ClixSense.com; Analysis to Aid Public Comment, 18538-18540 [2019-08786]
Download as PDF
jbell on DSK30RV082PROD with NOTICES
18538
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 84 / Wednesday, May 1, 2019 / Notices
OMB control number: 7100–0285.
Effective Date: April 2019.
Frequency: Triennially.
Respondents: Financial institutions
that serve as intermediaries in the
wholesale foreign exchange and
derivatives market.
Estimated number of respondents: 21.
Estimated average hours per response:
55.
Estimated annual burden hours:
1,155.
General description of report: The
survey is a comprehensive source of
global information on the volume of
foreign exchange and derivatives trading
and, as such, is useful to the Federal
Reserve System and other government
agencies in understanding market
developments and trends and for
conducting Federal Reserve and U.S.
Treasury foreign exchange operations.
Survey data are also used by market
participants to gain a perspective on the
market that is not available from data at
the firm level. Academics and the
general public also use the survey’s data
for research and analysis.
Legal authorization and
confidentiality: The FR 3036 is
authorized pursuant to sections 2A and
12A of the Federal Reserve Act (FRA).
Section 2A of the FRA requires that the
Board and the Federal Open Market
Committee (FOMC) maintain long-run
growth of the monetary and credit
aggregates commensurate with the
economy’s long run potential to increase
production, so as to promote effectively
the goals of maximum employment,
stable prices, and moderate long-term
interest rates (12 U.S.C. 225a). Under
section 12A of the FRA, the FOMC is
required to implement regulations
relating to the open market operations
conducted by Federal Reserve Banks.
Those transactions must be governed
with a view to accommodating
commerce and business and with regard
to their bearing upon the general credit
situation of the country (12 U.S.C. 263).
The Board and the FOMC use the
information obtained from the FR 3036
to help fulfill these obligations.
The FR 3036 is a voluntary survey.
Because the release of this information
would cause substantial harm to the
competitive position of the entity from
whom the information was obtained, the
information collected on the FR 3036
may be granted confidential treatment
under exemption (b)(4) of the Freedom
of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4),
which protects from disclosure ‘‘trade
secrets and commercial or financial
information obtained from a person and
privileged or confidential.’’
Current actions: On February 7, 2019,
the Board published a notice in the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:24 Apr 30, 2019
Jkt 247001
Federal Register (84 FR 2506)
requesting public comment for 60 days
on the extension, with revision, of the
Central Bank Survey of Foreign
Exchange and Derivatives Market
Activity. The comment period for this
notice expired on April 8, 2019. The
Board did not receive any comments.
The revisions will be implemented as
proposed.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, April 25, 2019.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Assistant Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2019–08779 Filed 4–30–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[File No. 1723003]
ClixSense.com; Analysis to Aid Public
Comment
Federal Trade Commission.
Proposed consent agreement
and Statement of the Commission.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The consent agreement in this
matter settles alleged violations of
federal law prohibiting unfair or
deceptive acts or practices. The attached
Analysis to Aid Public Comment
describes both the allegations in the
complaint and the terms of the consent
order—embodied in the consent
agreement—that would settle these
allegations. The attached Statement of
the Commission describes new
requirements in recent data security
orders.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received on
or before May 31, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file
comments online or on paper, by
following the instructions in the
Request for Comment part of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below. Write: ‘‘ClixSense.com; File No.
1723003’’ on your comment, and file
your comment online at https://
www.regulations.gov by following the
instructions on the web-based form. If
you prefer to file your comment on
paper, mail your comment to the
following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite
CC–5610 (Annex D), Washington, DC
20580, or deliver your comment to the
following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
Constitution Center, 400 7th Street SW,
5th Floor, Suite 5610 (Annex D),
Washington, DC 20024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jamie Hine (202–326–2188), Bureau of
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Consumer Protection, Federal Trade
Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20580.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to Section 6(f) of the Federal Trade
Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and
FTC Rule 2.34, 16 CFR 2.34, notice is
hereby given that the above-captioned
consent agreement containing a consent
order to cease and desist, having been
filed with and accepted, subject to final
approval, by the Commission, has been
placed on the public record for a period
of thirty (30) days. The following
Analysis to Aid Public Comment
describes the terms of the consent
agreement and the allegations in the
complaint. An electronic copy of the
full text of the consent agreement
package can be obtained from the FTC
Home Page (for April 24, 2019), on the
World Wide Web, at https://
www.ftc.gov/news-events/commissionactions.
