Atlantic Highly Migratory Species; Amendment 13 to the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic Highly Migratory Species Fishery Management Plan, 23020-23023 [2019-10565]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
23020
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 21, 2019 / Notices
available and the resulting 41.57 percent
CVD rate for POSCO, constitutes a final
decision of that court that is not in
harmony with the Final Amended
Determination. This notice is published
in fulfillment of the publication
requirements of Timken.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 516A(e)(1),
705(c)(1)(B), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: May 15, 2019.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2019–10544 Filed 5–20–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XF862
Endangered Species; File No. 21367
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; receipt of application for
a permit modification.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
Christopher Marshall, Ph.D., Texas
A&M University at Galveston, 200
Seawolf Parkway, Galveston, TX 77553,
has requested a modification to
scientific research Permit No. 21367.
DATES: Written, telefaxed, or email
comments must be received on or before
June 20, 2019.
ADDRESSES: The modification request
and related documents are available for
review by selecting ‘‘Records Open for
Public Comment’’ from the Features box
on the Applications and Permits for
Protected Species (APPS) home page,
https://apps.nmfs.noaa.gov, and then
selecting File No. 21367 Mod 3 from the
list of available applications. These
documents are also available upon
written request or by appointment in the
Permits and Conservation Division,
Office of Protected Resources, NMFS,
1315 East-West Highway, Room 13705,
Silver Spring, MD 20910; phone: (301)
427–8401; fax: (301) 713–0376.
Written comments on this application
should be submitted to the Chief,
Permits and Conservation Division, at
the address listed above. Comments may
also be submitted by facsimile to (301)
713–0376, or by email to
NMFS.Pr1Comments@noaa.gov. Please
include the File No. in the subject line
of the email comment.
Those individuals requesting a public
hearing should submit a written request
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:50 May 20, 2019
Jkt 247001
to the Chief, Permits and Conservation
Division at the address listed above. The
request should set forth the specific
reasons why a hearing on this
application would be appropriate.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy Hapeman or Erin Markin, (301)
427–8401.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
subject modification to Permit No.
21367, issued on March 15, 2018 (83 FR
17655) is requested under the authority
of the Endangered Species Act of 1973,
as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and
the regulations governing the taking,
importing, and exporting of endangered
and threatened species (50 CFR parts
222–226).
Permit No. 21367 authorizes the
permit holder to conduct research on
sea turtles to characterize the
movement, habitat use, foraging
ecology, and health of sea turtles on the
Texas coast and in the western Gulf of
Mexico. Researchers are authorized to
capture sea turtles by hand, dip net,
tangle net or cast net and perform the
following procedures prior to release of
animals: Examination, marking,
morphometrics, biological sampling,
and attachment of transmitters. The
permit holder requests authorization to
increase the number of green sea turtles
(Chelonia mydas) that may be taken
annually from 45 to 80 animals to
accommodate increased efforts in
Laguna Madre. No other changes to the
permit are requested.
Dated: May 16, 2019.
Julia Marie Harrison,
Chief, Permits and Conservation Division,
Office of Protected Resources, National
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2019–10548 Filed 5–20–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–BI08
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species;
Amendment 13 to the 2006
Consolidated Atlantic Highly Migratory
Species Fishery Management Plan
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of intent (NOI) to prepare
an environmental impact analysis;
notice of availability of issues and
options paper; request for comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS announces its intent to
prepare an environmental impact
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
analysis under the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and
the availability of the Issues and
Options Paper for Amendment 13 to the
2006 Consolidated Highly Migratory
Species (HMS) Fishery Management
Plan (FMP) (Issues and Options Paper).
This notice announces the start of a
public process for determining the
scope of significant issues related to the
management of Atlantic bluefin tuna
(bluefin), and addressing issues
identified by considering modification
of bluefin regulations. The catalysts for
beginning this regulatory process are the
release of the Draft Three-Year Review
of the IBQ Program (Three-Year
Review), recent changes in the bluefin
fishery, and advice and input from the
HMS Advisory Panel and the public.
The environmental impact analysis
will include an assessment of the
potential effects of alternative measures
for management of bluefin under the
2006 Consolidated Atlantic Highly
Migratory Species Fishery Management
Plan (2006 Consolidated HMS FMP).
The subjects in the Issues and Options
Paper include refining the Individual
Bluefin Quota (IBQ) Program,
reassessing allocation of the bluefin
quota and subquota, including the
potential elimination or phasing out of
the Purse Seine category, and other
regulatory provisions regarding directed
fisheries and incidental pelagic longline
fisheries. The scoping process and
environmental impact analysis would
determine whether existing
management measures are the best
means of achieving current management
objectives and providing flexibility to
adapt to variability in the future,
consistent with the 2006 Consolidated
HMS FMP, the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), the
Atlantic Tunas Convention Act (ATCA),
and other relevant Federal laws. NMFS
will use the scoping process and the
draft environmental impact analysis to
consider development of Amendment
13 to the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP,
if warranted.
