Atlantic Highly Migratory Species; Amendment 14 to the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic Highly Migratory Species Fishery Management Plan, 23014-23016 [2019-10567]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
23014
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 21, 2019 / Proposed Rules
fees, it may require that the requester
provide proof of identity.
(4) In cases in which the Committee
requires advance payment, the request
will not be considered received and
further work will not be completed until
the required payment is received. If the
requester does not pay the advance
payment within 30 calendar days after
the date of the Committee’s fee
determination, the request will be
closed.
(j) Other statutes specifically
providing for fees. The fee schedule of
this section does not apply to fees
charged under any statute that
specifically requires an agency to set
and collect fees for particular types of
records. In instances where records
responsive to a request are subject to a
statutorily-based fee schedule program,
the Committee shall inform the
requester of the contact information for
that program.
(k) Requirements for waiver or
reduction of fees.
(1) Requesters may seek a waiver of
fees by submitting a written application
demonstrating how disclosure of the
requested information is in the public
interest because it is likely to contribute
significantly to public understanding of
the operations or activities of the
government and is not primarily in the
commercial interest of the requester.
(2) The Committee will furnish
records responsive to a request without
charge or at a reduced rate when it
determines, based on all available
information, that the factors described
in paragraphs (k)(2)(i) through (ii) of this
section are satisfied:
(i) Disclosure of the requested
information would shed light on the
operations or activities of the
government. The subject of the request
must concern identifiable operations or
activities of the Federal Government
with a connection that is direct and
clear, not remote or attenuated.
(ii) Disclosure of the requested
information is likely to contribute
significantly to public understanding of
those operations or activities. This
factor is satisfied when the following
criteria are met:
(A) Disclosure of the requested
records must be meaningfully
informative about the Committee
operations or activities. The disclosure
of information that already is in the
public domain, in either the same or a
substantially identical form, would not
be meaningfully informative if nothing
new would be added to the public’s
understanding.
(B) The disclosure must contribute to
the understanding of a reasonably broad
audience of persons interested in the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 May 20, 2019
Jkt 247001
subject, as opposed to the individual
understanding of the requester. A
requester’s expertise in the subject area
as well as the requester’s ability and
intention to effectively convey
information to the public must be
considered. The Committee ordinarily
will presume that a representative of the
news media will satisfy this
consideration.
(iii) The disclosure must not be
primarily in the commercial interest of
the requester. To determine whether
disclosure of the requested information
is primarily in the commercial interest
of the requester, the Committee will
consider the following criteria:
(A) The Committee must identify
whether the requester has any
commercial interest that would be
furthered by the requested disclosure. A
commercial interest includes any
commercial, trade, or for profit interest.
Requesters must be given an
opportunity to provide explanatory
information regarding this
consideration.
(B) If there is an identified
commercial interest, the Committee
must determine whether that is the
primary interest furthered by the
request. A waiver or reduction of fees is
justified when the requirements of
paragraphs (k)(2)(i) through (ii) of this
section are satisfied and any commercial
interest is not the primary interest
furthered by the request. The Committee
ordinarily will presume that when a
news media requester has satisfied the
requirements of paragraphs (k)(2)(i)
through (ii) of this section, the request
is not primarily in the commercial
interest of the requester. Disclosure to
data brokers or others who merely
compile and market government
information for direct economic return
will not be presumed to primarily serve
the public interest.
(3) Where only some of the records to
be released satisfy the requirements for
a waiver of fees, a waiver shall be
granted for those records.
(4) Requests for a waiver or reduction
of fees should be made when the request
is first submitted to the Committee and
should address the criteria referenced
above. A requester may submit a fee
waiver request at a later time as long as
the underlying record request is
pending or on administrative appeal.
When a requester who has committed to
pay fees subsequently asks for a waiver
of those fees and that waiver is denied,
the requester must pay any costs
incurred up to the date the fee waiver
request was received.
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
§ 51–8.11
Other Rights and Services.
Nothing in this subpart shall be
construed to entitle any person, as of
right, to any service or to the disclosure
of any record to which such person is
not entitled under the FOIA.
Patricia Briscoe,
Deputy Director, Business Operations,
(Pricing and Information Management).