You can file a comment online or on
paper. For the Commission to consider
your comment, we must receive it on or
before May 31, 2019. Write
‘‘ClixSense.com; File No. 1723003’’ on
your comment. Your comment—
including your name and your state—
will be placed on the public record of
this proceeding, including, to the extent
practicable, on the https://
www.regulations.gov website.
Postal mail addressed to the
Commission is subject to delay due to
heightened security screening. As a
result, we encourage you to submit your
comments online through the https://
www.regulations.gov website.
If you prefer to file your comment on
paper, write ‘‘ClixSense.com; File No.
1723003’’ on your comment and on the
envelope, and mail your comment to the
following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite
CC–5610 (Annex D), Washington, DC
20580; or deliver your comment to the
following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
Constitution Center, 400 7th Street SW,
5th Floor, Suite 5610 (Annex D),
Washington, DC 20024. If possible,
submit your paper comment to the
Commission by courier or overnight
service.
Because your comment will be placed
on the publicly accessible website at
https://www.regulations.gov, you are
solely responsible for making sure that
your comment does not include any
sensitive or confidential information. In
particular, your comment should not
include any sensitive personal
information, such as your or anyone
else’s Social Security number; date of
E:\FR\FM\01MYN1.SGM
01MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 84 / Wednesday, May 1, 2019 / Notices
jbell on DSK30RV082PROD with NOTICES
birth; driver’s license number or other
state identification number, or foreign
country equivalent; passport number;
financial account number; or credit or
debit card number. You are also solely
responsible for making sure that your
comment does not include any sensitive
health information, such as medical
records or other individually
identifiable health information. In
addition, your comment should not
include any ‘‘trade secret or any
commercial or financial information
which . . . is privileged or
confidential’’—as provided by Section
6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and
FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR 4.10(a)(2)—
including in particular competitively
sensitive information such as costs,
sales statistics, inventories, formulas,
patterns, devices, manufacturing
processes, or customer names.
Comments containing material for
which confidential treatment is
requested must be filed in paper form,
must be clearly labeled ‘‘Confidential,’’
and must comply with FTC Rule 4.9(c).
In particular, the written request for
confidential treatment that accompanies
the comment must include the factual
and legal basis for the request, and must
identify the specific portions of the
comment to be withheld from the public
record. See FTC Rule 4.9(c). Your
comment will be kept confidential only
if the General Counsel grants your
request in accordance with the law and
the public interest. Once your comment
has been posted on the public FTC
website—as legally required by FTC
Rule 4.9(b)—we cannot redact or
remove your comment from the FTC
website, unless you submit a
confidentiality request that meets the
requirements for such treatment under
FTC Rule 4.9(c), and the General
Counsel grants that request.
Visit the FTC website at https://
www.ftc.gov to read this Notice and the
news release describing it. The FTC Act
and other laws that the Commission
administers permit the collection of
public comments to consider and use in
this proceeding, as appropriate. The
Commission will consider all timely
and responsive public comments that it
receives on or before May 31, 2019. For
information on the Commission’s
privacy policy, including routine uses
permitted by the Privacy Act, see
https://www.ftc.gov/site-information/
privacy-policy.
Analysis of Proposed Consent Order To
Aid Public Comment
The Federal Trade Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) has accepted, subject to
final approval, an agreement containing
a consent order from James V. Grago, Jr.,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:24 Apr 30, 2019
Jkt 247001
individually and doing business as
ClixSense.com (‘‘Respondent’’).
The proposed consent order
(‘‘proposed order’’) has been placed on
the public record for thirty (30) days for
receipt of comments by interested
persons. Comments received during this
period will become part of the public
record. After thirty (30) days, the
Commission will again review the
agreement and the comments received,
and will decide whether it should
withdraw from the agreement and take
appropriate action or make final the
agreement’s proposed order.
This matter involves ClixSense.com
(‘‘ClixSense’’), an online rewards
website owned and operated by James
V. Grago, Jr. (‘‘Mr. Grago’’) since 2010.
As the sole owner of ClixSense, Mr.
