Colorado; Final Approval of State Underground Storage Tank Program Revisions and Codification, 22727-22733 [2019-10413]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 97 / Monday, May 20, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
to comply with the SO2 and/or NOX
emission limits in paragraph (c) of this
section.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2019–09922 Filed 5–17–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 282
[EPA–R08–UST–2018–0729; FRL–9991–41–
Region 8]
Colorado; Final Approval of State
Underground Storage Tank Program
Revisions and Codification
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
Pursuant to the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA
or Act), the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final
action to approve revisions to the State
of Colorado’s Underground Storage
Tank (UST) Program submitted by the
State. The EPA has determined that
these revisions satisfy all requirements
needed for program approval. This
action also codifies the EPA’s approval
of Colorado’s State program and
incorporates by reference those
provisions of the State’s regulations that
we have determined meet the
requirements for approval. The State’s
federally authorized and codified UST
program, as revised pursuant to this
action, will remain subject to the EPA’s
inspection and enforcement authorities
under Sections 9005 and 9006 of RCRA
Subtitle I and other applicable statutory
and regulatory provisions.
DATES: This rule is effective July 19,
2019, unless the EPA receives adverse
comment by June 19, 2019. If the EPA
receives adverse comment, it will
publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public
that the rule will not take effect. The
incorporation by reference of certain
publications listed in the regulations is
approved by the Director of the Federal
Register, as of July 19, 2019, in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1
CFR part 51.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments by
one of the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
2. Email: Hendrix.Mark@epa.gov.
3. Mail: Mark Hendrix, Region 8,
Project Officer, UST, Solid Waste and
PCB Unit, Resource Conservation and
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 May 17, 2019
Jkt 247001
Recovery Program, Office of
Partnerships and Regulatory Assistance
(Mail Code: 8P–R), EPA Region 8, 1595
Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129.
4. Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver
your comments to Mark Hendrix,
Region 8, Project Officer, UST, Solid
Waste and PCB Unit, Resource
Conservation and Recovery Program,
Office of Partnerships and Regulatory
Assistance (Mail Code: 8P–R), EPA
Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver,
Colorado 80202–1129.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R08–UST–2018–
0729. The EPA’s policy is that all
comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and
may be available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or email. The
Federal https://www.regulations.gov
website is an ‘‘anonymous access’’
system, which means the EPA will not
know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send an
email comment directly to the EPA
without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, the EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If the EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, the EPA may not
be able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
You can view and copy the
documents that form the basis for this
action and associated publicly available
materials from 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, at the
following location: EPA Region 8, 1595
Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129, phone number (303) 312–
6561. Interested persons wanting to
examine these documents should make
an appointment with the office at least
2 days in advance.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
22727
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Hendrix, (303) 312–6561,
Hendrix.Mark@epa.gov. To inspect the
hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment with Mark Hendrix at
(303) 312–6561.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Approval of Revisions to Colorado’s
Underground Storage Tank Program
A. Why are revisions to state programs
necessary?
States that have received final
approval from the EPA under RCRA
section 9004(b) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C.
6991c(b), must maintain an
underground storage tank program that
is equivalent to, consistent with, and no
less stringent than the Federal
underground storage tank program.
When the EPA makes revisions to the
regulations that govern the UST
program, states must revise their
programs to comply with the updated
regulations and submit these revisions
to the EPA for approval. Most
commonly, states must change their
programs because of changes to the
EPA’s regulations in 40 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) part 280. States can
also initiate changes on their own to
their underground storage tank program
and these changes must then be
approved by the EPA.
B. What decisions has the EPA made in
this rule?
On July 6, 2018, in accordance with
40 CFR 281.51(a), Colorado submitted a
complete program revision application
seeking the EPA’s approval of
Colorado’s revisions corresponding to
the EPA final rule published on July 15,
2015, (80 FR 41566), which revised the
1988 UST regulations and the 1988
State program approval (SPA)
regulations (2015 Federal Revisions). As
required by 40 CFR 281.20, the State
application contains the following: A
transmittal letter from the Governor
requesting approval, a description of the
program and operating procedures, a
demonstration of the State’s procedures
to ensure adequate enforcement, a
Memorandum of Agreement outlining
the roles and responsibilities of the EPA
and the implementing agency, a
statement of certification from the
Attorney General, and copies of all
relevant State statutes and regulations.
We have reviewed the State application
and determined that the revisions to
Colorado’s UST program are equivalent
to, consistent with, and no less stringent
than, the corresponding Federal
requirements in subpart C of 40 CFR
part 281, and that the Colorado program
provides for adequate enforcement of
E:\FR\FM\20MYR1.SGM
20MYR1
22728
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 97 / Monday, May 20, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
compliance (40 CFR 281.11(b)).
Therefore, the EPA grants Colorado final
approval to operate its UST program
with the changes described in the
program revision application and as
outlined below in Section I.G of this
document.
C. What is the effect of this action on the
regulated community?
This action does not impose
additional requirements on the
regulated community because the
regulations being approved by this rule
are already in effect in the State of
Colorado, and are not changed by this
action. This action merely approves the
existing State regulations as meeting the
Federal requirements and renders them
federally enforceable.
D. Why is EPA using a direct final rule?
The EPA is publishing this direct final
rule without a prior proposed rule
because we view this as a
noncontroversial action and we
anticipate no adverse comment.
Colorado did not receive any comments
during its comment period when the
rules and regulations being considered
were proposed at the State level.
E. What happens if the EPA receives
comments that oppose this action?
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
Along with this direct final rule, the
EPA is publishing a separate document
in the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’ section of this
Federal Register that serves as the
proposal to approve the State’s UST
program revisions and provides an
opportunity for public comment. If the
EPA receives comments that oppose this
approval, the EPA will withdraw this
direct final rule by publishing a
document in the Federal Register before
it becomes effective. The EPA will base
any further decision on approval of the
State application on the proposal to
approve after considering all comments
received during the comment period.
The EPA will then address all public
comments in a later final rule. You may
not have another opportunity to
comment. If you want to comment on
this approval, you must do so at this
time.
F. For what has Colorado previously
been approved?
On April 23, 2007, the EPA finalized
a rule approving the UST program that
Colorado proposed to administer in lieu
of the Federal UST program. The State’s
program has not previously been
codified.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 May 17, 2019
Jkt 247001
G. What changes are we approving with
this action and what standards do we
use for review?
In order to be approved, each state
program application must meet the
general requirements in 40 CFR 281.11,
and specific requirements in the
following subparts of 40 CFR part 281:
Subpart B (Components of a Program
Application); subpart C (Criteria for No
Less Stringent); and subpart D
(Adequate Enforcement of Compliance).
This also is true for proposed revisions
to approved state programs.
As more fully described below, the
State has made the changes to its
approved UST program to reflect the
2015 Federal Revisions. The EPA is
approving the State’s changes because
they are equivalent to, consistent with,
and no less stringent than the Federal
UST program and because the EPA has
confirmed that the Colorado UST
program will continue to provide for
adequate enforcement of compliance as
described in 40 CFR 281.11(b) and part
281, subpart D after this approval.
The Colorado Department of Labor
and Employment, Division of Oil and
Public Safety (Department) is the lead
implementing agency for the UST
program in Colorado, except in Indian
country.
The Department continues to have
broad statutory authority to regulate the
installation, operation, maintenance,
and closure of USTs, as well as UST
releases under Colorado Revised
Statutes (C.R.S.) (2018), Title 8 Labor
and Industry, Article 20 Fuel Products,
selected provisions from Sections 8–20–
101, et seq. and Article 20.5 Petroleum
Storage Tanks, Sections 8–20.5–101, et
seq. The Colorado UST Program
enforcement authority arises from the
powers and duties granted to the
Department Director (Director), which
grants are found in C.R.S. Sections 8–
20–102(1), 8–20–104, 8–20–209(1), 8–
20.5–107, 8–20.5–202(1), 8–20.5–208(4)
and 8–20.5–209. C.R.S. Sections 8–20–
104 and 8–20.5–107 provide the
Director with broad enforcement
authority. Under C.R.S. Section 8–20–
209(1), any duly authorized agent or
employee of the Division of Oil and
Public Safety has the authority to enter
an UST facility during regular business
hours for inspections. In the case of a
release, C.R.S. Section 8–20.5–208(4)
provides the Director the authority to
take such action as necessary, including
the authority to enter any property,
premises, or place where an UST is
located for inspection, to conduct
monitoring and testing, and to require
an owner to furnish records, conduct
monitoring or testing and provide access
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
to tanks. C.R.S. Sections 8–20–228 and
8–20.5–209 provide the Director with
specific corrective action authority.
Notices of violation may be issued, and
penalties for non-compliance with
Colorado’s UST Act may be assessed
under C.R.S. Section 8–20.5–107. A
delivery prohibition tag may be placed
on each tank that has been determined
to meet any of the criteria for delivery
prohibition as described in 7 Code of
Colorado Regulations 1101–14, Section
6–2–1.
Specific authorities to regulate the
installation, operation, maintenance,
and closure of USTs, as well as UST
releases are found under C.R.S. Section
8–20–228, 8–20.5–102(1) and (2), and
Title 8, Article 20.5, Part 2 Underground
Storage Tanks, in addition to the
regulatory provisions of 7 CCR 1101–14,
Article 2, Underground Storage Tanks,
as amended effective May 1, 2018;
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements are found under 7 CCR
1101–14, Section 2–3–7. The
aforementioned statutory and
regulations sections satisfy the
requirements of 40 CFR 281.40 and
281.41.
