LaCrosse Solutions, LLC; La Crosse Boiling Water Reactor, Vernon County, Wisconsin, 23083-23085 [2019-10488]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 21, 2019 / Notices
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
Southern Nuclear Operating Company,
Inc., Docket Nos. 50–348 and 50–364,
Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant (Farley),
Units 1 and 2, Houston County,
Alabama, Southern Nuclear Operating
Company, Inc., Docket Nos. 50–321 and
50–366, Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant
(Hatch), Unit Nos. 1 and 2, City of
Dalton, Georgia
Southern Nuclear Operating Company,
Inc., Docket Nos. 50–424 and 50–425,
Vogtle Electric Generating Plant
(Vogtle), Units 1 and 2, Burke County,
Georgia
Date of amendment request: August 9,
2018, as supplemented by letter dated
January 31, 2019.
Brief description of amendments: The
amendments revised Technical
Specification (TS) 5.2.2.g to eliminate a
dedicated shift technical advisor (STA)
position at Farley, Units 1 and 2, and
Hatch, Units 1 and 2, by allowing the
STA functions to be combined with one
or more of the required senior licensed
operator positions. The Vogtle, Units 1
and 2, TS change aligns the facilities
with equivalent wording. This change
also incorporated wording related to the
modes of operation during which the
individual meeting the requirements in
TS 5.2.2.g is required and provided
guidance that the same individual may
provide advisory technical support for
both units.
Date of issuance: April 26, 2019.
Effective date: As of the date of
issuance and shall be implemented
within 90 days of issuance.
Amendment Nos.: Farley—222 (Unit
1) and 219 (Unit 2); Hatch—295 (Unit 1)
and 240 (Unit 2); and Vogtle—199 (Unit
1) and 182 (Unit 2). A publicly-available
version is in ADAMS under Accession
No. ML19064A774; documents related
to these amendments are listed in the
Safety Evaluation enclosed with the
amendments.
Facility Operating License Nos. NPF–
2, NPF–5, NPF–8, NPF–68, NPF–81, and
DPR–57: The amendments revised the
Facility Operating Licenses and TSs.
Date of initial notice in Federal
Register: October 23, 2018 (83 FR
53515). The supplemental letter dated
January 31, 2019, provided additional
information that clarified the
application, did not expand the scope of
the application as originally noticed,
and did not change the NRC staff’s
original proposed no significant hazards
consideration determination as
published in the Federal Register.
The Commission’s related evaluation
of the amendment is contained in a
Safety Evaluation dated April 26, 2019.
No significant hazards consideration
comments received: No.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:50 May 20, 2019
Jkt 247001
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 14th day
of May 2019.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Craig G. Erlanger,
Director, Division of Operating Reactor
Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2019–10315 Filed 5–20–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–409; NRC–2019–0120]
LaCrosse Solutions, LLC; La Crosse
Boiling Water Reactor, Vernon County,
Wisconsin
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Final environmental assessment
and finding of no significant impact;
issuance.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is considering an
amendment to Possession Only License
DPR–45 to add a license condition that
reflects the NRC’s approval of the
license termination plan (LTP) for the
La Crosse Boiling Water Reactor
(LACBWR) and provides criteria for
when prior NRC approval is needed to
make changes to the LTP. The NRC has
prepared a final environmental
assessment (EA) and finding of no
significant impact (FONSI) for this
licensing action.
DATES: The final EA referenced in this
document was available on May 6, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2019–0120 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may obtain publicly-available
information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2019–0120. Address
questions about Docket IDs in
Regulations.gov to Jennifer Borges;
telephone: 301–287–9127; email:
Jennifer.Borges@nrc.gov. For technical
questions, contact the individual listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For
problems with ADAMS, please contact
the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR)
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
23083
reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–
415–4737, or by email to pdr.resource@
nrc.gov. For the convenience of the
reader, instructions about obtaining
materials referenced in this document
are provided in the ‘‘Availability of
Documents’’ section.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marlayna Vaaler, Office of Nuclear
Material Safety and Safeguards,
telephone: 301–415–3178, email:
Marlayna.Vaaler@nrc.gov; U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
In June 2016, LaCrosseSolutions, LLC
(LS, the licensee) submitted a license
amendment request, which included the
LTP for LACBWR. The LTP was
updated by LS in December 2016, May
2018, and November 2018. The NRC is
considering amending Possession Only
License DPR–45 to add a license
condition that reflects the NRC’s
approval of the LTP and provides
criteria for when prior NRC approval is
needed to make changes to the LTP. As
required by of title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR) part 51,
‘‘Environmental Protection Regulations
for Domestic Licensing and Related
Regulatory Functions,’’ the NRC
prepared a final EA. Based on the
results of the final EA, as described in
the following sections, the NRC has
determined not to prepare an
environmental impact statement (EIS)
for the LACBWR LTP amendment, and
is issuing a FONSI.
