Certain Large Residential Washers From Korea and Mexico, 18319-18320 [2019-08671]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 83 / Tuesday, April 30, 2019 / Notices
2000. This notice corrects the cultural
affiliation. Lineal descendants or
representatives of any Indian Tribe or
Native Hawaiian organization not
identified in this notice that wish to
request transfer of control of these
human remains and associated funerary
objects should submit a written request
to the University of Denver Museum of
Anthropology. If no additional
requestors come forward, transfer of
control of the human remains and
associated funerary objects to the lineal
descendants, Indian Tribes, or Native
Hawaiian organizations stated in this
notice may proceed.
Lineal descendants or
representatives of any Indian Tribe or
Native Hawaiian organization not
identified in this notice that wish to
request transfer of control of these
human remains and associated funerary
objects should submit a written request
with information in support of the
request to the University of Denver
Museum of Anthropology at the address
in this notice by May 30, 2019.
DATES:
Anne Amati, University of
Denver Museum of Anthropology, 2000
East Asbury Avenue, Sturm Hall Room
146, Denver, CO 80208, telephone (303)
871–2687, email anne.amati@du.edu.
ADDRESSES:
Notice is
here given in accordance with the
Native American Graves Protection and
Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C.
3003, of the correction of an inventory
of human remains and associated
funerary objects under the control of the
University of Denver Museum of
Anthropology, Denver, CO. The human
remains and associated funerary objects
were removed from Pueblo Blanco,
Santa Fe County, NM.
This notice is published as part of the
National Park Service’s administrative
responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25
U.S.C. 3003(d)(3). The determinations in
this notice are the sole responsibility of
the museum, institution, or Federal
agency that has control of the Native
American human remains and
associated funerary objects. The
National Park Service is not responsible
for the determinations in this notice.
This notice corrects the cultural
affiliation published in a Notice of
Inventory Completion in the Federal
Register (65 FR 67757–67758,
November 13, 2000). This correction is
being made following additional
consultation that provided new
evidence of cultural affiliation. Transfer
of control of the items in this correction
notice has not occurred.
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Apr 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
Correction
In the Federal Register (65 FR 67757,
November 13, 2000), column 3,
paragraph 3, sentence 1 is corrected by
substituting the following sentence:
A detailed assessment of the human
remains was made by University of Denver
Department of Anthropology and Museum of
Anthropology professional staff, a contract
physical anthropologist, and the New Mexico
State Archaeologist in consultation with
representatives of the Colorado River Indian
Tribes of the Colorado River Indian
Reservation, Arizona and California; Hopi
Tribe of Arizona; Kewa Pueblo, New Mexico
(previously listed as the Pueblo of Santo
Domingo); Ohkay Owingeh, New Mexico
(previously listed as the Pueblo of San Juan);
Pueblo of Pojoaque, New Mexico; and Pueblo
of Tesuque, New Mexico (hereafter referred
to as ‘‘The Consulted Tribes’’).
In the Federal Register (65 FR 67757,
November 13, 2000), column 3,
paragraph 5, sentences 1–4 are corrected
by substituting the following sentences:
Pueblo Blanco (site LA 40) is a large Pueblo
IV-period Ancestral Pueblo village on the
west side of the Galisteo Basin. The evidence
presented in consultations with the Hopi
Tribe of Arizona; Kewa Pueblo, New Mexico
(previously listed as the Pueblo of Santo
Domingo); Ohkay Owingeh, New Mexico
(previously listed as the Pueblo of San Juan);
Pueblo of Pojoaque, New Mexico; and Pueblo
of Tesuque, New Mexico, supported by the
ethnohistoric record and geographical and
archeological evidence, demonstrates a
cultural affiliation between Pueblo Blanco
and the present day Pueblos who are the
descendants of Ancestral Puebloan groups.
