Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Rocky Intertidal Monitoring Surveys Along the Oregon and California Coasts, 17784-17788 [2019-08392]
Download as PDF
17784
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 81 / Friday, April 26, 2019 / Notices
Dated: April 19, 2019.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Appendix 1
RIN 0648–XG817
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to
Specified Activities; Taking Marine
Mammals Incidental to Rocky Intertidal
Monitoring Surveys Along the Oregon
and California Coasts
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
V. Discussion of the Issues:
Comment 1: Whether Commerce should
allow certain separate rate respondents
to withdraw from this administrative
review after the 90-day deadline.
Comment 2: Whether Commerce should
base the margin assigned to separate rate
respondents solely on Junhong’s margin.
Comment 3: Whether Commerce should
have selected a third mandatory
respondent.
Comment 4: Whether Commerce should
exclude certain information from
countries that maintain generally
available export subsidies.
Comment 5: Whether Commerce should
offset Junhong’s AD margin for the
Export Buyer’s Credit program.
Comment 6: Whether Commerce properly
valued Junhong’s energy inputs.
Comment 7: Whether to grant Crown,
Hankook, and HK Tiancheng a separate
rate for the Final Results.
VI. Recommendation
Appendix 2
List of Companies Not Receiving Separate
Rate Status
1. Cheng Shin Tire & Rubber (China) Co., Ltd.
2. Hebei Tianrui Rubber Co., Ltd.
3. Hong Kong Tri-Ace Tire Co., Limited
4. Hwa Fong Rubber (Hong Kong) Ltd.
5. Hwa Fong Rubber (Suzhou) Ltd.
6. Qingdao Fullrun Tyre Corp. Ltd.
7. Qingdao Fullrun Tyre Tech Corp. Ltd.
8. Qingdao Nexen Tire Corporation
9. Qingdao Qianzhen Tyre Co., Ltd.
10. Qingdao Qihang Tyre Co., Ltd.
11. Qingdao Qizhou Rubber Co., Ltd.
12. Shandong Haohua Tire Co., Ltd.
13. Shandong Haolong Rubber Tire Co., Ltd.
14. Shandong Haolong Rubber Co., Ltd.
15. Shandong Province Sanli Tire
16. Shifeng Juxing Tire Co., Ltd.
17. Southeast Mariner International Co., Ltd.
18. Toyo Tire (Zhangjiagang) Co., Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2019–08454 Filed 4–25–19; 8:45 am]
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:28 Apr 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; issuance of an incidental
harassment authorization Renewal.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
regulations implementing the Marine
Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), as
amended, notification is hereby given
that NMFS has issued an incidental
harassment authorization (IHA)
Renewal to the Partnership for
Interdisciplinary Study of Coastal
Oceans (PISCO) at the University of
California Santa Cruz (UCSC) to harass
marine mammals incidental to rocky
intertidal monitoring surveys along the
Oregon and California Coasts.
DATES: This IHA Renewal is valid from
April 12, 2019 through April 11, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rob
Pauline, Office of Protected Resources,
NMFS, (301) 427–8401. Electronic
copies of the original application,
Renewal request, and supporting
documents (including NMFS Federal
Register notices of the original proposed
and final authorizations, and the
previous IHA), as well as a list of the
references cited in this document, may
be obtained online at: https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/permit/
incidental-take-authorizations-undermarine-mammal-protection-act. In case
of problems accessing these documents,
please call the contact listed above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
The Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA; 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.)
prohibits the ‘‘take’’ of marine
mammals, with certain exceptions.
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the
MMPA direct the Secretary of
Commerce (as delegated to NMFS) to
allow, upon request, the incidental, but
not intentional, taking of small numbers
of marine mammals by U.S. citizens
who engage in a specified activity (other
than commercial fishing) within a
specified geographical region if certain
findings are made and either regulations
are issued or, if the taking is limited to
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
harassment, a notice of a proposed
incidental take authorization is
provided to the public for review.
Authorization for incidental takings
shall be granted if NMFS finds that the
taking will have a negligible impact on
the species or stock(s) and will not have
an unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for
taking for subsistence uses (where
relevant). Further, NMFS must prescribe
the permissible methods of taking and
other ‘‘means of effecting the least
practicable adverse impact’’ on the
affected species or stocks and their
habitat, paying particular attention to
rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of
similar significance, and on the
availability of such species or stocks for
taking for certain subsistence uses
(referred to here as ‘‘mitigation
measures’’). Monitoring and reporting of
such takings are also required. The
meaning of key terms such as ‘‘take,’’
‘‘harassment,’’ and ‘‘negligible impact’’
can be found in section 3 of the MMPA
(16 U.S.C. 1362) and the agency’s
regulations at 50 CFR 216.103.
NMFS’ regulations implementing the
MMPA at 50 CFR 216.107(e) indicate
that IHAs may be renewed for
additional periods of time not to exceed
one year for each reauthorization. In the
notice of proposed IHA for the initial
authorization, NMFS described the
circumstances under which we would
consider issuing a Renewal for this
activity, and requested public comment
on a potential Renewal IHA under those
circumstances. Specifically, on a caseby-case basis, NMFS may issue a oneyear IHA Renewal when (1) another year
of identical or nearly identical activities
as described in the Specified Activities
section is planned or (2) the activities
would not be completed by the time the
IHA expires and a second IHA would
allow for completion of the activities
beyond that described in the Dates and
Duration section of the initial IHA. All
of the following conditions must be met
in order to issue a Renewal:
• A request for Renewal is received
no later than 60 days prior to expiration
of the current IHA.
• The request for Renewal must
include the following:
(1) An explanation that the activities
to be conducted beyond the initial dates
either are identical to the previously
analyzed activities or include changes
so minor (e.g., reduction in pile size)
that the changes do not affect the
previous analyses, take estimates, or
mitigation and monitoring
requirements; and
(2) A preliminary monitoring report
showing the results of the required
monitoring to date and an explanation
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
26APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 81 / Friday, April 26, 2019 / Notices
showing that the monitoring results do
not indicate impacts of a scale or nature
not previously analyzed or authorized.
• Upon review of the request for
Renewal, the status of the affected
species or stocks, and any other
pertinent information, NMFS
determines that there are no more than
minor changes in the activities, the
mitigation and monitoring measures
remain the same and appropriate, and
the initial findings remain valid.
