Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; District of Columbia; Approval of the Redesignation Request for the Washington, DC-MD-VA 2008 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard Nonattainment Area, 22996-23005 [2019-10466]
Download as PDF
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
22996
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 21, 2019 / Proposed Rules
York. 6 NYCRR Part 243, ‘‘Transport
Rule NOX Ozone Season Trading
Program,’’ has been repealed and
replaced in its entirety with a new rule,
6 NYCRR Part 243, ‘‘CSAPR NOX Ozone
Season Group 2 Trading Program.’’ 6
NYCRR Part 244, ‘‘Transport Rule NOX
Annual Trading Program,’’ has been
repealed and replaced in its entirety
with a new rule, 6 NYCRR Part 244,
‘‘CSAPR NOX Annual Trading
Program.’’ 6 NYCRR Part 245,
‘‘Transport Rule SO2 Group 1 Trading
Program,’’ has also been repealed and
replaced in its entirety with a new rule,
6 NYCRR Part 245, ‘‘CSAPR SO2 Group
1 Trading Program.’’ Attendant
revisions were made to 6 NYCRR Part
200, ‘‘General Provisions,’’ to update the
list of referenced materials at Subpart
200.9 that are cited in the amended New
York regulations.
The EPA is proposing to approve into
the New York SIP the revised versions
of 6 NYCRR Parts 200 (Subpart 200.9),
243, 244, and 245 included in the
November 30, 2018 submission.
The EPA is also proposing to repeal
from the SIP previous versions of 6
NYCRR Part 243, 6 NYCRR Part 244,
and 6 NYCRR Part 245 which
implemented New York’s discontinued
CAIR program. New York adopted
amendments to 6 NYCRR Part 243, 6
NYCRR Part 244, and 6 NYCRR Part 245
that repealed and replaced CAIR trading
program rules with CSAPR trading rules
on November 10, 2015. Subsequently,
on November 11, 2018, New York
adopted amendments to 6 NYCRR Part
243, 6 NYCRR Part 244, and 6 NYCRR
Part 245 that repealed and replaced the
November 15, 2015 adopted rules that
implemented New York’s CSAPR
program with new versions of New
York’s CSAPR trading program rules.
The rules that are proposed to be
repealed from the SIP are 6 NYCRR Part
243, ‘‘CAIR NOX Ozone Season Trading
Program,’’ 6 NYCRR Part 244, ‘‘CAIR
NOX Annual Trading Program,’’ and 6
NYCRR Part 245, ‘‘CAIR SO2 Trading
Program.’’
The EPA is also proposing to approve
into the New York SIP a revised version
of 6 NYCRR Part 200 (Subpart 200.1) to
address updated definitions at Part
200.1(f) that were submitted to the EPA
on July 23, 2015 and that were
associated with a repeal of 6 NYCRR
Part 203, ‘‘Indirect Sources of Air
Contamination.’’
The revised versions of 6 NYCRR
Parts 200 (Subpart 200.9), 243, 244, and
245 included in the November 30, 2018
SIP submission replace the previous
versions of those rules that were
included in a December 1, 2015 SIP
submission. The EPA identified
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 May 20, 2019
Jkt 247001
deficiencies in the December 1, 2015
submission but on November 20, 2017
conditionally approved those previous
versions of Parts 200, 244, and 245 (but
not Part 243) into the SIP (82 FR 57362,
December 5, 2017). In a July 6, 2017
letter to the EPA, New York committed
to submitting a SIP revision that
addressed the identified deficiencies by
December 29, 2017. However, New
York’s response to the conditional
approval was not submitted to the EPA
by December 29, 2017. The November
30, 2018 SIP submittal addresses the
identified deficiencies, but was
submitted approximately 11 months
late, so the conditional approval is
treated as a disapproval.
The EPA did not take action on the
previous version of 6 NYCRR Part 243
included in New York’s December 1,
2015 submission. Following that
submission, the EPA finalized the
CSAPR Update rule 2 to address Eastern
states’ interstate air pollution mitigation
obligations with regard to the 2008
Ozone National Ambient Air Quality
Standard (NAAQS). Among other
things, starting in 2017 the CSAPR
Update required New York EGUs to
participate in the new CSAPR NOX
Ozone Season Group 2 Trading Program
instead of the earlier CSAPR NOX Ozone
Season Trading Program (now renamed
the ‘‘Group 1’’ program) and replaced
the ozone season budget for New York
with a lower budget developed to
address the revised and more stringent
2008 Ozone NAAQS. In a July 14, 2016
letter to the EPA, New York indicated
that the State would revise 6 NYCRR
Part 243 to conform with the final
CSAPR Update. As indicated earlier in
this section New York repealed 6
NYCRR Part 243 and replaced the rule
in its entirety with a new rule, 6 NYCRR
Part 243, ‘‘CSAPR NOx Ozone Season
Group 2 Trading Program’’.
This action proposes to approve into
New York’s SIP state-determined
allowance allocation procedures for
ozone-season NOX allowances that
would replace EPA’s default allocation
procedures for the control periods in
2021 and beyond. Additionally, EPA is
proposing to approve into New York’s
SIP state-determined allowance
allocation procedures for annual NOX
and SO2 allowances that would replace
EPA’s default allocation procedures for
the control periods in 2023 and beyond.
The proposed approval of this SIP
revision does not alter any provision,
other than the allowance allocation
provisions, of either the CSAPR NOX
Ozone Season Group 2 Trading
Program, the CSAPR NOX Annual
2 81
PO 00000
FR 74504 (October 26, 2016).
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Trading Program or the CSAPR SO2
Group 1 Trading Program as applied to
New York units. The FIP provisions
requiring those units to participate in
the programs (as modified by this SIP
revision) remain in place.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: May 2, 2019.
Peter D. Lopez,
Regional Administrator, Region 2.
[FR Doc. 2019–10470 Filed 5–20–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2018–0387; FRL–9993–95–
Region 3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; District
of Columbia; Approval of the
Redesignation Request for the
Washington, DC-MD-VA 2008 8-Hour
Ozone National Ambient Air Quality
Standard Nonattainment Area
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
request from the District of Columbia
(the District) to redesignate to
attainment their portion of the
Washington, DC-MD-VA nonattainment
area (hereafter ‘‘the Washington Area’’
or ‘‘the Area’’) for the 2008 8-hour ozone
national ambient air quality standard
(NAAQS or standard) (also referred to as
the 2008 ozone NAAQS). EPA has
already approved, as a revision to the
District’s SIP, a maintenance plan that
demonstrates maintenance of the 2008
ozone NAAQS through 2030 in the
Washington Area. This action is being
taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before June 20, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R03–
OAR–2018–0387 at https://
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
spielberger.susan@epa.gov. For
comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM
21MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 21, 2019 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed
from Regulations.gov. For either manner
of submission, EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
confidential business information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. EPA will generally not consider
comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e.,
on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission
methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the
full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sara
Calcinore, Planning & Implementation
Branch (3AD30), Air & Radiation
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. The
telephone number is (215) 814–2043.
Ms. Calcinore can also be reached via
electronic mail at calcinore.sara@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. What action is EPA proposing?
II. What is the background for this proposed
action?
III. What is EPA’s analysis of the District’s
redesignation request for the Washington
Area?
A. Has the Washington Area attained the
2008 Ozone NAAQS?
B. Has the District met all applicable
requirements of section 110 and part D
of the CAA for the Washington Area and
does the Washington Area have a fully
approved SIP under section 110(k) of the
CAA?
C. Are the air quality improvements in the
Washington Area due to permanent and
enforceable emission reductions?
D. Does the District have a fully approvable
ozone maintenance plan for the
Washington Area?
IV. Proposed Action
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What action is EPA proposing?
In this action, EPA is proposing to
approve the District’s March 12, 2018
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 May 20, 2019
Jkt 247001
redesignation request as satisfying the
requirements of CAA section
107(d)(3)(E) and redesignate the District
from marginal nonattainment to
attainment of the 2008 ozone NAAQS.
EPA has already approved, as a revision
to the District’s SIP, a maintenance plan
that demonstrates maintenance of the
2008 ozone NAAQS through 2030 in the
Washington Area. See 84 FR 15108
(April 15, 2019).
II. What is the background for this
proposed action?
Under the CAA, EPA establishes
NAAQS for criteria pollutants to protect
human health and the environment. In
response to scientific evidence linking
ozone exposure to adverse health
effects, EPA promulgated the first ozone
NAAQS, the 0.12 part per million (ppm)
1-hour ozone NAAQS, in 1979. See 44
FR 8202 (February 8, 1979). The CAA
requires EPA to review and reevaluate
the NAAQS every 5 years in order to
consider updated information regarding
the effects of the criteria pollutants on
human health and the environment. On
July 18, 1997, EPA promulgated a
revised ozone NAAQS, referred to as the
1997 ozone NAAQS, of 0.08 ppm
averaged over eight hours. 62 FR 38855.
This 8-hour ozone NAAQS was
determined to be more protective of
public health than the previous 1979 1hour ozone NAAQS. In 2008, EPA
strengthened the 8-hour ozone NAAQS
from 0.08 to 0.075 ppm. The 0.075 ppm
standard is referred to as the 2008 ozone
NAAQS. See 73 FR 16436 (March 27,
2008).
Upon promulgation of a new or
revised NAAQS, section 107(d)(1)(B) of
the CAA requires EPA to designate as
nonattainment any areas that are
violating the NAAQS based on the most
recent three years of quality-assured
ozone monitoring data. On May 21,
2012 and June 11, 2012, EPA designated
nonattainment areas for the 2008 ozone
NAAQS. 77 FR 30088 and 77 FR 34221.
Effective July 20, 2012, the Washington
Area was designated as marginal
nonattainment for the 2008 ozone
NAAQS. The Washington Area consists
of the Counties of Calvert, Charles,
Frederick, Montgomery, and Prince
George’s in Maryland, the Counties of
Arlington, Fairfax, Loudoun, and Prince
William and the Cities of Alexandria,
Fairfax, Falls Church, Manassas, and
Manassas Park in Virginia, and the
District of Columbia. See 40 CFR 81.309,
81.321, and 81.347.
Section 107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA
allows redesignation of an area to
attainment of the NAAQS provided that:
(1) The Administrator (EPA) determines
that the area has attained the applicable
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
22997
NAAQS; (2) the Administrator has fully
approved the applicable
implementation plan for the area under
section 110(k) of the CAA; (3) the
Administrator determines that the
improvement in air quality is due to
permanent and enforceable reductions
in emissions resulting from
implementation of the applicable SIP,
applicable Federal air pollutant control
regulations, and other permanent and
enforceable emission reductions; (4) the
Administrator has fully approved a
maintenance plan for the area as
meeting the requirements of section
175A of the CAA; and (5) the State
containing the area has met all
requirements applicable to the area for
purposes of redesignation under section
110 and part D of the CAA.
On March 12, 2018, February 5, 2018,
and January 3, 2018, the District,
Maryland, and Virginia, respectively,
formally submitted requests to
redesignate their portions of the
Washington Area from marginal
nonattainment to attainment for the
2008 ozone NAAQS. The District,
Maryland, and Virginia concurrently
submitted, as revisions to their
respective SIPs, a joint maintenance
plan for the Washington Area prepared
by the Metropolitan Washington
Council of Governments (MWCOG) that
demonstrates maintenance of the 2008
ozone NAAQS through 2030 in the
Washington Area. On April 15, 2019,
EPA approved, as revisions to the
District’s, Maryland’s, and Virginia’s
SIPs, the joint maintenance plan for the
Washington Area. 84 FR 15108. In the
April 15, 2019 action, EPA also
approved Maryland and Virginia’s
requests to redesignate to attainment
their portions of the Washington Area
from marginal nonattainment to
attainment of the 2008 ozone NAAQS.
On April 16, 1992, EPA provided
guidance on redesignations in the
General Preamble for the
Implementation of Title I of the CAA
Amendments of 1990 (57 FR 13498) and
supplemented this guidance on April
28, 1992 (57 FR 18070). EPA has
provided further guidance on processing
redesignation requests in the following
documents:
1. ‘‘Ozone and Carbon Monoxide
Design Value Calculations,’’
Memorandum from Bill Laxton,
Director, Technical Support Division,
June 18, 1990;
2. ‘‘Maintenance Plans for
Redesignation of Ozone and Carbon
Monoxide Nonattainment Areas,’’
Memorandum from G.T. Helms, Chief,
Ozone/Carbon Monoxide Programs
Branch, April 30, 1992;
E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM
21MYP1
22998
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 21, 2019 / Proposed Rules
3. ‘‘Contingency Measures for Ozone
and Carbon Monoxide (CO)
Redesignations,’’ Memorandum from
G.T. Helms, Chief, Ozone/Carbon
Monoxide Programs Branch, June 1,
1992;
4. ‘‘Procedures for Processing
Requests to Redesignate Areas to
Attainment,’’ Memorandum from John
Calcagni, Director, Air Quality
Management Division, September 4,
1992 (the ‘‘Calcagni memorandum’’);
5. ‘‘State Implementation Plan (SIP)
Actions Submitted in Response to Clean
Air Act (CAA) Deadlines,’’
Memorandum from John Calcagni,
Director, Air Quality Management
Division, October 28, 1992;
6. ‘‘Technical Support Documents
(TSDs) for Redesignation of Ozone and
Carbon Monoxide (CO) Nonattainment
Areas,’’ Memorandum from G.T. Helms,
Chief, Ozone/Carbon Monoxide
Programs Branch, August 17, 1993;
7. ‘‘State Implementation Plan (SIP)
requirements for Areas Submitting
Requests for Redesignation to
Attainment of the Ozone and Carbon
Monoxide (CO) National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQS) On or After
November 15, 1992,’’ Memorandum
from Michael H. Shapiro, Acting
Assistant Administrator for Air and
Radiation, September 17, 1993 (the
‘‘Shapiro memorandum’’);
8. ‘‘Use of Actual Emissions in
Maintenance Demonstrations for Ozone
and CO Nonattainment Areas,’’
Memorandum from D. Kent Berry,
Acting Director, Air Quality
Management Division, November 30,
1993;
9. ‘‘Part D New Source Review (part
D NSR) Requirements for Areas
Requesting Redesignation to
Attainment,’’ Memorandum from Mary
D. Nichols, Assistant Administrator for
Air and Radiation, October 14, 1994;
and
10. ‘‘Reasonable Further Progress,
Attainment Demonstration, and Related
Requirements for Ozone Nonattainment
Areas Meeting the Ozone National
Ambient Air Quality Standard,’’
Memorandum from John S. Seitz,
Director, Office of Air Quality Planning
and Standards, May 10, 1995.
data for the 3-year period must also
meet data completeness requirements.
