Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation Adjustment Rule, 18979-18982 [2019-09120]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 86 / Friday, May 3, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
18979
TABLE 1 OF § 165.801—SECTOR OHIO VALLEY ANNUAL AND RECURRING SAFETY ZONES—Continued
Date
Sponsor/name
Sector Ohio valley
location
Safety zone
75. 1 day—Second weekend in September.
76. 1 day—Second weekend in September.
77. 3 days—Second or third week in
September.
Nashville Symphony/Concert Fireworks
Nashville, TN .........
City of Clarksville/Clarksville Riverfest
Clarksville, TN .......
Wheeling Heritage Port Sternwheel
Festival Foundation/Wheeling Heritage Port Sternwheel Festival.
Boomtown Days—Fireworks ................
Wheeling, WV .......
Cumberland River, Miles 190.1–192.3
(Tennessee).
Cumberland River, Miles 124.5–127.0
(Tennessee).
Ohio River, Miles 90.2–90.7 (West Virginia).
78. 1 day—One weekend in September.
79. 1 day—One weekend in September.
80. 1 day—One weekend in September.
81. Multiple days—September through
January.
Ohio River Sternwheel Festival Committee fireworks.
Tribute to the River ...............................
Nitro, WV ...............
Marietta, OH ..........
Point Pleasant, WV
University of Pittsburgh Athletic Department/University of Pittsburgh Fireworks.
Pittsburgh, PA .......
Leukemia & Lymphoma Society/Light
the Night.
Leukemia and Lymphoma Society/Light
the Night Walk Fireworks.
Yeatman’s Fireworks ............................
Outdoor Chattanooga/Swim the Suck ..
Pittsburgh, PA .......
Cincinnati, OH .......
Chattanooga, TN ...
Chattajack .............................................
Chattanooga, TN ...
87. 1 day—One weekend in October ...
West Virginia Motor Car Festival ..........
Charleston, WV .....
88. 1 day—Friday before Thanksgiving
Pittsburgh, PA .......
90. 1 day—Friday before Thanksgiving
Pittsburgh Downtown Partnership/Light
Up Night.
Kittanning Light Up Night Firework Display.
Duquesne Light/Santa Spectacular ......
91. 1 day—Friday before Thanksgiving
Monongahela Holiday Show .................
Monongahela, PA
92. 1 day—Friday or Saturday after
Thanksgiving.
93. 1 day—Third week of November ..
94. 1 day—December 31 ....................
Friends of the Festival/Cheer at the
Pier.
Gallipolis in Lights .................................
Pittsburgh Cultural Trust/Highmark
First Night Pittsburgh.
University of Tennessee/UT Football
Fireworks.
Chattanooga, TN ...
82. 1 day—First week in October ........
83. 1 day—Second weekend of October.
84. 1 day—First two weeks in October
85. 1 day—Second or third weekend in
October.
86. 1 day—Fourth weekend in October
89. 1 day—Friday before Thanksgiving
95.
*
7 days—Scheduled home games
*
*
*
*
Nashville, TN .........
Kittanning, PA .......
Pittsburgh, PA .......
Gallipolis, OH ........
Pittsburgh, PA .......
Knoxville, TN .........
Department of the Army, Corps of
Engineers
33 CFR Part 326
[FR Doc. 2019–09042 Filed 5–2–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
RIN 0710–AA82
Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation
Adjustment Rule
Background Information
The U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) is issuing this final
rule to adjust its civil monetary
penalties (CMP) under the Clean Water
Act (CWA) and the National Fishing
The Federal Civil Penalties Inflation
Adjustment Act of 1990, Public Law
101–410, 104 Stat. 890 (28 U.S.C. 2461,
note), as amended by the Debt
Collection Improvement Act of 1996,
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
15:47 May 02, 2019
Jkt 247001
This final rule is effective on
May 3, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Brad Guarisco at 202–761–5856 or by
email at Brad.A.Guarisco@
usace.army.mil or access the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers Regulatory Home
Page at https://www.usace.army.mil/
Missions/CivilWorks/Regulatory
ProgramandPermits.aspx.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Department of Defense.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Ohio River, Miles 264.6–265.6 (West
Virginia).
Ohio
River,
Miles
0.0–0.1,
Monongahela River, Miles 0.0–0.1,
Allegheny River, Miles 0.0–0.25
(Pennsylvania).
Ohio River, Miles 0.0–0.4 (Pennsylvania).
Cumberland River, Miles 189.7–192.1
(Tennessee).
Ohio River, Miles 469.0–470.5 (Ohio).
