Amount Determined Under Section 956 for Corporate United States Shareholders, 23716-23719 [2019-10749]
Download as PDF
23716
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 100 / Thursday, May 23, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 9859]
RIN 1545–BO88
Amount Determined Under Section 956
for Corporate United States
Shareholders
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations.
AGENCY:
This document contains final
regulations that reduce the amount
determined under section 956 of the
Internal Revenue Code with respect to
certain domestic corporations. This
document finalizes the proposed
regulations published on November 5,
2018. The final regulations affect certain
domestic corporations that own (or are
treated as owning) stock in foreign
corporations.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Effective Date: These regulations are
effective on July 22, 2019.
Applicability Date: For the date of
applicability, see § 1.956–1(g)(4).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rose
E. Jenkins, (202) 317–6934.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
Background
On November 5, 2018, the Department
of the Treasury (‘‘Treasury
Department’’) and the IRS published
proposed regulations (REG–114540–18)
under section 956 in the Federal
Register (83 FR 55324) (the ‘‘proposed
regulations’’). No public hearing was
requested or held, and no substantive
comments were received with respect to
the proposed regulations. All written
comments received in response to the
proposed regulations are available at
www.regulations.gov or upon request.
This Treasury decision adopts the
proposed regulations, with the changes
described in the Summary of Comments
and Explanation of Revisions section of
this preamble, as final regulations.
Summary of Comments and
Explanation of Revisions
The final regulations, like the
proposed regulations, exclude
corporations that are United States
shareholders (as defined in section
951(b)) (‘‘U.S. shareholders’’) from the
application of section 956 to maintain
symmetry between the taxation of actual
repatriations and the taxation of
effective repatriations. To achieve this
result, the final regulations provide that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 May 22, 2019
Jkt 247001
the amount otherwise determined under
section 956 (the ‘‘tentative section 956
amount’’) with respect to a U.S.
shareholder for a taxable year of a
controlled foreign corporation (as
defined in section 957) (‘‘CFC’’) is
reduced to the extent that the U.S.
shareholder would be allowed a
deduction under section 245A if the
U.S. shareholder had received a
distribution from the CFC in an amount
equal to the tentative section 956
amount (the ‘‘hypothetical
distribution’’).
In general, under section 245A and
the final regulations, respectively,
neither an actual dividend to a
corporate U.S. shareholder, nor such a
shareholder’s tentative section 956
amount, will result in additional U.S.
tax.
I. Allocation of Hypothetical
Distribution
While not raised in any written
comments, published commentary on
the proposed regulations raised
concerns regarding how the proposed
rules apply in the case of a CFC that has
prior year earnings and profits (‘‘E&P’’)
described in section 959(c)(1) and
current-year E&P described in section
959(c)(3) that do not result in an
inclusion under section 951 or section
951A. Even though a dividend of the
current-year E&P would potentially be
eligible for a deduction under section
245A, a distribution by the CFC would
not qualify for a section 245A
deduction, because under section
959(c), the distribution would be
allocated to the prior-year E&P
described in section 959(c)(1) first.
Therefore, any tentative section 956
amount for the year might not be
reduced by the proposed rule. To
address this issue, the final regulations
include an ordering rule treating a
hypothetical distribution as attributable
first to E&P described in section
959(c)(2), then to E&P described in
section 959(c)(3), consistent with the
allocation of an amount determined
under section 956 pursuant to section
959(f)(1). This rule, which differs from
the general rule for allocation of
distributions in section 959(c) by not
treating any amount as attributable to
E&P described in section 959(c)(1), is
necessary to reflect the fact that the
amount to which the hypothetical
distribution applies is in fact a tentative
section 956 amount. This rule is
illustrated in a new example in § 1.956–
1(a)(3)(iii).
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
II. Domestic Partnerships and Their
Partners
Section 245A(g) grants the Secretary
authority to prescribe regulations for the
treatment of U.S. shareholders owning
stock of specified 10-percent owned
foreign corporations through a
partnership. As noted in the Comments
and Request for Public Hearing section
of the preamble to the proposed
regulations, the Treasury Department
and the IRS have studied the
appropriate application of the
regulations to U.S. shareholders that are
domestic partnerships, which may have
partners that are a combination of
domestic corporations, U.S. individuals,
or other persons. As noted in the
Background section of this preamble, no
substantive comments were received
with respect to the proposed
regulations, including with respect to
the two methods of applying the rules
in the case of domestic partnerships that
were described in the preamble to the
proposed regulations. Accordingly,
consistent with the first method
described in that preamble, the final
regulations provide that the tentative
section 956 amount with respect to a
domestic partnership is reduced to the
extent that one or more domestic
corporate partners would be entitled to
a section 245A deduction if the
partnership received such amount as a
distribution, and any remaining amount
of the domestic partnership’s inclusion
under sections 951(a)(1)(B) and 956 is
allocated to the partners in the same
proportion as net income would result
to the partners upon a hypothetical
distribution (that is, a distribution from
the CFC to the domestic partnership).
See § 1.956–1(a)(2)(i) and (iii). The rules
concerning domestic partnerships are
illustrated in a new example in § 1.956–
1(a)(3)(iv).
III. Revisions to Existing Examples
The final regulations also update
certain examples in the regulations
under section 956 to reflect that section
956 may no longer apply in the case of
corporate U.S. shareholders. See
§ 1.956–1(b)(4) (amended facts common
to several examples, to refer to a United
States citizen, rather than domestic
corporation).
IV. Applicability Date
The final regulations apply to taxable
years of a CFC beginning on or after July
22, 2019, and to taxable years of a U.S.
shareholder in which or with which
such taxable years of the CFC end.
However, consistent with the reliance
E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM
23MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 100 / Thursday, May 23, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
allowed for the proposed regulations,
taxpayers may apply the final
regulations for taxable years of a CFC
beginning after December 31, 2017, and
for taxable years of a U.S. shareholder
in which or with which such taxable
years of the CFC end, provided that the
taxpayer and United States persons that
are related (within the meaning of
section 267 or 707) to the taxpayer
consistently apply the regulations with
respect to all CFCs in which they are
U.S. shareholders for taxable years of
the CFCs beginning after December 31,
2017. See section 7805(b)(7).
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
Special Analyses
OIRA has determined that this final
rule is a significant regulatory action
pursuant to section 3(f) of Executive
Order (E.O.) 12866 and the April 11,
2018, Memorandum of Agreement
between the Department of Treasury
and the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). However, OIRA has
waived review of this final rule in
accordance with section 6(a)(3)(A) of
E.O. 12866.
Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6), it is hereby
certified that this regulation will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities,
although some small entities that are
domestic corporations could be affected
by the regulations. However, even if a
substantial number of small entities
were to be affected by this regulation,
the Treasury Department and the IRS
estimate that the economic impact on
such small entities would not be
significant as the regulation is expected
to marginally reduce compliance costs
for smaller entities. This is because the
Treasury Department and the IRS
believe that the cost-saving benefits of
the regulations with respect to complex
third-party borrowing arrangements,
internal financial management
structures, and restructurings of
worldwide operations will generally be
available only to large U.S.
multinational corporations with 20 or
more CFCs. The Treasury Department
and the IRS believe that U.S.
multinational corporations with fewer
than 20 CFCs generally will not have the
types of arrangements in place that
would otherwise need to be structured
and monitored to avoid section 956. The
regulations generally will not affect
small entities that are not domestic
corporations.
Pursuant to section 7805(f), the notice
of proposed rulemaking preceding this
regulation was submitted to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration for comment
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 May 22, 2019
Jkt 247001
on its impact on small businesses. No
comments were received.
There are no information collection
requirements associated with these final
regulations.
The Administrator of OIRA has
determined that this is a major rule for
purposes of the Congressional Review
Act (CRA) (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.). Under
section 801(3) of the CRA, a major rule
takes effect 60 days after the rule is
published in the Federal Register.
Drafting Information
The principal author of the final
regulations is Rose E. Jenkins of the
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(International). However, other
personnel from the Treasury
Department and the IRS participated in
their development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is
amended as follows:
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
■ PARAGRAPH 1. The authority citation
for part 1 is amended by revising the
entry for § 1.956–1 to read in part as
follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Section 1.956–1 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 245A(g), 956(d), and 956(e).
*
*
*
*
*
■ PAR. 2. Section 1.956–1 is amended
by:
1. Revising paragraph (a).
2. In the paragraph (b)(4) introductory
text, removing the language ‘‘following
examples’’ and adding in its place
‘‘examples in this paragraph (b)(4)’’ and
removing the language ‘‘domestic
corporation’’ and adding in its place
‘‘United States citizen.’’
■ 3. In paragraph (b)(4), designating
Examples 1 through 8 as paragraphs
(b)(4)(i) through (viii), respectively.
■ 4. In newly designated paragraphs
(b)(4)(i) through (viii), redesignating the
paragraphs in the first column as the
paragraphs in the second column:
■
■
Old paragraphs
(b)(4)(i)(i) and (ii)
(b)(4)(ii)(i) and (ii)
(b)(4)(iii)(i) and (ii)
(b)(4)(iv)(i) and (ii)
(b)(4)(v)(i) and (ii)
(b)(4)(vi)(i) and (ii)
(b)(4)(vii)(i) and (ii)
(b)(4)(viii)(i) and (ii)
New paragraphs
(b)(4)(i)(A) and (B)
(b)(4)(ii)(A) and (B)
(b)(4)(iii)(i) and (ii)
(b)(4)(iv)(A) and (B)
(b)(4)(v)(A) and (B)
(b)(4)(vi)(A) and (B)
(b)(4)(vii)(A) and (B)
(b)(4)(viii)(A) and (B)
5. In newly redesignated paragraph
(b)(4)(ii)(A), removing the language
■
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
23717
‘‘Example 1 of this paragraph (b)(4)’’
and adding in its place ‘‘paragraph
(b)(4)(i)(A) of this section (the facts in
Example 1).’’
■ 6. Revising the heading for paragraph
(g).
■ 7. In the first sentence of paragraph
(g)(1), removing the language
‘‘Paragraph (a)’’ and adding in its place
‘‘Paragraph (a)(1)’’.
■ 8. Adding paragraphs (g)(4) and (5).
■ 9. Removing the parenthetical
authority citation at the end of the
section.
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
§ 1.956–1 Shareholder’s pro rata share of
the average of the amounts of United States
property held by a controlled foreign
corporation.
(a) Overview and scope—(1) In
general. Subject to the provisions of
section 951(a) and the regulations in
this part, a United States shareholder of
a controlled foreign corporation is
required to include in gross income the
amount determined under section 956
with respect to the shareholder for the
taxable year but only to the extent not
excluded from gross income under
section 959(a)(2) and the regulations in
this part.
(2) Reduction for certain United
States shareholders—(i) In general. For
a taxable year of a controlled foreign
corporation, the amount determined
under section 956 with respect to each
share of stock of the controlled foreign
corporation owned (within the meaning
of section 958(a)) by a United States
shareholder is the amount that would be
determined under section 956 with
respect to such share for the taxable
year, absent the application of this
paragraph (a)(2) for the taxable year
(such amount, the tentative section 956
amount, and in the aggregate with
respect to all shares owned (within the
meaning of section 958(a)) by the United
States shareholder, the aggregate
tentative section 956 amount), reduced
by the amount of the deduction under
section 245A, if any, that the
shareholder would be allowed if the
shareholder received as a distribution
from the controlled foreign corporation
an amount equal to the tentative section
956 amount with respect to such share
on the last day during the taxable year
on which the foreign corporation is a
controlled foreign corporation
(hypothetical distribution). For purposes
of the preceding sentence, in the case of
a United States shareholder that is a
domestic partnership, the aggregate
amount of the deductions under section
245A, if any, that domestic corporations
that are partners of the domestic
E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM
23MYR1
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
23718
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 100 / Thursday, May 23, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
partnership (including indirect partners
through other partnerships) would be
allowed with respect to a hypothetical
distribution is treated as the amount of
the deduction under section 245A that
the domestic partnership would be
allowed.
(ii) Determination of the amount of
the deduction that would be allowed
under section 245A with respect to a
hypothetical distribution. For purposes
of determining the amount of the
deduction under section 245A that a
United States shareholder would be
allowed with respect to a share of stock
of a controlled foreign corporation by
reason of a hypothetical distribution,
the rules in paragraphs (a)(2)(ii)(A)
through (C) of this section apply—
(A) If a United States shareholder
owns a share of stock of a controlled
foreign corporation indirectly (within
the meaning of section 958(a)(2)), then—
(1) Sections 245A(a) through (d),
246(a), and 959 apply to the
hypothetical distribution as if the
United States shareholder directly
owned (within the meaning of section
958(a)(1)(A)) the share;
(2) Section 245A(e) applies to the
hypothetical distribution as if the
distribution were made to the United
States shareholder through each entity
by reason of which the United States
shareholder indirectly owns such share
and pro rata with respect to the equity
that gives rise to such indirect
ownership;
(3) To the extent that a distribution
treated as made to a controlled foreign
corporation pursuant to the hypothetical
distribution by reason of paragraph
(a)(2)(ii)(A)(2) of this section would be
subject to section 245A(e)(2), the United
States shareholder is treated as not
being allowed a deduction under
section 245A by reason of the
hypothetical distribution; and
(4) Section 246(c) applies to the
hypothetical distribution by substituting
the phrase ‘‘owned (within the meaning
of section 958(a))’’ for the term ‘‘held’’
each place it appears in section 246(c);
(B) Section 246(c) applies to the
hypothetical distribution by substituting
‘‘the last day during the taxable year on
which the foreign corporation is a
controlled foreign corporation’’ for the
phrase ‘‘the date on which such share
becomes ex-dividend with respect to
such dividend’’ in section 246(c)(1)(A);
and
(C) The hypothetical distribution is
treated as attributable first to earnings
and profits of the controlled foreign
corporation described in section
959(c)(2), then to earnings and profits of
the controlled foreign corporation
described in section 959(c)(3).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 May 22, 2019
Jkt 247001
(iii) Special rule in the case of
domestic partnerships—(A) In general.
