Special Local Regulation; Clear Lake, Clear Creek, TX, 20602-20604 [2019-09648]
Download as PDF
20602
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 91 / Friday, May 10, 2019 / Proposed Rules
required by the various laws and
executive orders governing the
rulemaking process and include them in
the final rule.
Kessler, Waterways Management
Division, U.S. Coast Guard; 281–464–
4891, Sarah.A.Kessler@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 935
I. Table of Abbreviations
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
COTP Captain of the Port
Dated: November 16, 2018.
Thomas D. Shope,
Regional Director, Appalachian Region.
Editorial note: This document was
received for publication by the Office of the
Federal Register on May 6, 2019.
[FR Doc. 2019–09556 Filed 5–9–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket Number USCG–2019–0312]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulation; Clear Lake,
Clear Creek, TX
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is proposing
to establish a special local regulation for
certain waters within Clear Lake, Clear
Creek, TX. This action is necessary to
provide safety of life on these navigable
waters immediately before, during, and
after the Texas Outlaw Challenge, a
power boat race being held annually on
the third Friday of June. This proposed
rulemaking would prohibit persons and
vessels not participating in the event
from being within the specified zone
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Houston/Galveston (COTP) or a
designated representative. We invite
your comments on this proposed
rulemaking.
SUMMARY:
Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before May 28, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2019–0312 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
DATES:
If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email MST3 Sarah
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:58 May 09, 2019
Jkt 247001
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
On April 16, 2019, The Offshore
Thunder Productions notified the Coast
Guard that they will be hosting a power
boat race from 9 to 11:30 a.m. on June
21, 2019. This event will take place in
Clear Lake. The COTP has determined
that potential hazards associated with
the power boat race would be a safety
concern for anyone within the Pre-Stage
Zone, Approach Zone, Course Run
Zone, Shut-Down Zone, and Turn Zone.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to
ensure the safety of vessels and the
navigable waters within the Pre-Stage
Zone, Approach Zone, Course Run
Zone, and Shut-Down Zone before,
during, and after the scheduled event.
The Coast Guard is proposing this
rulemaking under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70041.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP is proposing to establish a
special local regulation from 9 to 11:30
a.m. on the third Friday of June. The
special local regulation will encompass
5 different zones to include The PreStage Zone, Approach Zone, Course Run
Zone, Shut-Down Zone, and the
Spectator Zone as described below:
Pre-Stage Zone: This area is the pre-staging
area for participating vessels to line up. It
will include all waters within the following
areas 29°33.13 N 095°01.84 W, 29°33.12 N
095°01.89 W, 29°33.23 N 095°01.96 W,
29°33.13 N 095°01.84 W.
Approach Zone: 1⁄4 mile distance required
for participating vessels to obtain the
minimum 40mph requirement for course
entry. This will be a straight line to begin at
approximately 29°33.256 N, 095°01.89 W and
end at approximately 29°33.33 N, 095°02.15
W.
Course Run Zone: 3⁄4 mile distance where
participating vessels will conduct their highspeed run. This will be a straight line to
begin at approximately 29°33.33 N,
095°02.16 W and end at approximately
29°33.53 N, 095°02.98 W.
Shut-Down Zone: 1 mile distance where
participating vessels will be allowed to slow
their speeds back to an idle. This will be a
straight line to begin at approximately
29°33.53 N, 095°02.98 W and end at
approximately 29°33.74 N, 095°04.1 W.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Spectator Zone: All vessels that will be
viewing the event will be required to stay
within a designated area. The sponsor is
responsible for marking the spectator zone
with 4 buoys on the outer corners and
ensuring that all vessels within the area are
anchored and remain in the area during all
ongoing high-speed runs.
No vessel or person would be
permitted to enter the established zones
without obtaining permission from the
on-water Safety-Officer or designated
representative.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This NPRM has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, and
duration of the power boat race. The
safety zone will impact a small area of
Clear Lake for two and one-half hours
on June 21, 2019. The Coast Guard will
issue a Broadcast notice to Mariners via
VHF–FM marine channel 16 regarding
the special local regulations, and the
zone will allow vessels to seek
permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
E:\FR\FM\10MYP1.SGM
10MYP1
20603
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 91 / Friday, May 10, 2019 / Proposed Rules
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the
established zones may be small entities,
for the reasons stated in section IV.A
above, this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for
a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), if it has a substantial
direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175 (Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not
have a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:58 May 09, 2019
Jkt 247001
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
If you believe this proposed rule has
implications for federalism or Indian
tribes, please contact the person listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.1D,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a
preliminary determination that this
action is one of a category of actions that
do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. This proposed rule
involves a special local regulation
lasting two and one-half hours that
would prohibit entry into the
established zones. Normally such
actions are categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph L61 of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 01. We
seek any comments or information that
may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from
this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, visit https://
www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in the docket, and all
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
website’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard is proposing
to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70041; 33 CFR 1.05–
1.