In the Federal Register (65 FR 67758,
November 13, 2000), column 1,
paragraph 1, sentence 3 is corrected by
substituting the following sentence:
Lastly, officials of the University of Denver
Department of Anthropology and Museum of
Anthropology have determined that,
pursuant to 43 CFR 10.2 (e), there is a
relationship of shared group identity that can
be reasonably traced between the Native
American human remains and associated
funerary objects and the Hopi Tribe of
Arizona; Kewa Pueblo, New Mexico
(previously listed as the Pueblo of Santo
Domingo); Ohkay Owingeh, New Mexico
(previously listed as the Pueblo of San Juan);
Pueblo of Acoma, New Mexico; Pueblo of
Cochiti, New Mexico; Pueblo of Isleta, New
Mexico; Pueblo of Jemez, New Mexico;
Pueblo of Laguna, New Mexico; Pueblo of
Nambe, New Mexico; Pueblo of Picuris, New
Mexico; Pueblo of Pojoaque, New Mexico;
Pueblo of San Felipe, New Mexico; Pueblo of
San Ildefonso, New Mexico; Pueblo of
Sandia, New Mexico; Pueblo of Santa Ana,
New Mexico; Pueblo of Santa Clara, New
Mexico; Pueblo of Taos, New Mexico; Pueblo
of Tesuque, New Mexico; Pueblo of Zia, New
Mexico; Ysleta del Sur Pueblo (previously
listed as the Ysleta Del Sur Pueblo of Texas);
and the Zuni Tribe of the Zuni Reservation,
New Mexico (hereafter referred to as ‘‘The
Affiliated Tribes’’).
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18319
Additional Requestors and Disposition
Lineal descendants or representatives
of any Indian Tribe or Native Hawaiian
organization not identified in this notice
that wish to request transfer of control
of these human remains and associated
funerary objects should submit a written
request with information in support of
the request to Anne Amati, University of
Denver Museum of Anthropology, 2000
E Asbury Avenue, Denver, CO 80208,
telephone (303) 871–2687, email
anne.amati@du.edu, by May 30, 2019.
After that date, if no additional
requestors have come forward, transfer
of control of the human remains and
associated funerary objects to The
Affiliated Tribes may proceed.
The University of Denver Museum of
Anthropology is responsible for
notifying The Consulted Tribes and The
Affiliated Tribes that this notice has
been published.
Dated: April 4, 2019.
Melanie O’Brien,
Manager, National NAGPRA Program.
[FR Doc. 2019–08741 Filed 4–29–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–52–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–488 and 731–
TA–1199–1200 (Review)]
Certain Large Residential Washers
From Korea and Mexico
Determinations
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject five-year reviews, the
United States International Trade
Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of
1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the
antidumping and countervailing duty
orders on large residential washers from
Korea would not be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury to an industry in the United
States within a reasonably foreseeable
time, and that revocation of the
antidumping duty order on large
residential washers from Mexico would
be likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States within a
reasonably foreseeable time.
Background
The Commission, pursuant to section
751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)),
instituted these reviews on January 2,
2018 (83 FR 145) and determined on
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
E:\FR\FM\30APN1.SGM
30APN1
18320
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 83 / Tuesday, April 30, 2019 / Notices
April 9, 2018 that it would conduct full
reviews (83 FR 18347, April 26, 2018).
Notice of the scheduling of the
Commission’s reviews and of a public
hearing to be held in connection
therewith was given by posting copies
of the notice in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, Washington, DC, and by
publishing the notice in the Federal
Register on September 14, 2018 (83 FR
46757). Effective February 4, 2019, the
Commission revised its schedule due to
the lapse in appropriations and ensuing
cessation of Commission operations (84
FR 2926, February 8, 2019). The hearing
was held in Washington, DC, on
February 21, 2019, and all persons who
requested the opportunity were
permitted to appear in person or by
counsel.
The Commission made these
determinations pursuant to section
751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It
completed and filed its determinations
in these reviews on April 24, 2019. The
views of the Commission are contained
in USITC Publication 4482 (April 2019),
entitled Large Residential Washers from
Korea and Mexico: Investigation Nos.