An ozone design value is valid if daily
maximum 8-hour average
concentrations are available for at least
90 percent of the days within the ozone
monitoring season,2 on average, for the
three-year period, with a minimum data
completeness of 75 percent during the
ozone monitoring season of any year
during the three-year period. See section
2.3 of appendix P to 40 CFR part 50.
On November 14, 2017 (82 FR 52651),
in accordance with section 181(b)(2)(A)
of the CAA and Provisions for
Implementation of the 2008 Ozone
NAAQS (40 CFR part 51, subpart AA),
EPA made a determination that the
Washington Area attained the 2008
ozone NAAQS by the July 20, 2016
attainment date.3 EPA’s determination
was based upon three years of complete,
certified, and quality-assured data for
the 2013–2015 monitoring period.
In addition, EPA has reviewed the
most recent ambient air quality
monitoring data for ozone in the Area,
including preliminary 2016–2018
design values, as submitted by the
District, Maryland, and Virginia and
recorded in EPA’s AQS. The qualityassured, quality-controlled, and statecertified 2014 to 2017 ozone air quality
data, as well as the preliminary 2016–
2018 design values, show that the
Washington Area continues to attain the
2008 ozone NAAQS. This data is
summarized in Table 1 and is also
included in the docket for this
rulemaking available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, Docket ID: EPA–
R03–OAR–2018–0387.
III. What is EPA’s analysis of the
District’s redesignation request for the
Washington area?
A. Has the Washington area attained the
2008 Ozone NAAQS?
For redesignation of a nonattainment
area to attainment, the CAA requires
EPA to determine that the area has
attained the applicable NAAQS. See
CAA section 107(d)(3)(E)(i). An area is
attaining the 2008 ozone NAAQS if it
meets the 2008 ozone NAAQS, as
determined in accordance with 40 CFR
50.15 and appendix P of part 50, based
on three complete, consecutive calendar
years of quality-assured air quality data
for all monitoring sites in the area. To
attain the NAAQS, the three-year
average of the annual fourth-highest
daily maximum 8-hour average ozone
concentrations, referred to as ozone
design values, at each monitor must not
exceed 0.075 ppm.1 The air quality data
must be collected and quality-assured in
accordance with 40 CFR part 58 and
recorded in EPA’s Air Quality System
(AQS). Ambient air quality monitoring
TABLE 1—WASHINGTON AREA 2014–2016, 2015–2017, AND PRELIMINARY 2016–2018 OZONE DESIGN VALUES
Annual 4th highest reading
(ppm)
AQS site ID
11–001–0041 5
11–001–0043 ..
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
11–001–0050 ..
Site description
420 34th Street NE, Washington, DC 20019.
2500 1st Street NW, Washington, DC.
300 Van Buren Street NW,
Washington, DC 20012.
Jurisdiction
District of Columbia.
District of Columbia.
District of Columbia.
1 The rounding convention under 40 CFR part 50,
appendix P dictates that concentrations shall be
reported in ppm to the third decimal place, with
additional digits to the right of the third decimal
place truncated. Thus, a computed three-year
average ozone concentration of 0.0759 ppm or
lower would meet the standard, but 0.0760 ppm or
higher would be over the standard.
2 The ozone season is defined by state in 40 CFR
58 appendix D. For the 2013–2015 time period, the
ozone season was April-October for the states in the
Area. Beginning in 2016, the ozone season is
March-October for the states in the Washington
Area. See 80 FR 65292, 65466–67 (October 26,
2015).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 May 20, 2019
Jkt 247001
2016
PO 00000
2016–
2018
design
value
(ppm) 4
2015
................
................
0.065
0.056
0.050
0.056
0.060
0.057
0.068
0.072
0.072
0.071
0.073
0.070
0.071
0.072
0.069
0.72
0.071
0.067
0.073
0.070
0.070
0.070
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2018
2015–
2017
design
value
(ppm)
2014
3 As part of the final rule, ‘‘Implementation of the
2008 National Ambient Air Quality Standards for
Ozone: State Implementation Plan (SIP)
Requirements,’’ for the 2008 ozone NAAQS (80 FR
12264, March 6, 2015) (hereinafter, SIP
Requirements Rule), EPA modified the maximum
attainment dates for all nonattainment areas for the
2008 ozone NAAQS to be consistent with the
United States Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit’s (D.C. Circuit) decision in NRDC
v. EPA, 777 F .3d 456, 464–69 (D.C. Cir. 2014). The
SIP Requirements Rule established a maximum
deadline for marginal nonattainment areas to attain
the 2008 ozone NAAQS of three years from the
effective date of designation, or July 20, 2015. See
2017
2014–
2016
design
value
(ppm)
80 FR at 12268; 40 CFR 51.1103. On May 4, 2016,
EPA determined that the Washington Area did not
attain the 2008 ozone NAAQS by its July 20, 2015
attainment date, based on ambient air quality
monitoring data for the 2012–2014 monitoring
period. In that same action, EPA determined that
the Washington Area qualified for a 1-year
extension of its attainment date, as provided in
section 181(a)(5) of the CAA and interpreted by
regulation at 40 CFR 51.1107. With that final
rulemaking action, the new attainment date for the
Washington Area was July 20, 2016. See 81 FR
26697 (May 4, 2016).
E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM
21MYP1
22999
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 21, 2019 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 1—WASHINGTON AREA 2014–2016, 2015–2017, AND PRELIMINARY 2016–2018 OZONE DESIGN VALUES—
Continued
Annual 4th highest reading
(ppm)
AQS site ID
Site description
Jurisdiction
2014
24–009–0011
24–017–0010
24–021–0037
24–031–3001
..
..
..
..
24–033–0030 ..
24–033–8003 ..
24–033–9991 ..
51–013–0020 ..
51–059–0030 ..
51–107–1005 ..
51–153–0009 ..
350 Stafford Road ...................
14320 Oaks Road ...................
Frederick County Airport .........
Lathrop E. Smith Environmental Education Center.
Howard University’s Beltsville
Laboratory.
PG County Equestrian Center
Powder Mill Rd Laurel, MD
20708.
S 18th and Hayes St ...............
STA. 46–B9, Lee Park, Telegraph Road.
38–I, Broad Run High School,
Ashburn.
James S. Long Park ...............
Maryland
Maryland
Maryland
Maryland
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Jkt 247001
2017
2018
2016–
2018
design
value
(ppm) 4
0.070
0.070
0.063
0.064
0.067
0.068
0.070
0.072
0.070
0.073
0.070
0.068
0.066
0.068
0.067
0.065
0.067
0.068
0.067
0.069
0.069
0.070
0.067
0.068
0.067
0.069
0.069
0.068
0.067
0.069
0.068
0.067
Maryland .........
0.065
0.072
0.070
0.069
0.070
0.069
0.070
0.069
Maryland .........
Maryland .........
0.069
0.069
0.069
0.067
0.073
0.070
0.072
0.070
0.070
0.073
0.070
0.068
0.071
0.069
0.071
0.071
Virginia ...........
Virginia ...........
0.071
0.065
0.073
0.072
0.072
0.073
0.070
0.068
0.070
0.066
0.072
0.070
0.071
0.071
0.070
0.069
Virginia ...........
0.063
0.071
0.068
0.066
0.065
0.067
0.068
0.066
Virginia ...........
0.062
0.067
0.067
0.065
0.065
0.065
0.066
0.065
4 As noted previously, the 2016–2018 design
values are preliminary.
5 The 2014 and 2015 data at monitoring site 11–
001–0041 (also referred to as ‘‘the River Terrace
monitor’’) is incomplete. Therefore, the 2016 and
2017 design values are invalid. The River Terrace
monitor was temporarily shut down in March 2014
due to renovations at the monitoring site. The River
Terrace monitor was reinstated in 2016, and began
operation in May 2016. The temporary shutdown of
the River Terrace monitor is discussed in more
detail in the TSD for EPA’s August 8, 2018 (83 FR
39019) notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM),
which is available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, Docket ID: EPA–R03–OAR–
2018–0215.
6 MDE’s exceptional event demonstrations and
EPA’s concurrence are included in the docket for
this rulemaking, available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, Docket ID: EPA–R03–OAR–
2018–0387.
16:36 May 20, 2019
2016
2015–
2017
design
value
(ppm)
.........
.........
.........
.........
EPA notes that the data for the PG
County Equestrian Center monitor (AQS
Site ID 24–033–8003) in Table 1
excludes data associated with
exceptional event (EE) episodes for 8hour ozone data influenced by the Fort
McMurray wildfire on May 25 and 26,
2016, and northwestern Canada
wildfires on July 21 and 22, 2016. The
Maryland Department of the
Environment (MDE) determined that the
Fort McMurray and northwestern
Canada wildfires caused elevated ozone
concentrations at 16 and 12 monitors,
respectively, throughout Maryland,
including the PG County Equestrian
Center monitor. By letters and
enclosures dated May 26, 2017 and
October 20, 2017, MDE submitted EE
demonstrations related to the May and
July 2016 wildfires. On December 26,
2017, EPA concurred on MDE’s EE
demonstration for numerous monitors,
including the PG County Equestrian
Center monitor.6 Pursuant to EPA’s
concurrence, EPA excluded certain data,
affected by the wildfires, from AQS,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
2015
2014–
2016
design
value
(ppm)
thereby affecting the calculated design
values at the corresponding monitors.
Due to the exclusion of the exceptional
events data, the PG County Equestrian
Center monitor’s 2014–2016 design
value decreased from 0.071 ppm to
0.070 ppm and the 2015–2017 design
value and preliminary 2016–2018
design value decreased from 0.072 ppm
to 0.071 ppm.7 However, the design
value at the PG County Equestrian
Center monitor would have been below
the 2008 ozone NAAQS of 0.075 ppm
regardless of the exclusion of the
exceptional events data.
The Washington Area’s most recent
monitoring data supports EPA’s
previous determination that the Area
has attained, and continues to attain, the
2008 ozone NAAQS. In addition, as
discussed in EPA’s August 8, 2018 (83
FR 39019) NPRM, the District,
Maryland, and Virginia have committed
to continue monitoring ambient ozone
concentrations in accordance with 40
CFR part 58. Therefore, EPA is
proposing to determine that the
Washington Area continues to attain the
2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS, which is
required by CAA section 107(d)(3)(E)(i)
for redesignation of a nonattainment
area to attainment.
B. Has the District met all applicable
requirements of section 110 and part D
of the CAA for the Washington Area and
does the Washington Area have a fully
approved SIP under section 110(k) of
the CAA?
In accordance with section
107(d)(3)(E)(v) of the CAA, in order to
redesignate the Washington Area to
7 This
data is included in the docket for this
rulemaking available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, Docket ID: EPA–R03–OAR–
2018–0387.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
attainment, the District must meet all
requirements applicable to the
Washington Area under CAA section
110 (general SIP requirements) and part
D of Title I of the CAA (SIP
requirements for nonattainment areas).
In addition, in accordance with section
107(d)(3)(E)(ii) of the CAA, the District’s
SIP for the Washington Area must be
fully approved under CAA section
110(k).
The September 4, 1992 Calcagni
memorandum (‘‘Procedures for
Processing Requests to Redesignate
Areas to Attainment,’’ Memorandum
from John Calcagni, Director, Air
Quality Management Division,
September 4, 1992) describes EPA’s
interpretation of section 107(d)(3)(E)
with respect to the timing of applicable
requirements. Under this interpretation,
to qualify for redesignation, states
requesting redesignation to attainment
must meet only the relevant CAA
requirements that come due prior to the
submittal of a complete redesignation
request. See also Shapiro memorandum,
September 17, 1993, and 60 FR 12459,
12465–12466, (March 7, 1995)
(redesignation of Detroit-Ann Arbor).8
Applicable requirements of the CAA
that come due subsequent to the area’s
submittal of a complete redesignation
request remain applicable until a
redesignation is approved, but are not
required as a prerequisite to
redesignation. See CAA section 175A(c).
Sierra Club v. EPA, 375 F .3d 537 (7th
Cir. 2004). See also 68 FR 25424, 25427
(May 12, 2003) (redesignation of the St.
8 The Calcagni memorandum and Shapiro
memorandum are included in the docket for this
rulemaking available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, Docket ID: EPA–R03–OAR–
2018–0387.
E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM
21MYP1
23000
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 21, 2019 / Proposed Rules
Louis/East St. Louis area to attainment
of the 1-hour ozone NAAQS).
EPA has determined that, in
accordance with section 107(d)(3)(E)(v),
the District has met all SIP requirements
under section 110 of the CAA and part
D of Title I of the CAA applicable for
purposes of the redesignation of the
District’s portion of the Washington
Area. In addition, EPA has determined
that, in accordance with CAA section
107(d)(3)(E)(ii), the District’s SIP is fully
approved with respect to all
requirements applicable for purposes of
this redesignation. In making these
determinations, EPA ascertained what
requirements are applicable to the Area
and determined that the portions of the
District’s SIP meeting these
requirements are fully approved under
section 110(k) of the CAA. We note that
SIPs must be fully approved only with
respect to applicable requirements.
EPA’s rationale is discussed in more
detail in the following sections.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
1. The District Has Met All Applicable
Requirements of Section 110 and Part D
of the CAA Applicable to the
Washington Area for Purposes of
Redesignation
a. Section 110 General Requirements for
SIPs
Pursuant to CAA section 110(a)(1),
whenever new or revised NAAQS are
promulgated, the CAA requires states to
submit a plan (i.e. ‘‘SIP’’) for the
implementation, maintenance, and
enforcement of such NAAQS. Section
110(a)(2) of Title I of the CAA contains
the general requirements for a SIP, also
referred to as ‘‘infrastructure’’
requirements. The infrastructure
requirements of section 110(a)(2),
include, but are not limited to, the
following: (1) Submit a SIP that has
been adopted by the state after
reasonable public notice and hearing;
(2) include enforceable emission
limitations and other control measures,
means, or techniques necessary to meet
the requirements of the CAA; (3)
provide for establishment and operation
of appropriate devices, methods,
systems and procedures necessary to
monitor ambient air quality; (4) provide
for implementation of a source permit
program to regulate the modification
and construction of stationary sources
within the areas covered by the plan; (5)
include provisions for the
implementation of part C prevention of
significant deterioration (PSD) and part
D nonattainment new source review
(referred to as ‘‘part D NNSR,’’ ‘‘NNSR,’’
or ‘‘nonattainment NSR’’) permit
programs; (6) include provisions for
stationary source emission control
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 May 20, 2019
Jkt 247001
measures, monitoring, and reporting; (7)
include provisions for air quality
modeling; and, (8) provide for public
and local agency participation in
planning and emission control rule
development.
