Plan for the Review of Bureau Rules for Purposes of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 21732-21733 [2019-09813]
Download as PDF
21732
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 94 / Wednesday, May 15, 2019 / Proposed Rules
and invited feedback on these
alternatives, while noting that the
current Model Form A–9 remains
effective under Regulation E.22 The
Bureau received more than forty
comments in response to the release.
In response to the Bureau’s 2018 Call
for Evidence Initiative, which included
requesting input on all inherited
regulations and rulemaking authorities,
the Bureau received approximately ten
comments that included information
about checking account overdrafts
generally.23 These comments came from
trade groups, financial institutions, and
consumer advocates. The comments
addressed a wide variety of topics
including the overall cost of overdraft,
the treatment of overdrafts under the
Truth in Lending Act, and potential
modifications to the current Model
Form A–9.
Through these and other outreach
efforts, the Bureau has heard concerns
expressed by some financial institutions
and trade groups regarding the
requirements that the opt-in notice be
substantially similar to Model Form A–
9 and that the notice may not contain
any information not specified in or
otherwise permitted by the regulation.
Some of these financial institutions
have expressed a desire to add
additional information to the notice that
they believe may be relevant to the
consumer’s decision, such as an
institution’s policies for making
overdraft and balance-related
calculations.
Finally, the Bureau’s experience
suggests there is little overlap,
duplication, or conflict between the
Overdraft Rule and Federal, State, or
other rules. The Bureau has not received
any requests for a determination that the
Overdraft Rule preempts State law. In
October 2015, the Department of
Education also issued a final rule that
generally prohibits overdraft fees on
students’ checking accounts if the
financial institution offering the account
partners with an entity that handles the
school’s financial aid disbursement
process.24
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
II. Request for Comment
Consistent with the review plan, the
Bureau asks the public to comment on
the Overdraft Rule, including the
following topics:
(1) The nature and extent of the
economic impacts of the Rule as a
whole and of its major components on
22 https://www.consumerfinance.gov/about-us/
blog/know-you-owe-we-are-designing-newoverdraft-disclosure-forms/.
23 83 FR 12881 (March 26, 2018).
24 See 34 CFR 668.164.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 May 14, 2019
Jkt 247001
small entities, including impacts of the
reporting, recordkeeping, and other
compliance requirements of the
Overdraft Rule, as well as benefits of the
Rule.
(2) Whether and how the Bureau by
rule could reduce the costs of the
Overdraft Rule on small entities,
consistent with the stated objectives of
EFTA and the Overdraft Rule.
(3) Any other information relevant to
the factors that the Bureau considers in
completing a Section 610 Review under
the Regulatory Flexibility Act, as
described above.
Where possible, please submit
detailed comments, data, and other
information to support any submitted
positions.
Dated: May 6, 2019.
Kathleen L. Kraninger,
Director, Bureau of Consumer Financial
Protection.
[FR Doc. 2019–09812 Filed 5–14–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–AM–P
BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL
PROTECTION
12 CFR Chapter X
[Docket No. CFPB–2019–0024]
Plan for the Review of Bureau Rules
for Purposes of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act
Bureau of Consumer Financial
Protection.
ACTION: Plan for periodic review of rules
and request for comments.
AGENCY:
The Bureau of Consumer
Financial Protection (Bureau) is
publishing a plan for the review of rules
which have or will have a significant
economic impact upon a substantial
number of small entities, pursuant to
section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act.
DATES: Comments must be received by
July 15, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit responsive
information and other comments,
identified by Docket No. CFPB–2019–
0024, by any of the following methods:
• Electronic: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Email: like 2019-NoticeRFAReviewPlan@cfpb.gov. Include
Docket No. CFPB–2019–0024 in the
subject line of the message.
• Mail: Comment Intake, Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau, 1700 G
Street NW, Washington, DC 20552.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Comment
Intake, Consumer Financial Protection
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Bureau, 1700 G Street NW, Washington,
DC 20552.