An additional public comment period
of 15 days (for a total of 45 days), with
direct notice by email, phone, or postal
service to commenters on the initial
IHA, is provided to allow for any
additional comments on the proposed
Renewal. A description of the Renewal
process may be found on our website at:
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/
marine-mammal-protection/incidentalharassment-authorization-renewals.
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with NOTICES
History of Request
On March 8, 2018, NMFS issued an
IHA to PISCO to take marine mammals
incidental to rocky intertidal monitoring
surveys at multiple locations on the
coasts of Oregon and California (83 FR
11696; March 16, 2018), effective from
March 12, 2018 through March 11, 2019.
This multiyear annual survey involves
surveying rocky intertidal zones at a
number of coastal locations. On January
8, 2019, NMFS received an application
for a Renewal of the initial IHA. As
described in the application for
Renewal, the activities for which
incidental take has been requested are
nearly identical to those covered in the
initial IHA. As required, the applicant
also provided a preliminary monitoring
report (available at https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/
marine-mammal-protection/incidentaltake-authorizations-research-and-otheractivities) which confirms that the
applicant has implemented the required
mitigation and monitoring, and which
also shows that no impacts of a scale or
nature not previously analyzed or
authorized occurred as a result of the
activities conducted. Notice of the
proposed IHA Renewal was published
in the Federal Register on March 7,
2019 (84 FR 8316).
Description of the Specified Activities
and Anticipated Impacts
PISCO plans to continue rocky
intertidal monitoring work that has been
ongoing for 20 years. PISCO focuses on
understanding the nearshore ecosystems
of the U.S. west coast through a number
of interdisciplinary collaborations. The
program integrates long-term monitoring
of ecological and oceanographic
processes at 154 separate sites with
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:28 Apr 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
experimental work in the lab and field.
Research is conducted throughout the
year along the Oregon and California
coasts and will continue as long as
funding is available. The research being
conducted under the Renewal IHA will
be nearly identical to that analyzed
under the initial IHA. Since the
issuance of the initial IHA a new site
that had never been surveyed previously
(Waddell) was added to the site
inventory as part of a study examining
ecosystem level effects of sea star
wasting syndrome (SSWS). There are six
additional biodiversity sites (i.e., Ecola,
Roads End, Otter Rock, Seal Rock,
Graduation Point and North Head) that
were not visited or analyzed as part of
the initial IHA. Researchers accessing
and conducting research activities on
the sites may occasionally cause
behavioral disturbance (i.e., Level B
harassment) of three pinniped species at
16 of the sites (described in PISCO’s
application for the 2018 IHA). PISCO’s
request is for the following instances of
take: 90 California sea lion takes
(Zalophus californianus), 255 harbor
seal takes (Phoca vitulina richardii), and
50 northern elephant seal takes
(Mirounga angustirostris). These are the
same levels of take that were authorized
under the initial IHA. PISCO expects
that the disturbance to pinnipeds from
the research activities will be minimal
and will be limited to Level B
harassment, as described in the
documents associated with the initial
IHA.
Description of the Activity and Specific
Geographic Region
A detailed description of the planned
intertidal monitoring project was
provided in the Federal Register
Notices of the Proposed IHA (83 FR
3308; January 24, 2018) and Final IHA
(83 FR 11696; March 16, 2018) for the
initial IHA, along with the Federal
Register Notice of the Proposed IHA
Renewal (84 FR 8316; March 7, 2019).
Overall, the specified geographic region,
the amount of activity, and the nature of
the activities are identical to those
described in previous notices. The
frequency of visits and total visits to a
particular site may vary across years,
and within an annual plan once
submitted, but the description of the
action and the marine mammal analysis
included in the 2018 IHA were designed
to capture such variations. As noted
above, 154 sites are visited and
surveyed as part of the research,
although take of marine mammals does
not occur at every site (marine mammals
are not present at all sites). A few sites
are visited monthly, while many sites
are surveyed between 1 and 4 times
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17785
annually. In 2018, a new site that had
never been surveyed previously
(Waddell) was added to the site
inventory as part of a study examining
ecosystem level effects of sea star
wasting syndrome (SSWS). There are six
additional biodiversity sites (i.e., Ecola,
Roads End, Otter Rock, Seal Rock,
Graduation Point and North Head) that
were not visited or analyzed as part of
the initial IHA. This Renewal IHA is
effective for a period of one year from
the date of issuance.
Description of Marine Mammals
As noted in the Federal Register
Notice of the Proposed IHA Renewal (84
FR 8316; March 7, 2019), a description
of the marine mammals in the areas of
the activity for which incidental take is
authorized may be found in the Federal
Register Notice of the Proposed IHA (83
FR 3308; January 24, 2018) for the initial
authorization. NMFS has reviewed the
monitoring data from the initial IHA,
recent draft Stock Assessment Reports,
information on relevant Unusual
Mortality Events, and other scientific
literature, and determined that neither
this nor any other new information
affects which species or stocks have the
potential to be affected or the pertinent
information in the Description of the
Marine Mammals in the Area of
Specified Activities contained in the
supporting documents for the initial
IHA.
Potential Effects on Marine Mammals
and Their Habitat
As noted in the Federal Register
Notice of the Proposed IHA Renewal (84
FR 8316; March 7, 2019), the
description of the potential effects of the
specified activity on marine mammals
and their habitat for the activities for
which take is authorized is found in the
Federal Register Notice of the Proposed
IHA (83 FR 3308; January 24, 2018) for
the initial authorization. All of that
information and analysis remain
applicable and valid. NMFS has
reviewed the monitoring data from the
initial IHA, recent draft Stock
Assessment Reports, information on
relevant Unusual Mortality Events, and
other scientific literature, and
determined that no new information
affects our initial analysis of potential
impacts on marine mammals and their
habitat.
Estimated Take
Detailed descriptions of the methods
and inputs used to estimate take for the
specified activity are found in the
Federal Register Notices of the
Proposed (83 FR 3308; January 24, 2018)
and Final IHA (83 FR 11696; March 16,
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
26APN1
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with NOTICES
17786
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 81 / Friday, April 26, 2019 / Notices
2018) for the initial authorization, with
updated information associated with
new sites provided in the Federal
Register Notice of the Proposed IHA
Renewal (84 FR 8316; March 7, 2019).
As part of the initial IHA, PISCO had
estimated that Level B harassment of
marine mammals was likely to occur at
16 sites (see 2018 application),
conservatively based on the predicted
number of visits to the sites and
historical observational data (using
maximum observations). These same 16
sites will be surveyed under the
Renewal IHA. PISCO is requesting and
NMFS is authorizing the same level of
take for the 16 sites as was authorized
under the initial IHA.
