP) 2 standard
APSP–16 2011, Suction Fittings for Use
in Swimming Pools, Wading Pools,
Spas, and Hot Tubs, as the successor
standard to ASME/ANSI A112.19.8. The
Commission incorporated by reference
APSP–16 2011 into 16 CFR part 1450.
76 FR 47436 (Aug. 5, 2011). ASME/
ANSI A112.19.8 and its successor
standard, APSP–16 2011, contain
requirements that address hair
entrapment,3 body entrapment,4 and, in
a limited way, limb entrapment.5
On March 27, 2018, APSP notified the
Commission of the publication of a
successor pool drain cover standard to
APSP–16 2011, in conjunction with
ANSI and the International Code
Council (ICC), ANSI/APSP/ICC–16 2017
(APSP–16 2017).
II. APSP–16 2017
APSP–16 2017 establishes materials,
testing, use, installation, and marketing
requirements for new or replacement
bather-accessible suction outlet fitting
assemblies, other than maintenance
drains, that are designed to be fully
submerged for use in any pool. APSP–
16 2017 contains a new effective date
for the standard, changes to physical
testing requirements, new definitions,
and new labeling requirements for the
drain cover. These changes are
1 The Act defines the term ‘‘pool’’ to mean any
outdoor or indoor structure intended for swimming
or recreational bathing, including in-ground and
above ground structures, and includes hot tubs,
spas, portable spas, and non-portable wading pools.
2 On April 1, 2019, the Association of Pool and
Spa Professionals changed its name to the Pool &
Hot Tub Alliance (PHTA).
3 Hair entrapment typically occurs when water
flowing into the suction outlet carries a person’s
hair through and behind the openings in the drain
cover, where it becomes so entangled that it
prevents escape.
4 Body entrapment typically occurs on drains that
are not unblockable and are served by directsuction pumps when a person’s body forms a seal
around the perimeter of a drain, and they are thus
held against the drain by the pump suction.
5 Limb entrapment typically occurs on drain
covers when a cover is broken and a person gets a
limb stuck in the broken portion of the cover; or
when the cover is completely missing and a person
gets a limb stuck in the suction outlet, or other
geometry that is within the sump.
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
discussed in section III of this preamble.
APSP–16 2017 also contains new
requirements that apply to the
installation of the drain cover, to pools,
to the operation of pools, and to pool
owners. These changes are discussed in
section IV of this preamble. As
explained in section IV.A, the
Commission does not have the authority
to impose these requirements under
section 1404(b) of the VGBA.
III. Changes to APSP–16 2017 That Are
Within the Commission’s Authority
A. Effective Date
The VGBA does not specify an
effective date for implementing
successor standards. The Commission
expects drain covers that meet APSP–16
2011 to be able to meet APSP–16 2017
with minimal changes to the drain
covers. The changes necessary for the
product to comply with the revised
standard are limited to minor changes in
on-product markings and new
requirements for what must be included
in the documentation accompanying the
product. Product instructions and onproduct markings are already required;
thus, costs are limited to altering the
content of these items. The APSP–16
2017 standard states that it will take
effect 18 months after its adoption by
CPSC.
The Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) generally requires that the
effective date of a rule be at least 30
days after publication of the final rule
(5 U.S.C. 553(d)). Because of the low
rate of injuries under APSP–16 2011,6
and because the APA does not prohibit
an 18-month effective date, accelerated
adoption of the new standard is not
warranted. Therefore, unless the
Commission receives timely significant
adverse comments, CPSC’s revised
standard will take effect 18 months after
publication of this Federal Register
notice incorporating APSP–16 2017 as
the successor standard.
B. Changes to Physical Testing
Requirements
The APSP–16 technical committee
considered many possible changes to
physical testing requirements when it
was developing the 2017 version of the
APSP–16 standard. Ultimately, CPSC
staff found only two changes to physical
testing requirements that maintain or
increase the level of safety afforded by
APSP–16 2011. These are the changes to
the hair test approach time (section
5.9.5.5 of APSP–16 2017), and changes
6 There were two fatalities and nine injuries
between 2013 and 2017. https://www.cpsc.gov/s3fspublic/2018-Circulation-Entrapment.pdf?36TkV6Oz
JPzZPvRvC5IBnB5YhD1qkOPT.
E:\FR\FM\24MYR1.SGM
24MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 101 / Friday, May 24, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
For three of the most significant tests
specified in the 2011 version of APSP–
16, the test results are given as a flow
rating of gallons per minute of water
through the drain cover. These three
tests are the pony tail hair test, the full
head of hair test, and the body-blocking
test. The highest flow rate at which the
drain cover meets the performance
criteria of all three tests is the maximum
allowable flow rate of water for which
the drain cover may be certified. Drain
cover manufacturers seek the highest
possible flow rating. A higher flow
rating increases the number of
applications for which the drain cover
is suitable.
The hair and body-blocking tests are
conducted in a simulated pool
installation. The test technician selects
an initial water flow rate for testing
through the drain cover, and then
increases the test flow rate until the test
requirements are no longer met for the
hair or body tests. The test technician
records the maximum flow rate for each
of the tests where the drain cover meets
the standard. The lower of the flow rates
from the pony tail or full head of hair
tests is considered to be the hair test
result. The flow rating of the cover is the
highest flow rating at which the drain
cover meets the requirements for the
hair and body-blocking tests.
The pony tail and full head of hair
tests begin with the free ends of hair two
inches away from the drain cover.
APSP–16 2011 specified that the head
and ponytail fixtures are moved in a
side-to-side motion as they are lowered
over a period of 60 seconds toward the
drain cover during their respective tests.
The hair ends move in response to, or
generally opposite to, these motions,
until the flow of water draws the hair
into the drain cover. Due to the iterative
nature of the tests, coupled with the
dual requirement for the drain cover to
meet two types of hair test
requirements, it can take numerous tests
to determine a hair flow rating.
To reduce the time required to
perform the hair tests, and therefore, to
lower the cost of testing, APSP–16 2017
decreases the hair test approach time
from 60 seconds to 30 seconds. CPSC
staff studied the change in hair
approach time extensively. Staff
explained the results of its testing in a
detailed letter to APSP.7 Staff’s test
experiences indicate that most of the
time spent moving hair the full 60
seconds is unnecessary, because the hair
is effectively drawn to the target area
within a few seconds. Moreover, too
much movement can lead to the hair
being self-entangled above the drain and
not within the drain, thus producing
inaccurate results. The Commission
concludes that the change to 30 seconds
in section 5.9.5.5 of APSP–16 2017 is in
the public interest because it is at least
as protective as the 60 seconds specified
in APSP–16 2011; it may minimize the
risk of the hair being self-entangled
above the drain; and it reduces the cost
of performing the testing that is required
to meet the standard because it reduces
the time necessary to perform the tests.
Like traditional SOFAs, channel
drains are often equipped with multiple
suction outlets, not all of which must
necessarily be connected during
installation. However, because channel
drains have very narrow widths
compared to their lengths, their design
potentially concentrates the lowpressure area underneath the portion of
the drain cover that is closest to the
suction outlet. Because there was no
previous requirement to test SOFAs
using every suction outlet as the water
source for the pump, it was possible that
a channel drain could be tested using
only the suction outlet that yielded the
highest flow rating, i.e., the suction
outlet least likely to produce
entrapment for a given flow rate.
