Freedom of Information Act Regulations and Additional Incidental Technical Amendments to Other IMLS Regulations, 22943-22947 [2019-10212]
Download as PDF
22943
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 84, No. 98
Tuesday, May 21, 2019
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents.
NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE
ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES
Institute of Museum and Library
Services
2 CFR Part 3187
45 CFR Parts 1181, 1182 and 1184
RIN 3137–AA25
II. Discussion of the Final Rule
Freedom of Information Act
Regulations and Additional Incidental
Technical Amendments to Other IMLS
Regulations
Institute of Museum and
Library Services (IMLS or Institute),
National Foundation on the Arts and the
Humanities (NFAH).
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Final rule.
This rule amends the
regulations the Institute of Museum and
Library Services (IMLS) follows in
processing records under the Freedom
of Information Act, in part in
compliance with the FOIA Improvement
Act of 2016, and otherwise also revises
all current IMLS regulations to reflect
the agency’s change of address and
update outdated information. The
revisions to IMLS FOIA regulations
clarify and update procedures for
requesting information from IMLS and
procedures that IMLS follows in
responding to requests from the public.
The revisions to other IMLS regulations
would revise the citation to the Age
Discrimination Act of 1975, reflect the
agency’s change of address, and update
outdated information.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
This rule is effective May 20,
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan B. Gerson, Associate General
Counsel, Institute of Museum and
Library Services, (202) 653–4712.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:19 May 20, 2019
I. Background Information—FOIA and
Technical Amendments
On December 26, 2018 (83 FR 66163),
the Institute published a proposed rule
to revise its FOIA regulations in
accordance with the FOIA Improvement
Act of 2016 and otherwise reflect the
agency’s change of address and update
outdated information. IMLS also
proposed to make minor technical
amendments to all other IMLS
regulations to reflect the agency’s
change of physical address, update
contact information, and otherwise
facilitate readability. In the interests of
economy of administration, and because
all of the regulations proposed to be
removed are outdated and the technical
amendments are minor, they are
included in this one rulemaking.
Jkt 247001
A. Non-Discretionary Changes Required
by the FOIA Improvement Act of 2016
In compliance with the FOIA
Improvement Act of 2016, the Institute
has made changes to its regulatory
amendments to update information and
otherwise make technical amendments
to improve the clarity of the Institute’s
regulations.
B. Response to Comment and Changes
From the Proposed Rule
In total, the Institute received one
public submission to its proposed rule.
The Institute has given due
consideration to the comment received
and has made one modification to the
rule, as discussed below.
1. Comments on Proposed 45 CFR
1184.1(b) (the purpose and scope of
these IMLS regulations) and 1184.2(c)
(IMLS’s general policies with respect to
FOIA).
The commenter suggested that IMLS
remove all reference to the OMB
Guidelines, including such references
made in proposed 45 CFR 1184.1(b) and
45 CFR 1184.2(c), because the
commenter submits that the OMB
Guidelines are no longer authoritative.
The Institute has considered this
suggestion and determined that
proposed 45 CFR 1184.1(b) and 45 CFR
1184.2(c) adequately replaces the
language in the original 45 CFR
1184.1(b) and 45 CFR 1184.2(c).
The revised language’s reference to
the OMB Guidelines are general
references to the overall guidelines; and
such guidelines remain in force,
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
continuing to generally apply to agency
FOIA regulations. These references to
the OMB Guidelines in IMLS’s general
FOIA regulation provisions at proposed
45 CFR 1184.1(b) and 45 CFR 1184.2(c)
also are consistent with the Justice
Department’s Office of Information
Policy Template for Agency FOIA
Regulations and consistent with the
language used by many other
government agencies, including the
Department of Justice, which provides
interagency leadership on FOIA matters.
See 28 CFR 16.1.
2. Comments on Proposed 45 CFR
1184.2(c)(8) (Definitions; Representative
of the News Media).
The commenter suggested that the
Institute revise its definition of
Representative of the News Media at 45
CFR 1184.2(c)(8), to remove the
outdated ‘‘organized and operated’’
definition and replace it with an
updated one tracking the statutory
language. The Institute has considered
this suggestion and determined that it
will revise the language in current 45
CFR 1184.2(c)(8) to comport with a
definition of Representative of the News
Media which more squarely comports
with the FOIA, as amended. More
specifically, the Institute will adopt the
model definition of Representative of
the News Media as delineated in the
Justice Department’s Office of
Information Policy Template for Agency
FOIA Regulations. Because this change
is in line with the language used by
many other government agencies,
including the Department of Justice, the
Institute implements this revision
without the need of formal notice and
comment. See 28 CFR 16.10(b)(6).
The commenter further suggested that
the Institute supplement its regulations
definition of Representative of the News
Media to include that: (a) A requester’s
eligibility as a Representative of the
News Media should be assessed with a
focus on the requester rather than the
nature of the information requested, (b)
distinct works should include, as an
example, a substantive press release,
which applies editorial skills to raw
material, and (c) examples of news
media entities should be nonexhaustive, to include evolving news
media formats. The Institute has
considered these suggestions and
determined that the revised 45 CFR
1184.2(c)(8) defining a Representative of
the News Media is sufficiently detailed,
E:\FR\FM\21MYR1.SGM
21MYR1
22944
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 21, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
focuses on the person or entity rather
than the information requested, and
provides examples in a manner that is
non-exhaustive. The Institute therefore
has determined that the model language
set forth in the revised 45 CFR
1184.2(c)(8) adequately replaces the
language in the original 45 CFR
1184.2(c)(8).
III. Regulatory Analyses
Regulatory Planning and Review (E.O.
12866)
Under Executive Order 12866, the
Institute must determine whether the
regulatory action is ‘‘significant’’ and
therefore subject to OMB review and the
requirements of the Executive Order.