2. Amend § 100.801 by adding an
entry 7 in Table 3 to read as follows:
■
§ 100.801 Annual Marine Events in the
Eighth Coast Guard District.
*
E:\FR\FM\10MYP1.SGM
*
*
10MYP1
*
*
20604
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 91 / Friday, May 10, 2019 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 3 OF § 100.801—SECTOR HOUSTON-GALVESTON ANNUAL AND RECURRING MARINE EVENTS
*
7. The 3rd Friday morning
in June.
*
*
*
*
*
*
Texas Outlaw Challenge/
Offshore Thunder Productions.
*
Dated: May 3, 2019.
K. D. Oditt,
Captain, United States Coast Guard, Captain
of the Port Houston/Galveston.
[FR Doc. 2019–09648 Filed 5–9–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–R09–OAR–2018–0713: FRL–9993–40Region 9]
Revisions to California State
Implementation Plan; Antelope Valley
Air Quality Management District and
Ventura County Air Pollution Control
District; Nonattainment New Source
Review Requirements for the 2008 8Hour Ozone Standard
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
two state implementation plan (SIP)
revisions submitted by the State of
California addressing the nonattainment
new source review (NNSR)
requirements for the 2008 8-hour ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) and one SIP revision
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:58 May 09, 2019
Jkt 247001
*
*
*
Clear Lake from the beginning of the Pre Stage Zone
to the end of the Shut-Down Zone.
Pre-Stage Zone: This area is the pre-staging area for
participating vessels to line up. It will include all
waters within the following areas 29°33.13 N
095°01.84 W, 29°33.12 N 095°01.89 W, 29°33.23 N
095°01.96 W, 29°33.13 N 095°01.84 W.
Approach Zone: 1⁄4 mile distance required for participating vessels to obtain the minimum 40mph requirement for course entry. This will be a straight
line to begin at approximately 29°33.256 N,
095°01.89 W and end at approximately 29°33.33 N,
095°02.15 W.
Course Run Zone: 3⁄4 mile distance where participating
vessels will conduct their high-speed run. This will
be a straight line to begin at approximately 29°33.33
N, 095°02.16 W and end at approximately 29°33.53
N, 095°02.98 W.
Shut-Down Zone: 1 mile distance where participating
vessels will be allowed to slow their speeds back to
an idle. This will be a straight line to begin at approximately 29°33.53 N, 095°02.98 W and end at
approximately 29°33.74 N, 095°04.1 W.
Spectator Zone: All vessels that will be viewing the
event will be required to stay within a designated
area. The sponsor is responsible for marking the
spectator zone with 4 buoys on the outer corners
and ensuring that all vessels within the area are anchored and remain in the area during all ongoing
high-speed runs.
regarding a permit rule. These SIP
revisions address the Antelope Valley
Air Quality Management District
(AVAQMD or District) and Ventura
County Air Pollution Control District
(VCAPCD or District) portions of the
California SIP. This action is being
taken pursuant to the Clean Air Act
(CAA or ‘‘Act’’) and its implementing
regulations.
Any comments must arrive by
June 10, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09–
OAR–2018–0713 at https://
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
R9AirPermits@epa.gov. For comments
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be removed or edited from
Regulations.gov. For either manner of
submission, the EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
DATES:
40 CFR Part 52
SUMMARY:
*
Clear Lake, TX ...................
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
For the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Manny Aquitania, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA
94105; (415) 972–3977,
aquitania.manny@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, the terms
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Background and Purpose
II. The State’s Submittal
A. What did the State submit?
B. What is the purpose of the submitted
certification letters?
C. What is the purpose of the submitted
permit rule?
III. Analysis of Nonattainment New Source
Review Requirements
A. Antelope Valley Air Quality
Management District (AVAQMD)
B. Ventura County Air Pollution Control
District (VCAPCD)
IV. Proposed Action and Public Comment
E:\FR\FM\10MYP1.SGM
10MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 91 (Friday, May 10, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 20602-20604]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-09648]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket Number USCG-2019-0312]
RIN 1625-AA08
Special Local Regulation; Clear Lake, Clear Creek, TX
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is proposing to establish a special local
regulation for certain waters within Clear Lake, Clear Creek, TX. This
action is necessary to provide safety of life on these navigable waters
immediately before, during, and after the Texas Outlaw Challenge, a
power boat race being held annually on the third Friday of June. This
proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels not
participating in the event from being within the specified zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port Houston/Galveston (COTP) or a
designated representative. We invite your comments on this proposed
rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before May 28, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2019-0312 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email MST3 Sarah Kessler, Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; 281-464-4891,
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
COTP Captain of the Port
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
On April 16, 2019, The Offshore Thunder Productions notified the
Coast Guard that they will be hosting a power boat race from 9 to 11:30
a.m. on June 21, 2019. This event will take place in Clear Lake. The
COTP has determined that potential hazards associated with the power
boat race would be a safety concern for anyone within the Pre-Stage
Zone, Approach Zone, Course Run Zone, Shut-Down Zone, and Turn Zone.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of vessels
and the navigable waters within the Pre-Stage Zone, Approach Zone,
Course Run Zone, and Shut-Down Zone before, during, and after the
scheduled event. The Coast Guard is proposing this rulemaking under
authority in 46 U.S.C. 70041.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP is proposing to establish a special local regulation from
9 to 11:30 a.m. on the third Friday of June. The special local
regulation will encompass 5 different zones to include The Pre-Stage
Zone, Approach Zone, Course Run Zone, Shut-Down Zone, and the Spectator
Zone as described below:
Pre-Stage Zone: This area is the pre-staging area for
participating vessels to line up. It will include all waters within
the following areas 29[deg]33.13 N 095[deg]01.84 W, 29[deg]33.12 N
095[deg]01.89 W, 29[deg]33.23 N 095[deg]01.96 W, 29[deg]33.13 N
095[deg]01.84 W.
