Performance-Based Payments (DFARS Case 2019-D002), 18221-18225 [2019-08487]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 83 / Tuesday, April 30, 2019 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
48 CFR Parts 204, 232, and 252
[Docket DARS–2019–0019]
RIN 0750–AK37
Performance-Based Payments (DFARS
Case 2019–D002)
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
DoD is proposing to amend
the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to
implement a section of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2017, which amends 10 U.S.C.
2307 to address the use of performancebased payments.
DATES: Comment Date: Comments on
the proposed rule should be submitted
in writing to the address shown below
on or before July 1, 2019, to be
considered in the formation of a final
rule.
SUMMARY:
Submission of Comments:
Submit comments identified by DFARS
Case 2019–D002, using any of the
following methods:
Æ Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Search for
‘‘DFARS Case 2019–D002.’’ Select
‘‘Comment Now’’ and follow the
instructions provided to submit a
comment. Please include ‘‘DFARS Case
2019–D002’’ on any attached
documents.
Æ Email: osd.dfars@mail.mil. Include
DFARS Case 2019–D002 in the subject
line of the message.
Æ Fax: 571–372–6094.
Æ Mail: Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Attn: Ms. Amy G.
Williams, OUSD(A&S)DPC/DARS,
Room 3B941, 3060 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–3060.
Comments received generally will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. To
confirm receipt of your comment(s),
please check www.regulations.gov,
approximately two to three days after
submission to verify posting (except
allow 30 days for posting of comments
submitted by mail).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Amy Williams, DPC/DARS, at 571–372–
6106.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with PROPOSALS
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:27 Apr 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
I. Background
DoD is proposing to amend DFARS
subpart 232.10, Performance-Based
Payments; amend the clauses at DFARS
252.232–7012, Performance-Based
Payments—Whole Contract Basis, and
DFARS 252.232–7013, PerformanceBased Payments—Deliverable Item
Basis; and add a new provision at
252.232–70XX, Performance-Based
Payments—Representation, to
implement section 831 the National
Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for
Fiscal Year (FY) 2017, which amends 10
U.S.C. 2307 to address the use of
performance-based payments.
A proposed rule was published in the
Federal Register on August 23, 2018 (83
FR 42831), under DFARS Case 2017–
D019, Performance-Based Payments and
Progress Payments. That rule proposed
to implement section 831 and also
revise progress payments and
performance-based payments policies
and procedures for DoD contracts. That
proposed rule was withdrawn by a
notice published in the Federal Register
on October 4, 2018 (83 FR 47867). This
rule addresses only the amendments to
the DFARS required by section 831.
II. Discussion and Analysis
A. Preference for Performance-Based
Payments
Performance-based payments are a
method of contract financing that may
be available under fixed-price contracts,
except for contracts awarded using
Sealed Bidding procedures.
Performance-based payments differ from
the more traditional progress payments
based on costs because these contract
financing payments are made on the
basis of the contractor’s achievement of
objective, quantifiably measurable
events, results, or accomplishments that
are defined and valued in the contract
prior to performance. It is a preferred
method of contracting as it may reduce
oversight and compliance costs to the
Government. It also has benefits for
contractors as it should help cash flow,
reduce the cost of oversight and
compliance, and allows the
management team to focus on technical
and schedule progress.
Section 831 amends 10 U.S.C.
2307(b)(1) by requiring, whenever
practicable, that payment under the
authority of 10 U.S.C. 2307(a) shall be
made using performance-based
payments. Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR) 32.1001(a) already
states that performance-based payments
are the preferred Government financing
method when the contracting officer
finds them practical, and the contractor
agrees to their use.
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
18221
B. Relationship of Performance-Based
Payments to Costs Incurred
DFARS case 2011–D045, published in
the Federal Register on March 31, 2014
(77 FR 4638), mandated that cumulative
performance-based payments shall not
exceed the cumulative cost incurred on
the contract or delivery item, whichever
is applicable, at any point during
contract performance. That requirement
was supported by the statement at FAR
32.1004(b)(2)(i) that contract financing
should only be provided to the extent
actually needed for contract
performance and the statement at FAR
32.1004(b)(3)(ii) that the contracting
officer must ensure that performancebased payments ‘‘are not expected to
result in an unreasonably low or
negative level of contractor investment
in the contract.’’
Section 831 amended 10 U.S.C. 2307
by adding paragraph (b)(2), which
provides that performance-based
payments shall not be conditioned upon
costs incurred in contract performance
but only on the achievement of
negotiated performance outcomes.
