Special Conditions: Costruzioni Aeronautiche Tecnam S.P.A.; Model P2012 Airplane; Installation of Rechargeable Lithium Batteries, 17733-17736 [2019-08477]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 81 / Friday, April 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
P2012 airplane meets the applicable
provisions of part 23, as amended by
amendment 23–1 through 23–62 thereto.
If the Administrator finds that the
applicable airworthiness regulations in
part 23 do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for the
Model P2012 airplane because of a
novel or unusual design feature, special
conditions are prescribed under the
provisions of § 21.16.
In addition to the applicable
airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Model P2012 must
comply with the fuel vent and exhaust
emission requirements of 14 CFR part
34 and the noise certification
requirements of 14 CFR part 36; and the
FAA must issue a finding of regulatory
adequacy under § 611 of Public Law 92–
574, the ‘‘Noise Control Act of 1972.’’
The FAA issues special conditions, as
defined in § 11.19, under § 11.38 and
they become part of the type
certification basis under § 21.17(a)(2).
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should the type certificate
for that model be amended later to
include any other model that
incorporates the same novel or unusual
design feature, the FAA would apply
these special conditions to the other
model.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Model P2012 airplane will
incorporate the following novel or
unusual design features: The
installation of an Electronic Engine
Control (EEC) system. The EEC system
is the generic family of electrical/
electronic engine control systems,
including full authority digital engine
controls, supervisory controls, and
derivatives of these.
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
Discussion
This airplane makes use of an
electronic engine control system in
addition to a traditional mechanical
control system, which is a novel design
for this type of airplane. The applicable
airworthiness regulations do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for this design feature. Mandating a
structured assessment to determine
potential installation issues mitigate the
concerns that the addition of an
electronic engine control does not
produce a failure condition not
previously considered.
Applicability
These special conditions are
applicable to the Model P2012 airplane.
Should Tecnam apply at a later date for
a change to the type certificate to
include another model incorporating the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Apr 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
same novel or unusual design feature,
the FAA would apply these special
conditions to that model as well.
Conclusion
This action affects only a certain
novel or unusual design feature on the
Model P2012 airplane. It is not a rule of
general applicability.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 23
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Signs and
symbols.
Citation
The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40113,
44701–44702; Pub. L. 113–53, 127 Stat 584
(49 U.S.C. 44704) note.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special
conditions are issued as part of the type
certification basis for Tecnam Model
P2012 airplane.
1. Installation of Electronic Engine
Control System
a. For electronic engine control (EEC)
system installations, it must be
established that no single failure or
malfunction or probable combinations
of failures of EEC system components
will have an effect on the system, as
installed in the airplane, that causes the
Loss of Power Control (LOPC)
probability of the system to exceed
those allowed in part 33 certification.
b. Electronic engine control system
installations must be evaluated for
environmental and atmospheric
conditions, including lightning and
High Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF).
The EEC system lightning and HIRF
effects that result in LOPC should be
considered catastrophic.
c. The components of the installation
must be constructed, arranged, and
installed to ensure their continued safe
operation between normal inspections
or overhauls.
d. Functions incorporated into any
electronic engine control that make it
part of any equipment, systems or
installation whose functions are beyond
that of basic engine control, and which
may also introduce system failures and
malfunctions, are not exempt from
§ 23.1309 and must be shown to meet
part 23 levels of safety as derived from
§ 23.1309. Part 33 certification data, if
applicable, may be used to show
compliance with any part 23
requirements. If part 33 data is used to
substantiate compliance with part 23
requirements, then the part 23 applicant
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
17733
must be able to provide this data for its
showing of compliance.
Note: The term ‘‘probable’’ in the context
of ‘‘probable combination of failures’’ does
not have the same meaning as used for a
safety assessment process. The term
‘‘probable’’ in ‘‘probable combination of
failures’’ means ‘‘foreseeable,’’ or those
failure conditions anticipated to occur one or
more times during the operational life of each
airplane.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on April
22, 2019.
William Schinstock,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Standards
Branch, Policy and Innovation Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2019–08476 Filed 4–25–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 23
[Docket No. FAA–2019–0301; Special
Conditions No. 23–293–SC]
Special Conditions: Costruzioni
Aeronautiche Tecnam S.P.A.; Model
P2012 Airplane; Installation of
Rechargeable Lithium Batteries
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
These special conditions are
issued for the Costruzioni Aeronautiche
Tecnam S.P.A., Model P2012 airplane.