Through a Memorandum of
Agreement between the State of
Colorado and the EPA, signed by the
EPA Region 8 Regional Administrator
on February 13, 2018, the State
maintains procedures for receiving and
ensuring proper consideration of
information about violations submitted
by the public. The State agrees to
comply with public participation
provisions contained in 40 CFR 281.42,
including: The provision that the State
will not oppose intervention under Rule
24 of the Colorado Rules of Civil
Procedure for Courts of Record in
Colorado on the grounds that the
applicant’s interest is adequately
represented by the State; and the right
of aggrieved parties to be admitted as
party to agency proceedings under
C.R.S. Title 24, Article 4, Part 1, Section
24–4–105(2)(c). Colorado has met the
public participation requirements found
in 40 CFR 281.42.
To qualify for final approval,
revisions to a state’s program must be
‘‘equivalent to, consistent with, and no
less stringent’’ than the 2015 Federal
Revisions. In the 2015 Federal Revisions
the EPA addressed UST systems
deferred in the 1988 UST regulations
and added, among other things, new
operation and maintenance
requirements; secondary containment
requirements for new and replaced
tanks and piping; operator training
requirements; and a requirement to
ensure UST system compatibility before
storing certain biofuel blends. In
E:\FR\FM\20MYR1.SGM
20MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 97 / Monday, May 20, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
addition, the EPA removed past
deferrals for emergency generator tanks,
field constructed tanks, and airport
hydrant systems.
The EPA analyzes revisions to
approved state programs pursuant to the
criteria enumerated in 40 CFR 281.30
through 281.39, and has concluded that
the Department has revised its
regulations to help ensure that the
State’s UST program continues to be
equivalent to, consistent with, and no
less stringent than the 2015 Federal
Revisions. In particular, the Department
has amended the Code of Colorado
Regulations to incorporate the revised
requirements of 40 CFR part 280,
including the requirements added by
the 2015 Federal Revisions. The State,
therefore, has ensured that the criteria
found in 40 CFR 281.30 through 281.38
are met.
Title 40 CFR 281.39 describes the
state operator training requirements that
must be met in order to be considered
equivalent to, consistent with, and no
less stringent than Federal
requirements. Colorado has
promulgated and is implementing its
own operator training provisions under
Code of Colorado Regulations 7 CCR
1101–14 Section 2–3–1, et seq. After a
thorough review, the EPA has
determined that Colorado’s operator
training requirements are equivalent to,
consistent with, and no less stringent
than Federal requirements.
As part of the State Application, the
Colorado Attorney General certified that
the State revisions meet the ‘‘equivalent
to, consistent with, and no less
stringent’’ criteria in 40 CFR 281.30
through 281.39. The EPA is relying on
this certification in addition to the
analysis submitted by the State in
making our determination.
For further information on the EPA’s
analysis of the State’s application, see
the chart in the Technical Support
Document (TSD) contained in the
docket for this rulemaking.
H. Where are the revised rules different
from the Federal rules?
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
Broader in Scope Provisions
Where an approved state program has
a greater scope of coverage than
required by Federal law, the additional
coverage is not part of the federally
approved program and are not federally
enforceable (40 CFR 281.12(a)(3)(ii)).
The following regulatory requirements
are considered broader in coverage than
the Federal program, as these State-only
regulations are not required by Federal
regulation and are implemented by the
State in addition to the federally
approved program:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 May 17, 2019
Jkt 247001
7 Code of Colorado Regulations (CCR)
1101–14, Section 1–5 Definitions
‘‘motor fuel’’ because, and to the extent
that the State includes fuel products not
restricted to use as fuel in UST systems.
7 CCR 1101–14, Sections 2–2–3(a) and
2–2–3(j) are broader in scope because
fees are not imposed by the Federal
program.
7 CCR 1101–14, Section 2–3–7(d) is
broader in scope because the State
requires extra documentation and
recordkeeping to support the
reimbursement of funds from the State
Petroleum Storage Tank fund.
More Stringent Provisions
Where an approved state program
includes requirements that are
considered more stringent than required
by Federal law, the more stringent
requirements become part of the
federally approved and enforceable
program (40 CFR 281.12(a)(3)(i)).
The following regulatory
requirements are considered more
stringent than the Federal program, and
on approval, they become part of the
federally approved program and are
federally enforceable:
Under 7 Code of Colorado Regulations
(CCR) 1101–14:
At Section 1–5, definition of
‘‘replace’’ and 2–2–1(b) introductory
paragraph, third sentence, Colorado has
a shorter threshold for the length of
piping that triggers a designation of
replacement than the Federal program.
At Section 2–2–1(c)(1)(ii), Colorado
maintains more restrictive overfill
prevention equipment requirements
than the Federal program.
At Sections 2–2–2–3(a), 2–3–6–2(a)(1)
and (2), and 2–3–6–2(a)(7) and (c),
Colorado has State-only inspection
requirements that are additional to those
found in the Federal program.
At Sections 2–2–1(d)(1), introductory
paragraph—(d)(1)(iii), the State has
additional criteria for defining new
dispenser systems, which would
regulate as new more types of dispenser
systems than Federal.
At Sections 2–2–3(a) and (b),
Colorado has an additional State-only
annual tank registration requirement.
At Sections 2–3–7(b)(9), 2–4–3(e), 4–
1(a) and (e), and in the lack of a State
analog to Federal § 280.50(b)(1),
Colorado maintains reporting
requirements additional to those found
in the Federal program.
Colorado does not have an analog to
the Federal recordkeeping timeline
requirement found at § 280.45(b)(1) and
(3); therefore, the State requirement for
maintaining the records until the UST
system is permanently closed or
undergoes a change in service must be
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
22729
observed, which is more stringent than
the 3 years required under the Federal
program for these types of records.
At Sections 2–4–1(a), (f), and (g), 2–
4–3(a)–(c), and due to the lack of a State
analog to the last sentence of § 280.70(a)
and the exception to the spill and
overfill requirements at § 280.70(c), the
Colorado program sets forth additional
requirements relative to the State’s
temporary tank closure requirements
that are not found in the Federal
regulations.
At Section 2–3–1–6(c), Colorado has
additional requirements for the
identification and designation of Class
A and B operators.
At Section 7–3(d)(2)(i), the State has
an additional filing option for the
required financial responsibility filing
and a shorter timeline under which the
filing must take place than the Federal
program.
I. How does this action affect Indian
country (18 U.S.C. 1151) in Colorado?
The EPA’s approval of Colorado’s
program does not extend to Indian
country as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151.
Indian country generally includes all
lands within the exterior boundaries of
the following Indian reservations
located within Colorado: The Ute
Mountain Ute and Southern Ute Indian
Reservations; any land held in trust by
the United States for an Indian tribe;
and any other areas that are ‘‘Indian
country’’ within the meaning of 18
U.S.C. 1151. Any lands removed from
an Indian reservation status by Federal
court action are not considered
reservation lands even if located within
the exterior boundaries of an Indian
reservation. The EPA will retain
responsibilities under RCRA for
underground storage tanks in Indian
country. Therefore, this action has no
effect in Indian country. See 40 CFR
281.12(a)(2).
II. Codification
A. What is codification?
Codification is the process of placing
a state’s statutes and regulations that
comprise the State’s approved UST
program into the CFR. Section 9004(b)
of RCRA, as amended, authorizes the
EPA to approve state UST programs to
operate in lieu of the Federal program.
The EPA codifies its authorization of
state programs in 40 CFR part 282 and
incorporates by reference state
regulations that the EPA will enforce
under sections 9005 and 9006 of RCRA
and any other applicable statutory
provisions. The incorporation by
reference of state authorized programs
in the CFR should substantially enhance
E:\FR\FM\20MYR1.SGM
20MYR1
22730
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 97 / Monday, May 20, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
the public’s ability to discern the
current status of the federally approved
state program and state requirements
that can be federally enforced. This
effort provides clear notice to the public
of the scope of the approved program in
each state.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
B. What is the history of codification of
Colorado’s UST program?
The EPA has not previously
incorporated by reference and codified
Colorado’s approved UST program.
Through this action, the EPA is
incorporating by reference and
codifying Colorado’s State program in
40 CFR 282.55 to include the program
and the approved revisions.
C. What codification decisions have we
made in this rule?
In this rule we are finalizing the
Federal regulatory text that incorporates
by reference the federally authorized
Colorado UST program. In accordance
with the requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, we
are finalizing the incorporation by
reference of the Colorado rules
described in the amendments to 40 CFR
part 282 set forth below. The EPA has
made, and will continue to make, these
documents generally available through
https://www.regulations.gov and/or in
hard copy at the EPA Region 8 office
(see the ADDRESSES section of this
preamble for more information).
One purpose of this Federal Register
document is to codify Colorado’s
approved UST program. The
codification reflects the State program
that would be in effect at the time the
EPA’s approved revisions to the
Colorado UST program addressed in
this direct final rule become final. If,
however, the EPA receives substantive
comment on the proposed rule, then
this codification will not take effect, and
the State rules that are approved after
the EPA considers public comment will
be codified instead. By codifying the
approved Colorado program and by
amending the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR), the public will more
easily be able to discern the status of the
federally approved requirements of the
Colorado program.
The EPA is incorporating by reference
the Colorado approved UST program in
40 CFR 282.55. Section
282.55(d)(1)(i)(A) incorporates by
reference for enforcement purposes the
State’s regulations.
Section 282.55 also references the
Attorney General’s Statement,
Demonstration of Adequate
Enforcement Procedures, the Program
Description, and the Memorandum of
Agreement, which are approved as part
of the UST program under Subtitle I of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 May 17, 2019
Jkt 247001
RCRA. These documents are not
incorporated by reference.