Section 110(a)(2)(D) of the CAA
requires that SIPs contain certain
measures to prevent sources in a state
from significantly contributing to air
quality problems in another state. To
implement this provision, EPA has
required certain states to establish
programs to address transport of air
pollutants, in accordance with the NOX
SIP Call,9 amendments to the NOX SIP
Call, May 14, 1999 (64 FR 26298), and
March 2, 2000 (65 FR 11222), and the
Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR)
Update, October 26, 2016 (81 FR 74504).
However, the section 110(a)(2)(D) SIP
requirements are not linked with a
particular area’s ozone designation and
classification. The section 110(a)(2)(D)
requirements, where applicable,
continue to apply to a state regardless of
the designation (or redesignation) of any
particular area within the state. EPA
concludes that the SIP requirements
linked with an area’s ozone designation
and classification are the relevant
measures to evaluate when reviewing a
redesignation request for the area. Thus,
the requirements of section 110(a)(2)(D)
of the CAA are not applicable
requirements for purposes of
redesignation. See 65 FR 37890 (June
15, 2000), 66 FR 50399 (October 19,
2001), and 68 FR 25418, 25426–25427
(May 13, 2003).
Similarly, other section 110 elements
that are neither connected with
attainment plan submissions nor linked
with an area’s ozone attainment status
are not applicable requirements for
purposes of redesignation. An area that
is redesignated from nonattainment to
attainment will remain subject to these
statewide requirements after the area is
9 On October 27, 1998 (63 FR 57356), EPA
finalized the ‘‘Finding of Significant Contribution
and Rulemaking for Certain States in the Ozone
Transport Assessment Group Region for Purposes of
Reducing Regional Transport of Ozone’’
–commonly called the NOX SIP Call. The NOX SIP
call requires the District of Columbia and 22 states
to reduce emissions of NOX in order to reduce the
transport of ozone and ozone precursors. EPA
developed the NOX Budget Trading Program, an
allowance trading program that states could adopt
to meet their obligations under the NOX SIP Call.
The NOX Budget Trading Program allowed electric
generating units (EGUs) greater than 25 megawatts
and industrial non-electric generating units, such as
boilers and turbines, with a rated heat input greater
than 250 million British thermal units per hour
(MMBtu/hr), referred to as ‘‘large non-EGUs’’, to
participate in a regional NOX cap and trade
program. The NOX SIP call also established
reduction requirements for other non-EGUs,
including cement kilns and stationary internal
combustion (IC) engines.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
redesignated to attainment of the 2008
ozone NAAQS. The section 110(a)(2)
requirements that are linked to the
area’s designation and classification are
the relevant measures to evaluate in
reviewing a redesignation request. The
section 110(a)(2) elements not linked to
the area’s nonattainment status are not
applicable for purposes of
redesignation. This approach is
consistent with EPA’s existing policy on
applicability (e.g., for redesignations) of
conformity and oxygenated fuels
requirements, as well as with section
184 ozone transport region (OTR)
requirements. See, e.g., Reading,
Pennsylvania, proposed and final
rulemakings for redesignation, 61 FR
53174–53176 (October 10, 1996) and 62
FR 24826 (May 7, 1997); ClevelandAkron-Lorain, Ohio, final rulemaking
for redesignation, 61 FR 20458 (May 7,
1996); and Tampa, Florida final
rulemaking for redesignation, 60 FR
62748 (December 7, 1995). For further
information and analysis, see the
discussion of this issue in the
Cincinnati, Ohio ozone redesignation
(65 FR 37890, June 19, 2000), and the
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania ozone
redesignation (66 FR 50399, October 19,
2001).
EPA has reviewed the District’s SIP
and concludes that it meets the general
SIP requirements under section 110 of
the CAA, to the extent those
requirements are applicable for
purposes of redesignation. On April 13,
2015 and August 31, 2018, EPA
approved elements of the District’s SIP
submittal addressing the section
110(a)(2) requirements for the 2008
ozone NAAQS. See 80 FR 19538 (April
13, 2015) and 83 FR 44498 (August 31,
2018).10 As explained previously, the
general requirements of section
110(a)(2) are statewide requirements
that are not linked to the 2008 8-hour
ozone nonattainment status of the
Washington Area and are therefore not
‘‘applicable requirements’’ for purpose
of the review of the District’s 2008
ozone NAAQS redesignation request.
10 EPA’s April 13, 2015 final rule approved the
District’s infrastructure SIP submittal as satisfying
all requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2) for the
2008 ozone NAAQS, except for the requirements
under CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) and the PSDrelated portions of section 110(a)(2)(C), (D)(i)(II),
(D)(ii), and (J). See 80 FR 19538. In that final rule,
EPA did not take rulemaking action on the portion
of the District’s infrastructure SIP submittal related
to PSD, however, EPA notes that the District is
subject to a Federal implementation plan (FIP)
which incorporates the Federal PSD permitting
requirements of 40 CFR 52.21 into the District’s SIP.
See 40 CFR 52.499. EPA’s August 31, 2018 final
rule approved the District’s infrastructure SIP
submittal as satisfying the requirement of CAA
section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2008 ozone
NAAQS. See 83 FR 44498.
E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM
21MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 21, 2019 / Proposed Rules
Because the District’s SIP satisfies all of
the general SIP elements and
requirements set forth in CAA section
110(a)(2) applicable to and necessary for
redesignation, EPA concludes that the
District has satisfied the criterion of
section 107(d)(3)(E)(v) regarding section
110 of the CAA.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
b. Part D Requirements
Areas designated nonattainment for
the ozone NAAQS are subject to the
applicable nonattainment area and
ozone-specific planning requirements of
part D of the CAA. Section 172–176 of
the CAA, found in subpart 1 of part D,
set forth the basic nonattainment
requirements for all nonattainment
areas. Section 172(c), under part D of
the CAA, sets forth the basic
requirements of air quality plans for
states with nonattainment areas for all
pollutants that are required to submit
plans pursuant to section 172(b).
Section 182 of the CAA, found in
subpart 2 of part D, establishes specific
requirements for ozone nonattainment
areas depending on the areas’
nonattainment classifications.11 The
Washington Area was classified as
marginal under subpart 2 of part D of
the CAA for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. As
such, the Area is subject to the subpart
1 requirements contained in CAA
sections 172(c) and 176. The Area is
also subject to the subpart 2
requirements contained in CAA section
182(a) (marginal nonattainment area
requirements), which include, but are
not limited to, submitting a baseline
emissions inventory, adopting a SIP
requiring emissions statements from
stationary sources, and implementing a
NNSR program for the relevant ozone
standard. A thorough discussion of the
requirements contained in CAA section
172(c) and 182 can be found in the
General Preamble for Implementation of
Title I (57 FR 13498, April 16, 1992).
Additionally, states located in the
OTR, which includes the District,12 are
11 Ozone nonattainment areas are classified based
on the severity of their ozone levels (as determined
based on the area’s ‘‘design value,’’ which
represents air quality in the area for the most recent
3 years). The possible classifications for ozone
nonattainment areas are Marginal, Moderate,
Serious, Severe, and Extreme. See CAA section
181(a)(1).
12 The OTR is comprised of the states of
Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland,
Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New
York, Pennsylvania, and the Consolidated
Metropolitan Statistical Area, which includes the
District of Columbia and portions of Virginia. The
areas designated as in the Virginia portion of the
OTR are as follows: Arlington County, Fairfax
County, Loudoun County, Prince William County,
Stafford County, Alexandria City, Fairfax City, Falls
Church City, Manassas City, and Manassas Park
City. See, e.g. ‘‘Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia; NSR in the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 May 20, 2019
Jkt 247001
also subject to the requirements of CAA
section 184. All areas located in the
OTR, both attainment and
nonattainment, are subject to additional
control requirements under section 184
for the purpose of reducing interstate
transport of emissions that may
contribute to downwind ozone
nonattainment. The section 184
requirements include reasonable
available control technology (RACT),
NNSR, enhanced vehicle inspection and
maintenance (I/M), and State II vapor
recovery or a comparable measure
relating to gasoline dispensing facilities.
EPA has interpreted the section 184
OTR requirements, including the NNSR
program, as not being applicable for
purposes of redesignation. The rationale
for this is based on two considerations.
First, the requirement to submit SIP
revisions for the section 184
requirements continues to apply to areas
in the OTR even after redesignation to
attainment. Therefore, states remain
obligated to have NNSR, as well as
RACT, and I/M programs, even after
redesignation. Second, the section 184
control measures are region-wide
requirements and do not apply to the
area by virtue of the area’s designation
and classification, and thus are properly
considered not relevant to an action
changing an area’s designation. See 61
FR 53174, 53175–53176 (October 10,
1996) and 62 FR 24826, 24830–24832
(May 7, 1997).
i. CAA Section 172 Requirements
CAA section 172(c) contains general
requirements for nonattainment plans.
As stated previously, a thorough
discussion of these requirements may be
found in the General Preamble for
Implementation of Title I (57 FR 13498,
April 16, 1992). As provided in CAA
part D, subpart 2, for marginal ozone
nonattainment areas such as the
Washington Area, the ozone specific
requirements of section 182(a)
supersede (where overlapping) the
attainment planning requirements that
would otherwise apply under section
172(c).
Upon determination by EPA that the
Washington Area attained the 2008
ozone NAAQS, the requirements of
CAA section 172(c) for the District to
submit for their portion of the
Washington Area an attainment
demonstration and associated
reasonably available control measures
(RACM), a reasonable further progress
(RFP) plan, contingency measures for
failure to attain or make reasonable
progress, and other planning SIPs
Ozone Transport Region’’, 71 FR 39570 (July 13,
2006) and 71 FR 890 (January 6, 2006).
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
23001
related to attainment of the 2008 ozone
NAAQS were suspended. See 40 CFR
51.1118. Once the Area is redesignated
to attainment for the 2008 ozone
NAAQS, these requirements no longer
apply for the 2008 ozone NAAQS unless
EPA determines that the Area has
violated the 2008 ozone NAAQS, at
which time such plans are required to
be submitted. As stated previously, on
November 14, 2017 (82 FR 52651), EPA
determined that the Washington Area
had attained the 2008 ozone NAAQS by
the July 20, 2016 attainment date.
Furthermore, as explained in section
III.A of this action, the Washington Area
continues to attain the 2008 ozone
NAAQS. Therefore, because the
Washington Area has attained the 2008
ozone NAAQS and the Area continues
to attain the standard, no additional
measures are needed to provide for
attainment and the requirements of
section 172(c)(1), 172(c)(2), 172(c)(6),
and 172(c)(9) are not considered to be
applicable for purposes of redesignation
of the Washington Area for the 2008
ozone NAAQS.
Section 172(c)(3) requires submission
and approval of a comprehensive,
accurate, and current inventory of actual
emissions from all sources of the
relevant pollutant or pollutants in the
area. This requirement was not
suspended by EPA’s determination of
attainment for the Washington Area and
is superseded by the inventory
requirement in section 182(a)(1)
discussed later in this notice.
Section 172(c)(4) requires the
identification and quantification of
allowable emissions for major new and
modified sources in an area, and section
172(c)(5) requires source permits for the
construction and operation of new and
modified major stationary sources
anywhere in the nonattainment area.
EPA has determined that, since PSD
requirements will apply after
redesignation, areas being redesignated
need not comply with the requirement
that a NNSR program be approved prior
to redesignation, provided that the area
demonstrates maintenance of the
NAAQS without NNSR. A more detailed
rationale for this view is described in a
memorandum from Mary Nichols,
Assistant Administrator for Air and
Radiation, dated October 14, 1994,
entitled, ‘‘Part D New Source Review
Requirements for Areas Requesting
Redesignation to Attainment.’’ The
District lacks a SIP-approved PSD
program; however, it is subject to a FIP
which incorporates EPA’s PSD
permitting requirements of 40 CFR
52.21. See 40 CFR 52.499.
In addition, as explained previously,
the Washington Area is included in the
E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM
21MYP1
23002
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 21, 2019 / Proposed Rules
OTR established by Congress in section
184 of the CAA. Therefore, sources
located in the District will remain
subject to the part D NNSR requirements
even after the Washington Area is
redesignated to attainment. Since the
part D NNSR requirements apply to the
Washington Area regardless of its
attainment status, the part D NNSR
requirements are not considered to be
relevant for purposes of the
redesignation of the Washington Area.
Regardless, the District has an approved
part D NNSR program.13 See 62 FR
40937 (July 31, 1977).
Section 172(c)(7) requires the SIP to
meet the applicable provisions of
section 110(a)(2). As noted previously,
the District’s SIP meets the applicable
requirements of section 110(a)(2) for
purposes of redesignation.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
ii. CAA Section 176 Conformity
Requirements
Section 176(c) of the CAA requires
states to establish criteria and
procedures to ensure that Federally
supported or funded projects conform to
the air quality planning goals in the
applicable SIP. The requirement to
determine conformity applies to
transportation plans, programs, and
projects that are developed, funded, or
approved under title 23 of the United
States Code (U.S.C.) and the Federal
Transit Act (transportation conformity)
as well as to all other Federally
supported or funded projects (general
conformity). State transportation
conformity SIP revisions must be
consistent with Federal conformity
regulations relating to consultation,
enforcement, and enforceability that
EPA promulgated pursuant to its
authority under the CAA.
EPA interprets the conformity SIP
requirements 14 as not applicable for
purposes of evaluating a redesignation
request under section 107(d) because
state conformity rules are still required
after redesignation and Federal
conformity rules apply where state
13 On May 23, 2018 the District submitted a SIP
revision certifying that the District’s SIP-approved
NNSR program, established in Chapters 1 (Air
Quality—General Rules) and 2 (Air Quality—
General and Nonattainment Area Permits) in Title
20 of the District of Columbia Municipal
Regulations (DCMR), is at least as stringent as the
Federal NNSR requirements for the Washington
Area for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. See 40 CFR
51.165. EPA proposed approval of the District’s
NNSR program certification for the 2008 ozone
NAAQS on March 19, 2019. 84 FR 9995.
14 CAA section 176(c)(4)(E) requires states to
submit revisions to their SIPs to reflect certain
Federal criteria and procedures for determining
transportation conformity. Transportation
conformity SIPs are different from SIPs requiring
the development of Motor Vehicle Emission
Budgets (MVEBs), such as control strategy SIPs and
maintenance plans.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 May 20, 2019
Jkt 247001
conformity rules have not been
approved. See Wall v. EPA, 265 F .3d
426 (6th Cir. 2001) (upholding this
interpretation); see also 60 FR 62748
(December 7, 1995) (redesignation of
Tampa, Florida).
iii. Section 182 Requirements
Section 182(a)(1) requires states to
submit a comprehensive, accurate, and
current inventory of actual emissions
from sources of NOX and VOC emitted
within the boundaries of the ozone
nonattainment area. On July 17, 2014,
the District and Virginia submitted a
joint 2011 base year emissions inventory
addressing NOX and VOC emissions, as
well as carbon monoxide (CO)
emissions, for the Washington Area. On
August 4, 2014, Maryland submitted its
2011 base year emissions inventory for
the Washington Area, which also
addressed NOX, VOC, and CO. EPA
approved the District’s, Maryland’s, and
Virginia’s base year emissions
inventories for NOX and VOC for the
2008 ozone NAAQS on May 13, 2015
(80 FR 27255). On July 23, 2015 (80 FR
43625), EPA approved the District’s,
Maryland’s, and Virginia’s base year
emission inventories for CO.