The Order defines a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ as one that is likely
to result in a rule that may: (1) Have an
annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more or adversely affect in a
material way the economy, a sector of
the economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities; (2) create
a serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfere with an action taken or
planned by another agency; (3)
materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the rights and obligations of
recipients thereof; or (4) raise novel
legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or
the principles set forth in the Executive
Order.
This rule updates outdated
information and makes technical
amendments to the Institute’s
regulations. As such, it does not impose
a compliance burden on the economy
generally or on any person or entity.
Accordingly, this rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ from an
economic standpoint, and it does not
otherwise create any inconsistences or
budgetary impacts to any other agency
or Federal Program.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
Because this rule would amend
outdated regulations and make certain
technical amendments, the Institute has
determined in Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) review that this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities because it
simply makes technical amendments
and amends outdated regulations.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule is exempt from the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501–3521),
since it amends existing outdated
regulations and makes only technical
amendments. An OMB form 83–1 is not
required.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
For purposes of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C.
1501–1571), this rule will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments and will not result in
increased expenditures by State, local,
or tribal governments, or by the private
sector, of $100 million or more as
adjusted for inflation) in any one year.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act (SBREFA)
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule will not have an annual effect
on the economy of $100 million or
more; a major increase in costs or prices;
or significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the
ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises
in domestic and export markets.
Takings (E.O. 12630)
In accordance with Executive Order
12630, this rule does not have
significant takings implications. No
rights, property or compensation has
been, or will be, taken. A takings
implication assessment is not required.
Federalism (E.O. 13132)
In accordance with Executive Order
13132, this rule does not have
federalism implications that warrant the
preparation of a federalism assessment.
Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
In accordance with Executive Order
12988, the Institute has determined that
this rule does not unduly burden the
judicial system and meets the
requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of the Order.
Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribes (E.O. 13175)
In accordance with Executive Order
13175, the Institute has evaluated this
rule and determined that it has no
potential negative effects on federally
recognized Indian tribes.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not constitute a major
Federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment.
List of Subjects
2 CFR Part 3187
Federal awards, Nondiscrimination.
45 CFR Part 1181
Accessibility, Employment,
Nondiscrimination.
45 CFR Part 1182
Privacy Act.
45 CFR Part 1184
Freedom of Information Act.
For the reasons stated in the preamble
and under the authority of 20 U.S.C.
9101 et seq., the Institute of Museum
and Library Services amends 2 CFR part
3187 and 45 CFR parts 1181, 1182, and
1184 as follows:
Title 2—Grants and Agreements
PART 3187—UNIFORM
ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS,
COST PRINCIPLES, AND AUDIT
REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL
AWARDS
1. The authority citation for part 3187
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 20 U.S.C. 9101–9176, 9103(h);
20 U.S.C. 80r–5; 2 CFR part 200.
2. In § 3187.12, in the table in
paragraph (a), revise the entry for
‘‘Discrimination on the basis of age’’ to
read as follows:
■
§ 3187.12 Federal statutes and regulations
on nondiscrimination.
(a) * * *
Subject
Statute
*
*
*
*
Discrimination on the basis of age ...........................................................................
*
*
*
The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (42 U.S.C. 6101–6107).
*
*
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
*
17:11 May 20, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\21MYR1.SGM
21MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 21, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
§ 1182.15
Title 45—Public Welfare
PART 1181—ENFORCEMENT OF
NONDISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS
OF HANDICAP IN PROGRAMS OR
ACTIVITIES CONDUCTED BY THE
INSTITUTE OF MUSEUM AND
LIBRARY SERVICES
3. The authority citation for part 1181
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 794.
4. Amend § 1181.170 by revising the
second sentence of paragraph (c) to read
as follows:
■
§ 1181.170
PART 1182—IMPLEMENTATION OF
THE PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
5. The authority citation for part 1182
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a(f).
6. Revise § 1182.3 to read as follows:
§ 1182.3 Inquiries about the Institute’s
systems of records or implementation of
the Privacy Act.
Inquiries about the Institute’s systems
of records or implementation of the
Privacy Act should be sent to the
following address: Institute of Museum
and Library Services; Office of the
General Counsel, 955 L’Enfant Plaza
North SW, Suite 4000, Washington, DC
20024–2135.
[Amended]
7. Amend § 1182.5 by removing
‘‘Committee on Government Reform of
the House of Representatives’’ and
adding in its place ‘‘United States House
Committee on Oversight and
Government Reform’’ and by removing
‘‘Committee on Governmental Affairs of
the Senate’’ and adding in its place
‘‘United States Senate Committee on
Homeland Security and Governmental
Affairs.’’
■
§ 1182.13
[Amended]
8. Amend § 1182.13 by:
a. In paragraph (a) introductory text,
adding the word ‘‘will’’ between the
words ‘‘Institute’’ and ‘‘not;’’ and
■ b. In paragraph (a)(2), removing ‘‘45
CFR part 1100’’ and adding in its place
‘‘45 CFR part 1184’’.
■
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
PART 1184—IMPLEMENTATION OF
THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT
11. The authority citation for part
1184 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552.
*
*
*
*
(c) * * * Complaints may be sent to
Director, Institute of Museum and
Library Services, 955 L’Enfant Plaza
North SW, Suite 4000, Washington, DC,
20024–2135.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 1182.5
§ 1182.16 Procedures to ensure that
Institute employees involved with its
systems of records are familiar with the
requirements of the Privacy Act.
Compliance procedures.
*
■
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 May 20, 2019
Jkt 247001
[Amended]
9. In § 1182.15, amend paragraph
(a)(3) by removing ‘‘1182.1’’ and adding
in its place ‘‘1182.2’’.
■ 10. Revise the heading for § 1182.16 to
read as follows:
■
■
12. Revise § 1184.1 to read as follows:
§ 1184.1 What are the purpose and scope
of this part?
(a) This part describe how the
Institute of Museum and Library
Services (IMLS) processes requests for
records under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552 as
amended. The regulations in this part
apply only to records that are both:
(1) Created or obtained by IMLS; and
(2) Under the agency’s control at the
time of the FOIA request.