NMFS is requesting comments on this
NOI and the management options
described in the Issues and Options
Paper, and other potential regulatory
provisions regarding the bluefin
directed fisheries and incidental pelagic
longline fishery that would meet the
purpose and need for this action. NMFS
will hold public scoping meetings and
a webinar to gather comment on these
measures and potential management
options. The time and location details of
the scoping meetings and webinar will
be announced in a separate Federal
Register notice. NMFS will also present
E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM
21MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 21, 2019 / Notices
the Issues and Options Paper at the
HMS Advisory Panel Meeting on May
22, 2019 (https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/event/may2019-hms-advisory-panel-meeting).
Written comments on this NOI
and the scoping document must be
received on or before July 31, 2019.
DATES:
The presentation at the
HMS Advisory Panel will be held at the
Sheraton Silver Spring Hotel, 8777
Georgia Avenue, Silver Spring, MD
20910. You may submit comments,
identified by ‘‘NOAA–NMFS–2019–
0042,’’ by either of the following
methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for: NOAA–NMFS–2019–0042, click the
‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon, complete the
required fields, and enter or attach your
comments.
• Mail: Tom Warren, Highly
Migratory Species Management
Division, NOAA Greater Atlantic
Regional Fisheries Office, 55 Great
Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, or to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered. All comments received are
a part of the public record and will
generally be posted to https://
www.regulations.gov without change.
All Personal Identifying Information
(e.g., name, address), confidential
business information, or otherwise
sensitive information submitted
voluntarily by the sender will be
publicly accessible. NMFS will accept
anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/A’’ in
the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous).
The Issues and Options Paper is
available by sending your request to
Tom Warren at the mailing address
specified above, or by calling the phone
numbers indicated below. The Issues
and Options Paper, the Three-Year
Review, the 2006 Consolidated HMS
FMP, and FMP amendments may also
be downloaded from the HMS website
at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/
action/amendment-13-2006consolidated-hms-fishery-managementplan-bluefin-management-measures.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
ADDRESSES:
Tom
Warren at 978–281–9347, or Carrie
Soltanoff at 301–427–8587, or online at
https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/topic/
atlantic-highly-migratory-species.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:50 May 20, 2019
Jkt 247001
Background
Regulations implemented under the
authority of ATCA (16 U.S.C. 971 et
seq.) and the Magnuson-Stevens Act (16
U.S.C. 1801 et seq.) governing the
harvest of Atlantic HMS, including
bluefin, by persons and vessels subject
to U.S. jurisdiction are found at 50 CFR
part 635. The 1999 Fishery Management
Plan for Atlantic Tunas, Swordfish, and
Sharks (1999 FMP) allocated the annual
U.S. bluefin quota recommended by the
International Commission for the
Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT)
to bluefin quota categories based on
landings from 1983–1991. Landings
were the only portion of catch (i.e.,
‘‘catch’’ includes both landings and
dead discards) that were factored into
the 1999 FMP percentage allocation
analysis for the various bluefin fisheries
at that time, as dead discards were
accounted for under a separate ICCAT
allocation. In 2006, NMFS finalized the
2006 Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP,
to simplify management and better
coordinate domestic conservation and
management of Atlantic HMS. This
consolidated HMS FMP carried forward
many of the objectives and measures
from the 1999 FMP (e.g., reduce dead
discard and post-release mortality of
Atlantic HMS in directed and nondirected fisheries; reduce bycatch and
bycatch mortality). The bluefin quota
category percentage allocations
continued unchanged in the 2006
Consolidated HMS FMP.
Amendment 7 to the 2006
Consolidated HMS FMP (Amendment 7;
79 FR 71510, December 2, 2014)
implemented several measures for the
pelagic longline fishery including, but
not limited to, gear restricted areas, the
IBQ catch share program, and catch
reporting of each pelagic longline set
using vessel monitoring systems.
Amendment 7 also implemented an
annual adjustment of the Purse Seine
category quota, using a formula based
on the catch by purse seine fishery
participants in the previous year. This
allows NMFS to adjust the Purse Seine
category quota either upwards or
downwards based on recent fishing
activity. Amendment 7 provided the
opportunity for Purse Seine category
participants to lease quota to (or from)
pelagic longline vessels to ensure that
the IBQ leasing market met the needs of
the pelagic longline fishery to account
for bluefin catch, and provided
additional flexibility for the Purse Seine
category participants.
The most recent stock assessment for
western Atlantic bluefin was conducted
in 2017 by the Standing Committee on
Research and Statistics (SCRS), the
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
23021
scientific body of ICCAT. At its
November 2017 meeting, after
considering the SCRS advice, ICCAT
adopted a recommendation for an
interim conservation and management
plan for western Atlantic bluefin tuna
for 2018 through 2020 (ICCAT
Recommendation 17–06). Following the
2017 stock assessment, and after
applying domestic stock status
determination criteria, NMFS concluded
that the overfished status of the bluefin
stock was unknown, and that the stock
was not subject to overfishing. NMFS
stated that changing from ‘‘overfished’’
to ‘‘unknown’’ status was appropriate,
given the continued inability to resolve
the two widely divergent stock
recruitment scenarios approach taken
under past SCRS stock assessments, and
the SCRS’ use of a different approach
based on the fishing mortality rate in the
2017 assessment.