D. What is the effect of the EPA’s
codification of the federally authorized
state UST program on enforcement?
The EPA retains the authority under
sections 9003(h), 9005 and 9006 of
Subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991b(h),
6991d and 6991e, and other applicable
statutory and regulatory provisions to
undertake corrective action, inspections,
and enforcement actions, and to issue
orders in approved states. If the EPA
determines it will take such actions in
Colorado, the EPA will rely on Federal
sanctions, Federal inspection
authorities, and other Federal
procedures rather than the State
analogs. Therefore, though the EPA has
approved the State procedures listed in
40 CFR 282.55(d)(1)(ii), the EPA is not
incorporating by reference Colorado’s
procedural and enforcement authorities.
E. What state provisions are not part of
the codification?
The public also needs to be aware that
some provisions of the State’s UST
program are not part of the federally
approved state program. Such
provisions are not part of the RCRA
Subtitle I program because they are
‘‘broader in coverage’’ than Subtitle I of
RCRA. Title 40 CFR 281.12(a)(3)(ii)
states that where an approved state
program has provisions that are broader
in coverage than the Federal program,
those provisions are not a part of the
federally approved program. As a result,
state provisions which are ‘‘broader in
coverage’’ than the Federal program are
not incorporated by reference for
purposes of enforcement in part 282.
Title 40 CFR 282.55(d)(1)(iii) lists for
reference and clarity the Colorado
statutory and regulatory provisions
which are ‘‘broader in coverage’’ than
the Federal program and which are not,
therefore, part of the approved program
being codified. Provisions that are
‘‘broader in coverage’’ cannot be
enforced by EPA. The State, however,
will continue to implement and enforce
such provisions under State law.
III. Statutory and Executive Order (EO)
Reviews
This action only applies to Colorado’s
UST program requirements pursuant to
RCRA Section 9004 and imposes no
requirements other than those imposed
by State law. It complies with
applicable EOs and statutory provisions
as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review, Executive Order
13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has exempted this action from
the requirements of Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, Oct. 4, 1993) and
13563 (76 FR 3821, Jan. 21, 2011). This
action approves and codifies state
requirements for the purpose of RCRA
Section 9004 and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. Therefore, this action is not
subject to review by OMB.
B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing
Regulations and Controlling Regulatory
Costs
This action is not an Executive Order
13771 (82 FR 9339, February 3, 2017)
regulatory action because actions such
as this final approval of Colorado’s
revised underground storage tank
program under RCRA are exempted
under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, I certify that this action
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
C. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act and
Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
Because this action approves and
codifies preexisting requirements under
State law and does not impose any
additional enforceable duty beyond that
required by State law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(2 U.S.C. 1531–1538). For the same
reason, this action also does not
significantly or uniquely affect the
communities of tribal governments, as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
D. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action will not have substantial
direct effects on the states, on the
relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
Aug. 10, 1999), because it merely
approves and codifies state
requirements as part of the State RCRA
Underground Storage Tank Program
without altering the relationship or the
distribution of power and
responsibilities established by RCRA.
E:\FR\FM\20MYR1.SGM
20MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 97 / Monday, May 20, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
E. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
and Safety Risks
This action also is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885,
Apr. 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant, and it does not
make decisions based on environmental
health or safety risks.
F. Executive Order 13211: Actions That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This rule is not subject to Executive
Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22,
2001) because it is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ as defined under
Executive Order 12866.
G. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
Under RCRA section 9004(b), the EPA
grants a state’s application for approval
as long as the state meets the criteria
required by RCRA. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for the
EPA, when it reviews a state approval
application, to require the use of any
particular voluntary consensus standard
in place of another standard that
otherwise satisfies the requirements of
RCRA. Thus, the requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not
apply.
H. Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice
Reform
As required by Section 3 of Executive
Order 12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7,
1996), in issuing this rule, the EPA has
taken the necessary steps to eliminate
drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize
potential litigation, and provide a clear
legal standard for affected conduct.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
I. Executive Order 12630: Governmental
Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights
The EPA has complied with Executive
Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, Mar. 15, 1988)
by examining the takings implications
of the rule in accordance with the
‘‘Attorney General’s Supplemental
Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk
and Avoidance of Unanticipated
Takings’’ issued under the executive
order.
J. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
‘‘Burden’’ is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 May 17, 2019
Jkt 247001
K. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629,
Feb. 16, 1994) establishes Federal
executive policy on environmental
justice. Its main provision directs
Federal agencies, to the greatest extent
practicable and permitted by law, to
make environmental justice part of their
mission by identifying and addressing,
as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
Because this rule approves preexisting
State rules which are at least equivalent
to, consistent with, and no less stringent
than existing Federal requirements and
imposes no additional requirements
beyond those imposed by State law, and
there are no anticipated significant
adverse human health or environmental
effects, the rule is not subject to
Executive Order 12898.
L. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801–808, generally provides that
before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a
rule report, which includes a copy of
the rule, to each House of the Congress
and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a
report containing this document and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication in the Federal Register. A
major rule cannot take effect until 60
days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
However, this action will be effective
July 19, 2019 because it is a direct final
rule.
Authority: This rule is issued under the
authority of Sections 2002(a), 7004(b), and
9004, 9005 and 9006 of the Solid Waste
Disposal Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 6912(a),
6974(b), and 6991c, 6991d, and 6991e.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 282
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Incorporation by reference, Hazardous
substances, State program approval,
Underground storage tanks.
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
22731
Dated: April 29, 2019.
Debra Thomas,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA Region
8.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, EPA is amending 40 CFR part
282 as follows:
PART 282—APPROVED
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK
PROGRAMS
1. The authority citation for part 282
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6912, 6991c, 6991d,
and 6991e.
■
2. Add § 282.55 to read as follows:
§ 282.55 Colorado State-Administered
Program.
(a) The State of Colorado is approved
to administer and enforce an
underground storage tank program in
lieu of the Federal program under
Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA), as
amended, 42 U.S.C. 6991 et seq. The
State’s program, as administered by the
Colorado Department of Environmental
Quality (DEQ), Division of
Environmental Response and
Remediation (DERR), was approved by
EPA pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 6991c and
part 281 of this chapter. EPA published
the notice of final determination
approving the Colorado underground
storage tank base program effective on
April 23, 2007. A subsequent program
revision application was approved by
EPA and became effective on July 19,
2019.
(b) Colorado has primary
responsibility for administering and
enforcing its federally approved
underground storage tank program.
However, EPA retains the authority to
exercise its corrective action,
inspection, and enforcement authorities
under Sections 9003(h), 9005, and 9006
of Subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C.
6991b(h),6991d and 6991e, as well as
under any other applicable statutory
and regulatory provisions.
(c) To retain program approval,
Colorado must revise its approved
program to adopt new changes to the
Federal Subtitle I program which make
it more stringent, in accordance with
Section 9004 of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991c,
and 40 CFR part 281, subpart E. If
Colorado obtains approval for the
revised requirements pursuant to
Section 9004 of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991c,
the newly approved statutory and
regulatory provisions will be added to
this subpart, and notice of any change
will be published in the Federal
Register.
E:\FR\FM\20MYR1.SGM
20MYR1
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
22732
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 97 / Monday, May 20, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
(d) Colorado has final approval for the
following elements of its program
application originally submitted to the
EPA and approved effective April 23,
2007, and the program revision
application approved by the EPA
effective on July 19, 2019:
(1) State statutes and regulations—(i)
Incorporation by reference. The material
cited in this paragraph (d)(1), and listed
in appendix A to this part, is
incorporated by reference as part of the
underground storage tank program
under Subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C.
6991 et seq. (See § 282.2 for
incorporation by reference approval and
inspection information.) You may
obtain copies of the Colorado
regulations and statutes that are
incorporated by reference in this
paragraph (d)(1) from Colorado’s
Secretary of State, 1700 Broadway,
Denver, CO 80290; Attn: Code of
Colorado Regulations and
Administrative Rules; Phone number:
(303) 894–2200 ext. 6418; email: rules@
sos.state.co.us; website: https://
www.sos.state.co.us/CCR/Welcome.do.
(A) ‘‘EPA-Approved Colorado
Statutory and Regulatory Requirements
Applicable to the Underground Storage
Tank Program’’ dated February 2019.
(B) [Reserved]
(ii) Legal basis. The EPA evaluated the
following statutes and regulations
which provide the legal basis for the
State’s implementation of the
underground storage tank program, but
they are not being incorporated by
reference and do not replace Federal
authorities:
(A) The statutory provisions include:
(1) Colorado Revised Statutes (2018),
Title 8 Labor and Industry, Article 20
Fuel Products: Sections 8–20–102(1), 8–
20–104 except 8–20–104(4)(b) and (7),
8–20–209(1), 8–20–223.5(1) and (2), 8–
20–228.
(2) Colorado Revised Statutes (2018),
Title 8 Labor and Industry, Article 20.5
Petroleum Underground Storage Tanks:
Sections 8–20.5–101, except (2),
(10)(a)(III), (16) and references to
aboveground storage tanks (ASTs); 8–
20.5–102; 8–20.5–105; 8–20.5–106; 8–
20.5–107; 8–20.5–202(1), (1.5), (2), (3),
and (4); 8–20.5–203; 8–20.5–204; 8–
20.5–205; 8–20.5–206; 8–20.5–208; and
8–20.5–209.
(3) Colorado Revised Statutes (2018),
Title 24 Government—State
Administration, Article 4 Rule-Making
and Licensing Procedures by State
Agencies: Section 24–4–105(2)(c).