Therefore, this rule proposes to remove
the restrictions at DFARS 232.1001(a)
and paragraph (b)(i) of the clauses at
DFARS 252.232–7012 and 252.232–
7013 that limit performance-based
payments to amounts not greater than
costs incurred up to the time of
payment. However, the requirement for
contractors to report costs incurred
when requesting performance-based
payments is retained, in order to have
the data necessary for negotiation of
performance-based payments on future
contracts.
Section 831 also added paragraph
(b)(3) to 10 U.S.C. 2307, which
addresses the eligibility for
performance-based payments of
nontraditional defense contractors and
other private sector companies. This has
been added to the policy at DFARS
232.1001.
10 U.S.C. 2307(b)(4), as added by
section 831, requires contractors to be in
compliance with Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles in order to
receive performance-based payments,
with no requirement for a Governmentunique accounting systems or practices
as a prerequisite to receive performancebased payments. This requirement has
been incorporated at DFARS 232.1003–
70 and the clauses at DFARS 252.232–
7012 and 252.232–7013. This rule also
proposes a new representation by each
offeror, if performance-based payments
are anticipated, as to whether the output
of its accounting system is in
compliance with Generally Accepted
E:\FR\FM\30APP1.SGM
30APP1
18222
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 83 / Tuesday, April 30, 2019 / Proposed Rules
Accounting Principles, as evidenced by
audited financial statements.
Government in commercial contract
financing.
III. Applicability to Contracts at or
Below the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold and for Commercial Items,
Including Commercially Available Offthe-Shelf Items
IV. Expected Cost Impact
This rule proposes to amend the
clauses at DFARS 252.232–7012 and
252.232–7013. These clauses do not
apply to contracts at or below the
simplified acquisition threshold or for
the acquisition of commercial items. In
accordance with 10 U.S.C. 2307(f) and
41 U.S.C. 4505, FAR 32.201 provides
that payment for commercial items may
be made under such terms and
conditions as the agency head
determines are appropriate or customary
in the commercial marketplace and are
in the best interest of the United States.
Furthermore, FAR 32.202–1 states that
Government financing of commercial
purchases is expected to be different
from that used for noncommercial
purchases. While the contracting officer
may adapt techniques and procedures
from the noncommercial subparts for
use in implementing commercial
contract financing arrangements, the
contracting officer must have a full
understanding of effects of the differing
contract environments and of what is
needed to protect the interests of the
This rule proposes to amend the
DFARS to implement changes to
performance-based payment policies for
DoD contracts by amending the policy
on performance-based payments at
DFARS 232.1001 and amending the
clauses at DFARS 252.232–7012,
Performance-Based Payments—Whole
Contract Basis, and 252.232–7013,
Performance-Based Payments—
Deliverable Item Basis.
This rule may benefit contractors who
receive contract financing from the
Government in the form of performancebased payments. Performance-based
payments do not apply to—
• Payments under costreimbursement line-items;
• Contracts awarded under the
authority of FAR part 12 or part 13;
• Contracts for architect-engineer
services or construction, or for
shipbuilding or ship repair, when the
contract provides for progress payments
based upon a percentage or stage of
completion.
Performance-based payments are tied
to the achievement of specific,
measurable events or accomplishments
that are defined and valued in advance
by the parties to the contract. Total
Summary
Public
Present Value ..............................................................................................................................
Annualized Costs .........................................................................................................................
Annualized Value Costs (as of 2016 if Year 1 is 2019) ..............................................................
To access the complete Regulatory
Cost Analysis, go to the Federal
eRulmaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov, search for
‘‘DFARS Case 2019–D002,’’ click ‘‘Open
Docket,’’ and view ‘‘Supporting
Documents.’’
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with PROPOSALS
V. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:27 Apr 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
subject to review under section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
VI. Executive Order 13771
This rule is expected to be an E.O.
13771, Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs,
deregulatory action. The total
annualized value of the cost savings is
$1,521,836. Details on the estimated
cost savings can be found in section IV.
of this preamble.
VII. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD expects that this proposed rule
may have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.
Therefore, an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis has been prepared
and is summarized as follows:
PO 00000
performance-based payments cannot
exceed 90 percent of the contract price.
This rulemaking proposes to remove
the DFARS restrictions that limit
performance-based payments to
amounts not greater than costs incurred
up to the time of payment.
If performance-based payments to the
contractor based on the negotiated value
of completed milestone events are
allowed to exceed the total costs
incurred up to the time of payment, the
cost to the contractor of short-term
borrowing will decrease and the cost to
the Government of borrowing will
increase.
In addition, there is a minimal cost to
offerors and the Government related to
a new provision at DFARS 252.232–
70XX, Performance-Based Payments—
Representation, that requires each
offeror responding to a solicitation that
may result in a contract providing
performance-based financing to
represent whether the output of the
offeror’s accounting system is in
compliance with Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles, as evidenced by
audited financial statements.
