Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes, 19885-19888 [2019-09265]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 88 / Tuesday, May 7, 2019 / Proposed Rules
(i) Retained Compliance Times, With No
Changes
At the later of the times specified in
paragraphs (i)(1) and (i)(2) of this AD, do the
actions required by paragraph (h) of this AD.
(1) Before the accumulation of 4,500 total
flight cycles.
(2) At the applicable time specified by
paragraph (i)(2)(i) or (i)(2)(ii) of this AD.
(i) For airplanes that have accumulated
8,000 or more total flight cycles as of January
26, 2017 (the effective date of AD 2016–25–
03, Amendment 39–18729 (81 FR 93801,
December 22, 2016) (‘‘AD 2016–25–03’’)):
Within 100 flight cycles after January 26,
2017.
(ii) For airplanes that have accumulated
fewer than 8,000 total flight cycles as of
January 26, 2017 (the effective date of AD
2016–25–03): Within 400 flight cycles after
January 26, 2017.
(j) Service Information Exception
Where Airbus Service Bulletin A300–52–
6085, Revision 01, dated May 2, 2018,
specifies to contact Airbus for appropriate
action: Before further flight, accomplish
corrective actions in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (n)(2) of
this AD.
(k) No Terminating Action
Accomplishment of corrective actions on
an airplane as required by paragraph (h)(1) or
(h)(2) of this AD, or repair, modification, or
replacement of a frame fork as required by
paragraph (h)(3) of this AD, on the aft LDCD
of an airplane does not constitute terminating
action for the repetitive HFEC inspections
required by paragraph (h)(3) of this AD for
that airplane.
(l) No Reporting
Although the Accomplishment Instructions
of Airbus Alert Operators Transmission
A52W011–15, Revision 00, dated July 23,
2015; and Airbus Service Bulletin A300–52–
6086, Revision 01, dated May 29, 2018;
specify to submit certain information to the
manufacturer, this AD does not include that
requirement.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
(m) Credit for Previous Actions
(1) This paragraph provides credit for
actions required by paragraphs (h)(1) and
(h)(3) of this AD, if those actions were
performed before the effective date of this AD
using Airbus Service Bulletin A300–52–6086,
Revision 00, dated December 25, 2016.
(2) This paragraph provides credit for
actions required by paragraph (h)(3) of this
AD, if those actions were performed before
the effective date of this AD using Airbus
Service Bulletin A300–52–6085, Revision 00,
dated December 22, 2016.
(n) Other FAA AD Provisions
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 May 06, 2019
Jkt 247001
directly to the International Section, send it
to the attention of the person identified in
paragraph (o)(2) of this AD. Information may
be emailed to 9-ANM-116-AMOCREQUESTS@faa.gov.
(i) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(ii) AMOCs approved previously for AD
2018–20–06 are approved as AMOCs for the
corresponding provisions of this AD.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: As of the
effective date of this AD, for any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by
the Manager, International Section, Transport
Standards Branch, FAA; or the European
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus
SAS’s EASA Design Organization Approval
(DOA). If approved by the DOA, the approval
must include the DOA-authorized signature.
(o) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA AD
2018–0266, dated December 11, 2018, for
related information. This MCAI may be
found in the AD docket on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2019–0257.
(2) For more information about this AD,
contact Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Section, Transport Standards
Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax 206–
231–3225.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness
Office—EAW, Rond-Point Emile Dewoitine
No: 2, 31700 Blagnac Cedex, France;
telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@
airbus.com; internet https://www.airbus.com.