PISCO provided a preliminary marine
mammal monitoring report covering
March 12, 2018 through December 31,
2018 and recorded Level B harassment
of 87 harbor seal takes and 1 California
sea lion take. No northern elephant seal
takes were reported. The total recorded
take numbers are well below the take
numbers authorized by NMFS in 2018
(255 harbor seal, 90 California sea lion,
and 50 northern elephant seal). The
preliminary monitoring report indicated
that take by Level B harassment was
recorded at eight sites in 2018 (of 64
sites visited and 5 of the 16 sites at
which take was expected). At one site
(Government Point), 20 more harbor seal
takes occurred than predicted at that
site, however, at other sites fewer
marine mammal takes occurred than
predicted. PISCO submitted a draft final
monitoring report on March 27, 2019.
Fifteen survey sites were visited
between December 31, 2018 and the
effective end date of the IHA on March
11, 2019. No takes were recorded during
any of these 15 site visits. Variation in
predicted marine mammal presence is
expected across sites, and, further, as
described in the 2018 application and
IHA Federal Register notices, the
number of predicted visits to a
particular site may also vary. However,
the conservative take estimate
methodology continues to ensure that
the total authorized take and effect
analysis remains appropriate.
There is one new site, Waddell, which
was not addressed in the initial IHA,
since PISCO had not secured funding
for the SSWS study when the initial
authorization was issued. PISCO did,
however, monitor and record
observations during 12 visits to Waddell
between March 12, 2018 and March 11,
2019 after funding had been secured.
PISCO recorded one harbor seal take.
Seals are known to be rare at the
Waddell site, and with only a single
observation over a 12 month period at
this location, PISCO believes, and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:28 Apr 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
mammals prior to approach to
determine if mitigation is required;
• Researchers shall approach a site
with caution (slowly and quietly), keep
bodies low to the ground and avoid
pinnipeds along access ways to sites, by
locating and taking a different access
way if possible;
• Researchers shall keep a safe
distance from and not approach any
marine mammal while conducting
research, unless it is absolutely
necessary to flush a marine mammal in
order to continue conducting research
(i.e. if a site cannot be accessed or
sampled due to the presence of
pinnipeds);
• Researchers shall monitor the
offshore area for predators (such as
killer whales and white sharks) and
avoid flushing of pinnipeds when
predators are observed in nearshore
waters;
• Intentional flushing shall be
avoided if pups are present. Staff shall
TABLE 1—AUTHORIZED TAKE
reschedule work at sites where pups are
present, unless other means of
NUMBERS BY LEVEL B HARASSMENT
accomplishing the work can be done
Authorized
without causing disturbance to mothers
Species
take
and dependent pups;
• Any site where Steller sea lions,
Harbor seal ...........................
255
northern
fur seals, or Guadalupe fur
California sea lion .................
90
Northern elephant seal .........
50 seals are present shall not be
approached and shall be sampled at a
later date;
Description of Mitigation, Monitoring
• Personnel shall vacate the study
and Reporting Measures
area as soon as sampling of the site is
As explained in the Federal Register
completed;
Notice of the Proposed IHA Renewal (84
• Detailed monitoring information
FR 8316; March 7, 2019), a complete
will include species counts, number of
discussion of mitigation, monitoring,
disturbances, description of disturbance
and reporting measures under the
behaviors, and information regarding
MMPA, as well as the specific
physical and biological conditions at a
mitigation, monitoring, and reporting
given site;
measures appropriate for PISCO’s
• Submit a draft monitoring report to
activity at these particular sites, was
NMFS Office of Protected Resources
provided in the Federal Register
within 60 days after the conclusion of
Notices of the Proposed IHA (83 FR
the 2019–2020 field season or 60 days
3308; January 24, 2018) and Final IHA
prior to the start of the next field season
(83 FR 11696; March 16, 2018) for the
if a new IHA will be requested; and
initial IHA. All of that discussion
• Reporting injured or dead marine
remains applicable and valid for this
mammals to appropriate authorities,
Renewal IHA. Additionally, the
including NMFS Office of Protected
discussion of least practicable adverse
Resources and NMFS West Coast
impact included in those documents
Regional Stranding Coordinator.
remains accurate. NMFS therefore
Public Comments
determined that the mitigation,
A notice of NMFS’ proposal to issue
monitoring, and reporting measures
included as requirements in the Federal a Renewal IHA to PISCO was published
in the Federal Register on March 7,
Register Notice announcing the
2019 (84 FR 8316). That notice both
issuance of the initial IHA are
included information and referenced
appropriate and would be continued in
information from the initial IHA notices
this Renewal IHA. The following
on PISCO’s activity and the specific
measures, which are identical to those
geographic region; the marine mammal
in the initial IHA, are included in the
species that had the potential to be
Renewal IHA:
• Researchers shall observe a site
affected by the activity; the potential
from a distance, using binoculars if
effects on marine mammals and their
necessary, to detect any marine
habitat; the proposed amount and
NMFS agrees, that take is not likely at
this site. Therefore, we are not
increasing the total number of
authorized takes for harbor seals. There
are six biodiversity sites which will be
visited in 2019 that were not visited or
analyzed as part of the initial IHA.
However, based on historical
monitoring records the presence of
marine mammals is unlikely and take is
not authorized for any of these sites.
Accordingly, all methodology and
analysis in the Federal Register notices
for the proposed and final initial IHA
remain applicable and accurate, as
explained in the Federal Register Notice
of the Proposed IHA Renewal (84 FR
8316; March 7, 2019). We therefore
determine that the species and stocks
affected, methods of take, and types of
take remain unchanged from the initial
IHA, as do the number of takes for each
species, which are indicated below in
Table 1.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
26APN1
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 81 / Friday, April 26, 2019 / Notices
manner of take; the proposed mitigation,
monitoring and reporting measures; and
the preliminary determinations. NMFS
received one comment letter, which was
from the Marine Mammal Commission
(Commission). The Commission
provided comments as described below,
concurred with NMFS’s preliminary
determinations, and recommended
issuance of the Renewal IHA to PISCO,
subject to the inclusion of the
mitigation, monitoring, and reporting
measures.
Comment: The Commission
questioned whether the public notice
provisions for IHA Renewals fully
satisfy the public notice and comment
provision in the MMPA and discussed
the potential burden on reviewers to
reviewing key documents and
developing comments quickly.