Tennessee River, Miles 452.0–454.5
(Tennessee).
Tennessee River, Miles 462.7–465.5
(Tennessee).
Kanawha River, Miles 58–59 (West
Virginia).
Allegheny River, Miles 0.0–1.0 (Pennsylvania).
Allegheny River, Miles 44.5–45.5
(Pennsylvania).
Monongahela River, Miles 0.00–0.22,
Allegheny River, Miles 0.00–0.25,
and Ohio River, Miles 0.0–0.3
(Pennsylvania).
Ohio River, Miles 31.5–32.5 (Pennsylvania).
Tennessee River, Miles 462.7–465.2
(Tennessee).
Ohio River, Miles 269.2–270 (Ohio).
Allegheny River, Miles 0.5–1.0 (Pennsylvania).
Tennessee River, Miles 645.6–648.3
(Tennessee).
Enhancement Act to account for
inflation.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Dated: April 30, 2019.
M.A. Wike,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Captain of the Port, Sector Ohio Valley.
Kanawha River, Miles 43.1–44.2 (West
Virginia).
Ohio River, Miles 171.5–172.5 (Ohio).
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\03MYR1.SGM
03MYR1
18980
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 86 / Friday, May 3, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Public Law 104–134, April 26, 1996,
and further amended by the Federal
Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act
Improvements Act of 2015 (Inflation
Adjustment Act), Public Law 114–74,
November 2, 2015, required agencies to
annually adjust the level of CMP for
inflation to improve their effectiveness
and maintain their deterrent effect. The
Inflation Adjustment Act required that
not later than July 1, 2016, and not later
than January 15 of every year thereafter,
the Corps must adjust its CMP by the
inflation adjustment described in the
Inflation Adjustment Act. The inflation
adjustment is determined by increasing
the maximum CMP or the range of
minimum and maximum CMPs, as
applicable, for each CMP by the cost-ofliving adjustment, rounded to the
nearest multiple of $1. The cost-ofliving adjustment is the percentage (if
any) for each CMP by which the
Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the
month of October preceding the date of
the adjustment, exceeds the CPI for the
month of October in the previous
calendar year.
The initial catch up adjustments for
inflation to the Department of Defense’s
CMPs were published as an interim
final rule in the Federal Register on
May 26, 2016 (81 FR 33389–33391) and
became effective on that date. The
interim final rule was published as a
final rule without change on September
12, 2016 (81 FR 62629–62631), effective
that date.
Using the adjustment criteria
provided in the December 14, 2018,
Office of Management and Budget
Memorandum regarding the
‘‘Implementation of Penalty Inflation
Adjustments for 2019, Pursuant to the
Federal Civil Penalties Inflation
Adjustment Act Improvements Act of
2015’’, the 2019 annual adjustment for
inflation will increase the Class I civil
penalty under Section 309 of the Clean
Water Act to $21,934 per violation, and
the maximum civil penalty increases to
$54,833. The judicial civil penalty
under Section 404(s) of the Clean Water
Act increases to $54,833 per day for
each violation. Under the National
Fishing Enhancement Act, the Class I
civil penalty increases to $24,017 per
violation. This rule will apply
prospectively to penalty assessments
beginning on its effective date, May 3,
2019.
Section 4 of the Inflation Adjustment
Act directs federal agencies to publish
annual penalty inflation adjustments. In
accordance with Section 553 of the
Administrative Procedures Act (APA),
most rules are subject to notice and
comment and are effective no earlier
than 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register. Section 4(b)(2) of the
Inflation Adjustment Act further
provides that each agency shall make
the annual inflation adjustments
‘‘notwithstanding section 553’’ of the
APA. According to the December 2018
OMB guidance issued to Federal
agencies on the implementation of the
2019 annual adjustment, the phrase
‘‘notwithstanding section 553’’ means
that ‘‘the public procedure the APA
generally requires (i.e., notice, an
opportunity for comment, and a delay in
effective date) is not required for
agencies to issue regulations
implementing the annual adjustment.’’
Consistent with the language of the
Inflation Adjustment Act and OMB’s
implementation guidance, this rule is
not subject to notice and opportunity for
public comment.
On August 3, 2011, the Deputy
Secretary of Defense delegated to the
Secretary of the Army the authority and
responsibility to adjust penalties
administered by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers. On July 26, 2018, the
Secretary of the Army delegated that
authority and responsibility to the
Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil
Works who further delegated the
authority on October 31, 2018, to the
Commanding General of the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers. On January 23,
2019, the Commanding General of the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers delegated
that authority and responsibility to the
Deputy Commanding General for Civil
and Emergency Operations of the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers.