Grago controlled or had authority to
control, or participated in the acts or
practices alleged in the proposed
complaint.
ClixSense pays its users for clicking
on advertisements, performing online
tasks, or completing online surveys.
ClixSense makes money from
advertisers and from marketers who
purchase information generated from
consumer surveys. As part of the
enrollment process, ClixSense collects
and stores personal information on its
computer network about its users,
including full names, physical
addresses, dates of birth, gender, and
email addresses. ClixSense also requires
users to create a username, a password,
and an answer to a security question
that it stores in its database. For users
who earn more than $600 annually,
ClixSense requires a Social Security
number.
The Commission’s proposed threecount complaint alleges that
Respondent has violated Section 5(a) of
the Federal Trade Commission Act.
First, the proposed complaint alleges
that Respondent deceived its users
about the level of encryption it used. As
alleged in the proposed complaint,
Respondent has expressly represented
to its users through a Frequently Asked
Question (‘‘FAQ’’) entitled ‘‘Is my
personal information secure?’’ that it
uses the latest encryption techniques to
ensure the security of account
information. Contrary to this claim, the
proposed complaint alleges that
Respondent used no encryption to
protect consumers’ personal
information. In fact, Respondent stored
consumers’ personal information,
including SSNs, in clear text.
Second, the proposed complaint
alleges that Respondent misrepresented
to its users that it utilized the latest
security techniques to ensure the
security of users’ personal information.
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18539
As alleged in the proposed complaint,
Respondent failed to utilize the latest
security techniques in multiple areas.
Third, the proposed complaint alleges
that Respondent has engaged in a
number of unreasonable security
practices that led to a breach of
information regarding 6.6 million
consumers. The proposed complaint
alleges that Respondent:
• Failed to implement readily
available security measures to limit
access between computers on
ClixSense’s network, and between such
computers and the internet;
• permitted employees to store plain
text user credentials in personal email
accounts, and on ClixSense’s laptops;
• failed to change default login and
password credentials for third-party
company network resources; and
• maintained consumers’ personal
information, including consumers’
names, addresses, email addresses,
dates of birth, gender, answers to
security questions, login and password
credentials, and Social Security
numbers, in clear text on ClixSense’s
network and devices.
The proposed complaint alleges that
Respondent could have addressed each
of the failures described above by
implementing readily available and
relatively low-cost security measures.
The proposed complaint alleges that
Respondent’s failures caused or are
likely to cause substantial injury to
consumers that is not outweighed by
countervailing benefits to consumers or
competition and is not reasonably
avoidable by consumers themselves.
Such practice constitutes an unfair act
or practice under Section 5 of the FTC
Act.
The proposed order contains
injunctive provisions addressing the
alleged deceptive and unfair conduct in
connection with Respondent’s operation
of an online rewards website. Part I of
the proposed order prohibits
Respondent from false or deceptive
statements regarding the extent to which
Respondent maintains and protects the
privacy, security, confidentiality, or
integrity of Personal Information,
including the extent to which it utilizes
(1) encryption techniques and (2)
security techniques.
Part II of the proposed order prohibits
Respondent, in connection with any
business that Mr. Grago controls directly
and indirectly, including ClixSense,
from transferring, selling, sharing,
collecting, maintaining, or storing
personal information unless it
establishes and implements, and
thereafter maintains, a comprehensive
information security program that is
designed to protect the security,
E:\FR\FM\01MYN1.SGM
01MYN1
18540
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 84 / Wednesday, May 1, 2019 / Notices
confidentiality, and integrity of such
personal information.
Part III of the proposed order requires
any business that Mr. Grago controls,
directly or indirectly, that collects
personal information online to obtain
initial and biennial data security
assessments for twenty years.
Part IV of the agreement prohibits
Respondent from misrepresenting any
fact material to the assessments required
by Provision III.
Part V requires any business that Mr.
Grago controls directly or indirectly,
including ClixSense, to submit an
annual certification from a senior
corporate manager (or senior officer
responsible for its information security
program) that Respondent has
implemented the requirements of the
Order and is not aware of any material
noncompliance that has not been
corrected or disclosed to the
Commission.