(b) The rules in this part should be
read in conjunction with the text of the
FOIA and the Uniform Freedom of
Information Fee Act Schedule and
Guidelines published by the Office of
Management and Budget (the ‘‘OMB
Guidelines’’). Requests made by
individuals for records about
themselves under the Privacy Act of
1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, are processed
under 45 CFR part 1182 as well as under
this part.
■ 13. Amend § 1184.2 by revising
paragraphs (a) and (b), (c) introductory
text, (c)(8) and (10), the second sentence
of (c)(11), and (c)(12) to read as follows:
§ 1184.2 What are IMLS’s general policies
with respect to FOIA?
(a) Presumption of openness. IMLS
administers the FOIA with a
presumption of openness. Under this
presumption, IMLS makes discretionary
disclosures of records whenever such
disclosure would not foreseeably harm
an interest protected by a FOIA
exemption or otherwise be prohibited
by law.
(b) Records available at the IMLS
FOIA Electronic Reading Room. IMLS
makes records available on its website
Reading Room in accordance with 5
U.S.C. 552(a)(2), as amended, as well as
other records that have been requested
three or more times or that, because of
the nature of their subject matter, are
likely to be the subject of FOIA requests.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
22945
IMLS establishes categories of records
that can be disclosed regularly and
proactively identifies and discloses
additional records of interest to the
public. To save time and money, and
maximize efficiency, IMLS strongly
urges individuals who seek information
from IMLS to review documents
available at the IMLS FOIA Electronic
Reading Room before submitting a FOIA
request.
(c) Definitions. For purposes of this
part, IMLS adopts all of the terms
defined in the Freedom of Information
Act, and the OMB Guidelines, unless
otherwise defined in this part.
*
*
*
*
*
(8) Representative of the news media.
Representative of the news media is any
person or entity that gathers information
of potential interest to a segment of the
public, uses its editorial skills to turn
the raw materials into a distinct work,
and distributes that work to an
audience. The term ‘‘news’’ means
information that is about current events
or that would be of current interest to
the public. Examples of news media
entities include television or radio
stations that broadcast ‘‘news’’ to the
public at large and publishers of
periodicals that disseminate ‘‘news’’
and make their products available
through a variety of means to the
general public, including news
organizations that disseminate solely on
the internet. A request for records
supporting the news-dissemination
function of the requester will not be
considered to be for a commercial use.
‘‘Freelance’’ journalists who
demonstrate a solid basis for expecting
publication through a news media entity
will be considered as a representative of
the news media. A publishing contract
would provide the clearest evidence
that publication is expected; however,
agencies can also consider a requester’s
past publication record in making this
determination. Agencies will advise
requesters of their placement in this
category.
*
*
*
*
*
(10) Review. The examination of a
record located in response to a request
to determine whether any portion of it
is exempt from disclosure. Review time
includes all of the processing that is
necessary to prepare any record for
disclosure, including, as applicable,
redacting portions of the record and
marking the appropriate exemptions.
Review costs are properly charged even
if a record ultimately is not disclosed.
Review time also includes time spent
both obtaining and considering any
formal objection to disclosure made by
a confidential business information
E:\FR\FM\21MYR1.SGM
21MYR1
22946
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 21, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
submitter under § 1184.9 but it does not
include time spent resolving general
legal or policy issues regarding the
applicability of exemptions.
(11) * * * Search time includes pageby-page or line-by-line identification of
information within records; and the
reasonable efforts expended to locate
and retrieve information from both hard
copy and electronic records.
(12) Working day. A regular Federal
work day constitutes a working day. It
does not include Saturdays, Sundays, or
Federal holidays.
■ 14. Amend § 1184.3 by revising
paragraphs (a) and (b) to read as follows:
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
§ 1184.3
How do I request records?
(a) Where to send a request. You may
make a FOIA request for IMLS records
by completing the online prompts in the
FOIA Online Portal via FOIA.gov or via
https://www.imls.gov/about/foiarequest/form or by sending an email to
foia@imls.gov or by submitting a request
in writing via regular U.S. Mail
addressed directly to the FOIA Public
Liaison, Institute of Museum and
Library Services, 955 L’Enfant Plaza
North SW, Suite 4000, Washington, DC
20024–2135. Requests may also be sent
in writing via facsimile to the FOIA
Officer at (202) 653–4625.
(b) Form of request. Your FOIA
request need not be in any particular
format, but it must be in writing,
include your name and mailing address,
and should be clearly identified as a
Freedom of Information Act or ‘‘FOIA’’
request. You must describe the records
you seek with sufficient specificity to
enable the agency to identify and locate
the records, including, if possible, dates,
subjects, titles, or authors of the records
requested. Before submitting a request,
you may contact IMLS’s FOIA contact or
FOIA Officer to discuss the records you
seek and to receive assistance in
describing the records. If upon receiving
your request IMLS determines that it
does not reasonably describe the
requested records, IMLS will advise you
what additional information is required
to perfect your request, or why your
request is otherwise insufficient. You
should also indicate if you have a
preferred form or format in which you
would like to receive the requested
records.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 15. Amend § 1184.4 by adding
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
§ 1184.4 When will I receive a response to
my request?
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Expedited processing. (1) IMLS
must process requests and appeals on an
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 May 20, 2019
Jkt 247001
expedited basis whenever it is
determined that they involve:
(i) Circumstances in which the lack of
expedited processing could reasonably
be expected to pose an imminent threat
to the life or physical safety of an
individual; or
(ii) An urgency to inform the public
about an actual or alleged Federal
Government activity, if made by a
person who is primarily engaged in
disseminating information.
(2) A request for expedited processing
may be made at any time. When making
a request for expedited processing of an
administrative appeal, the request
should be submitted as required by
§ 1184.6.
(3) A requester who seeks expedited
processing must submit a statement,
certified to be true and correct,
explaining in detail the basis for making
the request for expedited processing.
