Air Plan Approval; Wisconsin; Nonattainment New Source Review Requirements for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone Standard, 18989-18991 [2019-09110]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 86 / Friday, May 3, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
International Business Reply Service
Competitive Contract 1
International Business Reply Service
Competitive Contract 3
Inbound Direct Entry Contracts with
Customers
Inbound Direct Entry Contracts with Foreign
Postal Administrations
Inbound Direct Entry Contracts with
Foreign Postal Administrations
Inbound Direct Entry Contracts with
Foreign Postal Administrations 1
Inbound EMS
Inbound EMS 2
Inbound Air Parcel Post (at non-UPU rates)
Royal Mail Group Inbound Air Parcel Post
Agreement
Inbound Competitive Multi-Service
Agreements with Foreign Postal
Operators
Inbound Competitive Multi-Service
Agreements with Foreign Postal
Operators 1
Special Services *
Address Enhancement Services
Greeting Cards, Gift Cards, and Stationery
International Ancillary Services
International Money Transfer Service—
Outbound
International Money Transfer Service—
Inbound
Premium Forwarding Service
Shipping and Mailing Supplies
Post Office Box Service
Competitive Ancillary Services
Final rule.
I. Background
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving, as a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision,
Wisconsin’s certification that its SIP
satisfies the nonattainment new source
review (NNSR) requirements of the
Clean Air Act (CAA) for the 2008 ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS). The State’s submittal is in
response to EPA’s February 3 and
December 11, 2017, Findings of Failure
to Submit (FFS) final rule, which found
that Wisconsin failed to satisfy CAA
requirements for implementation of the
2008 ozone NAAQS in nonattainment
areas.
SUMMARY:
This final rule is effective on
June 3, 2019.
DATES:
Stacy L. Ruble,
Secretary.
EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R05–OAR–2018–0569. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov website.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either through
www.regulations.gov or at the
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. This facility is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We
recommend that you telephone Rachel
Rineheart, Environmental Engineer, at
(312) 886–7017 before visiting the
Region 5 office.
[FR Doc. 2019–09096 Filed 5–2–19; 8:45 am]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
Rachel Rineheart, Environmental
Engineer, Air Permits Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR–18J),
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–7017,
Rineheart.rachel@epa.gov.
ADDRESSES:
Nonpostal Services *
Advertising
Licensing of Intellectual Property other than
Officially Licensed Retail Products
(OLRP)
Mail Service Promotion
Officially Licensed Retail Products (OLRP)
Passport Photo Service
Photocopying Service
Rental, Leasing, Licensing or other Non-Sale
Disposition of Tangible Property
Training Facilities and Related Services
USPS Electronic Postmark (EPM) Program
Market Tests *
Customized Delivery
Global eCommerce Marketplace (GeM)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2018–0569; FRL–9993–25–
Region 5]
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
ACTION:
Air Plan Approval; Wisconsin;
Nonattainment New Source Review
Requirements for the 2008 8-Hour
Ozone Standard
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:47 May 02, 2019
Jkt 247001
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. Background
II. What action is EPA taking?
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
18989
Sfmt 4700
A. Background on the 2008 Ozone
Standard
On March 27, 2008, EPA promulgated
a revised 8-hour ozone NAAQS of 0.075
parts per million (ppm).1 Promulgation
of a revised NAAQS triggers a
requirement for EPA to designate areas
of the country as nonattainment,
attainment, or unclassifiable for the
standard. For the ozone NAAQS, this
also involves classifying any
nonattainment areas at the time of
designation.2 Ozone nonattainment
areas are classified based on the severity
of their ozone levels (as determined
based on the area’s ‘‘design value,’’
which represents air quality in the area
for the most recent 3 years). The
classifications for ozone nonattainment
areas are marginal, moderate, serious,
severe, and extreme.3
Areas that EPA designates
nonattainment for the ozone NAAQS are
subject to the general nonattainment
area planning requirements of CAA
section 172 and also to the ozonespecific planning requirements of CAA
section 182. Ozone nonattainment areas
in the lower classification levels have
fewer and/or less stringent mandatory
air quality planning and control
requirements than those in higher
classifications. For marginal areas, a
state is required to submit a baseline
emissions inventory, adopt provisions
into the SIP requiring emissions
statements from stationary sources, and
implement a NNSR program for the
relevant ozone NAAQS.4 For moderate
areas, a state needs to comply with the
marginal area requirements, plus
additional moderate area requirements,
including the requirement to submit a
modeled demonstration that the area
will attain the NAAQS as expeditiously
as practicable but no later than 6 years
after designation, the requirement to
submit a reasonable further progress
(RFP) plan, the requirement to adopt
and implement certain emissions
controls, such as Reasonably Available
Control Technology and Vehicle
Emissions Inspection and Maintenance,
and the requirement for greater
emissions offsets for new or modified
major stationary sources under the
state’s NNSR program.5
1 73
FR 16436.