However, channel SOFAs could be
installed using a different suction outlet
than the one that was used during
testing; thus, this could potentially
expose bathers to conditions that exceed
what is allowed by the standard. To
ensure that channel-type SOFAs did not
receive an improper flow rating, the
committee initially proposed that
channel drains must meet the hair and
body-block tests when each suction
outlet was tested. Due to the wide
variety of styles and suction outlet
configurations available on traditional,
non-channel-type SOFAs, and because
all types of SOFAs could be subject to
differing flow through the drain cover
that are dependent on the suction outlet
location, the committee decided that the
new requirement to test at all suction
outlets on channel drains should also
apply to all types of SOFAs.
1. Changes to Hair Test Approach Time
2. Changes to Hair Testing To Include
all Suction Outlet Fittings
To ease product installation, many
SOFA manufacturers include more than
one suction outlet on their products.
Suction outlets may be located on one
or more sides of the SOFA, on the
bottom, or on a combination of these
locations. For SOFAs with multiple
suction outlets, APSP–16 2011, and
before it, ASME/ANSI A112.19.8, only
required that the hair and body-blocking
element tests be performed on the drain
cover while water was flowing through
one of the suction outlets. The standards
did not require testing the drain cover
using the additional suction outlets,
when present.
The introduction of channel drains,
whose length is much longer than their
width, provided a new scenario for
entrapment. Figure 1 shows an example
of a channel drain.
7 https://www.cpsc.gov/s3fs-public/pdfs/blk_
media_CPSCCommentstoRevisionAPSP162011.pdf.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 May 23, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\24MYR1.SGM
24MYR1
ER24MY19.004
to hair testing at specific ports in
suction outlet fitting assemblies (section
1.3.7.1 of APSP–16 2017).
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
24023
24024
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 101 / Friday, May 24, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
The additional requirement to
perform hair tests at all suction outlets
for all types of SOFAs will increase the
testing burden because it increases the
number of tests that are required to be
performed. However, the possible
increase in testing burden will be offset
by other changes to the testing
requirements. Under the revised
standard, if the hair cannot reach the
suction outlet, there is no need to test
that outlet. Thus, APSP–17 2017
provides that the requirement to test at
each suction outlet, which is included
in section 5.7.2, only applies to suction
outlets that have a ‘‘flow path length’’
(i.e., the distance between the drain
cover the suction outlet) of less than 16
inches, which is the maximum length of
hair used in the hair tests. Furthermore,
as discussed above, the 2017 standard
reduced the hair approach time from 60
seconds to 30 seconds. The additional
testing required to evaluate all of the
suction outlets on a SOFA is offset by
the reduction in hair test approach time
discussed in Section II.A.2.a.
The requirement in APSP–16 2017 to
test at every suction outlet reachable by
the hair test specimen will increase the
safety of bathers because it precludes
the chance of a SOFA being installed in
a manner that is different from the way
it was tested, serves to clarify prior
practice, and is supported by laboratory
testing. Accordingly, the Commission
determines that testing of SOFAS at
every suction outlet is in the public
interest.
C. Definition of ‘‘Unblockable Drain’’
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
A suction outlet fitting assembly that,
when installed according to the
manufacturer’s instructions, cannot be
shadowed by an 18″ x 23″ Body Blocking
Element, and has a rated flow through the
remaining open area beyond the shadowed
portion that cannot create a suction force in
excess of the force calculated in equation 2.
Pool drain professionals have
essentially been using this definition to
determine whether a SOFA is
unblockable since a similar version was
first published as an interpretive rule by
CPSC on April 27, 2010.8 At least 149
state and local building codes now
reference the 18″ x 23″ dimension and
the pull-off force requirements
8 https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/
2010/04/27/2010-8160/virginia-graeme-baker-pooland-spa-safety-act-interpretation-of-unblockabledrain.
16:08 May 23, 2019
Jkt 247001
D. Labeling Requirements
Section 8.4 of APSP–16 2017 contains
requirements for the labelling of a
SOFA, requiring identifying
information, such as the manufacturer
name and cover/grate part number, and
date of the installation of the cover/
grate. Section 8.5.1 of APSP–16 2017
contains labeling requirements for
Registered Design Professional (RDP)
SOFAs. Section 9.3 of APSP–16 2017
adds provisions regarding a General
Certificate of Conformity (GCC) that are
consistent with the Consumer Product
Safety Act and VGBA. These
requirements identify the product, the
manufacturer, and the test lab that
performed the analysis, as well as state
the standard to which the product was
tested, and when and where it was
tested. Because the presence of this
information makes it easy to identify
relevant safety information about the
product, the Commission finds these
requirements are in the public interest.
IV. Changes to APSP–16 2017 That
Exceed the Commission’s Authority
A. The Commission’s Authority Under
the VGBA
The 2011 version of the APSP
standard did not define ‘‘unblockable
drain’’ or ‘‘unblockable SOFA.’’ The
definitions section of APSP–16 2017
includes the following definition of
‘‘Unblockable SOFA’’:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
originally found in Table 1 of
A112.19.8, which are consistent with
the definition of ‘‘unblockable’’ in
APSP–16 2017. Other state and local
codes reference slight variations of this
definition of ‘‘unblockable.’’ Because
this is an accepted definition among
pool professionals, the Commission
believes including this definition in its
mandatory standard is in the public
interest.
Section 1404(b) of the VGBA specifies
a standard for drain covers. It states
‘‘each swimming pool or spa drain cover
manufactured, distributed, or entered
into commerce in the United States
shall conform to the entrapment
protection standards of [the drain cover
performance standard].’’ Section 1404(a)
of the VGBA states that the
requirements of section 1404(b) shall be
treated as a consumer product safety
rule under the CPSA. Thus, the drain
cover must be in compliance with the
drain cover standard at the time of
manufacture of the cover, distribution of
the cover, or when the cover is entered
into commerce. This indicates that the
drain cover standard is a standard for
the drain cover, as a discrete product.
Section 1404(b) requires the
Commission to assess any successor
drain cover standard to determine
whether the changes in the standard are
in the public interest, before
incorporating the successor standard.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
CPSC’s Office of Compliance enforces
section 1404(b) by determining whether
the drain cover, as a discrete product, at
the time of manufacture, distribution, or
entrance into commerce, complies with
the drain cover standard.
Separately, section 1404(c) of the
VGBA requires that public pools and
spas in the United States:
• Have drain covers that comply with
the standard specified in section 1404(b)
or a successor standard; and
• if the public pool or spa does not
have an unblockable drain, it must be
equipped with one or more of the
secondary systems specified in section
1404(c)(1)(A)(ii).
Thus, section 1404(c) gives the CPSC
authority to determine and enforce these
requirements for public pools and spas,
and it gives the CPSC the authority to
inspect these public facilities for the
presence of drain covers and secondary
systems and to enforce those
requirements. In summary, section
1404(b) of the VGBA is the drain cover
standard, which is to be treated as a
consumer product safety rule. The
VGBA authorizes a product safety
standard for that product—drain covers
(or SOFAs). The authority for the
Commission to incorporate by reference
the APSP drain cover standard is in
section 1404(b) of the VGBA.
Separately, section 1404(c) of the VGBA
requires public pools and spas to have
certain specified equipment, and it gives
the Commission authority to check that
the equipment is installed in public
pools and spas.
B. Specific Sections of APSP–16 2017
That Exceed Commission Authority
APSP–16 2017 contains many
changes that extend beyond the
requirements for the drain cover or
SOFA itself, and thus, exceed CPSC’s
authority under section 1404(b) of the
VGBA. The voluntary standard can have
such provisions. However, the
Commission does not have authority to
enforce them as mandatory standard
provisions. The changes include
requirements that can be separated into
the following categories:
• Installation of the SOFA;
• Requirements applicable to pools;
• Activities of pool owners;
• Changes to statutory definitions in
the VGBA.