(B) The regulatory provisions include:
(1) Code of Colorado Regulations
(May 1, 2018), 7 CCR 1101–14
‘‘Department of Labor and Employment,
Division of Oil and Public Safety,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 May 17, 2019
Jkt 247001
Storage Tank Regulations,’’ Article 6
Enforcement: Section 6–1 Enforcement
Program; Subsections 6–1–1 Notice of
Violation; 6–1–2 Enforcement Order; 6–
1–3 Informal Conference; Section 6–2
Underground Storage Tank Delivery
Prohibition Subsections 6–2–1 Criteria
for Delivery Prohibition; 6–2–2 Red Tag
Mechanisms Used to Identify Ineligible
USTs; 6–2–3 Notification Processes for
UST Owners/Operators and Product
Deliverers; 6–2–4 Reclassifying
Ineligible USTs as Eligible to Receive
Product; 6–2–5 Delivery Prohibition
Deferral in Rural and Remote Areas; 6–
2–6 Delivery Prohibition Deferral in
Emergency Situations; 6–2–7 Removal
of Red Tag from Emergency Generator
Tank Systems.
(2) [Reserved]
(iii) Provisions not incorporated by
reference. The following specifically
identified statutes and rules applicable
to the Colorado underground storage
tank program that are broader in
coverage than the Federal program, are
not part of the approved program, and
are not incorporated by reference in this
part for enforcement purposes:
(A) Code of Colorado Regulations
(May 1, 2018), 7 CCR 1101–14
‘‘Department of Labor and Employment,
Division of Oil and Public Safety,
Storage Tank Regulations’’: Sections 1–
5 ‘‘motor fuel’’; 2–2–3(a); 2–2–3(j); and
2–3–7(d).
(B) Colorado Revised Statutes (2018),
Title 8 Labor and Industry, Article 20
Fuel Products: Sections 8–20–209(2), 8–
20–212, 8–20–215, 8–20–218, 8–20–
223.5(3), 8–20–230, and 8–20–231;
Article 20.5 Petroleum Storage Tanks,
Sections 8–20.5–102(3) and (4), and 8–
20.5–207.
(2) Statement of legal authority. The
Attorney General’s Statement, signed by
the Attorney General of the State of
Colorado Department of Law on
December 7, 2001, and by the Assistant
Attorney General on November 23,
2016, though not incorporated by
reference, is referenced as part of the
approved underground storage tank
program under Subtitle I of RCRA, 42
U.S.C. 6991 et seq.
(3) Demonstration of procedures for
adequate enforcement. The
‘‘Demonstration of Procedures for
Adequate Enforcement’’ submitted as
part of the original application on
November 13, 2002, and as part of the
program revision application on
November 1, 2016, though not
incorporated by reference, is referenced
as part of the approved underground
storage tank program under Subtitle I of
RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991 et seq.
(4) Program description. The program
description and any other material
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
submitted as part of the original
application on November 13, 2002, and
as part of the program revision
application on November 1, 2016,
though not incorporated by reference,
are referenced as part of the approved
underground storage tank program
under Subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C.
6991 et seq.
(5) Memorandum of Agreement. The
Memorandum of Agreement between
EPA Region 8 and the Colorado
Department of Labor and Employment,
Division of Oil and Public Safety, signed
by the EPA Regional Administrator on
February 13, 2018, though not
incorporated by reference, is referenced
as part of the approved underground
storage tank program under Subtitle I of
RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991 et seq.
■ 3. Appendix A to part 282 is amended
by adding the entry for Colorado in
alphabetical order by State to read as
follows:
Appendix A to Part 282—State
Requirements Incorporated by
Reference in Part 282 of the Code of
Federal Regulations
*
*
*
*
*
Colorado
(a) The statutory provisions include:
Colorado Revised Statutes (2018), Title 8
Labor and Industry, Article 20.5 Petroleum
Storage Tanks, Part 1 Administration:
Section 8–20.5–101(16) definition of ‘‘tank’’.
(b) The regulatory provisions include:
(1) Code of Colorado Regulations (May 1,
2018), 7 CCR 1101–14 ‘‘Department of Labor
and Employment, Division of Oil and Public
Safety, Storage Tank Regulations’’:
Article 1 General Provisions:
Section 1–5 Definitions, except
‘‘aboveground storage tank’’ (AST),
‘‘aboveground storage tank (AST) system,’’
‘‘fire resistant tank,’’ ‘‘motor fuel,’’ the phrase
‘‘or above ground’’ in the definition of
‘‘operator,’’ Item (3) in the definition of
‘‘owner’’ relative to ASTs, and paragraph
relative to ASTs in the definition of
‘‘secondary containment’’; 1–6 Glossary of
Acronyms and Initializations;
Article 2 Underground Storage Tanks:
Section 2–1 UST Program Scope and
Applicability; Subsections 2–1–1
Applicability; 2–1–2 Determination of
ownership and use;
Section 2–2 UST Design, Construction,
Installation and Registration; Subsections 2–
2–1 Design and Performance standards for
new and replaced UST systems; 2–2–2
Installation; 2–2–2–1 Installation
Application; 2–2–2–2 Installation
Requirements; 2–2–2–3 Installation
Inspection; 2–2–3 UST System Registration;
2–2–4 Upgrading existing UST System; 2–2–
5 Repairs;
Section 2–3 Operation; Subsections 2–3–1
Operator training; 2–3–1–1 Classes of
Operators; 2–3–1–2 Class A Operator; 2–3–1–
3 Class B Operator; 2–3–1–4 Class C
E:\FR\FM\20MYR1.SGM
20MYR1
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 97 / Monday, May 20, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Operator; 2–3–1–5 Acceptable Training and
Certification Processes; 2–3–1–6 Training
and Certification Deadlines and Schedules;
2–3–1–7 Retraining Requirements; 2–3–1–8
Documentation; 2–3–2 Spill and Overfill
Prevention; 2–3–3 Corrosion Protection; 2–3–
4 Release Detection; 2–3–4–1 General
requirements for all UST systems; 2–3–4–2
Requirements for regulated substance UST
Systems; 2–3–4–3 Requirements for Piping;
2–3–4–4 Requirements for hazardous
substance UST systems; 2–3–5 Periodic
testing of spill prevision equipment and
containment sumps used for interstitial
monitoring of piping and periodic inspection
of overfill prevention equipment; 2–3–6
Compliance inspections; 2–3–6–1 Monthly
Compliance Inspections; 2–3–6–2 Annual
Operational Compliance Inspections; 2–3–6–
3 Inspections Conducted by the Director; 2–
3–7 Reporting and Record Keeping;
Section 2–4 Closure of UST Systems;
Subsections 2–4–1 Temporary Closure; 2–4–
2 Permanent Closure; 2–4–3 Site Assessment;
Section 2–5 UST Systems with FieldConstructed Tanks and Airport Hydrant Fuel
Distribution Systems; Subsections 2–5–1
Definitions; 2–5–2 General requirements; 2–
5–3 Additions, exceptions, and alternatives
for UST systems with field-constructed tanks
and airport hydrant systems;
Article 4 Release Identification And
Reporting:
Sections 4–1 Suspected Releases; 4–2
Response to Suspected Releases; 4–3
Confirmed Releases;
Article 5 Release Response:
Section 5–1 Response to Confirmed
Releases; Subsections 5–1–1 Acute human
health hazards; 5–1–2 Chronic and secondary
human health hazards and other
environmental impacts; Section 5–2 Site
Characterization;
Section 5–3 Corrective Action;
Section 5–4 No Further Action Request;
Article 7 Financial Responsibility
Requirements For Owners/Operators Of
Petroleum Underground Storage Tanks:
Section 7–1 Applicability;
Section 7–2 Financial Responsibility
Mechanisms;
Section 7–3 Maintenance of Financial
Responsibility.
(c) Copies of the Colorado statutes and
regulations that are incorporated by reference
are available from the following offices:
Statutes—Colorado Revisor of Statutes, 200
E. Colfax Avenue, Denver, CO 80203; Attn:
Office of Legislative Legal Services; Phone
number: (303) 866–2045; website: https://
leg.colorado.gov/agencies/office-legislativelegal-services/colorado-revised-statutes.
Regulations—Colorado’s Secretary of State,
1700 Broadway, Denver, CO 80290; Attn:
Code of Colorado Regulations and
Administrative Rules; Phone number: (303)
894–2200 ext. 6418; email: rules@
sos.state.co.us; website: https://
www.sos.state.co.us/CCR/Welcome.do.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2019–10413 Filed 5–17–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 May 17, 2019
Jkt 247001
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 25
[GN Docket Nos. 18–122, 17–183; FCC 18–
91]
Expanding Flexible Use of the 3.7 to
4.2 GHz Band
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final action; announcement of
deadline date.
AGENCY:
In this document, the
International Bureau, the Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau, and the
Office of Engineering and Technology
announce the deadline and other details
for filing the certifications and
information required by the
Commission’s, Order and Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (Order), FCC 18–
91. This document is consistent with
the Order, which stated that the
Commission would publish a document
in the Federal Register announcing the
deadline and other details for filing the
certifications and information required
by the Order.
DATES: The deadline date for submission
of information is May 28, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cathy Williams by email at
Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov and telephone
at (202) 418–2918.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
document announces the deadline and
other details for filing the certifications
and information required by the Order,
FCC 18–91,1 published at 83 FR 42043,
August 20, 2018.