II. Environmental Assessment
Description of the Proposed Action
The proposed action is NRC review
and approval of the LACBWR LTP. In its
license amendment request, LS
requested to add a license condition: (1)
Reflecting the NRC staff’s approval of
the LTP and (2) providing criteria for
when prior NRC approval is needed to
make changes to the LTP. If the NRC
approves the LTP, the approval will be
issued in the form of an amendment to
the LACBWR license to add the
requested license condition.
The LACBWR LTP provides the
details of the plan for characterizing,
identifying, and remediating the
remaining residual radioactivity at the
LACBWR site to a level that will allow
the site to be released for unrestricted
use. The LACBWR LTP also describes
E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM
21MYN1
23084
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 21, 2019 / Notices
how the licensee will confirm the extent
and success of remediation through
radiological surveys, provide financial
assurance to complete
decommissioning, and ensure the
environmental impacts of the
decommissioning activities are within
the scope originally envisioned in the
associated environmental documents.
The LTP outlines the remaining
decommissioning and dismantling
activities; decommissioning activities at
the LACBWR site are scheduled to be
complete in 2019, with license
termination occurring before the end of
2020.
Need for the Proposed Action
The purpose of and need for the
proposed action is to allow for
completion of decommissioning of the
LACBWR site by the licensee, the
termination of the LACBWR license by
the NRC, and the subsequent release of
the LACBWR site for unrestricted use.
The NRC will terminate the license if it
determines that the site meets the
performance-based criteria for
unrestricted site release, in accordance
with 10 CFR 20.1402, ‘‘Radiological
Criteria for Unrestricted Use,’’ and that
the facility has been dismantled in
accordance with the LTP.
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed
Action
The NRC assessed the environmental
impacts of the license termination
activities and remaining
decommissioning activities and
determined there would be no
significant impact to the quality of the
human environment.
During its review of the LACBWR
LTP, the NRC concluded the impacts for
most resource areas—land use, air
quality, ecology, socioeconomics,
historic and cultural resources,
aesthetics, noise, and transportation—
were still bounded by the previously
issued Decommissioning Generic
Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS).
Therefore, the NRC does not expect
impacts beyond those discussed in the
GEIS, which concluded that the impact
level for these issues was SMALL.
In the EA associated with the
LACBWR LTP, the NRC evaluated the
potential site-specific environmental
impacts of the remaining
decommissioning and license
termination activities on climate
change, water resources, environmental
justice, and waste management and did
not identify any significant impacts. For
protected species, the NRC determined
that the proposed action may affect but
not likely to adversely affect the Higgins
eye pearlymussel (Lampsilis higginsii),
the sheepnose mussel (Plethobasus
cyphyus), and the northern long-eared
bat (Myotis septentrionalis).
Environmental Impacts of the
Alternatives to the Proposed Action
As an alternative to the proposed
action, the NRC staff considered denial
of the proposed action (i.e., the ‘‘noaction’’ alternative). Under the no-action
alternative, the NRC would not approve
the LACBWR LTP or the license
amendment request because regulatory
requirements have not been met.
Consequently, the LACBWR license
would not be terminated,
decommissioning and other onsite
maintenance and operational activities
involving the storage of spent nuclear
fuel would continue, and the remainder
of the LACBWR site would not be
released for unrestricted use. If the NRC
was unable to approve the LACBWR
LTP because the regulatory
requirements were not met, then the
licensee would have to take the
necessary actions to ensure the
regulations are met.
Agencies and Persons Consulted
On December 19, 2018, the NRC staff
sent a copy of the draft EA associated
with the LACBWR LTP to the Wisconsin
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
Document and date
17:50 May 20, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
III. Finding of No Significant Impact
Based on its review of the proposed
action, and in accordance with the
requirements in 10 CFR part 51, the
NRC staff has determined that pursuant
to 10 CFR 51.31, ‘‘Determinations based
on environmental assessment,’’
preparation of an EIS is not required for
the proposed action and, pursuant to 10
CFR 51.32, ‘‘Finding of no significant
impact,’’ a FONSI is appropriate.
On the basis of the final EA, the NRC
concludes that the proposed action will
not have a significant effect on the
quality of the human environment.
Accordingly, the NRC has determined
not to prepare an EIS for the proposed
action.
IV. Availability of Documents
The documents identified in the
following table are available to
interested persons through one or more
of the following methods, as indicated.
