Notice of Availability of the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement and Proposed Land Use Plan Amendment to the California Desert Conservation Area Plan for the West Mojave Route Network Project, Inyo, Kern, Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties, California, 17886-17888 [2019-08281]
Download as PDF
17886
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 81 / Friday, April 26, 2019 / Notices
In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended, the Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) has prepared a Draft
Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS), analyzing the potential
impacts of hydraulic fracturing on oil
and gas leases within the Bakersfield
Field Office planning area, and by this
notice the BLM is announcing the
opening of the 45-day public comment
period.
DATES: To ensure consideration, the
BLM must receive written comments on
the Bakersfield Field Office Hydraulic
Fracturing Draft Supplemental EIS
within 45 days following the date the
Environmental Protection Agency
publishes its Notice of Availability in
the Federal Register. The BLM will
announce future meetings or hearings
and any other public involvement
activities at least 15 days in advance
through public notices, media releases,
and/or mailings.
ADDRESSES: You may submit written
comments related to the Bakersfield
Field Office Hydraulic Fracturing Draft
Supplemental EIS by any of the
following methods:
• Website: https://go.usa.gov/xE3Nw
• Mail: Bureau of Land Management,
Bakersfield Field Office, Attn:
Bakersfield Hydraulic Fracturing
Analysis, 3801 Pegasus Drive,
Bakersfield, CA 93308
Copies of the Bakersfield Field Office
Hydraulic Fracturing Draft
Supplemental EIS are available during
regular business hours in the
Bakersfield Field Office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carly Summers, Supervisory Natural
Resources Specialist, telephone: 661–
391–6000, email: csummers@blm.gov.
Persons who use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) may call the
Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1–800–
877–8339 to contact the above
individual during normal business
hours. The FRS is available 24 hours a
day, 7 days a week, to leave a message
or question. You will receive a reply
during normal business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Bakersfield Field Office planning area
includes Fresno, Kern, Kings, Madera,
San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Tulare,
and Ventura counties in California and
encompasses approximately 400,000
acres of public land and 1.2 million
acres of Federal mineral estate.
The supplemental environmental
analysis is being conducted in response
to a May 2017, U.S. District Court Order.
The BLM presented preliminary
resource issues for public scoping
review and comment in the August 8,
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:28 Apr 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
2018, Federal Register Notice of Intent
(83 FR 39116). Issues identified by BLM
personnel; Federal, State, and local
agencies; and other stakeholders and
analyzed in the Draft Supplemental EIS
include: Air and atmospheric values;
water quality and quantity; seismicity;
special status species; and mineral
resources (oil and gas). The U.S. District
Court Order upheld the range of
alternatives analyzed in the Proposed
RMP/Final EIS. The five management
alternatives as analyzed in the Proposed
RMP/Final EIS were:
• The No Action alternative
(Alternative A) would continue current
management under the existing 1997
Caliente RMP and 1984 Hollister RMP,
as amended.
• The Proposed Plan (Alternative B)
strives to balance resource conservation
and ecosystem health with the
production of commodities and public
use of the land.
• Alternative C emphasizes
conserving cultural and natural
resources, maintaining functioning
natural systems, and restoring natural
systems that are degraded.
• Alternative D follows Alternative C
in all aspects except with regard to
livestock grazing. Alternative D would
eliminate livestock grazing from the
BLM-managed lands in the planning
area for the life of this land use plan.
• Alternative E emphasizes the
production of natural resources and
commodities while emphasizing public
use opportunities.
The results of this draft supplemental
analysis analyzing the impacts of
hydraulic fracturing, additive to those
identified in the 2012 Final EIS, did not
show notable increase in total impacts.
No conflicts were found between the
estimated impacts of hydraulic
fracturing and the resource or program
management goals and objectives stated
in the RMP. The range of alternatives
has not changed between the approved
2014 RMP and its 2012 Final EIS and
the Draft Supplemental EIS. Therefore,
no amendment to the 2014 RMP is
necessary.
You may submit comments on the
Draft Supplemental EIS in writing to the
BLM using one of the methods listed
earlier in the ADDRESSES section. To be
most helpful, you should submit
comments by the close of the 45-day
comment period.