On July 13, 2018, the Commission
released an Order that contained
information collection requirements for
earth station and satellite licensees
regarding their current use of the 3.7–
4.2 GHz band.2 The Commission and
the public will use the information
collected to evaluate future use of the
band.3 On January 28, 2019, the Office
of Management and Budget approved
these information collection
requirements in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act.4 In this
SUMMARY:
1 Filers may seek confidential treatment for
information they submit, pursuant to 47 CFR 0.459.
2 Expanding Flexible Use of the 3.7 to 4.2 GHz
Band, Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,
33 FCC Rcd 6915, 6923–25, paras. 16–25 (2018)
(Order or Notice, as applicable).
3 See, e.g., Order, 33 FCC Rcd 6923, para. 17.
4 Notice of Office of Management and Budget
Action, ICR Ref. No. 201811–3060–018 (Jan. 28,
2019), available at https://www.reginfo.gov/public/
do/PRAViewICR?ref_nbr=201811-3060-018; Federal
Communications Commission, Expanding Flexible
Use of the 3.7 to 4.2 GHz Band, 84 FR 13141, Apr.
4, 2019.
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
22733
document (Public Notice), the
International Bureau, the Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau, and the
Office of Engineering and Technology
announce the deadline and other details
for filing the certifications and
information required by the Order.5
Required Earth Station Filings
Earth-station certifications. Operators
of fixed-satellite service (FSS) earth
stations in the 3.7–4.2 GHz band that are
licensed or registered (authorized) in the
International Bureau Filing System
(IBFS), including temporary-fixed or
transportable earth stations,6 must
certify the accuracy of all information
reflected on their licenses or
registrations in IBFS. The certification
must include the relevant call sign(s),
file numbers, and applicant or registrant
name, along with the following signed
statement: ‘‘The undersigned,
individually and for the applicant,
licensee, or registrant, hereby certifies
that all information reflected in his or
her licenses or registrations in IBFS,
including any attached exhibits, are
true, complete and correct to the best of
his or her knowledge and belief, and
have been made in good faith.’’ The
certification must be signed by an
authorized representative for the
licensee or registrant.
Earth station operators that filed for
new or modified licenses or
registrations between April 19, 2018 and
October 31, 2018, using the processes
outlined in the Earth Station Filing
Window Public Notices,7 are exempt
from this certification requirement.8
Temporary fixed or transportable
earth stations. Operators of temporaryfixed or transportable FSS earth stations
in the 3.7–4.2 GHz band that are
licensed or registered (authorized) in
IBFS must also provide the following
5 Filers may seek confidential treatment for
information they submit, pursuant to 47 CFR 0.459.
6 A temporary-fixed or transportable earth station
is a fixed earth station that remains at a location for
less than six months. See 47 CFR 25.277. These
stations operate on a temporary basis and are
variable in nature. A satellite news gathering truck
is a common example of a temporary-fixed or
transportable earth station.
7 Temporary Freeze on Applications for New or
Modified Fixed Satellite Service Earth Stations and
Fixed Microwave Stations in the 3.7–4.2 GHz Band;
90-Day Window to File Applications for Earth
Stations Currently Operating in 3.7–4.2 GHz Band,
Public Notice, 31 FCC Rcd 3841 (IB/PSHSB/WTB
Apr. 19, 2018); International Bureau Announces 90Day Extension of Filing Window, to October 17,
2018, to File Applications for Earth Stations
Currently Operating in 3.7–4.2 GHz Band, Filing
Options for Operators with Multiple Earth Station
Antennas, Public Notice, 31 FCC Rcd 6115 (IB June
21, 2018); International Bureau Announces TwoWeek Extension of Filing Window for Earth Stations
Currently Operating in 3.7–4.2 GHz Band, Public
Notice, DA 18–1061 (IB Oct. 17, 2018).
8 See Order, 33 FCC Rcd 6923, para. 19.
E:\FR\FM\20MYR1.SGM
20MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 97 (Monday, May 20, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 22727-22733]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-10413]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 282
[EPA-R08-UST-2018-0729; FRL-9991-41-Region 8]
Colorado; Final Approval of State Underground Storage Tank
Program Revisions and Codification
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA
or Act), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct
final action to approve revisions to the State of Colorado's
Underground Storage Tank (UST) Program submitted by the State. The EPA
has determined that these revisions satisfy all requirements needed for
program approval. This action also codifies the EPA's approval of
Colorado's State program and incorporates by reference those provisions
of the State's regulations that we have determined meet the
requirements for approval. The State's federally authorized and
codified UST program, as revised pursuant to this action, will remain
subject to the EPA's inspection and enforcement authorities under
Sections 9005 and 9006 of RCRA Subtitle I and other applicable
statutory and regulatory provisions.
DATES: This rule is effective July 19, 2019, unless the EPA receives
adverse comment by June 19, 2019. If the EPA receives adverse comment,
it will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing
the public that the rule will not take effect. The incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in the regulations is approved
by the Director of the Federal Register, as of July 19, 2019, in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments by one of the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the online instructions for submitting comments.
2. Email: [email protected].
3. Mail: Mark Hendrix, Region 8, Project Officer, UST, Solid Waste
and PCB Unit, Resource Conservation and Recovery Program, Office of
Partnerships and Regulatory Assistance (Mail Code: 8P-R), EPA Region 8,
1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129.
4. Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver your comments to Mark Hendrix,
Region 8, Project Officer, UST, Solid Waste and PCB Unit, Resource
Conservation and Recovery Program, Office of Partnerships and
Regulatory Assistance (Mail Code: 8P-R), EPA Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop
Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R08-UST-
2018-0729. The EPA's policy is that all comments received will be
included in the public docket without change and may be available
online at https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed
to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information
that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https://www.regulations.gov or email. The Federal https://www.regulations.gov
website is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means the EPA will not
know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send an email comment directly to the EPA
without going through https://www.regulations.gov, your email address
will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that
is placed in the public docket and made available on the internet. If
you submit an electronic comment, the EPA recommends that you include
your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and
with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If the EPA cannot read your comment
due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification,
the EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files
should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and
be free of any defects or viruses.
You can view and copy the documents that form the basis for this
action and associated publicly available materials from 8:30 a.m. to
4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, at the following location: EPA Region
8, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129, phone number (303)
312-6561. Interested persons wanting to examine these documents should
make an appointment with the office at least 2 days in advance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Hendrix, (303) 312-6561,
[email protected]. To inspect the hard copy materials, please
schedule an appointment with Mark Hendrix at (303) 312-6561.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Approval of Revisions to Colorado's Underground Storage Tank Program
A. Why are revisions to state programs necessary?
States that have received final approval from the EPA under RCRA
section 9004(b) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991c(b), must maintain an
underground storage tank program that is equivalent to, consistent
with, and no less stringent than the Federal underground storage tank
program. When the EPA makes revisions to the regulations that govern
the UST program, states must revise their programs to comply with the
updated regulations and submit these revisions to the EPA for approval.
Most commonly, states must change their programs because of changes to
the EPA's regulations in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 280.
States can also initiate changes on their own to their underground
storage tank program and these changes must then be approved by the
EPA.
B. What decisions has the EPA made in this rule?
On July 6, 2018, in accordance with 40 CFR 281.51(a), Colorado
submitted a complete program revision application seeking the EPA's
approval of Colorado's revisions corresponding to the EPA final rule
published on July 15, 2015, (80 FR 41566), which revised the 1988 UST
regulations and the 1988 State program approval (SPA) regulations (2015
Federal Revisions). As required by 40 CFR 281.20, the State application
contains the following: A transmittal letter from the Governor
requesting approval, a description of the program and operating
procedures, a demonstration of the State's procedures to ensure
adequate enforcement, a Memorandum of Agreement outlining the roles and
responsibilities of the EPA and the implementing agency, a statement of
certification from the Attorney General, and copies of all relevant
State statutes and regulations. We have reviewed the State application
and determined that the revisions to Colorado's UST program are
equivalent to, consistent with, and no less stringent than, the
corresponding Federal requirements in subpart C of 40 CFR part 281, and
that the Colorado program provides for adequate enforcement of
[[Page 22728]]
compliance (40 CFR 281.11(b)). Therefore, the EPA grants Colorado final
approval to operate its UST program with the changes described in the
program revision application and as outlined below in Section I.G of
this document.
C. What is the effect of this action on the regulated community?
This action does not impose additional requirements on the
regulated community because the regulations being approved by this rule
are already in effect in the State of Colorado, and are not changed by
this action. This action merely approves the existing State regulations
as meeting the Federal requirements and renders them federally
enforceable.
D. Why is EPA using a direct final rule?
The EPA is publishing this direct final rule without a prior
proposed rule because we view this as a noncontroversial action and we
anticipate no adverse comment. Colorado did not receive any comments
during its comment period when the rules and regulations being
considered were proposed at the State level.
E. What happens if the EPA receives comments that oppose this action?
Along with this direct final rule, the EPA is publishing a separate
document in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of this Federal Register
that serves as the proposal to approve the State's UST program
revisions and provides an opportunity for public comment. If the EPA
receives comments that oppose this approval, the EPA will withdraw this
direct final rule by publishing a document in the Federal Register
before it becomes effective. The EPA will base any further decision on
approval of the State application on the proposal to approve after
considering all comments received during the comment period. The EPA
will then address all public comments in a later final rule. You may
not have another opportunity to comment. If you want to comment on this
approval, you must do so at this time.
F. For what has Colorado previously been approved?
On April 23, 2007, the EPA finalized a rule approving the UST
program that Colorado proposed to administer in lieu of the Federal UST
program. The State's program has not previously been codified.
G. What changes are we approving with this action and what standards do
we use for review?