In the case of a domestic partnership
whose tentative section 956 amount
with respect to a share of stock of a
controlled foreign corporation is
reduced pursuant to paragraph (a)(2)(i)
of this section for a taxable year, the
portion of any inclusion under section
951(a)(1)(B) of the domestic partnership
with respect to such share for the
taxable year allocated to a partner of the
domestic partnership (including an
indirect partner through one or more
other partnerships) must equal the
product of the inclusion and the ratio
determined by dividing—
(1) The net hypothetical distribution
income with respect to the partner; by
(2) The aggregate of the net
hypothetical distribution income with
respect to all of the partners of the
domestic partnership.
(B) Definition of net hypothetical
distribution income. The term net
hypothetical distribution income means,
with respect to a hypothetical
distribution to a domestic partnership
and a partner of the domestic
partnership (including an indirect
partner through one or more other
partnerships), the amount of the
hypothetical distribution that would be
allocable to the partner reduced by the
amount of the deduction under section
245A with respect to the hypothetical
distribution that would be allowable to
the partner.
(3) Examples. The examples in this
paragraph (a)(3) illustrate the
application of paragraph (a)(2) of this
section.
(i) Example 1—(A) Facts. (1) USP, a
domestic corporation, owns all of the single
class of stock of FC, a foreign corporation.
The stock of FC consists of 100 shares, and
USP satisfies the holding period requirement
of section 246(c) (as modified by paragraph
(a)(2)(ii)(B) of this section) with respect to
each share of FC stock. Any dividend from
FC to USP would not constitute a hybrid
dividend for purposes of section 245A(e). FC
owns all of the stock of USS, a domestic
corporation. FC’s adjusted basis in the stock
of USS is $0.
(2) The functional currency of FC is the
U.S. dollar. FC has $100x of undistributed
earnings as defined in section 245A(c)(2) at
the end of the taxable year, $90x of which
constitute undistributed foreign earnings as
defined in section 245A(c)(3), and $10x of
which are described in section 245(a)(5)(B)
(that is, earnings attributable to a dividend
that FC received from USS). None of the
earnings and profits of FC are described in
section 959(c)(1) or (2) or are earnings and
profits attributable to income excluded from
subpart F income under section 952(b). FC’s
applicable earnings (as defined in section
956(b)(1)) are $100x. FC also has held an
obligation of USP with an adjusted basis of
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
$120x on every day during the taxable year
of FC, and such obligation was acquired
while all of its stock was owned by USP.
(B) Analysis. Because USP directly owns
all of the stock of FC at the end of FC’s
taxable year, USP’s aggregate tentative
section 956 amount with respect to FC is
$100x, the lesser of USP’s pro rata share of
the average amounts of United States
property held by FC ($120x) and its pro rata
share of FC’s applicable earnings ($100x).
Under paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section,
USP’s section 956 amount with respect to FC
is its aggregate tentative section 956 amount
with respect to FC reduced by the deduction
under section 245A that USP would be
allowed if USP received an amount equal to
its aggregate tentative section 956 amount as
a distribution with respect to the FC stock.
USP would be allowed a $90x deduction
under section 245A with respect to the
foreign-source portion of the $100x
hypothetical distribution (that is, an amount
of the dividend that bears the same ratio to
the dividend as the $90x of undistributed
foreign earnings bears to the $100x of
undistributed earnings). Accordingly, USP’s
section 956 amount with respect to FC is
$10x, its aggregate tentative section 956
amount ($100x) with respect to FC reduced
by the amount of the deduction that USP
would have been allowed under section
245A with respect to the hypothetical
distribution ($90x).
(ii) Example 2—(A) Facts. The facts are the
same as in paragraph (a)(3)(i)(A) of this
section (the facts in Example 1), except that
all $100x of FC’s undistributed earnings are
described in section 959(c)(2).
(B) Analysis. As in paragraph (a)(3)(i)(B) of
this section (the analysis in Example 1),
USP’s aggregate tentative section 956 amount
with respect to FC is $100x, the lesser of
USP’s pro rata share of the average amounts
of United States property held by FC ($120x)
and its pro rata share of FC’s applicable
earnings ($100x). However, paragraph (a)(2)
of this section does not reduce USP’s section
956 amount because USP would not be
allowed any deduction under section 245A
with respect to the $100x hypothetical
distribution by reason of section 959(a) and
(d). Accordingly, USP’s section 956 amount
is $100x. However, under sections 959(a)(2)
and 959(f)(1), USP’s inclusion under section
951(a)(1)(B) with respect to FC is $0, because
USP’s section 956 amount with respect to FC
does not exceed the earnings and profits of
FC described in section 959(c)(2) with
respect to USP. The $100x of earnings and
profits of FC described in section 959(c)(2)
are reclassified as earnings and profits
described in section 959(c)(1).
(iii) Example 3—(A) Facts. The facts are
the same as in paragraph (a)(3)(i)(A) of this
section (the facts in Example 1), except that
FC has $200x of undistributed earnings,
which constitute undistributed foreign
earnings as defined in section 245A(c)(3), of
which $100x are described in section
959(c)(1)(A) and $100x are described in
section 959(c)(3).