The changes specific to each category
are detailed in Tables 1 through 4.
E:\FR\FM\24MYR1.SGM
24MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 101 / Friday, May 24, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
24025
TABLE 1—SECTIONS OF APSP–16 2017 THAT ARE BEYOND THE AUTHORITY OF CPSC BECAUSE THEY ESTABLISH
REQUIREMENTS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE SOFA
Section No.
Summary of topic(s) covered
1.3.3.2 ...............
3.5.1 ..................
Drain covers can only be installed on SOFAs deemed suitable by the drain cover manufacturer.
Drain covers shall only be installed on sumps in configurations authorized by the drain cover manufacturer’s installation instructions, and at a specific flow rating.
A SOFA must be installed per the manufacturer’s instructions.
Compliance with the standard requires selecting and installing a SOFA or combination of SOFAs such that the flow rating of
the SOFAs is greater than the maximum system flow of the pool.
The flow rating for existing pools with blockable SOFAs is the flow rating of the SOFA, when also installed in conjunction with
an additional device or system designed to prevent suction entrapment (‘‘secondary anti-entrapment system’’). A single,
blockable SOFA installed in existing pools with no secondary anti-entrapment system results in a flow rating of zero.
Blockable SOFAs installed in existing pools must also be installed with a secondary anti-entrapment system.
Covers or grates marked unblockable may be installed in pools with multiple SOFA systems. Covers or grates marked
unblockable may also be installed in pools with single SOFA systems when this use is authorized by the cover/grate manufacturer.
Blockable covers may only be installed in multiple-SOFA systems, or in pools that are also equipped with one or more secondary anti-entrapment systems.
3.6.1 ..................
3.6.3.2 ...............
3.6.4.2 ...............
3.7.2 ..................
3.7.3 ..................
9.4.1 ..................
The provisions mentioned in Table 1
set forth requirements for how to install
the SOFA. The 2011 version of the
APSP standard addressed installation by
requiring that certain information about
installation be provided in labels and
instructions. In contrast, the provisions
referenced in Table 1 require that the
installer or pool owner/operator take
certain actions. These are not provisions
for the drain cover. A drain cover
manufacturer has the ability to provide
labels and instructions with the
product. A drain cover manufacturer
does not control how the product is
installed.
TABLE 2—SECTIONS OF APSP–16 2017 THAT ARE BEYOND THE AUTHORITY OF CPSC BECAUSE THEY ESTABLISH
REQUIREMENTS FOR POOLS
Section No.
Summary of topic(s) covered
1.3.3.1 ...............
A pool’s system suction flow must not exceed the rating of the installed SOFA(s). A pool with SOFA(s) that were not installed
per the manufacturer’s instructions is not in compliance with the standard.
A pool’s system flow ratings cannot exceed the SOFA flow rating while the pool is open to bathers.
For multiple blockable SOFA systems, the maximum system flow rating for the pool is determined by subtracting the flow rating of the largest SOFA.
The system flow rating for pools with unblockable SOFA(s) shall be determined by combining the flow rating of all SOFA(s).
In new pool construction, the use of a single blockable SOFA is not permitted.
3.6.3.1 ...............
3.6.4.1 ...............
3.6.4.3 ...............
3.7.1 ..................
The provisions mentioned in Table 2
set forth requirements for pools, not for
drain covers. Several of the provisions
set requirements for the pool’s flow
rating. The 2011 version of the APSP
standard required markings and
instructions regarding operation at an
appropriate flow rating. However, the
revised standard states requirements for
the pool; these are requirements the
drain cover manufacturer lacks the
ability to fulfill.
TABLE 3—SECTIONS OF APSP–16 2017 THAT ARE BEYOND THE AUTHORITY OF CPSC BECAUSE THEY REQUIRE
ACTIONS OF POOL OWNERS
Section No.
Summary of topic(s) covered
1.1.3 ..................
3.6.2 ..................
Drain covers must be replaced at the end of their stated service life.
No modifications to SOFAs or the SOFA flow paths are permitted unless they are subsequently re-tested.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
The provisions mentioned in Table 3
require pool owners to take certain
actions. The 2011 version of the APSP
standard required that components of
drain covers be marked to state the
component’s life span. In contrast, the
revised standard requires that drain
cover components be replaced at the
end of their service life. This change
makes the requirement apply to the pool
owner, not the drain cover
manufacturer. Similarly, a requirement
prohibiting modifications to installed
SOFAs applies to the pool owner, not
the drain cover.
TABLE 4—SECTIONS OF APSP–16 2017 THAT SET INSTATALLATION REQUIREMENTS REGARDING SECONDARY SYSTEMS
Section No.
Summary of topic(s) covered
9.4.1 ..................
Requires that blockable SOFAs have installation instructions stating that SOFAs shall be installed only in multiple SOFA systems or instructions shall state that the installer shall include one or more of the following devices or systems
Provides a definition of safety vacuum relief system (SVRS).
Provides a definition of suction-limiting vent system (SVLS).
9.4.1.1 ...............
9.4.1.2 ...............
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 May 23, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\24MYR1.SGM
24MYR1
24026
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 101 / Friday, May 24, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 4—SECTIONS OF APSP–16 2017 THAT SET INSTATALLATION REQUIREMENTS REGARDING SECONDARY SYSTEMS—
Continued
Section No.
9.4.1.3
9.4.1.4
9.4.1.5
9.4.1.6
Summary of topic(s) covered
...............
...............
...............
...............
Provides
Provides
Provides
Provides
a
a
a
a
definition
definition
definition
definition
of
of
of
of
gravity drainage system.
automatic pump shut-off system.
drain disablement.
other secondary anti-entrapment systems.
The provisions listed in Table 4 set
forth what seem to be requirements for
instructions. As is stated above, CPSC
standards can include requirements for
instructions. However, the instructions
specified in section 9.4 actually
establish requirements for pools and for
secondary devices and systems designed
to prevent suction entrapment. All of
section 9.4 exceeds the Commission’s
authority under Section 1404(a) of the
VGBA because the instructions require
secondary systems on all pools. The
VGBA only requires secondary systems
for public pools. In addition, this
section provides definitions of the
secondary systems that differ from the
statutory definitions in the VGBA.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
C. Section That Should Not Be Included
Because of an Error
Section 3.2.4 requires SOFAs to be
designated in their installation manual
as ‘‘blockable’’ or ‘‘unblockable.’’ This
requirement does fall within the
enforcement authority of CPSC.
However, the definition in APSP–16
2017 contains an error. As discussed,
APSP–16 2017 provides a definition of
‘‘unblockable.’’ That definition has two
parts: Unblockable SOFAs must meet a
minimum size requirement, and they
must meet the body-blocking element
maximum pull-off force requirement.
Due to a printing error, section 3.2.4
omitted the pull-off force requirement.
Thus, the Commission will not adopt
section 3.2.4 of APSP–16 2017.
V. Incorporation by Reference
The Office of the Federal Register
(OFR) has regulations concerning
incorporation by reference. 1 CFR part
51. Under these regulations, agencies
must discuss, in the preamble to the
final rule, ways that the materials the
agency incorporates by reference are
reasonably available to interested
person and how interested parties can
obtain the materials. In addition, the
preamble to the final rule must
summarize the material. 1 CFR 51.5(b).