DoD has performed a regulatory cost
analysis on this rule. The following is a
summary of the estimated public cost
savings and Government costs in
millions calculated in perpetuity in
2016 dollars at a 7-percent discount
rate:
Frm 00059
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
¥$53.971
¥3.778
¥3.084
Government
$27.338
1.914
1.562
Total
¥$26.633
¥1.864
¥1.522
This rule proposes to implement
section 831 the National Defense
Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal
Year (FY) 2017, which amends 10
U.S.C. 2307 to address the use of
performance-based payments.
The primary objective of this rule is
to remove the restrictions at DFARS
232.1001(a) and the clauses at 252.232–
7012(b)(i) and 252.232–7013(b)(i) that
limit performance-based payments to
amounts not greater than costs incurred
up to the time of payment, as required
10 U.S.C. 2307.
This rule will apply to approximately
50 small entities per year that submit
offers and are awarded contracts that
provide performance-based contract
payments from DoD, as well as an
additional 5 offerors that submit offers
in response to solicitations that may
result in contracts that provide
performance-based payments but do not
receive an award.
E:\FR\FM\30APP1.SGM
30APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 83 / Tuesday, April 30, 2019 / Proposed Rules
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with PROPOSALS
This rule adds a reporting
requirement that will require an entry in
the annual representations and
certifications with regard to whether the
output of the offeror’s accounting
system is in compliance with Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles, as
evidenced by audited financial
statements. DoD estimates that the skill
necessary for this requirement is at the
journeyman level and that each entry
will require an average of 6 minutes.
The rule does not duplicate, overlap,
or conflict with any other Federal rules.
This rule will not have a significant
economic impact on small entities. The
burden imposed by the new
representation is minimal. The net
impact is likely to benefit small entities,
to the extent that the entity may receive
an increase in cash flow if the
negotiated value of performance-based
payment events exceeds the actual costs
incurred at the time of event
completion. There are no significant
alternatives consistent with the stated
objectives of the statute.
DoD invites comments from small
business concerns and other interested
parties on the expected impact of this
rule on small entities.
DoD will also consider comments
from small entities concerning the
existing regulations in subparts affected
by this rule in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
610. Interested parties must submit such
comments separately and should cite 5
U.S.C. 610 (DFARS Case 2018–D043), in
correspondence.
XIII. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule affects the information
collection requirements at DFARS
subpart 232.10 (and associated clauses
at DFARS 252.232–7012 and 252.232–
7013, currently approved under OMB
Control Number 0704–0359, DFARS
Part 232, Contract Financing. The
impact, however, is negligible, because
only the last three lines of the table are
deleted, which do not impose the
predominance of the burden. This rule
also adds a new information collection
requirement that requires the approval
of the Office of Management and Budget
under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. chapter 35). Accordingly, DoD
has submitted a request for approval of
a new information collection
requirement concerning the provision at
252.232–70XX, Performance-Based
Payments—Representation to the Office
of Management and Budget.
A. Public reporting burden for this
collection of information is estimated to
average 0.1 hours per response,
including the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data
sources, gathering and maintaining the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:27 Apr 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
data needed, and completing and
reviewing the collection of information.
The annual reporting burden
estimated as follows:
Respondents: 144.
Responses per respondent: 1.
Total annual responses: 144.
Preparation hours per response: 0.1
hours.
Total response Burden Hours: 14.4.
B. Request for Comments Regarding
Paperwork Burden.
Written comments and
recommendations on the proposed
information collection, including
suggestions for reducing this burden,
should be sent to Ms. Jasmeet Seehra at
the Office of Management and Budget,
Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New
Executive Office Building, Washington,
DC 20503, or email Jasmeet_K._Seehra@
omb.eop.gov, with a copy to the Defense
Acquisition Regulations System, Attn:
Ms. Amy G. Williams, OUSD(A&S)DPC/
DARS, Room 3B941, 3060 Defense
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301–3060.
Comments can be received from 30 to 60
days after the date of this notice, but
comments to OMB will be most useful
if received by OMB within 30 days after
the date of this notice.
Public comments are particularly
invited on: Whether this collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of functions of the DFARS,
and will have practical utility; whether
our estimate of the public burden of this
collection of information is accurate,
and based on valid assumptions and
methodology; ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and ways in
which we can minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, through the use of
appropriate technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology.
To request more information on this
proposed information collection or to
obtain a copy of the proposal and
associated collection instruments,
please write to the Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Attn: Ms. Amy G.
Williams, OUSD(A&S)DPC/DARS,
Room 3B941, 3060 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–3060, or email
osd.dfars@mail.mil. Include DFARS
Case 2019–D002 in the subject line of
the message.
