Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Spiny Dogfish Fishery; 2019 and Projected 2020-2021 Specifications, 21723-21726 [2019-09915]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 94 / Wednesday, May 15, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
differing compliance or reporting
requirements or timetables that take into
account the resources available to small
entities; (2) the clarification,
consolidation, or simplification of
compliance or reporting requirements
under the rule for small entities; (3) the
use of performance, rather than design,
standards; and (4) an exemption from
coverage of the rule, or any part thereof,
for small entities.45
29. The Order eliminates the
obligation imposed on certain
broadcasters to file a Broadcast MidTerm Report on employment practices.
Eliminating this requirement is
intended to modernize the
Commission’s regulations and reduce
costs and recordkeeping burdens for
affected entities, including small
entities. Under the prior rule, affected
entities were required to expend time
and resources gathering and filing
consolidated information that is largely
already otherwise supplied to the
Commission. The Order will require
radio stations uploading an EEO public
file report to answer one ‘‘either/or’’
question about staffing in order to
determine their eligibility for the
statutorily mandated mid-term review of
broadcast equal employment practices.
In the aggregate, replacing Form 397
with this requirement to provide
additional information in the OPIF
constitutes a reduction in burdens, and
is as minimal a burden as possible for
all entities, including small entities.
Thus, we anticipate that affected small
entities only stand to benefit from these
revisions.
B. Paperwork Reduction Analysis
30. This document contains proposed
new or revised information collection
requirements subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–
13 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). The
requirements will be submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review under Section 3507(d)
of the PRA. OMB, the general public,
and other Federal agencies will be
invited to comment on the information
collection requirements contained in
this proceeding. The Commission will
publish a separate document in the
Federal Register at a later date seeking
these comments. In addition, we note
that, pursuant to the Small Business
Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public
Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4),
the Commission previously sought
specific comment on how it might
further reduce the information
collection burden for small business
concerns with fewer than 25 employees.
45 5
We have described impacts that might
affect small businesses, which includes
most businesses with fewer than 25
employees, in the FRFA.
Federal Communications Commission.
Katura Jackson,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, Office of the
Secretary.
C. Congressional Review Act
Final Rules
31. The Commission will send a copy
of this Report and Order in a report to
be sent to Congress and the Government
Accountability Office pursuant to the
Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C.
801(a)(1)(A).
III. Ordering Clauses
16:32 May 14, 2019
Jkt 247001
32. Accordingly, It is ordered that,
pursuant to the authority found in
sections 1, 4(i), 4(j) and 334 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 154(j),
and 334 this Report and Order IS
HEREBY ADOPTED.
33. It is further ordered that this
Report and Order SHALL BECOME
EFFECTIVE on May 1, 2019, except for
those provisions which contain nonsubstantive modifications to existing
information collection requirements that
require approval by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
the Paperwork Reduction Act. The nonsubstantive modifications WILL
BECOME EFFECTIVE upon the effective
date announced when the Commission
publishes a notice in the Federal
Register announcing such OMB
approval and the effective date.
34. It is further ordered that the
Commission’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference
Information Center, SHALL SEND a
copy of this Report and Order, including
the Final Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis, to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration.
35. It is further ordered that the
Commission SHALL SEND a copy of the
Report and Order in a report to Congress
and the Government Accountability
Office pursuant to the Congressional
Review Act (CRA), see 5 U.S.C.
801(a)(1)(A).
36. It is further ordered that, should
no petitions for reconsideration or
petitions for judicial review be timely
filed, MB Docket No. 18–23 shall be
TERMINATED, and its docket closed.
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73
Equal employment opportunity,
Radio, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Television.
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Federal Communications
Commission amends 47 CFR part 73 as
follows:
PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST
SERVICES
1. The authority citation for part 73
continues to read as follows:
■
U.S.C. 603(c)(1)–(4).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21723
Sfmt 4700
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 155, 301, 303,
307, 309, 310, 334, 336, and 339.
2. Amend § 73.2080 by revising
paragraph (f)(2) to read as follows:
■
§ 73.2080 Equal Employment
Opportunities (EEO).
