Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes, 22075-22078 [2019-09743]
Download as PDF
22075
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 84, No. 95
Thursday, May 16, 2019
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2019–0318; Product
Identifier 2019–NM–015–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Airbus SAS Model A330–200 Freighter,
A330–200, and A330–300 series
airplanes. This proposed AD was
prompted by an analysis conducted on
Airbus SAS Model A330–200 Freighter,
A330–200, and A330–300 series
airplanes that identified structural areas
that are susceptible to widespread
fatigue damage (WFD). This proposed
AD would require reinforcement
modifications of various structural parts
of the fuselage, and applicable related
investigative and corrective actions if
necessary, as specified in an European
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD,
which will be incorporated by reference.
We are proposing this AD to address the
unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by July 1, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 May 15, 2019
Jkt 247001
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For the material identified in this
proposed AD that will be incorporated
by reference (IBR), contact EASA,
Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668
Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221
89990 1000; email ADs@easa.europa.eu;
internet www.easa.europa.eu. You may
find this IBR material on the EASA
website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu.
You may view this IBR material at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
It is also available in the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2019–
0318; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this NPRM, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for Docket Operations
(telephone 800–647–5527) is listed
above. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Section, Transport
Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
telephone and fax 206–231–3229.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposal. Send your comments to
an address listed under the ADDRESSES
section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2019–0318; Product Identifier 2019–
NM–015–AD’’ at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this NPRM. We will consider
all comments received by the closing
date and may amend this NPRM based
on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this NPRM.
Discussion
Fatigue damage can occur locally, in
small areas or structural design details,
or globally, in widespread areas.
Multiple-site damage is widespread
damage that occurs in a large structural
element such as a single rivet line of a
lap splice joining two large skin panels.
Widespread damage can also occur in
multiple elements such as adjacent
frames or stringers. Multiple-site
damage and multiple-element damage
cracks are typically too small initially to
be reliably detected with normal
inspection methods. Without
intervention, these cracks will grow,
and eventually compromise the
structural integrity of the airplane. This
condition is known as WFD. It is
associated with general degradation of
large areas of structure with similar
structural details and stress levels. As
an airplane ages, WFD will likely occur,
and will certainly occur if the airplane
is operated long enough without any
intervention.
The FAA’s WFD final rule (75 FR
69746, November 15, 2010) became
effective on January 14, 2011. The WFD
rule requires certain actions to prevent
structural failure due to WFD
throughout the operational life of
certain existing transport category
airplanes and all of these airplanes that
will be certificated in the future. For
existing and future airplanes subject to
the WFD rule, the rule requires that
design approval holders (DAHs)
establish a limit of validity (LOV) of the
engineering data that support the
structural maintenance program.
Operators affected by the WFD rule may
not fly an airplane beyond its LOV,
unless an extended LOV is approved.
The WFD rule (75 FR 69746,
November 15, 2010) does not require
identifying and developing maintenance
actions if the DAHs can show that such
actions are not necessary to prevent
WFD before the airplane reaches the
LOV. Many LOVs, however, do depend
on accomplishment of future
maintenance actions. As stated in the
WFD rule, any maintenance actions
necessary to reach the LOV will be
mandated by airworthiness directives
through separate rulemaking actions.
E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM
16MYP1
22076
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 95 / Thursday, May 16, 2019 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
In the context of WFD, this action is
necessary to enable DAHs to propose
LOVs that allow operators the longest
operational lives for their airplanes, and
still ensure that WFD will not occur.
This approach allows for an
implementation strategy that provides
flexibility to DAHs in determining the
timing of service information
development (with FAA approval),
while providing operators with certainty
regarding the LOV applicable to their
airplanes.
The EASA, which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD
2018–0276R1, dated January 11, 2019;
corrected January 15, 2019 (‘‘EASA AD
2018–0276R1’’) (also referred to as the
Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness
Information, or ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct
an unsafe condition for all Airbus SAS
Model A330–200 Freighter, A330–200,
and A330–300 series airplanes. The
MCAI states:
An analysis conducted on [Airbus SAS]
A330 aeroplanes identified structural areas
which are susceptible to widespread fatigue
damage (WFD).