(B) Analysis. USP’s aggregate tentative
section 956 amount with respect to FC is
$20x, the lesser of $20x, the excess of USP’s
pro rata share of the average amounts of
E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM
23MYR1
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 100 / Thursday, May 23, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
United States property held by FC ($120x)
over the earnings and profits described in
section 959(c)(1)(A) with respect to USP
($100x), and its pro rata share of FC’s
applicable earnings ($100x). Under paragraph
(a)(2)(i) of this section, USP’s section 956
amount with respect to FC is its aggregate
tentative section 956 amount with respect to
FC reduced by the deduction under section
245A that USP would be allowed if USP
received an amount equal to its aggregate
tentative section 956 amount as a distribution
with respect to the FC stock. USP would be
allowed a $20x deduction under section
245A with respect to the foreign-source
portion of the $20x hypothetical distribution,
which, under paragraph (a)(2)(ii)(C) of this
section, is treated as attributable to the
earnings and profits of FC described in
section 959(c)(3) despite the fact that FC has
$100x of earnings and profits described in
section 959(c)(1)(A) that would otherwise be
distributed before earnings and profits
described in section 959(c)(3). Accordingly,
USP’s section 956 amount with respect to FC
is $0, its aggregate tentative section 956
amount ($20x) with respect to FC reduced by
the amount of the deduction that USP would
have been allowed under section 245A with
respect to the hypothetical distribution after
applying the rule in paragraph (a)(2)(ii)(C) of
this section ($20x).
(iv) Example 4—(A) Facts. The facts are the
same as in paragraph (a)(3)(i)(A) of this
section (the facts in Example 1), except that
USP is a domestic partnership in which
USC1 and USC2, each a domestic
corporation, and USI, a United States citizen,
have owned 50%, 30%, and 20%,
respectively, of the capital and profits
interests for five years.
(B) Analysis. As in paragraph (a)(3)(i)(B) of
this section (the analysis in Example 1),
USP’s aggregate tentative section 956 amount
with respect to FC is $100x. Under paragraph
(a)(2)(i) of this section, USP’s section 956
amount with respect to FC is its aggregate
tentative section 956 amount with respect to
FC reduced by the aggregate amount of
deductions under section 245A that USC1,
USC2, and USI would be allowed if USP
received an amount equal to its aggregate
tentative section 956 amount as a distribution
with respect to the FC stock. Assuming that,
under section 245A, USC1 and USC2 would
be allowed a $45x deduction and a $27x
deduction, respectively, with respect to the
foreign-source portion of their $50x and $30x
distributive shares of the $100x hypothetical
distribution (that is, an amount of the
dividend that bears the same ratio to the
dividend as the $90x of undistributed foreign
earnings bears to the $100x of undistributed
earnings), USP’s section 956 amount with
respect to FC is $28x, its aggregate tentative
section 956 amount ($100x) with respect to
FC reduced by the aggregate amount of the
deductions that its partners would have been
allowed under section 245A with respect to
the hypothetical distribution ($72x ($45x +
$27x)). Under paragraph (a)(2)(iii) of this
section, the portion of its $28x inclusion
under section 951(a)(1)(B) with respect to FC
that is allocated to USC1 is $5x ($28x x
(($50x¥$45x)/($50x¥$45x + $30x¥$27x +
$20x))); the portion that is allocated to USC2
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 May 22, 2019
Jkt 247001
is $3x ($28x x (($30x¥$27x) / ($50x¥$45x
+ $30x¥$27x + $20x))); and the portion that
is allocated to USI is $20x ($28x x ($20x /
($50x¥$45x + $30x¥$27x + $20x))).
(v) Example 5—(A) Facts. (1) USP, a
domestic corporation, owns all of the single
class of stock of FC1, a foreign corporation,
and has held such stock for five years. FC1
has held 70% of the single class of stock of
FC2, a foreign corporation, for three years.
The other 30% of the FC2 stock has been
held since FC2’s formation by a foreign
individual unrelated to USP or FC1. Any
dividend from FC2 or FC1 to FC1 or USP,
respectively, would not constitute a hybrid
dividend for purposes of section 245A(e).
FC2 has a calendar taxable year. On
December 1, Year 1, FC1 acquires the
remaining 30% of the stock of FC2 for cash.
On June 30, Year 2, FC1 sells to a third party
the 30% of FC2 stock acquired in Year 1 at
no gain. FC2 made no distributions during
Year 1.
(2) The functional currency of FC1 and FC2
is the U.S. dollar. For Year 1, FC2 has $120x
of undistributed earnings as defined in
section 245A(c)(2), all of which constitute
undistributed foreign earnings. None of the
earnings and profits of FC2 are described in
section 959(c)(1) or (2) or are earnings and
profits attributable to income excluded from
subpart F income under section 952(b). FC2’s
applicable earnings (as defined in section
956(b)(1)) for Year 1 are $120x. FC2 has held
an obligation of USP with an adjusted basis
of $100x on every day of Year 1 that was
acquired while USP owned all of the stock
of FC1 and FC1 held 70% of the single class
of stock of FC2.
(B) Analysis. Because USP indirectly owns
(within the meaning of section 958(a)) all of
the stock of FC2 at the end of Year 1, USP’s
aggregate tentative section 956 amount with
respect to FC2 for Year 1 is $100x, the lesser
of USP’s pro rata share of the average
amounts of United States property held by
FC2 ($100x) and its pro rata share of FC2’s
applicable earnings ($120x). Under paragraph
(a)(2)(i) of this section, USP’s section 956
amount with respect to FC2 for Year 1 is its
aggregate tentative section 956 amount with
respect to FC2 reduced by the deduction
under section 245A that USP would be
allowed if USP received an amount equal to
its aggregate tentative section 956 amount as
a distribution with respect to the FC2 stock
that USP owns indirectly within the meaning
of section 958(a)(2). For purposes of
determining the consequences of this
hypothetical distribution, under paragraph
(a)(2)(ii)(A)(1) of this section, USP is treated
as owning the FC2 stock directly. In addition,
under paragraph (a)(2)(ii)(A)(4) of this
section, the holding period requirement of
section 246(c) is applied by reference to the
period during which USP owned (within the
meaning of section 958(a)) the stock of FC2.
Therefore, with respect to the hypothetical
distribution from FC2 to USP, USP would
satisfy the holding period requirement under
section 246(c) with respect to the 70% of the
FC2 stock that USP indirectly owned for
three years through FC1, but not with respect
to the 30% of the FC2 stock that USP
indirectly owned through FC1 for a period of
less than 365 days. Accordingly, USP’s
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
23719
section 956 amount with respect to FC2 for
Year 1 is $30x, its aggregate tentative section
956 amount ($100x) reduced by the amount
of the deduction that USP would have been
allowed under section 245A with respect to
the hypothetical distribution ($70x).
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Applicability dates.* * *
(4) Paragraphs (a)(2) and (3) of this
section apply to taxable years of
controlled foreign corporations
beginning on or after July 22, 2019, and
to taxable years of a United States
shareholder in which or with which
such taxable years of the controlled
foreign corporations end.
