Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation Adjustment Rule, 18979-18982 [2019-09120]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 86 / Friday, May 3, 2019 / Rules and Regulations 18979 TABLE 1 OF § 165.801—SECTOR OHIO VALLEY ANNUAL AND RECURRING SAFETY ZONES—Continued Date Sponsor/name Sector Ohio valley location Safety zone 75. 1 day—Second weekend in September. 76. 1 day—Second weekend in September. 77. 3 days—Second or third week in September. Nashville Symphony/Concert Fireworks Nashville, TN ......... City of Clarksville/Clarksville Riverfest Clarksville, TN ....... Wheeling Heritage Port Sternwheel Festival Foundation/Wheeling Heritage Port Sternwheel Festival. Boomtown Days—Fireworks ................ Wheeling, WV ....... Cumberland River, Miles 190.1–192.3 (Tennessee). Cumberland River, Miles 124.5–127.0 (Tennessee). Ohio River, Miles 90.2–90.7 (West Virginia). 78. 1 day—One weekend in September. 79. 1 day—One weekend in September. 80. 1 day—One weekend in September. 81. Multiple days—September through January. Ohio River Sternwheel Festival Committee fireworks. Tribute to the River ............................... Nitro, WV ............... Marietta, OH .......... Point Pleasant, WV University of Pittsburgh Athletic Department/University of Pittsburgh Fireworks. Pittsburgh, PA ....... Leukemia & Lymphoma Society/Light the Night. Leukemia and Lymphoma Society/Light the Night Walk Fireworks. Yeatman’s Fireworks ............................ Outdoor Chattanooga/Swim the Suck .. Pittsburgh, PA ....... Cincinnati, OH ....... Chattanooga, TN ... Chattajack ............................................. Chattanooga, TN ... 87. 1 day—One weekend in October ... West Virginia Motor Car Festival .......... Charleston, WV ..... 88. 1 day—Friday before Thanksgiving Pittsburgh, PA ....... 90. 1 day—Friday before Thanksgiving Pittsburgh Downtown Partnership/Light Up Night. Kittanning Light Up Night Firework Display. Duquesne Light/Santa Spectacular ...... 91. 1 day—Friday before Thanksgiving Monongahela Holiday Show ................. Monongahela, PA 92. 1 day—Friday or Saturday after Thanksgiving. 93. 1 day—Third week of November .. 94. 1 day—December 31 .................... Friends of the Festival/Cheer at the Pier. Gallipolis in Lights ................................. Pittsburgh Cultural Trust/Highmark First Night Pittsburgh. University of Tennessee/UT Football Fireworks. Chattanooga, TN ... 82. 1 day—First week in October ........ 83. 1 day—Second weekend of October. 84. 1 day—First two weeks in October 85. 1 day—Second or third weekend in October. 86. 1 day—Fourth weekend in October 89. 1 day—Friday before Thanksgiving 95. * 7 days—Scheduled home games * * * * Nashville, TN ......... Kittanning, PA ....... Pittsburgh, PA ....... Gallipolis, OH ........ Pittsburgh, PA ....... Knoxville, TN ......... Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers 33 CFR Part 326 [FR Doc. 2019–09042 Filed 5–2–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110–04–P RIN 0710–AA82 Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation Adjustment Rule Background Information The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is issuing this final rule to adjust its civil monetary penalties (CMP) under the Clean Water Act (CWA) and the National Fishing The Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990, Public Law 101–410, 104 Stat. 890 (28 U.S.C. 2461, note), as amended by the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996, amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES SUMMARY: 15:47 May 02, 2019 Jkt 247001 This final rule is effective on May 3, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Brad Guarisco at 202–761–5856 or by email at Brad.A.Guarisco@ usace.army.mil or access the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Home Page at https://www.usace.army.mil/ Missions/CivilWorks/Regulatory ProgramandPermits.aspx. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DATES: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Department of Defense. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 Ohio River, Miles 264.6–265.6 (West Virginia). Ohio River, Miles 0.0–0.1, Monongahela River, Miles 0.0–0.1, Allegheny River, Miles 0.0–0.25 (Pennsylvania). Ohio River, Miles 0.0–0.4 (Pennsylvania). Cumberland River, Miles 189.7–192.1 (Tennessee). Ohio River, Miles 469.0–470.5 (Ohio). Tennessee River, Miles 452.0–454.5 (Tennessee). Tennessee River, Miles 462.7–465.5 (Tennessee). Kanawha River, Miles 58–59 (West Virginia). Allegheny River, Miles 0.0–1.0 (Pennsylvania). Allegheny River, Miles 44.5–45.5 (Pennsylvania). Monongahela River, Miles 0.00–0.22, Allegheny River, Miles 0.00–0.25, and Ohio River, Miles 0.0–0.3 (Pennsylvania). Ohio River, Miles 31.5–32.5 (Pennsylvania). Tennessee River, Miles 462.7–465.2 (Tennessee). Ohio River, Miles 269.2–270 (Ohio). Allegheny River, Miles 0.5–1.0 (Pennsylvania). Tennessee River, Miles 645.6–648.3 (Tennessee). Enhancement Act to account for inflation. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Dated: April 30, 2019. M.A. Wike, Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port, Sector Ohio Valley. Kanawha River, Miles 43.1–44.2 (West Virginia). Ohio River, Miles 171.5–172.5 (Ohio). PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\03MYR1.SGM 03MYR1 18980 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 86 / Friday, May 3, 2019 / Rules and Regulations Public Law 104–134, April 26, 1996, and further amended by the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015 (Inflation Adjustment Act), Public Law 114–74, November 2, 2015, required agencies to annually adjust the level of CMP for inflation to improve their effectiveness and maintain their deterrent effect. The Inflation Adjustment Act required that not later than July 1, 2016, and not later than January 15 of every year thereafter, the Corps must adjust its CMP by the inflation adjustment described in the Inflation Adjustment Act. The inflation adjustment is determined by increasing the maximum CMP or the range of minimum and maximum CMPs, as applicable, for each CMP by the cost-ofliving adjustment, rounded to the nearest multiple of $1. The cost-ofliving adjustment is the percentage (if any) for each CMP by which the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the month of October preceding the date of the adjustment, exceeds the CPI for the month of October in the previous calendar year. The initial catch up adjustments for inflation to the Department of Defense’s CMPs were published as an interim final rule in the Federal Register on May 26, 2016 (81 FR 33389–33391) and became effective on that date. The interim final rule was published as a final rule without change on September 12, 2016 (81 FR 62629–62631), effective that date. Using the adjustment criteria provided in the December 14, 2018, Office of Management and Budget Memorandum regarding the ‘‘Implementation of Penalty Inflation Adjustments for 2019, Pursuant to the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015’’, the 2019 annual adjustment for inflation will increase the Class I civil penalty under Section 309 of the Clean Water Act to $21,934 per violation, and the maximum civil penalty increases to $54,833. The judicial civil penalty under Section 404(s) of the Clean Water Act increases to $54,833 per day for each violation. Under the National Fishing Enhancement Act, the Class I civil penalty increases to $24,017 per violation. This rule will apply prospectively to penalty assessments beginning on its effective date, May 3, 2019. Section 4 of the Inflation Adjustment Act directs federal agencies to publish annual penalty inflation adjustments. In accordance with Section 553 of the Administrative Procedures Act (APA), most rules are subject to notice and comment and are effective no earlier than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. Section 4(b)(2) of the Inflation Adjustment Act further provides that each agency shall make the annual inflation adjustments ‘‘notwithstanding section 553’’ of the APA. According to the December 2018 OMB guidance issued to Federal agencies on the implementation of the 2019 annual adjustment, the phrase ‘‘notwithstanding section 553’’ means that ‘‘the public procedure the APA generally requires (i.e., notice, an opportunity for comment, and a delay in effective date) is not required for agencies to issue regulations implementing the annual adjustment.’’ Consistent with the language of the Inflation Adjustment Act and OMB’s implementation guidance, this rule is not subject to notice and opportunity for public comment. On August 3, 2011, the Deputy Secretary of Defense delegated to the Secretary of the Army the authority and responsibility to adjust penalties administered by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. On July 26, 2018, the Secretary of the Army delegated that authority and responsibility to the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works who further delegated the authority on October 31, 2018, to the Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. On January 23, 2019, the Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers delegated that authority and responsibility to the Deputy Commanding General for Civil and Emergency Operations of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. With this rule, the new statutory maximum penalty levels listed in Table 1 will apply to all statutory civil penalties assessed on or after the effective date of this rule. Table 1 shows the calculation of the 2019 annual inflation adjustment based on the guidance provided by OMB (see December 14, 2018, Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies, from Mick Mulvaney, Director, OMB, Subject: Implementation of Penalty Inflation Adjustments for 2019, Pursuant to the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015). The OMB provided to agencies the cost-of-living adjustment multiplier for 2019, based on the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI–U) for the month of October 2018, not seasonally adjusted, which is 1.02522. Agencies are to adjust ‘‘the maximum civil monetary penalty or the range of minimum and maximum civil monetary penalties, as applicable, for each civil monetary penalty by the cost-of-living adjustment.’’ For 2019, agencies multiply each applicable penalty by the multiplier, 1.02522, and round to the nearest dollar. The multiplier should be applied to the most recent penalty amount, i.e., the one that includes the 2018 annual inflation adjustment. TABLE 1 Citation CWA, 33 U.S.C. 1319(g)(2)(A). CWA, 33 U.S.C. 1344(s)(4) ... amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES National Fishing Enhancement Act, 33 U.S.C. 2104(e). Current civil monetary penalty (CMP) amount established by law Current CMP amount in effect prior to this rulemaking $10,000 per violation, with a maximum of $25,000. Maximum of $25,000 per day for each violation. Maximum of $10,000 per violation. $21,394 per violation, with a maximum of $53,484. Maximum of $53,484 per day for each violation. Maximum of $23,426 per violation. This rule will not result in any additional costs to implement the Corps Regulatory Program because the Class I civil penalties and judicial civil penalties have been in effect since 1990 VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:47 May 02, 2019 Jkt 247001 when the Corps first promulgated regulations regarding such penalties (Class I civil penalties were first established by statute in 1987). This rule merely adjusts the value of current PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 2019 Inflation adjustment multiplier 1.02522 1.02522 1.02522 CMP amount as of May 3, 2019 $21,934 per violation, with a maximum of $54,833. Maximum of $54,833 per day for each violation. Maximum of $24,017 per violation. statutory civil penalties to reflect and keep pace with the levels originally set by Congress when the statutes were enacted, as required by the Inflation Adjustment Act. This rule will result in E:\FR\FM\03MYR1.SGM 03MYR1 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 86 / Friday, May 3, 2019 / Rules and Regulations additional costs to members of the regulated public who do not comply with the terms and conditions of issued Department of the Army permits and either receive a final Class I civil administrative penalty order from a District Engineer or are subject to a judicial civil penalty. The rule increases the minimum and maximum penalty amounts to $21,934 and $54,833 for Class I civil administrative penalties under the Clean Water Act, to a maximum of $54,833 for judiciallyimposed civil penalties under the Clean Water Act, and to a maximum of $24,017 for Class I civil administrative penalties under the National Fishing Enhancement Act. The benefit of this rule will be to improve the effectiveness of Corps civil monetary penalties by maintaining their deterrent effect and promoting compliance with the law. Regulatory Procedures Plain Language In compliance with the principles in the President’s Memorandum of June 1, 1998, regarding plain language, this preamble is written using plain language. The use of ‘‘we’’ in this notice refers to the Corps and the use of ‘‘you’’ refers to the reader. We have also used the active voice, short sentences, and common everyday terms except for necessary technical terms. Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review’’ This rule is not designated a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, OMB has not reviewed this rule. Moreover, this final rule makes nondiscretionary adjustments to existing civil monetary penalties in accordance with the Inflation Adjustment Act and OMB guidance. The Corps, therefore, did not consider alternatives and does not have the flexibility to alter the adjustments of the civil monetary penalty amounts as provided in this rule. amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) The Department of Defense determined that provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, and its implementing regulations, 5 CFR part 1320, do not apply to this rule because there are no new or revised recordkeeping or reporting requirements. This action merely increases the level of statutory civil penalties that could be imposed in the context of a federal civil administrative VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:47 May 02, 2019 Jkt 247001 enforcement action or civil judicial case for violations of Corps-administered statutes and their implementing regulations. Executive Order 13771, ‘‘Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs’’ This rule has been deemed not significant under Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review,’’ and is, therefore, not subject to the requirements of Executive Order 13771, ‘‘Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs.’’ Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’ Executive Order 13132 establishes certain requirements that an agency must meet when it promulgates a rule that imposes substantial direct requirement costs on State and local governments, preempts State law, or otherwise has Federalism implications. This final rule will not have a substantial effect on State and local governments. Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6) Because notice of proposed rulemaking and opportunity for comment are not required pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, or any other law, the analytical requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.) are inapplicable. Therefore, a regulatory flexibility analysis is not required and has not been prepared. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. Chapter 25) Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1532) requires agencies to assess anticipated costs and benefits before issuing any rule the mandates of which require spending in any year of $100 million in 1995 dollars, updated annually for inflation. In 2016, that threshold is approximately $146 million. This rule will not mandate any requirements for State, local, or tribal governments, nor will it affect private sector costs. Public Law 104–113, ‘‘National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act’’ (15 U.S.C. Chapter 7) Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104– 113, (15 U.S.C. 272 note), directs us to use voluntary consensus standards in our regulatory activities, unless to do so would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards (e.g., materials specifications, PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 18981 test methods, sampling procedures, and business practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies. The NTTAA directs us to provide Congress, through OMB, explanations when we decide not to use available and applicable voluntary consensus standards. This rule does not involve technical standards. Therefore, we did not consider the use of any voluntary consensus standards. Executive Order 13045, ‘‘Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks’’ Executive Order 13045 applies to any rule that: (1) Is determined to be ‘‘economically significant’’ as defined under Executive Order 12866, and (2) concerns an environmental health or safety risk that we have reason to believe may have a disproportionate effect on children. If the regulatory action meets both criteria, we must evaluate the environmental health or safety effects of the rule on children, and explain why the regulation is preferable to other potentially effective and reasonably feasible alternatives. This rule is not subject to this Executive Order because it is not economically significant as defined in Executive Order 12866. In addition, it does not concern an environmental or safety risk that we have reason to believe may have a disproportionate effect on children. Executive Order 13175, ‘‘Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments’’ Executive Order 13175 requires agencies to develop an accountable process to ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory policies that have tribal implications.’’ The phrase ‘‘policies that have tribal implications’’ is defined in the Executive Order to include regulations that have ‘‘substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal government and the Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal government and Indian tribes.’’ This rule does not have tribal implications. The rule imposes no new substantive obligations on tribal governments. Therefore, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this rule. Public Law 104–121, ‘‘Congressional Review Act’’, (5 U.S.C Chapter 8) The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the E:\FR\FM\03MYR1.SGM 03MYR1 18982 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 86 / Friday, May 3, 2019 / Rules and Regulations agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. We will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This rule is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Executive Order 12898, ‘‘Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations’’ Executive Order 12898 requires that, to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law, each Federal agency must make achieving environmental justice part of its mission. Executive Order 12898 provides that each Federal agency conduct its programs, policies, and activities that substantially affect human health or the environment in a manner that ensures that such programs, policies, and activities do not have the effect of excluding persons (including populations) from participation in, denying persons (including populations) the benefits of, or subjecting persons (including populations) to discrimination under such programs, policies, and activities because of their race, color, or national origin. This rule merely adjusts civil penalties to account for inflation, and therefore, is not expected to negatively impact any community, and therefore is