These airplanes will have a novel or
unusual design feature associated with
the installation of a rechargeable lithium
battery. The applicable airworthiness
regulations do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for this
design feature. These special conditions
contain the additional safety standards
the Administrator considers necessary
to establish a level of safety equivalent
to that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
DATES: The effective date of these
special conditions is April 26, 2019.
We must receive your comments by
May 28, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
by docket number FAA–2019–0301
using any of the following methods:
• Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Room W12–140, West
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\26APR1.SGM
26APR1
17734
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 81 / Friday, April 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery Courier: Take
comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12–140 of the West Building
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at 202–493–2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all
comments it receives, without change,
to https://regulations.gov, including any
personal information the commenter
provides. Using the search function of
the docket website, anyone can find and
read the electronic form of all comments
received into any FAA docket,
including the name of the individual
sending the comment (or signing the
comment for an association, business,
labor union, etc.). DOT’s complete
Privacy Act Statement can be found in
the Federal Register published on April
11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–19478).
Docket: Background documents or
comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov at any time.
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or go to the Docket
Operations in Room W12–140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ruth Hirt, Federal Aviation
Administration, Aircraft Certification
Service, Small Airplane Directorate,
AIR–694, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas
City, MO; telephone (816) 329–4108;
facsimile (816)-329 4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
Reason for No Prior Notice and
Comment Before Adoption
The FAA has determined, in
accordance with 5 U.S. Code
§§ 553(b)(3)(B) and 553(d)(3), that notice
and opportunity for prior public
comment are unnecessary because
substantially identical special
conditions have been subjected to the
public comment process in several prior
instances such that the FAA is satisfied
that new comments are unlikely. For the
same reason, the FAA finds that good
cause exists for making these special
conditions effective upon issuance. The
FAA is requesting comments to allow
interested persons to submit views that
may not have been submitted in
response to the prior opportunities for
comment.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Apr 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
Special
conditions
No.
Company/airplane model
23–15–01–SC 1
23–16–02–SC 2
23–288–SC 3 .....
Kestrel Aircraft Company/Model
K–350.
Pilatus Aircraft, Ltd, Models
PC12, PC–12/45, and PC–12/
47.
St. Louis Helicopter, LLC, Textron
Aviation Models B300, B300C,
B300C(MC–12W), and B300C
(UC–12W).
1 https://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgSC.nsf/0/39B156C006EB842E8625
7EF3004BB13C?OpenDocument&
Highlight=installation%20of%20rechargeable
%20lithium%20battery.
2 https://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgSC.nsf/0/5A2FEC165CB49130
86258019005C34E2?OpenDocument&Highlight=23278-sc.
3 https://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgSC.nsf/0/B2D62B06A314D7418625
8282005F5E04?OpenDocument&Highlight=23-288sc.
Comments Invited
We invite interested people to take
part in this rulemaking by sending
written comments, data, or views. The
most helpful comments reference a
specific portion of the special
conditions, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data.
We will consider all comments we
receive on or before the closing date for
comments. We will consider comments
filed late if it is possible to do so
without incurring expense or delay. We
may change these special conditions
based on the comments we receive.
Background
On March 13, 2018, Costruzioni
Aeronautiche Tecnam S.P.A. (Tecnam)
applied for FAA validation of its type
certificate for its new Model P2012
airplane. The airplane is a normal
category, metallic, non-pressurized,
high wing, monoplane that will seat
nine passengers and two flightcrew.
Two wing mounted Lycoming Model
TEO–540–C1A piston engines driving
four blade variable pitch constant speed
MT-Propellers USA, Inc. Model MTV–
14–B–C–F/CF195–30b propellers power
the airplane. The airplane has fixed
tricycle landing gear, a Garmin G1000
NXi avionics suite, and a maximum
takeoff weight of 7,937 pounds. The
Model P2012 has rechargeable lithium
batteries installed for higher energy
density instead of the nickel-cadmium
(Ni-Cd) or lead-acid rechargeable
batteries.