You may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on
April 25, 2019.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2019–09264 Filed 5–6–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2019–0258; Product
Identifier 2018–NM–134–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
19885
Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
ACTION:
We propose to supersede
Airworthiness Directive (AD) 96–25–04,
which applies to certain Airbus SAS
Model A320 series airplanes. AD 96–
25–04 requires repetitive inspections to
detect chafing of the wire looms
(bundles) in the wing and the horizontal
stabilizer and in certain areas of the
main landing gear (MLG) bays; repair or
replacement, protection, and
realignment, if necessary; installation of
protective sleeves around the wire
bundles; and realignment of bundles
that are not guided centrally into the
conduit end fittings. Since we issued
AD 96–25–04, investigations identified
issues with the previously installed
protective sleeves. This proposed AD
would partially retain the requirements
of AD 96–25–04 and would require
modification of the wing electrical
installation, as specified in an European
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD,
which will be incorporated by reference.
We are proposing this AD to address the
unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by June 21, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For the incorporation by reference
(IBR) material described in the ‘‘Related
IBR material under 1 CFR part 51’’
section in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION,
contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3,
50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49
221 89990 1000; email ADs@
easa.europa.eu; internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this
IBR material on the EASA website at
https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may
view this IBR material at the FAA,
Transport Standards Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
It is also available in the AD docket on
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\07MYP1.SGM
07MYP1
19886
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 88 / Tuesday, May 7, 2019 / Proposed Rules
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2019–
0258; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this NPRM, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for Docket Operations
(telephone 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Section, Transport
Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
telephone and fax 206–231–3223.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposal. Send your comments to
an address listed under the ADDRESSES
section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2019–0258; Product Identifier 2018–
NM–134–AD’’ at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this NPRM. We will consider
all comments received by the closing
date and may amend this NPRM based
on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this NPRM.
Discussion
We issued AD 96–25–04, Amendment
39–9846 (61 FR 66881, December 19,
1996) (‘‘AD 96–25–04’’), for certain
Airbus SAS Model A320 series
airplanes. AD 96–25–04 requires
inspections of the wire looms (bundles)
in the wing and the horizontal stabilizer
and in certain areas of the MLG bays;
repair or replacement, protection, and
realignment, if necessary; installation of
protective sleeves around the wire
bundles; and realignment of bundles
that are not guided centrally into the
conduit end fittings. AD 96–25–04
resulted from a report that electrical
short-circuiting could occur in the wire
bundles in the MLG bays. We issued AD
96–25–04 to address electrical short-
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 May 06, 2019
Jkt 247001
circuiting due to chafing of the wire
bundles in the wing, horizontal
stabilizer, or MLG bay.
Actions Since AD 96–25–04 Was Issued
Since we issued AD 96–25–04,
investigations identified issues with the
previously installed protective sleeves.
We have determined that a modification
of the wing electrical installation, which
includes a new protective sleeve, is
necessary to address the identified
unsafe condition.
The EASA, which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD
2018–0200, dated September 6, 2018
(‘‘EASA AD 2018–0200’’) (also referred
to as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the
MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition
for certain Airbus SAS Model A320–
211, –212, and –231 airplanes. The
MCAI states:
Several cases of wire chafing were reported
by operators, occurring in the trailing edge
areas of zones 574 and 674 (both left-hand
and right-hand wing) at the breakout of the
electrical bundle from the conduit.
This condition, if not detected and
corrected, could lead to a short circuit,
possibly resulting in a fire in the concerned
areas. It was also determined that this failure
mode can also affect other wires installed on
the wing, horizontal stabilizer and in the
main landing gear (MLG) bays.
To address this unsafe condition, Airbus
issued SB [service bulletin] A320–24–1044 to
provide instructions for inspection of the
wires to detect chafing or signs of
overheating, and SB A320–24–1045
introducing protective sleeves on electrical
cables to prevent chafing.
Consequently, DGAC [Direction Ge´ne´rale
de l’Aviation Civile] France issued AD 91–
182–020(B) (later revised) [which
corresponds to FAA AD 96–25–04] to require
those repetitive inspections, or applicable
repairs depending on findings, and to install
protective sleeves as terminating action for
the repetitive inspections.
Since [DGAC France] AD 91–182–020(B)
R2 was issued, subsequent investigations
identified, in those areas (zones 574 and
674), issues with the protective sleeves
previously installed in production, through
mod 22109, or in service through SB A320–
24–1045.