Therefore the Commission
recommended that NMFS use the IHA
Renewal process sparingly and
selectively for activities expected to
have the lowest levels of impacts to
marine mammals and that require less
complex analysis.
Response: NMFS has taken a number
of steps to ensure the public has
adequate notice, time, and information
to be able to comment effectively on
IHA Renewals within the limitations of
processing IHA applications efficiently.
The Federal Register notice for the
proposed initial IHA had previously
identified the conditions under which a
one-year Renewal IHA might be
appropriate. This information is
presented in the Request for Public
Comments section and thus encourages
submission of comments on the
potential of a one-year renewal as well
as the initial IHA during the 30-day
comment period. In addition, when we
receive an application for a Renewal
IHA, we will publish notice of the
proposed IHA Renewal in the Federal
Register and provide an additional 15
days for public comment, making a total
of 45 days of public comment. We will
also directly contact all commenters on
the initial IHA by email, phone, or, if
the commenter did not provide email or
phone information, by postal service to
provide them the opportunity to submit
any additional comments on the
proposed Renewal IHA.
NMFS also strives to ensure the
public has access to key information
needed to submit comments on a
proposed IHA, whether an initial IHA or
a Renewal IHA. The agency’s website
includes information for all projects
under consideration, including the
application, references, and other
supporting documents. Each Federal
Register notice also includes the name
and contact information of the lead
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:28 Apr 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
agency staff in the event a commenter
has questions or cannot find the
information they seek.
Regarding the Commission’s comment
that Renewal IHAs should be limited to
certain types of projects, NMFS has
explained on its website and in
individual Federal Register notices that
Renewal IHAs are appropriate where the
continuing activities are identical,
nearly identical, or a subset of the
activities for which the initial 30-day
comment period applied. Where the
commenter has likely already reviewed
and commented on the proposed initial
IHA for these activities, the abbreviated
additional comment period should be
sufficient for consideration of the results
of the preliminary monitoring report
and new information from the past year.
Comment: In order to increase
efficiencies, the Commission
recommended that NMFS authorize the
incidental taking of marine mammals
for future PISCO activities via an MMPA
rulemaking rather than individual IHAs
and IHA Renewals.
Response: We appreciate the interest
that the Commission has shown in our
efforts to streamline the MMPA
authorization process. NMFS will
discuss with the applicant the option of
entering into a rulemaking for future
incidental take authorizations.
Findings and Determinations
In the context of the activities that are
likely to result in incidental take of
marine mammals, the rocky intertidal
monitoring surveys planned by PISCO
for 2019 are nearly identical to those
conducted under the initial IHA in
2018. The only changes are that a new
SSWS site, and six biodiversity sites
described in the Federal Register Notice
of the Proposed IHA Renewal, would be
visited under the Renewal IHA, but no
takes are anticipated or requested for
these locations. Planned survey
activities could result in Level B
harassment consisting of temporary,
short-term behavioral disturbance. In
analyzing the effects of the activities in
the initial IHA, and in consideration of
the implementation of the required
mitigation measures, NMFS determined
that the total marine mammal incidental
take from PISCO’s rocky intertidal
monitoring program would not
adversely affect annual rates of
recruitment or survival and, therefore,
would have a negligible impact on the
affected species or stocks. NMFS also
concluded that the numbers of animals
authorized for incidental take are small
relative to the relevant species or stocks
(0.65¥0.82 percent for harbor seals, and
<0.01 percent for California sea lions
and northern elephant seals). As
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17787
discussed above, the same amount and
type of take is authorized under this
Renewal IHA.
All of the information and analysis
from the initial IHA remains applicable
and valid for the findings and
determinations under this Renewal IHA.
In addition, there is no new information
that substantively affects or suggests
that our analysis or findings should
change from those reached for the initial
IHA. Based on the information and
analysis contained here and in the
referenced documents, NMFS has
determined the following: (1) The
required mitigation measures will effect
the least practicable impact on marine
mammal species or stocks and their
habitat; (2) the authorized takes will
have a negligible impact on the affected
marine mammal species or stocks; (3)
the authorized takes represent small
numbers of marine mammals relative to
the affected stock abundances; (4) the
authorized takes will not have an
unmitigable adverse impact on taking
for subsistence purposes as no relevant
subsistence uses of marine mammals are
implicated by these activities; and (5)
appropriate monitoring and reporting
requirements are included.
Endangered Species Act
Section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973 (ESA: 16 U.S.C.
1531 et seq.) requires that each Federal
agency insure that any action it
authorizes, funds, or carries out is not
likely to jeopardize the continued
existence of any endangered or
threatened species or result in the
destruction or adverse modification of
designated critical habitat. To ensure
ESA compliance for the issuance of
IHAs, NMFS consults internally, in this
case with the ESA Interagency
Cooperation Division whenever we
authorize take for endangered or
threatened species.
No incidental take of ESA-listed
species is authorized or expected to
result from this activity. Therefore,
NMFS has determined that formal
consultation under section 7 of the ESA
is not required for this action.
National Environmental Policy Act
To comply with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA; 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and
NOAA Administrative Order (NAO)
216–6A, NMFS must review our
proposed action (i.e., the issuance of an
IHA) with respect to potential impacts
on the human environment.
This action is consistent with
categories of activities identified in
Categorical Exclusion B4 (IHAs with no
anticipated serious injury or mortality)
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
26APN1
17788
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 81 / Friday, April 26, 2019 / Notices
of the Companion Manual for NOAA
Administrative Order 216–6A, which do
not individually or cumulatively have
the potential for significant impacts on
the quality of the human environment
and for which we have not identified
any extraordinary circumstances that
would preclude this categorical
exclusion. Accordingly, NMFS has
determined that the issuance of the
Renewal IHA qualifies to be
categorically excluded from further
NEPA review.
IHA Renewal
NMFS has issued an IHA Renewal
that includes the previously described
mitigation, monitoring, and reporting
requirements to PISCO for the
harassment of small numbers of the
three marine mammal species incidental
to conducting rocky intertidal
monitoring surveys off the coasts of
Oregon and California for a period of
one year.
Dated: April 22, 2019.
Donna S. Wieting,
Director, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2019–08392 Filed 4–25–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XG876
Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to
Specified Activities; Taking Marine
Mammals Incidental to the Chevron
Richmond Refinery Long Wharf
Maintenance and Efficiency Project in
San Francisco Bay, California
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; proposed incidental
harassment authorization; request for
comments on proposed authorization
and possible renewal.