The current regulatory requirements
for part 23 airplanes do not contain
adequate requirements for use of
rechargeable lithium batteries in
airborne applications. This type of
battery possesses certain failure and
operational characteristics with
maintenance requirements that differ
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
significantly from that of the nickelcadmium (Ni-Cd) and lead-acid
rechargeable batteries approved in
§ 23.1553, amendment 23–62 or earlier,
for other normal, utility, acrobatic, and
commuter category airplanes. Therefore,
the FAA is issuing this special
condition to address—
• All characteristics of the
rechargeable lithium batteries and their
installation that could affect safe
operation of the Model P2012 airplane;
and
• Appropriate Instructions for
Continued Airworthiness (ICA) that
include maintenance requirements to
ensure the availability of electrical
power from the batteries when needed.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of § 21.17,
Tecnam must show that the Model
P2012 airplane meets the applicable
provisions of part 23, as amended by
amendment 23–1 through 23–62 thereto.
If the Administrator finds that the
applicable airworthiness regulations
(i.e., 14 CFR part 23) do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for the Model P2012 airplane because of
a novel or unusual design feature,
special conditions are prescribed under
the provisions of § 21.16.
In addition to the applicable
airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Model P2012 airplane
must comply with the fuel vent and
exhaust emission requirements of 14
CFR part 34 and the noise certification
requirements of 14 CFR part 36; and the
FAA must issue a finding of regulatory
adequacy under § 611 of Public Law 92–
574, the ‘‘Noise Control Act of 1972.’’
The FAA issues special conditions, as
defined in § 11.19, under § 11.38 and
they become part of the type
certification basis under § 21.17(a)(2).
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the models for which they
are issued. Should the type certificate
for that model be amended later to
include any other model that
incorporates the same novel or unusual
design feature, the FAA would apply
these special conditions to the other
model.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Model P2012 airplane will
incorporate the following novel or
unusual design features: The
installation of a rechargeable lithium
battery—intended as energy storage for
the airplane—will power the essential
load for continued safe flight and
landing if the electrical generating
system fails.
E:\FR\FM\26APR1.SGM
26APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 81 / Friday, April 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
Discussion
The applicable regulations governing
the installation of batteries in general
aviation airplanes were derived from
Civil Air Regulations (CAR) 3 as part of
the recodification that established 14
CFR part 23. The battery requirements
identified in § 23.1353 were a rewording
of the CAR requirements. Subsequent
rulemaking activities—resulting from
increased incidents of Ni-Cd battery fire
or failures—added § 23.1353(f) and (g),
amendments 23–20 and 23–21,
respectively. The FAA did not envision
the introduction of lithium battery
installations when these regulations
were published.
The proposed use of rechargeable
lithium batteries prompted the FAA to
review the adequacy of these existing
regulations. We determined the existing
regulations do not adequately address
the safety of lithium battery
installations.
Current experience with rechargeable
lithium batteries in commercial or
general aviation is limited. However,
other users of this technology—ranging
from personal computers, to wireless
telephone manufacturers, to the electric
vehicle industry—have noted safety
problems with rechargeable lithium
batteries. These problems, as described
in the following paragraphs, include
overcharging, over-discharging,
flammability of cell components, cell
internal defects, and hazards resulting
from exposure to extreme temperatures.
1. Overcharging. In general,
rechargeable lithium batteries are
significantly more susceptible than their
Ni-Cd or lead-acid counterparts to
thermal runaway, which is an internal
failure that can result in self-sustaining
increases in temperature and pressure.
This is especially true for overcharging,
which causes heating and
destabilization of the components of the
cell, leading to the formation (by
plating) of highly unstable metallic
lithium. The metallic lithium can ignite,
resulting in a self-sustaining fire or
explosion. Finally, the severity of
thermal runaway due to overcharging
increases with increasing battery
capacity due to the higher amount of
electrolyte in large batteries.
2. Over-discharging. Discharge of
some types of rechargeable lithium
battery cells beyond the manufacturer’s
recommended specification can cause
corrosion of the electrodes of the cell,
resulting in loss of battery capacity that
cannot be reversed by recharging. This
loss of capacity may not be detected by
the simple voltage measurements
commonly available to flight crews as a
means of checking battery status—a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Apr 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
problem shared with Ni-Cd batteries. In
addition, over-discharging has the
potential to lead to an unsafe condition
(creation of dendrites that could result
in internal short circuit during the
recharging cycle).
