Safety Zone; Lake Michigan, Fox River, De Pere, WI, 20035-20037 [2019-09417]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 89 / Wednesday, May 8, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Lake Michigan or a designated on-scene
representative.
This notice of enforcement is issued
under authority of 33 CFR 165.929,
Safety Zones; Annual events requiring
safety zones in the Captain of the Port
Lake Michigan zone, and 5 U.S.C.
552(a). In addition to this publication in
the Federal Register, the Coast Guard
will provide the maritime community
with advance notification for the
enforcement of this safety zone via
Broadcast Notice to Mariners or Local
Notice to Mariners. The Captain of the
Port Lake Michigan or a designated
representative will inform the public
through a Broadcast Notice to Mariners
of any changes in the planned schedule.
The Captain of the Port Lake Michigan
or a representative may be contacted via
Channel 16, VHF–FM, or via telephone
(414) 747–7182.
Dated: May 2, 2019.
Thomas J. Stuhlreyer,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2019–09420 Filed 5–7–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2019–0220]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Lake Michigan, Fox River,
De Pere, WI
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone for
all navigable waters of the Fox River, in
the vicinity of Green Bay Metropolitan
Sewerage District, De Pere facility and
the Northern pier of the Perkofski Boat
Launch. This action is needed to protect
personnel and vessels from potential
hazards created by the outfall of a
fireworks display. Entry of vessels or
persons into this zone is prohibited
unless specifically authorized by the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan.
DATES: This rule is effective from 9 p.m.
through 11 p.m. on May 26, 2019.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2019–
0220 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 May 07, 2019
Jkt 247001
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email the marine event coordinator,
MSTC Kaleena Carpino, Prevention
Department, Coast Guard Sector Lake
Michigan, Milwaukee, WI; telephone
(414) 747–7148, email D09–SMB–
SECLakeMichigan-WWM@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because doing
so would be impracticable and contrary
to the public interest. The final details
for this event were not known to the
Coast Guard until there was insufficient
time remaining before the event to
publish an NPRM. Thus, delaying the
effective date of this rule to wait for a
comment period to run would be both
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest because it would inhibit the
Coast Guard’s ability to protect the
public, vessels, mariners, and property
from the hazards associated with a
fireworks display on May 26, 2019.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. For the same reasons
discussed in the preceding paragraph,
waiting for a 30 day notice period to run
would be impracticable and contrary to
the public interest.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034
(previously 33 U.S.C. 1231); 33 CFR
1.05–1, 160.5; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
20035
A fireworks display will take plan on
Fox River in De Pere, WI on May 26,
2019 from 9 p.m. through 11 p.m. The
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan has
determined that this fireworks display
will pose a significant risk to public
safety and property. Such hazards
include premature and accidental
detonations, falling and burning debris,
and collisions among spectator vessels.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
With the aforementioned hazards in
mind, the Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan has determined that this
temporary safety zone is necessary to
protect persons and vessels during the
fireworks display in the waters of the
Fox River, in De Pere, WI. This zone is
effective and will be enforced from 9
p.m. through 11 p.m. on May 26, 2019.
The safety zone will be enforced for all
navigable waters of the Fox River, in the
vicinity of Green Bay Metropolitan
Sewerage District, De Pere facility and
the Northern pier of the Perkofski Boat
Launch within an area bounded by the
following coordinates; at 44°27′43.26″ N
88°03′34.86″ W (NAD 83) continuing
east across the Fox River to 44°27′41.18″
N 88°03′24.32″ W (NAD 83) then south
along the riverbank to 44°27′18.10″ N
88°03′40.79″ W (NAD 83) then west
across the Fox River to 44°27′32.12″ N
88°04′06.21″ W (NAD 83) then north
returning to the point of origin.
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring
within the safety zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Lake Michigan or his or her
designated on-scene representative. The
Captain of the Port or his or her
designated on-scene representative may
be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. Executive Order 13771
directs agencies to control regulatory
costs through a budgeting process. This
rule has not been designated a
E:\FR\FM\08MYR1.SGM
08MYR1
20036
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 89 / Wednesday, May 8, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
this rule has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance
it is exempt from the requirements of
Executive Order 13771.