Instructions: The Bureau encourages
the early submission of comments. All
submissions must include the document
title and docket number. Please note the
specific rule or topic on which you are
commenting at the top of each response
(you do not need to address all rules or
topics). Because paper mail in the
Washington, DC area and at the Bureau
is subject to delay, commenters are
encouraged to submit comments
electronically. In general, all comments
received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov. In
addition, comments will be available for
public inspection and copying at 1700
G Street NW, Washington, DC 20552, on
official business days between the hours
of 10 a.m. and 5 p.m. eastern time. You
can make an appointment to inspect the
documents by telephoning 202–435–
7275.
All submissions in response to this
request for information, including
attachments and other supporting
materials, will become part of the public
record and subject to public disclosure.
Proprietary information or sensitive
personal information, such as account
numbers or Social Security numbers, or
names of other individuals, should not
be included. Submissions will not be
edited to remove any identifying or
contact information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph Baressi and Gregory Evans,
Senior Counsels, Office of Regulations,
at 202–435–7700. If you require this
document in an alternative electronic
format, please contact CFPB_
Accessibility@cfpb.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Regulatory Flexibility Act 1 (RFA)
requires each agency to consider the
effect on small entities for certain rules
it promulgates.2 Specifically, section
610(a) of the RFA 3 provides that each
agency shall publish in the Federal
Register a plan for the periodic review
of the rules issued by the agency which
have a significant economic impact
upon a substantial number of small
entities. An agency may amend a plan
at any time by publishing the revision
in the Federal Register. Congress
specified that the purpose of the review
shall be to determine whether such
rules should be continued without
change, or should be amended or
rescinded, consistent with the stated
objectives of applicable statutes, to
minimize any significant economic
1 Public
Law 96–354, 94 Stat. 1164.
terms ‘‘small entity’’ and ‘‘rule’’ are defined
in the RFA. See 5 U.S.C. 601.
3 5 U.S.C. 610(a).
2 The
E:\FR\FM\15MYP1.SGM
15MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 94 / Wednesday, May 15, 2019 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
impact of the rules upon a substantial
number of such small entities. Congress
further provided that the plan shall
provide for review of the relevant rules
within ten years of their publication as
final rules.4
In 2010, Congress established the
Bureau through the Dodd-Frank Wall
Street Reform and Consumer Protection
Act (Dodd-Frank Act).5 The Bureau is
now publishing this plan because it
anticipates performing reviews in the
coming years to comply with section
610 of the RFA (herein ‘‘610 reviews’’).
Although the Bureau is not required to
do so, it is also requesting comment on
its 610 review plan.6
The Bureau’s 610 reviews will
generally be separate from and in
addition to other Bureau reviews of its
regulations. In March 2018, the Bureau
issued a request for information (RFI) to
seek public input regarding the
substance of inherited regulations (those
transferred to the Bureau), and issued
another RFI for adopted regulations
(those issued by the Bureau), including
whether the Bureau should issue
additional rules.7 The Bureau also
conducts an assessment, pursuant to
section 1022(d) of the Dodd-Frank Act,
of each significant rule or order adopted
by the Bureau under Federal consumer
financial law and publishes a report of
each assessment not later than five years
after the effective date of the subject rule
or order.8 The Bureau has also
announced as part of the semi-annual
Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory
and Deregulatory Actions a long-term
action to review inherited regulations
for the purpose of ensuring that
outdated, unnecessary, or unduly
burdensome regulations are regularly
identified and addressed and stated that
it expects to focus its initial review on
4 The statute also contains certain additional
requirements for rules that existed on the effective
date of the RFA, which was January 1, 1981. Id.
Those requirements are not applicable to the
Bureau’s reviews.
5 Public Law 111–203, 124 Stat. 2081 (2010).
6 Notice and comment is not required because the
RFA provides that a plan may be amended by the
agency at any time by publishing the revision in the
Federal Register. 5 U.S.C. 610(a). Furthermore, the
plan is a procedural rule under the Administrative
Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553, and therefore it is
exempt from its notice and comment requirements.