3. Flammability of Cell Components.
Unlike Ni-Cd and lead-acid batteries,
some types of rechargeable lithium
batteries use liquid electrolytes that are
flammable. The electrolyte can serve as
a source of fuel for an external fire, if
there is a breach of the battery
container.
4. Cell Internal Defects. The
rechargeable lithium batteries and
rechargeable battery systems have a
history of undetected cell internal
defects. These defects may or may not
be detected during normal operational
evaluation, test, and validation. This
may lead to an unsafe condition during
in-service operation.
5. Extreme Temperatures. Exposure to
an extreme temperature environment
has the potential to create major
hazards. Care must be taken to ensure
that the lithium battery remains within
the manufacturer’s recommended
specification.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special
conditions are applicable to the Model
P2012 airplane. Should Tecnam apply
at a later date for a change to the type
certificate to include another model
incorporating the same novel or unusual
design feature, the FAA would apply
these special conditions to that model as
well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features on the Model
P2012 airplane. It is not a rule of general
applicability.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 23
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Signs and
symbols.
Citation
The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40113,
44701–44702, 44704, Pub. L. 113–53, 127
Stat 584 (49 U.S.C. 44704) note
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special
conditions are issued, in lieu of the
requirements in § 23.1353 (a), (b), (c),
(d), and (e), amendment 23–62, as part
of the type certification basis for the
Tecnam Model P2012 airplane.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
17735
Installation of Lithium Battery
Lithium battery installations must be
designed and installed as follows:
(1) Safe cell temperatures and
pressures must be maintained during—
i. Normal operations;
ii. Any probable failure conditions of
charging or discharging or battery
monitoring system; and
iii. Any failure of the charging or
battery monitoring system shown to not
be extremely remote.
(2) The rechargeable lithium battery
installation must be designed to
preclude explosion and fire in the event
of a failure under (1)(ii) and (1)(iii)
above.
(3) Design of the rechargeable lithium
batteries must preclude the occurrence
of self-sustaining, uncontrolled
increases in temperature or pressure.
(4) No explosive or toxic gasses
emitted by any rechargeable lithium
battery in normal operation or as the
result of any failure of the battery
charging system, monitoring system, or
battery installation, which is shown to
not be extremely remote, may
accumulate in hazardous quantities
within the airplane.
(5) Installations of rechargeable
lithium batteries must meet the
requirements of § 23.863(a) through (d),
amendment 23–34.
(6) No corrosive fluids or gases that
may escape from any rechargeable
lithium battery may damage
surrounding structure or any adjacent
systems, equipment, electrical wiring, or
the airplane in such a way as to cause
a major or more severe failure condition,
in accordance with § 23.1309,
amendment 23–62.
(7) Each rechargeable lithium battery
installation must have provisions to
prevent any hazardous effect on
structure or essential systems that may
be caused by the maximum amount of
heat the battery can generate during a
short circuit of the battery or of its
individual cells.
(8) Rechargeable lithium battery
installations must have a system to
automatically control the charging rate
of the battery to prevent battery
overheating and overcharging, and
either:
i. A battery temperature sensing and
over-temperature warning system with a
means for automatically disconnecting
the battery from its charging source in
the event of an over-temperature
condition; or
ii. A battery failure sensing and
warning system with a means for
automatically disconnecting the battery
from its charging source in the event of
battery failure.
E:\FR\FM\26APR1.SGM
26APR1
17736
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 81 / Friday, April 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
(9) Any rechargeable lithium battery
installation, the function of which is
required for safe operation of the
aircraft, must incorporate a monitoring
and warning feature that will provide an
indication to the appropriate flight
crewmembers whenever the state of
charge of the batteries has fallen below
levels considered acceptable for
dispatch of the aircraft.
Note 1 to paragraph (9): Reference
§ 23.1353(h) for dispatch consideration.
Note 2 to paragraph (10): Maintenance
requirements include procedures that check
battery capacity, charge degradation at
manufacturer’s recommended inspection
intervals, and replace batteries at
manufacturer’s recommended replacement
schedule/time to prevent age-related
degradation.
Note 3 to paragraph (10): The term
‘‘sufficiently charged’’ means that the battery
must retain enough charge, expressed in
ampere-hours, to ensure that the battery cells
will not be damaged. A battery cell may be
damaged by low charge (i.e., below certain
level), resulting in a reduction in the ability
to charge and retain a full charge. This
reduction would be greater than the
reduction that may result from normal
operational degradation.