In accordance with the OFR’s
requirements, section II of this preamble
summarizes the major provisions of the
APSP–16 2017 standard that the
Commission incorporates by reference
into 16 CFR 1450.3. The standard is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 May 23, 2019
Jkt 247001
reasonably available to interested
parties, and interested parties may
purchase a copy of the standard from
The Association of Pool & Spa
Professionals. A copy of the standard
can also be inspected at CPSC’s Office
of the Secretary.
VI. Direct Final Rule Process
The APA generally requires that
agencies use notice and comment
rulemaking when issuing a rule. 5
U.S.C. 553. The Commission is adopting
as a mandatory standard a voluntary
standard that was developed through
the consensus process. The voluntary
standard is noncontroversial and
receives widespread support. In
Recommendation 95–4, the
Administrative Conference of the
United States (ACUS) endorsed direct
final rulemaking as an appropriate
procedure to expedite promulgation of
rules that are noncontroversial and that
are not expected to generate significant
adverse comment. See 60 FR 43108
(August 18, 1995). The Commission
believes it is very unlikely that there
will be adverse comments to this rule.
Consistent with the ACUS
recommendation, the Commission is
satisfying the notice and comment
procedure by publishing this rule as a
direct final rule and providing that,
unless adverse comment is received
within 30 days, the rule will become
effective as a final rule.
VII. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
requires that when agencies are required
to issue a notice of proposed rulemaking
they must review the rulemaking’s
potential economic impact on small
entities, including small businesses.
Section 603 of the RFA requires the
Commission to prepare and make
available for public comment an Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA)
describing the impact of the proposed
rule on small entities and identifying
impact-reducing alternatives. However,
under Section 605 of the RFA, if an
agency certifies that the proposed rule,
if promulgated, will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities, an
IRFA is not required, provided that the
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
agency publishes the certification in the
Federal Register, along with a statement
providing the factual basis for the
certification.
As discussed in section III.B of this
preamble, the revised standard includes
two changes to the testing procedures in
ANSI/APSP/ICC–16: Hair test approach
time and hair testing at specific ports in
channel SOFAs. In addition to these two
changes in hair tests from the current
standard, ANSI/APSP/ICC–16 2017
specifies additional editorial changes,
which are intended to clarify existing
wording. Clarifying language pertaining
to installation and maintenance
instructions to be provided with the
covers/grates for SOFAs was also added
to the standard. Also, manufacturers are
required to make minor changes to the
information that is provided in
permanent markings of compliant
covers and grates.
Overall, the changes in testing
requirements in the standard revision
should have minimal impacts on small
businesses, either in costs of testing, or
in product modifications necessitated to
comply with the revised testing
provisions. The revisions that this rule
would require in the information that
must be provided in installation and
maintenance instructions, and the
changes in the permanent markings
required for covers, and grates should
also not impose significant costs on
small cover and grate manufacturers.
Because small firms should only
experience minimal increases in
compliance costs or other burdens
associated with this rule, the
Commission certifies that referencing
the revised standard, ANSI/APSP/ICC–
16–2017, as the successor standard
under the VGBA will not be likely to
have significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small businesses
or other entities.
VIII. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose any
information collection requirements.
Accordingly, this rule is not subject to
the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
3501–3520.
E:\FR\FM\24MYR1.SGM
24MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 101 / Friday, May 24, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
IX. Environmental Considerations
The Commission’s regulations
provide a categorical exclusion for the
Commission’s rules from any
requirement to prepare an
environmental assessment or an
environmental impact statement
because they ‘‘have little or no potential
for affecting the human environment.’’
16 CFR 1021.5(c)(2). This rule falls
within the categorical exclusion, so no
environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement is
required.
X. Preemption
Section 26(a) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C.
2075(a), provides that where a
‘‘consumer product safety standard
under [the Consumer Product Safety Act
(CPSA)]’’ is in effect and applies to a
product, no state or political
subdivision of a state may either
establish or continue in effect a
requirement dealing with the same risk
of injury, unless the state requirement is
identical to the federal standard. Section
26(c) of the CPSA also provides that
states or political subdivisions of states
may apply to the Commission for an
exemption from this preemption in
certain circumstances.
Section 1404(a) of the VGBA specifies
that a rule issued under section 1404(b)
of the VGBA shall be treated as a
consumer product safety standard under
the CPSA, thus, implying that the
preemptive effect of section 26(a) of the
CPSA would apply. Therefore, this rule
will invoke the preemptive effect of
section 26(a) of the CPSA when it
becomes effective.
List of Subjects in 16 CFR Part 1450
Consumer protection, Incorporation
by reference, Infants and children, Law
enforcement.
For the reasons stated above, the
Commission amends part 1450 of title
16 of the Code of the Federal
Regulations as follows:
PART 1450—VIRGINIA GRAEME
BAKER POOL AND SPA SAFETY ACT
REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 1450
continues to read as follows:
entrapment protection standards of
ANSI/APSP/ICC–16 2017, American
National Standard for Suction Outlet
Fitting Assemblies (SOFA) for Use in
Pools, Spas and Hot Tubs, approved on
August 18, 2017. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this
incorporation by reference in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1
CFR part 51. You may obtain a copy
from the Pool & Hot Tub Alliance
(formerly known as the Association of
Pool & Spa Professionals), 2111
Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria,
Virginia 22314; https://www.apsp.org,
telephone 703–838–0083. You may
inspect a copy at the Division of the
Secretariat, U.S. Consumer Product
Safety Commission, Room 820, 4330
East West Highway, Bethesda, MD
20814, telephone 301–504–7923, or at
the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030,
or go to https://www.archives.gov/
federal-regster/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
(b) The CPSC standard does not
require compliance with the following
provisions:
(1) Section 1.1.3 of ANSI/APSP/ICC–
16 2017.
(2) Sections 1.3.3.1 through 1.3.3.2 of
ANSP/APSP/ICC–16 2017.
(3) Section 3.2.4 of ANSI/APSP/ICC–
16 2017.
(4) Section 3.5.1 of ANSI/APSP/ICC–
16 2017.
(5) Sections 3.6.1 through 3.6.4.3 of
ANSI/APSP/ICC–16 2017.
(6) Section 3.7 of ANSI/APSP/ICC–16
2017.
(7) Section 9.4 of ANSI/APSP/ICC–16
2017.
Abioye E. Mosheim,
Acting Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2019–10845 Filed 5–23–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
■
[Docket No. FDA–2019–D–2011]
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2051–2089, 86 Stat.
1207; 15 U.S.C. 8001–8008, 121 Stat. 1794.
■
2. Revise § 1450.3 to read as follows:
§ 1450.3
Incorporation by reference.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph
(b) of this section, each swimming pool
or spa drain cover manufactured,
distributed, or entered into commerce in
the United States shall conform to the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 May 23, 2019
Jkt 247001
21 CFR Part 216
Section 503A Bulks List Final Rule
Questions and Answers; Guidance for
Industry; Small Entity Compliance
Guide; Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
PO 00000
Notification of availability.
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
24027
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA, the Agency, or
we) is announcing the availability of a
guidance for industry entitled ‘‘Section
503A Bulks List Final Rule Questions
and Answers—Small Entity Compliance
Guide.’’ The small entity compliance
guide (SECG) is intended to help small
entities comply with the final rule
establishing the list of bulk drug
substances that can be used in
accordance with certain compounding
provisions of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act).