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(2) The Commission will conduct a
mid-term review of the employment
practices of each broadcast television
station that is part of an employment
unit of five or more full-time employees
and each radio station that is part of an
employment unit of eleven or more fulltime employees, four years following
the station’s most recent license
expiration date as specified in
§ 73.1020. If a broadcast licensee
acquires a station pursuant to FCC Form
314 or FCC Form 315 during the period
that is to form the basis for the mid-term
review, that review will cover the
licensee’s EEO recruitment activity
during the period starting with the date
it acquired the station.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2019–09626 Filed 5–14–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 190207082–9433–02]
RIN 0648–XG800
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; Spiny Dogfish Fishery; 2019
and Projected 2020–2021
Specifications
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
21724
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 94 / Wednesday, May 15, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
NMFS issues final
specifications for the 2019 spiny dogfish
fishery, and projected specifications for
fishing years 2020 and 2021. The
specifications are necessary to establish
allowable harvest levels and other
management measures to prevent
overfishing while allowing optimum
yield, consistent with the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act and the Spiny Dogfish
Fishery Management Plan. This rule is
also intended to inform the public of
these specifications for the 2019 fishing
year and projected specifications for
2020 and 2021.
DATES: Effective May 15, 2019 through
April 30, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Copies of these
specifications, including the
Environmental Assessment (EA),
Regulatory Flexibility Act Analyses, and
other supporting documents for the
action, are available upon request from
Dr. Christopher M. Moore, Executive
Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery
Management Council, Suite 201, 800 N.
State Street, Dover, DE 19901. These
documents are also accessible via the
internet at https://www.mafmc.org/
dogfish.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cynthia Ferrio, Fishery Management
Specialist, (978) 281–9180.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Atlantic spiny dogfish fishery is
jointly managed in Federal waters by
the New England and Mid-Atlantic
Fishery Management Councils under the
Spiny Dogfish Fishery Management
Plan (FMP), with the Mid-Atlantic
Council serving as the administrative
lead. The Atlantic States Marine
Fisheries Commission manages the
fishery in state waters from Maine to
North Carolina through an interstate
fishery management plan. Regulations
implementing the spiny dogfish FMP
appear at 50 CFR part 648, subparts A
and L, and require the specification of
an annual catch limit (ACL), annual
catch target (ACT), and the total
allowable landings (TAL). These limits
and other management measures may be
set for up to five fishing years at a time,
with each fishing year running from
May 1 through April 30. This action
implements spiny dogfish specifications
for the 2019 fishing year, and announces
projected specifications for 2020 and
2021, as recommended by the Councils.
The proposed rule for this action
published in the Federal Register on
March 29, 2019 (84 FR 11923), and
comments were accepted through April
15, 2019. Additional background
information regarding the development
of these specifications was provided in
the proposed rule and is not repeated
here.
Final Specifications
This action implements the final 2019
and projected 2020–2021 spiny dogfish
specifications (Table 1) as described in
the March 29, 2019, proposed rule.
These specifications substantially
reduce the coastwide commercial quota
in 2019 to ensure overfishing does not
occur. Quota increases are projected for
2020 and 2021 as the stock biomass is
expected to increase and the risk of
overfishing declines. The lower catch
limits are not expected to have a
substantial impact on industry, as the
reduced coastwide quotas remain higher
than total annual landings in recent
years.
TABLE 1—SUMMARY OF FINAL 2019, AND PROJECTED 2020 AND 2021 SPINY DOGFISH FISHERY SPECIFICATIONS
2019
Metric tons
Overfishing Limit ......................................
Acceptable Biological Catch ....................
ACL = ACT ..............................................
TAL ...........................................................
Commercial Quota ...................................
Percent Change in Quota from Previous
Year ......................................................
All other fishery management
measures, including the 6,000-lb (2,722kg) Federal trip limit, remain
unchanged. Changes to the trip limit
may be pursued in a future, separate
rulemaking action. By providing
projected quotas for 2019 and 2020,
NMFS hopes to assist fishery
participants in planning ahead. The
Councils will review these
specifications annually, and NMFS will
provide notice prior to each fishing year
to finalize specifications and related
measures.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
Comments and Responses
The public comment period for the
proposed rule ended on April 15, 2019.
Five comments were received from the
public on this rule during the 15-day
comment period. No changes to the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 May 14, 2019
Jkt 247001
2020
Pounds
Metric tons
2021
Pounds
Metric tons
Pounds
21,549
12,914
12,865
9,390
9,309
47,507,413
28,470,497
28,362,470
20,701,000
20,522,832
N/A
14,126
14,077
10,602
10,521
N/A
31,142,499
31,034,473
23,373,409
23,194,835
N/A
16,043
15,994
12,519
12,438
N/A
35,368,761
35,260,734
27,599,671
27,421,096
¥46
¥46
+13
+13
+18
+18
proposed specifications were made as a
result of these comments.
Comment 1: One commenter
requested that the spiny dogfish quota
be reduced by 50 percent to prevent
overfishing, claimed that widespread
corruption and commercial profiteering
was taking place across all fisheries, and
asked that all trawl gear be banned. No
rationale or evidence was presented to
support the commenter’s claims.