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
Note 4 to paragraph (10): Replacement
battery in spares storage may be subject to
prolonged storage at a low state of charge.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on April
22, 2019.
William Schinstock,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Standards
Branch, Policy and Innovation Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Apr 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2019–0039; Airspace
Docket No. 19–AGL–4]
RIN 2120–AA66
Amendment of Class E Airspace;
Connersville and Richmond, IN
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
(10) The Instructions for Continued
Airworthiness (ICA) required by
§ 23.1529 must contain maintenance
requirements to ensure that the battery
has been sufficiently charged at
appropriate intervals specified by the
battery manufacturer and the equipment
manufacturer that contain the
rechargeable lithium battery or
rechargeable lithium battery system.
The lithium rechargeable batteries and
lithium rechargeable battery systems
must not degrade below specified
ampere-hour levels sufficient to power
the aircraft system. The ICA must also
contain procedures for the maintenance
of replacement batteries to prevent the
installation of batteries that have
degraded charge retention ability or
other damage due to prolonged storage
at a low state of charge. Replacement
batteries must be of the same
manufacturer and part number as
approved by the FAA.
[FR Doc. 2019–08477 Filed 4–25–19; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
This action modifies Class E
airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface at Mettel Field
Airport, Connersville, IN, and
Richmond Municipal Airport,
Richmond, IN. This action is due to an
airspace review caused by the
decommissioning of the Richmond VHF
omnidirectional range (VOR), which
provided navigation information to the
instrument procedures at these airports,
as part of the VOR Minimum
Operational Network (MON) Program.
The geographic coordinates of the
airports are also being updated to
coincide with the FAA’s aeronautic
database. Airspace redesign is necessary
for the safety and management of
instrument flight rules (IFR) operations
at these airports.
DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, August 15,
2019. The Director of the Federal
Register approves this incorporation by
reference action under Title 1 Code of
Federal Regulations part 51, subject to
the annual revision of FAA Order
7400.11 and publication of conforming
amendments.
ADDRESSES: FAA Order 7400.11C,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can
be viewed online at https://www.faa.gov/
air_traffic/publications/. For further
information, you can contact the
Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591;
telephone: (202) 267–8783. The Order is
also available for inspection at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of FAA
Order 7400.11C at NARA, call (202)
741–6030, or go to https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/
ibr-locations.html.
FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on
September 15.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey Claypool, Federal Aviation
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Administration, Operations Support
Group, Central Service Center, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX
76177; telephone (817) 222–5711.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority for This Rulemaking
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority
described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use
of airspace necessary to ensure the
safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
airspace. This regulation is within the
scope of that authority as it amends
Class E airspace extending upward from
700 feet above the surface at Mettel
Field Airport, Connersville, IN, and
Richmond Municipal Airport,
Richmond, IN, to support IFR
operations at these airports.
History
The FAA published a notice of
proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register (84 FR 5014; February 20,
2019) for Docket No. FAA–2019–0039 to
amend Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface
at Mettel Field Airport, Connersville,
IN, and Richmond Municipal Airport,
Richmond, IN. Interested parties were
invited to participate in this rulemaking
effort by submitting written comments
on the proposal to the FAA. One
comment was received, and the FAA
provides the following response.
Class E airspace extending from 700
feet above the surface of an airport is
provided for transition to and from the
terminal or en route environment within
the National Airspace System. The size
and design of this airspace is
determined by FAA Order 7400.2M,
Procedures for Handling Airspace
Matters, and takes both instrument and
visual flight rules approach and
departure procedures at the airports into
consideration. The design of the
airspace provides the transitional
airspace required without absorbing
more of the Class G airspace than is
required. In the cases of Mettel Field
Airport, Connersville, IN, and
Richmond Municipal Airport,
Richmond, IN, Class E airspace
extending upward from 700 feet above
the surface already exists at both
airports and no additional airspace is
included in the proposal. The airspace
E:\FR\FM\26APR1.SGM
26APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 81 (Friday, April 26, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 17733-17736]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-08477]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 23
[Docket No. FAA-2019-0301; Special Conditions No. 23-293-SC]
Special Conditions: Costruzioni Aeronautiche Tecnam S.P.A.; Model
P2012 Airplane; Installation of Rechargeable Lithium Batteries
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued for the Costruzioni
Aeronautiche Tecnam S.P.A., Model P2012 airplane. These airplanes will
have a novel or unusual design feature associated with the installation
of a rechargeable lithium battery. The applicable airworthiness
regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for
this design feature. These special conditions contain the additional
safety standards the Administrator considers necessary to establish a
level of safety equivalent to that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
DATES: The effective date of these special conditions is April 26,
2019.