In Amendment 7, NMFS proposed
and finalized a plan to formally evaluate
the success and performance of the IBQ
Program after three years of operation
and to provide the HMS Advisory Panel
with a publicly-available written
document with its findings. The Draft
Three-Year Review contains preliminary
conclusions of the program’s
effectiveness in meeting the goals and
objectives specified in Amendment 7, as
well as evaluates the various
components of this catch share program.
The Three-Year Review was released on
May 10, 2019, and included analyses of
the IBQ Program since its inception.
Amendment 7 anticipated that NMFS
would consider regulatory changes to
the IBQ Program after its formal review.
The Draft Three-Year Review provides a
large amount of data and is relevant for
consideration of such changes.
The Draft Three-Year Review made a
preliminary conclusion that the IBQ
Program fully achieved many
Amendment 7 objectives such as
reducing bluefin dead discards,
providing incentives to avoid bluefin,
implementing individual accountability
for bluefin catch, providing flexibility to
obtain quota from other vessels, and
minimizing constraints on fishing for
target species. However, the review
found that the IBQ Program only
partially achieved the objective of
maintaining profitability. The ThreeYear Review also made the following
preliminary recommendations regarding
the IBQ Program components (not to be
confused with the objectives). Regarding
share distributions and IBQ individual
accountability rules, the Three-Year
Review recommended considering a
different method of share or quota
distribution among participants. The
current share distribution method
E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM
21MYN1
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
23022
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 21, 2019 / Notices
reflects historical catch and participants
in the fishery, but may not reflect
current fishery participation, nor align
with the need for quota. Regarding
Accumulation Caps, the Draft ThreeYear Review stated: ‘‘A more
conservative cap on the amount of IBQ
used or owned should be considered to
reduce the risk of entities controlling a
large percentage of IBQ.’’ The Issues and
Options Paper for Amendment 13
includes options to address these issues.
Similar to the pelagic longline fishery,
the directed bluefin fisheries have
evolved over time, and the Issues and
Options Paper includes several issues
related to the directed bluefin fisheries.
Since 1982, the Purse Seine category has
been limited to participants who
historically were financially dependent
on the fishery. Although new entrants
are prohibited, an owner of a vessel
with an Atlantic Tunas permit in the
Purse Seine category may transfer the
permit to another purse seine vessel that
he or she owns. In the purse seine
fishery, since 2015, there have been no
landings of bluefin by purse seine
vessels. Only one purse seine vessel
operated, made only a small number of
sets over a couple of years, and
accounted for only a small percentage of
commercial bluefin landings between
2005 and 2015 (one, twelve, two, less
than one, eight, six, and five percent of
commercial bluefin landings in 2006,
2007, 2009, 2012, 2013, 2014, and 2015,
respectively). While the purse seine
fishery has been mostly inactive over
the past decade-plus, handgear fisheries
have remained very active, landing large
amounts of bluefin in recent years, and
have renewed interest in the optimal
and fair allocation of bluefin quota
among seasons and geographic areas.
HMS Advisory Panel members and
the public have suggested sun-setting or
phasing out the purse seine fishery to
optimize the utilization of bluefin quota
and increase certainty in the bluefin
fishery. Many permitted commercial
and recreational vessels that may target
bluefin, as well as the pelagic longline
vessels that may not target bluefin, but
that rely on bluefin quota to facilitate
directed fishing operations for target
species, would benefit from additional
bluefin quota and increased certainty
regarding quota availability. Prior to
Amendment 7, the Purse Seine category
was allocated 18.5 percent (over 150 mt)
of the U.S. bluefin quota. Since 2015,
when Amendment 7 implemented an
annual redistribution of Purse Seine
category quota (to the Reserve category)
based on the previous year’s catch by
the purse seine fishery, the Purse Seine
category quota has been adjusted
downward. Amendment 7 also
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:50 May 20, 2019
Jkt 247001
implemented the ability of the purse
seine fishery participants to lease IBQ to
or from the pelagic longline fishery. In
2018 and 2019, the Purse Seine category
quota was adjusted downward from its
baseline amount of 219.5 to 55 mt
(representing four percent of the bluefin
quota), and limited amounts of bluefin
quota were leased to pelagic longline
vessels within the IBQ Program.
Although limited in scope, IBQ leases
from Purse Seine participants to pelagic
longline vessel owners were a
meaningful initial component of the IBQ
Program, contributing to a successful
leasing market. Redistribution of Purse
Seine category quota may provide more
quota to active bluefin fisheries, which
may address desire for more flexibility
and concerns about premature fishery
closures, as well as provide additional
quota for allocation to the pelagic
longline fishery.