In order to be approved, each state program application must meet
the general requirements in 40 CFR 281.11, and specific requirements in
the following subparts of 40 CFR part 281: Subpart B (Components of a
Program Application); subpart C (Criteria for No Less Stringent); and
subpart D (Adequate Enforcement of Compliance). This also is true for
proposed revisions to approved state programs.
As more fully described below, the State has made the changes to
its approved UST program to reflect the 2015 Federal Revisions. The EPA
is approving the State's changes because they are equivalent to,
consistent with, and no less stringent than the Federal UST program and
because the EPA has confirmed that the Colorado UST program will
continue to provide for adequate enforcement of compliance as described
in 40 CFR 281.11(b) and part 281, subpart D after this approval.
The Colorado Department of Labor and Employment, Division of Oil
and Public Safety (Department) is the lead implementing agency for the
UST program in Colorado, except in Indian country.
The Department continues to have broad statutory authority to
regulate the installation, operation, maintenance, and closure of USTs,
as well as UST releases under Colorado Revised Statutes (C.R.S.)
(2018), Title 8 Labor and Industry, Article 20 Fuel Products, selected
provisions from Sections 8-20-101, et seq. and Article 20.5 Petroleum
Storage Tanks, Sections 8-20.5-101, et seq. The Colorado UST Program
enforcement authority arises from the powers and duties granted to the
Department Director (Director), which grants are found in C.R.S.
Sections 8-20-102(1), 8-20-104, 8-20-209(1), 8-20.5-107, 8-20.5-202(1),
8-20.5-208(4) and 8-20.5-209. C.R.S. Sections 8-20-104 and 8-20.5-107
provide the Director with broad enforcement authority. Under C.R.S.
Section 8-20-209(1), any duly authorized agent or employee of the
Division of Oil and Public Safety has the authority to enter an UST
facility during regular business hours for inspections. In the case of
a release, C.R.S. Section 8-20.5-208(4) provides the Director the
authority to take such action as necessary, including the authority to
enter any property, premises, or place where an UST is located for
inspection, to conduct monitoring and testing, and to require an owner
to furnish records, conduct monitoring or testing and provide access to
tanks. C.R.S. Sections 8-20-228 and 8-20.5-209 provide the Director
with specific corrective action authority. Notices of violation may be
issued, and penalties for non-compliance with Colorado's UST Act may be
assessed under C.R.S. Section 8-20.5-107. A delivery prohibition tag
may be placed on each tank that has been determined to meet any of the
criteria for delivery prohibition as described in 7 Code of Colorado
Regulations 1101-14, Section 6-2-1.
Specific authorities to regulate the installation, operation,
maintenance, and closure of USTs, as well as UST releases are found
under C.R.S. Section 8-20-228, 8-20.5-102(1) and (2), and Title 8,
Article 20.5, Part 2 Underground Storage Tanks, in addition to the
regulatory provisions of 7 CCR 1101-14, Article 2, Underground Storage
Tanks, as amended effective May 1, 2018; Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements are found under 7 CCR 1101-14, Section 2-3-7. The
aforementioned statutory and regulations sections satisfy the
requirements of 40 CFR 281.40 and 281.41.
Through a Memorandum of Agreement between the State of Colorado and
the EPA, signed by the EPA Region 8 Regional Administrator on February
13, 2018, the State maintains procedures for receiving and ensuring
proper consideration of information about violations submitted by the
public. The State agrees to comply with public participation provisions
contained in 40 CFR 281.42, including: The provision that the State
will not oppose intervention under Rule 24 of the Colorado Rules of
Civil Procedure for Courts of Record in Colorado on the grounds that
the applicant's interest is adequately represented by the State; and
the right of aggrieved parties to be admitted as party to agency
proceedings under C.R.S. Title 24, Article 4, Part 1, Section 24-4-
105(2)(c). Colorado has met the public participation requirements found
in 40 CFR 281.42.
To qualify for final approval, revisions to a state's program must
be ``equivalent to, consistent with, and no less stringent'' than the
2015 Federal Revisions. In the 2015 Federal Revisions the EPA addressed
UST systems deferred in the 1988 UST regulations and added, among other
things, new operation and maintenance requirements; secondary
containment requirements for new and replaced tanks and piping;
operator training requirements; and a requirement to ensure UST system
compatibility before storing certain biofuel blends. In
[[Page 22729]]
addition, the EPA removed past deferrals for emergency generator tanks,
field constructed tanks, and airport hydrant systems.
The EPA analyzes revisions to approved state programs pursuant to
the criteria enumerated in 40 CFR 281.30 through 281.39, and has
concluded that the Department has revised its regulations to help
ensure that the State's UST program continues to be equivalent to,
consistent with, and no less stringent than the 2015 Federal Revisions.
In particular, the Department has amended the Code of Colorado
Regulations to incorporate the revised requirements of 40 CFR part 280,
including the requirements added by the 2015 Federal Revisions. The
State, therefore, has ensured that the criteria found in 40 CFR 281.30
through 281.38 are met.
Title 40 CFR 281.39 describes the state operator training
requirements that must be met in order to be considered equivalent to,
consistent with, and no less stringent than Federal requirements.
Colorado has promulgated and is implementing its own operator training
provisions under Code of Colorado Regulations 7 CCR 1101-14 Section 2-
3-1, et seq. After a thorough review, the EPA has determined that
Colorado's operator training requirements are equivalent to, consistent
with, and no less stringent than Federal requirements.
As part of the State Application, the Colorado Attorney General
certified that the State revisions meet the ``equivalent to, consistent
with, and no less stringent'' criteria in 40 CFR 281.30 through 281.39.
The EPA is relying on this certification in addition to the analysis
submitted by the State in making our determination.
For further information on the EPA's analysis of the State's
application, see the chart in the Technical Support Document (TSD)
contained in the docket for this rulemaking.
H. Where are the revised rules different from the Federal rules?
Broader in Scope Provisions
Where an approved state program has a greater scope of coverage
than required by Federal law, the additional coverage is not part of
the federally approved program and are not federally enforceable (40
CFR 281.12(a)(3)(ii)). The following regulatory requirements are
considered broader in coverage than the Federal program, as these
State-only regulations are not required by Federal regulation and are
implemented by the State in addition to the federally approved program:
7 Code of Colorado Regulations (CCR) 1101-14, Section 1-5
Definitions ``motor fuel'' because, and to the extent that the State
includes fuel products not restricted to use as fuel in UST systems.
7 CCR 1101-14, Sections 2-2-3(a) and 2-2-3(j) are broader in scope
because fees are not imposed by the Federal program.
7 CCR 1101-14, Section 2-3-7(d) is broader in scope because the
State requires extra documentation and recordkeeping to support the
reimbursement of funds from the State Petroleum Storage Tank fund.
More Stringent Provisions
Where an approved state program includes requirements that are
considered more stringent than required by Federal law, the more
stringent requirements become part of the federally approved and
enforceable program (40 CFR 281.12(a)(3)(i)).
The following regulatory requirements are considered more stringent
than the Federal program, and on approval, they become part of the
federally approved program and are federally enforceable:
Under 7 Code of Colorado Regulations (CCR) 1101-14:
At Section 1-5, definition of ``replace'' and 2-2-1(b) introductory
paragraph, third sentence, Colorado has a shorter threshold for the
length of piping that triggers a designation of replacement than the
Federal program.
At Section 2-2-1(c)(1)(ii), Colorado maintains more restrictive
overfill prevention equipment requirements than the Federal program.
At Sections 2-2-2-3(a), 2-3-6-2(a)(1) and (2), and 2-3-6-2(a)(7)
and (c), Colorado has State-only inspection requirements that are
additional to those found in the Federal program.
At Sections 2-2-1(d)(1), introductory paragraph--(d)(1)(iii), the
State has additional criteria for defining new dispenser systems, which
would regulate as new more types of dispenser systems than Federal.
At Sections 2-2-3(a) and (b), Colorado has an additional State-only
annual tank registration requirement.
At Sections 2-3-7(b)(9), 2-4-3(e), 4-1(a) and (e), and in the lack
of a State analog to Federal Sec. 280.50(b)(1), Colorado maintains
reporting requirements additional to those found in the Federal
program.
Colorado does not have an analog to the Federal recordkeeping
timeline requirement found at Sec. 280.45(b)(1) and (3); therefore,
the State requirement for maintaining the records until the UST system
is permanently closed or undergoes a change in service must be
observed, which is more stringent than the 3 years required under the
Federal program for these types of records.
At Sections 2-4-1(a), (f), and (g), 2-4-3(a)-(c), and due to the
lack of a State analog to the last sentence of Sec. 280.70(a) and the
exception to the spill and overfill requirements at Sec. 280.70(c),
the Colorado program sets forth additional requirements relative to the
State's temporary tank closure requirements that are not found in the
Federal regulations.
At Section 2-3-1-6(c), Colorado has additional requirements for the
identification and designation of Class A and B operators.
At Section 7-3(d)(2)(i), the State has an additional filing option
for the required financial responsibility filing and a shorter timeline
under which the filing must take place than the Federal program.
I. How does this action affect Indian country (18 U.S.C. 1151) in
Colorado?
The EPA's approval of Colorado's program does not extend to Indian
country as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151. Indian country generally includes
all lands within the exterior boundaries of the following Indian
reservations located within Colorado: The Ute Mountain Ute and Southern
Ute Indian Reservations; any land held in trust by the United States
for an Indian tribe; and any other areas that are ``Indian country''
within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. 1151. Any lands removed from an Indian
reservation status by Federal court action are not considered
reservation lands even if located within the exterior boundaries of an
Indian reservation. The EPA will retain responsibilities under RCRA for
underground storage tanks in Indian country. Therefore, this action has
no effect in Indian country. See 40 CFR 281.12(a)(2).