Approach Zone: \1/4\ mile distance required for participating
vessels to obtain the minimum 40mph requirement for course entry.
This will be a straight line to begin at approximately 29[deg]33.256
N, 095[deg]01.89 W and end at approximately 29[deg]33.33 N,
095[deg]02.15 W.
Course Run Zone: \3/4\ mile distance where participating vessels
will conduct their high-speed run. This will be a straight line to
begin at approximately 29[deg]33.33 N, 095[deg]02.16 W and end at
approximately 29[deg]33.53 N, 095[deg]02.98 W.
Shut-Down Zone: 1 mile distance where participating vessels will
be allowed to slow their speeds back to an idle. This will be a
straight line to begin at approximately 29[deg]33.53 N,
095[deg]02.98 W and end at approximately 29[deg]33.74 N,
095[deg]04.1 W.
Spectator Zone: All vessels that will be viewing the event will
be required to stay within a designated area. The sponsor is
responsible for marking the spectator zone with 4 buoys on the outer
corners and ensuring that all vessels within the area are anchored
and remain in the area during all ongoing high-speed runs.
No vessel or person would be permitted to enter the established
zones without obtaining permission from the on-water Safety-Officer or
designated representative.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, and duration of the power boat race. The safety zone will
impact a small area of Clear Lake for two and one-half hours on June
21, 2019. The Coast Guard will issue a Broadcast notice to Mariners via
VHF-FM marine channel 16 regarding the special local regulations, and
the zone will allow vessels to seek permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
[[Page 20603]]
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
established zones may be small entities, for the reasons stated in
section IV.A above, this proposed rule would not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.1D, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a preliminary
determination that this action is one of a category of actions that do
not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This proposed rule involves a special local regulation
lasting two and one-half hours that would prohibit entry into the
established zones. Normally such actions are categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph L61 of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS
Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, visit https://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket,
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard is
proposing to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS
0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70041; 33 CFR 1.05-1.
0
2. Amend Sec. 100.801 by adding an entry 7 in Table 3 to read as
follows:
Sec. 100.801 Annual Marine Events in the Eighth Coast Guard
District.
* * * * *
[[Page 20604]]
Table 3 of Sec. 100.801--Sector Houston-Galveston Annual and Recurring Marine Events
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
7. The 3rd Friday morning in June.. Texas Outlaw Challenge/ Clear Lake, TX........ Clear Lake from the
Offshore Thunder beginning of the Pre Stage
Productions. Zone to the end of the
Shut-Down Zone.
Pre-Stage Zone: This area
is the pre-staging area
for participating vessels
to line up. It will
include all waters within
the following areas
29[deg]33.13 N
095[deg]01.84 W,
29[deg]33.12 N
095[deg]01.89 W,
29[deg]33.23 N
095[deg]01.96 W,
29[deg]33.13 N
095[deg]01.84 W.
Approach Zone: \1/4\ mile
distance required for
participating vessels to
obtain the minimum 40mph
requirement for course
entry. This will be a
straight line to begin at
approximately
29[deg]33.256 N,
095[deg]01.89 W and end at
approximately 29[deg]33.33
N, 095[deg]02.15 W.
Course Run Zone: \3/4\ mile
distance where
participating vessels will
conduct their high-speed
run. This will be a
straight line to begin at
approximately 29[deg]33.33
N, 095[deg]02.16 W and end
at approximately
29[deg]33.53 N,
095[deg]02.98 W.
Shut-Down Zone: 1 mile
distance where
participating vessels will
be allowed to slow their
speeds back to an idle.
This will be a straight
line to begin at
approximately 29[deg]33.53
N, 095[deg]02.98 W and end
at approximately
29[deg]33.74 N,
095[deg]04.1 W.
Spectator Zone: All vessels
that will be viewing the
event will be required to
stay within a designated
area. The sponsor is
responsible for marking
the spectator zone with 4
buoys on the outer corners
and ensuring that all
vessels within the area
are anchored and remain in
the area during all
ongoing high-speed runs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Dated: May 3, 2019.
K. D. Oditt,
Captain, United States Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Houston/
Galveston.
[FR Doc. 2019-09648 Filed 5-9-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P