The Amendment 13 Issues and
Options Paper will be used in 2019 for
scoping, a public process during which
NMFS will consider a range of issues
and objectives, as well as possible
options, for bluefin management. The
options being presented in the Issues
and Options Paper consider the
preliminary results of the Draft ThreeYear Review and respond to recent
changes in the bluefin fishery and input
from the public and HMS Advisory
Panel. The options include refining the
IBQ program, reassessing allocation of
bluefin tuna quotas (including the
potential elimination or phasing out of
the Purse Seine category) and other
regulatory provisions regarding bluefin
directed fisheries and bycatch in the
pelagic longline fishery, to determine if
existing measures are the best means of
achieving current management
objectives for bluefin management.
During scoping, public feedback will be
accepted via written comments or at
scoping meetings as described in
separate Federal Register notices.
NMFS has several ongoing actions
affecting HMS management that are, or
soon will be, available for public
comment. While each of these actions
are separate, they are interrelated in
some ways, and the comment periods
may overlap. Depending on the
outcomes, each action could have
impacts on the other actions. As noted
above, NMFS recently released the Draft
Three-Year Review, which is expected
to be finalized in September 2019 after
consideration by the HMS Advisory
Panel. The following details about these
ongoing actions are provided for the
regulated community’s information and
background.
NMFS is currently in the process of
developing a Proposed Rule Modifying
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Pelagic Longline Bluefin Tuna AreaBased and Weak Hook Management
Measures. To analyze the potential
environmental effects of a range of
alternatives, NMFS recently released a
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
(DEIS). The DEIS evaluates whether
current area-based and gear
management measures remain necessary
to reduce and/or maintain low numbers
of bluefin tuna discards and interactions
in the pelagic longline fishery, given
more recent management measures,
including the IBQ Program. The DEIS
prefers alternatives that undertake a
process to evaluate the need for the
Northeastern United States Closed Area
and the Gulf of Mexico Gear Restricted
Area; removes the Cape Hatteras Gear
Restricted Area; and adjusts the Gulf of
Mexico weak hook effective period from
year-round to seasonal (January–June).
The comment period for the DEIS and
for an anticipated Proposed Rule will be
open through July 31, 2019. After
consideration of public comment,
NMFS expect to finalize the rule in the
late fall of 2019. The proposed rule
related to this DEIS is expected to be
released shortly.
Recently, NMFS also released an
Issues and Options Paper considering
approaches to collect data and perform
research in areas that are currently
closed to certain gears or fishing
activities for Atlantic HMS. Such
research will help evaluate and support
spatial fisheries management for
Atlantic HMS. ‘‘Spatial management’’
refers to a suite of fisheries conservation
and management measures that are
based on geographic area. When some
spatial management tools, such as
closed areas, are deployed, the
collection of fishery-dependent data is
reduced or eliminated. This loss of data
can compromise effective fisheries
management. The Issues and Options
Paper considers approaches to collect
data and perform research in areas that
may otherwise restrict commercial or
recreational fishing, making the
collection of fisheries-dependent data
challenging or not possible. During
scoping, public feedback will be
accepted via written comments or at
scoping meetings as described in
separate Federal Register notices.
Finally, NMFS has also recently
published an Issues and Options Paper
for Amendment 14 that reviews annual
catch limits and other target reference
points for sharks. This action could
result in a different process for
establishing the annual catch limits for
sharks, and therefore could affect all
fishermen, commercial and recreational,
that target or incidentally catch sharks.
During scoping, public feedback will be
E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM
21MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 21, 2019 / Notices
Dated: May 16, 2019.
Kelly L. Denit,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
accepted via written comments or
scoping meetings as described a
separate Federal Register notice.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
Scoping Process
[FR Doc. 2019–10565 Filed 5–20–19; 8:45 am]
NMFS encourages all persons affected
or otherwise interested in bluefin
management measures to participate in
the process to determine the scope and
significance of issues to be analyzed in
the draft environmental impact analysis
and regulatory action for Amendment
13. All such persons are encouraged to
submit written comments (see
ADDRESSES), and are welcome to address
the specific measures in the Issues and
Options Paper. Comments may also be
submitted at one of the scoping
meetings or the public webinar to be
identified in a future Federal Register
notice.
NMFS intends to hold scoping
meetings in the geographic areas that
may be affected by these measures,
including locations on the Atlantic and
Gulf of Mexico coasts, and will consult
with the regional fishery management
councils in the Atlantic and Gulf of
Mexico. NMFS expects to present the
scoping document at the May 21–23,
2019 HMS Advisory Panel meeting (see
ADDRESSES).
After scoping has been completed and
public comment gathered and analyzed,
NMFS will determine if it is necessary
to proceed with preparation of a draft
environmental impact analysis and
proposed rule for Amendment 13,
which would include additional
opportunities for public comment. The
scope of the draft environmental impact
analysis would consist of the range of
actions, alternatives, and impacts to be
considered. Alternatives may include,
but are not limited to, the following: Not
amending the current regulations (i.e.,
taking no action); developing a
regulatory action that contains
management measures such as those
described in the Issues and Options
Paper; or other reasonable courses of
action. This scoping process also will
identify, and eliminate from further
detailed analysis, issues that may not
meet the purpose and need of the
action.