This condition, if not corrected, could lead
to crack initiation and undetected
propagation, reducing the structural integrity
of the aeroplane, possibly resulting in rapid
depressurisation and consequent injury to
occupants.
To address this potential unsafe condition,
Airbus developed a number of modifications
(Mod) and published associated Service
Bulletins (SB) for embodiment in service, to
provide instructions to reinforce the various
structural parts of the fuselage. Consequently,
EASA issued AD 2016–0207 to require
accomplishment of these modifications and
reinforcements. Since that [EASA] AD was
issued, Airbus developed new Mods for
A330–223F and A330–243F aeroplanes and
issued associated SBs accordingly. In
addition, for certain required modifications,
upper thresholds in flight hours (FH) have
been defined and the Applicability of some
required actions was redefined to certain
aeroplane configurations.
For the reasons described above, EASA
issued AD 2018–0276, retaining the
requirements of EASA AD 2016–0207, which
was superseded, requiring new actions
[modifications] for A330–200F aeroplanes,
introducing references to the related Airbus
SBs, and amending some compliance times
(see Table 3—Applicability of this AD). Since
that [EASA] AD was issued, prompted by
operator comments, it was determined that
there was need to clarify the compliance time
for aeroplanes that, for Action 9, were
modified by using a previous revision of
Airbus SB A330–53–3238. Consequently, this
[EASA] AD is revised, introducing paragraph
(6) to clarify this specific scenario. In
addition, Note 2 of this [EASA] AD is
corrected to clarify that the instructions of
each SB are applicable for certain
configurations, not limited to those MSN
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 May 15, 2019
Jkt 247001
[manufacturer serial number] listed in the
Effectivity of the SB.
This revised [EASA] AD is republished to
correct an error in one of the compliance
times for Action 14.
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would
apply to all Airbus SAS Model A330–
200 Freighter, A330–200, and A330–300
series airplanes. The NPRM published
in the Federal Register on September
19, 2017 (82 FR 43715). The NPRM was
prompted by an evaluation by the DAH
indicating that certain fuselage
structures are subject to WFD. The
NPRM proposed to require
reinforcement modifications of various
structural parts of the fuselage, and
related investigative and corrective
actions if necessary. Since we issued the
NPRM, Airbus SAS developed new
modifications for Model A330–200
Freighter series airplanes and issued
associated service information. In
addition, for certain required
modifications, upper thresholds in flight
hours have been defined and the
applicability of certain required actions
was redefined to certain airplane
configurations. In light of these changes,
we have withdrawn the NPRM
published on September 19, 2017 and
have issued this NPRM for public
comment.
Related IBR Material Under 1 CFR Part
51
EASA AD 2018–0276R1 describes
procedures for reinforcement
modifications of various structural parts
of the fuselage, and applicable related
investigative and corrective actions if
necessary. This material is reasonably
available because the interested parties
have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section, and
it is publicly available through the
EASA website.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI referenced above. We are
proposing this AD because we evaluated
all pertinent information and
determined an unsafe condition exists
and is likely to exist or develop on other
products of the same type design.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Proposed Requirements of This NPRM
This proposed AD would require
accomplishing the actions specified in
EASA AD 2018–0276R1 described
previously, as incorporated by
reference, except for any differences
identified as exceptions in the
regulatory text of this AD and except as
discussed under ‘‘Differences Between
this Proposed AD and the MCAI.’’
Explanation of Required Compliance
Information
In the FAA’s ongoing efforts to
improve the efficiency of the AD
process, the FAA worked with Airbus
and EASA to develop a process to use
certain EASA ADs as the primary source
of information for compliance with
requirements for corresponding FAA
ADs. As a result, EASA AD 2018–
0276R1 will be incorporated by
reference in the FAA final rule. This
proposed AD would, therefore, require
compliance with the provisions
specified in EASA AD 2018–0276R1,
except for any differences identified as
exceptions in the regulatory text of this
proposed AD. Service information
specified in EASA AD 2018–0276R1
that is required for compliance with
EASA AD 2018–0276R1 will be
available on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2019–
0318 after the FAA final rule is
published.