With this rule, the new statutory
maximum penalty levels listed in Table
1 will apply to all statutory civil
penalties assessed on or after the
effective date of this rule. Table 1 shows
the calculation of the 2019 annual
inflation adjustment based on the
guidance provided by OMB (see
December 14, 2018, Memorandum for
the Heads of Executive Departments and
Agencies, from Mick Mulvaney,
Director, OMB, Subject: Implementation
of Penalty Inflation Adjustments for
2019, Pursuant to the Federal Civil
Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act
Improvements Act of 2015). The OMB
provided to agencies the cost-of-living
adjustment multiplier for 2019, based
on the Consumer Price Index for All
Urban Consumers (CPI–U) for the month
of October 2018, not seasonally
adjusted, which is 1.02522. Agencies are
to adjust ‘‘the maximum civil monetary
penalty or the range of minimum and
maximum civil monetary penalties, as
applicable, for each civil monetary
penalty by the cost-of-living
adjustment.’’ For 2019, agencies
multiply each applicable penalty by the
multiplier, 1.02522, and round to the
nearest dollar. The multiplier should be
applied to the most recent penalty
amount, i.e., the one that includes the
2018 annual inflation adjustment.
TABLE 1
Citation
CWA, 33 U.S.C.
1319(g)(2)(A).
CWA, 33 U.S.C. 1344(s)(4) ...
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
National Fishing Enhancement Act, 33 U.S.C.
2104(e).
Current civil monetary penalty
(CMP) amount established by
law
Current CMP amount in effect
prior to this rulemaking
$10,000 per violation, with a
maximum of $25,000.
Maximum of $25,000 per day
for each violation.
Maximum of $10,000 per violation.
$21,394 per violation, with a
maximum of $53,484.
Maximum of $53,484 per day
for each violation.
Maximum of $23,426 per violation.
This rule will not result in any
additional costs to implement the Corps
Regulatory Program because the Class I
civil penalties and judicial civil
penalties have been in effect since 1990
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:47 May 02, 2019
Jkt 247001
when the Corps first promulgated
regulations regarding such penalties
(Class I civil penalties were first
established by statute in 1987). This rule
merely adjusts the value of current
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2019
Inflation
adjustment
multiplier
1.02522
1.02522
1.02522
CMP amount as of May 3,
2019
$21,934 per violation, with a
maximum of $54,833.
Maximum of $54,833 per day
for each violation.
Maximum of $24,017 per violation.
statutory civil penalties to reflect and
keep pace with the levels originally set
by Congress when the statutes were
enacted, as required by the Inflation
Adjustment Act. This rule will result in
E:\FR\FM\03MYR1.SGM
03MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 86 / Friday, May 3, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
additional costs to members of the
regulated public who do not comply
with the terms and conditions of issued
Department of the Army permits and
either receive a final Class I civil
administrative penalty order from a
District Engineer or are subject to a
judicial civil penalty. The rule increases
the minimum and maximum penalty
amounts to $21,934 and $54,833 for
Class I civil administrative penalties
under the Clean Water Act, to a
maximum of $54,833 for judiciallyimposed civil penalties under the Clean
Water Act, and to a maximum of
$24,017 for Class I civil administrative
penalties under the National Fishing
Enhancement Act. The benefit of this
rule will be to improve the effectiveness
of Corps civil monetary penalties by
maintaining their deterrent effect and
promoting compliance with the law.
Regulatory Procedures
Plain Language
In compliance with the principles in
the President’s Memorandum of June 1,
1998, regarding plain language, this
preamble is written using plain
language. The use of ‘‘we’’ in this notice
refers to the Corps and the use of ‘‘you’’
refers to the reader. We have also used
the active voice, short sentences, and
common everyday terms except for
necessary technical terms.
Executive Order 12866 and Executive
Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review’’
This rule is not designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
OMB has not reviewed this rule.
Moreover, this final rule makes
nondiscretionary adjustments to
existing civil monetary penalties in
accordance with the Inflation
Adjustment Act and OMB guidance.
The Corps, therefore, did not consider
alternatives and does not have the
flexibility to alter the adjustments of the
civil monetary penalty amounts as
provided in this rule.
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
The Department of Defense
determined that provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13, 44 U.S.C. Chapter
35, and its implementing regulations, 5
CFR part 1320, do not apply to this rule
because there are no new or revised
recordkeeping or reporting
requirements. This action merely
increases the level of statutory civil
penalties that could be imposed in the
context of a federal civil administrative
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:47 May 02, 2019
Jkt 247001
enforcement action or civil judicial case
for violations of Corps-administered
statutes and their implementing
regulations.