The process of developing a
regulatory action is expected to take
approximately two years.
Until the draft environmental impact
analysis and proposed rule are finalized
or until other regulations are put into
place, the current regulations remain in
effect.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq.; 16 U.S.C.
1801 et seq.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:50 May 20, 2019
Jkt 247001
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XH036
Pacific Fishery Management Council;
Public Meeting
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of a public meeting
webinar.
AGENCY:
The Pacific Fishery
Management Council’s (Pacific
Council’s) Scientific and Statistical
Committee’s (SSC’s) Economics
Subcommittee will hold a webinar to
review new economic analyses in three
draft coho rebuilding plans. The SSC
Economics Subcommittee webinar is
open to the public. Public comments
during the webinar will be received
from attendees at the discretion of the
SSC Economics Subcommittee chair.
DATES: The SSC Economics
Subcommittee webinar will commence
at 1 p.m. PDT, Tuesday, June 4, 2019
and continue until 4 p.m. or as
necessary to complete business for the
day.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held
via webinar. A public listening station
is available at the Pacific Council office
(address below). To attend the webinar
(1) join the meeting by visiting this link
https://www.gotomeeting.com/online/
webinar/join-webinar, (2) enter the
Webinar ID: 800–770–499, and (3) enter
your name and email address (required).
After logging in to the webinar, please
(1) dial this TOLL number 1–562–247–
8321, (2) enter the attendee phone audio
access code 176–615–134 when
prompted, and (3) enter your unique
audio phone pin (shown after joining
the webinar). Note: We have disabled
Mic/Speakers as an option and require
all participants to use a telephone or
cell phone to participate.
SUMMARY:
Technical Information and System
Requirements
PC-based attendees are required to use
Windows® 7, Vista, or XP; Mac®-based
attendees are required to use Mac OS®
X 10.5 or newer; Mobile attendees are
required to use iPhone®, iPad®,
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
23023
AndroidTM phone or Android tablet (See
the https://www.gotomeeting.com/
webinar/ipad-iphone-android-webinarapps). You may send an email to Mr.
Kris Kleinschmidt at
Kris.Kleinschmidt@noaa.gov or contact
him at (503) 820–2280, extension 411
for technical assistance.
Council address: Pacific Fishery
Management Council, 7700 NE
Ambassador Place, Suite 101, Portland,
OR 97220.
Mr.
John DeVore or Ms. Robin Ehlke, Pacific
Council; telephone: (503) 820–2280.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The
primary objective of the SSC Economics
Subcommittee webinar is to review new
analyses of economic impacts associated
with alternatives in three draft
rebuilding plans for Queets River,
Snohomish River, and Strait of Juan de
Fuca Coho. Other items on the Pacific
Council’s June 2019 agenda may be
discussed, but no management actions
will be decided in this webinar. The
SSC Economics Subcommittee
members’ role will be development of
recommendations and a report for
consideration by the SSC and Pacific
Council at the June 2019 meeting in San
Diego, CA.
Although non-emergency issues not
contained in the meeting agenda may be
discussed, those issues may not be the
subject of formal action during this
meeting. Action will be restricted to
those issues specifically listed in this
document and any issues arising after
publication of this document that
require emergency action under section
305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act,
provided the public has been notified of
the intent to take final action to address
the emergency.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Special Accommodations
This meeting is physically accessible
to people with disabilities. Requests for
sign language interpretation or other
auxiliary aids should be directed to Mr.
Kris Kleinschmidt, (503) 820–2411, at
least 10 business days prior to the
meeting date.
Dated: May 16, 2019.
Rey Israel Marquez,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2019–10557 Filed 5–20–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM
21MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 98 (Tuesday, May 21, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23020-23023]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-10565]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-BI08
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species; Amendment 13 to the 2006
Consolidated Atlantic Highly Migratory Species Fishery Management Plan
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of intent (NOI) to prepare an environmental impact
analysis; notice of availability of issues and options paper; request
for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS announces its intent to prepare an environmental impact
analysis under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and the
availability of the Issues and Options Paper for Amendment 13 to the
2006 Consolidated Highly Migratory Species (HMS) Fishery Management
Plan (FMP) (Issues and Options Paper). This notice announces the start
of a public process for determining the scope of significant issues
related to the management of Atlantic bluefin tuna (bluefin), and
addressing issues identified by considering modification of bluefin
regulations. The catalysts for beginning this regulatory process are
the release of the Draft Three-Year Review of the IBQ Program (Three-
Year Review), recent changes in the bluefin fishery, and advice and
input from the HMS Advisory Panel and the public.