Differences Between This Proposed AD
and the MCAI
The MCAI provides lower-limit
thresholds for accomplishment of
certain actions. This proposed AD
would additionally require obtaining
instructions for further actions for
airplanes already modified before the
specified lower threshold is reached.
The compliance times for the
modifications specified in this proposed
AD for addressing WFD were
established to ensure that discrepant
structure is replaced before WFD
develops in airplanes. Standard
inspection techniques cannot be relied
on to detect WFD before it becomes a
hazard to flight. We will not grant any
extensions of the compliance time to
complete any AD-mandated service
bulletin related to WFD without
extensive new data that would
substantiate and clearly warrant such an
extension.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
affects 104 airplanes of U.S. registry. We
estimate the following costs to comply
with this proposed AD:
E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM
16MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 95 / Thursday, May 16, 2019 / Proposed Rules
22077
ESTIMATED COSTS FOR REQUIRED ACTIONS
Labor cost
Parts cost
Cost per
product
Up to 413 work-hours × $85 per hour = $35,105 ...............
Up to $125,190 ....................
Up to $160,295 ....................
We have received no definitive data
that would enable us to provide cost
estimates for the on-condition actions
specified in this proposed AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
This proposed AD is issued in
accordance with authority delegated by
the Executive Director, Aircraft
Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance
with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance
and Airworthiness Division, but during
this transition period, the Executive
Director has delegated the authority to
issue ADs applicable to transport
category airplanes and associated
appliances to the Director of the System
Oversight Division.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 May 15, 2019
Jkt 247001
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
Airbus SAS: Docket No. FAA–2019–0318;
Product Identifier 2019–NM–015–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by July 1, 2019.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all airplanes identified
in paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(3) of this AD,
certificated in any category, all manufacturer
serial numbers.
(1) Airbus SAS Model A330–223F and
–243F airplanes.
(2) Airbus SAS Model A330–201, –202,
–203, –223, and –243 airplanes.
(3) Airbus SAS Model A330–301, –302,
–303, –321, –322, –323, –341, –342, and –343
airplanes.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 53, Fuselage.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by an analysis
conducted on Airbus SAS Model A330–200
Freighter, –200, and –300 series airplanes
that identified structural areas that are
susceptible to widespread fatigue damage
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Cost on U.S.
operators
Up to $16,670,680.
(WFD). We are issuing this AD to address this
condition, which, if not corrected, could lead
to crack initiation and undetected
propagation, reducing the structural integrity
of the airplane, possibly resulting in rapid
depressurization and consequent injury to
occupants.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Requirements
Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this
AD: Comply with all required actions and
compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, EASA AD 2018–0276R1,
dated January 11, 2019; corrected January 15,
2019 (‘‘EASA AD 2018–0276R1’’).
(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2018–0276R1
(1) The ‘‘Remarks’’ section of EASA AD
2018–0276R1 does not apply to this AD.
(2) Where paragraph (1) of EASA AD 2018–
0276R1 specifies to modify the airplane in
accordance with each applicable service
bulletin as specified in Appendix 1 of EASA
AD 2018–0276R1, this AD also requires the
accomplishment of all applicable related
investigative and corrective actions before
further flight in accordance with each
applicable service bulletin as specified in
Appendix 1 of EASA AD 2018–0276R1.
(3) For airplanes already modified before
the threshold specified in Table 2 of
Appendix 1 of EASA AD 2018–0276R1 is
reached, within 6 months after the effective
date of this AD, obtain instructions for
additional maintenance tasks (e.g.,
modifications/inspections) from and
approved by the Manager, International
Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA;
or the European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA); or Airbus’s EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA); and
accomplish those tasks within the
compliance time specified therein.
(i) No Reporting Requirement
Although certain service information
referenced in EASA AD 2018–0276R1
specifies to submit certain information to the
manufacturer, this AD does not include that
requirement.