[FR Doc. 2019–08336 Filed 5–20–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 635
RIN 0648–BI59
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species;
Amendment 14 to the 2006
Consolidated Atlantic Highly Migratory
Species Fishery Management Plan
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of intent (NOI) to prepare
an environmental impact statement
(EIS); request for comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS announces the
availability of the scoping document on
Amendment 14 to the 2006
Consolidated Atlantic Highly Migratory
Species Fishery Management Plan (2006
Consolidated HMS FMP) and its intent
to prepare an EIS under the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA Given
revisions to the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act National Standard 1 (NS1)
guidelines, NMFS is exploring options
related to the implementation of those
new guidelines as they relate to annual
catch limits (ACLs) for Atlantic sharks
in the HMS management unit. In the
scoping document, NMFS begins the
process for re-examining how to
establish these ACLs, including an
examination of how to establish the
acceptable biological catch (ABC) and
account for uncertainty arising from the
stock assessment and the impacts to the
management measures. NMFS expects
to consider the comments received on
the scoping document for developing
Amendment 14 to the 2006
Consolidated HMS FMP. NMFS will
announce the date and times for the
scoping meetings in a separate Federal
Register notice at a later date.
DATES: Topics included in this NOI will
be discussed at the HMS Advisory
Panel, May 21–23, 2019. Additional
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM
21MYP1
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 21, 2019 / Proposed Rules
scoping meetings and a conference call
will be announced in a subsequent
notice in the Federal Register. Please
see the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this NOI for more specifics
regarding the HMS Advisory Panel
meeting. NMFS requests receipt of any
comments on the scoping document by
July 31, 2019.
ADDRESSES: The presentation at the
HMS Advisory Panel will be held at the
Sheraton, 8777 Georgia Avenue, Silver
Spring, MD 20910. You may submit
comments on the scoping document,
identified by NOAA–NMFS–2019–0040,
by any of the following methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20190040, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
Peter Cooper, NMFS/SF1, 1315 EastWest Highway, National Marine
Fisheries Service, SSMC3, Silver Spring,
MD 20910.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and generally will be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/
A’’ in the required fields if you wish to
remain anonymous).
The Scoping Document on
Amendment 14 to the 2006
Consolidated Atlantic Highly Migratory
Species Fishery Management Plan and
supporting documents are available
from the HMS Management Division
website at https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/topic/atlantichighly-migratory-species, or contact Ian
Miller by phone at 301–427–8503 for
hard copies.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ian
Miller or Karyl Brewster-Geisz at 301–
427–8503.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act) requires that
any FMP or FMP amendment be
consistent with ten National Standards.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 May 20, 2019
Jkt 247001
Specifically, NS1 requires that
conservation and management measures
shall prevent overfishing while
achieving, on a continuing basis, the
optimum yield from each fishery for the
United States fishing industry. In 2016,
NMFS revised the NS1 guidelines to
improve and streamline them, enhance
their utility for managers and the public,
and to facilitate compliance with the
requirements of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act and provide management flexibility
in doing so.
The revisions address a range of
issues, including providing guidance on
phasing in changes to catch limits and
carrying over unused quota from one
year to the next (81 FR 71858; October
18, 2016). With the changes in the NS1
guidelines and given that NMFS is
seeking additional management
flexibility in establishment of shark
reference points, NMFS is exploring
options related to the implementation of
those new provisions as it relates to
shark ACLs.
Shark stock assessments conducted by
the SouthEast Data, Assessment, and
Review (SEDAR) process and conducted
by the science branch of the
International Commission for the
Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT).
Species are assessed individually to the
extent possible, with matching TACs. In
some cases, the available data are not
sufficient for estimating a TAC for use
in management (e.g., dusky shark). Also,
in some cases, TACs for individual
species may be aggregated into species
complexes for management purposes
(e.g., pelagic shark complex, large
coastal shark complex, etc.).
Since Amendment 3 to the 2006
Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP, NMFS
has set the acceptable biological catch
(ABC), overfishing limit (OFL), and
overall ACL for these stocks equal to the
TAC. NMFS has used this ABC to
calculate the shark sector ACLs and
commercial quotas for the fishery. In the
NS1 guidelines, NMFS defines the ABC
as a level of a stock or stock complex’s
annual catch, which is based on an ABC
control rule that accounts for the
scientific uncertainty in the estimate of
OFL, any other scientific uncertainty,
and the Council’s risk policy (see 50
CFR 600.310(f)(1)(ii)). NMFS defines
ACL as a limit on the total annual catch
of a stock or stock complex, which
cannot exceed the ABC, which serves as
the basis for invoking AMs. An ACL
may be divided into sector-ACLs (see 50
CFR 600.310(f)(1)(iii)). For the
prohibited shark complex, where
commercial and recreational retention
and landings are not allowed, NMFS
has, consistent with NS1 guideline
provisions, set the ACL equal to zero,
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
23015
although a small amount of bycatch
occurs during other fishing operations.