Notwithstanding the preceding
sentence, a United States shareholder
may apply paragraphs (a)(2) and (3) of
this section to taxable years of
controlled foreign corporations
beginning after December 31, 2017, and
to taxable years of the United States
shareholder in which or with which
such taxable years of the controlled
foreign corporations end, provided that
the United States shareholder and
United States persons that are related
(within the meaning of section 267 or
707) to the United States shareholder
consistently apply those paragraphs
with respect to all controlled foreign
corporations in which they are United
States shareholders for taxable years of
the controlled foreign corporations
beginning after December 31, 2017.
(5) Paragraph (e)(6) of this section
applies to property acquired in
exchanges occurring on or after June 24,
2011.
Kirsten Wielobob,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
Approved: May 9, 2019.
David J. Kautter,
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax
Policy).
[FR Doc. 2019–10749 Filed 5–22–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2019–0240]
Recurring Safety Zone; Chester
Fireworks, Chester, WV
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of enforcement of
regulation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard will enforce
the temporary safety zone for the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM
23MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 100 (Thursday, May 23, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 23716-23719]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-10749]
[[Page 23716]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 9859]
RIN 1545-BO88
Amount Determined Under Section 956 for Corporate United States
Shareholders
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains final regulations that reduce the
amount determined under section 956 of the Internal Revenue Code with
respect to certain domestic corporations. This document finalizes the
proposed regulations published on November 5, 2018. The final
regulations affect certain domestic corporations that own (or are
treated as owning) stock in foreign corporations.
DATES:
Effective Date: These regulations are effective on July 22, 2019.
Applicability Date: For the date of applicability, see Sec. 1.956-
1(g)(4).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rose E. Jenkins, (202) 317-6934.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 5, 2018, the Department of the Treasury (``Treasury
Department'') and the IRS published proposed regulations (REG-114540-
18) under section 956 in the Federal Register (83 FR 55324) (the
``proposed regulations''). No public hearing was requested or held, and
no substantive comments were received with respect to the proposed
regulations. All written comments received in response to the proposed
regulations are available at www.regulations.gov or upon request. This
Treasury decision adopts the proposed regulations, with the changes
described in the Summary of Comments and Explanation of Revisions
section of this preamble, as final regulations.
Summary of Comments and Explanation of Revisions
The final regulations, like the proposed regulations, exclude
corporations that are United States shareholders (as defined in section
951(b)) (``U.S. shareholders'') from the application of section 956 to
maintain symmetry between the taxation of actual repatriations and the
taxation of effective repatriations. To achieve this result, the final
regulations provide that the amount otherwise determined under section
956 (the ``tentative section 956 amount'') with respect to a U.S.
shareholder for a taxable year of a controlled foreign corporation (as
defined in section 957) (``CFC'') is reduced to the extent that the
U.S. shareholder would be allowed a deduction under section 245A if the
U.S. shareholder had received a distribution from the CFC in an amount
equal to the tentative section 956 amount (the ``hypothetical
distribution'').
In general, under section 245A and the final regulations,
respectively, neither an actual dividend to a corporate U.S.
shareholder, nor such a shareholder's tentative section 956 amount,
will result in additional U.S. tax.
I. Allocation of Hypothetical Distribution
While not raised in any written comments, published commentary on
the proposed regulations raised concerns regarding how the proposed
rules apply in the case of a CFC that has prior year earnings and
profits (``E&P'') described in section 959(c)(1) and current-year E&P
described in section 959(c)(3) that do not result in an inclusion under
section 951 or section 951A. Even though a dividend of the current-year
E&P would potentially be eligible for a deduction under section 245A, a
distribution by the CFC would not qualify for a section 245A deduction,
because under section 959(c), the distribution would be allocated to
the prior-year E&P described in section 959(c)(1) first. Therefore, any
tentative section 956 amount for the year might not be reduced by the
proposed rule. To address this issue, the final regulations include an
ordering rule treating a hypothetical distribution as attributable
first to E&P described in section 959(c)(2), then to E&P described in
section 959(c)(3), consistent with the allocation of an amount
determined under section 956 pursuant to section 959(f)(1). This rule,
which differs from the general rule for allocation of distributions in
section 959(c) by not treating any amount as attributable to E&P
described in section 959(c)(1), is necessary to reflect the fact that
the amount to which the hypothetical distribution applies is in fact a
tentative section 956 amount. This rule is illustrated in a new example
in Sec. 1.956-1(a)(3)(iii).
II. Domestic Partnerships and Their Partners
Section 245A(g) grants the Secretary authority to prescribe
regulations for the treatment of U.S. shareholders owning stock of
specified 10-percent owned foreign corporations through a partnership.
As noted in the Comments and Request for Public Hearing section of the
preamble to the proposed regulations, the Treasury Department and the
IRS have studied the appropriate application of the regulations to U.S.
shareholders that are domestic partnerships, which may have partners
that are a combination of domestic corporations, U.S. individuals, or
other persons. As noted in the Background section of this preamble, no
substantive comments were received with respect to the proposed
regulations, including with respect to the two methods of applying the
rules in the case of domestic partnerships that were described in the
preamble to the proposed regulations. Accordingly, consistent with the
first method described in that preamble, the final regulations provide
that the tentative section 956 amount with respect to a domestic
partnership is reduced to the extent that one or more domestic
corporate partners would be entitled to a section 245A deduction if the
partnership received such amount as a distribution, and any remaining
amount of the domestic partnership's inclusion under sections
951(a)(1)(B) and 956 is allocated to the partners in the same
proportion as net income would result to the partners upon a
hypothetical distribution (that is, a distribution from the CFC to the
domestic partnership). See Sec. 1.956-1(a)(2)(i) and (iii). The rules
concerning domestic partnerships are illustrated in a new example in
Sec. 1.956-1(a)(3)(iv).
III. Revisions to Existing Examples
The final regulations also update certain examples in the
regulations under section 956 to reflect that section 956 may no longer
apply in the case of corporate U.S. shareholders. See Sec. 1.956-
1(b)(4) (amended facts common to several examples, to refer to a United
States citizen, rather than domestic corporation).
IV. Applicability Date
The final regulations apply to taxable years of a CFC beginning on
or after July 22, 2019, and to taxable years of a U.S. shareholder in
which or with which such taxable years of the CFC end. However,
consistent with the reliance
[[Page 23717]]
allowed for the proposed regulations, taxpayers may apply the final
regulations for taxable years of a CFC beginning after December 31,
2017, and for taxable years of a U.S. shareholder in which or with
which such taxable years of the CFC end, provided that the taxpayer and
United States persons that are related (within the meaning of section
267 or 707) to the taxpayer consistently apply the regulations with
respect to all CFCs in which they are U.S. shareholders for taxable
years of the CFCs beginning after December 31, 2017. See section
7805(b)(7).