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
18223
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 204,
232, and 252
Government procurement.
Jennifer Lee Hawes,
Regulatory Control Officer, Defense
Acquisition Regulations System.
Therefore, 48 CFR parts 204, 232, and
252 are proposed to be amended as
follows:
■ 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
parts 204, 232, and 252 continues to
read as follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR
chapter 1.
PART 204—ADMINISTRATIVE
MATTERS
2. Amend section 204.1202 by—
a. Revising the section heading;
b. Redesignating paragraph (2)(xiii) as
(2)(xiv); and
■ c. Adding a new paragraph (2)(xiii)
The revision and addition read as
follows:
■
■
■
204.1202 Solicitation provision and
contract clause.
*
*
*
*
*
(2) * * *
(xiii) 252.232–70XX, PerformanceBased Payments—Representation.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 232—CONTRACT FINANCING
3. In section 232.1001, revise
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
■
232.1001
Policy.
(a) In accordance with 10 U.S.C.
2307(b)(2), performance-based payments
shall not be conditioned upon costs
incurred in contract performance, but
on the achievement of performance
outcomes. Private sector companies,
including nontraditional defense
contractors, are eligible for performancebased payments, consistent with best
commercial practices.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Revise section 232.1003–70 to read
as follows:
232.1003–70
Criteria for use.
In accordance with 10 U.S.C. 2307(b),
the output of a contractor’s accounting
system shall be in compliance with
Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles, as evidenced by audited
financial statements, in order to receive
performance-based payments. 10 U.S.C.
2307 does not grant the Defense
Contract Audit Agency the authority to
audit compliance with Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles.
■ 5. Amend section 232.1005–70 by—
■ a. Designating the introductory text as
paragraph (a);
E:\FR\FM\30APP1.SGM
30APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 83 / Tuesday, April 30, 2019 / Proposed Rules
b. Redesignating paragraphs (a) and
(b) as paragraphs (a)(1) and (2),
respectively; and
■ c. Adding a new paragraph (b).
The addition reads as follows:
b. Adding paragraph (d)(2)(vi) to read
as follows:
■
■
252.204–7007 Alternate A, Annual
Representations and Certifications.
6. Amend section 252.204–7007 by—
a. Removing the provision date of
‘‘(APR 2018)’’ and adding ‘‘(DATE)’’ in
its place; and
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(2) * * *
_(vi) 252.232–70XX, PerformanceBased Payments—Representation.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. Amend section 252.232–7012 by—
■ a. In the clause introductory text,
removing ‘‘232.1005–70(a)’’ and adding
‘‘232.1005–70(a)(1)’’ in its place;
■ b. Removing the clause date of ‘‘(MAR
2014)’’ and adding ‘‘(DATE)’’ in its
place;
■ c. Redesignating paragraphs (b)(i)
through (iii) as (c)(1) through (3),
respectively;
*
■
232.1003–70
*
Criteria for use.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Use the provision at 252.232–
70XX, Performance-Based Payments—
Representation, in solicitations where
the resulting contract may include
performance-based payments.
PART 252—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with PROPOSALS
■
■
*
*
*
*
8. Amend section 252.232–7013 by—
■ a. In the clause introductory text,
removing ‘‘232.1005–70(b)’’ and adding
‘‘232.1005–70(a)(2)’’ in its place;
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:27 Apr 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
b. Removing the clause date of (APR
2014)’’ and adding ‘‘(DATE)’’ in its
place;
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
d. Adding a new paragraph (b); and
e. Revising paragraph (c)(1).
The addition and revision reads as
follows:
■
■
252.232–7012 Performance-Based
Payments–Whole-Contract Basis.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) In accordance with 10 U.S.C.
2307(b), the output of the Contractor’s
accounting system shall be in
compliance with Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles, as evidenced by
audited financial statements, in order to
receive performance-based payments.
(c)(1) The Contractor shall, in
addition to providing the information
required by FAR 52.232–32, submit
supporting information for all payment
requests using the following format:
c. Redesignating paragraphs (b)(i)
through (iii) as (c)(1) through (3),
respectively;
■ d. Adding a new paragraph (b); and
■
E:\FR\FM\30APP1.SGM
30APP1
EP30AP19.000
18224
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 83 / Tuesday, April 30, 2019 / Proposed Rules
252.232–7013 Performance-Based
Payments—Deliverable-Item Basis.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
■ 9. Add section 252.232–70XX to read
as follows:
(b) In accordance with 10 U.S.C.
2307(b), the output of the Contractor’s
accounting system shall be in
compliance with Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles, as evidenced by
audited financial statements, in order to
receive performance-based payments.