For example, under paragraph (c)(1)(ii)
of this section, a requester who is not a
full-time member of the news media
must establish that the requester is a
person whose primary professional
activity or occupation is information
dissemination, though it need not be the
requester’s sole occupation. Such a
requester also must establish a
particular urgency to inform the public
about the government activity involved
in the request—one that extends beyond
the public’s right to know about
government activity generally. The
existence of numerous articles
published on a given subject can be
helpful in establishing the requirement
that there be an ‘‘urgency to inform’’ the
public on the topic. As a matter of
administrative discretion, IMLS may
waive the formal certification
requirement.
(4) IMLS must notify the requester
within 10 calendar days of the receipt
of a request for expedited processing of
its decision whether to grant or deny
expedited processing. If expedited
processing is granted, the request must
be given priority, placed in the
processing track for expedited requests,
and must be processed as soon as
practicable. If a request for expedited
processing is denied, IMLS must act on
any appeal of that decision
expeditiously.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 16. Amend § 1184.5 by:
■ a. Redesignating paragraphs (c), (d),
and (e) as paragraphs (d), (e), and (f);
■ b. Adding a new paragraph (c); and
■ c. In newly redesignated paragraph (f):
■ i. Removing ‘‘FOIA Officer’’ and
adding in its place ‘‘FOIA Public
Liaison;’’ and
■ ii. Adding a sentence at the end of the
paragraph.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The additions read as follows:
§ 1184.5 How will my request be
processed?
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Estimated dates of completion and
interim responses. Upon request, IMLS
will provide an estimated date by which
the agency expects to provide a
response to the requester. If a request
involves a voluminous amount of
material, or searches in multiple
locations, IMLS may provide interim
responses, releasing the records on a
rolling basis.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * * In addition, IMLS will
provide information about the
mediation services provided by the
Office of Government Information
Services of the National Archives and
Records Administration.
■ 17. Amend § 1184.6 by:
■ a. Revising paragraph (a); and
■ b. In paragraph (b), removing the term
‘‘Office of Government Services (OGIS)’’
and adding in its place ‘‘Office of
Government Information Services.’’
The revision reads as follows:
§ 1184.6 How can I appeal a denial of my
request?
(a) Submission of an appeal. If your
FOIA request has been denied in whole
or in part, or if the agency has not found
any records in response to your request,
you may file an appeal no later than
ninety (90) calendar days following the
date of the notification of denial. Your
appeal must include a description of the
initial request, the reason for the appeal,
and why you believe the agency’s
response was incorrect. Your appeal
must be in writing, signed, and filed
with the IMLS Director, c/o Office of the
General Counsel, 955 L’Enfant Plaza
North SW, Suite 4000, Washington, DC
20024–2135. Appeals may also be sent
via email to foia@imls.gov, or via
facsimile to (202) 653–4625.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 18. Amend § 1184.7 by revising
paragraphs (f)(3)(ii) and (g) to read as
follows:
§ 1184.7
How will fees be charged?
*
*
*
*
*
(f) ***
(3) ***
(ii) When IMLS requests an advance
payment, the time limits described in
section (a)(6) of the FOIA will begin
only after IMLS has received advanced
full payment in full.
(g) Failure to comply. In the absence
of unusual or exceptional
circumstances, IMLS will not assess fees
if the agency fails to comply with any
time limit set forth in this part, unless
E:\FR\FM\21MYR1.SGM
21MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 21, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
the agency has determined that unusual
circumstances apply and more than
5,000 pages are necessary to respond to
the request.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 19. Amend § 1184.8 by revising the
second sentence of paragraph (b) to read
as follows:
§ 1184.8 How can I address concerns
regarding my request?
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * * If you seek information
regarding OGIS and/or the services it
offers, please contact OGIS directly at
Office of Government Information
Services, National Archives and Records
Administration, 8601 Adelphi RoadOGIS, College Park, MD 20740–6001,
Email: ogis@nara.gov, Phone: (202) 741–
5770 or toll free (877) 684–6448, Fax:
(202) 741–5769. * * *
§ 1184.9
[Amended]
20. Amend § 1184.9(b)(2) by adding a
comma after ‘‘local’’.
■
Dated: May 13, 2019.
Kim Miller,
Grants Management Specialist, Institute of
Museum and Library Services.
[FR Doc. 2019–10212 Filed 5–20–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7036–01–P
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND
BUDGET
5 CFR Part 1303
RIN 0348–AB42
Freedom of Information Act
Office of Management and
Budget, Executive Office of the
President.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 May 20, 2019
Jkt 247001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
1. Section 1303.21
Dionne Hardy, Office of Management
and Budget, Office of General Counsel,
at OMBFOIA@omb.eop.gov, 202–395–
FOIA.
One commenter suggested a change to
this section’s provision stating how a
requester can access certain information
about a person other than the requester
which would otherwise be withheld.
OMB’s proposal provided that if the
requester includes authorization for full
disclosure given by the individual
whom the information is about, or a
death certificate or other proof that that
person is deceased, the requester can
receive ‘‘greater access’’ to the
information about that individual. The
commenter suggested that the rule
should limit the people for whom
‘‘greater access’’ can be withheld by
OMB in the first place, without such
proof or authorization, to only people
who are not ‘‘government officials.’’ The
commenter suggested that this change
would facilitate ‘‘open access to
government records about government
officials.’’
For this section, OMB used the text
found in the DOJ OIP’s Guidance for
Agency FOIA Regulations without
modification except to insert the name
of the agency. OMB’s purpose for
including this provision was to facilitate
greater access to information which is
permitted to be withheld by an agency
under exemptions b(6) and b(7)(C) in
the FOIA statute which protect against
unwarranted invasions of personal
privacy.