sections 107(d)(1) and 181(a)(1).
3 CAA section 181(a)(1).
4 CAA section 182(a).
5 CAA section 182(b).
2 CAA
E:\FR\FM\03MYR1.SGM
03MYR1
18990
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 86 / Friday, May 3, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
B. Background on the Wisconsin Ozone
Nonattainment Areas
On June 11, 2012,6 EPA designated
the Chicago area as a marginal
nonattainment area for the 2008 ozone
NAAQS. The Chicago area includes
Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry,
and Will Counties and part of Grundy
and Kendall Counties in Illinois; Lake
and Porter Counties in Indiana; and part
of Kenosha County in Wisconsin. On
May 4, 2016,7 pursuant to section
181(b)(2) of the CAA, EPA determined
that the Chicago area failed to attain the
2008 ozone NAAQS by the July 20, 2015
marginal area attainment deadline and
thus reclassified the area from marginal
to moderate nonattainment. In that
action, EPA established January 1, 2017,
as the due date for all moderate area
nonattainment plan SIP requirements
applicable to newly reclassified areas.
Pleasant Prairie and Somers townships
in Kenosha County are part of the
Chicago area nonattainment area. The
remainder of Kenosha County is
designated as unclassifiable/attainment.
On May 21, 2012,8 EPA designated
Sheboygan County in Wisconsin as a
marginal nonattainment area for the
2008 ozone NAAQS. On December 19,
2016,9 pursuant to section 181(b) of the
CAA, EPA determined that Sheboygan
County failed to attain the 2008 ozone
NAAQS by the July 20, 2016 marginal
area attainment deadline and thus
reclassified the area from marginal to
moderate nonattainment. In that action,
EPA established January 1, 2017, as the
due date for all moderate area
nonattainment plan SIP requirements
applicable to newly reclassified areas.
Effective March 6, 2017, EPA found that
15 states and the District of Columbia
failed to submit SIP revisions in a
timely manner to satisfy certain
requirements for the 2008 ozone
NAAQS.10 This finding established
certain deadlines for the imposition of
sanctions if a state does not submit a
timely SIP revision addressing the
requirements for which the finding was
made and for EPA to promulgate a
Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) to
address any outstanding SIP
requirements. As part of that action,
EPA made a finding that Wisconsin
failed to submit a marginal NNSR SIP
for the Wisconsin portion of the Chicago
area and for Sheboygan County.
6 77
FR 34221, effective July 20, 2012.
FR 26697.
8 77 FR 30088 (May 21,2012).
9 81 FR 91841 (December 19, 2016).
10 82 FR 9158 (February 3, 2017).
7 81
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:47 May 02, 2019
Jkt 247001
C. Wisconsin’s Submittal
On July 19, 2018, Wisconsin
submitted a SIP revision requesting EPA
approve Wisconsin’s certification that
its existing SIP-approved NNSR
regulations fully satisfy the NNSR
requirements set forth in 40 CFR 51.165
for both marginal and moderate ozone
nonattainment areas for the 2008 ozone
NAAQS. EPA proposed to approve
Wisconsin’s certification on February
12, 2019, with a comment period ending
on March 14, 2019 (84 FR 3376). No
comments were received during the
comment period.
II. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is approving Wisconsin’s July 18,
2018, SIP revision addressing the NNSR
requirements for the 2008 ozone
NAAQS for the Wisconsin portion of the
Chicago Nonattainment Area and for
Sheboygan County. EPA has concluded
that Wisconsin’s submission fulfills the
40 CFR 51.1114 revision requirement,
meets the requirements of CAA sections
110 and 172 and the minimum SIP
requirements of 40 CFR 51.165.