(c)(1) The Contractor shall, in
addition to providing the information
required by FAR 52.232–32, submit
supporting information for all payment
requests using the following format:
Accounting Principles, as evidenced by
audited financial statements.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
(End of Provision)
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
[FR Doc. 2019–08487 Filed 4–29–19; 8:45 am]
252.232–70XX Performance-Based
Payments—Representation
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
48 CFR Parts 239 and 252
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with PROPOSALS
As prescribed in 232.1005–70(b), use
the following provision:
[Docket DARS–2019–0018]
RIN 0750–AJ97
Performance-Based PaymentsRepresentation (DATE)
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement: Modification
of DFARS Clause ‘‘Cancellation or
Termination of Orders’’ (DFARS Case
2018–D035)
(a) In accordance with 10 U.S.C. 2307(b),
the output of a contractor’s accounting
system shall be in compliance with Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles in order to
receive performance-based payments.
(b) The Offeror represents that the output
of its accounting system is [ ] is not [ ] in
compliance with Generally Accepted
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:27 Apr 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
AGENCY:
Frm 00062
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\30APP1.SGM
30APP1
EP30AP19.001
e. Revising newly redesignated
paragraph (c)(1).
The addition and revision read as
follows:
■
18225
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 83 (Tuesday, April 30, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 18221-18225]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-08487]
[[Page 18221]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations System
48 CFR Parts 204, 232, and 252
[Docket DARS-2019-0019]
RIN 0750-AK37
Performance-Based Payments (DFARS Case 2019-D002)
AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense
(DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD is proposing to amend the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to implement a section of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017, which amends 10 U.S.C.
2307 to address the use of performance-based payments.
DATES: Comment Date: Comments on the proposed rule should be submitted
in writing to the address shown below on or before July 1, 2019, to be
considered in the formation of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submission of Comments: Submit comments identified by DFARS
Case 2019-D002, using any of the following methods:
[cir] Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Search for ``DFARS Case 2019-D002.'' Select ``Comment Now'' and follow
the instructions provided to submit a comment. Please include ``DFARS
Case 2019-D002'' on any attached documents.
[cir] Email: [email protected]. Include DFARS Case 2019-D002 in
the subject line of the message.
[cir] Fax: 571-372-6094.
[cir] Mail: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Attn: Ms. Amy
G. Williams, OUSD(A&S)DPC/DARS, Room 3B941, 3060 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301-3060.
Comments received generally will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. To
confirm receipt of your comment(s), please check www.regulations.gov,
approximately two to three days after submission to verify posting
(except allow 30 days for posting of comments submitted by mail).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Amy Williams, DPC/DARS, at 571-
372-6106.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD is proposing to amend DFARS subpart 232.10, Performance-Based
Payments; amend the clauses at DFARS 252.232-7012, Performance-Based
Payments--Whole Contract Basis, and DFARS 252.232-7013, Performance-
Based Payments--Deliverable Item Basis; and add a new provision at
252.232-70XX, Performance-Based Payments--Representation, to implement
section 831 the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal
Year (FY) 2017, which amends 10 U.S.C. 2307 to address the use of
performance-based payments.
A proposed rule was published in the Federal Register on August 23,
2018 (83 FR 42831), under DFARS Case 2017-D019, Performance-Based
Payments and Progress Payments. That rule proposed to implement section
831 and also revise progress payments and performance-based payments
policies and procedures for DoD contracts. That proposed rule was
withdrawn by a notice published in the Federal Register on October 4,
2018 (83 FR 47867). This rule addresses only the amendments to the
DFARS required by section 831.
II. Discussion and Analysis
A. Preference for Performance-Based Payments
Performance-based payments are a method of contract financing that
may be available under fixed-price contracts, except for contracts
awarded using Sealed Bidding procedures. Performance-based payments
differ from the more traditional progress payments based on costs
because these contract financing payments are made on the basis of the
contractor's achievement of objective, quantifiably measurable events,
results, or accomplishments that are defined and valued in the contract
prior to performance. It is a preferred method of contracting as it may
reduce oversight and compliance costs to the Government. It also has
benefits for contractors as it should help cash flow, reduce the cost
of oversight and compliance, and allows the management team to focus on
technical and schedule progress.
Section 831 amends 10 U.S.C. 2307(b)(1) by requiring, whenever
practicable, that payment under the authority of 10 U.S.C. 2307(a)
shall be made using performance-based payments. Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR) 32.1001(a) already states that performance-based
payments are the preferred Government financing method when the
contracting officer finds them practical, and the contractor agrees to
their use.