II. Codification
A. What is codification?
Codification is the process of placing a state's statutes and
regulations that comprise the State's approved UST program into the
CFR. Section 9004(b) of RCRA, as amended, authorizes the EPA to approve
state UST programs to operate in lieu of the Federal program. The EPA
codifies its authorization of state programs in 40 CFR part 282 and
incorporates by reference state regulations that the EPA will enforce
under sections 9005 and 9006 of RCRA and any other applicable statutory
provisions. The incorporation by reference of state authorized programs
in the CFR should substantially enhance
[[Page 22730]]
the public's ability to discern the current status of the federally
approved state program and state requirements that can be federally
enforced. This effort provides clear notice to the public of the scope
of the approved program in each state.
B. What is the history of codification of Colorado's UST program?
The EPA has not previously incorporated by reference and codified
Colorado's approved UST program. Through this action, the EPA is
incorporating by reference and codifying Colorado's State program in 40
CFR 282.55 to include the program and the approved revisions.
C. What codification decisions have we made in this rule?
In this rule we are finalizing the Federal regulatory text that
incorporates by reference the federally authorized Colorado UST
program. In accordance with the requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, we are
finalizing the incorporation by reference of the Colorado rules
described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 282 set forth below. The EPA
has made, and will continue to make, these documents generally
available through https://www.regulations.gov and/or in hard copy at
the EPA Region 8 office (see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble for
more information).
One purpose of this Federal Register document is to codify
Colorado's approved UST program. The codification reflects the State
program that would be in effect at the time the EPA's approved
revisions to the Colorado UST program addressed in this direct final
rule become final. If, however, the EPA receives substantive comment on
the proposed rule, then this codification will not take effect, and the
State rules that are approved after the EPA considers public comment
will be codified instead. By codifying the approved Colorado program
and by amending the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), the public will
more easily be able to discern the status of the federally approved
requirements of the Colorado program.
The EPA is incorporating by reference the Colorado approved UST
program in 40 CFR 282.55. Section 282.55(d)(1)(i)(A) incorporates by
reference for enforcement purposes the State's regulations.
Section 282.55 also references the Attorney General's Statement,
Demonstration of Adequate Enforcement Procedures, the Program
Description, and the Memorandum of Agreement, which are approved as
part of the UST program under Subtitle I of RCRA. These documents are
not incorporated by reference.
D. What is the effect of the EPA's codification of the federally
authorized state UST program on enforcement?
The EPA retains the authority under sections 9003(h), 9005 and 9006
of Subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991b(h), 6991d and 6991e, and other
applicable statutory and regulatory provisions to undertake corrective
action, inspections, and enforcement actions, and to issue orders in
approved states. If the EPA determines it will take such actions in
Colorado, the EPA will rely on Federal sanctions, Federal inspection
authorities, and other Federal procedures rather than the State
analogs. Therefore, though the EPA has approved the State procedures
listed in 40 CFR 282.55(d)(1)(ii), the EPA is not incorporating by
reference Colorado's procedural and enforcement authorities.
E. What state provisions are not part of the codification?
The public also needs to be aware that some provisions of the
State's UST program are not part of the federally approved state
program. Such provisions are not part of the RCRA Subtitle I program
because they are ``broader in coverage'' than Subtitle I of RCRA. Title
40 CFR 281.12(a)(3)(ii) states that where an approved state program has
provisions that are broader in coverage than the Federal program, those
provisions are not a part of the federally approved program. As a
result, state provisions which are ``broader in coverage'' than the
Federal program are not incorporated by reference for purposes of
enforcement in part 282. Title 40 CFR 282.55(d)(1)(iii) lists for
reference and clarity the Colorado statutory and regulatory provisions
which are ``broader in coverage'' than the Federal program and which
are not, therefore, part of the approved program being codified.
Provisions that are ``broader in coverage'' cannot be enforced by EPA.
The State, however, will continue to implement and enforce such
provisions under State law.
III. Statutory and Executive Order (EO) Reviews
This action only applies to Colorado's UST program requirements
pursuant to RCRA Section 9004 and imposes no requirements other than
those imposed by State law. It complies with applicable EOs and
statutory provisions as follows:
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review, Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this action
from the requirements of Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, Oct. 4,
1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, Jan. 21, 2011). This action approves and
codifies state requirements for the purpose of RCRA Section 9004 and
imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Therefore, this action is not subject to review by OMB.
B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing Regulations and Controlling
Regulatory Costs
This action is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February
3, 2017) regulatory action because actions such as this final approval
of Colorado's revised underground storage tank program under RCRA are
exempted under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, I certify that this
action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601 et seq.).
C. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act and Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments
Because this action approves and codifies preexisting requirements
under State law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty
beyond that required by State law, it does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as
described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-
1538). For the same reason, this action also does not significantly or
uniquely affect the communities of tribal governments, as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
D. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action will not have substantial direct effects on the states,
on the relationship between the national government and the states, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR
43255, Aug. 10, 1999), because it merely approves and codifies state
requirements as part of the State RCRA Underground Storage Tank Program
without altering the relationship or the distribution of power and
responsibilities established by RCRA.
[[Page 22731]]
E. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health and Safety Risks
This action also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, Apr. 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant, and
it does not make decisions based on environmental health or safety
risks.
F. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use
This rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001) because it is not a ``significant regulatory action'' as
defined under Executive Order 12866.
G. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
Under RCRA section 9004(b), the EPA grants a state's application
for approval as long as the state meets the criteria required by RCRA.
It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for the EPA, when it
reviews a state approval application, to require the use of any
particular voluntary consensus standard in place of another standard
that otherwise satisfies the requirements of RCRA. Thus, the
requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply.
H. Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice Reform
As required by Section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61 FR 4729,
February 7, 1996), in issuing this rule, the EPA has taken the
necessary steps to eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize
potential litigation, and provide a clear legal standard for affected
conduct.
I. Executive Order 12630: Governmental Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property Rights
The EPA has complied with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, Mar.
15, 1988) by examining the takings implications of the rule in
accordance with the ``Attorney General's Supplemental Guidelines for
the Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of Unanticipated Takings'' issued
under the executive order.
J. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose an information collection burden under
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.). ``Burden'' is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, Feb. 16, 1994) establishes
Federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision
directs Federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission
by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income
populations in the United States. Because this rule approves
preexisting State rules which are at least equivalent to, consistent
with, and no less stringent than existing Federal requirements and
imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law,
and there are no anticipated significant adverse human health or
environmental effects, the rule is not subject to Executive Order
12898.
L. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801-808, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule
must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each
House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United
States. The EPA will submit a report containing this document and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This
action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). However,
this action will be effective July 19, 2019 because it is a direct
final rule.
Authority: This rule is issued under the authority of Sections
2002(a), 7004(b), and 9004, 9005 and 9006 of the Solid Waste
Disposal Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6974(b), and 6991c,
6991d, and 6991e.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 282
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Incorporation by reference, Hazardous substances, State program
approval, Underground storage tanks.
Dated: April 29, 2019.
Debra Thomas,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA Region 8.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, EPA is amending 40 CFR
part 282 as follows:
PART 282--APPROVED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PROGRAMS
0
1. The authority citation for part 282 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6912, 6991c, 6991d, and 6991e.
0
2. Add Sec. 282.55 to read as follows:
Sec. 282.55 Colorado State-Administered Program.
(a) The State of Colorado is approved to administer and enforce an
underground storage tank program in lieu of the Federal program under
Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976
(RCRA), as amended, 42 U.S.C. 6991 et seq. The State's program, as
administered by the Colorado Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ),
Division of Environmental Response and Remediation (DERR), was approved
by EPA pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 6991c and part 281 of this chapter. EPA
published the notice of final determination approving the Colorado
underground storage tank base program effective on April 23, 2007. A
subsequent program revision application was approved by EPA and became
effective on July 19, 2019.
(b) Colorado has primary responsibility for administering and
enforcing its federally approved underground storage tank program.
However, EPA retains the authority to exercise its corrective action,
inspection, and enforcement authorities under Sections 9003(h), 9005,
and 9006 of Subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991b(h),6991d and 6991e, as
well as under any other applicable statutory and regulatory provisions.
(c) To retain program approval, Colorado must revise its approved
program to adopt new changes to the Federal Subtitle I program which
make it more stringent, in accordance with Section 9004 of RCRA, 42
U.S.C. 6991c, and 40 CFR part 281, subpart E. If Colorado obtains
approval for the revised requirements pursuant to Section 9004 of RCRA,
42 U.S.C. 6991c, the newly approved statutory and regulatory provisions
will be added to this subpart, and notice of any change will be
published in the Federal Register.
[[Page 22732]]
(d) Colorado has final approval for the following elements of its
program application originally submitted to the EPA and approved
effective April 23, 2007, and the program revision application approved
by the EPA effective on July 19, 2019:
(1) State statutes and regulations--(i) Incorporation by reference.
The material cited in this paragraph (d)(1), and listed in appendix A
to this part, is incorporated by reference as part of the underground
storage tank program under Subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991 et seq.
(See Sec. 282.2 for incorporation by reference approval and inspection
information.) You may obtain copies of the Colorado regulations and
statutes that are incorporated by reference in this paragraph (d)(1)
from Colorado's Secretary of State, 1700 Broadway, Denver, CO 80290;
Attn: Code of Colorado Regulations and Administrative Rules; Phone
number: (303) 894-2200 ext. 6418; email: [email protected];
website: https://www.sos.state.co.us/CCR/Welcome.do.