7 83 FR 12281 (March 21, 2018), 83 FR 12286
(March 21, 2018).
8 To date, the Bureau has published three such
assessment reports concerning, respectively, the
Bureau’s rules for remittance transfers, mortgage
servicing, and ability to repay and qualified
mortgage standards. These reports are available at
https://www.consumerfinance.gov/data-research/
research-reports/.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 May 14, 2019
Jkt 247001
subparts B and G of Regulation Z, which
implements the Truth in Lending Act.9
I. Review Plan
Each year, the Bureau plans to initiate
610 reviews of final rules. The Bureau
intends to commence the review
roughly nine years after each rule’s
publication.10 For each rule, the Bureau
will first assess whether it is having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities and
so is subject to 610 review. The Bureau
may also decide to exercise its
discretion to review rules issued by the
Bureau or by the Bureau’s predecessor
agencies that may not otherwise be
subject to 610 review. The Bureau will
then publish in the Federal Register a
list of rules which the Bureau plans to
review within the upcoming plan year.
In addition to this list, the Bureau will
publish, consistent with section 610(c)
of the RFA,11 a notice for each rule to
be reviewed that will include a brief
description of the rule, as well as the
need for and legal basis of, the rule.
Each of these notices will invite public
comment on the rule, and the public
may submit relevant data and other
information to support any submitted
positions.
For each rule, the Bureau intends to
conduct a review based on information
on hand, relevant literature, and
information submitted by the public in
response to the Bureau’s request for
comment. As circumstances warrant,
the Bureau may exercise its discretion to
request additional data from relevant
parties on a voluntary basis or otherwise
obtain data from other sources, for
example, by purchasing data from a
third-party vendor.
Consistent with section 610(a) of the
RFA, the purpose of the review will be
to determine whether the rule should be
continued without change, or should be
amended or rescinded, consistent with
the stated objectives of any applicable
statutes, to minimize any significant
economic impact of the rules upon a
substantial number of small entities.12
As set forth in section 610(b) of the
RFA, the Bureau will consider several
factors:
1. The continued need for the rule;
2. The nature of public complaints or
comments on the rule;
3. The complexity of the rule;
9 See https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
eAgendaViewRule?pubId=201810&RIN=3170AA73.
10 As permitted by section 605(c) of the RFA, the
Bureau may consider a series of closely related
rules as one rule for the purposes of section 610.
5 U.S.C. 605(c).
11 5 U.S.C. 610(c).
12 5 U.S.C. 610(a).
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21733
4. The extent to which the rule
overlaps, duplicates, or conflicts with
Federal, state, or other rules; and
5. The time since the rule was
evaluated or the degree to which
technology, market conditions, or other
factors have changed the relevant
market.13
The Bureau will complete each
review within ten years of the
publication of the relevant rule as a final
rule. The Bureau intends to
subsequently announce the
determinations made as to follow-on
rulemaking activities in the Unified
Agenda of Federal Regulatory and
Deregulatory Actions or through other
appropriate methods.
The Bureau may amend this review
plan at any time by publishing the
revision in the Federal Register.
Dated: May 6, 2019.
Kathleen L. Kraninger,
Director, Bureau of Consumer Financial
Protection.
[FR Doc. 2019–09813 Filed 5–14–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–AM–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No.: FAA–2019–0343; Notice No.
19–04]
RIN 2120–AL11
Decompression Criteria for Interior
Compartments
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to revise
its standards for pressurized
compartment loads such that partitions
located immediately adjacent to a
decompression hole need not be
designed to withstand certain
decompression conditions. This action
is necessary because, in some cases, it
is not practical to design partitions in
certain airplane compartments to
withstand a large decompression event
that occurs within that compartment.
Even though individual partition failure
would be allowed, continued safe flight
and landing would still be required.