ADAMS Accession Nos./weblink
License Amendment Request June 27, 2016 ..........................................
Supplemented LTP December 1, 2016 ....................................................
LTP Revision 1 May 31, 2018 ..................................................................
LTP Final Consolidated November 15, 2018 ...........................................
Final EA ....................................................................................................
NUREG–0586, Supplement 1 Decommissioning GEIS ...........................
Transmittal of Draft EA to WDHS December 19, 2018 ...........................
WDHS Comments on Draft EA January 29, 2019 ...................................
Transmittal of Draft EA to FWS December 19, 2018 ..............................
FWS Response January 30, 2019 ...........................................................
Transmittal of Draft EA to WSHS December 19, 2018 ...........................
WHS Response February 9, 2019 ...........................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Department of Health (WDHS) for
review and comment. The WDHS
responded on January 29, 2019, with no
comment.
The NRC consulted with the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service (FWS) on listed
protected species at the LACBWR site.
On December 20, 2018, the NRC
requested FWS review and concurrence
with the NRC’s determination that the
proposed action may affect, but is not
likely to adversely affect three federally
listed species. FWS concurred with the
NRC’s determination on January 30,
2019.
The NRC also made a determination
that no historic properties would be
affected, and on December 20, 2018,
requested the Wisconsin State Historical
Society’s concurrence on the finding.
The State Historical Society concurred
with the NRC’s finding on February 4,
2019.
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
ML16200A095.
ML16347A026.
ML18169A271 ML18169A235.
ML18331A023.
ML19031B926.
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr0586/.
ML18354B000.
ML19031B159.
ML18351A258.
ML19031B157.
ML18351A219.
ML19043A773.
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM
21MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 21, 2019 / Notices
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, on May 15,
2019.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Andrew J. Pretzello,
Deputy Director, Division of Fuel Cycle Safety,
Safeguards, and Environmental Review,
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and
Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2019–10488 Filed 5–20–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2019–0001]
Sunshine Act Meetings
Weeks of May 20, 27,
June 3, 10, 17, 24, 2019.
PLACE: Commissioners’ Conference
Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland.
STATUS: Public and Closed.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
TIME AND DATE:
Week of May 20, 2019
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of May 20, 2019.
Week of May 27, 2019—Tentative
Thursday, May 30, 2019
9:00 a.m.
Briefing on Nuclear Regulatory
Research Program (Public Meeting)
(Contact: Nicholas DiFrancesco:
301–415–1115).
This meeting will be webcast live at
the Web address—https://www.nrc.gov/.
Week of June 3, 2019—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of June 3, 2019.
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of June 10, 2019.
Week of June 17, 2019—Tentative
10:00 a.m.
Briefing on Human Capital and Equal
Employment Opportunity (Public
Meeting) (Contact: Jason Lising:
301–287–0569)
This meeting will be webcast live at
the Web address—https://www.nrc.gov/.
Thursday, June 20, 2019
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
For more information or to verify the
status of meetings, contact Denise
McGovern at 301–415–0681 or via email
at Denise.McGovern@nrc.gov. The
schedule for Commission meetings is
subject to change on short notice.
The NRC Commission Meeting
Schedule can be found on the internet
at: https://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/
public-meetings/schedule.html.
The NRC provides reasonable
accommodation to individuals with
disabilities where appropriate. If you
need a reasonable accommodation to
participate in these public meetings, or
need this meeting notice or the
transcript or other information from the
public meetings in another format (e.g.,
braille, large print), please notify
Kimberly Meyer-Chambers, NRC
Disability Program Manager, at 301–
287–0739, by videophone at 240–428–
3217, or by email at Kimberly.MeyerChambers@nrc.gov. Determinations on
requests for reasonable accommodation
will be made on a case-by-case basis.
Members of the public may request to
receive this information electronically.
If you would like to be added to the
distribution, please contact the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Office of the
Secretary, Washington, DC 20555 (301–
415–1969), or by email at
Wendy.Moore@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 17th day
of May, 2019.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Denise L. McGovern,
Policy Coordinator, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–10699 Filed 5–17–19; 4:15 pm]
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–461; NRC–2019–0123]
Tuesday, June 18, 2019
Exelon Generation Company, LLC;
Clinton Power Station, Unit No. 1
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Environmental assessment and
finding of no significant impact;
issuance.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is considering the
issuance of an amendment to Facility
Operating License No. NPF–62, issued
to Exelon Generation Company, LLC
(the licensee), for operation of the
Clinton Power Station, Unit No 1 (CPS),
located in DeWitt County, Illinois. The
SUMMARY:
10:00 a.m.