B. Relationship of Performance-Based Payments to Costs Incurred
DFARS case 2011-D045, published in the Federal Register on March
31, 2014 (77 FR 4638), mandated that cumulative performance-based
payments shall not exceed the cumulative cost incurred on the contract
or delivery item, whichever is applicable, at any point during contract
performance. That requirement was supported by the statement at FAR
32.1004(b)(2)(i) that contract financing should only be provided to the
extent actually needed for contract performance and the statement at
FAR 32.1004(b)(3)(ii) that the contracting officer must ensure that
performance-based payments ``are not expected to result in an
unreasonably low or negative level of contractor investment in the
contract.''
Section 831 amended 10 U.S.C. 2307 by adding paragraph (b)(2),
which provides that performance-based payments shall not be conditioned
upon costs incurred in contract performance but only on the achievement
of negotiated performance outcomes. Therefore, this rule proposes to
remove the restrictions at DFARS 232.1001(a) and paragraph (b)(i) of
the clauses at DFARS 252.232-7012 and 252.232-7013 that limit
performance-based payments to amounts not greater than costs incurred
up to the time of payment. However, the requirement for contractors to
report costs incurred when requesting performance-based payments is
retained, in order to have the data necessary for negotiation of
performance-based payments on future contracts.
Section 831 also added paragraph (b)(3) to 10 U.S.C. 2307, which
addresses the eligibility for performance-based payments of
nontraditional defense contractors and other private sector companies.
This has been added to the policy at DFARS 232.1001.
10 U.S.C. 2307(b)(4), as added by section 831, requires contractors
to be in compliance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in
order to receive performance-based payments, with no requirement for a
Government-unique accounting systems or practices as a prerequisite to
receive performance-based payments. This requirement has been
incorporated at DFARS 232.1003-70 and the clauses at DFARS 252.232-7012
and 252.232-7013. This rule also proposes a new representation by each
offeror, if performance-based payments are anticipated, as to whether
the output of its accounting system is in compliance with Generally
Accepted
[[Page 18222]]
Accounting Principles, as evidenced by audited financial statements.
III. Applicability to Contracts at or Below the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold and for Commercial Items, Including Commercially Available
Off-the-Shelf Items
This rule proposes to amend the clauses at DFARS 252.232-7012 and
252.232-7013. These clauses do not apply to contracts at or below the
simplified acquisition threshold or for the acquisition of commercial
items. In accordance with 10 U.S.C. 2307(f) and 41 U.S.C. 4505, FAR
32.201 provides that payment for commercial items may be made under
such terms and conditions as the agency head determines are appropriate
or customary in the commercial marketplace and are in the best interest
of the United States. Furthermore, FAR 32.202-1 states that Government
financing of commercial purchases is expected to be different from that
used for noncommercial purchases. While the contracting officer may
adapt techniques and procedures from the noncommercial subparts for use
in implementing commercial contract financing arrangements, the
contracting officer must have a full understanding of effects of the
differing contract environments and of what is needed to protect the
interests of the Government in commercial contract financing.
IV. Expected Cost Impact
This rule proposes to amend the DFARS to implement changes to
performance-based payment policies for DoD contracts by amending the
policy on performance-based payments at DFARS 232.1001 and amending the
clauses at DFARS 252.232-7012, Performance-Based Payments--Whole
Contract Basis, and 252.232-7013, Performance-Based Payments--
Deliverable Item Basis.
This rule may benefit contractors who receive contract financing
from the Government in the form of performance-based payments.
Performance-based payments do not apply to--
Payments under cost-reimbursement line-items;
Contracts awarded under the authority of FAR part 12 or
part 13;
Contracts for architect-engineer services or construction,
or for shipbuilding or ship repair, when the contract provides for
progress payments based upon a percentage or stage of completion.
Performance-based payments are tied to the achievement of specific,
measurable events or accomplishments that are defined and valued in
advance by the parties to the contract. Total performance-based
payments cannot exceed 90 percent of the contract price.
This rulemaking proposes to remove the DFARS restrictions that
limit performance-based payments to amounts not greater than costs
incurred up to the time of payment.
If performance-based payments to the contractor based on the
negotiated value of completed milestone events are allowed to exceed
the total costs incurred up to the time of payment, the cost to the
contractor of short-term borrowing will decrease and the cost to the
Government of borrowing will increase.
In addition, there is a minimal cost to offerors and the Government
related to a new provision at DFARS 252.232-70XX, Performance-Based
Payments--Representation, that requires each offeror responding to a
solicitation that may result in a contract providing performance-based
financing to represent whether the output of the offeror's accounting
system is in compliance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles,
as evidenced by audited financial statements.