Special Analyses
OIRA has determined that this final rule is a significant
regulatory action pursuant to section 3(f) of Executive Order (E.O.)
12866 and the April 11, 2018, Memorandum of Agreement between the
Department of Treasury and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
However, OIRA has waived review of this final rule in accordance with
section 6(a)(3)(A) of E.O. 12866.
Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6), it
is hereby certified that this regulation will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities, although
some small entities that are domestic corporations could be affected by
the regulations. However, even if a substantial number of small
entities were to be affected by this regulation, the Treasury
Department and the IRS estimate that the economic impact on such small
entities would not be significant as the regulation is expected to
marginally reduce compliance costs for smaller entities. This is
because the Treasury Department and the IRS believe that the cost-
saving benefits of the regulations with respect to complex third-party
borrowing arrangements, internal financial management structures, and
restructurings of worldwide operations will generally be available only
to large U.S. multinational corporations with 20 or more CFCs. The
Treasury Department and the IRS believe that U.S. multinational
corporations with fewer than 20 CFCs generally will not have the types
of arrangements in place that would otherwise need to be structured and
monitored to avoid section 956. The regulations generally will not
affect small entities that are not domestic corporations.
Pursuant to section 7805(f), the notice of proposed rulemaking
preceding this regulation was submitted to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment on its impact
on small businesses. No comments were received.
There are no information collection requirements associated with
these final regulations.
The Administrator of OIRA has determined that this is a major rule
for purposes of the Congressional Review Act (CRA) (5 U.S.C. 801 et
seq.). Under section 801(3) of the CRA, a major rule takes effect 60
days after the rule is published in the Federal Register.
Drafting Information
The principal author of the final regulations is Rose E. Jenkins of
the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (International). However, other
personnel from the Treasury Department and the IRS participated in
their development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is amended as follows:
PART 1--INCOME TAXES
0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 is amended by revising
the entry for Sec. 1.956-1 to read in part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Section 1.956-1 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 245A(g), 956(d), and
956(e).
* * * * *
0
Par. 2. Section 1.956-1 is amended by:
0
1. Revising paragraph (a).
0
2. In the paragraph (b)(4) introductory text, removing the language
``following examples'' and adding in its place ``examples in this
paragraph (b)(4)'' and removing the language ``domestic corporation''
and adding in its place ``United States citizen.''
0
3. In paragraph (b)(4), designating Examples 1 through 8 as paragraphs
(b)(4)(i) through (viii), respectively.
0
4. In newly designated paragraphs (b)(4)(i) through (viii),
redesignating the paragraphs in the first column as the paragraphs in
the second column:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Old paragraphs New paragraphs
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(b)(4)(i)(i) and (ii) (b)(4)(i)(A) and (B)
(b)(4)(ii)(i) and (ii) (b)(4)(ii)(A) and (B)
(b)(4)(iii)(i) and (ii) (b)(4)(iii)(i) and (ii)
(b)(4)(iv)(i) and (ii) (b)(4)(iv)(A) and (B)
(b)(4)(v)(i) and (ii) (b)(4)(v)(A) and (B)
(b)(4)(vi)(i) and (ii) (b)(4)(vi)(A) and (B)
(b)(4)(vii)(i) and (ii) (b)(4)(vii)(A) and (B)
(b)(4)(viii)(i) and (ii) (b)(4)(viii)(A) and (B)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
5. In newly redesignated paragraph (b)(4)(ii)(A), removing the language
``Example 1 of this paragraph (b)(4)'' and adding in its place
``paragraph (b)(4)(i)(A) of this section (the facts in Example 1).''
0
6. Revising the heading for paragraph (g).
0
7. In the first sentence of paragraph (g)(1), removing the language
``Paragraph (a)'' and adding in its place ``Paragraph (a)(1)''.
0
8. Adding paragraphs (g)(4) and (5).
0
9. Removing the parenthetical authority citation at the end of the
section.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 1.956-1 Shareholder's pro rata share of the average of the
amounts of United States property held by a controlled foreign
corporation.
(a) Overview and scope--(1) In general. Subject to the provisions
of section 951(a) and the regulations in this part, a United States
shareholder of a controlled foreign corporation is required to include
in gross income the amount determined under section 956 with respect to
the shareholder for the taxable year but only to the extent not
excluded from gross income under section 959(a)(2) and the regulations
in this part.
(2) Reduction for certain United States shareholders--(i) In
general. For a taxable year of a controlled foreign corporation, the
amount determined under section 956 with respect to each share of stock
of the controlled foreign corporation owned (within the meaning of
section 958(a)) by a United States shareholder is the amount that would
be determined under section 956 with respect to such share for the
taxable year, absent the application of this paragraph (a)(2) for the
taxable year (such amount, the tentative section 956 amount, and in the
aggregate with respect to all shares owned (within the meaning of
section 958(a)) by the United States shareholder, the aggregate
tentative section 956 amount), reduced by the amount of the deduction
under section 245A, if any, that the shareholder would be allowed if
the shareholder received as a distribution from the controlled foreign
corporation an amount equal to the tentative section 956 amount with
respect to such share on the last day during the taxable year on which
the foreign corporation is a controlled foreign corporation
(hypothetical distribution). For purposes of the preceding sentence, in
the case of a United States shareholder that is a domestic partnership,
the aggregate amount of the deductions under section 245A, if any, that
domestic corporations that are partners of the domestic
[[Page 23718]]
partnership (including indirect partners through other partnerships)
would be allowed with respect to a hypothetical distribution is treated
as the amount of the deduction under section 245A that the domestic
partnership would be allowed.
(ii) Determination of the amount of the deduction that would be
allowed under section 245A with respect to a hypothetical distribution.
For purposes of determining the amount of the deduction under section
245A that a United States shareholder would be allowed with respect to
a share of stock of a controlled foreign corporation by reason of a
hypothetical distribution, the rules in paragraphs (a)(2)(ii)(A)
through (C) of this section apply--
(A) If a United States shareholder owns a share of stock of a
controlled foreign corporation indirectly (within the meaning of
section 958(a)(2)), then--
(1) Sections 245A(a) through (d), 246(a), and 959 apply to the
hypothetical distribution as if the United States shareholder directly
owned (within the meaning of section 958(a)(1)(A)) the share;
(2) Section 245A(e) applies to the hypothetical distribution as if
the distribution were made to the United States shareholder through
each entity by reason of which the United States shareholder indirectly
owns such share and pro rata with respect to the equity that gives rise
to such indirect ownership;
(3) To the extent that a distribution treated as made to a
controlled foreign corporation pursuant to the hypothetical
distribution by reason of paragraph (a)(2)(ii)(A)(2) of this section
would be subject to section 245A(e)(2), the United States shareholder
is treated as not being allowed a deduction under section 245A by
reason of the hypothetical distribution; and
(4) Section 246(c) applies to the hypothetical distribution by
substituting the phrase ``owned (within the meaning of section
958(a))'' for the term ``held'' each place it appears in section
246(c);
(B) Section 246(c) applies to the hypothetical distribution by
substituting ``the last day during the taxable year on which the
foreign corporation is a controlled foreign corporation'' for the
phrase ``the date on which such share becomes ex-dividend with respect
to such dividend'' in section 246(c)(1)(A); and
(C) The hypothetical distribution is treated as attributable first
to earnings and profits of the controlled foreign corporation described
in section 959(c)(2), then to earnings and profits of the controlled
foreign corporation described in section 959(c)(3).