The BLM will utilize and coordinate
the NEPA process to help fulfill the
public involvement process under the
National Historic Preservation Act (54
U.S.C. 306108), as provided in 36 CFR
800.2(d)(3). The BLM will continue to
consult with Indian tribes on a
government-to-government basis, in
PO 00000
Frm 00115
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
accordance with Executive Order 13175
and other policies. Tribal concerns,
including impacts on Indian trust assets
and potential impacts to cultural
resources, will continue to be given due
consideration. Federal, State, and local
agencies, along with tribes and other
stakeholders that may be interested in or
affected by the proposed action that the
BLM is evaluating, are invited to
participate in the comment period.
Please note that public comments and
information submitted, including
names, street addresses, and email
addresses of persons who submit
comments, will be available for public
review and disclosure at the address
listed earlier during regular business
hours (8 a.m. to 4 p.m.), Monday
through Friday, except holidays.
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10)
Joe Stout,
Acting State Director, California.
[FR Doc. 2019–08282 Filed 4–25–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–40–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLCAD08000.L12200000.DT0000.
19XL1109AF.LXSSB0010000
(MO#4500135579)]
Notice of Availability of the Final
Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement and Proposed Land Use
Plan Amendment to the California
Desert Conservation Area Plan for the
West Mojave Route Network Project,
Inyo, Kern, Los Angeles, Riverside,
and San Bernardino Counties,
California
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended, and the Federal Land
Policy and Management Act of 1976, as
amended, the Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) has prepared a
Final Supplemental Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) and Proposed
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
26APN1
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 81 / Friday, April 26, 2019 / Notices
Land Use Plan Amendment to the
California Desert Conservation Area
(CDCA) Plan for the West Mojave Route
Network Project (WMRNP), and by this
notice is announcing its availability.
DATES: BLM planning regulations state
that any person who meets the
conditions as described in the
regulations may protest the BLM’s Final
Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement and Proposed Land Use Plan
Amendment. A person who meets the
conditions and files a protest must file
the protest within 30 days of the date
that the Environmental Protection
Agency publishes its Notice of
Availability in the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: The Final Supplemental EIS
and Proposed Land Use Plan
Amendment is available electronically
on the BLM ePlanning project website at
https://go.usa.gov/xE6YH.
Copies of the Final Supplemental EIS
and Proposed Land Use Plan
Amendment are available for public
inspection at the BLM-Ridgecrest Field
Office, 300 South Richmond Road,
Ridgecrest, CA 93555; the BLM-Barstow
Field Office, 2601 Barstow Road,
Barstow, CA 92311; and the BLMCalifornia Desert District Office, 22835
Calle San Juan de Los Lagos, Moreno
Valley, CA 92553.
All protests must be in writing and
filed with the BLM Director, either as a
hard copy or electronically, via the
BLM’s ePlanning project website listed
previously. To submit a protest
electronically, go to the ePlanning
project website and follow the protest
instructions highlighted at the top of the
home page. If submitting a protest in
hard copy, it must be mailed to one of
the following addresses:
Regular Mail: BLM Director (210),
Attention: Protest Coordinator, P.O.
Box 71383, Washington, DC 20024–
1383
Overnight Delivery: BLM Director (210),
Attention: Protest Coordinator, 20 M
Street SE, Room 2134LM,
Washington, DC 20003
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt
Toedtli, Planning and Environmental
Coordinator, telephone: 760–252–6026;
address: 2601 Barstow Road, Barstow,
CA 92311; email: mtoedtli@blm.gov.
Persons who use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) may call the
Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1–800–
877–8339 to contact Mr. Toedtli during
normal business hours. The FRS is
available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week,
to leave a message or question. You will
receive a reply during normal business
hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The BLM
prepared the WMRNP Proposed Land
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:28 Apr 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
Use Plan Amendment and Final
Supplemental EIS to comply with a U.S.
District Court Order that partially
remanded the 2006 West Mojave
(WEMO) Plan Amendment Record of
Decision (ROD) to the BLM and directed
the BLM to reconsider route
designations throughout the WEMO
Planning Area, as well as other specified
issues in the 2006 WEMO Plan. The
Court held that the BLM failed to
consider regulatory criteria when
designating routes, that the WEMO Plan
was inconsistent with language of the
CDCA Plan, which limits routes to those
existing in 1980, and that the EIS did
not contain a reasonable range of
alternatives and failed to adequately
address the No-Action Alternative or
analyze impacts to soils, cultural
resources, biological resources, and air
quality.