not expected to cause any disproportionately high and adverse impacts to minority or low-income communities. Executive Order 13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ This rule is not a ‘‘significant energy action’’ as defined in Executive Order 13211 because it is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 326 Administrative practice and procedure, Intergovernmental relations, Investigations, Law enforcement, Navigation (Water), Water pollution control, Waterways. Dated: April 24, 2019. Approved by: Scott A. Spellmon, Major General, U.S. Army, Deputy Commanding General for Civil and Emergency Operations. For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Corps amends 33 CFR part 326 as follows: PART 326—ENFORCEMENT 1. The authority citation for part 326 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 33 U.S.C. 401 et seq.; 33 U.S.C. 1344; 33 U.S.C. 1413; 33 U.S.C. 2104; 33 U.S.C. 1319; 28 U.S.C. 2461 note. 2. Amend § 326.6 by revising paragraph (a)(1) to read as follows: ■ § 326.6 Class I administrative penalties. (a) * * * (1) This section sets forth procedures for initiation and administration of Class I administrative penalty orders under Section 309(g) of the Clean Water Act, judicially-imposed civil penalties under Section 404(s) of the Clean Water Act, and Section 205 of the National Fishing Enhancement Act. Under Section 309(g)(2)(A) of the Clean Water Act, Class I civil penalties may not exceed $21,934 per violation, except that the maximum amount of any Class I civil penalty shall not exceed $54,833. Under Section 404(s)(4) of the Clean Water Act, judicially-imposed civil penalties may not exceed $54,833 per day for each violation. Under Section 205(e) of the National Fishing Enhancement Act, penalties for violations of permits issued in accordance with that Act shall not exceed $24,017 for each violation. TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (a)(1) Statutory civil monetary penalty amount for violations that occurred after November 2, 2015, and are assessed on or after May 3, 2019 Environmental statute and U.S. code citation Clean Water Act (CWA), Section 309(g)(2)(A), 33 U.S.C. 1319(g)(2)(A) CWA, Section 404(s)(4), 33 U.S.C. 1344(s)(4) ........................................ National Fishing Enhancement Act, Section 205(e), 33 U.S.C. 2104(e) BILLING CODE 3720–58–P list, which is re-published in its entirety, includes these updates. DATES: Effective date: May 3, 2019. For applicability dates, see SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: * * * * * [FR Doc. 2019–09120 Filed 5–2–19; 8:45 am] 39 CFR Part 3020 [Docket Nos. MC2010–21 and CP2010–36] Update to Product List Postal Regulatory Commission. Final rule. AGENCY: ACTION: amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES $21,934 per violation, with a maximum of $54,833. Maximum of $54,833 per day for each violation. Maximum of $24,017 per violation. The Commission is updating the competitive product list. This action reflects a publication policy adopted by Commission order. The referenced policy assumes periodic updates. The updates are identified in the body of this document. The competitive product SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:47 May 02, 2019 Jkt 247001 David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at 202–789–6800. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Applicability Dates: January 2, 2019, Priority Mail Contract 501 (MC2019–60 and CP2019–65); January 2, 2019, Priority Mail Express Contract 69 (MC2019–61 and CP2019–66); January 3, 2019, Parcel Return Service Contract 11 (MC2019–62 and CP2019–67); January 3, 2019, Parcel Return Service Contract 12 (MC2019–63 and CP2019– 68); January 8, 2019, Priority Mail Contract 502 (MC2019–66 and CP2019– 71); January 8, 2019, Priority Mail PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Express & Priority Mail Contract 81 (MC2019–68 and CP2019–73); January 8, 2019, Priority Mail Express & Priority Mail Contract 82 (MC2019–69 and CP2019–74); January 8, 2019, Priority Mail Express & Priority Mail Contract 83 (MC2019–70 and CP2019–75); January 8, 2019, Parcel Select & Parcel Return Service Contract 7 (MC2019–64 and CP2019–69); January 8, 2019, Global Plus 6 Contracts (MC2019–65 and CP2019–70); January 9, 2019, Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & First-Class Package Service Contract 48 (MC2019– 71 and CP2019–76); January 9, 2019, Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & First-Class Package Service Contract 49 (MC2019–72 and CP2019–77); January 9, 2019, Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & First-Class Package Service Contract 50 (MC2019–73 and CP2019– 78); January 10, 2019, Priority Mail E:\FR\FM\03MYR1.SGM 03MYR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 86 (Friday, May 3, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 18979-18982]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-09120]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers

33 CFR Part 326

RIN 0710-AA82


Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation Adjustment Rule

AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Department of Defense.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is issuing this final 
rule to adjust its civil monetary penalties (CMP) under the Clean Water 
Act (CWA) and the National Fishing Enhancement Act to account for 
inflation.

DATES: This final rule is effective on May 3, 2019.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Brad Guarisco at 202-761-5856 or 
by email at [email protected] or access the U.S. Army 
Corps of Engineers Regulatory Home Page at https://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits.aspx.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background Information

    The Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990, 
Public Law 101-410, 104 Stat. 890 (28 U.S.C. 2461, note), as amended by 
the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996,

[[Page 18980]]

Public Law 104-134, April 26, 1996, and further amended by the Federal 
Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015 
(Inflation Adjustment Act), Public Law 114-74, November 2, 2015, 
required agencies to annually adjust the level of CMP for inflation to 
improve their effectiveness and maintain their deterrent effect. The 
Inflation Adjustment Act required that not later than July 1, 2016, and 
not later than January 15 of every year thereafter, the Corps must 
adjust its CMP by the inflation adjustment described in the Inflation 
Adjustment Act. The inflation adjustment is determined by increasing 
the maximum CMP or the range of minimum and maximum CMPs, as 
applicable, for each CMP by the cost-of-living adjustment, rounded to 
the nearest multiple of $1. The cost-of-living adjustment is the 
percentage (if any) for each CMP by which the Consumer Price Index 
(CPI) for the month of October preceding the date of the adjustment, 
exceeds the CPI for the month of October in the previous calendar year.
    The initial catch up adjustments for inflation to the Department of 
Defense's CMPs were published as an interim final rule in the Federal 
Register on May 26, 2016 (81 FR 33389-33391) and became effective on 
that date. The interim final rule was published as a final rule without 
change on September 12, 2016 (81 FR 62629-62631), effective that date.
    Using the adjustment criteria provided in the December 14, 2018, 
Office of Management and Budget Memorandum regarding the 
``Implementation of Penalty Inflation Adjustments for 2019, Pursuant to 
the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act 
of 2015'', the 2019 annual adjustment for inflation will increase the 
Class I civil penalty under Section 309 of the Clean Water Act to 
$21,934 per violation, and the maximum civil penalty increases to 
$54,833. The judicial civil penalty under Section 404(s) of the Clean 
Water Act increases to $54,833 per day for each violation. Under the 
National Fishing Enhancement Act, the Class I civil penalty increases 
to $24,017 per violation. This rule will apply prospectively to penalty 
assessments beginning on its effective date, May 3, 2019.
    Section 4 of the Inflation Adjustment Act directs federal agencies 
to publish annual penalty inflation adjustments. In accordance with 
Section 553 of the Administrative Procedures Act (APA), most rules are 
subject to notice and comment and are effective no earlier than 30 days 
after publication in the Federal Register. Section 4(b)(2) of the 
Inflation Adjustment Act further provides that each agency shall make 
the annual inflation adjustments ``notwithstanding section 553'' of the 
APA. According to the December 2018 OMB guidance issued to Federal 
agencies on the implementation of the 2019 annual adjustment, the 
phrase ``notwithstanding section 553'' means that ``the public 
procedure the APA generally requires (i.e., notice, an opportunity for 
comment, and a delay in effective date) is not required for agencies to 
issue regulations implementing the annual adjustment.'' Consistent with 
the language of the Inflation Adjustment Act and OMB's implementation 
guidance, this rule is not subject to notice and opportunity for public 
comment.
    On August 3, 2011, the Deputy Secretary of Defense delegated to the 
Secretary of the Army the authority and responsibility to adjust 
penalties administered by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. On July 26, 
2018, the Secretary of the Army delegated that authority and 
responsibility to the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works 
who further delegated the authority on October 31, 2018, to the 
Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. On January 23, 
2019, the Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 
delegated that authority and responsibility to the Deputy Commanding 
General for Civil and Emergency Operations of the U.S. Army Corps of 
Engineers.
    With this rule, the new statutory maximum penalty levels listed in 
Table 1 will apply to all statutory civil penalties assessed on or 
after the effective date of this rule. Table 1 shows the calculation of 
the 2019 annual inflation adjustment based on the guidance provided by 
OMB (see December 14, 2018, Memorandum for the Heads of Executive 
Departments and Agencies, from Mick Mulvaney, Director, OMB, Subject: 
Implementation of Penalty Inflation Adjustments for 2019, Pursuant to 
the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act 
of 2015). The OMB provided to agencies the cost-of-living adjustment 
multiplier for 2019, based on the Consumer Price Index for All Urban 
Consumers (CPI-U) for the month of October 2018, not seasonally 
adjusted, which is 1.02522. Agencies are to adjust ``the maximum civil 
monetary penalty or the range of minimum and maximum civil monetary 
penalties, as applicable, for each civil monetary penalty by the cost-
of-living adjustment.'' For 2019, agencies multiply each applicable 
penalty by the multiplier, 1.02522, and round to the nearest dollar. 
The multiplier should be applied to the most recent penalty amount, 
i.e., the one that includes the 2018 annual inflation adjustment.

                                                     Table 1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                      Current civil
                                     monetary penalty    Current CMP amount  2019 Inflation    CMP amount as of
             Citation                  (CMP) amount      in effect prior to    adjustment        May 3, 2019
                                    established by law    this rulemaking      multiplier
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CWA, 33 U.S.C. 1319(g)(2)(A).....  $10,000 per          $21,394 per                 1.02522  $21,934 per
                                    violation, with a    violation, with a                    violation, with a
                                    maximum of $25,000.  maximum of $53,484.                  maximum of
                                                                                              $54,833.
CWA, 33 U.S.C. 1344(s)(4)........  Maximum of $25,000   Maximum of $53,484          1.02522  Maximum of $54,833
                                    per day for each     per day for each                     per day for each
                                    violation.           violation.                           violation.
National Fishing Enhancement Act,  Maximum of $10,000   Maximum of $23,426          1.02522  Maximum of $24,017
 33 U.S.C. 2104(e).                 per violation.       per violation.                       per violation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This rule will not result in any additional costs to implement the 
Corps Regulatory Program because the Class I civil penalties and 
judicial civil penalties have been in effect since 1990 when the Corps 
first promulgated regulations regarding such penalties (Class I civil 
penalties were first established by statute in 1987). This rule merely 
adjusts the value of current statutory civil penalties to reflect and 
keep pace with the levels originally set by Congress when the statutes 
were enacted, as required by the Inflation Adjustment Act. This rule 
will result in