We conclude that this rule is not a
significant regulatory action because we
anticipate that it will have minimal
impact on the economy, will not
interfere with other agencies, will not
adversely alter the budget of any grant
or loan recipients, and will not raise any
novel legal or policy issues. This
regulatory action determination is based
on the size, location, duration, and timeof-year of the safety zone. The safety
zone created by this rule will be
relatively small and enforced for only
two hours. Under certain conditions,
vessels may still transit through the
safety zone when permitted by the
Captain of the Port. Moreover, the Coast
Guard will issue Broadcast Notice to
Mariners via VHF–FM marine channel
16 about the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A above, this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 May 07, 2019
Jkt 247001
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Directive 023–01 and Commandant
Instruction M16475.1D, which guide the
Coast Guard in complying with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety
zone lasting only 2 hours that will
prohibit entry within the established
safety zone for the firework display. It
is categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L60a of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 01. A
Record of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T09–0220 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T09–0220 Safety Zone; Lake
Michigan, Fox River, De Pere, WI.
(a) Location. All navigable waters of
the Fox River, in the vicinity of Green
Bay Metropolitan Sewerage District, De
Pere facility and the Northern pier of the
Perkofski Boat Launch within an area
bounded by the following coordinates;
at 44°27′43.26″ N 88°03′34.86″ W (NAD
83) continuing east across the Fox River
to 44°27′41.18″ N 88°03′24.32″ W (NAD
83) then south along the riverbank to
44°27′18.10″ N 88°03′40.79″ W (NAD
83) then west across the Fox River to
44°27′32.12″ N 88°04′06.21″ W (NAD
E:\FR\FM\08MYR1.SGM
08MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 89 / Wednesday, May 8, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
83) then north returning to the point of
origin.
(b) Effective and enforcement period.
This section is effective and will be
enforced from 9 p.m. through 11 p.m. on
May 26, 2019.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23, entry
into, transiting, or anchoring within this
safety zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Lake Michigan or a designated on-scene
representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the Captain of the Port
Lake Michigan or a designated on-scene
representative.
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan
is any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant or petty officer who has been
designated by the Captain of the Port
Lake Michigan to act on his or her
behalf.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone must
contact the Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan or an on-scene representative
to obtain permission to do so. The
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or an
on-scene representative may be
contacted via VHF Channel 16. Vessel
operators given permission to enter or
operate in the safety zone must comply
with all directions given to them by the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or an
on-scene representative.
Dated: May 2, 2019.
Thomas J. Stuhlreyer,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Lake Michigan.
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2017–0532; FRL–9990–60]
Cyflumetofen; Pesticide Tolerances
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This regulation establishes
tolerances for residues of the insecticide
cyflumetofen in or on tea, dried. OAT
Agrio. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan c/o Landis
International, Inc. requested these
tolerances under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).
DATES: This regulation is effective May
8, 2019. Objections and requests for
hearings must be received on or before
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 May 07, 2019
Jkt 247001
The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2017–0532, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael L. Goodis, P.E., Director,
Registration Division (750P), Office of
Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001;
main telephone number: (703) 305–
7090; email address: RDFRNotices@
epa.gov.
ADDRESSES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
[FR Doc. 2019–09417 Filed 5–7–19; 8:45 am]
SUMMARY:
July 8, 2019 and must be filed in
accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to
other related information?
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of EPA’s tolerance
regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through
the Government Printing Office’s e-CFR
site at https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/textidx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/
40tab_02.tpl.
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
20037
C. How can I file an objection or hearing
request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. You must file your objection
or request a hearing on this regulation
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2017–0532 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
objections and requests for a hearing
must be in writing and must be received
by the Hearing Clerk on or before July
8, 2019. Addresses for mail and hand
delivery of objections and hearing
requests are provided in 40 CFR
178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing (excluding
any Confidential Business Information
(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
objection or hearing request, identified
by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
2017–0532, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be CBI or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on commenting
or visiting the docket, along with more
information about dockets generally, is
available at https://www.epa.gov/
dockets.
II. Summary of Petitioned-For
Tolerance
In the Federal Register of December
15, 2017 (82 FR 59604) (FRL–9970–50),
EPA issued a document pursuant to
FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C.
346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a
pesticide petition (PP 7E8609) by OAT
Agrio. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan, c/o Landis
International, Inc., 3185 Madison
Highway, P.O. Box 5126, Valdosta,
E:\FR\FM\08MYR1.SGM
08MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 8, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 20035-20037]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-09417]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2019-0220]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Lake Michigan, Fox River, De Pere, WI
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
all navigable waters of the Fox River, in the vicinity of Green Bay
Metropolitan Sewerage District, De Pere facility and the Northern pier
of the Perkofski Boat Launch. This action is needed to protect
personnel and vessels from potential hazards created by the outfall of
a fireworks display. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is
prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port
Lake Michigan.