Briefing on Results of the Agency
Action Review Meeting (Public
Meeting) (Contact: Andrea Mayer:
301–415–1081)
This meeting will be webcast live at
the Web address—https://www.nrc.gov/.
17:50 May 20, 2019
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
Week of June 10, 2019—Tentative
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Week of June 24, 2019—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of June 24, 2019.
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
23085
proposed action would amend the
expiration of Facility Operating License
No. NPF–62 from September 29, 2026,
to April 17, 2027. From September 29,
1986, to April 17, 1987, CPS was limited
to 5 percent of rated power while
operators conducted low-power testing
before being issued a full-power
operating license on April 17, 1987. The
action to amend the expiration date of
the license from September 29, 2026, to
April 17, 2027, would result in the
license expiring 40 years from the date
of the issuance of the full-power
operating license, as is permitted by the
NRC’s regulations.
The environmental assessment
(EA) and finding of no significant
impact (FONSI) referenced in this
document is available on May 21, 2019.
DATES:
Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2019–0123 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may obtain publicly-available
information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2019–0123. Address
questions about NRC docket IDs to
Jennifer Borges; telephone: 301–287–
9127; email: Jennifer.Borges@nrc.gov.
For technical questions, contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For
problems with ADAMS, please contact
the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR)
reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–
415–4737, or by email to pdr.resource@
nrc.gov. The ADAMS accession number
for each document referenced (if it is
available in ADAMS) is provided the
first time that it is mentioned in this
document.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
ADDRESSES:
Joel
S. Wiebe, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001; telephone: 301–415–6606; email:
Joel.Wiebe@nrc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM
21MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 98 (Tuesday, May 21, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23083-23085]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-10488]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-409; NRC-2019-0120]
LaCrosse Solutions, LLC; La Crosse Boiling Water Reactor, Vernon
County, Wisconsin
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Final environmental assessment and finding of no significant
impact; issuance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering an
amendment to Possession Only License DPR-45 to add a license condition
that reflects the NRC's approval of the license termination plan (LTP)
for the La Crosse Boiling Water Reactor (LACBWR) and provides criteria
for when prior NRC approval is needed to make changes to the LTP. The
NRC has prepared a final environmental assessment (EA) and finding of
no significant impact (FONSI) for this licensing action.
DATES: The final EA referenced in this document was available on May 6,
2019.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2019-0120 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You
may obtain publicly-available information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2019-0120. Address
questions about Docket IDs in Regulations.gov to Jennifer Borges;
telephone: 301-287-9127; email: [email protected]. For technical
questions, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or
by email to [email protected]. For the convenience of the reader,
instructions about obtaining materials referenced in this document are
provided in the ``Availability of Documents'' section.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marlayna Vaaler, Office of Nuclear
Material Safety and Safeguards, telephone: 301-415-3178, email:
[email protected]; U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555-0001.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
In June 2016, LaCrosseSolutions, LLC (LS, the licensee) submitted a
license amendment request, which included the LTP for LACBWR. The LTP
was updated by LS in December 2016, May 2018, and November 2018. The
NRC is considering amending Possession Only License DPR-45 to add a
license condition that reflects the NRC's approval of the LTP and
provides criteria for when prior NRC approval is needed to make changes
to the LTP. As required by of title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) part 51, ``Environmental Protection Regulations
for Domestic Licensing and Related Regulatory Functions,'' the NRC
prepared a final EA. Based on the results of the final EA, as described
in the following sections, the NRC has determined not to prepare an
environmental impact statement (EIS) for the LACBWR LTP amendment, and
is issuing a FONSI.
II. Environmental Assessment
Description of the Proposed Action
The proposed action is NRC review and approval of the LACBWR LTP.
In its license amendment request, LS requested to add a license
condition: (1) Reflecting the NRC staff's approval of the LTP and (2)
providing criteria for when prior NRC approval is needed to make
changes to the LTP. If the NRC approves the LTP, the approval will be
issued in the form of an amendment to the LACBWR license to add the
requested license condition.
The LACBWR LTP provides the details of the plan for characterizing,
identifying, and remediating the remaining residual radioactivity at
the LACBWR site to a level that will allow the site to be released for
unrestricted use. The LACBWR LTP also describes
[[Page 23084]]
how the licensee will confirm the extent and success of remediation
through radiological surveys, provide financial assurance to complete
decommissioning, and ensure the environmental impacts of the
decommissioning activities are within the scope originally envisioned
in the associated environmental documents. The LTP outlines the
remaining decommissioning and dismantling activities; decommissioning
activities at the LACBWR site are scheduled to be complete in 2019,
with license termination occurring before the end of 2020.