In the scoping document, NMFS
begins the process for re-examining how
to establish the ACLs for shark species
that are in the HMS management unit
based on the 2016 final rule updating
the NS1 guidelines (81 FR 71858,
October 18, 2016), and examines how to
establish the ABC and account for
uncertainty arising from the stock
assessment and the impacts to the
management measures. Additionally,
this document discusses how to
establish ACLs in the absence of a full
stock assessment and considers changes
to quota carry-over provisions. The
HMS shark regulations govern
conservation and management of sharks
in the management unit, under the
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Act.
For sharks, the ‘‘management unit’’
means all fish of the species listed in
Table 1 of Appendix A to 50 CFR part
635, in the western north Atlantic
Ocean, including the Gulf of Mexico
and the Caribbean Sea. For some shark
stocks caught in association with ICCAT
fisheries, ICCAT adopts conservation
and management measures, and NMFS
implements them consistent with
ATCA. NMFS welcomes comments on
the appropriate scope of the action as it
relates to the species with management
measures under ICCAT.
NMFS has several ongoing actions
affecting HMS management that are, or
soon will be, available for public
comment. While each of these actions
are separate, they are related in some
ways, and the comment periods may
overlap. Depending on the outcomes,
one action could have impacts on other
actions. The following summarizes
these other actions for the regulated
community’s information and
background.
NMFS recently released its ‘‘Draft
Three-Year Review of the Individual
Bluefin Quota (IBQ) Program.’’ The IBQ
Program, adopted in Amendment 7 to
the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP
(Amendment 7), is a catch share
program that introduced individual
vessel accountability for bluefin bycatch
in the pelagic longline fishery. Formal
reviews of such catch share programs
are required to evaluate whether their
objectives are met. In Amendment 7,
NMFS proposed and finalized a plan to
formally evaluate the success and
performance of the IBQ Program after
three years of operation and to provide
the HMS Advisory Panel with a
publicly-available written document
with its findings.
NMFS also recently released a
document (Amendment 13 Issues and
Options Paper) for use in 2019 for
E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM
21MYP1
23016
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 21, 2019 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
scoping, a public process during which
NMFS will consider a range of issues
and objectives, as well as possible
options for bluefin tuna management.
The options being presented in the
Issues and Options Paper consider the
preliminary results of the Draft ThreeYear Review and respond to recent
changes in the bluefin fishery and input
from the public and HMS Advisory
Panel. The options include refining the
IBQ Program; reassessing allocation of
bluefin tuna quotas (including the
potential elimination or phasing out of
the Purse Seine category); and other
regulatory provisions regarding bluefin
directed fisheries and bycatch in the
pelagic longline fishery, to determine if
existing measures are the best means of
achieving current management
objectives for bluefin tuna management.
During scoping, public feedback will be
accepted via written comments or
scoping meetings as described in
separate Federal Register notices.
NMFS also is currently in the process
of developing a Proposed Rule to
Modify Pelagic Longline Bluefin Tuna
Area-Based and Weak Hook
Management Measures. To analyze the
potential environmental effects of a
range of alternatives, NMFS recently
released a Draft Environmental Impact
Statement (DEIS). The DEIS evaluates
whether current area-based and gear
management measures remain necessary
to reduce and/or maintain low numbers
of bluefin tuna discards and interactions
in the pelagic longline fishery, given
more recent management measures,
including the IBQ Program. The DEIS
prefers alternatives that undertake a
process to evaluate the need for the
Northeastern United States Closed Area
and the Gulf of Mexico Gear Restricted
Area; removes the Cape Hatteras Gear
Restricted Area; and adjusts the Gulf of
Mexico weak hook effective period from
year-round to seasonal (January–June).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 May 20, 2019
Jkt 247001
The comment period for the DEIS and
proposed rule are open through July 31,
2019. NMFS is holding four public
hearings across the Gulf of Mexico and
Atlantic Coast. There will also be two
webinars that will serve as public
hearings for interested members of the
public from all geographic locations.
After consideration of public comments,
NMFS expects to finalize the rule in the
late fall of 2019. The proposed rule
related to this DEIS is expected to be
released shortly.