The environmental impact analysis will include an assessment of the
potential effects of alternative measures for management of bluefin
under the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic Highly Migratory Species Fishery
Management Plan (2006 Consolidated HMS FMP). The subjects in the Issues
and Options Paper include refining the Individual Bluefin Quota (IBQ)
Program, reassessing allocation of the bluefin quota and subquota,
including the potential elimination or phasing out of the Purse Seine
category, and other regulatory provisions regarding directed fisheries
and incidental pelagic longline fisheries. The scoping process and
environmental impact analysis would determine whether existing
management measures are the best means of achieving current management
objectives and providing flexibility to adapt to variability in the
future, consistent with the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP, the Magnuson-
Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act),
the Atlantic Tunas Convention Act (ATCA), and other relevant Federal
laws. NMFS will use the scoping process and the draft environmental
impact analysis to consider development of Amendment 13 to the 2006
Consolidated HMS FMP, if warranted.
NMFS is requesting comments on this NOI and the management options
described in the Issues and Options Paper, and other potential
regulatory provisions regarding the bluefin directed fisheries and
incidental pelagic longline fishery that would meet the purpose and
need for this action. NMFS will hold public scoping meetings and a
webinar to gather comment on these measures and potential management
options. The time and location details of the scoping meetings and
webinar will be announced in a separate Federal Register notice. NMFS
will also present
[[Page 23021]]
the Issues and Options Paper at the HMS Advisory Panel Meeting on May
22, 2019 (https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/event/may-2019-hms-advisory-panel-meeting).
DATES: Written comments on this NOI and the scoping document must be
received on or before July 31, 2019.
ADDRESSES: The presentation at the HMS Advisory Panel will be held at
the Sheraton Silver Spring Hotel, 8777 Georgia Avenue, Silver Spring,
MD 20910. You may submit comments, identified by ``NOAA-NMFS-2019-
0042,'' by either of the following methods:
Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for: NOAA-NMFS-2019-0042, click the
``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter or
attach your comments.
Mail: Tom Warren, Highly Migratory Species Management
Division, NOAA Greater Atlantic Regional Fisheries Office, 55 Great
Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930.
Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, or to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered. All comments received are a part of the public
record and will generally be posted to https://www.regulations.gov
without change. All Personal Identifying Information (e.g., name,
address), confidential business information, or otherwise sensitive
information submitted voluntarily by the sender will be publicly
accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter ``N/A'' in the
required fields if you wish to remain anonymous).
The Issues and Options Paper is available by sending your request
to Tom Warren at the mailing address specified above, or by calling the
phone numbers indicated below. The Issues and Options Paper, the Three-
Year Review, the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP, and FMP amendments may also
be downloaded from the HMS website at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/action/amendment-13-2006-consolidated-hms-fishery-management-plan-bluefin-management-measures.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Warren at 978-281-9347, or Carrie
Soltanoff at 301-427-8587, or online at https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/topic/atlantic-highly-migratory-species.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Regulations implemented under the authority of ATCA (16 U.S.C. 971
et seq.) and the Magnuson-Stevens Act (16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.)
governing the harvest of Atlantic HMS, including bluefin, by persons
and vessels subject to U.S. jurisdiction are found at 50 CFR part 635.
The 1999 Fishery Management Plan for Atlantic Tunas, Swordfish, and
Sharks (1999 FMP) allocated the annual U.S. bluefin quota recommended
by the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas
(ICCAT) to bluefin quota categories based on landings from 1983-1991.
Landings were the only portion of catch (i.e., ``catch'' includes both
landings and dead discards) that were factored into the 1999 FMP
percentage allocation analysis for the various bluefin fisheries at
that time, as dead discards were accounted for under a separate ICCAT
allocation. In 2006, NMFS finalized the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic HMS
FMP, to simplify management and better coordinate domestic conservation
and management of Atlantic HMS. This consolidated HMS FMP carried
forward many of the objectives and measures from the 1999 FMP (e.g.,
reduce dead discard and post-release mortality of Atlantic HMS in
directed and non-directed fisheries; reduce bycatch and bycatch
mortality). The bluefin quota category percentage allocations continued
unchanged in the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP.
Amendment 7 to the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP (Amendment 7; 79 FR
71510, December 2, 2014) implemented several measures for the pelagic
longline fishery including, but not limited to, gear restricted areas,
the IBQ catch share program, and catch reporting of each pelagic
longline set using vessel monitoring systems. Amendment 7 also
implemented an annual adjustment of the Purse Seine category quota,
using a formula based on the catch by purse seine fishery participants
in the previous year. This allows NMFS to adjust the Purse Seine
category quota either upwards or downwards based on recent fishing
activity. Amendment 7 provided the opportunity for Purse Seine category
participants to lease quota to (or from) pelagic longline vessels to
ensure that the IBQ leasing market met the needs of the pelagic
longline fishery to account for bluefin catch, and provided additional
flexibility for the Purse Seine category participants.
The most recent stock assessment for western Atlantic bluefin was
conducted in 2017 by the Standing Committee on Research and Statistics
(SCRS), the scientific body of ICCAT. At its November 2017 meeting,
after considering the SCRS advice, ICCAT adopted a recommendation for
an interim conservation and management plan for western Atlantic
bluefin tuna for 2018 through 2020 (ICCAT Recommendation 17-06).