(A) ``EPA-Approved Colorado Statutory and Regulatory Requirements
Applicable to the Underground Storage Tank Program'' dated February
2019.
(B) [Reserved]
(ii) Legal basis. The EPA evaluated the following statutes and
regulations which provide the legal basis for the State's
implementation of the underground storage tank program, but they are
not being incorporated by reference and do not replace Federal
authorities:
(A) The statutory provisions include:
(1) Colorado Revised Statutes (2018), Title 8 Labor and Industry,
Article 20 Fuel Products: Sections 8-20-102(1), 8-20-104 except 8-20-
104(4)(b) and (7), 8-20-209(1), 8-20-223.5(1) and (2), 8-20-228.
(2) Colorado Revised Statutes (2018), Title 8 Labor and Industry,
Article 20.5 Petroleum Underground Storage Tanks: Sections 8-20.5-101,
except (2), (10)(a)(III), (16) and references to aboveground storage
tanks (ASTs); 8-20.5-102; 8-20.5-105; 8-20.5-106; 8-20.5-107; 8-20.5-
202(1), (1.5), (2), (3), and (4); 8-20.5-203; 8-20.5-204; 8-20.5-205;
8-20.5-206; 8-20.5-208; and 8-20.5-209.
(3) Colorado Revised Statutes (2018), Title 24 Government--State
Administration, Article 4 Rule-Making and Licensing Procedures by State
Agencies: Section 24-4-105(2)(c).
(B) The regulatory provisions include:
(1) Code of Colorado Regulations (May 1, 2018), 7 CCR 1101-14
``Department of Labor and Employment, Division of Oil and Public
Safety, Storage Tank Regulations,'' Article 6 Enforcement: Section 6-1
Enforcement Program; Subsections 6-1-1 Notice of Violation; 6-1-2
Enforcement Order; 6-1-3 Informal Conference; Section 6-2 Underground
Storage Tank Delivery Prohibition Subsections 6-2-1 Criteria for
Delivery Prohibition; 6-2-2 Red Tag Mechanisms Used to Identify
Ineligible USTs; 6-2-3 Notification Processes for UST Owners/Operators
and Product Deliverers; 6-2-4 Reclassifying Ineligible USTs as Eligible
to Receive Product; 6-2-5 Delivery Prohibition Deferral in Rural and
Remote Areas; 6-2-6 Delivery Prohibition Deferral in Emergency
Situations; 6-2-7 Removal of Red Tag from Emergency Generator Tank
Systems.
(2) [Reserved]
(iii) Provisions not incorporated by reference. The following
specifically identified statutes and rules applicable to the Colorado
underground storage tank program that are broader in coverage than the
Federal program, are not part of the approved program, and are not
incorporated by reference in this part for enforcement purposes:
(A) Code of Colorado Regulations (May 1, 2018), 7 CCR 1101-14
``Department of Labor and Employment, Division of Oil and Public
Safety, Storage Tank Regulations'': Sections 1-5 ``motor fuel''; 2-2-
3(a); 2-2-3(j); and 2-3-7(d).
(B) Colorado Revised Statutes (2018), Title 8 Labor and Industry,
Article 20 Fuel Products: Sections 8-20-209(2), 8-20-212, 8-20-215, 8-
20-218, 8-20-223.5(3), 8-20-230, and 8-20-231; Article 20.5 Petroleum
Storage Tanks, Sections 8-20.5-102(3) and (4), and 8-20.5-207.
(2) Statement of legal authority. The Attorney General's Statement,
signed by the Attorney General of the State of Colorado Department of
Law on December 7, 2001, and by the Assistant Attorney General on
November 23, 2016, though not incorporated by reference, is referenced
as part of the approved underground storage tank program under Subtitle
I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991 et seq.
(3) Demonstration of procedures for adequate enforcement. The
``Demonstration of Procedures for Adequate Enforcement'' submitted as
part of the original application on November 13, 2002, and as part of
the program revision application on November 1, 2016, though not
incorporated by reference, is referenced as part of the approved
underground storage tank program under Subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C.
6991 et seq.
(4) Program description. The program description and any other
material submitted as part of the original application on November 13,
2002, and as part of the program revision application on November 1,
2016, though not incorporated by reference, are referenced as part of
the approved underground storage tank program under Subtitle I of RCRA,
42 U.S.C. 6991 et seq.
(5) Memorandum of Agreement. The Memorandum of Agreement between
EPA Region 8 and the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment,
Division of Oil and Public Safety, signed by the EPA Regional
Administrator on February 13, 2018, though not incorporated by
reference, is referenced as part of the approved underground storage
tank program under Subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991 et seq.
0
3. Appendix A to part 282 is amended by adding the entry for Colorado
in alphabetical order by State to read as follows:
Appendix A to Part 282--State Requirements Incorporated by Reference in
Part 282 of the Code of Federal Regulations
* * * * *
Colorado
(a) The statutory provisions include: Colorado Revised Statutes
(2018), Title 8 Labor and Industry, Article 20.5 Petroleum Storage
Tanks, Part 1 Administration: Section 8-20.5-101(16) definition of
``tank''.
(b) The regulatory provisions include:
(1) Code of Colorado Regulations (May 1, 2018), 7 CCR 1101-14
``Department of Labor and Employment, Division of Oil and Public
Safety, Storage Tank Regulations'':
Article 1 General Provisions:
Section 1-5 Definitions, except ``aboveground storage tank''
(AST), ``aboveground storage tank (AST) system,'' ``fire resistant
tank,'' ``motor fuel,'' the phrase ``or above ground'' in the
definition of ``operator,'' Item (3) in the definition of ``owner''
relative to ASTs, and paragraph relative to ASTs in the definition
of ``secondary containment''; 1-6 Glossary of Acronyms and
Initializations;
Article 2 Underground Storage Tanks:
Section 2-1 UST Program Scope and Applicability; Subsections 2-
1-1 Applicability; 2-1-2 Determination of ownership and use;
Section 2-2 UST Design, Construction, Installation and
Registration; Subsections 2-2-1 Design and Performance standards for
new and replaced UST systems; 2-2-2 Installation; 2-2-2-1
Installation Application; 2-2-2-2 Installation Requirements; 2-2-2-3
Installation Inspection; 2-2-3 UST System Registration; 2-2-4
Upgrading existing UST System; 2-2-5 Repairs;
Section 2-3 Operation; Subsections 2-3-1 Operator training; 2-3-
1-1 Classes of Operators; 2-3-1-2 Class A Operator; 2-3-1-3 Class B
Operator; 2-3-1-4 Class C
[[Page 22733]]
Operator; 2-3-1-5 Acceptable Training and Certification Processes;
2-3-1-6 Training and Certification Deadlines and Schedules; 2-3-1-7
Retraining Requirements; 2-3-1-8 Documentation; 2-3-2 Spill and
Overfill Prevention; 2-3-3 Corrosion Protection; 2-3-4 Release
Detection; 2-3-4-1 General requirements for all UST systems; 2-3-4-2
Requirements for regulated substance UST Systems; 2-3-4-3
Requirements for Piping; 2-3-4-4 Requirements for hazardous
substance UST systems; 2-3-5 Periodic testing of spill prevision
equipment and containment sumps used for interstitial monitoring of
piping and periodic inspection of overfill prevention equipment; 2-
3-6 Compliance inspections; 2-3-6-1 Monthly Compliance Inspections;
2-3-6-2 Annual Operational Compliance Inspections; 2-3-6-3
Inspections Conducted by the Director; 2-3-7 Reporting and Record
Keeping;
Section 2-4 Closure of UST Systems; Subsections 2-4-1 Temporary
Closure; 2-4-2 Permanent Closure; 2-4-3 Site Assessment;
Section 2-5 UST Systems with Field-Constructed Tanks and Airport
Hydrant Fuel Distribution Systems; Subsections 2-5-1 Definitions; 2-
5-2 General requirements; 2-5-3 Additions, exceptions, and
alternatives for UST systems with field-constructed tanks and
airport hydrant systems;
Article 4 Release Identification And Reporting:
Sections 4-1 Suspected Releases; 4-2 Response to Suspected
Releases; 4-3 Confirmed Releases;
Article 5 Release Response:
Section 5-1 Response to Confirmed Releases; Subsections 5-1-1
Acute human health hazards; 5-1-2 Chronic and secondary human health
hazards and other environmental impacts; Section 5-2 Site
Characterization;
Section 5-3 Corrective Action;
Section 5-4 No Further Action Request;
Article 7 Financial Responsibility Requirements For Owners/
Operators Of Petroleum Underground Storage Tanks:
Section 7-1 Applicability;
Section 7-2 Financial Responsibility Mechanisms;
Section 7-3 Maintenance of Financial Responsibility.
(c) Copies of the Colorado statutes and regulations that are
incorporated by reference are available from the following offices:
Statutes--Colorado Revisor of Statutes, 200 E. Colfax Avenue,
Denver, CO 80203; Attn: Office of Legislative Legal Services; Phone
number: (303) 866-2045; website: https://leg.colorado.gov/agencies/office-legislative-legal-services/colorado-revised-statutes.
Regulations--Colorado's Secretary of State, 1700 Broadway,
Denver, CO 80290; Attn: Code of Colorado Regulations and
Administrative Rules; Phone number: (303) 894-2200 ext. 6418; email:
[email protected]; website: https://www.sos.state.co.us/CCR/Welcome.do.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2019-10413 Filed 5-17-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P