Parts VI through IX of the proposed
order are reporting and compliance
provisions, which include
recordkeeping requirements and
provisions requiring Respondent to
provide information or documents
necessary for the Commission to
monitor compliance. Part X states that
the proposed order will remain in effect
for 20 years, with certain exceptions.
The purpose of this analysis is to aid
public comment on the proposed order.
It is not intended to constitute an
official interpretation of the complaint
or proposed order, or to modify in any
way the proposed order’s terms.
By direction of the Commission.
Julie A. Mack,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–08786 Filed 4–30–19; 8:45 am]
jbell on DSK30RV082PROD with NOTICES
Statement of the Federal Trade
Commission
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
April 24, 2019
Today, the Commission announces
cases against ClixSense and i-Dressup,1
which include allegations that the
companies failed to employ reasonable
security to protect consumers’ sensitive
data. The orders obtained in these
matters contain strong injunctive
provisions, including new requirements
that go beyond requirements from
previous data security orders. For
example, the orders include
requirements that a senior officer
provide annual certifications of
compliance to the Commission, and
explicit provisions prohibiting the
defendants from making
1 Although
the Commission’s settlement with iDressup addresses broader COPPA violations, this
statement focuses specifically on the data security
requirements set forth in the proposed stipulated
order.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:24 Apr 30, 2019
Jkt 247001
misrepresentations to the third parties
conducting assessments of their data
security programs. These new
requirements will provide greater
assurances that consumers’ data will be
protected going forward.
Since joining the Commission, we
have instructed staff to closely review
our orders to determine whether they
could be strengthened and improved—
particularly in the areas of privacy and
data security. Through ongoing
discussions both internally and with
external stakeholders, including through
our public Hearings on Competition and
Consumer Protection in the 21st Century
and the comment process,2 we continue
to consider changes to our orders. We
will adjust our data security orders, as
needed, to reflect our ongoing
discussions regarding the FTC’s
remedial authority and needs, as well as
the specific facts and circumstances of
each case.
We are particularly committed to
strengthening the order provisions
regarding data security assessments of
companies by third parties. The
Commission expects that these third
parties will faithfully assess data
security practices to identify potential
noncompliance with appropriate order
provisions. Future orders will better
ensure that third-party assessors know
they are accountable for providing
meaningful, independent analysis of the
data practices under examination. The
announcements today reflect the
beginning of our thinking, but we
anticipate further refinements, and these
orders may not reflect the approach that
we intend to use in every data security
enforcement action going forward.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality Notice of Meetings
Agency for Healthcare Research
and Quality (AHRQ), HHS.
ACTION: Notice of Five AHRQ
Subcommittee Meetings.
AGENCY:
The subcommittees listed
below are part of AHRQ’s Health
Services Research Initial Review Group
Committee. Grant applications are to be
reviewed and discussed at these
SUMMARY:
2 See, e.g., FTC Hearings on Competition and
Consumer Protection in the 21st Century (Session
9—Data Security), Dec. 11–12, 2018, https://
www.ftc.gov/news-events/events-calendar/ftchearing-competition-consumer-protection-21stcentury-december-2018.
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
meetings. Each subcommittee meeting
will commence in open session before
closing to the public for the duration of
the meeting.
DATES: See below for dates of meetings:
1. Health System and Value Research
(HSVR)
Date: May 22, 2019 (Open from 8:00
a.m. to 8:30 a.m. on May 22nd and
closed for remainder of the meeting)
2. Health Care Research and Training
(HCRT)
Date: May 23–24, 2019 (Open from
8:00 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. on May 23rd
and closed for remainder of the
meeting)
3. Healthcare Effectiveness and
Outcomes Research (HEOR)
Date: June 5–6, 2019 (Open from 8:30
a.m. to 9:00 a.m. on June 5th and
closed for remainder of the meeting)
4. Healthcare Information Technology
Research (HITR)
Date: June 6–7, 2019 (Open from 8:00
a.m. to 8:30 a.m. on June 6th and
closed for remainder of the meeting)
5. Healthcare Safety and Quality
Improvement Research (HSQR)
Date: June 12–13, 2019 (Open from
7:30 a.m. to 8:00 a.m. on June 12th
and closed for remainder of the
meeting)
Hilton Rockville &
Executive Meeting Center, 1750
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland
20852.