Approval of the NNSR requirements
addresses EPA’s finding that Wisconsin
failed to submit moderate ozone NNSR
requirements and EPA’s approval turns
off the sanctions and FIP clock.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Public Law 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by July 2, 2019. Filing a petition
for reconsideration by the Administrator
of this final rule does not affect the
finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the
E:\FR\FM\03MYR1.SGM
03MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 86 / Friday, May 3, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: April 24, 2019.
Cheryl L. Newton,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
2. Section 52.2585 is amended by
adding paragraph (hh) to read as
follows:
■
§ 52.2585
Control strategy: Ozone.
*
*
*
*
*
(hh) Approval—On July 19, 2018,
Wisconsin submitted a SIP revision
certifying that the existing SIP-approved
nonattainment new source review
regulations fully satisfy the
nonattainment new source review
requirements for marginal and moderate
ozone nonattainment areas for the 2008
ozone NAAQS.
[FR Doc. 2019–09110 Filed 5–2–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
I. Background
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R08–OAR–2018–0593; FRL–9992–97–
Region 8]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Colorado; Revisions to Regulation
Number 3
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve State Implementation Plan
(SIP) revisions submitted by the State of
Colorado on February 25, 2015, and
May 24, 2017. These SIP revisions are
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:47 May 02, 2019
Jkt 247001
necessary for Colorado to address
current federal prevention of significant
deterioration (PSD) and nonattainment
new source review (NSR) regulations. In
this rulemaking, we are taking final
action on all portions of the February
25, 2015, and May 24, 2017 submittals,
except for those portions of the
submittal which have been previously
acted on or do not belong in the SIP.
The intended effect of this action is to
bring Colorado’s PSD and
nonattainment NSR permitting
programs in line with federal
requirements. This action is being taken
under section 110 of the Clean Air Act
(CAA).
DATES: This final rule is effective on
June 3, 2019.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R08–OAR–2018–0593. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov website.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., confidential business information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kevin Leone, Air Program, EPA, Region
8, Mailcode 8P–AR, 1595 Wynkoop
Street, Denver, Colorado 80202–1129,
(303) 312–6227, leone.kevin@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ means the EPA.
The EPA is taking final action to
approve all revisions as submitted by
the State of Colorado on February 25,
2015, and May 24, 2017, with the
exception of the revisions that we have
previously acted on or proposed to not
act on, as outlined in section I. of our
proposed rulemaking published on
February 28, 2019 (84 FR 6732). On
October 12, 2017 (82 FR 47380), we
approved the following provisions that
were part of the February 25, 2015
submittal: (1) Colorado’s revisions to
fine particulate matter (PM2.5),
significant impact levels (SILs) and
significant monitoring concentration
(SMC) provisions; (2) Revisions to
Colorado’s air pollution emission
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
18991
notices; and (3) Revisions to public
notice requirements.
This final action approves the
remaining revisions in the February 25,
2015 submittal that include revisions to
the State’s PSD program in Regulation
Number 3, the definitions of carbon
dioxide equivalent (CO2e) and regulated
NSR pollutant, and the addition of
plantwide applicability limit (PAL)
provisions for greenhouse gases (GHGs).
On March 24, 2017, the State submitted
two sets of SIP revisions to Regulation
Number 3: The first pertaining to
regulatory changes necessary in
response to the June 23, 2014 U.S.
Supreme Court decision in Utility Air
Regulatory Group v. EPA; and the
second addresses nonattainment NSR
applicability in (among other things)
ozone nonattainment areas that have
been classified or reclassified as serious,
severe or extreme. We proposed to
approve those revisions in the February
28, 2019 rulemaking and are now taking
final action to approve them.
We provided a detailed explanation of
the bases for our proposed approval in
our February 28, 2019 rulemaking,
which will not be restated here. See 84
FR 6732. We invited comment on all
aspects of our proposal and provided a
30-day comment period. The comment
period ended on April 1, 2019.
II. Response to Comments
We received no comments during the
public comment period.
III. Final Action
As outlined in our proposed
rulemaking, the EPA is taking final
action to approve the addition of new
and revised rules to Regulation 3 that
were submitted by Colorado on
February 25, 2015, and May 24, 2017.