DATES: The announcement of the
guidance is published in the Federal
Register on May 24, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit either
electronic or written comments on
Agency guidances at any time as
follows:
SUMMARY:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Dockets
Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Dockets Management
Staff, FDA will post your comment, as
well as any attachments, except for
information submitted, marked and
identified, as confidential, if submitted
as detailed in ‘‘Instructions.’’
E:\FR\FM\24MYR1.SGM
24MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 101 (Friday, May 24, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 24021-24027]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-10845]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION
16 CFR Part 1450
[Docket No. CPSC-2019-0012]
Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and Spa Safety Act; Incorporation by
Reference of Successor Standard
AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission.
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and Spa Act (VGBA, or Act)
requires that drain covers must comply with entrapment protection
requirements specified by the joint American Society of Mechanical
Engineers (ASME) and American National Standards Institute (ANSI) ASME/
ANSI A112.19.8 performance standard, or any successor standard. The
Consumer Product Safety Commission incorporates sections of APSP-16
2017 as the successor drain cover standard.
DATES: The rule is effective November 24, 2020, unless we receive
significant adverse comment by June 24, 2019. If we receive timely
significant adverse comments, we will publish notification in the
Federal Register, withdrawing this direct final rule before its
effective date. The incorporation by reference of the publication
listed in this rule is
[[Page 24022]]
approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of November 24,
2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. CPSC-2019-
0012, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit electronic comments in the following
way: Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments. To ensure timely processing of
comments, please submit all electronic (email) comments through
www.regulations.gov rather than to CPSC. CPSC encourages you to submit
electronic comments by using the Federal eRulemaking Portal, as
described above.
Written Submissions: Submit written comments in the following way:
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for paper, disk or CD-ROM submissions),
preferably in five copies, to: Division of the Secretariat, Consumer
Product Safety Commission, Room 820, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda,
MD 20814; telephone (301) 504-7923.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number for this notice. All comments received may be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
identifiers, contact information, or other personal information
provided. Do not submit confidential business information, trade secret
information, or other sensitive or protected information that you do
not want to be available to the public. If furnished at all, such
information should be submitted by mail/hand delivery/courier.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to: https://www.regulations.gov, insert docket
number CPSC-2019-0012 into the ``Search'' box, and follow the prompts.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Troy Whitfield, Lead Compliance
Officer, Directorate for Compliance Regulatory Enforcement, Consumer
Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814;
telephone: 301-504-7548; email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background and Statutory Authority
The VGBA, 15 U.S.C. 8001 et seq., took effect on December 19, 2008.
The VGBA's purpose is to prevent drain entrapment and child drowning in
swimming pools and spas. In part, the Act requires that drain covers
must comply with entrapment protection requirements specified by the
joint ASME/ANSI A112.19.8 performance standard, or any successor
standard. The VGBA also states that public pools \1\ must be equipped
with drain covers that meet the requirements of the ASME/ANSI or any
successor standard. The VGBA provides that if a successor standard to
ASME/ANSI/A112.19.8 is proposed and the Commission determines the
successor standard is in the public interest, the Commission must
incorporate the revision into the mandatory drain cover standard.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Act defines the term ``pool'' to mean any outdoor or
indoor structure intended for swimming or recreational bathing,
including in-ground and above ground structures, and includes hot
tubs, spas, portable spas, and non-portable wading pools.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On August 5, 2011, the Commission recognized the Association of
Pool and Spa Professionals (APSP) \2\ standard APSP-16 2011, Suction
Fittings for Use in Swimming Pools, Wading Pools, Spas, and Hot Tubs,
as the successor standard to ASME/ANSI A112.19.8. The Commission
incorporated by reference APSP-16 2011 into 16 CFR part 1450. 76 FR
47436 (Aug. 5, 2011). ASME/ANSI A112.19.8 and its successor standard,
APSP-16 2011, contain requirements that address hair entrapment,\3\
body entrapment,\4\ and, in a limited way, limb entrapment.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ On April 1, 2019, the Association of Pool and Spa
Professionals changed its name to the Pool & Hot Tub Alliance
(PHTA).
\3\ Hair entrapment typically occurs when water flowing into the
suction outlet carries a person's hair through and behind the
openings in the drain cover, where it becomes so entangled that it
prevents escape.
\4\ Body entrapment typically occurs on drains that are not
unblockable and are served by direct-suction pumps when a person's
body forms a seal around the perimeter of a drain, and they are thus
held against the drain by the pump suction.
\5\ Limb entrapment typically occurs on drain covers when a
cover is broken and a person gets a limb stuck in the broken portion
of the cover; or when the cover is completely missing and a person
gets a limb stuck in the suction outlet, or other geometry that is
within the sump.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On March 27, 2018, APSP notified the Commission of the publication
of a successor pool drain cover standard to APSP-16 2011, in
conjunction with ANSI and the International Code Council (ICC), ANSI/
APSP/ICC-16 2017 (APSP-16 2017).
II. APSP-16 2017
APSP-16 2017 establishes materials, testing, use, installation, and
marketing requirements for new or replacement bather-accessible suction
outlet fitting assemblies, other than maintenance drains, that are
designed to be fully submerged for use in any pool. APSP-16 2017
contains a new effective date for the standard, changes to physical
testing requirements, new definitions, and new labeling requirements
for the drain cover. These changes are discussed in section III of this
preamble. APSP-16 2017 also contains new requirements that apply to the
installation of the drain cover, to pools, to the operation of pools,
and to pool owners. These changes are discussed in section IV of this
preamble. As explained in section IV.A, the Commission does not have
the authority to impose these requirements under section 1404(b) of the
VGBA.
III. Changes to APSP-16 2017 That Are Within the Commission's Authority
A. Effective Date
The VGBA does not specify an effective date for implementing
successor standards. The Commission expects drain covers that meet
APSP-16 2011 to be able to meet APSP-16 2017 with minimal changes to
the drain covers. The changes necessary for the product to comply with
the revised standard are limited to minor changes in on-product
markings and new requirements for what must be included in the
documentation accompanying the product. Product instructions and on-
product markings are already required; thus, costs are limited to
altering the content of these items. The APSP-16 2017 standard states
that it will take effect 18 months after its adoption by CPSC.
The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) generally requires that the
effective date of a rule be at least 30 days after publication of the
final rule (5 U.S.C. 553(d)). Because of the low rate of injuries under
APSP-16 2011,\6\ and because the APA does not prohibit an 18-month
effective date, accelerated adoption of the new standard is not
warranted. Therefore, unless the Commission receives timely significant
adverse comments, CPSC's revised standard will take effect 18 months
after publication of this Federal Register notice incorporating APSP-16
2017 as the successor standard.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ There were two fatalities and nine injuries between 2013 and
2017. https://www.cpsc.gov/s3fs-public/2018-Circulation-Entrapment.pdf?36TkV6OzJPzZPvRvC5IBnB5YhD1qkOPT.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Changes to Physical Testing Requirements
The APSP-16 technical committee considered many possible changes to
physical testing requirements when it was developing the 2017 version
of the APSP-16 standard. Ultimately, CPSC staff found only two changes
to physical testing requirements that maintain or increase the level of
safety afforded by APSP-16 2011. These are the changes to the hair test
approach time (section 5.9.5.5 of APSP-16 2017), and changes
[[Page 24023]]
to hair testing at specific ports in suction outlet fitting assemblies
(section 1.3.7.1 of APSP-16 2017).
1. Changes to Hair Test Approach Time
For three of the most significant tests specified in the 2011
version of APSP-16, the test results are given as a flow rating of
gallons per minute of water through the drain cover. These three tests
are the pony tail hair test, the full head of hair test, and the body-
blocking test. The highest flow rate at which the drain cover meets the
performance criteria of all three tests is the maximum allowable flow
rate of water for which the drain cover may be certified. Drain cover
manufacturers seek the highest possible flow rating. A higher flow
rating increases the number of applications for which the drain cover
is suitable.