Executive Order 13771, ‘‘Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs’’
This rule has been deemed not
significant under Executive Order
12866, ‘‘Regulatory Planning and
Review,’’ and is, therefore, not subject to
the requirements of Executive Order
13771, ‘‘Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs.’’
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
Executive Order 13132 establishes
certain requirements that an agency
must meet when it promulgates a rule
that imposes substantial direct
requirement costs on State and local
governments, preempts State law, or
otherwise has Federalism implications.
This final rule will not have a
substantial effect on State and local
governments.
Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
Because notice of proposed
rulemaking and opportunity for
comment are not required pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 553, or any other law, the
analytical requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601,
et seq.) are inapplicable. Therefore, a
regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required and has not been prepared.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2
U.S.C. Chapter 25)
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
(2 U.S.C. 1532) requires agencies to
assess anticipated costs and benefits
before issuing any rule the mandates of
which require spending in any year of
$100 million in 1995 dollars, updated
annually for inflation. In 2016, that
threshold is approximately $146
million. This rule will not mandate any
requirements for State, local, or tribal
governments, nor will it affect private
sector costs.
Public Law 104–113, ‘‘National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act’’ (15 U.S.C. Chapter 7)
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104–
113, (15 U.S.C. 272 note), directs us to
use voluntary consensus standards in
our regulatory activities, unless to do so
would be inconsistent with applicable
law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary
consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., materials specifications,
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
18981
test methods, sampling procedures, and
business practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies. The NTTAA directs
us to provide Congress, through OMB,
explanations when we decide not to use
available and applicable voluntary
consensus standards. This rule does not
involve technical standards. Therefore,
we did not consider the use of any
voluntary consensus standards.
Executive Order 13045, ‘‘Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’
Executive Order 13045 applies to any
rule that: (1) Is determined to be
‘‘economically significant’’ as defined
under Executive Order 12866, and (2)
concerns an environmental health or
safety risk that we have reason to
believe may have a disproportionate
effect on children. If the regulatory
action meets both criteria, we must
evaluate the environmental health or
safety effects of the rule on children,
and explain why the regulation is
preferable to other potentially effective
and reasonably feasible alternatives.
This rule is not subject to this Executive
Order because it is not economically
significant as defined in Executive
Order 12866. In addition, it does not
concern an environmental or safety risk
that we have reason to believe may have
a disproportionate effect on children.
Executive Order 13175, ‘‘Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments’’
Executive Order 13175 requires
agencies to develop an accountable
process to ensure ‘‘meaningful and
timely input by tribal officials in the
development of regulatory policies that
have tribal implications.’’ The phrase
‘‘policies that have tribal implications’’
is defined in the Executive Order to
include regulations that have
‘‘substantial direct effects on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal government and
the Indian tribes, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities between
the Federal government and Indian
tribes.’’
This rule does not have tribal
implications. The rule imposes no new
substantive obligations on tribal
governments. Therefore, Executive
Order 13175 does not apply to this rule.
Public Law 104–121, ‘‘Congressional
Review Act’’, (5 U.S.C Chapter 8)
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as amended by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
E:\FR\FM\03MYR1.SGM
03MYR1
18982
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 86 / Friday, May 3, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. We will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This rule is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Executive Order 12898, ‘‘Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations’’
Executive Order 12898 requires that,
to the greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law, each Federal agency
must make achieving environmental
justice part of its mission. Executive
Order 12898 provides that each Federal
agency conduct its programs, policies,
and activities that substantially affect
human health or the environment in a
manner that ensures that such programs,
policies, and activities do not have the
effect of excluding persons (including
populations) from participation in,
denying persons (including
populations) the benefits of, or
subjecting persons (including
populations) to discrimination under
such programs, policies, and activities
because of their race, color, or national
origin. This rule merely adjusts civil
penalties to account for inflation, and
therefore, is not expected to negatively
impact any community, and therefore is
not expected to cause any
disproportionately high and adverse
impacts to minority or low-income
communities.
Executive Order 13211, ‘‘Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’
This rule is not a ‘‘significant energy
action’’ as defined in Executive Order
13211 because it is not likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 326
Administrative practice and
procedure, Intergovernmental relations,
Investigations, Law enforcement,
Navigation (Water), Water pollution
control, Waterways.
Dated: April 24, 2019.