Following the 2017 stock assessment, and after applying domestic stock
status determination criteria, NMFS concluded that the overfished
status of the bluefin stock was unknown, and that the stock was not
subject to overfishing. NMFS stated that changing from ``overfished''
to ``unknown'' status was appropriate, given the continued inability to
resolve the two widely divergent stock recruitment scenarios approach
taken under past SCRS stock assessments, and the SCRS' use of a
different approach based on the fishing mortality rate in the 2017
assessment.
In Amendment 7, NMFS proposed and finalized a plan to formally
evaluate the success and performance of the IBQ Program after three
years of operation and to provide the HMS Advisory Panel with a
publicly-available written document with its findings. The Draft Three-
Year Review contains preliminary conclusions of the program's
effectiveness in meeting the goals and objectives specified in
Amendment 7, as well as evaluates the various components of this catch
share program. The Three-Year Review was released on May 10, 2019, and
included analyses of the IBQ Program since its inception. Amendment 7
anticipated that NMFS would consider regulatory changes to the IBQ
Program after its formal review. The Draft Three-Year Review provides a
large amount of data and is relevant for consideration of such changes.
The Draft Three-Year Review made a preliminary conclusion that the
IBQ Program fully achieved many Amendment 7 objectives such as reducing
bluefin dead discards, providing incentives to avoid bluefin,
implementing individual accountability for bluefin catch, providing
flexibility to obtain quota from other vessels, and minimizing
constraints on fishing for target species. However, the review found
that the IBQ Program only partially achieved the objective of
maintaining profitability. The Three-Year Review also made the
following preliminary recommendations regarding the IBQ Program
components (not to be confused with the objectives). Regarding share
distributions and IBQ individual accountability rules, the Three-Year
Review recommended considering a different method of share or quota
distribution among participants. The current share distribution method
[[Page 23022]]
reflects historical catch and participants in the fishery, but may not
reflect current fishery participation, nor align with the need for
quota. Regarding Accumulation Caps, the Draft Three-Year Review stated:
``A more conservative cap on the amount of IBQ used or owned should be
considered to reduce the risk of entities controlling a large
percentage of IBQ.'' The Issues and Options Paper for Amendment 13
includes options to address these issues.
Similar to the pelagic longline fishery, the directed bluefin
fisheries have evolved over time, and the Issues and Options Paper
includes several issues related to the directed bluefin fisheries.
Since 1982, the Purse Seine category has been limited to participants
who historically were financially dependent on the fishery. Although
new entrants are prohibited, an owner of a vessel with an Atlantic
Tunas permit in the Purse Seine category may transfer the permit to
another purse seine vessel that he or she owns. In the purse seine
fishery, since 2015, there have been no landings of bluefin by purse
seine vessels. Only one purse seine vessel operated, made only a small
number of sets over a couple of years, and accounted for only a small
percentage of commercial bluefin landings between 2005 and 2015 (one,
twelve, two, less than one, eight, six, and five percent of commercial
bluefin landings in 2006, 2007, 2009, 2012, 2013, 2014, and 2015,
respectively). While the purse seine fishery has been mostly inactive
over the past decade-plus, handgear fisheries have remained very
active, landing large amounts of bluefin in recent years, and have
renewed interest in the optimal and fair allocation of bluefin quota
among seasons and geographic areas.
HMS Advisory Panel members and the public have suggested sun-
setting or phasing out the purse seine fishery to optimize the
utilization of bluefin quota and increase certainty in the bluefin
fishery. Many permitted commercial and recreational vessels that may
target bluefin, as well as the pelagic longline vessels that may not
target bluefin, but that rely on bluefin quota to facilitate directed
fishing operations for target species, would benefit from additional
bluefin quota and increased certainty regarding quota availability.
Prior to Amendment 7, the Purse Seine category was allocated 18.5
percent (over 150 mt) of the U.S. bluefin quota. Since 2015, when
Amendment 7 implemented an annual redistribution of Purse Seine
category quota (to the Reserve category) based on the previous year's
catch by the purse seine fishery, the Purse Seine category quota has
been adjusted downward. Amendment 7 also implemented the ability of the
purse seine fishery participants to lease IBQ to or from the pelagic
longline fishery. In 2018 and 2019, the Purse Seine category quota was
adjusted downward from its baseline amount of 219.5 to 55 mt
(representing four percent of the bluefin quota), and limited amounts
of bluefin quota were leased to pelagic longline vessels within the IBQ
Program. Although limited in scope, IBQ leases from Purse Seine
participants to pelagic longline vessel owners were a meaningful
initial component of the IBQ Program, contributing to a successful
leasing market. Redistribution of Purse Seine category quota may
provide more quota to active bluefin fisheries, which may address
desire for more flexibility and concerns about premature fishery
closures, as well as provide additional quota for allocation to the
pelagic longline fishery.