(iii) Special rule in the case of domestic partnerships--(A) In
general. In the case of a domestic partnership whose tentative section
956 amount with respect to a share of stock of a controlled foreign
corporation is reduced pursuant to paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section
for a taxable year, the portion of any inclusion under section
951(a)(1)(B) of the domestic partnership with respect to such share for
the taxable year allocated to a partner of the domestic partnership
(including an indirect partner through one or more other partnerships)
must equal the product of the inclusion and the ratio determined by
dividing--
(1) The net hypothetical distribution income with respect to the
partner; by
(2) The aggregate of the net hypothetical distribution income with
respect to all of the partners of the domestic partnership.
(B) Definition of net hypothetical distribution income. The term
net hypothetical distribution income means, with respect to a
hypothetical distribution to a domestic partnership and a partner of
the domestic partnership (including an indirect partner through one or
more other partnerships), the amount of the hypothetical distribution
that would be allocable to the partner reduced by the amount of the
deduction under section 245A with respect to the hypothetical
distribution that would be allowable to the partner.
(3) Examples. The examples in this paragraph (a)(3) illustrate the
application of paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
(i) Example 1--(A) Facts. (1) USP, a domestic corporation, owns
all of the single class of stock of FC, a foreign corporation. The
stock of FC consists of 100 shares, and USP satisfies the holding
period requirement of section 246(c) (as modified by paragraph
(a)(2)(ii)(B) of this section) with respect to each share of FC
stock. Any dividend from FC to USP would not constitute a hybrid
dividend for purposes of section 245A(e). FC owns all of the stock
of USS, a domestic corporation. FC's adjusted basis in the stock of
USS is $0.
(2) The functional currency of FC is the U.S. dollar. FC has
$100x of undistributed earnings as defined in section 245A(c)(2) at
the end of the taxable year, $90x of which constitute undistributed
foreign earnings as defined in section 245A(c)(3), and $10x of which
are described in section 245(a)(5)(B) (that is, earnings
attributable to a dividend that FC received from USS). None of the
earnings and profits of FC are described in section 959(c)(1) or (2)
or are earnings and profits attributable to income excluded from
subpart F income under section 952(b). FC's applicable earnings (as
defined in section 956(b)(1)) are $100x. FC also has held an
obligation of USP with an adjusted basis of $120x on every day
during the taxable year of FC, and such obligation was acquired
while all of its stock was owned by USP.
(B) Analysis. Because USP directly owns all of the stock of FC
at the end of FC's taxable year, USP's aggregate tentative section
956 amount with respect to FC is $100x, the lesser of USP's pro rata
share of the average amounts of United States property held by FC
($120x) and its pro rata share of FC's applicable earnings ($100x).
Under paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section, USP's section 956 amount
with respect to FC is its aggregate tentative section 956 amount
with respect to FC reduced by the deduction under section 245A that
USP would be allowed if USP received an amount equal to its
aggregate tentative section 956 amount as a distribution with
respect to the FC stock. USP would be allowed a $90x deduction under
section 245A with respect to the foreign-source portion of the $100x
hypothetical distribution (that is, an amount of the dividend that
bears the same ratio to the dividend as the $90x of undistributed
foreign earnings bears to the $100x of undistributed earnings).
Accordingly, USP's section 956 amount with respect to FC is $10x,
its aggregate tentative section 956 amount ($100x) with respect to
FC reduced by the amount of the deduction that USP would have been
allowed under section 245A with respect to the hypothetical
distribution ($90x).
(ii) Example 2--(A) Facts. The facts are the same as in
paragraph (a)(3)(i)(A) of this section (the facts in Example 1),
except that all $100x of FC's undistributed earnings are described
in section 959(c)(2).
(B) Analysis. As in paragraph (a)(3)(i)(B) of this section (the
analysis in Example 1), USP's aggregate tentative section 956 amount
with respect to FC is $100x, the lesser of USP's pro rata share of
the average amounts of United States property held by FC ($120x) and
its pro rata share of FC's applicable earnings ($100x). However,
paragraph (a)(2) of this section does not reduce USP's section 956
amount because USP would not be allowed any deduction under section
245A with respect to the $100x hypothetical distribution by reason
of section 959(a) and (d). Accordingly, USP's section 956 amount is
$100x. However, under sections 959(a)(2) and 959(f)(1), USP's
inclusion under section 951(a)(1)(B) with respect to FC is $0,
because USP's section 956 amount with respect to FC does not exceed
the earnings and profits of FC described in section 959(c)(2) with
respect to USP. The $100x of earnings and profits of FC described in
section 959(c)(2) are reclassified as earnings and profits described
in section 959(c)(1).
(iii) Example 3--(A) Facts. The facts are the same as in
paragraph (a)(3)(i)(A) of this section (the facts in Example 1),
except that FC has $200x of undistributed earnings, which constitute
undistributed foreign earnings as defined in section 245A(c)(3), of
which $100x are described in section 959(c)(1)(A) and $100x are
described in section 959(c)(3).
(B) Analysis. USP's aggregate tentative section 956 amount with
respect to FC is $20x, the lesser of $20x, the excess of USP's pro
rata share of the average amounts of
[[Page 23719]]
United States property held by FC ($120x) over the earnings and
profits described in section 959(c)(1)(A) with respect to USP
($100x), and its pro rata share of FC's applicable earnings ($100x).