The WMRNP involves both a land use
plan amendment and implementationlevel actions within the WEMO
Planning Area. The land use plan
amendment addresses specific
regulation and policies, including travel
management guidance for route
designation, and amends language that
limits the route network to routes that
existed in 1980. Proposed changes to the
land use plan include guidelines for
stopping, parking, and camping adjacent
to designated routes. Alternative 2 also
considers changes to the livestock
grazing program, which would reallocate forage from livestock use to
wildlife use and ecosystem function in
desert tortoise critical habitat. Other
plan-level changes considered include
identifying travel management areas,
modifying off-highway vehicle use on
four lakebeds, modifying competitive
event access, and eliminating the permit
requirement for motorized access to the
Rand Mountains-Fremont Valley
Management Area. Implementationlevel decisions considered include the
adoption of travel management plans
and a designated route network based
on the designation criteria of 43 CFR
8342.1.
The WEMO planning area covers 9.4
million acres of the CDCA in the
western portion of the Mojave Desert in
southern California, including parts of
San Bernardino, Los Angeles, Riverside,
Kern, and Inyo counties. The WMRNP
applies to the 3.1 million acres of public
lands within the WEMO planning area.
The 9.4 million-acre WEMO planning
area includes several large Department
of Defense facilities covering almost 3
million acres, a portion of one National
Park, 3 million acres of private lands,
and approximately 100,000 acres of
State lands, including Red Rock Canyon
State Park. Much of the planning area is
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17887
managed as part of the BLM’s National
Landscape Conservation System,
including portions of the Pacific Crest
Trail and the Old Spanish National
Historic Trail. The planning area
includes 63 Areas of Critical
Environmental Concern, 5 California
Desert National Conservation Lands, 7
National Register Archaeological and 6
National Register Historic Districts, 4
Critical Habitat Units for the federally
listed desert tortoise, and 8 Off-Highway
Vehicle Open Areas.
On March 16, 2018, the BLM issued
a Draft Land Use Plan Amendment and
Supplemental EIS. The Draft
Supplemental EIS evaluated four
alternatives, including a No-Action
Alternative. During the 90-day public
comment period, the BLM held four
public meetings. The BLM received
more than 9,000 public comments of
which more than 7,900 were routespecific comments.
Public comments on the Draft Land
Use Plan Amendment and
Supplemental EIS were considered and
incorporated as appropriate into the
WMRNP Proposed Land Use Plan
Amendment and Final Supplemental
EIS. Public comments resulted in
changes to the route designation
alternatives, including addition of one
alternative, additional environmental
analysis for several resources, addition
of clarifying text, re-organization of text
including appendices, and removal of
duplicative text. Comments that were
not route-specific were organized into
categories and responses were
developed to each group of comments.
The response-to-comment document is
provided in Appendix I of the Final
Supplemental EIS. The BLM has added
and selected Alternative 5 as the Agency
Proposed Action in the Proposed Land
Use Plan Amendment and Final
Supplemental EIS.
Instructions for filing a protest with
the Director of the BLM regarding the
Proposed Land Use Plan Amendment
and Final Supplemental EIS may be
found online at https://go.usa.gov/
xE6gN, and at 43 CFR 1610.5–2. All
protests must be in writing and mailed
to the appropriate address, as set forth
in the ADDRESSES section, or submitted
electronically through the BLM
ePlanning project website as described
earlier. Protests submitted electronically
by any means other than the ePlanning
project website protest section will be
invalid unless a protest is also
submitted in hard copy. Protests
submitted by fax will also be invalid
unless also submitted either through the
ePlanning project website protest
section or in hard copy.
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
26APN1
17888
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 81 / Friday, April 26, 2019 / Notices
Unlike land use planning decisions,
implementation decisions included in
this Proposed Land Use Plan
Amendment and Final Supplemental
EIS are not subject to protest under the
BLM planning regulations, but are
subject to an administrative review
process through appeals to the Office of
Hearings and Appeals, Interior Board of
Land Appeals pursuant to 43 CFR part
4 subpart E. Implementation decisions
generally constitute the BLM’s final
approval allowing on-the-ground
actions to proceed. Where
implementation decisions are made as
part of the land use planning process,
they are still subject to the appeals
process or other administrative review
as prescribed by specific resource
program regulations once the BLM
resolves the protests to land use
planning decisions and issues a Record
of Decision.