ADDRESSES:
(To
obtain a roster of members, agenda or
minutes of the non-confidential portions
of the meetings.)
Heather Phelps, Acting Committee
Management Officer, Office of
Extramural Research Education and
Priority Populations, Agency for
Healthcare Research and Quality
(AHRQ), 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville,
Maryland 20857, Telephone (301) 427–
1128.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act (5
U.S.C. App. 2), AHRQ announces
meetings of the above-listed scientific
peer review groups, which are
subcommittees of AHRQ’s Health
Services Research Initial Review Group
Committees. Each subcommittee
meeting will commence in open session
before closing to the public for the
duration of the meeting. The
subcommittee meetings will be closed to
the public in accordance with the
provisions set forth in 5 U.S.C. App. 2
section 10(d), 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), and 5
U.S.C. 552b(c)(6). The grant applications
and the discussions could disclose
confidential trade secrets or commercial
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\01MYN1.SGM
01MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 84 (Wednesday, May 1, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18538-18540]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-08786]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[File No. 1723003]
ClixSense.com; Analysis to Aid Public Comment
AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.
ACTION: Proposed consent agreement and Statement of the Commission.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The consent agreement in this matter settles alleged
violations of federal law prohibiting unfair or deceptive acts or
practices. The attached Analysis to Aid Public Comment describes both
the allegations in the complaint and the terms of the consent order--
embodied in the consent agreement--that would settle these allegations.
The attached Statement of the Commission describes new requirements in
recent data security orders.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 31, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file comments online or on paper, by
following the instructions in the Request for Comment part of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below. Write: ``ClixSense.com; File
No. 1723003'' on your comment, and file your comment online at https://www.regulations.gov by following the instructions on the web-based
form. If you prefer to file your comment on paper, mail your comment to
the following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office of the
Secretary, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite CC-5610 (Annex D),
Washington, DC 20580, or deliver your comment to the following address:
Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, Constitution Center,
400 7th Street SW, 5th Floor, Suite 5610 (Annex D), Washington, DC
20024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jamie Hine (202-326-2188), Bureau of
Consumer Protection, Federal Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20580.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Section 6(f) of the Federal
Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and FTC Rule 2.34, 16 CFR 2.34,
notice is hereby given that the above-captioned consent agreement
containing a consent order to cease and desist, having been filed with
and accepted, subject to final approval, by the Commission, has been
placed on the public record for a period of thirty (30) days. The
following Analysis to Aid Public Comment describes the terms of the
consent agreement and the allegations in the complaint. An electronic
copy of the full text of the consent agreement package can be obtained
from the FTC Home Page (for April 24, 2019), on the World Wide Web, at
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/commission-actions.
You can file a comment online or on paper. For the Commission to
consider your comment, we must receive it on or before May 31, 2019.
Write ``ClixSense.com; File No. 1723003'' on your comment. Your
comment--including your name and your state--will be placed on the
public record of this proceeding, including, to the extent practicable,
on the https://www.regulations.gov website.
Postal mail addressed to the Commission is subject to delay due to
heightened security screening. As a result, we encourage you to submit
your comments online through the https://www.regulations.gov website.
If you prefer to file your comment on paper, write ``ClixSense.com;
File No. 1723003'' on your comment and on the envelope, and mail your
comment to the following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office of
the Secretary, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite CC-5610 (Annex D),
Washington, DC 20580; or deliver your comment to the following address:
Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, Constitution Center,
400 7th Street SW, 5th Floor, Suite 5610 (Annex D), Washington, DC
20024. If possible, submit your paper comment to the Commission by
courier or overnight service.
Because your comment will be placed on the publicly accessible
website at https://www.regulations.gov, you are solely responsible for
making sure that your comment does not include any sensitive or
confidential information. In particular, your comment should not
include any sensitive personal information, such as your or anyone
else's Social Security number; date of
[[Page 18539]]
birth; driver's license number or other state identification number, or
foreign country equivalent; passport number; financial account number;
or credit or debit card number. You are also solely responsible for
making sure that your comment does not include any sensitive health
information, such as medical records or other individually identifiable
health information. In addition, your comment should not include any
``trade secret or any commercial or financial information which . . .
is privileged or confidential''--as provided by Section 6(f) of the FTC
Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR 4.10(a)(2)--
including in particular competitively sensitive information such as
costs, sales statistics, inventories, formulas, patterns, devices,
manufacturing processes, or customer names.