There is no basis in the FOIA statute
allowing or directing agencies to make
a distinction between ‘‘government
officials’’ and other people who are the
subject of requested information when it
comes to what information will be
released. Indeed, the FOIA’s exemptions
from release for personal privacy
interests (5 U.S.C. 552(b)(6), (7)(C)) are
often invoked to withhold sensitive
personal information of government
employees. OMB’s rule directs
requesters to provide specified
documentation showing that no
invasion of personal privacy would
result from the release of the requested
records (i.e., because the subject of the
personal information has authorized the
release or is deceased). Personal
information is protected by exemption
b(6) regardless of whether the subject of
the information is a government official.
For these reasons, OMB declines to
make the change requested to
distinguish government officials.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background: On August 23, 2018, OMB
proposed revisions (43 FR 42610–
42618) to its existing regulations under
the CFR at part 1303 governing requests
and responses for agency records under
the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA),
5 U.S.C. 552. These revisions are now
being finalized to implement the FOIA
and incorporate the provisions of the
OPEN Government Act of 2007 (Pub. L.
110–81) and the FOIA Improvement Act
of 2016 (Pub. L. 114–185) as well as
streamline OMB’s FOIA regulations by
structuring the text of the regulation in
an order more similar to that of DOJ’s
FOIA regulation and the DOJ Office of
Information Policy’s (OIP) Guidance for
Agency FOIA Regulations (‘‘the DOJ
FOIA Regulation Guidance’’), thus
promoting uniformity of FOIA
regulations across agencies.
Additionally, the regulations are
updated to reflect developments in the
case law. OMB proposed these revisions
after conducting the review made in
accordance with section 3(a) of the
FOIA Improvement Act of 2016, which
provides that each agency ‘‘shall review
the regulations of such agency and shall
issue regulations on procedures for the
disclosure of records under [the FOIA].’’
With this final rule OMB is adopting the
revision to its FOIA regulation as
previously proposed, with amendments
included in response to public
comments regarding OMB’s proposal.
Public Comments
OMB is issuing a final rule
revising its regulations implementing
the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
These regulations are being revised to
implement the FOIA and incorporate
the provisions of the OPEN Government
Act of 2007 and the FOIA Improvement
Act of 2016 as well as streamline OMB’s
FOIA regulations by structuring the text
of the regulation in an order more
similar to that of the Department of
Justice’s (DOJ) FOIA regulation and the
DOJ Office of Information Policy’s (OIP)
Guidance for Agency FOIA Regulations,
thus promoting uniformity of FOIA
regulations across agencies.
Additionally, the regulations are being
updated to reflect developments in case
law regarding the FOIA.
DATES: The final rule is effective June
20, 2019.
SUMMARY:
22947
Interested persons were afforded the
opportunity to participate in the
rulemaking process through submission
of written comments to the proposed
rule during the 30-day public comment
period. OMB received twelve public
submissions in response to the proposed
rulemaking. Due consideration was
given to each submission received and
a determination was made that four of
the submissions were relevant
comments to the proposed rule and that
the remaining eight submissions were
unrelated to the subject matter of the
proposal. Overall, OMB adopted all four
of these relevant comments in part.
Three of these four comments contained
discussion of multiple sections of the
proposed revised rule. Discussion of
each of the comments and OMB’s
responses follows in order of the
relevant section of the revised
regulation.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2. Section 1303.22
The same commenter suggested that
OMB remove this section’s proposed
statement of the requirement that
‘‘requesters must describe the records
sought in sufficient detail to enable
E:\FR\FM\21MYR1.SGM
21MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 98 (Tuesday, May 21, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 22943-22947]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-10212]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 21, 2019 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 22943]]
NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES
Institute of Museum and Library Services
2 CFR Part 3187
45 CFR Parts 1181, 1182 and 1184
RIN 3137-AA25
Freedom of Information Act Regulations and Additional Incidental
Technical Amendments to Other IMLS Regulations
AGENCY: Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS or Institute),
National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities (NFAH).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule amends the regulations the Institute of Museum and
Library Services (IMLS) follows in processing records under the Freedom
of Information Act, in part in compliance with the FOIA Improvement Act
of 2016, and otherwise also revises all current IMLS regulations to
reflect the agency's change of address and update outdated information.
The revisions to IMLS FOIA regulations clarify and update procedures
for requesting information from IMLS and procedures that IMLS follows
in responding to requests from the public. The revisions to other IMLS
regulations would revise the citation to the Age Discrimination Act of
1975, reflect the agency's change of address, and update outdated
information.
DATES: This rule is effective May 20, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan B. Gerson, Associate General
Counsel, Institute of Museum and Library Services, (202) 653-4712.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background Information--FOIA and Technical Amendments
On December 26, 2018 (83 FR 66163), the Institute published a
proposed rule to revise its FOIA regulations in accordance with the
FOIA Improvement Act of 2016 and otherwise reflect the agency's change
of address and update outdated information. IMLS also proposed to make
minor technical amendments to all other IMLS regulations to reflect the
agency's change of physical address, update contact information, and
otherwise facilitate readability. In the interests of economy of
administration, and because all of the regulations proposed to be
removed are outdated and the technical amendments are minor, they are
included in this one rulemaking.
II. Discussion of the Final Rule
A. Non-Discretionary Changes Required by the FOIA Improvement Act of
2016
In compliance with the FOIA Improvement Act of 2016, the Institute
has made changes to its regulatory amendments to update information and
otherwise make technical amendments to improve the clarity of the
Institute's regulations.
B. Response to Comment and Changes From the Proposed Rule
In total, the Institute received one public submission to its
proposed rule. The Institute has given due consideration to the comment
received and has made one modification to the rule, as discussed below.
1. Comments on Proposed 45 CFR 1184.1(b) (the purpose and scope of
these IMLS regulations) and 1184.2(c) (IMLS's general policies with
respect to FOIA).
The commenter suggested that IMLS remove all reference to the OMB
Guidelines, including such references made in proposed 45 CFR 1184.1(b)
and 45 CFR 1184.2(c), because the commenter submits that the OMB
Guidelines are no longer authoritative. The Institute has considered
this suggestion and determined that proposed 45 CFR 1184.1(b) and 45
CFR 1184.2(c) adequately replaces the language in the original 45 CFR
1184.1(b) and 45 CFR 1184.2(c).