DATES: Send comments on or before
June 14, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
by docket number FAA–2019–0343
using any of the following methods:
SUMMARY:
13 5
U.S.C. 610(b).
E:\FR\FM\15MYP1.SGM
15MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 94 (Wednesday, May 15, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 21732-21733]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-09813]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION
12 CFR Chapter X
[Docket No. CFPB-2019-0024]
Plan for the Review of Bureau Rules for Purposes of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act
AGENCY: Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.
ACTION: Plan for periodic review of rules and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (Bureau) is
publishing a plan for the review of rules which have or will have a
significant economic impact upon a substantial number of small
entities, pursuant to section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
DATES: Comments must be received by July 15, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit responsive information and other comments,
identified by Docket No. CFPB-2019-0024, by any of the following
methods:
Electronic: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Email: like [email protected]. Include
Docket No. CFPB-2019-0024 in the subject line of the message.
Mail: Comment Intake, Consumer Financial Protection
Bureau, 1700 G Street NW, Washington, DC 20552.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Comment Intake, Consumer Financial
Protection Bureau, 1700 G Street NW, Washington, DC 20552.
Instructions: The Bureau encourages the early submission of
comments. All submissions must include the document title and docket
number. Please note the specific rule or topic on which you are
commenting at the top of each response (you do not need to address all
rules or topics). Because paper mail in the Washington, DC area and at
the Bureau is subject to delay, commenters are encouraged to submit
comments electronically. In general, all comments received will be
posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov. In addition,
comments will be available for public inspection and copying at 1700 G
Street NW, Washington, DC 20552, on official business days between the
hours of 10 a.m. and 5 p.m. eastern time. You can make an appointment
to inspect the documents by telephoning 202-435-7275.
All submissions in response to this request for information,
including attachments and other supporting materials, will become part
of the public record and subject to public disclosure. Proprietary
information or sensitive personal information, such as account numbers
or Social Security numbers, or names of other individuals, should not
be included. Submissions will not be edited to remove any identifying
or contact information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Baressi and Gregory Evans,
Senior Counsels, Office of Regulations, at 202-435-7700. If you require
this document in an alternative electronic format, please contact
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Regulatory Flexibility Act \1\ (RFA)
requires each agency to consider the effect on small entities for
certain rules it promulgates.\2\ Specifically, section 610(a) of the
RFA \3\ provides that each agency shall publish in the Federal Register
a plan for the periodic review of the rules issued by the agency which
have a significant economic impact upon a substantial number of small
entities. An agency may amend a plan at any time by publishing the
revision in the Federal Register. Congress specified that the purpose
of the review shall be to determine whether such rules should be
continued without change, or should be amended or rescinded, consistent
with the stated objectives of applicable statutes, to minimize any
significant economic
[[Page 21733]]
impact of the rules upon a substantial number of such small entities.
Congress further provided that the plan shall provide for review of the
relevant rules within ten years of their publication as final rules.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Public Law 96-354, 94 Stat. 1164.
\2\ The terms ``small entity'' and ``rule'' are defined in the
RFA. See 5 U.S.C. 601.
\3\ 5 U.S.C. 610(a).
\4\ The statute also contains certain additional requirements
for rules that existed on the effective date of the RFA, which was
January 1, 1981. Id. Those requirements are not applicable to the
Bureau's reviews.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 2010, Congress established the Bureau through the Dodd-Frank
Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act).\5\ The
Bureau is now publishing this plan because it anticipates performing
reviews in the coming years to comply with section 610 of the RFA
(herein ``610 reviews''). Although the Bureau is not required to do so,
it is also requesting comment on its 610 review plan.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Public Law 111-203, 124 Stat. 2081 (2010).