Response 1: This action does reduce
the commercial spiny dogfish quota by
46 percent to prevent overfishing, which
is almost the 50 percent requested by
the commenter. Banning trawl gear is
beyond the scope of outcomes
contemplated in specifications.
Comment 2: Another commenter
alleged that the spiny dogfish quota
should not be reduced because they
prey on valuable groundfish.
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Response 2: This action manages the
spiny dogfish fishery in terms of the
target species’ stock health and
availability. At this time, the FMP does
not account for predation effects by
spiny dogfish on other species.
Comment 3: The commenter
supported this action and the quota
reduction, but was also concerned with
inaccurate data from trawl fisheries, and
effects on the recreational spiny dogfish
fishery.
Response 3: These specifications were
developed using the best scientific
information available, which includes
fishery independent trawl surveys.
These surveys are conducted by the
Northeast Fisheries Science Center and
others, and are not solely dependent on
trawl reporting data from within the
fishery. Also, there are no Federal
regulations governing the spiny dogfish
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 94 / Wednesday, May 15, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
recreational fishery; these specifications
apply to the commercial fishery only.
For more information on recreational
spiny dogfish regulations, contact the
Atlantic States Marine Fisheries
Commission or your local state agency.
Comment 4: One commenter
supported this action, but did not
believe that immediate action is
required. They agreed that quotas
should be reduced in future years to
prevent overfishing (perhaps by using
limited protected areas), but for now,
the stock is stable, and dogfish eat other
groundfish species so the population
should be controlled.
Response 4: This action reduces the
dogfish quota to prevent overfishing
based on the best scientific information
available. Although the stock is not
currently overfished or experiencing
overfishing, biomass has been declining,
and the quota reductions are a result of
the application of the Mid-Atlantic
Council’s Risk Policy to prevent
overfishing, consistent with National
Standard 2 and the Magnuson-Stevens
Act. As stated earlier, the FMP does not
account for predation effects of spiny
dogfish on other species.
Comment 5: This commenter
supported this action’s quota reductions
for spiny dogfish to preserve future
sustainability in the fishery. They also
suggested that a sex-specific spiny
dogfish fishery be considered to protect
against harvest of pregnant females.
Response 5: NMFS agrees that these
specifications will better maintain
sustainability in the spiny dogfish
fishery. Consideration of a sex-specific
fishery and management measures was
not discussed in this action and would
need to be pursued separately by the
Councils in the future.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
Changes From the Proposed Rule
There are no changes from the
proposed rule.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, the NMFS
Assistant Administrator has determined
that this final rule is consistent with the
Spiny Dogfish FMP, other provisions of
the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other
applicable law.
This final rule is exempt from review
under Executive Order 12866 because
this action contains no implementing
regulations.
This final rule does not duplicate,
conflict, or overlap with any existing
Federal rules.
This action does not contain a
collection of information requirement
for purposes of the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 May 14, 2019
Jkt 247001
The Assistant Administrator for
Fisheries, NOAA, finds good cause
under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) to waive the
30-day delay of effectiveness period for
this rule, to ensure that the final
specifications are in place as close as
practicable to the start of the 2019 spiny
dogfish fishing year, which began on
May 1, 2019. This action implements
the final specifications (i.e., annual
catch limits) for the spiny dogfish
fishery for the 2019 fishing year. A
delay in effectiveness well beyond the
start of the fishing year would be
contrary to the public interest, as it
could create confusion in the
commercial spiny dogfish industry.
Additionally, it could compromise the
effectiveness of the lower catch limits in
preventing overfishing while still
allowing sustainable yield.
This rule is being issued at the earliest
possible date. Preparation of the
proposed rule was dependent on the
submission of the EA, in support of the
specifications, developed by the MidAtlantic Council. Following submission,
documentation in support of the
Council’s recommended specifications
is required for NMFS to provide the
public with information from the
environmental and economic analyses,
as required in rulemaking, and to
evaluate the consistency of the
Council’s recommendation with the
Magnuson-Stevens Act and other
applicable law. A complete draft of the
specifications document and
accompanying EA was received in late
November 2018. However, the recent
lapse in federal appropriations
prevented any work on this action from
December 22, 2018, through January 25,
2019, and delayed approval of the final
EA. As such, the final specifications
document and EA was not completed
and approved by NMFS until early
March 2019. The proposed rule for this
action published on March 29, 2019,
with a 15-day comment period ending
April 15, 2019. A 30-day delay in
effectiveness would needlessly
postpone implementation of the 2019
specifications beyond the start of the
fishing year on May 1, which is contrary
to the public interest.