The revised language's reference to the OMB Guidelines are general
references to the overall guidelines; and such guidelines remain in
force, continuing to generally apply to agency FOIA regulations. These
references to the OMB Guidelines in IMLS's general FOIA regulation
provisions at proposed 45 CFR 1184.1(b) and 45 CFR 1184.2(c) also are
consistent with the Justice Department's Office of Information Policy
Template for Agency FOIA Regulations and consistent with the language
used by many other government agencies, including the Department of
Justice, which provides interagency leadership on FOIA matters. See 28
CFR 16.1.
2. Comments on Proposed 45 CFR 1184.2(c)(8) (Definitions;
Representative of the News Media).
The commenter suggested that the Institute revise its definition of
Representative of the News Media at 45 CFR 1184.2(c)(8), to remove the
outdated ``organized and operated'' definition and replace it with an
updated one tracking the statutory language. The Institute has
considered this suggestion and determined that it will revise the
language in current 45 CFR 1184.2(c)(8) to comport with a definition of
Representative of the News Media which more squarely comports with the
FOIA, as amended. More specifically, the Institute will adopt the model
definition of Representative of the News Media as delineated in the
Justice Department's Office of Information Policy Template for Agency
FOIA Regulations. Because this change is in line with the language used
by many other government agencies, including the Department of Justice,
the Institute implements this revision without the need of formal
notice and comment. See 28 CFR 16.10(b)(6).
The commenter further suggested that the Institute supplement its
regulations definition of Representative of the News Media to include
that: (a) A requester's eligibility as a Representative of the News
Media should be assessed with a focus on the requester rather than the
nature of the information requested, (b) distinct works should include,
as an example, a substantive press release, which applies editorial
skills to raw material, and (c) examples of news media entities should
be non-exhaustive, to include evolving news media formats. The
Institute has considered these suggestions and determined that the
revised 45 CFR 1184.2(c)(8) defining a Representative of the News Media
is sufficiently detailed,
[[Page 22944]]
focuses on the person or entity rather than the information requested,
and provides examples in a manner that is non-exhaustive. The Institute
therefore has determined that the model language set forth in the
revised 45 CFR 1184.2(c)(8) adequately replaces the language in the
original 45 CFR 1184.2(c)(8).
III. Regulatory Analyses
Regulatory Planning and Review (E.O. 12866)
Under Executive Order 12866, the Institute must determine whether
the regulatory action is ``significant'' and therefore subject to OMB
review and the requirements of the Executive Order. The Order defines a
``significant regulatory action'' as one that is likely to result in a
rule that may: (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million
or more or adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of
the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or
communities; (2) create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by another agency; (3) materially alter
the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4)
raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President's priorities, or the principles set forth in the Executive
Order.
This rule updates outdated information and makes technical
amendments to the Institute's regulations. As such, it does not impose
a compliance burden on the economy generally or on any person or
entity. Accordingly, this rule is not a ``significant regulatory
action'' from an economic standpoint, and it does not otherwise create
any inconsistences or budgetary impacts to any other agency or Federal
Program.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Because this rule would amend outdated regulations and make certain
technical amendments, the Institute has determined in Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) review that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities because it simply makes technical amendments and amends
outdated regulations.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule is exempt from the requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521), since it amends existing outdated
regulations and makes only technical amendments. An OMB form 83-1 is
not required.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
For purposes of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C.
1501-1571), this rule will not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments and will not result in increased expenditures by State,
local, or tribal governments, or by the private sector, of $100 million
or more as adjusted for inflation) in any one year.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA)
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule will not have
an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; a major
increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based
enterprises in domestic and export markets.
Takings (E.O. 12630)
In accordance with Executive Order 12630, this rule does not have
significant takings implications. No rights, property or compensation
has been, or will be, taken. A takings implication assessment is not
required.
Federalism (E.O. 13132)
In accordance with Executive Order 13132, this rule does not have
federalism implications that warrant the preparation of a federalism
assessment.
Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
In accordance with Executive Order 12988, the Institute has
determined that this rule does not unduly burden the judicial system
and meets the requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of the Order.
Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribes (E.O. 13175)
In accordance with Executive Order 13175, the Institute has
evaluated this rule and determined that it has no potential negative
effects on federally recognized Indian tribes.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not constitute a major Federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human environment.
List of Subjects
2 CFR Part 3187
Federal awards, Nondiscrimination.
45 CFR Part 1181
Accessibility, Employment, Nondiscrimination.
45 CFR Part 1182
Privacy Act.
45 CFR Part 1184
Freedom of Information Act.
For the reasons stated in the preamble and under the authority of
20 U.S.C. 9101 et seq., the Institute of Museum and Library Services
amends 2 CFR part 3187 and 45 CFR parts 1181, 1182, and 1184 as
follows:
Title 2--Grants and Agreements
PART 3187--UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES,
AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL AWARDS
0
1. The authority citation for part 3187 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 20 U.S.C. 9101-9176, 9103(h); 20 U.S.C. 80r-5; 2 CFR
part 200.
0
2. In Sec. 3187.12, in the table in paragraph (a), revise the entry
for ``Discrimination on the basis of age'' to read as follows:
Sec. 3187.12 Federal statutes and regulations on nondiscrimination.
(a) * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject Statute
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Discrimination on the basis of The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (42 U.S.C. 6101-6107).
age.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[[Page 22945]]
Title 45--Public Welfare
PART 1181--ENFORCEMENT OF NONDISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF
HANDICAP IN PROGRAMS OR ACTIVITIES CONDUCTED BY THE INSTITUTE OF
MUSEUM AND LIBRARY SERVICES
0
3. The authority citation for part 1181 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 794.
0
4. Amend Sec. 1181.170 by revising the second sentence of paragraph
(c) to read as follows:
Sec. 1181.170 Compliance procedures.