AGENCY:
NMFS has received a request
from Chevron for authorization to take
marine mammals incidental to pile
driving and removal associated with the
Long Wharf Maintenance and Efficiency
Project (LWMEP) in San Francisco Bay,
California. Pursuant to the Marine
Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), NMFS
is requesting comments on its proposal
to issue an incidental harassment
authorization (IHA) to incidentally take
marine mammals during the specified
activities. NMFS is also requesting
comments on a possible one-year
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:28 Apr 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
renewal that could be issued under
certain circumstances and if all
requirements are met, as described in
Request for Public Comments at the end
of this notice. NMFS will consider
public comments prior to making any
final decision on the issuance of the
requested MMPA authorizations and
agency responses will be summarized in
the final notice of our decision.
DATES: Comments and information must
be received no later than May 28, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be
addressed to Jolie Harrison, Chief,
Permits and Conservation Division,
Office of Protected Resources, National
Marine Fisheries Service. Physical
comments should be sent to 1315 EastWest Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910
and electronic comments should be sent
to ITP.Pauline@noaa.gov.
Instructions: NMFS is not responsible
for comments sent by any other method,
to any other address or individual, or
received after the end of the comment
period. Comments received
electronically, including all
attachments, must not exceed a 25megabyte file size. Attachments to
electronic comments will be accepted in
Microsoft Word or Excel or Adobe PDF
file formats only. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted online at
https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/permit/
incidental-take-authorizations-undermarine-mammal-protection-act without
change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit confidential business
information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rob
Pauline, Office of Protected Resources,
NMFS, (301) 427–8401. Electronic
copies of the application and supporting
documents, as well as a list of the
references cited in this document, may
be obtained online at: https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/permit/
incidental-take-authorizations-undermarine-mammal-protection-act. In case
of problems accessing these documents,
please call the contact listed above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The MMPA prohibits the ‘‘take’’ of
marine mammals, with certain
exceptions. Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and
(D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et
seq.) direct the Secretary of Commerce
(as delegated to NMFS) to allow, upon
request, the incidental, but not
intentional, taking of small numbers of
marine mammals by U.S. citizens who
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified
geographical region if certain findings
are made and either regulations are
issued or, if the taking is limited to
harassment, a notice of a proposed
incidental take authorization may be
provided to the public for review.
Authorization for incidental takings
shall be granted if NMFS finds that the
taking will have a negligible impact on
the species or stock(s) and will not have
an unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for
taking for subsistence uses (where
relevant). Further, NMFS must prescribe
the permissible methods of taking and
other ‘‘means of effecting the least
practicable adverse impact’’ on the
affected species or stocks and their
habitat, paying particular attention to
rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of
similar significance, and on the
availability of such species or stocks for
taking for certain subsistence uses
(referred to in shorthand as
‘‘mitigation’’); and requirements
pertaining to the mitigation, monitoring
and reporting of such takings are set
forth.
National Environmental Policy Act
To comply with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA; 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and
NOAA Administrative Order (NAO)
216–6A, NMFS must review our
proposed action (i.e., the issuance of an
incidental harassment authorization)
with respect to potential impacts on the
human environment.
This action is consistent with
categories of activities identified in
Categorical Exclusion B4 (incidental
harassment authorizations with no
anticipated serious injury or mortality)
of the Companion Manual for NOAA
Administrative Order 216–6A, which do
not individually or cumulatively have
the potential for significant impacts on
the quality of the human environment
and for which we have not identified
any extraordinary circumstances that
would preclude this categorical
exclusion. Accordingly, NMFS has
preliminarily determined that the
issuance of the proposed IHA qualifies
to be categorically excluded from
further NEPA review.
We will review all comments
submitted in response to this notice
prior to concluding our NEPA process
or making a final decision on the IHA
request.
Summary of Request
On January 17, 2019, NMFS received
a request from Chevron for an IHA to
take marine mammals incidental to pile
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
26APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 81 (Friday, April 26, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17784-17788]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-08392]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XG817
Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities;
Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Rocky Intertidal Monitoring Surveys
Along the Oregon and California Coasts
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; issuance of an incidental harassment authorization
Renewal.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the regulations implementing the Marine
Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), as amended, notification is hereby given
that NMFS has issued an incidental harassment authorization (IHA)
Renewal to the Partnership for Interdisciplinary Study of Coastal
Oceans (PISCO) at the University of California Santa Cruz (UCSC) to
harass marine mammals incidental to rocky intertidal monitoring surveys
along the Oregon and California Coasts.
DATES: This IHA Renewal is valid from April 12, 2019 through April 11,
2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rob Pauline, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, (301) 427-8401. Electronic copies of the original
application, Renewal request, and supporting documents (including NMFS
Federal Register notices of the original proposed and final
authorizations, and the previous IHA), as well as a list of the
references cited in this document, may be obtained online at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/permit/incidental-take-authorizations-under-marine-mammal-protection-act. In case of problems accessing these
documents, please call the contact listed above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA; 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.)
prohibits the ``take'' of marine mammals, with certain exceptions.
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA direct the Secretary of
Commerce (as delegated to NMFS) to allow, upon request, the incidental,
but not intentional, taking of small numbers of marine mammals by U.S.
citizens who engage in a specified activity (other than commercial
fishing) within a specified geographical region if certain findings are
made and either regulations are issued or, if the taking is limited to
harassment, a notice of a proposed incidental take authorization is
provided to the public for review.
Authorization for incidental takings shall be granted if NMFS finds
that the taking will have a negligible impact on the species or
stock(s) and will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for taking for subsistence uses
(where relevant). Further, NMFS must prescribe the permissible methods
of taking and other ``means of effecting the least practicable adverse
impact'' on the affected species or stocks and their habitat, paying
particular attention to rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of similar
significance, and on the availability of such species or stocks for
taking for certain subsistence uses (referred to here as ``mitigation
measures''). Monitoring and reporting of such takings are also
required. The meaning of key terms such as ``take,'' ``harassment,''
and ``negligible impact'' can be found in section 3 of the MMPA (16
U.S.C. 1362) and the agency's regulations at 50 CFR 216.103.