DATES: This rule is effective from 9 p.m. through 11 p.m. on May 26,
2019.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2019-0220 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email the marine event coordinator, MSTC Kaleena Carpino,
Prevention Department, Coast Guard Sector Lake Michigan, Milwaukee, WI;
telephone (414) 747-7148, email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because doing so would be impracticable and
contrary to the public interest. The final details for this event were
not known to the Coast Guard until there was insufficient time
remaining before the event to publish an NPRM. Thus, delaying the
effective date of this rule to wait for a comment period to run would
be both impracticable and contrary to the public interest because it
would inhibit the Coast Guard's ability to protect the public, vessels,
mariners, and property from the hazards associated with a fireworks
display on May 26, 2019.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. For the same reasons discussed in
the preceding paragraph, waiting for a 30 day notice period to run
would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231); 33 CFR 1.05-1, 160.5; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
A fireworks display will take plan on Fox River in De Pere, WI on
May 26, 2019 from 9 p.m. through 11 p.m. The Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan has determined that this fireworks display will pose a
significant risk to public safety and property. Such hazards include
premature and accidental detonations, falling and burning debris, and
collisions among spectator vessels.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
With the aforementioned hazards in mind, the Captain of the Port
Lake Michigan has determined that this temporary safety zone is
necessary to protect persons and vessels during the fireworks display
in the waters of the Fox River, in De Pere, WI. This zone is effective
and will be enforced from 9 p.m. through 11 p.m. on May 26, 2019. The
safety zone will be enforced for all navigable waters of the Fox River,
in the vicinity of Green Bay Metropolitan Sewerage District, De Pere
facility and the Northern pier of the Perkofski Boat Launch within an
area bounded by the following coordinates; at 44[deg]27'43.26'' N
88[deg]03'34.86'' W (NAD 83) continuing east across the Fox River to
44[deg]27'41.18'' N 88[deg]03'24.32'' W (NAD 83) then south along the
riverbank to 44[deg]27'18.10'' N 88[deg]03'40.79'' W (NAD 83) then west
across the Fox River to 44[deg]27'32.12'' N 88[deg]04'06.21'' W (NAD
83) then north returning to the point of origin.
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan
or his or her designated on-scene representative. The Captain of the
Port or his or her designated on-scene representative may be contacted
via VHF Channel 16.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive order 13563 emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing
rules, and of promoting flexibility. Executive Order 13771 directs
agencies to control regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This
rule has not been designated a
[[Page 20036]]
``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
We conclude that this rule is not a significant regulatory action
because we anticipate that it will have minimal impact on the economy,
will not interfere with other agencies, will not adversely alter the
budget of any grant or loan recipients, and will not raise any novel
legal or policy issues. This regulatory action determination is based
on the size, location, duration, and time-of-year of the safety zone.
The safety zone created by this rule will be relatively small and
enforced for only two hours. Under certain conditions, vessels may
still transit through the safety zone when permitted by the Captain of
the Port. Moreover, the Coast Guard will issue Broadcast Notice to
Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.1D, which guide the
Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is
one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves
a safety zone lasting only 2 hours that will prohibit entry within the
established safety zone for the firework display. It is categorically
excluded from further review under paragraph L60a of Appendix A, Table
1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. A Record of
Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is available
in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T09-0220 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T09-0220 Safety Zone; Lake Michigan, Fox River, De Pere, WI.
(a) Location. All navigable waters of the Fox River, in the
vicinity of Green Bay Metropolitan Sewerage District, De Pere facility
and the Northern pier of the Perkofski Boat Launch within an area
bounded by the following coordinates; at 44[deg]27'43.26'' N
88[deg]03'34.86'' W (NAD 83) continuing east across the Fox River to
44[deg]27'41.18'' N 88[deg]03'24.32'' W (NAD 83) then south along the
riverbank to 44[deg]27'18.10'' N 88[deg]03'40.79'' W (NAD 83) then west
across the Fox River to 44[deg]27'32.12'' N 88[deg]04'06.21'' W (NAD
[[Page 20037]]
83) then north returning to the point of origin.
(b) Effective and enforcement period. This section is effective and
will be enforced from 9 p.m. through 11 p.m. on May 26, 2019.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec. 165.23, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within this safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan or a designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or a designated
on-scene representative.
(3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who
has been designated by the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan to act on
his or her behalf.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone must contact the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or an on-scene
representative to obtain permission to do so. The Captain of the Port
Lake Michigan or an on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF
Channel 16. Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in
the safety zone must comply with all directions given to them by the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or an on-scene representative.
Dated: May 2, 2019.
Thomas J. Stuhlreyer,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2019-09417 Filed 5-7-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P