\6\ Notice and comment is not required because the RFA provides
that a plan may be amended by the agency at any time by publishing
the revision in the Federal Register. 5 U.S.C. 610(a). Furthermore,
the plan is a procedural rule under the Administrative Procedure
Act, 5 U.S.C. 553, and therefore it is exempt from its notice and
comment requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Bureau's 610 reviews will generally be separate from and in
addition to other Bureau reviews of its regulations. In March 2018, the
Bureau issued a request for information (RFI) to seek public input
regarding the substance of inherited regulations (those transferred to
the Bureau), and issued another RFI for adopted regulations (those
issued by the Bureau), including whether the Bureau should issue
additional rules.\7\ The Bureau also conducts an assessment, pursuant
to section 1022(d) of the Dodd-Frank Act, of each significant rule or
order adopted by the Bureau under Federal consumer financial law and
publishes a report of each assessment not later than five years after
the effective date of the subject rule or order.\8\ The Bureau has also
announced as part of the semi-annual Unified Agenda of Federal
Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions a long-term action to review
inherited regulations for the purpose of ensuring that outdated,
unnecessary, or unduly burdensome regulations are regularly identified
and addressed and stated that it expects to focus its initial review on
subparts B and G of Regulation Z, which implements the Truth in Lending
Act.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 83 FR 12281 (March 21, 2018), 83 FR 12286 (March 21, 2018).
\8\ To date, the Bureau has published three such assessment
reports concerning, respectively, the Bureau's rules for remittance
transfers, mortgage servicing, and ability to repay and qualified
mortgage standards. These reports are available at https://www.consumerfinance.gov/data-research/research-reports/.
\9\ See https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eAgendaViewRule?pubId=201810&RIN=3170-AA73.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Review Plan
Each year, the Bureau plans to initiate 610 reviews of final rules.
The Bureau intends to commence the review roughly nine years after each
rule's publication.\10\ For each rule, the Bureau will first assess
whether it is having a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities and so is subject to 610 review. The Bureau
may also decide to exercise its discretion to review rules issued by
the Bureau or by the Bureau's predecessor agencies that may not
otherwise be subject to 610 review. The Bureau will then publish in the
Federal Register a list of rules which the Bureau plans to review
within the upcoming plan year. In addition to this list, the Bureau
will publish, consistent with section 610(c) of the RFA,\11\ a notice
for each rule to be reviewed that will include a brief description of
the rule, as well as the need for and legal basis of, the rule. Each of
these notices will invite public comment on the rule, and the public
may submit relevant data and other information to support any submitted
positions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ As permitted by section 605(c) of the RFA, the Bureau may
consider a series of closely related rules as one rule for the
purposes of section 610. 5 U.S.C. 605(c).
\11\ 5 U.S.C. 610(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For each rule, the Bureau intends to conduct a review based on
information on hand, relevant literature, and information submitted by
the public in response to the Bureau's request for comment. As
circumstances warrant, the Bureau may exercise its discretion to
request additional data from relevant parties on a voluntary basis or
otherwise obtain data from other sources, for example, by purchasing
data from a third-party vendor.
Consistent with section 610(a) of the RFA, the purpose of the
review will be to determine whether the rule should be continued
without change, or should be amended or rescinded, consistent with the
stated objectives of any applicable statutes, to minimize any
significant economic impact of the rules upon a substantial number of
small entities.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 5 U.S.C. 610(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As set forth in section 610(b) of the RFA, the Bureau will consider
several factors:
1. The continued need for the rule;
2. The nature of public complaints or comments on the rule;
3. The complexity of the rule;
4. The extent to which the rule overlaps, duplicates, or conflicts
with Federal, state, or other rules; and
5. The time since the rule was evaluated or the degree to which
technology, market conditions, or other factors have changed the
relevant market.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 5 U.S.C. 610(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Bureau will complete each review within ten years of the
publication of the relevant rule as a final rule. The Bureau intends to
subsequently announce the determinations made as to follow-on
rulemaking activities in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and
Deregulatory Actions or through other appropriate methods.
The Bureau may amend this review plan at any time by publishing the
revision in the Federal Register.
Dated: May 6, 2019.
Kathleen L. Kraninger,
Director, Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.
[FR Doc. 2019-09813 Filed 5-14-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AM-P