The hair and body-blocking tests are conducted in a simulated pool
installation. The test technician selects an initial water flow rate
for testing through the drain cover, and then increases the test flow
rate until the test requirements are no longer met for the hair or body
tests. The test technician records the maximum flow rate for each of
the tests where the drain cover meets the standard. The lower of the
flow rates from the pony tail or full head of hair tests is considered
to be the hair test result. The flow rating of the cover is the highest
flow rating at which the drain cover meets the requirements for the
hair and body-blocking tests.
The pony tail and full head of hair tests begin with the free ends
of hair two inches away from the drain cover. APSP-16 2011 specified
that the head and ponytail fixtures are moved in a side-to-side motion
as they are lowered over a period of 60 seconds toward the drain cover
during their respective tests. The hair ends move in response to, or
generally opposite to, these motions, until the flow of water draws the
hair into the drain cover. Due to the iterative nature of the tests,
coupled with the dual requirement for the drain cover to meet two types
of hair test requirements, it can take numerous tests to determine a
hair flow rating.
To reduce the time required to perform the hair tests, and
therefore, to lower the cost of testing, APSP-16 2017 decreases the
hair test approach time from 60 seconds to 30 seconds. CPSC staff
studied the change in hair approach time extensively. Staff explained
the results of its testing in a detailed letter to APSP.\7\ Staff's
test experiences indicate that most of the time spent moving hair the
full 60 seconds is unnecessary, because the hair is effectively drawn
to the target area within a few seconds. Moreover, too much movement
can lead to the hair being self-entangled above the drain and not
within the drain, thus producing inaccurate results. The Commission
concludes that the change to 30 seconds in section 5.9.5.5 of APSP-16
2017 is in the public interest because it is at least as protective as
the 60 seconds specified in APSP-16 2011; it may minimize the risk of
the hair being self-entangled above the drain; and it reduces the cost
of performing the testing that is required to meet the standard because
it reduces the time necessary to perform the tests.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ https://www.cpsc.gov/s3fs-public/pdfs/blk_media_CPSCCommentstoRevisionAPSP162011.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Changes to Hair Testing To Include all Suction Outlet Fittings
To ease product installation, many SOFA manufacturers include more
than one suction outlet on their products. Suction outlets may be
located on one or more sides of the SOFA, on the bottom, or on a
combination of these locations. For SOFAs with multiple suction
outlets, APSP-16 2011, and before it, ASME/ANSI A112.19.8, only
required that the hair and body-blocking element tests be performed on
the drain cover while water was flowing through one of the suction
outlets. The standards did not require testing the drain cover using
the additional suction outlets, when present.
The introduction of channel drains, whose length is much longer
than their width, provided a new scenario for entrapment. Figure 1
shows an example of a channel drain.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR24MY19.004
Like traditional SOFAs, channel drains are often equipped with
multiple suction outlets, not all of which must necessarily be
connected during installation. However, because channel drains have
very narrow widths compared to their lengths, their design potentially
concentrates the low-pressure area underneath the portion of the drain
cover that is closest to the suction outlet. Because there was no
previous requirement to test SOFAs using every suction outlet as the
water source for the pump, it was possible that a channel drain could
be tested using only the suction outlet that yielded the highest flow
rating, i.e., the suction outlet least likely to produce entrapment for
a given flow rate. However, channel SOFAs could be installed using a
different suction outlet than the one that was used during testing;
thus, this could potentially expose bathers to conditions that exceed
what is allowed by the standard. To ensure that channel-type SOFAs did
not receive an improper flow rating, the committee initially proposed
that channel drains must meet the hair and body-block tests when each
suction outlet was tested. Due to the wide variety of styles and
suction outlet configurations available on traditional, non-channel-
type SOFAs, and because all types of SOFAs could be subject to
differing flow through the drain cover that are dependent on the
suction outlet location, the committee decided that the new requirement
to test at all suction outlets on channel drains should also apply to
all types of SOFAs.
[[Page 24024]]
The additional requirement to perform hair tests at all suction
outlets for all types of SOFAs will increase the testing burden because
it increases the number of tests that are required to be performed.
However, the possible increase in testing burden will be offset by
other changes to the testing requirements. Under the revised standard,
if the hair cannot reach the suction outlet, there is no need to test
that outlet. Thus, APSP-17 2017 provides that the requirement to test
at each suction outlet, which is included in section 5.7.2, only
applies to suction outlets that have a ``flow path length'' (i.e., the
distance between the drain cover the suction outlet) of less than 16
inches, which is the maximum length of hair used in the hair tests.
Furthermore, as discussed above, the 2017 standard reduced the hair
approach time from 60 seconds to 30 seconds. The additional testing
required to evaluate all of the suction outlets on a SOFA is offset by
the reduction in hair test approach time discussed in Section II.A.2.a.
The requirement in APSP-16 2017 to test at every suction outlet
reachable by the hair test specimen will increase the safety of bathers
because it precludes the chance of a SOFA being installed in a manner
that is different from the way it was tested, serves to clarify prior
practice, and is supported by laboratory testing. Accordingly, the
Commission determines that testing of SOFAS at every suction outlet is
in the public interest.
C. Definition of ``Unblockable Drain''
The 2011 version of the APSP standard did not define ``unblockable
drain'' or ``unblockable SOFA.'' The definitions section of APSP-16
2017 includes the following definition of ``Unblockable SOFA'':
A suction outlet fitting assembly that, when installed according
to the manufacturer's instructions, cannot be shadowed by an 18'' x
23'' Body Blocking Element, and has a rated flow through the
remaining open area beyond the shadowed portion that cannot create a
suction force in excess of the force calculated in equation 2.
Pool drain professionals have essentially been using this definition to
determine whether a SOFA is unblockable since a similar version was
first published as an interpretive rule by CPSC on April 27, 2010.\8\
At least 149 state and local building codes now reference the 18'' x
23'' dimension and the pull-off force requirements originally found in
Table 1 of A112.19.8, which are consistent with the definition of
``unblockable'' in APSP-16 2017. Other state and local codes reference
slight variations of this definition of ``unblockable.'' Because this
is an accepted definition among pool professionals, the Commission
believes including this definition in its mandatory standard is in the
public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2010/04/27/2010-8160/virginia-graeme-baker-pool-and-spa-safety-act-interpretation-of-unblockable-drain.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Labeling Requirements
Section 8.4 of APSP-16 2017 contains requirements for the labelling
of a SOFA, requiring identifying information, such as the manufacturer
name and cover/grate part number, and date of the installation of the
cover/grate. Section 8.5.1 of APSP-16 2017 contains labeling
requirements for Registered Design Professional (RDP) SOFAs. Section
9.3 of APSP-16 2017 adds provisions regarding a General Certificate of
Conformity (GCC) that are consistent with the Consumer Product Safety
Act and VGBA. These requirements identify the product, the
manufacturer, and the test lab that performed the analysis, as well as
state the standard to which the product was tested, and when and where
it was tested. Because the presence of this information makes it easy
to identify relevant safety information about the product, the
Commission finds these requirements are in the public interest.
IV. Changes to APSP-16 2017 That Exceed the Commission's Authority
A. The Commission's Authority Under the VGBA
Section 1404(b) of the VGBA specifies a standard for drain covers.