(j) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information
E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM
16MYP1
22078
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 95 / Thursday, May 16, 2019 / Proposed Rules
directly to the International Section, send it
to the attention of the person identified in
paragraph (k)(2) of this AD. Information may
be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOCREQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain instructions
from a manufacturer, the instructions must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, International Section,
Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or EASA;
or Airbus SAS’s EASA Design Organization
Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA,
the approval must include the DOAauthorized signature.
(3) Required for Compliance (RC): For any
service information referenced in EASA AD
2018–0276R1 that contains RC procedures
and tests: Except as required by paragraphs
(h)(3) and (j)(2) of this AD, RC procedures
and tests must be done to comply with this
AD; any procedures or tests that are not
identified as RC are recommended. Those
procedures and tests that are not identified
as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator’s
maintenance or inspection program without
obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided
the procedures and tests identified as RC can
be done and the airplane can be put back in
an airworthy condition. Any substitutions or
changes to procedures or tests identified as
RC require approval of an AMOC.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
(k) Related Information
(1) For information about EASA AD 2018–
0276R1, contact EASA, Konrad-AdenauerUfer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone
+49 221 89990 6017; email ADs@
easa.europa.eu; Internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this
EASA AD on the EASA website at https://
ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this EASA
AD at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
EASA AD 2018–0276R1 may be found in the
AD docket on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA–2019–0318.
(2) For more information about this AD,
contact Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace
Engineer, International Section, Transport
Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th
St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and
fax 206–231–3229.
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on
April 25, 2019.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2019–09743 Filed 5–15–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 May 15, 2019
Jkt 247001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2019–0310; Airspace
Docket No. 19–ACE–7]
RIN 2120–AA66
Proposed Amendment of Class E
Airspace; Forest City, IA
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
This action proposes to
amend the Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface
at Forest City Municipal Airport, Forest
City, IA. The FAA is proposing this
action as the result of an airspace review
caused by the decommissioning of the
Forest City non-directional beacon
(NDB), which provided navigation
information for the instrument
procedures at this airport. Airspace
redesign is necessary for the safety and
management of instrument flight rules
(IFR) operations at this airport.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before July 1, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Send comments on this
proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202)
366–9826, or (800) 647–5527. You must
identify FAA Docket No. FAA–2019–
0310; Airspace Docket No. 19–ACE–7, at
the beginning of your comments. You
may also submit comments through the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
You may review the public docket
containing the proposal, any comments
received, and any final disposition in
person in the Dockets Office between
9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except federal holidays.
FAA Order 7400.11C, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, and
subsequent amendments can be viewed
online at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/
publications/. For further information,
you can contact the Airspace Policy
Group, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591;
telephone: (202) 267–8783. The Order is
also available for inspection at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of FAA
Order 7400.11C at NARA, call (202)
741–6030, or go to https://
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/
ibr-locations.html.
FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on
September 15.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey Claypool, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support
Group, Central Service Center, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX
76177; telephone (817) 222–5711.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority for This Rulemaking
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority
described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use
of airspace necessary to ensure the
safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
airspace. This regulation is within the
scope of that authority as it would
amend the Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface
at Forest City Municipal Airport, Forest
City, IA, to support IFR operations at
this airport.
Comments Invited
Interested parties are invited to
participate in this proposed rulemaking
by submitting such written data, views,
or arguments, as they may desire.
Comments that provide the factual basis
supporting the views and suggestions
presented are particularly helpful in
developing reasoned regulatory
decisions on the proposal. Comments
are specifically invited on the overall
regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related
aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both
docket numbers and be submitted in
triplicate to the address listed above.
Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this notice must submit with those
comments a self-addressed, stamped
postcard on which the following
statement is made: ‘‘Comments to
Docket No. FAA–2019–0310; Airspace
Docket No. 19–ACE–7.’’ The postcard
will be date/time stamped and returned
to the commenter.