Furthermore, the lower catch limits
specified in this action should be
implemented as soon as possible to
minimize the potential for overfishing.
Although the specifications from 2018
are carried into 2019 until new catch
limits are implemented, the Councils
have recommended a substantial
reduction in commercial quota based on
the most recent stock assessment
update. Harvest occurring within the
first weeks of the fishing year based on
outdated, higher catch limits could
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
21725
further harm the resource, and subject it
to a greater risk of overfishing.
Finally, regulated parties do not
require any additional time to come into
compliance with this rule, and thus, a
30-day delay in effectiveness does not
provide any benefit. Unlike actions that
require an adjustment period to comply
with new rules, participants in the
spiny dogfish fishery will not be
required to purchase new equipment or
otherwise expend time or money to
comply with these management
measures. Fishery stakeholders have
also been involved in the development
of this action and are anticipating this
rule. Therefore, there would be no
benefit to delaying the implementation
of these specifications.
For these reasons, a 30-day delay in
effectiveness would be contrary to the
public interest, and is therefore waived.
As a result, there is good cause to
implement these specifications on May
15, 2019.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
The final regulatory flexibility
analysis (FRFA) included in this final
rule was prepared pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
604(a), and incorporates the initial
regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA)
and a summary of analyses completed to
support the action. A public copy of the
environmental assessment/IRFA is
available from the Mid-Atlantic Council
(see ADDRESSES). The preamble to the
proposed rule included a detailed
summary of the analyses contained in
the IRFA, and that discussion is not
repeated here.
A Summary of the Significant Issues
Raised by the Public in Response to the
IRFA, a Summary of the Agency’s
Assessment of Such Issues, and a
Statement of Any Changes Made in the
Final Rule as a Result of Such
Comments
NMFS did not receive any comments
in response to the IRFA or regulatory
flexibility analysis (RFA) process. Refer
to the ‘‘Comments and Responses’’
section of this rule’s preamble for more
detail on the public comments that were
received. No changes to the proposed
rule were made as a result of public
comment.
Description and Estimate of Number of
Small Entities to Which the Rule Would
Apply
This final rule affects small entities
engaged in commercial fishing
operations in the spiny dogfish fishery.
For the purposes of the RFA analysis,
the ownership entities (or firms), not the
individual vessels, are considered to be
the regulated entities. Because of this,
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
21726
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 94 / Wednesday, May 15, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
some vessels with spiny dogfish permits
may be considered to be part of the
same firm because they may have the
same owners. In terms of RFA, a
business primarily engaged in
commercial fishing activity is classified
as a small business if it has combined
annual gross receipts not in excess of
$11 million for all its affiliated
operations worldwide. To identify these
small and large firms, vessel ownership
data from the permit database were
grouped according to common owners
and sorted by size.
The current ownership data set used
for this analysis is based on calendar
year 2017 (the most recent complete
year available). In 2017, there were
2,254 vessels that held a spiny dogfish
permit, while 244 of these vessels
contributed to overall landings. Crossreferencing those permits with vessel
ownership database revealed that 1,695
entities owned those vessels. 1,685 were
classified as small entities, with the
remaining 10 classified as large
businesses. Of the 1,685 small entities,
374 had no revenue in 2017, 1,104 were
commercial fishing entities, and 207
were for-hire entities. Overall, there
were 227 entities with spiny dogfish
permits that reported revenue from
spiny dogfish landings during 2017. Of
those entities, 1 was large and 226 were
small and their average overall revenues
in 2017 were $0.4 million.
Description of Projected Reporting,
Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance
Requirements
No additional reporting,
recordkeeping, or other compliance
requirements are included in this final
rule.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
Description of the Steps the Agency Has
Taken To Minimize the Significant
Economic Impact on Small Entities
Consistent With the Stated Objectives of
Applicable Statutes
Specification of commercial catch
limits is constrained by the conservation
objectives of the FMP and the
Magnuson-Stevens Act. This action
implements final 2019 and projected
2020–2021 commercial catch
specifications for the spiny dogfish
fishery based on the most recent stock
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 May 14, 2019
Jkt 247001
assessment update. The Councils also
considered taking no action, where the
same catch limits and specifications
from fishing year 2018 would continue
into 2019 with no change. Only these
two alternatives were considered by the
Councils. NMFS is somewhat
constrained in approving specifications
in that the agency can approve,
disapprove, partially approve, or in very
limited circumstances substitute
measures to end overfishing and rebuild
stocks if Council-recommended
measures will not do so. Because of this,
there are limited options to minimize
potential impacts on small entities.