It states ``each swimming pool or spa drain cover manufactured,
distributed, or entered into commerce in the United States shall
conform to the entrapment protection standards of [the drain cover
performance standard].'' Section 1404(a) of the VGBA states that the
requirements of section 1404(b) shall be treated as a consumer product
safety rule under the CPSA. Thus, the drain cover must be in compliance
with the drain cover standard at the time of manufacture of the cover,
distribution of the cover, or when the cover is entered into commerce.
This indicates that the drain cover standard is a standard for the
drain cover, as a discrete product.
Section 1404(b) requires the Commission to assess any successor
drain cover standard to determine whether the changes in the standard
are in the public interest, before incorporating the successor
standard. CPSC's Office of Compliance enforces section 1404(b) by
determining whether the drain cover, as a discrete product, at the time
of manufacture, distribution, or entrance into commerce, complies with
the drain cover standard.
Separately, section 1404(c) of the VGBA requires that public pools
and spas in the United States:
Have drain covers that comply with the standard specified
in section 1404(b) or a successor standard; and
if the public pool or spa does not have an unblockable
drain, it must be equipped with one or more of the secondary systems
specified in section 1404(c)(1)(A)(ii).
Thus, section 1404(c) gives the CPSC authority to determine and enforce
these requirements for public pools and spas, and it gives the CPSC the
authority to inspect these public facilities for the presence of drain
covers and secondary systems and to enforce those requirements. In
summary, section 1404(b) of the VGBA is the drain cover standard, which
is to be treated as a consumer product safety rule. The VGBA authorizes
a product safety standard for that product--drain covers (or SOFAs).
The authority for the Commission to incorporate by reference the APSP
drain cover standard is in section 1404(b) of the VGBA. Separately,
section 1404(c) of the VGBA requires public pools and spas to have
certain specified equipment, and it gives the Commission authority to
check that the equipment is installed in public pools and spas.
B. Specific Sections of APSP-16 2017 That Exceed Commission Authority
APSP-16 2017 contains many changes that extend beyond the
requirements for the drain cover or SOFA itself, and thus, exceed
CPSC's authority under section 1404(b) of the VGBA. The voluntary
standard can have such provisions. However, the Commission does not
have authority to enforce them as mandatory standard provisions. The
changes include requirements that can be separated into the following
categories:
Installation of the SOFA;
Requirements applicable to pools;
Activities of pool owners;
Changes to statutory definitions in the VGBA.
The changes specific to each category are detailed in Tables 1
through 4.
[[Page 24025]]
Table 1--Sections of APSP-16 2017 That Are Beyond the Authority of CPSC
Because They Establish Requirements for the Installation of the SOFA
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section No. Summary of topic(s) covered
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.3.3.2.................. Drain covers can only be installed on SOFAs
deemed suitable by the drain cover
manufacturer.
3.5.1.................... Drain covers shall only be installed on sumps
in configurations authorized by the drain
cover manufacturer's installation
instructions, and at a specific flow rating.
3.6.1.................... A SOFA must be installed per the
manufacturer's instructions.
3.6.3.2.................. Compliance with the standard requires
selecting and installing a SOFA or
combination of SOFAs such that the flow
rating of the SOFAs is greater than the
maximum system flow of the pool.
3.6.4.2.................. The flow rating for existing pools with
blockable SOFAs is the flow rating of the
SOFA, when also installed in conjunction
with an additional device or system designed
to prevent suction entrapment (``secondary
anti-entrapment system''). A single,
blockable SOFA installed in existing pools
with no secondary anti-entrapment system
results in a flow rating of zero.
3.7.2.................... Blockable SOFAs installed in existing pools
must also be installed with a secondary anti-
entrapment system.
3.7.3.................... Covers or grates marked unblockable may be
installed in pools with multiple SOFA
systems. Covers or grates marked unblockable
may also be installed in pools with single
SOFA systems when this use is authorized by
the cover/grate manufacturer.
9.4.1.................... Blockable covers may only be installed in
multiple-SOFA systems, or in pools that are
also equipped with one or more secondary
anti-entrapment systems.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The provisions mentioned in Table 1 set forth requirements for how
to install the SOFA. The 2011 version of the APSP standard addressed
installation by requiring that certain information about installation
be provided in labels and instructions. In contrast, the provisions
referenced in Table 1 require that the installer or pool owner/operator
take certain actions. These are not provisions for the drain cover. A
drain cover manufacturer has the ability to provide labels and
instructions with the product. A drain cover manufacturer does not
control how the product is installed.
Table 2--Sections of APSP-16 2017 That Are Beyond the Authority of CPSC
Because They Establish Requirements for Pools
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section No. Summary of topic(s) covered
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.3.3.1.................. A pool's system suction flow must not exceed
the rating of the installed SOFA(s). A pool
with SOFA(s) that were not installed per the
manufacturer's instructions is not in
compliance with the standard.
3.6.3.1.................. A pool's system flow ratings cannot exceed
the SOFA flow rating while the pool is open
to bathers.
3.6.4.1.................. For multiple blockable SOFA systems, the
maximum system flow rating for the pool is
determined by subtracting the flow rating of
the largest SOFA.
3.6.4.3.................. The system flow rating for pools with
unblockable SOFA(s) shall be determined by
combining the flow rating of all SOFA(s).
3.7.1.................... In new pool construction, the use of a single
blockable SOFA is not permitted.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The provisions mentioned in Table 2 set forth requirements for
pools, not for drain covers. Several of the provisions set requirements
for the pool's flow rating. The 2011 version of the APSP standard
required markings and instructions regarding operation at an
appropriate flow rating. However, the revised standard states
requirements for the pool; these are requirements the drain cover
manufacturer lacks the ability to fulfill.
Table 3--Sections of APSP-16 2017 That Are Beyond the Authority of CPSC
Because They Require Actions of Pool Owners
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section No. Summary of topic(s) covered
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.1.3.................... Drain covers must be replaced at the end of
their stated service life.
3.6.2.................... No modifications to SOFAs or the SOFA flow
paths are permitted unless they are
subsequently re-tested.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The provisions mentioned in Table 3 require pool owners to take
certain actions. The 2011 version of the APSP standard required that
components of drain covers be marked to state the component's life
span. In contrast, the revised standard requires that drain cover
components be replaced at the end of their service life. This change
makes the requirement apply to the pool owner, not the drain cover
manufacturer. Similarly, a requirement prohibiting modifications to
installed SOFAs applies to the pool owner, not the drain cover.
Table 4--Sections of APSP-16 2017 That Set Instatallation Requirements
Regarding Secondary Systems
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section No. Summary of topic(s) covered
------------------------------------------------------------------------
9.4.1.................... Requires that blockable SOFAs have
installation instructions stating that SOFAs
shall be installed only in multiple SOFA
systems or instructions shall state that the
installer shall include one or more of the
following devices or systems
9.4.1.1.................. Provides a definition of safety vacuum relief
system (SVRS).
9.4.1.2.................. Provides a definition of suction-limiting
vent system (SVLS).
[[Page 24026]]
9.4.1.3.................. Provides a definition of gravity drainage
system.
9.4.1.4.................. Provides a definition of automatic pump shut-
off system.
9.4.1.5.................. Provides a definition of drain disablement.