NMFS' regulations implementing the MMPA at 50 CFR 216.107(e)
indicate that IHAs may be renewed for additional periods of time not to
exceed one year for each reauthorization. In the notice of proposed IHA
for the initial authorization, NMFS described the circumstances under
which we would consider issuing a Renewal for this activity, and
requested public comment on a potential Renewal IHA under those
circumstances. Specifically, on a case-by-case basis, NMFS may issue a
one-year IHA Renewal when (1) another year of identical or nearly
identical activities as described in the Specified Activities section
is planned or (2) the activities would not be completed by the time the
IHA expires and a second IHA would allow for completion of the
activities beyond that described in the Dates and Duration section of
the initial IHA. All of the following conditions must be met in order
to issue a Renewal:
A request for Renewal is received no later than 60 days
prior to expiration of the current IHA.
The request for Renewal must include the following:
(1) An explanation that the activities to be conducted beyond the
initial dates either are identical to the previously analyzed
activities or include changes so minor (e.g., reduction in pile size)
that the changes do not affect the previous analyses, take estimates,
or mitigation and monitoring requirements; and
(2) A preliminary monitoring report showing the results of the
required monitoring to date and an explanation
[[Page 17785]]
showing that the monitoring results do not indicate impacts of a scale
or nature not previously analyzed or authorized.
Upon review of the request for Renewal, the status of the
affected species or stocks, and any other pertinent information, NMFS
determines that there are no more than minor changes in the activities,
the mitigation and monitoring measures remain the same and appropriate,
and the initial findings remain valid.
An additional public comment period of 15 days (for a total of 45
days), with direct notice by email, phone, or postal service to
commenters on the initial IHA, is provided to allow for any additional
comments on the proposed Renewal. A description of the Renewal process
may be found on our website at: www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/incidental-harassment-authorization-renewals.
History of Request
On March 8, 2018, NMFS issued an IHA to PISCO to take marine
mammals incidental to rocky intertidal monitoring surveys at multiple
locations on the coasts of Oregon and California (83 FR 11696; March
16, 2018), effective from March 12, 2018 through March 11, 2019. This
multiyear annual survey involves surveying rocky intertidal zones at a
number of coastal locations. On January 8, 2019, NMFS received an
application for a Renewal of the initial IHA. As described in the
application for Renewal, the activities for which incidental take has
been requested are nearly identical to those covered in the initial
IHA. As required, the applicant also provided a preliminary monitoring
report (available at https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/incidental-take-authorizations-research-and-other-activities) which confirms that the applicant has implemented the
required mitigation and monitoring, and which also shows that no
impacts of a scale or nature not previously analyzed or authorized
occurred as a result of the activities conducted. Notice of the
proposed IHA Renewal was published in the Federal Register on March 7,
2019 (84 FR 8316).
Description of the Specified Activities and Anticipated Impacts
PISCO plans to continue rocky intertidal monitoring work that has
been ongoing for 20 years. PISCO focuses on understanding the nearshore
ecosystems of the U.S. west coast through a number of interdisciplinary
collaborations. The program integrates long-term monitoring of
ecological and oceanographic processes at 154 separate sites with
experimental work in the lab and field. Research is conducted
throughout the year along the Oregon and California coasts and will
continue as long as funding is available. The research being conducted
under the Renewal IHA will be nearly identical to that analyzed under
the initial IHA. Since the issuance of the initial IHA a new site that
had never been surveyed previously (Waddell) was added to the site
inventory as part of a study examining ecosystem level effects of sea
star wasting syndrome (SSWS). There are six additional biodiversity
sites (i.e., Ecola, Roads End, Otter Rock, Seal Rock, Graduation Point
and North Head) that were not visited or analyzed as part of the
initial IHA. Researchers accessing and conducting research activities
on the sites may occasionally cause behavioral disturbance (i.e., Level
B harassment) of three pinniped species at 16 of the sites (described
in PISCO's application for the 2018 IHA). PISCO's request is for the
following instances of take: 90 California sea lion takes (Zalophus
californianus), 255 harbor seal takes (Phoca vitulina richardii), and
50 northern elephant seal takes (Mirounga angustirostris). These are
the same levels of take that were authorized under the initial IHA.
PISCO expects that the disturbance to pinnipeds from the research
activities will be minimal and will be limited to Level B harassment,
as described in the documents associated with the initial IHA.
Description of the Activity and Specific Geographic Region
A detailed description of the planned intertidal monitoring project
was provided in the Federal Register Notices of the Proposed IHA (83 FR
3308; January 24, 2018) and Final IHA (83 FR 11696; March 16, 2018) for
the initial IHA, along with the Federal Register Notice of the Proposed
IHA Renewal (84 FR 8316; March 7, 2019). Overall, the specified
geographic region, the amount of activity, and the nature of the
activities are identical to those described in previous notices. The
frequency of visits and total visits to a particular site may vary
across years, and within an annual plan once submitted, but the
description of the action and the marine mammal analysis included in
the 2018 IHA were designed to capture such variations. As noted above,
154 sites are visited and surveyed as part of the research, although
take of marine mammals does not occur at every site (marine mammals are
not present at all sites). A few sites are visited monthly, while many
sites are surveyed between 1 and 4 times annually. In 2018, a new site
that had never been surveyed previously (Waddell) was added to the site
inventory as part of a study examining ecosystem level effects of sea
star wasting syndrome (SSWS). There are six additional biodiversity
sites (i.e., Ecola, Roads End, Otter Rock, Seal Rock, Graduation Point
and North Head) that were not visited or analyzed as part of the
initial IHA. This Renewal IHA is effective for a period of one year
from the date of issuance.
Description of Marine Mammals
As noted in the Federal Register Notice of the Proposed IHA Renewal
(84 FR 8316; March 7, 2019), a description of the marine mammals in the
areas of the activity for which incidental take is authorized may be
found in the Federal Register Notice of the Proposed IHA (83 FR 3308;
January 24, 2018) for the initial authorization. NMFS has reviewed the
monitoring data from the initial IHA, recent draft Stock Assessment
Reports, information on relevant Unusual Mortality Events, and other
scientific literature, and determined that neither this nor any other
new information affects which species or stocks have the potential to
be affected or the pertinent information in the Description of the
Marine Mammals in the Area of Specified Activities contained in the
supporting documents for the initial IHA.
Potential Effects on Marine Mammals and Their Habitat
As noted in the Federal Register Notice of the Proposed IHA Renewal
(84 FR 8316; March 7, 2019), the description of the potential effects
of the specified activity on marine mammals and their habitat for the
activities for which take is authorized is found in the Federal
Register Notice of the Proposed IHA (83 FR 3308; January 24, 2018) for
the initial authorization. All of that information and analysis remain
applicable and valid. NMFS has reviewed the monitoring data from the
initial IHA, recent draft Stock Assessment Reports, information on
relevant Unusual Mortality Events, and other scientific literature, and
determined that no new information affects our initial analysis of
potential impacts on marine mammals and their habitat.