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
protest, please be aware that your entire
protest—including your personal
identifying information—may be made
publically available at any time. While
you can ask us in your comment to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10,
43 CFR 1610.2, 43 CFR 1610.5, 43 CFR
1610.6)
Danielle Chi,
Deputy State Director, Fire and Resources.
[FR Doc. 2019–08281 Filed 4–25–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–40–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLAZG02200.L16100000.
DQ0000.LXSS206A0000]
Notice of Availability of the Proposed
San Pedro Riparian National
Conservation Area Resource
Management Plan and Final
Environmental Impact Statement,
Arizona
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended, and the Federal Land
Policy and Management Act of 1976, as
amended, the Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) Tucson Field Office
has prepared a Proposed Resource
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:28 Apr 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
Management Plan (RMP) and Final
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
for the San Pedro Riparian National
Conservation Area and by this notice is
announcing its availability.
DATES: BLM planning regulations state
that any person who meets the
conditions as described in the
regulations may protest the BLM’s
Proposed RMP/Final EIS. A person who
meets the conditions and files a protest
must file the protest within 30 days of
the date that the Environmental
Protection Agency publishes its Notice
of Availability in the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: The Proposed RMP and
Final EIS is available on the BLM
ePlanning project website at https://
go.usa.gov/xQKFU. Click the
‘‘Documents & Reports’’ link on the left
side of the screen to find the electronic
version of these materials. Hard copies
of the Proposed RMP/Final EIS are also
available for public inspection at the
Arizona State Office, One North Central
Ave., Suite 800 (8th Floor), Phoenix, AZ
84004; and the Tucson Field Office,
3201 East Universal Way, Tucson, AZ
85756.
All protests must be in writing and
filed with the BLM Director, either as a
hard copy or electronically via the
BLM’s ePlanning project website listed
previously. To submit a protest
electronically, go to the ePlanning
project website and follow the protest
instructions highlighted at the top of the
home page. If submitting a protest in
hard copy, it must be mailed to one of
the following addresses:
Regular Mail: BLM Director (210),
Attention: Protest Coordinator, P.O.
Box 71383, Washington, DC 20024–
1383
Overnight Delivery: BLM Director (210),
Attention: Protest Coordinator, 20 M
Street SE, Room 2134LM,
Washington, DC 20003
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy McGowan, Planning &
Environmental Specialist, telephone
520–258–7231; address 3201 East
Universal Way, Tucson, AZ 85756;
email blm_az_tfo_sprnca_rmp@blm.gov.
Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS) at 1–800–877–8339 to
contact Ms. McGowan during normal
business hours. The FRS is available 24
hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a
message or question. You will receive a
reply during normal business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Conservation Area was established by
Public Law 100–696 on November 18,
1988. The planning area is located in
Cochise County in southeastern
PO 00000
Frm 00117
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Arizona, and encompasses
approximately 55,990 acres of public
land administered by the BLM Tucson
Field Office. The Proposed RMP/Final
EIS was prepared to address long-term
management of the Conservation Area,
accounting for the requirements of the
enabling legislation.
Issues identified as part of the
planning process and addressed in the
Proposed RMP/Final EIS include
management of riparian, water,
vegetation, soil resources, fire,
threatened and endangered species,
wildlife, cultural resources,
paleontological resources, educational,
scientific, livestock grazing, access,
recreation, socio-economics, and lands
and realty. It also considers lands with
wilderness characteristics, wild and
scenic rivers, and Areas of Critical
Environmental Concern.
The Proposed RMP/Final EIS
evaluates a range of alternatives
including the No Action and the
proposed plan. A detailed description of
these alternatives can be found in
Chapter 2 of the Final EIS. The BLM’s
proposed plan is Alternative C, except
that it includes the livestock grazing
allocation from Alternative A, which
allows grazing on 7,030 acres. This
grazing allocation represents current
management on the Conservation Area.
The BLM’s proposed plan represents a
balance between resource protection
and public access, authorizes livestock
grazing on existing allotments, and
provides for a diverse mix of recreation
opportunities. The proposed plan
focuses on active resource management
and allows for the broadest array of
management tools for ecosystem
restoration to meet goals and objectives.