Approved by:
Scott A. Spellmon,
Major General, U.S. Army, Deputy
Commanding General for Civil and
Emergency Operations.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Corps amends 33 CFR
part 326 as follows:
PART 326—ENFORCEMENT
1. The authority citation for part 326
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 401 et seq.; 33 U.S.C.
1344; 33 U.S.C. 1413; 33 U.S.C. 2104; 33
U.S.C. 1319; 28 U.S.C. 2461 note.
2. Amend § 326.6 by revising
paragraph (a)(1) to read as follows:
■
§ 326.6
Class I administrative penalties.
(a) * * *
(1) This section sets forth procedures
for initiation and administration of
Class I administrative penalty orders
under Section 309(g) of the Clean Water
Act, judicially-imposed civil penalties
under Section 404(s) of the Clean Water
Act, and Section 205 of the National
Fishing Enhancement Act. Under
Section 309(g)(2)(A) of the Clean Water
Act, Class I civil penalties may not
exceed $21,934 per violation, except
that the maximum amount of any Class
I civil penalty shall not exceed $54,833.
Under Section 404(s)(4) of the Clean
Water Act, judicially-imposed civil
penalties may not exceed $54,833 per
day for each violation. Under Section
205(e) of the National Fishing
Enhancement Act, penalties for
violations of permits issued in
accordance with that Act shall not
exceed $24,017 for each violation.
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (a)(1)
Statutory civil monetary penalty amount for violations that occurred
after November 2, 2015, and are assessed on or after May 3, 2019
Environmental statute and U.S. code citation
Clean Water Act (CWA), Section 309(g)(2)(A), 33 U.S.C. 1319(g)(2)(A)
CWA, Section 404(s)(4), 33 U.S.C. 1344(s)(4) ........................................
National Fishing Enhancement Act, Section 205(e), 33 U.S.C. 2104(e)
BILLING CODE 3720–58–P
list, which is re-published in its
entirety, includes these updates.
DATES: Effective date: May 3, 2019. For
applicability dates, see SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2019–09120 Filed 5–2–19; 8:45 am]
39 CFR Part 3020
[Docket Nos. MC2010–21 and CP2010–36]
Update to Product List
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
$21,934 per violation, with a maximum of $54,833.
Maximum of $54,833 per day for each violation.
Maximum of $24,017 per violation.
The Commission is updating
the competitive product list. This action
reflects a publication policy adopted by
Commission order. The referenced
policy assumes periodic updates. The
updates are identified in the body of
this document. The competitive product
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:47 May 02, 2019
Jkt 247001
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202–789–6800.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Applicability Dates: January 2, 2019,
Priority Mail Contract 501 (MC2019–60
and CP2019–65); January 2, 2019,
Priority Mail Express Contract 69
(MC2019–61 and CP2019–66); January
3, 2019, Parcel Return Service Contract
11 (MC2019–62 and CP2019–67);
January 3, 2019, Parcel Return Service
Contract 12 (MC2019–63 and CP2019–
68); January 8, 2019, Priority Mail
Contract 502 (MC2019–66 and CP2019–
71); January 8, 2019, Priority Mail
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Express & Priority Mail Contract 81
(MC2019–68 and CP2019–73); January
8, 2019, Priority Mail Express & Priority
Mail Contract 82 (MC2019–69 and
CP2019–74); January 8, 2019, Priority
Mail Express & Priority Mail Contract 83
(MC2019–70 and CP2019–75); January
8, 2019, Parcel Select & Parcel Return
Service Contract 7 (MC2019–64 and
CP2019–69); January 8, 2019, Global
Plus 6 Contracts (MC2019–65 and
CP2019–70); January 9, 2019, Priority
Mail Express, Priority Mail & First-Class
Package Service Contract 48 (MC2019–
71 and CP2019–76); January 9, 2019,
Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail &
First-Class Package Service Contract 49
(MC2019–72 and CP2019–77); January
9, 2019, Priority Mail Express, Priority
Mail & First-Class Package Service
Contract 50 (MC2019–73 and CP2019–
78); January 10, 2019, Priority Mail
E:\FR\FM\03MYR1.SGM
03MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 86 (Friday, May 3, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 18979-18982]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-09120]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers
33 CFR Part 326
RIN 0710-AA82
Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation Adjustment Rule
AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Department of Defense.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is issuing this final
rule to adjust its civil monetary penalties (CMP) under the Clean Water
Act (CWA) and the National Fishing Enhancement Act to account for
inflation.