Comments containing material for which confidential treatment is
requested must be filed in paper form, must be clearly labeled
``Confidential,'' and must comply with FTC Rule 4.9(c). In particular,
the written request for confidential treatment that accompanies the
comment must include the factual and legal basis for the request, and
must identify the specific portions of the comment to be withheld from
the public record. See FTC Rule 4.9(c). Your comment will be kept
confidential only if the General Counsel grants your request in
accordance with the law and the public interest. Once your comment has
been posted on the public FTC website--as legally required by FTC Rule
4.9(b)--we cannot redact or remove your comment from the FTC website,
unless you submit a confidentiality request that meets the requirements
for such treatment under FTC Rule 4.9(c), and the General Counsel
grants that request.
Visit the FTC website at https://www.ftc.gov to read this Notice and
the news release describing it. The FTC Act and other laws that the
Commission administers permit the collection of public comments to
consider and use in this proceeding, as appropriate. The Commission
will consider all timely and responsive public comments that it
receives on or before May 31, 2019. For information on the Commission's
privacy policy, including routine uses permitted by the Privacy Act,
see https://www.ftc.gov/site-information/privacy-policy.
Analysis of Proposed Consent Order To Aid Public Comment
The Federal Trade Commission (``Commission'') has accepted, subject
to final approval, an agreement containing a consent order from James
V. Grago, Jr., individually and doing business as ClixSense.com
(``Respondent'').
The proposed consent order (``proposed order'') has been placed on
the public record for thirty (30) days for receipt of comments by
interested persons. Comments received during this period will become
part of the public record. After thirty (30) days, the Commission will
again review the agreement and the comments received, and will decide
whether it should withdraw from the agreement and take appropriate
action or make final the agreement's proposed order.
This matter involves ClixSense.com (``ClixSense''), an online
rewards website owned and operated by James V. Grago, Jr. (``Mr.
Grago'') since 2010. As the sole owner of ClixSense, Mr. Grago
controlled or had authority to control, or participated in the acts or
practices alleged in the proposed complaint.
ClixSense pays its users for clicking on advertisements, performing
online tasks, or completing online surveys. ClixSense makes money from
advertisers and from marketers who purchase information generated from
consumer surveys. As part of the enrollment process, ClixSense collects
and stores personal information on its computer network about its
users, including full names, physical addresses, dates of birth,
gender, and email addresses. ClixSense also requires users to create a
username, a password, and an answer to a security question that it
stores in its database. For users who earn more than $600 annually,
ClixSense requires a Social Security number.
The Commission's proposed three-count complaint alleges that
Respondent has violated Section 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission
Act.
First, the proposed complaint alleges that Respondent deceived its
users about the level of encryption it used. As alleged in the proposed
complaint, Respondent has expressly represented to its users through a
Frequently Asked Question (``FAQ'') entitled ``Is my personal
information secure?'' that it uses the latest encryption techniques to
ensure the security of account information. Contrary to this claim, the
proposed complaint alleges that Respondent used no encryption to
protect consumers' personal information. In fact, Respondent stored
consumers' personal information, including SSNs, in clear text.
Second, the proposed complaint alleges that Respondent
misrepresented to its users that it utilized the latest security
techniques to ensure the security of users' personal information. As
alleged in the proposed complaint, Respondent failed to utilize the
latest security techniques in multiple areas.
Third, the proposed complaint alleges that Respondent has engaged
in a number of unreasonable security practices that led to a breach of
information regarding 6.6 million consumers. The proposed complaint
alleges that Respondent:
Failed to implement readily available security measures to
limit access between computers on ClixSense's network, and between such
computers and the internet;
permitted employees to store plain text user credentials
in personal email accounts, and on ClixSense's laptops;
failed to change default login and password credentials
for third-party company network resources; and
maintained consumers' personal information, including
consumers' names, addresses, email addresses, dates of birth, gender,
answers to security questions, login and password credentials, and
Social Security numbers, in clear text on ClixSense's network and
devices.