Finally, NMFS also released an Issues
and Options Paper considering
approaches to collect data and perform
research in areas that are currently
closed to certain gears or fishing
activities for Atlantic HMS. Such
research will help evaluate and support
spatial fisheries management for
Atlantic HMS. ‘‘Spatial management’’
refers to a suite of fisheries conservation
and management measures that are
based on geographic area. When some
spatial management tools, such as
closed areas, are deployed, the
collection of fishery-dependent data is
reduced or eliminated. This loss of data
can compromise effective fisheries
management. The Issues and Options
Paper considers approaches to collect
data and perform research in areas that
may otherwise restrict commercial or
recreational fishing, making the
collection of fisheries-dependent data
challenging or not possible. During
scoping, public feedback will be
accepted via written comments or at
scoping meetings as described in
separate Federal Register notices.
Request for Comments
NMFS anticipates changes to
management of the shark species that
are in the HMS management unit. Based
on the guidelines for NS1. This notice
requests additional information and
comments from the public related to the
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
establishment of TACs and ACLs. The
HMS shark regulations govern
conservation and management of sharks
in the management unit, under the
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Act.
For sharks, the ‘‘management unit’’
means all fish of the species listed in
Table 1 of Appendix A to 50 CFR part
635, in the western north Atlantic
Ocean, including the Gulf of Mexico
and the Caribbean Sea. For some shark
stocks caught in association with ICCAT
fisheries, ICCAT adopts conservation
and management measures, and NMFS
implements them consistent with
ATCA. NMFS welcomes comments on
the appropriate scope of the action as it
relates to the species with management
measures under ICCAT. The document
includes a summary of the anticipated
purpose and need for the FMP
amendment, and the potential
environmental, social, and economic
impacts of some potential conservation
and management options. The scoping
document is available online at the
HMS website: https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/topic/atlantichighly-migratory-species. The scoping
meetings and a conference call will be
announced in a subsequent notice in the
Federal Register. The comments
received on the scoping document will
be considered to assist in the
development of the upcoming
amendment to the 2006 Consolidated
Atlantic HMS FMP. NMFS anticipates
that a proposed rule and draft
environment impact statement (DEIS)
will be available in late 2019 and the
Final Amendment 14 and its related
documents will be available in 2020.
Dated: May 16, 2019.
Kelly L. Denit,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2019–10567 Filed 5–20–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM
21MYP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 98 (Tuesday, May 21, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 23014-23016]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-10567]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 635
RIN 0648-BI59
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species; Amendment 14 to the 2006
Consolidated Atlantic Highly Migratory Species Fishery Management Plan
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of intent (NOI) to prepare an environmental impact
statement (EIS); request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS announces the availability of the scoping document on
Amendment 14 to the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic Highly Migratory Species
Fishery Management Plan (2006 Consolidated HMS FMP) and its intent to
prepare an EIS under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA Given
revisions to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management
Act National Standard 1 (NS1) guidelines, NMFS is exploring options
related to the implementation of those new guidelines as they relate to
annual catch limits (ACLs) for Atlantic sharks in the HMS management
unit. In the scoping document, NMFS begins the process for re-examining
how to establish these ACLs, including an examination of how to
establish the acceptable biological catch (ABC) and account for
uncertainty arising from the stock assessment and the impacts to the
management measures. NMFS expects to consider the comments received on
the scoping document for developing Amendment 14 to the 2006
Consolidated HMS FMP. NMFS will announce the date and times for the
scoping meetings in a separate Federal Register notice at a later date.
DATES: Topics included in this NOI will be discussed at the HMS
Advisory Panel, May 21-23, 2019. Additional
[[Page 23015]]
scoping meetings and a conference call will be announced in a
subsequent notice in the Federal Register. Please see the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this NOI for more specifics regarding the HMS
Advisory Panel meeting. NMFS requests receipt of any comments on the
scoping document by July 31, 2019.
ADDRESSES: The presentation at the HMS Advisory Panel will be held at
the Sheraton, 8777 Georgia Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20910. You may
submit comments on the scoping document, identified by NOAA-NMFS-2019-
0040, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2019-0040, click the
``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter or
attach your comments.
Mail: Submit written comments to Peter Cooper, NMFS/SF1,
1315 East-West Highway, National Marine Fisheries Service, SSMC3,
Silver Spring, MD 20910.
Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the
public record and generally will be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address), confidential business information,
or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily by the sender
will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter
``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain anonymous).
The Scoping Document on Amendment 14 to the 2006 Consolidated
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species Fishery Management Plan and
supporting documents are available from the HMS Management Division
website at https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/topic/atlantic-highly-migratory-species, or contact Ian Miller by phone at 301-427-8503 for
hard copies.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ian Miller or Karyl Brewster-Geisz at
301-427-8503.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act) requires that any FMP or FMP amendment be
consistent with ten National Standards. Specifically, NS1 requires that
conservation and management measures shall prevent overfishing while
achieving, on a continuing basis, the optimum yield from each fishery
for the United States fishing industry. In 2016, NMFS revised the NS1
guidelines to improve and streamline them, enhance their utility for
managers and the public, and to facilitate compliance with the
requirements of the Magnuson-Stevens Act and provide management
flexibility in doing so.
The revisions address a range of issues, including providing
guidance on phasing in changes to catch limits and carrying over unused
quota from one year to the next (81 FR 71858; October 18, 2016). With
the changes in the NS1 guidelines and given that NMFS is seeking
additional management flexibility in establishment of shark reference
points, NMFS is exploring options related to the implementation of
those new provisions as it relates to shark ACLs.
Shark stock assessments conducted by the SouthEast Data,
Assessment, and Review (SEDAR) process and conducted by the science
branch of the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic
Tunas (ICCAT). Species are assessed individually to the extent
possible, with matching TACs. In some cases, the available data are not
sufficient for estimating a TAC for use in management (e.g., dusky
shark). Also, in some cases, TACs for individual species may be
aggregated into species complexes for management purposes (e.g.,
pelagic shark complex, large coastal shark complex, etc.).
Since Amendment 3 to the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP, NMFS
has set the acceptable biological catch (ABC), overfishing limit (OFL),
and overall ACL for these stocks equal to the TAC. NMFS has used this
ABC to calculate the shark sector ACLs and commercial quotas for the
fishery. In the NS1 guidelines, NMFS defines the ABC as a level of a
stock or stock complex's annual catch, which is based on an ABC control
rule that accounts for the scientific uncertainty in the estimate of
OFL, any other scientific uncertainty, and the Council's risk policy
(see 50 CFR 600.310(f)(1)(ii)). NMFS defines ACL as a limit on the
total annual catch of a stock or stock complex, which cannot exceed the
ABC, which serves as the basis for invoking AMs. An ACL may be divided
into sector-ACLs (see 50 CFR 600.310(f)(1)(iii)). For the prohibited
shark complex, where commercial and recreational retention and landings
are not allowed, NMFS has, consistent with NS1 guideline provisions,
set the ACL equal to zero, although a small amount of bycatch occurs
during other fishing operations.
In the scoping document, NMFS begins the process for re-examining
how to establish the ACLs for shark species that are in the HMS
management unit based on the 2016 final rule updating the NS1
guidelines (81 FR 71858, October 18, 2016), and examines how to
establish the ABC and account for uncertainty arising from the stock
assessment and the impacts to the management measures. Additionally,
this document discusses how to establish ACLs in the absence of a full
stock assessment and considers changes to quota carry-over provisions.
The HMS shark regulations govern conservation and management of sharks
in the management unit, under the authority of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act. For sharks, the ``management unit'' means all fish of the species
listed in Table 1 of Appendix A to 50 CFR part 635, in the western
north Atlantic Ocean, including the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean
Sea. For some shark stocks caught in association with ICCAT fisheries,
ICCAT adopts conservation and management measures, and NMFS implements
them consistent with ATCA. NMFS welcomes comments on the appropriate
scope of the action as it relates to the species with management
measures under ICCAT.
NMFS has several ongoing actions affecting HMS management that are,
or soon will be, available for public comment. While each of these
actions are separate, they are related in some ways, and the comment
periods may overlap. Depending on the outcomes, one action could have
impacts on other actions. The following summarizes these other actions
for the regulated community's information and background.
NMFS recently released its ``Draft Three-Year Review of the
Individual Bluefin Quota (IBQ) Program.'' The IBQ Program, adopted in
Amendment 7 to the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP (Amendment 7), is a catch
share program that introduced individual vessel accountability for
bluefin bycatch in the pelagic longline fishery. Formal reviews of such
catch share programs are required to evaluate whether their objectives
are met. In Amendment 7, NMFS proposed and finalized a plan to formally
evaluate the success and performance of the IBQ Program after three
years of operation and to provide the HMS Advisory Panel with a
publicly-available written document with its findings.