All communications received before
the specified closing date for comments
will be considered before taking action
E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM
16MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 95 (Thursday, May 16, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 22075-22078]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-09743]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 95 / Thursday, May 16, 2019 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 22075]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2019-0318; Product Identifier 2019-NM-015-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Airbus SAS Model A330-200 Freighter, A330-200, and A330-300 series
airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by an analysis conducted on
Airbus SAS Model A330-200 Freighter, A330-200, and A330-300 series
airplanes that identified structural areas that are susceptible to
widespread fatigue damage (WFD). This proposed AD would require
reinforcement modifications of various structural parts of the
fuselage, and applicable related investigative and corrective actions
if necessary, as specified in an European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
AD, which will be incorporated by reference. We are proposing this AD
to address the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by July 1, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For the material identified in this proposed AD that will be
incorporated by reference (IBR), contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3,
50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 89990 1000; email
[email protected]; internet www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this IBR
material on the EASA website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view
this IBR material at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195. It is also available in the AD
docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-
0318; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this NPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other
information. The street address for Docket Operations (telephone 800-
647-5527) is listed above. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax 206-231-3229.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2019-0318;
Product Identifier 2019-NM-015-AD'' at the beginning of your comments.
We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this NPRM. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend this NPRM based on
those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this NPRM.
Discussion
Fatigue damage can occur locally, in small areas or structural
design details, or globally, in widespread areas. Multiple-site damage
is widespread damage that occurs in a large structural element such as
a single rivet line of a lap splice joining two large skin panels.
Widespread damage can also occur in multiple elements such as adjacent
frames or stringers. Multiple-site damage and multiple-element damage
cracks are typically too small initially to be reliably detected with
normal inspection methods. Without intervention, these cracks will
grow, and eventually compromise the structural integrity of the
airplane. This condition is known as WFD. It is associated with general
degradation of large areas of structure with similar structural details
and stress levels. As an airplane ages, WFD will likely occur, and will
certainly occur if the airplane is operated long enough without any
intervention.
The FAA's WFD final rule (75 FR 69746, November 15, 2010) became
effective on January 14, 2011. The WFD rule requires certain actions to
prevent structural failure due to WFD throughout the operational life
of certain existing transport category airplanes and all of these
airplanes that will be certificated in the future. For existing and
future airplanes subject to the WFD rule, the rule requires that design
approval holders (DAHs) establish a limit of validity (LOV) of the
engineering data that support the structural maintenance program.
Operators affected by the WFD rule may not fly an airplane beyond its
LOV, unless an extended LOV is approved.
The WFD rule (75 FR 69746, November 15, 2010) does not require
identifying and developing maintenance actions if the DAHs can show
that such actions are not necessary to prevent WFD before the airplane
reaches the LOV. Many LOVs, however, do depend on accomplishment of
future maintenance actions. As stated in the WFD rule, any maintenance
actions necessary to reach the LOV will be mandated by airworthiness
directives through separate rulemaking actions.
[[Page 22076]]
In the context of WFD, this action is necessary to enable DAHs to
propose LOVs that allow operators the longest operational lives for
their airplanes, and still ensure that WFD will not occur. This
approach allows for an implementation strategy that provides
flexibility to DAHs in determining the timing of service information
development (with FAA approval), while providing operators with
certainty regarding the LOV applicable to their airplanes.
The EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD 2018-0276R1, dated January 11, 2019;
corrected January 15, 2019 (``EASA AD 2018-0276R1'') (also referred to
as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the
MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for all Airbus SAS Model A330-
200 Freighter, A330-200, and A330-300 series airplanes. The MCAI
states:
An analysis conducted on [Airbus SAS] A330 aeroplanes identified
structural areas which are susceptible to widespread fatigue damage
(WFD).
This condition, if not corrected, could lead to crack initiation
and undetected propagation, reducing the structural integrity of the
aeroplane, possibly resulting in rapid depressurisation and
consequent injury to occupants.
To address this potential unsafe condition, Airbus developed a
number of modifications (Mod) and published associated Service
Bulletins (SB) for embodiment in service, to provide instructions to
reinforce the various structural parts of the fuselage.