Prompted by these findings, Airbus issued
SB A320–92–1115, later revised, providing
instructions for installation of a new
protective sleeve on those cables localised in
zones 574 and 674, and introduced in
production (through mod 22626) new design
electrical cables more resistant to chafing.
For the reasons described above, this
[EASA] AD partially retains the requirements
of DGAC France AD 91–182–020(B) R2,
which is superseded, and requires
modification of the wing electrical
installation [installation of new protective
sleeves on the electrical cables, which
includes an inspection of the cables and
repair or replacement of damaged wires].
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Explanation of Retained Requirements
Although this proposed AD does not
explicitly restate the requirements of AD
96–25–04, this proposed AD would
retain certain requirements of AD 96–
25–04. Those requirements are
referenced in EASA AD 2018–0200,
which, in turn, is referenced in
paragraph (g) of this proposed AD.
Explanation of Change To Terminating
Action Included in AD 96–25–04
Note 2 of AD 96–25–04 indicated that
accomplishment of the actions specified
in Airbus Service Bulletin A320–24–
1045, Revision 2, dated April 12, 1992,
terminates the repetitive inspections
specified in paragraphs (c) and (d) of AD
96–25–04 (which correspond to
paragraphs (1) and (2) of EASA AD
2018–0200). However, this terminating
action is not included in EASA AD
2018–0200, which would be
incorporated by reference in the FAA
AD.
Related IBR Material Under 1 CFR Part
51
EASA AD 2018–0200 describes
procedures for repetitive inspections to
detect chafing, signs of overheating, and
misalignment of the wire looms
(bundles) in the wing and the horizontal
stabilizer and in certain areas of the
MLG bays; repair or replacement,
protection, and realignment, if
necessary; realignment of bundles that
are not guided centrally into the conduit
end fittings; and modification of the
wing electrical installation. This
material is reasonably available because
the interested parties have access to it
through their normal course of business
or by the means identified in the
ADDRESSES section, and it is publicly
available through the EASA website.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI referenced above. We are
proposing this AD because we evaluated
all pertinent information and
determined an unsafe condition exists
and is likely to exist or develop on other
products of the same type design.
Proposed Requirements of This NPRM
This proposed AD would require
accomplishing the actions specified in
EASA AD 2018–0200 described
previously, as incorporated by
reference, except for any differences
E:\FR\FM\07MYP1.SGM
07MYP1
19887
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 88 / Tuesday, May 7, 2019 / Proposed Rules
identified as exceptions in the
regulatory text of this AD.
ADs. As a result, EASA AD 2018–0200
will be incorporated by reference in the
FAA final rule. This proposed AD
would, therefore, require compliance
with the provisions specified in EASA
AD 2018–0200, except for any
differences identified as exceptions in
the regulatory text of this proposed AD.
Service information specified in EASA
AD 2018–0200 that is required for
compliance with EASA AD 2018–0200
Explanation of Required Compliance
Information
In the FAA’s ongoing efforts to
improve the efficiency of the AD
process, the FAA worked with Airbus
and EASA to develop a process to use
certain EASA ADs as the primary source
of information for compliance with
requirements for corresponding FAA
will be available on the internet https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2019–
0258 after the FAA final rule is
published.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
affects 27 airplanes of U.S. registry. We
estimate the following costs to comply
with this proposed AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS FOR REQUIRED ACTIONS
Action
Labor cost
Parts cost
Retained actions from AD 96–25–04 .............
New proposed actions ....................................
62 work-hours × $85 per hour = $5,270 ........
25 work-hours × $85 per hour = $2,125 ........