701–TA–488 and 731–TA–1199–1200
(Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: April 24, 2019.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2019–08671 Filed 4–29–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with NOTICES
Palafox Pharmacy; Decision and Order
On August 14, 2018, the Assistant
Administrator, Diversion Control
Division, Drug Enforcement
Administration (hereinafter, DEA or
Government), issued an Order to Show
Cause to Palafox Pharmacy (hereinafter,
Registrant), of Anthony, Texas. Order to
Show Cause (hereinafter, OSC), at 1.
The Show Cause Order proposes the
revocation of Registrant’s Certificate of
Registration on the ground that it has
‘‘no state authority to handle controlled
substances.’’ Id. (citing 21 U.S.C.
824(a)(3)).
Regarding jurisdiction, the Show
Cause Order alleges that Registrant
holds DEA Certificate of Registration
No. FP1305564 at the registered address
of 929 S Main St., Anthony, Texas
79821. OSC, at 1. The Show Cause
Order alleges that this registration
expires on March 31, 2021. Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Apr 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
The substantive ground for the
proceeding, as alleged in the Show
Cause Order, is that Registrant is
‘‘currently without authority to handle
controlled substances in the State of
Texas, the state in which . . . [it] is
registered with the DEA.’’ Id. at 1–2.
Specifically, the Show Cause Order
alleges that the Texas State Board of
Pharmacy suspended Registrant’s
pharmacy license on June 18, 2018. Id.
at 1.
The Show Cause Order notifies
Registrant of its right to request a
hearing on the allegation or to submit a
written statement while waiving its
right to a hearing, the procedures for
electing each option, and the
consequences for failing to elect either
option. Id. at 2 (citing 21 CFR 1301.43).
The Show Cause Order also notifies
Registrant of the opportunity to submit
a corrective action plan. OSC, at 2–3
(citing 21 U.S.C. 824(c)(2)(C)).
Adequacy of Service
In a Declaration dated November 2,
2018, a Diversion Investigator
(hereinafter, DI), who describes herself
as being assigned to the El Paso Field
Division, states that she had the OSC
delivered to the residential address of
Registrant’s owner. Government Exhibit
(hereinafter, GX) 6 (DI Declaration), at
1–2.1 See also GX 6, at 8–10 (proof of
delivery).
In its Request for Final Agency Action
dated November 7, 2018, the
Government represents that ‘‘[a]t least
30 days have passed since the time the
. . . [OSC] was served on Registrant
. . . [and] Registrant has not requested
a hearing.’’ Request for Final Agency
Action (hereinafter, RFAA), at 1.2 The
Government seeks the issuance of ‘‘a
Final Order revoking Registrant’s DEA
registration.’’ RFAA, at 4.
Based on the DI’s Declaration, the
Government’s written representations,
and my review of the record, I find that
the Government accomplished service
on August 30, 2018.3 GX 6, at 1–2, 8–
10. I also find that more than 30 days
have passed since the date the
Government served the OSC. Further,
based on the Government’s written
representations, I find that neither
Registrant, nor anyone purporting to
1 According to the DI, delivery attempts to
Registrant’s registered address were not successful.
GX 6, at 1.
2 In its Supplement to Request for Final Agency
Action dated March 19, 2019, the Government
represents that ‘‘Registrant has not otherwise
corresponded or communicated with DEA regarding
the Order to Show Cause served on it, including the
filing of any written statement in lieu of a hearing.’’
Supplement, at 1.
3 Nasim F. Khan, M.D., 73 FR 4630, 4630 (2008);
Patrick K. Riggs, M.D., 72 FR 71,959, 71,959 (2007).
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
represent him, requested a hearing,
submitted a written statement while
waiving Registrant’s right to a hearing,
or submitted a corrective action plan.