Under section 182(a)(2)(A), states
with ozone nonattainment areas that
were designated prior to the enactment
of the 1990 CAA amendments were
required to submit, within six months of
classification, all rules and corrections
to existing RACT rules that were
required under section 172(b)(3) prior to
the 1990 CAA amendments. EPA
approved the District’s SIP revision
satisfying the section 182(a)(2) RACT
‘‘fix-up’’ requirement on October 27,
1999 (64 FR 57777).
Section 182(c)(3) of the CAA requires
areas classified as serious and above to
adopt and implement an enhanced I/M
program. The Washington Area was
classified as severe for the 1979 1-hour
ozone NAAQS, and therefore enhanced
I/M was required. In addition, section
184(b)(1)(a) of the CAA requires areas
located in the OTR that are a
metropolitan statistical area, or part
thereof, with a population of 100,00 or
more to meet the enhanced I/M program
requirements of CAA section 182(c)(3).
EPA approved the District’s enhanced I/
M program into the District’s SIP on
June 11, 1999 (64 FR 31498).
CAA section 182(a)(2)(C) and section
182(a)(4) contain source permitting and
offset requirements (NNSR). As
discussed previously, the part D NNSR
requirements will continue to apply to
the Washington Area, regardless of
attainment status, due to the
Washington Area being part of the OTR.
Therefore, EPA concludes that the
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
District need not have a fully approved
part D NSR program for purposes of this
redesignation request. As stated
previously, however, the District has an
approved NNSR program. See 62 FR
40937 (July 31, 1997).
Section 182(a)(3) requires states to
submit periodic emission inventories
and a revision to the SIP to require
owners or operators of stationary
sources to annually submit emission
statements documenting actual NOX and
VOC emissions. The District submits
periodic emission inventories as
required by CAA section 182(a)(3). As
stated above, EPA approved the
District’s, Maryland’s, and Virginia’s
base year emissions inventories for NOX
and VOC for the 2008 ozone NAAQS on
May 13, 2015 (80 FR 27255). With
regard to the stationary source
emissions statements requirement of
CAA section 182(a)(3)(B), EPA approved
the District’s emissions statements rule
into the District’s SIP on May 26, 1995
(60 FR 27944). The District’s emissions
statements rule requires that certain
sources in the District report annual
NOX and VOC emissions and satisfies
the requirements of CAA section
182(a)(3)(B). On May 25, 2018, the
District submitted, as a formal revision
to its SIP, a statement certifying that the
District’s existing emissions statements
rule covers the District’s portion of the
Washington Area and satisfies the
requirements of CAA section
182(a)(3)(B) for the 2008 ozone NAAQS.
EPA proposed approval of the District’s
emissions statements certification for
the 2008 ozone NAAQS (finding that the
District’s existing SIP-approved
emissions statements rule satisfies the
CAA section 182(a)(3) requirements for
the 2008 ozone NAAQS) on March 5,
2019 (84 FR 7858).15
The District has satisfied all
applicable SIP requirements under
section 110 and part D of title I of the
CAA for purposes of redesignation of
the District for the 2008 ozone NAAQS.
Therefore, EPA has determined that the
District satisfies the requirements of
CAA section 107(d)(3)(E)(v) for
redesignation of the District’s portion of
the Washington Area.
2. The District Has a Fully Approved
SIP for Purposes of Redesignation Under
Section 110(k) of the CAA
At various times, the District has
adopted and submitted, and EPA has
approved, provisions addressing the
15 While not prejudging the outcome of EPA’s
rulemaking on the District’s May 25, 2018
emissions statements certification for the 2008
ozone NAAQS, EPA expects to finalize rulemaking
on that SIP revision before taking final action on
this redesignation action.
E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM
21MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 21, 2019 / Proposed Rules
various SIP elements applicable for the
ozone NAAQS. As discussed
previously, EPA has approved the
District’s SIP for the 2008 ozone
NAAQS under section 110(k) for all
requirements applicable for purposes of
redesignation of the Washington Area.16
EPA may rely on prior SIP approvals in
approving a redesignation request (see
the Calcagni memorandum at page 3;
Southwestern Pennsylvania Growth
Alliance v. Browner, 144 F.3d 984, 989–
990 (6th Cir. 1998); Wall v. EPA, 265
F.3d 426), plus any additional measures
it may approve in conjunction with a
redesignation action (see 68 FR 25426
(May 12, 2003) and citations therein).
Therefore, EPA has determined that
the District’s SIP is fully approved with
respect to all requirements applicable
for purposes of redesignation in
accordance with CAA section
107(d)(3)(E)(ii).
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
C. Are the air quality improvements in
the Washington Area due to permanent
and enforceable emission reductions?
To redesignate an area from
nonattainment to attainment, section
107(d)(3)(E)(iii) of the CAA requires
EPA to determine that the air quality
improvement in the area is due to
permanent and enforceable reductions
in emissions resulting from the
implementation of the SIP and
applicable Federal air pollution control
regulations and other permanent and
enforceable emission reductions. The
District has demonstrated that the
observed ozone air quality improvement
in the Washington Area is due to
permanent and enforceable reductions
in NOX and VOC emissions resulting
from measures approved as part of the
District’s SIP as well as Federal
measures.
In making this demonstration, the
District has calculated the change in
emissions between 2011 and 2014. The
change in emissions is shown in Table
2. The District attributes the decrease in
emissions and corresponding
improvement in air quality during this
time period to a number of regulatory
measures that have been implemented
in the Washington Area and upwind
areas in recent years. Based on the
information summarized in the
following sections, the District has
adequately demonstrated that the
improvement in air quality is due to
permanent and enforceable emissions
reductions pursuant to CAA section
107(d)(3)(E)(iii).
16 See
Footnote 8.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 May 20, 2019
Jkt 247001
23003
1. Permanent and Enforceable Emission
Controls Implemented
Nonroad Diesel Engines Tier 1 and Tier
2
a. Federal Emission Control Measures
On June 17, 1994 (59 FR 31306), EPA
made an affirmative determination
under section 213(a)(2) of the CAA that
nonroad engines are significant
contributors to ambient ozone or CO
levels in more than one nonattainment
area. In the same notice, EPA also made
a determination under CAA section
213(a)(4) that other emissions from
compression-ignition (CI) nonroad
engines rated at or above 37 kilowatts
(kW) cause or contribute to air pollution
that may reasonably be anticipated to
endanger public health or welfare. In
the June 17, 1994 final rule, EPA set a
first phase of emission standards (Tier 1
standards) for nonroad diesel engines
rated 37 kW and above. These standards
apply to nonroad, compression-ignition
(i.e. diesel-powered) utility engines
including, but not limited to, farm,
construction, and industrial equipment,
rated at or above 37 kW. On October 23,
1998 (63 FR 56968), EPA finalized a
second phase of emission standards
(Tier 2 standards) for nonroad diesel
engines rated under 37 kW. These
emission standards have resulted in a
decrease in NOX emissions from the
combustion of diesel fuel used to power
this equipment. The Tier 1 and Tier 2
standards for nonroad diesel engines
will continue to result in emission
reductions as older equipment is
replaced with newer, compliant models.
A variety of Federal and state control
programs have contributed to reduced
on-road, point source, and nonroad
emissions of NOX and VOC in the
Washington Area, with additional
emission reductions expected to occur
in the future as older equipment and
vehicles are replaced with newer,
compliant models. Federal emission
control measures include the following:
Tier 2 Motor Vehicle Emissions
Standards and Gasoline Sulfur Control
Requirements
On February 10, 2000 (65 FR 6698),
EPA promulgated Tier 2 motor vehicle
emission standards and gasoline sulfur
control requirements. These emission
control requirements result in lower
NOX and VOC emissions from new cars
and light duty trucks, including sport
utility vehicles. With respect to fuels,
this rule required refiners and importers
of gasoline to meet lower standards for
sulfur in gasoline, which were phased
in between 2004 and 2006. By 2006,
refiners were required to meet a 30 ppm
average sulfur level, with a maximum
cap of 80 ppm. This reduction in fuel
sulfur content ensures the effectiveness
of low emission-control technologies.
The Tier 2 tailpipe standards
established in this rule were phased in
for new vehicles between 2004 and
2009. EPA estimated in the final rule
that this program will reduce annual
NOX emissions by about 2.2 million
tons per year in 2020 and 2.8 million
tons per year in 2030 after the program
is fully implemented and non-compliant
vehicles have all been retired.
Control of Emissions From Nonroad
Spark-Ignition Engines and Equipment
On October 8, 2008 (73 FR 59034),
EPA finalized emission standards for
new nonroad spark-ignition engines.
The exhaust emission standards applied
beginning in 2010 for new marine sparkignition engines and in 2011 and 2012
for different sizes of new land-based,
spark-ignition engines at or below 19
kW (i.e. small engines used primarily in
lawn and garden applications). In the
October 8, 2008 final rule, EPA
estimated that by 2030 the rule will
result in annual nationwide reductions
of 604,000 tons of volatile organic
hydrocarbon emissions, 132,200 tons of
NOX emissions, and 5,500 tons of
directly-emitted PM2.5 emissions. These
reductions correspond to significant
reductions in the formation of groundlevel ozone.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Emissions Standards for Large Spark
Ignition Engines
On November 8, 2002 (67 FR 68242),
EPA established emission standards for
large spark-ignition engines such as
those used in forklifts and airport
ground-service equipment; recreational
vehicles using spark-ignition engines
such as off-highway motorcycles, allterrain vehicles, and snow mobiles; and
recreational marine diesel engines.
These emission standards were phased
in from model year 2004 through 2012.
When the emission standards are fully
implemented in 2030, EPA expects a
national 75 percent reduction in
hydrocarbon (HC) emissions, 82 percent
reduction in NOX emissions, 61 percent
reduction in CO emissions, and a 60
percent reduction in direct particulate
matter (PM) emissions from these
engines, equipment, and vehicles
compared to projected emissions if the
standards were not implemented.
Standards for Reformulated and
Conventional Gasoline
On February 16, 1994 (59 FR 7716),
EPA finalized regulations requiring that
gasoline in certain areas be reformulated
E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM
21MYP1
23004
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 21, 2019 / Proposed Rules
to reduce vehicle emissions of toxic and
ozone-forming compounds, including
NOX and VOC. Reformulated gasoline
(RFG) is required in the Washington
Area. The first phase of the RFG
program (Phase I) began in 1995 and the
second phase (Phase II) began in 2000.
These standards affect various gasolinepowered non-road mobile sources, such
as lawn equipment, generators, and
compressors. EPA estimates that Phase
I of the RFG program resulted in a 2
percent and 17 percent annual
reduction in NOX, and VOCs,
respectively, from 1995 emission levels
and prevented 64,000 tons of smogforming pollutants, including NOX and
VOC, from being emitted into the air
from 1995 to 2000. Phase II of the RFG
program, which began in 2000, was
expected to reduce emissions of NOX
and VOC by 7 percent and 27 percent,
respectively, from 1995 emission levels
and reduce emissions of smog-forming
pollutants by an additional 41,000
tons.17 The RFG program continues to
provide emission reductions in the
Washington Area as the use of RFG
results in less vehicle emissions of NOX
and VOC compared to the use of
conventional gasoline.
Emission Standards for Locomotives
and Locomotive Engines
On April 16, 1998 (63 FR 18978), EPA
established emission standards for NOX,
HC, CO, PM, and smoke from newly
manufactured and remanufactured
diesel-powered locomotives and
locomotive engines. These emission
standards were effective in 2000 and are
expected to result in a more than 60
percent reduction in NOX emissions
from locomotives by 2040 compared to
1995 baseline levels.
b. Control Measures Specific to the
Washington Area
Maryland Healthy Air Act
In addition to the measures referenced
previously, a reduction of emission of
ozone precursors can also be attributed
to the Maryland Healthy Air Act
(Annotated Code of Maryland
Environment Title 2 Ambient Air
Quality Control Subtitle 10 Healthy Air
Act Sections 2–1001 to 2–1005, with
implementing regulations at COMAR
26.11.27 Emission Limitations for Power
Plants). The Maryland Health Air Act
(HAA) was effective on July 16, 2007
and approved by EPA on September 4,
2008 (73 FR 51599). The HAA
established limits on the amount of NOX
and SO2 emissions affected facilities in
Maryland could emit and required the
installation of on-site pollution controls
at 15 power plants in Maryland. The
first phase of the HAA occurred
between 2009 and 2010 and reduced
NOX emissions from affected sources by
almost 70% compared to 2002 levels.
The second phase of the HAA occurred
between 2012 and 2013. Maryland
estimates that the HAA will reduce NOX
emissions by approximately 75% from
2002 levels.
Closure of GenOn Potomac River LLC
Facility
The decrease in emissions of ozone
precursors is also attributable to the
closure of the GenOn Potomac River
plant located in Alexandria, Virginia.
This 482-megawatt electrical generating
facility consisted of five coal-fired
boilers and emitted 557.7 tons of NOX
annually and 2.7 tons of NOX per ozone
season day (tpd) in 2011. The plant
ceased operations and signed a mutual
determination letter on December 21,
2012, agreeing to the permanent
shutdown of the source and revoking all
permits for the facility.18 Therefore, this
closure is permanent and Federally
enforceable.
2. Emission Reductions
The District calculated the change in
emissions between 2011 and 2014
throughout the entire Washington Area
to demonstrate that air quality has
improved. The change in emissions is
shown in Table 2. The District used the
2011 base year emissions inventory for
the Washington Area as the
nonattainment year inventory because
2011 was one of the three years used to
designate the area nonattainment for the
2008 ozone NAAQS. EPA approved the
Washington Area 2011 base year
inventory as meeting the requirements
of CAA section 182(a)(1) on May 13,
2015 (80 FR 27276) for NOX and VOC
emissions and July 23, 2015 (80 FR
43625) for CO emissions. As explained
in EPA’s August 8, 2018 (83 FR 39019)
NPRM, 2014 was used as the attainment
year inventory in the maintenance plan
for the Washington Area.