DATES: This final rule is effective on May 3, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Brad Guarisco at 202-761-5856 or
by email at [email protected] or access the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers Regulatory Home Page at https://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits.aspx.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background Information
The Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990,
Public Law 101-410, 104 Stat. 890 (28 U.S.C. 2461, note), as amended by
the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996,
[[Page 18980]]
Public Law 104-134, April 26, 1996, and further amended by the Federal
Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015
(Inflation Adjustment Act), Public Law 114-74, November 2, 2015,
required agencies to annually adjust the level of CMP for inflation to
improve their effectiveness and maintain their deterrent effect. The
Inflation Adjustment Act required that not later than July 1, 2016, and
not later than January 15 of every year thereafter, the Corps must
adjust its CMP by the inflation adjustment described in the Inflation
Adjustment Act. The inflation adjustment is determined by increasing
the maximum CMP or the range of minimum and maximum CMPs, as
applicable, for each CMP by the cost-of-living adjustment, rounded to
the nearest multiple of $1. The cost-of-living adjustment is the
percentage (if any) for each CMP by which the Consumer Price Index
(CPI) for the month of October preceding the date of the adjustment,
exceeds the CPI for the month of October in the previous calendar year.
The initial catch up adjustments for inflation to the Department of
Defense's CMPs were published as an interim final rule in the Federal
Register on May 26, 2016 (81 FR 33389-33391) and became effective on
that date. The interim final rule was published as a final rule without
change on September 12, 2016 (81 FR 62629-62631), effective that date.
Using the adjustment criteria provided in the December 14, 2018,
Office of Management and Budget Memorandum regarding the
``Implementation of Penalty Inflation Adjustments for 2019, Pursuant to
the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act
of 2015'', the 2019 annual adjustment for inflation will increase the
Class I civil penalty under Section 309 of the Clean Water Act to
$21,934 per violation, and the maximum civil penalty increases to
$54,833. The judicial civil penalty under Section 404(s) of the Clean
Water Act increases to $54,833 per day for each violation. Under the
National Fishing Enhancement Act, the Class I civil penalty increases
to $24,017 per violation. This rule will apply prospectively to penalty
assessments beginning on its effective date, May 3, 2019.
Section 4 of the Inflation Adjustment Act directs federal agencies
to publish annual penalty inflation adjustments. In accordance with
Section 553 of the Administrative Procedures Act (APA), most rules are
subject to notice and comment and are effective no earlier than 30 days
after publication in the Federal Register. Section 4(b)(2) of the
Inflation Adjustment Act further provides that each agency shall make
the annual inflation adjustments ``notwithstanding section 553'' of the
APA. According to the December 2018 OMB guidance issued to Federal
agencies on the implementation of the 2019 annual adjustment, the
phrase ``notwithstanding section 553'' means that ``the public
procedure the APA generally requires (i.e., notice, an opportunity for
comment, and a delay in effective date) is not required for agencies to
issue regulations implementing the annual adjustment.'' Consistent with
the language of the Inflation Adjustment Act and OMB's implementation
guidance, this rule is not subject to notice and opportunity for public
comment.
On August 3, 2011, the Deputy Secretary of Defense delegated to the
Secretary of the Army the authority and responsibility to adjust
penalties administered by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. On July 26,
2018, the Secretary of the Army delegated that authority and
responsibility to the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works
who further delegated the authority on October 31, 2018, to the
Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. On January 23,
2019, the Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
delegated that authority and responsibility to the Deputy Commanding
General for Civil and Emergency Operations of the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers.
With this rule, the new statutory maximum penalty levels listed in
Table 1 will apply to all statutory civil penalties assessed on or
after the effective date of this rule. Table 1 shows the calculation of
the 2019 annual inflation adjustment based on the guidance provided by
OMB (see December 14, 2018, Memorandum for the Heads of Executive
Departments and Agencies, from Mick Mulvaney, Director, OMB, Subject:
Implementation of Penalty Inflation Adjustments for 2019, Pursuant to
the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act
of 2015). The OMB provided to agencies the cost-of-living adjustment
multiplier for 2019, based on the Consumer Price Index for All Urban
Consumers (CPI-U) for the month of October 2018, not seasonally
adjusted, which is 1.02522. Agencies are to adjust ``the maximum civil
monetary penalty or the range of minimum and maximum civil monetary
penalties, as applicable, for each civil monetary penalty by the cost-
of-living adjustment.'' For 2019, agencies multiply each applicable
penalty by the multiplier, 1.02522, and round to the nearest dollar.
The multiplier should be applied to the most recent penalty amount,
i.e., the one that includes the 2018 annual inflation adjustment.