Estimated Take
Detailed descriptions of the methods and inputs used to estimate
take for the specified activity are found in the Federal Register
Notices of the Proposed (83 FR 3308; January 24, 2018) and Final IHA
(83 FR 11696; March 16,
[[Page 17786]]
2018) for the initial authorization, with updated information
associated with new sites provided in the Federal Register Notice of
the Proposed IHA Renewal (84 FR 8316; March 7, 2019). As part of the
initial IHA, PISCO had estimated that Level B harassment of marine
mammals was likely to occur at 16 sites (see 2018 application),
conservatively based on the predicted number of visits to the sites and
historical observational data (using maximum observations). These same
16 sites will be surveyed under the Renewal IHA. PISCO is requesting
and NMFS is authorizing the same level of take for the 16 sites as was
authorized under the initial IHA.
PISCO provided a preliminary marine mammal monitoring report
covering March 12, 2018 through December 31, 2018 and recorded Level B
harassment of 87 harbor seal takes and 1 California sea lion take. No
northern elephant seal takes were reported. The total recorded take
numbers are well below the take numbers authorized by NMFS in 2018 (255
harbor seal, 90 California sea lion, and 50 northern elephant seal).
The preliminary monitoring report indicated that take by Level B
harassment was recorded at eight sites in 2018 (of 64 sites visited and
5 of the 16 sites at which take was expected). At one site (Government
Point), 20 more harbor seal takes occurred than predicted at that site,
however, at other sites fewer marine mammal takes occurred than
predicted. PISCO submitted a draft final monitoring report on March 27,
2019. Fifteen survey sites were visited between December 31, 2018 and
the effective end date of the IHA on March 11, 2019. No takes were
recorded during any of these 15 site visits. Variation in predicted
marine mammal presence is expected across sites, and, further, as
described in the 2018 application and IHA Federal Register notices, the
number of predicted visits to a particular site may also vary. However,
the conservative take estimate methodology continues to ensure that the
total authorized take and effect analysis remains appropriate.
There is one new site, Waddell, which was not addressed in the
initial IHA, since PISCO had not secured funding for the SSWS study
when the initial authorization was issued. PISCO did, however, monitor
and record observations during 12 visits to Waddell between March 12,
2018 and March 11, 2019 after funding had been secured. PISCO recorded
one harbor seal take. Seals are known to be rare at the Waddell site,
and with only a single observation over a 12 month period at this
location, PISCO believes, and NMFS agrees, that take is not likely at
this site. Therefore, we are not increasing the total number of
authorized takes for harbor seals. There are six biodiversity sites
which will be visited in 2019 that were not visited or analyzed as part
of the initial IHA. However, based on historical monitoring records the
presence of marine mammals is unlikely and take is not authorized for
any of these sites.
Accordingly, all methodology and analysis in the Federal Register
notices for the proposed and final initial IHA remain applicable and
accurate, as explained in the Federal Register Notice of the Proposed
IHA Renewal (84 FR 8316; March 7, 2019). We therefore determine that
the species and stocks affected, methods of take, and types of take
remain unchanged from the initial IHA, as do the number of takes for
each species, which are indicated below in Table 1.
Table 1--Authorized Take Numbers by Level B Harassment
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authorized
Species take
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Harbor seal............................................. 255
California sea lion..................................... 90
Northern elephant seal.................................. 50
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Description of Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Measures
As explained in the Federal Register Notice of the Proposed IHA
Renewal (84 FR 8316; March 7, 2019), a complete discussion of
mitigation, monitoring, and reporting measures under the MMPA, as well
as the specific mitigation, monitoring, and reporting measures
appropriate for PISCO's activity at these particular sites, was
provided in the Federal Register Notices of the Proposed IHA (83 FR
3308; January 24, 2018) and Final IHA (83 FR 11696; March 16, 2018) for
the initial IHA. All of that discussion remains applicable and valid
for this Renewal IHA. Additionally, the discussion of least practicable
adverse impact included in those documents remains accurate. NMFS
therefore determined that the mitigation, monitoring, and reporting
measures included as requirements in the Federal Register Notice
announcing the issuance of the initial IHA are appropriate and would be
continued in this Renewal IHA. The following measures, which are
identical to those in the initial IHA, are included in the Renewal IHA:
Researchers shall observe a site from a distance, using
binoculars if necessary, to detect any marine mammals prior to approach
to determine if mitigation is required;
Researchers shall approach a site with caution (slowly and
quietly), keep bodies low to the ground and avoid pinnipeds along
access ways to sites, by locating and taking a different access way if
possible;
Researchers shall keep a safe distance from and not
approach any marine mammal while conducting research, unless it is
absolutely necessary to flush a marine mammal in order to continue
conducting research (i.e. if a site cannot be accessed or sampled due
to the presence of pinnipeds);
Researchers shall monitor the offshore area for predators
(such as killer whales and white sharks) and avoid flushing of
pinnipeds when predators are observed in nearshore waters;
Intentional flushing shall be avoided if pups are present.
Staff shall reschedule work at sites where pups are present, unless
other means of accomplishing the work can be done without causing
disturbance to mothers and dependent pups;
Any site where Steller sea lions, northern fur seals, or
Guadalupe fur seals are present shall not be approached and shall be
sampled at a later date;
Personnel shall vacate the study area as soon as sampling
of the site is completed;
Detailed monitoring information will include species
counts, number of disturbances, description of disturbance behaviors,
and information regarding physical and biological conditions at a given
site;
Submit a draft monitoring report to NMFS Office of
Protected Resources within 60 days after the conclusion of the 2019-
2020 field season or 60 days prior to the start of the next field
season if a new IHA will be requested; and
Reporting injured or dead marine mammals to appropriate
authorities, including NMFS Office of Protected Resources and NMFS West
Coast Regional Stranding Coordinator.