DoD has performed a regulatory cost analysis on this rule. The
following is a summary of the estimated public cost savings and
Government costs in millions calculated in perpetuity in 2016 dollars
at a 7-percent discount rate:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary Public Government Total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Present Value................................................... -$53.971 $27.338 -$26.633
Annualized Costs................................................ -3.778 1.914 -1.864
Annualized Value Costs (as of 2016 if Year 1 is 2019)........... -3.084 1.562 -1.522
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To access the complete Regulatory Cost Analysis, go to the Federal
eRulmaking Portal at www.regulations.gov, search for ``DFARS Case 2019-
D002,'' click ``Open Docket,'' and view ``Supporting Documents.''
V. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was subject to
review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804.
VI. Executive Order 13771
This rule is expected to be an E.O. 13771, Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs, deregulatory action. The total annualized
value of the cost savings is $1,521,836. Details on the estimated cost
savings can be found in section IV. of this preamble.
VII. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD expects that this proposed rule may have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. Therefore, an
initial regulatory flexibility analysis has been prepared and is
summarized as follows:
This rule proposes to implement section 831 the National Defense
Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2017, which amends 10
U.S.C. 2307 to address the use of performance-based payments.
The primary objective of this rule is to remove the restrictions at
DFARS 232.1001(a) and the clauses at 252.232-7012(b)(i) and 252.232-
7013(b)(i) that limit performance-based payments to amounts not greater
than costs incurred up to the time of payment, as required 10 U.S.C.
2307.
This rule will apply to approximately 50 small entities per year
that submit offers and are awarded contracts that provide performance-
based contract payments from DoD, as well as an additional 5 offerors
that submit offers in response to solicitations that may result in
contracts that provide performance-based payments but do not receive an
award.
[[Page 18223]]
This rule adds a reporting requirement that will require an entry
in the annual representations and certifications with regard to whether
the output of the offeror's accounting system is in compliance with
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, as evidenced by audited
financial statements. DoD estimates that the skill necessary for this
requirement is at the journeyman level and that each entry will require
an average of 6 minutes.
The rule does not duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any other
Federal rules.
This rule will not have a significant economic impact on small
entities. The burden imposed by the new representation is minimal. The
net impact is likely to benefit small entities, to the extent that the
entity may receive an increase in cash flow if the negotiated value of
performance-based payment events exceeds the actual costs incurred at
the time of event completion. There are no significant alternatives
consistent with the stated objectives of the statute.
DoD invites comments from small business concerns and other
interested parties on the expected impact of this rule on small
entities.
DoD will also consider comments from small entities concerning the
existing regulations in subparts affected by this rule in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must submit such comments
separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610 (DFARS Case 2018-D043), in
correspondence.
XIII. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule affects the information collection requirements at DFARS
subpart 232.10 (and associated clauses at DFARS 252.232-7012 and
252.232-7013, currently approved under OMB Control Number 0704-0359,
DFARS Part 232, Contract Financing. The impact, however, is negligible,
because only the last three lines of the table are deleted, which do
not impose the predominance of the burden. This rule also adds a new
information collection requirement that requires the approval of the
Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. chapter 35). Accordingly, DoD has submitted a request for
approval of a new information collection requirement concerning the
provision at 252.232-70XX, Performance-Based Payments--Representation
to the Office of Management and Budget.
A. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is
estimated to average 0.1 hours per response, including the time for
reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the
collection of information.
The annual reporting burden estimated as follows:
Respondents: 144.
Responses per respondent: 1.
Total annual responses: 144.
Preparation hours per response: 0.1 hours.
Total response Burden Hours: 14.4.
B. Request for Comments Regarding Paperwork Burden.
Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information
collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, should be
sent to Ms. Jasmeet Seehra at the Office of Management and Budget, Desk
Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office Building, Washington,
DC 20503, or email [email protected], with a copy to the
Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Attn: Ms. Amy G. Williams,
OUSD(A&S)DPC/DARS, Room 3B941, 3060 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC
20301-3060. Comments can be received from 30 to 60 days after the date
of this notice, but comments to OMB will be most useful if received by
OMB within 30 days after the date of this notice.
Public comments are particularly invited on: Whether this
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
functions of the DFARS, and will have practical utility; whether our
estimate of the public burden of this collection of information is
accurate, and based on valid assumptions and methodology; ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways in which we can minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who are to respond, through the use
of appropriate technological collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
To request more information on this proposed information collection
or to obtain a copy of the proposal and associated collection
instruments, please write to the Defense Acquisition Regulations
System, Attn: Ms. Amy G. Williams, OUSD(A&S)DPC/DARS, Room 3B941, 3060
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3060, or email
[email protected]. Include DFARS Case 2019-D002 in the subject line of
the message.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 204, 232, and 252
Government procurement.
Jennifer Lee Hawes,
Regulatory Control Officer, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
Therefore, 48 CFR parts 204, 232, and 252 are proposed to be
amended as follows:
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 204, 232, and 252 continues
to read as follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.