9.4.1.6.................. Provides a definition of other secondary anti-
entrapment systems.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The provisions listed in Table 4 set forth what seem to be
requirements for instructions. As is stated above, CPSC standards can
include requirements for instructions. However, the instructions
specified in section 9.4 actually establish requirements for pools and
for secondary devices and systems designed to prevent suction
entrapment. All of section 9.4 exceeds the Commission's authority under
Section 1404(a) of the VGBA because the instructions require secondary
systems on all pools. The VGBA only requires secondary systems for
public pools. In addition, this section provides definitions of the
secondary systems that differ from the statutory definitions in the
VGBA.
C. Section That Should Not Be Included Because of an Error
Section 3.2.4 requires SOFAs to be designated in their installation
manual as ``blockable'' or ``unblockable.'' This requirement does fall
within the enforcement authority of CPSC. However, the definition in
APSP-16 2017 contains an error. As discussed, APSP-16 2017 provides a
definition of ``unblockable.'' That definition has two parts:
Unblockable SOFAs must meet a minimum size requirement, and they must
meet the body-blocking element maximum pull-off force requirement. Due
to a printing error, section 3.2.4 omitted the pull-off force
requirement. Thus, the Commission will not adopt section 3.2.4 of APSP-
16 2017.
V. Incorporation by Reference
The Office of the Federal Register (OFR) has regulations concerning
incorporation by reference. 1 CFR part 51. Under these regulations,
agencies must discuss, in the preamble to the final rule, ways that the
materials the agency incorporates by reference are reasonably available
to interested person and how interested parties can obtain the
materials. In addition, the preamble to the final rule must summarize
the material. 1 CFR 51.5(b).
In accordance with the OFR's requirements, section II of this
preamble summarizes the major provisions of the APSP-16 2017 standard
that the Commission incorporates by reference into 16 CFR 1450.3. The
standard is reasonably available to interested parties, and interested
parties may purchase a copy of the standard from The Association of
Pool & Spa Professionals. A copy of the standard can also be inspected
at CPSC's Office of the Secretary.
VI. Direct Final Rule Process
The APA generally requires that agencies use notice and comment
rulemaking when issuing a rule. 5 U.S.C. 553. The Commission is
adopting as a mandatory standard a voluntary standard that was
developed through the consensus process. The voluntary standard is
noncontroversial and receives widespread support. In Recommendation 95-
4, the Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) endorsed
direct final rulemaking as an appropriate procedure to expedite
promulgation of rules that are noncontroversial and that are not
expected to generate significant adverse comment. See 60 FR 43108
(August 18, 1995). The Commission believes it is very unlikely that
there will be adverse comments to this rule. Consistent with the ACUS
recommendation, the Commission is satisfying the notice and comment
procedure by publishing this rule as a direct final rule and providing
that, unless adverse comment is received within 30 days, the rule will
become effective as a final rule.
VII. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) requires that when agencies
are required to issue a notice of proposed rulemaking they must review
the rulemaking's potential economic impact on small entities, including
small businesses. Section 603 of the RFA requires the Commission to
prepare and make available for public comment an Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) describing the impact of the proposed rule
on small entities and identifying impact-reducing alternatives.
However, under Section 605 of the RFA, if an agency certifies that the
proposed rule, if promulgated, will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities, an IRFA is not
required, provided that the agency publishes the certification in the
Federal Register, along with a statement providing the factual basis
for the certification.
As discussed in section III.B of this preamble, the revised
standard includes two changes to the testing procedures in ANSI/APSP/
ICC-16: Hair test approach time and hair testing at specific ports in
channel SOFAs. In addition to these two changes in hair tests from the
current standard, ANSI/APSP/ICC-16 2017 specifies additional editorial
changes, which are intended to clarify existing wording. Clarifying
language pertaining to installation and maintenance instructions to be
provided with the covers/grates for SOFAs was also added to the
standard. Also, manufacturers are required to make minor changes to the
information that is provided in permanent markings of compliant covers
and grates.
Overall, the changes in testing requirements in the standard
revision should have minimal impacts on small businesses, either in
costs of testing, or in product modifications necessitated to comply
with the revised testing provisions. The revisions that this rule would
require in the information that must be provided in installation and
maintenance instructions, and the changes in the permanent markings
required for covers, and grates should also not impose significant
costs on small cover and grate manufacturers. Because small firms
should only experience minimal increases in compliance costs or other
burdens associated with this rule, the Commission certifies that
referencing the revised standard, ANSI/APSP/ICC-16-2017, as the
successor standard under the VGBA will not be likely to have
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small businesses
or other entities.
VIII. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose any information collection requirements.
Accordingly, this rule is not subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act,
44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.
[[Page 24027]]
IX. Environmental Considerations
The Commission's regulations provide a categorical exclusion for
the Commission's rules from any requirement to prepare an environmental
assessment or an environmental impact statement because they ``have
little or no potential for affecting the human environment.'' 16 CFR
1021.5(c)(2). This rule falls within the categorical exclusion, so no
environmental assessment or environmental impact statement is required.
X. Preemption
Section 26(a) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2075(a), provides that where a
``consumer product safety standard under [the Consumer Product Safety
Act (CPSA)]'' is in effect and applies to a product, no state or
political subdivision of a state may either establish or continue in
effect a requirement dealing with the same risk of injury, unless the
state requirement is identical to the federal standard. Section 26(c)
of the CPSA also provides that states or political subdivisions of
states may apply to the Commission for an exemption from this
preemption in certain circumstances.
Section 1404(a) of the VGBA specifies that a rule issued under
section 1404(b) of the VGBA shall be treated as a consumer product
safety standard under the CPSA, thus, implying that the preemptive
effect of section 26(a) of the CPSA would apply. Therefore, this rule
will invoke the preemptive effect of section 26(a) of the CPSA when it
becomes effective.
List of Subjects in 16 CFR Part 1450
Consumer protection, Incorporation by reference, Infants and
children, Law enforcement.
For the reasons stated above, the Commission amends part 1450 of
title 16 of the Code of the Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 1450--VIRGINIA GRAEME BAKER POOL AND SPA SAFETY ACT
REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 1450 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2051-2089, 86 Stat. 1207; 15 U.S.C. 8001-
8008, 121 Stat. 1794.
0
2. Revise Sec. 1450.3 to read as follows:
Sec. 1450.3 Incorporation by reference.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each
swimming pool or spa drain cover manufactured, distributed, or entered
into commerce in the United States shall conform to the entrapment
protection standards of ANSI/APSP/ICC-16 2017, American National
Standard for Suction Outlet Fitting Assemblies (SOFA) for Use in Pools,
Spas and Hot Tubs, approved on August 18, 2017. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. You may obtain a copy from the
Pool & Hot Tub Alliance (formerly known as the Association of Pool &
Spa Professionals), 2111 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, Virginia 22314;
https://www.apsp.org, telephone 703-838-0083. You may inspect a copy at
the Division of the Secretariat, U.S. Consumer Product Safety
Commission, Room 820, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814,
telephone 301-504-7923, or at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal-regster/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
(b) The CPSC standard does not require compliance with the
following provisions:
(1) Section 1.1.3 of ANSI/APSP/ICC-16 2017.
(2) Sections 1.3.3.1 through 1.3.3.2 of ANSP/APSP/ICC-16 2017.
(3) Section 3.2.4 of ANSI/APSP/ICC-16 2017.
(4) Section 3.5.1 of ANSI/APSP/ICC-16 2017.
(5) Sections 3.6.1 through 3.6.4.3 of ANSI/APSP/ICC-16 2017.
(6) Section 3.7 of ANSI/APSP/ICC-16 2017.
(7) Section 9.4 of ANSI/APSP/ICC-16 2017.
Abioye E. Mosheim,
Acting Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. 2019-10845 Filed 5-23-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P