This rule decreases the commercial
quota by 46 percent to 9,309 mt in 2019,
followed by modest projected increases
to 10,521 mt and 12,438 mt, in 2020 and
2021, respectively. Although the 46percent reduction in 2019 is a
substantial quota change, landings
reports from the most recent available
full fishing year (2017) show that 7,439
mt of spiny dogfish were landed.
Available landing information for
fishing year 2018 is around 23 percent
lower than in 2017. Given this data, it
is likely that the reduction in quota for
2019 will not constrain the spiny
dogfish industry, including small
entities.
If the fishery were to reverse the
recent landing trends and achieve the
proposed 2019 quota, it would still
generate more landings and likely more
revenues than the most recent year
(2017) of full fishery information.
Therefore, it is expected that the
proposed action will have minimal
impact on small entities.
Taking no action was also considered,
where the same catch limits and
specifications from 2018 would
continue into 2019 and beyond. This
may have had a higher potential to
minimize short-term economic impacts
on small entities, as the quotas would
remain higher, providing the potential
for greater revenues and economic gain.
However, as previously stated, effort
and landings in the spiny dogfish
fishery have been low in recent years,
and higher quotas increase the risk of
overfishing without addressing the
issues in the market that may be keeping
landings low. Therefore, maintaining
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
status quo specifications was not
recommended by the Councils because
it would exceed catch level
recommendations, put the spiny dogfish
stock at an unnecessary risk of
overfishing, and would be inconsistent
with the requirements of the MagnusonStevens Act.
NMFS does not anticipate any
significant economic impacts on small
entities as a result of implementing the
reduced quotas in this action. While
there is a substantial reduction in the
2019 ACT and commercial quota,
analyses indicate that coastwide spiny
dogfish landings have been less than
these approved specifications in recent
years. It is unlikely that potential
revenue losses would be directly
affected by these quota reductions. In
addition, these quotas are projected to
increase in 2020 and 2021, so any
impact to small entities affected by this
action may be remedied quickly as the
risk of overfishing subsides.
Section 212 of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 states that, for each rule or group
of related rules for which an agency is
required to prepare a FRFA, the agency
shall publish one or more guides to
assist small entities in complying with
the rule, and shall designate such
publications as ‘‘small entity
compliance guides.’’ The agency shall
explain the actions a small entity is
required to take to comply with a rule
or group of rules. As part of this
rulemaking process, a letter to permit
holders that also serves as small entity
compliance guide was prepared and
will be sent to all holders of Federal
permits issued for the spiny dogfish
fishery. In addition, copies of this final
rule and guide (i.e., permit holder letter)
are available from NMFS at the
following website:
www.greateratlantic.fisheries.noaa.gov.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: May 9, 2019.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2019–09915 Filed 5–14–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 94 (Wednesday, May 15, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21723-21726]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-09915]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 190207082-9433-02]
RIN 0648-XG800
Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Spiny Dogfish
Fishery; 2019 and Projected 2020-2021 Specifications
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 21724]]
SUMMARY: NMFS issues final specifications for the 2019 spiny dogfish
fishery, and projected specifications for fishing years 2020 and 2021.
The specifications are necessary to establish allowable harvest levels
and other management measures to prevent overfishing while allowing
optimum yield, consistent with the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act and the Spiny Dogfish Fishery
Management Plan. This rule is also intended to inform the public of
these specifications for the 2019 fishing year and projected
specifications for 2020 and 2021.
DATES: Effective May 15, 2019 through April 30, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Copies of these specifications, including the Environmental
Assessment (EA), Regulatory Flexibility Act Analyses, and other
supporting documents for the action, are available upon request from
Dr. Christopher M. Moore, Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery
Management Council, Suite 201, 800 N. State Street, Dover, DE 19901.
These documents are also accessible via the internet at https://www.mafmc.org/dogfish.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cynthia Ferrio, Fishery Management
Specialist, (978) 281-9180.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Atlantic spiny dogfish fishery is jointly managed in Federal
waters by the New England and Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Councils
under the Spiny Dogfish Fishery Management Plan (FMP), with the Mid-
Atlantic Council serving as the administrative lead. The Atlantic
States Marine Fisheries Commission manages the fishery in state waters
from Maine to North Carolina through an interstate fishery management
plan. Regulations implementing the spiny dogfish FMP appear at 50 CFR
part 648, subparts A and L, and require the specification of an annual
catch limit (ACL), annual catch target (ACT), and the total allowable
landings (TAL). These limits and other management measures may be set
for up to five fishing years at a time, with each fishing year running
from May 1 through April 30. This action implements spiny dogfish
specifications for the 2019 fishing year, and announces projected
specifications for 2020 and 2021, as recommended by the Councils.