We must receive your comments by May 28, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2019-0301
using any of the following methods:
Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30, U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room
W12-140, West
[[Page 17734]]
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery Courier: Take comments to Docket Operations
in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at 202-493-2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all comments it receives, without
change, to https://regulations.gov, including any personal information
the commenter provides. Using the search function of the docket
website, anyone can find and read the electronic form of all comments
received into any FAA docket, including the name of the individual
sending the comment (or signing the comment for an association,
business, labor union, etc.). DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement can
be found in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477-19478).
Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140
of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ruth Hirt, Federal Aviation
Administration, Aircraft Certification Service, Small Airplane
Directorate, AIR-694, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, MO; telephone
(816) 329-4108; facsimile (816)-329 4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Reason for No Prior Notice and Comment Before Adoption
The FAA has determined, in accordance with 5 U.S. Code Sec. Sec.
553(b)(3)(B) and 553(d)(3), that notice and opportunity for prior
public comment are unnecessary because substantially identical special
conditions have been subjected to the public comment process in several
prior instances such that the FAA is satisfied that new comments are
unlikely. For the same reason, the FAA finds that good cause exists for
making these special conditions effective upon issuance. The FAA is
requesting comments to allow interested persons to submit views that
may not have been submitted in response to the prior opportunities for
comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Special conditions No. Company/airplane model
------------------------------------------------------------------------
23-15-01-SC \1\........................ Kestrel Aircraft Company/Model
K-350.
23-16-02-SC \2\........................ Pilatus Aircraft, Ltd, Models
PC12, PC-12/45, and PC-12/47.
23-288-SC \3\.......................... St. Louis Helicopter, LLC,
Textron Aviation Models B300,
B300C, B300C(MC-12W), and
B300C (UC-12W).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ https://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgSC.nsf/0/39B156C006EB842E86257EF3004BB13C?OpenDocument&Highlight=installation%20of%20rechargeable%20lithium%20battery.
\2\ https://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgSC.nsf/0/5A2FEC165CB4913086258019005C34E2?OpenDocument&Highlight=23-278-sc.
\3\ https://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgSC.nsf/0/B2D62B06A314D74186258282005F5E04?OpenDocument&Highlight=23-288-sc.
Comments Invited
We invite interested people to take part in this rulemaking by
sending written comments, data, or views. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the special conditions, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data.
We will consider all comments we receive on or before the closing
date for comments. We will consider comments filed late if it is
possible to do so without incurring expense or delay. We may change
these special conditions based on the comments we receive.
Background
On March 13, 2018, Costruzioni Aeronautiche Tecnam S.P.A. (Tecnam)
applied for FAA validation of its type certificate for its new Model
P2012 airplane. The airplane is a normal category, metallic, non-
pressurized, high wing, monoplane that will seat nine passengers and
two flightcrew. Two wing mounted Lycoming Model TEO-540-C1A piston
engines driving four blade variable pitch constant speed MT-Propellers
USA, Inc. Model MTV-14-B-C-F/CF195-30b propellers power the airplane.
The airplane has fixed tricycle landing gear, a Garmin G1000 NXi
avionics suite, and a maximum takeoff weight of 7,937 pounds. The Model
P2012 has rechargeable lithium batteries installed for higher energy
density instead of the nickel-cadmium (Ni-Cd) or lead-acid rechargeable
batteries.
The current regulatory requirements for part 23 airplanes do not
contain adequate requirements for use of rechargeable lithium batteries
in airborne applications. This type of battery possesses certain
failure and operational characteristics with maintenance requirements
that differ significantly from that of the nickel-cadmium (Ni-Cd) and
lead-acid rechargeable batteries approved in Sec. 23.1553, amendment
23-62 or earlier, for other normal, utility, acrobatic, and commuter
category airplanes. Therefore, the FAA is issuing this special
condition to address--
All characteristics of the rechargeable lithium batteries
and their installation that could affect safe operation of the Model
P2012 airplane; and
Appropriate Instructions for Continued Airworthiness (ICA)
that include maintenance requirements to ensure the availability of
electrical power from the batteries when needed.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of Sec. 21.17, Tecnam must show that the
Model P2012 airplane meets the applicable provisions of part 23, as
amended by amendment 23-1 through 23-62 thereto.