[[Page 18981]]

additional costs to members of the regulated public who do not comply 
with the terms and conditions of issued Department of the Army permits 
and either receive a final Class I civil administrative penalty order 
from a District Engineer or are subject to a judicial civil penalty. 
The rule increases the minimum and maximum penalty amounts to $21,934 
and $54,833 for Class I civil administrative penalties under the Clean 
Water Act, to a maximum of $54,833 for judicially-imposed civil 
penalties under the Clean Water Act, and to a maximum of $24,017 for 
Class I civil administrative penalties under the National Fishing 
Enhancement Act. The benefit of this rule will be to improve the 
effectiveness of Corps civil monetary penalties by maintaining their 
deterrent effect and promoting compliance with the law.

Regulatory Procedures

Plain Language

    In compliance with the principles in the President's Memorandum of 
June 1, 1998, regarding plain language, this preamble is written using 
plain language. The use of ``we'' in this notice refers to the Corps 
and the use of ``you'' refers to the reader. We have also used the 
active voice, short sentences, and common everyday terms except for 
necessary technical terms.

Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation 
and Regulatory Review''

    This rule is not designated a ``significant regulatory action'' 
under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, OMB has not reviewed this 
rule. Moreover, this final rule makes nondiscretionary adjustments to 
existing civil monetary penalties in accordance with the Inflation 
Adjustment Act and OMB guidance. The Corps, therefore, did not consider 
alternatives and does not have the flexibility to alter the adjustments 
of the civil monetary penalty amounts as provided in this rule.

Public Law 96-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)

    The Department of Defense determined that provisions of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 
35, and its implementing regulations, 5 CFR part 1320, do not apply to 
this rule because there are no new or revised recordkeeping or 
reporting requirements. This action merely increases the level of 
statutory civil penalties that could be imposed in the context of a 
federal civil administrative enforcement action or civil judicial case 
for violations of Corps-administered statutes and their implementing 
regulations.

Executive Order 13771, ``Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory 
Costs''

    This rule has been deemed not significant under Executive Order 
12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review,'' and is, therefore, not 
subject to the requirements of Executive Order 13771, ``Reducing 
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs.''

Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''

    Executive Order 13132 establishes certain requirements that an 
agency must meet when it promulgates a rule that imposes substantial 
direct requirement costs on State and local governments, preempts State 
law, or otherwise has Federalism implications. This final rule will not 
have a substantial effect on State and local governments.

Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)

    Because notice of proposed rulemaking and opportunity for comment 
are not required pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, or any other law, the 
analytical requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 
601, et seq.) are inapplicable. Therefore, a regulatory flexibility 
analysis is not required and has not been prepared.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. Chapter 25)

    Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (2 
U.S.C. 1532) requires agencies to assess anticipated costs and benefits 
before issuing any rule the mandates of which require spending in any 
year of $100 million in 1995 dollars, updated annually for inflation. 
In 2016, that threshold is approximately $146 million. This rule will 
not mandate any requirements for State, local, or tribal governments, 
nor will it affect private sector costs.

Public Law 104-113, ``National Technology Transfer and Advancement 
Act'' (15 U.S.C. Chapter 7)

    Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement 
Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, (15 U.S.C. 272 note), directs 
us to use voluntary consensus standards in our regulatory activities, 
unless to do so would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise 
impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards 
(e.g., materials specifications, test methods, sampling procedures, and 
business practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary 
consensus standards bodies. The NTTAA directs us to provide Congress, 
through OMB, explanations when we decide not to use available and 
applicable voluntary consensus standards. This rule does not involve 
technical standards. Therefore, we did not consider the use of any 
voluntary consensus standards.

Executive Order 13045, ``Protection of Children From Environmental 
Health Risks and Safety Risks''

    Executive Order 13045 applies to any rule that: (1) Is determined 
to be ``economically significant'' as defined under Executive Order 
12866, and (2) concerns an environmental health or safety risk that we 
have reason to believe may have a disproportionate effect on children. 
If the regulatory action meets both criteria, we must evaluate the 
environmental health or safety effects of the rule on children, and 
explain why the regulation is preferable to other potentially effective 
and reasonably feasible alternatives. This rule is not subject to this 
Executive Order because it is not economically significant as defined 
in Executive Order 12866. In addition, it does not concern an 
environmental or safety risk that we have reason to believe may have a 
disproportionate effect on children.