Accordingly, I find that Registrant has
waived his right to a hearing and his
right to submit a written statement and
corrective action plan. 21 CFR
1301.43(d) and 21 U.S.C. 824(c)(2)(C). I,
therefore, issue this Decision and Order
based on the record submitted by the
Government, which constitutes the
entire record before me. 21 CFR
1301.43(e).
Findings of Fact
Registrant’s DEA Registration
Registrant is the holder of DEA
Certificate of Registration No.
FP1305564 at the registered address of
929 S Main St., Anthony, Texas 79821
under the electronic signature of Samuel
Ambrosio Gurrola. GX 1 (Certification of
Registration History), at 1. Pursuant to
this registration, Registrant is authorized
to dispense controlled substances in
schedules IV and V as a retail pharmacy.
Id. Registrant’s registration expires on
March 31, 2021 and is in an active
pending status. Id.
The Status of Registrant’s State License
Registrant’s Texas pharmacy license
(number 26185) was revoked by Order
of the Texas State Board of Pharmacy.
GX 5 (Texas State Board of Pharmacy
certified ‘‘Agreed Board Order #J–18–
022–B’’ dated August 7, 2018), at 3. The
revocation was effective on the date of
entry of the Order. Id. The record
evidence shows that Registrant’s Texas
pharmacy license number 26185 is
revoked. GX 7 (Texas State Board of
Pharmacy website screen print showing
Registrant’s pharmacy license status as
‘‘Revocation’’), at 1. Further, according
to the online records of the Texas State
Board of Pharmacy, of which I take
official notice, Registrant’s pharmacy
license is still revoked.4 Texas State
Board of Pharmacy website, https://
4 Under the Administrative Procedure Act, an
agency ‘‘may take official notice of facts at any stage
in a proceeding—even in the final decision.’’
United States Department of Justice, Attorney
General’s Manual on the Administrative Procedure
Act 80 (1947) (Wm. W. Gaunt & Sons, Inc., Reprint
1979). Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 556(e), ‘‘[w]hen an
agency decision rests on official notice of a material
fact not appearing in the evidence in the record, a
party is entitled, on timely request, to an
opportunity to show the contrary.’’ Accordingly,
Registrant may dispute my finding by filing a
properly supported motion for reconsideration
within 15 calendar days of the date of this Order.
Any such motion shall be filed with the Office of
the Administrator and a copy shall be served on the
Government. In the event Registrant files a motion,
the Government shall have 15 calendar days to file
a response.
E:\FR\FM\30APN1.SGM
30APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 83 (Tuesday, April 30, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18319-18320]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-08671]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-488 and 731-TA-1199-1200 (Review)]
Certain Large Residential Washers From Korea and Mexico
Determinations
On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the
Act''), that revocation of the antidumping and countervailing duty
orders on large residential washers from Korea would not be likely to
lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in
the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time, and that
revocation of the antidumping duty order on large residential washers
from Mexico would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of
material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably
foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background
The Commission, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C.
1675(c)), instituted these reviews on January 2, 2018 (83 FR 145) and
determined on
[[Page 18320]]
April 9, 2018 that it would conduct full reviews (83 FR 18347, April
26, 2018). Notice of the scheduling of the Commission's reviews and of
a public hearing to be held in connection therewith was given by
posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the
notice in the Federal Register on September 14, 2018 (83 FR 46757).
Effective February 4, 2019, the Commission revised its schedule due to
the lapse in appropriations and ensuing cessation of Commission
operations (84 FR 2926, February 8, 2019). The hearing was held in
Washington, DC, on February 21, 2019, and all persons who requested the
opportunity were permitted to appear in person or by counsel.
The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c)
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its
determinations in these reviews on April 24, 2019. The views of the
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4482 (April 2019),
entitled Large Residential Washers from Korea and Mexico: Investigation
Nos. 701-TA-488 and 731-TA-1199-1200 (Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: April 24, 2019.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2019-08671 Filed 4-29-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P