Need for the Proposed Action
The purpose of and need for the proposed action is to allow for
completion of decommissioning of the LACBWR site by the licensee, the
termination of the LACBWR license by the NRC, and the subsequent
release of the LACBWR site for unrestricted use. The NRC will terminate
the license if it determines that the site meets the performance-based
criteria for unrestricted site release, in accordance with 10 CFR
20.1402, ``Radiological Criteria for Unrestricted Use,'' and that the
facility has been dismantled in accordance with the LTP.
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
The NRC assessed the environmental impacts of the license
termination activities and remaining decommissioning activities and
determined there would be no significant impact to the quality of the
human environment.
During its review of the LACBWR LTP, the NRC concluded the impacts
for most resource areas--land use, air quality, ecology,
socioeconomics, historic and cultural resources, aesthetics, noise, and
transportation--were still bounded by the previously issued
Decommissioning Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS).
Therefore, the NRC does not expect impacts beyond those discussed in
the GEIS, which concluded that the impact level for these issues was
SMALL.
In the EA associated with the LACBWR LTP, the NRC evaluated the
potential site-specific environmental impacts of the remaining
decommissioning and license termination activities on climate change,
water resources, environmental justice, and waste management and did
not identify any significant impacts. For protected species, the NRC
determined that the proposed action may affect but not likely to
adversely affect the Higgins eye pearlymussel (Lampsilis higginsii),
the sheepnose mussel (Plethobasus cyphyus), and the northern long-eared
bat (Myotis septentrionalis).
Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action
As an alternative to the proposed action, the NRC staff considered
denial of the proposed action (i.e., the ``no-action'' alternative).
Under the no-action alternative, the NRC would not approve the LACBWR
LTP or the license amendment request because regulatory requirements
have not been met. Consequently, the LACBWR license would not be
terminated, decommissioning and other onsite maintenance and
operational activities involving the storage of spent nuclear fuel
would continue, and the remainder of the LACBWR site would not be
released for unrestricted use. If the NRC was unable to approve the
LACBWR LTP because the regulatory requirements were not met, then the
licensee would have to take the necessary actions to ensure the
regulations are met.
Agencies and Persons Consulted
On December 19, 2018, the NRC staff sent a copy of the draft EA
associated with the LACBWR LTP to the Wisconsin Department of Health
(WDHS) for review and comment. The WDHS responded on January 29, 2019,
with no comment.
The NRC consulted with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) on
listed protected species at the LACBWR site. On December 20, 2018, the
NRC requested FWS review and concurrence with the NRC's determination
that the proposed action may affect, but is not likely to adversely
affect three federally listed species. FWS concurred with the NRC's
determination on January 30, 2019.
The NRC also made a determination that no historic properties would
be affected, and on December 20, 2018, requested the Wisconsin State
Historical Society's concurrence on the finding. The State Historical
Society concurred with the NRC's finding on February 4, 2019.
III. Finding of No Significant Impact
Based on its review of the proposed action, and in accordance with
the requirements in 10 CFR part 51, the NRC staff has determined that
pursuant to 10 CFR 51.31, ``Determinations based on environmental
assessment,'' preparation of an EIS is not required for the proposed
action and, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, ``Finding of no significant
impact,'' a FONSI is appropriate.
On the basis of the final EA, the NRC concludes that the proposed
action will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human
environment. Accordingly, the NRC has determined not to prepare an EIS
for the proposed action.
IV. Availability of Documents
The documents identified in the following table are available to
interested persons through one or more of the following methods, as
indicated.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Document and date ADAMS Accession Nos./weblink
------------------------------------------------------------------------
License Amendment Request June 27, 2016 ML16200A095.
Supplemented LTP December 1, 2016...... ML16347A026.
LTP Revision 1 May 31, 2018............ ML18169A271 ML18169A235.
LTP Final Consolidated November 15, ML18331A023.
2018.
Final EA............................... ML19031B926.
NUREG-0586, Supplement 1 https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
Decommissioning GEIS. doc-collections/nuregs/staff/
sr0586/.
Transmittal of Draft EA to WDHS ML18354B000.
December 19, 2018.
WDHS Comments on Draft EA January 29, ML19031B159.
2019.
Transmittal of Draft EA to FWS December ML18351A258.
19, 2018.
FWS Response January 30, 2019.......... ML19031B157.
Transmittal of Draft EA to WSHS ML18351A219.
December 19, 2018.
WHS Response February 9, 2019.......... ML19043A773.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 23085]]
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, on May 15, 2019.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Andrew J. Pretzello,
Deputy Director, Division of Fuel Cycle Safety, Safeguards, and
Environmental Review, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2019-10488 Filed 5-20-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P