* * * * *
(c) * * * Complaints may be sent to Director, Institute of Museum
and Library Services, 955 L'Enfant Plaza North SW, Suite 4000,
Washington, DC, 20024-2135.
* * * * *
PART 1182--IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
0
5. The authority citation for part 1182 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a(f).
0
6. Revise Sec. 1182.3 to read as follows:
Sec. 1182.3 Inquiries about the Institute's systems of records or
implementation of the Privacy Act.
Inquiries about the Institute's systems of records or
implementation of the Privacy Act should be sent to the following
address: Institute of Museum and Library Services; Office of the
General Counsel, 955 L'Enfant Plaza North SW, Suite 4000, Washington,
DC 20024-2135.
Sec. 1182.5 [Amended]
0
7. Amend Sec. 1182.5 by removing ``Committee on Government Reform of
the House of Representatives'' and adding in its place ``United States
House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform'' and by removing
``Committee on Governmental Affairs of the Senate'' and adding in its
place ``United States Senate Committee on Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs.''
Sec. 1182.13 [Amended]
0
8. Amend Sec. 1182.13 by:
0
a. In paragraph (a) introductory text, adding the word ``will'' between
the words ``Institute'' and ``not;'' and
0
b. In paragraph (a)(2), removing ``45 CFR part 1100'' and adding in its
place ``45 CFR part 1184''.
Sec. 1182.15 [Amended]
0
9. In Sec. 1182.15, amend paragraph (a)(3) by removing ``1182.1'' and
adding in its place ``1182.2''.
0
10. Revise the heading for Sec. 1182.16 to read as follows:
Sec. 1182.16 Procedures to ensure that Institute employees involved
with its systems of records are familiar with the requirements of the
Privacy Act.
PART 1184--IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT
0
11. The authority citation for part 1184 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552.
0
12. Revise Sec. 1184.1 to read as follows:
Sec. 1184.1 What are the purpose and scope of this part?
(a) This part describe how the Institute of Museum and Library
Services (IMLS) processes requests for records under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552 as amended. The regulations in
this part apply only to records that are both:
(1) Created or obtained by IMLS; and
(2) Under the agency's control at the time of the FOIA request.
(b) The rules in this part should be read in conjunction with the
text of the FOIA and the Uniform Freedom of Information Fee Act
Schedule and Guidelines published by the Office of Management and
Budget (the ``OMB Guidelines''). Requests made by individuals for
records about themselves under the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a,
are processed under 45 CFR part 1182 as well as under this part.
0
13. Amend Sec. 1184.2 by revising paragraphs (a) and (b), (c)
introductory text, (c)(8) and (10), the second sentence of (c)(11), and
(c)(12) to read as follows:
Sec. 1184.2 What are IMLS's general policies with respect to FOIA?
(a) Presumption of openness. IMLS administers the FOIA with a
presumption of openness. Under this presumption, IMLS makes
discretionary disclosures of records whenever such disclosure would not
foreseeably harm an interest protected by a FOIA exemption or otherwise
be prohibited by law.
(b) Records available at the IMLS FOIA Electronic Reading Room.
IMLS makes records available on its website Reading Room in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2), as amended, as well as other records that have
been requested three or more times or that, because of the nature of
their subject matter, are likely to be the subject of FOIA requests.
IMLS establishes categories of records that can be disclosed regularly
and proactively identifies and discloses additional records of interest
to the public. To save time and money, and maximize efficiency, IMLS
strongly urges individuals who seek information from IMLS to review
documents available at the IMLS FOIA Electronic Reading Room before
submitting a FOIA request.
(c) Definitions. For purposes of this part, IMLS adopts all of the
terms defined in the Freedom of Information Act, and the OMB
Guidelines, unless otherwise defined in this part.
* * * * *
(8) Representative of the news media. Representative of the news
media is any person or entity that gathers information of potential
interest to a segment of the public, uses its editorial skills to turn
the raw materials into a distinct work, and distributes that work to an
audience. The term ``news'' means information that is about current
events or that would be of current interest to the public. Examples of
news media entities include television or radio stations that broadcast
``news'' to the public at large and publishers of periodicals that
disseminate ``news'' and make their products available through a
variety of means to the general public, including news organizations
that disseminate solely on the internet. A request for records
supporting the news-dissemination function of the requester will not be
considered to be for a commercial use. ``Freelance'' journalists who
demonstrate a solid basis for expecting publication through a news
media entity will be considered as a representative of the news media.
A publishing contract would provide the clearest evidence that
publication is expected; however, agencies can also consider a
requester's past publication record in making this determination.
Agencies will advise requesters of their placement in this category.
* * * * *
(10) Review. The examination of a record located in response to a
request to determine whether any portion of it is exempt from
disclosure. Review time includes all of the processing that is
necessary to prepare any record for disclosure, including, as
applicable, redacting portions of the record and marking the
appropriate exemptions. Review costs are properly charged even if a
record ultimately is not disclosed. Review time also includes time
spent both obtaining and considering any formal objection to disclosure
made by a confidential business information
[[Page 22946]]
submitter under Sec. 1184.9 but it does not include time spent
resolving general legal or policy issues regarding the applicability of
exemptions.
(11) * * * Search time includes page-by-page or line-by-line
identification of information within records; and the reasonable
efforts expended to locate and retrieve information from both hard copy
and electronic records.
(12) Working day. A regular Federal work day constitutes a working
day. It does not include Saturdays, Sundays, or Federal holidays.
0
14. Amend Sec. 1184.3 by revising paragraphs (a) and (b) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1184.3 How do I request records?