Comments on the Draft RMP/Draft EIS
received from cooperators, tribes, other
agencies, the public, and internal BLM
review were considered and
incorporated as appropriate into the
proposed plan. In response to public
comments, additional information
related to increased livestock grazing
was analyzed in the Final EIS and
showed additional impacts on wildlife
habitat and cultural and water resources
would occur in areas not currently
grazed. As a result, the BLM chose the
existing grazing allocation as part of the
proposed plan.
Instructions for filing a protest with
the Director of the BLM regarding the
Proposed RMP and Final EIS may be
found online at https://www.blm.gov/
programs/planning-and-nepa/publicparticipation/filing-a-plan-protest and
at 43 CFR 1610.5–2. All protests must be
in writing and mailed to the appropriate
address, as set forth previously in the
ADDRESSES section or submitted
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
26APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 81 (Friday, April 26, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17886-17888]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-08281]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLCAD08000.L12200000.DT0000.19XL1109AF.LXSSB0010000 (MO#4500135579)]
Notice of Availability of the Final Supplemental Environmental
Impact Statement and Proposed Land Use Plan Amendment to the California
Desert Conservation Area Plan for the West Mojave Route Network
Project, Inyo, Kern, Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino
Counties, California
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended, and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of
1976, as amended, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has prepared a
Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Proposed
[[Page 17887]]
Land Use Plan Amendment to the California Desert Conservation Area
(CDCA) Plan for the West Mojave Route Network Project (WMRNP), and by
this notice is announcing its availability.
DATES: BLM planning regulations state that any person who meets the
conditions as described in the regulations may protest the BLM's Final
Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement and Proposed Land Use Plan
Amendment. A person who meets the conditions and files a protest must
file the protest within 30 days of the date that the Environmental
Protection Agency publishes its Notice of Availability in the Federal
Register.
ADDRESSES: The Final Supplemental EIS and Proposed Land Use Plan
Amendment is available electronically on the BLM ePlanning project
website at https://go.usa.gov/xE6YH.
Copies of the Final Supplemental EIS and Proposed Land Use Plan
Amendment are available for public inspection at the BLM-Ridgecrest
Field Office, 300 South Richmond Road, Ridgecrest, CA 93555; the BLM-
Barstow Field Office, 2601 Barstow Road, Barstow, CA 92311; and the
BLM-California Desert District Office, 22835 Calle San Juan de Los
Lagos, Moreno Valley, CA 92553.
All protests must be in writing and filed with the BLM Director,
either as a hard copy or electronically, via the BLM's ePlanning
project website listed previously. To submit a protest electronically,
go to the ePlanning project website and follow the protest instructions
highlighted at the top of the home page. If submitting a protest in
hard copy, it must be mailed to one of the following addresses:
Regular Mail: BLM Director (210), Attention: Protest Coordinator, P.O.
Box 71383, Washington, DC 20024-1383
Overnight Delivery: BLM Director (210), Attention: Protest Coordinator,
20 M Street SE, Room 2134LM, Washington, DC 20003
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt Toedtli, Planning and
Environmental Coordinator, telephone: 760-252-6026; address: 2601
Barstow Road, Barstow, CA 92311; email: [email protected]. Persons who
use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Relay Service (FRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to contact Mr. Toedtli during
normal business hours. The FRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a
week, to leave a message or question. You will receive a reply during
normal business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The BLM prepared the WMRNP Proposed Land Use
Plan Amendment and Final Supplemental EIS to comply with a U.S.
District Court Order that partially remanded the 2006 West Mojave
(WEMO) Plan Amendment Record of Decision (ROD) to the BLM and directed
the BLM to reconsider route designations throughout the WEMO Planning
Area, as well as other specified issues in the 2006 WEMO Plan. The
Court held that the BLM failed to consider regulatory criteria when
designating routes, that the WEMO Plan was inconsistent with language
of the CDCA Plan, which limits routes to those existing in 1980, and
that the EIS did not contain a reasonable range of alternatives and
failed to adequately address the No-Action Alternative or analyze
impacts to soils, cultural resources, biological resources, and air
quality.
The WMRNP involves both a land use plan amendment and
implementation-level actions within the WEMO Planning Area. The land
use plan amendment addresses specific regulation and policies,
including travel management guidance for route designation, and amends
language that limits the route network to routes that existed in 1980.