Executive Order 13175, ``Consultation and Coordination With Indian 
Tribal Governments''

    Executive Order 13175 requires agencies to develop an accountable 
process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input by tribal officials in 
the development of regulatory policies that have tribal implications.'' 
The phrase ``policies that have tribal implications'' is defined in the 
Executive Order to include regulations that have ``substantial direct 
effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the 
Federal government and the Indian tribes, or on the distribution of 
power and responsibilities between the Federal government and Indian 
tribes.''
    This rule does not have tribal implications. The rule imposes no 
new substantive obligations on tribal governments. Therefore, Executive 
Order 13175 does not apply to this rule.

Public Law 104-121, ``Congressional Review Act'', (5 U.S.C Chapter 8)

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as amended by 
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, 
generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the

[[Page 18982]]

agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes 
a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the 
Comptroller General of the United States. We will submit a report 
containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, 
the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the 
United States. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it 
is published in the Federal Register. This rule is not a ``major rule'' 
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

Executive Order 12898, ``Federal Actions To Address Environmental 
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations''

    Executive Order 12898 requires that, to the greatest extent 
practicable and permitted by law, each Federal agency must make 
achieving environmental justice part of its mission. Executive Order 
12898 provides that each Federal agency conduct its programs, policies, 
and activities that substantially affect human health or the 
environment in a manner that ensures that such programs, policies, and 
activities do not have the effect of excluding persons (including 
populations) from participation in, denying persons (including 
populations) the benefits of, or subjecting persons (including 
populations) to discrimination under such programs, policies, and 
activities because of their race, color, or national origin. This rule 
merely adjusts civil penalties to account for inflation, and therefore, 
is not expected to negatively impact any community, and therefore is 
not expected to cause any disproportionately high and adverse impacts 
to minority or low-income communities.

Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That 
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use''

    This rule is not a ``significant energy action'' as defined in 
Executive Order 13211 because it is not likely to have a significant 
adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 326

    Administrative practice and procedure, Intergovernmental relations, 
Investigations, Law enforcement, Navigation (Water), Water pollution 
control, Waterways.

    Dated: April 24, 2019.

    Approved by:
Scott A. Spellmon,
Major General, U.S. Army, Deputy Commanding General for Civil and 
Emergency Operations.

    For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Corps amends 33 CFR 
part 326 as follows:

PART 326--ENFORCEMENT

0
1. The authority citation for part 326 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 401 et seq.; 33 U.S.C. 1344; 33 U.S.C. 
1413; 33 U.S.C. 2104; 33 U.S.C. 1319; 28 U.S.C. 2461 note.


0
2. Amend Sec.  326.6 by revising paragraph (a)(1) to read as follows:


Sec.  326.6  Class I administrative penalties.

    (a) * * *
    (1) This section sets forth procedures for initiation and 
administration of Class I administrative penalty orders under Section 
309(g) of the Clean Water Act, judicially-imposed civil penalties under 
Section 404(s) of the Clean Water Act, and Section 205 of the National 
Fishing Enhancement Act. Under Section 309(g)(2)(A) of the Clean Water 
Act, Class I civil penalties may not exceed $21,934 per violation, 
except that the maximum amount of any Class I civil penalty shall not 
exceed $54,833. Under Section 404(s)(4) of the Clean Water Act, 
judicially-imposed civil penalties may not exceed $54,833 per day for 
each violation. Under Section 205(e) of the National Fishing 
Enhancement Act, penalties for violations of permits issued in 
accordance with that Act shall not exceed $24,017 for each violation.

                       Table 1 to Paragraph (a)(1)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Statutory civil monetary
                                          penalty amount for violations
  Environmental statute and U.S. code    that occurred after November 2,
                citation                   2015, and are assessed on or
                                                after May 3, 2019
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Clean Water Act (CWA), Section           $21,934 per violation, with a
 309(g)(2)(A), 33 U.S.C. 1319(g)(2)(A).   maximum of $54,833.
CWA, Section 404(s)(4), 33 U.S.C.        Maximum of $54,833 per day for
 1344(s)(4).                              each violation.
National Fishing Enhancement Act,        Maximum of $24,017 per
 Section 205(e), 33 U.S.C. 2104(e).       violation.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 2019-09120 Filed 5-2-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3720-58-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.