Table 1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current civil
monetary penalty Current CMP amount 2019 Inflation CMP amount as of
Citation (CMP) amount in effect prior to adjustment May 3, 2019
established by law this rulemaking multiplier
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CWA, 33 U.S.C. 1319(g)(2)(A)..... $10,000 per $21,394 per 1.02522 $21,934 per
violation, with a violation, with a violation, with a
maximum of $25,000. maximum of $53,484. maximum of
$54,833.
CWA, 33 U.S.C. 1344(s)(4)........ Maximum of $25,000 Maximum of $53,484 1.02522 Maximum of $54,833
per day for each per day for each per day for each
violation. violation. violation.
National Fishing Enhancement Act, Maximum of $10,000 Maximum of $23,426 1.02522 Maximum of $24,017
33 U.S.C. 2104(e). per violation. per violation. per violation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This rule will not result in any additional costs to implement the
Corps Regulatory Program because the Class I civil penalties and
judicial civil penalties have been in effect since 1990 when the Corps
first promulgated regulations regarding such penalties (Class I civil
penalties were first established by statute in 1987). This rule merely
adjusts the value of current statutory civil penalties to reflect and
keep pace with the levels originally set by Congress when the statutes
were enacted, as required by the Inflation Adjustment Act. This rule
will result in
[[Page 18981]]
additional costs to members of the regulated public who do not comply
with the terms and conditions of issued Department of the Army permits
and either receive a final Class I civil administrative penalty order
from a District Engineer or are subject to a judicial civil penalty.
The rule increases the minimum and maximum penalty amounts to $21,934
and $54,833 for Class I civil administrative penalties under the Clean
Water Act, to a maximum of $54,833 for judicially-imposed civil
penalties under the Clean Water Act, and to a maximum of $24,017 for
Class I civil administrative penalties under the National Fishing
Enhancement Act. The benefit of this rule will be to improve the
effectiveness of Corps civil monetary penalties by maintaining their
deterrent effect and promoting compliance with the law.
Regulatory Procedures
Plain Language
In compliance with the principles in the President's Memorandum of
June 1, 1998, regarding plain language, this preamble is written using
plain language. The use of ``we'' in this notice refers to the Corps
and the use of ``you'' refers to the reader. We have also used the
active voice, short sentences, and common everyday terms except for
necessary technical terms.
Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review''
This rule is not designated a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, OMB has not reviewed this
rule. Moreover, this final rule makes nondiscretionary adjustments to
existing civil monetary penalties in accordance with the Inflation
Adjustment Act and OMB guidance. The Corps, therefore, did not consider
alternatives and does not have the flexibility to alter the adjustments
of the civil monetary penalty amounts as provided in this rule.
Public Law 96-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
The Department of Defense determined that provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13, 44 U.S.C. Chapter
35, and its implementing regulations, 5 CFR part 1320, do not apply to
this rule because there are no new or revised recordkeeping or
reporting requirements. This action merely increases the level of
statutory civil penalties that could be imposed in the context of a
federal civil administrative enforcement action or civil judicial case
for violations of Corps-administered statutes and their implementing
regulations.
Executive Order 13771, ``Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs''
This rule has been deemed not significant under Executive Order
12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review,'' and is, therefore, not
subject to the requirements of Executive Order 13771, ``Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs.''
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''
Executive Order 13132 establishes certain requirements that an
agency must meet when it promulgates a rule that imposes substantial
direct requirement costs on State and local governments, preempts State
law, or otherwise has Federalism implications. This final rule will not
have a substantial effect on State and local governments.
Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
Because notice of proposed rulemaking and opportunity for comment
are not required pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, or any other law, the
analytical requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601, et seq.) are inapplicable. Therefore, a regulatory flexibility
analysis is not required and has not been prepared.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. Chapter 25)
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (2
U.S.C. 1532) requires agencies to assess anticipated costs and benefits
before issuing any rule the mandates of which require spending in any
year of $100 million in 1995 dollars, updated annually for inflation.
In 2016, that threshold is approximately $146 million. This rule will
not mandate any requirements for State, local, or tribal governments,
nor will it affect private sector costs.
Public Law 104-113, ``National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act'' (15 U.S.C. Chapter 7)
Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, (15 U.S.C. 272 note), directs
us to use voluntary consensus standards in our regulatory activities,
unless to do so would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise
impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards
(e.g., materials specifications, test methods, sampling procedures, and
business practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary
consensus standards bodies. The NTTAA directs us to provide Congress,
through OMB, explanations when we decide not to use available and
applicable voluntary consensus standards. This rule does not involve
technical standards. Therefore, we did not consider the use of any
voluntary consensus standards.