PART 204--ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS
0
2. Amend section 204.1202 by--
0
a. Revising the section heading;
0
b. Redesignating paragraph (2)(xiii) as (2)(xiv); and
0
c. Adding a new paragraph (2)(xiii)
The revision and addition read as follows:
204.1202 Solicitation provision and contract clause.
* * * * *
(2) * * *
(xiii) 252.232-70XX, Performance-Based Payments--Representation.
* * * * *
PART 232--CONTRACT FINANCING
0
3. In section 232.1001, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
232.1001 Policy.
(a) In accordance with 10 U.S.C. 2307(b)(2), performance-based
payments shall not be conditioned upon costs incurred in contract
performance, but on the achievement of performance outcomes. Private
sector companies, including nontraditional defense contractors, are
eligible for performance-based payments, consistent with best
commercial practices.
* * * * *
0
4. Revise section 232.1003-70 to read as follows:
232.1003-70 Criteria for use.
In accordance with 10 U.S.C. 2307(b), the output of a contractor's
accounting system shall be in compliance with Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles, as evidenced by audited financial statements, in
order to receive performance-based payments. 10 U.S.C. 2307 does not
grant the Defense Contract Audit Agency the authority to audit
compliance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
0
5. Amend section 232.1005-70 by--
0
a. Designating the introductory text as paragraph (a);
[[Page 18224]]
0
b. Redesignating paragraphs (a) and (b) as paragraphs (a)(1) and (2),
respectively; and
0
c. Adding a new paragraph (b).
The addition reads as follows:
232.1003-70 Criteria for use.
* * * * *
(b) Use the provision at 252.232-70XX, Performance-Based Payments--
Representation, in solicitations where the resulting contract may
include performance-based payments.
PART 252--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
0
6. Amend section 252.204-7007 by--
0
a. Removing the provision date of ``(APR 2018)'' and adding ``(DATE)''
in its place; and
0
b. Adding paragraph (d)(2)(vi) to read as follows:
252.204-7007 Alternate A, Annual Representations and Certifications.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(2) * * *
_(vi) 252.232-70XX, Performance-Based Payments--Representation.
* * * * *
0
7. Amend section 252.232-7012 by--
0
a. In the clause introductory text, removing ``232.1005-70(a)'' and
adding ``232.1005-70(a)(1)'' in its place;
0
b. Removing the clause date of ``(MAR 2014)'' and adding ``(DATE)'' in
its place;
0
c. Redesignating paragraphs (b)(i) through (iii) as (c)(1) through (3),
respectively;
0
d. Adding a new paragraph (b); and
0
e. Revising paragraph (c)(1).
The addition and revision reads as follows:
252.232-7012 Performance-Based Payments-Whole-Contract Basis.
* * * * *
(b) In accordance with 10 U.S.C. 2307(b), the output of the
Contractor's accounting system shall be in compliance with Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles, as evidenced by audited financial
statements, in order to receive performance-based payments.
(c)(1) The Contractor shall, in addition to providing the
information required by FAR 52.232-32, submit supporting information
for all payment requests using the following format:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP30AP19.000
* * * * *
0
8. Amend section 252.232-7013 by--
0
a. In the clause introductory text, removing ``232.1005-70(b)'' and
adding ``232.1005-70(a)(2)'' in its place;
0
b. Removing the clause date of (APR 2014)'' and adding ``(DATE)'' in
its place;
0
c. Redesignating paragraphs (b)(i) through (iii) as (c)(1) through (3),
respectively;
0
d. Adding a new paragraph (b); and
[[Page 18225]]
0
e. Revising newly redesignated paragraph (c)(1).
The addition and revision read as follows:
252.232-7013 Performance-Based Payments--Deliverable-Item Basis.
* * * * *
(b) In accordance with 10 U.S.C. 2307(b), the output of the
Contractor's accounting system shall be in compliance with Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles, as evidenced by audited financial
statements, in order to receive performance-based payments.
(c)(1) The Contractor shall, in addition to providing the
information required by FAR 52.232-32, submit supporting information
for all payment requests using the following format:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP30AP19.001
* * * * *
0
9. Add section 252.232-70XX to read as follows:
252.232-70XX Performance-Based Payments--Representation
As prescribed in 232.1005-70(b), use the following provision:
Performance-Based Payments-Representation (DATE)
(a) In accordance with 10 U.S.C. 2307(b), the output of a
contractor's accounting system shall be in compliance with Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles in order to receive performance-based
payments.
(b) The Offeror represents that the output of its accounting
system is [ ] is not [ ] in compliance with Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles, as evidenced by audited financial statements.
(End of Provision)
[FR Doc. 2019-08487 Filed 4-29-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P