Proposed changes to the land use plan include guidelines for stopping,
parking, and camping adjacent to designated routes. Alternative 2 also
considers changes to the livestock grazing program, which would re-
allocate forage from livestock use to wildlife use and ecosystem
function in desert tortoise critical habitat. Other plan-level changes
considered include identifying travel management areas, modifying off-
highway vehicle use on four lakebeds, modifying competitive event
access, and eliminating the permit requirement for motorized access to
the Rand Mountains-Fremont Valley Management Area. Implementation-level
decisions considered include the adoption of travel management plans
and a designated route network based on the designation criteria of 43
CFR 8342.1.
The WEMO planning area covers 9.4 million acres of the CDCA in the
western portion of the Mojave Desert in southern California, including
parts of San Bernardino, Los Angeles, Riverside, Kern, and Inyo
counties. The WMRNP applies to the 3.1 million acres of public lands
within the WEMO planning area. The 9.4 million-acre WEMO planning area
includes several large Department of Defense facilities covering almost
3 million acres, a portion of one National Park, 3 million acres of
private lands, and approximately 100,000 acres of State lands,
including Red Rock Canyon State Park. Much of the planning area is
managed as part of the BLM's National Landscape Conservation System,
including portions of the Pacific Crest Trail and the Old Spanish
National Historic Trail. The planning area includes 63 Areas of
Critical Environmental Concern, 5 California Desert National
Conservation Lands, 7 National Register Archaeological and 6 National
Register Historic Districts, 4 Critical Habitat Units for the federally
listed desert tortoise, and 8 Off-Highway Vehicle Open Areas.
On March 16, 2018, the BLM issued a Draft Land Use Plan Amendment
and Supplemental EIS. The Draft Supplemental EIS evaluated four
alternatives, including a No-Action Alternative. During the 90-day
public comment period, the BLM held four public meetings. The BLM
received more than 9,000 public comments of which more than 7,900 were
route-specific comments.
Public comments on the Draft Land Use Plan Amendment and
Supplemental EIS were considered and incorporated as appropriate into
the WMRNP Proposed Land Use Plan Amendment and Final Supplemental EIS.
Public comments resulted in changes to the route designation
alternatives, including addition of one alternative, additional
environmental analysis for several resources, addition of clarifying
text, re-organization of text including appendices, and removal of
duplicative text. Comments that were not route-specific were organized
into categories and responses were developed to each group of comments.
The response-to-comment document is provided in Appendix I of the Final
Supplemental EIS. The BLM has added and selected Alternative 5 as the
Agency Proposed Action in the Proposed Land Use Plan Amendment and
Final Supplemental EIS.
Instructions for filing a protest with the Director of the BLM
regarding the Proposed Land Use Plan Amendment and Final Supplemental
EIS may be found online at https://go.usa.gov/xE6gN, and at 43 CFR
1610.5-2. All protests must be in writing and mailed to the appropriate
address, as set forth in the ADDRESSES section, or submitted
electronically through the BLM ePlanning project website as described
earlier. Protests submitted electronically by any means other than the
ePlanning project website protest section will be invalid unless a
protest is also submitted in hard copy. Protests submitted by fax will
also be invalid unless also submitted either through the ePlanning
project website protest section or in hard copy.
[[Page 17888]]
Unlike land use planning decisions, implementation decisions
included in this Proposed Land Use Plan Amendment and Final
Supplemental EIS are not subject to protest under the BLM planning
regulations, but are subject to an administrative review process
through appeals to the Office of Hearings and Appeals, Interior Board
of Land Appeals pursuant to 43 CFR part 4 subpart E. Implementation
decisions generally constitute the BLM's final approval allowing on-
the-ground actions to proceed. Where implementation decisions are made
as part of the land use planning process, they are still subject to the
appeals process or other administrative review as prescribed by
specific resource program regulations once the BLM resolves the
protests to land use planning decisions and issues a Record of
Decision.
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your protest, please be aware
that your entire protest--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publically available at any time. While you
can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10, 43 CFR 1610.2, 43 CFR
1610.5, 43 CFR 1610.6)
Danielle Chi,
Deputy State Director, Fire and Resources.
[FR Doc. 2019-08281 Filed 4-25-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P