Under paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section, USP's section 956 amount
with respect to FC is its aggregate tentative section 956 amount
with respect to FC reduced by the deduction under section 245A that
USP would be allowed if USP received an amount equal to its
aggregate tentative section 956 amount as a distribution with
respect to the FC stock. USP would be allowed a $20x deduction under
section 245A with respect to the foreign-source portion of the $20x
hypothetical distribution, which, under paragraph (a)(2)(ii)(C) of
this section, is treated as attributable to the earnings and profits
of FC described in section 959(c)(3) despite the fact that FC has
$100x of earnings and profits described in section 959(c)(1)(A) that
would otherwise be distributed before earnings and profits described
in section 959(c)(3). Accordingly, USP's section 956 amount with
respect to FC is $0, its aggregate tentative section 956 amount
($20x) with respect to FC reduced by the amount of the deduction
that USP would have been allowed under section 245A with respect to
the hypothetical distribution after applying the rule in paragraph
(a)(2)(ii)(C) of this section ($20x).
(iv) Example 4--(A) Facts. The facts are the same as in
paragraph (a)(3)(i)(A) of this section (the facts in Example 1),
except that USP is a domestic partnership in which USC1 and USC2,
each a domestic corporation, and USI, a United States citizen, have
owned 50%, 30%, and 20%, respectively, of the capital and profits
interests for five years.
(B) Analysis. As in paragraph (a)(3)(i)(B) of this section (the
analysis in Example 1), USP's aggregate tentative section 956 amount
with respect to FC is $100x. Under paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this
section, USP's section 956 amount with respect to FC is its
aggregate tentative section 956 amount with respect to FC reduced by
the aggregate amount of deductions under section 245A that USC1,
USC2, and USI would be allowed if USP received an amount equal to
its aggregate tentative section 956 amount as a distribution with
respect to the FC stock. Assuming that, under section 245A, USC1 and
USC2 would be allowed a $45x deduction and a $27x deduction,
respectively, with respect to the foreign-source portion of their
$50x and $30x distributive shares of the $100x hypothetical
distribution (that is, an amount of the dividend that bears the same
ratio to the dividend as the $90x of undistributed foreign earnings
bears to the $100x of undistributed earnings), USP's section 956
amount with respect to FC is $28x, its aggregate tentative section
956 amount ($100x) with respect to FC reduced by the aggregate
amount of the deductions that its partners would have been allowed
under section 245A with respect to the hypothetical distribution
($72x ($45x + $27x)). Under paragraph (a)(2)(iii) of this section,
the portion of its $28x inclusion under section 951(a)(1)(B) with
respect to FC that is allocated to USC1 is $5x ($28x x (($50x-$45x)/
($50x-$45x + $30x-$27x + $20x))); the portion that is allocated to
USC2 is $3x ($28x x (($30x-$27x) / ($50x-$45x + $30x-$27x + $20x)));
and the portion that is allocated to USI is $20x ($28x x ($20x /
($50x-$45x + $30x-$27x + $20x))).
(v) Example 5--(A) Facts. (1) USP, a domestic corporation, owns
all of the single class of stock of FC1, a foreign corporation, and
has held such stock for five years. FC1 has held 70% of the single
class of stock of FC2, a foreign corporation, for three years. The
other 30% of the FC2 stock has been held since FC2's formation by a
foreign individual unrelated to USP or FC1. Any dividend from FC2 or
FC1 to FC1 or USP, respectively, would not constitute a hybrid
dividend for purposes of section 245A(e). FC2 has a calendar taxable
year. On December 1, Year 1, FC1 acquires the remaining 30% of the
stock of FC2 for cash. On June 30, Year 2, FC1 sells to a third
party the 30% of FC2 stock acquired in Year 1 at no gain. FC2 made
no distributions during Year 1.
(2) The functional currency of FC1 and FC2 is the U.S. dollar.
For Year 1, FC2 has $120x of undistributed earnings as defined in
section 245A(c)(2), all of which constitute undistributed foreign
earnings. None of the earnings and profits of FC2 are described in
section 959(c)(1) or (2) or are earnings and profits attributable to
income excluded from subpart F income under section 952(b). FC2's
applicable earnings (as defined in section 956(b)(1)) for Year 1 are
$120x. FC2 has held an obligation of USP with an adjusted basis of
$100x on every day of Year 1 that was acquired while USP owned all
of the stock of FC1 and FC1 held 70% of the single class of stock of
FC2.
(B) Analysis. Because USP indirectly owns (within the meaning of
section 958(a)) all of the stock of FC2 at the end of Year 1, USP's
aggregate tentative section 956 amount with respect to FC2 for Year
1 is $100x, the lesser of USP's pro rata share of the average
amounts of United States property held by FC2 ($100x) and its pro
rata share of FC2's applicable earnings ($120x). Under paragraph
(a)(2)(i) of this section, USP's section 956 amount with respect to
FC2 for Year 1 is its aggregate tentative section 956 amount with
respect to FC2 reduced by the deduction under section 245A that USP
would be allowed if USP received an amount equal to its aggregate
tentative section 956 amount as a distribution with respect to the
FC2 stock that USP owns indirectly within the meaning of section
958(a)(2). For purposes of determining the consequences of this
hypothetical distribution, under paragraph (a)(2)(ii)(A)(1) of this
section, USP is treated as owning the FC2 stock directly. In
addition, under paragraph (a)(2)(ii)(A)(4) of this section, the
holding period requirement of section 246(c) is applied by reference
to the period during which USP owned (within the meaning of section
958(a)) the stock of FC2. Therefore, with respect to the
hypothetical distribution from FC2 to USP, USP would satisfy the
holding period requirement under section 246(c) with respect to the
70% of the FC2 stock that USP indirectly owned for three years
through FC1, but not with respect to the 30% of the FC2 stock that
USP indirectly owned through FC1 for a period of less than 365 days.
Accordingly, USP's section 956 amount with respect to FC2 for Year 1
is $30x, its aggregate tentative section 956 amount ($100x) reduced
by the amount of the deduction that USP would have been allowed
under section 245A with respect to the hypothetical distribution
($70x).
* * * * *
(g) Applicability dates.* * *
(4) Paragraphs (a)(2) and (3) of this section apply to taxable
years of controlled foreign corporations beginning on or after July 22,
2019, and to taxable years of a United States shareholder in which or
with which such taxable years of the controlled foreign corporations
end. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, a United States
shareholder may apply paragraphs (a)(2) and (3) of this section to
taxable years of controlled foreign corporations beginning after
December 31, 2017, and to taxable years of the United States
shareholder in which or with which such taxable years of the controlled
foreign corporations end, provided that the United States shareholder
and United States persons that are related (within the meaning of
section 267 or 707) to the United States shareholder consistently apply
those paragraphs with respect to all controlled foreign corporations in
which they are United States shareholders for taxable years of the
controlled foreign corporations beginning after December 31, 2017.
(5) Paragraph (e)(6) of this section applies to property acquired
in exchanges occurring on or after June 24, 2011.
Kirsten Wielobob,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
Approved: May 9, 2019.
David J. Kautter,
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. 2019-10749 Filed 5-22-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P