TABLE 2—2011–2014 EMISSIONS REDUCTION FOR THE WASHINGTON, DC-MD-VA AREA
2011
2014
D 2011–
2014
Percent
reduction
from 2011
VOC Emissions (tpd)
295.0 ............................................................................................................................................................
259.4
35.6
12.1
296.9
139.6
32.0
1,617.9
182.9
10.2
NOX Emissions (tpd)
436.5 ............................................................................................................................................................
CO Emissions (tpd)
1,800.8 .........................................................................................................................................................
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Note: 2011 emissions data is from the 2011 base year emissions inventory for the Washington, DC–MD–VA 2008 ozone NAAQS nonattainment area that was approved by EPA on May 13, 2015 (80 FR 27276) for NOX and VOC emissions and July 23, 2015 (80 FR 43625) for CO
emissions.
17 See https://www.epa.gov/gasoline-standards/
reformulated-gasoline for more information on the
RFG program.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 May 20, 2019
Jkt 247001
18 See Mutual Determination Letter from Virginia
Department of Environmental Quality to Mr.
William Lee Davis, President, GenOn Potomac
River, LLC, Subject: Mutual Determination of
Permanent Shutdown of the Potomac River
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Generating Station, December 20, 2012 included in
the docket for this rulemaking available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, Docket ID: EPA–R03–
OAR–2018–0387.
E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM
21MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 21, 2019 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Table 2 shows that emissions of VOC
and NOX in the Washington area were
reduced by 35.6 tpd and 139.6 tpd,
respectively, between 2011 and 2014.
As discussed previously, the District has
identified several Federal rules that
resulted in the reduction of NOX and
VOC emissions from 2011 to 2014.
Therefore, the District has shown that
the air quality improvements in the
Washington Area are due to permanent
and enforceable emission reductions.
D. Does the District have a fully
approvable ozone maintenance plan for
the Washington Area?
As one of the criteria for redesignation
to attainment, section 107(d)(3)(E)(iv) of
the CAA requires EPA to determine that
the area has a fully approved
maintenance plan pursuant to section
175A of the CAA. Section 175A of the
CAA sets forth the elements of a
maintenance plan for areas seeking
redesignation from nonattainment to
attainment. Under CAA section 175A,
the maintenance plan must demonstrate
continued attainment of the NAAQS for
at least 10 years after the Administrator
approves a redesignation to attainment.
Eight years after the redesignation, the
state must submit a revised maintenance
plan which demonstrates that
attainment of the NAAQS will continue
for an additional 10 years beyond the
initial 10-year maintenance period. To
address the possibility of future NAAQS
violations, the maintenance plan must
contain contingency measures, as EPA
deems necessary, to assure prompt
correction of the future NAAQS
violation.
The Calcagni memorandum provides
further guidance on the content of a
maintenance plan, explaining that a
maintenance plan should address five
elements: (1) An attainment emission
inventory; (2) a maintenance
demonstration; (3) a commitment for
continued air quality monitoring; (4) a
process for verification of continued
attainment; and (5) a contingency plan.
In conjunction with their requests to
redesignate their respective portions of
the Washington Area to attainment of
the 2008 ozone NAAQS, the District,
Maryland, and Virginia submitted, as a
revision to their SIPs, a plan to provide
for maintenance of the 2008 ozone
NAAQS through 2030, which is more
than 10 years after the expected
effective date of the redesignation to
attainment of the Washington Area. On
April 15, 2019, EPA approved the
District, Maryland, and Virginia’s
maintenance plan for the Washington
Area as a revision to the District’s,
Maryland’s, and Virginia’s SIPs. See 84
FR 15108. Therefore, EPA finds that the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 May 20, 2019
Jkt 247001
District has satisfied the maintenance
plan requirement of CAA section
107(d)(3)(E)(iv) for redesignation of the
Washington Area.
IV. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve the
District’s March 12, 2018 request to
redesignate to attainment the District’s
portion of the Washington Area. EPA is
soliciting public comments on the
issues discussed in this document.
These comments will be considered
before taking final action.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the redesignation of
an area to attainment and the
accompanying approval of the
maintenance plan under CAA section
107(d)(3)(E) are actions that affect the
status of geographical area and do not
impose any additional regulatory
requirements on sources beyond those
required by state law. A redesignation to
attainment does not in and of itself
impose any new requirements, but
rather results in the application of
requirements contained in the CAA for
areas that have been redesignated to
attainment. Moreover, the Administrator
is required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866.
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
23005
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed rule,
proposing approval of the District’s
March 12, 2018 redesignation request
for the District’s portion of the
Washington Area, does not have tribal
implications as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000), because the SIP is not approved
to apply in Indian country located in the
state, and EPA notes that it will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: May 9, 2019.
Diana Esher,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2019–10466 Filed 5–20–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM
PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR
SEVERELY DISABLED
41 CFR Parts 51–8
RIN 3037–AA10
Proposed Public Availability of Agency
Materials
Committee for Purchase From
People Who Are Blind or Severely
Disabled.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM
21MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 98 (Tuesday, May 21, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 22996-23005]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-10466]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2018-0387; FRL-9993-95-Region 3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
District of Columbia; Approval of the Redesignation Request for the
Washington, DC-MD-VA 2008 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality
Standard Nonattainment Area
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve a request from the District of Columbia (the District) to
redesignate to attainment their portion of the Washington, DC-MD-VA
nonattainment area (hereafter ``the Washington Area'' or ``the Area'')
for the 2008 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS
or standard) (also referred to as the 2008 ozone NAAQS). EPA has
already approved, as a revision to the District's SIP, a maintenance
plan that demonstrates maintenance of the 2008 ozone NAAQS through 2030
in the Washington Area. This action is being taken under the Clean Air
Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before June 20, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R03-
OAR-2018-0387 at https://www.regulations.gov, or via email to
[email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for
[[Page 22997]]
submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or
removed from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, EPA may
publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be confidential business
information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish
to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents
located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI
or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective
comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sara Calcinore, Planning &
Implementation Branch (3AD30), Air & Radiation Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. The telephone number is (215) 814-
2043. Ms. Calcinore can also be reached via electronic mail at
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. What action is EPA proposing?
II. What is the background for this proposed action?
III. What is EPA's analysis of the District's redesignation request
for the Washington Area?
A. Has the Washington Area attained the 2008 Ozone NAAQS?
B. Has the District met all applicable requirements of section
110 and part D of the CAA for the Washington Area and does the
Washington Area have a fully approved SIP under section 110(k) of
the CAA?
C. Are the air quality improvements in the Washington Area due
to permanent and enforceable emission reductions?
D. Does the District have a fully approvable ozone maintenance
plan for the Washington Area?
IV. Proposed Action
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What action is EPA proposing?
In this action, EPA is proposing to approve the District's March
12, 2018 redesignation request as satisfying the requirements of CAA
section 107(d)(3)(E) and redesignate the District from marginal
nonattainment to attainment of the 2008 ozone NAAQS. EPA has already
approved, as a revision to the District's SIP, a maintenance plan that
demonstrates maintenance of the 2008 ozone NAAQS through 2030 in the
Washington Area. See 84 FR 15108 (April 15, 2019).
II. What is the background for this proposed action?
Under the CAA, EPA establishes NAAQS for criteria pollutants to
protect human health and the environment. In response to scientific
evidence linking ozone exposure to adverse health effects, EPA
promulgated the first ozone NAAQS, the 0.12 part per million (ppm) 1-
hour ozone NAAQS, in 1979. See 44 FR 8202 (February 8, 1979). The CAA
requires EPA to review and reevaluate the NAAQS every 5 years in order
to consider updated information regarding the effects of the criteria
pollutants on human health and the environment. On July 18, 1997, EPA
promulgated a revised ozone NAAQS, referred to as the 1997 ozone NAAQS,
of 0.08 ppm averaged over eight hours. 62 FR 38855. This 8-hour ozone
NAAQS was determined to be more protective of public health than the
previous 1979 1-hour ozone NAAQS. In 2008, EPA strengthened the 8-hour
ozone NAAQS from 0.08 to 0.075 ppm. The 0.075 ppm standard is referred
to as the 2008 ozone NAAQS. See 73 FR 16436 (March 27, 2008).
Upon promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS, section 107(d)(1)(B)
of the CAA requires EPA to designate as nonattainment any areas that
are violating the NAAQS based on the most recent three years of
quality-assured ozone monitoring data. On May 21, 2012 and June 11,
2012, EPA designated nonattainment areas for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. 77
FR 30088 and 77 FR 34221. Effective July 20, 2012, the Washington Area
was designated as marginal nonattainment for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. The
Washington Area consists of the Counties of Calvert, Charles,
Frederick, Montgomery, and Prince George's in Maryland, the Counties of
Arlington, Fairfax, Loudoun, and Prince William and the Cities of
Alexandria, Fairfax, Falls Church, Manassas, and Manassas Park in
Virginia, and the District of Columbia. See 40 CFR 81.309, 81.321, and
81.347.
Section 107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA allows redesignation of an area to
attainment of the NAAQS provided that: (1) The Administrator (EPA)
determines that the area has attained the applicable NAAQS; (2) the
Administrator has fully approved the applicable implementation plan for
the area under section 110(k) of the CAA; (3) the Administrator
determines that the improvement in air quality is due to permanent and
enforceable reductions in emissions resulting from implementation of
the applicable SIP, applicable Federal air pollutant control
regulations, and other permanent and enforceable emission reductions;
(4) the Administrator has fully approved a maintenance plan for the
area as meeting the requirements of section 175A of the CAA; and (5)
the State containing the area has met all requirements applicable to
the area for purposes of redesignation under section 110 and part D of
the CAA.
On March 12, 2018, February 5, 2018, and January 3, 2018, the
District, Maryland, and Virginia, respectively, formally submitted
requests to redesignate their portions of the Washington Area from
marginal nonattainment to attainment for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. The
District, Maryland, and Virginia concurrently submitted, as revisions
to their respective SIPs, a joint maintenance plan for the Washington
Area prepared by the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments
(MWCOG) that demonstrates maintenance of the 2008 ozone NAAQS through
2030 in the Washington Area. On April 15, 2019, EPA approved, as
revisions to the District's, Maryland's, and Virginia's SIPs, the joint
maintenance plan for the Washington Area. 84 FR 15108. In the April 15,
2019 action, EPA also approved Maryland and Virginia's requests to
redesignate to attainment their portions of the Washington Area from
marginal nonattainment to attainment of the 2008 ozone NAAQS.
On April 16, 1992, EPA provided guidance on redesignations in the
General Preamble for the Implementation of Title I of the CAA
Amendments of 1990 (57 FR 13498) and supplemented this guidance on
April 28, 1992 (57 FR 18070). EPA has provided further guidance on
processing redesignation requests in the following documents:
1. ``Ozone and Carbon Monoxide Design Value Calculations,''
Memorandum from Bill Laxton, Director, Technical Support Division, June
18, 1990;
2. ``Maintenance Plans for Redesignation of Ozone and Carbon
Monoxide Nonattainment Areas,'' Memorandum from G.T. Helms, Chief,
Ozone/Carbon Monoxide Programs Branch, April 30, 1992;
[[Page 22998]]
3. ``Contingency Measures for Ozone and Carbon Monoxide (CO)
Redesignations,'' Memorandum from G.T. Helms, Chief, Ozone/Carbon
Monoxide Programs Branch, June 1, 1992;
4. ``Procedures for Processing Requests to Redesignate Areas to
Attainment,'' Memorandum from John Calcagni, Director, Air Quality
Management Division, September 4, 1992 (the ``Calcagni memorandum'');
5. ``State Implementation Plan (SIP) Actions Submitted in Response
to Clean Air Act (CAA) Deadlines,'' Memorandum from John Calcagni,
Director, Air Quality Management Division, October 28, 1992;
6. ``Technical Support Documents (TSDs) for Redesignation of Ozone
and Carbon Monoxide (CO) Nonattainment Areas,'' Memorandum from G.T.
Helms, Chief, Ozone/Carbon Monoxide Programs Branch, August 17, 1993;
7. ``State Implementation Plan (SIP) requirements for Areas
Submitting Requests for Redesignation to Attainment of the Ozone and
Carbon Monoxide (CO) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) On
or After November 15, 1992,'' Memorandum from Michael H. Shapiro,
Acting Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation, September 17,
1993 (the ``Shapiro memorandum'');
8. ``Use of Actual Emissions in Maintenance Demonstrations for
Ozone and CO Nonattainment Areas,'' Memorandum from D. Kent Berry,
Acting Director, Air Quality Management Division, November 30, 1993;
9. ``Part D New Source Review (part D NSR) Requirements for Areas
Requesting Redesignation to Attainment,'' Memorandum from Mary D.
Nichols, Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation, October 14,
1994; and
10. ``Reasonable Further Progress, Attainment Demonstration, and
Related Requirements for Ozone Nonattainment Areas Meeting the Ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standard,'' Memorandum from John S. Seitz,
Director, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, May 10, 1995.
III. What is EPA's analysis of the District's redesignation request for
the Washington area?
A. Has the Washington area attained the 2008 Ozone NAAQS?
For redesignation of a nonattainment area to attainment, the CAA
requires EPA to determine that the area has attained the applicable
NAAQS. See CAA section 107(d)(3)(E)(i). An area is attaining the 2008
ozone NAAQS if it meets the 2008 ozone NAAQS, as determined in
accordance with 40 CFR 50.15 and appendix P of part 50, based on three
complete, consecutive calendar years of quality-assured air quality
data for all monitoring sites in the area. To attain the NAAQS, the
three-year average of the annual fourth-highest daily maximum 8-hour
average ozone concentrations, referred to as ozone design values, at
each monitor must not exceed 0.075 ppm.\1\ The air quality data must be
collected and quality-assured in accordance with 40 CFR part 58 and
recorded in EPA's Air Quality System (AQS). Ambient air quality
monitoring data for the 3-year period must also meet data completeness
requirements. An ozone design value is valid if daily maximum 8-hour
average concentrations are available for at least 90 percent of the
days within the ozone monitoring season,\2\ on average, for the three-
year period, with a minimum data completeness of 75 percent during the
ozone monitoring season of any year during the three-year period. See
section 2.3 of appendix P to 40 CFR part 50.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The rounding convention under 40 CFR part 50, appendix P
dictates that concentrations shall be reported in ppm to the third
decimal place, with additional digits to the right of the third
decimal place truncated. Thus, a computed three-year average ozone
concentration of 0.0759 ppm or lower would meet the standard, but
0.0760 ppm or higher would be over the standard.