Executive Order 13045, ``Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks''
Executive Order 13045 applies to any rule that: (1) Is determined
to be ``economically significant'' as defined under Executive Order
12866, and (2) concerns an environmental health or safety risk that we
have reason to believe may have a disproportionate effect on children.
If the regulatory action meets both criteria, we must evaluate the
environmental health or safety effects of the rule on children, and
explain why the regulation is preferable to other potentially effective
and reasonably feasible alternatives. This rule is not subject to this
Executive Order because it is not economically significant as defined
in Executive Order 12866. In addition, it does not concern an
environmental or safety risk that we have reason to believe may have a
disproportionate effect on children.
Executive Order 13175, ``Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments''
Executive Order 13175 requires agencies to develop an accountable
process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input by tribal officials in
the development of regulatory policies that have tribal implications.''
The phrase ``policies that have tribal implications'' is defined in the
Executive Order to include regulations that have ``substantial direct
effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal government and the Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the Federal government and Indian
tribes.''
This rule does not have tribal implications. The rule imposes no
new substantive obligations on tribal governments. Therefore, Executive
Order 13175 does not apply to this rule.
Public Law 104-121, ``Congressional Review Act'', (5 U.S.C Chapter 8)
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as amended by
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the
[[Page 18982]]
agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes
a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the
Comptroller General of the United States. We will submit a report
containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the
United States. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register. This rule is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Executive Order 12898, ``Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations''
Executive Order 12898 requires that, to the greatest extent
practicable and permitted by law, each Federal agency must make
achieving environmental justice part of its mission. Executive Order
12898 provides that each Federal agency conduct its programs, policies,
and activities that substantially affect human health or the
environment in a manner that ensures that such programs, policies, and
activities do not have the effect of excluding persons (including
populations) from participation in, denying persons (including
populations) the benefits of, or subjecting persons (including
populations) to discrimination under such programs, policies, and
activities because of their race, color, or national origin. This rule
merely adjusts civil penalties to account for inflation, and therefore,
is not expected to negatively impact any community, and therefore is
not expected to cause any disproportionately high and adverse impacts
to minority or low-income communities.
Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use''
This rule is not a ``significant energy action'' as defined in
Executive Order 13211 because it is not likely to have a significant
adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 326
Administrative practice and procedure, Intergovernmental relations,
Investigations, Law enforcement, Navigation (Water), Water pollution
control, Waterways.
Dated: April 24, 2019.
Approved by:
Scott A. Spellmon,
Major General, U.S. Army, Deputy Commanding General for Civil and
Emergency Operations.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Corps amends 33 CFR
part 326 as follows:
PART 326--ENFORCEMENT
0
1. The authority citation for part 326 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 401 et seq.; 33 U.S.C. 1344; 33 U.S.C.
1413; 33 U.S.C. 2104; 33 U.S.C. 1319; 28 U.S.C. 2461 note.
0
2. Amend Sec. 326.6 by revising paragraph (a)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 326.6 Class I administrative penalties.
(a) * * *
(1) This section sets forth procedures for initiation and
administration of Class I administrative penalty orders under Section
309(g) of the Clean Water Act, judicially-imposed civil penalties under
Section 404(s) of the Clean Water Act, and Section 205 of the National
Fishing Enhancement Act. Under Section 309(g)(2)(A) of the Clean Water
Act, Class I civil penalties may not exceed $21,934 per violation,
except that the maximum amount of any Class I civil penalty shall not
exceed $54,833. Under Section 404(s)(4) of the Clean Water Act,
judicially-imposed civil penalties may not exceed $54,833 per day for
each violation. Under Section 205(e) of the National Fishing
Enhancement Act, penalties for violations of permits issued in
accordance with that Act shall not exceed $24,017 for each violation.
Table 1 to Paragraph (a)(1)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statutory civil monetary
penalty amount for violations
Environmental statute and U.S. code that occurred after November 2,
citation 2015, and are assessed on or
after May 3, 2019
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Clean Water Act (CWA), Section $21,934 per violation, with a
309(g)(2)(A), 33 U.S.C. 1319(g)(2)(A). maximum of $54,833.
CWA, Section 404(s)(4), 33 U.S.C. Maximum of $54,833 per day for
1344(s)(4). each violation.
National Fishing Enhancement Act, Maximum of $24,017 per
Section 205(e), 33 U.S.C. 2104(e). violation.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2019-09120 Filed 5-2-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720-58-P