If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness
regulations (i.e., 14 CFR part 23) do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for the Model P2012 airplane because of a
novel or unusual design feature, special conditions are prescribed
under the provisions of Sec. 21.16.
In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Model P2012 airplane must comply with the fuel vent and
exhaust emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34 and the noise
certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36; and the FAA must issue a
finding of regulatory adequacy under Sec. 611 of Public Law 92-574,
the ``Noise Control Act of 1972.''
The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in Sec. 11.19, under
Sec. 11.38 and they become part of the type certification basis under
Sec. 21.17(a)(2).
Special conditions are initially applicable to the models for which
they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended
later to include any other model that incorporates the same novel or
unusual design feature, the FAA would apply these special conditions to
the other model.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Model P2012 airplane will incorporate the following novel or
unusual design features: The installation of a rechargeable lithium
battery--intended as energy storage for the airplane--will power the
essential load for continued safe flight and landing if the electrical
generating system fails.
[[Page 17735]]
Discussion
The applicable regulations governing the installation of batteries
in general aviation airplanes were derived from Civil Air Regulations
(CAR) 3 as part of the recodification that established 14 CFR part 23.
The battery requirements identified in Sec. 23.1353 were a rewording
of the CAR requirements. Subsequent rulemaking activities--resulting
from increased incidents of Ni-Cd battery fire or failures--added Sec.
23.1353(f) and (g), amendments 23-20 and 23-21, respectively. The FAA
did not envision the introduction of lithium battery installations when
these regulations were published.
The proposed use of rechargeable lithium batteries prompted the FAA
to review the adequacy of these existing regulations. We determined the
existing regulations do not adequately address the safety of lithium
battery installations.
Current experience with rechargeable lithium batteries in
commercial or general aviation is limited. However, other users of this
technology--ranging from personal computers, to wireless telephone
manufacturers, to the electric vehicle industry--have noted safety
problems with rechargeable lithium batteries. These problems, as
described in the following paragraphs, include overcharging, over-
discharging, flammability of cell components, cell internal defects,
and hazards resulting from exposure to extreme temperatures.
1. Overcharging. In general, rechargeable lithium batteries are
significantly more susceptible than their Ni-Cd or lead-acid
counterparts to thermal runaway, which is an internal failure that can
result in self-sustaining increases in temperature and pressure. This
is especially true for overcharging, which causes heating and
destabilization of the components of the cell, leading to the formation
(by plating) of highly unstable metallic lithium. The metallic lithium
can ignite, resulting in a self-sustaining fire or explosion. Finally,
the severity of thermal runaway due to overcharging increases with
increasing battery capacity due to the higher amount of electrolyte in
large batteries.
2. Over-discharging. Discharge of some types of rechargeable
lithium battery cells beyond the manufacturer's recommended
specification can cause corrosion of the electrodes of the cell,
resulting in loss of battery capacity that cannot be reversed by
recharging. This loss of capacity may not be detected by the simple
voltage measurements commonly available to flight crews as a means of
checking battery status--a problem shared with Ni-Cd batteries. In
addition, over-discharging has the potential to lead to an unsafe
condition (creation of dendrites that could result in internal short
circuit during the recharging cycle).
3. Flammability of Cell Components. Unlike Ni-Cd and lead-acid
batteries, some types of rechargeable lithium batteries use liquid
electrolytes that are flammable. The electrolyte can serve as a source
of fuel for an external fire, if there is a breach of the battery
container.
4. Cell Internal Defects. The rechargeable lithium batteries and
rechargeable battery systems have a history of undetected cell internal
defects. These defects may or may not be detected during normal
operational evaluation, test, and validation. This may lead to an
unsafe condition during in-service operation.
5. Extreme Temperatures. Exposure to an extreme temperature
environment has the potential to create major hazards. Care must be
taken to ensure that the lithium battery remains within the
manufacturer's recommended specification.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the
Model P2012 airplane. Should Tecnam apply at a later date for a change
to the type certificate to include another model incorporating the same
novel or unusual design feature, the FAA would apply these special
conditions to that model as well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
on the Model P2012 airplane. It is not a rule of general applicability.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 23
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Signs and symbols.