NMFS also recently released a document (Amendment 13 Issues and
Options Paper) for use in 2019 for
[[Page 23016]]
scoping, a public process during which NMFS will consider a range of
issues and objectives, as well as possible options for bluefin tuna
management. The options being presented in the Issues and Options Paper
consider the preliminary results of the Draft Three-Year Review and
respond to recent changes in the bluefin fishery and input from the
public and HMS Advisory Panel. The options include refining the IBQ
Program; reassessing allocation of bluefin tuna quotas (including the
potential elimination or phasing out of the Purse Seine category); and
other regulatory provisions regarding bluefin directed fisheries and
bycatch in the pelagic longline fishery, to determine if existing
measures are the best means of achieving current management objectives
for bluefin tuna management. During scoping, public feedback will be
accepted via written comments or scoping meetings as described in
separate Federal Register notices.
NMFS also is currently in the process of developing a Proposed Rule
to Modify Pelagic Longline Bluefin Tuna Area-Based and Weak Hook
Management Measures. To analyze the potential environmental effects of
a range of alternatives, NMFS recently released a Draft Environmental
Impact Statement (DEIS). The DEIS evaluates whether current area-based
and gear management measures remain necessary to reduce and/or maintain
low numbers of bluefin tuna discards and interactions in the pelagic
longline fishery, given more recent management measures, including the
IBQ Program. The DEIS prefers alternatives that undertake a process to
evaluate the need for the Northeastern United States Closed Area and
the Gulf of Mexico Gear Restricted Area; removes the Cape Hatteras Gear
Restricted Area; and adjusts the Gulf of Mexico weak hook effective
period from year-round to seasonal (January-June). The comment period
for the DEIS and proposed rule are open through July 31, 2019. NMFS is
holding four public hearings across the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic
Coast. There will also be two webinars that will serve as public
hearings for interested members of the public from all geographic
locations. After consideration of public comments, NMFS expects to
finalize the rule in the late fall of 2019. The proposed rule related
to this DEIS is expected to be released shortly.
Finally, NMFS also released an Issues and Options Paper considering
approaches to collect data and perform research in areas that are
currently closed to certain gears or fishing activities for Atlantic
HMS. Such research will help evaluate and support spatial fisheries
management for Atlantic HMS. ``Spatial management'' refers to a suite
of fisheries conservation and management measures that are based on
geographic area. When some spatial management tools, such as closed
areas, are deployed, the collection of fishery-dependent data is
reduced or eliminated. This loss of data can compromise effective
fisheries management. The Issues and Options Paper considers approaches
to collect data and perform research in areas that may otherwise
restrict commercial or recreational fishing, making the collection of
fisheries-dependent data challenging or not possible. During scoping,
public feedback will be accepted via written comments or at scoping
meetings as described in separate Federal Register notices.
Request for Comments
NMFS anticipates changes to management of the shark species that
are in the HMS management unit. Based on the guidelines for NS1. This
notice requests additional information and comments from the public
related to the establishment of TACs and ACLs. The HMS shark
regulations govern conservation and management of sharks in the
management unit, under the authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Act. For
sharks, the ``management unit'' means all fish of the species listed in
Table 1 of Appendix A to 50 CFR part 635, in the western north Atlantic
Ocean, including the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea. For some
shark stocks caught in association with ICCAT fisheries, ICCAT adopts
conservation and management measures, and NMFS implements them
consistent with ATCA. NMFS welcomes comments on the appropriate scope
of the action as it relates to the species with management measures
under ICCAT. The document includes a summary of the anticipated purpose
and need for the FMP amendment, and the potential environmental,
social, and economic impacts of some potential conservation and
management options. The scoping document is available online at the HMS
website: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/topic/atlantic-highly-migratory-species. The scoping meetings and a conference call will be
announced in a subsequent notice in the Federal Register. The comments
received on the scoping document will be considered to assist in the
development of the upcoming amendment to the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic
HMS FMP. NMFS anticipates that a proposed rule and draft environment
impact statement (DEIS) will be available in late 2019 and the Final
Amendment 14 and its related documents will be available in 2020.
Dated: May 16, 2019.
Kelly L. Denit,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-10567 Filed 5-20-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