The proposed rule for this action published in the Federal Register
on March 29, 2019 (84 FR 11923), and comments were accepted through
April 15, 2019. Additional background information regarding the
development of these specifications was provided in the proposed rule
and is not repeated here.
Final Specifications
This action implements the final 2019 and projected 2020-2021 spiny
dogfish specifications (Table 1) as described in the March 29, 2019,
proposed rule. These specifications substantially reduce the coastwide
commercial quota in 2019 to ensure overfishing does not occur. Quota
increases are projected for 2020 and 2021 as the stock biomass is
expected to increase and the risk of overfishing declines. The lower
catch limits are not expected to have a substantial impact on industry,
as the reduced coastwide quotas remain higher than total annual
landings in recent years.
Table 1--Summary of Final 2019, and Projected 2020 and 2021 Spiny Dogfish Fishery Specifications
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2019 2020 2021
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Metric tons Pounds Metric tons Pounds Metric tons Pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Overfishing Limit....................................... 21,549 47,507,413 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Acceptable Biological Catch............................. 12,914 28,470,497 14,126 31,142,499 16,043 35,368,761
ACL = ACT............................................... 12,865 28,362,470 14,077 31,034,473 15,994 35,260,734
TAL..................................................... 9,390 20,701,000 10,602 23,373,409 12,519 27,599,671
Commercial Quota........................................ 9,309 20,522,832 10,521 23,194,835 12,438 27,421,096
Percent Change in Quota from Previous Year.............. -46 -46 +13 +13 +18 +18
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All other fishery management measures, including the 6,000-lb
(2,722-kg) Federal trip limit, remain unchanged. Changes to the trip
limit may be pursued in a future, separate rulemaking action. By
providing projected quotas for 2019 and 2020, NMFS hopes to assist
fishery participants in planning ahead. The Councils will review these
specifications annually, and NMFS will provide notice prior to each
fishing year to finalize specifications and related measures.
Comments and Responses
The public comment period for the proposed rule ended on April 15,
2019. Five comments were received from the public on this rule during
the 15-day comment period. No changes to the proposed specifications
were made as a result of these comments.
Comment 1: One commenter requested that the spiny dogfish quota be
reduced by 50 percent to prevent overfishing, claimed that widespread
corruption and commercial profiteering was taking place across all
fisheries, and asked that all trawl gear be banned. No rationale or
evidence was presented to support the commenter's claims.
Response 1: This action does reduce the commercial spiny dogfish
quota by 46 percent to prevent overfishing, which is almost the 50
percent requested by the commenter. Banning trawl gear is beyond the
scope of outcomes contemplated in specifications.
Comment 2: Another commenter alleged that the spiny dogfish quota
should not be reduced because they prey on valuable groundfish.
Response 2: This action manages the spiny dogfish fishery in terms
of the target species' stock health and availability. At this time, the
FMP does not account for predation effects by spiny dogfish on other
species.
Comment 3: The commenter supported this action and the quota
reduction, but was also concerned with inaccurate data from trawl
fisheries, and effects on the recreational spiny dogfish fishery.
Response 3: These specifications were developed using the best
scientific information available, which includes fishery independent
trawl surveys. These surveys are conducted by the Northeast Fisheries
Science Center and others, and are not solely dependent on trawl
reporting data from within the fishery. Also, there are no Federal
regulations governing the spiny dogfish
[[Page 21725]]
recreational fishery; these specifications apply to the commercial
fishery only. For more information on recreational spiny dogfish
regulations, contact the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission or
your local state agency.
Comment 4: One commenter supported this action, but did not believe
that immediate action is required. They agreed that quotas should be
reduced in future years to prevent overfishing (perhaps by using
limited protected areas), but for now, the stock is stable, and dogfish
eat other groundfish species so the population should be controlled.
Response 4: This action reduces the dogfish quota to prevent
overfishing based on the best scientific information available.
Although the stock is not currently overfished or experiencing
overfishing, biomass has been declining, and the quota reductions are a
result of the application of the Mid-Atlantic Council's Risk Policy to
prevent overfishing, consistent with National Standard 2 and the
Magnuson-Stevens Act. As stated earlier, the FMP does not account for
predation effects of spiny dogfish on other species.
Comment 5: This commenter supported this action's quota reductions
for spiny dogfish to preserve future sustainability in the fishery.
They also suggested that a sex-specific spiny dogfish fishery be
considered to protect against harvest of pregnant females.