$0
* $0
Cost per
product
$5,270
2,125
Cost on
U.S. operators
$142,290
57, 375
* We have received no definitive data on the parts costs.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
We have received no definitive data
that would enable us to provide cost
estimates for the on-condition actions
specified in this proposed AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
This proposed AD is issued in
accordance with authority delegated by
the Executive Director, Aircraft
Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance
with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance
and Airworthiness Division, but during
this transition period, the Executive
Director has delegated the authority to
issue ADs applicable to transport
category airplanes and associated
appliances to the Director of the System
Oversight Division.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 May 06, 2019
Jkt 247001
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
96–25–04, Amendment 39–9846 (61 FR
66881, December 19, 1996), and adding
the following new AD:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Airbus SAS: Docket No. FAA–2019–0258;
Product Identifier 2018–NM–134–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by June 21,
2019.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 96–25–04,
Amendment 39–9846 (61 FR 66881,
December 19, 1996) (‘‘AD 96–25–04’’).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus SAS Model
A320–211, –212, and –231 airplanes,
certificated in any category, as identified in
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD
2018–0200, dated September 6, 2018 (‘‘EASA
AD 2018–0200’’).
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 24, Electrical power.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a report that
electrical short-circuiting could occur in the
wire bundles in the wing, horizontal
stabilizer or main landing gear (MLG) bays.
This AD was also prompted by a
determination that there were issues with
protective sleeves previously installed as
specified in AD 96–25–04. We are issuing
this AD to address electrical short circuiting
due to chafing of the wire bundles in the
wing, horizontal stabilizer, or MLG bay,
which could result in a fire.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Requirements
Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this
AD: Comply with all required actions and
compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, EASA AD 2018–0200.
(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2018–0200
(1) For purposes of determining
compliance with the requirements of this AD:
Where EASA AD 2018–0200 refers to its
E:\FR\FM\07MYP1.SGM
07MYP1
19888
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 88 / Tuesday, May 7, 2019 / Proposed Rules
effective date, this AD requires using the
effective date of this AD.
(2) For purposes of determining
compliance with the requirements of this AD:
Where EASA AD 2018–0200 refers to ‘‘the
effective date of DGAC France AD 91–182–
020 at original issue’’ or refers to ‘‘the
effective date of DGAC France AD 91–182–
020 at Rev.2,’’ this AD requires using January
27, 1997 (the effective date of AD 96–25–04).
(3) The ‘‘Remarks’’ section of EASA AD
2018–0200 does not apply to this AD.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
(i) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Section, send it
to the attention of the person identified in
paragraph (j)(2) of this AD. Information may
be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOCREQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain instructions
from a manufacturer, the instructions must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, International Section,
Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or EASA;
or Airbus SAS’s EASA Design Organization
Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA,
the approval must include the DOAauthorized signature.
(3) Required for Compliance (RC): For any
service information referenced in EASA AD
2018–0200 that contains RC procedures and
tests: Except as required by paragraph (i)(2)
of this AD, RC procedures and tests must be
done to comply with this AD; any procedures
or tests that are not identified as RC are
recommended. Those procedures and tests
that are not identified as RC may be deviated
from using accepted methods in accordance
with the operator’s maintenance or
inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the
procedures and tests identified as RC can be
done and the airplane can be put back in an
airworthy condition. Any substitutions or
changes to procedures or tests identified as
RC require approval of an AMOC.
(j) Related Information
(1) For information about EASA AD 2018–
0200, contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer
3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49
221 89990 6017; email ADs@easa.europa.eu;
Internet www.easa.europa.eu. You may find
this EASA AD on the EASA website at
https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this
EASA AD at the FAA, Transport Standards
Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines,
WA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 May 06, 2019
Jkt 247001
EASA AD 2018–0200 may be found in the
AD docket on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA–2019–0258.
(2) For more information about this AD,
contact Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Section, Transport Standards
Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax 206–
231–3223.