Specifically, we are taking final action
to approve the following revisions:
Regulation Number 3, Part A: I.
(Applicability)—I.B.10., I.B.23., I.B.25.c.,
I.B.28., I.B.28e., I.B.43., I.B.44.b.,
I.B.44.c., I.B.44.e.; V. (Certification And
Trading Of Emission Reduction Credits
Offset And Netting Transactions)—
V.C.6., V.C.7., V.C.8., V.C.12., V.I.1; VI.
(Fees)—VI.C.1.c, VI.C.1.; Regulation
Number 3, Part D: I. (Applicability)—
I.A.2., I.A.3.; I.B.1., I.B.2., I.B.3., I.C.; II.
(Definitions)—II.A.I.d., II.A.2., II.A.4.,
II.A.4.e., II.A.4.f., II.A.5.c., II.A.13.a.,
II.A.13.a.(i)–(ii), II.A.13.b., II.A.13.b.(i)–
(ii), II.A.16.–22., II.A.22.a.–c., II.A.23.–
31. II.A.32.–35., II.A.36.–39., II.A.40.a.–
c., II.A.40.d., II.A.40.e.–g., II.A.41.–45.,
II.A.46., II.A.46.a.–b., II.A.47., II.A.47.a.–
b., II.A.48.; V. (Requirements Applicable
to Nonattainment Areas)—V.A.3.c.,
V.A.7.c., V.A.7.c.(i)(C)., V.A.7.c.(v); VI.
(Requirements applicable to attainment
E:\FR\FM\03MYR1.SGM
03MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 86 (Friday, May 3, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 18989-18991]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-09110]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R05-OAR-2018-0569; FRL-9993-25-Region 5]
Air Plan Approval; Wisconsin; Nonattainment New Source Review
Requirements for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone Standard
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving, as a
State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision, Wisconsin's certification
that its SIP satisfies the nonattainment new source review (NNSR)
requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) for the 2008 ozone National
Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). The State's submittal is in
response to EPA's February 3 and December 11, 2017, Findings of Failure
to Submit (FFS) final rule, which found that Wisconsin failed to
satisfy CAA requirements for implementation of the 2008 ozone NAAQS in
nonattainment areas.
DATES: This final rule is effective on June 3, 2019.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R05-OAR-2018-0569. All documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
through www.regulations.gov or at the Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604. This facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We recommend
that you telephone Rachel Rineheart, Environmental Engineer, at (312)
886-7017 before visiting the Region 5 office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rachel Rineheart, Environmental
Engineer, Air Permits Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J),
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-7017, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. Background
II. What action is EPA taking?
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
A. Background on the 2008 Ozone Standard
On March 27, 2008, EPA promulgated a revised 8-hour ozone NAAQS of
0.075 parts per million (ppm).\1\ Promulgation of a revised NAAQS
triggers a requirement for EPA to designate areas of the country as
nonattainment, attainment, or unclassifiable for the standard. For the
ozone NAAQS, this also involves classifying any nonattainment areas at
the time of designation.\2\ Ozone nonattainment areas are classified
based on the severity of their ozone levels (as determined based on the
area's ``design value,'' which represents air quality in the area for
the most recent 3 years). The classifications for ozone nonattainment
areas are marginal, moderate, serious, severe, and extreme.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 73 FR 16436.
\2\ CAA sections 107(d)(1) and 181(a)(1).
\3\ CAA section 181(a)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Areas that EPA designates nonattainment for the ozone NAAQS are
subject to the general nonattainment area planning requirements of CAA
section 172 and also to the ozone-specific planning requirements of CAA
section 182. Ozone nonattainment areas in the lower classification
levels have fewer and/or less stringent mandatory air quality planning
and control requirements than those in higher classifications. For
marginal areas, a state is required to submit a baseline emissions
inventory, adopt provisions into the SIP requiring emissions statements
from stationary sources, and implement a NNSR program for the relevant
ozone NAAQS.\4\ For moderate areas, a state needs to comply with the
marginal area requirements, plus additional moderate area requirements,
including the requirement to submit a modeled demonstration that the
area will attain the NAAQS as expeditiously as practicable but no later
than 6 years after designation, the requirement to submit a reasonable
further progress (RFP) plan, the requirement to adopt and implement
certain emissions controls, such as Reasonably Available Control
Technology and Vehicle Emissions Inspection and Maintenance, and the
requirement for greater emissions offsets for new or modified major
stationary sources under the state's NNSR program.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ CAA section 182(a).