Response 5: NMFS agrees that these specifications will better
maintain sustainability in the spiny dogfish fishery. Consideration of
a sex-specific fishery and management measures was not discussed in
this action and would need to be pursued separately by the Councils in
the future.
Changes From the Proposed Rule
There are no changes from the proposed rule.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the
NMFS Assistant Administrator has determined that this final rule is
consistent with the Spiny Dogfish FMP, other provisions of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable law.
This final rule is exempt from review under Executive Order 12866
because this action contains no implementing regulations.
This final rule does not duplicate, conflict, or overlap with any
existing Federal rules.
This action does not contain a collection of information
requirement for purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act.
The Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, NOAA, finds good cause
under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) to waive the 30-day delay of effectiveness
period for this rule, to ensure that the final specifications are in
place as close as practicable to the start of the 2019 spiny dogfish
fishing year, which began on May 1, 2019. This action implements the
final specifications (i.e., annual catch limits) for the spiny dogfish
fishery for the 2019 fishing year. A delay in effectiveness well beyond
the start of the fishing year would be contrary to the public interest,
as it could create confusion in the commercial spiny dogfish industry.
Additionally, it could compromise the effectiveness of the lower catch
limits in preventing overfishing while still allowing sustainable
yield.
This rule is being issued at the earliest possible date.
Preparation of the proposed rule was dependent on the submission of the
EA, in support of the specifications, developed by the Mid-Atlantic
Council. Following submission, documentation in support of the
Council's recommended specifications is required for NMFS to provide
the public with information from the environmental and economic
analyses, as required in rulemaking, and to evaluate the consistency of
the Council's recommendation with the Magnuson-Stevens Act and other
applicable law. A complete draft of the specifications document and
accompanying EA was received in late November 2018. However, the recent
lapse in federal appropriations prevented any work on this action from
December 22, 2018, through January 25, 2019, and delayed approval of
the final EA. As such, the final specifications document and EA was not
completed and approved by NMFS until early March 2019. The proposed
rule for this action published on March 29, 2019, with a 15-day comment
period ending April 15, 2019. A 30-day delay in effectiveness would
needlessly postpone implementation of the 2019 specifications beyond
the start of the fishing year on May 1, which is contrary to the public
interest.
Furthermore, the lower catch limits specified in this action should
be implemented as soon as possible to minimize the potential for
overfishing. Although the specifications from 2018 are carried into
2019 until new catch limits are implemented, the Councils have
recommended a substantial reduction in commercial quota based on the
most recent stock assessment update. Harvest occurring within the first
weeks of the fishing year based on outdated, higher catch limits could
further harm the resource, and subject it to a greater risk of
overfishing.
Finally, regulated parties do not require any additional time to
come into compliance with this rule, and thus, a 30-day delay in
effectiveness does not provide any benefit. Unlike actions that require
an adjustment period to comply with new rules, participants in the
spiny dogfish fishery will not be required to purchase new equipment or
otherwise expend time or money to comply with these management
measures. Fishery stakeholders have also been involved in the
development of this action and are anticipating this rule. Therefore,
there would be no benefit to delaying the implementation of these
specifications.
For these reasons, a 30-day delay in effectiveness would be
contrary to the public interest, and is therefore waived. As a result,
there is good cause to implement these specifications on May 15, 2019.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
The final regulatory flexibility analysis (FRFA) included in this
final rule was prepared pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 604(a), and incorporates
the initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA) and a summary of
analyses completed to support the action. A public copy of the
environmental assessment/IRFA is available from the Mid-Atlantic
Council (see ADDRESSES). The preamble to the proposed rule included a
detailed summary of the analyses contained in the IRFA, and that
discussion is not repeated here.
A Summary of the Significant Issues Raised by the Public in Response to
the IRFA, a Summary of the Agency's Assessment of Such Issues, and a
Statement of Any Changes Made in the Final Rule as a Result of Such
Comments
NMFS did not receive any comments in response to the IRFA or
regulatory flexibility analysis (RFA) process. Refer to the ``Comments
and Responses'' section of this rule's preamble for more detail on the
public comments that were received. No changes to the proposed rule
were made as a result of public comment.
Description and Estimate of Number of Small Entities to Which the Rule
Would Apply
This final rule affects small entities engaged in commercial
fishing operations in the spiny dogfish fishery. For the purposes of
the RFA analysis, the ownership entities (or firms), not the individual
vessels, are considered to be the regulated entities. Because of this,
[[Page 21726]]
some vessels with spiny dogfish permits may be considered to be part of
the same firm because they may have the same owners. In terms of RFA, a
business primarily engaged in commercial fishing activity is classified
as a small business if it has combined annual gross receipts not in
excess of $11 million for all its affiliated operations worldwide. To
identify these small and large firms, vessel ownership data from the
permit database were grouped according to common owners and sorted by
size.