Public Comments
A notice of NMFS' proposal to issue a Renewal IHA to PISCO was
published in the Federal Register on March 7, 2019 (84 FR 8316). That
notice both included information and referenced information from the
initial IHA notices on PISCO's activity and the specific geographic
region; the marine mammal species that had the potential to be affected
by the activity; the potential effects on marine mammals and their
habitat; the proposed amount and
[[Page 17787]]
manner of take; the proposed mitigation, monitoring and reporting
measures; and the preliminary determinations. NMFS received one comment
letter, which was from the Marine Mammal Commission (Commission). The
Commission provided comments as described below, concurred with NMFS's
preliminary determinations, and recommended issuance of the Renewal IHA
to PISCO, subject to the inclusion of the mitigation, monitoring, and
reporting measures.
Comment: The Commission questioned whether the public notice
provisions for IHA Renewals fully satisfy the public notice and comment
provision in the MMPA and discussed the potential burden on reviewers
to reviewing key documents and developing comments quickly. Therefore
the Commission recommended that NMFS use the IHA Renewal process
sparingly and selectively for activities expected to have the lowest
levels of impacts to marine mammals and that require less complex
analysis.
Response: NMFS has taken a number of steps to ensure the public has
adequate notice, time, and information to be able to comment
effectively on IHA Renewals within the limitations of processing IHA
applications efficiently. The Federal Register notice for the proposed
initial IHA had previously identified the conditions under which a one-
year Renewal IHA might be appropriate. This information is presented in
the Request for Public Comments section and thus encourages submission
of comments on the potential of a one-year renewal as well as the
initial IHA during the 30-day comment period. In addition, when we
receive an application for a Renewal IHA, we will publish notice of the
proposed IHA Renewal in the Federal Register and provide an additional
15 days for public comment, making a total of 45 days of public
comment. We will also directly contact all commenters on the initial
IHA by email, phone, or, if the commenter did not provide email or
phone information, by postal service to provide them the opportunity to
submit any additional comments on the proposed Renewal IHA.
NMFS also strives to ensure the public has access to key
information needed to submit comments on a proposed IHA, whether an
initial IHA or a Renewal IHA. The agency's website includes information
for all projects under consideration, including the application,
references, and other supporting documents. Each Federal Register
notice also includes the name and contact information of the lead
agency staff in the event a commenter has questions or cannot find the
information they seek.
Regarding the Commission's comment that Renewal IHAs should be
limited to certain types of projects, NMFS has explained on its website
and in individual Federal Register notices that Renewal IHAs are
appropriate where the continuing activities are identical, nearly
identical, or a subset of the activities for which the initial 30-day
comment period applied. Where the commenter has likely already reviewed
and commented on the proposed initial IHA for these activities, the
abbreviated additional comment period should be sufficient for
consideration of the results of the preliminary monitoring report and
new information from the past year.
Comment: In order to increase efficiencies, the Commission
recommended that NMFS authorize the incidental taking of marine mammals
for future PISCO activities via an MMPA rulemaking rather than
individual IHAs and IHA Renewals.
Response: We appreciate the interest that the Commission has shown
in our efforts to streamline the MMPA authorization process. NMFS will
discuss with the applicant the option of entering into a rulemaking for
future incidental take authorizations.
Findings and Determinations
In the context of the activities that are likely to result in
incidental take of marine mammals, the rocky intertidal monitoring
surveys planned by PISCO for 2019 are nearly identical to those
conducted under the initial IHA in 2018. The only changes are that a
new SSWS site, and six biodiversity sites described in the Federal
Register Notice of the Proposed IHA Renewal, would be visited under the
Renewal IHA, but no takes are anticipated or requested for these
locations. Planned survey activities could result in Level B harassment
consisting of temporary, short-term behavioral disturbance. In
analyzing the effects of the activities in the initial IHA, and in
consideration of the implementation of the required mitigation
measures, NMFS determined that the total marine mammal incidental take
from PISCO's rocky intertidal monitoring program would not adversely
affect annual rates of recruitment or survival and, therefore, would
have a negligible impact on the affected species or stocks. NMFS also
concluded that the numbers of animals authorized for incidental take
are small relative to the relevant species or stocks (0.65-0.82 percent
for harbor seals, and <0.01 percent for California sea lions and
northern elephant seals). As discussed above, the same amount and type
of take is authorized under this Renewal IHA.
All of the information and analysis from the initial IHA remains
applicable and valid for the findings and determinations under this
Renewal IHA. In addition, there is no new information that
substantively affects or suggests that our analysis or findings should
change from those reached for the initial IHA. Based on the information
and analysis contained here and in the referenced documents, NMFS has
determined the following: (1) The required mitigation measures will
effect the least practicable impact on marine mammal species or stocks
and their habitat; (2) the authorized takes will have a negligible
impact on the affected marine mammal species or stocks; (3) the
authorized takes represent small numbers of marine mammals relative to
the affected stock abundances; (4) the authorized takes will not have
an unmitigable adverse impact on taking for subsistence purposes as no
relevant subsistence uses of marine mammals are implicated by these
activities; and (5) appropriate monitoring and reporting requirements
are included.
Endangered Species Act
Section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA: 16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) requires that each Federal agency insure that any
action it authorizes, funds, or carries out is not likely to jeopardize
the continued existence of any endangered or threatened species or
result in the destruction or adverse modification of designated
critical habitat. To ensure ESA compliance for the issuance of IHAs,
NMFS consults internally, in this case with the ESA Interagency
Cooperation Division whenever we authorize take for endangered or
threatened species.
No incidental take of ESA-listed species is authorized or expected
to result from this activity. Therefore, NMFS has determined that
formal consultation under section 7 of the ESA is not required for this
action.
National Environmental Policy Act
To comply with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA;
42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and NOAA Administrative Order (NAO) 216-6A,
NMFS must review our proposed action (i.e., the issuance of an IHA)
with respect to potential impacts on the human environment.
This action is consistent with categories of activities identified
in Categorical Exclusion B4 (IHAs with no anticipated serious injury or
mortality)
[[Page 17788]]
of the Companion Manual for NOAA Administrative Order 216-6A, which do
not individually or cumulatively have the potential for significant
impacts on the quality of the human environment and for which we have
not identified any extraordinary circumstances that would preclude this
categorical exclusion. Accordingly, NMFS has determined that the
issuance of the Renewal IHA qualifies to be categorically excluded from
further NEPA review.
IHA Renewal
NMFS has issued an IHA Renewal that includes the previously
described mitigation, monitoring, and reporting requirements to PISCO
for the harassment of small numbers of the three marine mammal species
incidental to conducting rocky intertidal monitoring surveys off the
coasts of Oregon and California for a period of one year.
Dated: April 22, 2019.
Donna S. Wieting,
Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-08392 Filed 4-25-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P