\5\ CAA section 182(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 18990]]
B. Background on the Wisconsin Ozone Nonattainment Areas
On June 11, 2012,\6\ EPA designated the Chicago area as a marginal
nonattainment area for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. The Chicago area includes
Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry, and Will Counties and part of Grundy
and Kendall Counties in Illinois; Lake and Porter Counties in Indiana;
and part of Kenosha County in Wisconsin. On May 4, 2016,\7\ pursuant to
section 181(b)(2) of the CAA, EPA determined that the Chicago area
failed to attain the 2008 ozone NAAQS by the July 20, 2015 marginal
area attainment deadline and thus reclassified the area from marginal
to moderate nonattainment. In that action, EPA established January 1,
2017, as the due date for all moderate area nonattainment plan SIP
requirements applicable to newly reclassified areas. Pleasant Prairie
and Somers townships in Kenosha County are part of the Chicago area
nonattainment area. The remainder of Kenosha County is designated as
unclassifiable/attainment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 77 FR 34221, effective July 20, 2012.
\7\ 81 FR 26697.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On May 21, 2012,\8\ EPA designated Sheboygan County in Wisconsin as
a marginal nonattainment area for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. On December 19,
2016,\9\ pursuant to section 181(b) of the CAA, EPA determined that
Sheboygan County failed to attain the 2008 ozone NAAQS by the July 20,
2016 marginal area attainment deadline and thus reclassified the area
from marginal to moderate nonattainment. In that action, EPA
established January 1, 2017, as the due date for all moderate area
nonattainment plan SIP requirements applicable to newly reclassified
areas. Effective March 6, 2017, EPA found that 15 states and the
District of Columbia failed to submit SIP revisions in a timely manner
to satisfy certain requirements for the 2008 ozone NAAQS.\10\ This
finding established certain deadlines for the imposition of sanctions
if a state does not submit a timely SIP revision addressing the
requirements for which the finding was made and for EPA to promulgate a
Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) to address any outstanding SIP
requirements. As part of that action, EPA made a finding that Wisconsin
failed to submit a marginal NNSR SIP for the Wisconsin portion of the
Chicago area and for Sheboygan County.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 77 FR 30088 (May 21,2012).
\9\ 81 FR 91841 (December 19, 2016).
\10\ 82 FR 9158 (February 3, 2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Wisconsin's Submittal
On July 19, 2018, Wisconsin submitted a SIP revision requesting EPA
approve Wisconsin's certification that its existing SIP-approved NNSR
regulations fully satisfy the NNSR requirements set forth in 40 CFR
51.165 for both marginal and moderate ozone nonattainment areas for the
2008 ozone NAAQS. EPA proposed to approve Wisconsin's certification on
February 12, 2019, with a comment period ending on March 14, 2019 (84
FR 3376). No comments were received during the comment period.
II. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is approving Wisconsin's July 18, 2018, SIP revision addressing
the NNSR requirements for the 2008 ozone NAAQS for the Wisconsin
portion of the Chicago Nonattainment Area and for Sheboygan County. EPA
has concluded that Wisconsin's submission fulfills the 40 CFR 51.1114
revision requirement, meets the requirements of CAA sections 110 and
172 and the minimum SIP requirements of 40 CFR 51.165. Approval of the
NNSR requirements addresses EPA's finding that Wisconsin failed to
submit moderate ozone NNSR requirements and EPA's approval turns off
the sanctions and FIP clock.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by July 2, 2019. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the
[[Page 18991]]
time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This
action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: April 24, 2019.
Cheryl L. Newton,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
0
2. Section 52.2585 is amended by adding paragraph (hh) to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.2585 Control strategy: Ozone.
* * * * *
(hh) Approval--On July 19, 2018, Wisconsin submitted a SIP revision
certifying that the existing SIP-approved nonattainment new source
review regulations fully satisfy the nonattainment new source review
requirements for marginal and moderate ozone nonattainment areas for
the 2008 ozone NAAQS.
[FR Doc. 2019-09110 Filed 5-2-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P