The current ownership data set used for this analysis is based on
calendar year 2017 (the most recent complete year available). In 2017,
there were 2,254 vessels that held a spiny dogfish permit, while 244 of
these vessels contributed to overall landings. Cross-referencing those
permits with vessel ownership database revealed that 1,695 entities
owned those vessels. 1,685 were classified as small entities, with the
remaining 10 classified as large businesses. Of the 1,685 small
entities, 374 had no revenue in 2017, 1,104 were commercial fishing
entities, and 207 were for-hire entities. Overall, there were 227
entities with spiny dogfish permits that reported revenue from spiny
dogfish landings during 2017. Of those entities, 1 was large and 226
were small and their average overall revenues in 2017 were $0.4
million.
Description of Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance
Requirements
No additional reporting, recordkeeping, or other compliance
requirements are included in this final rule.
Description of the Steps the Agency Has Taken To Minimize the
Significant Economic Impact on Small Entities Consistent With the
Stated Objectives of Applicable Statutes
Specification of commercial catch limits is constrained by the
conservation objectives of the FMP and the Magnuson-Stevens Act. This
action implements final 2019 and projected 2020-2021 commercial catch
specifications for the spiny dogfish fishery based on the most recent
stock assessment update. The Councils also considered taking no action,
where the same catch limits and specifications from fishing year 2018
would continue into 2019 with no change. Only these two alternatives
were considered by the Councils. NMFS is somewhat constrained in
approving specifications in that the agency can approve, disapprove,
partially approve, or in very limited circumstances substitute measures
to end overfishing and rebuild stocks if Council-recommended measures
will not do so. Because of this, there are limited options to minimize
potential impacts on small entities.
This rule decreases the commercial quota by 46 percent to 9,309 mt
in 2019, followed by modest projected increases to 10,521 mt and 12,438
mt, in 2020 and 2021, respectively. Although the 46-percent reduction
in 2019 is a substantial quota change, landings reports from the most
recent available full fishing year (2017) show that 7,439 mt of spiny
dogfish were landed. Available landing information for fishing year
2018 is around 23 percent lower than in 2017. Given this data, it is
likely that the reduction in quota for 2019 will not constrain the
spiny dogfish industry, including small entities.
If the fishery were to reverse the recent landing trends and
achieve the proposed 2019 quota, it would still generate more landings
and likely more revenues than the most recent year (2017) of full
fishery information. Therefore, it is expected that the proposed action
will have minimal impact on small entities.
Taking no action was also considered, where the same catch limits
and specifications from 2018 would continue into 2019 and beyond. This
may have had a higher potential to minimize short-term economic impacts
on small entities, as the quotas would remain higher, providing the
potential for greater revenues and economic gain. However, as
previously stated, effort and landings in the spiny dogfish fishery
have been low in recent years, and higher quotas increase the risk of
overfishing without addressing the issues in the market that may be
keeping landings low. Therefore, maintaining status quo specifications
was not recommended by the Councils because it would exceed catch level
recommendations, put the spiny dogfish stock at an unnecessary risk of
overfishing, and would be inconsistent with the requirements of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act.
NMFS does not anticipate any significant economic impacts on small
entities as a result of implementing the reduced quotas in this action.
While there is a substantial reduction in the 2019 ACT and commercial
quota, analyses indicate that coastwide spiny dogfish landings have
been less than these approved specifications in recent years. It is
unlikely that potential revenue losses would be directly affected by
these quota reductions. In addition, these quotas are projected to
increase in 2020 and 2021, so any impact to small entities affected by
this action may be remedied quickly as the risk of overfishing
subsides.
Section 212 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness
Act of 1996 states that, for each rule or group of related rules for
which an agency is required to prepare a FRFA, the agency shall publish
one or more guides to assist small entities in complying with the rule,
and shall designate such publications as ``small entity compliance
guides.'' The agency shall explain the actions a small entity is
required to take to comply with a rule or group of rules. As part of
this rulemaking process, a letter to permit holders that also serves as
small entity compliance guide was prepared and will be sent to all
holders of Federal permits issued for the spiny dogfish fishery. In
addition, copies of this final rule and guide (i.e., permit holder
letter) are available from NMFS at the following website:
www.greateratlantic.fisheries.noaa.gov.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: May 9, 2019.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-09915 Filed 5-14-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P