The Amendment 13 Issues and Options Paper will be used in 2019 for
scoping, a public process during which NMFS will consider a range of
issues and objectives, as well as possible options, for bluefin
management. The options being presented in the Issues and Options Paper
consider the preliminary results of the Draft Three-Year Review and
respond to recent changes in the bluefin fishery and input from the
public and HMS Advisory Panel. The options include refining the IBQ
program, reassessing allocation of bluefin tuna quotas (including the
potential elimination or phasing out of the Purse Seine category) and
other regulatory provisions regarding bluefin directed fisheries and
bycatch in the pelagic longline fishery, to determine if existing
measures are the best means of achieving current management objectives
for bluefin management. During scoping, public feedback will be
accepted via written comments or at scoping meetings as described in
separate Federal Register notices.
NMFS has several ongoing actions affecting HMS management that are,
or soon will be, available for public comment. While each of these
actions are separate, they are interrelated in some ways, and the
comment periods may overlap. Depending on the outcomes, each action
could have impacts on the other actions. As noted above, NMFS recently
released the Draft Three-Year Review, which is expected to be finalized
in September 2019 after consideration by the HMS Advisory Panel. The
following details about these ongoing actions are provided for the
regulated community's information and background.
NMFS is currently in the process of developing a Proposed Rule
Modifying Pelagic Longline Bluefin Tuna Area-Based and Weak Hook
Management Measures. To analyze the potential environmental effects of
a range of alternatives, NMFS recently released a Draft Environmental
Impact Statement (DEIS). The DEIS evaluates whether current area-based
and gear management measures remain necessary to reduce and/or maintain
low numbers of bluefin tuna discards and interactions in the pelagic
longline fishery, given more recent management measures, including the
IBQ Program. The DEIS prefers alternatives that undertake a process to
evaluate the need for the Northeastern United States Closed Area and
the Gulf of Mexico Gear Restricted Area; removes the Cape Hatteras Gear
Restricted Area; and adjusts the Gulf of Mexico weak hook effective
period from year-round to seasonal (January-June). The comment period
for the DEIS and for an anticipated Proposed Rule will be open through
July 31, 2019. After consideration of public comment, NMFS expect to
finalize the rule in the late fall of 2019. The proposed rule related
to this DEIS is expected to be released shortly.
Recently, NMFS also released an Issues and Options Paper
considering approaches to collect data and perform research in areas
that are currently closed to certain gears or fishing activities for
Atlantic HMS. Such research will help evaluate and support spatial
fisheries management for Atlantic HMS. ``Spatial management'' refers to
a suite of fisheries conservation and management measures that are
based on geographic area. When some spatial management tools, such as
closed areas, are deployed, the collection of fishery-dependent data is
reduced or eliminated. This loss of data can compromise effective
fisheries management. The Issues and Options Paper considers approaches
to collect data and perform research in areas that may otherwise
restrict commercial or recreational fishing, making the collection of
fisheries-dependent data challenging or not possible. During scoping,
public feedback will be accepted via written comments or at scoping
meetings as described in separate Federal Register notices.
Finally, NMFS has also recently published an Issues and Options
Paper for Amendment 14 that reviews annual catch limits and other
target reference points for sharks. This action could result in a
different process for establishing the annual catch limits for sharks,
and therefore could affect all fishermen, commercial and recreational,
that target or incidentally catch sharks. During scoping, public
feedback will be
[[Page 23023]]
accepted via written comments or scoping meetings as described a
separate Federal Register notice.
Scoping Process
NMFS encourages all persons affected or otherwise interested in
bluefin management measures to participate in the process to determine
the scope and significance of issues to be analyzed in the draft
environmental impact analysis and regulatory action for Amendment 13.
All such persons are encouraged to submit written comments (see
ADDRESSES), and are welcome to address the specific measures in the
Issues and Options Paper. Comments may also be submitted at one of the
scoping meetings or the public webinar to be identified in a future
Federal Register notice.
NMFS intends to hold scoping meetings in the geographic areas that
may be affected by these measures, including locations on the Atlantic
and Gulf of Mexico coasts, and will consult with the regional fishery
management councils in the Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico. NMFS expects to
present the scoping document at the May 21-23, 2019 HMS Advisory Panel
meeting (see ADDRESSES).
After scoping has been completed and public comment gathered and
analyzed, NMFS will determine if it is necessary to proceed with
preparation of a draft environmental impact analysis and proposed rule
for Amendment 13, which would include additional opportunities for
public comment. The scope of the draft environmental impact analysis
would consist of the range of actions, alternatives, and impacts to be
considered. Alternatives may include, but are not limited to, the
following: Not amending the current regulations (i.e., taking no
action); developing a regulatory action that contains management
measures such as those described in the Issues and Options Paper; or
other reasonable courses of action. This scoping process also will
identify, and eliminate from further detailed analysis, issues that may
not meet the purpose and need of the action.
The process of developing a regulatory action is expected to take
approximately two years.
Until the draft environmental impact analysis and proposed rule are
finalized or until other regulations are put into place, the current
regulations remain in effect.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq.; 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: May 16, 2019.
Kelly L. Denit,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-10565 Filed 5-20-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