\2\ The ozone season is defined by state in 40 CFR 58 appendix
D. For the 2013-2015 time period, the ozone season was April-October
for the states in the Area. Beginning in 2016, the ozone season is
March-October for the states in the Washington Area. See 80 FR
65292, 65466-67 (October 26, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On November 14, 2017 (82 FR 52651), in accordance with section
181(b)(2)(A) of the CAA and Provisions for Implementation of the 2008
Ozone NAAQS (40 CFR part 51, subpart AA), EPA made a determination that
the Washington Area attained the 2008 ozone NAAQS by the July 20, 2016
attainment date.\3\ EPA's determination was based upon three years of
complete, certified, and quality-assured data for the 2013-2015
monitoring period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ As part of the final rule, ``Implementation of the 2008
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone: State
Implementation Plan (SIP) Requirements,'' for the 2008 ozone NAAQS
(80 FR 12264, March 6, 2015) (hereinafter, SIP Requirements Rule),
EPA modified the maximum attainment dates for all nonattainment
areas for the 2008 ozone NAAQS to be consistent with the United
States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit's (D.C.
Circuit) decision in NRDC v. EPA, 777 F .3d 456, 464-69 (D.C. Cir.
2014). The SIP Requirements Rule established a maximum deadline for
marginal nonattainment areas to attain the 2008 ozone NAAQS of three
years from the effective date of designation, or July 20, 2015. See
80 FR at 12268; 40 CFR 51.1103. On May 4, 2016, EPA determined that
the Washington Area did not attain the 2008 ozone NAAQS by its July
20, 2015 attainment date, based on ambient air quality monitoring
data for the 2012-2014 monitoring period. In that same action, EPA
determined that the Washington Area qualified for a 1-year extension
of its attainment date, as provided in section 181(a)(5) of the CAA
and interpreted by regulation at 40 CFR 51.1107. With that final
rulemaking action, the new attainment date for the Washington Area
was July 20, 2016. See 81 FR 26697 (May 4, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, EPA has reviewed the most recent ambient air quality
monitoring data for ozone in the Area, including preliminary 2016-2018
design values, as submitted by the District, Maryland, and Virginia and
recorded in EPA's AQS. The quality-assured, quality-controlled, and
state-certified 2014 to 2017 ozone air quality data, as well as the
preliminary 2016-2018 design values, show that the Washington Area
continues to attain the 2008 ozone NAAQS. This data is summarized in
Table 1 and is also included in the docket for this rulemaking
available online at https://www.regulations.gov, Docket ID: EPA-R03-
OAR-2018-0387.
Table 1--Washington Area 2014-2016, 2015-2017, and Preliminary 2016-2018 Ozone Design Values
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual 4th highest reading (ppm) 2014-2016 2015-2017 2016-2018
------------------------------------------------------- design design design
AQS site ID Site description Jurisdiction value value value
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) \4\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11-001-0041 \5\.............. 420 34th Street District of ......... ......... 0.065 0.056 0.050 0.056 0.060 0.057
NE, Washington, Columbia.
DC 20019.
11-001-0043.................. 2500 1st Street District of 0.068 0.072 0.072 0.071 0.073 0.070 0.071 0.072
NW, Washington, Columbia.
DC.
11-001-0050.................. 300 Van Buren District of 0.069 0.72 0.071 0.067 0.073 0.070 0.070 0.070
Street NW, Columbia.
Washington, DC
20012.
[[Page 22999]]
24-009-0011.................. 350 Stafford Maryland....... 0.070 0.067 0.070 0.066 0.067 0.069 0.067 0.067
Road.
24-017-0010.................. 14320 Oaks Road. Maryland....... 0.070 0.068 0.073 0.068 0.068 0.070 0.069 0.069
24-021-0037.................. Frederick County Maryland....... 0.063 0.070 0.070 0.067 0.067 0.067 0.069 0.068
Airport.
24-031-3001.................. Lathrop E. Smith Maryland....... 0.064 0.072 0.068 0.065 0.069 0.068 0.068 0.067
Environmental
Education
Center.
24-033-0030.................. Howard Maryland....... 0.065 0.072 0.070 0.069 0.070 0.069 0.070 0.069
University's
Beltsville
Laboratory.
24-033-8003.................. PG County Maryland....... 0.069 0.069 0.073 0.072 0.070 0.070 0.071 0.071
Equestrian
Center.
24-033-9991.................. Powder Mill Rd Maryland....... 0.069 0.067 0.070 0.070 0.073 0.068 0.069 0.071
Laurel, MD
20708.
51-013-0020.................. S 18th and Hayes Virginia....... 0.071 0.073 0.072 0.070 0.070 0.072 0.071 0.070
St.
51-059-0030.................. STA. 46-B9, Lee Virginia....... 0.065 0.072 0.073 0.068 0.066 0.070 0.071 0.069
Park, Telegraph
Road.
51-107-1005.................. 38-I, Broad Run Virginia....... 0.063 0.071 0.068 0.066 0.065 0.067 0.068 0.066
High School,
Ashburn.
51-153-0009.................. James S. Long Virginia....... 0.062 0.067 0.067 0.065 0.065 0.065 0.066 0.065
Park.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ As noted previously, the 2016-2018 design values are
preliminary.
\5\ The 2014 and 2015 data at monitoring site 11-001-0041 (also
referred to as ``the River Terrace monitor'') is incomplete.
Therefore, the 2016 and 2017 design values are invalid. The River
Terrace monitor was temporarily shut down in March 2014 due to
renovations at the monitoring site. The River Terrace monitor was
reinstated in 2016, and began operation in May 2016. The temporary
shutdown of the River Terrace monitor is discussed in more detail in
the TSD for EPA's August 8, 2018 (83 FR 39019) notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM), which is available online at https://www.regulations.gov, Docket ID: EPA-R03-OAR-2018-0215.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA notes that the data for the PG County Equestrian Center monitor
(AQS Site ID 24-033-8003) in Table 1 excludes data associated with
exceptional event (EE) episodes for 8-hour ozone data influenced by the
Fort McMurray wildfire on May 25 and 26, 2016, and northwestern Canada
wildfires on July 21 and 22, 2016. The Maryland Department of the
Environment (MDE) determined that the Fort McMurray and northwestern
Canada wildfires caused elevated ozone concentrations at 16 and 12
monitors, respectively, throughout Maryland, including the PG County
Equestrian Center monitor. By letters and enclosures dated May 26, 2017
and October 20, 2017, MDE submitted EE demonstrations related to the
May and July 2016 wildfires. On December 26, 2017, EPA concurred on
MDE's EE demonstration for numerous monitors, including the PG County
Equestrian Center monitor.\6\ Pursuant to EPA's concurrence, EPA
excluded certain data, affected by the wildfires, from AQS, thereby
affecting the calculated design values at the corresponding monitors.
Due to the exclusion of the exceptional events data, the PG County
Equestrian Center monitor's 2014-2016 design value decreased from 0.071
ppm to 0.070 ppm and the 2015-2017 design value and preliminary 2016-
2018 design value decreased from 0.072 ppm to 0.071 ppm.\7\ However,
the design value at the PG County Equestrian Center monitor would have
been below the 2008 ozone NAAQS of 0.075 ppm regardless of the
exclusion of the exceptional events data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ MDE's exceptional event demonstrations and EPA's concurrence
are included in the docket for this rulemaking, available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, Docket ID: EPA-R03-OAR-2018-0387.
\7\ This data is included in the docket for this rulemaking
available online at https://www.regulations.gov, Docket ID: EPA-R03-
OAR-2018-0387.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Washington Area's most recent monitoring data supports EPA's
previous determination that the Area has attained, and continues to
attain, the 2008 ozone NAAQS. In addition, as discussed in EPA's August
8, 2018 (83 FR 39019) NPRM, the District, Maryland, and Virginia have
committed to continue monitoring ambient ozone concentrations in
accordance with 40 CFR part 58. Therefore, EPA is proposing to
determine that the Washington Area continues to attain the 2008 8-hour
ozone NAAQS, which is required by CAA section 107(d)(3)(E)(i) for
redesignation of a nonattainment area to attainment.
B. Has the District met all applicable requirements of section 110 and
part D of the CAA for the Washington Area and does the Washington Area
have a fully approved SIP under section 110(k) of the CAA?
In accordance with section 107(d)(3)(E)(v) of the CAA, in order to
redesignate the Washington Area to attainment, the District must meet
all requirements applicable to the Washington Area under CAA section
110 (general SIP requirements) and part D of Title I of the CAA (SIP
requirements for nonattainment areas). In addition, in accordance with
section 107(d)(3)(E)(ii) of the CAA, the District's SIP for the
Washington Area must be fully approved under CAA section 110(k).
The September 4, 1992 Calcagni memorandum (``Procedures for
Processing Requests to Redesignate Areas to Attainment,'' Memorandum
from John Calcagni, Director, Air Quality Management Division,
September 4, 1992) describes EPA's interpretation of section
107(d)(3)(E) with respect to the timing of applicable requirements.
Under this interpretation, to qualify for redesignation, states
requesting redesignation to attainment must meet only the relevant CAA
requirements that come due prior to the submittal of a complete
redesignation request. See also Shapiro memorandum, September 17, 1993,
and 60 FR 12459, 12465-12466, (March 7, 1995) (redesignation of
Detroit-Ann Arbor).\8\ Applicable requirements of the CAA that come due
subsequent to the area's submittal of a complete redesignation request
remain applicable until a redesignation is approved, but are not
required as a prerequisite to redesignation. See CAA section 175A(c).
Sierra Club v. EPA, 375 F .3d 537 (7th Cir. 2004). See also 68 FR
25424, 25427 (May 12, 2003) (redesignation of the St.
[[Page 23000]]
Louis/East St. Louis area to attainment of the 1-hour ozone NAAQS).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ The Calcagni memorandum and Shapiro memorandum are included
in the docket for this rulemaking available online at https://www.regulations.gov, Docket ID: EPA-R03-OAR-2018-0387.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA has determined that, in accordance with section
107(d)(3)(E)(v), the District has met all SIP requirements under
section 110 of the CAA and part D of Title I of the CAA applicable for
purposes of the redesignation of the District's portion of the
Washington Area. In addition, EPA has determined that, in accordance
with CAA section 107(d)(3)(E)(ii), the District's SIP is fully approved
with respect to all requirements applicable for purposes of this
redesignation. In making these determinations, EPA ascertained what
requirements are applicable to the Area and determined that the
portions of the District's SIP meeting these requirements are fully
approved under section 110(k) of the CAA. We note that SIPs must be
fully approved only with respect to applicable requirements. EPA's
rationale is discussed in more detail in the following sections.
1. The District Has Met All Applicable Requirements of Section 110 and
Part D of the CAA Applicable to the Washington Area for Purposes of
Redesignation
a. Section 110 General Requirements for SIPs
Pursuant to CAA section 110(a)(1), whenever new or revised NAAQS
are promulgated, the CAA requires states to submit a plan (i.e.
``SIP'') for the implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of such
NAAQS. Section 110(a)(2) of Title I of the CAA contains the general
requirements for a SIP, also referred to as ``infrastructure''
requirements. The infrastructure requirements of section 110(a)(2),
include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) Submit a SIP that
has been adopted by the state after reasonable public notice and
hearing; (2) include enforceable emission limitations and other control
measures, means, or techniques necessary to meet the requirements of
the CAA; (3) provide for establishment and operation of appropriate
devices, methods, systems and procedures necessary to monitor ambient
air quality; (4) provide for implementation of a source permit program
to regulate the modification and construction of stationary sources
within the areas covered by the plan; (5) include provisions for the
implementation of part C prevention of significant deterioration (PSD)
and part D nonattainment new source review (referred to as ``part D
NNSR,'' ``NNSR,'' or ``nonattainment NSR'') permit programs; (6)
include provisions for stationary source emission control measures,
monitoring, and reporting; (7) include provisions for air quality
modeling; and, (8) provide for public and local agency participation in
planning and emission control rule development.
Section 110(a)(2)(D) of the CAA requires that SIPs contain certain
measures to prevent sources in a state from significantly contributing
to air quality problems in another state. To implement this provision,
EPA has required certain states to establish programs to address
transport of air pollutants, in accordance with the NOX SIP
Call,\9\ amendments to the NOX SIP Call, May 14, 1999 (64 FR
26298), and March 2, 2000 (65 FR 11222), and the Cross-State Air
Pollution Rule (CSAPR) Update, October 26, 2016 (81 FR 74504). However,
the section 110(a)(2)(D) SIP requirements are not linked with a
particular area's ozone designation and classification. The section
110(a)(2)(D) requirements, where applicable, continue to apply to a
state regardless of the designation (or redesignation) of any
particular area within the state. EPA concludes that the SIP
requirements linked with an area's ozone designation and classification
are the relevant measures to evaluate when reviewing a redesignation
request for the area. Thus, the requirements of section 110(a)(2)(D) of
the CAA are not applicable requirements for purposes of redesignation.
See 65 FR 37890 (June 15, 2000), 66 FR 50399 (October 19, 2001), and 68
FR 25418, 25426-25427 (May 13, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ On October 27, 1998 (63 FR 57356), EPA finalized the
``Finding of Significant Contribution and Rulemaking for Certain
States in the Ozone Transport Assessment Group Region for Purposes
of Reducing Regional Transport of Ozone'' -commonly called the
NOX SIP Call. The NOX SIP call requires the
District of Columbia and 22 states to reduce emissions of
NOX in order to reduce the transport of ozone and ozone
precursors. EPA developed the NOX Budget Trading Program,
an allowance trading program that states could adopt to meet their
obligations under the NOX SIP Call. The NOX
Budget Trading Program allowed electric generating units (EGUs)
greater than 25 megawatts and industrial non-electric generating
units, such as boilers and turbines, with a rated heat input greater
than 250 million British thermal units per hour (MMBtu/hr), referred
to as ``large non-EGUs'', to participate in a regional
NOX cap and trade program. The NOX SIP call
also established reduction requirements for other non-EGUs,
including cement kilns and stationary internal combustion (IC)
engines.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Similarly, other section 110 elements that are neither connected
with attainment plan submissions nor linked with an area's ozone
attainment status are not applicable requirements for purposes of
redesignation. An area that is redesignated from nonattainment to
attainment will remain subject to these statewide requirements after
the area is redesignated to attainment of the 2008 ozone NAAQS. The
section 110(a)(2) requirements that are linked to the area's
designation and classification are the relevant measures to evaluate in
reviewing a redesignation request. The section 110(a)(2) elements not
linked to the area's nonattainment status are not applicable for
purposes of redesignation. This approach is consistent with EPA's
existing policy on applicability (e.g., for redesignations) of
conformity and oxygenated fuels requirements, as well as with section
184 ozone transport region (OTR) requirements. See, e.g., Reading,
Pennsylvania, proposed and final rulemakings for redesignation, 61 FR
53174-53176 (October 10, 1996) and 62 FR 24826 (May 7, 1997);
Cleveland-Akron-Lorain, Ohio, final rulemaking for redesignation, 61 FR
20458 (May 7, 1996); and Tampa, Florida final rulemaking for
redesignation, 60 FR 62748 (December 7, 1995). For further information
and analysis, see the discussion of this issue in the Cincinnati, Ohio
ozone redesignation (65 FR 37890, June 19, 2000), and the Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania ozone redesignation (66 FR 50399, October 19, 2001).