Citation
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40113, 44701-44702, 44704,
Pub. L. 113-53, 127 Stat 584 (49 U.S.C. 44704) note
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special conditions are issued, in lieu of
the requirements in Sec. 23.1353 (a), (b), (c), (d), and (e),
amendment 23-62, as part of the type certification basis for the Tecnam
Model P2012 airplane.
Installation of Lithium Battery
Lithium battery installations must be designed and installed as
follows:
(1) Safe cell temperatures and pressures must be maintained
during--
i. Normal operations;
ii. Any probable failure conditions of charging or discharging or
battery monitoring system; and
iii. Any failure of the charging or battery monitoring system shown
to not be extremely remote.
(2) The rechargeable lithium battery installation must be designed
to preclude explosion and fire in the event of a failure under (1)(ii)
and (1)(iii) above.
(3) Design of the rechargeable lithium batteries must preclude the
occurrence of self-sustaining, uncontrolled increases in temperature or
pressure.
(4) No explosive or toxic gasses emitted by any rechargeable
lithium battery in normal operation or as the result of any failure of
the battery charging system, monitoring system, or battery
installation, which is shown to not be extremely remote, may accumulate
in hazardous quantities within the airplane.
(5) Installations of rechargeable lithium batteries must meet the
requirements of Sec. 23.863(a) through (d), amendment 23-34.
(6) No corrosive fluids or gases that may escape from any
rechargeable lithium battery may damage surrounding structure or any
adjacent systems, equipment, electrical wiring, or the airplane in such
a way as to cause a major or more severe failure condition, in
accordance with Sec. 23.1309, amendment 23-62.
(7) Each rechargeable lithium battery installation must have
provisions to prevent any hazardous effect on structure or essential
systems that may be caused by the maximum amount of heat the battery
can generate during a short circuit of the battery or of its individual
cells.
(8) Rechargeable lithium battery installations must have a system
to automatically control the charging rate of the battery to prevent
battery overheating and overcharging, and either:
i. A battery temperature sensing and over-temperature warning
system with a means for automatically disconnecting the battery from
its charging source in the event of an over-temperature condition; or
ii. A battery failure sensing and warning system with a means for
automatically disconnecting the battery from its charging source in the
event of battery failure.
[[Page 17736]]
(9) Any rechargeable lithium battery installation, the function of
which is required for safe operation of the aircraft, must incorporate
a monitoring and warning feature that will provide an indication to the
appropriate flight crewmembers whenever the state of charge of the
batteries has fallen below levels considered acceptable for dispatch of
the aircraft.
Note 1 to paragraph (9): Reference Sec. 23.1353(h) for dispatch
consideration.
(10) The Instructions for Continued Airworthiness (ICA) required by
Sec. 23.1529 must contain maintenance requirements to ensure that the
battery has been sufficiently charged at appropriate intervals
specified by the battery manufacturer and the equipment manufacturer
that contain the rechargeable lithium battery or rechargeable lithium
battery system. The lithium rechargeable batteries and lithium
rechargeable battery systems must not degrade below specified ampere-
hour levels sufficient to power the aircraft system. The ICA must also
contain procedures for the maintenance of replacement batteries to
prevent the installation of batteries that have degraded charge
retention ability or other damage due to prolonged storage at a low
state of charge. Replacement batteries must be of the same manufacturer
and part number as approved by the FAA.
Note 2 to paragraph (10): Maintenance requirements include
procedures that check battery capacity, charge degradation at
manufacturer's recommended inspection intervals, and replace
batteries at manufacturer's recommended replacement schedule/time to
prevent age-related degradation.
Note 3 to paragraph (10): The term ``sufficiently charged''
means that the battery must retain enough charge, expressed in
ampere-hours, to ensure that the battery cells will not be damaged.
A battery cell may be damaged by low charge (i.e., below certain
level), resulting in a reduction in the ability to charge and retain
a full charge. This reduction would be greater than the reduction
that may result from normal operational degradation.
Note 4 to paragraph (10): Replacement battery in spares storage
may be subject to prolonged storage at a low state of charge.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on April 22, 2019.
William Schinstock,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Standards Branch, Policy and Innovation
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-08477 Filed 4-25-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P