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on
April 25, 2019.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2019–09265 Filed 5–6–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2019–0253; Product
Identifier 2019–NM–006–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to supersede
Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2016–07–
22, which applies to all Airbus SAS
Model A300 B4–600, B4–600R, and F4–
600R series airplanes, and Model A300
C4–605R Variant F airplanes
(collectively called Model A300–600
series airplanes), and Model A310 series
airplanes. AD 2016–07–22 requires
modifying the electrical routing
installation at the right-hand (RH) and
left-hand (LH) wings to achieve a
minimum distance between wiring
bundles and surrounding structures.
Since we issued AD 2016–07–22, we
received reports of missing installation
information for certain airplanes. This
proposed AD would retain the
requirements of AD 2016–07–22 and, for
certain airplanes, add a requirement to
further modify the electrical
installations in both wings, as specified
in an European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) AD, which will be incorporated
by reference. We are proposing this AD
to address the unsafe condition on these
products.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by June 21, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For the incorporation by reference
(IBR) material described in the ‘‘Related
IBR material under 1 CFR part 51’’
section in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION,
contact the EASA, Konrad-AdenauerUfer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany;
telephone +49 221 89990 1000; email
ADs@easa.europa.eu; internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this
IBR material on the EASA website at
https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may
view this IBR material at the FAA,
Transport Standards Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
It is also available in the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2019–
0253; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this NPRM, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for Docket Operations
(telephone 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan
Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Section, Transport
Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
telephone and fax 206–231–3225.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposal. Send your comments to
an address listed under the ADDRESSES
section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2019–0253; Product Identifier 2019–
NM–006–AD’’ at the beginning of your
E:\FR\FM\07MYP1.SGM
07MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 88 (Tuesday, May 7, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 19885-19888]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-09265]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2019-0258; Product Identifier 2018-NM-134-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD) 96-25-04,
which applies to certain Airbus SAS Model A320 series airplanes. AD 96-
25-04 requires repetitive inspections to detect chafing of the wire
looms (bundles) in the wing and the horizontal stabilizer and in
certain areas of the main landing gear (MLG) bays; repair or
replacement, protection, and realignment, if necessary; installation of
protective sleeves around the wire bundles; and realignment of bundles
that are not guided centrally into the conduit end fittings. Since we
issued AD 96-25-04, investigations identified issues with the
previously installed protective sleeves. This proposed AD would
partially retain the requirements of AD 96-25-04 and would require
modification of the wing electrical installation, as specified in an
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD, which will be incorporated
by reference. We are proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by June 21, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For the incorporation by reference (IBR) material described in the
``Related IBR material under 1 CFR part 51'' section in SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION, contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne,
Germany; telephone +49 221 89990 1000; email [email protected];
internet www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this IBR material on the EASA
website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this IBR material at
the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines,
WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call 206-231-3195. It is also available in the AD docket on
[[Page 19886]]
the internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-
0258; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this NPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other
information. The street address for Docket Operations (telephone 800-
647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax 206-231-3223.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2019-0258;
Product Identifier 2018-NM-134-AD'' at the beginning of your comments.
We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this NPRM. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend this NPRM based on
those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this NPRM.
Discussion
We issued AD 96-25-04, Amendment 39-9846 (61 FR 66881, December 19,
1996) (``AD 96-25-04''), for certain Airbus SAS Model A320 series
airplanes. AD 96-25-04 requires inspections of the wire looms (bundles)
in the wing and the horizontal stabilizer and in certain areas of the
MLG bays; repair or replacement, protection, and realignment, if
necessary; installation of protective sleeves around the wire bundles;
and realignment of bundles that are not guided centrally into the
conduit end fittings. AD 96-25-04 resulted from a report that
electrical short-circuiting could occur in the wire bundles in the MLG
bays. We issued AD 96-25-04 to address electrical short-circuiting due
to chafing of the wire bundles in the wing, horizontal stabilizer, or
MLG bay.
Actions Since AD 96-25-04 Was Issued
Since we issued AD 96-25-04, investigations identified issues with
the previously installed protective sleeves. We have determined that a
modification of the wing electrical installation, which includes a new
protective sleeve, is necessary to address the identified unsafe
condition.
The EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD 2018-0200, dated September 6, 2018
(``EASA AD 2018-0200'') (also referred to as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe
condition for certain Airbus SAS Model A320-211, -212, and -231
airplanes. The MCAI states:
Several cases of wire chafing were reported by operators,
occurring in the trailing edge areas of zones 574 and 674 (both
left-hand and right-hand wing) at the breakout of the electrical
bundle from the conduit.
This condition, if not detected and corrected, could lead to a
short circuit, possibly resulting in a fire in the concerned areas.
It was also determined that this failure mode can also affect other
wires installed on the wing, horizontal stabilizer and in the main
landing gear (MLG) bays.
To address this unsafe condition, Airbus issued SB [service
bulletin] A320-24-1044 to provide instructions for inspection of the
wires to detect chafing or signs of overheating, and SB A320-24-1045
introducing protective sleeves on electrical cables to prevent
chafing.
Consequently, DGAC [Direction G[eacute]n[eacute]rale de
l'Aviation Civile] France issued AD 91-182-020(B) (later revised)
[which corresponds to FAA AD 96-25-04] to require those repetitive
inspections, or applicable repairs depending on findings, and to
install protective sleeves as terminating action for the repetitive
inspections.
Since [DGAC France] AD 91-182-020(B) R2 was issued, subsequent
investigations identified, in those areas (zones 574 and 674),
issues with the protective sleeves previously installed in
production, through mod 22109, or in service through SB A320-24-
1045.
Prompted by these findings, Airbus issued SB A320-92-1115, later
revised, providing instructions for installation of a new protective
sleeve on those cables localised in zones 574 and 674, and
introduced in production (through mod 22626) new design electrical
cables more resistant to chafing.
For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD partially
retains the requirements of DGAC France AD 91-182-020(B) R2, which
is superseded, and requires modification of the wing electrical
installation [installation of new protective sleeves on the
electrical cables, which includes an inspection of the cables and
repair or replacement of damaged wires].
Explanation of Retained Requirements
Although this proposed AD does not explicitly restate the
requirements of AD 96-25-04, this proposed AD would retain certain
requirements of AD 96-25-04. Those requirements are referenced in EASA
AD 2018-0200, which, in turn, is referenced in paragraph (g) of this
proposed AD.
Explanation of Change To Terminating Action Included in AD 96-25-04
Note 2 of AD 96-25-04 indicated that accomplishment of the actions
specified in Airbus Service Bulletin A320-24-1045, Revision 2, dated
April 12, 1992, terminates the repetitive inspections specified in
paragraphs (c) and (d) of AD 96-25-04 (which correspond to paragraphs
(1) and (2) of EASA AD 2018-0200). However, this terminating action is
not included in EASA AD 2018-0200, which would be incorporated by
reference in the FAA AD.
Related IBR Material Under 1 CFR Part 51
EASA AD 2018-0200 describes procedures for repetitive inspections
to detect chafing, signs of overheating, and misalignment of the wire
looms (bundles) in the wing and the horizontal stabilizer and in
certain areas of the MLG bays; repair or replacement, protection, and
realignment, if necessary; realignment of bundles that are not guided
centrally into the conduit end fittings; and modification of the wing
electrical installation. This material is reasonably available because
the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section, and it is
publicly available through the EASA website.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI referenced
above. We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe condition exists and is likely to
exist or develop on other products of the same type design.
Proposed Requirements of This NPRM
This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in EASA AD 2018-0200 described previously, as incorporated by
reference, except for any differences
[[Page 19887]]
identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of this AD.
Explanation of Required Compliance Information
In the FAA's ongoing efforts to improve the efficiency of the AD
process, the FAA worked with Airbus and EASA to develop a process to
use certain EASA ADs as the primary source of information for
compliance with requirements for corresponding FAA ADs. As a result,
EASA AD 2018-0200 will be incorporated by reference in the FAA final
rule. This proposed AD would, therefore, require compliance with the
provisions specified in EASA AD 2018-0200, except for any differences
identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of this proposed AD.