EPA has reviewed the District's SIP and concludes that it meets the
general SIP requirements under section 110 of the CAA, to the extent
those requirements are applicable for purposes of redesignation. On
April 13, 2015 and August 31, 2018, EPA approved elements of the
District's SIP submittal addressing the section 110(a)(2) requirements
for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. See 80 FR 19538 (April 13, 2015) and 83 FR
44498 (August 31, 2018).\10\ As explained previously, the general
requirements of section 110(a)(2) are statewide requirements that are
not linked to the 2008 8-hour ozone nonattainment status of the
Washington Area and are therefore not ``applicable requirements'' for
purpose of the review of the District's 2008 ozone NAAQS redesignation
request.
[[Page 23001]]
Because the District's SIP satisfies all of the general SIP elements
and requirements set forth in CAA section 110(a)(2) applicable to and
necessary for redesignation, EPA concludes that the District has
satisfied the criterion of section 107(d)(3)(E)(v) regarding section
110 of the CAA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ EPA's April 13, 2015 final rule approved the District's
infrastructure SIP submittal as satisfying all requirements of CAA
section 110(a)(2) for the 2008 ozone NAAQS, except for the
requirements under CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) and the PSD-
related portions of section 110(a)(2)(C), (D)(i)(II), (D)(ii), and
(J). See 80 FR 19538. In that final rule, EPA did not take
rulemaking action on the portion of the District's infrastructure
SIP submittal related to PSD, however, EPA notes that the District
is subject to a Federal implementation plan (FIP) which incorporates
the Federal PSD permitting requirements of 40 CFR 52.21 into the
District's SIP. See 40 CFR 52.499. EPA's August 31, 2018 final rule
approved the District's infrastructure SIP submittal as satisfying
the requirement of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2008 ozone
NAAQS. See 83 FR 44498.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
b. Part D Requirements
Areas designated nonattainment for the ozone NAAQS are subject to
the applicable nonattainment area and ozone-specific planning
requirements of part D of the CAA. Section 172-176 of the CAA, found in
subpart 1 of part D, set forth the basic nonattainment requirements for
all nonattainment areas. Section 172(c), under part D of the CAA, sets
forth the basic requirements of air quality plans for states with
nonattainment areas for all pollutants that are required to submit
plans pursuant to section 172(b). Section 182 of the CAA, found in
subpart 2 of part D, establishes specific requirements for ozone
nonattainment areas depending on the areas' nonattainment
classifications.\11\ The Washington Area was classified as marginal
under subpart 2 of part D of the CAA for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. As such,
the Area is subject to the subpart 1 requirements contained in CAA
sections 172(c) and 176. The Area is also subject to the subpart 2
requirements contained in CAA section 182(a) (marginal nonattainment
area requirements), which include, but are not limited to, submitting a
baseline emissions inventory, adopting a SIP requiring emissions
statements from stationary sources, and implementing a NNSR program for
the relevant ozone standard. A thorough discussion of the requirements
contained in CAA section 172(c) and 182 can be found in the General
Preamble for Implementation of Title I (57 FR 13498, April 16, 1992).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Ozone nonattainment areas are classified based on the
severity of their ozone levels (as determined based on the area's
``design value,'' which represents air quality in the area for the
most recent 3 years). The possible classifications for ozone
nonattainment areas are Marginal, Moderate, Serious, Severe, and
Extreme. See CAA section 181(a)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, states located in the OTR, which includes the
District,\12\ are also subject to the requirements of CAA section 184.
All areas located in the OTR, both attainment and nonattainment, are
subject to additional control requirements under section 184 for the
purpose of reducing interstate transport of emissions that may
contribute to downwind ozone nonattainment. The section 184
requirements include reasonable available control technology (RACT),
NNSR, enhanced vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/M), and State II
vapor recovery or a comparable measure relating to gasoline dispensing
facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ The OTR is comprised of the states of Connecticut,
Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey,
New York, Pennsylvania, and the Consolidated Metropolitan
Statistical Area, which includes the District of Columbia and
portions of Virginia. The areas designated as in the Virginia
portion of the OTR are as follows: Arlington County, Fairfax County,
Loudoun County, Prince William County, Stafford County, Alexandria
City, Fairfax City, Falls Church City, Manassas City, and Manassas
Park City. See, e.g. ``Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality
Implementation Plans; Virginia; NSR in the Ozone Transport Region'',
71 FR 39570 (July 13, 2006) and 71 FR 890 (January 6, 2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA has interpreted the section 184 OTR requirements, including the
NNSR program, as not being applicable for purposes of redesignation.
The rationale for this is based on two considerations. First, the
requirement to submit SIP revisions for the section 184 requirements
continues to apply to areas in the OTR even after redesignation to
attainment. Therefore, states remain obligated to have NNSR, as well as
RACT, and I/M programs, even after redesignation. Second, the section
184 control measures are region-wide requirements and do not apply to
the area by virtue of the area's designation and classification, and
thus are properly considered not relevant to an action changing an
area's designation. See 61 FR 53174, 53175-53176 (October 10, 1996) and
62 FR 24826, 24830-24832 (May 7, 1997).
i. CAA Section 172 Requirements
CAA section 172(c) contains general requirements for nonattainment
plans. As stated previously, a thorough discussion of these
requirements may be found in the General Preamble for Implementation of
Title I (57 FR 13498, April 16, 1992). As provided in CAA part D,
subpart 2, for marginal ozone nonattainment areas such as the
Washington Area, the ozone specific requirements of section 182(a)
supersede (where overlapping) the attainment planning requirements that
would otherwise apply under section 172(c).
Upon determination by EPA that the Washington Area attained the
2008 ozone NAAQS, the requirements of CAA section 172(c) for the
District to submit for their portion of the Washington Area an
attainment demonstration and associated reasonably available control
measures (RACM), a reasonable further progress (RFP) plan, contingency
measures for failure to attain or make reasonable progress, and other
planning SIPs related to attainment of the 2008 ozone NAAQS were
suspended. See 40 CFR 51.1118. Once the Area is redesignated to
attainment for the 2008 ozone NAAQS, these requirements no longer apply
for the 2008 ozone NAAQS unless EPA determines that the Area has
violated the 2008 ozone NAAQS, at which time such plans are required to
be submitted. As stated previously, on November 14, 2017 (82 FR 52651),
EPA determined that the Washington Area had attained the 2008 ozone
NAAQS by the July 20, 2016 attainment date. Furthermore, as explained
in section III.A of this action, the Washington Area continues to
attain the 2008 ozone NAAQS. Therefore, because the Washington Area has
attained the 2008 ozone NAAQS and the Area continues to attain the
standard, no additional measures are needed to provide for attainment
and the requirements of section 172(c)(1), 172(c)(2), 172(c)(6), and
172(c)(9) are not considered to be applicable for purposes of
redesignation of the Washington Area for the 2008 ozone NAAQS.
Section 172(c)(3) requires submission and approval of a
comprehensive, accurate, and current inventory of actual emissions from
all sources of the relevant pollutant or pollutants in the area. This
requirement was not suspended by EPA's determination of attainment for
the Washington Area and is superseded by the inventory requirement in
section 182(a)(1) discussed later in this notice.
Section 172(c)(4) requires the identification and quantification of
allowable emissions for major new and modified sources in an area, and
section 172(c)(5) requires source permits for the construction and
operation of new and modified major stationary sources anywhere in the
nonattainment area. EPA has determined that, since PSD requirements
will apply after redesignation, areas being redesignated need not
comply with the requirement that a NNSR program be approved prior to
redesignation, provided that the area demonstrates maintenance of the
NAAQS without NNSR. A more detailed rationale for this view is
described in a memorandum from Mary Nichols, Assistant Administrator
for Air and Radiation, dated October 14, 1994, entitled, ``Part D New
Source Review Requirements for Areas Requesting Redesignation to
Attainment.'' The District lacks a SIP-approved PSD program; however,
it is subject to a FIP which incorporates EPA's PSD permitting
requirements of 40 CFR 52.21. See 40 CFR 52.499.
In addition, as explained previously, the Washington Area is
included in the
[[Page 23002]]
OTR established by Congress in section 184 of the CAA. Therefore,
sources located in the District will remain subject to the part D NNSR
requirements even after the Washington Area is redesignated to
attainment. Since the part D NNSR requirements apply to the Washington
Area regardless of its attainment status, the part D NNSR requirements
are not considered to be relevant for purposes of the redesignation of
the Washington Area. Regardless, the District has an approved part D
NNSR program.\13\ See 62 FR 40937 (July 31, 1977).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ On May 23, 2018 the District submitted a SIP revision
certifying that the District's SIP-approved NNSR program,
established in Chapters 1 (Air Quality--General Rules) and 2 (Air
Quality--General and Nonattainment Area Permits) in Title 20 of the
District of Columbia Municipal Regulations (DCMR), is at least as
stringent as the Federal NNSR requirements for the Washington Area
for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. See 40 CFR 51.165. EPA proposed approval
of the District's NNSR program certification for the 2008 ozone
NAAQS on March 19, 2019. 84 FR 9995.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 172(c)(7) requires the SIP to meet the applicable
provisions of section 110(a)(2). As noted previously, the District's
SIP meets the applicable requirements of section 110(a)(2) for purposes
of redesignation.
ii. CAA Section 176 Conformity Requirements
Section 176(c) of the CAA requires states to establish criteria and
procedures to ensure that Federally supported or funded projects
conform to the air quality planning goals in the applicable SIP. The
requirement to determine conformity applies to transportation plans,
programs, and projects that are developed, funded, or approved under
title 23 of the United States Code (U.S.C.) and the Federal Transit Act
(transportation conformity) as well as to all other Federally supported
or funded projects (general conformity). State transportation
conformity SIP revisions must be consistent with Federal conformity
regulations relating to consultation, enforcement, and enforceability
that EPA promulgated pursuant to its authority under the CAA.
EPA interprets the conformity SIP requirements \14\ as not
applicable for purposes of evaluating a redesignation request under
section 107(d) because state conformity rules are still required after
redesignation and Federal conformity rules apply where state conformity
rules have not been approved. See Wall v. EPA, 265 F .3d 426 (6th Cir.
2001) (upholding this interpretation); see also 60 FR 62748 (December
7, 1995) (redesignation of Tampa, Florida).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ CAA section 176(c)(4)(E) requires states to submit
revisions to their SIPs to reflect certain Federal criteria and
procedures for determining transportation conformity. Transportation
conformity SIPs are different from SIPs requiring the development of
Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets (MVEBs), such as control strategy
SIPs and maintenance plans.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
iii. Section 182 Requirements
Section 182(a)(1) requires states to submit a comprehensive,
accurate, and current inventory of actual emissions from sources of
NOX and VOC emitted within the boundaries of the ozone
nonattainment area. On July 17, 2014, the District and Virginia
submitted a joint 2011 base year emissions inventory addressing
NOX and VOC emissions, as well as carbon monoxide (CO)
emissions, for the Washington Area. On August 4, 2014, Maryland
submitted its 2011 base year emissions inventory for the Washington
Area, which also addressed NOX, VOC, and CO. EPA approved
the District's, Maryland's, and Virginia's base year emissions
inventories for NOX and VOC for the 2008 ozone NAAQS on May
13, 2015 (80 FR 27255). On July 23, 2015 (80 FR 43625), EPA approved
the District's, Maryland's, and Virginia's base year emission
inventories for CO.
Under section 182(a)(2)(A), states with ozone nonattainment areas
that were designated prior to the enactment of the 1990 CAA amendments
were required to submit, within six months of classification, all rules
and corrections to existing RACT rules that were required under section
172(b)(3) prior to the 1990 CAA amendments. EPA approved the District's
SIP revision satisfying the section 182(a)(2) RACT ``fix-up''
requirement on October 27, 1999 (64 FR 57777).
Section 182(c)(3) of the CAA requires areas classified as serious
and above to adopt and implement an enhanced I/M program. The
Washington Area was classified as severe for the 1979 1-hour ozone
NAAQS, and therefore enhanced I/M was required. In addition, section
184(b)(1)(a) of the CAA requires areas located in the OTR that are a
metropolitan statistical area, or part thereof, with a population of
100,00 or more to meet the enhanced I/M program requirements of CAA
section 182(c)(3). EPA approved the District's enhanced I/M program
into the District's SIP on June 11, 1999 (64 FR 31498).
CAA section 182(a)(2)(C) and section 182(a)(4) contain source
permitting and offset requirements (NNSR). As discussed previously, the
part D NNSR requirements will continue to apply to the Washington Area,
regardless of attainment status, due to the Washington Area being part
of the OTR. Therefore, EPA concludes that the District need not have a
fully approved part D NSR program for purposes of this redesignation
request. As stated previously, however, the District has an approved
NNSR program. See 62 FR 40937 (July 31, 1997).
Section 182(a)(3) requires states to submit periodic emission
inventories and a revision to the SIP to require owners or operators of
stationary sources to annually submit emission statements documenting
actual NOX and VOC emissions. The District submits periodic
emission inventories as required by CAA section 182(a)(3). As stated
above, EPA approved the District's, Maryland's, and Virginia's base
year emissions inventories for NOX and VOC for the 2008
ozone NAAQS on May 13, 2015 (80 FR 27255). With regard to the
stationary source emissions statements requirement of CAA section
182(a)(3)(B), EPA approved the District's emissions statements rule
into the District's SIP on May 26, 1995 (60 FR 27944). The District's
emissions statements rule requires that certain sources in the District
report annual NOX and VOC emissions and satisfies the
requirements of CAA section 182(a)(3)(B). On May 25, 2018, the District
submitted, as a formal revision to its SIP, a statement certifying that
the District's existing emissions statements rule covers the District's
portion of the Washington Area and satisfies the requirements of CAA
section 182(a)(3)(B) for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. EPA proposed approval of
the District's emissions statements certification for the 2008 ozone
NAAQS (finding that the District's existing SIP-approved emissions
statements rule satisfies the CAA section 182(a)(3) requirements for
the 2008 ozone NAAQS) on March 5, 2019 (84 FR 7858).\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ While not prejudging the outcome of EPA's rulemaking on the
District's May 25, 2018 emissions statements certification for the
2008 ozone NAAQS, EPA expects to finalize rulemaking on that SIP
revision before taking final action on this redesignation action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The District has satisfied all applicable SIP requirements under
section 110 and part D of title I of the CAA for purposes of
redesignation of the District for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. Therefore, EPA
has determined that the District satisfies the requirements of CAA
section 107(d)(3)(E)(v) for redesignation of the District's portion of
the Washington Area.