The proposed complaint alleges that Respondent could have addressed
each of the failures described above by implementing readily available
and relatively low-cost security measures.
The proposed complaint alleges that Respondent's failures caused or
are likely to cause substantial injury to consumers that is not
outweighed by countervailing benefits to consumers or competition and
is not reasonably avoidable by consumers themselves. Such practice
constitutes an unfair act or practice under Section 5 of the FTC Act.
The proposed order contains injunctive provisions addressing the
alleged deceptive and unfair conduct in connection with Respondent's
operation of an online rewards website. Part I of the proposed order
prohibits Respondent from false or deceptive statements regarding the
extent to which Respondent maintains and protects the privacy,
security, confidentiality, or integrity of Personal Information,
including the extent to which it utilizes (1) encryption techniques and
(2) security techniques.
Part II of the proposed order prohibits Respondent, in connection
with any business that Mr. Grago controls directly and indirectly,
including ClixSense, from transferring, selling, sharing, collecting,
maintaining, or storing personal information unless it establishes and
implements, and thereafter maintains, a comprehensive information
security program that is designed to protect the security,
[[Page 18540]]
confidentiality, and integrity of such personal information.
Part III of the proposed order requires any business that Mr. Grago
controls, directly or indirectly, that collects personal information
online to obtain initial and biennial data security assessments for
twenty years.
Part IV of the agreement prohibits Respondent from misrepresenting
any fact material to the assessments required by Provision III.
Part V requires any business that Mr. Grago controls directly or
indirectly, including ClixSense, to submit an annual certification from
a senior corporate manager (or senior officer responsible for its
information security program) that Respondent has implemented the
requirements of the Order and is not aware of any material
noncompliance that has not been corrected or disclosed to the
Commission.
Parts VI through IX of the proposed order are reporting and
compliance provisions, which include recordkeeping requirements and
provisions requiring Respondent to provide information or documents
necessary for the Commission to monitor compliance. Part X states that
the proposed order will remain in effect for 20 years, with certain
exceptions.
The purpose of this analysis is to aid public comment on the
proposed order. It is not intended to constitute an official
interpretation of the complaint or proposed order, or to modify in any
way the proposed order's terms.
By direction of the Commission.
Julie A. Mack,
Acting Secretary.
Statement of the Federal Trade Commission
April 24, 2019
Today, the Commission announces cases against ClixSense and i-
Dressup,\1\ which include allegations that the companies failed to
employ reasonable security to protect consumers' sensitive data. The
orders obtained in these matters contain strong injunctive provisions,
including new requirements that go beyond requirements from previous
data security orders. For example, the orders include requirements that
a senior officer provide annual certifications of compliance to the
Commission, and explicit provisions prohibiting the defendants from
making misrepresentations to the third parties conducting assessments
of their data security programs. These new requirements will provide
greater assurances that consumers' data will be protected going
forward.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Although the Commission's settlement with i-Dressup
addresses broader COPPA violations, this statement focuses
specifically on the data security requirements set forth in the
proposed stipulated order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Since joining the Commission, we have instructed staff to closely
review our orders to determine whether they could be strengthened and
improved--particularly in the areas of privacy and data security.
Through ongoing discussions both internally and with external
stakeholders, including through our public Hearings on Competition and
Consumer Protection in the 21st Century and the comment process,\2\ we
continue to consider changes to our orders. We will adjust our data
security orders, as needed, to reflect our ongoing discussions
regarding the FTC's remedial authority and needs, as well as the
specific facts and circumstances of each case.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See, e.g., FTC Hearings on Competition and Consumer
Protection in the 21st Century (Session 9--Data Security), Dec. 11-
12, 2018, https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/events-calendar/ftc-hearing-competition-consumer-protection-21st-century-december-2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We are particularly committed to strengthening the order provisions
regarding data security assessments of companies by third parties. The
Commission expects that these third parties will faithfully assess data
security practices to identify potential noncompliance with appropriate
order provisions. Future orders will better ensure that third-party
assessors know they are accountable for providing meaningful,
independent analysis of the data practices under examination. The
announcements today reflect the beginning of our thinking, but we
anticipate further refinements, and these orders may not reflect the
approach that we intend to use in every data security enforcement
action going forward.
[FR Doc. 2019-08786 Filed 4-30-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-P