Consequently, EASA issued AD 2016-0207 to require accomplishment of
these modifications and reinforcements. Since that [EASA] AD was
issued, Airbus developed new Mods for A330-223F and A330-243F
aeroplanes and issued associated SBs accordingly. In addition, for
certain required modifications, upper thresholds in flight hours
(FH) have been defined and the Applicability of some required
actions was redefined to certain aeroplane configurations.
For the reasons described above, EASA issued AD 2018-0276,
retaining the requirements of EASA AD 2016-0207, which was
superseded, requiring new actions [modifications] for A330-200F
aeroplanes, introducing references to the related Airbus SBs, and
amending some compliance times (see Table 3--Applicability of this
AD). Since that [EASA] AD was issued, prompted by operator comments,
it was determined that there was need to clarify the compliance time
for aeroplanes that, for Action 9, were modified by using a previous
revision of Airbus SB A330-53-3238. Consequently, this [EASA] AD is
revised, introducing paragraph (6) to clarify this specific
scenario. In addition, Note 2 of this [EASA] AD is corrected to
clarify that the instructions of each SB are applicable for certain
configurations, not limited to those MSN [manufacturer serial
number] listed in the Effectivity of the SB.
This revised [EASA] AD is republished to correct an error in one
of the compliance times for Action 14.
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to all Airbus SAS Model A330-
200 Freighter, A330-200, and A330-300 series airplanes. The NPRM
published in the Federal Register on September 19, 2017 (82 FR 43715).
The NPRM was prompted by an evaluation by the DAH indicating that
certain fuselage structures are subject to WFD. The NPRM proposed to
require reinforcement modifications of various structural parts of the
fuselage, and related investigative and corrective actions if
necessary. Since we issued the NPRM, Airbus SAS developed new
modifications for Model A330-200 Freighter series airplanes and issued
associated service information. In addition, for certain required
modifications, upper thresholds in flight hours have been defined and
the applicability of certain required actions was redefined to certain
airplane configurations. In light of these changes, we have withdrawn
the NPRM published on September 19, 2017 and have issued this NPRM for
public comment.
Related IBR Material Under 1 CFR Part 51
EASA AD 2018-0276R1 describes procedures for reinforcement
modifications of various structural parts of the fuselage, and
applicable related investigative and corrective actions if necessary.
This material is reasonably available because the interested parties
have access to it through their normal course of business or by the
means identified in the ADDRESSES section, and it is publicly available
through the EASA website.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI referenced
above. We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe condition exists and is likely to
exist or develop on other products of the same type design.
Proposed Requirements of This NPRM
This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in EASA AD 2018-0276R1 described previously, as incorporated by
reference, except for any differences identified as exceptions in the
regulatory text of this AD and except as discussed under ``Differences
Between this Proposed AD and the MCAI.''
Explanation of Required Compliance Information
In the FAA's ongoing efforts to improve the efficiency of the AD
process, the FAA worked with Airbus and EASA to develop a process to
use certain EASA ADs as the primary source of information for
compliance with requirements for corresponding FAA ADs. As a result,
EASA AD 2018-0276R1 will be incorporated by reference in the FAA final
rule. This proposed AD would, therefore, require compliance with the
provisions specified in EASA AD 2018-0276R1, except for any differences
identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of this proposed AD.
Service information specified in EASA AD 2018-0276R1 that is required
for compliance with EASA AD 2018-0276R1 will be available on the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating
Docket No. FAA-2019-0318 after the FAA final rule is published.
Differences Between This Proposed AD and the MCAI
The MCAI provides lower-limit thresholds for accomplishment of
certain actions. This proposed AD would additionally require obtaining
instructions for further actions for airplanes already modified before
the specified lower threshold is reached.
The compliance times for the modifications specified in this
proposed AD for addressing WFD were established to ensure that
discrepant structure is replaced before WFD develops in airplanes.