(a) Where to send a request. You may make a FOIA request for IMLS
records by completing the online prompts in the FOIA Online Portal via
FOIA.gov or via https://www.imls.gov/about/foia-request/form or by
sending an email to [email protected] or by submitting a request in writing
via regular U.S. Mail addressed directly to the FOIA Public Liaison,
Institute of Museum and Library Services, 955 L'Enfant Plaza North SW,
Suite 4000, Washington, DC 20024-2135. Requests may also be sent in
writing via facsimile to the FOIA Officer at (202) 653-4625.
(b) Form of request. Your FOIA request need not be in any
particular format, but it must be in writing, include your name and
mailing address, and should be clearly identified as a Freedom of
Information Act or ``FOIA'' request. You must describe the records you
seek with sufficient specificity to enable the agency to identify and
locate the records, including, if possible, dates, subjects, titles, or
authors of the records requested. Before submitting a request, you may
contact IMLS's FOIA contact or FOIA Officer to discuss the records you
seek and to receive assistance in describing the records. If upon
receiving your request IMLS determines that it does not reasonably
describe the requested records, IMLS will advise you what additional
information is required to perfect your request, or why your request is
otherwise insufficient. You should also indicate if you have a
preferred form or format in which you would like to receive the
requested records.
* * * * *
0
15. Amend Sec. 1184.4 by adding paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 1184.4 When will I receive a response to my request?
* * * * *
(c) Expedited processing. (1) IMLS must process requests and
appeals on an expedited basis whenever it is determined that they
involve:
(i) Circumstances in which the lack of expedited processing could
reasonably be expected to pose an imminent threat to the life or
physical safety of an individual; or
(ii) An urgency to inform the public about an actual or alleged
Federal Government activity, if made by a person who is primarily
engaged in disseminating information.
(2) A request for expedited processing may be made at any time.
When making a request for expedited processing of an administrative
appeal, the request should be submitted as required by Sec. 1184.6.
(3) A requester who seeks expedited processing must submit a
statement, certified to be true and correct, explaining in detail the
basis for making the request for expedited processing. For example,
under paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of this section, a requester who is not a
full-time member of the news media must establish that the requester is
a person whose primary professional activity or occupation is
information dissemination, though it need not be the requester's sole
occupation. Such a requester also must establish a particular urgency
to inform the public about the government activity involved in the
request--one that extends beyond the public's right to know about
government activity generally. The existence of numerous articles
published on a given subject can be helpful in establishing the
requirement that there be an ``urgency to inform'' the public on the
topic. As a matter of administrative discretion, IMLS may waive the
formal certification requirement.
(4) IMLS must notify the requester within 10 calendar days of the
receipt of a request for expedited processing of its decision whether
to grant or deny expedited processing. If expedited processing is
granted, the request must be given priority, placed in the processing
track for expedited requests, and must be processed as soon as
practicable. If a request for expedited processing is denied, IMLS must
act on any appeal of that decision expeditiously.
* * * * *
0
16. Amend Sec. 1184.5 by:
0
a. Redesignating paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) as paragraphs (d), (e),
and (f);
0
b. Adding a new paragraph (c); and
0
c. In newly redesignated paragraph (f):
0
i. Removing ``FOIA Officer'' and adding in its place ``FOIA Public
Liaison;'' and
0
ii. Adding a sentence at the end of the paragraph.
The additions read as follows:
Sec. 1184.5 How will my request be processed?
* * * * *
(c) Estimated dates of completion and interim responses. Upon
request, IMLS will provide an estimated date by which the agency
expects to provide a response to the requester. If a request involves a
voluminous amount of material, or searches in multiple locations, IMLS
may provide interim responses, releasing the records on a rolling
basis.
* * * * *
(f) * * * In addition, IMLS will provide information about the
mediation services provided by the Office of Government Information
Services of the National Archives and Records Administration.
0
17. Amend Sec. 1184.6 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (a); and
0
b. In paragraph (b), removing the term ``Office of Government Services
(OGIS)'' and adding in its place ``Office of Government Information
Services.''
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 1184.6 How can I appeal a denial of my request?
(a) Submission of an appeal. If your FOIA request has been denied
in whole or in part, or if the agency has not found any records in
response to your request, you may file an appeal no later than ninety
(90) calendar days following the date of the notification of denial.
Your appeal must include a description of the initial request, the
reason for the appeal, and why you believe the agency's response was
incorrect. Your appeal must be in writing, signed, and filed with the
IMLS Director, c/o Office of the General Counsel, 955 L'Enfant Plaza
North SW, Suite 4000, Washington, DC 20024-2135. Appeals may also be
sent via email to [email protected], or via facsimile to (202) 653-4625.
* * * * *
0
18. Amend Sec. 1184.7 by revising paragraphs (f)(3)(ii) and (g) to
read as follows:
Sec. 1184.7 How will fees be charged?
* * * * *
(f) ***
(3) ***
(ii) When IMLS requests an advance payment, the time limits
described in section (a)(6) of the FOIA will begin only after IMLS has
received advanced full payment in full.
(g) Failure to comply. In the absence of unusual or exceptional
circumstances, IMLS will not assess fees if the agency fails to comply
with any time limit set forth in this part, unless
[[Page 22947]]
the agency has determined that unusual circumstances apply and more
than 5,000 pages are necessary to respond to the request.
* * * * *
0
19. Amend Sec. 1184.8 by revising the second sentence of paragraph (b)
to read as follows:
Sec. 1184.8 How can I address concerns regarding my request?
* * * * *
(b) * * * If you seek information regarding OGIS and/or the
services it offers, please contact OGIS directly at Office of
Government Information Services, National Archives and Records
Administration, 8601 Adelphi Road-OGIS, College Park, MD 20740-6001,
Email: [email protected], Phone: (202) 741-5770 or toll free (877) 684-
6448, Fax: (202) 741-5769. * * *
Sec. 1184.9 [Amended]
0
20. Amend Sec. 1184.9(b)(2) by adding a comma after ``local''.
Dated: May 13, 2019.
Kim Miller,
Grants Management Specialist, Institute of Museum and Library Services.
[FR Doc. 2019-10212 Filed 5-20-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7036-01-P