Service information specified in EASA AD 2018-0200 that is required for
compliance with EASA AD 2018-0200 will be available on the internet
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA-2019-0258 after the FAA final rule is published.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD affects 27 airplanes of U.S.
registry. We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed
AD:
Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Retained actions from AD 96-25-04.. 62 work-hours x $85 per $0 $5,270 $142,290
hour = $5,270.
New proposed actions............... 25 work-hours x $85 per * $0 2,125 57, 375
hour = $2,125.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* We have received no definitive data on the parts costs.
We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this proposed
AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
This proposed AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated
by the Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as
authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order,
issuance of ADs is normally a function of the Compliance and
Airworthiness Division, but during this transition period, the
Executive Director has delegated the authority to issue ADs applicable
to transport category airplanes and associated appliances to the
Director of the System Oversight Division.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
96-25-04, Amendment 39-9846 (61 FR 66881, December 19, 1996), and
adding the following new AD:
Airbus SAS: Docket No. FAA-2019-0258; Product Identifier 2018-NM-
134-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by June 21, 2019.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 96-25-04, Amendment 39-9846 (61 FR 66881,
December 19, 1996) (``AD 96-25-04'').
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus SAS Model A320-211, -212, and -231
airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified in European
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2018-0200, dated September 6, 2018
(``EASA AD 2018-0200'').
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 24, Electrical
power.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a report that electrical short-
circuiting could occur in the wire bundles in the wing, horizontal
stabilizer or main landing gear (MLG) bays. This AD was also
prompted by a determination that there were issues with protective
sleeves previously installed as specified in AD 96-25-04. We are
issuing this AD to address electrical short circuiting due to
chafing of the wire bundles in the wing, horizontal stabilizer, or
MLG bay, which could result in a fire.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Requirements
Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this AD: Comply with all
required actions and compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, EASA AD 2018-0200.
(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2018-0200
(1) For purposes of determining compliance with the requirements
of this AD: Where EASA AD 2018-0200 refers to its
[[Page 19888]]
effective date, this AD requires using the effective date of this
AD.
(2) For purposes of determining compliance with the requirements
of this AD: Where EASA AD 2018-0200 refers to ``the effective date
of DGAC France AD 91-182-020 at original issue'' or refers to ``the
effective date of DGAC France AD 91-182-020 at Rev.2,'' this AD
requires using January 27, 1997 (the effective date of AD 96-25-04).
(3) The ``Remarks'' section of EASA AD 2018-0200 does not apply
to this AD.
(i) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Section, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (j)(2) of this AD. Information
may be emailed to: [email protected]. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International
Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus SAS's
EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, the
approval must include the DOA-authorized signature.
(3) Required for Compliance (RC): For any service information
referenced in EASA AD 2018-0200 that contains RC procedures and
tests: Except as required by paragraph (i)(2) of this AD, RC
procedures and tests must be done to comply with this AD; any
procedures or tests that are not identified as RC are recommended.
Those procedures and tests that are not identified as RC may be
deviated from using accepted methods in accordance with the
operator's maintenance or inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the procedures and tests identified as
RC can be done and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition. Any substitutions or changes to procedures or tests
identified as RC require approval of an AMOC.
(j) Related Information
(1) For information about EASA AD 2018-0200, contact EASA,
Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221
89990 6017; email [email protected]; Internet www.easa.europa.eu.
You may find this EASA AD on the EASA website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this EASA AD at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
206-231-3195. EASA AD 2018-0200 may be found in the AD docket on the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating
Docket No. FAA-2019-0258.
(2) For more information about this AD, contact Sanjay Ralhan,
Aerospace Engineer, International Section, Transport Standards
Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone
and fax 206-231-3223.
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on April 25, 2019.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-09265 Filed 5-6-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P