Standard inspection techniques cannot be relied on to detect WFD before
it becomes a hazard to flight. We will not grant any extensions of the
compliance time to complete any AD-mandated service bulletin related to
WFD without extensive new data that would substantiate and clearly
warrant such an extension.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD affects 104 airplanes of U.S.
registry. We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed
AD:
[[Page 22077]]
Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product Cost on U.S. operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Up to 413 work-hours x $85 per Up to $125,190....... Up to $160,295...... Up to $16,670,680.
hour = $35,105.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this proposed
AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
This proposed AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated
by the Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as
authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order,
issuance of ADs is normally a function of the Compliance and
Airworthiness Division, but during this transition period, the
Executive Director has delegated the authority to issue ADs applicable
to transport category airplanes and associated appliances to the
Director of the System Oversight Division.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
Airbus SAS: Docket No. FAA-2019-0318; Product Identifier 2019-NM-
015-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by July 1, 2019.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all airplanes identified in paragraphs (c)(1)
through (c)(3) of this AD, certificated in any category, all
manufacturer serial numbers.
(1) Airbus SAS Model A330-223F and -243F airplanes.
(2) Airbus SAS Model A330-201, -202, -203, -223, and -243
airplanes.
(3) Airbus SAS Model A330-301, -302, -303, -321, -322, -323, -
341, -342, and -343 airplanes.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by an analysis conducted on Airbus SAS
Model A330-200 Freighter, -200, and -300 series airplanes that
identified structural areas that are susceptible to widespread
fatigue damage (WFD). We are issuing this AD to address this
condition, which, if not corrected, could lead to crack initiation
and undetected propagation, reducing the structural integrity of the
airplane, possibly resulting in rapid depressurization and
consequent injury to occupants.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Requirements
Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this AD: Comply with all
required actions and compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, EASA AD 2018-0276R1, dated January 11, 2019;
corrected January 15, 2019 (``EASA AD 2018-0276R1'').
(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2018-0276R1
(1) The ``Remarks'' section of EASA AD 2018-0276R1 does not
apply to this AD.
(2) Where paragraph (1) of EASA AD 2018-0276R1 specifies to
modify the airplane in accordance with each applicable service
bulletin as specified in Appendix 1 of EASA AD 2018-0276R1, this AD
also requires the accomplishment of all applicable related
investigative and corrective actions before further flight in
accordance with each applicable service bulletin as specified in
Appendix 1 of EASA AD 2018-0276R1.
(3) For airplanes already modified before the threshold
specified in Table 2 of Appendix 1 of EASA AD 2018-0276R1 is
reached, within 6 months after the effective date of this AD, obtain
instructions for additional maintenance tasks (e.g., modifications/
inspections) from and approved by the Manager, International
Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or the European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus's EASA Design Organization Approval
(DOA); and accomplish those tasks within the compliance time
specified therein.
(i) No Reporting Requirement
Although certain service information referenced in EASA AD 2018-
0276R1 specifies to submit certain information to the manufacturer,
this AD does not include that requirement.
(j) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
[[Page 22078]]
directly to the International Section, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (k)(2) of this AD. Information
may be emailed to: [email protected]. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International
Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus SAS's
EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, the
approval must include the DOA-authorized signature.
(3) Required for Compliance (RC): For any service information
referenced in EASA AD 2018-0276R1 that contains RC procedures and
tests: Except as required by paragraphs (h)(3) and (j)(2) of this
AD, RC procedures and tests must be done to comply with this AD; any
procedures or tests that are not identified as RC are recommended.
Those procedures and tests that are not identified as RC may be
deviated from using accepted methods in accordance with the
operator's maintenance or inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the procedures and tests identified as
RC can be done and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition. Any substitutions or changes to procedures or tests
identified as RC require approval of an AMOC.
(k) Related Information
(1) For information about EASA AD 2018-0276R1, contact EASA,
Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221
89990 6017; email [email protected]; Internet www.easa.europa.eu.
You may find this EASA AD on the EASA website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this EASA AD at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
206-231-3195. EASA AD 2018-0276R1 may be found in the AD docket on
the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2019-0318.
(2) For more information about this AD, contact Vladimir
Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, International Section, Transport
Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
telephone and fax 206-231-3229.
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on April 25, 2019.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-09743 Filed 5-15-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P