2. The District Has a Fully Approved SIP for Purposes of Redesignation
Under Section 110(k) of the CAA
At various times, the District has adopted and submitted, and EPA
has approved, provisions addressing the
[[Page 23003]]
various SIP elements applicable for the ozone NAAQS. As discussed
previously, EPA has approved the District's SIP for the 2008 ozone
NAAQS under section 110(k) for all requirements applicable for purposes
of redesignation of the Washington Area.\16\ EPA may rely on prior SIP
approvals in approving a redesignation request (see the Calcagni
memorandum at page 3; Southwestern Pennsylvania Growth Alliance v.
Browner, 144 F.3d 984, 989-990 (6th Cir. 1998); Wall v. EPA, 265 F.3d
426), plus any additional measures it may approve in conjunction with a
redesignation action (see 68 FR 25426 (May 12, 2003) and citations
therein).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See Footnote 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Therefore, EPA has determined that the District's SIP is fully
approved with respect to all requirements applicable for purposes of
redesignation in accordance with CAA section 107(d)(3)(E)(ii).
C. Are the air quality improvements in the Washington Area due to
permanent and enforceable emission reductions?
To redesignate an area from nonattainment to attainment, section
107(d)(3)(E)(iii) of the CAA requires EPA to determine that the air
quality improvement in the area is due to permanent and enforceable
reductions in emissions resulting from the implementation of the SIP
and applicable Federal air pollution control regulations and other
permanent and enforceable emission reductions. The District has
demonstrated that the observed ozone air quality improvement in the
Washington Area is due to permanent and enforceable reductions in
NOX and VOC emissions resulting from measures approved as
part of the District's SIP as well as Federal measures.
In making this demonstration, the District has calculated the
change in emissions between 2011 and 2014. The change in emissions is
shown in Table 2. The District attributes the decrease in emissions and
corresponding improvement in air quality during this time period to a
number of regulatory measures that have been implemented in the
Washington Area and upwind areas in recent years. Based on the
information summarized in the following sections, the District has
adequately demonstrated that the improvement in air quality is due to
permanent and enforceable emissions reductions pursuant to CAA section
107(d)(3)(E)(iii).
1. Permanent and Enforceable Emission Controls Implemented
a. Federal Emission Control Measures
A variety of Federal and state control programs have contributed to
reduced on-road, point source, and nonroad emissions of NOX
and VOC in the Washington Area, with additional emission reductions
expected to occur in the future as older equipment and vehicles are
replaced with newer, compliant models. Federal emission control
measures include the following:
Tier 2 Motor Vehicle Emissions Standards and Gasoline Sulfur Control
Requirements
On February 10, 2000 (65 FR 6698), EPA promulgated Tier 2 motor
vehicle emission standards and gasoline sulfur control requirements.
These emission control requirements result in lower NOX and
VOC emissions from new cars and light duty trucks, including sport
utility vehicles. With respect to fuels, this rule required refiners
and importers of gasoline to meet lower standards for sulfur in
gasoline, which were phased in between 2004 and 2006. By 2006, refiners
were required to meet a 30 ppm average sulfur level, with a maximum cap
of 80 ppm. This reduction in fuel sulfur content ensures the
effectiveness of low emission-control technologies. The Tier 2 tailpipe
standards established in this rule were phased in for new vehicles
between 2004 and 2009. EPA estimated in the final rule that this
program will reduce annual NOX emissions by about 2.2
million tons per year in 2020 and 2.8 million tons per year in 2030
after the program is fully implemented and non-compliant vehicles have
all been retired.
Control of Emissions From Nonroad Spark-Ignition Engines and Equipment
On October 8, 2008 (73 FR 59034), EPA finalized emission standards
for new nonroad spark-ignition engines. The exhaust emission standards
applied beginning in 2010 for new marine spark-ignition engines and in
2011 and 2012 for different sizes of new land-based, spark-ignition
engines at or below 19 kW (i.e. small engines used primarily in lawn
and garden applications). In the October 8, 2008 final rule, EPA
estimated that by 2030 the rule will result in annual nationwide
reductions of 604,000 tons of volatile organic hydrocarbon emissions,
132,200 tons of NOX emissions, and 5,500 tons of directly-
emitted PM2.5 emissions. These reductions correspond to
significant reductions in the formation of ground-level ozone.
Nonroad Diesel Engines Tier 1 and Tier 2
On June 17, 1994 (59 FR 31306), EPA made an affirmative
determination under section 213(a)(2) of the CAA that nonroad engines
are significant contributors to ambient ozone or CO levels in more than
one nonattainment area. In the same notice, EPA also made a
determination under CAA section 213(a)(4) that other emissions from
compression-ignition (CI) nonroad engines rated at or above 37
kilowatts (kW) cause or contribute to air pollution that may reasonably
be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare. In the June 17,
1994 final rule, EPA set a first phase of emission standards (Tier 1
standards) for nonroad diesel engines rated 37 kW and above. These
standards apply to nonroad, compression-ignition (i.e. diesel-powered)
utility engines including, but not limited to, farm, construction, and
industrial equipment, rated at or above 37 kW. On October 23, 1998 (63
FR 56968), EPA finalized a second phase of emission standards (Tier 2
standards) for nonroad diesel engines rated under 37 kW. These emission
standards have resulted in a decrease in NOX emissions from
the combustion of diesel fuel used to power this equipment. The Tier 1
and Tier 2 standards for nonroad diesel engines will continue to result
in emission reductions as older equipment is replaced with newer,
compliant models.
Emissions Standards for Large Spark Ignition Engines
On November 8, 2002 (67 FR 68242), EPA established emission
standards for large spark-ignition engines such as those used in
forklifts and airport ground-service equipment; recreational vehicles
using spark-ignition engines such as off-highway motorcycles, all-
terrain vehicles, and snow mobiles; and recreational marine diesel
engines. These emission standards were phased in from model year 2004
through 2012. When the emission standards are fully implemented in
2030, EPA expects a national 75 percent reduction in hydrocarbon (HC)
emissions, 82 percent reduction in NOX emissions, 61 percent
reduction in CO emissions, and a 60 percent reduction in direct
particulate matter (PM) emissions from these engines, equipment, and
vehicles compared to projected emissions if the standards were not
implemented.
Standards for Reformulated and Conventional Gasoline
On February 16, 1994 (59 FR 7716), EPA finalized regulations
requiring that gasoline in certain areas be reformulated
[[Page 23004]]
to reduce vehicle emissions of toxic and ozone-forming compounds,
including NOX and VOC. Reformulated gasoline (RFG) is
required in the Washington Area. The first phase of the RFG program
(Phase I) began in 1995 and the second phase (Phase II) began in 2000.
These standards affect various gasoline-powered non-road mobile
sources, such as lawn equipment, generators, and compressors. EPA
estimates that Phase I of the RFG program resulted in a 2 percent and
17 percent annual reduction in NOX, and VOCs, respectively,
from 1995 emission levels and prevented 64,000 tons of smog-forming
pollutants, including NOX and VOC, from being emitted into
the air from 1995 to 2000. Phase II of the RFG program, which began in
2000, was expected to reduce emissions of NOX and VOC by 7
percent and 27 percent, respectively, from 1995 emission levels and
reduce emissions of smog-forming pollutants by an additional 41,000
tons.\17\ The RFG program continues to provide emission reductions in
the Washington Area as the use of RFG results in less vehicle emissions
of NOX and VOC compared to the use of conventional gasoline.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See https://www.epa.gov/gasoline-standards/reformulated-gasoline for more information on the RFG program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emission Standards for Locomotives and Locomotive Engines
On April 16, 1998 (63 FR 18978), EPA established emission standards
for NOX, HC, CO, PM, and smoke from newly manufactured and
remanufactured diesel-powered locomotives and locomotive engines. These
emission standards were effective in 2000 and are expected to result in
a more than 60 percent reduction in NOX emissions from
locomotives by 2040 compared to 1995 baseline levels.
b. Control Measures Specific to the Washington Area
Maryland Healthy Air Act
In addition to the measures referenced previously, a reduction of
emission of ozone precursors can also be attributed to the Maryland
Healthy Air Act (Annotated Code of Maryland Environment Title 2 Ambient
Air Quality Control Subtitle 10 Healthy Air Act Sections 2-1001 to 2-
1005, with implementing regulations at COMAR 26.11.27 Emission
Limitations for Power Plants). The Maryland Health Air Act (HAA) was
effective on July 16, 2007 and approved by EPA on September 4, 2008 (73
FR 51599). The HAA established limits on the amount of NOX
and SO2 emissions affected facilities in Maryland could emit
and required the installation of on-site pollution controls at 15 power
plants in Maryland. The first phase of the HAA occurred between 2009
and 2010 and reduced NOX emissions from affected sources by
almost 70% compared to 2002 levels. The second phase of the HAA
occurred between 2012 and 2013. Maryland estimates that the HAA will
reduce NOX emissions by approximately 75% from 2002 levels.
Closure of GenOn Potomac River LLC Facility
The decrease in emissions of ozone precursors is also attributable
to the closure of the GenOn Potomac River plant located in Alexandria,
Virginia. This 482-megawatt electrical generating facility consisted of
five coal-fired boilers and emitted 557.7 tons of NOX
annually and 2.7 tons of NOX per ozone season day (tpd) in
2011. The plant ceased operations and signed a mutual determination
letter on December 21, 2012, agreeing to the permanent shutdown of the
source and revoking all permits for the facility.\18\ Therefore, this
closure is permanent and Federally enforceable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See Mutual Determination Letter from Virginia Department of
Environmental Quality to Mr. William Lee Davis, President, GenOn
Potomac River, LLC, Subject: Mutual Determination of Permanent
Shutdown of the Potomac River Generating Station, December 20, 2012
included in the docket for this rulemaking available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, Docket ID: EPA-R03-OAR-2018-0387.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Emission Reductions
The District calculated the change in emissions between 2011 and
2014 throughout the entire Washington Area to demonstrate that air
quality has improved. The change in emissions is shown in Table 2. The
District used the 2011 base year emissions inventory for the Washington
Area as the nonattainment year inventory because 2011 was one of the
three years used to designate the area nonattainment for the 2008 ozone
NAAQS. EPA approved the Washington Area 2011 base year inventory as
meeting the requirements of CAA section 182(a)(1) on May 13, 2015 (80
FR 27276) for NOX and VOC emissions and July 23, 2015 (80 FR
43625) for CO emissions. As explained in EPA's August 8, 2018 (83 FR
39019) NPRM, 2014 was used as the attainment year inventory in the
maintenance plan for the Washington Area.
Table 2--2011-2014 Emissions Reduction for the Washington, DC-MD-VA Area
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Percent
2011 2014 [Delta] reduction
2011-2014 from 2011
------------------------------------------------------------------------
VOC Emissions (tpd).....................................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
295.0.............................. 259.4 35.6 12.1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOX Emissions (tpd).....................................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
436.5.............................. 296.9 139.6 32.0
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CO Emissions (tpd)......................................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1,800.8............................ 1,617.9 182.9 10.2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: 2011 emissions data is from the 2011 base year emissions inventory
for the Washington, DC-MD-VA 2008 ozone NAAQS nonattainment area that
was approved by EPA on May 13, 2015 (80 FR 27276) for NOX and VOC
emissions and July 23, 2015 (80 FR 43625) for CO emissions.
[[Page 23005]]
Table 2 shows that emissions of VOC and NOX in the
Washington area were reduced by 35.6 tpd and 139.6 tpd, respectively,
between 2011 and 2014. As discussed previously, the District has
identified several Federal rules that resulted in the reduction of
NOX and VOC emissions from 2011 to 2014. Therefore, the
District has shown that the air quality improvements in the Washington
Area are due to permanent and enforceable emission reductions.
D. Does the District have a fully approvable ozone maintenance plan for
the Washington Area?
As one of the criteria for redesignation to attainment, section
107(d)(3)(E)(iv) of the CAA requires EPA to determine that the area has
a fully approved maintenance plan pursuant to section 175A of the CAA.
Section 175A of the CAA sets forth the elements of a maintenance plan
for areas seeking redesignation from nonattainment to attainment. Under
CAA section 175A, the maintenance plan must demonstrate continued
attainment of the NAAQS for at least 10 years after the Administrator
approves a redesignation to attainment. Eight years after the
redesignation, the state must submit a revised maintenance plan which
demonstrates that attainment of the NAAQS will continue for an
additional 10 years beyond the initial 10-year maintenance period. To
address the possibility of future NAAQS violations, the maintenance
plan must contain contingency measures, as EPA deems necessary, to
assure prompt correction of the future NAAQS violation.
The Calcagni memorandum provides further guidance on the content of
a maintenance plan, explaining that a maintenance plan should address
five elements: (1) An attainment emission inventory; (2) a maintenance
demonstration; (3) a commitment for continued air quality monitoring;
(4) a process for verification of continued attainment; and (5) a
contingency plan.
In conjunction with their requests to redesignate their respective
portions of the Washington Area to attainment of the 2008 ozone NAAQS,
the District, Maryland, and Virginia submitted, as a revision to their
SIPs, a plan to provide for maintenance of the 2008 ozone NAAQS through
2030, which is more than 10 years after the expected effective date of
the redesignation to attainment of the Washington Area. On April 15,
2019, EPA approved the District, Maryland, and Virginia's maintenance
plan for the Washington Area as a revision to the District's,
Maryland's, and Virginia's SIPs. See 84 FR 15108. Therefore, EPA finds
that the District has satisfied the maintenance plan requirement of CAA
section 107(d)(3)(E)(iv) for redesignation of the Washington Area.
IV. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve the District's March 12, 2018 request
to redesignate to attainment the District's portion of the Washington
Area. EPA is soliciting public comments on the issues discussed in this
document. These comments will be considered before taking final action.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the redesignation of an area to attainment and the
accompanying approval of the maintenance plan under CAA section
107(d)(3)(E) are actions that affect the status of geographical area
and do not impose any additional regulatory requirements on sources
beyond those required by state law. A redesignation to attainment does
not in and of itself impose any new requirements, but rather results in
the application of requirements contained in the CAA for areas that
have been redesignated to attainment. Moreover, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions
of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40
CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to
approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866.
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed rule, proposing approval of the
District's March 12, 2018 redesignation request for the District's
portion of the Washington Area, does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: May 9, 2019.
Diana Esher,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2019-10466 Filed 5-20-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P